Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 948.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 948.03 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 948.03

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 948
PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 948.03
948.03 Terms and conditions of probation.
(1) The court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation. Conditions specified in this section do not require oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing and may be considered standard conditions of probation. These conditions may include among them the following, that the probationer or offender in community control shall:
(a) Report to the probation officer as directed. Such reporting requirements may be fulfilled through remote reporting if approved by the relevant probation officer, the relevant county probation authority or entity, or the Department of Corrections and if the court has not excluded the possibility of remote reporting by the defendant in his or her order of probation. If the Department of Corrections or a county probation authority or entity elects to authorize remote reporting, it must adopt and make available remote probation reporting policies.
(b) Permit the probation officer to visit him or her at his or her home or elsewhere.
(c) Work faithfully at suitable employment insofar as may be possible.
(d) Remain within a specified place.
(e) Live without violating any law. A conviction in a court of law is not necessary for such a violation of law to constitute a violation of probation, community control, or any other form of court-ordered supervision.
(f) Make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by his or her offense in an amount to be determined by the court. The court shall make such reparation or restitution a condition of probation, unless it determines that clear and compelling reasons exist to the contrary. If the court does not order restitution, or orders restitution of only a portion of the damages, as provided in s. 775.089, it shall state on the record in detail the reasons therefor.
(g) Effective July 1, 1994, and applicable for offenses committed on or after that date, make payment of the debt due and owing to a county or municipal detention facility under s. 951.032 for medical care, treatment, hospitalization, or transportation received by the felony probationer while in that detention facility. The court, in determining whether to order such repayment and the amount of the repayment, shall consider the amount of the debt, whether there was any fault of the institution for the medical expenses incurred, the financial resources of the felony probationer, the present and potential future financial needs and earning ability of the probationer, and dependents, and other appropriate factors.
(h) Support his or her legal dependents to the best of his or her ability.
(i) Make payment of the debt due and owing to the state under s. 960.17, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.
(j) Pay any application fee assessed under s. 27.52(1)(b) and attorney’s fees and costs assessed under s. 938.29, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.
(k) Not associate with persons engaged in criminal activities.
(l)1. Submit to random testing as directed by the probation officer or the professional staff of the treatment center where he or she is receiving treatment to determine the presence or use of alcohol or controlled substances.
2. If the offense was a controlled substance violation and the period of probation immediately follows a period of incarceration in the state correctional system, the conditions must include a requirement that the offender submit to random substance abuse testing intermittently throughout the term of supervision, upon the direction of the probation officer.
(m) Be prohibited from possessing, carrying, or owning any:
1. Firearm.
2. Weapon without first procuring the consent of the probation officer.
(n) Be prohibited from using intoxicants to excess or possessing any drugs or narcotics unless prescribed by a physician, an advanced practice registered nurse, or a physician assistant. The probationer or community controllee may not knowingly visit places where intoxicants, drugs, or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed, or used.
(o) Submit to the drawing of blood or other biological specimens as prescribed in ss. 943.325 and 948.014, and reimburse the appropriate agency for the costs of drawing and transmitting the blood or other biological specimens to the Department of Law Enforcement.
(p) Submit to the taking of a digitized photograph by the department as a part of the offender’s records. This photograph may be displayed on the department’s public website while the offender is under court-ordered supervision. However, the department may not display the photograph on the website if the offender is only on pretrial intervention supervision or if the offender’s identity is exempt from disclosure due to an exemption from the requirements of s. 119.07.
(2) The enumeration of specific kinds of terms and conditions does not prevent the court from adding thereto such other or others as it considers proper. However, the sentencing court may only impose a condition of supervision allowing an offender convicted of s. 794.011, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145 to reside in another state if the order stipulates that it is contingent upon the approval of the receiving state interstate compact authority. The court may rescind or modify at any time the terms and conditions theretofore imposed by it upon the probationer. However, if the court withholds adjudication of guilt or imposes a period of incarceration as a condition of probation, the period may not exceed 364 days, and incarceration shall be restricted to either a county facility, or a probation and restitution center under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections.
History.s. 23, ch. 20519, 1941; s. 5, ch. 77-452; s. 1, ch. 81-198; s. 3, ch. 83-75; s. 16, ch. 83-131; s. 192, ch. 83-216; s. 3, ch. 83-256; s. 8, ch. 84-363; s. 15, ch. 85-288; s. 5, ch. 87-211; s. 11, ch. 88-96; ss. 70, 71, ch. 88-122; s. 37, ch. 89-526; s. 10, ch. 90-287; ss. 8, 17, ch. 90-337; s. 11, ch. 91-225; s. 4, ch. 91-280; s. 23, ch. 92-310; s. 10, ch. 93-37; s. 15, ch. 93-227; s. 1, ch. 94-294; s. 1, ch. 95-189; ss. 53, 59, ch. 95-283; s. 1, ch. 96-170; s. 4, ch. 96-232; s. 54, ch. 96-312; s. 6, ch. 96-409; s. 22, ch. 97-78; s. 1877, ch. 97-102; s. 11, ch. 97-107; s. 27, ch. 97-234; s. 44, ch. 97-271; s. 3, ch. 97-308; s. 14, ch. 98-81; s. 15, ch. 98-251; s. 122, ch. 99-3; s. 13, ch. 99-201; s. 3, ch. 2000-246; s. 6, ch. 2001-50; s. 1045, ch. 2002-387; s. 1, ch. 2003-18; s. 1, ch. 2003-63; s. 136, ch. 2003-402; ss. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ch. 2004-373; s. 116, ch. 2006-1; s. 28, ch. 2008-172; s. 18, ch. 2010-64; s. 19, ch. 2016-224; s. 5, ch. 2017-115; s. 86, ch. 2018-106; s. 97, ch. 2018-110; s. 2, ch. 2022-166.

