Florida Statute 95.11 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS

Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION

View Entire Chapter

95.11 Limitations other than for the recovery of real property.—Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows:

(1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.—An action on a judgment or decree of a court of record in this state.

(2) WITHIN FIVE YEARS.—

(a) An action on a judgment or decree of any court, not of record, of this state or any court of the United States, any other state or territory in the United States, or a foreign country.

(b) A legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation, or liability founded on a written instrument, except for an action to enforce a claim against a payment bond, which shall be governed by the applicable provisions of paragraph (6)(e), s. 255.05(10), s. 337.18(1), or s. 713.23(1)(e), and except for an action for a deficiency judgment governed by paragraph (6)(g).

(d) An action alleging a willful violation of s. 448.110.

(e) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), an action for breach of a property insurance contract, with the period running from the date of loss.

(3) WITHIN FOUR YEARS.—

(a) An action relating to the determination of paternity, with the time running from the date the child reaches the age of majority.

(b) An action founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property, with the time running from the date the authority having jurisdiction issues a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion, or the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, whichever date is earliest; except that, when the action involves a latent defect, the time runs from the time the defect is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence. In any event, the action must be commenced within 7 years after the date the authority having jurisdiction issues a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion, or the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, whichever date is earliest. However, counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims that arise out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out or attempted to be set out in a pleading may be commenced up to 1 year after the pleading to which such claims relate is served, even if such claims would otherwise be time barred. With respect to actions founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property, if such construction is performed pursuant to a duly issued building permit and if the authority having jurisdiction has issued a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion, then as to the construction which is within the scope of such building permit and certificate, the correction of defects to completed work or repair of completed work, whether performed under warranty or otherwise, does not extend the period of time within which an action must be commenced. If a newly constructed single-dwelling residential building is used as a model home, the time begins to run from the date that a deed is recorded first transferring title to another party. Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, if the improvement to real property consists of the design, planning, or construction of multiple buildings, each building must be considered its own improvement for purposes of determining the limitations period set forth in this paragraph.

(c) An action to recover public money or property held by a public officer or employee, or former public officer or employee, and obtained during, or as a result of, his or her public office or employment.

(d) An action for injury to a person founded on the design, manufacture, distribution, or sale of personal property that is not permanently incorporated in an improvement to real property, including fixtures.

(e) An action founded on a statutory liability.

(f) An action for trespass on real property.

(g) An action for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property.

(h) An action to recover specific personal property.

(i) A legal or equitable action founded on fraud.

(j) A legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation, or liability not founded on a written instrument, including an action for the sale and delivery of goods, wares, and merchandise, and on store accounts.

(k) An action to rescind a contract.

(l) An action for money paid to any governmental authority by mistake or inadvertence.

(m) An action for a statutory penalty or forfeiture.

(n) An action for assault, battery, false arrest, malicious prosecution, malicious interference, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort, except as provided in subsections (5), (6), and (8).

(o) Any action not specifically provided for in these statutes.

(p) An action alleging a violation, other than a willful violation, of s. 448.110.

(4) WITHIN THREE YEARS.—An action to collect medical debt for services rendered by a facility licensed under chapter 395, provided that the period of limitations shall run from the date on which the facility refers the medical debt to a third party for collection.

(5) WITHIN TWO YEARS.—

(a) An action founded on negligence.

(b) An action for professional malpractice, other than medical malpractice, whether founded on contract or tort; provided that the period of limitations shall run from the time the cause of action is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence. However, the limitation of actions herein for professional malpractice shall be limited to persons in privity with the professional.

(c) An action for medical malpractice shall be commenced within 2 years from the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence; however, in no event shall the action be commenced later than 4 years from the date of the incident or occurrence out of which the cause of action accrued, except that this 4-year period shall not bar an action brought on behalf of a minor on or before the child’s eighth birthday. An “action for medical malpractice” is defined as a claim in tort or in contract for damages because of the death, injury, or monetary loss to any person arising out of any medical, dental, or surgical diagnosis, treatment, or care by any provider of health care. The limitation of actions within this subsection shall be limited to the health care provider and persons in privity with the provider of health care. In those actions covered by this paragraph in which it can be shown that fraud, concealment, or intentional misrepresentation of fact prevented the discovery of the injury the period of limitations is extended forward 2 years from the time that the injury is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but in no event to exceed 7 years from the date the incident giving rise to the injury occurred, except that this 7-year period shall not bar an action brought on behalf of a minor on or before the child’s eighth birthday. This paragraph shall not apply to actions for which ss. 766.301-766.316 provide the exclusive remedy.

(d) An action to recover wages or overtime or damages or penalties concerning payment of wages and overtime.

(e) An action for wrongful death.

(f) An action founded upon a violation of any provision of chapter 517, with the period running from the time the facts giving rise to the cause of action were discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but not more than 5 years from the date such violation occurred.

(g) An action for personal injury caused by contact with or exposure to phenoxy herbicides while serving either as a civilian or as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during the period January 1, 1962, through May 7, 1975; the period of limitations shall run from the time the cause of action is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.

(h) An action for libel or slander.

(6) WITHIN ONE YEAR.—

(a) An action for specific performance of a contract.

(b) An action to enforce an equitable lien arising from the furnishing of labor, services, or material for the improvement of real property.

(d) An action against any guaranty association and its insured, with the period running from the date of the deadline for filing claims in the order of liquidation.

(e) Except for actions governed by s. 255.05(10), s. 337.18(1), or s. 713.23(1)(e), an action to enforce any claim against a payment bond on which the principal is a contractor, subcontractor, or sub-subcontractor as defined in s. 713.01, for private work as well as public work, from the last furnishing of labor, services, or materials or from the last furnishing of labor, services, or materials by the contractor if the contractor is the principal on a bond on the same construction project, whichever is later.

(f) Except for actions described in subsection (9), or a petition challenging a criminal conviction, all petitions; extraordinary writs; tort actions, including those under s. 768.28(14); or other actions which concern any condition of confinement of a prisoner filed by or on behalf of a prisoner as defined in s. 57.085. Any petition, writ, or action brought under this paragraph must be commenced within 1 year after the time the incident, conduct, or conditions occurred or within 1 year after the time the incident, conduct, or conditions were discovered, or should have been discovered.

(g) An action to enforce a claim of a deficiency related to a note secured by a mortgage against a residential property that is a one-family to four-family dwelling unit. The limitations period shall commence on the day after the certificate is issued by the clerk of court or the day after the mortgagee accepts a deed in lieu of foreclosure.

(7) LACHES.—Laches shall bar any action unless it is commenced within the time provided for legal actions concerning the same subject matter regardless of lack of knowledge by the person sought to be held liable that the person alleging liability would assert his or her rights and whether the person sought to be held liable is injured or prejudiced by the delay. This subsection shall not affect application of laches at an earlier time in accordance with law.

(8) FOR INTENTIONAL TORTS BASED ON ABUSE.—An action founded on alleged abuse, as defined in s. 39.01 or s. 415.102; incest, as defined in s. 826.04; or an action brought pursuant to s. 787.061 may be commenced at any time within 7 years after the age of majority, or within 4 years after the injured person leaves the dependency of the abuser, or within 4 years from the time of discovery by the injured party of both the injury and the causal relationship between the injury and the abuse, whichever occurs later.

(9) WITHIN 30 DAYS FOR ACTIONS CHALLENGING CORRECTIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.—Any court action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28(2) must be commenced within 30 days after final disposition of the prisoner disciplinary proceedings through the administrative grievance process under chapter 33, Florida Administrative Code. Any action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings shall be barred by the court unless it is commenced within the time period provided by this section.

(10) SPECIFIED OFFENSES ON VICTIMS UNDER AGE 16.—An action related to an act constituting a violation of s. 794.011 or an action brought pursuant to s. 787.061 involving a victim who was under the age of 16 at the time of the act may be commenced at any time. This subsection applies to any such action other than one which would have been time barred on or before July 1, 2010.

(11) FOR INTENTIONAL TORTS RESULTING IN DEATH FROM ACTS DESCRIBED IN S. 782.04 OR S. 782.07.—Notwithstanding paragraph (5)(e), an action for wrongful death seeking damages authorized under s. 768.21 brought against a natural person for an intentional tort resulting in death from acts described in s. 782.04 or s. 782.07 may be commenced at any time. This subsection shall not be construed to require an arrest, the filing of formal criminal charges, or a conviction for a violation of s. 782.04 or s. 782.07 as a condition for filing a civil action.

(12) COURT COSTS AND FINES.—Notwithstanding subsection (1), an action to collect court costs, fees, or fines owed to the state may be commenced at any time.

(13) FOR ACTIONS INVOLVING SERVICEMEMBERS.—Any action involving a servicemember as defined in s. 250.01, in which the servicemember is a party, is subject to s. 250.5201 and part IV of chapter 250, which includes the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. ss. 501 et seq., providing for protections to members of the United States Armed Forces, the United States Reserve Forces, or the National Guard during terms of federal or state active duty which materially affect the servicemember’s ability to appear.

History.—s. 10, ch. 1869, 1872; s. 1, ch. 3900, 1889; RS 1294; GS 1725; s. 10, ch. 7838, 1919; RGS 2939; CGL 4663; s. 1, ch. 21892, 1943; s. 7, ch. 24337, 1947; s. 24, ch. 57-1; s. 1, ch. 59-188; s. 1, ch. 67-284; s. 1, ch. 71-254; s. 30, ch. 73-333; s. 7, ch. 74-382; s. 7, ch. 75-9; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 11, ch. 78-435; s. 1, ch. 80-322; s. 34, ch. 83-38; s. 1, ch. 84-13; s. 1, ch. 85-63; s. 139, ch. 86-220; s. 1, ch. 86-231; s. 1, ch. 86-272; s. 1, ch. 88-397; s. 20, ch. 90-109; s. 1, ch. 92-102; s. 520, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-283; s. 4, ch. 96-106; s. 1, ch. 96-167; s. 15, ch. 98-280; s. 2, ch. 99-5; s. 12, ch. 99-137; s. 2, ch. 2001-211; s. 15, ch. 2005-230; s. 1, ch. 2005-353; s. 1, ch. 2006-145; s. 2, ch. 2010-45; s. 1, ch. 2010-54; s. 1, ch. 2011-39; s. 13, ch. 2012-100; s. 1, ch. 2012-211; s. 1, ch. 2013-137; s. 18, ch. 2016-24; s. 18, ch. 2017-37; s. 1, ch. 2017-101; s. 10, ch. 2017-107; ss. 1, 2, ch. 2018-97; s. 3, ch. 2023-15; s. 1, ch. 2023-22; s. 1, ch. 2023-86; s. 1, ch. 2024-183; s. 2, ch. 2025-81; s. 41, ch. 2025-153.

F.S. 95.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.11 on CourtListener

Amendments to 95.11

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 95.11

Total Results: 1000

Major League Baseball v. Morsani

790 So. 2d 1071, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1401, 2001 WL 776662

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 249004

Cited 163 times | Published

provisions of chapter 95, Florida Statutes (1991). Section 95.11 sets forth the limitations period for an action

Moransais v. Heathman

744 So. 2d 973, 1999 WL 462629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1999 | Docket: 2527054

Cited 146 times | Published

statutory scheme for limitations of actions. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1997), reads in pertinent

Joshua v. City of Gainesville

768 So. 2d 432, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 641, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1751, 2000 WL 1227755

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2000 | Docket: 629162

Cited 107 times | Published

statute of limitations for statutory violations, section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to actions

Hearndon v. Graham

767 So. 2d 1179, 2000 WL 1288688

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2000 | Docket: 2487445

Cited 99 times | Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1987). Hearndon argued

Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc.

368 So. 2d 1337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1979 | Docket: 1389669

Cited 86 times | Published

the general four year statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1973). This was so, because

Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc.

368 So. 2d 1337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1979 | Docket: 1389669

Cited 86 times | Published

the general four year statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1973). This was so, because

Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons

369 So. 2d 572

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1979 | Docket: 470751

Cited 86 times | Published

called upon to review the constitutionality of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), insofar as it

Silvestrone v. Edell

721 So. 2d 1173, 1998 WL 904305

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1998 | Docket: 1271390

Cited 62 times | Published

a litigation-related context begins to run. Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), provides in

Tanner v. Hartog

618 So. 2d 177, 1993 WL 152666

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1993 | Docket: 98088

Cited 61 times | Published

RIGHTS TO COMMENCE THE LIMITATIONS PERIOD UNDER SECTION 95.11(4)(b), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989). 17 Fla. L. Weekly

Omar Ex Rel. Cannon v. Lindsey

334 F.3d 1246, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12976, 2003 WL 21480389

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 26, 2003 | Docket: 1190749

Cited 58 times | Published

(11th Cir.1988) (stating that Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(3) provides for a four-year limitations period

Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP

137 So. 3d 1081, 2014 WL 1230326, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2014 | Docket: 60240164

Cited 47 times | Published

instrument to be commenced within five years, see § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat., and claims for unjust enrichment

Beck v. Lazard Freres & Co., LLC

175 F.3d 913, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9039, 1999 WL 300894

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1999 | Docket: 2273593

Cited 45 times | Published

dismissed the complaint as being barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, the five-year breach

Beck v. Lazard Freres & Co., LLC

175 F.3d 913, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9039, 1999 WL 300894

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1999 | Docket: 2273593

Cited 45 times | Published

dismissed the complaint as being barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, the five-year breach

Abbott Labs., Inc. v. General Elec. Capital

765 So. 2d 737, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6072, 2000 WL 664052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2000 | Docket: 1522881

Cited 44 times | Published

are barred by the statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The facts are

Davis v. Monahan

832 So. 2d 708, 2002 WL 31477296

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2002 | Docket: 1336041

Cited 40 times | Published

malpractice, and intentional torts based on abuse. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 2000), provides:

Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.

531 So. 2d 84, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 831, 1988 WL 97201

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 2527053

Cited 40 times | Published

two years from the discovery of the malpractice. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983). Other actions founded

Abram-Adams v. Citigroup, Inc.

491 F. App'x 972

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 16, 2012 | Docket: 65709994

Cited 39 times | Published

claims-four-year statute of limitations, see Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3). On appeal, Abram-Adams argues that the doctrines

Silva v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.

601 So. 2d 1184, 1992 WL 110906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1992 | Docket: 1710931

Cited 39 times | Published

limitations for medical malpractice suits under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), or the four-year

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

863 So. 2d 201, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 719, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1623, 2003 WL 22207887

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2003 | Docket: 1431590

Cited 38 times | Published

repose applicable to medical malpractice cases. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), extends the

Foley v. Morris

339 So. 2d 215

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1976 | Docket: 1436240

Cited 38 times | Published

the two-year statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (1973), effective July 1, 1972, rather than

Fulton County Adm'r v. Sullivan

753 So. 2d 549, 1999 WL 1072973

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1999 | Docket: 1433918

Cited 37 times | Published

was included as a tolling provision only in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995) (medical malpractice

American Home Assur. v. PLAZA MATERIALS

908 So. 2d 360, 2005 WL 1575877

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1397756

Cited 36 times | Published

1984); 7 Fla. Jur.2d Bonds § 9 (2004); see also, § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004) (providing a five-year

Joe Allen Baker v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., Joe Allen Baker v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.

850 F.2d 1480, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10184, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 772, 1988 WL 72420

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 1, 1988 | Docket: 308387

Cited 34 times | Published

within the subsections enumerated in Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3), which provides for a four-year statute of limitations

Wood v. Fraser

677 So. 2d 15, 1996 WL 324987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1996 | Docket: 1993559

Cited 33 times | Published

four-year medical malpractice statute of repose in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), in that the

JB v. Sacred Heart Hosp. of Pensacola

635 So. 2d 945, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 194, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 577, 1994 WL 137919

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1994 | Docket: 1705398

Cited 33 times | Published

transporter for the patient fall within Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(b), the two-year statute of limitations for

Lopez-Infante v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.

809 So. 2d 13, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 201, 2002 WL 54051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1312496

Cited 32 times | Published

So.2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). According to Section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes, the statute of limitations

Lopez-Infante v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.

809 So. 2d 13, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 201, 2002 WL 54051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1312496

Cited 32 times | Published

So.2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). According to Section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes, the statute of limitations

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lee

678 So. 2d 818, 1996 WL 473318

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1996 | Docket: 2517431

Cited 32 times | Published

the running of the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that

Universal Engineering Corp. v. Perez

451 So. 2d 463, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3026

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1984 | Docket: 1483313

Cited 31 times | Published

413 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), which held section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), unconstitutional

Cason v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF MANAGEMENT SERVS.

944 So. 2d 306, 2006 WL 3313749

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2006 | Docket: 2518596

Cited 30 times | Published

specifically includes the State within its operation. See § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that limitations

Bell v. Indian River Mem. Hosp.

778 So. 2d 1030, 2001 WL 98665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 1686912

Cited 29 times | Published

claim for medical malpractice as defined by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

Baskerville-Donovan Eng's, Inc. v. Pensacola Exec. House Condominium Ass'n, Inc.

581 So. 2d 1301, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 440, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 931, 1991 WL 101180

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1283831

Cited 29 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983),[2] applies only

Todd Pioch v. IBEX Engineering Services, Inc.

825 F.3d 1264

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 2016 | Docket: 3078150

Cited 25 times | Published

counterclaim was time-barred under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) (imposing a two-year statute of limitations

Hankey v. Yarian

755 So. 2d 93, 2000 WL 283692

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2000 | Docket: 1699332

Cited 25 times | Published

this scheme. LIMITATIONS SCHEME Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for

Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. MacKal

641 So. 2d 445, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7987, 1994 WL 419054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1994 | Docket: 1648621

Cited 25 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations applies. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1991). The discovery rule found

Angrand v. Fox

552 So. 2d 1113, 1989 WL 104034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1989 | Docket: 1663556

Cited 25 times | Published

remaining in the two-year limitations period, § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (1987), the plaintiff secured

Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.

805 So. 2d 835, 2001 WL 883234

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2001 | Docket: 2449499

Cited 24 times | Published

"action on a judgment" within the meaning of section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), the Florida

Raie v. Cheminova, Inc.

336 F.3d 1278, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13691, 2003 WL 21525295

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2003 | Docket: 397756

Cited 23 times | Published

follows: An action for products liability under § 95.11(3) must be begun within the period prescribed in

Merkle v. Robinson

737 So. 2d 540, 1999 WL 506972

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1999 | Docket: 1709516

Cited 23 times | Published

INVOLVING FLORIDA'S STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, SECTION 95.11, FLORIDA STATUTES? Robinson v. Merkle, 700 So

Carr v. Broward County

541 So. 2d 92, 1989 WL 23391

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1989 | Docket: 23554

Cited 22 times | Published

the statute of repose provisions contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). In so holding

Wiley v. Roof

641 So. 2d 66, 1994 WL 275172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1994 | Docket: 1648564

Cited 21 times | Published

in chapter 92-102, Laws of Florida, amended section 95.11 to read: Actions other than for recovery of

Scott v. Otis Elevator Company

524 So. 2d 642, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 457, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 289, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 524, 1988 WL 40939

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1988 | Docket: 1329567

Cited 21 times | Published

court reversed, finding the action barred by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), which provides

Alford v. Summerlin

423 So. 2d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1982 | Docket: 544497

Cited 21 times | Published

death. In so holding, the court determined that Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), effective May

Kiesel v. Graham

388 So. 2d 594

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1980 | Docket: 1520800

Cited 21 times | Published

five-year period of limitation as set forth in Section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes. There are no factual

Federal Ins. v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA

707 So. 2d 1119

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1998 | Docket: 1239512

Cited 20 times | Published

judgment on the pleadings, ruling that under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), any claim arising

Boyd v. Becker

627 So. 2d 481, 1993 WL 444290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1993 | Docket: 1530911

Cited 20 times | Published

malpractice action is computed. The pertinent part of section 95.11(4)(b) reads as follows: (b) An action for medical

Navarro v. City of Riviera Beach

192 F. Supp. 3d 1353, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117792, 2016 WL 4257311

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2016 | Docket: 64309361

Cited 19 times | Published

relevant statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o). Although Plaintiffs Complaint omits the

Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc.

22 So. 3d 36, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1868, 2009 WL 3644163

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2009 | Docket: 1432532

Cited 19 times | Published

are governed by two main authorities. First, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth a two-year

JJ Gumberg Co. v. Janis Services, Inc.

847 So. 2d 1048, 2003 WL 21221313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2003 | Docket: 2485524

Cited 19 times | Published

5th DCA 2000), the court held that "[u]nder section 95.11(2)(b), the limitations period begins to run

HOLLYWOOD LAKES CIVIC ASS'N v. Hollywood

676 So. 2d 500, 1996 WL 364787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1996 | Docket: 373836

Cited 19 times | Published

within the four-year timeframe provided for by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1995). The complaint

Barron v. Shapiro

565 So. 2d 1319, 1990 WL 82925

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1990 | Docket: 1725965

Cited 19 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations in Nardone was section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1965), which provided:

Patten v. Winderman

965 So. 2d 1222, 2007 WL 2782549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2007 | Docket: 1509287

Cited 18 times | Published

argued that Patten's actions were barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2006), claiming that accounting

Nadd v. Le Credit Lyonnais, SA

804 So. 2d 1226, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 769, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2274, 2001 WL 1472623

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2001 | Docket: 1699582

Cited 18 times | Published

statute of limitations found in subsection (1) of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995), is applicable to actions

AllState Insurance Company v. Sara C. Vizcay

826 F.3d 1326, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11479, 2016 WL 3448447

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 23, 2016 | Docket: 3081938

Cited 17 times | Published

must be brought within four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Like many jurisdictions, however, Florida

Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Phlieger

508 So. 2d 713, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 256, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1923

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1987 | Docket: 1648786

Cited 17 times | Published

11 and 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1983). Section 95.11 provides in pertinent part: Actions other than

Sheoah Highlands, Inc. v. Daugherty

837 So. 2d 579, 2003 WL 328430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2003 | Docket: 537491

Cited 16 times | Published

attorney's fees. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1998), provides, in relevant

Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Banyon Lakes C. Corp.

831 So. 2d 204, 2002 WL 31174884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 1722922

Cited 16 times | Published

is two years as to all Callaway claims under section 95.11(4)(g), Florida Statutes. Banyon argued that

Musculoskeletal Institute v. Parham

745 So. 2d 946

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1999 | Docket: 352781

Cited 16 times | Published

ALSO EXTEND THE STATUTE OF REPOSE CONTAINED IN SECTION 95.11(4)( [b]), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)? Id. at 625

PUBLIC H. TRUST OF DADE CTY. v. Knuck

495 So. 2d 834, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 1758741

Cited 16 times | Published

the applicable statute of limitations period, § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1985),[2] had failed to observe

Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales

400 So. 2d 965

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1981 | Docket: 1677228

Cited 16 times | Published

subsequent amendments upon the application of section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973). Brooks v. Cerrato

Walker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

320 So. 2d 418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1975 | Docket: 1733820

Cited 16 times | Published

statute of limitations on such actions set forth in § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. As grounds for her contention

Merle Wood and Associates, Inc. v. Trinity Yachhts, LLC

714 F.3d 1234, 2013 WL 1501928, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7479

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 15, 2013 | Docket: 2201382

Cited 15 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11, because they accrued prior to September 8, 2006

YUSUF MOHAMAD EXCAV. INC. v. Ringhaver Equip. Co.

793 So. 2d 1127, 2001 WL 1023501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2001 | Docket: 1267340

Cited 15 times | Published

deceptive trade practice claims. We disagree. Section 95.11(3) of the Florida Statutes (1989) provides a

Stackhouse v. Emerson

611 So. 2d 1365, 1993 WL 9788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1993 | Docket: 1677588

Cited 15 times | Published

medical malpractice, section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes (1989). Section 95.11(4)(b) provides in

Rybovich Boat Works, Inc. v. Atkins

585 So. 2d 270, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 511, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1268, 1991 WL 165124

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1991 | Docket: 1688657

Cited 15 times | Published

was not filed within one year, as required by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court

Green v. Moore

777 So. 2d 425, 2000 WL 1867515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 1513975

Cited 14 times | Published

100(c)(1) and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.630(c) (certiorari); § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2000) (actions challenging prisoner

RJA v. Foster

603 So. 2d 1167, 1992 WL 118713

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1992 | Docket: 1476036

Cited 14 times | Published

lawsuit must be commenced and tried. See, e.g., § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1991) (setting time limitations on

American Liberty Ins. Co. v. West and Conyers

491 So. 2d 573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1986 | Docket: 1383212

Cited 14 times | Published

against the contractor and the architect is section 95.11, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), which reads

Askew v. County of Volusia

450 So. 2d 233, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1984 | Docket: 1729129

Cited 14 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations for negligence. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). In the instant case,

Mazda Motors of Am., Inc. v. SC Henderson & Sons, Inc.

364 So. 2d 107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1978 | Docket: 461863

Cited 14 times | Published

time the applicable statute of limitations was F.S. 95.11(5)(c), *109 Florida Statutes 1973. That statute

Oliveros v. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt, Inc.

