Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 948.001 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 948.001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 948.001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 948.001

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 948
PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
948.001 Definitions.As used in this chapter, the term:
(1) “Administrative probation” means a form of no contact, nonreporting supervision. A court may order administrative probation, or the Department of Corrections may transfer an offender to administrative probation, as provided in s. 948.013.
(2) “Child care facility” has the same meaning as provided in s. 402.302.
(3) “Community control” means a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted caseloads. Community control is an individualized program in which the freedom of an offender is restricted within the community, home, or noninstitutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced.
(4) “Drug offender probation” means a form of intensive supervision that emphasizes treatment of drug offenders in accordance with individualized treatment plans administered by officers with restricted caseloads. Caseloads should be restricted to a maximum of 50 cases per officer in order to ensure an adequate level of staffing.
(5) “Mental health probation” means a form of specialized supervision that emphasizes mental health treatment and working with treatment providers to focus on underlying mental health disorders and compliance with a prescribed psychotropic medication regimen in accordance with individualized treatment plans. Mental health probation shall be supervised by officers with restricted caseloads who are sensitive to the unique needs of individuals with mental health disorders, and who will work in tandem with community mental health case managers assigned to the defendant. Caseloads of such officers should be restricted to a maximum of 50 cases per officer in order to ensure an adequate level of staffing and supervision.
(6) “Park” has the same meaning as provided in s. 775.215.
(7) “Playground” has the same meaning as provided in s. 775.215.
(8) “Probation” means a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03.
(9) “Qualified practitioner” means a social worker, mental health counselor, or a marriage and family therapist licensed under chapter 491 who, as determined by rule of the respective board, has the coursework, training, qualifications, and experience to evaluate and treat sexual offenders; a psychiatrist licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459; or a psychologist licensed under chapter 490.
(10) “Risk assessment” means an assessment completed by a qualified practitioner to evaluate the level of risk associated when a sex offender has contact with a child.
(11) “Safety plan” means a written document prepared by the qualified practitioner, in collaboration with the sex offender, the child’s parent or legal guardian, and, when appropriate, the child which establishes clear roles and responsibilities for each individual involved in any contact between the child and the sex offender.
(12) “School” has the same meaning as provided in s. 775.215.
(13) “Sex offender probation” or “sex offender community control” means a form of intensive supervision, with or without electronic monitoring, which emphasizes treatment and supervision of a sex offender in accordance with an individualized treatment plan administered by an officer who has a restricted caseload and specialized training. An officer who supervises an offender placed on sex offender probation or sex offender community control must meet as necessary with a treatment provider and polygraph examiner to develop and implement the supervision and treatment plan, if a treatment provider and polygraph examiner specially trained in the treatment and monitoring of sex offenders are reasonably available.
History.s. 11, ch. 83-131; s. 13, ch. 91-225; s. 32, ch. 92-310; s. 3, ch. 93-59; s. 13, ch. 93-227; s. 80, ch. 95-211; s. 2, ch. 97-308; s. 1, ch. 2004-373; s. 3, ch. 2005-67; s. 8, ch. 2007-200; s. 9, ch. 2007-209; s. 17, ch. 2010-64; s. 11, ch. 2010-92; s. 9, ch. 2010-113; s. 14, ch. 2016-127; s. 30, ch. 2016-224; s. 1, ch. 2017-115; s. 59, ch. 2019-167.

F.S. 948.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 948.001 on CourtListener

Amendments to 948.001


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 948.001

Total Results: 381  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Villery v. Florida Parole & Prob. Com'n, 396 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 274 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

incarceration as a condition of probation. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1979), authorizes the trial
Copy

United States v. Wright, 607 F.3d 708 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 204 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 WL 2089257

...The government relies on Florida law to inform its interpretation. Chapter 948 of the Florida Statutes, entitled “Probation and Community Control,” defines probation as “a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers.” Fla. Stat. § 948.001(5)....
...The same 8 statute defines community control as “a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted caseloads.” Fla. Stat. § 948.001(2)....
Copy

Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 182 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

allowed by the trial court sub judice pursuant to Section 948.01(1) without an actual adjudication of guilt
Copy

Trotter v. State, 576 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 109 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 252108

...[10] when he committed this crime. Trotter had previously been convicted and sentenced for burglary and robbery. His sentence was community control which he was serving when he committed this homicide. Community control and probation are defined in section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1985): (1) "Community control" means a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted caseloads....
...overcrowding while still providing a sufficient measure of public safety and assuring an element of punishment." Id. § 2(4) (emphasis added). Probation is the noncustodial alternative, while community control is the nonprison custodial alternative. § 948.001....
Copy

McKendry v. State, 641 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1994).

Cited 90 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1994 WL 192216

great public importance: DO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 948.01, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), AUTHORIZE THE IMPOSITION
Copy

Zack v. State, 753 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 87 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 14472

...overcrowding while still providing a sufficient measure of public safety and assuring an element of punishment." Id. § 2(4) (emphasis added). Probation is the noncustodial alternative, while community control is the nonprison custodial alternative. § 948.001....
Copy

Lawson v. State, 969 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2007).

Cited 73 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2007 WL 3101817

...rime . . . and their status as chronic substance abusers." Id. at 24. As defined by statute, drug offender probation is "a form of intensive supervision which emphasizes treatment of drug offenders in accordance with individualized treatment plans." § 948.001(4), Fla....
...eed to comply with the requirements of drug offender probation—"a form of intensive supervision which emphasizes treatment of drug offenders in accordance with *237 individualized treatment plans administered by officers with restricted caseloads." § 948.001(4), Fla....
Copy

State v. Jones, 327 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 66 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

SENTENCE STAYED AND WITHHELD (AS PERMITTED BY § 948.01(4), FLA. STAT., F.S.A.), UPON REVOCATION OF THE
Copy

State v. Holmes, 360 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1978).

Cited 51 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

imposed under Florida's split sentencing statute, Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1975), must be within
Copy

Lippman v. State, 633 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1994).

Cited 46 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1994 WL 81822

...We conclude *1066 that the modification order did not violate the double jeopardy clause. To begin with, probation is "a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03." § 948.001(2), Fla....
Copy

Martin v. State, 243 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Cited 34 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

order of probation entered the same date. F.S. Section 948.01(1), F.S.A. The order of probation was for a
Copy

Dorfman v. State, 351 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 1977).

Cited 33 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

split sentence since, at the time of the crime, Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1971), did not allow
Copy

State v. Powell, 703 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1997).

Cited 32 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1997 WL 718233

sentencing options available at that time. In section 948.01(6),[[1]] the legislature empowers trial courts
Copy

Trotter v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., 535 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 31 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15553, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 935

...Community control is “a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, . . . in which the freedom of an offender is restricted within the community, home, or noninstitutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced.” Fla. Stat. § 948.001....
Copy

Edwards v. State, 422 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

to withhold adjudication and order probation. § 948.01, Fla. Stat. (1981). Moreover, where drug charges
Copy

Singletary v. State, 290 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

jail split-sentence situation provided in F.S. Section 948.01(4), F.S.A., and in Florida the trial judge
Copy

United States v. Anton, 546 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 28 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 WL 4742625

F.3d 1297, 1298 (11th Cir. 2005). Under Florida Statute 948.01(2), the district court has the discretionary
Copy

Addison v. State, 452 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 28 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

probation, the trial court withheld imposing sentence. § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1983). Probation does not constitute
Copy

Delaney v. State, 190 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1966).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

In doing so the judge acted pursuant to F.S. Section 948.01, F.S.A. It is this order which is before us
Copy

Williams v. State, 280 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Cited 27 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

appellant on probation pursuant to the authority of § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat., F.S.A., which reads as follows:
Copy

United States v. Reinaldo Orellanes, A/K/A Reinaldo Orellana, 809 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 27 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2188

withholding adjudication pursuant to Florida Statute § 948.01. Orellanes’s lawyer in the state court proceeding
Copy

Shead v. State, 367 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 27 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law... ." § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1975). The required findings under
Copy

Roberts v. State, 335 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

persons 18 years of age and older." [4] Fla. Stat. § 948.01.
Copy

Bateh v. State, 101 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

imposition of a sentence may be deferred. F.S. § 948.01(3), F.S.A., provides that "* * * if it appears
Copy

Helton v. State, 106 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1958).

