Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 95.011 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 95.011 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 95.011 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 95.011

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS
Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
View Entire Chapter
95.011 Applicability.—A civil action or proceeding, called “action” in this chapter, including one brought by the state, a public officer, a political subdivision of the state, a municipality, a public corporation or body corporate, or any agency or officer of any of them, or any other governmental authority, shall be barred unless begun within the time prescribed in this chapter or, if a different time is prescribed elsewhere in these statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere.
History.—s. 1, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 77-174.

F.S. 95.011 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.011 on CourtListener

Amendments to 95.011


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 95.011

Total Results: 947  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 253 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 336

that the applicable statute of limitations is section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973), and the applicable
Copy

Major League Baseball v. Morsani, 790 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 163 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1401, 2001 WL 776662

provisions of chapter 95, Florida Statutes (1991). Section 95.11 sets forth the limitations period for an action
Copy

Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 146 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 462629

statutory scheme for limitations of actions. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1997), reads in pertinent
Copy

Hearndon v. Graham, 767 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 99 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1288688

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1987). Hearndon argued
Copy

Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 96 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13078

the statute of limitations relating to fraud (§ 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1965)), but finding no such
Copy

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLC, 746 F.3d 1008 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 92 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

to enforce a restrictive covenant. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b); Pond Apple Place III Condo. Ass’n
Copy

Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla., Inc., 829 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 87 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 834, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1967, 2002 WL 31259952

statute of limitations for statutory violations, section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to actions
Copy

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 71 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 428

exposure between those sought to be limited by section 95.11(3)(c), struck down in Overland, and those listed
Copy

Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co., 357 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 1978).

Cited 67 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4729

negligence/products liability *402 actions. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1971). In 1974 there was
Copy

Gordon Jones & Laura Jones v. John H. Childers & Talent Servs., Inc., 18 F.3d 899 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 67 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 40 Fed. R. Serv. 843, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6530, 1994 WL 91268

five years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). 2. breach of fiduciary duty:
Copy

Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co., 392 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1980).

Cited 64 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

this section, I would limit that holding to section 95.11(3)(c). I do this not for any reason expressed
Copy

Armour v. Allen, 377 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 61 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

four-year limitation period of Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(p) does not apply to claims for child support
Copy

In Re: Fernando R. Alvarez, Debtor. Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. v. Fernando R. Alvarez, 224 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 58 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the exercise of due diligence.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however
Copy

Allen v. Butterworth, 756 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 53 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 381484

court denied the writ as time barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), which states that
Copy

Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Assocs., LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Cited 47 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1230326, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401

instrument to be commenced within five years, see § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat., and claims for unjust enrichment
Copy

Beck v. Lazard Freres & Co., LLC, 175 F.3d 913 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 45 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9039, 1999 WL 300894

dismissed the complaint as being barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, the five-year breach
Copy

Creviston v. Gen. Motors Corp., 225 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1969).

Cited 45 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

three-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(5) (e), Florida Statutes 1961, F.S.A. In affirming
Copy

Abbott Labs., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Capital, 765 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Cited 44 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6072, 2000 WL 664052

are barred by the statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The facts are
Copy

Colhoun v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 265 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1972).

Cited 41 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

was begun within the period set forth in F.S. Section 95.11, F.S.A. If it arose in Tennessee, however, it
Copy

Davis v. Monahan, 832 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2002 WL 31477296

malpractice, and intentional torts based on abuse. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 2000), provides:
Copy

Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc., 531 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 831, 1988 WL 97201

two years from the discovery of the malpractice. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983). Other actions founded
Copy

Engle Cases 4432 Individual Tobacco v. Various Tobacco Companies, 767 F.3d 1082 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1199, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17450

subject to a two-year limitations period, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d). Plaintiffs’ counsel sought leave from the
Copy

Abram-Adams v. Citigroup, Inc., 491 F. App'x 972 (11th Cir. 2012).

Cited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

claims-four-year statute of limitations, see Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3). On appeal, Abram-Adams argues that the doctrines
Copy

Silva v. Sw. Florida Blood Bank, Inc., 601 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 39 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1992 WL 110906

limitations for medical malpractice suits under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), or the four-year
Copy

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Labs., Inc., 863 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2003).

Cited 38 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 719, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1623, 2003 WL 22207887

repose applicable to medical malpractice cases. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), extends the
Copy

Foley v. Morris, 339 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 38 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the two-year statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (1973), effective July 1, 1972, rather than
Copy

Fulton Cnty. Adm'r v. Sullivan, 753 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 1072973

was included as a tolling provision only in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995) (medical malpractice
Copy

Kala Investments, Inc. v. Sklar, 538 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 34 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 6188

and Kala's actions against them are barred by Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1985). While it is
Copy

Marek v. State, 14 So. 3d 985 (Fla. 2009).

Cited 33 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 461, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1125, 2009 WL 2045416

depending on the cause of action asserted. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1983) (establishing four-year
Copy

JB v. Sacred Heart Hosp. of Pensacola, 635 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1994).

Cited 33 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 194, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 577, 1994 WL 137919

transporter for the patient fall within Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(b), the two-year statute of limitations for
Copy

Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs of Madison Cty. v. Grice, 438 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1983).

Cited 31 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

statute of limitations barred their claim. See § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (1977). Although the rules of
Copy

Carter v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 778 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 31 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1726779

539. II. Analysis A. Statute of Limitations Section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1981), states that
Copy

Universal Eng'g Corp. v. Perez, 451 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1984).

Cited 31 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3026

413 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), which held section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), unconstitutional
Copy

Knight v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc., 750 F. Supp. 1109 (M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 30 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15044, 1990 WL 176026

four-year statute of limitations. Florida Statutes, § 95.11(3)(j). The statute of limitations for *1113 Florida
Copy

Cason v. Florida Dept. of Mgmt. Servs., 944 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 30 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2006 WL 3313749

...en leased merely because the State failed to file a timely challenge to the assessment. We also note that the provisions of section 194.171 differ from the civil statute of limitations, which specifically includes the State within its operation. See § 95.011, Fla....
...Pizzarelli, 761 So.2d 294, 298 (Fla.2000) (looking to language in different statute to conclude that "[w]hen the Florida Legislature wishes to provide for set-offs for future benefits it well knows how to express itself") (quoting Pizzarelli v. Rollins, 704 So.2d 630, 633 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)). Section 95.011 shows that had the Legislature chosen to make the State subject to the sixty-day filing requirement in section 194.171(2), it knew how to do so....
...The petitioners actually use the statute of limitations to support their position that because the Legislature clearly intended the State to be subject to the limitations periods set forth in chapter 95, Florida Statutes (2006), the Legislature also intended the State to be bound by section 194.171(2). Section 95.011 provides that a civil action or proceeding, ....
...e. (Emphasis supplied.) The petitioners contend that for lawsuits challenging ad valorem tax assessments, the "time prescribed elsewhere" is the sixty-day period in section 194.171(2). We disagree. The reference to "the time prescribed elsewhere" in section 95.011 encompasses other provisions that can also be construed as statutes of limitations, but not jurisdictional statutes of nonclaim such as section 194.171....
...Risk of Delay Finally, we caution that although the State is not subject to the sixty-day requirement in section 194.171(2) under these circumstances, lengthy delay by the State in filing suit to vindicate its nontaxable status on property that is nonetheless being taxed remains risky. As noted above, section 95.011 specifies that the limitations periods in chapter 95 apply to the State, its agencies, and officers....
Copy

Baskerville-Donovan Eng's, Inc. v. Pensacola Exec. House Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 581 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 1991).

Cited 29 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 440, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 931, 1991 WL 101180

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983),[2] applies only
Copy

Stebilla v. Mussallem, 595 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 27 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 24470

that of the two year limitation of actions in section 95.11, were subject to dismissal pursuant to section
Copy

Hosp. Corp. of Am. v. Lindberg, 571 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 198320

jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. [3] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), provides, in
Copy

Hankey v. Yarian, 755 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 283692

this scheme. LIMITATIONS SCHEME Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for
Copy

Todd Pioch v. IBEX Eng'g Servs., Inc., 825 F.3d 1264 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 25 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

counterclaim was time-barred under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) (imposing a two-year statute of limitations
Copy

Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. MacKal, 641 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7987, 1994 WL 419054

the four-year statute of limitations applies. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1991). The discovery rule found
Copy

Raie v. Cheminova, Inc., 336 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 23 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13691, 2003 WL 21525295

follows: An action for products liability under § 95.11(3) must be begun within the period prescribed in
Copy

Merkle v. Robinson, 737 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 23 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 506972

INVOLVING FLORIDA'S STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, SECTION 95.11, FLORIDA STATUTES? Robinson v. Merkle, 700 So
Copy

Cheylla Silva v. Baptist Health South Florida, Inc., 856 F.3d 824 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 22 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 WL 1830158, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8151, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1509

which in Florida is a four-year period, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3); see also City of Hialeah v. Rojas, 311 F.3d
Copy

Greene v. Bursey, 733 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Cited 22 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 314126

that the applicable statute of limitations is section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which sets a
Copy

Broward Builders Exch., Inc. v. Goehring, 231 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1970).

Cited 22 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2858

the defense of the Statute of Limitations, F.S. § 95.11(7) (b), and moved for dismissal. The trial court
Copy

Dade Cnty. v. Lambert, 334 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Cited 22 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

four-year statute of *847 limitations, provided for in § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat., applies herein. The second point
Copy

Florida Dhrs v. Sap, 835 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Additionally, since neither section 768.28 nor section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes abrogates these equitable
Copy

Almengor v. Dade Cnty., 359 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

then applicable four year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4) Fla. Stat. (1969). The plaintiff contends that
Copy

Korman v. Iglesias, 736 F. Supp. 261 (S.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 21 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 16 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1626, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5852, 1990 WL 63031

statute of limitation found in Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(j) (1989). Plaintiff also correctly notes that
Copy

Wiley v. Roof, 641 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1994).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1994 WL 275172

...urth count, she alleged that all of the named defendants conspired to prevent her from reporting the alleged abuse. The trial court dismissed the amended complaint because the statute of limitations barred Roof's cause of action pursuant to sections 95.011 and 95.11(3)( o ), Florida Statutes (1991)....
...Before the action is barred by the statute, the Legislature has absolute power to amend the statute and alter the period of limitations prescribed therein... ." Id., 37 So.2d at 162 (quoting Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident Commission, 198 Cal. 631, 246 P. 1046, 1047 (1926)). Florida's statute of limitations, section 95.011, bars all action unless commenced within designated times....
...Therefore, we hold that provision invalid as to a previously barred action and quash the decision below. It is so ordered. GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Roof's complaint was filed more than eighteen years after the last instance of alleged abuse. Section 95.011, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: A civil action or proceeding, called "action" in this chapter, including one brought by the state, a public officer, a political subdivision of the state, a municipality, a public corporation or body...
Copy

Clemons v. Flagler Hosp., Inc., 385 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

the two-year limitation period provided by section 95.11(4) and (6), Florida Statutes (1971), the plaintiff
Copy

Scott v. Otis Elevator Co., 524 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 457, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 289, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 524, 1988 WL 40939

court reversed, finding the action barred by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), which provides
Copy

Auto Owners Ins. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 227 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 19 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19478, 2002 WL 31114023

five year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) begins to run. The owner in Southwest Florida
Copy

Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Indus., Inc., 22 So. 3d 36 (Fla. 2009).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1868, 2009 WL 3644163

are governed by two main authorities. First, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth a two-year
Copy

Barron v. Shapiro, 565 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 82925

applicable statute of limitations in Nardone was section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1965), which provided:
Copy

Melvin v. Melvin, 391 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Cited 19 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

four-year limitations period of Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(p) does not apply to claims for child support
Copy

Patten v. Winderman, 965 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 18 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2782549

argued that Patten's actions were barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2006), claiming that accounting
Copy

Nadd v. Le Credit Lyonnais, SA, 804 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 769, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2274, 2001 WL 1472623

statute of limitations found in subsection (1) of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995), is applicable to actions
Copy

Jacobs v. Bd. of Regents, Etc., 473 F. Supp. 663 (S.D. Fla. 1979).

Cited 18 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1656, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11134, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30, 465

to believe based upon the facts alleged that F.S. 95.11(3)(f) is the proper statute of limitations to
Copy

Zakak v. Broida & Napier, PA, 545 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 70859

action with prejudice. The operative statute is section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1985) which provides in
Copy

Bryne v. Gulfstream First Bank & Trust Co., Etc., 528 F. Supp. 692 (S.D. Fla. 1981).