F.S. 948.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 948.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 948.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 948.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 948.03.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES, v. DAVIS, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . §§ 948.03(1), (4)(a), (b) (2016) ("unreasonable risk of harm," "unreasonable risk of great bodily harm . . .

S. OSBORNE, v. STATE, 272 So. 3d 794 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2018), provides that a trial court may rescind or modify the terms . . . defendant agreed to modification, but distinguishing modification under section 948.06 from section 948.03 . . . Because section 948.03(2) does not contain similar requirements, the court properly considered Petitioner's . . .

LIVINGSTONE, DOC v. STATE, 268 So. 3d 252 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . This language tracks the language of section 948.03(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2015). . . . Additionally, although section 948.03(1)(m) only includes firearms and weapons in its prohibition of . . .

STATE v. WALK,, 267 So. 3d 437 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes, generally allows a trial court to rescind or modify the terms and . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- REGULAR- CYCLE REPORT., 265 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 2018)

. . . is replaced with "GENERAL CONDITIONS: [List the general conditions of probation pursuant to section 948.03 . . . Florida Statutes. (13) You shall submit to the taking of a digitized photograph as required by section 948.03 . . . GENERAL CONDITIONS: [List the general conditions of probation pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes . . .

UNITED STATES v. LARRY,, 673 F. App'x 568 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 948.03(2)(b). See State v. . . . Kimberly B., 283 Wis.2d 731, 699 N.W.2d 641, 647 (2005) (recognizing that conviction under 948.03(2)( . . .

LAVENDER, v. STATE, 203 So. 3d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . requirement of maintaining a daily activity log is not statutorily authorized under sections 948.101 and 948.03 . . .