45 So. 3d 873, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12923, 2010 WL 3447253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2010 | Docket: 2525062

Cited 13 times | Published

date to file a medical malpractice action. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). The filing of the notice

Fox v. Madsen

12 So. 3d 1261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767, 2009 WL 1872524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2009 | Docket: 1647202

Cited 13 times | Published

limitations for specific performance of a contract. See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. Madsen contends, on the other

Medalie v. FSC Securities Corp.

87 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5455, 2000 WL 255918

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2000 | Docket: 2154367

Cited 13 times | Published

limitations applicable to Chapter 517 is set forth in § 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes, which provides: Actions

Doe v. Dorsey

683 So. 2d 614, 1996 WL 672986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1996 | Docket: 279200

Cited 13 times | Published

church is barred by the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes, limits an action for

Havatampa Corp. v. McELVY, JENNEWEIN, INC.

417 So. 2d 703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1982 | Docket: 1383417

Cited 13 times | Published

forth in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1979).[1] The applicable portions of section 95.11(3)(c)

Glass v. Camara

369 So. 2d 625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1979 | Docket: 470920

Cited 13 times | Published

barred by the two-year statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes. If the two-year limitation

Raphael v. Shecter

18 So. 3d 1152, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14084, 2009 WL 3018157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 83627

Cited 12 times | Published

the time the malpractice incident occurs.[5]See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002); Patient's Compensation

Suarez v. City of Tampa

987 So. 2d 681, 2008 WL 268910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2008 | Docket: 1724232

Cited 12 times | Published

"not specifically provided for" in the statute. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2002). The parties also acknowledge

Allan and Conrad v. University of Cent. Fl.

961 So. 2d 1083, 2007 WL 2140595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2007 | Docket: 325746

Cited 12 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence. . . . § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1989) (emphasis added). The

Brooks Tropicals, Inc. v. Acosta

959 So. 2d 288, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5633, 2007 WL 1135697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2007 | Docket: 528386

Cited 12 times | Published

wares, and merchandise, and on store accounts. § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2006); see ARDC Corp. v. Hogan

Torrey v. Leesburg Regional Medical Center

769 So. 2d 1040, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 911, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2040, 2000 WL 1588051

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2000 | Docket: 1476642

Cited 12 times | Published

medical malpractice actions is two years. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). However, the 90-day presuit

Lynn v. Mount Sinai Medical Center, Inc.

692 So. 2d 1002, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934, 1997 WL 227474

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1997 | Docket: 435571

Cited 12 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1992). The Medical Malpractice

Sarasota Welfare Home v. Sarasota

666 So. 2d 171, 1995 WL 698905

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 452644

Cited 12 times | Published

condemnation action is four years pursuant to section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1991). However, we

Turner Murphy v. SPEC. CONSTRUCT.

659 So. 2d 1242, 1995 WL 504817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1995 | Docket: 2516314

Cited 12 times | Published

other state or territory in the United States," § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), so that the judgment

Turner Murphy v. SPEC. CONSTRUCT.

659 So. 2d 1242, 1995 WL 504817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1995 | Docket: 2516314

Cited 12 times | Published

other state or territory in the United States," § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), so that the judgment

Preyer v. Gulf Tank & Fabricating Co., Inc.

826 F. Supp. 1389, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9522, 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1452, 1993 WL 264418

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 5, 1993 | Docket: 1066632

Cited 12 times | Published

four year statute of limitations set out at Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1991). See Baker v. Western

Fowhand v. Piper

611 So. 2d 1308, 1992 WL 389022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1992 | Docket: 1674508

Cited 12 times | Published

limited by the statute of limitation found in section 95.11(3)(k); and (3) should not have been awarded

Arthur v. Unicare Health Facilities, Inc.

602 So. 2d 596, 1992 WL 135047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 161001

Cited 12 times | Published

limitations is the two-year medical malpractice statute. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). That limitations period

Loewer v. New York Life Insurance

773 F. Supp. 1518, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13543, 1991 WL 192675

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1991 | Docket: 1228305

Cited 12 times | Published

limitations specified under Florida Statutes, § 95.11 (1985), which requires that a legal or equitable

Cristich v. Allen Engineering, Inc.

458 So. 2d 76, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2298, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1984 | Docket: 472548

Cited 12 times | Published

for professional malpractice applied here. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in relevant

Whitney v. Marion County Hosp. Dist.

416 So. 2d 500

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1982 | Docket: 1225266

Cited 12 times | Published

trial court found that the action was barred by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) (the two-year

Carter v. Cross

373 So. 2d 81

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1979 | Docket: 1331290

Cited 12 times | Published

purposes of the statute of limitations under Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). We hold that

Carpenter v. Florida Cent. Credit Union

369 So. 2d 935

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1979 | Docket: 470922

Cited 12 times | Published

period for instruments under seal was 20 years. Section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1969). Effective January

Elaine Hess, etc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

175 So. 3d 687, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 188, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 623, 2015 WL 1472319

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2015 | Docket: 2646455

Cited 11 times | Published

[I]n any event an action for fraud under § 95.11(3) must be begun within 12 years after the date

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

126 So. 3d 186, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2493, 2013 WL 2096252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60236340

Cited 11 times | Published

importance,1 which we rephrase as follows: DOES SECTION 95.011, FLORIDA STATUTES, APPLY TO ARBITRATION? *188We

Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc.

906 So. 2d 343, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2005 | Docket: 1775398

Cited 11 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations is five years. See § 95.11; Barnes v. Escambia County Employees Credit Union

Brooke v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

828 So. 2d 1078, 2002 WL 31398610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2002 | Docket: 1523203

Cited 11 times | Published

applicable two-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). We reverse. On June 8

Rowe v. Schreiber

725 So. 2d 1245, 1999 WL 30612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 1293930

Cited 11 times | Published

two year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Berisford v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

667 So. 2d 809, 1995 WL 699875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 2515648

Cited 11 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), does not apply

Faw v. Wiles (In Re Wiles)

166 B.R. 975, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 84, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 732, 1994 WL 200158

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 1994 | Docket: 1404635

Cited 11 times | Published

argue that the action is barred by Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(j) because the loan was received and the certificate

ALMAND CONST. CO., INC. v. Evans

547 So. 2d 626, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 331, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 651, 1989 WL 75307

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1989 | Docket: 1474495

Cited 11 times | Published

the fifth amended complaint were barred by section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1977),[1] because the

Adams v. Sommers

475 So. 2d 279, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1985 | Docket: 1709929

Cited 11 times | Published

cause of action for legal malpractice arose. Section 95.11(4)(a) provides that the period of limitations

Adams v. Sommers

475 So. 2d 279, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1985 | Docket: 1709929

Cited 11 times | Published

cause of action for legal malpractice arose. Section 95.11(4)(a) provides that the period of limitations

Dade County v. Ferro

384 So. 2d 1283

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1980 | Docket: 1269471

Cited 11 times | Published

of the statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), which requires

Padilla v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.

391 F. Supp. 3d 1108

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 64325406

Cited 10 times | Published

claim under FDUTPA is four years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(f) ; Speier-Roche v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am.

Silver Shells Corp. v. St. Maarten at Silver Shells Condominium Ass'n

169 So. 3d 197, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9597, 2015 WL 3875556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2015 | Docket: 60248868

Cited 10 times | Published

by the five-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, which applies to “[a]

Canete v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

967 So. 2d 412, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16862, 2007 WL 3118664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2007 | Docket: 1454490

Cited 10 times | Published

January 2004, his claim was untimely under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes.[2] DOC further argued

Hamilton v. Tanner

962 So. 2d 997, 2007 WL 2254572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2007 | Docket: 480867

Cited 10 times | Published

an action on the lease agreement is five years, § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002), and that the statute

Spring Lake Imp. Dist. v. Tyrrell

868 So. 2d 656, 2004 WL 535429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 451876

Cited 10 times | Published

maintenance beyond the four-year period contained in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1997). Specifically

Ryan v. Lobo De Gonzalez

841 So. 2d 510, 2003 WL 468482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2003 | Docket: 365189

Cited 10 times | Published

statute of limitations or laches contained in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1997). They argued that the

Michael v. Valley Trucking Co., Inc.

832 So. 2d 213, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17762, 2002 WL 31696808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 1700102

Cited 10 times | Published

from doing so by the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), which provides

Putnam Berkley Group, Inc. v. Dinin

734 So. 2d 532, 1999 WL 333143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 2516530

Cited 10 times | Published

the identity of the actual tortfeasor. While section 95.11(4)(b) provided a tolling provision for fraudulent

Pezzi v. Brown

697 So. 2d 883, 1997 WL 345702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 1777030

Cited 10 times | Published

limitations applicable to negligence cases. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). However, the trial court

Adams v. Adams

691 So. 2d 10, 1997 WL 106956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 1424221

Cited 10 times | Published

independent action may be based, citing to section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, on limitations of actions

Moneyhun v. Vital Industries, Inc.

611 So. 2d 1316, 1993 WL 2973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1993 | Docket: 1757391

Cited 10 times | Published

actions are. The contract action is controlled by Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1981), which prescribes

Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Scherer

558 So. 2d 411, 1990 WL 26383

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1990 | Docket: 1359400

Cited 10 times | Published

statute of limitations begins to run under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). The district

Phelan v. Hanft

471 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397243

Cited 10 times | Published

August 1, 1983, the plaintiff sued Dr. Hanft.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provides in

Phelan v. Hanft

471 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397243

Cited 10 times | Published

August 1, 1983, the plaintiff sued Dr. Hanft.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provides in

Mitchell A. Newberger v. United States Marshals Service

751 F.2d 1162, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27765

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 28, 1985 | Docket: 488058

Cited 10 times | Published

analogous to appellant’s cause of action. Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f), which provides a four-year limitation

Szabo v. Essex Chemical Corp.

461 So. 2d 128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1984 | Docket: 1514574

Cited 10 times | Published

was dismissed on statute of limitation grounds. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). The trial court also found

Drake v. ISLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH

462 So. 2d 1142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1984 | Docket: 449462

Cited 10 times | Published

therefore the five-year statute of limitations in Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1983) is inapplicable

Toledo Park Homes v. Grant

447 So. 2d 343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 1984 | Docket: 1312167

Cited 10 times | Published

limitations applicable to professional malpractice, Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1981), barred the action

School Bd. of Seminole County v. GAF Corp.

413 So. 2d 1208, 4 Educ. L. Rep. 688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1982 | Docket: 1344802

Cited 10 times | Published

its lawsuits, in July of 1977. We agree that section 95.11(3)(c) applies to these cases rather than the

Fletcher v. Dozier

314 So. 2d 241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1975 | Docket: 1421137

Cited 10 times | Published

deaths resulting from medical malpractice, is F.S. 95.11(6), which provides for a period of two years

Grissom v. North American Aviation, Inc.

326 F. Supp. 465, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13350

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 11, 1971 | Docket: 1618803

Cited 10 times | Published

actions in Florida, Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes, F.S. A., has run. F.S. Section 95.11(6), F.S.A., provides

Barfield v. United States Rubber Company

234 So. 2d 374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1970 | Docket: 1354238

Cited 10 times | Published

statute of limitations set forth in Florida Statutes § 95.11(5) (e), or by the four year statute of limitations

Wilcox v. Atkins

213 So. 2d 879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1968 | Docket: 471568

Cited 10 times | Published

was barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5) (e), Florida Statutes F.S.A., since the May

Hicks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

178 So. 3d 957, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17002, 2015 WL 7017440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2015 | Docket: 60251637

Cited 9 times | Published

alleged in the complaint, as required under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013)- (establishing

Hames v. CITY OF MIAMI FIREFIGHTERS'

980 So. 2d 1112, 2008 WL 583672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2008 | Docket: 1418761

Cited 9 times | Published

forward with the forfeiture determination. Section 95.011 provides that in the absence of a separately

Ross v. Jim Adams Ford, Inc.

871 So. 2d 312, 2004 WL 1057655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 1300677

Cited 9 times | Published

because the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1993), bars this action

Alexander v. Suncoast Builders, Inc.

837 So. 2d 1056, 2002 WL 31870567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2002 | Docket: 1527450

Cited 9 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991). Section 95.11(3)(c) provides, in pertinent

New York State Dept. of Taxation v. Patafio

829 So. 2d 314, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566, 2002 WL 31396460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2002 | Docket: 1733619

Cited 9 times | Published

the twenty year limitation period found in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to its

Scarfo v. Ginsberg

817 So. 2d 919, 2002 WL 885789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 1430413

Cited 9 times | Published

barred by the Florida statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla Stat. (2000). The trial court granted

Le Credit Lyonnais, SA v. Nadd

741 So. 2d 1165, 1999 WL 729066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 453069

Cited 9 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1995). [2] §§ 55.XXX-XX-XXX, Fla.Stat. [3] § 95.11(1), Fla.Stat.

Nayee v. Nayee

705 So. 2d 961, 1998 WL 20680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1998 | Docket: 1560492

Cited 9 times | Published

specifically provided for in these statutes." § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1995). Jay also filed a new

Ins. Co. of No. Amer. v. Metro. Dade Co.

705 So. 2d 33, 1997 WL 667601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1997 | Docket: 1581319

Cited 9 times | Published

(Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Therefore, as provided in section 95.11(2)(b) Florida Statutes (1995) the proper limitations

Leasco Response, Inc. v. John Wright

99 F.3d 381, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29335, 1996 WL 616676

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 12, 1996 | Docket: 1059707

Cited 9 times | Published

relevant section of the Florida Code, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11, provides: Actions other than for recovery

Mangoni v. Temkin

679 So. 2d 1286, 1996 WL 539832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1996 | Docket: 1666010

Cited 9 times | Published

barred by the four year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). Appellants filed their

Pinnacle Port Community Association, Inc. v. Charles Orenstein

952 F.2d 375, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1071

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 30, 1992 | Docket: 1007702

Cited 9 times | Published

construction of an improvement...." Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3)(c) (West 1979) (emphasis added). When reenacting

Puchner v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.

553 So. 2d 216, 1989 WL 133280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1989 | Docket: 976327

Cited 9 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose. Similarly, section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), bars Puchner's

Hanft v. Phelan

488 So. 2d 531, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 231

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1986 | Docket: 317530

Cited 9 times | Published

that the two-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), would bar her

Corkery v. SuperX Drugs Corp.

602 F. Supp. 42, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 1200757

Cited 9 times | Published

discrimination); § 95.11(4)(c) (two years for action to recover lost wages); § 95.11(3)(f) (four years

Phillips v. Mease Hosp. and Clinic

445 So. 2d 1058, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1984 | Docket: 1685609

Cited 9 times | Published

Florida Patients Compensation Fund, pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). The summary

Harris v. Aberdeen Property Owners Ass'n

135 So. 3d 365, 2014 WL 223072, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2014 | Docket: 60239588

Cited 8 times | Published

five-year limitations period applied under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), that the cause

Baxter v. Northrup

128 So. 3d 908, 2013 WL 6687846, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237211

Cited 8 times | Published

695, 698 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). *910Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, an action for medical

Baxter v. Northrup

128 So. 3d 908, 2013 WL 6687846, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237211

Cited 8 times | Published

695, 698 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). *910Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, an action for medical

Joseph v. University Behavioral LLC

71 So. 3d 913, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15862, 2011 WL 5108524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2011 | Docket: 60303168

Cited 8 times | Published

there*917fore is barred pursuant to Florida Statutes § 95.11.” UBC also alleged: “[UBC] asserts that this Court

Estate of Rotell Ex Rel. Rotell v. Kuehnle

38 So. 3d 783, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7735, 2010 WL 2178581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2010 | Docket: 2409449

Cited 8 times | Published

negligence). . "A profession, within the meaning of section 95.11, is ‘any vocation requiring at a minimum a four-year

Medical Jet v. Signature Flight Support

941 So. 2d 576, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19135, 2006 WL 3300342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2006 | Docket: 431650

Cited 8 times | Published

that the five-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), barred the cause

Gannett Co., Inc. v. Anderson

947 So. 2d 1, 2006 WL 2986459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2006 | Docket: 1720407

Cited 8 times | Published

of privacy claim to circumvent the effect of section 95.11(4)(g), Florida Statutes, which places a two-year

American Bankers Life Assur. v. 2275 West

905 So. 2d 189, 2005 WL 765075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2005 | Docket: 1711849

Cited 8 times | Published

discover. Id. The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or

Haskins v. City of Ft. Lauderdale

898 So. 2d 1120, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371, 2005 WL 714049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 1732215

Cited 8 times | Published

an action founded on negligence is four years. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2004). "As a general rule, a statute

Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd., Pasco

900 So. 2d 601, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314, 2005 WL 292210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 1514224

Cited 8 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2002). Houck asserts

Wishnatzki v. Coffman Const., Inc.

884 So. 2d 282, 2004 WL 1809875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2004 | Docket: 1281901

Cited 8 times | Published

the four-year limitations period provided by section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), commenced to

Collections USA, Inc. v. City of Homestead

816 So. 2d 1225, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7394, 2002 WL 1062239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2002 | Docket: 752422

Cited 8 times | Published

suit was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001).[2] The lower

Sussman v. First Financial Title Co.

793 So. 2d 1066, 2001 WL 864179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2001 | Docket: 1677863

Cited 8 times | Published

limitations on ordinary negligence is four years. See § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1997). Appellee argues that since

Cisko v. Phoenix Medical Products, Inc.

797 So. 2d 11, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10625, 2001 WL 844675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2001 | Docket: 1714827

Cited 8 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations was four years. § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Heekin v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc.

789 So. 2d 355, 2001 WL 513893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2001 | Docket: 1696140

Cited 8 times | Published

not specifically named in any subsection of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1999). Therefore, the statute

HOSP. CONSTRUCTORS LTD. EX REL. LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. Lefor

749 So. 2d 546, 2000 WL 6061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2000 | Docket: 1690324

Cited 8 times | Published

founded on a written instrument is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (1990). When an action is based

Boyce v. Cluett

672 So. 2d 858, 1996 WL 148174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1996 | Docket: 1764151

Cited 8 times | Published

the grounds that the statute of limitations section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1975), barred Appellant's

ROGER ZITRIN, MD, PA v. Glaser

621 So. 2d 748, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1993 WL 230141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1993 | Docket: 2517491

Cited 8 times | Published

two year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse and

Frazier v. Frazier

616 So. 2d 575, 1993 WL 95551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1993 | Docket: 1726622

Cited 8 times | Published

foreign support order, appears to have elapsed. See § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (1991). Thus, it is important to

Wilder v. Meyer

779 F. Supp. 164, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17796, 1991 WL 259869

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1991 | Docket: 2180895

Cited 8 times | Published

Blue Sky Law claims is § 95.11(4)(e). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) requires a two prong

Public Health Trust v. Menendez

584 So. 2d 567, 1991 WL 155129

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1991 | Docket: 1515218

Cited 8 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), barred

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

548 So. 2d 231, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 415, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1989 WL 101543

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 1699053

Cited 8 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), or the four-year

Kaufman v. Stephen Cahen, PA

507 So. 2d 1152, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1987 | Docket: 460058

Cited 8 times | Published

the wrongful death statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1981), applied to claims

Small v. Niagara MacH. & Tool Works

502 So. 2d 943, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 1180837

Cited 8 times | Published

otherwise barred, accrued on June 26, 1981. Under section 95.11 entitled "Limitations other than for the recovery

Dubin v. Dow Corning Corp.

478 So. 2d 71, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1985 | Docket: 153707

Cited 8 times | Published

construction of an improvement to real property. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1981). On appeal, Dubin argues

Aprigliano v. American Honda Motor Co.

979 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2013 WL 5788771, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154539

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2013 | Docket: 65995102

Cited 7 times | Published

founded on a written instrument....” Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). Here, the express limited warranties were

Beltran v. Vincent P. Miraglia, M.D., P.A.

125 So. 3d 855, 2013 WL 1442239, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2013 | Docket: 60236094

Cited 7 times | Published

or unjust enrichment claims is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing for four-year

Banks v. Lardin

938 So. 2d 571, 2006 WL 2683275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 2424916

Cited 7 times | Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2005). The trial court

Williams v. ALBERTSON'S INC.

879 So. 2d 657, 2004 WL 1750135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2004 | Docket: 463851

Cited 7 times | Published

Systems, Inc., 871 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes, requires an action

Holiday Furniture Factory Out. Corp. v. State Dept. of Corrections

852 So. 2d 926, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12528, 2003 WL 21980487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2003 | Docket: 1711073

Cited 7 times | Published

for actions alleging breach of contract under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995). We disagree

Muka v. Horizon Financial Corp.

766 So. 2d 239, 2000 WL 121792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2000 | Docket: 1697810

Cited 7 times | Published

that registration in Florida is barred under section 95.11(2)(a) which requires that an action "on a judgment

Morsani v. Major League Baseball

739 So. 2d 610, 1999 WL 172627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 1293964

Cited 7 times | Published

plaintiffs had a four-year limitation under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1993), to file their

Harmony Homes, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration

936 F. Supp. 907, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11339, 1996 WL 450214

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1996 | Docket: 972617

Cited 7 times | Published

Judgment is GRANTED. II. Laches Florida Statute § 95.11(6) provides that laches automatically bar any action

Stone v. Rosenthal

665 So. 2d 276, 1995 WL 689540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 1705135

Cited 7 times | Published

February 4, 1993. She filed suit on June 3, 1993. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), provides in

Goodlet v. Steckler

586 So. 2d 74, 1991 WL 150406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 1487137

Cited 7 times | Published

discovered that incident prior to August 10, 1987. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). The evidence at summary

Allie v. Ionata

466 So. 2d 1108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1985 | Docket: 1524943

Cited 7 times | Published

asserted the applicable statute of limitations (§ 95.11(3), Fla. Stat.) as an affirmative defense, and

Allie v. Ionata

466 So. 2d 1108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1985 | Docket: 1524943

Cited 7 times | Published

asserted the applicable statute of limitations (§ 95.11(3), Fla. Stat.) as an affirmative defense, and

Whack v. SEMINOLE MEMORIAL HOSP.

456 So. 2d 561, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2089, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 2515752

Cited 7 times | Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitation, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes; (2) the complaint failed

Worrell v. John F. Kennedy Mem. Hosp.

384 So. 2d 897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1980 | Docket: 1678431

Cited 7 times | Published

early 1940's the limitations in effect were Section 95.11(4) and (6), Florida Statutes (1943). These provisions

Poulos v. Vordermeier

327 So. 2d 245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1976 | Docket: 1716217

Cited 7 times | Published

Limitations is three years, the statute being Fla. Stat. 95.11(5) (d) (1973).[1] "95.11 Limitations upon

National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC

192 So. 3d 498, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4820, 2016 WL 1238265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2016 | Docket: 3049198

Cited 6 times | Published

discovered or should have been discovered”); accord § 95.11(4)(a) (indicating that the time period for action

CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC v. Unknown Heirs

198 So. 3d 3, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 641, 2015 WL 248796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2015 | Docket: 60256485

Cited 6 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), and by the five-year

Anderson v. State

93 So. 3d 1201, 2012 WL 3210623, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2012 | Docket: 60310498

Cited 6 times | Published

amended petitions? It is no answer to say that section 95.11(p) provides a four-year statute of limitations

Anderson v. State

93 So. 3d 1201, 2012 WL 3210623, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2012 | Docket: 60310498

Cited 6 times | Published

amended petitions? It is no answer to say that section 95.11(p) provides a four-year statute of limitations

Corzo Trucking Corp. v. West

61 So. 3d 1285, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8072, 2011 WL 2135589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2011 | Docket: 60300447

Cited 6 times | Published

year life of a judgment." 805 So.2d at 843. . § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). . Florida Rule of Civil

Collins v. Monroe County

999 So. 2d 709, 2008 WL 5412010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2008 | Docket: 946628

Cited 6 times | Published

257, 100 S.Ct. 1127, 63 L.Ed.2d 373 (1980). [7] § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2007). The catch-all four-year

Technical Packaging, Inc. v. Hanchett

992 So. 2d 309, 2008 WL 4366038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2008 | Docket: 1723137

Cited 6 times | Published

Technical-UCB sales agreements were oral contracts. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2002) (providing that "[a] legal

SOUTH MOTOR CO. v. Doktorczyk

957 So. 2d 1215, 2007 WL 1217922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 1679102

Cited 6 times | Published

persuaded to purchase a power train warranty. Section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996), covers "[a]n

City of Hollywood v. Petrosino

864 So. 2d 1175, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 27, 2004 WL 32691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2004 | Docket: 1727639

Cited 6 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations is five years. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Williams v. Cordis Corp

Town of Oakland v. Mercer

851 So. 2d 266, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11727, 2003 WL 21766236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2003 | Docket: 1312964

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations for forfeiture proceedings found in section 95.11(3)(n), Florida Statutes (2002), meaningless

Doe v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HOSP. AUTHORITY

816 So. 2d 262, 2002 WL 1022054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 2523263

Cited 6 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), *263 applied

Carlton v. Germany Hammock Groves

803 So. 2d 852, 2002 WL 4555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2002 | Docket: 1785134

Cited 6 times | Published

found the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1997) was applicable

Marsh v. Patchett

788 So. 2d 353, 2001 WL 649643

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2001 | Docket: 1286722

Cited 6 times | Published

statute of limitations for a judgment is 20 years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1980). Several months prior

Performing Arts Center Authority v. CLARK CONST. GROUP, INC.

