Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 948.3 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 948.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 948.03 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 948.03

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 948
PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 948.03
948.03 Terms and conditions of probation.—
(1) The court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation. Conditions specified in this section do not require oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing and may be considered standard conditions of probation. These conditions may include among them the following, that the probationer or offender in community control shall:
(a) Report to the probation officer as directed. Such reporting requirements may be fulfilled through remote reporting if approved by the relevant probation officer, the relevant county probation authority or entity, or the Department of Corrections and if the court has not excluded the possibility of remote reporting by the defendant in his or her order of probation. If the Department of Corrections or a county probation authority or entity elects to authorize remote reporting, it must adopt and make available remote probation reporting policies.
(b) Permit the probation officer to visit him or her at his or her home or elsewhere.
(c) Work faithfully at suitable employment insofar as may be possible.
(d) Remain within a specified place.
(e) Live without violating any law. A conviction in a court of law is not necessary for such a violation of law to constitute a violation of probation, community control, or any other form of court-ordered supervision.
(f) Make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by his or her offense in an amount to be determined by the court. The court shall make such reparation or restitution a condition of probation, unless it determines that clear and compelling reasons exist to the contrary. If the court does not order restitution, or orders restitution of only a portion of the damages, as provided in s. 775.089, it shall state on the record in detail the reasons therefor.
(g) Effective July 1, 1994, and applicable for offenses committed on or after that date, make payment of the debt due and owing to a county or municipal detention facility under s. 951.032 for medical care, treatment, hospitalization, or transportation received by the felony probationer while in that detention facility. The court, in determining whether to order such repayment and the amount of the repayment, shall consider the amount of the debt, whether there was any fault of the institution for the medical expenses incurred, the financial resources of the felony probationer, the present and potential future financial needs and earning ability of the probationer, and dependents, and other appropriate factors.
(h) Support his or her legal dependents to the best of his or her ability.
(i) Make payment of the debt due and owing to the state under s. 960.17, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.
(j) Pay any application fee assessed under s. 27.52(1)(b) and attorney’s fees and costs assessed under s. 938.29, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.
(k) Not associate with persons engaged in criminal activities.
(l)1. Submit to random testing as directed by the probation officer or the professional staff of the treatment center where he or she is receiving treatment to determine the presence or use of alcohol or controlled substances.
2. If the offense was a controlled substance violation and the period of probation immediately follows a period of incarceration in the state correctional system, the conditions must include a requirement that the offender submit to random substance abuse testing intermittently throughout the term of supervision, upon the direction of the probation officer.
(m) Be prohibited from possessing, carrying, or owning any:
1. Firearm.
2. Weapon without first procuring the consent of the probation officer.
(n) Be prohibited from using intoxicants to excess or possessing any drugs or narcotics unless prescribed by a physician, an advanced practice registered nurse, or a physician assistant. The probationer or community controllee may not knowingly visit places where intoxicants, drugs, or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed, or used.
(o) Submit to the drawing of blood or other biological specimens as prescribed in ss. 943.325 and 948.014, and reimburse the appropriate agency for the costs of drawing and transmitting the blood or other biological specimens to the Department of Law Enforcement.
(p) Submit to the taking of a digitized photograph by the department as a part of the offender’s records. This photograph may be displayed on the department’s public website while the offender is under court-ordered supervision. However, the department may not display the photograph on the website if the offender is only on pretrial intervention supervision or if the offender’s identity is exempt from disclosure due to an exemption from the requirements of s. 119.07.
(2) The enumeration of specific kinds of terms and conditions does not prevent the court from adding thereto such other or others as it considers proper. However, the sentencing court may only impose a condition of supervision allowing an offender convicted of s. 794.011, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145 to reside in another state if the order stipulates that it is contingent upon the approval of the receiving state interstate compact authority. The court may rescind or modify at any time the terms and conditions theretofore imposed by it upon the probationer. However, if the court withholds adjudication of guilt or imposes a period of incarceration as a condition of probation, the period may not exceed 364 days, and incarceration shall be restricted to either a county facility, or a probation and restitution center under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections.
History.—s. 23, ch. 20519, 1941; s. 5, ch. 77-452; s. 1, ch. 81-198; s. 3, ch. 83-75; s. 16, ch. 83-131; s. 192, ch. 83-216; s. 3, ch. 83-256; s. 8, ch. 84-363; s. 15, ch. 85-288; s. 5, ch. 87-211; s. 11, ch. 88-96; ss. 70, 71, ch. 88-122; s. 37, ch. 89-526; s. 10, ch. 90-287; ss. 8, 17, ch. 90-337; s. 11, ch. 91-225; s. 4, ch. 91-280; s. 23, ch. 92-310; s. 10, ch. 93-37; s. 15, ch. 93-227; s. 1, ch. 94-294; s. 1, ch. 95-189; ss. 53, 59, ch. 95-283; s. 1, ch. 96-170; s. 4, ch. 96-232; s. 54, ch. 96-312; s. 6, ch. 96-409; s. 22, ch. 97-78; s. 1877, ch. 97-102; s. 11, ch. 97-107; s. 27, ch. 97-234; s. 44, ch. 97-271; s. 3, ch. 97-308; s. 14, ch. 98-81; s. 15, ch. 98-251; s. 122, ch. 99-3; s. 13, ch. 99-201; s. 3, ch. 2000-246; s. 6, ch. 2001-50; s. 1045, ch. 2002-387; s. 1, ch. 2003-18; s. 1, ch. 2003-63; s. 136, ch. 2003-402; ss. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ch. 2004-373; s. 116, ch. 2006-1; s. 28, ch. 2008-172; s. 18, ch. 2010-64; s. 19, ch. 2016-224; s. 5, ch. 2017-115; s. 86, ch. 2018-106; s. 97, ch. 2018-110; s. 2, ch. 2022-166.

F.S. 948.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 948.03 on CourtListener

Amendments to 948.03


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 948.03

Total Results: 405

Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n

396 So. 2d 1107

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1981 | Docket: 1732035

Cited 274 times | Published

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law. Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1979), lists the terms

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543

Cited 171 times | Published

hearing. Brock, 688 So.2d at 910-12 & n. 1; see § 948.03(1)(k)1., Florida Statutes (Supp.1996); Torres

Kasischke v. State

991 So. 2d 803, 2008 WL 2678449

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2008 | Docket: 1400494

Cited 122 times | Published

community control and eight years of probation. Section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1999), requires that

Reyes v. State

655 So. 2d 111, 1995 WL 65502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1995 | Docket: 457341

Cited 105 times | Published

because that condition is statutorily mandated, § 948.03(1)(i), Fla. Stat. (1991), and is reasonably related

State v. Hawthorne

573 So. 2d 330, 1991 WL 1360

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1991 | Docket: 2506434

Cited 75 times | Published

Where restitution is a condition of probation, section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), is applicable

Rodriguez v. State

378 So. 2d 7

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1979 | Docket: 1795290

Cited 67 times | Published

the terms and conditions of probation... ." Section 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1977). As previously noted

State v. Jones

327 So. 2d 18

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1976 | Docket: 1716252

Cited 66 times | Published

probation pursuant to its prior provisions. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1973), prescribes the terms

Fresneda v. State

347 So. 2d 1021

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1977 | Docket: 1290772

Cited 61 times | Published

trial court passed on the constitutionality of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975). Accordingly, we have

Glaubius v. State

688 So. 2d 913, 1997 WL 67973

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1997 | Docket: 1508295

Cited 59 times | Published

(Fla. 1977) (in reviewing constitutionality of section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975) (governing probation

Lippman v. State

633 So. 2d 1061, 1994 WL 81822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1994 | Docket: 1707799

Cited 46 times | Published

State, 572 So.2d 1368, 1370-72 (Fla. 1991). Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), confers broad authority

Nank v. State

646 So. 2d 762, 1994 WL 600818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1994 | Docket: 1405385

Cited 37 times | Published

general condition of probation authorized by section 948.03(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1991), which prohibits

Martin v. State

243 So. 2d 189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1971 | Docket: 539988

Cited 34 times | Published

substantially similar to those set forth in F.S. Section 948.03, F.S.A. The order also provided that the term

Del Valle v. State

80 So. 3d 999, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 732, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2878, 2011 WL 6220783

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2011 | Docket: 1935006

Cited 33 times | Published

a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011). That section, entitled

Clark v. State

579 So. 2d 109, 1991 WL 66663

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1991 | Docket: 1432796

Cited 30 times | Published

553 So.2d at 1341. [3] We recognize that section 948.03(7), Florida Statutes (1987), permits the court

Spivey v. State

531 So. 2d 965, 1988 WL 103831

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1988 | Docket: 242284

Cited 29 times | Published

Where restitution is a condition of probation, section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), is also applicable

Tomlinson v. State

645 So. 2d 1, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1994 | Docket: 2585020

Cited 28 times | Published

precise defining of conduct prohibited under section 948.03(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1991), which states

Delaney v. State

190 So. 2d 578

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1966 | Docket: 2462486

Cited 27 times | Published

of probation imposed upon the appellant (F.S. § 948.03, F.S.A.). (2) If, during the said five years,

Tillman v. State

592 So. 2d 767, 1992 WL 9711

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1992 | Docket: 1728055

Cited 23 times | Published

exception, the condition for random drug screening. Section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988) authorizes

Bentley v. State

411 So. 2d 1361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1982 | Docket: 1326956

Cited 23 times | Published

Probation is solely a creature of statute. Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1979), expressly authorizes

State v. Yule

905 So. 2d 251, 2005 WL 1521211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2005 | Docket: 1307884

Cited 20 times | Published

probation which may be included in a probation order. § 948.03(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). [6] The State has not

Rowland v. State

548 So. 2d 812, 1989 WL 104003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1989 | Docket: 1699262

Cited 20 times | Published

conditions of probation. Appellant suggests that section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (1987), provides the *814

Kirby v. State

863 So. 2d 238, 2003 WL 22304524

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2003 | Docket: 1728596

Cited 19 times | Published

1. [7] In addition to section 775.089(1), section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1999), also imposes

State v. Williams

237 So. 2d 69

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1970 | Docket: 1370484

Cited 19 times | Published

as conditions of probation. However, Fla. Stat. § 948.03(2), F.S.A. is sufficiently broad to allow imposition

Tory v. State

686 So. 2d 689, 1996 WL 734615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 1260446

Cited 17 times | Published

"standard conditions" of probation provided in section 948.03(1), and contained in the probation order, which

