Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 409.2564 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 409.2564 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 409.2564 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 409.2564

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE
Chapter 409
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
View Entire Chapter
409.2564 Actions for support.
(1) In each case in which regular support payments are not being made as provided herein, the department shall institute, within 30 days after determination of the obligor’s reasonable ability to pay, action as is necessary to secure the obligor’s payment of current support, any arrearage that may have accrued under an existing order of support, and, if a parenting time plan was not incorporated into the existing order of support, include either a signed, agreed-upon parenting time plan or a signed Title IV-D Standard Parenting Time Plan, if appropriate. The department shall notify the program attorney in the judicial circuit in which the recipient resides setting forth the facts in the case, including the obligor’s address, if known, and the public assistance case number. Whenever applicable, the procedures established under chapter 88, Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, chapter 61, Dissolution of Marriage; Support; Time-sharing, chapter 39, Proceedings Relating to Children, chapter 984, Children and Families in Need of Services; Prevention and Intervention for School Truancy and Ungovernable and Runaway Children, and chapter 985, Delinquency; Interstate Compact on Juveniles, may govern actions instituted under this act, except that actions for support under chapter 39, chapter 984, or chapter 985 brought pursuant to this act shall not require any additional investigation or supervision by the department.
(2) The order for support entered pursuant to an action instituted by the department under subsection (1) shall require that the support payments be made periodically to the department through the depository. An order for support entered under subsection (1) must include either a signed, agreed-upon parenting time plan or a signed Title IV-D Standard Parenting Time Plan, if appropriate. Upon receipt of a payment made by the obligor pursuant to any order of the court, the depository shall transmit the payment to the department within 2 working days, except those payments made by personal check which shall be disbursed in accordance with s. 61.181. Upon request, the depository shall furnish to the department a certified statement of all payments made by the obligor. Such statement shall be provided by the depository at no cost to the department.
(3) When it is no longer authorized to receive payments for the obligee, the department shall notify the depository to redirect income deduction payments to the obligee.
(4) Whenever the Department of Revenue has undertaken an action for enforcement of support, the Department of Revenue may enter into an agreement with the obligor for the entry of a judgment determining paternity, if applicable, and for periodic child support payments based on the child support guidelines schedule in s. 61.30. Before entering into this agreement, the obligor shall be informed that a judgment will be entered based on the agreement. The clerk of the court shall file the agreement without the payment of any fees or charges, and the court, upon entry of the judgment, shall forward a copy of the judgment to the parties to the action.
(5) Whenever the department has undertaken an action to determine paternity, to establish an obligation of support, or to enforce or modify an obligation of support, the department shall be a party to the action only for those purposes allowed under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. The program attorney shall be the attorney of record solely for the purposes of support enforcement as authorized under Title IV-D and may prosecute only those activities which are eligible for federal financial participation under Title IV-D. An attorney-client relationship exists only between the department and the legal services providers in all Title IV-D cases. The attorney shall advise the obligee in Title IV-D cases that the attorney represents the agency and not the obligee.
(6) The department and its officers, employees, and agents and all persons and agencies acting pursuant to contract with the department are immune from liability in tort for actions taken to establish, enforce, or modify support obligations if such actions are taken in good faith, with apparent legal authority, without malicious purpose, and in a manner not exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of rights or property of another.
(7) The director of the department, or the director’s designee, is authorized to subpoena from any person financial and other information necessary to establish, modify, or enforce a child support order.
(a) For the purpose of establishing or modifying a child support order, or enforcing a support order, the director of the department or another state’s Title IV-D agency, or any employee designated by the director of the department or authorized under another state’s law, may administer oaths or affirmations, subpoena witnesses and compel their attendance, take evidence and require the production of any matter which is relevant to the support action, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of relevant facts or any other matter reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of material evidence.
(b) Subpoenas issued by the department or another state’s Title IV-D agency may be challenged in accordance with s. 120.569(2)(k)1. While a subpoena is being challenged, the department may not impose a fine as provided for under paragraph (c) until the challenge is complete and the subpoena has been found to be valid.
