CopyCited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2005 WL 2230403
...[8] Lastly, in determining whether to award attorney's fees, the trial court must consider the "financial resources of both parties." §
61.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). [9] Chapter 61 contains two separate definitions of income relevant to this case. First, section
61.046(7), Florida Statutes (2004), sets forth a general definition of the term "income" and provides that income as used within chapter 61 means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including but not limited to: wages,...
...loyment, partnership, close corporations, and independent contracts. "Business income" means gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income. §
61.30(2)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (2004) (emphasis supplied). Although sections
61.046(7) and
61.30(2)(a)(3) utilize different language to define income, both statutory provisions focus on income that is available to a spouse. [10] The plain language of section
61.046(7) defines income in terms of payment to an individual....
...Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control Dist.,
604 So.2d 452, 455 (Fla.1992)); McGhee v. Volusia County,
679 So.2d 729, 730 n. 1 (Fla.1996) (stating that the doctrine of in pari materia requires courts to construe related statutes together so that they are harmonized). *1230 We conclude that construed together, sections
61.046(7),
61.30(2)(a)(3),
61.08(2)(g),
61.30(6), and
61.16(1), reflect legislative intent that trial courts consider only that portion of a spouse's income that is available to the spouse....
...pplied). [11] III. Case Law Addressing Undistributed Business Income for Chapter 61 Purposes In Zipperer, the First District Court of Appeal held that a spouse's undistributed business income fell within the general definition of income set forth in section 61.046 and thus was properly considered by the trial court in awarding alimony....
...The First District rejected the argument that undistributed business income should not be considered income under chapter 61 because it was reported only for tax purposes and was not actually received by the payor spouse. See id. The First District noted that income is broadly defined in section 61.046 to include " any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source." Id. (quoting § 61.046(4), Fla....
...at has been retained by a corporation for corporate purposes does not constitute income within the meaning of chapter 61. Specifically, undistributed "pass-through" income that has been retained for corporate purposes is not available "income" under section
61.046(7) or "business income" under section
61.30(2)(a)(3)....
...In contrast, where undistributed "pass-through" income has been retained for noncorporate purposes, such as to shield this income from the reach of the other spouse during dissolution, the improper motive for its retention *1232 makes it available "income" under section
61.046(7) or "business income" under section
61.30(2)(a)(3)....
...."). [9] See also Rosen v. Rosen,
696 So.2d 697, 699 (Fla.1997) (stating that in deciding whether attorney's fees are appropriate, "the trial court must look to each spouse's need for suit money versus each spouse's respective ability to pay"). [10] Section
61.046 was enacted in 1986. See ch. 86-220, § 113, Laws of Fla. One year later, the Legislature enacted the child support guidelines enumerated in section
61.30. See ch. 87-95, § 3, Laws of Fla. Both sections
61.046 and
61.30 were enacted in response to 1984 federal legislation that amended the Social Security Act to require states to adopt certain specified procedures designed to improve collection of child support, including the enactment of child support guidelines....
CopyCited 17 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22012612
...In determining the amount of alimony, section
61.08(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2000), requires the trial court to consider the financial resources of each party including the nonmarital assets distributed. And section
61.08(2)(g) requires that "[a]ll sources of income available to either party" must be considered. Section
61.046(7) defines income as "any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to......
CopyCited 15 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 211249
...The trial court's denial of child support was based merely on a finding that the husband "has no income of his own," but the record does not support that finding. There is competent substantial evidence that the husband has received income as contemplated by section 61.046(4), Florida Statutes (1989)....
CopyCited 14 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 66212
...decision to put aside a portion of income for savings and investment. Clearly, the father's "income," for the purpose of determining child support, includes trust income. Page v. Page,
371 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Trust income is recognized in section
61.046(4), Florida Statutes, which defines income as (4) "Income" means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, ......
CopyCited 14 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21697203
...s. Feger as primary residential parent and as "the decision making parent with full authority to make decisions for the minor child." This finding suggests that the court was ordering "sole parental responsibility" to the mother, which is defined in section 61.046(12) as "a court-ordered relationship in which one parent makes decisions regarding the minor child," rather than "shared parental responsibility," wherein "both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly," as defined in section 61.046(11)....
