Cases from cite.case.law:

TAYLOR, v. STATE, 227 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 948.20(1), Florida Statutes (2014), sets forth the specific circumstances under which a defendant . . . See § 948.20(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

POWELL, v. STATE, 223 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . there was insufficient evidence that Powell qualified as a “chronic substance abuser” under section 948.20 . . . 2007) ("[Battery on a law enforcement officer] is not a forcible felony under section 776.08.”); § 948.20 . . .

ROMANS, v. STATE, 221 So. 3d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 948.20(1), Fla. Stat. None of these conditions apply to the instant case. . . .

ORR, v. STATE, 206 So.3d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 948.20(1), Florida Statutes (2014), provides when a trial court may place a defendant on drug . . . Moreover, Orr’s offense does not constitute a nonviolent felony as that term is defined in section 948.20 . . . The State contends that the language of section 948.20(1) applies only when the trial court imposes drug . . . This argument is not supported by Jones or the language in section 948.20, which authorizes the trial . . . special condition of ordinary probation; (2) as a condition of drug offender probation under section 948.20 . . .

PAIGE, v. STATE, 196 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 948.20 Fla. Stat. (2014); Green v. State, 178 So.3d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). . . .

INMON, v. STATE, 190 So. 3d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Appellant’s history of substance abuse, which would qualify him for sentencing pursuant to section 948.20 . . .

GREEN, v. STATE, 178 So. 3d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 948.20(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

C. SUTTON, v. STATE, 128 So. 3d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . offender probation because burglary and grand theft are not among the enumerated offenses under section 948.20 . . . Section 948.20 was amended in 2009. See Ch. 2009-64, § 7, at 583-84, Laws of Fla. . . . Because, section 948.20 specifically includes third-degree felonies under chapter 810 in its definition . . .

STATE v. WINBUSH,, 121 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The drug offender statute reads, in relevant part, as follows: 948.20. . . . into a post adjudicatory treatment-based drug court program if the defendant otherwise qualifies. § 948.20 . . .

IBARRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 736 F.3d 903 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 948.21, 948.03(4), 948.04(2), 948.20 (West, Westlaw through 1996 legislation). . . .

IBARRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 721 F.3d 1157 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 948.21, 948.03(4), 948.04(2), 948.20 (West, Westlaw through 1996 legislation). . . .

McGRILL, v. STATE, 82 So. 3d 130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . (6)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), is not barred from obtaining an alternative sentence under section 948.20 . . . He pled no contest to the charges and filed a motion for an alternative sentence under section 948.20 . . . Prior to its amendment in 2009, section 948.20 made no mention of a defendant’s criminal score sheet: . . . Section 948.20(1), when constructed in the light most favorable to the accused, does not require that . . . requirement from 52 to 60. § 948.20(1), Fla. . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 47 So. 3d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . is not one of the enumerated offenses for which drug offender probation can be imposed under section 948.20 . . .

CARSON, v. STATE, 37 So. 3d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . condition of ordinary probation, as a condition of drug offender probation pursuant to sections 948.034 and 948.20 . . . sentence because he was not convicted of one of the enumerated chapter 893 offenses. §§ 948.034(1), 948.20 . . .

V. ROSS, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 463 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . He then sought the imposition of an alternative sentence pursuant to section 948.20, Florida Statutes . . . Ross’s multiple prior, non-drug felony convictions precluded the imposition of sentence under section 948.20 . . . sentence, this court held that Langdon does not control the imposition of sentence pursuant to section 948.20 . . . trial court’s denial of Ross’s motion for imposition of an alternative sentence pursuant to section 948.20 . . . Effective July 1, 2009, section 948.20 was amended. See Ch. 2009-64, § 7, at 583-84, Laws of Fla. . . .

MORRIS, v. STATE, 26 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Effective July 1, 2009, section 948.20, Fla. . . .

FORTNER, v. STATE, 23 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2006), authorizes drug offender probation for chronic drug abusers . . .

NELSON, v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . accepted the plea, denied appellant’s motion for alternative sentencing under Florida Statutes section 948.20 . . . circuit court’s stated reason that appellant was “not eligible” for alternative sentencing under section 948.20 . . . a defendant with prior non-felony convictions is eligible for alternative sentencing under section 948.20 . . . court may reconsider appellant’s motion for alternative sentencing under the plain language of section 948.20 . . .