Cassamassima v. State

657 So. 2d 906, 1995 WL 325956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1995 | Docket: 1514455

Cited 17 times | Published

community control or probation in this case. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1993) establishes that probationers

Ballance v. State

447 So. 2d 974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1984 | Docket: 1312175

Cited 17 times | Published

restitution as a condition of probation under Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1981), and established

Chatman v. State

365 So. 2d 789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1978 | Docket: 1314294

Cited 17 times | Published

Bienz v. State, 343 So.2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); § 948.03(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (1977) (permitting condition

Wheeler v. State

344 So. 2d 630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1977 | Docket: 474702

Cited 17 times | Published

condition is common to almost every probation. See Section 948.03, Florida Statutes. Under due process of law

Cumbie v. State

597 So. 2d 946, 1992 WL 85087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1992 | Docket: 1350967

Cited 16 times | Published

conditions" of probation (i.e., those listed in Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes) may be included in the

Woodson v. State

864 So. 2d 512, 2004 WL 40521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2004 | Docket: 1727526

Cited 15 times | Published

supervised sex offender probation, pursuant to section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes.[1] Specifically, Woodson

Lynom v. State

816 So. 2d 1218, 2002 WL 1058382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2002 | Docket: 1557490

Cited 15 times | Published

offender *1220 probation conditions set forth in section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1997), including the

Malone v. State

652 So. 2d 902, 1995 WL 119122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1995 | Docket: 2572717

Cited 15 times | Published

Condition ten is a general condition set forth in section 948.03(1)(j)1, Florida Statutes (1991), and may be

Ex Parte Bosso

41 So. 2d 322, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 750

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1949 | Docket: 3275170

Cited 14 times | Published

found in them does not appear in our law. True, Section 948.03, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A., enumerates

Ayoub v. State

901 So. 2d 311, 2005 WL 1025960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 1216237

Cited 13 times | Published

general condition of probation authorized under section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2002). Ayoub also contests

Robbins v. State

318 So. 2d 472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1975 | Docket: 1476862

Cited 13 times | Published

under the broad grant of authority contained in § 948.03, F.S. 1973. However, before a defendant's probation

Hayes v. State

585 So. 2d 397, 1991 WL 167286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1991 | Docket: 1688583

Cited 12 times | Published

orally pronounced, because it is authorized by section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes. In State v. Beasley

Clinger v. State

533 So. 2d 315, 1988 WL 118076

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1988 | Docket: 1233265

Cited 12 times | Published

sentencing court have the discretion under section 948.03(7), Florida Statutes, to require the defendant

Van Tassel v. Coffman

486 So. 2d 528

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1986 | Docket: 1407027

Cited 12 times | Published

offenses pursuant to the general conditions of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes." The actual holding in Jones

Barber v. State

344 So. 2d 913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1977 | Docket: 474713

Cited 12 times | Published

probationer's probation may be revoked. See Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975); and Kominsky v. State

Department of Corrections v. Grubbs

884 So. 2d 1147, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15874, 2004 WL 2387312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2004 | Docket: 1683160

Cited 11 times | Published

offender treatment program at their own expense. § 948.03(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). Thus, the legislature

Anthony v. State

854 So. 2d 744, 2003 WL 22012607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2003 | Docket: 1460319

Cited 11 times | Published

failure to submit to electronic monitoring, section 948.03(3)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides

Brock v. State

688 So. 2d 909, 1997 WL 45051

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1997 | Docket: 443930

Cited 11 times | Published

relying on the reference to such a condition in section 948.03(1)(k)1., Florida Statutes (1995),[2] and Hayes

Goldschmitt v. State

490 So. 2d 123, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1986 | Docket: 1743176

Cited 11 times | Published

*125 any other form of probation.[2] We agree. Section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (1985), which permits

Bass v. State

473 So. 2d 1367, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1985 | Docket: 1510508

Cited 11 times | Published

or as a condition of probation pursuant to Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1983). Section 775

Pickman v. State

155 So. 2d 646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1963 | Docket: 473963

Cited 11 times | Published

Chapter 948 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Section 948.03 provides that the court shall set the terms

Jones v. State

876 So. 2d 642, 2004 WL 1360450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2004 | Docket: 1671154

Cited 10 times | Published

of the general conditions of his probation. See § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1999)(general conditions of probation)

Kiriazes v. State

798 So. 2d 789, 2001 WL 1219487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2001 | Docket: 1668261

Cited 10 times | Published

imposes the statutory conditions contained in section 948.03(5)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes, as conditions

Barfield v. State

762 So. 2d 564, 2000 WL 864209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2000 | Docket: 1311256

Cited 10 times | Published

were not orally pronounced at sentencing. See § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat., State v. Williams, 712 So.2d 762

Lindsay v. State

606 So. 2d 652, 1992 WL 222132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1992 | Docket: 1733750

Cited 10 times | Published

probation and incarceration exceed 1 year. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1991), deals generally with

Faulkner v. State

582 So. 2d 783, 1991 WL 129740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1991 | Docket: 1363891

Cited 10 times | Published

(1989). [2] § 812.014, Fla. Stat. (1989). [3] Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes, provides that restitution

Lewis v. State

402 So. 2d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1981 | Docket: 1313538

Cited 10 times | Published

conclude, as they have previously,[1] that section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (1979), allows a trial

Britt v. State

775 So. 2d 415, 2001 WL 10233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 2510449

Cited 9 times | Published

and other similar offenses, as was appellant. § 948.03(5)(a)2 & 6, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). According

Vezina v. State

644 So. 2d 602, 1994 WL 603150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1994 | Docket: 1672241

Cited 9 times | Published

distinguishable from the lawful condition set forth in section 948.03(1)(c), Florida Statutes, which authorizes the

White v. State

606 So. 2d 1265, 1992 WL 312760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1992 | Docket: 132015

Cited 9 times | Published

and it is hereby modified in accordance with Section 948.03 Florida Statutes, in the following manner:

Dickens v. State

556 So. 2d 782, 1990 WL 10220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1990 | Docket: 543007

Cited 9 times | Published

begin; however, it did not do so. In fact, section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), which provides for

Dickens v. State

556 So. 2d 782, 1990 WL 10220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1990 | Docket: 543007

Cited 9 times | Published

begin; however, it did not do so. In fact, section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), which provides for

Morel v. State

547 So. 2d 341, 1989 WL 89683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1989 | Docket: 1738707

Cited 9 times | Published

a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1985). A condition

Distefano v. State

526 So. 2d 110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1988 | Docket: 1272533

Cited 9 times | Published

than twelve months, in order to comply with section 948.03(7), (8)(a), Florida Statutes (1987). Appellant's

Griner v. State

523 So. 2d 789, 1988 WL 34670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1988 | Docket: 1517217

Cited 9 times | Published

condition of probation on a felony conviction, § 948.03(7), Florida Statutes (1987). Refusing to allow

Smith v. State

484 So. 2d 581, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 81

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1986 | Docket: 1702745

Cited 9 times | Published

probation pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1973). Section 948.03 enumerates the conditions

Davis v. State

474 So. 2d 1246, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1985 | Docket: 1472571

Cited 9 times | Published

to report to the probation supervisor [see section 948.03(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983)]. Without such

Arnold v. State

356 So. 2d 862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1978 | Docket: 1479068

Cited 9 times | Published

is within the discretion of the trial judge. F.S. 948.03 authorizes the judge to determine the terms and

Adams v. State

979 So. 2d 921, 2008 WL 794662

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2008 | Docket: 1407823

Cited 8 times | Published

30(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2007) (previously codified at § 948.03(5)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (2003)). The statutes applicable

Taylor v. State

821 So. 2d 404, 2002 WL 1558570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 2259294

Cited 8 times | Published

chapter to provide two DNA samples to FDLE. Section 948.03(10) and (11), Florida Statutes (1997), provides

Fisher v. State

697 So. 2d 1291, 1997 WL 528284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1997 | Docket: 1777386

Cited 8 times | Published

affirm this portion of the sentence, because section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995) provides constructive

Miller v. State

683 So. 2d 600, 1996 WL 661746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1996 | Docket: 466202

Cited 8 times | Published

an error in this appeal, we note that under section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1993), a period of incarceration

Nieves v. State

678 So. 2d 468, 1996 WL 464157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1996 | Docket: 1737036

Cited 8 times | Published

(Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Effective July 1, 1995, section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes, allows such an assessment

Grice v. State

528 So. 2d 1347, 1988 WL 81553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1988 | Docket: 1717648

Cited 8 times | Published

089(1)(a), (b), and (4), Fla. Stat. (1985). Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes, was also amended in

Winfield v. State

406 So. 2d 50

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1981 | Docket: 449761

Cited 8 times | Published

Chatman v. State, 365 So.2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1979). As a corollary, the

Cuba v. State

362 So. 2d 29

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1978 | Docket: 1363517

Cited 8 times | Published

requested jury instruction are without merit. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975) provides that the

Brenner v. State

337 So. 2d 1007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1976 | Docket: 1735183

Cited 8 times | Published

to renege on their agreement. In addition, Section 948.03, Florida Statutes is sufficiently broad to

Nelson v. State

780 So. 2d 294, 2001 WL 261598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2001 | Docket: 1298663

Cited 7 times | Published

the standard conditions of probation found in section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes, which includes provisions

Boutwell v. State

776 So. 2d 1014, 2001 WL 43092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2001 | Docket: 421742

Cited 7 times | Published

SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 948.03(5)(a)(b), Fla.Stat. (1997). [2] In order for

Cleveland v. State

617 So. 2d 1166, 1993 WL 167704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1993 | Docket: 1512592

Cited 7 times | Published

only special conditions need be announced. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes, lists certain standard conditions

Jackson v. State

615 So. 2d 850, 1993 WL 75787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1993 | Docket: 1185323

Cited 7 times | Published

Tassel v. Coffman, 486 So.2d 528 (Fla. 1986); § 948.03(5), Fla. Stat. (1989). Reversed and remanded for

Jordan v. State

610 So. 2d 616, 1992 WL 365448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1992 | Docket: 1734791

Cited 7 times | Published

more than doubling the original amount. Under Section 948.03(7), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), "[t]he court

McCaskill v. State

520 So. 2d 664, 1988 WL 14564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1988 | Docket: 1300069

Cited 7 times | Published

setting the amount to be paid by the defendant. Section 948.03(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (1985) states in clear and

Lawson v. State

498 So. 2d 541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1986 | Docket: 1699676

Cited 7 times | Published

was convicted, namely burglary of a dwelling. Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1983) reads: 1. The