Cited 23 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

commission for the duration of such probation * *", § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. 1957, F.S.A. So that there could
Copy

Franklin v. State, 526 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 54214

revoking probation. Instead, the court interpreted section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes,[7] which states that
Copy

State v. Whitehead, 472 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 354

calendar years. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 948.01, adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence
Copy

Williams v. State, 581 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1991).

Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1991 WL 88740

to engage in a criminal course of conduct. See § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). On the other hand, section
Copy

Raulerson v. State, 763 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 963827

that because a trial court may, pursuant to section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1995), withhold an adjudication
Copy

Landeverde v. State, 769 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 19 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1505076

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law." § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). The "penalty" is generally
Copy

Peters v. State, 984 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 1901668

adjudicated guilty." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.790(a); see also § 948.01(2) Fla. Stat. (2006). Thus, Peters contends that
Copy

State v. Williams, 237 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970).

Cited 19 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

withdrawn following conviction of a felony, Fla. Stat. § 948.01(1), F.S.A. allows a court to hear and determine
Copy

Hutchins v. State, 286 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Cited 18 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

was pointed out that the authority granted by § 948.01(4) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. to add a period of probation
Copy

Marsh v. Garwood, 65 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1953).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1265

generally, Chapter 948, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A. § 948.01(3), because section 7 also provides that when
Copy

State v. Keirn, 720 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 18 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 219729

conduct to be punishable as a felony, and because § 948.01, Fla. Stat., allows this Court to withhold adjudication
Copy

State v. Cregan, 908 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 2005).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2005 WL 1576143

...It is defined as "a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community," pursuant to which an offender's "freedom . . . is restricted within the community, home, or noninstitutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced." § 948.001(2), Fla....
Copy

State v. Meeks, 789 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2001 WL 776488

...icers with restricted caseloads. Community control is an individualized program in which the freedom of an offender is restricted within the community, home, or noninstitutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced." § 948.001(2), Fla....
Copy

Tory v. State, 686 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 734615

...set forth in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), which pertain to "probation" and "community control." He alleges that drug offender probation is separate and distinct from probation and community control since it is defined separately in section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1993), and, therefore, was required to be orally pronounced....
Copy

Bashlor v. State, 586 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 192037

either unknown or unnoticed by the trial court, section 948.01(1), Florida Statutes (1951), prohibited the
Copy

Ogden v. State, 605 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 217079

...However, none of these cases interpreting section 948.06 involve terms of community control in excess of 2 years, but instead involve revocation of probation and resentencing to incarceration. There is clearly a distinction between probation and community control. Section 948.001(2), Florida Statutes (1991) defines community control as: "[A] form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted case-loads....
Copy

Cunningham v. State, 385 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

remanded. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a). [2] § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1979).
Copy

Jones v. State, 813 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2002 WL 87377

...side at a community residential drug punishment center." § 948.034(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). "Placement of an offender at a community residential drug punishment center is subject to budgetary considerations and availability of bed space." Id. Section 948.001(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), defines a "community residential drug punishment center" as a "residential drug punishment center designated by the Department of Corrections." The record in this case reflects that the probation and...
Copy

Solomon v. State, 341 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

error even if not raised at the trial court.[2] Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1973), which permits the
Copy

State v. McFadden, 772 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1675950

probation provided that the requirements of section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1997), are met. See also
Copy

Walker v. State, 546 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 75724

...ach offense for which he is sentenced where he was under legal constraint at the time of the offense. AFFIRMED. DANIEL, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur. NOTES [1] § 812.13(2)(c) Florida Statutes (1987). [2] § 784.021(1)(b) Florida Statutes (1987). [3] § 948.001(1) Florida Statutes (1987).
Copy

Woodson v. State, 864 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 40521

...5th DCA 1998); Salzano v. State, 664 So.2d 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Melecio v. State, 662 So.2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Gibbs v. State, 609 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). [4] Palma; Jones; Edgerton; Salzano; Gibbs. [5] Gamble; Melecio. [6] Palma. [7] Section 948.001(7), Florida Statutes (2000), provides, in pertinent part, that the emphasis of sex offender probation is treatment of the sex offender: "Sex offender probation" or "sex offender community control" means a form of intensive supervision...
Copy

Ex Parte Bosso, 41 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1949).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1949 Fla. LEXIS 750

valid in the first instance. The basic statute, Section 948.01, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A., empowers
Copy

Ellis v. State, 816 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 906172

...der probation" on counts 3-5, following his term of incarceration on count 2. Initially the court placed the defendant on straight probation, but in the final pronouncement, he added the words "drug offender." "Drug offender probation" is defined in 948.001(4) as "a form of intensive supervision which emphasizes treatment of drug offenders in accordance with individualized treatment plans administered by officers with restricted caseloads....
Copy

United States v. Gustavo Garcia A/K/A "Popeye", 727 F.2d 1028 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24424

given probation, which he successfully served. Section 948.01, Fla.Stat. The district court, after a hearing
Copy

State v. Williams, 667 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1996).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1996 WL 26547

exceed the term provided by general law."). Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1993), provides, in relevant
Copy

Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21697171

whether adjudication of guilt is withheld. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.790(a). Richardson
Copy

Clinger v. State, 533 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 118076

probation or community control as permitted by section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes, is the defendant a "convicted
Copy

Thomas v. State, 356 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

notwithstanding the provision of Chapter 948.01 or Section 948.01 of the Florida Statutes. 948.01 is that section
Copy

Duggar v. State, 446 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

must stay and withhold imposition of sentence. Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1983). In this case,
Copy

Beech v. State, 436 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1983).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

pursuant to the true split sentence authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979). A close reading
Copy

Van Tassel v. Coffman, 486 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1986).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

a defendant placed on probation pursuant to section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1973), who subsequently
Copy

Trotter v. State, 690 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1996).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1996 WL 726878

...retroactively). Custodial restraint has served in aggravation in Florida since the "sentence of imprisonment" circumstance was created, and enactment of community control simply extended traditional custody to include "custody in the community." See § 948.001, Fla....
Copy

Bolware v. State, 995 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 645

being in a possession of a firearm); Fla. Stat. § 948.01(3)(a) (specifically allows the Court to revoke
Copy

Berezovsky v. State, 350 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1977).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

alternatives provided for in Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1975). Section 948.01, Florida Statutes, provides
Copy

Vasquez v. State, 663 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 621335

"weapon," see 790.001(13). [4] We note that section 948.01(13) of the Florida Statutes (1993) authorizes
Copy

Rodriguez v. State, 441 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law... ." § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). Until the PSI is completed
Copy

State v. Jogan, 388 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

sentence and place the defendant upon probation. § 948.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1979). Under Chapter 958, the
Copy

Dietz v. State, 534 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 124794

appropriate restraints on the offender's liberty. § 948.01(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). This program is, in
Copy

State v. Wilcox, 351 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

court erred in imposing unsupervised probation. Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1975), authorizes the
Copy

State v. Kendrick, 596 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 57165

originally authorizing probation in Florida (now in section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes), clearly shows that the
Copy

Kohn v. State, 289 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

period of probation is not authorized by Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A. See Williams v. State, supra; Hutchins
Copy

United States v. Thompson, 756 F. Supp. 1492 (N.D. Fla. 1991).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2256, 1991 WL 23651

imprisonment of more than one year. As is permitted by Section 948.01 of the Florida Statutes, adjudication of guilt
Copy

Singleton v. State, 183 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

Singleton and Grace Marie Singleton." [2] F.S. Section 948.01, F.S.A. [3] This is permitted by Section 924
Copy

Ivey v. State, 308 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

followed by probation and is thereby contrary to F.S. § 948.01(4). (3) The trial court erred in denying appellant
Copy

Lewis v. State, 402 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

under a true split sentence as authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979), cannot equal or
Copy

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc., 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1992 WL 246494

added to permit the judge to operate under section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes. The Florida law forming
Copy

Warrington v. State, 660 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 544148

sentences that may be imposed pursuant to Poore and section 948.01, Florida Statutes. The sentence does not violate
Copy

Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2005 WL 2779476

passed upon the question certified."). [3] Section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (2004), which was in effect
Copy

Gibson v. Florida Dept. of Corr., 885 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 626, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1829, 2004 WL 2360131

offender is serving a "split sentence pursuant to section 948.01," the trial court shall only order credit for
Copy

Tyrone Oliver Chong v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 890 F.2d 284 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18096, 1989 WL 142096

prosecuted Chong in its courts. Pursuant to Florida Statute 948.01(3), the state court withheld adjudication
Copy

Summers v. State, 625 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 383493

defendant presently suffer the penalty imposed by law. § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1989). Probation is a matter of
Copy