NELSON, v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . defendant with prior non-drug felony convictions is eligible for an alternative sentence under section 948.20 . . . During the plea colloquy, the defendant moved for alternative sentencing under section 948.20, Florida . . . placed on drug offender probation are subject to revocation of probation as provided in s. 948.06. § 948.20 . . . Section 893.13 does not prohibit a court from considering an alternative sentence under section 948.20 . . . the circuit court shall reconsider the defendant’s motion for alternative sentencing under section 948.20 . . .

BEALS, v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 948.20, Fla. Stat. (2004) (emphasis added). . . . special condition of ordinary probation; (2) as a condition of drug offender probation under section 948.20 . . .

HORNE, v. STATE, 6 So. 3d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 948.20, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . On the other hand, section 948.20 is plainly titled “Drug offender probation.” . . . pronouncement of “drug offender supervision” was imposition of those terms of probation as set forth in section 948.20 . . . convictions for possession of a controlled substance are eligible for drug offender probation under section 948.20 . . .

BENNER, v. STATE, 974 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . not an offense contained within chapter 893, Florida Statutes, as required by sections 948.034 and 948.20 . . . the drug offender portions of Appellant’s probation were not imposed pursuant to sections 948.034 or 948.20 . . .

C. REDMOND, v. STATE, 970 So. 2d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2005), authorizes drug offender probation for violations of section . . .

LAWSON, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2007)

. . . special condition of ordinary probation; (2) as a condition of drug offender probation under section 948.20 . . . stay and withhold the imposition of sentence and place the defendant on drug offender probation.” § 948.20 . . . This is mirrored in section 948.20, which mandates that the Department of Corrections develop and administer . . . treatment conditions and other treatment approaches necessary to monitor this population may be ordered. § 948.20 . . . This Case In this case, Lawson was placed on drug offender probation pursuant to section 948.20, which . . .

LAWSON, v. STATE, 941 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 948.20(1), Fla. . . .

L. ANDERSON, v. STATE, 941 So. 2d 446 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . probation in connection with count one, sale of cocaine, as such is contrary to Florida Statutes section 948.20 . . .

COLE, v. STATE, 932 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . were not special conditions and were standard conditions under Florida Statutes sections 948.03 and 948.20 . . . Additionally, Florida Statutes section 948.20, formerly Florida Statutes section 948.01(13), addressing . . . Section 948.20(1) provides only that: “Drug offender probation status shall include surveillance and . . .

STATE v. ROPER,, 915 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . This appeal causes us to examine section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2004), concerning the imposition by . . . The trial judge read section 948.20 and the case of Jones v. . . . Section 948.20 reads in pertinent part: If it appears to the court upon a hearing that the defendant . . . violation of section 893.13(l)(a)(l), it appears that the trial court was not authorized to use section 948.20 . . . Section 948.20 does not provide a basis in the present case for sentencing below the minimum calculated . . .

STATE v. CREWS,, 884 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Stat. (2002) (currently § 948.20, Fla. . . .

ADAMS, v. WAL- MART STORES, INC., 151 F.R.D. 610 (S.D. Miss. 1993)

. . . Powell 262 So.2d 645 (Miss.1972), (medical expenses $948.20—inadequate jury award $946.20); Gregory v . . .

SABIN, v. ISRAEL La, 554 F. Supp. 390 (E.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . was tried in Waupaca County for theft of the van and for operating it without the owner’s consent (§§ 948.20 . . .

F. FORD v. UNITED STATES F. HARLOW v. UNITED STATES, 276 F.2d 17 (Ct. Cl. 1960)

. . . Santos Company on July 15, 1947: (a) the claimant had erroneously included in the gross price of $258,-948.20 . . .

ACHILLE F. FORD v. THE UNITED STATES JEANNE F. HARLOW v. THE UNITED STATES, 149 Ct. Cl. 558 (Ct. Cl. 1960)

. . . capital gain was computed by each plaintiff in the income tax return as follows: Gross sales price_$258, 948.20 . . . capital gain was computed by each plaintiff in the income tax return as follows: Gross sales price_$258, 948.20 . . .