Cited 17 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16439

violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 is Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e),[1] which pertains to limitation of actions
Copy

Pub. H. Trust of Dade Cty. v. Knuck, 495 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

the applicable statute of limitations period, § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1985),[2] had failed to observe
Copy

Steiner v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 364 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970

therefore, barred by the Statute of Limitations, Section 95.11(3)(a) & (e), Florida Statutes (1977).[2] The
Copy

Musculoskeletal Inst. v. Parham, 745 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

ALSO EXTEND THE STATUTE OF REPOSE CONTAINED IN SECTION 95.11(4)( [b]), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)? Id. at 625
Copy

Daniels v. Weiss, 385 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

applicable two-year statute of limitations [Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973)] having already
Copy

Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales, 400 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

subsequent amendments upon the application of section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973). Brooks v. Cerrato
Copy

Sheoah Highlands, Inc. v. Daugherty, 837 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 328430

attorney's fees. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1998), provides, in relevant
Copy

Penthouse North Ass'n v. Lombardi, 461 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. 1984).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 508, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3662

characterize the nature of the cause of action. See § 95.11(3), (4), and (5), Fla. Stat. (1967). It is unnecessary
Copy

Yusuf Mohamad Excav. Inc. v. Ringhaver Equip. Co., 793 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 1023501

deceptive trade practice claims. We disagree. Section 95.11(3) of the Florida Statutes (1989) provides a
Copy

Brown v. Wood, 202 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

statute of limitations for assault and battery, § 95.11 (6), Fla.Stats., F.S.A. The trial court granted
Copy

Ash v. Stella, 457 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1984).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

statute of limitations governing this case is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), which provides:
Copy

Archer v. Maddux, 645 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 630814

before the two-year statute of limitations ran, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), and more than
Copy

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Carter, 658 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 366678

and thus of a statute of repose. Compare also § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993) ("[H]owever, in no event
Copy

Veltmann v. Walpole Pharmacy, Inc., 928 F. Supp. 1161 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 15 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8247, 1996 WL 327844

with limitations of actions in Florida and section 95.11 deals with limitations periods for causes of
Copy

Burroughs Corp. v. Suntogs of Miami, Inc., 472 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 370

for actions based on written contracts under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). However, the
Copy

Stackhouse v. Emerson, 611 So. 2d 1365 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 9788

medical malpractice, section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes (1989). Section 95.11(4)(b) provides in
Copy

Swain v. Curry, 595 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 34638

that the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), has commenced
Copy

Merle Wood & Assocs., Inc. v. Trinity Yachhts, LLC, 714 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2013).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2013 WL 1501928, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7479

applicable statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11, because they accrued prior to September 8, 2006
Copy

Walgreen Drug Stores Co. v. Lee, 28 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1946).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 158 Fla. 260, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 565

suit was barred by the Statute of Limitations, Section 95.11 (5E), Florida Statutes 1941. We do not think
Copy

Sea Lane Bahamas Ltd. v. Europa Cruises Corp., Europa Cruise Line, Ltd., 188 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 A.M.C. 66, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22481, 1999 WL 727067

031(2) (Supp.1996) ("Actions for ... fraud under § 95.11(3) must be begun within the period prescribed in
Copy

Mazda Motors of Am., Inc. v. SC Henderson & Sons, Inc., 364 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

time the applicable statute of limitations was F.S. 95.11(5)(c), *109 Florida Statutes 1973. That statute
Copy

Se Fid. Ins. Co. v. Earnest, 395 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

Bradwell would have been entirely worthless. [3] § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (1979).
Copy

Cent. Home Trust Co. v. Lippincott, 392 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1028

C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) sets a 5 year
Copy

Askew v. Cnty. of Volusia, 450 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12664

four-year statute of limitations for negligence. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). In the instant case,
Copy

Venditti-Siravo, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, Fla., 418 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

City's affirmative defenses, we believe that Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1980), to be applicable
Copy

Oliveros v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc., 45 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12923, 2010 WL 3447253

date to file a medical malpractice action. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). The filing of the notice
Copy

Glass v. Camara, 369 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

barred by the two-year statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes. If the two-year limitation
Copy

Olson v. Johnson, 961 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1855687

prosecution and civil conspiracy is four years. See § 95.11(3)(o), (p), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). "A cause of
Copy

Fox v. Madsen, 12 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767, 2009 WL 1872524

limitations for specific performance of a contract. See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. Madsen contends, on the other
Copy

Seaside Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. Edwards, 573 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 2342

for specific performance of a contract.[1]See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). Therefore, according
Copy

Donovan v. St. Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 574 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 17303

applicable to actions brought on a written contract, § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1981), the trial court ruled
Copy

Medalie v. FSC Sec. Corp., 87 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (S.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5455, 2000 WL 255918

limitations applicable to Chapter 517 is set forth in § 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes, which provides: Actions
Copy

Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 222 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

action was barred by the statute of limitations, § 95.11 (3), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Since the contract was
Copy

Raphael v. Shecter, 18 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14084, 2009 WL 3018157

the time the malpractice incident occurs.[5]See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002); Patient's Compensation
Copy

Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. LAWYERS TITLE INS., 478 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2497

aware of them in 1973. It is also conceded that section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides
Copy

Sarasota Welfare Home v. Sarasota, 666 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 698905

condemnation action is four years pursuant to section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1991). However, we
Copy

Cristich v. Allen Eng'g, Inc., 458 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2298, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15677

for professional malpractice applied here. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in relevant
Copy

Arthur v. Unicare Health Facilities, Inc., 602 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 135047

limitations is the two-year medical malpractice statute. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). That limitations period
Copy

Allan & Conrad v. Univ. of Cent. Fl., 961 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2140595

discovered with the exercise of due diligence. . . . § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1989) (emphasis added). The
Copy

Monte v. Tipton, 612 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 17749

limitations had not run. Mrs. Monte argues that section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), bars the commencement
Copy

Suarez v. City of Tampa, 987 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 268910

"not specifically provided for" in the statute. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2002). The parties also acknowledge
Copy

Houston v. Florida-Georgia Television Co., 192 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

for invasion of privacy is subdivision (4) of Section 95.11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., providing that actions
Copy

Fowhand v. Piper, 611 So. 2d 1308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 389022

limited by the statute of limitation found in section 95.11(3)(k); and (3) should not have been awarded
Copy

Keramati v. Schackow, 553 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 150082

ORFINGER, M., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1977). [2] § 768.28(1), Fla
Copy

Turner Murphy v. SPEC. CONSTRUCT., 659 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 504817

other state or territory in the United States," § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), so that the judgment
Copy

Miller v. Miami Prefabricators, Inc., 438 F. Supp. 176 (S.D. Fla. 1977).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14087, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7991, 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1190

one year State of Limitations pursuant to Florida Statute 95.11(7)(b) (1943) applies. It is therefore ORDERED
Copy

Adams v. Sommers, 475 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

cause of action for legal malpractice arose. Section 95.11(4)(a) provides that the period of limitations
Copy

Brooke v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, 828 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31398610

applicable two-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). We reverse. On June 8
Copy

Josef's of Palm Beach, Inc. v. S. Inv. Co., 349 F. Supp. 1057 (S.D. Fla. 1972).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11483

relief upon the ground of fraud, Florida Statute § 95.11(5)(d), F.S.A., is most applicable. Where there
Copy

Berisford v. Jack Eckerd Corp., 667 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 699875

medical malpractice statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), does not apply
Copy

Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Phillips, 126 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 2013).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2493, 2013 WL 2096252

importance,1 which we rephrase as follows: DOES SECTION 95.011, FLORIDA STATUTES, APPLY TO ARBITRATION? *188We
Copy

Perez v. Universal Eng'g Corp., 413 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

resolving the legal issues we must examine Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975) and the several
Copy

Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc., 906 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1688

applicable statute of limitations is five years. See § 95.11; Barnes v. Escambia County Employees Credit Union
Copy

Lindberg v. Hosp. Corp. of Am., 545 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 75737

litigation within the limitation period set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1985), was fatal to the continuation
Copy

Rowe v. Schreiber, 725 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 30612

two year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court
Copy

Popper v. Popper, 595 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 18543

T.D., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). [2] But see Boyer
Copy

Spadaro v. City of Miramar, 855 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25965

infliction of emotional distress claims. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o). In Florida, a cause of action accrues “when
Copy

Smith v. Branch, 391 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

and that he would try to work something out. Section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1979) provides that
Copy

Maynard v. Household Fin. Corp. III, 861 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18709, 2003 WL 22899783

founded on fraud must be brought within four years. § 95.11(2)(b), (3)(j)-(k), Fla. Stat. (1995). The issues
Copy

Lamm v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 889 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135008, 2012 WL 3828287

four-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(3).
Copy

Robbins v. Hess, 659 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 469649

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1987). On July 28, 1988, appellant
Copy

Elaine Hess, etc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 175 So. 3d 687 (Fla. 2015).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 188, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 623, 2015 WL 1472319

[I]n any event an action for fraud under § 95.11(3) must be begun within 12 years after the date
Copy

Aviation Credit Corp. v. Batchelor, 190 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4840

under seal is five years. See Fla. Stat. 1963, § 95.11(3), F.S.A. The Florida "borrowing statute" is section
Copy

Goldman v. Halifax Med. Ctr., Inc., 662 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 1995 WL 544149

negligent acts of a health care provider. See also § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993); Stackhouse v. Emerson
Copy

Salvaggio v. Austin, 336 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

governed by the two-year statute of limitations, § 95.11(6) F.S. 1973,[1] which provides that the cause
Copy

Canete v. Florida Dept. of Corr., 967 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16862, 2007 WL 3118664

January 2004, his claim was untimely under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes.[2] DOC further argued
Copy

Fowler v. Taco Viva, Inc., 646 F. Supp. 152 (S.D. Fla. 1986).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 724, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18788

this case, the applicable statute is Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c), which provides a two year period in which
Copy

Szabo v. Essex Chem. Corp., 461 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

was dismissed on statute of limitation grounds. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). The trial court also found
Copy

Creviston v. Gen. Motors Corp., 210 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

limitations in this case is three years, based on Section 95.11(5) (e). An implied warranty is an action founded
Copy

Putnam Berkley Grp., Inc. v. Dinin, 734 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 333143

the identity of the actual tortfeasor. While section 95.11(4)(b) provided a tolling provision for fraudulent
Copy

Padilla v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc., 391 F. Supp. 3d 1108 (S.D. Fla. 2019).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

claim under FDUTPA is four years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(f) ; Speier-Roche v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am.
Copy

Grissom v. North Am. Aviation, Inc., 326 F. Supp. 465 (M.D. Fla. 1971).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13350

actions in Florida, Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes, F.S. A., has run. F.S. Section 95.11(6), F.S.A., provides
Copy

Spring Lake Imp. Dist. v. Tyrrell, 868 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 535429

maintenance beyond the four-year period contained in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1997). Specifically
Copy

Adams v. Adams, 691 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 106956

independent action may be based, citing to section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, on limitations of actions
Copy

Zureikat v. Shaibani, 944 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 565907

for fraud or untimely action for equitable lien. § 95.11(3)(j), (k), Fla. Stat. (2004). Zureikat's argument
Copy

Fletcher v. Dozier, 314 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

deaths resulting from medical malpractice, is F.S. 95.11(6), which provides for a period of two years
Copy

Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 345702

...e policy and not from the assets of the estate. The resolution of this issue depends on an interpretation of sections 733.702 and 733.710, which place limitations on creditors' claims against probate assets, and the relationship of these sections to section 95.011, which places general time limitations on bringing causes of actions....
Copy

Phelan v. Hanft, 471 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1595

August 1, 1983, the plaintiff sued Dr. Hanft.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provides in
Copy

Smith v. Cont'l Ins. Co., 326 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1220, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14267

the three year limitations period of Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(e)(1973), which governs an action upon a contract
Copy

Mitchell A. Newberger v. United States Marshals Serv., 751 F.2d 1162 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27765

analogous to appellant’s cause of action. Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f), which provides a four-year limitation
Copy

Moneyhun v. Vital Indus., Inc., 611 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 2973

actions are. The contract action is controlled by Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1981), which prescribes
Copy

Malunney v. Pearlstein, 539 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 9762

two-year statute of limitations period required by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1985), and by insertion of
Copy

Toledo Park Homes v. Grant, 447 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

limitations applicable to professional malpractice, Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1981), barred the action
Copy

Steven A. Stepanian, II v. David R. Addis, 782 F.2d 902 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22336

Florida Statute of Limitations, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11, the slander count should not have been dismissed
Copy

Scherer v. Laborers'intern. Union of N. Am., 746 F. Supp. 73 (N.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2962, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17290, 1988 WL 214512

from the date of accrual of the cause of action. § 95.11(2), Fla.Stat. And, if the action is founded on
Copy

Hamilton v. Tanner, 962 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2254572

an action on the lease agreement is five years, § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002), and that the statute
Copy

Sch. Bd. of Seminole Cnty. v. GAF Corp., 413 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 4 Educ. L. Rep. 688

its lawsuits, in July of 1977. We agree that section 95.11(3)(c) applies to these cases rather than the
Copy

Barfield v. United States Rubber Co., 234 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

statute of limitations set forth in Florida Statutes § 95.11(5) (e), or by the four year statute of limitations
Copy

Mangoni v. Temkin, 679 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 539832

barred by the four year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). Appellants filed their
Copy

Ins. Co. of No. Amer. v. Metro. Dade Co., 705 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 667601

(Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Therefore, as provided in section 95.11(2)(b) Florida Statutes (1995) the proper limitations
Copy

New York State Dept. of Taxation v. Patafio, 829 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566, 2002 WL 31396460

the twenty year limitation period found in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to its
Copy

Puchner v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 553 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 133280

barred by the statute of repose. Similarly, section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), bars Puchner's
Copy

Hicks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 178 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17002, 2015 WL 7017440

alleged in the complaint, as required under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013)- (establishing
Copy

Leasco Response, Inc. v. John Wright, 99 F.3d 381 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29335, 1996 WL 616676

relevant section of the Florida Code, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11, provides: Actions other than for recovery
Copy

Hames v. City of Miami Firefighters', 980 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 583672

...feiture determination in any event. Arguing in the alternative, Hames contends that the four-year limitations period found in paragraph 95.11(3)(n), Florida Statutes (2001), barred the Trust from proceeding forward with the forfeiture determination. Section 95.011 provides that in the absence of a separately provided time period, the limitations periods listed in chapter 95 are applicable to any "civil action or proceeding." § 95.011, Fla....
...1st DCA 1983) (explaining that in Bishop, the *1116 administrative claim involved an action that was an administrative substitute for a common law breach of contract suit). Thus, an administrative substitute for a civil action is a "civil action or proceeding" for the purposes of section 95.011, Florida Statutes (2001), and therefore, those administrative proceedings must be brought within any applicable limitations period in chapter 95....
...A disciplinary proceeding conducted pursuant to chapter 120 seeks to determine whether a penalty ought to be imposed upon the respondent as a result of past conduct. Accordingly, such an action is more appropriately described as a penal or quasi-criminal action or proceeding than a "civil action or proceeding." § 95.011, Fla....
Copy