Madrigal v. State, 683 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 668423

...tion officers can constitute a crime, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1325, the record does not establish that the [defendant's] presence in the United States is in itself criminal." 627 So.2d at 543. Additionally, as appellant points out, the definitional section of 948.001 provides: "`Administrative probation' means a form of noncontact supervision in which an offender who presents a low risk of harm to the community may, upon satisfactory completion of half the term of probation, be placed by the Department of Corrections on nonreporting status until expiration of the term of supervision." § 948.001(1), Fla.Stat....
...Section 948.01(12), Florida Statutes (1995), provides: "The court may also impose split probation whereby, upon satisfactory completion of half the term of probation, the Department of Corrections may place the offender *1096 on administrative probation as defined in s. 948.001 for the remainder of the term of supervision." The trial court placed appellant on administrative probation so that appellant would not have to be present to be supervised....
Copy

Johnson v. State, 561 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 66200

commence until he serves his prison sentence. See § 948.01(8), Fla. Stat. (1987). See also Van Tassel v.
Copy

Smith v. State, 484 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1986).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 81

authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1973) (codified as amended at section 948.01(8), Florida
Copy

Arnold v. State, 356 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

2d 490 (Fla. 1974) and cases therein cited) F.S. 948.01(4) clearly provides that the granting of probation
Copy

Glass v. State, 574 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 1991).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1991 WL 16326

incarceration, whether by parole or gain-time allowances. § 948.01(8), Fla. Stat. (1989). Glass's position is that
Copy

Genung v. Nuckolls, 292 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

necessarily one who has been adjudicated guilty. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., specifically provides:
Copy

Poore v. State, 503 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 450

old practice of deferring sentencing.[3]*1284 Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes, specifically provides
Copy

Griner v. State, 523 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 34670

[1] This distinction derives in part from section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1987) which provides
Copy

Wayne v. State, 513 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2120

answering by our supreme court. NOTES [1] Section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1985) provides: (8)
Copy

Scott v. State, 550 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 112266

defendant presently suffer the penalty imposed by law. § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). Indeed, in Shead v. State
Copy

Brenner v. State, 337 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

two year incarceration is without merit. See Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes. Judgments and sentences
Copy

Adams v. State, 979 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 794662

...e of treatment. For example, the very definition of sex offender probation provides that it is "a form of intensive supervision . . . which emphasizes treatment and supervision of a sex offender in accordance with an individualized treatment plan. " § 948.001(10), Fla....
...the trial judge to specify time parameters for completion at the time of sentencing."). We agree. Sex offender treatment, like drug treatment, focuses on "rehabilitation pursuant to an individualized treatment plan." Lawson, 969 So.2d at 232; see §§ 948.001(10), 948.30(1)(c), 948.31, Fla....
Copy

Punta v. State, 806 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 81429

probation was illegal because it was prohibited by section 948.01(12), Florida Statutes (1989), which provided
Copy

Cleveland v. State, 287 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

pointed out that the authority granted by Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A. to add a period of probation to be
Copy

Mulkey v. Purdy, 234 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

considerations. We agree. The contention that § 948.01 Fla. Stat. F.S.A. — When courts may place defendant
Copy

Horner v. State, 617 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1993).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1993 WL 113511

(Fla. 1st DCA 1990).[1] The issue is whether section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1989), which precludes
Copy

Disbrow v. State, 642 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1994).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1994 WL 499344

reverse split sentence is a legal sentence under section 948.01(11), Florida Statutes (1991). However, we cannot
Copy

Toombs v. State, 404 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

imprisonment[2] to be followed by three years probation. See § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1979).[3] Toombs contends that
Copy

Brown v. State, 302 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

from those alternatives is that authorized by § 948.01(4), F.S., enabling the court to sentence a defendant
Copy

Waite v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 681 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787

when there has been an adjudication of guilt. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). [2] We note that Florida
Copy

Rodney Tyrone Lowe v. State of Florida, 259 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2018).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...offender statute-as was the case with Lowe and the previous robbery he committed in 1987-are instead put in a "community control program ." We disagree. A simple look at the relevant statutes reveals that the definition of "community control" under section 948.001(3), Florida Statutes (2011), is virtually identical to the definition of "community control program" in section 958.03(2), Florida Statutes (2011), of the Florida Youthful Offender Act....
Copy

Holland v. Florida Real Est. Comm., 352 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16665

adjudication of guilt has been entered against him. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1975), permits the court
Copy

Hanson v. State, 187 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

defendant's motion for new trial. NOTES [1] See section 948.01, Fla. Stat. 1963, F.S.A., which permits the
Copy

Smith v. State, 543 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 48085

adjudication of guilt was withheld pursuant to section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes. Clinger v. State, 533
Copy

Jackson v. State, 615 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 75787

impermissible gap in sentencing in violation of section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1989).[1]See Gill v.
Copy

Heuring v. State, 559 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 29520

face and would be deemed valid absent Green. Section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1983), provides: Whenever
Copy

Hutchinson v. State, 360 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

guilty to burglary and was sentenced under Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1975) to three years
Copy

Montgomery v. State, 821 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 1625469

the defendant on probation or community control. § 948.01(2) and (3), Fla. Stat. (1999). See also Raulerson
Copy

Boyett v. State, 452 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

appellant was "sentenced" to probation when section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that
Copy

Sanchez v. State, 538 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 6419

terms of community control. We conclude that section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (1987)[1] does not limit
Copy

Burrell v. State, 483 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 442

reconcile two separate pieces of legislation. Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979), permitted the
Copy

State v. Gloster, 703 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 774761

conduct to be punishable as a felony, and because § 948.01, Fla. Stat., allows this Court to withhold adjudication
Copy

Shieder v. State, 430 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

withholding or suspending sentencing contravened section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1941), and was "improper"
Copy

Lawson v. State, 941 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 3102274

...State, 722 So.2d 950, 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)). We begin our analysis by noting that pursuant to the plea agreement, Lawson specifically agreed to submit to the requirements of drug offender probation. The contours of drug offender probation are defined by section 948.001(4), Florida *489 Statutes (2005), as "a form of intensive supervision ....
Copy

Purdy v. Mulkey, 228 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

involved. The appellee argues that since a purpose of § 948.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., is to enable a defendant to
Copy

Yates v. Buchanan, 170 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

, F.S.A., dealing with probation, provides in § 948.01(4) that probation can not be granted except under
Copy

Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 34

...fender had been committed for the offense or a period not to exceed 2 years, whichever is less. We interpret the above provision as applying to both probation and community control, since both community control and probation involve supervision. See section 948.001(2) (probation means a form of community supervision); section 948.03(2) (the court shall require intensive supervision and surveillance for an offender placed into community control)....
Copy

King v. State, 648 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 697953

(Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (Cowart, J., dissenting). Section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1993) still provides
Copy

Lewis v. State, 298 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

interpretation of F.S. § 922.051 (1971) and F.S. § 948.01(4) (1971). The first of these statutes allows
Copy

State v. Roper, 915 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1923121

was available under a predecessor statute (section 948.01(13), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998)), as an alternative
Copy

Whitehead v. State, 450 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

of 3 years. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 948.01, adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence
Copy

Crawford v. State, 567 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 141434

certified as being of great public importance: Does Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988) limit the
Copy

Casterline v. State, 703 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 606498

conditions of probation at any time pursuant to section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (1991), "[a]bsent proof
Copy

Dearth v. State, 390 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

grant probation and to set the terms thereof. Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1979), provides that
Copy

Mick v. State, 506 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1158

community control. The issue before us is whether Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (1985), limits the duration
Copy

State v. Ackerman, 785 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 543222

Ackerman on drug offender probation, pursuant to section 948.01(13), Florida Statutes. Ackerman pled guilty
Copy

State v. Young, 561 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 68109

...hall be added whenever the defendant, at the time of the offense before the court for sentencing, was on community control. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). The rule does not distinguish between the adult sanction known as community control, as defined in section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1987), and community control programs applicable to juveniles....
Copy

Reilly v. Florida, Dep't of Corr., 847 F. Supp. 951 (M.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3930, 1994 WL 110840

less severe than incarceration. See generally § 948.01, Florida Statutes (1985). Petitioner could have
Copy

Dupree v. State, 708 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 107309

688 So.2d 1008, 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); see § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1991) ("When community control
Copy

Cole v. State, 932 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1627567

Statutes section 948.20, formerly Florida Statutes section 948.01(13), addressing drug offender probation, does
Copy