(c) The department is authorized to impose a fine for failure to comply with a subpoena. Failure to comply with the subpoena, or to challenge the subpoena as provided in paragraph (b), within 15 days after service of the subpoena may result in the agency taking the following actions:
1. Imposition of an administrative fine of not more than $500.
2. Enforcement of the subpoena as provided in s. 120.569(2)(k)2. When the subpoena is enforced pursuant to s. 120.569(2)(k)2., the court may award costs and fees to the prevailing party in accordance with that section.
(d) The department may seek to collect administrative fines imposed pursuant to paragraph (c) by filing a petition in the circuit court of the judicial circuit in which the person against whom the fine was imposed resides. All fines collected pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited into the Child Support Enforcement Application and Program Revenue Trust Fund.
(8) In cases in which support is subject to an assignment as provided under 45 C.F.R. s. 301.1, the department shall, upon providing notice to the obligor and obligee, direct the obligor or other payor to change the payee to the appropriate depository.
(9)(a) For the purpose of securing delinquent support, the department may increase the amount of the monthly support obligation to include amounts for delinquencies, subject to such conditions or limitations as set forth in paragraph (b).
(b) In support obligations not subject to income deduction, the department shall notify the obligor in writing of his or her delinquency and of the department’s intent to require an additional 20 percent of the monthly obligation amount to allow for collection of the delinquency unless, within 20 days, the obligor pays the delinquency in full or files a petition with the circuit court to contest the delinquency action.
(c) All written notices provided to an obligor regarding delinquent support must include information on how the obligor can access the web page required under s. 409.2557(4) and how to access services through CareerSource Florida, Inc., and the organizations that are awarded grants under s. 409.25996.
(10) For the purposes of denial, revocation, or limitation of an obligor’s United States passport, consistent with 42 U.S.C. s. 652(k)(1), the department shall have procedures to certify to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services that an obligor owes arrearages of support in an amount exceeding $2,500. Said procedures shall provide that the obligor be given notice of the determination and of the consequence thereof and an opportunity to contest the accuracy of the determination.
(11)(a) The Department of Revenue shall review child support orders in IV-D cases at least once every 3 years when requested by either party, or when support rights are assigned to the state under s. 414.095(7), and may seek modification of the order if appropriate under the child support guidelines in s. 61.30. Not less than once every 3 years the department shall provide notice to the parties subject to the order informing them of their right to request a review and, if appropriate, a modification of the child support order. The notice requirement may be met by including appropriate language in the initial support order or any subsequent orders.
(b) If the department’s review of a support order entered by the circuit court indicates that the order should be modified, the department, through counsel, shall file a petition to modify the order with the court. Along with the petition, the department shall file a child support guideline worksheet, any financial affidavits or written declarations, pursuant to s. 61.30(15), received from the parties or completed by the department as part of the support order review, a proposed modified order that includes findings as to the source and amount of income, and a notice that informs the parties of the requirement to file an objection or a request for hearing with the court if the party wants a court hearing on the petition to modify. A copy of the petition, proposed order, and other documents shall be served by regular mail on a party who requested the support order review. A party that did not request the support order review shall be served personally in any manner authorized under chapter 48.
(c) To obtain a court hearing on a petition to modify a support order, a party who is served by regular mail must file an objection to the proposed order or a request for hearing with the court within 30 days after the date on which the petition, proposed order, and other documents were mailed. If a party is served personally, to obtain a court hearing on a petition to modify the party must file an objection to the proposed order or a request for hearing with the court within 30 days after the date of receipt of the petition, proposed order, and other documents.
(d) If a timely objection or request for hearing is not filed with the court, the court may modify the support order without a hearing in accordance with the terms of the proposed order.
(e) If a support order does not provide for payment of noncovered medical expenses or require health insurance for the minor child and health insurance is accessible to the child and available at a reasonable cost, the department shall seek to have the order modified and any modification shall be made without a requirement for proof or showing of a change in circumstances.
(12)(a) When the department files a petition for modification of a child support order and the petition is accompanied with a verified motion signed by the department to redirect payment alleging that:
1. The child is residing with a relative caretaker as defined in s. 414.0252 and the relative caretaker receives temporary cash assistance as defined in s. 414.0252; or
2. The child was formerly residing with a relative caretaker as defined in s. 414.0252, the child support payments were redirected to the relative caretaker, and the child is now residing with the original payee,