789 So. 2d 392, 2001 WL 485419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2001 | Docket: 1696138

Cited 6 times | Published

period of limitations had expired in February 1999. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2000). Defendants contend that

Monahan v. Davis

781 So. 2d 436, 2001 WL 194890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1294080

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations for such intentional torts was found at section 95.11(3)(o).[1] Such causes of action were different

Moyer v. Walt Disney World Co.

146 F. Supp. 2d 1249, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20530, 2000 WL 33310908

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2000 | Docket: 2203585

Cited 6 times | Published

personal injury statute of limitations. See F.S.A. § 95.11(3). "Claims of discrimination accrue when the plaintiff

McLeod v. Barber

764 So. 2d 790, 2000 WL 1004642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2000 | Docket: 470284

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida's four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1997).[2] The defense

Ambrose v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.

736 So. 2d 146, 1999 WL 445795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1999 | Docket: 1419728

Cited 6 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations relating to fraud, section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1997). This four-year

Hearndon v. Graham

710 So. 2d 87, 1998 WL 169753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1998 | Docket: 2532162

Cited 6 times | Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1987). Hearndon argued

Damiano v. McDaniel

689 So. 2d 1059, 1997 WL 109214

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1997 | Docket: 2230139

Cited 6 times | Published

the statute of repose for medical malpractice. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).[1] The Fourth District

Kilby v. Ilgen (In Re Kilby)

196 B.R. 627, 35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1511, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 415, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 633, 1996 WL 306687

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1996 | Docket: 1755264

Cited 6 times | Published

after the entry of the judgment and Fla.Stat. § 95.11 requires an action on a judgment to be commenced

Barnes Surgical Specialties, Inc. v. Bradshaw

549 So. 2d 1189, 1989 WL 119549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1989 | Docket: 374522

Cited 6 times | Published

barred by the two year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1987). The court found, however

Brown v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

441 So. 2d 1098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1983 | Docket: 1333484

Cited 6 times | Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1979).[1] We reverse because

Notar v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

438 So. 2d 531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1983 | Docket: 2517437

Cited 6 times | Published

consideration. We reverse both orders. Under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), a suit founded

CATES EX REL. CATES v. Graham

427 So. 2d 290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 1478080

Cited 6 times | Published

asserted that Plaintiffs' action was time barred by F.S. 95.11(4)(b) which provides that in medical malpractice

City of Brooksville v. HERNANDO CTY.

424 So. 2d 846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 1708136

Cited 6 times | Published

defense of statute of limitations under Florida Statute 95.11 is *848 tolled by the continuing negotiations

Bruce v. Byer

423 So. 2d 413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1982 | Docket: 544617

Cited 6 times | Published

that given a sufficient evidentiary predicate, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), the statute

Roberts v. Casey

413 So. 2d 1226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1982 | Docket: 1702829

Cited 6 times | Published

625, 627-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), which was in

Cowan v. Turchin

270 So. 2d 449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1972 | Docket: 1293803

Cited 6 times | Published

1969, 225 So.2d 331, 333, which, in applying Section 95.11(5)(e)[3] to an action based upon an implied

Access Insurance Planners, Inc. v. Gee

175 So. 3d 921, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14513, 2015 WL 5712568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 60250682

Cited 5 times | Published

governed by a four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2011); Acoustic Innovations

Doe v. St. John's Episcopal Parish Day School, Inc.

997 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 87 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1296, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17982, 2014 WL 585767

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2014 | Docket: 65997455

Cited 5 times | Published

Id. The court did rely on Florida Statute section 95.11(7), since the plaintiffs action was based on

Tillman v. Orange County

519 F. App'x 632

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 2013 | Docket: 65705525

Cited 5 times | Published

340 F.3d 1279, 1283 (11th Cir.2003); Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o)-(p). However, the accrual date of a § 1983

Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

106 So. 3d 456, 2012 WL 5233477, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2012 | Docket: 60228206

Cited 5 times | Published

bars only the right to enforce a cause of action. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2005). A remedy, on the other hand

Germ v. St. Luke's Hosp. Ass'n

993 So. 2d 576, 2008 WL 4683288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 2550270

Cited 5 times | Published

two arguments. First, the 1996 Amendment to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), applies to the

Todd v. Johnson

965 So. 2d 255, 2007 WL 2681877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2007 | Docket: 446800

Cited 5 times | Published

statute of limitations [sic] beyond four years." See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004).[1] We reverse. "Whether

Martin v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

951 So. 2d 84, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3670, 2007 WL 737576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2007 | Docket: 1280616

Cited 5 times | Published

nonetheless reached the correct result in light of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2006), which provides

Berg v. Wagner

935 So. 2d 100, 2006 WL 2265412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2006 | Docket: 1671196

Cited 5 times | Published

subject to a four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), (p), Fla. Stat. (limitations periods for

Swafford v. Schweitzer

906 So. 2d 1194, 2005 WL 1681923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 1775244

Cited 5 times | Published

on a claim for unjust enrichment is four years. § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (1999). Generally, the statute

NEW YORK STATE COM'R OF TAXATION v. Friona

902 So. 2d 864, 2005 WL 1109580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2005 | Docket: 1674999

Cited 5 times | Published

the "domestication" of the foreign judgment. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), provides a twenty-year

Childers v. Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc.

898 So. 2d 973, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2691, 2005 WL 497139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2005 | Docket: 1447812

Cited 5 times | Published

appeal is whether the statute of repose in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, for cases "brought

Delgado v. J. Byrons, Inc.

877 So. 2d 822, 2004 WL 1496867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 1285133

Cited 5 times | Published

statute of limitations for negligence had run. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. As such, it is apparent that

Lundstrom Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.

856 So. 2d 1117, 2003 WL 22400487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 43189

Cited 5 times | Published

two-year limitations period under Florida Statutes section 95.11(4)(c)(action to recover wages) and the one-year

Laney v. American Equity Investment Life Ins.

243 F. Supp. 2d 1347, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2242, 2003 WL 297508

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2003 | Docket: 2285586

Cited 5 times | Published

Desimone is correct that Florida Statutes section 95.11(3) provides a statute limitation period of four

Dinerstein v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

173 F.3d 826, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7848

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 1999 | Docket: 395223

Cited 5 times | Published

Stat. Ann. § 95.11(2)(b) (West 1999). The Florida Supreme Court has held that, under § 95.11(2)(b), a breach

Joshua v. City of Gainesville

734 So. 2d 1068, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4622, 1999 WL 71523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 1731047

Cited 5 times | Published

general four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes. We affirm the dismissal

Primerica Financial Services, Inc. v. Mitchell

48 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5902, 1999 WL 242419

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1999 | Docket: 2287195

Cited 5 times | Published

characterized as tortious interference. See Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(g). Defendant, however, is unable to evaluate

Hernandez v. Amisub, Inc.

714 So. 2d 539, 1998 WL 329412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1998 | Docket: 461519

Cited 5 times | Published

four-year medical malpractice statute of repose. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). This Court reversed,

Parham v. Balis

704 So. 2d 623, 1997 WL 716797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1997 | Docket: 1354557

Cited 5 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989).[1] This statute

Ondo v. F. GARY GIESEKE, PA

697 So. 2d 921, 1997 WL 408322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 1777255

Cited 5 times | Published

late spring of 1993. FURTHER AFFIANT SAY NOT Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995) provides that

Kelley v. Rice

670 So. 2d 1094, 1996 WL 124682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1996 | Docket: 1245835

Cited 5 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant, on

Charley Toppino & Sons v. SEAWATCH

658 So. 2d 922

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1994 | Docket: 439645

Cited 5 times | Published

cause of action for breach of implied warranty; section 95.11(3)(c) provides a four-year limitations period

Tanner v. Hartog

593 So. 2d 249, 1992 WL 571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1992 | Docket: 1508955

Cited 5 times | Published

complaint. They argued, among other points, that section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), the two year

Harr v. HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY MH CTR.

591 So. 2d 1051, 1991 WL 275534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 541391

Cited 5 times | Published

limitations against health care providers, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), began to run

ELIZABETH N. v. Riverside Group, Inc.

585 So. 2d 376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8083, 1991 WL 156590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1991 | Docket: 1688652

Cited 5 times | Published

which asserted that the action was barred by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1984), because the

Martin v. Pafford

583 So. 2d 736, 1991 WL 138151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1991 | Docket: 1284158

Cited 5 times | Published

determination that suit was time-barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm. In 1981

PENSACOLA EXEC. H. CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Baskerville-Donovan Engineers, Inc.

566 So. 2d 850, 1990 WL 126329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1990 | Docket: 548008

Cited 5 times | Published

that appellant's cause of action was barred by Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional

Menendez v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE CTY.

566 So. 2d 279, 1990 WL 102683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1990 | Docket: 547322

Cited 5 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980). The trial

Gray v. Greyhound Retirement and Disability Trust

730 F. Supp. 415, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1400, 1989 WL 167617

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 1814464

Cited 5 times | Published

limitations period, it should adopt Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(c), which allows for a two-year limitations

United States v. Hunter

700 F. Supp. 26, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13487, 1988 WL 127582

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1988 | Docket: 1012703

Cited 5 times | Published

for the recovery of defaulted loans, Fla.Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), had expired before the assignment of his

United States v. Hunter

700 F. Supp. 26, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13487, 1988 WL 127582

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1988 | Docket: 1012703

Cited 5 times | Published

for the recovery of defaulted loans, Fla.Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), had expired before the assignment of his

Shields v. Buchholz

515 So. 2d 1379, 1987 WL 2268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1468534

Cited 5 times | Published

malpractice. Appellants claim that application of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985) to their cause

Attache Resort Motel, Ltd. v. Kaplan

498 So. 2d 501, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1986 | Docket: 1335348

Cited 5 times | Published

alia, a statute of limitations defense under section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1981).[2] In the motion

Fabal v. FLORIDA KEYS MEMORIAL HOSP.

452 So. 2d 946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1984 | Docket: 474546

Cited 5 times | Published

from June 28, 1978, is barred by Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b)... It is, therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Taddiken v. FLA. PATIENT'S COMP. FUND

449 So. 2d 956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1984 | Docket: 1695848

Cited 5 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) is not applicable

Burr v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund

447 So. 2d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1984 | Docket: 1691170

Cited 5 times | Published

barred by the limitations period provided in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). We affirm. On

Forehand v. International Business MacHines Corp.

586 F. Supp. 9, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 876, 26 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1396, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20139, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,040

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1984 | Docket: 1505503

Cited 5 times | Published

Defendant contends that the applicable statute is § 95.11(4)(c), Fla.Stat., which prescribes a two-year limitations

Forehand v. International Business MacHines Corp.

586 F. Supp. 9, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 876, 26 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1396, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20139, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,040

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1984 | Docket: 1505503

Cited 5 times | Published

Defendant contends that the applicable statute is § 95.11(4)(c), Fla.Stat., which prescribes a two-year limitations

Birnholz v. Steisel

394 So. 2d 523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1981 | Docket: 1315577

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement governed by a five-year limitations statute. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1975).[4] The other counts are

Neff v. General Development Corp.

354 So. 2d 1275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1978 | Docket: 1279966

Cited 5 times | Published

court found that the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes,[1] barred appellant's

Smith v. Metropolitan Dade County

338 So. 2d 878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1976 | Docket: 455474

Cited 5 times | Published

she is barred by the statute of limitations [Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1975)]. On September 30

DeLuca v. Mathews

297 So. 2d 854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510408

Cited 5 times | Published

the statute of limitations had expired, under § 95.11(6) of Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.

271 So. 3d 870

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2018 | Docket: 8119865

Cited 4 times | Published

with authority to sue on the minor's behalf. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. A review of our precedent reveals

HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n ex rel. Registered Holders of Nomura Home Equity Home Loan, Inc. v. Estate of Petercen

227 So. 3d 640, 2017 WL 4280603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60278046

Cited 4 times | Published

brought within five years of the, default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say

HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n ex rel. Registered Holders of Nomura Home Equity Home Loan, Inc. v. Estate of Petercen

227 So. 3d 640, 2017 WL 4280603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60278046

Cited 4 times | Published

brought within five years of the, default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say

Effs v. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, Inc.

197 So. 3d 1243, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12043, 2016 WL 4198129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 4118363

Cited 4 times | Published

the applicable four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2005). Thereafter, Sony Pictures

Jane Doe v. Baptist Primary Care, Inc

177 So. 3d 669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991541

Cited 4 times | Published

to comply with the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, and the pre-suit notice

West Brook Isles Partner's 1, LLC v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company

163 So. 3d 635, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027, 2015 WL 1874453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2015 | Docket: 2652162

Cited 4 times | Published

2004 closing to sue Mr. Navaretta. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004) (two-year limitation for

Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.

161 So. 3d 568, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17609, 2014 WL 5461973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2014 | Docket: 60247208

Cited 4 times | Published

to make the effect of the dismissal final. See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing a four-year statute

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Wiley

145 So. 3d 946, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13005, 2014 WL 4114482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2014 | Docket: 60242785

Cited 4 times | Published

832 So.2d 213, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Under section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, the statute of limitations

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Wiley

145 So. 3d 946, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13005, 2014 WL 4114482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2014 | Docket: 60242785

Cited 4 times | Published

832 So.2d 213, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Under section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, the statute of limitations

Crews v. Malara

123 So. 3d 144, 2013 WL 5584090, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234989

Cited 4 times | Published

would have been within the 30-day time limit of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes; however, the date stamp

Cisko v. Diocese of Steubenville

123 So. 3d 83, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14151, 2013 WL 4734567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60235249

Cited 4 times | Published

statute of limitations barred the action. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). The appellants argued

Xavier v. Leviev Boymelgreen Marquis Developers, LLC

117 So. 3d 773, 2012 WL 5869998, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60232777

Cited 4 times | Published

statute of limitations for fraud is four years. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2009). The four years, however

Zirkelbach Construction Inc. v. Rajan

93 So. 3d 1124, 2012 WL 3046925, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2012 | Docket: 60310447

Cited 4 times | Published

on the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11 (3)(c), Florida Statutes (2006). .Auto-Owners

Insurance Co. of West v. Island Dream Homes, Inc.

679 F.3d 1295, 2012 WL 1588799, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9345

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2012 | Docket: 753848

Cited 4 times | Published

for limitations of actions" is Florida Statute § 95.11, which states that an action for professional malpractice

Brown v. Nationscredit Financial Services Corp.

32 So. 3d 661, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 2010 WL 786246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 1197034

Cited 4 times | Published

for a FDUTPA claim is four years pursuant to section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes, as it is based on a

Cohen v. Cooper

20 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16080, 2009 WL 3446369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 1639923

Cited 4 times | Published

a medical malpractice claim is governed by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. The section states

Cohen v. Cooper

20 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16080, 2009 WL 3446369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 1639923

Cited 4 times | Published

a medical malpractice claim is governed by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. The section states

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. West

21 So. 3d 96, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15800, 2009 WL 3364925

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2009 | Docket: 1655966

Cited 4 times | Published

be filed within four years of the taking date. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat (2008); New Testament Baptist

Roberts v. Stidham

19 So. 3d 1155, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15619, 2009 WL 3316923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2009 | Docket: 1651664

Cited 4 times | Published

the date of the accident to file her complaint. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2003). [2] Initially, the appeal

Shands v. City of Marathon

999 So. 2d 718, 2008 WL 5412069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2008 | Docket: 1514943

Cited 4 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2007). We therefore

City of Riviera Beach v. Reed

987 So. 2d 168, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10878, 2008 WL 2744386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2008 | Docket: 64855249

Cited 4 times | Published

See §§ 158.67, 159.17, Fla. Stat. (2005). Section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), establishes

Bott v. City of Marathon

949 So. 2d 295, 2007 WL 465032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 1720105

Cited 4 times | Published

commence within five (5) years from May 1, 2000. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000) (providing a five year

Cooper v. Florida Parole Commission

924 So. 2d 966, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 2006 WL 862965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2006 | Docket: 229189

Cited 4 times | Published

court properly denied the petition as untimely. § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal

Sarasota County v. CITY BANK OF CLEVELAND

902 So. 2d 233, 2005 WL 1125050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2005 | Docket: 1256791

Cited 4 times | Published

Stat. (2001). We grant relief, holding that section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), has no application

Carter v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc.

889 So. 2d 960, 2004 WL 2921786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2004 | Docket: 1742685

Cited 4 times | Published

C.J. and WEBSTER, J., Concur. NOTES [1] See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). [2] See also Chaffin

Brown v. Ameri Star, Inc.

884 So. 2d 1065, 2004 WL 2309035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 1281871

Cited 4 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1998), Brown filed

Richey v. Modular Designs, Inc.

879 So. 2d 665, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11703, 2004 WL 1773534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2004 | Docket: 1514429

Cited 4 times | Published

barred by two-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2000); that the cause

POND APPLE PLACE III CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. Russo

841 So. 2d 526, 2003 WL 470247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2003 | Docket: 1233669

Cited 4 times | Published

performance and was, therefore, time-barred by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes. We disagree with the

In Re Estate of Tensfeldt

839 So. 2d 720, 2003 WL 118210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2003 | Docket: 1708014

Cited 4 times | Published

by the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11 (2)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992). In the

Omar Ex Rel. Cannon v. Lindsey

243 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6580, 2003 WL 257552

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2003 | Docket: 2488653

Cited 4 times | Published

(11th Cir.1988) (stating that Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(3) provides for a four-year limitations period

Georgia State Department of Education v. Derrick C.

314 F.3d 545, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25256, 2002 WL 31749395

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 10, 2002 | Docket: 238927

Cited 4 times | Published

based on statutory liability under Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(f) applied instead. Id. at 848, 851-52

Gundlah v. Moore

831 So. 2d 780, 2002 WL 31696736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 1722861

Cited 4 times | Published

precludes the court from exercising jurisdiction. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)

Gundlah v. Moore

831 So. 2d 780, 2002 WL 31696736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 1722861

Cited 4 times | Published

precludes the court from exercising jurisdiction. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)

Hillsborough County Hosp. Auth. v. Coffaro

829 So. 2d 862, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1946, 2002 WL 31190892

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2002 | Docket: 1733529

Cited 4 times | Published

Yarian, 755 So.2d 93 (Fla.2000): Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for

Snyder v. Wernecke

813 So. 2d 213, 2002 WL 491855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2002 | Docket: 1403077

Cited 4 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2000), which governs

White v. City of Pompano Beach

813 So. 2d 1003, 2002 WL 429241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1402939

Cited 4 times | Published

to bring a civil action under this section. See § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1999); Joshua v. City of Gainesville

Garden Street Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Tanner

789 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9028, 2001 WL 725681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2001 | Docket: 1326135

Cited 4 times | Published

limitations statute applicable to trespass actions. § 95.11(3)(g), Fla. Stat. (1995). But the record contained

Virginia Ins. Reciprocal v. Walker

765 So. 2d 229, 2000 WL 1049874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2000 | Docket: 428608

Cited 4 times | Published

requirements, we note that it is still contained in section 95.11, Florida Statutes, the general statute of limitations

Bardol v. Martin

763 So. 2d 1119, 1999 WL 1243870

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 1278234

Cited 4 times | Published

the father of a child born outside marriage. Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provided that

Ortiz v. Moore

741 So. 2d 1153, 1999 WL 641432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1999 | Docket: 1511138

Cited 4 times | Published

days of rendition of that order. Similarly, section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, requires that a court

Kalway v. Singletary

708 So. 2d 267, 1998 WL 79065

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1998 | Docket: 1528252

Cited 4 times | Published

1995, which was denied as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995). The district court

Mizrahi v. Valdes-Fauli, Cobb & Petrey

671 So. 2d 805, 1996 WL 61363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1996 | Docket: 1476474

Cited 4 times | Published

found the action barred under Florida Statutes Section 95.11(4). The vocation of escrow agent does not qualify

Willoughby v. Dowda and Fields, Chartered

643 So. 2d 1098, 1994 WL 391044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 1493663

Cited 4 times | Published

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1993). [1] See Allie v. Ionata, 503

Hillsborough Community Mental Health Ctr. v. Harr

618 So. 2d 187

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1993 | Docket: 1375864

Cited 4 times | Published

importance: DOES THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN SECTION 95.11(4)(b) COMMENCE: (A) WHEN THE POTENTIAL PLAINTIFF

Ross v. Twenty-Four Collection, Inc.

617 So. 2d 428, 1993 WL 130559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1993 | Docket: 2588018

Cited 4 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations for tort claims. Section 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1989). These causes of action

Whigham v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSP.

613 So. 2d 110, 1993 WL 13463

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1993 | Docket: 128465

Cited 4 times | Published

order dismissing appellants' suit as barred by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellants contend

Babush v. American Home Products Corp.

589 So. 2d 1379, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11748, 1991 WL 248417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1991 | Docket: 1441249

Cited 4 times | Published

Circuit. The Nardone court said that, in applying section 95.11(4), an action would be barred four years after

Moore v. Winter Haven Hosp.

579 So. 2d 188, 1991 WL 53555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1991 | Docket: 1728621

Cited 4 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida *189 Statutes (1983).[1] We reverse

Sheils v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

560 So. 2d 361, 1990 WL 52323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1990 | Docket: 1477633

Cited 4 times | Published

that appellants' cause of action was barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year

Frazier v. Baker Material Handling Corp.

559 So. 2d 1091, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 33, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 149, 1990 WL 59407

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1990 | Docket: 1356920

Cited 4 times | Published

466-67 (Fla. 1984), we stated: "Thus, for section 95.11(3)(c) to be unconstitutional as applied, it

Elliot v. Barrow

526 So. 2d 989, 1988 WL 55785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1988 | Docket: 1273047

Cited 4 times | Published

arguing that the 2 year statute of limitations of § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. barred plaintiff's claim. Specifically

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

516 So. 2d 1148, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 3, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1987 WL 3174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 1677894

Cited 4 times | Published

complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes. Under that section

Leenen Ex Rel. Leenen v. Ruttgers Ocean Beach Lodge, Ltd.

662 F. Supp. 240, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13980

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1987 | Docket: 938441

Cited 4 times | Published

barred by Florida's statute of limitations, Fla.Stat. 95.11(3)(a), which provides that an action founded

Otis Elevator Co. v. Scott

503 So. 2d 941, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 56,013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1987 | Docket: 1453914

Cited 4 times | Published

that the applicable statute of limitations is Section 95.11(4)(c) Florida Statutes (1979), which provides

Estate of James v. Martin Memorial Hosp.

422 So. 2d 1043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 2561304

Cited 4 times | Published

any provider of health care. (Emphasis added.) § 95.11(4)(b) Fla. Stat. (1979). Under this provision the

Johnson v. Szymanski

368 So. 2d 370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1979 | Docket: 1723364

Cited 4 times | Published

argued that the two-year limitation period of § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat. (1973) expired in October 1975,

Gonzales v. Jacksonville General Hospital, Inc.

365 So. 2d 800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1978 | Docket: 1314670

Cited 4 times | Published

action to be barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. 95.11(6), Florida Statutes 1973. During the evening

Codding v. Phillips

296 So. 2d 554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1974 | Docket: 1617069

Cited 4 times | Published

ground that the statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(d), F.S.A., pertaining to causes of action alleging

Tejera v. Lincoln Lending Services

271 So. 3d 97

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2019 | Docket: 14572880

Cited 3 times | Published

to a four-year statute of limitations (see section 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2009)), when that four-year

Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance Co.

225 So. 3d 974, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12424, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145452

Cited 3 times | Published

reversed, finding that under a prior version of § 95.11(2)(e), the statute of limitations did not begin

Donald Kipnis v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank, etc.

202 So. 3d 859, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2422

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2016 | Docket: 4485247

Cited 3 times | Published

Act); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013) (negligence); § 95.11(3)0’), Fla- Stat. (fraud); § 95.11(3)(p)

Ashraf v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.

200 So. 3d 173, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10158, 2016 WL 3569545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2016 | Docket: 4109019

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations for actions for “libel and slander.” § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2014). The statute of limitations

Ibis Circle, LLC and Shlomo Rasabi v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and WAMU Insurance Services, Inc.

193 So. 3d 957, 2016 WL 1688536, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2016 | Docket: 3062291

Cited 3 times | Published

bring an action under the FUITPA is four years. § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (2014). The facts giving rise

Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Sunderman

201 So. 3d 139, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2015 | Docket: 3009676

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations for a foreclosure action set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Flori *140 da Statutes (2014)

Snow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

156 So. 3d 538, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 406, 2015 WL 160326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2015 | Docket: 2624227

Cited 3 times | Published

relevant statute of limitations is provided in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2008). 2

BIEL REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Development etc.

156 So. 3d 506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2014 | Docket: 2614605

Cited 3 times | Published

under § 56.29. The debtor argued the UFTA and § 95.11(3)’s limitations periods barred proceedings supplementary

Smith v. Bruster

151 So. 3d 511, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17682, 2014 WL 5462468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2014 | Docket: 60244463

Cited 3 times | Published

Analysts, Inc., 499 F.2d 996,1002 (5th Cir.1974)). Section 95.11(3)(j) provides that a legal or equitable action

Arlene Donovan v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Company

147 So. 3d 566, 2014 WL 3189914, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2014 | Docket: 1153

Cited 3 times | Published

after the 2005 loss and was time-barred by section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2011), and that Donovan

Medical Data Systems, Inc. v. Coastal Insurance Group, Inc.