State v. McGraw, 474 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1676

contends that upon conviction of a felony, section 948.01(3) mandates a reporting probation. We agree
Copy

Staley v. State, 851 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21748913

State, 823 So.2d 319, 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Section 948.01(13), which authorizes drug offender probation
Copy

United States v. Hartsfield, 387 F. Supp. 16 (M.D. Fla. 1975).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14174

on probation pursuant to the provisions of Section 948.01(3) of the Florida Statutes, which reads in
Copy

State v. Powell, 696 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 43388

See §§ 921.187, 948.01, Fla. Stat. (1987). In section 948.01(6), the legislature empowers trial courts to
Copy

McKinley v. State, 519 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 10831

but once. This is why it is imperative, as section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes contemplates, that in
Copy

United States v. James Charles Cannon, in Re United States of Am., 778 F.2d 747 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25437

is authorized. See, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 948.01; United States v. Garcia, 727 F.2d
Copy

Williams v. State, 464 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 673

...* * * * * * (7) Impose a split sentence whereby the offender is to be placed on probation upon completion of any specified period of such sentence, which period may include a term of years or less. The Act further defined the terms "community control" and "probation" and are set forth in Section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1983)....
...will be required in accordance with Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.701(d)(11). See also committee note to Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.701(d)(12). Except as set forth herein, the state's motion for rehearing or clarification is denied. SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] 948.001 Definitions....
Copy

Woodson v. State, 889 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2004 WL 2923221

...ment is whether the defendant's conduct in failing to participate and complete the program was willful. The parameters of sexual offender probation are statutorily defined as a form of intensive supervision with an individualized treatment plan. See § 948.001(7), Fla....
Copy

Warren v. State, 174 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

order appealed was entered pursuant to F.S. Section 948.01, F.S.A., which provides as follows: "(1) Any
Copy

Sipp v. State, 604 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 217075

community control available for any one offense. § 948.01(5), Fla. Stat. (1989). Because the total term
Copy

Noble v. State, 338 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

and was given a five year split sentence, under § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1975). The trial court ordered
Copy

Pendergrass v. State, 487 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

in Holmes appears to be an interpretation of section 948.01(4), the same is true as to youthful offenders
Copy

Dean v. State, 669 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 123168

...probation, drug offender, on this previous charge." The state contends that this statement at the time of sentencing placing defendant on drug offender probation also put him on constructive notice of the special conditions imposed. We do not agree. Section 948.001(4), Florida Statutes (1995), which defines drug offender probation, emphasizes "individualized treatment plans" and does not reference any special conditions of probation....
...Accordingly, we strike conditions I, II, and IV, and that portion of condition III requiring defendant to pay for the cost of random drug testing. WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] We note that the Broward County form order of probation erroneously cites to "Chapter 948.001(3) F.S." for drug offender probation. This section now contains the statutory definition for Criminal Quarantine Community Control, although this was the correct citation for drug offender probation in the 1991 Florida Statutes, see § 948.001(3), Fla.Stat....
Copy

Filmore v. State, 133 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 941903, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3494

...re on time, “does not support the conclusion that the defendant willfully or deliberately missed the meeting”). Community control is “a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays.” § 948.001(3), Fla....
Copy

Williams v. State, 653 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 96826

range is any nonstate prison sanction. See also § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1991). However, Thompson did not
Copy

Williams v. State, 528 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 66082

sentence as described in, and authorized by, section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes. Although the sentence
Copy

Mosley v. State, 677 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 347783

probation pursuant to section 948.01(13), Florida Statutes (1993). Section 948.01(13)(a) provides that
Copy

State v. Tribble, 984 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2436154

948.01" if a prison sentence is not imposed. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that "the
Copy

Young v. State, 509 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1750

control may be imposed only for felony offenses. § 948.01(4), (8), Fla. Stat. Despite defendant's failure
Copy

Childers v. Dept. of Environ. Prot., 696 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 402381

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.670 and section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1995). In a certified
Copy

Washington v. State, 564 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 98483

probation in regard to one of the sentences. See § 948.01(8), Fla. Stat. (1987). Our conclusion is based
Copy

Bryant v. State, 290 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

period of probation is not authorized by Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A. See Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1973
Copy

Brown v. State, 463 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 438

courts must "withhold the imposition of sentence." § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1983). In addition, a sentence
Copy

United States v. Gispert, 864 F. Supp. 1193 (S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14186, 1994 WL 547455

number 84-3690CF. Pursuant to Florida Statute § 948.01,[2] the state court "withheld adjudication" and
Copy

The Florida Bar v. Jacqueline Marie Kinsella, 260 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. 2018).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law." § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). The dissenting opinion
Copy

Swain v. State, 553 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 152149

...upreme Court. See State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla. 1989). *1333 Nevertheless, we reject appellant's contention that he is entitled to credit the time spent in community control supervision against his new sentence. Community control is defined in section 948.001(1), Florida Statutes (1987), as — a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted caseloads....
Copy

Williams v. State, 566 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 115528

again to engage in a criminal course of conduct. § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). The first reason, therefore
Copy

Johnson v. State, 511 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2080

probation. See State v. Mestas, infra. See also § 948.01(5), Fla. Stat. (1985).
Copy

Freeman v. State, 382 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

288 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1974). We find nothing in Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1979) which authorizes a
Copy

State v. Griffith, 331 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

jail split-sentence procedure described in Section 948.01 (4), Florida Statutes. In the instant case
Copy

Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 105445

affirmance was based on the state's argument that section 948.01(3)(a), Florida Statutes, authorized suspension
Copy

State v. Scriber, 991 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4224287

sentence for any violation of this section. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2007), generally allows
Copy

Stranigan v. State, 457 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...The trial judge denied the defendant's motion but modified the original sentence to two years' community control followed by one year of probation. This appeal followed. We agree with the defendant that community control is a more severe sanction than probation. Section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1983), defines community control and probation as follows: (1) "Community control" means a form of intensive, supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted caseloads....
Copy

Buswell v. State, 855 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22238999

Jones v. State, 813 So.2d 22, 25 (Fla.2002) ("Section 948.01(13) [providing for drug offender probation]
Copy

Metchik v. State, 286 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

probation for eighteen months. See Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A.; Hutchins v. State, Fla.App. 3rd 1973
Copy

Brown v. State, 460 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

years or less. (emphasis added) In addition, section 948.01(4) was amended by chapter 83-131 and renumbered
Copy

Brown v. State, 358 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

following wording: "Notwithstanding the provisions of § 948.01, adjudication of guilt or IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE
Copy

Butler v. State, 543 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 52147

...Under the applicable rule points shall be added whenever the defendant, at the time of the offense before the court for sentencing, was on community control. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). The rule does not distinguish between the adult sanction known as community control, as defined in section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1987), and community control programs applicable to juveniles....
Copy

Chupka v. State, 775 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 571387

So.2d 161, 164 (Fla.1988) (emphasis added). Section 948.01(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that
Copy

United States v. Bobby Jenkins, 822 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8652, 2016 WL 2754018

adjudication was not withheld pursuant to section 948.01, Florida Statutes, as it was in Jenkins’ case
Copy

Hankey v. State, 529 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 66085

law for the commission of a criminal offense. Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes, provides for probation
Copy

Cigelski v. State, 453 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

dispositions in this case were expressly pursuant to § 948.01(3) which provides in part that the trial court
Copy

Jones v. State, 296 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

sentence stayed and withheld (as permitted by § 948.01(4) Fla. Stat., F.S.A.), upon revocation of the
Copy

Morgan v. State, 142 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

the character and background of an accused. Section 948.01(2) indicates that when requested by the court
Copy

State v. Sylvio, 846 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21347195

probation provided that the requirements of section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes, are met")(emphasis added);
Copy

Easton v. State, 472 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1836

is unauthorized by the applicable statute, section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1983),[1] which provides
Copy

Chaney v. State, 452 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

sentenced him to a split sentence pursuant to Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes. The sentence imposed
Copy

Mitchell v. State, 463 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 270

...rs with restricted caseloads, and, further, defined as an individualized program in which the freedom of an offender is restricted within the community, home, or noninstitutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced. Section 948.001(1), Florida Statutes (1983)....
Copy

Harris v. State, 288 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

find that the sentence is illegal. See Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A. See also Williams v. State, Fla.App
Copy

State v. Beardsley, 464 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 310

except Section 948.05, already discussed, and Section 948.01 which latter section delineates when a court
Copy