then the court shall enter a temporary order, ex parte, within 5 days that redirects the child support payments to the relative caretaker or original payee pending a final hearing and may grant such relief as the court deems proper. Upon the filing of a verified motion by the department to redirect payment, the relative caretaker is deemed a party to the proceedings.

(b) In the event that it is subsequently determined by the court that the child support payments were improperly diverted, the department shall pay the improperly diverted child support payments to the appropriate party and shall attempt to recoup any child support improperly paid.
(13) The department shall have the authority to adopt rules to implement this section.
History.s. 5, ch. 76-220; s. 143, ch. 86-220; s. 20, ch. 92-138; s. 12, ch. 95-222; s. 89, ch. 96-175; s. 48, ch. 97-170; s. 39, ch. 98-280; s. 24, ch. 98-397; ss. 12, 13, ch. 99-375; s. 54, ch. 2000-153; s. 93, ch. 2000-165; s. 31, ch. 2001-158; ss. 28, 29, ch. 2005-39; s. 1, ch. 2005-61; s. 4, ch. 2007-85; s. 22, ch. 2008-61; s. 10, ch. 2010-187; s. 6, ch. 2017-117; s. 13, ch. 2022-67; s. 91, ch. 2023-8; s. 42, ch. 2025-153.

F.S. 409.2564 on Google Scholar

F.S. 409.2564 on CourtListener

Amendments to 409.2564


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 409.2564

Total Results: 29  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv. v. Holland, 602 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 158125

...VanDyke, 415 So.2d 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 426 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1983), and its award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 61.16 to Holland, the appellee, against the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. In this case, HRS, acting pursuant to section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1991), [1] filed a suit in Citrus County, Florida in 1991, against Holland, on behalf of his former wife, McReynolds, to obtain payment of unpaid child support he owed pursuant to a 1976 Florida dissolution decree....
...ony with Chapter 88. That statute provides, in part: Whenever applicable, the procedures established under the provision of chapter 88, Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support, ... may govern actions instituted under the provisions of this act ... § 409.2564(1), Fla....
...f the other parent for the simple reason that the other parent does not own the cause for child support and it can be enforced by others acting on behalf of the minor child. [3] See, e.g., Sprunger v. Sprunger, 534 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). [1] Section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1991) provides: In each case in which regular child support payments are not being made as provided herein, the department shall institute, within 30 days after determination of the obligor's reasonable ability...
Copy

Dept. of Rev. Ex Rel. Preston v. Cummings, 871 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...ible." Amerada Hess Corp. v. Morgan, 426 So.2d 1122, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Allman v. Wolfe, 592 So.2d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). These paternity cases seek to determine the man who has a legal duty to support *1059 the children involved. See § 409.2564(1), Fla....
Copy

DHRS v. Crossdale, 585 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...The statute creating the power in HRS to seek enforcement on behalf of a parent who has not received support payments due from the other parent under a court order expressly says that its remedies "are in addition to, and not in lieu of, existing remedies." Section 409.2551, Florida Statutes (1989). Moreover, section 409.2564(1) says: Whenever applicable, the procedures established under the provisions of chapter 88, Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support, and chapter 61, Dissolution of Marriage; Support; Custody, and chapter 39, Proceedings Relating t...
Copy

Dept. of Revenue Ex Rel. Jackson v. Nesbitt, 975 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 313471