139 So. 3d 394, 2014 WL 2101238, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2014 | Docket: 60241089

Cited 3 times | Published

four years of when the cause of action accrued. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). “A cause of action accrues

Rizo v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.

133 So. 3d 1114, 2014 WL 464090, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60238680

Cited 3 times | Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010).1 The pertinent

Kaan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

981 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 2013 WL 5944074, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160288

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2013 | Docket: 65995367

Cited 3 times | Published

Singleton, 882 So.2d at 1008. See also Fl. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) (setting a five year statute of limitation

Chau Kieu Nguyen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

709 F.3d 1342, 2013 WL 646410, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 884499

Cited 3 times | Published

213-14 (McKinney 2012), and Florida, Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (2012), barred her claims. 1 The District

Reyes ex rel. Barcenas v. Roush

99 So. 3d 586, 2012 WL 4900826, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2012 | Docket: 60313110

Cited 3 times | Published

not yet reached his eighth birthday, citing section 95.11(4)(b), *589Florida Statutes (2011).1 We decline

Woodburn v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services

854 F. Supp. 2d 1184, 2011 WL 7661425, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154858

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2011 | Docket: 65980458

Cited 3 times | Published

founded on statutory liability is four years. Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f) (2011). The limitations period is statutorily

City of Quincy v. Womack

60 So. 3d 1076, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2666, 2011 WL 714334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 60300044

Cited 3 times | Published

filed within the limitations time allowed under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. But the City is calculating

Welt v. EfloorTrade, LLC (In Re Phoenix Diversified Investment Corp.)

439 B.R. 231, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3925

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Nov 1, 2010 | Docket: 2059861

Cited 3 times | Published

malpractice claims provided by Florida Statutes § 95.11(4)(a). CCIP argues that this two year period began

Ultimate Makeover Salon & Spa, Inc. v. DiFrancesco

41 So. 3d 335, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10586, 2010 WL 2882401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2010 | Docket: 2530203

Cited 3 times | Published

on the two-year limit set for wage claims in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2007). The motion incorporated

Rayner v. AIRCRAFT SPRUCE-ADVANTAGE INC.

38 So. 3d 817, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2010 WL 2425958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2010 | Docket: 1658793

Cited 3 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations was August 18, 2005. § 95.11(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). Shortly before this deadline

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Ace Electrical Service, Inc.

648 F. Supp. 2d 1371, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75367

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2009 | Docket: 345738

Cited 3 times | Published

and contractual causes of action. See, e.g., Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(a) ("An action *1382 for professional malpractice

Villa Maria Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. South Broward Hospital District

8 So. 3d 1167, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2893, 2009 WL 928461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1156921

Cited 3 times | Published

malpractice against the hospital had run. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). In its answer brief,

BDI Const. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

995 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15915, 2008 WL 4568075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2008 | Docket: 1286243

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations is the five-year period provided in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999). Their dispute

In Re Biddiscombe Intern., LLC

392 B.R. 909

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2008 | Docket: 1467586

Cited 3 times | Published

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal

In Re Biddiscombe Intern., LLC

392 B.R. 909

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2008 | Docket: 1467586

Cited 3 times | Published

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal

Poux v. State

985 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 2663496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2008 | Docket: 37162

Cited 3 times | Published

motion. We can discern no reason not to apply section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, mandating a four year

Thomas v. Lopez

982 So. 2d 64, 2008 WL 1752207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2008 | Docket: 1204492

Cited 3 times | Published

found in chapter 766, Florida Statutes.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, establishing a two-year

SALTPONDS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. McCoy

972 So. 2d 230, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20104, 2007 WL 4409688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2007 | Docket: 1650023

Cited 3 times | Published

applicable limitation period would be four years. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006).[3] Since the lawsuit

Manning v. Tunnell

943 So. 2d 1018, 2006 WL 3698835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2006 | Docket: 1526817

Cited 3 times | Published

prejudice, pursuant to the statute of limitations, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2003), his complaint against

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Brewer

940 So. 2d 1284, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18749, 2006 WL 3228603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 432765

Cited 3 times | Published

Ins. Co. v. Kilbreath, 419 So.2d 632 (Fla.1982); § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1991).

Haigh v. Planning Bd. of Town of Medfield

940 So. 2d 1230, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18452, 2006 WL 3102275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 1523997

Cited 3 times | Published

noting that the five year limitations period in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes, "applies only to independent

Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Law Fabrication, LLC

459 F. Supp. 2d 1236, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3171, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36445, 2006 WL 1895476

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2006 | Docket: 2481221

Cited 3 times | Published

judicial suits to compel arbitration pursuant to Fla. Stat. 95.11(5)(a), in lieu of borrowing the sixmonth statute

Walters v. Ocean Gate Phase I Condominium

925 So. 2d 440, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5070, 2006 WL 888093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2006 | Docket: 1517007

Cited 3 times | Published

one-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2004). Generally, the

Aristide v. JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSP.

917 So. 2d 253, 2005 WL 3409690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 1509416

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations applicable to this case is set forth in section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes: (b) An action for medical

Maggio v. Department of Labor and Employment Security

910 So. 2d 876, 2005 WL 1875486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2005 | Docket: 1494970

Cited 3 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2002). According to

Donald R. Buse v. Robert J. Kuechenbert

325 F.3d 1249, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5922, 2003 WL 1563731

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 2003 | Docket: 212877

Cited 3 times | Published

must be brought within five years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). Since Buse registered his judgment

Bearse v. Main Street Investments

220 F. Supp. 2d 1338, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17802, 2002 WL 31103989

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2002 | Docket: 2397505

Cited 3 times | Published

years from the accrual of the cause of action. Fla. Stat. 95.11(j). According to the Florida courts, Florida's

AMISUB (AMERICAN HOSP.) INC. v. Hernandez

817 So. 2d 870, 2002 WL 662657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2002 | Docket: 1430603

Cited 3 times | Published

outside the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993). Eventually, Hernandez

Glucksman v. PERSOL NORTH AMERICA, INC.

813 So. 2d 122, 2002 WL 272295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2002 | Docket: 1725749

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations governing legal malpractice actions is section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). See Peat, Marwick

Gilbride, Heller & Brown, PA v. Watkins

783 So. 2d 224, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 173, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 606, 2001 WL 277992

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2001 | Docket: 1259335

Cited 3 times | Published

THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD OF SECTION 95.11(4)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, BEGIN TO RUN FROM THE

Robbat v. Gordon

771 So. 2d 631, 2000 WL 1781452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2000 | Docket: 1339035

Cited 3 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). Rowe v. Schreiber, 725

Alipour v. Thomas (In Re Alipour)

252 B.R. 230, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 308, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 960, 2000 WL 1209984

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2000 | Docket: 1429195

Cited 3 times | Published

example, the Supreme Court of Florida looked to § 95.11(a)(4)(a) for guidance. Generally, in Florida a

King Ex Rel. Murray v. Rojas

767 So. 2d 510, 2000 WL 827065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2000 | Docket: 1661612

Cited 3 times | Published

with the text of the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4)(b) provides: "An action for medical malpractice

Simonetti Development, LTD. v. Hillard Development Corp. (In Re Hillard Development Corp.)

238 B.R. 857, 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1017, 52 Fed. R. Serv. 1028, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 953

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Aug 4, 1999 | Docket: 1638560

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations for federal judgments. See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(2)(a). Hillard also suggests the five-year period

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Echeverri

736 So. 2d 791, 1999 WL 492601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1999 | Docket: 1445151

Cited 3 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). It provides:

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Echeverri

736 So. 2d 791, 1999 WL 492601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1999 | Docket: 1445151

Cited 3 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). It provides:

Balfour Beatty Bahamas, Ltd. v. Bush

170 F.3d 1048, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047, 1999 WL 162459

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 25, 1999 | Docket: 212199

Cited 3 times | Published

five-year limitations period of Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(2)(a) (West Supp.1999), or the twenty-year limitations

Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Alley

728 So. 2d 272, 1999 WL 43516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1999 | Docket: 562656

Cited 3 times | Published

found in section 95.11(4)(d) applies." 487 So.2d at 1097. Nissan concedes that it is section 95.11(4)(d)

Sabal Chase Homeowners v. Disney World

726 So. 2d 796, 1999 WL 9784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1999 | Docket: 1307248

Cited 3 times | Published

appellees because the statute of repose in Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), barred the cause

Cabanas v. WOMACK & BASS, PA

706 So. 2d 68, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1146, 1998 WL 51707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1998 | Docket: 1280275

Cited 3 times | Published

barred by the two-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), and the statute

Ramsey v. Jonassen

698 So. 2d 581, 1997 WL 423435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1997 | Docket: 434011

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations period for professional malpractice. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Because we reverse Ramsey's

Schrank v. Pearlman

683 So. 2d 559, 1996 WL 603645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 2525557

Cited 3 times | Published

or liability founded on a written instrument." § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). They reason that the

Schrank v. Pearlman

683 So. 2d 559, 1996 WL 603645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 2525557

Cited 3 times | Published

or liability founded on a written instrument." § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). They reason that the

Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France

679 So. 2d 875, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9761, 1996 WL 531158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1996 | Docket: 2126660

Cited 3 times | Published

applicable four-year statute of limitations period. § 95.11(3), Fla.Stat. (1995). The trial court concluded

Hernandez v. AMISUB (AMERICAN HOSP.)

659 So. 2d 1316, 1995 WL 521109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1748215

Cited 3 times | Published

statute of repose found in Florida Statutes, Section 95.11(4)(b). The trial court granted A.M.I.'s motion

Doe v. Young

656 So. 2d 569, 1995 WL 358085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1995 | Docket: 1283617

Cited 3 times | Published

outside the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), as opposed

Sarasota County v. Ex

645 So. 2d 7, 1994 WL 397617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1994 | Docket: 1654521

Cited 3 times | Published

by a four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1991). The Exes contend

Doe v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. & CLINICS

614 So. 2d 1170, 1993 WL 40470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1993 | Docket: 1509874

Cited 3 times | Published

we must reject appellant's contention that section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), the medical

Williams v. Johnson

584 So. 2d 90, 1991 WL 134866

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1991 | Docket: 1515192

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations to which the court referred was section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1953) which provided that

Silva v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.

578 So. 2d 503, 1991 WL 63770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1991 | Docket: 1525243

Cited 3 times | Published

dismiss, alleging that it is entitled to rely on section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), the medical

Meir v. KIRK, PINKERTON, McCLELLAND, SAVARY & CARR, PA

561 So. 2d 399, 1990 WL 60902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1990 | Docket: 1480926

Cited 3 times | Published

trial court that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974), is not

Williams v. Shuler

551 So. 2d 585, 1989 WL 132570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 527699

Cited 3 times | Published

twenty-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987). The wife argues

Wallis v. Grumman Corp.

515 So. 2d 1276, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 590, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2541, 1987 WL 2366

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1987 | Docket: 1749316

Cited 3 times | Published

sale of personal property" as set forth in section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1985). We reject this

Assoc. Coca Cola v. Spec. Disability Tr.

508 So. 2d 1305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1987 | Docket: 1648798

Cited 3 times | Published

within the four-year limitations period of section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1985). We conclude

Assoc. Coca Cola v. Spec. Disability Tr.

508 So. 2d 1305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1987 | Docket: 1648798

Cited 3 times | Published

within the four-year limitations period of section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1985). We conclude

Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Cohen

488 So. 2d 56, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2025, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 193

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 2558023

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations for medical malpractice claims, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), was not applicable

Boyd v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

611 F. Supp. 218, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18788

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 1831315

Cited 3 times | Published

the two year limitations period contained in section 95.11(4)(e) of the Florida Investor Protection Act

SCHOOL BD. OF VOLUSIA v. Fidelity Co. of Md.

468 So. 2d 431, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1082, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14133, 25 Educ. L. Rep. 721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1985 | Docket: 1402754

Cited 3 times | Published

supplier, the architect and other defendants, § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983),[1] it is well established

Florida Keys Comm. Coll. v. Ins. Co. of North Am.

456 So. 2d 1250, 20 Educ. L. Rep. 1045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1984 | Docket: 1732181

Cited 3 times | Published

limitation period applicable to common law bonds. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1977). Accordingly, we reverse and

Carlton v. Ridings

422 So. 2d 1067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 1739871

Cited 3 times | Published

claim for medical malpractice is barred by Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). We affirm. On

Wetmore v. Brennan

378 So. 2d 79

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1979 | Docket: 1795630

Cited 3 times | Published

Chapter 74-382, Laws of Florida, codified as Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), in pertinent

MICHAEL M. GRDIC v. H S B C BANK U S A, N. A.

267 So. 3d 473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2019 | Docket: 14693143

Cited 2 times | Published

maintained that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), barred HSBC's

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

263 So. 3d 156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64702734

Cited 2 times | Published

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of

SOUTHERN SPECIALTIES, INC. v. FARMHOUSE TOMATOES, INC

259 So. 3d 869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2018 | Docket: 8221306

Cited 2 times | Published

actions not founded on a written instrument. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. It also filed a counterclaim

Weeks v. Town of Palm Beach

252 So. 3d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 64685932

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for a defamation suit is two years. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012) ; Wagner, Nugent, Johnson

AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC. v. VERO VENTURES, LLC. etc.

254 So. 3d 439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2018 | Docket: 7292510

Cited 2 times | Published

the five-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014) has been clearly

Norkin v. Fla. Bar

311 F. Supp. 3d 1299

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2018 | Docket: 64318781

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for libel or slander. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(g). "Defamation encompasses both libel and slander[

WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., and Lisa D. Grant

223 So. 3d 476, 2017 WL 3360822, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2017 | Docket: 6133736

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Statutes (2015). Because we conclude that section 95.11(5)(h) does not apply to the current cause of

Owens-Benniefield v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

258 F. Supp. 3d 1300

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2017 | Docket: 64314538

Cited 2 times | Published

#23 at 11-12). Nationstar is correct that section 95.11,, Fla. Stat., does not establish that it owed

Morrison v. Homewise Preferred Insurance Co.

209 So. 3d 682, 2017 WL 543427, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2017 | Docket: 4586777

Cited 2 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations is found in section 95.11(5)(d), Florida Statutes (2011). The issue presented

Preudhomme v. Bailey

211 So. 3d 127, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2017 | Docket: 60262537

Cited 2 times | Published

favor in the dissolution of marriage proceedings. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). Finally, as to Appellant’s

Amato and Bouchard v. City of Miami Beach

208 So. 3d 235, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4549400

Cited 2 times | Published

the statute of limitations is four years. See § 95.11(3) (a), (o), (p), Fla. Stat. (2010); Kelly v. Lodwick

Laterza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

221 F. Supp. 3d 1347, 2016 WL 6459829, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151306

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2016 | Docket: 64311526

Cited 2 times | Published

such, all of Plaintiffs’ claims are untimely. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (providing a five-year statute

Coffey-Garcia and Garcia v. South Miami Hospital, Inc.

194 So. 3d 533, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9575, 2016 WL 3410415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2016 | Docket: 3081240

Cited 2 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). The Florida Supreme Court

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Burnette

177 So. 3d 1032, 2015 WL 6594312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2015 | Docket: 60251062

Cited 2 times | Published

applicable five-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(b), (c), Florida Statutes (2007), rendered

Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Brown

175 So. 3d 833, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12652, 2015 WL 4999017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2015 | Docket: 60250670

Cited 2 times | Published

after the original 2007 acceleration of the note. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012) (establishing five year

Elkins V. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

65 F. Supp. 3d 1333, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156104, 2014 WL 5690445

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2014 | Docket: 64298892

Cited 2 times | Published

cause of action began to accrue. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3). When a loss of consortium claim is linked to

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Bartram

140 So. 3d 1007, 2014 WL 1632138, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60241334

Cited 2 times | Published

Singleton, 882 So.2d at 1008. See also Fl[a], Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) (setting a five year statute of limitation

Arch Specialty Insurance Co. v. Kubicki Draper, LLP

137 So. 3d 487, 2014 WL 1225188, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2014 | Docket: 60240330

Cited 2 times | Published

cause of action is or should have been discovered. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). . Circumstances indicating

Scullock v. Gee

133 So. 3d 1208, 2014 WL 962067, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60238725

Cited 2 times | Published

for actions based on false arrest is four years. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2010). Measuring from the date

Gren v. Gren

133 So. 3d 1066, 2014 WL 51640, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238658

Cited 2 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2011). Lastly, she

Homaday v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

994 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 2014 WL 260568, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10292

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2014 | Docket: 65997075

Cited 2 times | Published

years and runs from the date of death. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d); Fulton Cnty. Adm’r v. Sullivan, 753 So.2d

Goodwin v. Sphatt

114 So. 3d 1092, 2013 WL 2501984, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231746

Cited 2 times | Published

liability founded on a written instrument.” See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). The statute of limitations

Magwood v. Tucker

98 So. 3d 725, 2012 WL 4760846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2012 | Docket: 60312545

Cited 2 times | Published

within the thirty-day limitations period of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and noted appellant’s

Doe ex rel. Doe's Mother v. Sinrod

90 So. 3d 852, 2012 WL 1934498, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2012 | Docket: 60309662

Cited 2 times | Published

her claims are not time-barred, pursuant to section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes, because her claims are

Kelly v. Balboa Insurance

897 F. Supp. 2d 1262, 2012 WL 4761905, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86463

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 29, 2012 | Docket: 65985496

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(e). Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(e) establishes a five (5) year

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

110 So. 3d 908, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18182, 2011 WL 5555691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 60230516

Cited 2 times | Published

“actions” or “proceedings” for purposes of section 95.011, Florida Statutes (2005), we affirm. In doing

Rearick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

68 So. 3d 944, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12910, 2011 WL 3586158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2011 | Docket: 2356699

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida's four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), which would

Clark v. Estate of Elrod

61 So. 3d 416, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4498, 2011 WL 1198272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2011 | Docket: 60300474

Cited 2 times | Published

962 So.2d 997, 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), an action on

Milan Investment Group, Inc. v. City of Miami

50 So. 3d 662, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18004, 2010 WL 4740293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2010 | Docket: 60297331

Cited 2 times | Published

assertion that the four-year statute of limitations, § 95.11(3), applies to (and bars) Milan Investment’s challenges

Beyer v. CITY OF MARATHON

37 So. 3d 932, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8164, 2010 WL 2292118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 1239634

Cited 2 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations imposed by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. We reverse. We review

Harris v. State

30 So. 3d 674, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3809, 2010 WL 1049979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2010 | Docket: 1431861

Cited 2 times | Published

apply [to a motion for return of property] section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, mandating a four year

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

27 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2010 | Docket: 1664367

Cited 2 times | Published

chapter 95 and the rules of civil procedure. Section 95.011 provides that a “civil action ... including

Sutton v. Monroe County

34 So. 3d 22, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048, 2009 WL 4928219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1641526

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2007). Sutton, the landowner

GLK, L.P. v. Four Seasons Hotel Ltd.

22 So. 3d 635, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15534, 2009 WL 3272190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Docket: 60267085

Cited 2 times | Published

with certain requirements. We disagree. Under section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes, the limitations period

McFall v. TRUBEY

992 So. 2d 867, 2008 WL 4482578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2008 | Docket: 1723843

Cited 2 times | Published

statute of limitations applicable to such suits, § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2003). Accordingly, the court

Nicarry v. Eslinger

990 So. 2d 661, 2008 WL 4179476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2008 | Docket: 2527668

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the statute of limitations found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2004). We affirm. Nicarry

Maraj v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.

989 So. 2d 682, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11593, 2008 WL 2906956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 2530321

Cited 2 times | Published

concluded that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), had run with

SALTPONDS CONDO. v. Walbridge Aldinger Co.

979 So. 2d 1240, 2008 WL 1883903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2008 | Docket: 1714657

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla. 3d DCA 1982), we stated in dicta that section 95.11(3)(c) of the Florida Statutes provided the "applicable

Cassedy v. Alland Investments Corp.

982 So. 2d 719, 2007 WL 5084943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2008 | Docket: 1664610

Cited 2 times | Published

cause of action arose in 1999, under either section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, which provides that

Blackburn v. Bartsocas

978 So. 2d 820, 2008 WL 583048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2008 | Docket: 445373

Cited 2 times | Published

reality a claim for past wages and is limited by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), which provides

Head v. McNeil

975 So. 2d 583, 2008 WL 515029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2008 | Docket: 1727162

Cited 2 times | Published

petition for writ of mandamus as untimely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2006). Appellant argues

LIFESOUTH CMTY. BLOOD CENTERS v. Fitchner

970 So. 2d 379, 2007 WL 3144829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2007 | Docket: 1324266

Cited 2 times | Published

malpractice under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991). The supreme court analyzed section 95.11(4)(b) by

Manicini Enterprises, Inc. v. American Express Co.

236 F.R.D. 695, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58975

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2006 | Docket: 66027516

Cited 2 times | Published

founded upon a written instrument. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k). Thus, if the Court were to find that the

INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICES v. Mitchel

931 So. 2d 1073, 2006 WL 1816442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2006 | Docket: 425944

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for legal malpractice is two years, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2003). This suit for

RUSSO ASSOCIATES v. City of Dania Beach

920 So. 2d 716, 2006 WL 437388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 1440867

Cited 2 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations found within section 95.11(3)(p) has been held to govern inverse condemnation

Mitchell v. Osceola Farms Co.

408 F. Supp. 2d 1275, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38128, 2005 WL 3591983

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2005 | Docket: 2433127

Cited 2 times | Published

contract, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), and four years for an oral contract, Id. § 95.11(3)(k). In either case

Foxworth Ex Rel. Estate of Durden v. Kia Motors

377 F. Supp. 2d 1196, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18587, 2005 WL 1690601

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 2574291

Cited 2 times | Published

years limitations period set forth in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d) for wrongful death actions should apply to

Elmore v. Florida Power & Light Co.

895 So. 2d 475, 2005 WL 293019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 1255721

Cited 2 times | Published

Montgomery, 768 So.2d 1166, 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). "A cause of action accrues

Eastman v. State

883 So. 2d 889, 2004 WL 2191691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2004 | Docket: 1718275

Cited 2 times | Published

defects: First, it was untimely pursuant to section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2003), which became the

LLP Mortg. Ltd. v. Cravero

851 So. 2d 897, 2003 WL 21919339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2003 | Docket: 1691473

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida's five year period of limitations, section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, the cause of action

American Home Assurance Co. v. APAC-FLA., INC.

834 So. 2d 369, 2003 WL 69549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2003 | Docket: 2504341

Cited 2 times | Published

governed by the longer statute of limitations in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995). Although this result

Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Rekant

832 So. 2d 831, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16878, 2002 WL 31519797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 1335740

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for professional malpractice contained in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2001).[1] We reverse

In Re Conrad

279 B.R. 320, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 173, 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 550, 2002 WL 1160730

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2002 | Docket: 1637486

Cited 2 times | Published

Judgment Creditors were barred by Florida Statutes § 95.11 to enforce their judgment against the debtor; (ii)

Ortiz v. Moore

776 So. 2d 333, 2001 WL 50479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 421945

Cited 2 times | Published

days of rendition of that order. Similarly, section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, requires that a court

Myklejord v. Morris

766 So. 2d 1160, 2000 WL 1228028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2000 | Docket: 1697744

Cited 2 times | Published

from suing appellees. The pertinent statute is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993): An action for

In Re Conrad

252 B.R. 559, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 334, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 980, 2000 WL 1251898

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2000 | Docket: 1429193

Cited 2 times | Published

the California Final Judgment is barred by Fla. Stat. 95.11, the applicable statute of limitations of

Watkins v. GILBRIDE HELLER & BROWN, PA

754 So. 2d 759, 2000 WL 256327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2000 | Docket: 431087

Cited 2 times | Published

is not time barred. Our analysis starts with section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), which provides

Coffaro v. HILLSBOROUGH CTY. HOSP. AUTH.

752 So. 2d 712, 2000 WL 216713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2000 | Docket: 1280268

Cited 2 times | Published

Supreme Court as one of great public importance. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), provides a two-year

Singletary v. Van Meter

708 So. 2d 266, 1998 WL 79686

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1998 | Docket: 1528210

Cited 2 times | Published

1996), wherein the district court declared section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), invalid. We have

Balfour Beatty Bahamas, Ltd. v. Boca Raton Millwork, Inc.

217 B.R. 339, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2574, 1998 WL 102960

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1998 | Docket: 1285921

Cited 2 times | Published

collection of judgment has run. Florida Statute § 95.11 provides as follows: Actions other than for the

ROBINSON BY HARGIS v. Merkle

700 So. 2d 723, 1997 WL 577722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1997 | Docket: 1719786

Cited 2 times | Published

complaint holding the action was barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995).[1] Because West Virginia

Murphy v. Tucker

689 So. 2d 1164, 1997 WL 90840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 1477449

Cited 2 times | Published

court did not err in applying the provisions of section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1995), to the facts of

Keenan v. City of Edgewater

684 So. 2d 226, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12301, 1996 WL 672985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1996 | Docket: 1740916

Cited 2 times | Published

statute of limitations bars appellants' suit. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1995). Hollywood Lakes Sec.

SOUTHWEST FLA. RETIREMENT CTR., INC. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

682 So. 2d 1130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 1276343

Cited 2 times | Published

forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). All parties agree that section 95.11(2)(b), pertaining

Nealon v. RIGHT HUMAN RESOURCE CONSUL.