Purvis v. State

442 So. 2d 1085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1983 | Docket: 2539102

Cited 7 times | Published

to appeal the imposition of the condition. Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1981), mandates that

Toombs v. State

404 So. 2d 766

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1981 | Docket: 1782647

Cited 7 times | Published

incarceration as a condition of probation under Section 948.03(2) together as the "split sentence alternatives

Watkins v. State

368 So. 2d 363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1979 | Docket: 1723269

Cited 7 times | Published

condition in question is specifically authorized by Section 948.03(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1977). Probation is

McGowan v. State

362 So. 2d 335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1978 | Docket: 1715746

Cited 7 times | Published

pursuant to the general condition provisions of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975). State v. Jones, 327

DiOrio v. State

359 So. 2d 45

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1978 | Docket: 1735611

Cited 7 times | Published

amount of damage or loss caused by his offense. Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1977). Clearly, the

Patrick v. State

336 So. 2d 1253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1976 | Docket: 2564814

Cited 7 times | Published

his probation for one year on authority of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975). On 24 May 1976, an

Brown v. State

302 So. 2d 430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1974 | Docket: 1746616

Cited 7 times | Published

usually thought of as conditions of probation, § 948.03(2), F.S., has been held to be sufficiently broad

Caston v. State

58 So. 2d 694, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1201

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1952 | Docket: 1453844

Cited 7 times | Published

sentence them to prison for a term of years. Section 948.03, F.S.A., prescribes the terms and conditions

Rowan v. State

791 So. 2d 40, 2001 WL 584433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2001 | Docket: 1655803

Cited 6 times | Published

modified Rowan's community control *42 pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1991), to require two months'

Kirkland v. State

666 So. 2d 974, 1996 WL 12610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1996 | Docket: 2562233

Cited 6 times | Published

conditions" of probation (i.e., those listed in Section 948.03(1), Florida *976 Statutes) may be included

Paterson v. State

612 So. 2d 692, 1993 WL 12404

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1993 | Docket: 1262287

Cited 6 times | Published

testing accords with section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990). Section 948.03(1)(j) provides that

Weckerle v. State

579 So. 2d 742, 1991 WL 44961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 2537156

Cited 6 times | Published

amount of restitution to be paid pursuant to section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1989). The duty may

O'Steen v. State

547 So. 2d 235, 1989 WL 77479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1989 | Docket: 1474930

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Statutes (1987) (emphasis supplied). Section 948.03 states that the court may include the following

Ward v. State

511 So. 2d 1109, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1987 | Docket: 144835

Cited 6 times | Published

therefore, is an invalid condition of probation. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes, however, expressly authorizes

Davis v. State

461 So. 2d 1003, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 34

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1984 | Docket: 464329

Cited 6 times | Published

(probation means a form of community supervision); section 948.03(2) (the court shall require intensive supervision

Cooper v. State

356 So. 2d 911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1978 | Docket: 237342

Cited 6 times | Published

second point does not present reversible error. Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1975), specifically

Lewis v. State

298 So. 2d 540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1974 | Docket: 1438958

Cited 6 times | Published

69 (2d D.C.A. Fla. 1970) the court held that F.S. 948.03 was sufficiently broad so as to allow imposition

Cole v. State

932 So. 2d 1123, 2006 WL 1627567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 1285650

Cited 5 times | Published

at 692. The general conditions enumerated in section 948.03 do not include the financial responsibility

Woodson v. State

889 So. 2d 823, 2004 WL 2923221

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2004 | Docket: 1742804

Cited 5 times | Published

Fla. Stat. (2004) (previously codified at section 948.03(5)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2003)). It is only

Wesner v. State

843 So. 2d 1039, 2003 WL 21032047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2003 | Docket: 1670545

Cited 5 times | Published

the Tenth Circuit Sentencing Order pursuant to F.S. 948.03(5)." In the written probation order, the trial

Greenwood v. State

754 So. 2d 158, 2000 WL 305156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2000 | Docket: 1523534

Cited 5 times | Published

all five conditions *160 are authorized by section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1997). Therefore, they

Gilchrist v. State

674 So. 2d 847, 1996 WL 257331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1996 | Docket: 1195084

Cited 5 times | Published

probation and need not be orally pronounced. See § 948.03(1)(k)1, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994); Malone v. State

Zeigler v. State

647 So. 2d 272, 1994 WL 685953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1994 | Docket: 437743

Cited 5 times | Published

which is statutorily authorized, see, e.g., section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1991), may be included in

Jennings v. State

645 So. 2d 592, 1994 WL 659359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1125121

Cited 5 times | Published

1993), because it is statutorily authorized by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1993), thus making it a

Gladfelter v. State

618 So. 2d 1364, 1993 WL 176646

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1993 | Docket: 1376362

Cited 5 times | Published

requiring this to be done within sixty days. Section 948.03(8), Florida Statutes (1989), authorizes the

Navarre v. State

608 So. 2d 525, 1992 WL 324875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1992 | Docket: 1449946

Cited 5 times | Published

reasonably relates to the type of offense. See section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.); Hayes

Shaddix v. State

599 So. 2d 269, 1992 WL 110915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1992 | Docket: 1483734

Cited 5 times | Published

be determined by the trial court pursuant to section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1989), and this purely

Alfonso v. State

595 So. 2d 583, 1992 WL 57872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1992 | Docket: 2539358

Cited 5 times | Published

these were standard conditions, provided for in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1991), and, thus, need not

Singleton v. State

582 So. 2d 657, 1991 WL 103455

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1363181

Cited 5 times | Published

counseling was apparently ordered pursuant to Section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988). That statute

Tillman v. State

555 So. 2d 940, 1990 WL 2407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1990 | Docket: 1396892

Cited 5 times | Published

time as a condition of community control. See § 948.03(7), Fla. Stat. (1987) and Reese v. State, 535

Barnes v. State

489 So. 2d 1182, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1248

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1986 | Docket: 116059

Cited 5 times | Published

offense in an amount to be determined by the court. § 948.03(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (1983). The probationer may

Brudie v. State

467 So. 2d 1113, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1985 | Docket: 285090

Cited 5 times | Published

that the standard terms of probation found in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1965)[1] "would have no

Harris v. State

452 So. 2d 1041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1984 | Docket: 2570913

Cited 5 times | Published

method of payment. Similar provisions appear in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1983), which authorizes

FLORIDA DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. v. Gross

421 So. 2d 44

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1982 | Docket: 1719354

Cited 5 times | Published

judges in formulating conditions of probation. § 948.03(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). This argument fails on

Dearth v. State

390 So. 2d 108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1980 | Docket: 1750225

Cited 5 times | Published

presently suffer the penalty imposed by law." Section 948.03 vests authority in the trial court to determine

Barlow v. State

388 So. 2d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1980 | Docket: 1520905

Cited 5 times | Published

relationship to his offense. The court also noted that section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes, requires the "amount

Carmo v. State

378 So. 2d 850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1979 | Docket: 1794333

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement. Nevertheless, we must be concerned with Section 948.03(2) Florida Statutes (1977) which provides:

Reeves v. State

372 So. 2d 1016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1979 | Docket: 1695665

Cited 5 times | Published

v. State, 364 So.2d 828 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1977), expressly provides

State v. Springer

965 So. 2d 270, 2007 WL 2682153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2007 | Docket: 1509194

Cited 4 times | Published

probation condition in any respect. 12. Florida Statute 948.03(2) provides in pertinent part that "The

Gearhart v. State

885 So. 2d 415, 2004 WL 2315112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 1685212

Cited 4 times | Published

recognizes that a trial court may, pursuant to section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes, at any time during the

Queen v. State

832 So. 2d 956, 2002 WL 31875006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 1700098

Cited 4 times | Published

pronounced at sentencing to be validly imposed. § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2000), Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.986(f)

Perez v. State

805 So. 2d 76, 2002 WL 54645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1669532

Cited 4 times | Published

contain the additional provisions contained in section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1995), which were required

Wilcox v. State

783 So. 2d 1150, 2001 WL 345183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2001 | Docket: 2568237

Cited 4 times | Published

probation with conditions imposed pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998). By motion pursuant

Grumet v. State

771 So. 2d 39, 2000 WL 1396216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2000 | Docket: 1338928

Cited 4 times | Published

conditions are statutorily-authorized pursuant to section 948.03 or otherwise based on a Florida statute which

Lee v. State

766 So. 2d 374, 2000 WL 1049889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2000 | Docket: 199686

Cited 4 times | Published

for two years under conditions enumerated in section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1999). This statutory

Torres v. State

712 So. 2d 1169, 1998 WL 372140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 1471491

Cited 4 times | Published

v. State, 688 So.2d 909, 912 n. 4 (Fla.1997); § 948.03(k), Fla. Stat. (1995). The second portion of condition

Curry v. State

682 So. 2d 1091, 1996 WL 648250

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1996 | Docket: 2565131

Cited 4 times | Published

standard condition of probation provided for in section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.). The First

Mosley v. State

677 So. 2d 27, 1996 WL 347783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 1689917

Cited 4 times | Published

"standard conditions" of probation provided in section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), and contained

Reiter v. State

674 So. 2d 189, 1996 WL 268018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1996 | Docket: 1661909

Cited 4 times | Published

to any probationer under section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1993). See § 948.03(1)(j), Fla.Stat. (1993)

Dean v. State

669 So. 2d 1140, 1996 WL 123168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1996 | Docket: 530103

Cited 4 times | Published

was not sentenced pursuant to that statute. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995), which enumerates

Delancey v. State

653 So. 2d 1062, 1995 WL 170002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1995 | Docket: 552042

Cited 4 times | Published

Griffith's initial evaluation and diagnosis. See § 948.03(7), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1990).[1] It also shows

Luby v. State

648 So. 2d 308, 1995 WL 3211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1995 | Docket: 1342388

Cited 4 times | Published

condition was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1992), authorizes

Berry v. State

636 So. 2d 555, 1994 WL 169542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1994 | Docket: 1715353

Cited 4 times | Published

county jail and restitution center violated section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1991). We conclude from

Nunez v. State

633 So. 2d 1146, 1994 WL 84144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1994 | Docket: 310265

Cited 4 times | Published

controlled substances, is statutorily authorized by section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1991). Thus the appellant

Crawford v. State

616 So. 2d 1158, 1993 WL 114781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 1368578

Cited 4 times | Published

constructive notice of this condition pursuant to section 948.03(1)(c) and (f), Florida Statutes (1989). See