...sed to allow him to accept a job in France as a basketball player pursuant to a contract for a fixed term. DOR argued that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to order Nesbitt's requested relief because the funds owed exceeded $5,000, citing section 409.2564, Florida Statutes (2006), section 51.70 of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and section 652 of title 42 of the United States Code....
...g the debtor's child support obligations to the Secretary of State in order to initiate that hold." Id. at 571. Similarly, in the instant case, the trial court had no authority to order DOR to lift and release the restrictions on Nesbitt's passport. Section 409.2564(10), Florida Statutes (2006), gives DOR the authority to certify to the Secretary of Health and Human Services that an individual has child support arrearages and may be eligible for passport restrictions: (10) For the purposes of de...
...in an amount exceeding $5,000. Said procedures shall provide that the individual be given notice of the determination and of the consequence thereof and that the individual shall be given an opportunity to contest the accuracy of the determination. § 409.2564(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). Nesbitt does not contest the DOR's determination that his child support arrearages exceeded $5,000. Nesbitt does not assert, and the trial court did not conclude, that section 409.2564(10) is unconstitutional....
...But I think something far less intrusive is afoot here. Under federal statutes, the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Secretary of State (SOS) are actually responding to a process set in motion by DOR, a Florida agency. Under section 409.2564(10), Florida Statutes (2006), the Florida DOR is required to have procedures for notifying HHS of person's failure to pay child support after being ordered to do so and to certify to HHS the fact that the payor owes arrearages exceeding $2,500....
Copy

Rogers v. Cooper, 575 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 17924

...The issue presented is whether the department is subject to the provisions of Section 61.16, Florida Statutes, which provides for the award of attorney's fees and costs in Chapter 61 actions. We hold that the department is subject to the provisions of Section 61.16, and we affirm the order appealed. Pursuant to Section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, the department instituted a Section 61.17, Florida Statutes, action against appellee....
...ntent serves to contravene the very clear language of the section. Neither the department's brief, nor our review of the statutes has revealed any such legislative expression. The specific authority for the department to bring the action is found in Section 409.2564, Florida Statutes....
...be treated as a party for purposes of assessment of attorney's fees and costs. However, a review of the role of the department in such proceedings, as specified by the statutes, clearly reveals that the department is much more than a nominal party. Section 409.2564(2), Florida Statutes, authorizes the department to receive the support payments ordered by the court in an action for child support enforcement which the department has instituted. Section 409.2564(4), Florida Statutes, even authorizes the department to settle the action by agreement between the department and the defendant. Finally, we find it worthy of note that the legislature did consider limitation of the department's potential exposure in its role as a party in actions for child support enforcement. Section 409.2564(6), Florida Statutes, provides: (6) The department and its officers, employees, and agents and all persons and agencies acting pursuant to contract with the department are immune from liability in tort for actions taken to establish...
Copy

Fla. D. of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Cisneros, 446 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...aternity action brought by the department on behalf of a mother receiving public assistance for her dependent child. The record establishes that the department initiated this action in discharge of its statutory obligation under section 409.2561 and section 409.2564, Florida Statutes (1981), in good faith reliance upon information furnished by the mother in both her application for public assistance and paternity questionnaire....
Copy

State, Dhrs v. Harvey, 593 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 25918

...The appellee thereafter filed a motion to tax his reasonable attorneys' fees to HRS pursuant to section 61.16. The trial court *612 entered an order granting the motion based upon the authority of Rogers v. Cooper, 575 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1989), authorizes HRS to bring child support enforcement actions pursuant to chapter 61 "in each case in which regular child support payments are not being made......
...child support enforcement action and is thus subject to the provisions of section 61.16. The First and Fourth Districts so held notwithstanding HRS is statutorily mandated to bring a child support enforcement action on behalf of an aggrieved party. Section 409.2564(1). We do not agree that HRS is a party as contemplated by section 61.16, nor do we find any provision in the statutes that would otherwise make HRS liable for payment of fees when it is fulfilling its duties under section 409.2564....
Copy