669 So. 2d 1120, 1996 WL 120338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1996 | Docket: 1526154

Cited 2 times | Published

recovery of unpaid wages or overtime contained in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statute (1993). At issue here

Colandrea v. King

661 So. 2d 1250, 1995 WL 621533

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 1526350

Cited 2 times | Published

period set forth for negligence actions in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1989). The complaint,

J.B. And J.W.B., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, S.B. And E.B. And M.B. Individually v. Sacred Heart Hospital of Pensacola

996 F.2d 276, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19190

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 1993 | Docket: 372177

Cited 2 times | Published

medical malpractice actions set forth in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(b). On December 17, 1991, the U.S. District

Roof v. Wiley

622 So. 2d 1018, 1993 WL 210574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1993 | Docket: 546465

Cited 2 times | Published

effect at the time the complaint was filed, section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1989), Roof's complaint

Seawatch at Marathon Condo. Ass'n v. CHARLEY TOPPINO AND SONS, INC.

610 So. 2d 470, 1992 WL 318499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1992 | Docket: 1734786

Cited 2 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations period in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1991);[2] or (2) that

Hampton v. Payne

600 So. 2d 1144, 1992 WL 98350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1992 | Docket: 539690

Cited 2 times | Published

action on the ground that the cause is barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), the two-year

Hampton v. Payne

600 So. 2d 1144, 1992 WL 98350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1992 | Docket: 539690

Cited 2 times | Published

action on the ground that the cause is barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), the two-year

USX Corp. v. Schilbe

535 So. 2d 719, 1989 WL 191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1989 | Docket: 2573062

Cited 2 times | Published

action to foreclose a mortgage is controlled by section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), and the duration

Fuller v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

677 F. Supp. 1131, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12721, 1987 WL 35077

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1987 | Docket: 66653378

Cited 2 times | Published

Specifically, the issue is one of preemption. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), establishes

Dade County v. Rohr Industries, Inc.

826 F.2d 983, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 770

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 8, 1987 | Docket: 66227983

Cited 2 times | Published

Fla.Stat. § 672.2-725 or alternatively Fla.Stat. § 95.-11(2)(b) should apply to this case.5 Section 672

Velzy v. Estate of Miller

502 So. 2d 1297, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1987 | Docket: 1181224

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the general statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(i) and (j), Florida Statutes (1983); and

MacRae v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

457 So. 2d 1093, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2078, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 426328

Cited 2 times | Published

2d 463 (Fla. 1984), the court, in interpreting § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (which for purposes of this opinion

PISUT BY PISUT v. Sichelman

455 So. 2d 620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1984 | Docket: 1317195

Cited 2 times | Published

decision regarding the constitutionality of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977).[1] On October

Byington v. AH Robins Co., Inc.

580 F. Supp. 1513, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18943

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1984 | Docket: 1009551

Cited 2 times | Published

656 (11th Cir.1983). II. Analysis Under Section 95.11(3)(a), (e), Fla. Stat. (1981),[2] the four-year

Lipshaw v. PINOSKY, PINOSKY, PA

442 So. 2d 992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1983 | Docket: 1515934

Cited 2 times | Published

of limitations for medical malpractice actions. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1979). We affirm in part and

Engle v. Acopian

432 So. 2d 113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1983 | Docket: 1265210

Cited 2 times | Published

statutory laches bars the action by the Acopians. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1981), provides: LACHES

Arnold v. Duval County School Board

549 F. Supp. 25, 7 Educ. L. Rep. 286, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17714

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1981 | Docket: 1716600

Cited 2 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations found in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c) (1979) ("action[s] to recover wages or overtime

Garris v. Cruce

404 So. 2d 785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1981 | Docket: 1782555

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for initiating this paternity action, Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes, could not run against

MOUNT SINAI HOSP. OF GR. MIAMI, INC. v. Cordis Corp.

285 So. 2d 645, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1973 | Docket: 2544080

Cited 2 times | Published

claim to be barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. 95.11, F.S.A.[1] Appellant contends (1) the trial court's

Enlow v. E.C. Scott Wright, P.A.

274 So. 3d 1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2019 | Docket: 64718924

Cited 1 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). The statute of limitations

Enlow v. E.C. Scott Wright, P.A.

274 So. 3d 1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2019 | Docket: 64718924

Cited 1 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). The statute of limitations

Broz v. Reece

272 So. 3d 512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2019 | Docket: 14909101

Cited 1 times | Published

common ground that the applicable statute, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), specifies a

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. TERESA NORTON & SAMUEL NORTON

267 So. 3d 478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2019 | Docket: 14717611

Cited 1 times | Published

Nortons 1Until July 1, 2013, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes' five-year limitation

Connie L. Mielke and Blair C. Mielke v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc.

264 So. 3d 249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2019 | Docket: 8488328

Cited 1 times | Published

current complaint was time-barred pursuant to section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Deutsche Bank responded

Brown v. Poole

261 So. 3d 708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 64700830

Cited 1 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations governs these claims. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015). This time did not begin

Hayes v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions

260 So. 3d 391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2018 | Docket: 8221184

Cited 1 times | Published

impression as to when the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, begins to run for

HOME TITLE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC. v. MICHAEL J. LASALLA

257 So. 3d 640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2018 | Docket: 8200208

Cited 1 times | Published

complaint was not filed until December 2013.1 See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2006); Goodwin v. Sphatt, 114

Gindel v. Centex Homes

267 So. 3d 403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 64709209

Cited 1 times | Published

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. KENNETH H. GRAYBUSH and ROBIN B. GRAYBUSH

253 So. 3d 1188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2018 | Docket: 7664435

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2017). As a result

Wells Fargo Bank v. Diz

253 So. 3d 705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2018 | Docket: 7619131

Cited 1 times | Published

under the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). There is no basis, in

CAN FINANCIAL, LLC v. DARYL R. KRAZMIEN

253 So. 3d 8

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567957

Cited 1 times | Published

by the five year statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2009); and a valid

Simmons v. Jackson Memorial Hospital

253 So. 3d 59

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567931

Cited 1 times | Published

a medical malpractice claim is two years, see § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013), while the statute of

TRILOK DESAI v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ETC.

240 So. 3d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2018 | Docket: 6326616

Cited 1 times | Published

not barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015); § 95.031, Fla. Stat.

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey

881 F.3d 876

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 5, 2018 | Docket: 6292397

Cited 1 times | Published

5-year limitations period established in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). 1 Id. In so holding, the District

Bollettieri Resort Villas Condominium Association, Inc. v. the Bank of New York Mellon, etc.

228 So. 3d 72, 2017 WL 4546114

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2017 | Docket: 6168330

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida, regarding how the statute of limitations, § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017), operates vis-á-vis a

Bollettieri Resort Villas Condominium Association, Inc. v. the Bank of New York Mellon, etc.

228 So. 3d 72, 2017 WL 4546114

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2017 | Docket: 6168330

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida, regarding how the statute of limitations, § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017), operates vis-á-vis a

Cal. Fin., LLC v. Perdido Land Dev. Co.

303 F. Supp. 3d 1306

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2017 | Docket: 64318090

Cited 1 times | Published

within four years pursuant to Florida Statute § 95.11(3). However, in Florida, "the statute of limitations

Doe No. 3 v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc.

217 So. 3d 85, 2017 WL 1076928, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3777

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2017 | Docket: 60265900

Cited 1 times | Published

the legislature in 2010 enacted a revision to section 95.11 which provides for an unlimited time period

City of Riviera Beach v. J & B Motel Corp.

213 So. 3d 1102, 2017 WL 1018521, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 60263443

Cited 1 times | Published

general limitations period contained in Chapter 96. § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (“A civil action or proceeding, called

Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell

204 So. 3d 22, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 506, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2487

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2016 | Docket: 4487516

Cited 1 times | Published

Green’s state law claims were time-barred under section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2007), which provides

& SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & The Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc.

211 So. 3d 1009

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2016 | Docket: 4485248

Cited 1 times | Published

action to foreclose a mortgage” pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2012).1 The Fifth District

Anderson v. Epstein

202 So. 3d 893, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 4426702

Cited 1 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations, see § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2015), while her claim for breach

Riverwalk at Sunrise Homeowners Ass'n v. Biscayne Painting Corp.

199 So. 3d 348, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12068, 2016 WL 4205352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 60256588

Cited 1 times | Published

four years after the cause of action accrues. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). “A cause of action accrues

W.D. v. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. Archdiocese of Miami, a Corporation Sole Archbishop Wenski, etc.

197 So. 3d 584, 2016 WL 3065748, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3071343

Cited 1 times | Published

circumvent the statute of limitations; (2) section 95.11(9), Florida Statutes, is inapplicable because

Onika Williams v. The City of Jacksonville (County of Duval)

191 So. 3d 925, 2016 WL 2610603, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2016 | Docket: 3061485

Cited 1 times | Published

timely filed under the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes, and that the action

Gregor Woodward v. Orator E. Woodward, individually, and as Trustee of the Mary T. Woodward Trust, etc., Lorence Woodward, Marcus Woodward, Serena Woodward and Maureen Woodward

192 So. 3d 528, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881, 2016 WL 2342152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2016 | Docket: 3062271

Cited 1 times | Published

erred in finding that laches barred the action. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that “[l]aches

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais

188 So. 3d 938, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2016 | Docket: 3053146

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations governing mortgage foreclosures. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). According to Aqua, the

Brock v. Garner Window & Door Sales, Inc.

187 So. 3d 294, 2016 WL 830452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 3045487

Cited 1 times | Published

determination of which statute applies is one of law. Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, provides a four-year

Jenkins v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

185 So. 3d 675, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1764, 2016 WL 519618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2016 | Docket: 3035163

Cited 1 times | Published

contract claim would have run. See § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2005) (providing' five-year statute

Firestone v. Temple Beth Sholom

183 So. 3d 1225, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 231339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2016 | Docket: 3029449

Cited 1 times | Published

to the four-year limitations period found in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2012). The complaint explains

Harris v. Anne Bates Leach Eye Institute

174 So. 3d 570, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13048, 2015 WL 5132661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690035

Cited 1 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose set forth in section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes. Harris alleges

Milan Investment Group, Inc. v. City of Miami

172 So. 3d 458, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2015 | Docket: 2659838

Cited 1 times | Published

a local government ordinance or resolution, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2009). The trial

Harris v. Goderick

608 F. App'x 760

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 65959998

Cited 1 times | Published

false arrest claims is four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o). As noted previously, a complaint may be

Sylvia A. Russ v. Carolyn Williams

159 So. 3d 408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2015 | Docket: 2643351

Cited 1 times | Published

statute of limitations expired. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (providing that an “action founded

Juan Luciano and Vickie Luciano v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company

156 So. 3d 1108, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 340802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2015 | Docket: 2628640

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for breach of contract actions under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). 1

Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

56 F. Supp. 3d 1345, 85 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 83, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154767, 2014 WL 5522478

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2014 | Docket: 64298098

Cited 1 times | Published

Judge Rosenbaum’s Order. ECF No. [78] at 7-14. Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, provides that both “action[s]

Betancourt v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc.

153 So. 3d 936, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15858, 2014 WL 5092909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2014 | Docket: 1441453

Cited 1 times | Published

forth in sections >95.11(5)(d) and 631.68. Section 95.11(5)(d) requires the commencement of suit within

Rodriguez v. Bank of America, N.A.

49 F. Supp. 3d 1154, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142653, 2014 WL 4851777

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2014 | Docket: 64297489

Cited 1 times | Published

for mortgage foreclosure under Florida Statute § 95.11(2)(c), and the five-year statute of repose under

Uffner v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

46 F. Supp. 3d 1339, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132893, 2014 WL 4716144

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 64297271

Cited 1 times | Published

of Limitations Pursuant to Florida Statute section 95.11, Engle personal injury actions must be brought

Snell v. Mott's Contracting Services, Inc.

141 So. 3d 605, 2014 WL 2118044, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2014 | Docket: 60241961

Cited 1 times | Published

term ‘civil action or proceeding' found in section 95.011[, Florida Statutes].” 126 So.3d at 188. Upon

Scullock v. Gee

161 So. 3d 421, 2014 WL 948877, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60247135

Cited 1 times | Published

subject to a four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2010). Scullock’s cause of action

Vargas v. City of Fort Myers

137 So. 3d 1031, 2014 WL 185193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2014 | Docket: 60240138

Cited 1 times | Published

to bring an action founded in negligence. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). The record demonstrates

American Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc.

990 F. Supp. 2d 1254, 2013 WL 7659924

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2013 | Docket: 65996623

Cited 1 times | Published

resulting damages have occurred. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o); Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. Mackal, 641 So.2d

Janie Doe 1 ex rel. Miranda v. Sinrod

117 So. 3d 786, 2013 WL 1890647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2013 | Docket: 60232780

Cited 1 times | Published

the original Complaint. It also argued that section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes (2006), does not toll the

Frantz v. Walled

513 F. App'x 815

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 18, 2013 | Docket: 65704430

Cited 1 times | Published

a four-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Therefore, they too were untimely filed

Altenel v. Millennium Partners, L.L.C.

947 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77917, 2013 WL 2363233

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2013 | Docket: 65991520

Cited 1 times | Published

Plaintiffs purchased their units. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e). D. Accounting Finally, based on all of the

Woodward v. Olson

107 So. 3d 540, 2013 WL 645908, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60228746

Cited 1 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of repose found in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2009). Because the

Spencer v. EMC Mortgage Corp.

97 So. 3d 257, 2012 WL 3705166, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60311737

Cited 1 times | Published

thus triggering the limitations period under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2012), well more than

Castleman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

97 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 3537237, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2012 | Docket: 60311991

Cited 1 times | Published

fraud, and negligence actions is four years. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. However, the Florida Supreme Court

Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC

91 So. 3d 220, 2012 WL 2345120, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2012 | Docket: 60309847

Cited 1 times | Published

1990). The four-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2006), governs actions

Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC

91 So. 3d 220, 2012 WL 2345120, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2012 | Docket: 60309847

Cited 1 times | Published

1990). The four-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2006), governs actions

Starling v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

845 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151514, 2011 WL 6965854

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2011 | Docket: 65979342

Cited 1 times | Published

10); see Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d) (2011) (“Section 95.11(4)(d)”). Section 95.11(4)(d) and the case law

Lopez-Loarca v. Cosme

76 So. 3d 5, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16363, 2011 WL 4949808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 60304558

Cited 1 times | Published

in the second year following the accident. Section 95.11, Florida ■ Statutes (2000), provides a four

BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, INC. v. Haines

69 So. 3d 1090, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169, 2011 WL 4435805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 2359435

Cited 1 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes, which provides for

Capone v. Philip Morris U.S.A. Inc.

56 So. 3d 34, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18323, 2010 WL 4861743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2010 | Docket: 60298578

Cited 1 times | Published

death action is two years from the date of death. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2008). Frank Capone died on

Traveler Indemnity Co. of Conn. v. Centimark Corp.

746 F. Supp. 2d 1284, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103310, 2010 WL 3834611

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 2340538

Cited 1 times | Published

years of the time of the improvement. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(c); Havatampa Corp. v. McElvy, Jennewein, Stefany

Canonico v. Callaway

26 So. 3d 53, 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1339, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 2010 WL 21170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2010 | Docket: 1115433

Cited 1 times | Published

by the applicable statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2003). We affirm. We review

McMillan v. Shively

23 So. 3d 830, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19044, 2009 WL 4591074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2009 | Docket: 60282073

Cited 1 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), requires an

MOGER v. Florida Parole Commission

22 So. 3d 138, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17264, 2009 WL 3817893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2009 | Docket: 178785

Cited 1 times | Published

deemed untimely by the circuit court pursuant to section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes. The final agency action

Fields v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

751 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130131, 2009 WL 7115136

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2009 | Docket: 2338669

Cited 1 times | Published

a four year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(2008). The Florida Legislature has made clear

Petersen v. Whitson

14 So. 3d 300, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11573, 2009 WL 2514164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 1650054

Cited 1 times | Published

a court of record in Florida is twenty years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2007); Commercebank, N.A. v. Taylor

Milliken & Co. v. HAIMA GROUP CORP.

654 F. Supp. 2d 1374, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72855, 2009 WL 2567025

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2009 | Docket: 2381430

Cited 1 times | Published

entity from the Judgment Debtors, (2) Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a)'s five (5) year statute of limitation bars

Arvelo v. Park Finance of Broward, Inc.

15 So. 3d 660, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526, 2009 WL 1766693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2009 | Docket: 1192159

Cited 1 times | Published

should be quashed. Petition granted. NOTES [1] § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). Although Ms. Arvelo argued

Conrad v. Young

10 So. 3d 1154, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6047, 2009 WL 1456720

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 1642437

Cited 1 times | Published

easement is five years after discovery of its breach. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). According to appellant

Krause v. TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORP.

10 So. 3d 208, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2009 WL 1025406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 2536564

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year state law limitations provision found in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005), and that the

Porumbescu v. Thompson

987 So. 2d 1275, 2008 WL 3850381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 1724213

Cited 1 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). Two statutory extensions

Kelley v. McNeil

987 So. 2d 786, 2008 WL 3050410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2008 | Docket: 1214795

Cited 1 times | Published

habeas corpus petition as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes. In light of this court's

Smith v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

987 So. 2d 229, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11575, 2008 WL 2906650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 2581886

Cited 1 times | Published

Second District Courts of Appeal as to whether section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, applies to a petition

Tse Industries, Inc. v. Larson & Larson, Pa

987 So. 2d 687, 2008 WL 268914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2008 | Docket: 1723746

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for professional malpractice. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). The Larson Defendants

Bryant v. Florida Parole Commission

965 So. 2d 825, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14871, 2007 WL 2766716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2007 | Docket: 330244

Cited 1 times | Published

mandamus occurred prior to the effective date of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, the circuit court erred

Design Pallets, Inc. v. Grayrobinson, P.A.

515 F. Supp. 2d 1246, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57005, 2007 WL 2274432

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2007 | Docket: 34296

Cited 1 times | Published

alleges that this claim is time barred by Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). (Doc. 33 at 19). Plaintiffs do not respond

Carpenter v. Florida Parole Commission

958 So. 2d 564, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 2007 WL 1757097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 1258763

Cited 1 times | Published

his habeas petition was not time-barred by section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2004), based on the

Cadle Co. v. McCartha

920 So. 2d 144, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 2006 WL 249216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2006 | Docket: 1730627

Cited 1 times | Published

liability founded on a written instrument." See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. She contends that each of the

Padron Warehouse v. Realty Associates Fund III

377 F. Supp. 2d 1259

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2005 | Docket: 2228947

Cited 1 times | Published

and are therefore time-barred under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j) (four-year statute of limitations for a "legal

Padron Warehouse v. Realty Associates Fund III

377 F. Supp. 2d 1259

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2005 | Docket: 2228947

Cited 1 times | Published

and are therefore time-barred under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j) (four-year statute of limitations for a "legal

Lee v. Simon

885 So. 2d 939, 2004 WL 2389952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2004 | Docket: 1287007

Cited 1 times | Published

for medical malpractice actions is found in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1998): An action for

Bryant v. Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt, Inc.

869 So. 2d 681, 19 A.L.R. 6th 875, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4330, 2004 WL 689886

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2004 | Docket: 1174851

Cited 1 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1996) states, in pertinent

NY STATE DEPT. OF TAX. AND FIN. v. Klein

852 So. 2d 866, 2003 WL 21537334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2003 | Docket: 1711017

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations set out in section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes (2001), barred appellant's

CLARK CONST. GROUP, INC. v. Wentworth Plastering of Boca Raton, Inc.

840 So. 2d 357, 2003 WL 729171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 1748361

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Citing Federal Insurance

Williams v. Southeast Florida Cable, Inc.

782 So. 2d 988, 2001 WL 388094

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 456465

Cited 1 times | Published

statute of limitations for statutory violations, section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to actions

Ellsworth v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners

780 So. 2d 903, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 95, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 331, 2001 WL 169598

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2001 | Docket: 64804408

Cited 1 times | Published

for statutory causes of action embodied in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999), applies when

Ellsworth v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners

780 So. 2d 903, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 95, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 331, 2001 WL 169598

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2001 | Docket: 64804408

Cited 1 times | Published

for statutory causes of action embodied in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999), applies when

Slapikas v. Llorente

766 So. 2d 440, 2000 WL 1224878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 1329878

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for legal malpractice is two years. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). In this case, the action

Clemente v. Freshman

760 So. 2d 1059, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7577, 2000 WL 784229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2000 | Docket: 64798132

Cited 1 times | Published

year statute of limitation period found in section 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reverse and remand

In Re Miller

248 B.R. 198, 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 79, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 185, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 500, 2000 WL 622748

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2000 | Docket: 2512405

Cited 1 times | Published

Court also notes the applicability of Fla. Stat. § 95.11 mandating that actions on judgments issued by Florida

Beck v. Lazard Freres & Co., LLC

175 F.3d 913

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1999 | Docket: 212218

Cited 1 times | Published

dismissed the complaint as being barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, the five-year breach

Hazen v. Kaplan

734 So. 2d 441, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5537, 1999 WL 252479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1999 | Docket: 64788579

Cited 1 times | Published

from the myelogram or since the myelogram. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993) states, in pertinent

Barnes v. Clark Sand Co.

721 So. 2d 329, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1998 | Docket: 64784514

Cited 1 times | Published

County, 541 So.2d 92, 95 (Fla.1989) (holding “section 95.11(4)(b) was properly grounded on an announced

Federal Insurance Co. v. Southwest Florida Retirement Center, Inc.

707 So. 2d 1119, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 76, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 142

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1998 | Docket: 64779771

Cited 1 times | Published

judgment on the pleadings, ruling that under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), any claim arising

Federal Insurance Co. v. Southwest Florida Retirement Center, Inc.

707 So. 2d 1119, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 76, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 142

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1998 | Docket: 64779771

Cited 1 times | Published

judgment on the pleadings, ruling that under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), any claim arising

Campo v. Tafur

704 So. 2d 730, 1998 WL 10882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1998 | Docket: 1706012

Cited 1 times | Published

not time-barred, we reverse on these counts. See § 95.11(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). ACTUAL FRAUD Tafur also

Crutchley v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office

688 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 231, 1997 WL 24241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1997 | Docket: 64771225

Cited 1 times | Published

barred by the four year statute of limitation in section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes. We affirm. The sheriff

Lewis v. Allstate Ins. Co.

667 So. 2d 261, 1995 WL 511584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 144244

Cited 1 times | Published

subject to a four-year limitations period, see § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983), while the UM claim is

In Re Ballato

188 B.R. 690, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 169, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1522, 1995 WL 628051

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1995 | Docket: 1818484

Cited 1 times | Published

of the estate" (sic); that based on Fla.Stat. § 95.11 a Judgment entered against the Debtor in the State

ARDC Corp. v. Hogan

656 So. 2d 1371, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6922, 1995 WL 380235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1995 | Docket: 64757479

Cited 1 times | Published

of limitations applicable to oral contracts, section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statute (1993). Hogan asserted

Joseph v. Okeelanta Corp.

656 So. 2d 1316, 1995 WL 270697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1995 | Docket: 1283399

Cited 1 times | Published

appellees moved to dismiss as untimely under section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), a two-year statute

Cardenas ex rel. Cardenas v. Godbold

625 So. 2d 98, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 1993 WL 393654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1993 | Docket: 64743306

Cited 1 times | Published

favor based on the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). The appellants maintain

Cardenas ex rel. Cardenas v. Godbold

625 So. 2d 98, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 1993 WL 393654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1993 | Docket: 64743306

Cited 1 times | Published

favor based on the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). The appellants maintain

Pinnacle Port Community Ass'n v. Orenstein

952 F.2d 375, 1992 WL 4518

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 30, 1992 | Docket: 66270199

Cited 1 times | Published

construction of an improvement....” Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3)(e) (West 1979) (emphasis added). When reenacting

Smith v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.

578 So. 2d 501, 1991 WL 63768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1991 | Docket: 1525274

Cited 1 times | Published

alleging that it is entitled to reliance on section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), the medical

Queen v. Clearwater Elec., Inc.

555 So. 2d 1262, 1989 WL 151453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1990 | Docket: 1724707

Cited 1 times | Published

statutes set forth below. The relevant portion of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Limitations

Queen v. Clearwater Elec., Inc.

555 So. 2d 1262, 1989 WL 151453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1990 | Docket: 1724707

Cited 1 times | Published

statutes set forth below. The relevant portion of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Limitations

Hardy Equipment Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc.