Brown v. State

613 So. 2d 558, 1993 WL 25615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1993 | Docket: 454204

Cited 4 times | Published

support his dependents is statutorily allowed by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1989). Although appellant

King v. State

611 So. 2d 24, 1992 WL 383010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 1674166

Cited 4 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] We have not overlooked section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1991), which provides

Fairweather v. State

596 So. 2d 1276, 1992 WL 81445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1992 | Docket: 1295806

Cited 4 times | Published

as to the amount of restitution to be paid. Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1989) does not specify

Showers v. State

570 So. 2d 377, 1990 WL 178648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1990 | Docket: 1704341

Cited 4 times | Published

delegated to a probation or parole officer. Section 948.03(1)(e), F.S. (1989); Doner v. State, 515 So

State v. Seward

543 So. 2d 398, 1989 WL 50238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1989 | Docket: 2541925

Cited 4 times | Published

the two days which she has already served. See § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (1987); Smith v. State, 484 So.2d

Kline v. State

509 So. 2d 1178, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1987 | Docket: 1715514

Cited 4 times | Published

condition of probation on the felony conviction by section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). State v. Jones

Williams v. State

505 So. 2d 478, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1987 | Docket: 2506851

Cited 4 times | Published

unduly limited the restitution provisions of section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1985). In J.S.H. the

KMC v. State

485 So. 2d 1296, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 392, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 1680764

Cited 4 times | Published

"aggrieved party." Appellant draws this phrase from section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides

Roberts v. State

467 So. 2d 439, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 1275555

Cited 4 times | Published

injured parties. The supreme court held that section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1975) which authorized

JSH v. State

455 So. 2d 1143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1984 | Docket: 1316948

Cited 4 times | Published

condition of probation in adult proceedings, section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1975), was construed

Riner v. State

389 So. 2d 316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1980 | Docket: 378005

Cited 4 times | Published

offense of leaving the scene of an accident. Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1977), provides that

Crowder v. State

334 So. 2d 819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1976 | Docket: 1309644

Cited 4 times | Published

convicted. Under the provisions of Fla. Stat. § 948.03 (1975), the sentencing judge sets the terms and

Knite v. State

102 So. 3d 691, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20444, 2012 WL 5933035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2012 | Docket: 60226751

Cited 3 times | Published

the sale, dispensing, or use of such drugs. See § 948.03(l)(m), Fla. Stat. (2009) (authorizing trial court

Newton v. State

31 So. 3d 892, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3819, 2010 WL 1050066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2010 | Docket: 1151313

Cited 3 times | Published

statutorily authorized or mandated, see, e.g., section 948.03-.034, Florida Statutes (1993), may be imposed

Beal v. State

978 So. 2d 825, 2008 WL 656671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2008 | Docket: 1508425

Cited 3 times | Published

to impose a probation condition required by section 948.03, Florida Statutes, could not be corrected more

Hicks v. State

890 So. 2d 459, 2004 WL 3008773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2004 | Docket: 1290728

Cited 3 times | Published

of the standard sexual offender conditions, section 948.03(5)(a)(6), Florida Statutes (1999), prohibits

England v. State

879 So. 2d 660, 2004 WL 1752173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2004 | Docket: 463797

Cited 3 times | Published

pronounced. The trial court based its conclusion on section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987),[3] which lists the

Rivera v. State

862 So. 2d 55, 2003 WL 22296940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2003 | Docket: 1762915

Cited 3 times | Published

standard conditions of sex offender probation. See § 948.03(5), Fla. Stat. (2000). Thus, the amended sentence

Jones v. State

846 So. 2d 662, 2003 WL 21274801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2003 | Docket: 289426

Cited 3 times | Published

Jones bear the cost of such testing was error. See § 948.03(1)(k)(1), Fla. Stat. (2000); Diaz v. State, 691

Garvison v. State

775 So. 2d 340, 2000 WL 1224775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 1667829

Cited 3 times | Published

did with Garvison's six-month jail sentence. See § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (1997). Even though Garvison agreed

Johnston v. State

768 So. 2d 504, 2000 WL 1224867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 1525589

Cited 3 times | Published

the probationer has violated his probation. Section 948.03(5)(a)(10), Florida Statutes (1997), imposes

Lane v. State

762 So. 2d 560, 2000 WL 864429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2000 | Docket: 1311610

Cited 3 times | Published

his program in 1997 when Florida Statutes, section 948.03(5)(b)1, was enacted requiring annual polygraph

Brown v. State

697 So. 2d 928, 1997 WL 422570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1997 | Docket: 1777247

Cited 3 times | Published

general condition of probation, nor is found in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995), we would ordinarily

Diaz v. State

691 So. 2d 589, 1997 WL 178854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1997 | Docket: 2576996

Cited 3 times | Published

drug and alcohol testing is a general condition. § 948.03(1)(j)1, Fla.Stat. (1993). It need not be orally

Jackson v. State

685 So. 2d 1386, 1997 WL 7162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1997 | Docket: 2580213

Cited 3 times | Published

probation, and therefore need not be orally announced. § 948.03(1)(k), Fla.Stat. (1995). However, the additional

Lunn v. State

675 So. 2d 648, 1996 WL 312201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1996 | Docket: 1323134

Cited 3 times | Published

evaluation and treatment of drug and alcohol problems. § 948.03(1)(k)(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994); State v. Hart

Washington v. State

685 So. 2d 858, 1996 WL 274135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 1415736

Cited 3 times | Published

include the phrase "insofar as may be possible." See § 948.03(1)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Godley v. State, 659

State v. Green

667 So. 2d 959, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1996 | Docket: 454595

Cited 3 times | Published

Procedure 3.986(e), has no statutory counterpart in section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993).[1] Nowhere in

Emond v. State

652 So. 2d 419, 1995 WL 107432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1995 | Docket: 476176

Cited 3 times | Published

affirmed because it is statutorily authorized by section 948.03(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1993). See Nank, 646

Johnson v. State

636 So. 2d 792, 1994 WL 157124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 2577445

Cited 3 times | Published

Johnson's community control to read, pursuant to section 948.03(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1993): You shall work

Randolph v. State

626 So. 2d 1006, 1993 WL 435896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1993 | Docket: 1286253

Cited 3 times | Published

Rosa v. State, 592 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); § 948.03(5), Fla. Stat. (1991). Furthermore, ordering that

Reynolds v. State

598 So. 2d 188, 1992 WL 88928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1992 | Docket: 1472138

Cited 3 times | Published

"in an amount to be determined by the court." Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1989). The trial judge

In Interest of TLD

586 So. 2d 1294, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15576, 1991 WL 193335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1991 | Docket: 605996

Cited 3 times | Published

State, 344 So.2d 913, 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). Furthermore, a trial court

Reese v. State

535 So. 2d 676, 1988 WL 135854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1988 | Docket: 2348781

Cited 3 times | Published

as it was in Van Kooten, Hankey and Francis. Section 948.03(7), Florida Statutes (1987) specifically recognizes

Hankey v. State

529 So. 2d 736, 1988 WL 66085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1988 | Docket: 432289

Cited 3 times | Published

use, approval,[6] and recognition by statute (§ 948.03(7), Fla. Stat.) has greatly muddied the original

Smith v. State

513 So. 2d 1367, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2458

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1987 | Docket: 1689520

Cited 3 times | Published

probation and to set the terms thereof. See section 948.03 Florida Statutes (1985); Dearth v. State, 390

Hussey v. State

504 So. 2d 796, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 925

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 1511209

Cited 3 times | Published

rehabilitation and is therefore contrary to section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1985). We agree. We do

McDonald v. State

478 So. 2d 113, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1985 | Docket: 1378524

Cited 3 times | Published

restitution as determined by his probation officer. Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that

Chaney v. State

452 So. 2d 1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 474534

Cited 3 times | Published

incarceration as a condition of probation (Section 948.03(3), Florida Statutes) and to incarceration

Chaney v. State

452 So. 2d 1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 474534

Cited 3 times | Published

incarceration as a condition of probation (Section 948.03(3), Florida Statutes) and to incarceration

Young v. State

438 So. 2d 998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1983 | Docket: 1445831

Cited 3 times | Published

enumerated in section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981). Additionally, pursuant to section 948.03(3), the

Noel v. State

127 So. 3d 769, 2013 WL 6182407, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2013 | Docket: 60236854

Cited 2 times | Published

a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03, Florida Statutes. Id. Restitution orders are

State v. Medina

118 So. 3d 944, 2013 WL 4007281, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2013 | Docket: 60233489

Cited 2 times | Published

remanded with instructions. . See Fla. Stat. § 948.03(1)(1) (2006) (general condition of probation prohibiting

Brown v. State

117 So. 3d 484, 2013 WL 3814313, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 60232695

Cited 2 times | Published

remanded. DAVIS, C.J., and WALLACE, J., Concur. . § 948.03(5)(a)(7), Fla. Stat. (1998). The statute has been

Bauer v. State

96 So. 3d 1063, 2012 WL 3822191, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2012 | Docket: 60311412

Cited 2 times | Published

circuit court imposed a condition required by section 948.03(5)(a)7., Florida *1065Statutes (2001), prohibiting

Witchard v. State

68 So. 3d 407, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14089, 2011 WL 3903112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2011 | Docket: 60302275

Cited 2 times | Published

monitoring prior to the enactment of the statute. See § 948.03(5)(b)(5), Fla. Stat. (2003); Burrell, 993 So.2d

State v. Ford

27 So. 3d 725, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 910, 2010 WL 363888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2010 | Docket: 1664744

Cited 2 times | Published

5th DCA 2000); see § 775.089, Fla. Stat. (2009); § 948.03(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). Ford argues that although

Sellers v. State

16 So. 3d 225, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393, 2009 WL 2475008

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2009 | Docket: 1641243

Cited 2 times | Published

affidavit of violation of probation tracked section 948.03(5)(a)(7), Florida Statutes (2003), which prohibits

Stephens v. State

14 So. 3d 254, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10000, 2009 WL 2168805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2009 | Docket: 1159453

Cited 2 times | Published

correctly agrees that resentencing is necessary. Section 948.03(2) of the Florida Statutes (2007) provides:

Kasischke v. State

946 So. 2d 1155, 2006 WL 3740612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 1771256

Cited 2 times | Published

violating a condition of community control under section 948.03(5)(a)(7), Florida Statutes (1999). We affirm

Jackson v. State

902 So. 2d 193, 2005 WL 735099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2005 | Docket: 1674931

Cited 2 times | Published

it is not pronounced at sentencing, because section 948.03(5) authorizes the condition, and provides the