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1707, 2009 WL 528795
...The court awarded reasonable visitation to the former wife, including visitation on the first and third weekends of each month from 6:00 p.m. Friday until 6:00 p.m. the following Sunday, for one month during the summer, and on certain birthdays and holidays. The parties agreed to shared parental responsibility. See § 61.046(15), Fla....
CopyCited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 731454
...of the wife's living expenses by the wife's mother. Cooper v. Kahn,
696 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The court noted that the definition of income in the definitions section of chapter 61 defines income as including "payments, made by any person." §
61.046, Fla....
CopyCited 11 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 70856
...The wife's actual net monthly income is therefore about $400 less than the judge contemplated. While income may not be imputed to the wife in this case, it clearly may be imputed to the husband. Income is liberally defined as any payment to an individual, regardless of source. See Section 61.046, Florida Statutes (1987); Zipperer v....
CopyCited 11 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 141209
...Because section
61.1301(1)(b)1. expressly provided that an income deduction order may "[d]irect a payor to deduct from all income due and payable to an obligor the amount required by the court to meet the obligor's [alimony or child] support obligation" and section
61.046(4) defined "income" as including "retirement benefits" and "pensions" paid by "any unit of local government," the court concluded that section
61.1301 was sufficiently irreconcilable with the pension plan's anti-alienation clause to manifest a legislative intent to repeal the latter....
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 689855
...Accordingly, they conclude that their parenting arrangement constitutes a de facto extension of the intact family unit. It is appropriate for the court to examine the meaning of shared parental responsibility under chapter 61 of the Florida Statutes. Pursuant to section 61.046(11), Florida Statutes (1997), shared parental responsibility means "a court ordered relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with e...
...meaningful family relationships" and "to promote the amicable settlement of disputes that arise between parties to a marriage." §
61.001(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). Of particular import to the intact family analysis required by Beagle is the language in section
61.046(11) providing that, in cases of shared parental responsibility, both parents retain full parental rights and responsibility with respect to their child....
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 3390894
...the legislature specifically listed is "(g) All sources of income available to either party." See also O'Connor v. O'Connor,
782 So.2d 502, 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Brock v. Brock,
690 So.2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The term, "income," is defined in section
61.046(7), Florida Statutes (2006), as it pertains to the present case, as follows: (7) "Income" means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, ....
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1756970
...The final judgment of dissolution of marriage provides that the parties have shared parental responsibility as to the children and that the Mother is the primary residential parent. As primary residential parent, the Mother does not make all childrearing decisions. Rather, section 61.046(15) defines "shared parental responsibility" as "a court-ordered relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that m...
CopyCited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 354904
..."`Shared parental responsibility' means a court-ordered relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly." § 61.046(15), Fla....
CopyCited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 4561584
...d relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly. § 61.046(15), Fla....
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 126321
...bility benefits, annuity and retirement benefits, pensions, dividends, interest, royalties, trusts, and any other payments, made by any other person, private entity, federal or state government, or any unit of local government... . (Emphasis added). Section 61.046(4), Florida Statutes....
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 46411
...relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly." § 61.046(11), Fla....
...of each parent. The parties do not contend otherwise. The principle of shared parental responsibility applies to the religious upbringing of the children, just as it applies to the other "major decisions affecting the welfare *160 of the child... ." § 61.046(11), Fla....
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 194132
...Rather, the supreme court ordered the trial judge to take control of the matter and proceed to final judgment on all pending matters. Second, we also reject Cooper's claim that the trial court erred in imputing income to her based on the continued monthly payment of Cooper's living expenses by her mother. Section
61.046 Florida Statutes (1995), the definitions section of Chapter 61, instructs that "income" includes "payments, made by any person." Section
61.30(2)(a)(13), Florida Statutes (1995), outlining the child support guidelines, instructs us tha...
