Florida Statute 61.30 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 61.30

61.30 Child support guidelines; retroactive child support.—

(1)(a) The child support guideline amount as determined by this section presumptively establishes the amount the trier of fact must order as child support for a minor child, or a child who is dependent in fact and between the ages of 18 and 19 and who is still in high school and is performing in good faith with a reasonable expectation of graduation before he or she reaches the age of 19, in an initial proceeding for such support or in a proceeding for modification of an existing order for such support, whether the proceeding arises under this or another chapter. The trier of fact may order payment of child support which varies, plus or minus 5 percent, from the guideline amount, after considering all relevant factors, including the needs of the child or children, age, station in life, standard of living, and the financial status and ability of each parent. The trier of fact may order payment of child support in an amount which varies more than 5 percent from such guideline amount only upon a written finding explaining why ordering payment of such guideline amount would be unjust or inappropriate. Notwithstanding the variance limitations of this section, the trier of fact must order payment of child support which varies from the guideline amount as provided in paragraph (11)(b) whenever any of the children are required by court order or mediation agreement to spend a substantial amount of time with either parent. This requirement applies to any living arrangement, whether temporary or permanent.

(b) The guidelines may provide the basis for proving a substantial change in circumstances upon which a modification of an existing order may be granted. However, the difference between the existing monthly obligation and the amount provided for under the guidelines shall be at least 15 percent or $50, whichever amount is greater, before the court may find that the guidelines provide a substantial change in circumstances.

(c) For each support order reviewed by the department as required by s. 409.2564(11), if the amount of the child support award under the order differs by at least 10 percent but not less than $25 from the amount that would be awarded under this section, the department shall seek to have the order modified and any modification shall be made without a requirement for proof or showing of a change in circumstances.

(2) Income shall be determined on a monthly basis for each parent as follows:

(a) Gross income shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

1. Salary or wages.

2. Bonuses, commissions, allowances, overtime, tips, and other similar payments.

3. Business income from sources such as self-employment, partnership, close corporations, and independent contracts. “Business income” means gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income.

4. Disability benefits.

5. All workers’ compensation benefits and settlements.

6. Reemployment assistance or unemployment compensation.

7. Pension, retirement, or annuity payments.

8. Social security benefits.

9. Spousal support received from a previous marriage or court ordered in the marriage before the court.

10. Interest and dividends.

11. Rental income, which is gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce the income.

12. Income from royalties, trusts, or estates.

13. Reimbursed expenses or in kind payments to the extent that they reduce living expenses.

14. Gains derived from dealings in property, unless the gain is nonrecurring.

(b) Monthly income shall be imputed to an unemployed or underemployed parent if such unemployment or underemployment is found by the court to be voluntary on that parent’s part, absent a finding of fact by the court of physical or mental incapacity or other circumstances over which the parent has no control. In the event of such voluntary unemployment or underemployment, the employment potential and probable earnings level of the parent shall be determined based upon his or her recent work history, occupational qualifications, and prevailing earnings level in the community if such information is available. If the information concerning a parent’s income is unavailable, a parent fails to participate in a child support proceeding, or a parent fails to supply adequate financial information in a child support proceeding, income shall be automatically imputed to the parent and there is a rebuttable presumption that the parent has income equivalent to the median income of year-round full-time workers as derived from current population reports or replacement reports published by the United States Bureau of the Census. However, the court may refuse to impute income to a parent if the court finds it necessary for that parent to stay home with the child who is the subject of a child support calculation or as set forth below:

1. In order for the court to impute income at an amount other than the median income of year-round full-time workers as derived from current population reports or replacement reports published by the United States Bureau of the Census, the court must make specific findings of fact consistent with the requirements of this paragraph. The party seeking to impute income has the burden to present competent, substantial evidence that:

a. The unemployment or underemployment is voluntary; and

b. Identifies the amount and source of the imputed income, through evidence of income from available employment for which the party is suitably qualified by education, experience, current licensure, or geographic location, with due consideration being given to the parties’ time-sharing schedule and their historical exercise of the time-sharing provided in the parenting plan or relevant order.

2. Except as set forth in subparagraph 1., income may not be imputed based upon:

a. Income records that are more than 5 years old at the time of the hearing or trial at which imputation is sought; or

b. Income at a level that a party has never earned in the past, unless recently degreed, licensed, certified, relicensed, or recertified and thus qualified for, subject to geographic location, with due consideration of the parties’ existing time-sharing schedule and their historical exercise of the time-sharing provided in the parenting plan or relevant order.

(c) Incarceration may not be treated as voluntary unemployment in establishing or modifying a support order. However, the court may deviate from the child support guideline amount as provided in paragraph (1)(a).

(d) Social security benefits received by a minor child due to the retirement or disability of the child’s parent shall be included in the parent’s gross income.

(e) Public assistance as defined in s. 409.2554 shall be excluded from gross income.

(3) Net income is obtained by subtracting allowable deductions from gross income. Allowable deductions shall include:

(a) Federal, state, and local income tax deductions, adjusted for actual filing status and allowable dependents and income tax liabilities.

(b) Federal insurance contributions or self-employment tax.

(d) Mandatory retirement payments.

(e) Health insurance payments, excluding payments for coverage of the minor child.

(f) Court-ordered support for other children which is actually paid.

(g) Spousal support paid pursuant to a court order from a previous marriage or the marriage before the court.

(4) Net income for each parent shall be computed by subtracting allowable deductions from gross income.

(5) Net income for each parent shall be added together for a combined net income.

(6) The following guidelines schedule shall be applied to the combined net income to determine the minimum child support need:

Combined
Monthly Net	Child or Children
Income	One	Two	Three	Four	Five	Six
800.00	190	211	213	216	218	220
850.00	202	257	259	262	265	268
900.00	213	302	305	309	312	315
950.00	224	347	351	355	359	363
1000.00	235	365	397	402	406	410
1050.00	246	382	443	448	453	458
1100.00	258	400	489	495	500	505
1150.00	269	417	522	541	547	553
1200.00	280	435	544	588	594	600
1250.00	290	451	565	634	641	648
1300.00	300	467	584	659	688	695
1350.00	310	482	603	681	735	743
1400.00	320	498	623	702	765	790
1450.00	330	513	642	724	789	838
1500.00	340	529	662	746	813	869
1550.00	350	544	681	768	836	895
1600.00	360	560	701	790	860	920
1650.00	370	575	720	812	884	945
1700.00	380	591	740	833	907	971
1750.00	390	606	759	855	931	996
1800.00	400	622	779	877	955	1022
1850.00	410	638	798	900	979	1048
1900.00	421	654	818	923	1004	1074
1950.00	431	670	839	946	1029	1101
2000.00	442	686	859	968	1054	1128
2050.00	452	702	879	991	1079	1154
2100.00	463	718	899	1014	1104	1181
2150.00	473	734	919	1037	1129	1207
2200.00	484	751	940	1060	1154	1234
2250.00	494	767	960	1082	1179	1261
2300.00	505	783	980	1105	1204	1287
2350.00	515	799	1000	1128	1229	1314
2400.00	526	815	1020	1151	1254	1340
2450.00	536	831	1041	1174	1279	1367
2500.00	547	847	1061	1196	1304	1394
2550.00	557	864	1081	1219	1329	1420
2600.00	568	880	1101	1242	1354	1447
2650.00	578	896	1121	1265	1379	1473
2700.00	588	912	1141	1287	1403	1500
2750.00	597	927	1160	1308	1426	1524
2800.00	607	941	1178	1328	1448	1549
2850.00	616	956	1197	1349	1471	1573
2900.00	626	971	1215	1370	1494	1598
2950.00	635	986	1234	1391	1517	1622
3000.00	644	1001	1252	1412	1540	1647
3050.00	654	1016	1271	1433	1563	1671
3100.00	663	1031	1289	1453	1586	1695
3150.00	673	1045	1308	1474	1608	1720
3200.00	682	1060	1327	1495	1631	1744
3250.00	691	1075	1345	1516	1654	1769
3300.00	701	1090	1364	1537	1677	1793
3350.00	710	1105	1382	1558	1700	1818
3400.00	720	1120	1401	1579	1723	1842
3450.00	729	1135	1419	1599	1745	1867
3500.00	738	1149	1438	1620	1768	1891
3550.00	748	1164	1456	1641	1791	1915
3600.00	757	1179	1475	1662	1814	1940
3650.00	767	1194	1493	1683	1837	1964
3700.00	776	1208	1503	1702	1857	1987
3750.00	784	1221	1520	1721	1878	2009
3800.00	793	1234	1536	1740	1899	2031
3850.00	802	1248	1553	1759	1920	2053
3900.00	811	1261	1570	1778	1940	2075
3950.00	819	1275	1587	1797	1961	2097
4000.00	828	1288	1603	1816	1982	2119
4050.00	837	1302	1620	1835	2002	2141
4100.00	846	1315	1637	1854	2023	2163
4150.00	854	1329	1654	1873	2044	2185
4200.00	863	1342	1670	1892	2064	2207
4250.00	872	1355	1687	1911	2085	2229
4300.00	881	1369	1704	1930	2106	2251
4350.00	889	1382	1721	1949	2127	2273
4400.00	898	1396	1737	1968	2147	2295
4450.00	907	1409	1754	1987	2168	2317
4500.00	916	1423	1771	2006	2189	2339
4550.00	924	1436	1788	2024	2209	2361
4600.00	933	1450	1804	2043	2230	2384
4650.00	942	1463	1821	2062	2251	2406
4700.00	951	1477	1838	2081	2271	2428
4750.00	959	1490	1855	2100	2292	2450
4800.00	968	1503	1871	2119	2313	2472
4850.00	977	1517	1888	2138	2334	2494
4900.00	986	1530	1905	2157	2354	2516
4950.00	993	1542	1927	2174	2372	2535
5000.00	1000	1551	1939	2188	2387	2551
5050.00	1006	1561	1952	2202	2402	2567
5100.00	1013	1571	1964	2215	2417	2583
5150.00	1019	1580	1976	2229	2432	2599
5200.00	1025	1590	1988	2243	2447	2615
5250.00	1032	1599	2000	2256	2462	2631
5300.00	1038	1609	2012	2270	2477	2647
5350.00	1045	1619	2024	2283	2492	2663
5400.00	1051	1628	2037	2297	2507	2679
5450.00	1057	1638	2049	2311	2522	2695
5500.00	1064	1647	2061	2324	2537	2711
5550.00	1070	1657	2073	2338	2552	2727
5600.00	1077	1667	2085	2352	2567	2743
5650.00	1083	1676	2097	2365	2582	2759
5700.00	1089	1686	2109	2379	2597	2775
5750.00	1096	1695	2122	2393	2612	2791
5800.00	1102	1705	2134	2406	2627	2807
5850.00	1107	1713	2144	2418	2639	2820
5900.00	1111	1721	2155	2429	2651	2833
5950.00	1116	1729	2165	2440	2663	2847
6000.00	1121	1737	2175	2451	2676	2860
6050.00	1126	1746	2185	2462	2688	2874
6100.00	1131	1754	2196	2473	2700	2887
6150.00	1136	1762	2206	2484	2712	2900
6200.00	1141	1770	2216	2495	2724	2914
6250.00	1145	1778	2227	2506	2737	2927
6300.00	1150	1786	2237	2517	2749	2941
6350.00	1155	1795	2247	2529	2761	2954
6400.00	1160	1803	2258	2540	2773	2967
6450.00	1165	1811	2268	2551	2785	2981
6500.00	1170	1819	2278	2562	2798	2994
6550.00	1175	1827	2288	2573	2810	3008
6600.00	1179	1835	2299	2584	2822	3021
6650.00	1184	1843	2309	2595	2834	3034
6700.00	1189	1850	2317	2604	2845	3045
6750.00	1193	1856	2325	2613	2854	3055
6800.00	1196	1862	2332	2621	2863	3064
6850.00	1200	1868	2340	2630	2872	3074
6900.00	1204	1873	2347	2639	2882	3084
6950.00	1208	1879	2355	2647	2891	3094
7000.00	1212	1885	2362	2656	2900	3103
7050.00	1216	1891	2370	2664	2909	3113
7100.00	1220	1897	2378	2673	2919	3123
7150.00	1224	1903	2385	2681	2928	3133
7200.00	1228	1909	2393	2690	2937	3142
7250.00	1232	1915	2400	2698	2946	3152
7300.00	1235	1921	2408	2707	2956	3162
7350.00	1239	1927	2415	2716	2965	3172
7400.00	1243	1933	2423	2724	2974	3181
7450.00	1247	1939	2430	2733	2983	3191
7500.00	1251	1945	2438	2741	2993	3201
7550.00	1255	1951	2446	2750	3002	3211
7600.00	1259	1957	2453	2758	3011	3220
7650.00	1263	1963	2461	2767	3020	3230
7700.00	1267	1969	2468	2775	3030	3240
7750.00	1271	1975	2476	2784	3039	3250
7800.00	1274	1981	2483	2792	3048	3259
7850.00	1278	1987	2491	2801	3057	3269
7900.00	1282	1992	2498	2810	3067	3279
7950.00	1286	1998	2506	2818	3076	3289
8000.00	1290	2004	2513	2827	3085	3298
8050.00	1294	2010	2521	2835	3094	3308
8100.00	1298	2016	2529	2844	3104	3318
8150.00	1302	2022	2536	2852	3113	3328
8200.00	1306	2028	2544	2861	3122	3337
8250.00	1310	2034	2551	2869	3131	3347
8300.00	1313	2040	2559	2878	3141	3357
8350.00	1317	2046	2566	2887	3150	3367
8400.00	1321	2052	2574	2895	3159	3376
8450.00	1325	2058	2581	2904	3168	3386
8500.00	1329	2064	2589	2912	3178	3396
8550.00	1333	2070	2597	2921	3187	3406
8600.00	1337	2076	2604	2929	3196	3415
8650.00	1341	2082	2612	2938	3205	3425
8700.00	1345	2088	2619	2946	3215	3435
8750.00	1349	2094	2627	2955	3224	3445
8800.00	1352	2100	2634	2963	3233	3454
8850.00	1356	2106	2642	2972	3242	3464
8900.00	1360	2111	2649	2981	3252	3474
8950.00	1364	2117	2657	2989	3261	3484
9000.00	1368	2123	2664	2998	3270	3493
9050.00	1372	2129	2672	3006	3279	3503
9100.00	1376	2135	2680	3015	3289	3513
9150.00	1380	2141	2687	3023	3298	3523
9200.00	1384	2147	2695	3032	3307	3532
9250.00	1388	2153	2702	3040	3316	3542
9300.00	1391	2159	2710	3049	3326	3552
9350.00	1395	2165	2717	3058	3335	3562
9400.00	1399	2171	2725	3066	3344	3571
9450.00	1403	2177	2732	3075	3353	3581
9500.00	1407	2183	2740	3083	3363	3591
9550.00	1411	2189	2748	3092	3372	3601
9600.00	1415	2195	2755	3100	3381	3610
9650.00	1419	2201	2763	3109	3390	3620
9700.00	1422	2206	2767	3115	3396	3628
9750.00	1425	2210	2772	3121	3402	3634
9800.00	1427	2213	2776	3126	3408	3641
9850.00	1430	2217	2781	3132	3414	3647
9900.00	1432	2221	2786	3137	3420	3653
9950.00	1435	2225	2791	3143	3426	3659
10000.00	1437	2228	2795	3148	3432	3666

(a) If the obligor parent’s net income is less than the amount in the guidelines schedule:

1. The parent should be ordered to pay a child support amount, determined on a case-by-case basis, to establish the principle of payment and lay the basis for increased support orders should the parent’s income increase.

2. The obligor parent’s child support payment shall be the lesser of the obligor parent’s actual dollar share of the total minimum child support amount, as determined in subparagraph 1., and 90 percent of the difference between the obligor parent’s monthly net income and the current poverty guidelines as periodically updated in the Federal Register by the United States Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. s. 9902(2) for a single individual living alone.

(b) For combined monthly net income greater than the amount in the guidelines schedule, the obligation is the minimum amount of support provided by the guidelines schedule plus the following percentages multiplied by the amount of income over $10,000:

Child or Children
One	Two	Three	Four	Five	Six
5.0%	7.5%	9.5%	11.0%	12.0%	12.5%

(7) Child care costs incurred due to employment, job search, or education calculated to result in employment or to enhance income of current employment of either parent shall be added to the basic obligation. After the child care costs are added, any moneys prepaid by a parent for child care costs for the child or children of this action shall be deducted from that parent’s child support obligation for that child or those children. Child care costs may not exceed the level required to provide quality care from a licensed source.

(8) Health insurance costs resulting from coverage ordered pursuant to s. 61.13(1)(b), and any noncovered medical, dental, and prescription medication expenses of the child, shall be added to the basic obligation unless these expenses have been ordered to be separately paid on a percentage basis. After the health insurance costs are added to the basic obligation, any moneys prepaid by a parent for health-related costs for the child or children of this action shall be deducted from that parent’s child support obligation for that child or those children.

(9) Each parent’s percentage share of the child support need shall be determined by dividing each parent’s net monthly income by the combined net monthly income.

(10)(a) Each parent’s actual dollar share of the total minimum child support need shall be determined by multiplying the minimum child support need by each parent’s percentage share of the combined monthly net income.

(b)1. A parent is entitled to credit for social security benefits paid directly to the child or the child’s caregiver when the benefits are paid due to the parent’s retirement or disability. The parent’s share of the monthly support obligation is paid in full each month for which such benefits are paid that are equal to or greater than the parent’s share of the monthly obligation. If the benefits are less than the parent’s share of the monthly obligation, the parent owes the difference. If the benefits are more than the parent’s share of the monthly obligation, the excess inures to the benefit of the child and may not be credited to arrears or retroactive support that accrued before the benefits commenced.

2. To obtain credit for social security benefits paid, a parent subject to a court order for child support, or the department in a Title IV-D case, may file a motion with the court or include the request in a petition to modify the support order. Alternatively, in a Title IV-D case, the department may determine and apply credit after notice and an opportunity for a hearing are provided in accordance with chapter 120. If the department determines that a credit applies, the department shall notify the clerk of court, and the clerk shall update the payment record to reflect the credit.

(11)(a) The court may adjust the total minimum child support award, or either or both parents’ share of the total minimum child support award, based upon the following deviation factors:

1. Extraordinary medical, psychological, educational, or dental expenses.

2. Independent income of the child, not to include moneys received by a child from supplemental security income.

3. The payment of support for a parent which has been regularly paid and for which there is a demonstrated need.

4. Seasonal variations in one or both parents’ incomes or expenses.

5. The age of the child, taking into account the greater needs of older children.

6. Special needs, such as costs that may be associated with the disability of a child, that have traditionally been met within the family budget even though fulfilling those needs will cause the support to exceed the presumptive amount established by the guidelines.

7. Total available assets of the obligee, obligor, and the child.

8. The impact of the Internal Revenue Service Child & Dependent Care Tax Credit, Earned Income Tax Credit, and dependency exemption and waiver of that exemption. The court may order a parent to execute a waiver of the Internal Revenue Service dependency exemption if the paying parent is current in support payments.

9. An application of the child support guidelines schedule that requires a person to pay another person more than 55 percent of his or her gross income for a child support obligation for current support resulting from a single support order.

10. The particular parenting plan, a court-ordered time-sharing schedule, or a time-sharing arrangement exercised by agreement of the parties, such as where the child spends a significant amount of time, but less than 20 percent of the overnights, with one parent, thereby reducing the financial expenditures incurred by the other parent; or the refusal of a parent to become involved in the activities of the child.

11. Any other adjustment that is needed to achieve an equitable result which may include, but not be limited to, a reasonable and necessary existing expense or debt. Such expense or debt may include, but is not limited to, a reasonable and necessary expense or debt that the parties jointly incurred during the marriage.

(b) Whenever a particular parenting plan, a court-ordered time-sharing schedule, or a time-sharing arrangement exercised by agreement of the parties provides that each child spend a substantial amount of time with each parent, the court shall adjust any award of child support, as follows:

1. In accordance with subsections (9) and (10), calculate the amount of support obligation apportioned to each parent without including day care and health insurance costs in the calculation and multiply the amount by 1.5.

2. Calculate the percentage of overnight stays the child spends with each parent.

3. Multiply each parent’s support obligation as calculated in subparagraph 1. by the percentage of the other parent’s overnight stays with the child as calculated in subparagraph 2.

4. The difference between the amounts calculated in subparagraph 3. shall be the monetary transfer necessary between the parents for the care of the child, subject to an adjustment for day care and health insurance expenses.

5. Pursuant to subsections (7) and (8), calculate the net amounts owed by each parent for the expenses incurred for day care and health insurance coverage for the child.

6. Adjust the support obligation owed by each parent pursuant to subparagraph 4. by crediting or debiting the amount calculated in subparagraph 5. This amount represents the child support which must be exchanged between the parents.

7. The court may deviate from the child support amount calculated pursuant to subparagraph 6. based upon the deviation factors in paragraph (a), as well as the obligee parent’s low income and ability to maintain the basic necessities of the home for the child, the likelihood that either parent will actually exercise the time-sharing schedule set forth in the parenting plan, a court-ordered time-sharing schedule, or a time-sharing arrangement exercised by agreement of the parties, and whether all of the children are exercising the same time-sharing schedule.

8. For purposes of adjusting any award of child support under this paragraph, “substantial amount of time” means that a parent exercises time-sharing at least 20 percent of the overnights of the year.

(c) A parent’s failure to regularly exercise the time-sharing schedule set forth in the parenting plan, a court-ordered time-sharing schedule, or a time-sharing arrangement exercised by agreement of the parties not caused by the other parent which resulted in the adjustment of the amount of child support pursuant to subparagraph (a)10. or paragraph (b) shall be deemed a substantial change of circumstances for purposes of modifying the child support award. A modification pursuant to this paragraph is retroactive to the date the noncustodial parent first failed to regularly exercise the court-ordered or agreed time-sharing schedule.

(12)(a) A parent with a support obligation may have other children living with him or her who were born or adopted after the support obligation arose. If such subsequent children exist, the court, when considering an upward modification of an existing award, may disregard the income from secondary employment obtained in addition to the parent’s primary employment if the court determines that the employment was obtained primarily to support the subsequent children.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (a), the existence of such subsequent children should not as a general rule be considered by the court as a basis for disregarding the amount provided in the guidelines schedule. The parent with a support obligation for subsequent children may raise the existence of such subsequent children as a justification for deviation from the guidelines schedule. However, if the existence of such subsequent children is raised, the income of the other parent of the subsequent children shall be considered by the court in determining whether or not there is a basis for deviation from the guideline amount.

(c) The issue of subsequent children under paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) may only be raised in a proceeding for an upward modification of an existing award and may not be applied to justify a decrease in an existing award.

(13) If the recurring income is not sufficient to meet the needs of the child, the court may order child support to be paid from nonrecurring income or assets.

(14) Every petition for child support or for modification of child support shall be accompanied by an affidavit which shows the party’s income, allowable deductions, and net income computed in accordance with this section. The affidavit shall be served at the same time that the petition is served. The respondent, whether or not a stipulation is entered, shall make an affidavit which shows the party’s income, allowable deductions, and net income computed in accordance with this section. The respondent shall include his or her affidavit with the answer to the petition or as soon thereafter as is practicable, but in any case at least 72 hours prior to any hearing on the finances of either party.

(15) For purposes of establishing an obligation for support in accordance with this section, if a person who is receiving public assistance is found to be noncooperative as defined in s. 409.2572, the department may submit to the court an affidavit or written declaration signed under penalty of perjury as specified in s. 92.525(2) attesting to the income of that parent based upon information available to the department.

(16) The Legislature shall review the guidelines schedule established in this section at least every 4 years beginning in 1997.

(17) In an initial determination of child support, whether in a paternity action, dissolution of marriage action, or petition for support during the marriage, the court has discretion to award child support retroactive to the date when the parents did not reside together in the same household with the child, not to exceed a period of 24 months preceding the filing of the petition, regardless of whether that date precedes the filing of the petition. In determining the retroactive award in such cases, the court shall consider the following:

(a) The court shall apply the guidelines schedule in effect at the time of the hearing subject to the obligor’s demonstration of his or her actual income, as defined by subsection (2), during the retroactive period. Failure of the obligor to so demonstrate shall result in the court using the obligor’s income at the time of the hearing in computing child support for the retroactive period.

(b) All actual payments made by a parent to the other parent or the child or third parties for the benefit of the child throughout the proposed retroactive period.

History.—s. 3, ch. 87-95; s. 5, ch. 89-183; s. 5, ch. 91-246; s. 11, ch. 92-138; s. 5, ch. 93-208; s. 2, ch. 94-204; s. 2, ch. 94-318; s. 1366, ch. 95-147; s. 53, ch. 96-175; s. 3, ch. 96-305; s. 11, ch. 97-170; s. 11, ch. 98-397; s. 1, ch. 99-359; s. 2, ch. 2001-91; ss. 15, 16, ch. 2001-158; s. 7, ch. 2002-173; s. 11, ch. 2005-39; s. 16, ch. 2008-61; ss. 2, 17, ch. 2010-187; s. 5, ch. 2010-199; s. 3, ch. 2011-4; s. 38, ch. 2012-30; s. 1, ch. 2014-35; s. 4, ch. 2021-103; s. 4, ch. 2023-152; s. 4, ch. 2023-213.