VILLANUEVA, v. STATE, 200 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Because I conclude that the trial court acted within the broad discretion provided by section 948.03, . . . .2d 734 (Fla.1993)—a misreading that unduly limits the discretion afforded to trial judges by section 948.03 . . . The statute provides that “[t]he court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation.” § 948.03 . . . conditions shall not prevent the court from adding thereto such other or others as it considers proper.” § 948.03 . . . Nothing in section 948.30 suggests that it in any way limits the authority granted by section 948.03. . . . statutory interpretation, especially the principle of in pari materia and the consideration of sections ,948.03 . . . Section 948.03(2) indicates that the enumeration of specific kinds of terms and conditions shall not . . . Only by reading sections 948.03, 948.039, and 948.30 in pari materia can we actually understand the question . . . See §§ 948.03(2), 948.039. . . . (citing §§ 948.03(2), 948.039, Fla. Stats. (2011)). . . . See §§ 948.03(2), 948.039, Fla. Stats. (2008). . . . Sections 948.03 and 948.039 describe the broad discretion given to trial courts to determine probation . . . See § 948.03(2), Fla. . . .

DEMOTT, v. STATE, 194 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2016)

. . . also concluded that the condition is no more vague than the general condition contained in section 948.03 . . . Demott Section 948.03 provides a list of sixteen conditions of probation that are deemed a standard part . . . See § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . One of these-standard conditions, set forth in section 948.03(l)(k), states that the probationer shall . . . Demott does not challenge the validity of section 948.03(l)(k). . . .

LATHAM, v. STATE, 185 So. 3d 686 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The court shall make the payment of restitution- a condition of probation in accordance'-with s. 948.03 . . . The court shall make the payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with s. 948.03 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 188 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Florida Statutes. (13) You shall submit to the taking of a digitized photograph as required by section 948.03 . . .

ALAMO, III, v. STATE, 177 So. 3d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2014), permits a court, as a special condition of probation, to . . .

ENEA, v. STATE, 171 So. 3d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . departed from the essential requirements of law because it erroneously interpreted the language of section 948.03 . . .

FERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 164 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that if the court “imposes a period of incarceration . . . sentence imposing five years in state prison as a condition of probation is in violation of section 948.03 . . . (holding that á sentence of two years in state prison as a condition of probation violated section 948.03 . . . that “the sentence imposing forty-eight months in prison as a condition of probation violated section 948.03 . . .

HARRELL, v. STATE, 162 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . His order of probation largely tracked the language of section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (2000). . . . the probationer to “[pjermit such supervisors to visit him or her at his or her home or elsewhere.” § 948.03 . . . Harrell points to the lack of an express warrantless search condition in section 948.03. . . . Furthermore, section 948.03(1)(b), which permits a supervisor to visit a probationer at his home, places . . .

PULECIO, v. STATE, 160 So. 3d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 948.03(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2012) (providing that a trial court may require a probationer to . . . interest in requiring Pulecio to “[w]ork faithfully at suitable employment insofar as may be possible,” § 948.03 . . .

DEMOTT, v. STATE, 160 So. 3d 520 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 948.03(l)(k), Florida Statutes (2012) provides, in pertinent part: 948.03. . . . In denying the motion, the trial court held that the condition was permissible because section 948.03 . . . unlawfully sold, dispensed, or used is valid as a more precise defining of conduct prohibited under section 948.03 . . . vague than the condition approved in Tomlinson or the condition specifically authorized by section 948.03 . . . Also, the defendant has not challenged the validity of section 948.03. . . .

SNOW, v. STATE, 157 So. 3d 559 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . unlawful acts pursuant to section 847.0135(4)(a), which is not an enumerated offense under section 948.03 . . .

PULLEN v. G. HOUSE, M., 88 F. Supp. 3d 927 (W.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . . § 948.03. . . . (Plaintiff was not cited for violating § 948.03, but that is irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment. . . . Stat. § 948.03(2)(b), “Whoever intentionally causes bodily harm to a child is guilty of a Class H felony . . .

NOEL, v. STATE, 127 So. 3d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . the court must make the payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03 . . .

VILLANUEVA, v. STATE, 118 So. 3d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 948.014, 948.03(l)(o), Fla. . . . Stat. (2011) (provide blood or other biological speei-mens); §§ 948.03(l)(f), 948.032, Fla. . . . See, e.g., § 948.03(2), Fla. . . .