Pinnacle Port Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Charles Orenstein, 952 F.2d 375 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1071

construction of an improvement...." Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3)(c) (West 1979) (emphasis added). When reenacting
Copy

Cobb v. Maldonado, 451 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

discovered in August, 1980, within four years. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) provides in part:
Copy

Nayee v. Nayee, 705 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 20680

specifically provided for in these statutes." § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1995). Jay also filed a new
Copy

Nolen v. Sarasohn, 379 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

beyond the two-year time limit prescribed in Section 95.11, Florida Statutes. After hearing argument of
Copy

Phillips v. Mease Hosp. & Clinic, 445 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11707

Florida Patients Compensation Fund, pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). The summary
Copy

Corkery v. SuperX Drugs Corp., 602 F. Supp. 42 (M.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815

discrimination); § 95.11(4)(c) (two years for action to recover lost wages); § 95.11(3)(f) (four years
Copy

Brumby v. Brumby, 647 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 706271

Furthermore, the courts have recognized that while section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1993), allows laches to
Copy

KRC Enter., Inc. v. Soderquist, 553 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2905, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7048, 1989 WL 151468

acceleration under the note, and pursuant to section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1987), any action after April
Copy

Epic Metals Corp. v. Condec, Inc., 867 F. Supp. 1009 (M.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19417, 1994 WL 652503

specific categories provided in Florida Statute § 95.11, the four year all inclusive statute of limitations
Copy

McRae v. Douglas, 644 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 531272

the two year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes concerning actions to
Copy

Wilder v. Meyer, 779 F. Supp. 164 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17796, 1991 WL 259869

Blue Sky Law claims is § 95.11(4)(e). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) requires a two prong
Copy

Joseph v. Univ. Behavioral LLC, 71 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15862, 2011 WL 5108524

there*917fore is barred pursuant to Florida Statutes § 95.11.” UBC also alleged: “[UBC] asserts that this Court
Copy

Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

limitations on a wrongful death action is two years. Section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Where the last day
Copy

Dubin v. Dow Corning Corp., 478 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2294

construction of an improvement to real property. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1981). On appeal, Dubin argues
Copy

Med. Jet v. Signature Flight Support, 941 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19135, 2006 WL 3300342

that the five-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), barred the cause
Copy

Collections USA, Inc. v. City of Homestead, 816 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7394, 2002 WL 1062239

suit was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001).[2] The lower
Copy

Sims v. New Falls Corp., 37 So. 3d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7302, 2010 WL 2077145

limitations applies, this suit is time-barred. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (providing a five-year
Copy

Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Sitomer, 524 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

two-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), and 2) in giving
Copy

Haskins v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, 898 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371, 2005 WL 714049

an action founded on negligence is four years. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2004). "As a general rule, a statute
Copy

Roger Zitrin, Md, Pa v. Glaser, 621 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1993 WL 230141

two year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse and
Copy

Est. of Rotell Ex Rel. Rotell v. Kuehnle, 38 So. 3d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7735, 2010 WL 2178581

negligence). . "A profession, within the meaning of section 95.11, is ‘any vocation requiring at a minimum a four-year
Copy

Cisko v. Phoenix Med. Prods., Inc., 797 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10625, 2001 WL 844675

applicable statute of limitations was four years. § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1997).
Copy

Rebich v. Burdine's & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 417 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

limitations for breach of contract contained in Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes, and are thus timely
Copy

Hosp. Constructors Ltd. Ex Rel. Lifemark Hospitals of Florida, Inc. v. Lefor, 749 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 6061

founded on a written instrument is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (1990). When an action is based
Copy

Harris v. Aberdeen Prop. Owners Ass'n, 135 So. 3d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 223072, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 588

five-year limitations period applied under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), that the cause
Copy

Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd., Pasco, 900 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314, 2005 WL 292210

five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2002). Houck asserts
Copy

Heekin v. CBS Broad., Inc., 789 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 513893

not specifically named in any subsection of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1999). Therefore, the statute
Copy

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 548 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1989).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 415, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1989 WL 101543

two-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), or the four-year
Copy

Pub. Health Trust v. Menendez, 584 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1991).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1991 WL 155129

...would apply notwithstanding chapter 95: A civil action or proceeding ... shall be barred unless begun within the time prescribed in this chapter or, if a different time is prescribed elsewhere in these statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere. § 95.011, Fla....
...Since we find that such a conclusion would not be a correct statement of the law applicable to this case, we have accepted jurisdiction to resolve the conflict created by our broad statements in Carr. Turning now to the matters not directly addressed in Carr, we find that the legislative statement contained in section 95.011, Florida Statutes (1979), is dispositive of this case....
...Thus, section 768.28(11) is the statute applicable to this case. We are aware of PHT's argument that section 768.28(11) contains no statute of repose and that the repose period contained in section 95.11 thus should apply. However, we find nothing in section 95.011 that makes a distinction between "statutes of limitation" and "statutes of repose." The statute does not even use these two terms, but rather refers only to the "time prescribed" to bring a suit. Moreover, the language of section 95.011 is plain: If a different statute prescribes a different time, then the periods of time in chapter 95 have no applicability....
Copy

Wishnatzki v. Coffman Const., Inc., 884 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1809875

the four-year limitations period provided by section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), commenced to
Copy

Sussman v. First Fin. Title Co., 793 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 864179

limitations on ordinary negligence is four years. See § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1997). Appellee argues that since
Copy

Dep't of Revenue v. Nemeth, 733 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 189822

dealing with Florida's statute of limitations, section 95.11, in reaching our decision, we cited approvingly
Copy

Am. Bankers Life Assur. v. 2275 West, 905 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 765075

discover. Id. The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or
Copy

Pontier v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 881 F. Supp. 1565 (M.D. Fla. 1995).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5000, 1995 WL 224783

1480, 1481 (11th Cir.1988); see Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3). Plaintiff filed this action four (4) years
Copy

Whack v. Seminole Mem'l Hosp., 456 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2089, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15227

barred by the applicable statute of limitation, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes; (2) the complaint failed
Copy

Banks v. Lardin, 938 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2683275

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2005). The trial court
Copy

Firearms Imp. & Exp. Corp. v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., 458 F. Supp. 88 (S.D. Fla. 1978).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15409

period provided by Florida statute. See F.S.A. § 95.11 (West Supp. 1978). Defendant LYKES argues that
Copy

Aprigliano v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2013).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2013 WL 5788771, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154539

founded on a written instrument....” Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). Here, the express limited warranties were
Copy

Hawkins v. Barnes, 661 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 627458

was beyond the applicable limitation period. Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1987) provides that
Copy

Stone v. Rosenthal, 665 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 689540

February 4, 1993. She filed suit on June 3, 1993. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), provides in
Copy

Ves Carpenter Contractors, Inc. v. City of Dania, 422 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22127

laches as an affirmative defense and, under Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1981), the laches period
Copy

Frew v. Poole & Kent Co., 654 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 253636

four year period of limitations provided by section 95.11(3)(a) would have expired, plaintiff filed a
Copy

Hudson v. Keene Corp., 445 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

period for a wrongful death action is two years, Section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Section 768.19 provides:
Copy

Morsani v. Major League Baseball, 739 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 172627

plaintiffs had a four-year limitation under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1993), to file their
Copy

Bay Park Towers Condo. v. Hj Ross & Assoc., 503 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12030

an action founded on negligence is four years. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). Thus, a new action by
Copy

Davis v. MacEdonia Hous. Auth., 641 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 284111

limitation periods") seems to refer the reader to section 95.11(3)(m), Florida Statutes, and accompanying text:
Copy

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Hiott, 129 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 88031, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 100

Reynolds argued that an action for fraud under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, must be brought “within
Copy

Poulos v. Vordermeier, 327 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Limitations is three years, the statute being Fla. Stat. 95.11(5) (d) (1973).[1] "95.11 Limitations upon
Copy

Muka v. Horizon Fin. Corp., 766 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 121792

...registration is not a conventional action, as that term is used under the rules of civil procedure. [5] As Judge Sharp observed in Credit Lyonnais, the term action is defined in the Florida statutes of limitations to encompass a mere proceeding, see § 95.011 ("A civil action or proceeding [e.s.], called `action' in this chapter...."); Credit Lyonnais, 741 So.2d at 1171, and registration under FEFJA is surely such a proceeding....
Copy

Williams v. Albertson's Inc., 879 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1750135

Systems, Inc., 871 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes, requires an action
Copy

Jelenc v. Draper, 678 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 491723

limitations for professional malpractice. Pursuant to § 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), an action for professional
Copy

Holiday Furniture Factory Out. Corp. v. State Dept. of Corr., 852 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12528, 2003 WL 21980487

for actions alleging breach of contract under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995). We disagree
Copy

Lindsey v. Hh Raulerson Jr. Mem. Hosp., 505 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 969

upon application of the Statute of Limitations. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1985). Dr. Manuel Garcia performed
Copy

Notar v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 438 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

consideration. We reverse both orders. Under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), a suit founded
Copy

Technical Packaging, Inc. v. Hanchett, 992 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4366038

Technical-UCB sales agreements were oral contracts. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2002) (providing that "[a] legal
Copy

Anderson v. Emro Mktg. Co., 550 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 124597

was two days after the complaint was filed. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981).
Copy

Barnes Surgical Specialties, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 549 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 119549

barred by the two year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1987). The court found, however
Copy

Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co., 701 F. Supp. 208 (S.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13176, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 459, 1988 WL 125736

F.2d 1312 (11th Cir.1983) (applying Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(c) — limitations on actions to recover wages)
Copy

Performing Arts Ctr. Auth. v. CLARK CONST. Grp., INC., 789 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 485419

period of limitations had expired in February 1999. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2000). Defendants contend that
Copy

Doe v. Hillsborough Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 816 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 1022054

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), *263 applied
Copy

Owens v. Florida Patient's Comp. Fund, 428 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

deceased died in May of 1976. Appellee pled the § 95.11(4)(b) statute of limitations as an affirmative
Copy

Nat'l Auto Serv. Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4820, 2016 WL 1238265

discovered or should have been discovered”); accord § 95.11(4)(a) (indicating that the time period for action
Copy

Phlieger v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., 487 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 743, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7060

under circumstances constituting a felony. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1983) provides for limitations
Copy

Jones v. Law Firm of Hill & Ponton, 141 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5749, 2001 WL 468486

personal injury claim against Ramada Inn. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(a). Jones may still be successful in settlement
Copy

Burke v. Snyder, 899 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 475546

Buchanan construed the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981); O'Shea interpreted
Copy

Walker v. Dunne, 368 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

and that the two-year limitation period of Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) barred her suit
Copy

Damiano v. McDaniel, 689 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1997 WL 109214

the statute of repose for medical malpractice. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).[1] The Fourth District
Copy

Nash v. Humana Sun Bay Cmty. Hosp., Inc., 526 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 60470

served within the time limits set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1985). Clearly, the serving
Copy

Marsh v. Patchett, 788 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 649643

statute of limitations for a judgment is 20 years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1980). Several months prior
Copy

Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 182692

brought ten years after the sales transaction, section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1991), does not bar
Copy

McLeod v. Barber, 764 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1004642

Florida's four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1997).[2] The defense
Copy

City of Hollywood v. Petrosino, 864 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 27, 2004 WL 32691

applicable statute of limitations is five years. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Williams v. Cordis Corp
Copy

Carlton v. Germany Hammock Groves, 803 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 4555

found the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1997) was applicable
Copy

Monahan v. Davis, 781 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 194890

limitations for such intentional torts was found at section 95.11(3)(o).[1] Such causes of action were different
Copy

Cates Ex Rel. Cates v. Graham, 427 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

asserted that Plaintiffs' action was time barred by F.S. 95.11(4)(b) which provides that in medical malpractice
Copy

Gilbert v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania, 219 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

five year statute of limitations set forth in § 95.11(3) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Appellee argues that since
Copy

Lomelo v. Am. Oil Co., 256 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

three year statute of limitations (F.S. 1969, section 95.11(5) (b), F.S.A.). Under their second point, the
Copy

Farzad v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg., 443 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

by the statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1981), and laches,
Copy

George C. Huff v. George Earl Pharr, 748 F.2d 1553 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15802

domesticate foreign judgments had expired. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(2)(a) (West 1982). Plaintiff then unsuccessfully
Copy

Lloyd Ex Rel. Lloyd v. North Broward Hosp. Dist., 570 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

incident giving rise to the injury occurred. [2] See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1975); see also supra n. 1.
Copy

CASTLE CONST. CO. v. Huttig Sash & Door Co., 425 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

did not establish that the four-year limit in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, had run prior to Huttig's
Copy

Mm v. Mps, 556 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 149625

separate action. [2] Appellees maintain that section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1986), bars the action
Copy

City of Brooksville v. HERNANDO CTY., 424 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

defense of statute of limitations under Florida Statute 95.11 is *848 tolled by the continuing negotiations
Copy

Bice v. Metz Const. Co., Inc., 699 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 473851

statute of limitations grounds. Pursuant to section 95.11(3)(a), *747 Florida Statutes (1991), the statute
Copy

Fladd v. Fortune Ins. Co., 530 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 82685

the accident alleged in the amended complaint. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1981). On appeal, appellant
Copy

