The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See § 120.68(1)(a), Fla. . . .
. . . Because we find no ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes for setting aside the final administrative . . .
. . . reviews a final administrative order establishing a child support obligation in accordance with section 120.68 . . . Id. § 120.68(10) ; see Finch v. Dep't of Rev. ex rel. . . . in Hernando County, which is within the jurisdictional boundaries of this Court pursuant to section 120.68 . . .
. . . Agency for Persons with Disabilities , 19 So.3d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (citing § 120.68(7), Fla . . .
. . . ." § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012) ; see also De Groot v. . . . See § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . Dep't of Health, 107 So.3d 1139, 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; § 120.68(7)(e), Fla. . . .
. . . III Section 120.68(7)(e), Florida Statutes, requires an agency's exercise of discretion to be consistent . . . standard of review of the agency's findings of fact is that of "competent substantial evidence." § 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(6)(a) 1., Florida Statutes. B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey, J., concur. . . .
. . . ." § 120.68(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; see also Schrimsher v. Sch. . . . made such an election, so there has been a "material error in procedure" within the meaning of section 120.68 . . .
. . . Prot., 714 So.2d 512, 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) ) ); see also § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
. . . See § 120.68(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; Fla. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Fla. . . .
. . . ." § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .
. . . because Petitioners are not "parties" for the purposes of final agency action review under section 120.68 . . . subject to the APA must derive from either Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2) or section 120.68 . . . Section 120.68 This does not conclude our inquiry, though, because Article V, section 4(b)(2) of the . . . Section 120.68, in turn, expressly provides for judicial review of final agency action by the district . . . the petition for hearing, that decision shall be considered final agency action for purposes of s. 120.68 . . .
. . . ." § 120.68(7)(e), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 120.68(7)(e), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Section 120.68(7)(c), Florida Statutes (2017), provides, in pertinent part, that the court shall remand . . .
. . . See § 120.68(1)(a), Fla. . . . Judicial review of the State Board's final agency action is governed by section 120.68 of Florida's Administrative . . . Dep't of Health, Bd. of Med., 962 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ); see also § 120.68(7), Fla. . . .
. . . (ii) In an appeal from a rule adoption pursuant to sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and or 120.68(9), . . .
. . . Stat. (2018) ; § 120.68(1) - (2), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(3). . . .
. . . . § 120.68(7)(e) ; cf. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Williams , 188 So.2d 368, 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. . . .
. . . Analysis Section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes (2018), sets forth the standard of review. . . .
. . . agency action unless Appellant shows a ground for setting such action aside, as provided by section 120.68 . . . , Florida Statutes. § 120.68(8), Fla. . . .
. . . See also § 120.68 and 409.2563(10)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . See § 120.68(4), Fla. Stat.; Pinacoteca Corp. v. Dep't of Bus. . . .
. . . See § 120.68(2)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Graham (Citizens II ), 191 So.3d 897, 900 (Fla. 2016) ; see also § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . See Citizens I , 146 So.3d at 1153 ; see also §§ 120.569(2)(l)-(m), 120.68(7)(d)-(e), Fla. . . .
. . . Dep't of Health , 175 So.3d 815, 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ; see also § 120.68(7), Fla. . . .
. . . appeal ... shall be limited to review of the record, and shall otherwise proceed in accordance with s. 120.68 . . . Relevant portions of section 120.68(7) provide the relevant standards to be applied to this appeal: ( . . . The supreme court has never rejected the application of section 120.68(7) in medical malpractice binding . . . or non-economic is a question of the proper application of the statute, which we review de novo. § 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . : the factual findings are reviewed for competent substantial evidence, see § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. . . . 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ; and the recommended penalty is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, see § 120.68 . . . And, pursuant to section 120.68(8), the order must be affirmed "[u]nless the court finds a ground for . . . , remanding, or ordering agency action or ancillary relief under a specified provision of [ section 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; see also McCloskey v. Dep't of Fin. . . . See § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. However, we review the agency's conclusions of law de novo. . . . . § 120.68(7)(d) ; see , e.g. , Abrams v. Seminole Cty. Sch. . . . for further proceedings consistent with this court's analysis or set aside the agency's decision. § 120.68 . . .
. . . ANALYSIS Section 120.68(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), authorizes judicial review of final administrative . . . of the administrative law judge as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact." § 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat.; Dep't of Health v. Bayfront Med. . . . of the administrative law judge as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact. § 120.68 . . .
. . . See § 120.68(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
. . . IMC Phosphates Co., 18 So.3d 1079, 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. . . . of the administrative law judge as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact." § 120.68 . . . administrative law judge as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact.' " (quoting § 120.68 . . .
. . . Section 120.68 (10), Florida Statutes (2016), provides as follows: (10) If an administrative law -judge . . .
. . . Analysis This Court’s review of final agency action arising from a bid protest is governed by section 120.68 . . . Section 120.68(7) gives the Court statutory authprity to, among other things, remand or set aside agency . . .