Thompson v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 867 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2690, 2004 WL 401587

...Calvin Thompson appeals a non-final order denying his motion to quash service of process in this support-administrative paternity action filed by the Department of Revenue. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502-03 (Fla.1989). Pursuant to section 409.2564, Florida Statutes (2002), the Department filed an action to establish and enforce child support for Thompson's four year-old daughter....
Copy

State, Dept. of Health & Reh. Serv. v. Hatfield, 522 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...HRS did not seek a court order to establish Hatfield's obligations to provide child support during his incarceration because HRS's investigation indicated that Hatfield did not have the financial ability to pay child support during that period. See § 409.2564, Fla....
Copy

Lopez v. Dep't of Revenue, 201 So. 3d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14477

...Lopez,” it was served on Lopez – or more specifically on Lopez’s wife at the couple’s home. B. Lopez’s 57.105 motion 1Lopez’s middle initial is D. DOR was seeking to establish paternity against Guillermo J. Lopez. DOR had misidentified Lopez. 2 Section 409.2564 of the Florida Statutes authorizes DOR to bring a paternity action on behalf of an unwed mother in order to establish an obligation of support by the father for the benefit of the child born out of wedlock....
Copy

Eller v. Thomas, 586 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9433, 1991 WL 186983

...Since HRS brought the action, the case in Martin County was not a Chapter 742 proceeding. Appellant correctly points out that the Martin County ease was a Chapter 409 proceeding brought by a Title IV-D agency, namely HRS, and that custody may not be addressed in such a proceeding. Section 409.2564(5), Florida Statutes, states: Whenever the IV-D agency [HRS] has undertaken an action to determine paternity, to establish an obligation of support, or to enforce an obligation of support, the IV-D agency shall be a party to the action only for those purposes allowed under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act....
...may prosecute only those activities which are eligible for federal financial participation under Title IV-D. *482 Custody is not an issue addressed in Title IV-D ( 42 U.S.C. § 651-666 ), entitled “Child Support and Establishment of Paternity,” and as such Section 409.2564 would bar HRS from pursuing the custody issue....
Copy

Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Collingwood, 43 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13723, 2010 WL 3583985

...In the alternative, the lower court may have concluded that the department's action was inequitable because the department should spend its time and resources seeking to recover for the mother what the father owes her, rather than seeking to arrange that he pay her a lesser amount. On the contrary, under section 409.2564(11), Florida Statutes (2010), the department is required to review a child-support obligation every three years to determine whether the amount continues to be consistent with current support guidelines, "and may seek adjustment of t...
...an upward adjustment. The department is authorized by law to bring such an action and thus it is not inequitable as a matter of law. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED. PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See § 409.2564(5), Fla....
Copy

Fort v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 626 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11177, 1993 WL 452693

...Accordingly, we issue the writ of certiorari, quash the order of substitution, and remand this matter to the trial court with directions to conduct a hearing on the father’s motion for assessment of attorney’s fees against HRS. 4 HARRIS, C.J., and DIAMANTIS, J., and BROCK, N.D., Associate Judge, concur. . See § 409.2564, Fla.Stat....
Copy

Camps v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. ex rel. Jamerson, 459 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2460, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15910

child support payments, as contemplated by section 409.2564(1) and (2), Florida Statutes, for reimbursement
Copy

Dep't of Revenue obo Hanna May Rose Peterson v. Jeremiah Kenneth Johnson, 177 So. 3d 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) instructing DOR to commence proceedings for modification of an administrative support order. For the reasons explained below, we grant DOR’s request. Pursuant to section 409.2564(11)(a), Florida Statutes, DOR informed Respondent that he was entitled to a review of the administrative support order that obligated him to pay child support in a certain amount....
...eached, leaving DOR with no recourse other than interlocutory review. We agree. As in Dove, the ALJ conflated the purpose of a hearing held after DOR determines that no modification action is warranted after conducting a review pursuant to section 409.2564(11)(a), with the purpose of a hearing held pursuant to section 409.2563(5)(c) after DOR submits a proposed modified support order....
Copy