F.S. 61.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.30 on CourtListener

Amendments to 61.30

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.30

Total Results: 908

State v. Cotton

769 So. 2d 345, 2000 WL 766521

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2000 | Docket: 1476653

Cited 87 times | Published

1116-1117 (Fla.1998) (accepting amendment to section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes, as clarifying legislative

Ondrejack v. Ondrejack

839 So. 2d 867, 2003 WL 1038986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2003 | Docket: 1707770

Cited 49 times | Published

648 So.2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Section 61.30(9), Florida Statutes, provides the statutory

Segall v. Segall

708 So. 2d 983, 1998 WL 130021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1998 | Docket: 542372

Cited 41 times | Published

establishing the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), the legislature established

Wilcox v. Munoz

35 So. 3d 136, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7029, 2010 WL 2010841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2010 | Docket: 1645800

Cited 34 times | Published

404 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). 1. Findings of Fact Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2006), provides guidelines

Shrove v. Shrove

724 So. 2d 679, 1999 WL 17921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1999 | Docket: 1733982

Cited 28 times | Published

and to take into account the guidelines of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1997). We further hold that

Hinton v. Smith

725 So. 2d 1154, 1998 WL 796713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1998 | Docket: 1688963

Cited 28 times | Published

reasonable anticipations of the parties' agreement. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), sets forth the

Overbey v. Overbey

698 So. 2d 811, 1997 WL 296971

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1997 | Docket: 434865

Cited 28 times | Published

So.2d 713 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). To that end, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995), which sets forth guidelines

Sumlar v. Sumlar

827 So. 2d 1079, 2002 WL 31295118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2002 | Docket: 1360465

Cited 27 times | Published

support in an initial proceeding for such support. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000); Swanston v. Swanston

Ballantyne v. Ballantyne

666 So. 2d 957, 1996 WL 4907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1996 | Docket: 452477

Cited 27 times | Published

amount be determined under the guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Appellee opposed the modification

Finley v. Scott

707 So. 2d 1112, 1998 WL 29648

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1998 | Docket: 1259799

Cited 26 times | Published

also sought support for the child pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993). By order dated January

Zold v. Zold

911 So. 2d 1222, 2005 WL 2230403

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2005 | Docket: 249811

Cited 25 times | Published

parties' "combined monthly available income." § 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. (2004).[8] Lastly, in determining

Smith v. Smith

737 So. 2d 641, 1999 WL 560268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1999 | Docket: 1300884

Cited 25 times | Published

necessary for a parent to stay home with the child. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Thilem v. Thilem, 662

Miller v. Schou

616 So. 2d 436, 1993 WL 102014

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1993 | Docket: 1367000

Cited 25 times | Published

greater support as the parents' income increases. Section 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1991). If courts could only take

Wendel v. Wendel

852 So. 2d 277, 2003 WL 21471693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2003 | Docket: 66257

Cited 24 times | Published

calculating his child support obligation. We agree. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001), requires the

Solomon v. Solomon

861 So. 2d 1218, 2003 WL 22927241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2003 | Docket: 1514167

Cited 21 times | Published

taking into account all the factors specified in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2000), including whether

Mitchell v. Mitchell

841 So. 2d 564, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2003 | Docket: 1234151

Cited 21 times | Published

circuit court entered its judgment in May 2001, section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), provided: "Whenever

Chapoteau v. Chapoteau

659 So. 2d 1381, 1995 WL 539671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 1748175

Cited 21 times | Published

Departing from the child support guidelines, § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1993), the court ordered the former

Walsh v. Walsh

600 So. 2d 1222, 1992 WL 123323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1992 | Docket: 539227

Cited 21 times | Published

Miller, 589 So.2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), specifically

Guida v. Guida

870 So. 2d 222, 2004 WL 573847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2004 | Docket: 103497

Cited 20 times | Published

the final judgment's award of child support. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2002), contains guidelines

Cozier v. Cozier

819 So. 2d 834, 2002 WL 1181945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 1409438

Cited 20 times | Published

dollar value to these in-kind contributions. See § 61.30(2)(a)(13), Fla. Stat. (1999); McDaniel v. McDaniel

Jones v. Jones

636 So. 2d 867, 1994 WL 178054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1994 | Docket: 1362113

Cited 19 times | Published

specific record findings justifying departure. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1992). We reject the wife's

Scapin v. Scapin

547 So. 2d 1012, 1989 WL 97683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1989 | Docket: 1738693

Cited 19 times | Published

guidelines and the test of reasonableness. Section 61.30 Florida Statutes (1987); Canakaris v. Canakaris

Burkley v. Burkley

911 So. 2d 262, 2005 WL 2396501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2005 | Docket: 1501217

Cited 18 times | Published

derives its authority to impute income from section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004): Income on a

Murphy v. Murphy

621 So. 2d 455, 1993 WL 74287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1993 | Docket: 1265573

Cited 18 times | Published

supporting an award or denial of alimony."); and § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991) ("The trier of fact may

Garcia v. Garcia

560 So. 2d 403, 1990 WL 58254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1990 | Docket: 1739485

Cited 18 times | Published

the extent that they reduce living expenses." § 61.30(2)(a)13, Fla. Stat. (1989). In this particular

Garcia v. Garcia

560 So. 2d 403, 1990 WL 58254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1990 | Docket: 1739485

Cited 18 times | Published

the extent that they reduce living expenses." § 61.30(2)(a)13, Fla. Stat. (1989). In this particular

Layeni v. Layeni

843 So. 2d 295, 2003 WL 553768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2003 | Docket: 1244057

Cited 17 times | Published

as income to the former husband on remand. See § 61.30(2)(a)(13), Fla. Stat. (1998); Cozier v. Cozier

Ensley v. Ensley

578 So. 2d 497, 1991 WL 61814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1991 | Docket: 441450

Cited 17 times | Published

if the circumstances change. The wife cites section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), in support of

Chipman v. Chipman

975 So. 2d 603, 2008 WL 583670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2008 | Docket: 1727414

Cited 16 times | Published

wife in the amount of $77,000.00 per year. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), mandates: *608

Calderon v. Calderon

730 So. 2d 400, 1999 WL 193294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1999 | Docket: 1755285

Cited 16 times | Published

income in determining the child support amount. See § 61.30(2)(a)9., Fla. Stat. (1997) ("Gross income shall

Bardin v. State, Dept. of Revenue

720 So. 2d 609, 1998 WL 796624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1998 | Docket: 1371801

Cited 16 times | Published

guideline child support in accordance with Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court's

Stock v. Stock

693 So. 2d 1080, 1997 WL 253034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1997 | Docket: 435345

Cited 16 times | Published

amount prescribed by the statutory guidelines. Section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that

McDaniel v. McDaniel

653 So. 2d 1076, 1995 WL 214601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 552021

Cited 16 times | Published

however, present a more difficult problem. Section 61.30(2)(a), Florida Statutes, reads in pertinent

Armstrong v. Armstrong

623 So. 2d 1216, 1993 WL 337041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1993 | Docket: 1183395

Cited 16 times | Published

statutory guidelines and the reasonableness test. Section 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989); Canakaris v. Canakaris

Freilich v. Freilich

897 So. 2d 537, 2005 WL 497271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2005 | Docket: 1735323

Cited 15 times | Published

voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2003), which provides:

Reynolds v. Reynolds

668 So. 2d 245, 1996 WL 63231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1996 | Docket: 1290515

Cited 15 times | Published

support in the presumptive amount set forth in section 61.30(6), Florida Statutes (1993), or else to make

In Re Family Law Rules of Procedure

663 So. 2d 1049, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 581, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1953, 1995 WL 689537

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 1313670

Cited 15 times | Published

Florida's child support guidelines (see section 61.30, Florida Statutes). f. ____ Child support

In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules Civ. Proc.

604 So. 2d 1110, 1992 WL 163953

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1992 | Docket: 1686576

Cited 15 times | Published

definition of income shall be that as contained in section 61.30, Florida Statutes.) a. State your gross annual

Polley v. Polley

588 So. 2d 638, 1991 WL 211249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1991 | Docket: 1297489

Cited 15 times | Published

denied, 581 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1991). In addition, section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that

Brown v. Cannady-Brown

954 So. 2d 1206, 2007 WL 1136020

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2007 | Docket: 1166978

Cited 14 times | Published

unemployed and imputing income to him. We reverse. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005), mandates: Income

Ghay v. Ghay

954 So. 2d 1186, 2007 WL 1094304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2007 | Docket: 1165388

Cited 14 times | Published

be imputed to the husband in accordance with section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2006). See also Smith

Department of Revenue v. Jackson

846 So. 2d 486, 2003 WL 1922661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2003 | Docket: 1709864

Cited 14 times | Published

on the petition. See id. Moreover, although section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2001), provides presumptive

Amend. to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.

723 So. 2d 208, 1998 WL 765134

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1998 | Docket: 1693632

Cited 14 times | Published

_______ 26. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines 18 through

Oxley v. Oxley

695 So. 2d 364, 1997 WL 66212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 304212

Cited 14 times | Published

any unit of local government. Additionally, section 61.30(2)(a)12 provides, in calculating income, that

Oxley v. Oxley

695 So. 2d 364, 1997 WL 66212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 304212

Cited 14 times | Published

any unit of local government. Additionally, section 61.30(2)(a)12 provides, in calculating income, that

Vaccaro v. Vaccaro

677 So. 2d 918, 1996 WL 387424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1996 | Docket: 1268339

Cited 14 times | Published

her income package." Peter is referring to section 61.30(2)(a)13, Florida Statutes, which instructs the

Green v. Green

672 So. 2d 49, 1996 WL 106341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1996 | Docket: 1763154

Cited 14 times | Published

marriage in arriving at his net monthly income. See § 61.30(4), Fla.Stat. (1993). We therefore reverse the

Nelson v. Nelson

651 So. 2d 1252, 1995 WL 103329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1995 | Docket: 358597

Cited 14 times | Published

contributed about $25,000 to this plan in 1993. Section 61.30(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1993), allows mandatory

Levine v. Best

595 So. 2d 278, 1992 WL 48845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1992 | Docket: 1708966

Cited 14 times | Published

adjusting the guidelines amount in accordance with section 61.30(10)(i), Florida Statutes (1991). Affirmed, in

Wrona v. Wrona

592 So. 2d 694, 1991 WL 262906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1991 | Docket: 1428714

Cited 14 times | Published

of the payments attributed to the husband. See § 61.30(2)(a)7, Fla. Stat. (1989). II. Since we authorize

Harris v. McKinney

20 So. 3d 400, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15196, 2009 WL 3232432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2009 | Docket: 1177168

Cited 13 times | Published

date that the child was born. He points to section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2008), which provides

Tarnawski v. Tarnawski

851 So. 2d 239, 2003 WL 21749401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 1313142

Cited 13 times | Published

of child support being paid by the husband. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), requires the

Cooper v. Cooper

760 So. 2d 1048, 2000 WL 770543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2000 | Docket: 1324662

Cited 13 times | Published

that support such deviation in accordance with section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Thilem v. Thilem

662 So. 2d 1314, 1995 WL 621769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 1283037

Cited 13 times | Published

a voluntarily underemployed parent's earnings. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993). Underemployment is voluntary

Cash v. Cash

122 So. 3d 430, 2013 WL 5288857, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2013 | Docket: 60234691

Cited 12 times | Published

the hearing on the former husband’s petition. Section 61.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2010), provides: The

Rabbath v. Farid

4 So. 3d 778, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2199, 2009 WL 127862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2009 | Docket: 1666688

Cited 12 times | Published

and prevailing earnings level in the community." § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); see Swain v. Swain, 932

Shaw v. Nelson

4 So. 3d 740, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1707, 2009 WL 528795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2009 | Docket: 1666187

Cited 12 times | Published

court followed the child support guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2005), and how the court

Karimi v. Karimi

867 So. 2d 471, 2004 WL 256347

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 2562662

Cited 12 times | Published

"significant" amount of time with the Former Husband. Section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2002), indicates that

Artuso v. Dick

843 So. 2d 942, 2003 WL 1824610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2003 | Docket: 1244048

Cited 12 times | Published

obligation determined pursuant to s. 61.30(6)." Section 61.30(6) lists the schedules to be applied to the

Lauro v. Lauro

757 So. 2d 523, 2000 WL 294558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2000 | Docket: 1698227

Cited 12 times | Published

home, including food, telephone and laundry. Section 61.30(2)(a)(13) provides that "reimbursed expenses

McHugh v. McHugh

702 So. 2d 639, 1997 WL 794758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1997 | Docket: 2576859

Cited 12 times | Published

it would have been income as contemplated by section 61.30(2), Florida Statutes (1993), which provides

Winters v. Katseralis

623 So. 2d 613, 1993 WL 333572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1993 | Docket: 1183913

Cited 12 times | Published

finding on the record to justify the deviation. Section 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). At the time of the

Fowhand v. Piper

611 So. 2d 1308, 1992 WL 389022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1992 | Docket: 1674508

Cited 12 times | Published

computed under the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, to Ms. Piper, assessed $200

Neal v. Meek

591 So. 2d 1044, 1991 WL 279425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1991 | Docket: 541261

Cited 12 times | Published

bound by the child support guidelines contained in § 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989). These guidelines apply

Hindle v. FUITH

33 So. 3d 782, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5347, 2010 WL 1626410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2010 | Docket: 1649168

Cited 11 times | Published

determine the net income of each parent pursuant to section 61.30, and to include findings in the final judgment

McKenna v. McKenna

31 So. 3d 890, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3828, 2010 WL 1050081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2010 | Docket: 1647709

Cited 11 times | Published

Although the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, do not address a split custody

Bator v. Osborne

983 So. 2d 1198, 2008 WL 2065854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2008 | Docket: 1756503

Cited 11 times | Published

prevailing earnings level in the community. . . . § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006). In other words, there

Kareff v. Kareff

943 So. 2d 890, 2006 WL 3422110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2006 | Docket: 1527420

Cited 11 times | Published

computing his child support obligation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2006). Wife properly concedes

Parry v. Parry

933 So. 2d 9, 2006 WL 1113520

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2006 | Docket: 1712246

Cited 11 times | Published

party's income when computing alimony, and section 61.30(2) requires a court to include bonuses when

Crouch v. Crouch

898 So. 2d 177, 2005 WL 562558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2005 | Docket: 1732287

Cited 11 times | Published

discretion to decline to order guideline support. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2003) contains child support

Guerin v. DiRoma

819 So. 2d 968, 2002 WL 1369603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2002 | Docket: 1192729

Cited 11 times | Published

child beyond the obligor's ability to do so. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (2001), and Migliore v. Migliore, 792

Bacon v. Bacon

819 So. 2d 950, 2002 WL 1369573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2002 | Docket: 1498831

Cited 11 times | Published

Law, 60 TUL. L.REV. 1165 (1986). [6] Compare § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (2001) ("For combined monthly available

Bryan v. Bryan

765 So. 2d 829, 2000 WL 1152839

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 428831

Cited 11 times | Published

to the extent that they reduce living expenses. § 61.30(2)(a)13, Florida Statutes (1997); Hinton v. Smith

Ordini v. Ordini

701 So. 2d 663, 1997 WL 731454

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1997 | Docket: 1470462

Cited 11 times | Published

Fla. Stat. (1995). The court also noted that section 61.30(2)(a)13, Florida Statutes (1995), which provides

Sol v. Sol

656 So. 2d 206, 1995 WL 316529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1995 | Docket: 1283539

Cited 11 times | Published

purposes of the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993). The former husband

Dyer v. Dyer

658 So. 2d 148, 1995 WL 407452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1995 | Docket: 439130

Cited 11 times | Published

the minor child of the parties, we disagree. Section 61.30(13), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that

The Florida Bar v. Schramek

616 So. 2d 979, 1993 WL 113509

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1993 | Docket: 1385412

Cited 11 times | Published

as a basis for reducing child support payments. § 61.30(1)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (1989). The motion for child

Barrs v. Barrs

590 So. 2d 980, 1991 WL 259447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1991 | Docket: 458260

Cited 11 times | Published

statutory child support guidelines, or $4,200.00. § 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. (1989). In circumstances in which

Huntley v. Huntley

578 So. 2d 890, 1991 WL 70856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1991 | Docket: 441144

Cited 11 times | Published

addictions, both circumstances beyond her control. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). He also refused to deduct

Demont v. Demont

67 So. 3d 1096, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10906, 2011 WL 2698685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2011 | Docket: 60301930

Cited 10 times | Published

each party. To calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2009), the court listed the

Zinovoy v. Zinovoy

50 So. 3d 763, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19823, 2010 WL 5350985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2010 | Docket: 1928450

Cited 10 times | Published

support allocation. This contention has merit. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2009); Wilcox v. Munoz, 35 So.3d

Zarycki-Weig v. Weig

25 So. 3d 573, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10365, 2009 WL 2243807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2009 | Docket: 1662143

Cited 10 times | Published

circumstances over which the parent has no control." § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. In determining the imputation

Scariti v. Sabillon

16 So. 3d 144, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4208, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2009 | Docket: 1641350

Cited 10 times | Published

level in the community. Chipman, 975 So.2d at 608; § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). The mother, who has a

Lafaille v. Lafaille

837 So. 2d 601, 2003 WL 340854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2003 | Docket: 1527447

Cited 10 times | Published

respective child-support obligations under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2001). We affirm. The parties

Jacoby v. Jacoby

763 So. 2d 410, 2000 WL 678997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2000 | Docket: 1681894

Cited 10 times | Published

statutory factor. Retroactive child support. Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (1997), permits the circuit

Walker v. Walker

719 So. 2d 977, 1998 WL 736369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1998 | Docket: 1704964

Cited 10 times | Published

be imputed on the parent's recent work history. § 61.30(2)(B), Fla. Stat.; Ensley v. Ensley, 578 So.2d

Drakulich v. Drakulich

705 So. 2d 665, 1998 WL 27587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1998 | Docket: 1753695

Cited 10 times | Published

For purposes of the child support guidelines, § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995), the Master determined that

Stein v. Stein

701 So. 2d 381, 1997 WL 683121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1997 | Docket: 1736802

Cited 10 times | Published

the imputation of income. Florida Statutes section 61.30(2)(b) permits the trial court to impute income

Crowley v. Crowley

678 So. 2d 435, 1996 WL 441624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1996 | Docket: 1470843

Cited 10 times | Published

husband earned $30,000 from Dry Cleaning Depot. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), provides for

Mahaffey v. Mahaffey

614 So. 2d 649, 1993 WL 48256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1993 | Docket: 2550423

Cited 10 times | Published

pursuant to the Guidelines of Florida Statutes, Section 61.30... ." We reverse the $645 per month child support

Pelton v. Pelton

617 So. 2d 714, 1992 WL 370422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1992 | Docket: 1391506

Cited 10 times | Published

recalculation of the parties' net incomes pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991) (child support guidelines)

Glover v. Glover

601 So. 2d 231, 1992 WL 108393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1992 | Docket: 1305259

Cited 10 times | Published

presumptive child support need is established in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989). The child support

Touchstone v. Touchstone

579 So. 2d 826, 1991 WL 75545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1991 | Docket: 1431729

Cited 10 times | Published

the minimum amount under the guidelines of Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987). We find the rehabilitative

Marsh v. Marsh

553 So. 2d 366, 1989 WL 147385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1989 | Docket: 1675670

Cited 10 times | Published

DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See e.g., § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. [2] This is reversible error

Haas v. Haas

552 So. 2d 221, 1989 WL 116621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1989 | Docket: 1663668

Cited 10 times | Published

without imputed income, exceeds $50,000 per year. § 61.30(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). If the guidelines were applicable

Fortune v. Fortune

61 So. 3d 441, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5942, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2011 | Docket: 60300479

Cited 9 times | Published

being current in his child support payments. Section 61.30(ll)(a)(8) provides that “[t]he court may order

Henderson v. Henderson

905 So. 2d 901, 2005 WL 623235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2005 | Docket: 1711805

Cited 9 times | Published

master's calculations were facially erroneous. Section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2003), lists deductions

Stebbins v. Stebbins

754 So. 2d 903, 2000 WL 461228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2000 | Docket: 431198

Cited 9 times | Published

necessary for the parent to stay home with the child. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998); Smith v. Smith,

Thomas v. Thomas

712 So. 2d 822, 1998 WL 374716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 1471787

Cited 9 times | Published

pursuant to the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995). The court declared

Fullerton v. Fullerton

709 So. 2d 162, 1998 WL 135087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 1681986

Cited 9 times | Published

amount by more than 5% with no written reasons. See § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). We reverse this award

Hyatt v. Hyatt

672 So. 2d 74, 1996 WL 184448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1996 | Docket: 2516863

Cited 9 times | Published

has substantially increased. e. Pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes, the present support amount

Rojas v. Rojas

656 So. 2d 563, 1995 WL 353492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1995 | Docket: 1283666

Cited 9 times | Published

calculating child support pursuant to the guidelines, section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), requires the

Viscito v. Menditto

644 So. 2d 135, 1994 WL 568048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1994 | Docket: 1248826

Cited 9 times | Published

to pay $500.00 per month in child support. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), presumptively establishes

Eagle v. Eagle

632 So. 2d 122, 1994 WL 33646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1994 | Docket: 1514005

Cited 9 times | Published

application of the guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, to the earnings of the parties

Pitts v. Pitts

626 So. 2d 278, 1993 WL 440274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1993 | Docket: 1285929

Cited 9 times | Published

payment of the guidelines amount, as required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So.2d

Sinclair v. Sinclair

594 So. 2d 807, 1992 WL 21849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1992 | Docket: 1485820

Cited 9 times | Published

child whose parents have an income up to $100,800. § 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. (1991). On remand, the trial court

Arce v. Arce

566 So. 2d 1308, 1990 WL 98587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1990 | Docket: 547986

Cited 9 times | Published

payments, we see no need to determine whether section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), compels a different

Williams v. Williams

560 So. 2d 308, 1990 WL 48651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1990 | Docket: 1739590

Cited 9 times | Published

accordance with the statutory child support guidelines. § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1987). However, the trial court incorrectly

In Re Amendments to Rules of Civ. Proc.