STATE v. MEDINA,, 118 So. 3d 944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 948.03(1)(1) (2006) (general condition of probation prohibiting a probationer from possessing, carrying . . .

PAPAZOGLOU, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 725 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 948.03(3)(b). He was sentenced to 2 ^ years’ imprisonment and 4/& years probation. . . .

T. BROWN, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 948.03(5)(a)(7), Fla. Stat. (1998). . . .

IBARRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 736 F.3d 903 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 948.21, 948.03(4), 948.04(2), 948.20 (West, Westlaw through 1996 legislation). . . .

IBARRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 721 F.3d 1157 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 948.21, 948.03(4), 948.04(2), 948.20 (West, Westlaw through 1996 legislation). . . .

DRISCOLL, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 948.30(1) was originally created as section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1995). . . .

FILPPULA, v. STATE, 106 So. 3d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that if the court “imposes a period of incarceration . . . completed in a county facility, a probation or restitution center, or a community residential facility. § 948.03 . . . holding that sentence of forty-eight months in state prison as a condition of probation violated section 948.03 . . .

R. KNITE, v. STATE, 102 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 948.03(l)(m), Fla. . . .

STATE v. NAZARIO,, 100 So. 3d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . In support, the defendant cites section 948.03(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), which provides, in pertinent . . .

W. BAUER, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . As part of the probation, the circuit court imposed a condition required by section 948.03(5)(a)7., Florida . . . computer programs, or computer services that are relevant to the offender’s deviant behavior 'pattern.” § 948.03 . . . The probation condition at issue arises from section 948.03(5)(a)7., Florida Statutes (2001). . . . . § 948.03(5)(a)7., Fla. Stat. (2001) (emphasis added). . . . the state can establish that the material is “relevant to the offender’s deviant behavior pattern.” § 948.03 . . .

J. DUKHARAN, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . motion to modify conditions of probation, which the trial court is authorized to consider under section 948.03 . . .

DEL VALLE, v. STATE, 80 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2011)

. . . is also required to make payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03 . . . condition of probation, unless it determines that clear and compelling reasons exist to the contrary.” § 948.03 . . . Further, under both sections 775.089(l)(b)l. and 948.03(l)(f), if the court “does not order restitution . . .

FORD, v. STATE, 69 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (2009). On Mr. . . .

WITCHARD, v. STATE, 68 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 948.03(5)(b)(5), Fla. . . .

VELEZ- PIZZINI, v. STATE, 58 So. 3d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . These fees used to be included as standard conditions under section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1996 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2008), provides that if the trial court imposes a period of incarceration . . . Thus, the sentence imposing forty-eight months in prison as a condition of probation violated section 948.03 . . .

STATE v. COLEMAN,, 44 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . specified contacts with parole and probation officers[ ] and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03 . . . supervisors and permits a trial court to “rescind or modify at any time the terms and conditions” imposed. § 948.03 . . . (Supp. 1998 & 1999); 948.03(l)(a), (2), (5), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998 & 1999). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 48 So. 3d 17 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Specific references to sections 948.03 and 948.101, Florida Statutes, are included because these statutes . . . , Florida Statutes. (13) You shall submit to the taking of a digitized photograph as required by s. 948.03 . . .

MANCIPE, v. STATE, 43 So. 3d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Under section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1993), the one-year term of incarceration is illegal as a . . .

STATE v. ISOM,, 36 So. 3d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2008), states that “if the court ... imposes a period of incarceration . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 36 So. 3d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The reporting requirement of probation provided for in section 948.03(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), . . .

NEWTON, Jr. v. STATE, 31 So. 3d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . “[A] condition of probation which is statutorily authorized or mandated, see, e.g., section 948.03-.034 . . . Section 948.03(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that a probationer shall “[pjermit such supervisors . . . The state asserts that the standard condition satisfies the spirit of section 948.03(l)(b) because a . . .

LONCAR, v. STATE, 27 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that a trial court “may rescind or modify at any . . .