Town of Oakland v. Mercer, 851 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11727, 2003 WL 21766236

limitations for forfeiture proceedings found in section 95.11(3)(n), Florida Statutes (2002), meaningless
Copy

SOUTH MOTOR CO. v. Doktorczyk, 957 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1217922

persuaded to purchase a power train warranty. Section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996), covers "[a]n
Copy

Roberts v. Casey, 413 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

625, 627-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), which was in
Copy

Hearndon v. Graham, 710 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 169753

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1987). Hearndon argued
Copy

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 458 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

four-year limitations period provided for in Section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes, it was not filed within
Copy

Johns v. Richards, 717 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 646681

to support until after the child is an adult. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997)(action to determine paternity
Copy

Todd v. Johnson, 965 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2681877

statute of limitations [sic] beyond four years." See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004).[1] We reverse. "Whether
Copy

Sullivan v. Fulton Cnty. Adm'r, 662 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 540280

fraudulent concealment is only included in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (extending the time
Copy

Smith v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 338 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

she is barred by the statute of limitations [Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1975)]. On September 30
Copy

Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 5233477, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18385

bars only the right to enforce a cause of action. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2005). A remedy, on the other hand
Copy

Germ v. St. Luke's Hosp. Ass'n, 993 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4683288

two arguments. First, the 1996 Amendment to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), applies to the
Copy

Lundstrom Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd., 856 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22400487

two-year limitations period under Florida Statutes section 95.11(4)(c)(action to recover wages) and the one-year
Copy

Robinson v. Auto Owners Ins. Co., 718 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12957, 1998 WL 719523

preserve the insurer's subrogation rights. Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), imposes a four-year
Copy

Dye v. Houston, 421 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

it was barred by the statute of limitations [Section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes] since it was not filed
Copy

O'Shea v. Phillips, 746 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 741115

on medical malpractice claims contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). Chapter 766
Copy

Novitsky v. Hards, 589 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 234545

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b), provides that: An action for medical
Copy

Parham v. Balis, 704 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 716797

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989).[1] This statute
Copy

Smith v. Hussey, 363 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

1972, and that the two-year limitation period of § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1975) barred his suit filed
Copy

Taddiken v. Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund, 449 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

two-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) is not applicable
Copy

Hernandez v. Metro-Dade Cnty., 992 F. Supp. 1365 (S.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21751, 1997 WL 833305

claim against Officer Rodriguez, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3)(o) (West Supp.1997). [2] There is no need for
Copy

Fabal v. Florida Keys Mem'l Hosp., 452 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

from June 28, 1978, is barred by Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b)... It is, therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
Copy

New York State Com'r of Taxation v. Friona, 902 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1109580

the "domestication" of the foreign judgment. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), provides a twenty-year
Copy

Herrero v. Black & Decker Mfg. Co., 275 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

holiday. Although the limitation statute, F.S. § 95.11, F.S.A., is silent in this regard it makes sense
Copy

Martin v. Florida Parole Com'n, 951 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3670, 2007 WL 737576

nonetheless reached the correct result in light of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2006), which provides
Copy

Hernandez v. Amisub, Inc., 714 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 329412

four-year medical malpractice statute of repose. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). This Court reversed,
Copy

Tobin v. Dannheisser, 372 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

malpractice was barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). We reverse.
Copy

Spivey v. Trader, 620 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 182512

These facts are not disputed. LAW AND ANALYSIS Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), governs actions
Copy

Mercy Hosp., Inc. v. Carr, 297 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6855

upon instruments in writing and, therefore, F.S. § 95.11(3), F.S.A., the five-year statute of limitations
Copy

Dist. Sch. Bd. of Desoto Cty. v. Safeco Ins. Co., 434 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19811

legislature would have said so as it did in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1981), relating to
Copy

DeLuca v. Mathews, 297 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

the statute of limitations had expired, under § 95.11(6) of Florida Statutes. The trial court granted
Copy

Menendez v. Pub. Health Trust of Dade Cty., 566 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 102683

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980). The trial
Copy

Martin v. Pafford, 583 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 138151

determination that suit was time-barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm. In 1981
Copy

Swafford v. Schweitzer, 906 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1681923

on a claim for unjust enrichment is four years. § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (1999). Generally, the statute
Copy

Tanner v. Hartog, 593 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 571

complaint. They argued, among other points, that section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), the two year
Copy

Gray v. Greyhound Ret. & Disability Trust, 730 F. Supp. 415 (M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1400, 1989 WL 167617

limitations period, it should adopt Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(c), which allows for a two-year limitations
Copy

Diamond v. ER Squibb & Sons, Inc., 366 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

products liability and fraud under subsection (3) of § 95.11 must be begun within the period prescribed in this
Copy

Flanagan v. Wagner, Nugent, 594 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 266

period from four to two years, impacting on section 95.11(4)(g), and having no effect on the statutory
Copy

Wester v. Rigdon, 110 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jr., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] F.S. § 95.11(1), F.S.A. [2] Carruthers v. Peninsular Life Insurance
Copy

Krause v. Textron Fin. Corp., 59 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 2011).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 54, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 330, 2011 WL 320989

barred by the limitations period set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).1 Petitioners
Copy

Birnholz v. Steisel, 394 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

agreement governed by a five-year limitations statute. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1975).[4] The other counts are
Copy

Doe v. St. John's Episcopal Par. Day Sch., Inc., 997 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 87 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1296, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17982, 2014 WL 585767

Id. The court did rely on Florida Statute section 95.11(7), since the plaintiffs action was based on
Copy

Harr v. Hillsborough Cmty. Mh Ctr., 591 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 275534

limitations against health care providers, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), began to run
Copy

Berg v. Wagner, 935 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2265412

subject to a four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), (p), Fla. Stat. (limitations periods for
Copy

PENSACOLA EXEC. H. CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Baskerville-Donovan Engineers, Inc., 566 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 126329

that appellant's cause of action was barred by Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional
Copy

Andreasen v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 276 F. Supp. 3d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2017).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

negligence count against her barred by Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(a)’s four-year statute of limitations. [ECF
Copy

Dinerstein v. Paul Revere Life Ins., 173 F.3d 826 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7848

Stat. Ann. § 95.11(2)(b) (West 1999). The Florida Supreme Court has held that, under § 95.11(2)(b), a breach
Copy

Dibble v. Jensen, 129 So. 2d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

action was barred by the statute of limitations, § 95.11, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. The defendant, Ruth Mark Jensen
Copy

Francese v. Tamarac Hosp. Corp., 504 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 915

be sued. REVERSED AND REMANDED. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes (1981). [2] Florida
Copy

Cisko v. Diocese of Steubenville, 123 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14151, 2013 WL 4734567

statute of limitations barred the action. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). The appellants argued
Copy

Willoughby v. Dowda & Fields, Chartered, 643 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 391044

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1993). [1] See Allie v. Ionata, 503
Copy

HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n ex rel. Registered Holders of Nomura Home Equity Home Loan, Inc. v. Est. of Petercen, 227 So. 3d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 4280603

brought within five years of the, default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say
Copy

Black v. Nesmith, 475 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2092

1220 (Fla. 1979), the trial court ruled that Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), providing for
Copy

Florida Hosp. Waterman v. Stoll, 855 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14924, 2003 WL 22259832

for a medical malpractice action is two years. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. However, chapter 766 provides
Copy

Hillsborough Cnty. Hosp. Auth. v. Coffaro, 829 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1946, 2002 WL 31190892

Yarian, 755 So.2d 93 (Fla.2000): Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for
Copy

Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., 161 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17609, 2014 WL 5461973

to make the effect of the dismissal final. See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing a four-year statute
Copy

Cohen v. Cooper, 20 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16080, 2009 WL 3446369

a medical malpractice claim is governed by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. The section states
Copy

Abbott v. Friedsam, 682 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 612635

that the two-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), had run after
Copy

Florida Dep't of Env't Prot. Ex Rel. Bd. of Trs. v. West, 21 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15800, 2009 WL 3364925

be filed within four years of the taking date. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat (2008); New Testament Baptist
Copy

Jane Doe v. Baptist Primary Care, Inc, 177 So. 3d 669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to comply with the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, and the pre-suit notice
Copy

Brown v. Ameri Star, Inc., 884 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2309035

the four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1998), Brown filed
Copy

Crews v. Malara, 123 So. 3d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 5584090, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16285

would have been within the 30-day time limit of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes; however, the date stamp
Copy

Mosley v. State Ex Rel. Broward Cty., 363 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

limitations for forfeiture proceedings is four years. Section 95.11(3)(n) Florida Statutes (1975). Sections 943
Copy

Xavier v. Leviev Boymelgreen Marquis Developers, LLC, 117 So. 3d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 5869998, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048

statute of limitations for fraud is four years. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2009). The four years, however
Copy

Sarasota Cnty. v. City Bank of Cleveland, 902 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1125050

...The circuit court judge who wrote that decision obviously spent considerable time and effort on the opinion. Nevertheless, we conclude that the Latorre decision erroneously equated an administrative proceeding with a civil action. Chapter 95 applies to civil actions or proceedings. § 95.011, Fla....
Copy

Denes & Denes & Assocs., Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 396 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18973

equitable lien and to award equitable relief. § 95.11(5), Fla. Stat. (1975); Kimbrell v. Fink, 78 So
Copy

Cuillo v. McCoy, 810 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 423474

five-year statute of limitation set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), bars the enforcement
Copy

White v. City of Pompano Beach, 813 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 429241

to bring a civil action under this section. See § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1999); Joshua v. City of Gainesville
Copy

Colon v. Celotex Corp., 465 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 732

Under the Florida statute of limitations, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1983), a plaintiff has four
Copy

Brown v. Nationscredit Fin. Servs. Corp., 32 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 2010 WL 786246

for a FDUTPA claim is four years pursuant to section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes, as it is based on a
Copy

Elliot v. Barrow, 526 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 55785

arguing that the 2 year statute of limitations of § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. barred plaintiff's claim. Specifically
Copy

Garden Street Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Tanner, 789 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9028, 2001 WL 725681

limitations statute applicable to trespass actions. § 95.11(3)(g), Fla. Stat. (1995). But the record contained
Copy

Leenen Ex Rel. Leenen v. Ruttgers Ocean Beach Lodge, Ltd., 662 F. Supp. 240 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13980

barred by Florida's statute of limitations, Fla.Stat. 95.11(3)(a), which provides that an action founded
Copy

Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Campbell, 433 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19618

invoking the five-year statute of limitations, Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1971). On April 25, 1979
Copy

Wilhelm v. Traynor, 434 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

suit that a lesion on his knee was cancerous. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1979). In March 1978, Wilhelm
Copy

Sartori v. Dep't of Revenue, 714 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 396717

subsequently found. (Emphasis added). See also § 95.11(3)(m), Fla. Stat. (1993)(providing that four-year
Copy

Sands v. Blando, 575 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 7694

appellant based upon the statute of limitations.[1] Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that the
Copy

Whigham v. Shands Teaching Hosp., 613 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 13463

order dismissing appellants' suit as barred by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellants contend
Copy

Fredrick v. N. Palm Beach Cty. Imp., 971 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

barring the claims of the Homeowners here. Section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2006) establishes a
Copy

Omar Ex Rel. Cannon v. Lindsey, 243 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (M.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6580, 2003 WL 257552

(11th Cir.1988) (stating that Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(3) provides for a four-year limitations period
Copy

Johnson v. Szymanski, 368 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

argued that the two-year limitation period of § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat. (1973) expired in October 1975,
Copy

Pond Apple Place III Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Russo, 841 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 470247

performance and was, therefore, time-barred by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes. We disagree with the
Copy

Kalway v. Singletary, 708 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1998 WL 79065

1995, which was denied as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995). The district court
Copy

Otis Elevator Co. v. Scott, 503 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 56, 013

that the applicable statute of limitations is Section 95.11(4)(c) Florida Statutes (1979), which provides
Copy

Gundlah v. Moore, 831 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31696736

precludes the court from exercising jurisdiction. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)
Copy

Shands v. City of Marathon, 999 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 5412069

four-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2007). We therefore
Copy

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 516 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 3, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1987 WL 3174

complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes. Under that section
Copy

Bardol v. Martin, 763 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 1243870

the father of a child born outside marriage. Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provided that
Copy

Gonzales v. Jacksonville Gen. Hosp., Inc., 365 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

action to be barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. 95.11(6), Florida Statutes 1973. During the evening
Copy

Carter v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc., 889 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2921786

C.J. and WEBSTER, J., Concur. NOTES [1] See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). [2] See also Chaffin
Copy

Jones v. Williams Steel Indus., Inc., 460 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 23

of the judgment, which is twenty years under section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes.[1] Appellant argues that
Copy

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Wiley, 145 So. 3d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13005, 2014 WL 4114482

832 So.2d 213, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Under section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, the statute of limitations
Copy

Anderson v. Wagner, 955 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 4540506

limitations in medical negligence actions, section 95.11(4)(b) is two (2) years. The statute ran out
Copy

Cheves v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 227 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17840, 2002 WL 31103998

for intentional torts is four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11. At the April 24, 2002 hearing, the plaintiffs
Copy

Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In Re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC), 410 B.R. 710 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 4 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2287, 2009 WL 2581712

Protection Act (Fla.Stat.Chap.517). Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) states that claims based on any provision
Copy

Effs v. Sony Pictures Home Ent., Inc., 197 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12043, 2016 WL 4198129

the applicable four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2005). Thereafter, Sony Pictures
Copy

Richey v. Modular Designs, Inc., 879 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11703, 2004 WL 1773534

barred by two-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2000); that the cause
Copy