Ridley v. State

890 So. 2d 1261, 2005 WL 119465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2005 | Docket: 1690279

Cited 2 times | Published

Ridley's sentencing, but not on the authority of section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (2002), as the State

State v. Miller

888 So. 2d 76, 2004 WL 2409350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2004 | Docket: 2542989

Cited 2 times | Published

terms of Mr. Miller's probation, as required by section 948.03(5)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (2002), was

Russman v. State

869 So. 2d 635, 2004 WL 587649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1175307

Cited 2 times | Published

the list of standard probation conditions in section 948.03(1)(a)(m). See Justice v. State, 674 So.2d 123

Harris v. State

879 So. 2d 1223, 2002 WL 731699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2002 | Docket: 463814

Cited 2 times | Published

minor children" and "sex offender counseling." See § 948.03(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). Probation was part

State v. Thurman

791 So. 2d 1228, 2001 WL 929872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 1228894

Cited 2 times | Published

that the sex offender conditions specified in section 948.03(5)[1], Florida Statutes (1999), apply only

Ertley v. State

785 So. 2d 592, 2001 WL 376487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2001 | Docket: 450243

Cited 2 times | Published

his challenge to the condition set forth in section 948.03(5)(a)(7), were not raised below or were perfunctorily

CCM v. State

782 So. 2d 537, 2001 WL 376512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2001 | Docket: 456415

Cited 2 times | Published

sex offender probation conditions mandated by section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes apply in a juvenile delinquency

Porchia v. State

705 So. 2d 1050, 1998 WL 56427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1998 | Docket: 1555001

Cited 2 times | Published

probation and need *1051 not be orally announced. § 948.03(1)(k), Fla. Stat. (1995). However, the requirement

McDaniels v. State

679 So. 2d 840, 1996 WL 511514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1996 | Docket: 157923

Cited 2 times | Published

probation and need not be orally pronounced. See § 948.03(1)(k)1, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994); Malone v. State

Frey v. State

679 So. 2d 37, 1996 WL 464806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1996 | Docket: 1666055

Cited 2 times | Published

probation and need not be orally pronounced. See § 948.03(1)(k)(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994); Gilchrist v.

Ringling v. State

678 So. 2d 1339, 1996 WL 416120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1996 | Docket: 1737009

Cited 2 times | Published

pronounced and must be stricken under Nank. See § 948.03(1)(j)1., Fla.Stat. (1993). Further, the payment

Fernandez v. State

677 So. 2d 332, 1996 WL 293616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1996 | Docket: 1690052

Cited 2 times | Published

statutorily-authorized as "random testing," pursuant to section 948.03(1)(k)1, Florida Statutes (1995),[2] this condition

Powell v. State

681 So. 2d 722, 1996 WL 228580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1996 | Docket: 1385262

Cited 2 times | Published

testing is a general condition set forth in section 948.03(1)(j)1, Florida Statutes (1991); therefore

Powell v. State

681 So. 2d 722, 1996 WL 228580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1996 | Docket: 1385262

Cited 2 times | Published

testing is a general condition set forth in section 948.03(1)(j)1, Florida Statutes (1991); therefore

Brock v. State

667 So. 2d 1014, 1996 WL 63218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1996 | Docket: 148601

Cited 2 times | Published

affirm as to this issue, on the authority of section 948.03(1)(k)(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), and

Soca v. State

656 So. 2d 536, 1995 WL 335713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 1683811

Cited 2 times | Published

Ed.2d 276 (1990). Second, Florida Statutes Section 948.03 regulates the terms and conditions of probation

Sheffield v. State

651 So. 2d 160, 1995 WL 63195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1995 | Docket: 476430

Cited 2 times | Published

dispensed or used is a more precise statement of section 948.03(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1993), and thus the

Brooks v. State

649 So. 2d 329, 1995 WL 28980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1995 | Docket: 1693803

Cited 2 times | Published

Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 1986). [2] While section 948.03(2)(a)(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), authorizes

Mathis v. State

649 So. 2d 279, 1995 WL 15473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 1320707

Cited 2 times | Published

condition that defendant serve 364 days in jail. See § 948.03(5), Fla. Stat. (1991). Such a sentence requires

Burke v. State

642 So. 2d 677, 1994 WL 531280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 1159688

Cited 2 times | Published

suitable employment insofar as may be possible. See § 948.03(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992). Accordingly, we

Shacraha v. State

635 So. 2d 1051, 1994 WL 149697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1994 | Docket: 1352831

Cited 2 times | Published

standard conditions of community control/probation. § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (1991). We agree that these conditions

Solis v. State

622 So. 2d 584, 1993 WL 292042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1993 | Docket: 1169110

Cited 2 times | Published

of probation or community control. We agree. Section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1991), which appears

Russo v. State

603 So. 2d 1353, 1992 WL 193993

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1992 | Docket: 1475671

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence of eleven months and fifteen days. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1989) outlines the terms

Williams v. State

565 So. 2d 849, 1990 WL 115525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1990 | Docket: 1403451

Cited 2 times | Published

a probation condition which is proper under section 948.03(8) would not necessarily be precluded by the

Huffman v. State

472 So. 2d 469, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1985 | Docket: 1793246

Cited 2 times | Published

undetermined amount of restitution upon the appellant. Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1983), requires that

Walker v. State

461 So. 2d 229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1984 | Docket: 464393

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 411 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (1983). In Kominsky v

Myers v. State

426 So. 2d 986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1983 | Docket: 1283634

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 411 So.2d 1391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Section 948.03(3) Florida Statutes (1981). See also Barlow

Pickman v. State

164 So. 2d 805

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1964 | Docket: 60221874

Cited 2 times | Published

alleged conflict *806between the decision and F.S. § 948.03, F.S.A., we conclude that the writ must be denied

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207

Cited 1 times | Published

general conditions of probation pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes.]" and "SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

Justin Randolph Demott v. State of Florida

194 So. 3d 335, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 304, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1317, 2016 WL 3444016

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2016 | Docket: 3081760

Cited 1 times | Published

precise defining of conduct prohibited under section 948.03, Fla. Stat. (1991)). The court also concluded

Demott v. State

160 So. 3d 520, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4363, 2015 WL 1360814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2015 | Docket: 60246881

Cited 1 times | Published

illegally using drugs was improper. We disagree. Section 948.03(l)(k), Florida Statutes (2012) provides, in

Villanueva v. State

118 So. 3d 999, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13015, 2013 WL 4436953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2013 | Docket: 60233526

Cited 1 times | Published

probation that promote rehabilitation. See, e.g., § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2011) (“The enumeration of specific

State v. Nazario

100 So. 3d 1246, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19730, 2012 WL 5500440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2012 | Docket: 60225599

Cited 1 times | Published

probation. In support, the defendant cites section 948.03(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), which provides

Ford v. State

69 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14661, 2011 WL 4104913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2011 | Docket: 2358457

Cited 1 times | Published

condition that must be specified on the order. § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (2009). On Mr. Ford's community control

State v. Coleman

44 So. 3d 1198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14478, 2010 WL 3766763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2010 | Docket: 60295549

Cited 1 times | Published

at any time the terms and conditions” imposed. § 948.03(l)(a), (2), Fla. Stat. (2010). In contrast to

Davis v. State

36 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7307, 2010 WL 2077153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1115737

Cited 1 times | Published

reporting requirement of probation provided for in section 948.03(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), and in Florida

J.D.D. v. State

12 So. 3d 820, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6965, 2009 WL 1425216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 60233833

Cited 1 times | Published

terms or conditions of probation it imposes. See § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also State v. Springer

Williams v. State

879 So. 2d 49, 2004 WL 1531752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2004 | Docket: 2578814

Cited 1 times | Published

conditions of probation the conditions set forth in section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), relating

DPB v. State

877 So. 2d 770, 2004 WL 1393381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 1285384

Cited 1 times | Published

standard condition of probation, authorized under section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1993), and rule 3.986(e)

Pilorge v. State

876 So. 2d 591, 2004 WL 1226867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2004 | Docket: 1670961

Cited 1 times | Published

documentation. [2] Compare this statute with section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (2002), which specifically

Pagliuca v. State

860 So. 2d 1095, 2003 WL 22927150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2003 | Docket: 348036

Cited 1 times | Published

at sentencing in order to be validly imposed. § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2002); e.g., Queen v. State, 832

JM v. State

783 So. 2d 1204, 2001 WL 434904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2001 | Docket: 1259633

Cited 1 times | Published

that the sex offender conditions mandated by section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes, apply exclusively to

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897

Cited 1 times | Published

hearing. Brock, 688 So.2d at 910-12 & n. 1; see § 948.03(l)(k)l., Florida Statutes (Supp.1996); Torres

Law v. State

705 So. 2d 632, 1998 WL 11835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1998 | Docket: 1554997

Cited 1 times | Published

after the date the sentence is imposed. See also § 948.03(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (1995). However, our supreme

Johnson v. State

701 So. 2d 367, 1997 WL 677988

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1997 | Docket: 1736749

Cited 1 times | Published

taken from a statutory condition of probation. Section 948.03(1)(m), Florida Statutes (1995), authorizes

Scott v. State

681 So. 2d 738, 1996 WL 290584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1996 | Docket: 1722259

Cited 1 times | Published

to submit to random alcohol testing because section 948.03(1)(k)1., Florida Statutes (1993), provides

Nelson v. State

669 So. 2d 1145, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2640, 1996 WL 123170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1996 | Docket: 64763229

Cited 1 times | Published

probation restitution center may not exceed 364 days. § 948.03(7)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Holmes v. State, 645

Burdo v. State

667 So. 2d 874, 1996 WL 34123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1996 | Docket: 160601

Cited 1 times | Published

precise defining of conduct prohibited under section 948.03(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1991), which states

Young v. State

663 So. 2d 1376, 1995 WL 703631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 1313595

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant pay for such testing is not authorized by section 948.03(1)(k), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), and as

Williams v. State

661 So. 2d 59, 1995 WL 334322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 532499

Cited 1 times | Published

abuse unannounced and at your own expense." Section 948.03(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1993) authorizes the

Perry v. State

639 So. 2d 1090, 1994 WL 369651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1994 | Docket: 1712677

Cited 1 times | Published

I hesitate to make additional conclusions. Section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1991), prohibits a trial

Gluesenkamp v. State

636 So. 2d 1367, 1994 WL 171595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1994 | Docket: 1361295

Cited 1 times | Published

a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03, Florida Statutes. In addition to awarding