. . . Analysis The Companies and their Principals seek review of the temporary order of suspension under section 120.68 . . .
. . . See § 120.68, Fla. Stat. (2016); Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C), .110(a)(2). . . .
. . . Comm’n on Ethics, 969 So.2d 553, 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Dep’t of Health, Bd. of Med., 881 So.2d 682, 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (citing § 120.68(7), Fla. . . .
. . . Under section 120.68(7)(c), Florida Statutes, (2016), the appellate court “shall remand a case to the . . .
. . . We review the Board’s final order pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes (2014). . . .
. . . Appellants also fail to establish any ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, upon which the . . .
. . . Review in this Court was premised upon section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, which provides that agency . . . These issues fit squarely within the grounds for relief under section 120.68(7). . . . Under section 120.68(6)(a), “[t]he reviewing court’s decision may be mandatory, prohibitory, or declaratory . . . the rights, privileges, obligations, requirements, or procedures at issue between the parties[.]” § 120.68 . . . See 120.68(7)(c), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Section 120.68(l)(a), Florida Statutes, provides: “A party who is adversely affected by final agency . . . action is entitled to judicial review.” § 120.68(l)(a), Fla. . . . Sections 120.57(l)(b) 9, 120.57(2)(a) 1 and 2, 120.60(2), 120.68. . . . Judicial review proceedings under Section 120.68 similarly press for erys-talization [sic] of agency . . . See § 120.68(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (“The court may: 1. . . .
. . . .” § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
. . . . § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. (2015); Salinas v. E. Aero Marine, 908 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). . . .
. . . appeal. “ ‘The scope of review for a petition seeking review of a non-final agency action under section 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(1), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. App. . . .
. . . Judicial review of final agency action arising from a bid protest is governed- by section 120.68, Florida . . .
. . . Standard of Review Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, governs appellate review of final administrative . . . generally whether the final order is supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. § 120.68 . . . of a material error in procedure, an incorrect interpretation of law, or an abuse of discretion. §§ 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(1)-(2)(a); Sys. Mgmt. Assocs., Inc. v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. . . .
. . . Tenney filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the circuit court pursuant to section 120.68(1), . . .
. . . We review this case in accordance with the standards outlined in section 120.68, Florida Statutes. . . . . § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
. . . First District, treating the petition as one for review of non-final agency action pursuant to section 120.68 . . . Agency for Workforce Innovation, 85 So.3d 1139, 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (citing section 120.68(7)(b), . . .
. . . We have jurisdiction pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes (2015), and Florida Rule of Appellate . . .
. . . See § 120.68(1), Fla. Stat. (2015); Fla, R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C), 9.190(b)(2). . . . .
. . . .; § 120.68(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015); Fla. R, App. P. 9.100(a). . . .
. . . constitutionality in the district court on the direct review to which the party is entitled under section 120.68 . . .
. . . The parameters of our review of administrative final orders are set out in section 120.68, Florida Statutes . . . that statute for setting aside, modifying, remanding, or ordering agency action or ancillary relief. § 120.68 . . . Accordingly, section 120.68(7)(d) is the available statutory ground for his appeal and Mr. . . .
. . . the agency interprets the law wrongly and the right interpretation compels a particular result, see § 120.68 . . .
. . . .” § 120.68(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); Brown v. State, Dep’t of Fin. . . .
. . . Florida Statute, section 120.68(7)(d) states that “[t]he court shall remand a case to the agency for . . .
. . . See § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); Jacoby v. Fla. . . .
. . . We have jurisdiction pursuant to § 120.68(1), Florida Statutes, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure . . .
. . . APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED FORFEITURE Our review of the Board’s forfeiture order is governed by section 120.68 . . . Dep’t of Health, Bd. of Med., 962 So.2d 1011, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (citing § 120.68(7)); see also . . . § 120.68(8) & (10). . . . jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(1)(C), section 112.3173(5)(b), and section 120.68 . . .
. . . In granting the stay, the trial court relied in part on section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes (2015), which . . .
. . . Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 19 So.3d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (citing to § 120.68(7), . . .
. . . Prot., 714 So.2d 512, 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see also § 120.68(7)(b), (d), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
. . . See § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014); Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Auth. v. . . .
. . . As such, the appellate procedures described in section 120.68 of the APA do not apply. . . .
. . . Our own review of the resulting final administrative order is governed by section 120.68, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Reg., 983 So.2d 45, 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .
. . . order denying McCloskey’s application for attorney’s fees is controlled by sections 57.111(4)(d) and 120.68 . . . Accordingly, pursuant to section 120.68(6)(a) Florida Statutes (2014), we reverse the final order denying . . .