Waters v. State, 290 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

sentences is not more than one year." F.S. Section 948.01(4), F.S.A., provides: "Whenever punishment
Copy

Johnson v. State, 557 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 15385

Ch. 89-526, §§ 6, 8, 52, Laws of Florida. [1] § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1981). [2] Also included as violations
Copy

State v. Green, 667 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459

again to engage in a criminal course of conduct." § 948.01(2), Fla.Stat. (1993). Thus, obedience to the law
Copy

State v. Barfield, 995 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 5100547

the prior felony or the prior withholding. Section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (2008), provides that
Copy

Simmons v. State, 305 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

contends his probation was revoked contrary to Section 948.01(4), F.S. and is therefore a nullity. Careful
Copy

Proffitt v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n, 658 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8202, 1995 WL 457071

and the defendant placed on probation under section 948.01(3) of the Florida Statutes. Under those circumstances
Copy

Horner v. State, 597 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 81074

563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We recognize that section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1989), requires a period
Copy

Phillips v. State, 455 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

Salvation Army or some other public or private entity. § 948.01(5), Fla. Stat. (1981). This sentencing vagary
Copy

Mills v. State, 623 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 341116

to two years community control in each case. Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990). There is
Copy

Harris v. State, 879 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 731699

...e probation while confined under the Ryce Act to the custody of the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS). [1] *1236 Appellant's sentence provided that he would be placed on probation "under supervision of the Department of Corrections." Section 948.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), defines probation as "a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s....
Copy

Durham v. State, 304 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

pointed out that the authority granted by Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), 24 F.S.A., to add a period of probation to
Copy

State v. Manos, 983 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 1958917

obligated to impose some form of probation. See § 948.01, Fla. Stat. (2007); and State v. Sylvio, 846 So
Copy

Straughan v. State, 636 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 169963

"sentence." This conclusion is supported by section 948.01(2) which distinguishes between probation and
Copy

Bolyea v. State, 508 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1355

placed on probation... ." (Emphasis added.) But see § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1985) (when court places defendant
Copy

United States v. Robert Grinkiewicz, 873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6654, 1989 WL 42392

guilt be withheld pursuant to Florida Statutes § 948.01(3). Defendant argues that: (1) the withholding
Copy

State v. Glover, 634 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 94308

hearings. However, in light of the constraints of section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1993), we must remand
Copy

Carr v. State, 528 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 54429

and the defendant placed on probation under section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes. The statute clearly recognizes
Copy

Ringling v. State, 678 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 416120

placing him on drug offender probation. Under section 948.01(13), Florida Statutes (1993), a defendant who
Copy

Hults v. State, 307 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

sentence was in violation of Florida Statutes, Section 948.01(4), effective July 1, 1974, Laws of Florida
Copy

Welborn v. State, 687 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 12934

pronounced and should be stricken, and that section 948.01(13)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), establishing
Copy

Wright v. State, 342 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

imprisonment and part probation) is pursuant to § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. 1975, which states as follows:
Copy

State v. McKendry, 614 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 36289

sentencing, McKendry's counsel maintained that section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1989), concerning the trial
Copy

State v. Robertson, 614 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 36288

PRECLUDE THE IMPOSITION OF COMMUNITY CONTROL UNDER SECTION 948.01, WHERE THE GUIDELINES SCORESHEET PERMITS ANY
Copy

Williams v. State, 556 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 11133

incarceration followed by a period of probation, section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1987), the combined periods
Copy

State v. Del Castillo, 890 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2955012

950, 951. Specifically, the Court referred to section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes, which provides that when
Copy

DeLeon v. State, 536 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 133893

control may be imposed only for a felony offense. § 948.01(4), (8), Fla. Stat. (1985). Accordingly, the trial
Copy

Beals v. State, 14 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10723, 2009 WL 2382385

...e to the facts of this case. "Drug offender probation" is defined as "a form of intensive supervision which emphasizes treatment of drug offenders in accordance with individualized treatment plans administered by officers with restricted caseloads." § 948.001(4), Fla....
Copy

Woods v. State, 214 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1438510, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665

alternative non-incarcerative forms of penance. See § 948.001(9), Fla. Stat. (2016) (" 'Probation' means a form
Copy

Reynolds v. State, 293 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

probation, was clearly in violation of Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A.[1] The state in this case, however
Copy

State v. Coleman, 44 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14478, 2010 WL 3766763

...he very definition of sex offender probation. We agree. “Probation” is defined as “a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers[ 1 ] and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03.” § 948.001(8), Fla....
...upervision, with or without electronic monitoring, which emphasizes treatment and supervision of a sex offender in accordance with an individualized treatment plan administered by an officer who has a restricted caseload and specialized training.” § 948.001(13), Fla....
...ffender probation. We thus reverse the order appealed. Reversed and Remanded. STEVENSON, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. . Chapter 948 provides for "administrative probation,” which does contemplate "nonre-porting'’ status for a probationer. § 948.001(1), Fla....
...ation of section 800.04. See § 948.013(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . The language of the relevant provisions of chapter 948 addressed in this opinion were identical at the time of the commission of the defendant’s crimes in late 1998/early 1999. See §§ 948.001(1), (5), (10), Fla....
Copy

State v. Crews, 884 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2387080

DCA 1997).[2] Finally, Mr. Crews argues that section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2002), authorized the trial
Copy

Elbert v. State, 20 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15522, 2009 WL 3270834

So.2d 492, 493-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see also § 948.01(6), Fla. Stat. (1991) (subsequently renumbered
Copy

State v. Nazario, 100 So. 3d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19730, 2012 WL 5500440

...“Probation is a creature of statute; thus, in imposing a probationary sentence, courts are limited to the authority given them by the relevant statutes.” State v. Coleman, 44 So.3d 1198, 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (citation and internal quotations omitted). Section 948.001(1), Florida Statutes (2011), defines “administrative probation” as “a form of noncontact supervision in which an offender who presents a low risk of harm to the community may, upon satisfactory completion of half the term, of pr...
...These conditions may include among them the following, that the probationer ... shall: (a) Report to the probation and parole supervisors as directed. We disagree with the defendant. The circuit court’s order immediately placing the defendant on administrative probation effectively negated: (1) section 948.001(1)’s requirement that the offender satisfactorily complete half the term of probation before being considered for administrative probation; and (2) the Department of Corrections’ procedures for transferring an offender to administrative probation as established under section 948.013(1)....
Copy

York v. State, 599 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 92449

control on those misdemeanor charges. Pursuant to section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes, community control may
Copy

Senger v. State, 200 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8060, 2016 WL 3030829

State, 541 So.2d 1140, 1141 (Fla.1989) (quoting § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1985)). Senger acknowledges that
Copy

State v. Richard, 197 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3557, 2016 WL 889172

appealed'this as an illegal sentence, contending section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (-1983), mandates reporting
Copy

Michael John Triatik v. State of Florida, 267 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

and the welfare of society” appeared to require. § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (allowing a court to withhold sentencing
Copy

Calvin v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (N.D. Fla. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2016 WL 1122884, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36121

...with restricted caseloads. Community control is an individualized program in which the freedom of an offender is restricted within the community, home, ornoninsti-tutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced.” Id. § 948.001(3) (emphasis added)....
Copy

State v. Henderson, 108 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1007312, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4198

statute allows for alternative sentencing under section 948.01 Florida Statutes. She points out that other
Copy

Heuring v. State, 539 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 19561

sentence as that imposed at bar is authorized by section 948.01(8). Accordingly, we certify the following question
Copy

McKee v. State, 528 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 57433

split sentence as authorized and described in section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes.[1] The *419 underlying
Copy

Justin Randolph Demott v. State of Florida, 194 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 304, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1317, 2016 WL 3444016

...the special condition at issue in Demott. -3- Probation, Generally The Florida Statutes governing probation are set forth in chapter 948, entitled “Probation and Community Control.” Section 948.001(8), Florida Statutes (2015), defines probation as “a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s....
Copy

DPB v. State, 877 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1393381

again to engage in a criminal course of conduct." § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). Thus, obedience to the
Copy

State v. Messina, 13 So. 3d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 2009 WL 1606028

948.01" if a prison sentence is not imposed. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that "the
Copy

Robinson v. State, 256 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

3.790 is an adaptation of those portions of F.S. 948.01(1), (2) and (3) that pertain to the procedural
Copy