536 So. 2d 974

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 1759905

Cited 9 times | Published

with the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987). The need for an amendment

Daniel Windsor v. Tiffany Windsor

262 So. 3d 853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2018 | Docket: 8462704

Cited 8 times | Published

So. 2d 641, 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see also § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. Therefore, the first step is

Whittingham v. Whittingham

67 So. 3d 239, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14188, 2010 WL 3718117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2010 | Docket: 2364248

Cited 8 times | Published

award is within the guidelines established in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2007). We do not find merit

Alois v. Alois

937 So. 2d 171, 2006 WL 2265417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2006 | Docket: 1513099

Cited 8 times | Published

the trier of fact shall order as child support. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). Subsection 61.30(11)(a)

Smith v. Smith

872 So. 2d 397, 2004 WL 943134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2004 | Docket: 1356796

Cited 8 times | Published

1202 (Fla.1980). To impute income pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2003), "the trial judge

Gerthe v. Gerthe

857 So. 2d 306, 2003 WL 22316811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2003 | Docket: 1774068

Cited 8 times | Published

imputation of income to a parent is governed by section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001), which states:

Jensen v. Jensen

824 So. 2d 315, 2002 WL 1971880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2002 | Docket: 1435494

Cited 8 times | Published

appellant's child support obligation pursuant to section 61.30(11)(b)10., Florida Statutes (2001). Finally

Undercuffler v. Undercuffler

798 So. 2d 867, 2001 WL 1359095

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 1238935

Cited 8 times | Published

appears nowhere in the stipulated statement. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), governs the

Wendel v. Wendel

805 So. 2d 913, 2001 WL 1268262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2001 | Docket: 1242333

Cited 8 times | Published

Smith, 725 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), provides: (b)

Connell v. Connell

718 So. 2d 842, 1998 WL 472649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1998 | Docket: 466326

Cited 8 times | Published

Connell was "underemployed" for the purposes of section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), and that such

Catalfumo v. Catalfumo

704 So. 2d 1095, 1997 WL 795077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1997 | Docket: 761838

Cited 8 times | Published

the gains were recurring or non-recurring. See § 61.30(a)(14) Fla. Stat.(1987). We also hold that the

Cooper v. Kahn

696 So. 2d 1186, 1997 WL 194132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 1325806

Cited 8 times | Published

"income" includes "payments, made by any person." Section 61.30(2)(a)(13), Florida Statutes (1995), outlining

Bimonte v. Martin-Bimonte

679 So. 2d 18, 1996 WL 426159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 1665887

Cited 8 times | Published

imputed gross income figure as provided in section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (1991)." Id. at 165. Id

State, Dept. of Revenue v. Sumblin

675 So. 2d 691, 1996 WL 343016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1996 | Docket: 1694643

Cited 8 times | Published

residential parent, to be at home with the child, see section 61.30(2)(b). Apparently the trial court did *693 not

Alon v. Alon

665 So. 2d 1110, 1996 WL 1118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1996 | Docket: 1351822

Cited 8 times | Published

imputed gross income figure as provided in section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (1991)." Id. at 165. Third

Zolonz v. Zolonz

659 So. 2d 451, 1995 WL 480677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1995 | Docket: 1748063

Cited 8 times | Published

to pay support in accordance with guidelines in § 61.30); and § 743.07(2), Fla. Stat. (1993) (court may

Sotnick v. Sotnick

650 So. 2d 157, 1995 WL 46411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1995 | Docket: 1346755

Cited 8 times | Published

(footnotes omitted; emphasis in original);[2]see also § 61.30(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993); Miller v. Schou, 616

Pridgeon v. Pridgeon

632 So. 2d 257, 1994 WL 51098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1994 | Docket: 462786

Cited 8 times | Published

establishing the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991), the legislature has

Pridgeon v. Pridgeon

632 So. 2d 257, 1994 WL 51098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1994 | Docket: 462786

Cited 8 times | Published

establishing the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991), the legislature has

Butler v. Brewster

629 So. 2d 1092, 1994 WL 6721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1994 | Docket: 1677407

Cited 8 times | Published

second job, which is properly includable under section 61.30(2)(a)2. in determining gross income. On remand

Salazar v. Salazar

976 So. 2d 1155, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 316520

Cited 7 times | Published

be 64%. We find this to be reversible error. Section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2006), provides that children's

Thyrre v. Thyrre

963 So. 2d 859, 2007 WL 2285318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2007 | Docket: 1328301

Cited 7 times | Published

circumstances). Section 61.30(1)(a) provides that the child support guidelines in section 61.30 establish the

Silverman v. Silverman

940 So. 2d 615, 2006 WL 3103153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 433998

Cited 7 times | Published

$1135 per month as child support. Although section 61.30(11)(a)(6) allows a trial court, in its discretion

Keeley v. Keeley

899 So. 2d 387, 2005 WL 711620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 756784

Cited 7 times | Published

obligation pursuant to section 61.30(11)(b)(10), Florida Statutes (2003). Section 61.30(11)(b) provides that

Deoca v. Deoca

837 So. 2d 1137, 2003 WL 365970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 1527511

Cited 7 times | Published

adjusted by the mandatory deductions required by section 61.30(3), Florida Statute (2001). Our review of the

Forrest v. Ron

821 So. 2d 1163, 2002 WL 1563373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 1236190

Cited 7 times | Published

by a specific finding explaining the deviation. § 61.30(11)(a), Fla Stat. (2000) Here, there was record

Hoffman v. Hoffman

793 So. 2d 128, 2001 WL 945848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2001 | Docket: 1678050

Cited 7 times | Published

determined pursuant to s. 61.30(6). Additionally, section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes, provides: Health insurance

Arze v. Sadough-Arze

789 So. 2d 1141, 2001 WL 716874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2001 | Docket: 1696003

Cited 7 times | Published

parent. The Husband contends that pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1999), and the decision in

Harris v. Harris

760 So. 2d 152, 2000 WL 6063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2000 | Docket: 1324931

Cited 7 times | Published

of the opinions do not refer specifically to section 61.30. See, e.g., Robertson v. Bretthauer, 712 So

DF v. Department of Revenue Ex Rel. LF

736 So. 2d 782, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9184, 1999 WL 462098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1999 | Docket: 1736599

Cited 7 times | Published

meet the current child support guidelines. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997). Even if the child still resides

Burkhardt v. Bass

711 So. 2d 158, 1998 WL 236163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 1700474

Cited 7 times | Published

"factual findings" he alleges are required by section 61.30(2)(b). We disagree because there is no statutory

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules

713 So. 2d 1, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 105, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 475, 1998 WL 166533

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1998 | Docket: 1732751

Cited 7 times | Published

Florida's child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child

Robinson v. Robinson

657 So. 2d 958, 1995 WL 421035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1995 | Docket: 463983

Cited 7 times | Published

husband had a baby to support with his new wife. Section 61.30(12), Florida Statutes (1993), states, The existence

Moss v. Moss

636 So. 2d 164, 1994 WL 149843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1994 | Docket: 1361780

Cited 7 times | Published

husband without first imputing a gross income. See § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). Although the trial court

Whight v. Whight

635 So. 2d 135, 1994 WL 122840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1994 | Docket: 1353075

Cited 7 times | Published

remedial child support guideline *137 statute, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), to the pending proceedings

Wollschlager v. Veal

601 So. 2d 274, 1992 WL 119845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1992 | Docket: 1305114

Cited 7 times | Published

court utilized the guidelines enumerated in section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), in determining

Ford v. Ford

592 So. 2d 698, 1991 WL 268072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1991 | Docket: 1728054

Cited 7 times | Published

for in cases under the child support guidelines, § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1989), as amended, ch. 91-246, § 5

Fletcher v. Fletcher

573 So. 2d 941, 1991 WL 5005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1991 | Docket: 478763

Cited 7 times | Published

calculating his child support obligation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989), and reverse. The order

Thalgott v. Thalgott

571 So. 2d 1368, 1990 WL 205395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1990 | Docket: 1653582

Cited 7 times | Published

imputed income amounts, to be $2,100. Pursuant to Section 61.30(6), Florida Statutes (1989), the parties' combined

Motie v. Motie

132 So. 3d 1210, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2367, 2014 WL 656748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2014 | Docket: 60238347

Cited 6 times | Published

together in the same household with the child ....”§ 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2013). Awarding child support

Brennan v. Brennan

122 So. 3d 923, 2013 WL 5450946, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2013 | Docket: 60234806

Cited 6 times | Published

are supported by competent substantial evidence. § 61.30(2)(b)l., Fla. Stat. (2011). The trial court failed

Kingsbury v. Kingsbury

116 So. 3d 473, 2013 WL 1955890, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2013 | Docket: 60232359

Cited 6 times | Published

also recalculate child support consistent with section 61.30(l)(a). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and

Kingsbury v. Kingsbury

116 So. 3d 473, 2013 WL 1955890, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2013 | Docket: 60232359

Cited 6 times | Published

also recalculate child support consistent with section 61.30(l)(a). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and

Mobley v. Mobley

18 So. 3d 724, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15191, 2009 WL 3232651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2009 | Docket: 1640630

Cited 6 times | Published

factored into the child support determination. See § 61.30(2)(a)(9), (3)(g); Storey v. Storey, 979 So.2d 1057

Rodriguez v. MEDERO

17 So. 3d 867, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13175, 2009 WL 2871593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2009 | Docket: 1645671

Cited 6 times | Published

obligation down to $349 per month pursuant to section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2007). The former

Finney v. Finney

995 So. 2d 579, 2008 WL 4601216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2008 | Docket: 1285481

Cited 6 times | Published

subject to the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. See Kareff v. Kareff, 943

Guard v. Guard

993 So. 2d 1086, 2008 WL 4265312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2008 | Docket: 1516295

Cited 6 times | Published

Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that

Campagna v. Cope

971 So. 2d 243, 2008 WL 53547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2008 | Docket: 1446868

Cited 6 times | Published

of the petition for dissolution pursuant to section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2005), because the parties

Morrow v. Frommer

913 So. 2d 1195, 2005 WL 2508603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2005 | Docket: 1331356

Cited 6 times | Published

establish a child support award in accordance with section 61.30(9), Florida Statutes (2004). The court acknowledged

Seiberlich v. Wolf

859 So. 2d 570, 2003 WL 22735692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2003 | Docket: 1684346

Cited 6 times | Published

having the child a "substantial amount of time." § 61.30(11)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001). The trial court's reasoning

Zanone v. Clause

848 So. 2d 1268, 2003 WL 21554275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2003 | Docket: 1712361

Cited 6 times | Published

Walker, 719 So.2d 977, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001). The imputation must be

Migliore v. Harris

848 So. 2d 1250, 2003 WL 21537467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2003 | Docket: 1309460

Cited 6 times | Published

other concerns the court's compliance with section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2001). We agree that

Zubkin v. Zubkin

823 So. 2d 870, 2002 WL 1939920

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2002 | Docket: 1512741

Cited 6 times | Published

Walker, 719 So.2d 977, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001). The imputation must be

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

820 So. 2d 350, 2002 WL 491038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2002 | Docket: 2159296

Cited 6 times | Published

in circumstances warranting modification. See § 61.30(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000). [7] On remand, the trial

Weiser v. Weiser

782 So. 2d 986, 2001 WL 387947

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 456429

Cited 6 times | Published

For the purpose of calculating child support, section 61.30(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), permits deductions

Musser v. Watkins

752 So. 2d 141, 2000 WL 263130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2000 | Docket: 1279981

Cited 6 times | Published

children's future uncovered medical expenses. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997). In addition, the trial court

Musser v. Watkins

752 So. 2d 141, 2000 WL 263130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2000 | Docket: 1279981

Cited 6 times | Published

children's future uncovered medical expenses. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997). In addition, the trial court

Lee v. Lee

751 So. 2d 741, 2000 WL 196648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2000 | Docket: 1310071

Cited 6 times | Published

requisite findings for imputation of income. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), permits

Jones v. Johnson

747 So. 2d 1066, 2000 WL 31823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2000 | Docket: 1475341

Cited 6 times | Published

Clarke, 619 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Section 61.30(1) requires a deviation from the guidelines

Kranz v. Kranz

737 So. 2d 1198, 1999 WL 518821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1999 | Docket: 283384

Cited 6 times | Published

paid is deducted from the payor spouse's income. § 61.30(2), (3), Fla. Stat. (1997). This indicates that

Hanley v. Hanley

734 So. 2d 529, 1999 WL 333425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 1731040

Cited 6 times | Published

provision of health insurance as required by section 61.30(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1995); therefore, we

Cummings v. Cummings

719 So. 2d 948, 1998 WL 689752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1998 | Docket: 1705152

Cited 6 times | Published

699 So.2d 744, 744-45 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Section 61.30(2), Florida Statutes (1995), requires that income

Robinson v. Robinson

713 So. 2d 437, 1998 WL 288406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1998 | Docket: 2391076

Cited 6 times | Published

qualifications and prevailing earnings." See also § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). Here, the imputation

Jones v. Jones

679 So. 2d 1270, 1996 WL 531563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1996 | Docket: 1665988

Cited 6 times | Published

560 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Second, section 61.30(2)(a)13, Florida Statutes (1993), requires inclusion

Stanton v. Stanton

648 So. 2d 1233, 1995 WL 15557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 2558281

Cited 6 times | Published

net income by their combined net incomes and section 61.30(9), Florida Statutes (1991) must be used to

Martin v. Martin

616 So. 2d 158, 1993 WL 90535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1993 | Docket: 112776

Cited 6 times | Published

guideline amount would be unjust or inappropriate." § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1991). Accordingly, we reverse the

Harrison v. Harrison

573 So. 2d 1018, 1991 WL 10434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1991 | Docket: 1518709

Cited 6 times | Published

valuation of the dental practice at $45,000. Section 61.30(1)(b)2, Florida Statutes (1989) provides: (b)

Trager v. Trager

541 So. 2d 148, 1989 WL 30825

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1989 | Docket: 470487

Cited 6 times | Published

to be paid by the husband, we find no error. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), became effective after

Mitri Freiha, Former Husband v. Roula Freiha, Former Wife

197 So. 3d 606, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9899, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2016 | Docket: 3090205

Cited 5 times | Published

to re-calculate that obligation pursuant to section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), after it determines

Ivanovich v. Valladarez

190 So. 3d 1144, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6689, 2016 WL 2247951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2016 | Docket: 3060710

Cited 5 times | Published

required to determine net income based upon section 61.30, Florida Statutes, by determining ‘gross income’

Gray v. Gray

103 So. 3d 962, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21630, 2012 WL 6554552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2012 | Docket: 60227272

Cited 5 times | Published

and prevailing earnings level in the community.” § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). Here, after receiving

Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Sherman v. Daly

74 So. 3d 165, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18136, 2011 WL 5560565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 2355004

Cited 5 times | Published

statutory sections related to the issue before us. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2010), governs the calculation

Vanzant v. Vanzant

82 So. 3d 991, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794, 2011 WL 3558151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2011 | Docket: 2415174

Cited 5 times | Published

supported by competent, substantial evidence."); § 61.30(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (requiring child support to be

Yeakle v. Yeakle

12 So. 3d 884, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8670, 2009 WL 1766616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2009 | Docket: 1646915

Cited 5 times | Published

the husband's income including the alimony. See § 61.30(2), Fla. Stat. From this income, the wife will

Smith v. Smith

996 So. 2d 924, 2008 WL 5101138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2008 | Docket: 1692437

Cited 5 times | Published

with the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. See Finney v. Finney, 995

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

994 So. 2d 1157, 2008 WL 2986417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1666919

Cited 5 times | Published

Retroactive Child Support and Arrearages Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2005), grants a trial

Kaiser v. Harrison

985 So. 2d 1226, 2008 WL 2774436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2008 | Docket: 1673623

Cited 5 times | Published

his $665.70 monthly share of child support. Section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), permits the

Morris v. Swanson

940 So. 2d 1256, 2006 WL 3153255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2006 | Docket: 433542

Cited 5 times | Published

Tallahassee, for Appellee. BENTON, J. Citing section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes, Ricky E. Morris contends

Vazquez v. Vazquez

922 So. 2d 368, 2006 WL 473806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2006 | Docket: 1282643

Cited 5 times | Published

for a trial court to impute income because section 61.30(2)(b) requires the court to find only that the

Stern v. Chovnick

914 So. 2d 524, 2005 WL 3116119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 1781439

Cited 5 times | Published

husband does not challenge the award of alimony. Section 61.30(2)(a)9., Florida Statutes (2004), provides that

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

912 So. 2d 363, 2005 WL 2467051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2005 | Docket: 1648513

Cited 5 times | Published

contained in section 61.30, the child support guidelines provision, is very broad. Section 61.30(2)(a) states

Davidson v. Davidson

882 So. 2d 418, 2004 WL 1779118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2004 | Docket: 1289677

Cited 5 times | Published

income, the children's needs are $2,052.00. See § 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. (2003). The husband's responsibility

Kuttas v. Ritter

879 So. 2d 3, 2004 WL 912663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 379424

Cited 5 times | Published

be associated with the disability of a child." § 61.30(11)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (2001). Both parents agreed

Owen v. Owen

867 So. 2d 1222, 2004 WL 442869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2004 | Docket: 1386090

Cited 5 times | Published

primary custodian of the parties' minor children. Section 61.30 of the Florida Statute (2000) provides the following

Manolakos v. Manolakos

871 So. 2d 258, 2004 WL 384151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2004 | Docket: 1300726

Cited 5 times | Published

sufficient factual findings as required under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2002). While a child support

Melo v. Melo

864 So. 2d 1268, 2004 WL 231223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2004 | Docket: 1426157

Cited 5 times | Published

failing to add it to the income of appellee. See § 61.30(2)(a)(9), (3)(g), Fla. Stat. (2001). Appellant's

Christ v. Christ

854 So. 2d 244, 2003 WL 22056280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2003 | Docket: 1460108

Cited 5 times | Published

according to their financial circumstances. See § 61.30, Fla. *248 Stat. (2001); Coons v. Coons, 765 So

McDaniel v. McDaniel

835 So. 2d 1265, 2003 WL 215044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2003 | Docket: 1643535

Cited 5 times | Published

retroactive and increased child support pursuant to section 61.30(11)(c), Florida Statutes (2001); the trial court

Santiago v. Santiago

830 So. 2d 922, 2002 WL 31557488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2002 | Docket: 471360

Cited 5 times | Published

child support pursuant to section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2001). See § 61.30(11)(b)10. (providing

Davies v. Turner

802 So. 2d 1195, 2002 WL 10421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2002 | Docket: 1332875

Cited 5 times | Published

conduct further proceedings on this matter. Section 61.30(11)(a)8., Florida Statutes states that "the

Guttler v. Guttler

798 So. 2d 888, 2001 WL 1359546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 2144366

Cited 5 times | Published

per month. The court failed to properly apply section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), which provides

Sealander v. Sealander

789 So. 2d 401, 2001 WL 575166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2001 | Docket: 1325996

Cited 5 times | Published

security payments made to the child and relied on section 61.30(11)(b). See id. That section, as amended and

Vorcheimer v. Vorcheimer

780 So. 2d 1018, 2001 WL 313744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 1708810

Cited 5 times | Published

with a parental income of $5,830 is $2,134. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997). The trial court awarded the

Wallace v. DEPT. OF REV. EX REL. CUTTER

774 So. 2d 804, 2000 WL 1867643

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 1698056

Cited 5 times | Published

like those received by Mr. Wallace because section 61.30(2)(a)(8), Florida Statutes (1999), provides

Martinez v. Martinez

761 So. 2d 433, 2000 WL 690380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2000 | Docket: 1709283

Cited 5 times | Published

Stat. (1997); § 61.08(2)(g), Fla. Stat. (1997); § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); Sohacki v. Sohacki, 657

Horn v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF REV. EX REL. ABEL

752 So. 2d 687, 2000 WL 140199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2000 | Docket: 1682387

Cited 5 times | Published

adopt Horn's argument that the amendment to section 61.30(17), effected by chapter 98-397, section 11

Johns v. Richards

717 So. 2d 1103, 1998 WL 646681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 1277336

Cited 5 times | Published

find, instead, that this case is controlled by section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (1997), which became effective

Cifrian v. Cifrian

715 So. 2d 1068, 1998 WL 438808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1998 | Docket: 1717098

Cited 5 times | Published

statutory guidelines and the reasonableness test. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995); Canakaris v. Canakaris

Holmes v. Holmes

709 So. 2d 166, 1998 WL 135123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 1279412

Cited 5 times | Published

relevant factor justifying departure under section 61.30(11)(a)-(k). See Reynolds v. Reynolds, 668 So

Knight v. Knight

702 So. 2d 242, 1997 WL 715590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1997 | Docket: 460230

Cited 5 times | Published

substantial change of his circumstances was section 61.30(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides:

Brock v. Brock

695 So. 2d 744, 1997 WL 91453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 1522086

Cited 5 times | Published

testimony nor made findings consonant with section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, to support a finding

Schellhammer v. Schellhammer

687 So. 2d 987, 1997 WL 70881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1997 | Docket: 2535983

Cited 5 times | Published

exceeds the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995), because the trial

Flanagan v. Flanagan

673 So. 2d 894, 1996 WL 220555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1996 | Docket: 1245936

Cited 5 times | Published

pay 39% of the amount, or $481.26 per month. See § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1993). In her first issue on appeal

Matthews v. Matthews

677 So. 2d 323, 1996 WL 191046

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1996 | Docket: 1690135

Cited 5 times | Published

award, the mother relies on the amendment to section 61.30(1)(b), Florida Statutes, Ch. 92-138, § 11, at

Savery v. Savery

670 So. 2d 1034, 1996 WL 93924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1996 | Docket: 171104

Cited 5 times | Published

trial court follow the guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993); and that it make a

Kelley v. Kelley

656 So. 2d 1343, 1995 WL 358087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1995 | Docket: 1283398

Cited 5 times | Published

Whight, 635 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (holding § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1993), remedial child support guidelines

Hutslar v. Lappin

652 So. 2d 432, 1995 WL 111467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1995 | Docket: 144846

Cited 5 times | Published

computing temporary child support pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The issue for resolution

Dehler v. Dehler

648 So. 2d 819, 1995 WL 1661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1995 | Docket: 1701960

Cited 5 times | Published

address the amount of child support. Pursuant to section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), the child support

DEPT. OF H & R SERV. v. Beckwith

624 So. 2d 395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1993 | Docket: 475732

Cited 5 times | Published

when one of the children attains majority. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991) indicates that departures

Burkhart v. Burkhart

620 So. 2d 225, 1993 WL 199446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1993 | Docket: 517944

Cited 5 times | Published

presumptive amount to be ordered as child support. See § 61.30(1)(a), (6), (10), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992). On the

Short v. Short

577 So. 2d 723, 1991 WL 53561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1991 | Docket: 458357

Cited 5 times | Published

additional children by his subsequent marriage. Section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), specifically

Huff v. Huff

556 So. 2d 537, 1990 WL 13347

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1990 | Docket: 542997

Cited 5 times | Published

inadequate under the guidelines amount suggested by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987). Pursuant to court

Pope v. Langowski

115 So. 3d 1076, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9624, 2013 WL 3014113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232080

Cited 4 times | Published

2d 432, 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (construing section 61.30(11)(a)11. “as vesting broad discretion in the

D.J.S. v. W.R.R.

99 So. 3d 991, 2012 WL 5233621, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2012 | Docket: 60313331

Cited 4 times | Published

child support pursuant to the guidelines in section 61.30. § 742.031(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). As to jurisdiction

Hentze v. Denys

88 So. 3d 307, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6770, 2012 WL 1514444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2012 | Docket: 60308229

Cited 4 times | Published

DeBacher, 867 So.2d 404, 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that

Nabinger v. Nabinger

82 So. 3d 1075, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20898, 2011 WL 6851182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 1935623

Cited 4 times | Published

incomes to arrive at the guidelines amount set by section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The trial court then adjusted

In Re Implementation of Committee on Privacy & Court Records Recommendations—Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

78 So. 3d 1045, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 3030, 2011 WL 5829543

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2011 | Docket: 1227055

Cited 4 times | Published

determined by Florida's child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

Castillo v. Castillo

59 So. 3d 221, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3903, 2011 WL 1007377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2011 | Docket: 2361625

Cited 4 times | Published

“gross income” for child support purposes, section 61.30(2)(a)(13), Florida Statutes (2009), provides

McCall v. Martin

34 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5281, 2010 WL 1560913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2010 | Docket: 1128823

Cited 4 times | Published

current income or assets while imprisoned. Section 61.30(2)(b)[1] governs the imputation of income for

McCall v. Martin

34 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5281, 2010 WL 1560913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2010 | Docket: 1128823

Cited 4 times | Published

current income or assets while imprisoned. Section 61.30(2)(b)[1] governs the imputation of income for

Drew v. Drew

27 So. 3d 802, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1800, 2010 WL 569849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2010 | Docket: 1275896

Cited 4 times | Published

account in determining his income, we reverse. Section 61.30(2), Florida Statutes (2007), requires trial

Armour v. McMiller

15 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10977, 2009 WL 2407680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2009 | Docket: 1661002

Cited 4 times | Published

determine the net income of each parent pursuant to section 61.30, and to include findings in the final judgment

In Re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules

995 So. 2d 445, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 840, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1975, 2008 WL 4587208

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2008 | Docket: 472157

Cited 4 times | Published

defined there. For further information, see section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Special notes ... If this

Strassner v. Strassner

982 So. 2d 1224, 2008 WL 2167844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2008 | Docket: 1664740

Cited 4 times | Published

retroactive child support is appropriate. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); see also Stebbins v.