Virginia Ins. Reciprocal v. Walker, 765 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1049874

requirements, we note that it is still contained in section 95.11, Florida Statutes, the general statute of limitations
Copy

Wood v. Hunter, 504 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 971

claim was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes. The master's report was
Copy

Cooper v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 924 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 2006 WL 862965

court properly denied the petition as untimely. § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal
Copy

Snyder v. Wernecke, 813 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 491855

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2000), which governs
Copy

Ross v. Twenty-Four Collection, Inc., 617 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 130559

four-year statute of limitations for tort claims. Section 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1989). These causes of action
Copy

Sheils v. Jack Eckerd Corp., 560 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 52323

that appellants' cause of action was barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year
Copy

Lake v. Martin Marietta Corp., 538 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2522, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13613

statute of *729 limitations found in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c). That statute (which was in effect in 1975)
Copy

West Brook Isles Partner's 1, LLC v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 163 So. 3d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027, 2015 WL 1874453

2004 closing to sue Mr. Navaretta. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004) (two-year limitation for
Copy

Codding v. Phillips, 296 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

ground that the statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(d), F.S.A., pertaining to causes of action alleging
Copy

Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Peterson, 311 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

payment of wages is one year. See, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7)(b), F.S.A. It is our inclination to agree with
Copy

Hernandez v. Amisub (Am. Hosp.), 659 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 521109

statute of repose found in Florida Statutes, Section 95.11(4)(b). The trial court granted A.M.I.'s motion
Copy

Jones v. Rainey, 386 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

applicable statute of limitations was twenty years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (1959). As part of a general revision
Copy

Allen v. Orlando Reg'l Med. Ctr., 606 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9889, 1992 WL 228916

served within the time limits set forth in Section 95.11. However, during the 90 day period, the statute
Copy

Hager v. Venice Hosp., Inc., 944 F. Supp. 1530 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16682, 1996 WL 650933

two-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(4)(g), Fla.Stat. (1995). The elements that a
Copy

Schrank v. Pearlman, 683 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 603645

or liability founded on a written instrument." § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). They reason that the
Copy

Mason v. Salinas, 643 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1994 WL 570625

limitations period for this cause of action. Section 95.11(3)(o) and (p), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974)
Copy

BDI Const. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 995 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15915, 2008 WL 4568075

limitations is the five-year period provided in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999). Their dispute
Copy

Kaan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 981 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (S.D. Fla. 2013).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2013 WL 5944074, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160288

Singleton, 882 So.2d at 1008. See also Fl. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) (setting a five year statute of limitation
Copy

Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Sunderman, 201 So. 3d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16471

limitations for a foreclosure action set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Flori *140 da Statutes (2014)
Copy

Donald Kipnis v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank, etc., 202 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 2016).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2422

Act); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013) (negligence); § 95.11(3)0’), Fla- Stat. (fraud); § 95.11(3)(p)
Copy

Haigh v. Plan. Bd. of Town of Medfield, 940 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18452, 2006 WL 3102275

noting that the five year limitations period in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes, "applies only to independent
Copy

Williams v. Shuler, 551 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 132570

twenty-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987). The wife argues
Copy

Meir v. Kirk, Pinkerton, Mcclelland, Savary & Carr, Pa, 561 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 60902

trial court that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974), is not
Copy

Med. Data Sys., Inc. v. Coastal Ins. Grp., Inc., 139 So. 3d 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 2101238, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7632

four years of when the cause of action accrued. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). “A cause of action accrues
Copy

Sch. Bd. of Volusia v. Fid. Co. of Md., 468 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1082, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14133, 25 Educ. L. Rep. 721

supplier, the architect and other defendants, § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983),[1] it is well established
Copy

Rahn v. Amp Inc., 447 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

upon the date of the death of the deceased. Section 95.11(4)(d) Florida Statutes (1977); Walker v. Beech
Copy

Donald R. Buse v. Robert J. Kuechenbert, 325 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5922, 2003 WL 1563731

must be brought within five years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). Since Buse registered his judgment
Copy

Caprio v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 848 F. Supp. 1528 (M.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4852, 1994 WL 136327

intentional torts is four years. See Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3) (1993). Plaintiff filed the instant action with
Copy

Gilbride, Heller & Brown, PA v. Watkins, 783 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 173, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 606, 2001 WL 277992

THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD OF SECTION 95.11(4)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, BEGIN TO RUN FROM THE
Copy

City of Quincy v. Womack, 60 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2666, 2011 WL 714334

filed within the limitations time allowed under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. But the City is calculating
Copy

Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. Law Fabrication, LLC, 459 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (M.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3171, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36445, 2006 WL 1895476

judicial suits to compel arbitration pursuant to Fla. Stat. 95.11(5)(a), in lieu of borrowing the sixmonth statute
Copy

City of St. Petersburg v. Norris, 335 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

2d 876. The applicable statute here, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7)(b), (1973), states that: ... [a]ctions other
Copy

King Ex Rel. Murray v. Rojas, 767 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 827065

with the text of the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4)(b) provides: "An action for medical malpractice
Copy

Rayner v. Aircraft Spruce-advantage Inc., 38 So. 3d 817 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2010 WL 2425958

four-year statute of limitations was August 18, 2005. § 95.11(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). Shortly before this deadline
Copy

Boyd v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 611 F. Supp. 218 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18788

the two year limitations period contained in section 95.11(4)(e) of the Florida Investor Protection Act
Copy

Assoc. Coca Cola v. Spec. Disability Tr., 508 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

within the four-year limitations period of section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1985). We conclude
Copy

Doe v. Young, 656 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 358085

outside the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), as opposed
Copy

Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. GRANDOFF INVEST., INC., 297 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

that the applicable statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5)(e), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.,[1] has run
Copy

Arlene Donovan v. Florida Peninsula Ins. Co., 147 So. 3d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2014 WL 3189914, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10516

after the 2005 loss and was time-barred by section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2011), and that Donovan
Copy

Poux v. State, 985 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2663496

motion. We can discern no reason not to apply section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, mandating a four year
Copy

Ramsey v. Jonassen, 698 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 423435

limitations period for professional malpractice. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Because we reverse Ramsey's
Copy

Bearse v. Main Street Investments, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17802, 2002 WL 31103989

years from the accrual of the cause of action. Fla. Stat. 95.11(j). According to the Florida courts, Florida's
Copy

Williams v. Johnson, 584 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 134866

limitations to which the court referred was section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1953) which provided that
Copy

Ultimate Makeover Salon & Spa, Inc. v. DiFrancesco, 41 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10586, 2010 WL 2882401

on the two-year limit set for wage claims in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2007). The motion incorporated
Copy

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Echeverri, 736 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 492601

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). It provides:
Copy

Brown v. SCI Funeral Servs. of Florida, Inc., 212 F.R.D. 602 (S.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6023, 2003 WL 164523

Plaintiffs’ RISA claims is four years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(f) (2002). Thus, for class-wide RISA claims, the
Copy

Snow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 156 So. 3d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 406, 2015 WL 160326

relevant statute of limitations is provided in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2008). 2
Copy

Sabal Chase Homeowners v. Disney World, 726 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 9784

appellees because the statute of repose in Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), barred the cause
Copy

Rizo v. State Farm Florida Ins. Co., 133 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 464090, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1432

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010).1 The pertinent
Copy

Enter. Leasing Co. v. Alley, 728 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 43516

found in section 95.11(4)(d) applies." 487 So.2d at 1097. Nissan concedes that it is section 95.11(4)(d)
Copy

Tejera v. Lincoln Lending Servs., 271 So. 3d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to a four-year statute of limitations (see section 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2009)), when that four-year
Copy

Glucksman v. Persol North Am., Inc., 813 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 272295

limitations governing legal malpractice actions is section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). See Peat, Marwick
Copy

Chau Kieu Nguyen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 709 F.3d 1342 (11th Cir. 2013).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2013 WL 646410, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780

213-14 (McKinney 2012), and Florida, Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (2012), barred her claims. 1 The District
Copy

Wallis v. Grumman Corp., 515 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 1987).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 590, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2541, 1987 WL 2366

sale of personal property" as set forth in section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1985). We reject this
Copy

Aristide v. Jackson Mem'l Hosp., 917 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 3409690

limitations applicable to this case is set forth in section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes: (b) An action for medical
Copy

BIEL REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Dev. etc., 156 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

under § 56.29. The debtor argued the UFTA and § 95.11(3)’s limitations periods barred proceedings supplementary
Copy

Woodburn v. Florida Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 854 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 WL 7661425, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154858

founded on statutory liability is four years. Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f) (2011). The limitations period is statutorily
Copy

Carlton v. Ridings, 422 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

claim for medical malpractice is barred by Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). We affirm. On
Copy

Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 225 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12424, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1891

reversed, finding that under a prior version of § 95.11(2)(e), the statute of limitations did not begin
Copy

Sarasota Cnty. v. Ex, 645 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 397617

by a four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1991). The Exes contend
Copy

Auto-Owners Ins. v. Ace Elec. Serv., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75367

and contractual causes of action. See, e.g., Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(a) ("An action *1382 for professional malpractice
Copy

In Re Biddiscombe Intern., LLC, 392 B.R. 909 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal
Copy

Maggio v. Dep't of Labor & Emp. Sec., 910 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1875486

four-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2002). According to
Copy

Villa Maria Nursing & Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. South Broward Hosp. Dist., 8 So. 3d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2893, 2009 WL 928461

malpractice against the hospital had run. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). In its answer brief,
Copy

Walters v. Ocean Gate Phase I Condo., 925 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5070, 2006 WL 888093

one-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2004). Generally, the
Copy

Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 540 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 840, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1712, 1989 WL 30790

is discovered or should have been discovered. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985).
Copy

Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. v. LJ Clark Const. Co., Inc., 579 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967, 1991 WL 44982

subject to the five year limitation period in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1990 Supp.). School
Copy

Mosher v. Anderson, 817 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2002 WL 716163

contain repayment terms or is payable on demand. Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2001), mandates that
Copy

Thomas v. Lopez, 982 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 1752207

found in chapter 766, Florida Statutes.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, establishing a two-year
Copy

Dade Cnty. v. Rohr Indus., Inc., 826 F.2d 983 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 770

Fla.Stat. § 672.2-725 or alternatively Fla.Stat. § 95.-11(2)(b) should apply to this case.5 Section 672
Copy

Nicarry v. Eslinger, 990 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4179476

barred by the statute of limitations found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2004). We affirm. Nicarry
Copy

PISUT BY PISUT v. Sichelman, 455 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

decision regarding the constitutionality of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977).[1] On October
Copy

Sw. Fla. Ret. Ctr., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 682 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). All parties agree that section 95.11(2)(b), pertaining
Copy

Magwood v. Tucker, 98 So. 3d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 4760846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17164

within the thirty-day limitations period of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and noted appellant’s
Copy

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Burnette, 177 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 WL 6594312

applicable five-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(b), (c), Florida Statutes (2007), rendered
Copy

Van Meter v. Singletary, 682 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 625398

a disciplinary infraction. We conclude that section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), which the trial
Copy

Mount Sinai Hosp. of Gr. Miami, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., 285 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6409

claim to be barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. 95.11, F.S.A.[1] Appellant contends (1) the trial court's
Copy

Mcfall v. Trubey, 992 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4482578

statute of limitations applicable to such suits, § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2003). Accordingly, the court
Copy

Eastman v. State, 883 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2191691

defects: First, it was untimely pursuant to section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2003), which became the
Copy

Lipshaw v. Pinosky, Pinosky, Pa, 442 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

of limitations for medical malpractice actions. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1979). We affirm in part and
Copy

Seawatch at Marathon Condo. Ass'n v. CHARLEY TOPPINO & SONS, INC., 610 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 318499

four-year statute of limitations period in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1991);[2] or (2) that
Copy

Florida Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. S.A.P., 835 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 980, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2458

Additionally, since neither section 768.28 nor section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes abrogates these equitable
Copy

Milan Inv. Grp., Inc. v. City of Miami, 50 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18004, 2010 WL 4740293

assertion that the four-year statute of limitations, § 95.11(3), applies to (and bars) Milan Investment’s challenges
Copy

Fuller v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 677 F. Supp. 1131 (N.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12721, 1987 WL 35077

Specifically, the issue is one of preemption. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), establishes
Copy

S. Specialties, Inc. v. Farmhouse Tomatoes, Inc, 259 So. 3d 869 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

actions not founded on a written instrument. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. It also filed a counterclaim
Copy

Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Phillips, 110 So. 3d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18182, 2011 WL 5555691

“actions” or “proceedings” for purposes of section 95.011, Florida Statutes (2005), we affirm. In doing
Copy

Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Rekant, 832 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16878, 2002 WL 31519797

limitations for professional malpractice contained in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2001).[1] We reverse
Copy

Higgs v. Florida Dept. of Corr., 654 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 258900

occurrence out of which the cause of action accrued. § 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993).[1] There has been
Copy

Doe ex rel. Doe's Mother v. Sinrod, 90 So. 3d 852 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 1934498, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8744

her claims are not time-barred, pursuant to section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes, because her claims are
Copy

Kelly v. Balboa Ins., 897 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (M.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2012 WL 4761905, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86463

limitations pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(e). Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(e) establishes a five (5) year
Copy

In Re Conrad, 252 B.R. 559 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 334, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 980, 2000 WL 1251898

the California Final Judgment is barred by Fla. Stat. 95.11, the applicable statute of limitations of
Copy

Lustig v. McCormick, 358 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

shorten the general statute of limitations, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court's
Copy

Lewis v. Associated Med. Institutions, Inc., 345 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 965

applied the three year statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5)(e), Florida Statutes (1973), rather than
Copy