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1991 WL 78756
...ghters' pension benefits from legal process. The trial court denied the motion, finding that retirement benefits and pensions are subject to section
61.1301 deduction orders, because they are specifically included in the definition of "income" under section
61.046(4), Florida Statutes (1987), and "[o]nly Veterans Administration disability, and unemployment compensation benefits are excluded from this definition." The court reasoned that section
61.1301, which provides for the entry of income ded...
...The district court further concluded that section
175.241, a general law that specifically covers the subject, must control over section
61.1301, a general law that is general in its coverage. Id. The district court certified the above-quoted question, which we rephrase as follows: DO SECTIONS
61.1301 AND
61.046(4), WHICH, RESPECTIVELY, MANDATE THE ENTRY OF INCOME DEDUCTION ORDERS FOR COURT-ORDERED ALIMONY AND CHILD SUPPORT AND DEFINE THE "INCOME" SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDERS, IMPLICITLY REPEAL THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 74-613, LAWS OF FLORIDA, AND SECTION...
....... (b) The income deduction order shall: 1. Direct a payor to deduct from all income due and payable to an obligor the amount required by the court to meet the obligor's support obligation[.] Section 113 of chapter 86-220, Laws of Florida, created section 61.046(4) that defines the "income" subject to a chapter 61 deduction order. Section 61.046(4), Florida Statutes (1987), provides: (4) "Income" means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, compensation as an independent contractor, wor...
...government, or any unit of local government. Veterans Administration disability benefits and unemployment compensation, as defined in chapter 443, are excluded from this definition of income. (Emphasis added.) Based on the following construction of section
61.046(4), we find an irreconcilable conflict between the income deduction provisions of chapter 61 and the provisions of both chapter 74-613 and section
175.241 that would exempt firefighters' pension benefits from income deduction. Section
61.046(4) defines the income that can be reached by a section
61.1301 income deduction order very broadly to include "any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source." This definition expressly includes "disability benefits, annuity and retirement benefits, pensions" and any other payments made by "any unit of local government." As did the trial court, we find it significant that section
61.046(4) expressly excludes Veterans Administration disability benefits and unemployment compensation from the definition of reachable income....
...Kichinko,
156 Fla. at 131,
22 So.2d at 629 (applying maxim that mention of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of things not mentioned to determine that general act impliedly repealed a special or local one). Based on this clear legislative intent that section
61.046(4) serve as a complete statement of what "income" can be reached by a chapter 61 deduction order, both chapter 74-613 and section
175.241 are repealed to the extent that they exempt firefighters' pension benefits from such orders....
...retirement benefits, [or] pensions, ... such amounts as are necessary to comply with the order of alimony or child support... . [4] The enumeration of specific items excludes others not so listed. State v. Parsons,
569 So.2d 437-38, n. 1 (Fla. 1990). [5] At the time section
61.046(4), Florida Statutes (1987), was enacted, Veteran's Administration benefits and unemployment compensation appear to have been exempt from legal process under section 38 U.S.C....
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 5005
...We find that the court erred in excluding the remainder of Fletcher's VA disability benefits from his income in calculating his child support obligation under section
61.30, Florida Statutes (1989), and reverse. The order herein appealed was based on the trial court's ruling that section
61.046(4), Florida Statutes (1987), "specifically excludes Veterans Administration disability benefits from the definition of income for purposes of determining child support" under section
61.30. The court concluded that "[s]ince [Fletcher] has no source of income or assets other than Veterans Administration disability benefits, [he] has a zero net income" for purposes of calculating his section
61.30 child support obligation. Section
61.046(4), enacted in 1986, excludes Veterans Administration disability benefits from the definition of "income" as the term is generally used in chapter 61....
...evail; the general provision must be taken to affect only such cases as are not within the terms of the particular provision. 49 Fla.Jur.2d Statutes, § 182. Therefore, the exclusion of VA disability benefits by the general definition of "income" in section
61.046(4) has been overridden by the later-enacted, and more specific, section
61.30(2)(a)4....
...ZEHMER, Judge (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. On this appeal, Ms. Thomas and her son Kenneth contend that the trial court erred in excluding Mr. Fletcher's Veteran's disability benefits from his total "income" under the provisions of section
61.30. Rather than using section
61.046(4)'s general definition of income for determining Mr....
