CopyCited 30 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 62031
...on Judiciary, CS for HB 1313 (1986) Staff Analysis 1-2 (rev. Jan. 31, 1986) (on file with committee). In addition to providing for the establishment of liens as a method of enforcement, section 61.1352, Florida Statutes (1987), the legislature adopted section 61.17(3), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides: Alimony and child support; additional method for enforcing orders and judgments; costs, expenses....
...ich the judgment was entered. The language of this section, adopted subsequent to Lamm and Sokolsky, expressly provides for the use of contempt proceedings, in addition to other remedies available, to enforce a judgment for support arrearages. While section 61.17(3) took effect after the events in this case, the statute merely embodies the preexisting public policy that equitable remedies, including contempt, are available to enforce a judgment for support arrearages....
...been expended to maintain the child during minority. The purpose, in part, of support enforcement legislation is to ensure that parents, rather than the public, bear the responsibility for the support of their children while the children are minors. Section 61.17(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides for the use of contempt proceedings, in addition to other remedies available, to enforce a judgment for support arrearages....
...However, times have changed. As explained in the majority opinion in this case, both the United States Congress and the Florida Legislature have enacted legislation that expands the means available for collecting child support and alimony. Such legislation includes section 61.17(3), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides in part: "The entry of a judgment for arrearages for child support, alimony, or attorney's fees and costs does not preclude a subsequent contempt proceeding ......
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 21485
...1st DCA 1987), we note that the court must reconsider the entire issue in the light of our instant determination to increase the amount of the recoverable arrearages. When it does so, it should reconsider also the propriety of the terms and conditions of the order requiring payment of the sums due. See generally § 61.17, Fla....
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 158125
...1990) expresses a continued evolution of public policy in favor of enforcing payment of child support obligations rather than throwing procedural roadblocks in the way of collection efforts. This alone should give this court cause to reassess Cronebaugh. In Gibson, the court held that section 61.17(3), as well as prior case law, makes available contempt remedies to enforce child support and alimony obligations, even though the arrearage has been reduced to a judgment, and even though the child is no longer a minor....
...r than Holland's, so he should come off well and likely be paid in full. *659 This helps illustrate why I agree with Judge Minor's dissent in Rogers v. Cooper,
575 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) that HRS should not be liable for attorney's fees under section
61.17 when filing suit, as it is required to do under section
409.2561(1)....
...4th DCA 1991) is support for the majority opinion in this case, on that issue, it could be limited to allowing attorney's fees for filing frivolous lawsuits pursuant to section
57.105. If HRS is liable for attorney's fee awards in enforcement of support cases under section
61.17, this will inhibit and perhaps prevent its effectiveness as the enforcement agency for support obligations in Florida....
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 22259
...limony and child support awards, permits modification in the county in which either of the parties resides, see
404 So.2d at 1183, but no such authority exists under section
61.13, Florida Statutes (1987), pertaining to child custody awards. Compare section
61.17, Florida Statutes (1987), providing for additional methods for enforcing alimony and child support judgments in the county in which either party resides, wherein it states: If the pleadings ask for a modification of the order or judgmen...
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 61800
...5th DCA 1985) rev. dismissed,
478 So.2d 53 (1985) (laches available in presence of extraordinary facts or compelling circumstances). The legislature has specifically authorized the use of the IRS intercept program to collect child support arrearages. §
61.17(3), Fla....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 301325
...urt, in a lawsuit filed by the former wife, that is a distinction without significance. Surely Florida courts give at least as much "full faith & credit" [3] to Florida judgments, as they do to out-of-state judgments. The Gibson decision relied upon section 61.17(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: The entry of a judgment for arrearages for child support, alimony, or attorney's fees and costs does not preclude a subsequent contempt proceeding or certification of a IV-D case for intercept, by...
...Kutz did not appeal nor did he seek clarification of its terms. He argues that the 1978 judgment includes an award for Fankhanel's attorney's fees and for the children's medical expenses. The trial court said the arrearage judgment was less than clear on that point. But, in view of section 61.17(3), quoted above, which makes a judgment for arrearages for child support as well as attorney's fees and costs enforceable by contempt measures, Kutz's argument appears irrelevant....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
...We will not unduly extend this opinion by recreating them here as they would be of no precedential value. We determine that no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated as concerns the amount of child support awarded, being always aware that same can be adjusted if and when changes in circumstances occur. F.S. 1969, section 61.17, F.S.A....
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
...When an original decree has been entered in Florida there will always be a court with authority to act in this state. In child support cases the legislature has afforded the means of enforcing or modifying the same in courts other than the one in which the original decree was entered, Section 61.17, F.S., F.S.A., however, similar treatment has not yet been extended to modification of custody decrees....
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 17924
...of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, for appellants. No appearance, for appellee. ALLEN, Judge. This is an appeal from an order awarding attorney's fees and costs to appellee, following his successful defense of a child support enforcement action under Section 61.17, Florida Statutes....
...or the award of attorney's fees and costs in Chapter 61 actions. We hold that the department is subject to the provisions of Section
61.16, and we affirm the order appealed. Pursuant to Section
409.2564, Florida Statutes, the department instituted a Section
61.17, Florida Statutes, action against appellee....
...proceedings. The court may order that the amount be paid directly to the attorney, who may enforce the order in his name. (Emphasis added). It is readily apparent, therefore, that where the department brings a child support enforcement action under Section
61.17, as was done here, the department subjects itself to the provisions of Section
61.16, unless some other expression of legislative intent serves to contravene the very clear language of the section....
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 312857
...(c) All expenses of the minor children in connection with their obtaining a four year college education, including room, board, tuition, books, clothes, medical expenses and all other reasonable living expenses. In August 1991, appellant, now an adult, sued in his name to enforce the provision under section 61.17, Florida Statutes (1991), alleging that his father had refused to comply with it....
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 710797
...Attorney's fees in a dissolution action may be enforced by contempt. Fishman v. Fishman,
656 So.2d 1250 (Fla.1995); Heitzman v. Heitzman,
281 So.2d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Moreover, the entry of a money judgment does not preclude enforcement by contempt. See §
61.17(3), Fla.Stat....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1807
...Boulder County, Dep't of Social Services,
494 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 1986). Thus, were this case a URESA proceeding, a Florida court could modify upward or downward the support order according to present circumstances. The instant proceeding is brought under section
61.17, Florida Statutes (1985), an action to enforce a support order of one Florida court in another Florida court....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 176623
...quity requires, with due regard to the changed circumstances or the financial ability of the parties or the child, decreasing, increasing, or confirming the amount of separate support, maintenance, or alimony provided for in the agreement or order." Section 61.17(1) provides that an order or judgment for the payment of alimony or child support entered by any court of this state may be enforced by another chancery court....
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046
judgments. The Gibson decision relied upon section
61.17(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: The entry
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24196
appeal by the ex-wife followed. We reverse. Section
61.17(1), Florida Statutes (1981), specifically states:
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
delinquency for non-payment of child support); §
61.17, Fla. Stat. (providing for enforcement of an “order
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6081
requesting a modification of the judgment pursuant to §
61.17, Fla.Stat.F.S.A.(1969). On March 4, 1970, the appellee
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21249
jurisdiction to enforce the support order by virtue of Section
61.17, Florida Statutes, and had subject-matter jurisdiction