Watkins v. Gilbride Heller & Brown, Pa, 754 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 256327

is not time barred. Our analysis starts with section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), which provides
Copy

Murphy v. Tucker, 689 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 90840

court did not err in applying the provisions of section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1995), to the facts of
Copy

Hilsenroth v. Kessler, 446 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

barred by the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1981). Nonetheless, it is an
Copy

Harris v. State, 30 So. 3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3809, 2010 WL 1049979

apply [to a motion for return of property] section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, mandating a four year
Copy

Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Auth., 537 F. Supp. 175 (S.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17792

Sections 95.11(3)(a), 95.11(4)(a) and 95.11(5)(a). Section 95.11(5)(a) speaks of a one year limitations period
Copy

Jaisinghani v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., 973 F. Supp. 1450 (S.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 25 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1888, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5745, 1997 WL 405929

allowing his claims to proceed. See Fl.Stat. § 95.11(4)(g). The Court heard oral argument on this issue
Copy

Nealon v. Right Human Resource Consul., 669 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 120338

recovery of unpaid wages or overtime contained in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statute (1993). At issue here
Copy

Metro. Life Ins. v. Solomon, 996 F. Supp. 1473 (M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3318, 1998 WL 125814

breach of written instruments. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b)(1989). Since Defendant was a Florida resident
Copy

Sutton v. Florida Parole Com'n, 975 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3397, 2008 WL 649610

covered by the one-year time limitation of section 95.11(5)(f), rather than rule 9.100(c)(2). We also
Copy

Beyer v. City of Marathon, 37 So. 3d 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8164, 2010 WL 2292118

four-year statute of limitations imposed by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. We reverse. We review
Copy

Avelo Mortg., LLC. v. Vero Ventures, LLC. Etc., 254 So. 3d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

the five-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014) has been clearly
Copy

Goodwin v. Sphatt, 114 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 2501984, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9268

liability founded on a written instrument.” See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). The statute of limitations
Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Health & Wellness Servs., Inc., 389 F. Supp. 3d 1137 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

he maintains applies under Florida Statute section 95.11(3)(j) has long since run as to any of the claims
Copy

Lake Forest Master Cmty. Ass'n v. Orlando Lake Forest Jt. Venture, 10 So. 3d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7464, 2009 WL 1639564

repose was reduced from fifteen to ten years. § 95.11(c)(3), Fla. Stat. (2008). Thus, if Association
Copy

Integrated Broadcast Servs. v. Mitchel, 931 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1816442

limitations for legal malpractice is two years, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2003). This suit for
Copy

Manicini Enter., Inc. v. Am. Express Co., 236 F.R.D. 695 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58975

founded upon a written instrument. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k). Thus, if the Court were to find that the
Copy

Maraj v. North Broward Hosp. Dist., 989 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11593, 2008 WL 2906956

concluded that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), had run with
Copy

J.B. & J.W.B., Individually & on Behalf of Their Minor Child, S.B. & E.B. & M.B. Individually v. Sacred Heart Hosp. of Pensacola, 996 F.2d 276 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19190

medical malpractice actions set forth in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(b). On December 17, 1991, the U.S. District
Copy

Weeks v. Town of Palm Beach, 252 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

limitations for a defamation suit is two years. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012) ; Wagner, Nugent, Johnson
Copy

Lane v. Health Options, Inc., 221 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17998, 2002 WL 31096748

failure to provide pre-suit notice and Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(b). The Honorable Leroy Moe, state circuit court
Copy

Gren v. Gren, 133 So. 3d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 51640, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 175

five-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2011). Lastly, she
Copy

Homaday v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 994 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (M.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2014 WL 260568, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10292

years and runs from the date of death. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d); Fulton Cnty. Adm’r v. Sullivan, 753 So.2d
Copy

USX Corp. v. Schilbe, 535 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 191

action to foreclose a mortgage is controlled by section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), and the duration
Copy

Smith v. Florida Dep't of Corr., 27 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

...), not a civil restitution lien order entered by the sentencing court under section 960.292(2). This distinction is significant because, as a civil action, the counterclaim is subject to the provisions of chapter 95 and the rules of civil procedure. Section 95.011 provides that a "civil action ......
Copy

Ortiz v. Moore, 776 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 50479

days of rendition of that order. Similarly, section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, requires that a court
Copy

Crummer Co. v. Du Pont, 117 F. Supp. 870 (N.D. Fla. 1954).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4633

Florida three-year statute of limitations, F.S.A. § 95.11(5) (a), is applicable. This section reads as follows:
Copy

Am. Home Assurance Co. v. APAC-FLA., INC., 834 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 69549

governed by the longer statute of limitations in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995). Although this result
Copy

RUSSO Assocs. v. City of Dania Beach, 920 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 437388

four-year statute of limitations found within section 95.11(3)(p) has been held to govern inverse condemnation
Copy

Mason v. Bisogno, 633 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 28838

the two year statute of limitations expired. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1991).[1] The effect of the
Copy

Head v. McNeil, 975 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 515029

petition for writ of mandamus as untimely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2006). Appellant argues
Copy

Singletary v. Van Meter, 708 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1998 WL 79686

1996), wherein the district court declared section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), invalid. We have
Copy

Coffaro v. Hillsborough Cty. Hosp. Auth., 752 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 216713

Supreme Court as one of great public importance. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), provides a two-year
Copy

Velzy v. Est. of Miller, 502 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 590

barred by the general statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(i) and (j), Florida Statutes (1983); and
Copy

Morrison v. Homewise Preferred Ins. Co., 209 So. 3d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 543427, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1648

applicable statute of limitations is found in section 95.11(5)(d), Florida Statutes (2011). The issue presented
Copy

Amato & Bouchard v. City of Miami Beach, 208 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18048

the statute of limitations is four years. See § 95.11(3) (a), (o), (p), Fla. Stat. (2010); Kelly v. Lodwick
Copy

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A., 263 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of
Copy

Sutton v. Monroe Cnty., 34 So. 3d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048, 2009 WL 4928219

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2007). Sutton, the landowner
Copy

Arnold v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 549 F. Supp. 25 (M.D. Fla. 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 7 Educ. L. Rep. 286, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17714

two-year statute of limitations found in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c) (1979) ("action[s] to recover wages or overtime
Copy

WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., & Lisa D. Grant, 223 So. 3d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 3360822, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

Florida Statutes (2015). Because we conclude that section 95.11(5)(h) does not apply to the current cause of
Copy

Allie v. Ionata, 417 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(l),[1] Florida Statutes, pertaining to rescission
Copy

Myklejord v. Morris, 766 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1228028

from suing appellees. The pertinent statute is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993): An action for
Copy

Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co., 771 F. Supp. 1205 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12688, 1991 WL 179747

filing of their complaint. See Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(o) (1989). Though the general principle is that
Copy

Rearick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 68 So. 3d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12910, 2011 WL 3586158

Florida's four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), which would
Copy

SALTPONDS CONDO. v. Walbridge Aldinger Co., 979 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 1883903

(Fla. 3d DCA 1982), we stated in dicta that section 95.11(3)(c) of the Florida Statutes provided the "applicable
Copy

Engle v. Acopian, 432 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

statutory laches bars the action by the Acopians. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1981), provides: LACHES
Copy

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Bartram, 140 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1632138, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6057

Singleton, 882 So.2d at 1008. See also Fl[a], Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) (setting a five year statute of limitation
Copy

Enfield v. Held, 357 So. 2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

233, 1st DCA, Opinion filed April 5, 1978. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) provides a two
Copy

Est. of Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 126 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1442256, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651

the two-year *327statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2008). . As indicated
Copy

Rodriguez v. Bank of Am., N.A., 49 F. Supp. 3d 1154 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142653, 2014 WL 4851777

for mortgage foreclosure under Florida Statute § 95.11(2)(c), and the five-year statute of repose under
Copy

Traveler Indem. Co. of Conn. v. Centimark Corp., 746 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103310, 2010 WL 3834611

years of the time of the improvement. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(c); Havatampa Corp. v. McElvy, Jennewein, Stefany
Copy

Indem. Ins. Co. v. Am. Aviation, 399 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

"profession" as defined by Florida law. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (defining professional as "any vocation requiring
Copy

Bryant v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 965 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14871, 2007 WL 2766716

mandamus occurred prior to the effective date of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, the circuit court erred
Copy

Black Diamond Props., Inc. v. Haines, 69 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169, 2011 WL 4435805

applicable statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes, which provides for
Copy

Uffner v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 46 F. Supp. 3d 1339 (M.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132893, 2014 WL 4716144

of Limitations Pursuant to Florida Statute section 95.11, Engle personal injury actions must be brought
Copy

Fowler v. Towse, 900 F. Supp. 454 (S.D. Fla. 1995).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14185, 1995 WL 574812

allegedly advanced by Fowler. DONE and ORDERED. . Section 95.11 (3)(k) applies to a “legal or equitable action
Copy

Gindel v. Centex Homes, 267 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run
Copy

Alvarez v. United States, 207 F. Supp. 3d 1291 (M.D. Fla. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123437, 2016 WL 4733183

barred by Florida’s statute of repose, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e). A. McLeod’s Status as an Employee or Contractor
Copy

Cardenas ex rel. Cardenas v. Godbold, 625 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 1993 WL 393654

favor based on the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). The appellants maintain
Copy

Barnes v. Clark Sand Co., 721 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730

County, 541 So.2d 92, 95 (Fla.1989) (holding “section 95.11(4)(b) was properly grounded on an announced
Copy

Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 56 F. Supp. 3d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 85 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 83, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154767, 2014 WL 5522478

Judge Rosenbaum’s Order. ECF No. [78] at 7-14. Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, provides that both “action[s]
Copy

Fields v. Mylan Pharm., Inc., 751 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (N.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130131, 2009 WL 7115136

a four year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(2008). The Florida Legislature has made clear
Copy

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Ross, Saarinen, Bolton & Wilder, Inc., 815 F. Supp. 444 (S.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20938, 1992 WL 448861

of an improvement to real property." Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3)(c). If the action involves a latent defect,
Copy

Sherrod v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sch. Bd., 620 F. Supp. 1275 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 28 Educ. L. Rep. 809, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24072

governing wages and overtime claims. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(4)(c) (West 1982). This assertion is incorrect
Copy

New Testament Baptist Church v. DOT, 993 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4643792

limitations applies to inverse condemnation claims. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat.; Heckman v. City of Oakland Park
Copy

Lopez-Loarca v. Cosme, 76 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16363, 2011 WL 4949808

in the second year following the accident. Section 95.11, Florida ■ Statutes (2000), provides a four
Copy

Bollettieri Resort Villas Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. the Bank of New York Mellon, etc., 228 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2017 WL 4546114

Florida, regarding how the statute of limitations, § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017), operates vis-á-vis a
Copy

Edwards v. Okaloosa Cnty., 5 F.3d 1431 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 WL 413896

1988, two years after Molbert’s death. Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(d) (Supp.1992); Walker v. Beech Aircraft Corp
Copy

Hayes v. Reverse Mortg. Solutions, 260 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

impression as to when the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, begins to run for
Copy

Starling v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 845 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151514, 2011 WL 6965854

10); see Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d) (2011) (“Section 95.11(4)(d)”). Section 95.11(4)(d) and the case law
Copy

MOGER v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 22 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17264, 2009 WL 3817893

deemed untimely by the circuit court pursuant to section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes. The final agency action
Copy

Home Title Co. of Maryland, Inc. v. Michael J. Lasalla, 257 So. 3d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

complaint was not filed until December 2013.1 See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2006); Goodwin v. Sphatt, 114
Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. B&A Diagnostic, Inc., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1154 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2015 WL 7272738

of unjust enrichment in Florida. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11. Instead, courts apply various limitations, periods
Copy

Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell, 204 So. 3d 22 (Fla. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 506, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2487

Green’s state law claims were time-barred under section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2007), which provides
Copy

Janie Doe 1 ex rel. Miranda v. Sinrod, 117 So. 3d 786 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1890647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7361

the original Complaint. It also argued that section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes (2006), does not toll the
Copy

Gregor Woodward v. Orator E. Woodward, individually, & as Tr. of the Mary T. Woodward Trust, etc., Lorence Woodward, Marcus Woodward, Serena Woodward & Maureen Woodward, 192 So. 3d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881, 2016 WL 2342152

erred in finding that laches barred the action. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that “[l]aches
Copy

Conrad v. Young, 10 So. 3d 1154 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6047, 2009 WL 1456720

easement is five years after discovery of its breach. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). According to appellant
Copy

Snell v. Mott's Contracting Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 2118044, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7649

term ‘civil action or proceeding' found in section 95.011[, Florida Statutes].” 126 So.3d at 188. Upon
Copy

Nat'l Franchisee Ass'n v. Burger King Corp., 715 F. Supp. 2d 1232 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50721, 2010 WL 2102993

Florida law for breach of contract had expired. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (the statute of limitations for
Copy

Trilok Desai v. Bank of New York Mellon, Etc., 240 So. 3d 729 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

not barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015); § 95.031, Fla. Stat.
Copy

CLARK CONST. Grp., INC. v. Wentworth Plastering of Boca Raton, Inc., 840 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 729171

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Citing Federal Insurance
Copy

Fowler v. Matheny, 184 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5726

plaintiff could not revive the cause of action. F.S.A. § 95.11(5) (d), the fraud exception to statutes of limitation
Copy

Doe No. 3 v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc., 217 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1076928, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3777

the legislature in 2010 enacted a revision to section 95.11 which provides for an unlimited time period
Copy