Storey v. Storey

979 So. 2d 1057, 2008 WL 782860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 2537925

Cited 4 times | Published

recalculated in light of the amended alimony amount. See § 61.30(2)(a)(9), Fla. Stat. (2005); Cornett v. Cornett

Wamsley v. Wamsley

957 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 1373764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2007 | Docket: 1679362

Cited 4 times | Published

noncustodial parent is current in support payments." § 61.30(11)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (2005). The trial court cannot

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

958 So. 2d 436, 2007 WL 1262528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 1734962

Cited 4 times | Published

find that the husband is not entitled to a section 61.30(11)(b) credit because his counsel stipulated

Murphy v. Murphy

948 So. 2d 864, 2007 WL 283036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2007 | Docket: 1769923

Cited 4 times | Published

child support shall be recalculated pursuant to F.S. 61.30 effective upon the expiration of alimony as contained

Swain v. Swain

932 So. 2d 1214, 2006 WL 1835101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2006 | Docket: 1684678

Cited 4 times | Published

Andrews, 867 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003). The amount imputed must

Alich v. Clapp

926 So. 2d 467, 2006 WL 1006876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2006 | Docket: 467084

Cited 4 times | Published

what level of income to impute to a parent. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Wendel v. Wendel, 852

Alich v. Clapp

926 So. 2d 467, 2006 WL 1006876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2006 | Docket: 467084

Cited 4 times | Published

what level of income to impute to a parent. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Wendel v. Wendel, 852

Perez v. Perez

882 So. 2d 537, 2004 WL 2101985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2004 | Docket: 1686308

Cited 4 times | Published

will alter the child support calculation. See § 61.30(3)(g), Fla. Stat. (2003). Under the facts of this

Jacobs v. Jacobs

868 So. 2d 568, 2004 WL 305730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2004 | Docket: 231634

Cited 4 times | Published

should not be included in his available income. See § 61.30(2)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (1999). We agree with the trial

Department of Revenue v. Hinnerschietz

850 So. 2d 625, 2003 WL 21697052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2003 | Docket: 1783781

Cited 4 times | Published

the extent that they reduce living expenses." § 61.30(2)(a)13, Fla. Stat. (2002). After a review of the

Newberry v. Newberry

831 So. 2d 749, 2002 WL 31525290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1722832

Cited 4 times | Published

So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Furthermore, section 61.30 is premised on the concept that the amount of

Miller v. Miller

826 So. 2d 480, 2002 WL 31094135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2002 | Docket: 1662901

Cited 4 times | Published

allocation "is needed to achieve an equitable result." § 61.30(11)(k), Fla. Stat. (1997). See Coons v. Coons,

Rainsberger v. Rainsberger

819 So. 2d 275, 2002 WL 1396040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2002 | Docket: 1494259

Cited 4 times | Published

entitled to an offset under the amended version of section 61.30, Florida Statutes, which became effective on

Meighen v. Meighen

813 So. 2d 173, 2002 WL 429065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1725752

Cited 4 times | Published

its discretion when it imputed income to her. Section 61.30(2)(b) provides that income "shall" be imputed

Penalver v. Columbo

810 So. 2d 563, 2002 WL 449068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2002 | Docket: 1654783

Cited 4 times | Published

payments for his daughter's health insurance under section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2000). But it did not

Pribble v. Pribble

800 So. 2d 743, 2001 WL 1589218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2001 | Docket: 1283308

Cited 4 times | Published

Normally, according to the plain language of section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, the only finding required

Gore v. Peck

800 So. 2d 273, 2001 WL 1205377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2001 | Docket: 1683602

Cited 4 times | Published

together since prior to the birth of the child. Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes *275 (1999), provides

Green v. Green

788 So. 2d 1083, 2001 WL 640730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2001 | Docket: 1286647

Cited 4 times | Published

award in determining the child support award. Section 61.30(3)(g), Florida Statutes (1997), permits the

Allen v. Allen

787 So. 2d 215, 2001 WL 523377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2001 | Docket: 1745008

Cited 4 times | Published

income to the former wife on these facts. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1999). Accordingly, the order

Douglas v. Douglas

795 So. 2d 99, 2001 WL 227366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2001 | Docket: 1150922

Cited 4 times | Published

the parties' respective incomes pursuant to section 61.30, the child support guidelines. Under the guidelines

Zucker v. Zucker

774 So. 2d 890, 2001 WL 6183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2001 | Docket: 1698055

Cited 4 times | Published

reduced by his alimony obligation to the wife. § 61.30(2)(a)9., (3)(g), Fla.Stat. (1996). A trial court

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure & Family Law Forms

810 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2272, 2000 WL 1352932

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2000 | Docket: 64813197

Cited 4 times | Published

determined by Florida’s child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

Coons v. Coons

765 So. 2d 167, 2000 WL 889843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2000 | Docket: 428757

Cited 4 times | Published

accordance with their financial means" according to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1997). See id. at 667; Willey

Gallinar v. Gallinar

763 So. 2d 447, 2000 WL 763120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2000 | Docket: 1681820

Cited 4 times | Published

based on her alimony and disability income. See § 61.30(2)(a)4, 9, Fla. Stat. (1997)(income includes disability

McMillian v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE

746 So. 2d 1234, 1999 WL 1260013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 1360712

Cited 4 times | Published

issue is whether the July 1, 1998, amendment to section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes, is remedial and thus

Bardol v. Martin

763 So. 2d 1119, 1999 WL 1243870

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 1278234

Cited 4 times | Published

1980). Recently, the legislature has added section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (1997), regarding retroactive

Knight v. Knight

746 So. 2d 1117, 1999 WL 816975

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1999 | Docket: 1714971

Cited 4 times | Published

Menditto, 644 So.2d 135, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), provides for

Cole v. Cole

723 So. 2d 925, 1999 WL 9791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1999 | Docket: 1319781

Cited 4 times | Published

(Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Second, the provisions of section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995),[4] are broad

Fisher v. Fisher

722 So. 2d 243, 1998 WL 846072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 1241414

Cited 4 times | Published

guideline amount would be unjust or inappropriate. See § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). When ruling on a petition

Bromson v. Department of Revenue

710 So. 2d 154, 1998 WL 186834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1998 | Docket: 1444347

Cited 4 times | Published

of fact required for "imputed" income. Under section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), in order to

Vanbrussel v. Vanbrussel

710 So. 2d 170, 1998 WL 187467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1998 | Docket: 1445193

Cited 4 times | Published

supported with the appropriate findings required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Wood, 632 So.2d at 721. See

Widder v. Widder

673 So. 2d 954, 1996 WL 271566

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1996 | Docket: 1671401

Cited 4 times | Published

required to pay as per the final judgment and section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991). The trial court's

Silberman v. Silberman

670 So. 2d 1109, 1996 WL 134760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1996 | Docket: 2585259

Cited 4 times | Published

best of his or her potential, as set forth in Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995). The father was

Copeland v. Copeland

667 So. 2d 487, 1996 WL 44716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1996 | Docket: 1511501

Cited 4 times | Published

calculating child support, as authorized by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991). The language of 61

Lewis v. Lewis

665 So. 2d 322, 1995 WL 749630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1995 | Docket: 1351802

Cited 4 times | Published

only if that spouse's unemployment is voluntary. § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1993). Therefore, the trial court

Boyt v. Romanow

664 So. 2d 995, 1995 WL 594348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1995 | Docket: 1655903

Cited 4 times | Published

mandated by the child support guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), the trial court determined

Stewmon v. Stewmon

654 So. 2d 259, 1995 WL 244194

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1995 | Docket: 1710347

Cited 4 times | Published

affidavit dated April 1993, $1,213.00. Pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), the child support

Riley v. Parker

624 So. 2d 828, 1993 WL 383471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1993 | Docket: 170140

Cited 4 times | Published

this case" is insufficient as a matter of law. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). We vacate the order and

Bryant v. Bryant

621 So. 2d 574, 1993 WL 274430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1993 | Docket: 1265273

Cited 4 times | Published

income for the calculation of child support. Section 61.30(2)(a)5, Fla. Stat. (1991). It is clear that

Braman v. Braman

602 So. 2d 682, 1992 WL 164088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1992 | Docket: 1321466

Cited 4 times | Published

the trial court is empowered, pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), to attribute

Lewis v. Lewis

569 So. 2d 1342, 1990 WL 175080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1990 | Docket: 1660593

Cited 4 times | Published

directing Wife to pay child support. According to section 61.30(2)(b) of the Child Support Guidelines, income

Leone v. Leone

577 So. 2d 587, 1990 WL 154793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1990 | Docket: 1654206

Cited 4 times | Published

that the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), do not apply to this

MICHAEL LENNON v. SIMONE LENNON

264 So. 3d 1084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2019 | Docket: 14530835

Cited 3 times | Published

under certain circumstances. Id. § 152(e)(1)-(3); § 61.30(11)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (2016); Alston v. Vazquez

Ted K. Brown, former husband v. Valerie Hays Brown, Former Wife

180 So. 3d 1070

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2015 | Docket: 3014835

Cited 3 times | Published

provided under the guidelines of at least 15%. § 61.30(l)(b), Fla. Stat. In declining to modify the

Department of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M.

127 So. 3d 859, 2013 WL 6246168, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2013 | Docket: 60236900

Cited 3 times | Published

would lower his child support obligation, see § 61.30(ll)(a)(10), he was not doing so, in the child’s

B.K. v. S.D.C.

122 So. 3d 980, 2013 WL 5576097, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234833

Cited 3 times | Published

circuit court’s imputation of income to him under section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), and calculation

El-Hajji v. El-Hajji

67 So. 3d 256, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17634, 2010 WL 4628581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2010 | Docket: 60302082

Cited 3 times | Published

exemption for the child between the parties because section 61.30(ll)(a)(8), Florida Statutes (2008), does not

Martinez v. ABINADER

37 So. 3d 944, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8239, 2010 WL 2330252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2010 | Docket: 1668677

Cited 3 times | Published

child support payments that he actually made. See § 61.30(2)(a), (17); Mitchell v. Mitchell, 841 So.2d 564

Amendments to Approved Family Law Forms

20 So. 3d 173

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2009 | Docket: 751733

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida's child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

In re Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

20 So. 3d 173, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 298, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 785, 2009 WL 775400

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2009 | Docket: 60294181

Cited 3 times | Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Kelley v. Kelley

987 So. 2d 1246, 2008 WL 3539514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2008 | Docket: 1393225

Cited 3 times | Published

the trial court were not in conformity with Section 61.30 Florida Statutes and Devereaux v. Devereaux

Ogando v. Munoz

962 So. 2d 957, 2007 WL 2119040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2007 | Docket: 1519220

Cited 3 times | Published

not directly address the current situation. Section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2006), allows a deduction

Martinez v. Martinez

911 So. 2d 288, 2005 WL 2398538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2005 | Docket: 1751861

Cited 3 times | Published

federal income taxes paid on the alimony award. See § 61.30(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003); Weiser v. Weiser, 782

Harwood v. Li

909 So. 2d 396, 2005 WL 1875528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2005 | Docket: 1663107

Cited 3 times | Published

cannot, as a matter of law, retroactively apply section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2003), which mandates

Harbus v. Harbus

874 So. 2d 1230, 2004 WL 1161717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2004 | Docket: 1473667

Cited 3 times | Published

So.2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2003), *1231 [i]ncome

Cameron v. Dickey

871 So. 2d 1022, 2004 WL 912373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 1300744

Cited 3 times | Published

court imputes the income to him as required by § 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Cameron's total child

Niemann v. Anderson

834 So. 2d 319, 2003 WL 19937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2003 | Docket: 1697497

Cited 3 times | Published

reaching this amount, the court was applying section 61.30(11)(b) (even though the total number of overnight

Cerra v. Cerra

820 So. 2d 398, 2002 WL 1085962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 1715659

Cited 3 times | Published

the prevailing earnings level in the community." § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000).[3]See Smith v. Smith

Benardo v. DOR EX REL. REILLY

819 So. 2d 161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 1496301

Cited 3 times | Published

the provision of child support pursuant to section 61.30 pending an administrative or judicial determination

Miles v. Champlin

805 So. 2d 1085, 2002 WL 126186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2002 | Docket: 1669536

Cited 3 times | Published

which included a child care cost component. See § 61.30(7), Fla. Stat. (1993). Ms. Miles now appeals a

Town v. Town

801 So. 2d 324, 2001 WL 1616510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 1744786

Cited 3 times | Published

imputing income to Former Husband pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse

Austin v. Austin

785 So. 2d 528, 2001 WL 37806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 1510168

Cited 3 times | Published

ordered to recalculate the child support award. See § 61.30(2)(a)(9), Fla.Stat. (1999). The remaining issues

Swanston v. Swanston

746 So. 2d 566, 1999 WL 1261832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1999 | Docket: 2542941

Cited 3 times | Published

from the child support guidelines set out in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1997), without an adequate

Bellville v. Bellville

763 So. 2d 1076, 1999 WL 817884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1999 | Docket: 1681741

Cited 3 times | Published

award could be made retroactive. Finding that section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (1997), did not apply

Gomez v. Gomez

736 So. 2d 119, 1999 WL 414973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1999 | Docket: 128641

Cited 3 times | Published

child. In reaching our decision, we rely on section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which provides

Gomez v. Gomez

727 So. 2d 1092, 1999 WL 105217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1999 | Docket: 1729990

Cited 3 times | Published

contention that the judgment runs afoul of section 61.30(1)(a) and (11)(g), Florida Statutes (1997),

Pollow v. Pollow

712 So. 2d 1235, 1998 WL 347106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 1737182

Cited 3 times | Published

increase that amount by 5% without written reasons. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). With the 5% increase

Clayton v. Lloyd

707 So. 2d 407, 1998 WL 116297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 1675785

Cited 3 times | Published

would support its decision to impute income. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), provides: Income

Pohlmann v. Pohlmann

703 So. 2d 1121, 1997 WL 710302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1997 | Docket: 1349165

Cited 3 times | Published

decrease in an existing award. (Emphasis added). Section 61.30(12) prescribes a preference for a child under

Singleton v. Singleton

696 So. 2d 1338, 1997 WL 408753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 1325874

Cited 3 times | Published

he lived at the time of the final hearing. Section 61.30(2)(a)13, Florida Statutes (1995), pertaining

O'BRIEN v. Crumley

695 So. 2d 881, 1997 WL 336592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1997 | Docket: 424978

Cited 3 times | Published

needs to be considered by the trial court and section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), requires a written

Milopoulos v. Milopoulos

691 So. 2d 1199, 1997 WL 194731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 1423091

Cited 3 times | Published

circumstances do not meet the requirements of section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (1993), which provides:

Miller-Bent v. Miller-Bent

680 So. 2d 1119, 1996 WL 587863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1996 | Docket: 1201291

Cited 3 times | Published

are dealt with in two separate portions of section 61.30, Florida Statutes. In computing income available

STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Cain

675 So. 2d 679, 1996 WL 332372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1996 | Docket: 1694430

Cited 3 times | Published

petitions for modification of child support. See § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. The trial court is permitted

Hice v. Pace

675 So. 2d 952, 1996 WL 168615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1996 | Docket: 1322685

Cited 3 times | Published

permanent child support in accordance with section 61.30; (2) to pay retroactive child support; (3) to

Whitcomb v. Whitcomb

669 So. 2d 309, 1996 WL 98870

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1996 | Docket: 530516

Cited 3 times | Published

of the marital settlement agreement. Under section 61.30(13), Florida Statutes (1993), a court may, if

Hardy v. Hardy

659 So. 2d 1246, 1995 WL 504836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1995 | Docket: 1747995

Cited 3 times | Published

calculations based on the formula specified in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The parties differed, however

Parker v. Parker

655 So. 2d 233, 1995 WL 331443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1995 | Docket: 1327236

Cited 3 times | Published

child as a dependent for income tax purposes. See § 61.30(11)(i), Fla. Stat. (1993). Accordingly, we affirm

Richards v. Ryan

655 So. 2d 1184, 1995 WL 293680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1995 | Docket: 1326949

Cited 3 times | Published

mandate a more generous retroactive award. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1993) (child support guidelines).

Wood v. Wood

632 So. 2d 720, 1994 WL 64935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1994 | Docket: 2547274

Cited 3 times | Published

appropriate findings, as specifically required by section 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1991). Neal v. Meek, 591 So.2d

Wiedman v. Wiedman

610 So. 2d 681, 1992 WL 371557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1992 | Docket: 1413429

Cited 3 times | Published

child support in a dissolution case pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b). We upheld the trial court's refusal to

Silver v. Borrelli

584 So. 2d 1077, 1991 WL 147531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 1515249

Cited 3 times | Published

the figure for two children would be $1,763. Section 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1991). The wife's net

Martinez v. Garcia

575 So. 2d 1365, 1991 WL 31835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1991 | Docket: 1731167

Cited 3 times | Published

proceeding arises under this or another chapter." § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1989). The guidelines apply in "[a]ny

Hillman v. Hillman

567 So. 2d 1066, 1990 WL 152193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1990 | Docket: 1380477

Cited 3 times | Published

Jason pursuant to the child support guidelines. § 61.30 Fla. Stat. (1987).[1] The lower court conducted

Hinshelwood v. Hinshelwood

564 So. 2d 141, 1990 WL 74059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1990 | Docket: 1294479

Cited 3 times | Published

the support of her own children.[3] NOTES [1] § 61.30(1)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (1989). [2] Although Bruce's

Mulford v. Sullivan

560 So. 2d 1364, 1990 WL 61944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1990 | Docket: 1739537

Cited 3 times | Published

the trial court determined was required by Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), and half of Mulford's

Mulford v. Sullivan

560 So. 2d 1364, 1990 WL 61944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1990 | Docket: 1739537

Cited 3 times | Published

the trial court determined was required by Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), and half of Mulford's

Reed v. Reed

541 So. 2d 755, 1989 WL 34513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1989 | Docket: 1516526

Cited 3 times | Published

that the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1987), effective July 1, 1987,

Gregory Rawson, Former Husband v. Lisa L. Rawson, Former Wife

264 So. 3d 325

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533672

Cited 2 times | Published

the child support guidelines as set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. In her second point

M.M. v. J.H.

251 So. 3d 970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2018 | Docket: 64685452

Cited 2 times | Published

not set forth how these amounts were derived. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2017), provides guidelines

Ness v. Martinez

249 So. 3d 754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 64683355

Cited 2 times | Published

So.3d 991, 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; see also § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (providing for calculation of child

Crystal Lancaster v. Erik S. Lancaster

228 So. 3d 1197, 2017 WL 5076892

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2017 | Docket: 6217565

Cited 2 times | Published

The statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, are the starting point for

CALVIN CALLWOOD v. TOLEATHA CALLWOOD

221 So. 3d 1198

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2017 | Docket: 6085994

Cited 2 times | Published

the extent that they reduce- living expenses.” § 61.30(2)(a)13., Fla. Stat. (2016). “Specific dollar values

Gaut v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program

220 So. 3d 552, 2017 WL 2484963, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2017 | Docket: 6071534

Cited 2 times | Published

32 So.3d 777, 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); see also § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). Therefore, we affirm

Ziruolo v. Ziruolo

217 So. 3d 1170, 2017 WL 1536066, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2017 | Docket: 60265637

Cited 2 times | Published

owes by utilizing the guidelines set forth in § 61.30, Florida Statutes. Because the trial court failed

Garcia-Lawson v. Lawson

211 So. 3d 137, 2017 WL 514336, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2017 | Docket: 60262541

Cited 2 times | Published

or is otherwise agreed to by the parties.”); § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“In an initial determination

Dickson v. Dickson

204 So. 3d 498, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2016 | Docket: 63630608

Cited 2 times | Published

considering an award of retroactive child support. Section 61.30(17),-Florida Statutes (2013), provides the following

Tluzek v. Tluzek

179 So. 3d 455, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17005, 2015 WL 7017418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2015 | Docket: 60251759

Cited 2 times | Published

to the child support guidelines codified at section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2014), the court used the

Department of Revenue Ex Rel. K.A.N. v. A.N.J.

165 So. 3d 846, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8762, 2015 WL 3609459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2663359

Cited 2 times | Published

parent was actually paying the amount ordered. § 61,30(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (20Í2); Dep’t of Revenue

Moore v. Moore

157 So. 3d 435, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1577, 2015 WL 484050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2015 | Docket: 2633535

Cited 2 times | Published

attributable to a parent in computing child support, section 61.30(2)(a), defines “gross income” to include “[b]usiness

Ervin v. Florida Department of Revenue

152 So. 3d 1261, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20725, 2014 WL 7243144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2014 | Docket: 60244719

Cited 2 times | Published

subject to the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes.” Id. (citing Kareff v. Kareff

James E. Ballard, Husband v. Melissa G. Ballard, Wife

158 So. 3d 641, 2014 WL 3865835, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2014 | Docket: 836394

Cited 2 times | Published

obligation without imputing income to him. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that

Marlowe v. Marlowe

123 So. 3d 1194, 2013 WL 5832530, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2013 | Docket: 60234900

Cited 2 times | Published

income to her; (2) the Final Judgment violates section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (2012); (3) the revised

Hoffman v. Hoffman

98 So. 3d 196, 2012 WL 4220737, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2012 | Docket: 60312206

Cited 2 times | Published

necessary to reach a monthly income of $3000. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009); Bator v. Osborne, 983

Walters v. Walters

96 So. 3d 972, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13207, 2012 WL 3192752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2012 | Docket: 60311611

Cited 2 times | Published

toward his child support obligation, pursuant to section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes. The trial court denied

C.J.E. v. S.D.A.

79 So. 3d 229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2012 | Docket: 60305269

Cited 2 times | Published

paternity action to set child support pursuant to section 61.30). When calculating the basic child support obligation

Tummings v. Francois

82 So. 3d 955, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12556, 2011 WL 3477165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2011 | Docket: 60306307

Cited 2 times | Published

79% and the husband’s percentage was 20.21%. Section 61.30(8) provides that “any noncovered medical, dental

Finch v. Department of Revenue

65 So. 3d 1150, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11374, 2011 WL 2848630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2011 | Docket: 2360997

Cited 2 times | Published

actual income during the retroactive period. See § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing that the "[f]ailure

Nilsen v. Nilsen

63 So. 3d 850, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8412, 2011 WL 2201181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 60301178

Cited 2 times | Published

it does not comply with the requirement of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2010), that a trial court

Chaney v. Fife

18 So. 3d 44, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13356, 2009 WL 2877633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2009 | Docket: 60252119

Cited 2 times | Published

from each party’s gross monthly income. Id.; § 61.30(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). In this case, there is

Calero v. Calero

996 So. 2d 244, 2008 WL 5156678

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2008 | Docket: 1692594

Cited 2 times | Published

father's claim regarding child care costs. Section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes, provides, in relevant

Martland v. Arabia

987 So. 2d 118, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2008 | Docket: 1723783

Cited 2 times | Published

set forth in the child support guideline. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (2007). The child support guideline

Trespalacios v. Trespalacios

978 So. 2d 858, 2008 WL 942040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2008 | Docket: 1508724

Cited 2 times | Published

section 61.046(7) or `business income' under section 61.30(2)(a)(3).") The trial court concluded that a

Voronin v. VORONINA

975 So. 2d 1228, 2008 WL 649201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 1421978

Cited 2 times | Published

visitation with the Husband as required by section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes (2006). We are inclined

Voronin v. VORONINA

975 So. 2d 1228, 2008 WL 649201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 1421978

Cited 2 times | Published

visitation with the Husband as required by section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes (2006). We are inclined

Burnstine v. Townley

976 So. 2d 624, 2008 WL 536633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2008 | Docket: 1680020

Cited 2 times | Published

him for purposes of calculating child support. § 61.30(2)(a)13., Fla. Stat. (2006); Layeni v. Layeni,

Matias v. Matias

948 So. 2d 1021, 2007 WL 542114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2007 | Docket: 1764118

Cited 2 times | Published

make a proper child support calculation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2005), was, in part, overlooked

In Re Amendments to Rules of Juvenile Proc.

951 So. 2d 804, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 87, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 245, 2007 WL 415377

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2007 | Docket: 1280790

Cited 2 times | Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The parents shall pay child

Hicks v. Hicks

948 So. 2d 63, 2007 WL 74120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2007 | Docket: 1773489

Cited 2 times | Published

obligation based upon the guidelines set forth in section 61.30 of the Florida Statutes (2005). He further argues

Roca v. Roca

937 So. 2d 736, 2006 WL 2519714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2006 | Docket: 1513187

Cited 2 times | Published

to seek the mandatory reduction set forth in section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes. We reject the husband's

Nadrich v. Nadrich

936 So. 2d 15, 2006 WL 1627807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 1162113

Cited 2 times | Published

his forty-six percent overnights timesharing. Section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2001), states that

Buhler v. Buhler

913 So. 2d 767, 2005 WL 3001881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2005 | Docket: 1698412

Cited 2 times | Published

reduced his support obligation pursuant to section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2003), because he

Matthews v. Montgomery-Matthews

913 So. 2d 1201, 2005 WL 2508756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2005 | Docket: 2582045

Cited 2 times | Published

is within the discretion of the trial court, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, provides the statutory formula

Pike v. Pike

932 So. 2d 229, 2005 WL 2138758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2005 | Docket: 187308

Cited 2 times | Published

income, determine the amount of child support. § 61.30(2)(a)9, Fla. Stat. (2004). Cornett v. Cornett,

Cheverie v. Cheverie

898 So. 2d 1028, 2005 WL 562658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2005 | Docket: 1448830

Cited 2 times | Published

for review the trial court's application of section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), which concerns

Cheverie v. Cheverie

898 So. 2d 1028, 2005 WL 562658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2005 | Docket: 1448830

Cited 2 times | Published

for review the trial court's application of section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), which concerns

Herrera v. Herrera

895 So. 2d 1171, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 1255091

Cited 2 times | Published

the other spouse absent a finding pursuant to section 61.30(13), Florida Statutes (2002), that the non-custodial

Garone v. Goller

878 So. 2d 430, 2004 WL 1506152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 1353508

Cited 2 times | Published

278, 284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Additionally, section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes permits a court to deviate

Young v. Taubman

855 So. 2d 184, 2003 WL 22082178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2003 | Docket: 1752506

Cited 2 times | Published

refused to impute income to the former wife. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, governs the imputation

Krufal v. Jorgensen

830 So. 2d 228, 2002 WL 31507244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 471425

Cited 2 times | Published

1986)(Sharp, J., dissenting). The father argues that section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2001), our child support

Ford v. Ford

816 So. 2d 1193, 2002 WL 1021444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 1560000

Cited 2 times | Published

income into account as provided pursuant to Section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes, the Husband's child

Migliore v. Migliore

792 So. 2d 1276, 2001 WL 1008136

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 1416473

Cited 2 times | Published

the child support guidelines contained within section 61.30, Florida Statutes. This constitutes error. On

Cole v. Cole

792 So. 2d 605, 2001 WL 912732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2001 | Docket: 1366549

Cited 2 times | Published

Jones takes into account the requirements of section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), and the circumstances

McGhee v. Childress

724 So. 2d 196, 1999 WL 29161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 1409860

Cited 2 times | Published

amount of the appellee's obligation. Pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes, the appellee's support obligation

Stelk v. Stelk

699 So. 2d 811, 1997 WL 590084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1997 | Docket: 1472161

Cited 2 times | Published

in calculating the child support obligation. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), requires imputation

Ledbetter v. Bell

698 So. 2d 1272, 1997 WL 461177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1997 | Docket: 434100

Cited 2 times | Published

"voluntary" within the meaning of Florida Statutes Section 61.30.[1] That statutory provision allows the trial

Turner v. Turner

695 So. 2d 422, 1997 WL 268488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1997 | Docket: 425127

Cited 2 times | Published

concluded that "[t]he provisions of Florida Statute § 61.30 1(b) have been met."[1] The circuit court judge

Abdella v. Abdella

693 So. 2d 637, 1997 WL 193949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 1524357

Cited 2 times | Published

demonstrated that a spouse is voluntary unemployed. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995); Chapoteau v. Chapoteau

Finley v. Scott

687 So. 2d 338, 1997 WL 63671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Docket: 1718422

Cited 2 times | Published

contends that under this principle, and under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, as amended in 1993, she (on

Honeycutt v. Honeycutt

669 So. 2d 1098, 1996 WL 111763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1996 | Docket: 530078

Cited 2 times | Published

figure found in section 61.30 shall be supported by a specific finding. See § 61.30(1)(a), Fla.Stat.