DOR v. Curtis, 247 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...(2017). The Department is considered a party to the enforcement action "only for those purposes allowed under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act," and the Department's attorney is the attorney of record "solely for the purposes of support enforcement as authorized under Title IV-D." § 409.2564(5), Fla. Stat. (2017) (footnotes omitted). Although the Department's attorney represents the agency and not the custodial parent, 2 see § 409.2564(5), Fla....
...While the statute is clear that the Department's attorney represents only the agency and not Mother, this is not material because the Department is Mother's attorney in fact for purposes of enforcing the administrative child support order. §§ 409.2561(2)(b), 409.2564(5), Fla....
Copy

Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., State ex rel. Bollheimer v. Bollheimer, 634 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1677, 1994 WL 63303

...See generally Chapter 93-208, § 4, Laws of Florida. The failure of the trial court to assess the fee against HRS, however, has not been raised by cross-appeal. Accordingly, we reverse the attorney’s fee award entered by the trial court. REVERSED. PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . See § 409.2564, Fla.Stat.
Copy

Taylor v. McGregor, 616 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3602, 1993 WL 90536

bring child support enforcement actions under section 409.-2564(1), Florida Statutes (1989). The statute provides
Copy

Florida Dep't of Revenue v. John Garrison Seeley & Sarah Ann Gilbride, 213 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...9.100(c)(3). Because the ALJ improperly reserved jurisdiction below, we grant the petition. I. Mr. Seeley requested that DOR conduct a review of his child support payments in accordance with § 409.2564(11)(a), Florida Statutes....
Copy

Andrew Boukzam v. Jossi Jugo (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...judgment and did not catch that the support payments would be paid directly to the mother. The Department also pointed out that the mother had assigned her rights to the Department by accepting public assistance. 2 The Department asserted that under section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, any order of support must require the payments to be made through the depository....
... custodian “to prosecute or maintain any support action or action to determine paternity or execute any legal, equitable, or administrative remedy existing under the laws of the state to obtain reimbursement.” § 409.2561(3), Fla. Stat. (2018). Actions for support are governed by section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, which states in relevant part: (1) In each case in which regular support payments are not being made as provided herein, the department shall institute, within 30 days after determination of the...
...provided under 45 C.F.R. s. 301.1, the department shall, upon providing notice to the obligor and obligee, direct the obligor or other payor to change the payee to the appropriate depository. 8 § 409.2564, Fla....
...98-397, § 43, Laws of Fla. (creating section 61.1824, Florida Statutes). Thus, under current law, unlike in Branscomb, the direct payment of child support to the mother in this Title IV-D case violates federal and state statutory requirements. Indeed, section 409.2564(8) states that “[i]n cases in which support is subject to an assignment . . . the department shall . . . direct the obligor 9 or other payor to change the payee to the appropriate depository.” § 409.2564(8), Fla. Stat. (2018). Notably, this requirement was first enacted in 1997, which was after Branscomb was decided. See Ch. 97-170, § 48, Laws of Fla. While the father argues that section 409.2564 applies only to situations in which the obligor fails to make support payments, his argument rests entirely on section 409.2564(1). Section 409.2564(1) requires the Department to bring an action for support in each case in which regular support payments are not being made. However, section 409.2564(8) is not limited to cases where the Department instituted an action under subsection (1). Nothing in the plain language of section 409.2564(8) would preclude this subsection from applying to a paternity case in which the Department intervened to enforce an obligation of support under Title IV-D. Furthermore, although section 61.13 still contains language which assumes...
Copy

Washington v. James, 471 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1601, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816

PER CURIAM. We reverse upon a finding that the state attorney was not empowered to represent the absent mother on issues relating to visitation, see § 409.2564, Fla.Stat....
Copy

Hoover v. Florida Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Mitchell, 114 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 2462119, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9238