...ion of gross income, does not distinguish between VA disability benefits and other types of disability benefits, and does not list VA disability benefits as an allowable deduction from gross income. Third, they contend that the legislative intent of section 61.046(4), which excludes VA disability benefits from its definition of "income," was so phrased to reflect existing provisions of federal law that prevent direct garnishment of VA disability benefits by creditors, while permitting those bene...
...icular matter, the particular *944 provision will prevail and the general will affect only cases not within the terms of the particular, the opinion holds that the assumed "exclusion of VA disability benefits by the general definition of `income' in section
61.046(4) has been overridden by the later-enacted, and more specific, section
61.30(2)(a)4." Second, the opinion relies on the principle of statutory construction that "where legislative language is susceptible to more than one interpretation, the interpretation which avoids an unreasonable result should be preferred" to reach the conclusion that to ignore the limiting definition in section
61.046(4) "results in the more reasonable interpretation of chapter 61." I do not intend to criticize the fairness of the policy arguments made by appellants....
...ppellants' arguments through its choice of statutory language is the only concern of this court on this appeal. I find appellants' arguments unavailing because the statutes in question, read in pari materia, contain specific, unambiguous language in section 61.046 explicitly defining the terms "as used in this chapter"; they manifest a clear legislative intent to exclude VA benefits from the disability benefits includable in "income," as that term is used throughout chapter 61....
...effect so important a measure as the repeal of a law without expressing an intention to do so." Woodgate Dev. Corp. v. Hamilton Investment Trust,
351 So.2d 14, 16 (Fla. 1977). Thus, our first task is to harmonize the two statutory provisions if that is reasonably possible. Reading the statutory provisions in section
61.046(4) and section
61.30(2) here involved [2] in pari materia, the only interpretation of section
61.30 that can be harmonized with section
61.046(4) and the remaining sections of Chapter 61 is to apply the statutory definition of "income" in section
61.046(4) throughout the chapter, including section
61.30, because the latter section does not provide otherwise....
...While the child support guidelines in section
61.30 indicate that "disability benefits" in general are included in the definition of "gross income," there is no explicit language in that section expressly negating the application of the definitional provisions in section
61.046(4) to that general term as used in section
61.30....
...om calculating net income by deducting authorized allowable deductions from gross income as set forth in section
61.30(3). In the absence of explicit language in section
61.30 repudiating application of the statutory definition previously enacted in section
61.046(4), the court is not permitted to ignore the statutory definition so as to construe section
61.30 directly contrary to the language expressly making that definition applicable throughout chapter 61. *945 Further, I find no obvious or irreconcilable conflict between the provisions of section
61.046(4) and section
61.30 simply because section
61.046 specifically excludes VA disability benefits from includable disability benefits while section
61.30 is silent on the subject. An apparent conflict may arise only if one assumes that the omission of any reference to VA disability benefits in section
61.30 necessarily manifests legislative intent that the more definitive definitions of includable disability benefits in section
61.046(4) are to be given no consideration in construing and applying section
61.30....
...It must be remembered that there are various kinds of disability benefits other than VA benefits includable by definition in calculating gross income, and this fact provides a sufficient basis for construing and applying the term "disability benefits" consistently in both sections. The fact that section
61.046(4) specifically excludes VA disability benefits from the definition of "disability benefits" is simply not inconsistent with the provisions of section
61.30 setting forth allowable deductions from gross income....
...to be corrected by the legislature, not by this court. NOTES [1] 38 U.S.C. § 3101(a). That section prohibits a creditor's attachment, levy, or seizure of a veteran's disability benefits either before or after the veteran receives the benefits. [2] Section 61.046(4), Florida Statutes (1989), sets forth the general definition of "income" for use throughout chapter 61 and, although it includes general disability benefits, it expressly excludes VA disability benefits....
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6324, 2011 WL 1661073
...sets and liabilities distributed to each. * * * (g) All sources of income available to either party. The court may consider any other factor necessary to do equity and justice between the parties. Chapter 61 also contains a definition of "income" in section 61.046(8), Florida Statutes (2007): (8) "Income" means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, compensation as an independent contractor, worker's comp...