Rosen v. Rosen

655 So. 2d 153, 1995 WL 254362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1995 | Docket: 1696902

Cited 2 times | Published

1992), cause dismissed, 617 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1993); § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993). On remand, the trial

Fast v. Fast

654 So. 2d 958, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1995 | Docket: 1710387

Cited 2 times | Published

included in the calculation of each party's income. § 61.30(2)(a)10, Fla. Stat. (1991). This reference in the

Jarrell v. Jarrell

630 So. 2d 626, 1994 WL 1512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1994 | Docket: 481271

Cited 2 times | Published

error on the part of the trial judge, because section 61.30(9), Florida Statutes (1991) provides that "Each

Zak v. Zak

629 So. 2d 187, 1993 WL 452221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1993 | Docket: 1264388

Cited 2 times | Published

husband's percentage of support, pursuant to section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (1991), should have been

STATE, DHRS v. Davis

616 So. 2d 1207, 1993 WL 125114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1993 | Docket: 1392474

Cited 2 times | Published

the child support guidelines established in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991). The father answered

Edwards v. Edwards

615 So. 2d 178, 1993 WL 52964

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1993 | Docket: 1658858

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Child support guidelines section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991) provides: (b)

Edwards v. Edwards

615 So. 2d 178, 1993 WL 52964

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1993 | Docket: 1658858

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Child support guidelines section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991) provides: (b)

STATE, DEPT. OF H & R SERVICES v. Bush

614 So. 2d 32, 1993 WL 40473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1993 | Docket: 1371790

Cited 2 times | Published

to his reasons for doing so, as required by section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). Accordingly

Huffman v. Huffman

596 So. 2d 718, 1992 WL 51239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1992 | Docket: 1707340

Cited 2 times | Published

upon child support guidelines contained in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987). The final judgment

Waldon v. Johnson

561 So. 2d 1342, 1990 WL 72514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1990 | Docket: 1740312

Cited 2 times | Published

of the child support guidelines mandated by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989), which have been made

Mosbarger v. Mosbarger

547 So. 2d 188, 1989 WL 84315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1989 | Docket: 1738642

Cited 2 times | Published

illness, except for the criminal sentence. Cf. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987) (income imputable for

J.A.D. v. K.M.A.

264 So. 3d 1080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2019 | Docket: 64705102

Cited 1 times | Published

addition. We will address each argument in turn. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016), establishes a guidelines

Sean Patrick Mahoney v. Virginia Colby Mahoney

251 So. 3d 977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 7387545

Cited 1 times | Published

5% from the guideline amount as required by section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016). The former husband’s

Esad Kurtanovic, Husband v. Zineta Kurtanovic, Wife

248 So. 3d 247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2018 | Docket: 6915080

Cited 1 times | Published

Smith, 737 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), states in relevant

Crespo v. Lebron

240 So. 3d 888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2018 | Docket: 6356444

Cited 1 times | Published

losses by competent, substantial evidence. See § 61.30(2)(a)3, Fla. Stat. (2014) (defining “business income”

NANCY B. HUA v. DENNIS H.L. TSUNG

222 So. 3d 584, 2017 WL 2858897, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2017 | Docket: 6085983

Cited 1 times | Published

determining whether to award attorney’s fees); § 61.30(ll)(a)7. Fla. Stat. (2014) (allowing deviation

Rorrer F/K/A Orban v. Orban

215 So. 3d 148, 2017 WL 1177588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2017 | Docket: 4658146

Cited 1 times | Published

quired to pay as per the final judgment and section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991).... While we are

Knight v. Knight

208 So. 3d 1278, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2017 | Docket: 60258184

Cited 1 times | Published

deviate from the guidelines, irrespective of section 61.30(ll)(b). That is true as a general matter, but

Golson v. Golson

207 So. 3d 321, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 4544024

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida’s child support guideline statute, section § 61.30. However, at trial, both parties testified

Gross v. Zimmerman

197 So. 3d 1248, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12070, 2016 WL 4205345

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 60256186

Cited 1 times | Published

of child support to be awarded begins with section 61.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes, which provides, in

Back v. Back

197 So. 3d 132, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175, 2016 WL 3946806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2016 | Docket: 4113238

Cited 1 times | Published

unemployed, imputing income is error. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012) (providing that income

Desmond D. Dillion v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program

189 So. 3d 353, 2016 WL 1688579, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2016 | Docket: 3062297

Cited 1 times | Published

n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); see also § 61.30(11)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). When the Father

Ceilia Abramovic v. Dan Abramovic

188 So. 3d 61, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2016 | Docket: 3046952

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 1166, 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). “Section 61.30(11)^X8), authorize[s] the circuit court to consider

Quinn v. Quinn

169 So. 3d 268, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10488, 2015 WL 4154179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679105

Cited 1 times | Published

support should be adjusted as set forth in section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), requiring calculation

Howard Elias v. Cindy Elias

168 So. 3d 301, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9970, 2015 WL 4002203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2015 | Docket: 2679221

Cited 1 times | Published

apply the child support guidelines contained in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2014);. This was error.

Dottaviano v. Dottaviano

170 So. 3d 98, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9742, 2015 WL 3903553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2015 | Docket: 60249600

Cited 1 times | Published

trying to find work, but could not. We agree. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent

Glenn Robert Broga v. Linda Marie Broga

166 So. 3d 183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2015 | Docket: 2650255

Cited 1 times | Published

Imputed Florida’s child support statute, section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that

In re Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

173 So. 3d 19

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2015 | Docket: 60294087

Cited 1 times | Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Kemper v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Kemper

159 So. 3d 303, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3147, 2015 WL 965647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2015 | Docket: 60246551

Cited 1 times | Published

should be included in her gross income under section 61.30(2), Florida Statutes (2014), when calculating

Henderson v. Henderson

162 So. 3d 203, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1556, 2015 WL 477876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2015 | Docket: 60247450

Cited 1 times | Published

“substantial amount of time” with a child. Under section 61.30(11)(b)8., Florida Statutes, a “substantial amount

McDuffie v. McDuffie

155 So. 3d 1234, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 865, 2015 WL 292499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2015 | Docket: 60245584

Cited 1 times | Published

other circumstance beyond the parent’s control. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat.; Swain v. Swain, 932 So.2d 1214

William Moncrief Wood, Jr Former Husband v. Peggy Hodge Wood, Former Wife

162 So. 3d 133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2014 | Docket: 2616180

Cited 1 times | Published

her unemployment was “voluntary.” See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. In addition, the court relied

Brad E Parker v. Jodie Ann Parker

141 So. 3d 1291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2014 | Docket: 378983

Cited 1 times | Published

that the trial court failed to comply with section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2013), in determining

deLabry v. Sales

134 So. 3d 1110, 2014 WL 444040, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60239035

Cited 1 times | Published

to the child support guidelines. Pursuant to section 61.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), the court then

Carmenates v. Hernandez

127 So. 3d 631, 2013 WL 6097226, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60236789

Cited 1 times | Published

Car-menates to pay temporary child support under section 61.30, if appropriate. II. Whether the trial court

Hirsch v. Hirsch

136 So. 3d 622, 2013 WL 5762985, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2013 | Docket: 60240044

Cited 1 times | Published

unable to determine whether this application of section 61.30(3) has been federally preempted by the SGLIA

In re Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

122 So. 3d 320, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 2013 WL 4734603, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1892

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60234662

Cited 1 times | Published

under Florida’s child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, to the other parent. The

Harris v. Harris

114 So. 3d 1095, 2013 WL 2501986, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9269, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231747

Cited 1 times | Published

determined pursuant to s. 61.30(6).” Id.; see also § 61.30(8) (“Health insurance costs resulting from coverage

Department of Revenue ex rel. T.L.S. v. S.J.W.

113 So. 3d 85, 2013 WL 1776707, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2013 | Docket: 60231615

Cited 1 times | Published

in the current case in accordance with Florida Statute 61.30(3)(f).” The court then deferred ruling on

Mayfield v. Mayfield

103 So. 3d 968, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21614, 2012 WL 6554559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2012 | Docket: 60227273

Cited 1 times | Published

734 So.2d 470, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also § 61.30(2)-(4), Fla. Stat. (detailing the calculation of

Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Taylor v. Aluscar

82 So. 3d 1165, 2012 WL 833126, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2012 | Docket: 2412443

Cited 1 times | Published

v. Daly, 74 So.3d 165 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Section 61.30(11)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), permits deviation

Myles v. Florida Department of Revenue

80 So. 3d 1135, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3452, 2012 WL 695639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2012 | Docket: 329680

Cited 1 times | Published

voluntarily unemployed, as that term is used in section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes and there is no finding

Cje v. Sda

79 So. 3d 229, 2012 WL 470226, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2012 | Docket: 2569581

Cited 1 times | Published

paternity action to set child support pursuant to section 61.30). When calculating the basic child support obligation

Mudafort v. Lee

62 So. 3d 1196, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8404, 2011 WL 2200782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 2362788

Cited 1 times | Published

Weig, 25 So.3d 573, 575 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), governs the

Richardson v. Starling

56 So. 3d 866, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3204, 2011 WL 824480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2011 | Docket: 60298680

Cited 1 times | Published

it shall refer to the applicable portions of section 61.30, Florida Statutes and include particular findings

Swor v. Swor

56 So. 3d 825, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 581, 2011 WL 252940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2011 | Docket: 60298660

Cited 1 times | Published

child support awarded in the final judgment. See § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009) (requiring the court

In re Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

59 So. 3d 792, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 734, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2116, 2010 WL 5129227

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2010 | Docket: 60299743

Cited 1 times | Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Gergen v. Gergen

48 So. 3d 148, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18068, 2010 WL 4703852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2010 | Docket: 1926753

Cited 1 times | Published

both of the parties have incomes.” Pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes, incomes of the parents are

Department of Revenue v. Selles

47 So. 3d 916, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17143, 2010 WL 4483712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2401772

Cited 1 times | Published

Support, based on the child support guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. [4] DOR "may establish a

Ceccarelli v. Ceccarelli

46 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15589, 2010 WL 4024751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 60296158

Cited 1 times | Published

trial court contained no findings pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2009), and no worksheet in

Smith v. Smith

45 So. 3d 928, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15572, 2010 WL 3984611

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2010 | Docket: 2400899

Cited 1 times | Published

summary judgment at issue here was premised on section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), a subsection

Geddies v. Geddies

43 So. 3d 888, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13313, 2010 WL 3477462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2010 | Docket: 2400555

Cited 1 times | Published

remaining current on his child support obligation. Section 61.30(11)(a)8., Florida Statutes (2008), authorizes

MacRAE-BILLEWICZ v. BILLEWICZ

67 So. 3d 226, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12200, 2010 WL 3269955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2010 | Docket: 2364736

Cited 1 times | Published

his last job to move up north. According to section 61.30(2)(b), the trial court should impute income

Quintero v. Quintero

40 So. 3d 882, 2010 WL 2836405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2010 | Docket: 2538591

Cited 1 times | Published

and SALTER, JJ. *883 PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2009); McKenna v. McKenna, 31

Posner v. Posner

39 So. 3d 411, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9117, 2010 WL 2509134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 2401821

Cited 1 times | Published

found that this was appropriate pursuant to section 61.30(2)(a)13., Florida Statutes, which requires inclusion

Galasso v. GARGIONE

40 So. 3d 14, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8722, 2010 WL 2430982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2010 | Docket: 1667108

Cited 1 times | Published

time with his son, pursuant to the dictates of section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). That statute

Tjd v. Ag

39 So. 3d 360, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8212, 2010 WL 2330251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2010 | Docket: 2409097

Cited 1 times | Published

downward departure was appropriate "pursuant to section 61.30(11)(a)(10) [,Florida Statutes (2007),] based

T.J.D. v. A.G.

39 So. 3d 360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2010 | Docket: 60294869

Cited 1 times | Published

downward departure was appropriate “pursuant to section 61.30(ll)(a)(10) [,Florida Statutes (2007),] based

Rotolante v. Rotolante

22 So. 3d 684, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16558, 2009 WL 3670354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2009 | Docket: 1176878

Cited 1 times | Published

earnings in the wife's income was mandated by section 61.30(2)(a)(10) of the Florida Statutes. See Henin

Cooper v. Cooper

19 So. 3d 421, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14108, 2009 WL 3018127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 1165204

Cited 1 times | Published

Ondrejack, 839 So.2d 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Section 61.30, Florida Statutes, sets forth the child support

Valdes v. Valdes

6 So. 3d 731, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6262, 2009 WL 1035004

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2009 | Docket: 1130748

Cited 1 times | Published

with the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. See Smith v. Smith, 996 So

Anderko v. Nicholson

997 So. 2d 519, 2008 WL 5411898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2008 | Docket: 2123051

Cited 1 times | Published

because that finding cannot be squared with section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (2007) (requiring that

Martinez v. Martinez

995 So. 2d 1091, 2008 WL 4998684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2008 | Docket: 1685061

Cited 1 times | Published

trial court's determination of child support. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2008), sets forth the child

Lopez v. Lopez

994 So. 2d 374, 2008 WL 4489182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2008 | Docket: 1217480

Cited 1 times | Published

not an abuse of the trial court's discretion. Section 61.30(11)(a)(11), Florida Statutes (2007), provides

Khenh Ye Vong v. Chassang

981 So. 2d 1262, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 7185, 2008 WL 2119842

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2008 | Docket: 64854878

Cited 1 times | Published

retroactive to August 1, 2006. This was error. Under section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2005), the former husband

Amendments to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.

940 So. 2d 409

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2006 | Docket: 1523908

Cited 1 times | Published

__________ 26. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, *418 FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines 18 through

Martinez v. Rodriguez

927 So. 2d 93, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5361, 2006 WL 931941

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2006 | Docket: 64844199

Cited 1 times | Published

MAKE A WRITTEN FINDING CONSISTENT WITH FLA. STAT. § 61.30. III. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR

Simmons v. Simmons

922 So. 2d 373, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2771, 2006 WL 473571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2006 | Docket: 64842616

Cited 1 times | Published

five percent from those amounts set forth in F.S. 61.30, but agree that the amounts set forth herein

Largaespada v. Largaespada

920 So. 2d 645, 2005 WL 3408056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 1730655

Cited 1 times | Published

period, he would forego the right conferred by section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2005),[1] to a reduction

Walls v. Sebastian

914 So. 2d 1110, 2005 WL 3180004

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 1781438

Cited 1 times | Published

children. For authority, the former husband cites section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2004) and Willey v. Willey

In Re Approval of Indigent Status Forms

910 So. 2d 194, 2005 WL 1530359

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2005 | Docket: 1744614

Cited 1 times | Published

determined by Florida's child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

Silver v. Silver

898 So. 2d 145, 2005 WL 545091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2005 | Docket: 1448831

Cited 1 times | Published

obligation payable to the former wife as required by section 61.30(3)(g), Florida Statutes (2002).[1] That section

Ditton v. Circelli

888 So. 2d 161, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18299, 2004 WL 2782307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2004 | Docket: 64834474

Cited 1 times | Published

was there evidence to support it. Although section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes, gives the trial court

Fry v. Fry

887 So. 2d 438, 2004 WL 2724046

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2004 | Docket: 466495

Cited 1 times | Published

expense under the applicable statutory provision, section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (2003).[1] Mr. Fry's claim

Camus v. Prokosch

882 So. 2d 428, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2004 | Docket: 1686215

Cited 1 times | Published

payments from his gross income pursuant to section 61.30(3)(g), Florida Statutes (2003), as payments

Wright v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE

833 So. 2d 799, 2002 WL 31202718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2002 | Docket: 326960

Cited 1 times | Published

thereby warranting the imputation of income under section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999); however, we

Constantino v. Constantino

823 So. 2d 155, 2002 WL 1332305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2002 | Docket: 458639

Cited 1 times | Published

improperly computed his support obligation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes and, therefore, reverse. Esmeraldo

Rodgers v. Diederichsen

820 So. 2d 362, 2002 WL 971346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2002 | Docket: 1715437

Cited 1 times | Published

$2,028, with the allowable deductions under section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2000). The trial court

Bator v. Osborne

799 So. 2d 263, 2001 WL 957385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2001 | Docket: 87709

Cited 1 times | Published

order was not properly entered pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1999), we reverse. Bator

Pedroza v. Pedroza

779 So. 2d 616, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 2001 WL 201933

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2001 | Docket: 64804237

Cited 1 times | Published

reimbursed expenses are income pursuant to Florida Statute 61.30. 6. After careful review of the evidence

Williams v. Beagle Ex Rel. Beagle

777 So. 2d 1213, 2001 WL 175218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2001 | Docket: 462146

Cited 1 times | Published

601 So.2d 274, 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Thus, section 61.30(9), Florida Statutes (2000) provides that "[e]ach

Ervin v. Chason

750 So. 2d 148, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2000 | Docket: 1431087

Cited 1 times | Published

circumstances. If the court was operating under section 61.30(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1999),[1] case law

Johnson v. Johnson

761 So. 2d 345, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16924, 1999 WL 1206715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1999 | Docket: 64798334

Cited 1 times | Published

over 5% without written justification. See section 61.30(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1998). Further, even though

King v. King

734 So. 2d 470, 1999 WL 294449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1999 | Docket: 240281

Cited 1 times | Published

court order in the marriage before the court. See § 61.30(2)(a)9, (3)(g), Fla. Stat. (1997); ch. 96-305,

King v. King

734 So. 2d 470, 1999 WL 294449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1999 | Docket: 240281

Cited 1 times | Published

court order in the marriage before the court. See § 61.30(2)(a)9, (3)(g), Fla. Stat. (1997); ch. 96-305,

Wilcox v. Wilcox

729 So. 2d 506, 1999 WL 186636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1999 | Docket: 1172252

Cited 1 times | Published

the parties incurred transportation costs. Section 61.30(1)(a) permits deviation from the child support

Siegel v. Siegel

700 So. 2d 414, 1997 WL 586790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1997 | Docket: 1374030

Cited 1 times | Published

marital assets subject to equitable distribution. Section 61.30(2)(a)7, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), requires

Siegel v. Siegel

700 So. 2d 414, 1997 WL 586790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1997 | Docket: 1374030

Cited 1 times | Published

marital assets subject to equitable distribution. Section 61.30(2)(a)7, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), requires

Burton v. Burton

697 So. 2d 1295, 1997 WL 528289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1997 | Docket: 1776962

Cited 1 times | Published

guideline amount would be unjust or inappropriate. § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995); see Reynolds v. Reynolds

Lotz v. Lotz

686 So. 2d 704, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422, 1996 WL 736590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1996 | Docket: 64770425

Cited 1 times | Published

be unjust or inappropriate, as required by section 61.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). Although at

Simpson v. Simpson

680 So. 2d 1085, 1996 WL 577272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 1663779

Cited 1 times | Published

has been an unwarranted deviation from them. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995). A trial judge cannot logically

Irvin v. Seals

676 So. 2d 436, 1996 WL 47690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 1693007

Cited 1 times | Published

to the Child Support Guidelines contained in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), should be placed

Bullock v. Jones

666 So. 2d 224, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13483, 1995 WL 763346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1995 | Docket: 64761317

Cited 1 times | Published

the child support guidelines established in section 61.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). The former husband

Weinstein v. Steele

590 So. 2d 1005, 1991 WL 259244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1991 | Docket: 1512665

Cited 1 times | Published

therefore, the child support guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989), did not apply. The

Marshall v. Marshall

596 So. 2d 675, 1991 WL 244670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1991 | Docket: 52159

Cited 1 times | Published

stay home with the children in her custody, see § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989); in fact, it appears that

Ombres v. Ombres

564 So. 2d 1103, 1990 WL 29565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1990 | Docket: 1294266

Cited 1 times | Published

orders based upon individual case by case review." § 61.30(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). We believe that the share

Caskey v. Pratt

540 So. 2d 253, 1989 WL 27948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1989 | Docket: 2570601

Cited 1 times | Published

all issues except the award of child support. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that: Income

Gerard Thevinh Bui v. Tatianan Patricia Padilla Panzardi

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71155267

Published

So. 3d 1197, 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)). Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2024), sets forth the method

Carmen Thermidor v. Edva Pierre

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2025 | Docket: 71098975

Published

evidence of voluntary unemployment. Id.; see also § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“Monthly income shall

Mullarkey v. Tiraco

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2025 | Docket: 70913425

Published

the parties' net incomes as required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2023).

Kimberly Morrell v. Mark Alsentzer

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2025 | Docket: 69899471

Published

dismissing her child support petition. We reverse. Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2021), permits the trial

J. E. J. v. S. A. B.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2025 | Docket: 70761142

Published

payable in a paternity action is determined by section 61.30, Florida Statutes. §§ 61.30(1)(a), 742.031(1)

Dr. Jonathan Frantz v. Jennifer Crawford-Frantz

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2025 | Docket: 70650232

Published

parties and child all resided together. Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2024), provides:

Jordan Keck v. Matthew Fortier

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2025 | Docket: 70649183

Published

2 their gross incomes. See § 61.30(9), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, when awarding child

Jordan Keck v. Matthew Fortier

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2025 | Docket: 70649183

Published

2 their gross incomes. See § 61.30(9), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, when awarding child

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure - Forms

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2025 | Docket: 70639983

Published

26. $______ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines 18 through

Holly Squires v. Jared Squires

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2025 | Docket: 70590494

Published

amount from the child support guidelines. Id. § 61.30(1)(a). However, the plain text of these statutes

Holly Squires v. Jared Squires

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2025 | Docket: 70590494

Published

amount from the child support guidelines. Id. § 61.30(1)(a). However, the plain text of these statutes

Emance Charite Antoine v. Department of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 69998661

Published

receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses. See § 61.30(2)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2023). This claim is not preserved

Clarence Garwood v. Jessica Garwood K/N/A Jessica Wyatt

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2025 | Docket: 69942881

Published

Former Husband’s minimum support obligation. See § 61.30(6)–(10), Fla. Stat. (2022).2 But the trial court

Kimberly Morrell v. Mark Alsentzer

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2025 | Docket: 69899471

Published

her petition for child support. We reverse. Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2021), permits the trial

Jamie Hunter v. Kenneth W. Hunter, Jr., Premier Homes of North Florida, Inc., and 2834 Investments, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2025 | Docket: 69807155

Published

conclusion is challenged by Former Wife. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2022), sets forth the child

Mark Eberhart v. Nesia Eberhart

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2025 | Docket: 69807931

Published

gross monthly income. For child support, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2023), outlines the process

Francisco Phara v. Selena Robert

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2025 | Docket: 69674472

Published

adequate findings of such in the final judgment. Section 61.30 establishes a guidelines schedule that a trial

Nadia Kiswani v. Saleem Hafza

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2025 | Docket: 69640656

Published

determine the net income of each parent pursuant to section 61.30, and to include findings in the final judgment

Williams v. Department of Revenue, Ross

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2025 | Docket: 69632915

Published

Department argues that this decision is supported by section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes, which allows for a

Aaron Smith v. Julie N. Chevillet

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2025 | Docket: 69525403

Published

So. 3d 1142, 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)). Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2023), governs the calculation

Rouson, Sr. v. Department of Revenue, Jacson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2025 | Docket: 69265739

Published

income . . . during the retroactive period." § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2023); see also Gaut v. Dep't

A. A. v. M. A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2024 | Docket: 69335436

Published

We reverse on that issue only. Under section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2021), a court must

Rouson, Sr. v. Department of Revenue, Jacson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69265739

Published

income . . . during the retroactive period." § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2023); see also Gaut v. Dep't

Ferdinand Frank v. Honiria Frank

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2024 | Docket: 69217909

Published

So. 2d 1155, 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); see also § 61.30(11)(a), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“The court may order

Campbell v. Jara

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2024 | Docket: 68881993

Published

not supported by the record as required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2023). A lengthy recitation

Florence M. Bellegarde v. Yves Antoine O. Bellegarde

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2024 | Docket: 68792896

Published

4 Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2020), provides:

Jessica Camacho Delosreyes v. Rodel Bergonio Delosreyes

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2024 | Docket: 68912876

Published

1065, 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019). Pursuant to section 61.30(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2022), for purposes

Knight v. Knight

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2024 | Docket: 68132303

Published

factor” or other basis for an adjustment under section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, we vacate

Einath Bach Levy v. Samuel Salomon Levy

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68313513

Published

of any testimony that they will or 3 See § 61.30(2)(a)13., Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Income shall be determined

Eduardo Perez v. State of Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2024 | Docket: 68187996

Published

adjusting the total minimum child support award. See § 61.30(11)(a)2, Fla. Stat. (2023) (providing: “The court

MYRIELLE LEMOINE v. KEVIN L. JACKSON, SR.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2023 | Docket: 68123893

Published

licensure, or geographic location, . . . . § 61.30(2)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2022). Although Appellee presented

Hardwick v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2023 | Docket: 68117125

Published

first began living with Appellant on account of § 61.30(11)(c), Florida Statutes, which governs retroactive

In Re: Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms 12.902(k) and 12.902(l)

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2023 | Docket: 67916775

Published

requested in a family matter, pursuant to section 61.30(14), Florida Statutes (2023), and the parties

Floridians Against Increased Rates, Inc. v. Gary F. Clark, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2023 | Docket: 67836463

Published

addressing distribution of assets and liabilities); § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2023) (expressly requiring written

WILLIAM S. DUNSON, III vs JESSICA DUNSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2023 | Docket: 68034316

Published

instead of his net income. This is error. See § 61.30(9), Fla. Stat. (2021); King v. King, 320 So. 3d

FEDLINE INNOCENT v. RICO INNOCENT

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2023 | Docket: 67400403

Published

2022). Similarly, “[i]n conformance with section 61.30, the case law is ‘well- settled that a trial