Joseph Peter Clarke v. United States, 184 So. 3d 1107 (Fla. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 41, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 277, 2016 WL 533898

adjudication was not withheld pursuant to section 948.01, Florida Statutes, as it was in Jenkins’ case
Copy

Timothy Turner v. State of Florida, 261 So. 3d 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...Turner must recognize, Norvil and all of the other cases upon which he relies involved the trial court's improper sentencing considerations following a trial or a guilty plea on the main offense; they did not implicate a controlee's conduct during a term of "intensive, supervised custody." See § 948.001(2), Fla....
Copy

Brod v. State, 418 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

sentences. First, the legislature by enacting Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979) appears to have
Copy

Joel Canchola v. State of Florida, 255 So. 3d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

a defendant's probationary sentence. See § 948.01(1) ("Any state court having original jurisdiction
Copy

State v. Blackburn, 965 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2481016

shall not be suspended, deferred, or withheld. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2005), is the statute that
Copy

Walker v. State, 604 So. 2d 913 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426, 1992 WL 217177

release of the defendant from incarceration.” § 948.-01(8), Fla.Stat. (1987); Horner v. State, 597 So
Copy

State v. Jones, 772 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12299, 2000 WL 1395927

years’ drug offender probation pursuant to section 948.01(13), Florida *41Statutes (Supp.1998), without
Copy

Catron v. State, 885 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14100, 2004 WL 2112777

State, 779 So.2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see also § 948.01, Fla. Stat. (2002). AFFIRMED. SAWAYA, C.J., and
Copy

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Crim. Procedure 3.790 (Fla. 2022).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the enactment of recent legislation amending section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2021) (When court may place
Copy

Soard v. State, 531 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2182, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4144, 1988 WL 96455

I is a true split sentence as described in section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes. Not only does the 15
Copy

State v. Stankovitch, 456 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2037, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15053

provides: Notwithstanding the provisions of section 948.01, no court shall suspend, defer, or withhold
Copy

Wilcox v. State, 349 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16596

pronounced prior to the July 1, 1974, amendment of Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes.4 In arguing to this court
Copy

King v. State, 990 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4265182

the defendant is released from incarceration. § 948.01(6), Fla. Stat. (2001) ("The period of probation
Copy

Craft v. State, 300 So. 2d 307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8696

prison to be followed by a period of probation. Section 948.01 F.S.;1 RCrP 3.790. In the case sub judice,
Copy

Wilcher v. State, 388 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17182

Procedure. The state contends, and we agree, that section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979), specifically authorizes
Copy

Hicks v. State, 362 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

incarceration followed by a period of probation. See Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1977); State v. Jones
Copy

Billy Joe Fowler v. State of Florida, 225 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 4018419, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 13044

DCA 2000), Furthermore, under the terms of section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (2014), the trial court
Copy

Kelvin Leon Jones v. Governor of Florida (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law.” Id. § 948.01(2). But even felony defendants who have their
Copy

Kelvin Leon Jones v. Governor of Florida (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law.” Id. § 948.01(2). But even felony defendants who have their
Copy

Fisher v. State, 493 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1945, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626

illegal sentence because it is in violation of section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1983), under the rationale
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1990).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

organization agreeing to supervise him or her. Section 948.01(1), F.S., as amended by s. 7, Ch. 90-337, Laws
Copy

Flynn v. State, 413 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21446

between true split sentences imposed pursuant to § 948.01(4), Fla.Stat. and incarceration as a condition
Copy

State of Florida v. Roody Dhaiti (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

defendant. Our supreme court has held that section 948.01(13) 3 is an alternative sentencing scheme independent
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1983).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

of ordering imprisonment or incarceration. Section 948.01(4), F.S., as amended by s 13, Ch. 83-131, provides
Copy

State v. Carder, 625 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 424199

the terms and conditions of your probation. (Section 948.01(13) Florida Statutes).[1] *967 The issue is
Copy

Jane Doe v. Richard L. Swearingen (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...Laws Ch. 2018-105, § 2, codified at Fla. Stat. § 943.0435(9)(b) (2018). Community control is “intensive, super- vised custody in the community” that includes a term of electronic monitoring ranging from six months to two years. Id.; see Fla. Stat. § 948.001(3), (13). B. The plaintiffs alleged the following facts in their second amended complaint, which we accept as true....
Copy

Amendment to Florida Rule of Crim. Procedure 3.850, 779 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 2000).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 906, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2271, 2000 WL 1535283

withheld and have been placed on probation. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1999).1 Therefore, the Court approves
Copy

Weaver v. State, 587 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10287, 1991 WL 206843

461 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). However, section 948.01(5) of the Florida Statutes (1989) states, in
Copy

Bush v. State, 338 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15620

authority to sentence him to a split sentence under Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes, as amended effective
Copy

Williams v. State, 681 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10459, 1996 WL 582582

adjudication of guilt at sentencing, as does section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1995). If adjudication
Copy

Rodriguez v. State, 588 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11047, 1991 WL 225490

Howland v. State, 420 So.2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); § 948.01, Fla.Stat. (1989). Affirmed.
Copy

O'Brien v. State, 532 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2445, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 1988 WL 115229

involves neither a “true split sentence” under section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes, nor a “probationary split
Copy

McMillan v. State, 701 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13301, 1997 WL 731794

accepted his initial plea was precluded, under section 948.01(10), Florida Statutes (1991), from placing
Copy

McGraw v. State, 498 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1986).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 609, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2870

BARK-ETT, JJ., concur. We further note that section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes, has been amended to delete
Copy

Winkle v. State, 422 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21704

because the decision is based upon a reading of section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1981).4 This statute
Copy

Lewis v. State, 532 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2428, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4791, 1988 WL 114602

community control is excessive by one year. See § 948.01(5), Fla.Stat. (1985). The net result is that the
Copy

Berzin v. State, 215 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4884

sentence was withheld, pursuant to the authority of § 948.01 (3), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We reverse. The evidence
Copy

State v. Williams, 759 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14719, 1998 WL 796626

...ped by the Department of Corrections, and that the probation is not proper under section 948.034(2)(b) because the program to which appellee was ordered, Turning Point Bridge, is not a designated “community drug punishment center,” as defined by section 948.001(6), Florida Statutes (1997)....
Copy

Vicaria v. State, 743 So. 2d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15153, 1999 WL 1038443

withhold adjudication of guilty, pursuant to section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1997), unless a withholding
Copy

Goss v. State, 608 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643, 1992 WL 335896

sentence the court could have imposed was two years. § 948.01(4), Fla.Stat. (1991); Sipp v. State, 604 So.2d
Copy

Amendments to Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure 3.670 & 3.700(b), 760 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1999).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1988, 1999 WL 1029286

added to permit the judge to operate under section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes. The Florida law forming
Copy

Carlin v. State, 626 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11407, 1993 WL 461934

control can only be imposed for felony offenses. Section 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1991); See Thompson v. State
Copy

Hiers v. State, 440 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24174

belief that he is no longer on probation.1 Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1981), provides in relevant
Copy

Sanders v. State, 268 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037

confinement as a condition of probation. F.S. § 948.01(4) F.S.A. provides that the Court may impose a
Copy

Yourn v. State, 579 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4337, 1991 WL 74815

...Although trial courts have broad discretion in fashioning the terms and conditions of probation, we agree with the Fifth District that this type of house arrest can only be imposed as a condition of community control. Coleman v. State, 564 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See §§ 948.001, 948.-03(2)(b), Fla.Stat....
Copy

Williams v. State, 332 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14341

. prior to July 1, 1974, the provisions of Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1973), granted specific
Copy

Straughan v. State, 636 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4323

“sentence.” This conclusion is supported by section 948.01(2) which distinguishes between probation and
Copy

Bozeman v. State, 598 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1992 WL 93573

91-225, which added subsections 11 and 12 to section 948.01, was not approved until May 29, 1991. That
Copy

Adkins v. State, 330 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15093

the trial court was not authorized under Florida Statute 948.01(4) to place the appellant on probation
Copy

State of Florida v. Edward Fiddemon (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

violated section 948.012(1)’s predecessor, section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1989). Id. Specifically
Copy

Morales v. State, 901 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8018, 2005 WL 1249224

suspended portion of incarceration”); see also § 948.01(11), Fla. Stat. (1997). After the trial court
Copy

Ramon D. Senger v. State, 200 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

State, 541 So. 2d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 1989) (quoting § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1985)). Senger acknowledges that
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1996).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

on the date of the offense. Question Three Section 948.01, Florida Statutes, provides that a court having
Copy