Wheatley v. State

629 So. 2d 896, 1993 WL 474127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1993 | Docket: 2577000

Cited 1 times | Published

counseling as directed by your Officer."[1]See § 948.03(1)(j)1, Fla. Stat. (1989); Boudreaux v. State

Vincent v. State

600 So. 2d 1292, 1992 WL 140967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1992 | Docket: 1408402

Cited 1 times | Published

probation/community control [i.e., those listed in Section 948.03, Florida Statutes], and must be stricken. Cumbie

Hamrick v. State

532 So. 2d 71, 1988 WL 105207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1988 | Docket: 59807

Cited 1 times | Published

the correct amount of restitution. We agree. Section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), clearly provides

Colburn v. State

510 So. 2d 652, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1649079

Cited 1 times | Published

discretion of the sentencing judge pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1985), the supreme court

Woods v. State

418 So. 2d 401, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1982 | Docket: 64591790

Cited 1 times | Published

that he pay 15% interest on the restitution. Section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes, which provides that

McCrae v. State

400 So. 2d 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1981 | Docket: 787833

Cited 1 times | Published

one year as a condition of probation under section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (1979), to be illegal

Adams v. State

387 So. 2d 498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1980 | Docket: 2577257

Cited 1 times | Published

pursuant to the general condition provisions of section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1979). State v. Jones, 327

Catherine Capozzi v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70630892

Published

Statutorily authorized conditions are listed in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2023), and a probationer

Ryan Lee Scheurman v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2025 | Docket: 69631018

Published

standard condition of probation authorized by section 948.03(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2023). Chapter 948

Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2024 | Docket: 68869501

Published

oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing.” § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2021); State v. Hart, 668 So.

Dale E. Folsom v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2024 | Docket: 68422848

Published

followed by a period of probation”). Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes, gives the trial court

ROBERDD DOUCHARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2023 | Docket: 66833840

Published

in section 948.03(1)(m), Florida Statutes (1995), included the word “knowingly.” See § 948.03(1)(n)

LORENZO KEANDRE SMITH vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2022 | Docket: 68035124

Published

probation, which arrangement is authorized by section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2020) (stating that “[t]he

LORENZO KEANDRE SMITH vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2022 | Docket: 66777665

Published

probation, which arrangement is authorized by section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2020) (stating that “[t]he

SHERRI LAVICTOIRE MARQUIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2022 | Docket: 63335822

Published

conditions because they are not authorized by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2020), or Florida Rule of

TYRONE G. JENKINS, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2022 | Docket: 61689371

Published

suspension is not a general condition of probation. See § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (2020).

DANIELLE ELIZABETH HITCHMAN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2021 | Docket: 60088924

Published

“determine the terms and conditions of probation.” § 948.03(1), Fla. Stat. In the instant case, Hitchman

MARK METELLUS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2021 | Docket: 29102121

Published

condition of probation authorized by either section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2017) or Florida Rule of

MARK METELLUS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2020 | Docket: 18642920

Published

condition of probation authorized by either section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2017) or Florida Rule of

DONALD E. WILSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2019 | Docket: 16503206

Published

800(c). He instead filed his motion pursuant to section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2017), which states

ROBERT A. MALDONADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2019 | Docket: 16090303

Published

the relevant subsection did not change. Compare § 948.03(5)(b)5., Fla. Stat. (1999), with § 948.30(2)(e)

Osborne v. State

272 So. 3d 794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 64715379

Published

his motions without an evidentiary hearing. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2018), provides that

Osborne v. State

272 So. 3d 794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 64715380

Published

his motions without an evidentiary hearing. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2018), provides that

JEREMY LIVINGSTONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

268 So. 3d 252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2019 | Docket: 14925788

Published

" This language tracks the language of section 948.03(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2015). Although chapter

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHRISTOPHER WALK

267 So. 3d 437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2019 | Docket: 14757617

Published

and removed that condition of probation. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes, generally allows a trial

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972

Published

taking of a digitized photograph as required by section 948.03, Florida Statutes.

Victor Villanueva v. State of Florida

200 So. 3d 47, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1428, 2016 WL 4168765

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2016 | Docket: 4108654

Published

acted within the broad discretion provided by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011), for trial courts

Victor Villanueva v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2016 | Docket: 4416257

Published

courts to determine probation conditions. See § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“The enumeration of specific

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264

Published

taking of a digitized photograph as required by section 948.03, Florida Statutes. SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Alamo v. State

177 So. 3d 99, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15736, 2015 WL 6393713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2015 | Docket: 60251260

Published

serve the first six months in the county jail. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2014), permits a court

Enea v. State

171 So. 3d 219, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11800, 2015 WL 4660075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2015 | Docket: 60249693

Published

it erroneously interpreted the language of section 948.03(5)(a)(5) and a condition of probation as eliminating

Fernandez v. State

164 So. 3d 1283, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9001, 2015 WL 3645895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2015 | Docket: 60247928

Published

concedes that Mr. Fernandez’s sentence is illegal. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that

Jesse Cleveland Harrell v. State of Florida

162 So. 3d 1128, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2679382

Published

of probation largely tracked the language of section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (2000). Specifically,

Pulecio v. State

160 So. 3d 556, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5009, 2015 WL 1544986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2015 | Docket: 2647628

Published

disputed over the course of his supervision. See § 948.03(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2012) (providing that

Jared Snow v. State of Florida

157 So. 3d 559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2015 | Docket: 2638637

Published

0135(4)(a), which is not an enumerated offense under section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2013). * Section

Driscoll v. State

111 So. 3d 945, 2013 WL 1689033, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2013 | Docket: 60230921

Published

Section 948.30(1) was originally created as section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1995). See ch. 95-283

Filppula v. State

106 So. 3d 45, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1541, 2013 WL 376064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2013 | Docket: 60228202

Published

condition of probation is an illegal sentence. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that

Dukharan v. State

96 So. 3d 454, 2012 WL 3629286, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2012 | Docket: 60311523

Published

trial court is authorized to consider under section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2010). Cf. Stuart v.

Velez-Pizzini v. State

58 So. 3d 278, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 590, 2011 WL 248560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2011 | Docket: 60299293

Published

to be included as standard conditions under section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1996), but in 2004, were

Williams v. State

67 So. 3d 249, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17179, 2010 WL 4484631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 60302079

Published

time it attempted to correct the sentence. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2008), provides that

MANCIPE v. State

43 So. 3d 194, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13717, 2010 WL 3582925

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2010 | Docket: 2583177

Published

correct illegal sentence is reversed. Under section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1993), the one-year term

State v. Isom

36 So. 3d 936, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9122, 2010 WL 2508859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 2566130

Published

probationary term were to be served in prison. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2008), states that "if

Loncar v. State

27 So. 3d 200, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 2010 WL 446496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2010 | Docket: 60288095

Published

finding that Loncar had violated his probation. Section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that

Harder v. State

14 So. 3d 1291, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, 2009 WL 2004158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2009 | Docket: 60241297

Published

appellant’s crime was committed on August 18, 1995, section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995), is applicable. See

Kelly v. State

13 So. 3d 127, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6918, 2009 WL 1532966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 60237583

Published

qualifying language relating to “relevance” in section 948.03(5)(a)(7), Florida Statutes (1999)— which was

King v. State

990 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 4265182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2008 | Docket: 1291946

Published

this condition, which was imposed pursuant to section 948.03(5)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2001),[1] without

Phillips v. State

971 So. 2d 255, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 82, 2008 WL 53645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2008 | Docket: 64853519

Published

standard conditions of probation set forth in section 948.03(1) are still applicable. Phillips had constructive

Kalinowski v. State

948 So. 2d 962, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1973, 2007 WL 486011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2007 | Docket: 64849154

Published

concur. . Section 948.30 formerly appeared as section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (2004). The statute was

State v. Witthaus

944 So. 2d 505, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21209, 2006 WL 3733314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 64848254

Published

v. State, 618 So.2d 1364, 1365 (Fla.1993). Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), sets forth standard

Berchin v. State

938 So. 2d 659, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16909, 2006 WL 2872481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2006 | Docket: 64847090

Published

conditions of probation imposed by it at any time. § 948.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). In Clark v. State, 579

Billias v. State

924 So. 2d 917, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4225, 2006 WL 733974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2006 | Docket: 64843261

Published

at the statutory maximum for each offense, section 948.03(6) required that the court reduce the probationary

Gaines v. State

899 So. 2d 513, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6058, 2005 WL 991664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2005 | Docket: 64837684

Published

The statute referred to by the trial court, section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2000), provides: *514(1)

Parrish v. State

898 So. 2d 1074, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3692, 2005 WL 636880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2005 | Docket: 64837443

Published

first sentence of paragraph 12 is authorized by section 948.03(l)(k)l., Florida Statutes (2002) and is therefore

Douglas v. State

893 So. 2d 655, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1602, 2005 WL 357033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 64836088

Published

to make various constitutional challenges to section 948.03(5)(b)5, Florida Statutes (2001). Affirmed.