FRED VIERA, JR. v. VIVIENNE LEMUS VIERA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2023 | Docket: 60680324

Published

credited for same in the final judgment.5 See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“In determining the retroactive

JENE VELASCO v. DONALD C. SOLLEY, III

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 67140865

Published

calculate the parties’ gross monthly incomes. § 61.30(2), Fla. Stat. (2022). Net monthly income for each

VICTOR H. WAITE v. JACLEN A. MILO-WAITE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 67140862

Published

support. Compare § 61.08, Fla. Stat. (2021), with § 61.30(3), Fla. Stat. (2021). The court has discretion

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 8.245, 8.250, and Form 8.961

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2023 | Docket: 67078453

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The parents shall pay child

DANIELA SOUTO COE v. REINIER NICOLAAS RAUTENBERG

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814487

Published

agreement of the parties or Court order.” See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“In an initial determination

PAUL ERNEST VARCHETTI v. JULIE ANNE VARCHETTI

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2023 | Docket: 66738078

Published

determining child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. See § 61.30(2)(a)9., Fla. Stat. (2021) (for

ROXANNE EILEEN EADIE vs ADAM DANIEL GILLIS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2022 | Docket: 68035019

Published

than a party has ever earned in the past. See § 61.30(2)(b)2.b., Fla. Stat. (2021). We remand for proper

DEREK SCHENAVAR v. REBECCA SCHENAVAR

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2022 | Docket: 65742505

Published

fails to set child support consistent with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2020). Third, the judgment

SHARIN KAYE JOHNSON vs ERIC PAUL JOHNSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2022 | Docket: 63162690

Published

297 So. 3d 700, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (citing § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat.). “Although we review a trial

SHARIN KAYE JOHNSON vs ERIC PAUL JOHNSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2022 | Docket: 63162690

Published

297 So. 3d 700, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (citing § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat.). “Although we review a trial

FRANK LEYTE-VIDAL v. VERONICA LEYTE-VIDAL

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2022 | Docket: 65635499

Published

amount, after considering all relevant factors[.]” § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020). “The statute allows the

JOHELI CRUZ WHITE v. KEVIN LEE-YUK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2022 | Docket: 65363939

Published

order requiring child support pursuant to [section] 61.30 pending an administrative or judicial determination

CHRISTINE MARIE SHENOI v. RAVEEN SHENOI

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2022 | Docket: 64944946

Published

already paid for the benefit of the child. See § 61.30(17)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020); Carter v. Carter, 294

MARCUS BROWN vs MARY NORWOOD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2022 | Docket: 60627026

Published

determine taxable income. This was error. See § 61.30(3), (4), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that net

YVES MOQUIN v. SYLVIE BERGERON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2022 | Docket: 63301696

Published

timesharing; (2) child support pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019); (3) equitable distribution

KENZIE SADLAK v. FRANK TRUJILLO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2022 | Docket: 63232258

Published

community if such information is available.” § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020); see also Waldera, 306

HEATHER SEITH v. RICHARD SEITH

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2022 | Docket: 63127638

Published

of child support allocated to each parent. See § 61.30(11)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020). Therefore, these amounts

NICOLE LIFAITE v. WILNER JEAN CHARLES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2022 | Docket: 62984884

Published

health insurance expense in its calculation. See § 61.30(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Net income is obtained

ISABEL ALVAREZ v. SANDER ANDRES SALAZAR

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2022 | Docket: 62984887

Published

years prior to the filing of the petition. See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2018). “Further, a court may award

SOBERS BROOKS v. RENITA HENRY, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2022 | Docket: 62607482

Published

was a breach of section 61.30(2)(a)(d) and the Fourteenth Amendment. Section 61.30 governs child support

In Re: Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure - Form 12.902(e)

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2022 | Docket: 62555125

Published

modify the sentence to specifically reference section 61.30(6), Florida Statutes (Child support guidelines;

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60680655

Published

$_______ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60688689

Published

$_______ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines

JAMES DAMASK v. LESYA RYABCHENKO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2021 | Docket: 60677205

Published

proceeding arises under this or another chapter.” § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020) (emphasis added).

CRYSTAL NADEAU v. HENRY REEVES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2021 | Docket: 60660148

Published

the mother at $2,080 per month pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2021), for purposes

Susan Jennings v. Jose E. Arenas Fredes

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2021 | Docket: 60414523

Published

Gross income includes disability payments. See § 61.30(2)(a)4., Fla. Stat. (2020). Thus, we reverse and

RICHARD THOMAS MORGAN v. MONICA SUE MORGAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2021 | Docket: 60392384

Published

6 Section 61.30(17) provides that "[i]n an initial determination

CHRISTOPHER L. BURKE v. MAUREEN KELLY BURKE, N/K/A MAUREEN BRIDGET KELLY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2021 | Docket: 60361366

Published

fashion as it does to child support under section 61.30(2) (and that, as such, the circuit court should

LUCAS PEREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2021 | Docket: 60290979

Published

no longer residing together with the child. See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2021) (providing: “In an initial

JOSHUA ADAM KING v. CANDACE DAWN KING

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2021 | Docket: 59780278

Published

943 So. 2d 890, 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). “Section 61.30(9), Florida Statutes, provides the statutory

FALLON JOHNSON v. JACOREY JOHNSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2021 | Docket: 59759002

Published

actually paid” to determine the parent’s net income. § 61.30(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (2019) (emphasis added). Where

ERIK RITACCO v. BOBBIE RITACCO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2021 | Docket: 45654157

Published

that identifies insurance as income relies on section 61.30, the child support guidelines, which has a broader

JESUS GARCIA v. JULIETTE ESPINOSA-GARCIA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2021 | Docket: 29084907

Published

by utilizing the guidelines set forth in [section] 61.30, Florida Statutes.” Ziruolo, 217 So. 3d at

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2020 | Docket: 18620269

Published

$_______ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines

RAYMOND FELICIANO v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and STEFFANIE DANIELLE CACCIATORE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2020 | Docket: 18580203

Published

deduction from Appellant’s gross income under section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes, or a deviation for

KARVOILL WILLIAMS v. ROOSEDELE BOSSICOT

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2020 | Docket: 17330537

Published

time-sharing at least 20% of the overnights of the year. § 61.30(11)(b)8., Fla. Stat. (2019). “Where a child spends

DOMINIQUE WILLIAMS v. GLORIA GONZALEZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2020 | Docket: 17089291

Published

voluntary unemployment or underemployment is made, section 61.30(2)(b) states that the trial court is to determine

CRAIG D CARTER, SR. v. LENORA J. CARTER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2020 | Docket: 17070196

Published

or (17), as applicable. (emphasis added.) Section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2016) provides:

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2019 Fast-Track Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2020 | Docket: 16761646

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The parents shall pay child

PEDRO SUAREZ v. CANDICE MURPHY SUAREZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2019 | Docket: 16460462

Published

So. 3d 426, 427–28 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Section 61.30, which governs retroactive child support, provides:

KRISTIN MYERS v. GEOFFREY LANE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2019 | Docket: 16368674

Published

support a modification of child support. Section 61.30(11)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), provides:

CLAUDE MIKHAIL v. CHRISTINE MIKHAIL

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2019 | Docket: 16223266

Published

extent that they reduce living expenses." § 61.30(2)(a)(13), Fla. Stat. (2017). The evidence at the

Sakinah Tarajee Jackson, Wife v. Barry Christopher Jackson, Husband

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2019 | Docket: 15892175

Published

payments as part of the former wife’s income. See § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018). In his cross-appeal

Sakinah Tarajee Jackson, Wife v. Barry Christopher Jackson, Husband

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2019 | Docket: 15892175

Published

payments as part of the former wife’s income. See § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018). In his cross-appeal

NICOLE L. CARMACK v. BOB CARMACK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2019 | Docket: 15875044

Published

when determining a child support award under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2011), and the court must

KUNTA KINTE HOLLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

273 So. 3d 1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2019 | Docket: 15775595

Published

his retroactive child support obligation. See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2017) (limiting the time period

Patrick Smith v. Caitlyn Smith, n/k/a Caitlin Cleveland

273 So. 3d 1168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738276

Published

148, 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). In this case, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, supports the conclusion that

Michael E. Holder, Former Husband v. Anna Marie Lopez, f/k/a Anna Marie Holder, Former Wife

274 So. 3d 518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738277

Published

community if such information is available,” under § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat.); Vallette v. Vallette, 693 So

Stokes v. Dep't of Revenue

275 So. 3d 713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 64719838

Published

compute his retroactive support obligation. See § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; see also Finch, 65

Stokes v. Dep't of Revenue

275 So. 3d 713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 64719837

Published

compute his retroactive support obligation. See § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; see also Finch, 65

STACEY WALKER v. KRISTI WALKER

274 So. 3d 1156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2019 | Docket: 15704310

Published

deducted from his gross income as required by section 61.30(4). Based upon our review of the child support

HAROLD GUNNAR JOHANSSON v. JACQUELYN JOHANSSON n/k/a JACQUELYN PUTT

270 So. 3d 426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2019 | Docket: 15034058

Published

underemployed. The trial court did not follow section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016), in the modification

GARY STOUT v. TERRY STOUT

270 So. 3d 429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2019 | Docket: 15034060

Published

accordance with the guidelines set forth in section 61.30 of the Florida Statutes. The MSA here is silent

Johnson v. Johnson

268 So. 3d 203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2019 | Docket: 64710865

Published

calculating the retroactive child support award. Section 61.30(2)(a)9., Florida Statutes (2014), defines gross

Johnson v. Johnson

268 So. 3d 203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2019 | Docket: 64710864

Published

calculating the retroactive child support award. Section 61.30(2)(a)9., Florida Statutes (2014), defines gross

Glenn Charles Dorsey, II, Former Husband v. Paula Rae Dorsey, Former Wife

266 So. 3d 1282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865380

Published

expenses not covered by insurance violated section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2017). See Demmi v. Demmi

Wilcox v. Dept. of Revenue

272 So. 3d 479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865435

Published

petition was filed on February 7, 2018. Under section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes (2018),1 a court has

Ellis v. Allen

266 So. 3d 1269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2019 | Docket: 64708583

Published

prescription medication expenses as required by section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2015). AFFIRMED; REMANDED

Frerking v. Stacy

266 So. 3d 273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2019 | Docket: 64707701

Published

and prevailing earnings level in the community." § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; see Freilich v. Freilich

Frerking v. Stacy

266 So. 3d 273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2019 | Docket: 64707702

Published

and prevailing earnings level in the community." § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; see Freilich v. Freilich

Mattison v. Mattison

266 So. 3d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2019 | Docket: 64707680

Published

is erroneous as a matter of law. We agree. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2017), sets forth the child

Mattison v. Mattison

266 So. 3d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2019 | Docket: 64707679

Published

is erroneous as a matter of law. We agree. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2017), sets forth the child

Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Shorter v. Amico

265 So. 3d 681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2019 | Docket: 64706637

Published

income when calculating child support under section 61.30(2)(a) 13, Florida Statutes. After performing

Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Shorter v. Amico

265 So. 3d 681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2019 | Docket: 64706638

Published

income when calculating child support under section 61.30(2)(a) 13, Florida Statutes. After performing

Jennifer Tisdale, Former Wife v. Stephen Tisdale, Former Husband

264 So. 3d 1105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 14554412

Published

but seeks to justify the difference under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. We hold, however, that the

Silva v. Silva

273 So. 3d 116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2019 | Docket: 64716038

Published

upon which to impute income to the mother, see § 61.30, Fla. Stat., and the Department of Revenue established

Silva v. Silva

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2019 | Docket: 14549569

Published

upon which to impute income to the mother, see § 61.30, Fla. Stat., and the Department of Revenue established

Silva v. Silva

273 So. 3d 116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2019 | Docket: 64716037

Published

upon which to impute income to the mother, see § 61.30, Fla. Stat., and the Department of Revenue established

J.A.D. v. K.M.A.

264 So. 3d 1080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2019 | Docket: 64705103

Published

addition. We will address each argument in turn. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016), establishes a guidelines

J. A. D. v. K. M. A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2019 | Docket: 14530838

Published

unemployment or underemployment pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2016), but instead

JUAN CARLOS JULIA v. MARTHA JULIA

263 So. 3d 795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2019 | Docket: 8504965

Published

child support allocation was split 60/40. Section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2017), provides in pertinent

Cairns v. Department Of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program

264 So. 3d 254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2019 | Docket: 64704563

Published

other parent's overnight stays with the child. See § 61.30(11)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The judge did not find that

Cairns v. Department Of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program

264 So. 3d 254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2019 | Docket: 64704562

Published

other parent's overnight stays with the child. See § 61.30(11)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The judge did not find that

Tanya L. Cairns v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program and Aaron Evans

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2019 | Docket: 8488325

Published

other parent’s overnight stays with the child. See § 61.30(11)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The judge did not find that

Rebecca M. Gay v. Christopher M. Gay

262 So. 3d 259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2018 | Docket: 8465987

Published

for reviewing decisions imputing income under section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, is whether the trial

Dept. of Revenue v. De La Begassiere

262 So. 3d 207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2018 | Docket: 8346785

Published

not comply or make findings consistent with section 61.30 of the Florida Statutes. The record

Dept. of Revenue v. De La Begassiere

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2018 | Docket: 8382966

Published

not comply or make findings consistent with section 61.30 of the Florida Statutes. The record

MICHAEL LENNON v. SIMONE LENNON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2018 | Docket: 8040496

Published

under certain circumstances. Id. § 152(e)(1)-(3); § 61.30(11)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (2016); Alston v. Vazquez

LISA HOGAN v. MATTHEW ALOIA

257 So. 3d 479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2018 | Docket: 8015483

Published

4th DCA 2005) (internal citations omitted). Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2017), provides in pertinent

Department of Revenue, on behalf of etc. v. McMorris Vincent Magloire

256 So. 3d 230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2018 | Docket: 7905930

Published

Magloire’s retroactive child support. Section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that

TERRI JO HOEHN MCKENZIE v. HENRY GRACE MCKENZIE IV

254 So. 3d 993

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2018 | Docket: 7804255

Published

income. As the Former Wife correctly argues, section 61.30(2)(a)3., Florida Statutes (2016), states:

Christie Spikes v. Shane Fonville

252 So. 3d 419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2018 | Docket: 7775014

Published

support being current in their support payments. § 61.30(11)(a)8., Fla. Stat. However, the court does not

VLADIMIR MASNEV v. ANNA MASNEV

253 So. 3d 638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2018 | Docket: 7664424

Published

provision within the child support provisions of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016), as it did within the

Department of Revenue, on behalf of Neandra Gilmore v. Byron Johnson

253 So. 3d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2018 | Docket: 7638662

Published

miscalculated or left erroneously unexplained under § 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Mr. Johnson requested

Department of Revenue, on behalf of Neandra Gilmore v. Byron Johnson

253 So. 3d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2018 | Docket: 7638662

Published

miscalculated or left erroneously unexplained under § 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Mr. Johnson requested

Florida Department of Revenue, on behalf of Sharon Wind v. Mark Cochran

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2018 | Docket: 7673014

Published

deduction from the obligor’s gross income because section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes, only allows for a deduction

Florida Department of Revenue, on behalf of Sharon Wind v. Mark Cochran

253 So. 3d 731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2018 | Docket: 7638660

Published

deduction from the obligor’s gross income because section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes, only allows for a deduction

M. M. v. J. H.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2018 | Docket: 7371867

Published

these amounts were derived. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2017), provides guidelines

Moody v. Moody

250 So. 3d 770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2018 | Docket: 64684252

Published

court denied the petition, however, finding that § 61.30(11)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), only permitted

Brooke Larae Ness f/k/a Brooke Larae Martinez v. Robert Jason Martinez

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7144548

Published

So. 3d 991, 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); see also § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (providing for calculation of child

GINA K. PERSAUD v. DHANIRAM DANNY PERSAUD

244 So. 3d 410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2018 | Docket: 6775143

Published

income . . . during the retroactive period." § 61.30(17)(a) (emphasis added); see also Swor v. Swor

JENNIFER HEARD v. MIGUEL PERALES

247 So. 3d 533

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2018 | Docket: 6716314

Published

minimum wage income to the mother. Because section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2014), requires that each

Jack E. De La Piedra, Husband v. Katherine M. De La Piedra, Wife

243 So. 3d 1052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2018 | Docket: 6375139

Published

purposes, alimony must be included as income. See § 61.30(2)(a)(9), Fla. Stat.; Christensen v. Christensen

Department of Revenue and Porshaun Walker v. Michael Eady Brown

243 So. 3d 526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2018 | Docket: 6368553

Published

paternity proceeding, the maximum amount allowed by section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes. The Division of Administrative

GINA K. PERSAUD v. DHANIRAM DANNY PERSAUD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2018 | Docket: 6302664

Published

income . . . during the retroactive period." § 61.30(17)(a) (emphasis added); see also Swor v. Swor

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms - Nomenclature

235 So. 3d 357

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2018 | Docket: 6289808

Published

Florida’s child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

Lockett v. Lockett

235 So. 3d 1003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2017 | Docket: 60286088

Published

formula set forth in section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2015). See also § 61.30(1)(a) (mandating that

Goodman v. Goodman

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2017 | Docket: 6169402

Published

issue of retroactive child support as well. See § 61.30. We note further that Mr. Goodman

Hernandez v. Dept. of Revenue

230 So. 3d 514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2017 | Docket: 6167430

Published

comply with section 61,30, Florida Statutes. See § 409.2563(7)(e), Fla. Stat. (2016). Section 61.30(17)(b)

ANDREA K. GILLETTE n/k/a ANDREA ECONOMUS v. JOSEPH GILLETTE

226 So. 3d 958, 2017 WL 3888760, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2017 | Docket: 6148170

Published

reasonableness test.”). The governing statute, section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2015), provides that

Morejon v. Department of Revenue

224 So. 3d 928, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12360, 2017 WL 3721807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145445

Published

statutory findings required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016). See § 61.30(l)(a) (“The child support

Barlow v. Barlow

224 So. 3d 868, 2017 WL 3495240, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2017 | Docket: 6138723

Published

total gross income of $19,583.33 per month. “Section 61.30(2), Florida Statutes (2007), requires trial

Bond v. Bond

224 So. 3d 874, 2017 WL 3495355, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2017 | Docket: 6138722

Published

for purposes of the child support guidelines. § 61.30(2)(a)(13), Fla. Stat. (2016); Jacob v. Jacob, 26

Dept. of Revenue v. Dorce

225 So. 3d 334, 2017 WL 3161049, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2017 | Docket: 6126099

Published

justify a downward modification, pursuant to section 61.30(b), Florida Statutes (2016). The court applied

Dept. of Revenue v. Dorce

225 So. 3d 334, 2017 WL 3161049, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2017 | Docket: 6126099

Published

justify a downward modification, pursuant to section 61.30(b), Florida Statutes (2016). The court applied

Van Der Meulen v. Van Der Meulen

221 So. 3d 792, 2017 WL 2989008, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2017 | Docket: 60268410

Published

unreimbursed medical expenses on a percentage basis. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2011); Zinovoy v. Zinovoy, 50 So

Van Der Meulen v. Van Der Meulen

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2017 | Docket: 6119778

Published

unreimbursed medical expenses on a percentage basis. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2011); Zinovoy v. Zinovoy, 50

CRISTINA KIRTLEY v. Florida Department of Revenue

221 So. 3d 1267, 2017 WL 2871030, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2017 | Docket: 6085236

Published

been paying under the guidelines provided in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016). Mr. Kirtley requested

Sickels v. Sickels

221 So. 3d 778, 2017 WL 2821720, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2017 | Docket: 6086564

Published

“Although the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, do not address a split custody

Threadgill v. Nishimura

222 So. 3d 633, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9357, 2017 WL 2790914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2017 | Docket: 6081377

Published

Procedure, 536 So.2d 974, 987 (Fla. 1988)); see also § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013) (defining business income

Brown v. Brown

220 So. 3d 560, 2017 WL 2605125, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2017 | Docket: 6079328

Published

determine child support guideline amount). Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016), establishes the method

Andrews v. Andrews

219 So. 3d 1006, 2017 WL 2491568, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2017 | Docket: 6071540

Published

the final order in all other aspects. Section 61.30(ll)(c), Florida Statutes (2015), allows for

Dottaviano v. Dottaviano

219 So. 3d 990, 2017 WL 2389982, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2017 | Docket: 6071402

Published

in the former marital home. Pursuant to section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, once a trial court

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson

220 So. 3d 480, 2017 WL 1423911, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2017 | Docket: 5912208

Published

1270-71, the First District found that neither section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, nor Jackson require

Schafstall v. Schafstall

211 So. 3d 1108, 2017 WL 697697, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608341

Published

the extent that they reduce living expenses.” § 61.30(2)(a)13., Fla. Stat. (2014). This category includes

Schafstall v. Schafstall

211 So. 3d 1108, 2017 WL 697697, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608341

Published

the extent that they reduce living expenses.” § 61.30(2)(a)13., Fla. Stat. (2014). This category includes

Ryans v. Bell

210 So. 3d 251, 2017 WL 535422, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1656

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2017 | Docket: 4583385

Published

of the record and contrary to Florida law. See § 61.30(3)(e), Florida Statutes (2011) (“Allowable deductions

Grubbs v. State, Department of Revenue

204 So. 3d 984, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2016 | Docket: 63630709

Published

permitted to impute income to Appellant under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2015), it must make the statutorily

Ricky E. Grubbs Jr. v. State, Department of Revenue etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4550137

Published

permitted to impute income to Appellant under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2015), it must make the

Session v. Bradshaw

202 So. 3d 955, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2016 | Docket: 60257324

Published

ultimate ruling on time sharing and parenting. See § 61.30(ll)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014) (providing for adjustment

Department of Revenue ex rel. Harris v. Crawford

201 So. 3d 860, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2016 | Docket: 60257110

Published

expenses against his gross income not permitted by section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2016). Accordingly, we

Sandra Bloom v. Randy Panchyshyn

200 So. 3d 272, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14740, 2016 WL 5805201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2016 | Docket: 4468661

Published

award this retroactive support, see § 61.30(l'l)(c), Fla. Stat. (providing that a modification

Liguori, JR. v. Liguori

210 So. 3d 117, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2016 | Docket: 4422981

Published

moved out of the marital residence. See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“[T]he court has discretion

Viruet v. Grace

197 So. 3d 643, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12585, 2016 WL 4431563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2016 | Docket: 4416529

Published

304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); see also § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“In an initial determination

Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Shirer v. Shirer

197 So. 3d 1260, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372, 2016 WL 4375433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2016 | Docket: 4121186

Published

failed to follow the procedures established in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2013), for determining the

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. Malgrot NUNEZ, Appellee

196 So. 3d 1271, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12224, 2016 WL 4446064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2016 | Docket: 4116967

Published

He is a ward due to bipolar disorder.” Section 61,30, Florida Statutes (2014), provides child support

Department of Revenue v. Juan Llamas and Jennifer Duque

196 So. 3d 1267, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12223, 2016 WL 4446050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2016 | Docket: 4116968

Published

II. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes, sets child-support guidelines

Michael Duggan v. State, Department of Revenue, etc.

197 So. 3d 631, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2016 | Docket: 4116965

Published

from the retroactive period); see also § 61.30(17)(a), Fla. Stat. We therefore reverse and remand

Adkins v. Sotolongo

197 So. 3d 1233, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11670, 2016 WL 4131996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2016 | Docket: 4116632

Published

justification for a departure from the guidelines. § 61.30(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995); Hooper v. Hooper

Bachman v. McLinn

197 So. 3d 123, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11060, 2016 WL 3913366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4112458

Published

(2011) (“Except as otherwise provided in [section] 61.30(ll)(c), the court may modify an order of support

J.N.S. v. A.M.A.