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2356432
...Under section
61.08(2)(g), Florida Statutes, a court may consider all sources of income available to either party in computing alimony. Income includes "annuity and retirement benefits, pensions, dividends, interest, royalties, trusts, and any other payments, made by any person [or] private entity...." §
61.046(8), Fla....
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 597421
...Although our law *713 has concentrated on "shared parental responsibility," emphasizing the concept that both parents are responsible for the welfare of the child, and some of our statutes speak in terms of determining "primary residence," the statutes still differentiate between custodial and noncustodial parents. Section 61.046(1), Florida Statutes (1997), defines the "custodial parent" as "the parent with whom the child maintains his or her primary residence." A "noncustodial parent" means "the parent with whom the child does not maintain his or her primary residence." § 61.046(7)....
...See, e.g., §
61.13(2)(a)("[t]he court shall have jurisdiction to determine custody"); §
61.13(4)(b)("[w]hen a custodial parent refuses to honor a noncustodial parent's visitation rights")(emphases added). In fact, the statutes equate custody with the primary residence of the child. See §§
61.046(1), (7); see also §
61.13(2)(b)1....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 2467051
..., the court shall consider all relevant economic factors, including but not limited to: . . . . (g) All sources of income available to either party. With certain exclusions not material here, "income" is broadly defined for purposes of chapter 61 in section 61.046(7): "Income" means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, compensation as an independent contractor, worker's compensation, disability benefits...
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18190, 2009 WL 4164075
...nit of local government. United States Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits and unemployment compensation, as defined in chapter 443, are excluded from this definition of income except for purposes of establishing an amount of support. § 61.046(8), Fla....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18136, 2011 WL 5560565
...Stat. The term "parenting plan" is defined as "a document created to govern the relationship between the parents relating to decisions that must be made regarding the minor child and must contain a time-sharing schedule for the parents and child." § 61.046(14), Fla....
...(emphasis added). Here, the statutes' plain meaning evidences the Legislature's intent to require deviations from the child support guidelines only where a parent shares at least 20% of the overnight stays pursuant to a court authorized parenting plan. See §§
61.046(14),
61.30(11), Fla....
...Section
61.30(11)(a)(10) expressly requires that an equitable deviation based on time-sharing be awarded only where (1) there exists a "parenting plan," and (2) the parent has time-sharing with the child for less than 20% of the time. As noted above, a parenting plan is defined in section
61.046(14) as a court-approved parenting plan with a time-sharing arrangement that can be created through mediation and later approved by a court, or approved by a court where the parties cannot agree....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 690380
...Former husband next contends that the trial court erroneously imputed to him the retained income of his construction company, an S-corporation, for alimony and child support purposes. We disagree and find that the record supports the award, and amount of, child and spousal support. See § 61.046(4), Fla....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 86790
...of the support order to the depository... . §
61.1301(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). The definitional section of the statute provides that an "obligor" is "a person responsible for making support payments pursuant to an alimony or child support order." §
61.046(9), Fla....
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 1241948
...this question, under this particular factual scenario, [6] must be answered in the affirmative. Moreover, I believe that such a construction of section
741.24 would be wholly consistent with the concept of shared parental responsibility as found in section
61.046(11), Florida Statutes (1997)....
...Under chapter 61, "shared parental responsibility means a court ordered relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly." See § 61.046(11), Fla....
...with the responsibility of the child's upbringing and instilling good and sound values within the child that will hopefully dissuade the child from engaging in acts of delinquency. In short, shared parental responsibility must mean shared liability. Section 61.046(11) imposes a duty on both parents to confer and share equally in the rearing and supervision of their minor child, albeit from their separate residences....
...dly tortious acts under Florida's parental liability tort statute. To date, according to my research, no state with a similar parental tort liability statute has ever so reached such a result. [8] In its construction of section
741.24 in relation to section
61.046(11), the majority has effectively permitted these statutes to operate as a sword and shield for the secondary residential parentsin this case the father....