530 So. 2d 521, 1988 WL 92995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1988 | Docket: 1267461

Cited 1 times | Published

coverage, and that this action was governed by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides

Richardson v. Wilson

490 So. 2d 1039, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1986 | Docket: 1488798

Cited 1 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of limitation, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). A default judgment

Richardson v. Wilson

490 So. 2d 1039, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1986 | Docket: 1488798

Cited 1 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of limitation, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). A default judgment

Durring v. Reynolds, Smith & Hills

471 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 1724652

Cited 1 times | Published

Smith & Hills. The tri al court determined that section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1980 Supp.), which

Durring v. Reynolds, Smith & Hills

471 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 1724652

Cited 1 times | Published

Smith & Hills. The tri al court determined that section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1980 Supp.), which

Walker v. Walker

254 So. 2d 832, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1971 | Docket: 64523203

Cited 1 times | Published

barred by the statute of limitations. (F.S.A. § 95.11(9)). The lower court further held that the appellee’s

Davis v. Big Bend Hospice, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71154550

Published

the four- year limitation period set out in section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes, applied, as held by

Emilio Perez v. University of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71155248

Published

written instrument’ is five years.” (quoting § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023))); Mendoza v. V.A. Crudele

Daisha Ervin v. Sergio A. Alvarez, M.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2025 | Docket: 70891676

Published

MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016) (“An action for medical

City of Parker v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70629877

Published

before 2017, five years before she filed suit. See § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat. (2022) (codifying laches bar); Corona

Terrace Gallery, LLC v. Gallery One Condominium Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387157

Published

actions based on a contract, as set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). DEJ argued that

Gallery One Condominium Association, Inc. v. Terrace Gallery, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387159

Published

actions based on a contract, as set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). DEJ argued that

Vista Financial Group, LLC v. the Bank of New York Mellon, Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387851

Published

990 So. 2d 661, 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes, outlines the statute of

Condominium Association of Golf Villas II, Inc. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 69998664

Published

would appear that Florida Statute § 95.11(2)(b) and § 95.11(5)(d) are in conflict, but they are

George Escalona v. People's Trust Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2025 | Docket: 69898822

Published

the second amended complaint as untimely. See § 95.11(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (“Actions other than for recovery

Eddie Edwin Gaitor v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2025 | Docket: 69632705

Published

outside the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(h), Fla. Stat. (setting forth four-year limitation

LAD Commercial, LLC v. Eagle Trace at Vero Beach Homeowners' Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2024 | Docket: 69217907

Published

contract is within five years of the breach under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2019), it would not

Kenneth Marcantonio v. Carol Marcantonio Sansone, Individually and as Successor Trustee for the Joseph and Mary

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2024 | Docket: 69208059

Published

on a four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2015). The trial court

Mario Zequeira v. MMPB Group, LLC, Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2024 | Docket: 69193510

Published

five-year statute of limitations provided for in section 95.11(2)(d), Florida Statutes, warranted dismissal

Aaron Shaw v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2024 | Docket: 69193514

Published

by the controlling statutory limitations of section 95.11, Florida Statutes. The State responded to

John W. Schmitz v. Dorothy Joan Schmitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2024 | Docket: 69151109

Published

statute of limitations for intentional torts, section 95.11(3)(n), Florida Statutes. Joan and Cheryl cross-appeal

Mark Kinchla, Individually and Mark 48, LLC v. Ran Investments, LLC, Kilgore Properties, LLC, Nanlann, Inc., Robert Pola, Newton Corner Condominium

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2024 | Docket: 69135349

Published

statute of limitations. Although it agreed that section 95.11(2)(b) applied, it concluded that Mark 48’s

ENGELKE, I I I v. LOGAN, SMART COMMUNICATIONS PASCO, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2024 | Docket: 69021511

Published

limitation for oral agreements set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2019).

ENGELKE, I I I v. LOGAN, SMART COMMUNICATIONS PASCO, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2024 | Docket: 69021511

Published

limitation for oral agreements set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2019).

Shawn M. Daugherty v. Robert Neil McDavid

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848306

Published

easement and thus the action was untimely under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court rejected

Beachway Restaurants 2 and James Wigg v. Santo & June, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2024 | Docket: 68301810

Published

accordance with Fla. Stat. 475.01(1)(a) and Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(a).” On appeal, the Buyers argue the

Hernando County, Florida v. Hernando County Fair Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2024 | Docket: 68103703

Published

Golf Course Dist. Ass’n, 288 So. 1 See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). 2 The parties’

Blue Water Coast Services, LLC and Jacqueline Hyatt v. Maize

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2024 | Docket: 68443447

Published

verdict to conform to the jury’s intent 1 See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2011) (establishing a four-year

KYLE E. MCCLAMMA v. MARK GLASS, COMMISSIONER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2024 | Docket: 68101120

Published

301 So. 3d 372, 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020); see also § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2005) (noting four- year statute

CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC, D/B/A CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL v. JOHN HARMON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2024 | Docket: 68335133

Published

years." See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2021). Harmon argued that under section 95.11(3)(k), CHHS had

ROSEMARY ARWAY v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2024 | Docket: 67419166

Published

limitations for actions on written contracts under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, running from the date

Fagan v. Jackson County Hospital District, Jackson Hospital

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2024 | Docket: 68251065

Published

accrues. § 768.28(6)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2017); see § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (establishing two-year statute

TAMPA PORT AUTHORITY v. BOB HENRIQUEZ, AS PROPERTY APPRAISER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2023 | Docket: 68123866

Published

Florida's civil statutes of limitation generally. Section 95.11, which prescribes limitations for civil lawsuits

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Wellington Acquisition, LLC and Ethrensa Family Trust Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043001

Published

performance claim to exercise its right/option. See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); see also Wing, 107 So

DELMARIE DONALD v. MRYLENE BARRERA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2023 | Docket: 67912620

Published

031(2)(a), 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2020) (fraud); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020) (negligence).

SLAVICA RAFFAY AND ATTILA RAFFAY v. LONGWOOD HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2023 | Docket: 67811572

Published

5 instrument” is five years. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023). The limitations period

STUART L. LONGMAN vs ATLANTIC COAST BANK, ROBERT J. MCKAY, WHITFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORP., DREAMFIELDS EQUESTRIAN COMMUNITY HOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION, INC. AND TDMA, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2023 | Docket: 68034317

Published

motion for deficiency was untimely based on section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes. We agree with Longman’s

IT'S A NEW 10, LLC, IT'S A 10, INC, and CAROLYN ARONSON v. MICHAEL WILSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2023 | Docket: 67657810

Published

expired four years later, by November 22, 2017. See § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“Actions other than for

AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FDH INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2023 | Docket: 67454249

Published

professional malpractice limitation imposed in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2022). On appeal,

JOHN DENNIS ENLOW AND LISA ENLOW vs E.C. SCOTT WRIGHT, P.A. AND MOLETTEIRE INJURY LAW, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2023 | Docket: 63654623

Published

cause of action is or should be ‘discovered,’ § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002).”); Silvestrone v. Edell

THE LEXI CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MOSS & ASSOCIATES, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2023 | Docket: 67173912

Published

with the exercise of due diligence” (quoting § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat.)).

ISRAEL REYES, etc. v. BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2023 | Docket: 61718833

Published

statute of limitations began to run pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). In addressing

JOHN DOE 1 v. ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2023 | Docket: 63180115

Published

therefore be brought “at any time” pursuant to § 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2022). I. INTRODUCTION

DANIEL FETZER vs STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2023 | Docket: 67221662

Published

Florida’s statute of limitations codified at section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2009), because it sought

WINNIEFRED RAMSAY vs SOUTH LAKE HOSPITAL, KERRY L. NEALL, M.D., AND HOLLY B. SAUNDERS, M.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2023 | Docket: 65664774

Published

under the statute of limitations codified at section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2015), because it

AISY ALEU, PHARM. D. v. NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814493

Published

this case, the four- year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2015), for “[a]n action

MIAMI BEACH CRUISERS, LLC v. ROLLY MARINE SERVICE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814463

Published

BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Actions other than for

David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2022 | Docket: 65382148

Published

Appellant filed his petition as required by section 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Any action challenging

David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2022 | Docket: 65382148

Published

Appellant filed his petition as required by section 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Any action challenging

MARIA MARTINEZ v. DON JOHN PEREZ-ORTIZ, M. D. AND THE PEREZ EYE CENTER, P. L.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2022 | Docket: 65370802

Published

litigation on Dr. Perez Ortiz and Perez Eye Center. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also § 766.106(4)

IGOR MIKHAYLOV v. BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2022 | Docket: 64952865

Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, which applies to a

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, etc. v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63654659

Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3), Florida Statute; and 4) dismissed Counts

GULAM JAFFER v. 153 REHC LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2022 | Docket: 63352034

Published

LC, 6 So. 3d 681, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009))); § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (providing that the statute of

LUIS N. MENDEZ, etc. v. GREEN MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS (CAYMAN) LTD.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2022 | Docket: 63318824

Published

the complaint, the action is not barred by section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes.”).

PLASTIQUIM, S.A. v. ODEBRECHT CONSTRUCTION, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2022 | Docket: 63266658

Published

103(1), Fla. Stat.; § 772.102(4), Fla. Stat.; § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, we affirm in part

Theodore D. Karantsalis v. City of Miami Springs, Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 12, 2021 | Docket: 60990381

Published

which provide a period of four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3); Silva v. Baptist Health S. Fla., Inc., 856

EDWIN TORRES v. KENDALL HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2021 | Docket: 60642691

Published

comply with the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, as well as the mandatory

Orlan L. Hagins v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2021 | Docket: 60414528

Published

correctly dismissed the complaint as time barred. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (barring action “challenging

SYDNEY SMITH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2021 | Docket: 60385559

Published

cases, a 4-year statute of limitations applies. § 95.11(3)(i), Fla. Stat. (establishing 4-year statute

ALFRED RHINER v. TAKASHI KOYAMA, DMD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2021 | Docket: 60368611

Published

for medical malpractice suits set forth by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, he had not been served

OLAYA MILIAN v. ADRIAN GARCIA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2021 | Docket: 60290976

Published

at 192 (“The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or

MICHAEL R. MAISONNEUVE and CYNTHIA A. MAISONNEUVE v. SITUS INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2021 | Docket: 60199086

Published

last payment required under the mortgage. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). Ultimately, the trial

GUILLERMO POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2021 | Docket: 60123693

Published

containing the avoidance.” (emphasis added)); § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that the statute

DORAL HEALTH CENTER, P.A., A/A/O ESPERANZA ESCARIZ v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2021 | Docket: 60056679

Published

within five years of the cause of action accruing. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). The breach occurs upon

KEYS COUNTRY RESORT, LLC v. 1733 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2021 | Docket: 60041119

Published

(“[A] legal action ‘on a contract’ to which [section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes,] applies connotes an

JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA v. ANDREW FRANKLIN RIER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2021 | Docket: 59936522

Published

two-year statute of limitations, pursuant to section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2020). Upon finding

JOHN P. WOODWARD and ROBERT C. WOODWARD v. TIMOTHY MORELL, in his capacity as PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MILDRED W. OLSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2021 | Docket: 59882202

Published

7 Section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes provides for a five-year

FALISHA BELL v. SCOTT WAGNER & ASSOCIATES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2020 | Docket: 18748376

Published

JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (“An action for professional

EDMUND ACCARDI v. REGIONS BANK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2020 | Docket: 18726938

Published

one-year statute of limitations specified in section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes (2018), apply to a motion

R.R. v. New Life Community Church of CMA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2020 | Docket: 18495687

Published

arguments that their claims were timely under section 95.11(7) or 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2019), or

GABRIJI, LLC v. HOLLYWOOD EAST, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2020 | Docket: 18488454

Published

improvement of real property” is one year. See § 95.11(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2019). Accepting the allegations

Joselyn Santiago v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 2020 | Docket: 17532535

Published

action for trespass on real property. Fla. Stat. § 95.11.

VIGNARAJ MUNSAMI PILLAY v. PUBLIC STORAGE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2019 | Docket: 16460459

Published

element constituting the cause of action occurs. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2018). Here, the three alleged break-ins

SANDRA SANTIAGO AND NORMA CACERES, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF RAMONA REYES v. FRANCISCO A. RODRIGUEZ, MD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2019 | Docket: 16350302

Published

applicable to medical malpractice actions under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), had expired

Jimmy Stephens v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2019 | Docket: 16275552

Published

the filing of his petition was timely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and that the trial court

Kelly Mitchell v. Applebee's Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2019 | Docket: 16275551

Published

beyond the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court

Kelly Mitchell v. Applebee's Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2019 | Docket: 16275551

Published

beyond the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court

James Harrell v. The Ryland Group, doing business as Ryland Homes, a foreign for-profit corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2019 | Docket: 16049254

Published

erred in ruling that the statute of repose of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), applies. In

JAMES J. MC MANUS v. DR. G. A. GAMEZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2019 | Docket: 16025077

Published

applicable to medical negligence claims. Cf. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014). We therefore reverse

FAIRWAYS AT EAGLE RIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. EAGLE RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2019 | Docket: 15897424

Published

by the parties in this appeal, we affirm. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). In doing so, we voice

Enlow v. E.C. Scott Wright, P.A.

274 So. 3d 1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2019 | Docket: 64718925

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). The statute of limitations

CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA v. CHILDREN'S CANCER CARING CENTER, INC.

274 So. 3d 1102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2019 | Docket: 15688838

Published

claim of unjust enrichment is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing a four-year

Covenant Baptist Church v. Vasallo Construction

273 So. 3d 236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2019 | Docket: 15658403

Published

we affirm the final judgment under review. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2018); Kelley, 435 So. 2d at

Manney v. MBV Eng'g, Inc.

273 So. 3d 214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716088

Published

the ten-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides:

Manney v. MBV Eng'g, Inc.

273 So. 3d 214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716087

Published

the ten-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides:

Adams v. State

273 So. 3d 195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716074

Published

motion for return of personal property based on section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes (2010). In his motion

Adams v. State

273 So. 3d 195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716073

Published

motion for return of personal property based on section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes (2010). In his motion

Linda Byrd Goley v. Robert Anthony Goley

272 So. 3d 800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2019 | Docket: 15059372

Published

to the statutes of fraud and limitations. See § 95.11, Fla. Stat.

Gindel v. Centex Homes

272 So. 3d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 64714671

Published

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? Fernandez and

Gindel v. Centex Homes

272 So. 3d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 64714672

Published

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? Fernandez and

ROBERT C. GINDEL v. CENTEX HOMES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865451

Published

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? FERNANDEZ and

Otero v. Arcia

264 So. 3d 1140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2019 | Docket: 64705117

Published

limitations for litigation-related malpractice under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), begins to run

Otero v. Arcia

264 So. 3d 1140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2019 | Docket: 64705116

Published

limitations for litigation-related malpractice under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), begins to run

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

263 So. 3d 156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64702735

Published

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of

Brown v. Poole

261 So. 3d 708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 64700831

Published

four-year statute of limitations governs these claims. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015). This time did not begin

Bank of New York Mellon v. Arnoux

257 So. 3d 1179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2018 | Docket: 8110463

Published

of the five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). 1 During the pendency

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.800

257 So. 3d 91

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081306

Published

Stat. Ann. 116 (Supp.1975)7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). 30 Fla. Stat. Ann. 69-70 (2004)

Gindel v. Centex Homes

267 So. 3d 403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 64709210

Published

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run

ROBERT C. GINDEL v. CENTEX HOMES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 7863695

Published

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run

Gonzalez v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567940

Published

Florida Supreme Court stated that: 3 See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013).

Brexendorf v. Bank of Am., N.A.

319 F. Supp. 3d 1257

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2018 | Docket: 64319485

Published

from when the cause of action accrued. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Fraud actions accrue when the plaintiff

Dixon v. Dixon Bellamy

252 So. 3d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7511608

Published

2 of limitations under section 95.11, Florida Statutes required Bellamy to have

Nails v. Walmart

252 So. 3d 332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 64685943

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(o ), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing four-year limitations period

JASON WEEKS v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7511622

Published

limitations for a defamation suit is two years. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012); Wagner, Nugent, Johnson

U.S. Bank v. Wilson

252 So. 3d 306

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2018 | Docket: 7531222

Published

expiration of the statute of limitations under section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes (2014). The

In Re: The Name Change of Maria Fernanda Benitez

250 So. 3d 153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7144555

Published

elapsed from W.M.B.’s attainment of her majority. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla Stat. (2018); see also, Rose v. Sonson

U.S. Bank v. Morelli

249 So. 3d 717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2018 | Docket: 7061968

Published

five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014). Because under

R.R. v. New Life

248 So. 3d 232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2018 | Docket: 6911556

Published

four-year statute of limitations outlined in section 95.11(3)(a), (p), Florida Statutes (1996). In reaching

Deutsche Bank v. Torres

245 So. 3d 985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2018 | Docket: 6383130

Published

applicable five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014). Finding this conclusion

U. S. BANK, N. A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE v. ANA GONZALEZ

244 So. 3d 407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2018 | Docket: 6383119

Published

years of the initial default date alleged. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2010).2 The trial court entered

U. S. BANK, N. A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE v. ANA GONZALEZ

244 So. 3d 407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2018 | Docket: 6383119

Published

years of the initial default date alleged. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2010).2 The trial court entered

Gonzalez v. Stern

244 So. 3d 1187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2018 | Docket: 6385785

Published

statute of limitations barred her complaint. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (2004) (providing two-year statute

Wells Fargo Bank v. Rendon

245 So. 3d 917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2018 | Docket: 6366300

Published

the applicable five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015). For the reasons that

Deutsche Bank v. Miller

239 So. 3d 789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2018 | Docket: 6336046

Published

the default date alleged in the complaint. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing five-year statute

INLET MARINA OF PALM BEACH, LTD. v. ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION

237 So. 3d 395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2018 | Docket: 6288115

Published

statute of limitations as a matter of law. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“Actions . . . shall

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2018 | Docket: 6282760

Published

the five-year limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes. The judgment

Velden v. Nationstar Mortgage

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2018 | Docket: 6262719

Published

first missed payment. We disagree. Section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes (2014) provides

Republic of Ecuador v. Dassum

255 So. 3d 390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2017 | Docket: 6248130

Published

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. C. Proceedings

Kendron v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, LLC

230 So. 3d 636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2017 | Docket: 6242493

Published

the time the plaintiffs cause of action accrued. § 95.11(3)(a), (o), Fla. Stat. (2016). “A- cause of action

Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Limited Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6236488

Published

Florida’s delayed discovery doctrine12 11 Section 95.11 reads, in relevant part, as follows:

Green v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

280 F. Supp. 3d 1349

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2017 | Docket: 64316164

Published

228 So.3d at 74; Fla. Stat. § 95.031(1); Id. § 95.11(2); Id. § 673.1181. Here, Green promised to pay

Flanzer v. Kaplan

230 So. 3d 960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2017 | Docket: 6232643

Published

undue influence claim challenging a trust. See § 95.011 (“A civil action ... shall be barred unless begun

YULIA v. FOREST v. L. LISA BATTS and STUART LAW GROUP, P.A.

228 So. 3d 156, 2017 WL 4812665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2017 | Docket: 6179300

Published

Morsani, 790 So.2d 1071, 1074 (Fla. 2001). Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), provides that

Rogers v. Jones

227 So. 3d 759, 2017 WL 4449511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2017 | Docket: 60278058

Published

time-barred under the one-year limitation period of section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). However, the

Jerry Layne Rogers, Sr. v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2017 | Docket: 6165240

Published

time-barred under the one-year limitation period of section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). However, the

Llano Financing Group, LLC v. Theodore F. Petit

230 So. 3d 141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6158976

Published

based on that faulty appraisal and subject to section 95.11(3)’s four-year statute of limitations accrue

HSBC BANK USA , NATIONAL ASSOC., ETC. v. THE ESTATE OF CHLOE ANN PETERSEN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159009

Published

brought within five years of the default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say

CITY OF COOPER CITY v. WALTER S. JOLIFF, BARBARA JOLIFF & BRENDA J. KEZAR

227 So. 3d 633, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159013

Published

rather, the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2011), controlled the time

CITY OF COOPER CITY v. WALTER S. JOLIFF, BARBARA JOLIFF & BRENDA J. KEZAR

227 So. 3d 633, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159013

Published

rather, the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2011), controlled the time

Espinoza v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP

708 F. App'x 625

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 26, 2017 | Docket: 65966261

Published

instrument,” or “to foreclose a mortgage.” Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b),(c). The Espinozas argue that the statute

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Diamond

228 So. 3d 177, 2017 WL 3795319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2017 | Docket: 6148684

Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), The trial CQurt

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. v. Anton

230 So. 3d 502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145460

Published

barred by the five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009). The trial court entered

Anderson Jerome Parker, Sr. v. The Geo Group, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2017 | Docket: 6144165

Published

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the

VICTORVILLE WEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. THE INVERRARY ASSOCIATION, INC.

226 So. 3d 888, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12050, 2017 WL 3616397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2017 | Docket: 6142261

Published

when it purchased the golf course. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). We find this portion

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. BH-NV Investments 1, LLC

230 So. 3d 60

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2017 | Docket: 6138592

Published

five-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes. A review of the record

Parker v. Geo Group, Inc.

224 So. 3d 857, 2017 WL 3469420, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2017 | Docket: 60271737

Published

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the

Sandra A. Forero and William L. Forero v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC

223 So. 3d 440, 2017 WL 2989493, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2017 | Docket: 6119596

Published

and because the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, did not bar the action

Halveland v. Florida Department of Corrections

219 So. 3d 1037, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2017 | Docket: 60266350

Published

limitations for prisoners bringing suit under , section 95.11(5)(g) applied, as opposed to section 768.28(14))

Desylvester v. The Bank of New York Mellon

219 So. 3d 1016, 2017 WL 2562370, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2017 | Docket: 6073810

Published

applicable to actions on a written instrument. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). In Mr. Desylvester’s

Riverwood Nursing Center, LLC. etc. v. John F. Gilroy, ind., And John F. etc.

219 So. 3d 996, 2017 WL 2438333, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2017 | Docket: 6069479

Published

that the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, barred the claims as

Peters v. The Bank of New York Mellon

227 So. 3d 175, 2017 WL 2304263, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2017 | Docket: 6066405

Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Ventures Trust 2013-I-NH Ex Rel. MCM Capital Partners, LLC v. Johnson

220 So. 3d 1227, 2017 WL 2200226, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2017 | Docket: 6066351

Published

five-year statute of limitations as set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2015). In opposing

Bush v. Whitney Bank

219 So. 3d 257, 2017 WL 2200223, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2017 | Docket: 6066362

Published

the one-year statute of limita*258tions in section 95.11(5)(h) of the Florida Statutes (2015) did not

Companion Property & Casualty Group v. Built Tops Building Services, Inc.

218 So. 3d 989, 2017 WL 1908372, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2017 | Docket: 6060373

Published

expiration of the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). We reverse because

Companion Property & Casualty Group v. Built Tops Building Services, Inc.

218 So. 3d 989, 2017 WL 1908372, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2017 | Docket: 6060373

Published

expiration of the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). We reverse because

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey

858 F.3d 1360, 27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 533, 2017 WL 1593469, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7775

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2017 | Docket: 6057546

Published

five-year limitations period established in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). Id. at 1049, 1051. The facts here are nearly

Busch v. Lennar Homes, LLC

219 So. 3d 93, 2017 WL 1372085, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 5099902

Published

applicable to construction defect claims. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015). Because the complaint

D.H. Ex Rel. R.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.

217 So. 3d 1072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2017 | Docket: 4669313

Published

limitations applicable to negligence claims under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006). In case 2D15-677

Desylvester v. The Bank of New York Mellon

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608294

Published

applicable to actions on a written instrument. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). In Mr. Desylvester's

John Patrick v. Richard Hess

212 So. 3d 1039, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2017 WL 632259, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 337

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2017 | Docket: 4586139

Published

twenty-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (2012), is applicable to

Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

213 So. 3d 1012, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2016 | Docket: 4478843

Published

motion for rehearing and for certification. 3 § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014).

Dhanasar v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

201 So. 3d 825, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2016 | Docket: 4478841

Published

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2013). The trial

Dhanasar v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

201 So. 3d 825, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2016 | Docket: 4478841

Published

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2013). The trial

Blue v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

201 So. 3d 808, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2016 | Docket: 60257088

Published

for writ of manda*809mus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that

Wyndell Blue v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2016 | Docket: 4477776

Published

for writ of mandamus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that

Wyndell Blue v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2016 | Docket: 4477776

Published

for writ of mandamus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that

Reverse Mortgage Solution, Inc. v. The Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees, etc.

207 So. 3d 917, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2016 | Docket: 4480292

Published

2005) (“The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the hen or

Rose v. Sonson

208 So. 3d 136, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4419696

Published

paternity claim had already been extinguished by section 95.11(3)(b) of the Florida Statute (1986), the applicable

Dhanasar v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2016 | Docket: 4114288

Published

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013). The

Mobley and Sanders v. Homestead Hospital, Inc.

202 So. 3d 868, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11076

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4112461

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). See also Tanner

Mobley and Sanders v. Homestead Hospital, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4114292

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). See also Tanner v. Hartog

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Beckett

200 So. 3d 179, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152, 2016 WL 3570108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2016 | Docket: 4109015

Published

applicable to the present case, we note that section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes (2015), now provides

Townes v. National Deaf Academy, LLC

197 So. 3d 1130, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9383, 2016 WL 3381809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2016 | Docket: 3082126

Published

601 So.2d 1184, 1186 (Fla.1992) (quoting § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1992)). “In ordinary, common

Discount Sleep of Ocala, LLC v. City of Ocala

200 So. 3d 156, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2016 WL 3364655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2016 | Docket: 3082135

Published

the four-year limitations period set forth in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2014). We agree and

Anthony v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

550 B.R. 577, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59802, 2016 WL 2586659

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 5, 2016 | Docket: 65517271

Published

the statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes”). Deutsche Bank Trust

Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2016 | Docket: 3053147

Published

barred by the statute of limitations found in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, provided the subsequent

Hummer v. Adams Homes of Northwest Florida, Inc.