194 So. 3d 559, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9675, 2016 WL 3452536

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2016 | Docket: 60255827

Published

retirement benefits from her gross income. Section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2012), lists the expenses

J.N.S. v. A.M.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2016 | Docket: 3091561

Published

retirement benefits from her gross income. Section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2012), lists the expenses

Edge v. Edge

196 So. 3d 448, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9198, 2016 WL 3268811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2016 | Docket: 3078608

Published

are included as allowable deductions under section 61.30(3)(d), voluntary retirement payments are not

Elizabeth B. McWilson v. Gary J. McWilson

192 So. 3d 719, 2016 WL 3191135, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2016 | Docket: 3072188

Published

was made in accordance with the guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, and we thüs reverse and'

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2016 | Docket: 3067641

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, within 28 days of this order

Payne v. Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Gutierrez

191 So. 3d 550, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7712, 2016 WL 2944624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2016 | Docket: 3068011

Published

date precedes the filing of the petition. . § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). “[W]hen

Songur v. Songur

190 So. 3d 267, 2016 WL 2760103, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2016 | Docket: 3065881

Published

based on the statutory guideline's found ih section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2015). In all other

State of Florida, Department of Revenue, o/b/o Karina Juliana Noriega De Veli

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2016 | Docket: 3062282

Published

filed for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 61.30 (11)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014). GROSS, DAMOORGIAN

Corina Castillo Marquez v. Fredy Lopez

187 So. 3d 335, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3602, 2016 WL 899334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3042779

Published

deductions allowed by the statute. See § 61.30(2), Fla. Stat. (2014). This court has explained

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029853

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, within 28 days of this order

Department of Revenue v. Reyes

181 So. 3d 1270, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19494, 2015 WL 9584862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2015 | Docket: 60252544

Published

with the child support guidelines schedule in section 61.30. The child support guideline amount presumptively

State of Florida, Department of Revenue v. Channon C. Price and John E. Price

182 So. 3d 782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2015 | Docket: 3025217

Published

father, John E. Price’s gross income under section 61.30(2)(a), Florida Statutes, for purposes of calculating

Onye v. Dept. of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2015 | Docket: 3023604

Published

3d 1210, 1214-15 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2014). We affirm the trial court’s

Onye v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Missick

180 So. 3d 243, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19218, 2015 WL 9319139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2015 | Docket: 60252367

Published

3d 1210, 1214-15 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2014). We affirm the trial court’s

Robert Addie v. Onyx Coale

179 So. 3d 534, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17911, 2015 WL 7566689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2015 | Docket: 3015998

Published

child support award accordingly. See § 61.30(2)(a)9.; see also Pike, 932 So.2d at

Gillislee v. Florida Department of Revenue

150 So. 3d 294, 2014 WL 6478813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2015 | Docket: 60244240

Published

Failing to include this amount was error. See § 61.30(17)(b), Fla. Stat. (July 2012); Ditton v. Circelli

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS

205 So. 3d 1, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 647, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2607

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2015 | Docket: 3014109

Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Wells v. Whitfield

175 So. 3d 926, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14465, 2015 WL 5714623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 60250683

Published

Black’s Law Dictionary 548 (8th ed. 2004)); see also § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (providing that gross income

Niekamp v. Niekamp

173 So. 3d 1106, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12711, 2015 WL 5023119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2015 | Docket: 2687742

Published

purposes of calculating child support under section 61.30. For the reasons just described, the imputation

Thompson v. Malicki

169 So. 3d 271, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 2015 WL 4154181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679103

Published

For purposes of calculating child support, section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that

Sowell v. McConnell

167 So. 3d 521, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9988, 2015 WL 4002501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2015 | Docket: 60248493

Published

objections when the wife testified as to amounts. Section 61.30(8) of the Florida Statutes (2013), requires

Jennifer D. Heard v. Miguel Perales

189 So. 3d 834, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802, 2015 WL 3609104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679278

Published

932 So.2d 245, 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), provides that

Jennifer D. Heard v. Miguel Perales

189 So. 3d 834, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802, 2015 WL 3609104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679278

Published

932 So.2d 245, 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), provides that

Department of Revenue v. Sean Michael Wolf and Christina Lian Guilliams

164 So. 3d 101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2015 | Docket: 2655231

Published

who has an absent parent. 2 . Section 61.30(1 l)(c), is inapplicable because it relates

Gilroy v. Gilroy

163 So. 3d 674, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6240, 2015 WL 1929184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2015 | Docket: 2653256

Published

change in financial circumstances. For its part, section 61.30(14), Florida Statutes (2013), provides that

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2015 | Docket: 2644900

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, within 28 days of this order

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

173 So. 3d 19, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 163, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 583, 2015 WL 1343088

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2015 | Docket: 2644899

Published

Florida’s child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE

158 So. 3d 523, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 101, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 281, 2015 WL 686028

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 2635438

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, within 28 days of this order

Cameron v. Cameron

154 So. 3d 1230, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 864, 2015 WL 292537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2015 | Docket: 60245447

Published

other circumstances beyond the parent’s control. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2011); Hentze v. Denys, 88 So

Valdes v. Valdes

154 So. 3d 1165, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 108, 2015 WL 72433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621508

Published

support calculations, including its reliance on section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). The trial court

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

154 So. 3d 301, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 774, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3779, 2014 WL 7212609

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 2616693

Published

$_______ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, FLORIDA STATUTES (Add lines

Clayton v. Clayton

152 So. 3d 762, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19779, 2014 WL 6833041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2014 | Docket: 60244984

Published

arrangement does not support this method. See § 61.30(ll)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013) (setting forth method

Exter v. Diodonet-Molina

152 So. 3d 699, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19483, 2014 WL 6679010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2014 | Docket: 2609423

Published

findings in the Final Judgment pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2012). He further contends

Derek Kudson v. Monique Drobnak

149 So. 3d 114, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368, 2014 WL 4626846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2014 | Docket: 1255915

Published

were not incurred by the mother. See § 61.30(7), Fla. Stat. (2011) (requiring, for certain purposes

Christensen v. Christensen

147 So. 3d 118, 2014 WL 4056693, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2014 | Docket: 60243114

Published

Pike, 932 So.2d 229, 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); § 61.30(2)(a)9., Fla. Stat. (2012). Here, the trial court

Justin Edward Johnson v. Samantha Nicole McCullough

143 So. 3d 1129, 2014 WL 3843082, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 843612

Published

determine the net income of each parent pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes, and to include such findings

Adam Justin Steele v. Charity Noel Love

143 So. 3d 1020, 2014 WL 3605549, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2014 | Docket: 2302

Published

substantial evidence. *1022 Section 61.30(2)(a)(13), Florida Statutes (2012), specifically

In Re: Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Form

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2014 | Docket: 57368

Published

Florida’s child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, to the other parent. The

Department of Revenue v. Cody

131 So. 3d 823, 2014 WL 482374, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2014 | Docket: 60238188

Published

child support order that he was not paying. Section 61.30(3)(f) provides that “[c]ourt-ordered support

Department of Revenue v. Williams

129 So. 3d 1193, 2014 WL 185199, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2014 | Docket: 60237331

Published

046(14)(a); see also Sherman, 74 So.3d at 167. Section 61.30 governs child support calculations. Subsection

Williams v. Lutrario

131 So. 3d 801, 2013 WL 6244175, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2013 | Docket: 60238174

Published

v. Lutrario, 81 So.3d 589 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); § 61.30(11)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (2011). At the time of the

Emmenegger v. Emmenegger

135 So. 3d 1103, 2013 WL 5224926, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14825

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60239401

Published

adjustment in his or her child support obligation. See § 61.30(ll)(b)(10), Fla. Stat. (2005). In 2007, the trial

Caudill-Rosa v. Rosa

136 So. 3d 614, 2013 WL 5226537, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14828

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60240039

Published

written findings supporting the deviation. See § 61.30(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). The failure to do so

Moore v. Moore

120 So. 3d 194, 2013 WL 4483065, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2013 | Docket: 60233945

Published

deducted as mandatory retirement payments.1 Section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2011), addresses the calculation

Pullis v. Pullis

118 So. 3d 937, 2013 WL 4007238, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2013 | Docket: 60233487

Published

239-40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), succinctly stated: Section 61.30[, Florida Statutes (2012),] sets forth guidelines

In re Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

117 So. 3d 958, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1964, 2013 WL 3334307

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2013 | Docket: 60232868

Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Russell v. McQueen

115 So. 3d 1084, 2013 WL 3100777, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2013 | Docket: 60232085

Published

obligation to be paid separately on a percentage basis. § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2010). Eschewing the percentage

Hoover v. Florida Department of Revenue ex rel. Mitchell

114 So. 3d 494, 2013 WL 2462119, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2013 | Docket: 60231951

Published

credit to Appellant for prepaying the premium. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2012). Appellant next contends

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

115 So. 3d 286, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 337, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1944, 2013 WL 2248756

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2013 | Docket: 60232163

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, within 28 days of this order

Department of Revenue ex rel. Mash v. Ingram

112 So. 3d 169, 2013 WL 1923791, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2013 | Docket: 60231011

Published

1st DCA 2011), where this court held that section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes, did not provide authority

Garren v. Oliver

108 So. 3d 1158, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4767, 2013 WL 1165060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2013 | Docket: 60229008

Published

the father’s child-support obligation under section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (2011),* based on the

Department of Revenue v. LaGree

106 So. 3d 534, 2013 WL 535765, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2263, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2013 | Docket: 60228275

Published

in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, and may include retroactive support pursuant to section 61.30(17)

Weaver v. Weaver

95 So. 3d 1029, 2012 WL 3629237, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2012 | Docket: 60311057

Published

accordance with the child support guidelines. Section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes (2010), provides, in pertinent

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Zeoli v. Kline

95 So. 3d 440, 2012 WL 3537823, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2012 | Docket: 60311247

Published

obligations for each parent in accordance with section 61.30. In so doing, the hearing officer considered

George v. George

93 So. 3d 464, 2012 WL 2948549, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2012 | Docket: 60310607

Published

404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (emphasis added) (quoting § 61.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat.). Housing or housing payments

Department of Revenue v. Dorkins

91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874250, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2012 | Docket: 60309893

Published

visit him overnight each Saturday and Sunday. Section 61.30(ll)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), permits a trier

Department of Revenue ex rel. Roberson v. Chaney

90 So. 3d 883, 2012 WL 2053297, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2012 | Docket: 60309676

Published

parent from whom support is sought under the section 61.30 child support guidelines. § 409.2563(5)(a),

In re Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

96 So. 3d 217, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 386, 2012 WL 1869337, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1143

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2012 | Docket: 60311512

Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Williams v. Lutrario

81 So. 3d 589, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3251, 2012 WL 635647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2012 | Docket: 60305958

Published

if the father “is current in support payments.” § 61.30(11)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (2011); Salazar v. Salazar

In re Implementation of Committee on Privacy & Court Records

80 So. 3d 317, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 36, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 74, 2012 WL 143610

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2012 | Docket: 60305695

Published

defined there. For further information, see section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Special notes ... If you

Koslowski v. Koslowski

78 So. 3d 642, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20855, 2011 WL 6847812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 2357933

Published

awarded Appellee is for Alex's medical care. Section 61.30(11)(a)1, Florida Statutes (2004), permits adjustments

Messier v. Martin-Messier

77 So. 3d 795, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20456, 2011 WL 6373003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2011 | Docket: 60304792

Published

the date of Dakota’s high school graduation. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (2010); § 743.07(2), Fla. Stat. (2010);

Buhler v. Buhler

83 So. 3d 790, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19190, 2011 WL 6003301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2011 | Docket: 60306502

Published

year, a substantial amount of time pursuant to section 61.30(ll)(b)10., Florida Statutes (2003).1 However

Sullivan v. HOFF-SULLIVAN

74 So. 3d 1146, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19196, 2011 WL 6017936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2011 | Docket: 2580288

Published

support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. *1147 See § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. ("The child

Halawy v. Halawy

67 So. 3d 447, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13423, 2011 WL 3760859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2011 | Docket: 2572576

Published

within our jurisdiction at this time. [3] See § 61.30(9), (10), Fla. Stat. (2009). [4] Mrs. Halawy further

Newberry v. Newberry

67 So. 3d 1123, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11169, 2011 WL 2753801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2011 | Docket: 2352319

Published

support award to the former wife pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The former husband properly

Fuesy v. Fuesy

64 So. 3d 151, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8443, 2011 WL 2279023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2011 | Docket: 60301379

Published

remand for recalculation of child support. Section 61.30(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), describes the

Brend v. Brend

56 So. 3d 923, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4531, 2011 WL 1197663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2011 | Docket: 60298710

Published

gross incomes, rather than their net incomes. See § 61.30(9), Fla. Stat. (2009); see also Finney v. Finney

In Re Amend. to the Fla. Family Law Forms

59 So. 3d 792

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2010 | Docket: 2361433

Published

by Florida's child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

Stanton v. Stanton

50 So. 3d 688, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18818, 2010 WL 5018361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2010 | Docket: 60297336

Published

$12,000 in babysitting and daycare expenses. See § 61.30(7), Fla. Stat. (2007) (child support may include

Department of Revenue ex rel. Bufford v. Pipkin

48 So. 3d 1010, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18341, 2010 WL 4903610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2010 | Docket: 60296436

Published

the finding of the hearing officer was improper. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009); Freilich v. Freilich

Moforis v. Moforis

45 So. 3d 571, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15816, 2010 WL 4103148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2010 | Docket: 60296055

Published

his petition for modification accordingly. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (2009) (setting forth the child support

Heysek v. Heysek

48 So. 3d 877, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14545, 2010 WL 4277770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 1387950

Published

his net income.[1] The Husband is correct. Section 61.30 provides, in pertinent part: (3) Allowable deductions

In Re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules

55 So. 3d 381, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 524, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1632, 2010 WL 3781979

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 1931936

Published

under Florida's child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, to the other parent. The

In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

48 So. 3d 25, 2010 WL 3701318

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2010 | Docket: 60296540

Published

defined there. For further information, see section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Special notes... If this

Shafer v. Shafer

45 So. 3d 494, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13393, 2010 WL 3488737

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2010 | Docket: 1927317

Published

over which the parent has no control.'") (quoting § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008)). However, we agree with

Hayde v. Hayde

41 So. 3d 1089, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11782, 2010 WL 3186495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2010 | Docket: 2549891

Published

marriage. Section 61.30(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), requires the court to do so. Section 61.30(11)(b)

Needham v. Needham

39 So. 3d 1289, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11710, 2010 WL 3155015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2010 | Docket: 1656364

Published

even considered the effect of the older child. Section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes (2005), contains no specific

Quintero v. Quintero

40 So. 3d 882, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2010 | Docket: 60295183

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2009); McKenna v. McKenna, 31 So.3d 890, 891 (Fla

McQuaig v. McQuaig

36 So. 3d 801, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7313, 2010 WL 2077163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1639088

Published

"Vendor Mate;" entertainment; parking). Citing section 61.30, Florida Statutes, and cases interpreting that

Zepeda v. Zepeda

32 So. 3d 679, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2010 | Docket: 1662482

Published

substantial amount of time with her father. Section 61.30 establishes child support guidelines based on

Vollmer v. Vollmer

33 So. 3d 67, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2687, 2010 WL 743934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2010 | Docket: 1156471

Published

is not sufficient to meet a child's needs. See § 61.30(13), Fla. Stat. (2007); Ghay v. Ghay, 954 So.2d

Doll v. Doll

28 So. 3d 233, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2224, 2010 WL 669748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2010 | Docket: 1652665

Published

parent earning less than $1000 per month. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (2009).

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE EX REL. SOTO v. Soto

28 So. 3d 171, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2010 | Docket: 1167745

Published

daughter on Christmases and her birthdays. Section 61.30(17)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), authorizes

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

22 So. 3d 9, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 555, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1663, 2009 WL 3132829

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2009 | Docket: 1639562

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The parents shall pay child

Segnini v. Segnini

10 So. 3d 188, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2881, 2009 WL 928489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 2567833

Published

Kareff, 943 So.2d 890, 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Section 61.30(2)(a)(3), Florida Statutes, provides that gross

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

7 So. 3d 1143, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 2009 WL 633200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2009 | Docket: 2567941

Published

support. This double assessment was error. See § 61.30(3), Fla. Stat. (2007). Thus, on this point, we

Hall v. Hall

994 So. 2d 1169, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15420, 2008 WL 4531802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2008 | Docket: 64856837

Published

former husband’s available income pursuant section 61.30(2)(a) is approximately $1,737 per month. The

Gigantelli v. Gigantelli

992 So. 2d 825, 2008 WL 4330024

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2008 | Docket: 1723742

Published

failed to comply with the waiver requirement of section 61.30(11)(a)(8), Florida Statutes (2007). "The trial

Cypress v. Jumper

990 So. 2d 576, 2008 WL 2906988

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 2538656

Published

obligation based upon the factors set forth in section 61.30 of the Florida Statutes, the statutes do not

Parsons v. Brake

975 So. 2d 1161, 2008 WL 595930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1727125

Published

or earning capacity. This appeal followed. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005), provides, Income

Hirsch v. Hirsch

974 So. 2d 1159, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1821, 2008 WL 373229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 64853934

Published

living expenses.” § 61.30(2)(a)13., Fla. Stat. (2006). While by its terms section 61.30 applies only to

Jaworski v. Jaworski

972 So. 2d 1095, 2008 WL 200309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2008 | Docket: 1650610

Published

designated as the primary residential parent. See § 61.30(11)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004). We agree because here

Long v. Long

967 So. 2d 1069, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17730, 2007 WL 3274687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2007 | Docket: 64853032

Published

this amount went to reduce living expenses. See § 61.30(2)(a)(13), Fla. Stat. (2006). There was no specific

Blackmon v. Blackmon

969 So. 2d 426, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17692, 2007 WL 3252870

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2007 | Docket: 64853139

Published

husband’s income based on side masonry work. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that income

Ferraro v. Ferraro

971 So. 2d 826, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16295, 2007 WL 3005573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2007 | Docket: 64853535

Published

children; and $44,680 for three children. Under section 61.30(l)(b), of the Florida Statutes, the guidelines

Mena v. Mena

967 So. 2d 360, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15957, 2007 WL 2935464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2007 | Docket: 64852778

Published

agreement is incorporated in a court order. Section 61.30(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2005) provides that

O'BYRNE v. Miller

965 So. 2d 316, 2007 WL 2713546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 1509083

Published

to be "separately paid on a percentage basis." § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2006). The use of this approach

O'BYRNE v. Miller

965 So. 2d 316, 2007 WL 2713546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 1509083

Published

to be "separately paid on a percentage basis." § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2006). The use of this approach

Stephens v. Stephens

959 So. 2d 388, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9550, 2007 WL 1730129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2007 | Docket: 64851274

Published

properly applied the child support guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2005). Thus, the cause is

Mejia v. Santana

948 So. 2d 1007, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2404, 2007 WL 518629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2007 | Docket: 64849174

Published

anticipated daycare or health insurance expenses. See § 61.30(7), (8), Fla. Stat. (2005) (requiring court to

Lehman v. Department of Revenue

946 So. 2d 1116, 2006 WL 3613683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 1771844

Published

emancipation. In viewing the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2005), we note that as the

In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

940 So. 2d 409, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 627, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2366, 2006 WL 2771540

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2006 | Docket: 64847480

Published

here]] 26. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 61.30, *418[[Image here]] *419[[Image here]] *420[[Image

Waters v. Bland

935 So. 2d 1239, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426, 2006 WL 2347740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2006 | Docket: 64846169

Published

fashioned the child support award. We agree. Section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (2002), mandates that child

Jobe v. Jobe

934 So. 2d 576, 2006 WL 1910167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2006 | Docket: 1460944

Published

DCA 2003). According to the plain language of section 61.30(2)(b), the only finding required for imputation

Department of Revenue ex rel. Moneyham v. Moneyham

931 So. 2d 1048, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10271, 2006 WL 1697537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2006 | Docket: 64845482

Published

evidence in the record and violate provisions of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2005). Accordingly, we reverse

D.O.B. v. Department of Children & Family Services

928 So. 2d 491, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7077, 2006 WL 1234983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 64844584

Published

calculated in accordance with the guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2004), and that the trial

Word v. Word

924 So. 2d 968, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4961, 2006 WL 862876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2006 | Docket: 64843288

Published

shall re-calculate child support by applying section 61.30(ll)(b), rather than 61.30(ll)(a)(10), Florida

Sarnoff v. Daily

925 So. 2d 391, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4431, 2006 WL 782706

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2006 | Docket: 64843441

Published

that the trial court determined pursuant to section 61.30 was not needed for the child’s day-to-day custodial

Font v. Mastrapa-Font

923 So. 2d 1195, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3553, 2006 WL 626065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 64843050

Published

rule contained in the child support statute. See § 61.30(ll)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004). The statute provides

Henry v. Henry

921 So. 2d 880, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3307, 2006 WL 544531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 64842540

Published

which no evidence was introduced. We agree. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2005), provides for the calculation

Jones v. Jones

920 So. 2d 800, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 2006 WL 357832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2006 | Docket: 64842377

Published

wife equal to that of the husband, we reverse. Section 61.30(2)(b) of the Florida Statutes (2002) provides

Hernandez v. Hernandez

924 So. 2d 853, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1799, 2006 WL 335026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2006 | Docket: 64843249

Published

obligation according to the guidelines set out in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2003), rather than according

Kusterer v. Kusterer

933 So. 2d 542, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 423, 2006 WL 141406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2006 | Docket: 64845722

Published

.” The child-support guidelines statute is section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2004), subsection (2)(a)

Hecht v. Hecht

908 So. 2d 547, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12190, 2005 WL 1832970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2005 | Docket: 64839813

Published

substantial parenting formula provided for in section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (2002), in calculating

Macci v. Macci

904 So. 2d 517, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7957, 2005 WL 1226060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2005 | Docket: 64839045

Published

expenses for her children by a prior marriage. See § 61.30(7), Fla. Stat. (2000). We do, however, reverse

Florida Department of Revenue v. Kaiser

890 So. 2d 364, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19666, 2004 WL 2952812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2004 | Docket: 64835273

Published

is not sufficient to meet the children’s needs. § 61.30(13), Fla. Stat. (2003). Before the court may invade

Rogers v. Brown

884 So. 2d 523, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14988, 2004 WL 2290910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 64833585

Published

or to reserve jurisdiction to do so); see also § 61.30(17)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003) (observing that in determining

Henderson v. Henderson

882 So. 2d 499, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13816, 2004 WL 2098389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2004 | Docket: 64832569

Published

financial affidavit was attached, as required by section 61.30(14), Florida Statutes (2003) — dismissal without

Torres v. Torres

883 So. 2d 839, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11758, 2004 WL 1778953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2004 | Docket: 64833107

Published

paid, and therefore, is not a proper deduction. § 61.30(3)(f), Fla. Stat. Additionally, the affidavit allowances

Laggini v. Laggini

875 So. 2d 1278, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9206, 2004 WL 1462103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2004 | Docket: 64831204

Published

determine whether the award was in compliance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2002). See Cooper v. Cooper

Merting v. Merting

871 So. 2d 991, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 2004 WL 813165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2004 | Docket: 64830107

Published

based upon the ehild support guidelines in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2002). See Bunassar. We accordingly

Herring v. Ashby

869 So. 2d 630, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3512, 2004 WL 533940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 64829168

Published

judgment related to child support, as required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2003), we conclude that we

Berges v. Berges

871 So. 2d 919, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3291, 2004 WL 575692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2004 | Docket: 64830089

Published

subtracting allowable deductions from gross income. § 61.30(2)-(4), Fla. Stat. (2002) (emphasis added).2 In

Fleischmann v. Fleischmann

868 So. 2d 1, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 2004 WL 133982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2004 | Docket: 64828908

Published

child support pursuant to the 1999 version of section 61.30, Florida Statutes, seeks a downward departure

Manolakos v. Manolakos

864 So. 2d 1155, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19750, 2003 WL 23094869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2003 | Docket: 64827837

Published

sufficient factual findings as required under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2002). While a child support

Sichewski v. Sichewski

862 So. 2d 850, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18722, 2003 WL 22901023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2003 | Docket: 64827300

Published

in the amount of child support, pursuant to section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes, taking into account

DeBacher v. DeBacher

867 So. 2d 404, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2003 | Docket: 64828594

Published

support award. The child support guidelines, section 61.30, specifically provide in pertinent part that:

Department of Revenue v. Skirko

855 So. 2d 1205, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15225, 2003 WL 22316808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2003 | Docket: 64825715

Published

substantial change in circum*1206stances under section 61.30(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2002), because it is

Alday v. Gleason

853 So. 2d 1105, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13281, 2003 WL 22056279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2003 | Docket: 64824926

Published

omission in the trial court. Similarly, because, section 61.30(ll)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), allows the

Houston v. Maglio

845 So. 2d 971, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7963, 2003 WL 21180332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2003 | Docket: 64822936

Published

ex rel. Abel, 752 So.2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2002).

Peetluk v. Huffstetler

840 So. 2d 1175, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4498, 2003 WL 1785812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2003 | Docket: 64821627

Published

income to determine the base income required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991), was contrary to the

Clark v. Clark

837 So. 2d 1120, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1838, 2003 WL 355250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2003 | Docket: 64820871

Published

fall within the category of child support. Section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes, discusses the provision

Singleton v. Singleton

834 So. 2d 271, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17754, 2002 WL 31696937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 64819838

Published

alleges that the trial court deviated from section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2001), in calculating the

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

833 So. 2d 682, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 822, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1952, 2002 WL 31190920

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2002 | Docket: 64819741

Published

902(e) were made to reflect statutory changes to section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes (2000). See ch.2001-158

Johnson v. Johnson

821 So. 2d 1275, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10917, 2002 WL 1769769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 64816576

Published

factors which the trial court deems proper. See § 61.30(ll)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2001). Affirmed in part

Knorr v. Knorr

827 So. 2d 1017, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9591, 2002 WL 1466250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 64818044

Published

child support to be awarded in accordance with section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), and to award

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

824 So. 2d 95, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 542, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1154, 2002 WL 1066145

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2002 | Docket: 64817027

Published

Form 12.902(e) based on 2001 amendments to section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes. See ch.2001-158, § 16

Benardo v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Reilly

819 So. 2d 161, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6200, 2002 WL 920471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 64815919

Published

the provision of child support pursuant to section 61.30 pending an administrative or judicial determination

R.H.B. v. J.B.W.