...a decision not to impose or enforce a curfew)? Under the majority decision, the primary residential parent would nevertheless bear sole responsibility for this joint decision under section
741.24. To avoid such an inequitable and outrageous result, I believe that sections
741.24 and
61.046(11) can and must be construed in para materia in order to give effect to the legislative intent of both statutes....
..."Shared parental responsibility" in this context means that the parent, if at all possible and in the best interest of the child, should "retain full parental rights and responsibilities,..." and to "confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly." § 61.046(11), Fla....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1577, 2015 WL 484050
...ion of a party's income has to be supported by
substantial, competent evidence. McCants v. McCants,
984 So. 2d 678, 682 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2008). For the purpose of determining the amount of income that is attributable to
a spouse in computing alimony, section
61.046(8), Florida Statutes (2010), defines
"income" as
any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source,
including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and
bonuses, compensatio...
...'Business income' means gross receipts
minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income."
In Zold v. Zold,
911 So. 2d 1222, 1230 (Fla. 2005), the Florida Supreme
Court stated, "We conclude that construed together, sections
61.046(7),
61.30(2)(a)(3),
61.08(2)(g),
61.30(6), and
61.16(1), reflect legislative intent that trial courts consider
only that portion of a spouse's income that is available to the spouse." An award of
alimony must be based on the income that is available to the party, i.e., the party's net
monthly income....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 942040
...61, "where undistributed `pass-through' income has been retained for noncorporate purposes, such as to shield this income from the reach of the other spouse during dissolution, the improper motive for its retention makes it available `income' under section
61.046(7) or `business income' under section
61.30(2)(a)(3).") The trial court concluded that a presumed income of $17,000 per year for the husband would reflect neither his true income nor his earning capacity....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2847884
...The trial court properly resolved the impasse between the parties. "Shared parental responsibility" refers to a court-ordered relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and "confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined jointly." § 61.046(15), Fla....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6454, 2011 WL 1707233
...Zold, in determining the amount of alimony, the trial court must consider "`[a]ll sources of income available to either party.'"
911 So.2d 1222, 1228 (Fla.2005) (quoting §
61.08(2)(g)); see Yangco v. Yangco,
901 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Section
61.046(7) broadly defines income as follows: "Income" means any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, compensation as an independent contractor, worker's...
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
time-sharing schedule for the parents and child. Section
61.046(14), Florida Statutes. You may use constructive
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 231, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 588, 2011 WL 5219466
...o be the biological father. "Parenting plan" means a document created to govern the relationship between the parents relating to decisions that must be made regarding the minor child and must contain a timesharing schedule for the parents and child. Section 61.046(14), Florida Statutes....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8503, 2009 WL 1796073
...NOTES [1] Section
744.301, Florida Statutes (2007), provides: "The mother of a child born out of wedlock is the natural guardian of the child and is entitled to primary residential care and custody of the child unless a court of competent jurisdiction enters an order stating otherwise." Section
61.046(3), Fla....
...(2007), defines "Custodial parent" or "primary residential parent" as "the parent with whom the child maintains his or her primary residence." Custodial parents have residential custody whereas noncustodial parents have visitation with the child. See generally Gumberg v. Gumberg,
755 So.2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Section
61.046 has since been amended to eliminate references to the "custodial" or "primary residential" parent....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida
Shared parental responsibility, as defined in section
61.046(17), Florida Statutes (2012), “means a court-ordered
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
parent for the purpose of the final judgment. See §
61.046(17), Fla. Stat. (2012) (defining “shared parental
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
September 26, 2016 parenting plan as required by section
61.046(14)(a)1., Florida Statutes. We conclude the
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 647, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2607
...be the biological
father. "Parenting plan" means a document created to govern the relationship between the
parents relating to decisions that must be made regarding the minor child and must contain a
time-sharing schedule for the parents and child. Section 61.046(14), Florida Statutes....
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17019, 2015 WL 7074655
...employer, which included a wage component.