198 So. 3d 750, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 2016 WL 746423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2016 | Docket: 3039679

Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3). In reaching its decision, it appears the majority

City of Miami v. 346 Nw 29th Street, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 3031225

Published

applicability of either section 194.171 or section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes, as we find any such

City of Miami v. 346 NW 29th Street, LLC

184 So. 3d 592, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1006, 2016 WL 313977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 60253333

Published

applicability of either section 194.171 or section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes, as we find any such

Trust Mortgage LLC v. Residential Credit Solutions Inc. (In re Gonzalez)

544 B.R. 716

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 13, 2016 | Docket: 65788299

Published

by the five year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. 95.11(2)(c). Count II of the Amended Complaint alleges

Winston R. Wilkins v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 843, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2016 WL 64974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026012

Published

for actions to recover personal property in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes-(2014). Poux v. State

Nina Solonenko and Valeriy Solonenko v. Georgia Notes 18, LLC

182 So. 3d 876, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 257, 2016 WL 72580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026035

Published

mortgage has a five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013), Appellants argue that

Blinn v. West Shore Villas of Naples Owners' Association, Inc.

182 So. 3d 686, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18504, 2015 WL 8519425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2015 | Docket: 3020395

Published

private nuisance: four years. Se,e § 95.11(2)(b), (3)(g), (3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2012). Unless

City of Fort Pierce v. Australian Properties, LLC WTC, LLC Ted Glasrud Associates FL, LLC William D. McKnight and Kathryn A. McKnight, etc.

179 So. 3d 426, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980, 2015 WL 7245219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011960

Published

the four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes, based on the annual

Access Insurance Planners, Inc. and Access Insurance Underwriter, LLC v. Janice S. Gee, Jan Gee Insurance, LLC, Jeff Altizer d/b/a Brookstone Insurance and Wendy Starks

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863194

Published

governed by a four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2011); Acoustic Innovations

Ryan & Jessica Dominguez v. Hayward Industries

201 So. 3d 100, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2015 | Docket: 2808039

Published

four-year statute of limitations, pursuant to section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2013). Section 95.031(2)(b)

Green v. Cottrell

172 So. 3d 1009, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129, 2015 WL 5164938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2015 | Docket: 60250002

Published

one-year statute of limitations period outlined in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2007). We affirm appellant’s

Juan Sanchez, a/k/a George Ruiz, a/k/a Miguel Martinez v. State of Florida

174 So. 3d 439, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730, 2015 WL 4634534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2015 | Docket: 2681910

Published

1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), acknowledges that section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, provides a four-year civil

In re Anthony

534 B.R. 834, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 319, 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 2526, 2015 WL 4522971

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2015 | Docket: 65787738

Published

denied without prejudice. ORDERED. . Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c). . Fla. Stat. § 95.281(1)(a). . (Debtor’s

Ervans v. The City of Venice, Florida

169 So. 3d 267, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10491, 2015 WL 4154176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679111

Published

a four-year limitations period. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2009). While it is possible

Stern v. Bank of America Corp.

112 F. Supp. 3d 1297, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84804, 2015 WL 3991058

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2015 | Docket: 64302689

Published

a five-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c). Stern argues that the limitations period

Barrier v. JFK Medical Center Ltd. Partnership

169 So. 3d 185, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9264, 2015 WL 3759641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2015 | Docket: 60248867

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence .... ” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). In Tanner v. Hartog,

Pamela Barrier, etc. v. JFK Medical Center Limited Partnership, etc., Palm Beach Emergency Medical Associates, P.L., etc., Jason Sevald, M.D., Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., etc., Tanya Beaumont, L.P.N., Shara Davis, L.P.N., Patricia Salmon, L.P.N., Garry J. Beauzile, M.D., and Pierre Dorsainvil, M.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2015 | Docket: 2679257

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence . . . .” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). In Tanner v. Hartog

Jax Utilities Management, Inc. v. Hancock Bank, A Foreign Corp.

164 So. 3d 1266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2663945

Published

(1) the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), barred Jax’s

Angel Barreiro v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

164 So. 3d 1249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2663949

Published

as it relates to that decision, see § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat.; Moger v. Fla. Parole Comm’n

Purrier v. Department of Corrections

164 So. 3d 783, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180, 2015 WL 3408090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2015 | Docket: 60248057

Published

Department’s final disposition; it was thereby timely. § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“Any court action challenging

Hess v. Patrick

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2015 | Docket: 2658381

Published

year statute of limitations to bring the action. § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Such an action results

Cypress Fairway Condominium v. Bergeron Construction Co.

164 So. 3d 706, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6841, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2015 | Docket: 60248036

Published

ten-year statute of repose period. Pursuant to section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2010), an action founded

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. B & A Diagnostic, Inc.

104 F. Supp. 3d 1366, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64336, 2015 WL 2217312

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2015 | Docket: 64302009

Published

enrichment claim is four (4) years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k). Therefore, Defendants state that as State

Hess v. Patrick

164 So. 3d 19, 2015 WL 1443113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2015 | Docket: 2646049

Published

five-year statute of limitations to bring the action. § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Such an action results

Doris Rich Corya, etc. v. Roy Sanders

155 So. 3d 1279, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633414

Published

affirmative defense of lach-es, pursuant to section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2008), was an issue to

CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC v. Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees, or other of Norman W. Gendron

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2015 | Docket: 2626276

Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), and by the

Salazar v. Coello

154 So. 3d 430, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20403, 2014 WL 7156859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 2616006

Published

judicial interpretation of the interplay between section 95.11(4)(b) and [ ] section 766.106(4) the legislature

Deutsche Bank v. Beauvais

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 2616012

Published

Under the relevant statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, “[a]n action to foreclose

Byrnes v. Small

60 F. Supp. 3d 1284, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161770, 2014 WL 6467305

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2014 | Docket: 64298464

Published

time-barred by the statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11. That section provides that, absent fraud, concealment

Hussey v. Collier County

158 So. 3d 661, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18764, 2014 WL 5900018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2014 | Docket: 2597991

Published

inordinately burdens the property. See § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (2008); P.I.E., LLC v.

Doris Rich Corya, etc. and Paul J. Rich Sanders, etc. v. Roy Sanders

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2014 | Docket: 2592852

Published

affirmative defense of laches, pursuant to section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2008), was an issue to

Eugene Smith v. Reginald Bruster

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1311327

Published

499 F.2d 996, 1002 (5th Cir. 1974)). Section 95.11(3)(j) provides that a legal or equitable action

Hardey v. Shell

144 So. 3d 668, 2014 WL 3929140, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 935068

Published

Limitations would begin to run pursuant to Florida Statute 95.11, at the latest, as of the filing of that

Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

145 So. 3d 183, 2014 WL 3928495, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 936951

Published

limitations on a wrongful death claim is two years. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). 3 . Based

Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

145 So. 3d 183, 2014 WL 3928495, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 936951

Published

limitations on a wrongful death claim is two years. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). 3 . Based

Sarras v. Mills-Sarras

161 So. 3d 509, 2014 WL 3871235, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2014 | Docket: 60247189

Published

the five-year limitation period set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), not the four-year

Nieve & Marisol Linares v. Universal Property & Casualty

141 So. 3d 719, 2014 WL 2965882, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2014 | Docket: 434339

Published

of the cause of action accruing. See § 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). “A cause of action

Olean Medical Condominium Ass'n v. Azima

144 So. 3d 561, 2014 WL 2783190, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242511

Published

from the accrual of his action had passed. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010) (setting forth the five-year

Exposito v. Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County

141 So. 3d 663, 2014 WL 2866414, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2014 | Docket: 60242004

Published

Tanner v. Hartog, 618 So.2d 177, 181 (Fla.1993). Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), recognizes the

Romero v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.

15 F. Supp. 3d 1279, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58185, 2014 WL 1623703

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2014 | Docket: 64294588

Published

year statute of limitations under Florida Statute § 95.11 to bring a foreclosure action on the mortgage or

Dutra v. Kaplan

137 So. 3d 1190, 2014 WL 1491639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2014 | Docket: 60240213

Published

of limitations *1192for breach of contract, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), began to run

Buccellati Holding Italia Spa v. Laura Buccellati, LLC

5 F. Supp. 3d 1368, 2014 WL 1202965

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2014 | Docket: 64293753

Published

statute of limitations period, provided by Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f). The statute of limitations period does

Smith v. Miami-Dade County

21 F. Supp. 3d 1286, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72781, 2014 WL 2139248

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2014 | Docket: 64295108

Published

four-year statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(f); Maggio v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec

Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer, P.A.

134 So. 3d 1079, 2014 WL 51692, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60239027

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). Recognizing that the

Phillips v. City of West Palm Beach

133 So. 3d 1071, 2014 WL 51665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 159, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238661

Published

limitations on a negligence claim is four years. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). A negligence claim does

Broward County v. 8705 Hampshire Drive Condominium, Inc.

127 So. 3d 853, 2013 WL 6244200, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2013 | Docket: 60236893

Published

statute of limitations had expired in July 2008. See § 95.11(2)(b) and (c), Fla. Stat. (2009). Nevertheless

Clearwater Housing Authority v. Future Capital Holding Corp.

126 So. 3d 410, 2013 WL 5951583, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2013 | Docket: 60236437

Published

that the ten-year statute of repose found in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2011), barred Clearwater

State v. Basford

119 So. 3d 478, 2013 WL 3814317, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 60233618

Published

four-year statute of limitations provided for in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. It also contends that

Judkins v. Walton County

128 So. 3d 62, 2013 WL 3491163, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2013 | Docket: 60237131

Published

four year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. Judkins argues that

Langley Ltd. Partnership v. School Board of Lake County

113 So. 3d 995, 2013 WL 1482779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231684

Published

one-year statute of limitations set forth' in section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes, for an action seeking

Wendler v. City of St. Augustine

108 So. 3d 1141, 2013 WL 1007290, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2013 | Docket: 60228994

Published

the analysis in Russo. Consequently, under section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2010), the Wendlers

Green v. Palatka Daily News

108 So. 3d 739, 2013 WL 842850, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2013 | Docket: 60229226

Published

within the applicable statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4)(g), Florida Statutes (2011), provides for

Lewis v. Florida Parole Commission

112 So. 3d 534, 2013 WL 828013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60231137

Published

untimely as a result of the application of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2011). He alleges that

Hill v. Crews

109 So. 3d 267, 2013 WL 692976, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2013 | Docket: 60229535

Published

that Appellant’s claim is time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2009), as to the legal documents

Calhoun v. Nienhuis

110 So. 3d 24, 2013 WL 645348, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60230260

Published

statute of limitations for prisoner claims, section 95.11(5)(g), because she filed her complaint more

Whitfield v. Department of Corrections

107 So. 3d 1210, 2013 WL 646059, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60228595

Published

state’ ”) (quoting Haag, 591 So.2d at 617). Section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[a]ny

Bustetter v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.

919 F. Supp. 2d 1282, 2013 WL 247106, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9002

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2013 | Docket: 65988295

Published

period set forth in Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b) has expired. Section 95.11(4)(b) provides the following:

AFFCO New Zealand, Ltd. v. American Fine Foods Corp.

913 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2012 WL 6644997, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180097

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2012 | Docket: 65987481

Published

years for a breach of contract claim, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), and one year for specific performance against

Smith v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

103 So. 3d 955, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21520, 2012 WL 6216756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2012 | Docket: 60227270

Published

years from the date of death. Id. at 56 (citing § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2001)). But the two-year statute

Spence v. Tucker

107 So. 3d 444, 2012 WL 6097977, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2012 | Docket: 60228659

Published

disciplinary proceedings was time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), but asserts the

Stevens v. Peebles

103 So. 3d 220, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20442, 2012 WL 5933023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2012 | Docket: 60227006

Published

limitations period for injunctive relief had run. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009). We have considered the

M.J.O. Holding Corp. v. Heller

97 So. 3d 864, 2012 WL 3329195, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 60311988

Published

period for the causes of action at issue. See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2003). M.J.O. contends that the

M.J.O. Holding Corp. v. Heller

97 So. 3d 864, 2012 WL 3329195, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 60311988

Published

period for the causes of action at issue. See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2003). M.J.O. contends that the

Bistricer v. Palmer

93 So. 3d 1231, 2012 WL 3237813, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2012 | Docket: 60310501

Published

limitations applicable to actions alleging fraud. See § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2002). We reverse. Although

Taplin v. Taplin

88 So. 3d 344, 2012 WL 1605253, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2012 | Docket: 60308243

Published

bringing an action for an intentional tort under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (2007).2 We disagree

Joseph v. Estate of Joseph

83 So. 3d 965, 2012 WL 933020, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 60306554

Published

not subject to the statute of limitations, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2010). McFall v. Trubey,

Fuss v. Gross

82 So. 3d 1082, 2012 WL 129847, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2012 | Docket: 2416497

Published

action for fraud must be filed within four years. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1995). This period, however

Coconut Grove Station Development, Ltd. v. Miami-Dade County

76 So. 3d 369, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20455, 2011 WL 6373024

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2011 | Docket: 60304508

Published

under the applicable statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009) (providing a five year

MELBOURNE OCEAN CLUB CONDOMINIUM v. Elledge

71 So. 3d 144, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416, 2011 WL 3754655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2011 | Docket: 2536265

Published

one year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2007): Actions other

McLeod v. Bankier

63 So. 3d 858, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8398, 2011 WL 2200705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 60301185

Published

limitations governing legal malpractice actions is section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). See Peat, Marwick

Hochberg v. THOMAS CARTER PAINTING, INC.

63 So. 3d 861, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8411, 2011 WL 2496612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 1097809

Published

Professionals, and General Caulking. Under section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, (2010) "an action founded

Patrick v. Gatien

65 So. 3d 42, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7156, 2011 WL 1879201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2011 | Docket: 60301712

Published

the statute began to run on June 10, 2004. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that an “action

Holcomb v. Lee County

57 So. 3d 987, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4499, 2011 WL 1197668

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2011 | Docket: 60299231

Published

estate still has time to file such a lawsuit. See § 95.11(3)(i), Fla. Stat. (2008). Without discussing whether

Parker v. State Department of Corrections

58 So. 3d 318, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3487, 2011 WL 890939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2011 | Docket: 60299314

Published

prosecution in which the property was seized concluded. § 95.11(3)(i), Fla. Stat. (1989); Poux v. State, 985 So

Shouman v. Ecker

53 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2011 | Docket: 60297982

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla

SHOUMAN v. Ecker

53 So. 3d 1091, 2011 WL 92761

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2011 | Docket: 250075

Published

GERSTEN and LAGOA, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); Steele v. Kehoe, 747

Jones v. Florida Parole Commission

48 So. 3d 704, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 578, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1732, 2010 WL 4007652

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2010 | Docket: 60296619

Published

without merit, and . . . untimely," citing section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2008), as the basis

Kravitz v. EVANS MEDICAL LTD.

741 F. Supp. 2d 1299, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107726, 2010 WL 3835663

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2010 | Docket: 2343929

Published

F.3d 840, 845 (11th Cir.2004). 1. FLA. STAT. § 95.11(3)(E) Florida has a four-year statute of limitations

Knighten v. PALISADES COLLECTIONS, LLC

721 F. Supp. 2d 1261, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67168, 2010 WL 2696768

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2010 | Docket: 2404546

Published

year statute of limitations applies. Fla. Stat. § 95.11. He claims that his alleged debt was last paid

Mariner Club, Ltd. v. Summit Contractors, Inc.

20 So. 3d 1014, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16544, 2009 WL 3645190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2009 | Docket: 380176

Published

defect(s) of which the former owner complains. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). Our examination of the

Roberts v. McNeil

16 So. 3d 963, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12747, 2009 WL 2602291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2009 | Docket: 1124579

Published

100(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure; Section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2007); and Kalway v. Singletary

White Construction Co. v. Jones

13 So. 3d 130, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7084, 2009 WL 1533037

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 60237584

Published

that the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), barred White’s

Rodriguez v. Favalora

11 So. 3d 393, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2861, 2009 WL 928467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1657060

Published

connection with intentional torts based on abuse. § 95.11(7), Fla. Stat. (1992). Subsection 7 states: An

Jones v. Florida Parole Commission

4 So. 3d 91, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1843, 2009 WL 529593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2009 | Docket: 60295147

Published

dismissing the habeas corpus petition as untimely. See § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2008); Smith v. Fla. Parole

Miller v. ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC.

591 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106241, 2008 WL 5427990

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2008 | Docket: 2286439

Published

the specific categories provided in Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (entitled "Limitations other than for the recovery

Park v. CITY OF WEST MELBOURNE

999 So. 2d 673, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18369, 2008 WL 5100339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2008 | Docket: 464682

Published

statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere." § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (1998). However, a limitations period

Biddiscombe International, L.L.C. v. Gayheart (In re Biddiscombe International, L.L.C.)

392 B.R. 909, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 501, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2472

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2008 | Docket: 65783381

Published

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal

Biddiscombe International, L.L.C. v. Gayheart (In re Biddiscombe International, L.L.C.)

392 B.R. 909, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 501, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2472

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2008 | Docket: 65783381

Published

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal

Barrera v. Florida Parole Commission

987 So. 2d 810, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, 2008 WL 3286102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2008 | Docket: 64855302

Published

petition for writ of mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2005). In his petition

Stubbs v. Plantation General Hospital Ltd. Partnership

988 So. 2d 683, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11585, 2008 WL 2907995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 64855493

Published

applicable to professional negligence actions. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (2005). The motion further alleged

Ressler v. McNeil

993 So. 2d 1069, 2008 WL 2403651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2008 | Docket: 2581355

Published

habeas corpus petition as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2005). Appellee correctly

Cadle Co. v. Rhoades

978 So. 2d 833, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4335, 2008 WL 782813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 64854566

Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).2 In its reply

Blackburn v. BARTSOCAS

972 So. 2d 311, 2008 WL 238568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2008 | Docket: 1650745

Published

reality a claim for past wages and is limited by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), which provides

Patchett v. Marsh (In Re Marsh)

377 B.R. 749, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 54, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3606

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 29, 2007 | Docket: 1103996

Published

life of the original judgment was twenty years. § 95.11 Fla. Stats. (Supp.1980). However, prior to the

Thompson v. McDonough

967 So. 2d 971, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16690, 2007 WL 3085011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 64853002

Published

limitation for such claims provided for by section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. The Department moves for

Hale v. McDonough

970 So. 2d 362, 2007 WL 2847992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 1323969

Published

APPLICABLE LAW AND CONCLUSIONS Florida Statute § 95.11(8) governs when an action challenging a correctional

Hale v. McDonough

970 So. 2d 362, 2007 WL 2847992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 1323969

Published

APPLICABLE LAW AND CONCLUSIONS Florida Statute § 95.11(8) governs when an action challenging a correctional

Reeves v. Barrett

964 So. 2d 869, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14679, 2007 WL 2733843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2007 | Docket: 64852450

Published

is barred by the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the court assumed that

Ragan v. McDonough

958 So. 2d 1148, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 2007 WL 1827527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2007 | Docket: 64851147

Published

the 2002 order was time barred pursuant to section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2006). Appellant contends

Schachter v. Krzynowek

958 So. 2d 1061, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9197, 2007 WL 1687774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2007 | Docket: 64851115

Published

return of deposit or specific performance. Section 95.11(5), Florida Statutes (2003), allowed the buyer

Tweed v. McDonough

956 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2007 WL 1554146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2007 | Docket: 64850819

Published

denied his - mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. He argues, among other

Small v. Florida Parole Commission

956 So. 2d 1269, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8309, 2007 WL 1555725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2007 | Docket: 64850822

Published

habeas corpus petition as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes. The Parole Commission

Carter v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

954 So. 2d 734, 2007 WL 1213670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 175277

Published

prejudice based upon the statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2002). Carter's complaint

Special Disability Trust Fund v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

943 So. 2d 298, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20312, 2006 WL 3497260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 1526775

Published

of each interval of periodic reimbursement. See § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1999); Associated Coca Cola

Hill v. McDonough

946 So. 2d 1091, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20057, 2006 WL 3454788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2006 | Docket: 64848608

Published

was commenced within the time prescribed by section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. And we reverse the second

Leavitt Communications, Inc. v. Quality Communications of America, Inc.

939 So. 2d 257, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17298, 2006 WL 2956052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 64847189

Published

June 27, 1999, and expired on June 27, 2004. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing a limitation

Noughton v. Hooker

941 So. 2d 1176, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17272, 2006 WL 2959156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 64847804

Published

entered the order dismissing the complaint. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).

Special Disability Trust Fund v. Rescare Home Health, Inc./Liberty Mutual Group

930 So. 2d 746, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6698, 2006 WL 1168761

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2006 | Docket: 64845193

Published

four-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, to ap-pellees’ claim for

Stone v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.

934 So. 2d 532, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3236, 2006 WL 544542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 64845841

Published

statutory violation, it was time-barred under section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999). After conducting

Stone v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.

934 So. 2d 532, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3236, 2006 WL 544542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 64845841

Published

statutory violation, it was time-barred under section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999). After conducting

Group W., Inc. v. William H. Morris Co.

932 So. 2d 275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17020, 2005 WL 2806974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2005 | Docket: 64845528

Published

five-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2003). Group W. and

Horta v. Department of Children & Families

911 So. 2d 139, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8507, 2005 WL 1338260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2005 | Docket: 64840410

Published

of Limitations. [She] cite[s] Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(f) (2003) which limits an action founded on

Best v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Inc.

899 So. 2d 424, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4482, 2005 WL 735000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2005 | Docket: 64837632

Published

limitations applicable to negligence claims. See § 95.11(3)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). The trial court

Lussy v. Damsel

890 So. 2d 1184, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20381, 2004 WL 3048726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2004 | Docket: 64835388

Published

barred by the two-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); Slapikas v. Llorente

Apac-Florida, Inc. v. Onebeacon Insurance Co.

888 So. 2d 126, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17939, 2004 WL 2729722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 64834449

Published

See ch.2001-211, § 2, Laws of Fla. (amending § 95.11(2)(b), (5)(e), Fla. Stat.). The parties agree that

Savery v. State

884 So. 2d 439, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14443, 2004 WL 2191545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2004 | Docket: 64833534

Published

disposition of the disciplinary proceedings. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2004). We disagree, quash the circuit

Savery v. State

884 So. 2d 439, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14443, 2004 WL 2191545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2004 | Docket: 64833534

Published

disposition of the disciplinary proceedings. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2004). We disagree, quash the circuit

Mercado v. Fitell

875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2004 | Docket: 64831155

Published

four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s

Efron v. Milton

892 So. 2d 497, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8739, 2004 WL 1393535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 64835735

Published

four-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(3)(0), Florida Statutes. The claims for civil

Creel v. Danisi

868 So. 2d 603, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 2004 WL 438554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2004 | Docket: 64828976

Published

“the two-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(b) is suspended (‘tolled’) for ninety days

Cora Health Services, Inc. v. Steinbronn

867 So. 2d 587, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2941, 2004 WL 401531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 64828655

Published

within the two-year time limit prescribed by section 95.11, Florida Statutes. In Burbank, this court approved

Kennedy Contracting, Inc. v. Traveler's Insurance Co.

866 So. 2d 1264, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2170, 2004 WL 360887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828528

Published

limitations for breach of written contract, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Kennedy argues that

Kennedy Contracting, Inc. v. Traveler's Insurance Co.

866 So. 2d 1264, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2170, 2004 WL 360887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828528

Published

limitations for breach of written contract, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Kennedy argues that

Pierson D. Construction, Inc. v. Yudell

863 So. 2d 413, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757, 2003 WL 23095239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2003 | Docket: 64827482

Published

the case with prejudice. Pierson argues that section 95.11 contains the applicable statute of limitations

Estate of Cadden v. Schickedanz

855 So. 2d 651, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12829, 2003 WL 22014640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2003 | Docket: 64825533

Published

probate statute is erroneous and contrary to section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2000), which dictates statutes

Cortes v. Williams

850 So. 2d 634, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2003 WL 21705239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2003 | Docket: 64824127

Published

alleged malpractice occurred September 30, 1999. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, requires, in relevant

Nichols v. Preiser

849 So. 2d 478, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10883, 2003 WL 21673001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2003 | Docket: 64823977

Published

extinguished by the statute of repose in May 1997. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000). Nichols retained Preiser

Young v. Ball

835 So. 2d 385, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 761, 2003 WL 187439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2003 | Docket: 64820097

Published

were first asserted against them in 1999.2 See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1993). The circuit court agreed

RAIE v. Cheminova, Inc.

221 F. Supp. 2d 1297, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17763, 2002 WL 31127286

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2002 | Docket: 2353910

Published

Thompson, 159 Fla. 453, 31 So.2d 710 (1947) and § 95.11(4)(d), Fla.Stat. (1985)). The parties have cited

Overholt v. Neto

822 So. 2d 589, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11306, 2002 WL 1815887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2002 | Docket: 64816661

Published

1998, and filed his complaint on May 14, 1999. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), provides for

Overholt v. Neto

822 So. 2d 589, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11306, 2002 WL 1815887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2002 | Docket: 64816661

Published

1998, and filed his complaint on May 14, 1999. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), provides for

Woods v. Sapolsky

821 So. 2d 376, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9581, 2002 WL 1457939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2002 | Docket: 64816411

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). This Court has previously

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

822 So. 2d 519, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 2002 WL 1390728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2002 | Docket: 64816627

Published

four year statute of repose as set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, which requires that

Gumbs v. Guerra

820 So. 2d 336, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2337, 2002 WL 341750

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2002 | Docket: 64816206

Published

the commencement of the action provided by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995). There is no

Landrum v. South Dade Healthcare Group, Ltd.