Sylvia A. Russ v. Carolyn Williams, 159 So. 3d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...(providing that an “action founded on negligence” must be commenced within four years of the date the cause of action accrues). Accordingly, unless the amended complaint relates back to the date of the original complaint, Ms. Russ’ claim against Mrs. Williams is barred. See § 95.011, Fla....
Copy

Frantz v. Walled, 513 F. App'x 815 (11th Cir. 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

a four-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Therefore, they too were untimely filed
Copy

Dyck-o'neal, Inc. v. Teresa Norton & Samuel Norton, 267 So. 3d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nortons 1Until July 1, 2013, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes' five-year limitation
Copy

City of Riviera Beach v. J & B Motel Corp., 213 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1018521, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435

general limitations period contained in Chapter 96. § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (“A civil action or proceeding, called
Copy

Sykes v. Fireman's Fund Ins., 269 F. Supp. 229 (S.D. Fla. 1967).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8773

limitations for contracts provided in Florida Statutes § 95.11(3), applies. Defendant contends that this is an
Copy

Scullock v. Gee, 161 So. 3d 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 948877, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3492

subject to a four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2010). Scullock’s cause of action
Copy

King v. Gandolfo, 714 F. Supp. 1180 (M.D. Fla. 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6862, 1989 WL 68003

limitations period is set forth at Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e), which provides in pertinent part: Actions
Copy

Richardson v. Wilson, 490 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1437

action was barred by the statute of limitation, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). A default judgment
Copy

Arvelo v. Park Fin. of Broward, Inc., 15 So. 3d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526, 2009 WL 1766693

should be quashed. Petition granted. NOTES [1] § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). Although Ms. Arvelo argued
Copy

Graney v. Caduceus Props., LLC, 91 So. 3d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 2345120, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10028

1990). The four-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2006), governs actions
Copy

Clemente v. Freshman, 760 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7577, 2000 WL 784229

year statute of limitation period found in section 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reverse and remand
Copy

Carpenter v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 958 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 2007 WL 1757097

his habeas petition was not time-barred by section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2004), based on the
Copy

W.D. v. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. Archdiocese of Miami, a Corp. Sole Archbishop Wenski, etc., 197 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 3065748, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8343

circumvent the statute of limitations; (2) section 95.11(9), Florida Statutes, is inapplicable because
Copy

Wong v. Calvin, 87 F.R.D. 145 (N.D. Fla. 1980).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 30 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1434, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13219, 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 447

for actions to recover wages.2 The statute, Section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1977), creates a two-year
Copy

Juan Luciano & Vickie Luciano v. United Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 156 So. 3d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 340802

limitations for breach of contract actions under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). 1
Copy

In Re Miller, 248 B.R. 198 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 79, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 185, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 500, 2000 WL 622748

Court also notes the applicability of Fla. Stat. § 95.11 mandating that actions on judgments issued by Florida
Copy

Crutchley v. Brevard Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 688 So. 2d 371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 231, 1997 WL 24241

barred by the four year statute of limitation in section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes. We affirm. The sheriff
Copy

Firestone v. Temple Beth Sholom, 183 So. 3d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 231339

to the four-year limitations period found in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2012). The complaint explains
Copy

Connie L. Mielke & Blair C. Mielke v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., etc., 264 So. 3d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

current complaint was time-barred pursuant to section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Deutsche Bank responded
Copy

Pritchett v. Kerr, 354 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15194

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur. . Florida Statutes, § 95.11 (2)(b). . A federal court in Florida has since
Copy

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey, 881 F.3d 876 (11th Cir. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

5-year limitations period established in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). 1 Id. In so holding, the District
Copy

Cadle Co. v. McCartha, 920 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 2006 WL 249216

liability founded on a written instrument." See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. She contends that each of the
Copy

Brock v. Garner Window & Door Sales, Inc., 187 So. 3d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 830452

determination of which statute applies is one of law. Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, provides a four-year
Copy

Univ. of Miami v. Wilson, 948 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2728, 2006 WL 1687685

death, section 95.11(4)(d), controlled.[7] *786 At the time of the decedent's death, section 95.11(4)(b)
Copy

Woodward v. Olson, 107 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 645908, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2937

medical malpractice statute of repose found in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2009). Because the
Copy

Belanger v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 140 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 538744, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1847

limitations period for product liability actions, § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1994), an individual's Engle cause
Copy

Gissendanner v. Manchester Ins. Co., 307 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

Reversed and remanded with directions. NOTES [1] See § 95.11(3) Fla. Stat.
Copy

Jenkins v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 185 So. 3d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1764, 2016 WL 519618

contract claim would have run. See § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2005) (providing' five-year statute
Copy

Morales v. Scherer, 528 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 8096

the purpose of the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes. However, case law fails
Copy

Eagle Nat. Bank of Miami v. Burks, 502 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 496, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6710

since they were no longer enforceable under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), the five year
Copy

Tse Indus., Inc. v. Larson & Larson, Pa, 987 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 268914

limitations for professional malpractice. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). The Larson Defendants
Copy

Fremont Indem. v. Carey Dwyer, 197 F.3d 1053 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

limitation period imposed by Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4)(a), where (1) the alleged malpractice complained
Copy

Hood v. Hood, 392 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

statute of limitations does not bar wife's claim. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that
Copy

Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transp., Inc., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2013 WL 7659924

resulting damages have occurred. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o); Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. Mackal, 641 So.2d
Copy

Brown v. Poole, 261 So. 3d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

four-year statute of limitations governs these claims. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015). This time did not begin
Copy

M.M. v. M.P.S., 556 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2874, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7023

separate action. . Appellees maintain that section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1986), bars the action
Copy

Capone v. Philip Morris U.S.A. Inc., 56 So. 3d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18323, 2010 WL 4861743

death action is two years from the date of death. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2008). Frank Capone died on
Copy

Wells Fargo Bank v. Diz, 253 So. 3d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

under the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). There is no basis, in
Copy

Design Pallets, Inc. v. Grayrobinson, P.A., 515 F. Supp. 2d 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57005, 2007 WL 2274432

alleges that this claim is time barred by Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). (Doc. 33 at 19). Plaintiffs do not respond
Copy

Slapikas v. Llorente, 766 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1224878

limitations for legal malpractice is two years. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). In this case, the action
Copy

Spencer v. EMC Mortg. Corp., 97 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3705166, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332

thus triggering the limitations period under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2012), well more than
Copy

Petersen v. Whitson, 14 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11573, 2009 WL 2514164

a court of record in Florida is twenty years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2007); Commercebank, N.A. v. Taylor
Copy

Milliken & Co. v. Haima Grp. Corp., 654 F. Supp. 2d 1374 (S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72855, 2009 WL 2567025

entity from the Judgment Debtors, (2) Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a)'s five (5) year statute of limitation bars
Copy

Castleman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 97 So. 3d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3537237, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13620

fraud, and negligence actions is four years. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. However, the Florida Supreme Court
Copy

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kenneth H. Graybush & Robin B. Graybush, 253 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2017). As a result
Copy

Riverwalk at Sunrise Homeowners Ass'n v. Biscayne Painting Corp., 199 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12068, 2016 WL 4205352

four years after the cause of action accrues. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). “A cause of action accrues
Copy

Can Fin., LLC v. Daryl R. Krazmien, 253 So. 3d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

by the five year statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2009); and a valid
Copy

Miami Beach First Nat'l Bank v. Borbiro, 201 So. 2d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4634

of the Statute of Limitations prescribed by Section 95.11(7) (b), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides
Copy

Hazen v. Kaplan, 734 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5537, 1999 WL 252479

from the myelogram or since the myelogram. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993) states, in pertinent
Copy

Amis v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 564 F. Supp. 1121 (M.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17447

private antitrust action as the federal statute. Fla.Stat. 95.11(3)(f) (1981). No party has suggested any reason
Copy

Harris v. Goderick, 608 F. App'x 760 (11th Cir. 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

false arrest claims is four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o). As noted previously, a complaint may be
Copy

Williams v. Se. Florida Cable, Inc., 782 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 388094

statute of limitations for statutory violations, section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to actions
Copy

Krause v. Textron Fin. Corp., 10 So. 3d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2009 WL 1025406

five-year state law limitations provision found in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005), and that the
Copy

Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais, 188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584

limitations governing mortgage foreclosures. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). According to Aqua, the
Copy

Broz v. Reece, 272 So. 3d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

common ground that the applicable statute, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), specifies a
Copy

Fabian v. City of Miami, 513 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10156

1977), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 131 (Fla.1978); § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1977). Appellant’s other point
Copy

Igor Mikhaylov v. Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, which applies to a
Copy

Rose v. Sonson, 208 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13408

paternity claim had already been extinguished by section 95.11(3)(b) of the Florida Statute (1986), the applicable
Copy

Mark Kinchla, Individually & Mark 48, LLC v. Ran Investments, LLC, Kilgore Props., LLC, Nanlann, Inc., Robert Pola, Newton Corner Condo. (Fla. 6th DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 6th District Court of Appeal

statute of limitations. Although it agreed that section 95.11(2)(b) applied, it concluded that Mark 48’s
Copy

Papa v. State, 792 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12471, 2001 WL 1007824

See Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 33-103.007 (2000); § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat.(2000); Fla. R.App. Proc. 9.100(c);
Copy

Kenneth Marcantonio v. Carol Marcantonio Sansone, Individually & as Successor Tr. for the Joseph & Mary (Fla. 6th DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 6th District Court of Appeal

on a four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2015). The trial court
Copy

Gabriji, LLC v. Hollywood East, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

improvement of real property” is one year. See § 95.11(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2019). Accepting the allegations
Copy

Green v. Cottrell, 172 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129, 2015 WL 5164938

one-year statute of limitations period outlined in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2007). We affirm appellant’s
Copy

Ehrlich v. Mangicapra, 626 So. 2d 702 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9617, 1993 WL 383489

by the five-year statute of limitations. F.S.A. § 95.11. Thus, under Swanson, when a mortgage contains
Copy

David Terrence Stephens v. Dep't of Corr. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Appellant filed his petition as required by section 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Any action challenging
Copy

Hsbc Bank USA , Nat'l Assoc., Etc. v. The Est. of Chloe Ann Petersen (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

brought within five years of the default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say
Copy

Llano Fin. Grp., LLC v. Theodore F. Petit, 230 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

based on that faulty appraisal and subject to section 95.11(3)’s four-year statute of limitations accrue
Copy

Espinoza v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, 708 F. App'x 625 (11th Cir. 2017).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

instrument,” or “to foreclose a mortgage.” Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b),(c). The Espinozas argue that the statute
Copy

Mario Zequeira v. MMPB Grp., LLC, Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

five-year statute of limitations provided for in section 95.11(2)(d), Florida Statutes, warranted dismissal
Copy

Aaron Shaw v. the State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

by the controlling statutory limitations of section 95.11, Florida Statutes. The State responded to
Copy

Maria Martinez v. Don John Perez-ortiz, M. D. & the Perez Eye Ctr., P. L. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

litigation on Dr. Perez Ortiz and Perez Eye Center. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also § 766.106(4)
Copy

RAIE v. Cheminova, Inc., 221 F. Supp. 2d 1297 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17763, 2002 WL 31127286

Thompson, 159 Fla. 453, 31 So.2d 710 (1947) and § 95.11(4)(d), Fla.Stat. (1985)). The parties have cited
Copy

Orlan L. Hagins v. Mark S. Inch, Sec'y, Florida Dep't of Corr. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

correctly dismissed the complaint as time barred. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (barring action “challenging
Copy

B. B. S. v. R. C. B., 252 So. 2d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

was barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. § 95.11(9) F.S.A. He also filed a motion for summary judgment
Copy

Dampf v. Furst, 624 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9440, 1993 WL 365574

on a finding that the action was barred by section 95.11(4)(b), the four-year medical malpractice statute
Copy

Slavica Raffay & Attila Raffay v. Longwood House Condo. Ass'n, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

5 instrument” is five years. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023). The limitations period
Copy

Daugherty v. Sarasota Cnty., 157 F.R.D. 542 (M.D. Fla. 1994).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21677, 1994 WL 515521

Florida, this period is four years. Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3) (1993). Plaintiff argues that a four year statute
Copy

Sydney Smith v. The State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

cases, a 4-year statute of limitations applies. § 95.11(3)(i), Fla. Stat. (establishing 4-year statute
Copy

Seale v. EMSA Corr. Care, Inc., 767 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 2000).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 689, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1831, 2000 WL 1288895

for statutory causes of action embodied in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999), applies when
Copy

Nale v. Montgomery, 768 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11682, 2000 WL 1283863

negligence must be commenced within four years. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). Pursuant to section 95
Copy

Edwards v. Lindsley, 349 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16581

required to be commenced within five years. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). The *818trustees
Copy

Gindel v. Centex Homes, 267 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run
Copy

Robert C. Gindel v. Centex Homes (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run
Copy

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Diamond, 228 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 3795319

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), The trial CQurt
Copy

Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Montero, 741 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 1999 WL 674552

determine beneficiaries, American argued that section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), requires an
Copy

Wyndell Blue v. Florida Comm'n on Offender Review (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

for writ of mandamus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that
Copy

Arrington v. Walgreen Co., 664 F. Supp. 2d 1230 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94285, 2009 WL 3273217

pharmacists under Florida law is two years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). Walgreens filled the prescription at issue
Copy

Sw. Florida Ret. Ctr., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 682 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10389

legislature would have said so as it did in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1981).”). The majority
Copy

Vergara v. Butter, 568 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7671, 1990 WL 149810

would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is
Copy

Pub. Health Trust of Dade Cnty. v. Knuck, 495 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2123, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10007

the applicable statute of limitations period, § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1985),2 had failed to observe
Copy