. . . State, Comm’n on Ethics, 969 So.2d 553, 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see also § 120.68(7), Fla. . . . Dep’t of Health, 943 So.2d 909, 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); see also § 120.68(7), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . judicial review of a final order of the RAAC relating to reemployment assistance, is governed by section 120.68 . . . Under section 120.68(8), this court is required to affirm the agency’s action unless it finds a ground . . . grounds requiring this court to set aside, modify, remand, or order other relief, are listed in section 120.68 . . . provision of law or an exercise of discretion in violation of a statutory provision, pursuant to section 120.68 . . . No ground for reversal under section 120.68(7) has been shown. . . .
. . . below, we treat this petition as one seeking review of non-final agency action pursuant to section 120.68 . . . because a writ of mandamus should not be issued where there is an adequate legal remedy, and section 120.68 . . . that case, the final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy as contemplated by section 120.68 . . . “The scope of review” for a petition seeking review of non-final agency action under section 120.68(1 . . . For the foregoing reasons, we GRANT the petition pursuant to section 120.68(1) and remand the case to . . .
. . . court “initially treated the petition as one seeking review of non-final agency action under section 120.68 . . . should be denied, unless “review of the final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy.” § 120.68 . . . We initially treated the petition as one seeking review of non-final agency action under section 120.68 . . .
. . . Jacobs, 810 So.2d 906, 908 (Fla.2002); § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . Agency for Workforce Innovation, 85 So.3d 1139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); §§ 120.68(7)(b), (10), Fla. . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes, “[t]he filing of the petition does not itself stay enforcement . . . would constitute a “probable danger to the health, safety, or welfare to the state” pursuant to section 120.68 . . . would permit denial of the stay in every instance, effectively nullifying the stay provision of section 120.68 . . . administrative complaint, and we accordingly decline to override the automatic stay provision of section 120.68 . . .
. . . .”); § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014). Affirmed. . . .
. . . Tejada-Guibert characterizes this correspondence as “final agency action” within the meaning of section 120.68 . . .
. . . .” § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . An ALJ’s findings of fact must be based upon competent, substantial evidence. § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. . . .
. . . showing by Diez that the Commission’s interpretation of the applicable law is erroneous, see section 120.68 . . .
. . . . § 120.68(6)(a)(2), is sufficient to redress [the plaintiff] for the deprivation alleged and is sufficient . . .
. . . department shall have standing to seek judicial review of any final order of the board, pursuant to s. 120.68 . . .
. . . . § 120.68, Fla. Stat. (2012). See also Braddock v. Sch. . . .
. . . State, Comm’n on Ethics, 927 So.2d 28, 26 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (quoting § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. . . .
. . . See §§ 120.68(7)(c) and (7)(e)l., Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . whether the Commission’s exercise of discretion was outside the range of discretion delegated to it. §§ 120.68 . . . Finally, section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes (2012), also provides that “[a] party who is adversely affected . . .
. . . The scope and standards for our review are governed by section 120.68, Florida Statutes. . . . Pursuant to section 120.68(8), final agency action must be affirmed unless this Court finds a ground . . . or grounds to set it aside under section 120.68(7)(a)-(7)(e). . . . Thus, the statutory ground most closely aligned with Appellant’s argument on appeal is section 120.68 . . . that DCF’s Amended Final Order does not constitute an erroneous interpretation of law under section 120.68 . . .
. . . . § 120.68, see Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Brevard Cnty. v. . . .
. . . IMC Phosphates Co., 18 So.3d 1079, 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); see also § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. . . . However, an appellate court reviews the agency’s conclusions of law de novo. § 120.68(7)(d); C.D. v. . . .
. . . Because the appellant has failed to establish any ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, upon . . .
. . . Because the appellant has failed to establish any ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes upon . . .
. . . . § 120.68, Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C). DCF’s methodology to determine Mr. . . .
. . . agency’s interpretation of a statute generally is subject to de novo review by an appellate court, see § 120.68 . . .
. . . . § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). Our review of that interpretation is de novo. Parlato v. . . .
. . . who is adversely affected by final agency action” entitled to judicial review as allowed by section 120.68 . . . Section 120.68(1) provides that a “party who is adversely affected by final agency action is entitled . . . with the agency clerk, the property appraiser cannot seek judicial review as contemplated by section 120.68 . . .
. . . . § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). J.J.’s reliance on Webb v. Fla. . . .
. . . .” § 120.68(7)(c), Fla. Stat. This acts as a harmless error rule. Carter v. . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes (2013), Dr. . . . a supersedeas would constitute a probable danger to the health, safety, or welfare of the state.” § 120.68 . . . agency to perform an action required by law or remand a matter for additional agency proceedings. § 120.68 . . . See § 120.68(3). . . .
. . . Dep’t of Health, 778 So.2d 531, 533 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (referencing section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . DFS noticed the School Board’s right to appeal to this court per § 120.68, which it did in a timely fashion . . .
. . . . § 120.68, which “provides for judicial review of agency actions, including a local government’s zoning . . . Stat. § 120.68, but did not. . . .
. . . Furthermore, section 120.68(7)(d), Florida Statutes (2005), states that a reviewing court shall remand . . .
. . . See § 120.68(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2012); Krulla v. . . .