STATE v. FORD,, 27 So. 3d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Stat. (2009); § 948.03(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

W. WARFIELD, v. GRAMS,, 341 F. App'x 227 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 948.03(2)(b), kidnapping, id. § 940.31(l)(b), and seven counts of hostage-taking, id. § 940.305(1 . . .

SELLERS, v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The affidavit of violation of probation tracked section 948.03(5)(a)(7), Florida Statutes (2003), which . . . Thus, section 948.03(5)(a)(7) does not prohibit a probationer from possessing any and all obscene, pornographic . . .

L. STEPHENS, v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 948.03(2) of the Florida Statutes (2007) provides: [I]f the court withholds adjudication of guilt . . .

HARDER, v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Because the appellant’s crime was committed on August 18, 1995, section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995 . . . Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995), affords trial courts discretion to impose probation terms and . . . Stat. (2006); § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . the sentencing hearing did not conclusively show that it exercised its discretion pursuant to section 948.03 . . .

STATE v. LUXENBURG,, 13 So. 3d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03 . . .

KELLY, v. STATE, 13 So. 3d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . applied the rule of lenity and held that the qualifying language relating to “relevance” in section 948.03 . . .

J. D. D. a v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 820 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also State v. Springer, 965 So.2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). . . .

GORDON, v. STATE, 1 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See 948.03(l)(b), Fla. . . .

KING, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Special Condition” in the order under review, this condition, which was imposed pursuant to section 948.03 . . . Although section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (2001) (currently section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2008 . . . However, neither Special Condition 2 nor the statute requiring its imposition, section 948.03(5)(a)2. . . . Section 948.03(5)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2001) (currently section 948.30(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2008 . . .

KASISCHKE, v. STATE, 991 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2008)

. . . As I will show, the Legislature intended section 948.03(5)(a)(7) to prohibit supervised sex offenders . . . In addition to this broad antipornography ban, the Legislature intended section 948.03(5)(a)(7) to prohibit . . . Indeed, the opposite is true: The Legislature amended section 948.03(5)(g) (postamendment 948.03(5) ( . . . 948.03(5)(a)(7)) to expand, rather than limit, the existing prohibition. . . . Kasischke disputes whether his possession of this videotape violated section 948.03(5)(a)(7). . . . The Plain Text of Section 948.03(5)(a)(7) The plain text of section 948.03(5)(a)(7) clearly conveys the . . . Cf. § 948.03(6), Fla. . . . From 1995 until 1996, section 948.03(5)(g) remained unchanged. . . . Cf. § 948.03(6), Fla. . . . .”); § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2007) (substantially similar). . . . Section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1999), requires that courts impose several conditions on sexual . . . computer programs, or computer services that are relevant to the offender’s deviant behavior pattern. § 948.03 . . . For the reasons explained below, we find section 948.03(5)(a)(7), Florida Statutes (1999), ambiguous. . . . , Laws of Florida, states in pertinent part: An act relating to sex offenders; ... amending section 948.03 . . . “relevant to the offender’s deviant behavior pattern” qualifies each of the prohibitions in section 948.03 . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 979 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Stat. (2007) (previously codified at § 948.03(5)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (2003)). . . . supervision may only be accomplished if the offender undertakes immediate treatment, as required by section 948.03 . . .

BEAL, v. STATE, 978 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . held in Kiriazes that the trial court’s failure to impose a probation condition required by section 948.03 . . .

A. PHILLIPS, v. STATE, 971 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . probationer remains on a form of probation, and the standard conditions of probation set forth in section 948.03 . . . The standard conditions listed in section 948.03(1) include: (k)(l) Submit to random testing as directed . . . Under section 948.03(l)(k)(l), Phillips was required to submit to random drug tests. . . . Phillips violated section 948.03(l)(m) when he tested positive for marijuana and cocaine use. . . .