State v. Torres

890 So. 2d 292, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18322, 2004 WL 3023408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2004 | Docket: 64835259

Published

counseling sessions under the authority of section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (2002), constitutes a

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

886 So. 2d 197, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 568, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1746, 2004 WL 2248209

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2004 | Docket: 64834033

Published

section 6, at 321, Laws of Florida, which amended section 948.03, Florida Statutes (terms and conditions of

D.P.B. v. State

877 So. 2d 770, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 64831834

Published

standard condition of probation, authorized under section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1993), and rule 3.986(e)

Cline v. State

855 So. 2d 657, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12982, 2003 WL 22023486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2003 | Docket: 64825534

Published

10(e) of his probation, a condition required by section 948.03(5)(a)5., Florida Statutes (1997). See Rowland

Wilson v. State

857 So. 2d 223, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12539, 2003 WL 21990217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 64825864

Published

condition eighteen was permissible based on section 948.03(j), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Thompson v. State

840 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2402, 2003 WL 554492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2003 | Docket: 64821320

Published

the basis that it was no longer necessary. See § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (2002). A trial court’s decision

Poplar v. State

842 So. 2d 902, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1341, 2003 WL 291904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2003 | Docket: 64822169

Published

adding conditions of supervision mandated by section 948.03(5)(a), (b), Florida Statutes (1999), including

Moore v. Nelson

830 So. 2d 918, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17169, 2002 WL 31557171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2002 | Docket: 64819061

Published

state interstate compact authority.” Id. (citing § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (2000)). This court held that the

Burch v. State

823 So. 2d 854, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11905, 2002 WL 1899769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2002 | Docket: 64816874

Published

without first announcing it at sentencing. See § 948.03(l)(o), Fla. Stat.; Justice, 674 So.2d at 125;

Edmondson v. State

816 So. 2d 768, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6274, 2002 WL 925243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2002 | Docket: 64815209

Published

they were statutorily required under section 948.03(5). Section 948.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), provides

T.R.B. v. State

796 So. 2d 640, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14467, 2001 WL 1219300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2001 | Docket: 64809240

Published

that sexual offender conditions mandated by section 948.03(5) apply to adults and juveniles sentenced

M.A.F. v. State

796 So. 2d 1248, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14462, 2001 WL 1223129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2001 | Docket: 64809390

Published

that sexual offender conditions mandated by section 948.03(5) apply to adults and juveniles sentenced

Moore v. Proctor

795 So. 2d 235, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13453, 2001 WL 1131664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2001 | Docket: 64808808

Published

receiving state interstate compact authority.” § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (2000). The order did not so stipulate

Andrews v. State

792 So. 2d 1274, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12515, 2001 WL 1008127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 64807910

Published

resentencing him to sexual offender probation under section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1999), enhanced his original

J.M. v. State

783 So. 2d 1204, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2001 | Docket: 64805094

Published

that the sex offender conditions mandated by section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes, apply exclusively to

C.C.M. v. State

782 So. 2d 537, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2001 | Docket: 64804782

Published

sex offender probation conditions mandated by section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes apply in a juvenile delinquency

Muzzo v. State

773 So. 2d 1271, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16870, 2000 WL 1872998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 64802610

Published

been mandatory if section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (2000) applied. See § 948.03(5)(a)3 & 5, Fla. Stat

Richardson v. State

761 So. 2d 1232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8490, 2000 WL 899250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 64798538

Published

the plea agreement and authorized by law. See § 948.03(6), (7), Fla. Stat. (1999); Waite v. City of Fort

Graham v. State

753 So. 2d 607, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1450, 2000 WL 192164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2000 | Docket: 64795924

Published

special condition of his probation. We agree. Section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that

STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Coleman

766 So. 2d 285, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1357, 2000 WL 172470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 1330208

Published

Virginia under Florida imposed community control. Section 948.03(6) unambiguously provides: "The enumeration

Spry v. State

750 So. 2d 123, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 307, 2000 WL 35826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64794508

Published

substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used.” See § 948.03(l)m, Fla. Stat. (1997) (making the prohibited

Gatlin v. State

741 So. 2d 1230, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13132, 1999 WL 776217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1999 | Docket: 64791245

Published

period for a drug rehabilitation program. See § 948.03(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Likewise, we are concerned

O'CONNELL v. State

733 So. 2d 556, 1999 WL 236185

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1999 | Docket: 1659958

Published

707 So.2d 688 (Fla.1998). As to Condition 15, section 948.03(n), Florida Statutes, amended effective October

Wanner v. State

746 So. 2d 478, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4547, 1999 WL 199501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1999 | Docket: 64792827

Published

victim as defined by this statute. Further, section 948.03(6) allows the trial court to modify probation

McDowell v. State

720 So. 2d 315, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14552, 1998 WL 796472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1998 | Docket: 64784131

Published

serve 85 months in prison fails to comport with section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (1977). In pertinent part

Joly v. State

702 So. 2d 569, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12934, 1997 WL 716480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1997 | Docket: 64777278

Published

condition, and thus, need not be orally announced. § 948.03(l)(j)l., Fla. Stat. (1993); State v. Hart, 668

Nase v. State

746 So. 2d 469, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12710, 1997 WL 716537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1997 | Docket: 64792822

Published

626 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Moreover, section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that

Phelps v. State

696 So. 2d 1307, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8230, 1997 WL 400102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1997 | Docket: 64775057

Published

J., concur. . The legislature has amended section 948.03, Florida Statutes, to include attending an

Fennell v. State

694 So. 2d 873, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6239, 1997 WL 310189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1997 | Docket: 64774099

Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.986 and section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995). Although not raised

Pardes v. State

696 So. 2d 823, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2468, 1997 WL 119743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1997 | Docket: 64774823

Published

suitable employment insofar as may be possible.” § 948.03(l)(e), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994). We strike condition

State v. Simmons

687 So. 2d 827, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 19, 1997 WL 57204

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771046

Published

01(3), Florida Statutes (1993).5 Additionally, Section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1993),6 expressly authorizes

Sanford v. State

684 So. 2d 269, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12756, 1996 WL 697904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1996 | Docket: 64769548

Published

be improper, the court explained that: While section 948.03, which enumerates the terms and conditions

Hawkins v. State

693 So. 2d 562, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12317, 1996 WL 670451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 64773416

Published

work faithfully “insofar as may be possible.” § 948.03(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993). We also strike the portion

Wong v. State

685 So. 2d 882, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11613, 1996 WL 637702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 64770152

Published

We reverse only as to that one point. Under section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1993), a period of incarceration

Weekfall v. State

686 So. 2d 618, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11632, 1996 WL 637699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 64770402

Published

“insofar as may be possible,” contained in section 948.03(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1993). Therefore,

Jackson v. State

680 So. 2d 1102, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1996 WL 583171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 64768125

Published

construed as the standard costs associated with section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1995). Accordingly, we strike

Williams v. State

681 So. 2d 817, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10459, 1996 WL 582582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 64768438

Published

and consented to by the probation officer.” See § 948.03(1)(Z), Fla. Stat. (1995). I believe it would be

Martin v. State

679 So. 2d 880, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9889, 1996 WL 531679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1996 | Docket: 64767487

Published

prior to the effective date of the amendment to section 948.03(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1995), which authorized

Hill v. State

679 So. 2d 842, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9432, 1996 WL 511539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1996 | Docket: 64767458

Published

See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996); § 948.03(1)(j)1., Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.986(e)

Carter v. State

677 So. 2d 1349, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8261, 1996 WL 441640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1996 | Docket: 64766554

Published

condition applicable to any probationer under section 948.03, Florida Statutes. Similar reasoning would

McRae v. State

679 So. 2d 14, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7857, 1996 WL 417532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1996 | Docket: 64767080

Published

imposition of payments to First Step in the past, section 948.03(1)(n), Florida Statutes, now provides that

Brown v. State

677 So. 2d 395, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7819, 1996 WL 411397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1996 | Docket: 64766320

Published

is a standard condition of probation under section 948.03(1)©, Florida Statutes (1993), the portion of

Fair v. State

676 So. 2d 85, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7467, 1996 WL 387899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1996 | Docket: 64766026

Published

portion of the sentence which is excessive. Section 948.03(6), Florida Statutes (1995) limits the time

Holmes v. State

675 So. 2d 995, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6168, 1996 WL 313127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1996 | Docket: 64765517

Published

to submit to random alcohol testing because section 948.03(l)(j)l., Florida Statutes (1993), provides

Washington v. State

685 So. 2d 858, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 64770145

Published

include the phrase “insofar as may be possible.” See § 948.03(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Godley v. State, 659

Williams v. State

673 So. 2d 536, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4665, 1996 WL 228579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1996 | Docket: 64764588

Published

a general condition of probation set out in section 948.03(1)©, Florida Statutes (1993). However, we strike

Shell v. State

672 So. 2d 92, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905, 1996 WL 187550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1996 | Docket: 64764013

Published

general condition of probation outlined in section 948.03(l)(j)l., Florida Statutes (1993), we strike

Shell v. State

672 So. 2d 92, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905, 1996 WL 187550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1996 | Docket: 64764013

Published

general condition of probation outlined in section 948.03(l)(j)l., Florida Statutes (1993), we strike

McConn v. State

685 So. 2d 1331, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3528, 1996 WL 164619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1996 | Docket: 64770254

Published

drug, or controlled substance use. Although section 948.03(1)©, Florida Statutes (1993), provides constructive

Swinton v. State

670 So. 2d 1128, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3075, 1996 WL 139210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1996 | Docket: 64763504

Published

general condition of probation pursuant to section 948.03(l)(j)l, Florida Statutes (1998), the unannounced

Rivas v. State

667 So. 2d 908, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 877, 1996 WL 46927

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 64762206

Published

condition of probation exceeding 364 days. See § 948.03(5), Fla.Stat. (1995); Solis v. State, 622 So.2d

Dobson v. State

665 So. 2d 386, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 80, 1996 WL 4129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1996 | Docket: 64761078

Published

1, 1995 effective date of the amendment to section 948.03, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). See Ch. 95-189

Hayes v. State

665 So. 2d 339, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13394, 1995 WL 757873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1995 | Docket: 64761054

Published

conditions are statutorily authorized pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1993), or are otherwise

Hickey v. State

685 So. 2d 845, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10221, 1995 WL 567364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1995 | Docket: 64770127

Published

affirm the remaining portion of condition 7. See § 948.03(l)(i), Fla.Stat. (1991); Tomlin-son, 645 So.2d

Zepeda v. State

658 So. 2d 1201, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8516, 1995 WL 471666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1995 | Docket: 64758159

Published

modification of an existing condition is valid. Section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1993), allows the trial

Fielder v. State

658 So. 2d 596, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428, 1995 WL 407433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1995 | Docket: 64758009

Published

more precise definition of a general prohibition. § 948.03(l)(i), Fla.Stat. (1993); Tomlinson v. State, 645

Woodruff v. State

656 So. 2d 968, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7102, 1995 WL 385401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 64757334

Published

include the language “in so far as possible.” § 948.03(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Burke v. State, 642 So

Heathcoe v. State

654 So. 2d 1258, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5066, 1995 WL 277084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1995 | Docket: 64756370

Published

general condition of probation authorized by section 948.03(l)(i), Florida Statutes. See Emond, 652 So

Dexter v. State

654 So. 2d 1248, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5090, 1995 WL 277052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1995 | Docket: 64756364

Published

general condition of probation authorized by section 948.03(l)(i), Florida Statutes (1993). See Emond,

Lowell v. State

652 So. 2d 975, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3507, 1995 WL 147391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1995 | Docket: 64755254

Published

This is not a standard condition set out in section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1991); consequently, the

Duby v. State

651 So. 2d 800, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2296, 1995 WL 93827

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1995 | Docket: 64754875

Published

$98,642.00 as a condition of community control. § 948.03(l)(e), Fla.Stat. (1991) (provision for making