802 So. 2d 1154, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16423, 2001 WL 1471756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2001 | Docket: 64811228

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995); Hankey v. Yarian, 755 So.2d 93, 94 (Fla

Caiazza v. Tuff Realty Corp.

805 So. 2d 29, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16284, 2001 WL 1440803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 64811743

Published

foreign country must be commenced within five years. § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). “Every judgment gives rise

Lane v. Health Options, Inc.

796 So. 2d 1234, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14619, 2001 WL 1205854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2001 | Docket: 64809383

Published

within the two-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1999), applicable to medical

Papa v. State

792 So. 2d 1270, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12471, 2001 WL 1007824

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 64807909

Published

See Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 33-103.007 (2000); § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat.(2000); Fla. R.App. Proc. 9.100(c);

Admiral Security & Investment Co. v. Curtis

804 So. 2d 354, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12126, 2001 WL 984793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2001 | Docket: 64811540

Published

Florida, as expressed in legal authority such as section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), which seek to

Medical Cost Control & Management, Inc. v. Dougherty

791 So. 2d 498, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8822, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2001 | Docket: 64807391

Published

period for a suit to recover “wages” is two years. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997).1 Each of the appellants’

Kasbar v. Elias

789 So. 2d 404, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7514, 2001 WL 575127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2001 | Docket: 64806670

Published

barred by the four year statute of repose, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995). The motion asserted

Onofrio v. Johnston & Sasser, P.A.

782 So. 2d 1019, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5732, 2001 WL 427353

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2001 | Docket: 64804912

Published

four year statute of limitations prescribed in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996) bars any recovery

Schultz v. Amica Mutual Insurance

778 So. 2d 402, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 490, 2001 WL 55788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 64803766

Published

running of the five year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (2000); Bolin v. Mass. Bay Ins

Thurston v. Thurston

777 So. 2d 1001, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16357, 2000 WL 1838640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2000 | Docket: 64803586

Published

determination of paternity within the meaning of section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1995);2 and (ii) that

DCc Constructors, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

770 So. 2d 1283, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14798, 2000 WL 1700700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 64801641

Published

1119, 1121 (Fla.1998) (“We expressly hold that section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), as it applies

Thompson v. Liles

769 So. 2d 474, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13283, 2000 WL 1514588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2000 | Docket: 64801079

Published

barred by the four year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(j). We disagree and reverse. Count I of the

Sandford v. Manatee County

769 So. 2d 1084, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11863, 2000 WL 1344263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2000 | Docket: 64801203

Published

statute of limitations period set forth in section 95.11(3)(a). Thereafter, the County filed a motion

Seale v. EMSA Correctional Care, Inc.

767 So. 2d 1188, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 689, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1831, 2000 WL 1288895

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2000 | Docket: 64800607

Published

for statutory causes of action embodied in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999), applies when

Nale v. Montgomery

768 So. 2d 1166, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11682, 2000 WL 1283863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 64800868

Published

negligence must be commenced within four years. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). Pursuant to section 95

Hartford Insurance Group v. Lacey-Bogue

766 So. 2d 463, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11480, 2000 WL 1268763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2000 | Docket: 64800222

Published

Group by the five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). We agree and reverse

Tobin v. Damian

772 So. 2d 13, 2000 WL 1060487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2000 | Docket: 1435962

Published

limitations under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1991), and that neither section 95.11(7), Florida

Penagos v. Capital Bank

766 So. 2d 1089, 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 751, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9419, 2000 WL 1034525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 64800301

Published

obligation founded on a written instrument, see § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987), had expired because suit

Hickey v. Dunn & Corey

761 So. 2d 1245, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8757, 2000 WL 954948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2000 | Docket: 64798551

Published

professional malpractice limitations period of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991) had passed, thus

Doss v. Florida Department of Corrections

764 So. 2d 699, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7151, 2000 WL 742203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2000 | Docket: 64799403

Published

petition for writ of mandamus was untimely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Appellate

V.J. Usina Contracting, Inc. v. Putnam County

777 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5708, 2000 WL 569900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2000 | Docket: 64803576

Published

knowledge met the’ discovery aspect of either section 95.11(3)(a) or (c), Florida Statutes. Second, the

Elmore v. Florida Power & Light Co.

760 So. 2d 968, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4579, 2000 WL 390329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2000 | Docket: 64798095

Published

and (5)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). Under section 95.11(2)(b), an action for damages for breach of a

Sylk v. Rosenberg

754 So. 2d 836, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3976, 2000 WL 346165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796333

Published

Sylk’s action does not fit into the structure of Section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes (1997), which reads: “An

Poppell v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund

742 So. 2d 488, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12684, 1999 WL 761179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1999 | Docket: 64791416

Published

claim is barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1969); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc

American Airlines, Inc. v. Montero

741 So. 2d 587, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 1999 WL 674552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1999 | Docket: 64791068

Published

determine beneficiaries, American argued that section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), requires an

Biscayne Developments Ltd. v. Venetian Isle Condominium, Inc.

738 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10067, 1999 WL 542848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 64789770

Published

trial judge that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), bars the Appellants’

Multi-Line Claims Service, Inc. v. Cumis Insurance Society

739 So. 2d 144, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9638, 1999 WL 510624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 64790144

Published

four-year statute of limitations as set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1997) began to run

Kolnick v. FOUNTAINVIEW ASS'N, INC.

737 So. 2d 1192, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700, 1999 WL 510666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 1709634

Published

on the basis of the statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). The trial court

Dinerstein v. Paul Revere Ins.

173 F.3d 826

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 1999 | Docket: 395225

Published

Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) (1995). The Florida Supreme Court has held that, under § 95.11(2)(b), a breach

Schweihs v. Bianchini

728 So. 2d 1229, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1999 WL 187224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1999 | Docket: 64787062

Published

Bianchini moved to dismiss all claims based on Florida Statute 95.11(3)(b), which provided for a four-year statute

Balfour Beatty v. Boca Raton

170 F.3d 1048

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 25, 1999 | Docket: 395142

Published

Florida. Hence, it must be concluded that [§]95.11(2)(a) will operate as an exception

Northcutt v. Balkany

727 So. 2d 382, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2448, 1999 WL 110843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 64786501

Published

95’s applicability in general is covered by section 95.011: Applicability. — A civil action or proceeding

H & B Builders, Inc. v. City of Sunrise

727 So. 2d 1068, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1773, 1999 WL 89550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1999 | Docket: 64786640

Published

by the four year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. H & B’s complaint was

Senger Bros. Nursery, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

184 F.R.D. 674, 43 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1295, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1586, 1999 WL 80337

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1999 | Docket: 66009324

Published

statutes of limitation are contained in § 95.11. See Fla.Stat. § 95.11. Tolling of Florida’s statutes of limitation

Trustman v. Gelfman

724 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 858, 1999 WL 44196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1999 | Docket: 64785867

Published

estate, as the action was barred by laches. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: Laches

Cunningham v. Lowery

724 So. 2d 176, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 87, 1999 WL 4926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1999 | Docket: 64785474

Published

defendants’ favor. The controlling statute is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, which provides: (b)

Norris v. Florida Department of Corrections

721 So. 2d 1235, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15967, 1998 WL 883288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1998 | Docket: 64784821

Published

counsel argued that Norris’ claim was barred by section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, which requires that any

Goradesky v. Hickox

721 So. 2d 419, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 1998 WL 821791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 64784540

Published

two-year statute of limitations period under section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1993), for the Go-radeskys’

Goradesky v. Hickox

721 So. 2d 419, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 1998 WL 821791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 64784540

Published

two-year statute of limitations period under section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1993), for the Go-radeskys’

Maxwell v. Allison Construction Co.

720 So. 2d 1134, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13917, 1998 WL 771390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1998 | Docket: 64784375

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1995); § 631.68, Fla. Stát. (1995); Miller v. Pagodin

Beckman v. Rick's Watercraft Rentals

719 So. 2d 1025, 1999 A.M.C. 678, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13916, 1998 WL 771384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783859

Published

four-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). Accordingly

Anthony v. Singletary

718 So. 2d 335, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11858, 1998 WL 646622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 64783193

Published

that Anthony's complaint is untimely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), which requires

Archey v. Government Healthcare Services

718 So. 2d 249, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10789, 1998 WL 530888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1998 | Docket: 64783164

Published

by the statute of limitations and repose in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the

Hasemeier v. Singletary

715 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10873, 1998 WL 484139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1998 | Docket: 64782068

Published

PER CURIAM. DENIED. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat.; Kalway v. Singletary, 708 So.2d 267 (Fla.1998). WOLF

Helton v. Gunderson

708 So. 2d 1029, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3675, 1998 WL 158846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1998 | Docket: 64780046

Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). However, as the plaintiff

DeSouza v. DeSouza

708 So. 2d 993, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2932, 1998 WL 130077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1998 | Docket: 64780027

Published

beyond the four year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1995). He argues for

Law v. City of Ormond Beach

705 So. 2d 720, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1526, 1998 WL 66572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1998 | Docket: 64778779

Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1995). We affirm in part, reverse

Standard Jury Instructions—Civil Cases—No. 97-1

700 So. 2d 379, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 641, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1532, 1997 WL 637664

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1997 | Docket: 64776159

Published

the statute of limitations was filed. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(b); Fla. Stat. § 766.106; Fla. Stat. § 766.104(2)

Pierce v. Insurance Co. of North America

699 So. 2d 827, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11152, 1997 WL 599653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1997 | Docket: 64775973

Published

last element constituting the cause of action. Section 95.11 sets forth the statutes of limitations for causes

Rubenstein v. Saldariagga

699 So. 2d 754, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678, 1997 WL 530344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1997 | Docket: 64775943

Published

limitations provi*755sions of sections 681.68 and section 95.11(5)(d) were constitutional, The court acknowledged

Suntrust Banks of Florida, Inc. v. Don Wood, Inc.

693 So. 2d 99, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4954, 1997 WL 231483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1997 | Docket: 64773319

Published

Florida’s four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court

Ash v. Singletary

687 So. 2d 968, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1046, 1997 WL 63178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1997 | Docket: 64771104

Published

In Van Meter, we held that the enactment of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), was an unconstitutional

Williams v. Ivey

708 So. 2d 287, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 337, 1997 WL 35262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1997 | Docket: 64779863

Published

mandamus. The trial court apparently relied upon section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), in denying the

Hanano v. Petrou

683 So. 2d 637, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 1996 WL 685534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1996 | Docket: 64769363

Published

that the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), had run. The

Southwest Florida Retirement Center, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.

682 So. 2d 1130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 64768995

Published

legislature would have said so as it did in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1981).”). The majority

Zlotogura v. Geller

681 So. 2d 778, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10039, 1996 WL 539626

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1996 | Docket: 64768423

Published

of Florida, which was the 1992 amendment to section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1991), did not create a new

Wilson v. Scruggs

685 So. 2d 1206

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1996 | Docket: 64770227

Published

court dismissed Scruggs’ claim, finding that section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), the statute

Steinmetz v. G.D. Parker Sod, Inc.

673 So. 2d 968, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1996 WL 273508

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 64764743

Published

governed by a four year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1995). The cause of action accrues

Damiano v. McDaniel

670 So. 2d 1198, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3552, 1996 WL 164664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1996 | Docket: 64763548

Published

rev. dismissed, 634 So.2d 629 (Fla.1994). Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, provides, in relevant

Jaen v. Garcia

657 So. 2d 44, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6926, 1995 WL 380088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1995 | Docket: 64757507

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1993); Brummett v. Camble, 946 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir

Carpenter v. Bachman Enterprises Inc.

657 So. 2d 42, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6928, 1995 WL 380060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1995 | Docket: 64757506

Published

limitations applicable to negligence actions.1 § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1985). However, as the Robarts court

Barnett Recovery Corp. v. Fornasari

655 So. 2d 1274, 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1270, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6102, 1995 WL 334328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 64756693

Published

by the five year *1275period prescribed in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1993). See Barnes v

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Skinner

649 So. 2d 280, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1995 WL 15481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 64753775

Published

motion for partial summary judgment refers to section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1991).1 We agree with

Platt v. State

647 So. 2d 993, 1994 WL 700671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1994 | Docket: 437534

Published

statute of limitations had run pursuant to section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1985). The appellant

Daugherty v. Sarasota County

157 F.R.D. 542, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21677, 1994 WL 515521

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1994 | Docket: 66312350

Published

Florida, this period is four years. Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3) (1993). Plaintiff argues that a four year statute

Rosenbaum v. South Miami Hospital, Inc.

642 So. 2d 60, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8377, 1994 WL 454873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750623

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Florida, Inc

Rosenbaum v. South Miami Hospital, Inc.

642 So. 2d 60, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8377, 1994 WL 454873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750623

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Florida, Inc

J.B. And J.W.B., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, S.B. And E.B. And M.B. Individually v. Sacred Heart Hospital of Pensacola

27 F.3d 506, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19618

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 28, 1994 | Docket: 362565

Published

TRANSPORTER FOR THE PATIENT FALL WITHIN FLA. STAT. § '95.11(4)(b), THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR

Martinez v. Pasteur Health Plan, Inc.

639 So. 2d 198, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7093, 1994 WL 375916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1994 | Docket: 64749575

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1987); Kush v. Lloyd, 616 So.2d 415 (Fla.1992); University

Scruggs v. Wilson

640 So. 2d 1152, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6315, 1994 WL 284113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1994 | Docket: 64750028

Published

determined that the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), bars her from

Kagan v. Pollock

638 So. 2d 151, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1994 WL 246515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1994 | Docket: 64749086

Published

extended. DELL, C.J., and STEVENSON, J„ concur. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), provides in

N.G. ex rel. M.G. v. Arvida Corp.

630 So. 2d 1164, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12518, 1993 WL 530857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1993 | Docket: 64746010

Published

of the accrual date, or by August 9, 1988. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983). Rule 1.210, Florida Rules

Clements v. Sheffield

626 So. 2d 272, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10980, 1993 WL 435897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1993 | Docket: 64743898

Published

appellants’ negligence action was barred by section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), and that

Salinas v. Mason

627 So. 2d 525, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 1993 WL 414201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1993 | Docket: 64744381

Published

issue of the definition of abuse, for which section 95.11, Florida Statutes, refers to section 39.01(2)

Dampf v. Furst

624 So. 2d 368, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9440, 1993 WL 365574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1993 | Docket: 64742983

Published

on a finding that the action was barred by section 95.11(4)(b), the four-year medical malpractice statute

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Sippert v. Tindall

622 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7889, 1993 WL 280506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1993 | Docket: 64698011

Published

the date the child reaches the age of majority. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). Actions for past due child

Scott v. Morris

619 So. 2d 1049, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6511, 1993 WL 210579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1993 | Docket: 64696929

Published

was filed beyond the limitations period in section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes, and the record does not

Kahler v. Kent

616 So. 2d 601, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3812, 1993 WL 100649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1993 | Docket: 64695411

Published

action was barred by the statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). We distinguish this case

Fisher v. Fisher

613 So. 2d 1370, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2039, 1993 WL 40415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1993 | Docket: 64694377

Published

moved for a directed verdict on the basis that section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1989) required dismissal

Parker v. Critton

611 So. 2d 46, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12843, 1992 WL 379893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1992 | Docket: 64693130

Published

actions complained of occurred over ten years ago. § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1992 Supp.). As to the former husband’s

Rojas v. Sams, Gerstein & Ward, P.A.

601 So. 2d 639, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8033, 1992 WL 162290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1992 | Docket: 64668677

Published

Weiner v. Moreno, 271 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991).

Ghaleb v. Leibell

600 So. 2d 1251, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6849, 1992 WL 131850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1992 | Docket: 64668546

Published

children is a written contract governed by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), the five-year

Vellanti v. Maercks

590 So. 2d 495, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11975, 1991 WL 253819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1991 | Docket: 64663728

Published

within the two year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. *496(1985). Accordingly, we reverse

Nemeth v. Harriman

586 So. 2d 72, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7791, 1991 WL 150405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 64661693

Published

court's conclusion that the statute of repose, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), precludes the

Newmeyer v. Southeast Mortgage Co.

581 So. 2d 963, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5632, 1991 WL 110316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1991 | Docket: 64659857

Published

According to SEMCO, Newmeyer’s action was barred by Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), which requires

Garden v. Frier

580 So. 2d 873, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5034, 1991 WL 90962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1991 | Docket: 64659287

Published

to be a professional within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional

Cueto v. Caribco Enterprises, Inc.

578 So. 2d 396, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3536, 1991 WL 55699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1991 | Docket: 64658253

Published

finding that this action was not timely brought. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). Reversed and remanded

Lewis v. North Broward Hospital District

574 So. 2d 318, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1261, 1991 WL 18245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1991 | Docket: 64656366

Published

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), citing this

Miles Plastering & Associates, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Co.

573 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1991 | Docket: 64656034

Published

regarding improvements to real property had run. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1989). Miles responded arguing

Lemelin v. Gensler

570 So. 2d 1131, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9289, 1990 WL 198316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1990 | Docket: 64654833

Published

construction, is barred by the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that the

Vergara v. Butter

568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7671, 1990 WL 149810

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1990 | Docket: 64653886

Published

would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is

Weisfeld v. Cassel

568 So. 2d 962, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7482, 1990 WL 143661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1990 | Docket: 64653881

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979).

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Riede

565 So. 2d 883, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6350, 1990 WL 120007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 64652431

Published

under Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, or a four-year limitations period under Section 95.11(3)(p)

Corinthian Investments, Inc. v. Reeder

555 So. 2d 871, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2559, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6123, 1989 WL 130679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1989 | Docket: 64647567

Published

barred by so-called “statutory laches” under section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court

Troiano v. Troiano

549 So. 2d 1053, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2061, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4945, 1989 WL 101592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1989 | Docket: 64645358

Published

on July 1, 1987, almost seven years later. Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1979) concerning equitable

Bilic v. New Fairways Investment of Florida, Inc.

543 So. 2d 458, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1273, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2942, 1989 WL 54232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1989 | Docket: 64642637

Published

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur. . § 95.11(3)(h), Fla.Stat. (1987). . § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987).

Tri-W Steel, Inc. v. Miami National Bank

546 So. 2d 731, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 1989 WL 47183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1989 | Docket: 64643824

Published

DCA), cert. denied, 304 So.2d 125 (Fla.1974); § 95.11(3)(j), Fla.Stat. (1981).

Bogorff ex rel. Bogorff v. Koch

547 So. 2d 1223, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 968, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1989 | Docket: 64644528

Published

damage) occurred, at the latest, in 1972 or 1973. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1971), provides a four-year

Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Insurance Agency

520 So. 2d 601, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 523, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1988 | Docket: 1709424

Published

limited to persons in privity with the professional. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). The term "profession"

Paige v. Florida Department of Transportation

502 So. 2d 96, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 517, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1987 | Docket: 64624907

Published

Judge. This case involves the application of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), a statute of

Cardona v. Scheerer

498 So. 2d 553, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 64623472

Published

limitations is Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985) rather than section 95.11(4)(d) which was

Long v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

497 So. 2d 964, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2399, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1986 | Docket: 64623077

Published

judgment finding that their claim was barred by § 95.11(3)(c), Fla.Stat, a four year statute of limitations

Hellinger v. Fike

503 So. 2d 905, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2333, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1986 | Docket: 64625697

Published

by the medical malpractice statute of repose. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1983). The trial court denied

In re Mandalay Shores Cooperative Housing Ass'n

67 B.R. 92, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 4997

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1986 | Docket: 65779266

Published

Limitations, Fla. Stat.Ann. § 95.11(2)(b) (West 1982). Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(2)(b) provides that any action

Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Knuck

495 So. 2d 834, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2123, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 64622207

Published

the applicable statute of limitations period, § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1985),2 had failed to observe

Freel v. Fleming

489 So. 2d 1209, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1986 | Docket: 64620081

Published

barred by the statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

Cohen v. Baxt

473 So. 2d 1340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1668, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1985 | Docket: 64613595

Published

limitations for medical malpractice claims (section 95.11(4)(b), Flor*1341ida Statutes (1983)) to a complaint

Cliffin v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

458 So. 2d 29, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2185, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 64607663

Published

beyond the two-year statutory period provided in Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1977), and that the four-year

Drake ex rel. Fletcher v. Island Community Church, Inc.

462 So. 2d 1142, 23 Educ. L. Rep. 416, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2076, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1984 | Docket: 64609602

Published

the five year statute of limitations found in Section 95.11(2)(b) Florida Statutes (1981) is not applicable

Calder v. Uwanawich

449 So. 2d 911, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1984 | Docket: 64604543

Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, § 95.11(3)(j), Fla.Stat. (1979). I would reverse. The facts

Calder v. Uwanawich

449 So. 2d 911, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1984 | Docket: 64604543

Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, § 95.11(3)(j), Fla.Stat. (1979). I would reverse. The facts

Lipshaw v. Pinosky, Pinosky, P.A.

442 So. 2d 992, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1983 | Docket: 64601785

Published

of limitations for medical malpractice actions. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1979). We affirm in part and

McGhee v. Ogburn

707 F.2d 1312, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 346, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26428, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,712

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1983 | Docket: 66193401

Published

two-year limitation period provided by Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(4)(c) (West 1982). Since 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981 and

Maiden v. Cogdill

428 So. 2d 376, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1983 | Docket: 64595766

Published

appellant alleged that the action was barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). Appellee’s reply

Cates ex rel. Cates v. Graham

427 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 64595271

Published

asserted that Plaintiffs’ action was time barred by F.S. 95.11(4)(b) which provides that in medical malpractice

Stuyvesant Insurance v. Square D. Co.

399 So. 2d 1102, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1981 | Docket: 64583348

Published

the applicable statute of limitations was section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1973), which established

Quaintance v. Fogg

392 So. 2d 360, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1981 | Docket: 64579609

Published

that the applicable statute of limitations under § 95.11(2)(a) was 5 years, but the Court finds that the

Dubose v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

387 So. 2d 461, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1980 | Docket: 64577892

Published

the two-year statute of limitations set forth in § 95.11(4)(d), Fla.Stat. Appellant asserted that the four-year

Garofalo v. Community Hospital of South Broward

382 So. 2d 722, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1980 | Docket: 64575622

Published

limitations in Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1969). Defendant/appellee relies upon Section 95.11(6), Florida

O'Neil v. Lorain National Bank

369 So. 2d 378, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1979 | Docket: 64569467

Published

that the statute of limitations bars the action. § 95.11(6) Fla.Stat. (1973). Appellee also alleges that

Nash v. Asher

342 So. 2d 1038, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15095

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1977 | Docket: 64557293

Published

limitations in effect when the action accrued, Section 95.11(4) Florida Statutes 1969, but more than two

Fuller v. Hahn

313 So. 2d 419, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1975 | Docket: 64546736

Published

the injuries and damages resulting therefrom. F.S. 95.11(6) Florida Statutes 1971, specifically provides

Barfield v. United States Rubber Co.

234 So. 2d 374, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1970 | Docket: 64514311

Published

statute of limitations set forth in Florida Statutes § 95.11(5) (e), or by the four year statute of limitations

Hendon v. Stanley Home Products, Inc.

225 So. 2d 553, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1969 | Docket: 64510994

Published

limitations had run, relying on the three year statute § 95.11(5) (e). The trial court granted summary judgment

Hendon v. Stanley Home Products, Inc.

225 So. 2d 553, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1969 | Docket: 64510994

Published

limitations had run, relying on the three year statute § 95.11(5) (e). The trial court granted summary judgment

Goehring v. Broward Builders Exchange, Inc.

222 So. 2d 801, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1969 | Docket: 64509948

Published

one year period of limitations established by Section 95.11(7) (b), F.S.1967, F.S.A. The sole issue on this

International Mail Order, Inc. v. Capital National Bank of Miami

192 So. 2d 287, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1966 | Docket: 64498767

Published

of action; both of the provisions are a part of § 95.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. .The appellee urges the applicability

Bambrick v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando

192 So. 2d 68, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1966 | Docket: 64498700

Published

limitations applicable to unwritten contracts, F.S.A. § 95.11(5), rather than the five year statute applicable

Young v. Williamson

169 So. 2d 856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1964 | Docket: 64491470

Published

embodied in Fla.Stat. 95.11(4), F.S.A., or upon the arguably applicable limitation in Fla.Stat. 95.-11(5) (e)

Fidelity National Bank of West Fort Lauderdale v. Valachovic

163 So. 2d 33, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1964 | Docket: 60221238

Published

was properly within the five year limitation of § 95.11(3) 2 pertaining to action founded upon an instrument

Beck v. Barnett National Bank of Jacksonville

142 So. 2d 329, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1962 | Docket: 60205248

Published

general statute of limitations as provided in F.S. § 95.11(4), F.S.A., should be applied. Pertinent provisions

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 95 in the context of civil statutes of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.