Hardy v. State, 370 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14533

Appellant was placed on unsupervised probation. Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that a
Copy

Reino v. State, 295 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1974).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

1973, 280 So.2d 518, in which it was held that § 948.01(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. did not make provision for
Copy

Falzone v. State, 527 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1175, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1928, 1988 WL 45884

and 10 years probation. He contends that (a) section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1985), prohibits the
Copy

Lynn v. State, 398 So. 2d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19751

State, 302 So.2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1979), clearly states
Copy

McGehee v. State, 688 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1810, 1997 WL 90782

a sentence of community control is two years. § 948.01(4), Fla.Stat., (1995). Thus, McGehee is entitled
Copy

Hollingsworth v. State, 394 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18857

sentencing is authorized by statute in Florida.1 § 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979); State v. Holmes,
Copy

Cronce v. State, 411 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

did not “apply to ‘split’ sentences under Section 948.01(4) such as the one imposed on [Cronce].” We
Copy

Medina v. State, 411 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19554

given a true split sentence as authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1981), committing him
Copy

Bracey v. State, 356 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

shall be provided for in the sentence.” Under Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1975), the trial court
Copy

Vihinen v. State, 368 So. 2d 626 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14255

contained in Chapter 948, Florida Statutes (1977). Section 948.01(4) provides: “Whenever punishment by imprisonment
Copy

Hatton v. State, 689 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2326, 1997 WL 106967

The Florida Supreme Court has also held that section 948.01(6), Florida Statutes (1995), requires the inearcerative
Copy

Guest v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Med. Examiners, 429 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18828

time that he shall be sentenced to serve. . Section 948.01(1) provides: (1) Any court of the state having
Copy

Lloyd v. State, 650 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1973, 1995 WL 79885

misdemeanor, and remand for resentencing. See § 948.01, Fla. Stat. (1998); Carlin v. State, 626 So.2d
Copy

Michael Levandoski v. State of Florida, 245 So. 3d 643 (Fla. 2018).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Levandoski did not file a rule 3.800(b) motion or raise a due process claim on direct appeal. This claim was first raised in a postconviction motion to strike which was ultimately treated as a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Levandoski , 217 So.3d at 218 . Section 948.001(13), Florida Statutes (2010), defines "sex offender probation" as a form of intensive supervision, with or without electronic monitoring, which emphasizes treatment and supervision of a sex offender in accordance with an individualize...
Copy

State v. Moss, 758 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6874, 2000 WL 726523

affirm appellee’s downward sentence pursuant to section 948.01(13), Florida Statutes (1997). However, we remand
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

sentences entered pursuant to s.948.01(4), F. S. Section 948.01(4) authorizes the imposition of a sentence
Copy

State v. Luxenburg, 13 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7441, 2009 WL 1563442

...Luxenburg on a seven-day term of “court-supervised” probation, which was to terminate once Mr. Luxen-burg paid his court costs. Probation is a sanction authorized upon a court’s entry of an adjudication of guilt or a withhold of adjudication. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). Section 948.001(5) defines probation as “a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s....
Copy

Alleman v. State, 279 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011

splitting of sentence is permissible under Fla.Stat., § 948.01(4), F.S.A.
Copy

Bland v. State, 507 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1407, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8576

gain time or for any other reason. Pursuant to section 948.01, Florida Statutes, the duration of community
Copy

Lloyd v. State, 528 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2778, 1988 WL 66080

classic true “split sentence”2 authorized by section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes,3 with a “prescribed”
Copy

State v. Robinson, 138 So. 3d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 2500638, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8387

completion of any specified period of such sentence”); § 948.01(5), Fla. Stat. (2011) (“The imposition of sentence
Copy

Alexander v. State, 399 So. 2d 424 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20085

of twelve years which was split, pursuant to section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979), into a two-year
Copy

State v. Dull, 249 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6448

since the trial court had authority under F.S. Section 948.01, F.S.A., to have withheld an adjudication of
Copy

Antoine Robinson v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

imposition of probation or community control. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2011) (if a court withholds adjudication
Copy

Catherine Capozzi v. the State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

placed on ‘drug offender’ probation, pursuant to section 948.01(13)(a).”). 9 The Circuit Court of the Eleventh
Copy

Nealy v. State, 141 So. 3d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9579, 2014 WL 2875010

time of the alleged violation in May 2012. See § 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (2008) (stating that community
Copy

Cline v. State, 399 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20374

split sentence alternative provided for in section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes, prohibits incarceration
Copy

Lauxman v. State, 402 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20373

its construction of split sentencing under section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes, and incarceration as
Copy

D.P.B. v. State, 877 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8741

again to engage in a criminal course of conduct.” § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). Thus, obedience to the
Copy

Bebout v. State, 904 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9690, 2005 WL 1458638

credit for the time served on community control. Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (2004) provides for a
Copy

Gulker v. State, 528 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1420, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2563, 1988 WL 61875

sentence as described in and authorized by section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes. As contemplated by that
Copy

Islaam v. State of Florida (Fla. 2d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of [section] 948.01, [Florida Statutes (2020),] with respect
Copy

Cadet v. State, 274 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...nce should be reversed, and he should be allowed to withdraw his original 2008 plea. We disagree. Administrative probation is non-reporting probation. By law, this is a type of probation that can only be imposed by the Department of Corrections. See § 948.001, Fla....
Copy

Cadet v. State, 274 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...nce should be reversed, and he should be allowed to withdraw his original 2008 plea. We disagree. Administrative probation is non-reporting probation. By law, this is a type of probation that can only be imposed by the Department of Corrections. See § 948.001, Fla....
Copy

Smith v. State, 399 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20139

imposed as part of a split sentence pursuant to section 948.-01(4), Florida Statutes (1979) is invalid. Accordingly
Copy

Jensen v. State, 453 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13844

withheld when a defendant is placed on probation. See § 948.01(3), Fla.Stat. (1983). Consequently, Florida’s
Copy

Williams v. State, 452 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13860

withheld when a defendant is placed on probation. See § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1983). Consequently, Florida’s
Copy

Harden v. State, 452 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13861

withheld when a defendant is placed on probation. See § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1983). Consequently, Florida’s
Copy

Battie v. State, 452 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13854

withheld when a defendant is placed on probation. See § 948.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1983). Consequently, Florida’s
Copy

Tavaris Jamal Evans v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

rather than the DJJ, that provides the supervision. § 948.01(1)(a), (3), Fla. Stat. (2018); see also § 948
Copy

State v. Morrow, 700 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8621, 1997 WL 423414

wife, the victim of the aggravated battery. Section 948.01(7), Florida Statutes, provides that “[i]n no
Copy

Danielle Elizabeth Hitchman v. The State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

regardless of whether adjudication is withheld, § 948.01(1), Fla. Stat., and the sentencing court is permitted
Copy

State v. Millett, 658 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7999, 1995 WL 443961

proceedings. In McKendry, the supreme court held that section 948.01, Florida Statues (1989), which grants trial
Copy

Dorfman v. State, 351 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 1977).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3980

split sentence since, at the time of the crime, Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1971), did not allow
Copy

Lopez v. State, 509 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1762, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9478

for placing Lopez on probation is found in Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1983), which gives the
Copy

State v. Bryant S. Rivera, 249 So. 3d 1314 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

the court does not impose a prison sentence. Section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes, further provides that
Copy

Brittany Nichole Rossi v. State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...Roberts v. Cochran, 140 So. 2d 597, 599 (Fla. 1962). After hearing from several witnesses and assessing their credibility, the trial court found that Appellant Brittany Nichole Rossi willfully violated her community control. 2 See generally § 948.001(3), Fla....
Copy

Childers v. Dep't of Env't Prot., 696 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8173, 1997 WL 402381

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.670 and section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1995). In a certified
Copy

Washington v. State, 564 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5111

probation in regard to one of the sentences. See § 948.01(8), Fla.Stat. (1987). Our conclusion is based
Copy

Meyers v. State, 400 So. 2d 195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20438

effectively repealed split sentences under section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes, it should be noted that
Copy

McNally v. State, 685 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 74, 1997 WL 5160

argument regarding the constitutionality of section 948.01(13)(a), Florida Statutes. First, appellee concedes
Copy

Yates v. State, 392 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18756

As charged in the information, pursuant to section 948.01(6), Yates had been committed to the Department
Copy

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Crim. Procedure 3.670 (Fla. 2024).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

proposed by the Committee. The amendments mirror section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes, to avoid confusion about
Copy