...Finally, Appellant argues that the ALJ erred in failing to award support retroactively. Appellee concedes that retroactive support should have been awarded as of the date of the Proposed Administrative Order to Modify Administrative Support Order, which functioned as the “petition” under section 409.2564(ll)(b), Florida Statutes....
Copy

Mears v. Luterman, 453 So. 2d 499 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14181

...After a hearing, the trial court entered an order directing that no action be taken against respondent father until a petition for support was filed against the natural mother also and both cases brought before the court at the same time. We reverse on the basis of the plain language of section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1983), which states in relevant part: In each case in which regular child support payments are not being made to the department as provided herein, the department shall institute, within 30 days after determinat...
Copy

State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Hatfield, 522 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 443, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 565

...HRS did not seek a court order to establish Hatfield’s obligations to provide child support during his incarceration because HRS’s investigation indicated that Hatfield did not have the financial ability to pay child support during that period. See § 409.2564, Fla.Stat....
Copy

Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Nolden, 556 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 544, 1990 WL 6440

...of child support set by the June 6, 1988 order and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED. HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, the nominal appellant, is acting under section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, for the mother, who is the “real party in interest” plaintiff-appellant and is the custodian of the parties’ dependent children....
Copy

State, Dhrs v. Savage, 570 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...Section 409.2554(2) provides in pertinent part (emphasis added): "Dependent child" means any unemancipated person under the age of 18, any person under the age of 21 and still in school, or any person who is mentally or physically incapacitated when such incapacity began prior to such person reaching the age of 18. Section 409.2564(1) provides in pertinent part (emphasis added): [T]he department shall institute, within 30 days after determination of the obligor's reasonable ability to pay, action as is necessary to secure the obligor's payment of current support and any arrearage which may have accrued under an existing order of support....
Copy

Liebert v. State, Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Liebert, 748 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16633, 1999 WL 1127719

...This motion was denied. Appellant then sought discovery of any documents showing that either Raye Liebert or the State of New Hampshire had applied for DOR services. The child support hearing officer denied the discovery request, citing sections 409.2567 and 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1997), and finding it irrelevant whether or not an application had been filed with DOR for services....
...Section 409.2567 provides: All child support services provided by the department shall be made available on behalf of all dependent children. Services shall be provided upon acceptance of public assistance or upon proper application filed with the department. ... Section 409.2564(1) provides: In each case in which regular support payments are not being made as provided herein, the department shall institute ......
Copy

Hand v. Mensh & MacIntosh, P.A., 718 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10447, 1998 WL 484058

action for negligence by the Firm.1 However, section 409.2564(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides immunity
Copy

Dep't of Revenue v. McLeod, 96 So. 3d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3537235, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13717

...McLeod and the child “are eligible for child support services of [DOR] pursuant to chapter 409, Florida Statutes.” The petition also stated: “DOR’s participation and the undersigned attorney’s representation are limited in scope as set forth in Section 409.2564(5), Florida Statutes.” The trial court conducted a hearing and entered a written order dismissing DOR’s supplemental petition....
...necessary, seek a modification, exists only with respect to “child support orders in Federal Title IV-D cases at least once every 3 years when requested by either party, or when support rights are assigned to the state under s. 414.095(7)....” 2 § 409.2564(11)....
...support obligations, as well as the modification, enforcement, and collection of support obligations.” Section 409.2558(1) provides: “The department shall distribute and disburse support payments collected in Title IV-D eases in accordance with 42 U.S.C. s. 657 and regulations adopted thereunder....” Section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, addresses “Actions for support.” Subsection 409.2564(1) provides: “In each case in which regular support payments are not being made as provided herein, the department shall institute, within 30 days after determination of the obligor’s reasonable ability to pay, action as is neces...
...to the department through the depository.” It is in this context that this statute also addresses DOR’s obligation to periodically review support orders to determine if modification is warranted, either on its own or at a party’s request. See § 409.2564(11), (12), Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.