The Former Husband properly used the $250,000 in future lost wages to
pay his expenses and support obligations under the MSA. Wages and salary are
specifically included in the definition of "income" under section 61.046(8), Florida
Statutes (2011), and should be considered in determining child support and alimony
obligations....
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
made by any person [or] private entity. . . .” §
61.046(8), Fla. Stat. Florida courts have interpreted
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7038, 2015 WL 2219677
...The Husband objected to the enforcement of the parties’ August 2013
parenting plan agreement, essentially alleging: (i) the agreement was entered under
duress, (ii) the agreement did not contain the required parenting plan components
mandated by section 61.046(14), Florida Statutes (2014), and (iii) the trial court
lacked jurisdiction to approve or enforce the parties’ agreement, since the
agreement included provisions outside the scope of what the Florida court would
ultimately adjudicate (i.e....
...The parties’ August 2013
agreement, and the trial court’s November 2014 order approving the agreement,
continue until such time that the trial court conducts a final hearing, and—
consistent with the requirements contained in the relevant provisions of section
3
61.046, Florida Statutes—enters a final order that includes a parenting plan,
support order, and time-sharing schedule....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 163, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 583, 2015 WL 1343088
...be the biological
father. "Parenting plan" means a document created to govern the relationship between the
parents relating to decisions that must be made regarding the minor child and must contain a
time-sharing schedule for the parents and child. Section 61.046(14), Florida Statutes....
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3837
...fees, the order did not set forth any findings of fact. This appeal followed.
This is a Title IV-D action. “IV-D” refers to services provided under Title
IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ss. 651 et seq., a child support
enforcement program. § 61.046(9), Fla....
...3
In this case, the Mother was the obligee—“the person to whom payments are
made pursuant to an order establishing, enforcing, or modifying an obligation for
alimony, for child support, or for alimony and child support.” § 61.046(12), Fla.
Stat....
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
discusses jurisdictional issues as required by section
61.046(14)(b), Florida Statutes (2020). The Father
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida
time-sharing schedule for the parents and child. Section
61.046(14), Florida Statutes. You may use constructive
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida
time-sharing schedule for the parents and child. Section
61.046(14), Florida Statutes. You may use constructive
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
court to make a child custody determination. See §
61.046(14)(c), Fla. Stat. (“For purposes of the Uniform
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
“disability benefits” are considered income, section
61.046(8), Florida Statutes (2019), and may be considered
CopyPublished | Florida 6th District Court of Appeal
dividends . . . and any other payments . . . .” §
61.046(8), Fla. Stat. (2022) (emphasis added). A parent’s
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
September 26, 2016 parenting plan as required by section
61.046(14)(a)1., Florida Statutes. We
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
leaves unresolved. 3 b. Alimony 3 Section
61.046(8), Florida Statutes, defines “income” as “any
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 407096, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1939
...Hobdy, had a valid and binding settlement agreement concerning the time-sharing schedule of their children. Because no such agreement exists, we reverse. The record reveals that the parties were negotiating the terms of a Parenting Plan governed by section 61.046(14), Florida Statutes (2010)....
...Time-sharing of the children is just one aspect of the Plan; other issues remained for negotiation between the parties before a written, binding agreement could be reached. There was no written document executed by the parties regarding all aspects of the Plan, as contemplated under section 61.046(14), and, therefore, the trial court erred in concluding that a valid and binding settlement agreement had been reached....
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1988).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General (gh) 1 Section
61.046(3), F.S., defines "[d]epository" as "the central
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11913, 2015 WL 4747194
...CPA's testimony that this would be a reasonable return on investment of the former
husband's retirement accounts."). This is true regardless of whether the party has
attained the age at which funds may be withdrawn without penalty. Niederman,
60 So.
3d at 548. Section
61.046(8), Florida Statutes (2013), defines "income" to include
"retirement benefits, pensions, dividends, [and] interest." The interest earned on the
equalization payments falls within the statutory definition of income and should also be
considered in calculating the Former Wife's income....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida
that must be made regarding the minor child.” §
61.046(14), Fla. Stat. (2020). “In creating the plan
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
4 Section
61.046(18), Florida Statutes (2024), provides that