State v. Williams, 667 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1996).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 42, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 29

exceed the term provided by general law.”). Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1993), provides, in relevant
Copy

Charatz v. State, 555 So. 2d 1303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 441, 1990 WL 4101

subsection notwithstanding the provisions of section 948.01. Therefore, because of Sanchez, the trial court’s
Copy

Bunn v. State, 687 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 200, 1997 WL 20717

appellant challenges the constitutionality of section 948.01(13)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). Appellant
Copy

Williams v. State, 392 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20454

not apply to a split sentence entered under Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (Supp.1974). He contends
Copy

Chambers v. State, 685 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 49, 1997 WL 1576

appellant. Specifically, appellant contends that section 948.01(13)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), is unconstitutional
Copy

Johnson v. State, 242 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5510

CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur. . F.S. § 948.01, F.S.A. . Morgan v. State (Fla.App.1962), 142
Copy

Ray v. State, 556 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 709, 1990 WL 7637

neither section 921.187, Florida Statutes, nor section 948.01 expressly prohibit a sentence of community
Copy

Wildie v. State, 326 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14274

and DOWNEY, JJ., concur. . Amending Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4) (1973).
Copy

Welch v. State, 519 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 382, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 419, 1988 WL 7061

control. The appellant argues that although section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1985), authorizes a split
Copy

Lennard v. State, 308 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14544

is a “nullity and is void”. The language of F.S. 948.-01(4) makes it clear that “ . . . in order to impose
Copy

Phillips v. State, 394 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19526

it was not a suspended sentence pursuant to Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1975), since it was not
Copy

Lippman v. State, 595 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1746, 1992 WL 32799

...We conclude that the modification order did not violate the double jeopardy clause. To begin with, probation is “a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03.” § 948.001(2), Fla....
Copy

Doss v. Crosby, 357 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (N.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6584, 2005 WL 170705

Id., quoting (with added emphasis) Fla. Stat. § 948.01(6). At the time of Petitioner Doss's offense and
Copy

Woodruff v. State, 309 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14335

This was contrary to the authority granted by § 948.01(4) F. S. In Williams v. State, Fla.App.3rd 1973
Copy

Beagling v. State, 667 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366, 1996 WL 64813

challenged. .§ 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). . § 948.01(7), Fla.Stat. (1989). . In so ruling we reject
Copy

Spear v. State, 632 So. 2d 201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 977, 1994 WL 43403

commenced. The state relies on language in section 948.01(6), Florida Statutes, which relates to parole
Copy

Harrell v. State, 308 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

two years probation was contrary to Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4) (1973). Consequently, the cause is hereby remanded
Copy

State v. Simmons, 687 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 1997).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 19, 1997 WL 57204

community control is an authorized sanction under section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1993).5 Additionally
Copy

State v. Burgos, 613 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1642, 1993 WL 30598

appellee’s sentence was improper pursuant to section 948.01(10), Florida Statutes (1991), which provides:
Copy

Gasiorowski v. State, 610 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12713, 1992 WL 361301

community control. The state concedes that section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1986), limits the
Copy

McNulty v. State, 339 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16024

defendant placed on probation pursuant to Florida Statute 948.01(1) is not subject to the pro*1156bation
Copy

Ard v. State, 91 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1956).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

appellant placed on probation for seven years. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A. *167Evidently
Copy

Gazda v. State, 244 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6581

trial courts by the probation code, F.S.1969, section 948.01, et seq., F.S.A., there are occasions when
Copy

Steiner v. State, 591 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 279434

v. Payne, 404 So.2d 1055, 1057-58 (Fla.1981); § 948.01(3), Fla.Stat. (1989). Further, as the First District
Copy

Poulsen v. State, 610 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 379836

Crawford v. State, 567 So.2d 428 (Fla. 1990); § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1991). AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED
Copy

Moore v. State, 553 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2922, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7072, 1989 WL 152163

not limited to the guideline sentence. See section 948.01(1), Florida Statutes (1988); Addison v. State
Copy

Noles v. State, 407 So. 2d 370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21915

under a true split sentence as authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979), cannot equal or
Copy

Noyola v. State, 407 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21907

alternative to the imposition of sentences. See § 948.01(3), (4), Fla. Stat. (1979); Villery v. Florida
Copy

King v. State, 648 So. 2d 183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 13196

(Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (Cowart, J., dissenting). Section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (1993) still provides
Copy

Suggs v. State, 304 So. 2d 463 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7512

was void as contrary to Florida Statutes, Section 948.-01. We do not agree and hold that the case of
Copy

State v. Jene-Charles, 253 So. 3d 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

in its discretion, withholds adjudication, section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (2016), provides that
Copy

Haynes v. State, 962 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2254585

13(2)(a) or (6)(a), Florida Statutes (2001); and section 948.01(13), Florida Statutes (2001), does not authorize
Copy

Reatz v. State, 677 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8244, 1996 WL 441347

immediately on his release from incarceration. § 948.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). There is nothing in the record
Copy

Stamper v. State, 528 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1839, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, 1988 WL 79821

split sentence as defined and authorized in section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes, and as is exempted by
Copy

Jackson v. State, 529 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1986, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3755, 1988 WL 87083

case is a true split sentence as described in section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes. Not only does the 15
Copy

Moreno v. State, 532 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1984, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3757, 1988 WL 86868

This is a true split sentence as described in section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes, and the issue is whether
Copy

Coleman v. State, 564 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5685, 1990 WL 108832

prior approval in writing from your officer. Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (1988) provides that a
Copy

Wilson v. State, 853 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12882, 2003 WL 22110387

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (2000). PETERSON, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur
Copy

Harris v. State, 698 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9305, 1997 WL 465202

...State, 674 So.2d 123 (Fla.1996). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. DAUKSCH, COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . We do, however, lake this opportunity to clarify the issue of the existence, vel non of statutory authority for the cost provision in condition 12. Section 948.001(1), Florida Statutes (1995) dealing with probation and community control does provide that the Department of Corrections "is authorized to collect an initial processing fee of up to $50.00 for each probationer reduced to administrative probation....
Copy

Alexander v. State, 602 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9067, 1992 WL 191279

...Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We find merit in appellant’s contentions. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to vacate that portion of appellant’s five-year term of community control which exceeds two years. See § 948.001, Fla.Stat....
Copy

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure, 900 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 2005).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 244, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 615, 2005 WL 774834

added to permit' the judge to operate under section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes. The Florida law forming
Copy

State v. Williams, 652 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1995 WL 150255

we remand for sentencing within the guidelines. § 948.01(11), Fla.Stat. (1991); Bell v. State, 651 So.2d
Copy

Fisher v. State, 559 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2242, 1990 WL 37484

indefinite and uncertain, is not authorized by Section 948.01, Florida Stat*363utes (1987). We agree and
Copy

Crawford v. State, 558 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2341, 1990 WL 39888

question as one of great public importance: Does Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988) limit the
Copy

Varnom v. State, 198 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4734

the trial judge pursuant to the provisions of Section 948.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., withheld an adjudication
Copy

Cooper v. State, 672 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4376

community control available for any one offense. § 948.01(5), Fla.Stat. (1989).' Because the total term
Copy

Jesse Cleveland Harrell v. State of Florida, 162 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5849

...chapter 948, Florida Statutes, under which a defendant placed on probation is subject to “supervision” and a defendant placed on community control is subject to “intensive, supervised custody” by a Department of Corrections probation officer. See § 948.001(2), (5), Fla. Stat....
Copy

Carroll v. State, 523 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 985, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1575, 1988 WL 34667

a defendant on probation, as authorized by section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes, the probationer is entitled
Copy

Harden v. State, 293 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7650

years probation, is not authorized by Fla. Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A.; and therefore, the sentence for appellant
Copy

Roberts v. State, 400 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19253

principles of that opinion to split sentences under section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979). The order entered
Copy

State v. Stone, 617 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4143, 1993 WL 113315

sentencing Stone to community control pursuant to section 948.01(10), Florida Statutes (1991). State v. Burgos
Copy

Bowker v. State, 466 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 931, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13301

means any term that is within the general law. See § 948.01(8), Fla.Stat. (1983); see also Davis. . §§ 810
Copy

Maxwell v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

to the criminal charges filed against him. See § 948.01(1), Fla. Stat. (authorizing probation as an alternative
Copy

Michelle a Hollingsworth v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

defendant is deemed unlikely to reoffend, see section 948.01(2), Florida Statutes (2018), or the trial court

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.