826 So. 2d 346, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6039, 2002 WL 851297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2002 | Docket: 64817612

Published

would be appropriate under the directives of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2000). R.H.B. filed a motion

Ponce v. Minda

805 So. 2d 972, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16401, 2001 WL 1472613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2001 | Docket: 64811989

Published

support. For the purposes of remand, we note that section 61.30(17)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that

Workman v. Workman

802 So. 2d 390, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16045, 2001 WL 1415755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2001 | Docket: 64810964

Published

entitled to the dependency exemptions based on section 61.30(ll)(a)8, Florida Statutes (2000).1 Under the

Workman v. Workman

802 So. 2d 390, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16045, 2001 WL 1415755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2001 | Docket: 64810964

Published

entitled to the dependency exemptions based on section 61.30(ll)(a)8, Florida Statutes (2000).1 Under the

Department of Revenue v. Lovins

798 So. 2d 891, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15666, 2001 WL 1359241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 64809855

Published

attempt at suit in 1993. We agree and reverse. Section 61.30(17) provides that: “In an initial determination

Department of Revenue v. Lovins

798 So. 2d 891, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15666, 2001 WL 1359241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 64809855

Published

attempt at suit in 1993. We agree and reverse. Section 61.30(17) provides that: “In an initial determination

Sichewski v. Sichewski

796 So. 2d 1233, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614, 2001 WL 1205853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2001 | Docket: 64809382

Published

without the adjustment which is required by section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), in cases in

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Stanley v. Stanley

793 So. 2d 1168, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12900, 2001 WL 1046003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2001 | Docket: 64808240

Published

imputed to him for purposes of child support. See section 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999); Brock v. Brock, 695

Tomaszewski v. Tomaszewski

793 So. 2d 1156, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13170, 2001 WL 1098272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2001 | Docket: 64808237

Published

monthly income” to mean imputed income under section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), we would agree

Walker v. Walker

796 So. 2d 569, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12518, 2001 WL 1008141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 64809214

Published

support purposes for the second petition. See § 61.30(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (2000). Our calculations indicate

Joye v. Jones

789 So. 2d 508, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9709, 2001 WL 788501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2001 | Docket: 64806717

Published

child support. ERVIN and MINER, JJ., concur. . § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997).

Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.902(E), Child Support Guidelines Worksheet

816 So. 2d 528, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 405, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1188, 2001 WL 619596

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2001 | Docket: 64815187

Published

Legislature amended the child support guidelines, section 61.30(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), which became

Florida Department of Revenue ex rel. Marquette v. Hennessey

812 So. 2d 442, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 19427, 2001 WL 1809083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2001 | Docket: 64813856

Published

guidelines statute, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2000), provides, in section 61.30(2)(b): Income on

Sanchez v. Sanchez

773 So. 2d 611, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15986, 2000 WL 1805205

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2000 | Docket: 64802434

Published

him to a variance from the guideline amount. See § 61.30(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). The trial court entered

McDowell v. McDowell

770 So. 2d 1289, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15174, 2000 WL 1724956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2000 | Docket: 64801648

Published

this unemployment was voluntary. This was error. § 61.30(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999); see Brock v. Brock, 695

Hudlet v. Hudlet

770 So. 2d 1264, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14667, 2000 WL 1677204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2000 | Docket: 64801622

Published

of net income imputed to the husband under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1999). See Scapin v. Scapin

Negron v. Ray

769 So. 2d 524, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13847, 2000 WL 1595715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2000 | Docket: 64801103

Published

itself "adjusted for ... allowable dependents.” Section 61.30(3)(a), Florida Statutes. Hence, the child support

Amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Procedure

783 So. 2d 138, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 924, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2041, 2000 WL 1587805

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2000 | Docket: 64804956

Published

to accurately calculate child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, within 28 days of this order

Blum v. Blum

769 So. 2d 1142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13738, 2000 WL 1582753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2000 | Docket: 64801248

Published

figures were determined for either spouse. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1999). Despite the scant record, the

Hauser v. Hauser

778 So. 2d 309, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13222, 2000 WL 1508393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 64803748

Published

failed to apply the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, we reverse and remand the

Hauser v. Hauser

778 So. 2d 309, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13222, 2000 WL 1508393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 64803748

Published

failed to apply the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes, we reverse and remand the

Stokes v. Huelsman

770 So. 2d 701, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13088, 2000 WL 1475681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2000 | Docket: 64801525

Published

must pay support according to section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Section 61.30 clearly distinguishes between

Taylor v. Taylor

768 So. 2d 1193, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11871, 2000 WL 1344493

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2000 | Docket: 64800879

Published

that this become an accepted practice. . See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997).

Henderson v. Henderson

765 So. 2d 796, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9905, 2000 WL 1062040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2000 | Docket: 64799868

Published

deducted from his paycheck for that insurance. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (1999). The wife concedes the credit

Webb v. Webb

765 So. 2d 220, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9199, 2000 WL 1005269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2000 | Docket: 64799703

Published

Former Wife filed her petition for modification, section 61.30(2)(a)9, Florida Statutes (1995), provided that

Faircloth v. Faircloth

756 So. 2d 1120, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5506, 2000 WL 572639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 64797078

Published

guidelines rather than the two-children column. See § 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. (1999). The trial court subsequently

Florida Department of Revenue ex rel. Bloemendal v. Hodge

754 So. 2d 845, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4166, 2000 WL 353967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2000 | Docket: 64796336

Published

the trial court should order a party to pay. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1997). The trial court may deviate

Mannix v. Mannix

763 So. 2d 1135, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17581, 1999 WL 1259915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 64799192

Published

day care expenses in computing child support. Section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes, requires that 75% of day

Jarrett v. Jarrett

746 So. 2d 586, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17042, 1999 WL 1244438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 64792862

Published

Husband’s employer in determining his income. § 61.30(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). With regard to car expenses

Wehrum v. Wehrum

745 So. 2d 465, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120, 1999 WL 1037969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1999 | Docket: 64792442

Published

during the period of extended visitation. See § 61.30(ll)(g), Florida Statutes; Gomez v. Gomez, 727 So

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Cornejo v. Martinez

744 So. 2d 580, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15051, 1999 WL 1024042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1999 | Docket: 64792096

Published

including the wife’s income in the calculations. Section 61.30(12), Florida Statutes (1997), does specify that

Bolds v. Strong

744 So. 2d 487, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12183, 1999 WL 743580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1999 | Docket: 64792043

Published

guideline amount is presumptively correct. See § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1997); State, Dept. of Revenue By and

Blender v. Blender

760 So. 2d 950, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11553, 1999 WL 641794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1999 | Docket: 64798090

Published

minimum monthly guideline amount, pursuant to section 61.30(6), Florida Statutes (1995), is $2,839.50.1

Layman v. Layman

738 So. 2d 466, 1999 WL 543243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 1503152

Published

findings which was not done in this case. See § 61.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). We find that on the facts

Bokinsky v. Bokinsky

742 So. 2d 809, 1999 WL 518543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1999 | Docket: 717042

Published

imputing income without following the dictates of section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). We disagree

Vanbrussel v. Vanbrussel

735 So. 2d 608, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9173, 1999 WL 462133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1999 | Docket: 64788907

Published

not to exceed 50 percent of the amount awarded.” § 61.30(ll)(g), Fla. Stat. (1997). The judge’s order, by

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Forms

759 So. 2d 583, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 321, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1174, 1999 WL 462636

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1999 | Docket: 64797771

Published

determined by the child support guidelines found in section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The court, at its discretion

Rico-Perez v. Rico-Perez

734 So. 2d 1177, 1999 WL 452151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1999 | Docket: 1731118

Published

would not be ordered in a different case. [2] Section 61.30(1)(a)provides: The child support guideline

Martin v. Martin

734 So. 2d 1133, 1999 WL 333107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 1442826

Published

pension plan from his income as required by section 61.30(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1997). See also Nelson

Kochinsky v. Moore

729 So. 2d 407, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 177, 1999 WL 9809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1999 | Docket: 64787143

Published

together in the same household with the child.” § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Milopoulos v.

Thorsen v. Stuglik

725 So. 2d 396, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16044, 1998 WL 889353

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1998 | Docket: 64785926

Published

father to reimburse for those premiums under section 61.30(8), Florida Statutes. On remand, the court should

Sadd v. Sadd

720 So. 2d 285, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13663, 1998 WL 746017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1998 | Docket: 64784094

Published

child support obligation as provided for in section 61.30(2)(a)(9), Florida Statutes (1997), to reflect

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Marshall v. Smith

716 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10460, 1998 WL 518518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1998 | Docket: 64782381

Published

had divorced. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995). Marshall contends that section 61.30(11), Florida Statutes

Williamson v. Williamson

714 So. 2d 1167, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569, 1998 WL 422272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 64781970

Published

than 28 consecutive days, in accordance with section 61.30(ll)(g) Florida Statutes (1997), the trial judge

Daley v. Daley

714 So. 2d 614, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9122, 1998 WL 406018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1998 | Docket: 64781869

Published

court in 1994 would have been required to do under § 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (1997). After further examining

Roshkind v. Roshkind

717 So. 2d 545, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8002, 1998 WL 348364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 64782785

Published

for summer visitation shall be controlled by section 61.30(ll)(g), Florida Statutes (1995).” This appeal

In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

717 So. 2d 914, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1238, 1998 WL 334343

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1998 | Docket: 64782890

Published

determined by Florida’s child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes. A completed Child Support

Department of Revenue ex rel. Killian v. Green

711 So. 2d 1245, 1998 WL 241274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781217

Published

v. Warner, 692 So.2d 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); § 61.30(2)(b), (9), Fla. Stat. (1995). Here, the record

Shapiro v. Shapiro

710 So. 2d 114, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 64780743

Published

former husband and received by the former wife. See § 61.30(2)(a)9, (3)(g), Fla. Stat. (Supp.l996)(stating

Hanna v. Schmidt

707 So. 2d 966, 1998 WL 158824

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1998 | Docket: 115097

Published

See Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975); § 61.30(b), Fla. Stat. (1996). However, we reverse reduction

Colston v. Green

742 So. 2d 280, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2860, 1998 WL 128890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1998 | Docket: 64791340

Published

failing to follow the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995); 2) by determining

Sotoloff v. Sotoloff

745 So. 2d 959, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2642, 1998 WL 1058594

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 64792648

Published

child’s needs. The child support guidelines under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), presumptively establish

Steinmoen v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Seabrook

708 So. 2d 320, 1998 WL 116242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 64779873

Published

for the presumptive minimum amount of support. § 61.30(6), Fla. Stat. Instead, the father argues that

Gebauer v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Hurlburt

706 So. 2d 407, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2149, 1998 WL 88299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1998 | Docket: 64779129

Published

receiving food stamps and other welfare assistance. Section 61.30(12), Florida Statutes (1993) does not prohibit

Terrell v. Terrell

704 So. 2d 1156, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 926, 1998 WL 44620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1998 | Docket: 64778464

Published

Brewster, 629 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); § 61.30(2)(a)(2). GRIFFIN, C.J., and HARRIS and ANTOON

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Strockbine v. Strockbine

705 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1998 | Docket: 64778648

Published

financial status and ability of each parent to pay. § 61.30, Fla. Stat. For the trial court to have awarded

Dinn v. Haynes

705 So. 2d 686, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 630, 1998 WL 27580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1998 | Docket: 64778738

Published

depart from the child support guidelines under Section 61.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), if the court

Willey v. Willey

703 So. 2d 1234, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 38, 1998 WL 2406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1998 | Docket: 64777960

Published

health insurance from his child support obligation. § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (1995). However, it appears from

Claudio v. Claudio

702 So. 2d 1360, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586, 1997 WL 786736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1997 | Docket: 64777423

Published

support guideline that applies in this case. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, on remand, the

Schwartz v. Schwartz

720 So. 2d 531, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10715, 1997 WL 586663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1997 | Docket: 64784211

Published

which are excluded from gross income under section 61.30(2)(e), Florida Statutes, and which are (like

Escribano v. Coviello

698 So. 2d 934, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10130, 1997 WL 559437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1997 | Docket: 64775579

Published

support would be pursuant to the guidelines. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995).1 To obtain a guidelines amount

Feidelman v. Feidelman

699 So. 2d 744, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9459, 1997 WL 473666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1997 | Docket: 64775941

Published

determining a parent’s child support obligation, section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that allowable

Eiler v. Eiler

695 So. 2d 870, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1997 WL 330595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1997 | Docket: 64774347

Published

the merits, we remand, nevertheless, because section 61.30(13), Florida Statutes (1996), provides: “If

Wieland v. Wieland

692 So. 2d 307, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4830, 1997 WL 213041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1997 | Docket: 64772651

Published

allocate it between the parties in accordance with section 61.30(6), Florida Statutes (1993). STONE and POLEN

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Powell v. Feeney

689 So. 2d 350, 1997 WL 60875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1997 | Docket: 64771629

Published

after-born children.” The department argues, citing section 61.30(12), Florida Statutes (1993), that the trial

Somma v. Vesely

687 So. 2d 936, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 982, 1997 WL 54802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1997 | Docket: 64771083

Published

circumstance unlike that described above. . Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995), requires the court

Burdette v. Burdette

681 So. 2d 862, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10890, 1996 WL 595198

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1996 | Docket: 64768454

Published

legislature has specifically addressed this issue in section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides

Hooper v. Hooper

681 So. 2d 833, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11490, 1996 WL 588685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1996 | Docket: 64768444

Published

of the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995). We have jurisdiction

Department of Revenue, Child Support, Enforcement Division v. Moore

677 So. 2d 979, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8296, 1996 WL 446509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1996 | Docket: 64766498

Published

six percent deviation from the guidelines. Section 61.30(1) does not permit the trial court to deviate

Sierra v. Ellison

677 So. 2d 406, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7982, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 64766325

Published

find that the court’s calculations violated section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), we reverse and remand

Hall v. Hall

677 So. 2d 91, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7832, 1996 WL 412805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1996 | Docket: 64766253

Published

Former Husband’s child support obligation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (Florida’s child support guidelines)

Hall v. Hall

677 So. 2d 91, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7832, 1996 WL 412805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1996 | Docket: 64766253

Published

Former Husband’s child support obligation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (Florida’s child support guidelines)

Esfahani v. Esfahani

676 So. 2d 527, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7587, 1996 WL 396316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1996 | Docket: 64766099

Published

with the child support guidelines pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes, we are remanding this case

Ervin v. Ervin

675 So. 2d 252, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6430, 1996 WL 335563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1996 | Docket: 64765279

Published

more than 5% from the statutory guidelines of section 61.30, Florida Statutes. While we held that such an

Burns v. Burns

679 So. 2d 6, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6165, 1996 WL 312199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1996 | Docket: 64767075

Published

utilized the child support guidelines under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), and calculated Mr

Smoot v. Smoot

685 So. 2d 1337, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5538, 1996 WL 283981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1996 | Docket: 64770258

Published

calculating the guideline amount of child support. See § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1995). Thus, the husband has not shown

Lacaria v. Lacaria

673 So. 2d 542, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4775, 1996 WL 252236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1996 | Docket: 64764590

Published

support 'received from a “previous marriage.” § 61.30(2)(a)(9), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994). This provision

State, Department of Revenue v. Beal

672 So. 2d 608, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4114, 1996 WL 194423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1996 | Docket: 64764070

Published

The Florida Department of Revenue1 appeals. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995), in relevant part provides:

Didier v. Didier

669 So. 2d 1072, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2029, 1996 WL 91640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1996 | Docket: 64763204

Published

intended to conform the child support award with section 61.30(11)(g), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), which

Elliott v. Elliott

666 So. 2d 276, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 304, 1996 WL 15489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 64761350

Published

of the guidelines amount was not justified, see § 61.30(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Jones v. Jones, 636 So

Irwin v. Perryman

666 So. 2d 959, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 76, 1996 WL 5144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1996 | Docket: 64761703

Published

obligation. The wife properly concedes error. § 61.30(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). We reverse and remand

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Stanley v. Tucker

661 So. 2d 385, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10651, 1995 WL 597435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1995 | Docket: 64759243

Published

father was financially dependent upon appellee. See § 61.30(ll)(c), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994). Similarly, while

Harbolt v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

660 So. 2d 387, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 64758664

Published

affidavits of the parents and the guidelines of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993) to determine that a

Lamas v. Lamas

660 So. 2d 765, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 1995 WL 539680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 64758886

Published

support amount as required by that figure under section 61.30, Florida Statutes. The $2,108 figure was presented

Cortez-Williams v. Douglass

659 So. 2d 1250, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9022, 1995 WL 504928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1995 | Docket: 64758558

Published

to make the requisite findings of fact under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), to impute income to

Warner v. Warner

659 So. 2d 1237, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9007, 1995 WL 502104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 64758556

Published

cognizable reason for a greater departure. Section 61.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993) provides that

Ledbetter v. Bell

658 So. 2d 1146, 1995 WL 455440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1995 | Docket: 439443

Published

voluntarily underemployed within the meaning of section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1993). The parties

Margolles v. Margolles

652 So. 2d 1288, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4040, 1995 WL 229251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1995 | Docket: 64755368

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 61.30(1 DELL, C.J., and KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Winogrond v. Winogrond

652 So. 2d 459, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2829, 1995 WL 119238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1995 | Docket: 64755147

Published

awarded, or correct the award to comply with section 61.30(l)(a). Such remand would not, in my view, require

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Norman

646 So. 2d 846, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12792, 1994 WL 712734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1994 | Docket: 64752771

Published

minus 5 percent would be unjust or inappropriate. § 61.30(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); Pitts v. Pitts,

Passori v. Couto

644 So. 2d 547, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9467, 1994 WL 535057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1994 | Docket: 64751785

Published

joint obligation and the support guidelines of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993), presumptively establish

Aust v. Aust

644 So. 2d 536, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9378, 1994 WL 531273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 64751784

Published

and it was in their best interest to do so. See § 61.30(11)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Assuming for the sake

Finch v. Finch

640 So. 2d 1243, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001, 1994 WL 419599

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1994 | Docket: 64750100

Published

590 So.2d 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Finally, section 61.30(1)(a) establishes a presumptive amount of child

Lupkowski v. Lupkowski

638 So. 2d 632, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6595, 1994 WL 316693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 64749244

Published

the husband’s income in order to comply with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989), to justify the trial

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Dean

647 So. 2d 184, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6491, 1994 WL 284561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1994 | Docket: 64752894

Published

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur. . Section 61.30(1), Florida Statutes 1993, establishes a presumptive

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Jones v. Scott

634 So. 2d 1122, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3270, 1994 WL 114763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1994 | Docket: 64747604

Published

to be ordered for the support of a minor child. § 61.30(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991). The court must make a

Clowdis v. Earnest

629 So. 2d 1044, 1993 WL 540171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 1263489

Published

to achieve an equitable result pursuant to Section 61.30(10)(i) based upon the Respondent's present financial

Womack v. Young

627 So. 2d 1304, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12147, 1993 WL 504486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1993 | Docket: 64744675

Published

from the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, without making specific findings

Neale v. Balcerak

627 So. 2d 1310, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12168, 1993 WL 504498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1993 | Docket: 64744679

Published

obligation to an amount in accordance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Appellants’ request that

Will v. Thomas

627 So. 2d 574, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11967, 1993 WL 496048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 64744397

Published

support guidelines amount of $50.99 per week. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991), provides a mathematical

Zayas v. Zayas

625 So. 2d 1330, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391, 1993 WL 458889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1993 | Docket: 64743842

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Section 61.30(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Marshall v. Marshall, 596 So.2d 675 (Fla

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Beckwith

624 So. 2d 395, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9516, 1993 WL 372165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1993 | Docket: 64742998

Published

when one of the children attains majority. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991) indicates that departures

Dinsmore v. Dinsmore

623 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9472, 1993 WL 366867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1993 | Docket: 64698487

Published

date of filing the motion for modification. Section 61.30, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992); Miller v. Schou, 616

Gregg v. Gregg

623 So. 2d 831, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8957, 1993 WL 337042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1993 | Docket: 64698547

Published

nurse’s aide earning that much. . According to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), the presumptive

Sylvester v. Ryan

623 So. 2d 767, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8440, 1993 WL 309052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1993 | Docket: 64698522

Published

discretion of the trial court, even in light of section 61.30(l)(b)2, Florida Statutes, is as broad as many

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Heinold v. Schwass

622 So. 2d 578, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8190, 1993 WL 291979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1993 | Docket: 64698156

Published

the guideline support calculation pursuant to section 61.-30(6), Florida Statutes (1991), requires ap-pellee

Baker v. Ashton

617 So. 2d 822, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4763, 1993 WL 136603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1993 | Docket: 64695895

Published

the *823proper amount of child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991). Appellant is a medical

Kussrath v. Kussrath

615 So. 2d 863, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3228, 1993 WL 80525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1993 | Docket: 64695106

Published

guidelines presumptively call for, namely, $1,198.60. § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1991). The trial court did not abuse

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. McGurl

614 So. 2d 648, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2260, 1993 WL 48254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1993 | Docket: 64694627

Published

below the amount provided in the guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1991). We affirm. This case

Hernandez v. Marsarm Corp.

613 So. 2d 914, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12352, 1992 WL 360943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1992 | Docket: 64694090

Published

enforcing orders and judgments; costs and expenses); § 61.30 (Child support guidelines); see also § 88.012 (“It

Dye v. Dye

608 So. 2d 941, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12240, 1992 WL 355270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1992 | Docket: 64692191

Published

award of $528 per month for the three children. § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1991). The record con*942tains a written

Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Skates

603 So. 2d 81, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165, 1992 WL 178948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1992 | Docket: 64669197

Published

support for his earlier-born child. Indeed, section 61.30(10)(e), Florida Statutes (1989), recognizes

Osborne v. Osborne

604 So. 2d 858, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7964, 1992 WL 171580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1992 | Docket: 64669555

Published

guidelines because of the husband’s high annual salary. § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1989). . The husband attempts to

Batts v. Batts

600 So. 2d 1301, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1992 WL 143600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1992 | Docket: 64668561

Published

currently paying in child support. This contravenes section 61.-30(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1989). Additionally

Rosales v. Rosales

599 So. 2d 779, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6846, 1992 WL 131862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1992 | Docket: 64667766

Published

departure” from the child support guidelines. See § 61.30(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Weinstein v. Steele, 590

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Behnke-Coolidge

598 So. 2d 293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 1992 WL 101493

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 64667154

Published

apparently extrapolated from the guidelines, see § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1989), but it reduced that amount and

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Behnke-Coolidge

598 So. 2d 293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 1992 WL 101493

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 64667154

Published

apparently extrapolated from the guidelines, see § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1989), but it reduced that amount and

Rogers v. Truitt

596 So. 2d 1081, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793, 1992 WL 35364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1992 | Docket: 64666602

Published

support to the child to pay support pursuant to Section 61.30.”4 We hold that acknowledging paternity is a

Torres v. Hunter

592 So. 2d 757, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 449, 1992 WL 10921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1992 | Docket: 64664739

Published

child support guidelines are inapplicable. Section 61.30(l)(b)2, Fla.Stat. (1989). Both parties have

Edgar v. Edgar

588 So. 2d 1092, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11852, 1991 WL 247466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1991 | Docket: 64662921

Published

were inappropriate in this particular case, see § 61.30(10), Fla.Stat. (1989), there was no error in applying

Schou v. Miller

583 So. 2d 805, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8039, 1991 WL 152945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1991 | Docket: 64660667

Published

trial judge’s view, the subsequent enactment of section 61.30(12), Florida Statutes (1989),1 does not change

Durden v. Hewitt

582 So. 2d 1243, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7024, 1991 WL 134050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1991 | Docket: 64660328

Published

court or master to utilize the provisions of section 61.-30(l)(b)(2), Florida Statutes (1989), as is required

Tanner v. Tanner

577 So. 2d 712, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3207, 1991 WL 50595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1991 | Docket: 64657945

Published

child support in an amount commensurate with section 61.30, Florida Statutes. Much of Tanner’s pro se brief

Upshaw v. Reaves

572 So. 2d 560, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9675, 1990 WL 212145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1990 | Docket: 64655666

Published

compliance with the child support guidelines, section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989), a minimum wage income

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Massey

568 So. 2d 1343, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8360, 1990 WL 165354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1990 | Docket: 64654173

Published

court failed to comply with the requirements of section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1989). We agree and reverse

Brandt v. Brandt

565 So. 2d 397, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5921, 1990 WL 114698

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1990 | Docket: 64652117

Published

5th DCA 1990) (Sharp, J., concurring specially); § 61.30(1)(b)2, Fla.Stat. (1987). The record does not disclose

Jessell v. Jessell

560 So. 2d 1325, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2959, 1990 WL 54975

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1990 | Docket: 64650358

Published

excess of the support guidelines pursuant to section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), and in excess of appellee

Grigutis v. Grigutis

561 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2874, 1990 WL 49861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 64650735

Published

calculating child support obligations, see section 61.30(2), Florida Statutes (1989), we cannot say that

Eiler v. Eiler

556 So. 2d 834, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 1990 WL 14251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1990 | Docket: 64648088

Published

provision for child care costs pursuant to section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (1987), and for entry of

Gutierrez v. Gutierrez

554 So. 2d 589, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7069, 1989 WL 153767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1989 | Docket: 64647244

Published

is well within the guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987); however, we reverse

Ellis v. Council

546 So. 2d 801, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1813, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2912, 1989 WL 86415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1989 | Docket: 64643858

Published

adjustments to either or both parent’s share. § 61.30(10), Fla.Stat. (1987). The analysis should begin

Meadows v. Cox

542 So. 2d 1060, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1090, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309, 1989 WL 52237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1989 | Docket: 64642266

Published

utilize the child support guidelines contained in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), it appears the trial

Glinsky v. Glinsky

542 So. 2d 1021, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 821, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1617, 1989 WL 29040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1989 | Docket: 64642248

Published

conclude that the award is clearly inadequate, see section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987), but take cognizance

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Buttiglieri

539 So. 2d 1185, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 757, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1519, 1989 WL 25340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1989 | Docket: 64641061

Published

recommended child support guidelines under section 61.-30, Florida Statutes (1987).2 The General *1187Master