Green v. State

638 So. 2d 1006, 1994 WL 261437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1994 | Docket: 2513332

Published

concur. NOTES [1] However, it is clear that section 948.03(5) does provide for rescission and modification

Davie v. State

632 So. 2d 1090, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1351, 1994 WL 54845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1994 | Docket: 64746734

Published

Corrections.” The state agrees this sentence violates section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992) which limits

Quinonez v. State

634 So. 2d 173, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1198, 1994 WL 46974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1994 | Docket: 64747107

Published

Condition (9) is statutorily authorized pursuant to section 948.03(1)©, Florida Statutes (1989); therefore, it

Marin v. State

624 So. 2d 808, 1993 WL 392286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1993 | Docket: 1517926

Published

imposed a four year sentence of imprisonment. Section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1991) provides that "a

Bryant v. State

622 So. 2d 190, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8472, 1993 WL 310669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1993 | Docket: 64698074

Published

conditions of community control pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes. Those conditions require

Vernon v. State

618 So. 2d 369, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5664, 1993 WL 169167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1993 | Docket: 64696275

Published

probation was erroneously imposed. Although Section 948.03(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1989), authorizes

Quigley v. State

620 So. 2d 1010, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9455, 1992 WL 216355

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1992 | Docket: 64697432

Published

restitution ordered by the trial court under Section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1991). The fact that

McDougal v. State

604 So. 2d 896, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462, 1992 WL 212027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1992 | Docket: 64669566

Published

period of incarceration which may be so imposed. § 948.03(5), Fla.Stat. (1991). See also Villery v. Florida

Alexander v. State

602 So. 2d 697, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9067, 1992 WL 191279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1992 | Docket: 64669027

Published

exceeds two years. See § 948.001, Fla.Stat. (1987); § 948.03(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987); Yourn v. State, 579 So

Gaal v. State

599 So. 2d 723, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5848, 1992 WL 110911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1992 | Docket: 64667730

Published

standard condition of probation permitted under section 948.03(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), involves merely

Johnson v. State

598 So. 2d 282, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5367, 1992 WL 98781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1992 | Docket: 64667148

Published

challenged conditions are statutorily authorized, see § 948.03, Fla.Stat. (1989), it appears appellant was on

Forsythe v. State

597 So. 2d 423, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4753, 1992 WL 81077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1992 | Docket: 64666779

Published

condi-, tion 18 for random drug screening. See § 948.03(l)(j), Fla.Stat. (1989). SCHOONOVER, C.J., and

Lippman v. State

595 So. 2d 190, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1746, 1992 WL 32799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1992 | Docket: 64665836

Published

State, 572 So.2d 1368, 1370-72 (Fla.1990). Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), confers broad authority

Rosa v. State

592 So. 2d 769, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 650, 1992 WL 9651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1992 | Docket: 64664746

Published

(condition of probation) makes the sentence illegal. Section 948.03(8), Florida Statutes (1989) limits the period

Stinson v. State

590 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11883, 1991 WL 248623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1991 | Docket: 64663496

Published

condition of probation or community control. See § 948.03(8), Fla.Stat. (1989). Since the guideline schedules

Mendaros v. State

589 So. 2d 386, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433, 1991 WL 239908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1991 | Docket: 64663110

Published

cases as directed by your probation officer.” Section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes, expressly states that

Small v. State

587 So. 2d 597, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9996, 1991 WL 200773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1991 | Docket: 64662298

Published

for an unrelated offense can be ordered under section 948.03(8), Florida Statutes: The enumeration of specific

Harris v. State

576 So. 2d 426, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2344, 1991 WL 35413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1991 | Docket: 64657347

Published

one year in the county jail is invalid. See Section 948.03(7), Florida Statutes (1987); Villery v. Florida

Smith v. State

573 So. 2d 863, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8121, 1990 WL 159676

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1990 | Docket: 64656022

Published

sentence imposed and remand for resentencing. § 948.03(8), Fla. Stat. (1989). Upon remand, should the

Coleman v. State

564 So. 2d 1238, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5685, 1990 WL 108832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1990 | Docket: 64652023

Published

REMANDED. COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. . § 948.03, Fla.Stat. (1983).

Woods v. Angel

556 So. 2d 820, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 871, 1990 WL 12010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1990 | Docket: 64648083

Published

jurisdiction to hear the state’s motion. Clearly, Section 948.03(7) Fla.Stat. (1987) grants the court the authority

Brenatelli v. State

555 So. 2d 1315, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1990 WL 4145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1990 | Docket: 64647727

Published

no violation. We agree and reverse. Although Section 948.03(7), Florida Statutes (1987) permits the trial

Waller v. State

550 So. 2d 1190, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2546, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6097, 1989 WL 129798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1989 | Docket: 64645833

Published

determine the correct amount of restitution under section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes, and in this case erred

Cusmina v. State

549 So. 2d 1168, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5546, 1989 WL 118631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1989 | Docket: 64645401

Published

probation conditions 9 and 10 were violated. See § 948.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Chatman v. State, 365 So

Calhoun v. State

546 So. 2d 1194, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4424, 1989 WL 87552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1989 | Docket: 64643973

Published

reverse that provision of the order of probation. Section 948.03(1)(e), Fla.Stat. (1987) provides that the amount

Cogdell v. State

547 So. 2d 256, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1778, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4223, 1989 WL 82153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1989 | Docket: 64644168

Published

JJ., concur. . It should be also noted that section 948.03(3), Florida Statutes (1981) (now 948.03(4)

Cogdell v. State

547 So. 2d 256, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1778, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4223, 1989 WL 82153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1989 | Docket: 64644168

Published

JJ., concur. . It should be also noted that section 948.03(3), Florida Statutes (1981) (now 948.03(4)

Brown v. State

546 So. 2d 1156, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1775, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4224, 1989 WL 82140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1989 | Docket: 64643937

Published

amount of restitution due a victim pursuant to section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1987). Accordingly, the

Carson v. State

531 So. 2d 1069, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2341, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4600, 1988 WL 107127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1988 | Docket: 64637411

Published

eighteen months’ community control pursuant to section 948.03, Florida Statutes. During this period, defendant’s

Brewer v. State

531 So. 2d 393, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2173, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4097, 1988 WL 94680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1988 | Docket: 64637137

Published

order is subsequently modified pursuant to section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (1987), and additional

Wright v. State

531 So. 2d 221, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2173, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4096, 1988 WL 94676

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1988 | Docket: 64636992

Published

order is subsequently modified pursuant to section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (1987), and additional

Durrett v. State

530 So. 2d 483, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2052, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3926, 1988 WL 91209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 64636727

Published

“aggrieved parties” (within the meaning of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes) to whom the defendant should

Tucker v. State

529 So. 2d 818, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1917, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3672, 1988 WL 84223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1988 | Docket: 64636406

Published

within any of the conditions enumerated in section 948.03, F.S., nor does the record indicate any rational

Cole v. State

521 So. 2d 297, 1988 WL 17832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1988 | Docket: 1593081

Published

within the category of enumerated conditions in section 948.03, Florida Statutes, which may be broadly imposed

Waters v. State

520 So. 2d 678, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 543, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 688, 1988 WL 14584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1988 | Docket: 64632898

Published

association with Richard Cooper merits discussion. Section 948.03(l)(i), Florida Statutes, permits the courts

Greenfield v. State

511 So. 2d 751, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2089, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1987 | Docket: 64629013

Published

810 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Appellee argues that section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides

K.M.C. v. State

485 So. 2d 1296, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 392, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 64618373

Published

“aggrieved party.” Appellant draws this phrase from section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides

Thomas v. State

480 So. 2d 158, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2780, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1985 | Docket: 64616248

Published

restitution as a condition of probation are Section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1983)1 *160and Section

Williams v. State

474 So. 2d 1260, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2075, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613922

Published

costs as a condition of probation pursuant to Section 948.03(4), Florida Statutes (1983); however, the trial

J.S.H. v. State

455 So. 2d 1143, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2044, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1984 | Docket: 64606814

Published

condition of probation in adult proceedings, section 948.03(l)(g), Florida Statutes (1975), was construed

Milton v. State

453 So. 2d 137, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1984 | Docket: 64606025

Published

state is an aggrieved party for purposes of section 948.03(1)(g), Florida Statutes. See also Ballance

Smith v. State

448 So. 2d 20, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1984 | Docket: 64604040

Published

incarceration as a condition of probation. Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1983),1 establishes certain

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 26, 1983 | Docket: 3259007

Published

conditions of probation or community control. Section 948.03(4), F.S., as amended by s 16, Ch. 83-131, Laws

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 22, 1983 | Docket: 3257578

Published

State, 243 So.2d 189 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1971). Section 948.03, F.S., sets forth the terms and conditions

Jones v. State

427 So. 2d 398, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1983 | Docket: 64595321

Published

case. He argues that the statute in question, Section 948.03(l)(g), Florida Statutes (1979), limits restitution

Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Gross

421 So. 2d 44, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1982 | Docket: 64592934

Published

judges in formulating conditions of probation. § 948.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1981). This argument fails on the

Lauxman v. State

402 So. 2d 432, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1981 | Docket: 64584642

Published

incarceration as a condition of probation under section 948.03(2), Florida Statutes, disposed of the issue

Maples v. State

397 So. 2d 1146, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1981 | Docket: 64582436

Published

COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur. . § 948.03(l)(g), Fla.Stat. (1977). . The trial court contended

Fillastre v. State

387 So. 2d 400, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1980 | Docket: 64577888

Published

terms and conditions of probation is found in Section 948.03. It is clear from this record that the trial

Stokes v. State

377 So. 2d 766, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15920

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1979 | Docket: 64573110

Published

amount of damages or loss caused by his offense. § 948.03(l)(g), Fla.Stat. (1977); Fresneda v. State, supra

Curry v. State

362 So. 2d 36, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1978 | Docket: 64565873

Published

and it is hereby modified in accordance with Section 948.03, Florida Statutes, in the following manner:

Bracey v. State

356 So. 2d 72

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1978 | Docket: 64563328

Published

defendant spend a specified period of time in jail. Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975). State v. Jones, 327

Green v. State

310 So. 2d 373, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1975 | Docket: 64545374

Published

stands for the proposition that pursuant to F.S. § 948.03(2) a judge may impose a jail sentence as a condition

Sanders v. State

268 So. 2d 553, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1972 | Docket: 64528540

Published

and the defendant placed upon probation. F.S. § 948.03 F.S.A. sets forth the general terms and conditions