STATE v. SPRINGER,, 965 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Florida Statute 948.03(2) provides in pertinent part that “The Court may rescind or modify at any time . . . That language existed in § 948.03 at the time § 948.30 was promulgated. . . . As noted earlier, § 948.03(l)(b) contains the phrase “,as prescribed by the court.” . . . In Wes-ner, the Second District, reviewing section 948.03(5)(a)5., Florida Statutes (2000), held that . . . This section formerly appeared in section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (2004). . . .

STATE v. CASTRO,, 965 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Given the statutory requirements of both sections 775.089 and 948.03 that restitution be imposed absent . . .

KALINOWSKI, v. STATE, 948 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 948.30 formerly appeared as section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (2004). . . .

KASISCHKE, v. STATE, 946 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . an order revoking his community control for violating a condition of community control under section 948.03 . . . Section 948.03(5)(a) requires courts to impose upon all probationers and community controllees, whose . . . See § 948.03(5)(a)(6), Fla. Stat. . . . The language of section 948.03(5)(a)(7), as currently written, is undeniably susceptible to multiple . . . In 1997, the legislature amended section 948.03(5)(a)(7) through the passage of Committee Substitute . . .

STATE v. WITTHAUS,, 944 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), sets forth standard terms and conditions of probation. . . . .” § 948.03(l)(e). . . .

BERCHIN, v. STATE, 938 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). In Clark v. . . .

KOILE, v. STATE, 934 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 2006)

. . . The court shall make the payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with s. 948.03 . . .

COLE, v. STATE, 932 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . conditions were not special conditions and were standard conditions under Florida Statutes sections 948.03 . . . other words, a condition of probation which is statutorily authorized or mandated, see, e.g., sections 948.03 . . . The general conditions enumerated in section 948.03 do not include the financial responsibility for drug . . .

G. BILLIAS, v. STATE, 924 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . total sentence imposed (five years) was already at the statutory maximum for each offense, section 948.03 . . .

C. T. H. A v. STATE, 905 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The court shall make the payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with s. 948.03 . . .

STATE v. YULE,, 905 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . § 948.03(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). . The State has not addressed the issue of whether Ms. . . .

AYOUB, v. STATE, 901 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . random alcohol and drug testing, which is a general condition of probation authorized under section 948.03 . . .

GAINES, v. STATE, 899 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The statute referred to by the trial court, section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2000), provides: (1) The . . . See § 948.03(1). . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 902 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . submit to warrantless searches is valid even though it is not pronounced at sentencing, because section 948.03 . . . See § 948.03(1)(a)-(m), Fla. Stat. . See § 948.03(1)(o ), Fla. . . . Stat. .Section 948.03(1) provides that conditions specified in paragraphs 948.03(a)-(m) do not require . . . By implication, the condition set forth in 948.03(l)(o) requires oral pronouncement to be imposed. . . . . See § 948.03(5)(a)10, Fla. Stat. . . .

PARRISH, v. STATE, 898 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . that the testing requirement set forth in the first sentence of paragraph 12 is authorized by section 948.03 . . .

DOUGLAS, v. STATE, 893 So. 2d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . year prison sentence, appellant waived his right to make various constitutional challenges to section 948.03 . . .

G. RIDLEY, v. STATE, 890 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . hearing conducted less than sixty days after Ridley’s sentencing, but not on the authority of section 948.03 . . .

KOILE, v. STATE, 902 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The court shall make the payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with s. 948.03 . . .

HICKS, v. STATE, 890 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Condition 72 of the standard sexual offender conditions, section 948.03(5)(a)(6), Florida Statutes (1999 . . . of probation, a trial court still has the alternative of imposing its own additional conditions. § 948.03 . . .

WOODSON, v. STATE, 889 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 2004)

. . . Stat. (2004) (previously codified at section 948.03(5)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2003)). . . .

STATE v. TORRES,, 890 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . to an'evaluation and attend certain sex offender counseling sessions under the authority of section 948.03 . . . Torres argues that section 948.03(4) does not provide statutory authority for the court to impose sex . . . Section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (2002), provides: The court shall require a diagnosis and evaluation . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 888 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Miller’s probation, as required by section 948.03(5)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (2002), was erroneous . . . The State responded that because the requirements of section 948.03(5)(a) are mandatory when a defendant . . . Section 948.03(5)(a) indicates that for probationers who committed certain specified sex based crimes . . . In the present case, on the other hand, the requirements of section 948.03 are specifically engrafted . . . We note that section 948.03(5), which mandates the imposition of sex offender conditions of probation . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. GRUBBS,, 884 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 948.03(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

GEARHART, v. STATE, 885 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Case law recognizes that a trial court may, pursuant to section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes, at any time . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 886 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2004)

. . . amendments are in response to chapter 2001-50, section 6, at 321, Laws of Florida, which amended section 948.03 . . .

R. ANDERER, Jr. v. JONES,, 385 F.3d 1043 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 948.03. Lt. . . . Stat. § 948.03. . . . Stat. § 948.03. . . .

ENGLAND, v. STATE, 879 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The trial court based its conclusion on section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), which lists the general . . . conditions shall not prevent the court from adding thereto such other or others as it considers proper.” § 948.03 . . . In addition to its analysis of section 948.03, the trial court found that the condition imposing psychiatric . . . evaluation and mental health counseling on England was specifically authorized by section 948.03(6). . . . As a general condition of probation authorized by section 948.03, no oral statement of the condition . . .

E. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 879 So. 2d 49 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The court imposed as special conditions of probation the conditions set forth in section 948.03(5)(a) . . . Although the statutory language of section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), requires the imposition . . . Indeed, section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (1985), specifically authorizes the court to impose any conditions . . .

D. P. B. a v. STATE, 877 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . at liberty without violating any law” is a standard condition of probation, authorized under section 948.03 . . . In Tory, we held that standard conditions of probation provided in section 948.03, or included in rule . . . 985.231(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.947, and not by section 948.03 . . . Stat. § 948.03(1)(1993) and finding that there was no express statutory requirement, corresponding to . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 876 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1999)(general conditions of probation), and Fla. R.Crim. . . . See § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

H. PILORGE, v. STATE, 876 So. 2d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Compare this statute with section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (2002), which specifically exempts from . . .

RUSSMAN, v. STATE, 869 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . pronounce this condition and it is not included in the list of standard probation conditions in section 948.03 . . .

WOODSON, v. STATE, 864 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . of incarceration followed by three years of supervised sex offender probation, pursuant to section 948.03 . . . was ordered to comply with the following conditions, which closely parrot the provisions of sections 948.03 . . . (5)(a)3. and 948.03(5)(b)4., Florida Statutes (2000): You will actively participate in and successfully . . . Stat. (2000). . §§ 948.03(5)(a)2. & 6., Fla. Stat. (2000). . § 948.03(5)(a)4., Fla. . . . . § 948.03(5)(a)8., Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

PAGLIUCA, v. STATE, 860 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2002); e.g., Queen v. State, 832 So.2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). . . .

ESPINDOLA, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . community by specially trained probation officers with low caseloads, as described in ss. 947.1405(7) and 948.03 . . .

KIRBY, v. STATE, 863 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2003)

. . . In addition to section 775.089(1), section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1999), also imposes this requirement . . . . 948.03 Terms and conditions of probation or community control.— (e) Make reparation or restitution . . .

RIVERA, v. STATE, 862 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 948.03(5), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

W. CLINE, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . erred by finding that he violated condition 10(e) of his probation, a condition required by section 948.03 . . .

ANTHONY, v. STATE, 854 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Concerning the alleged violations of condition 77 for failure to submit to electronic monitoring, section 948.03 . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 857 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), that condition eighteen was permissible based on section 948.03 . . .

STATE v. OWENS,, 848 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See §§ 775.089(3)(a), (4), 948.03(1)(a), (e) Fla. Stat. (2000); see also White, 755 So.2d at 832. . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 846 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 948.03(l)(k)(l), Fla. Stat. (2000); Diaz v. State, 691 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). . . .