Rogers v. Jones, 227 So. 3d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 4449511

time-barred under the one-year limitation period of section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). However, the
Copy

Jerry Layne Rogers, Sr. v. Julie L. Jones, Sec'y, etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

time-barred under the one-year limitation period of section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). However, the
Copy

Gaines v. MacArthur, 254 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5658

action stated in the count was barred by F.S. § 95.11(3), F.S.A.1 The trial court entered the summary
Copy

Bank of New York Mellon v. Arnoux, 257 So. 3d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

of the five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). 1 During the pendency
Copy

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report (Fla. 2020).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

numbers. (1) 7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). (2) 30 Fla. Stat. Ann
Copy

Delmarie Donald v. Mrylene Barrera (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

031(2)(a), 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2020) (fraud); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020) (negligence).
Copy

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.800, 257 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 2018).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Stat. Ann. 116 (Supp.1975)7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). 30 Fla. Stat. Ann. 69-70 (2004)
Copy

Thompson v. McDonough, 967 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16690, 2007 WL 3085011

limitation for such claims provided for by section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. The Department moves for
Copy

Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Isabella, 478 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 576, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3933

whether the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), is applicable
Copy

Jane Doe v. Richard L. Swearingen (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

1480, 1482 (11th Cir. 1988) (citing Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)). Neither party addresses the statute of limitations
Copy

Dr. Marc Bivins v. Charles W. Douglas, Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

298 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020). Section 95.11(3)(b) of the Florida Statutes imposes a four-year
Copy

Davis v. Green, 625 So. 2d 130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1993 WL 416219

is unclear as to the date this occurred. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991) provides in pertinent
Copy

Weisfeld v. Cassel, 568 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7482, 1990 WL 143661

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979).
Copy

Patterson v. Sodders, 167 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

of this action” basing this defense on F.S. section 95.11(9), F.S.A. The aforesaid section provides that
Copy

Sandra Santiago & Norma Caceres, as Pers. Representatives of the Est. of Ramona Reyes v. Francisco a. Rodriguez, Md (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

applicable to medical malpractice actions under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), had expired
Copy

Leavitt Commc'ns, Inc. v. Quality Commc'ns of Am., Inc., 939 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17298, 2006 WL 2956052

June 27, 1999, and expired on June 27, 2004. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing a limitation
Copy

Noughton v. Hooker, 941 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17272, 2006 WL 2959156

entered the order dismissing the complaint. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).
Copy

Markham v. Gottsegen, 179 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3716

we need not deal with the other defenses. Section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that
Copy

Jones v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 578, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1732, 2010 WL 4007652

without merit, and . . . untimely," citing section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2008), as the basis
Copy

Edwin Torres v. Kendall Healthcare Grp., Ltd., Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

comply with the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, as well as the mandatory
Copy

Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 213 So. 3d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15115

motion for rehearing and for certification. 3 § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014).
Copy

Dhanasar v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 201 So. 3d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15119

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2013). The trial
Copy

Florida Dep't of Ins. v. ADP Totalsource, Inc., 775 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13192, 2000 WL 1506192

of limitations bars this contract action. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Burr v. Florida Patient’s
Copy

Winkelman v. Dep't of Banking & Fin., 537 So. 2d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2308, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4459, 1988 WL 103874

Securities and Investor Act upon holdings that (1) Section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year
Copy

Thorney v. Clough, 438 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24504

filed the next day). Reversed and remanded. . See § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1981): Limitations other than for the
Copy

Blue v. Florida Comm'n on Offender Review, 201 So. 3d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15059

for writ of manda*809mus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that
Copy

R.R. v. New Life Cmty. Church of CMA, Inc. (Fla. 2020).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

arguments that their claims were timely under section 95.11(7) or 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2019), or
Copy

Kelly Mitchell v. Applebee's Servs., Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

beyond the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court
Copy

Jimmy Stephens v. Florida Dep't of Corr. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

the filing of his petition was timely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and that the trial court
Copy

Pierce v. Ins. Co. of North Am., 699 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11152, 1997 WL 599653

last element constituting the cause of action. Section 95.11 sets forth the statutes of limitations for causes
Copy

Richardson v. State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. ex rel. Goodrich, 389 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18016

action was barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). We affirm. Appellant’s
Copy

Hellinger v. Fike, 503 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2333, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11543

by the medical malpractice statute of repose. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1983). The trial court denied
Copy

Mariner Club, Ltd. v. Summit Contractors, Inc., 20 So. 3d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16544, 2009 WL 3645190

defect(s) of which the former owner complains. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). Our examination of the
Copy

Maxwell v. Allison Constr. Co., 720 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13917, 1998 WL 771390

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1995); § 631.68, Fla. Stát. (1995); Miller v. Pagodin
Copy

Green v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, 280 F. Supp. 3d 1349 (M.D. Fla. 2017).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida

228 So.3d at 74; Fla. Stat. § 95.031(1); Id. § 95.11(2); Id. § 673.1181. Here, Green promised to pay
Copy

Corinthian Investments, Inc. v. Reeder, 555 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2559, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6123, 1989 WL 130679

barred by so-called “statutory laches” under section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court
Copy

Bambrick v. Citizens Nat'l Bank of Orlando, 192 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4600

limitations applicable to unwritten contracts, F.S.A. § 95.11(5), rather than the five year statute applicable
Copy

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Wellington Acquisition, LLC & Ethrensa Fam. Trust Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

performance claim to exercise its right/option. See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); see also Wing, 107 So
Copy

Flanzer v. Kaplan, 230 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

undue influence claim challenging a trust. See § 95.011 (“A civil action ... shall be barred unless begun
Copy

Stevens v. Peebles, 103 So. 3d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20442, 2012 WL 5933023

limitations period for injunctive relief had run. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009). We have considered the
Copy

DuBreuil v. James, 365 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17103

time specified by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1973), had run, the judgment
Copy

Apac-Florida, Inc. v. Onebeacon Ins. Co., 888 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17939, 2004 WL 2729722

See ch.2001-211, § 2, Laws of Fla. (amending § 95.11(2)(b), (5)(e), Fla. Stat.). The parties agree that
Copy

Moloughney v. Tropical Park, Inc., 339 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15967

Corporation, 74 Misc.2d 471, 343 N.Y.S.2d 651; Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1975).
Copy

Rebecca Hughes v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

otherwise apply to an insured’s claim under section 95.11, Florida Statutes. Most significantly
Copy

Rowland v. Wolf, 192 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4586

monies is barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5) (e), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which requires
Copy

Landrum v. South Dade Healthcare Grp., Ltd., 802 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16423, 2001 WL 1471756

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995); Hankey v. Yarian, 755 So.2d 93, 94 (Fla
Copy

City of North Miami v. Williams, 555 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2704, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6483, 1989 WL 139510

the applicable four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). We affirm the final judgment
Copy

Byrnes v. Small, 60 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (M.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161770, 2014 WL 6467305

time-barred by the statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11. That section provides that, absent fraud, concealment
Copy

Stokes v. Huggins Constr. Co., 626 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11521, 1993 WL 469419

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). We reverse.
Copy

Coquette Originals, Inc. v. Canadian Gulf Line of Florida, Inc., 240 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5669

parties were controlled by maritime law. Under § 95.11(5) (c) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the limitation period
Copy

Caiazza v. Tuff Realty Corp., 805 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16284, 2001 WL 1440803

foreign country must be commenced within five years. § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). “Every judgment gives rise
Copy

DCc Constructors, Inc. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 770 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14798, 2000 WL 1700700

1119, 1121 (Fla.1998) (“We expressly hold that section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), as it applies
Copy

City of Fort Pierce v. Australian Props., LLC WTC, LLC Ted Glasrud Assocs. FL, LLC William D. McKnight & Kathryn A. McKnight, etc., 179 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980, 2015 WL 7245219

the four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes, based on the annual
Copy

Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez, 921 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2005).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 789, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 2005 WL 3005556

DCA 1996). The limitations period is four years. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2004). The children argue that
Copy

Taplin v. Taplin, 88 So. 3d 344 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 1605253, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7207

bringing an action for an intentional tort under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (2007).2 We disagree
Copy

Cypress Fairway Condo. v. Bergeron Constr. Co., 164 So. 3d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6841, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1097

ten-year statute of repose period. Pursuant to section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2010), an action founded
Copy

Linda Byrd Goley v. Robert Anthony Goley, 272 So. 3d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to the statutes of fraud and limitations. See § 95.11, Fla. Stat.
Copy

Valdes v. W. Knapp Eng'g Co., 382 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16477

12-year statute of limitation contained in Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1977). Subsequent to
Copy

Anthony v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 550 B.R. 577 (M.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59802, 2016 WL 2586659

the statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes”). Deutsche Bank Trust
Copy

Am. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Fdh Infrastructure Servs., LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

professional malpractice limitation imposed in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2022). On appeal,
Copy

Tweed v. McDonough, 956 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2007 WL 1554146

denied his - mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. He argues, among other
Copy

Garden v. Frier, 580 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5034, 1991 WL 90962

to be a professional within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional
Copy

Hernando Cnty., Florida v. Hernando Cnty. Fair Ass'n, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Golf Course Dist. Ass’n, 288 So. 1 See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). 2 The parties’
Copy

Beachway Restaurants 2 & James Wigg v. Santo & June, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

accordance with Fla. Stat. 475.01(1)(a) and Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(a).” On appeal, the Buyers argue the
Copy

Cleveland Clinic Florida v. Child.'s Cancer Caring Ctr., Inc., 274 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

claim of unjust enrichment is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing a four-year
Copy

Terrace Gallery, LLC v. Gallery One Condo. Ass'n (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

actions based on a contract, as set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). DEJ argued that
Copy

Vista Fin. Grp., LLC v. the Bank of New York Mellon, Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

990 So. 2d 661, 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes, outlines the statute of
Copy

Gallery One Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Terrace Gallery, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

actions based on a contract, as set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). DEJ argued that
Copy

Purrier v. Dep't of Corr., 164 So. 3d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180, 2015 WL 3408090

Department’s final disposition; it was thereby timely. § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“Any court action challenging
Copy

Juan Francisco Vega v. Andrew Franklin Rier (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

two-year statute of limitations, pursuant to section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2020). Upon finding
Copy

Peters v. The Bank of New York Mellon, 227 So. 3d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2304263, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7646

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court
Copy

Fuddruckers, Inc. v. Fudpucker's, Inc., 436 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (N.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33217, 2006 WL 1517049

expiration of the four-year limitations period in § 95.11(3)(j). This Court finds it difficult to believe
Copy

Bilic v. New Fairways Inv. of Florida, Inc., 543 So. 2d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1273, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2942, 1989 WL 54232

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur. . § 95.11(3)(h), Fla.Stat. (1987). . § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987).
Copy

Steinmetz v. G.D. Parker Sod, Inc., 673 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1996 WL 273508

governed by a four year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1995). The cause of action accrues
Copy

Covenant Baptist Church v. Vasallo Constr., 273 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

we affirm the final judgment under review. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2018); Kelley, 435 So. 2d at
Copy

Hess v. Patrick (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

year statute of limitations to bring the action. § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Such an action results
Copy

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey, 858 F.3d 1360 (11th Cir. 2017).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 533, 2017 WL 1593469, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7775

five-year limitations period established in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). Id. at 1049, 1051. The facts here are nearly
Copy

John Dennis Enlow & Lisa Enlow Vs E.C. Scott Wright, P.A. & Moletteire Injury Law, P.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

cause of action is or should be ‘discovered,’ § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002).”); Silvestrone v. Edell
Copy

Ventures Trust 2013-I-NH Ex Rel. MCM Capital Partners, LLC v. Johnson, 220 So. 3d 1227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2200226, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7176

five-year statute of limitations as set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2015). In opposing
Copy

Bush v. Whitney Bank, 219 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2200223, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7182

the one-year statute of limita*258tions in section 95.11(5)(h) of the Florida Statutes (2015) did not
Copy

Luis N. Mendez, Etc. v. Green Mountain Holdings (cayman) Ltd. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

the complaint, the action is not barred by section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes.”).
Copy

Patrick v. Gatien, 65 So. 3d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7156, 2011 WL 1879201

the statute began to run on June 10, 2004. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that an “action
Copy

Scherer v. Schultz, 468 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14183

discovered the incident giving rise to the action. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1979). This court defined the
Copy

R.R. v. New Life, 248 So. 3d 232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

four-year statute of limitations outlined in section 95.11(3)(a), (p), Florida Statutes (1996). In reaching
Copy

V.J. Usina Contracting, Inc. v. Putnam Cnty., 777 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5708, 2000 WL 569900

knowledge met the’ discovery aspect of either section 95.11(3)(a) or (c), Florida Statutes. Second, the
Copy

Manney v. MBV Eng'g, Inc., 273 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

the ten-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides:
Copy

Adams v. State, 273 So. 3d 195 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

motion for return of personal property based on section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes (2010). In his motion
Copy

Adams v. State, 273 So. 3d 195 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

motion for return of personal property based on section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes (2010). In his motion
Copy

Companion Prop. & Cas. Grp. v. Built Tops Bldg. Servs., Inc., 218 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1908372, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6584

expiration of the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). We reverse because
Copy

Lewis v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 112 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 828013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3623

untimely as a result of the application of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2011). He alleges that
Copy

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Kaufman Lynn Constr., Inc. (11th Cir. 2025).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

year statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). And the Sec- ond District recently
Copy

Deutsche Bank v. Miller, 239 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

the default date alleged in the complaint. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing five-year statute
Copy

Northcutt v. Balkany, 727 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2448, 1999 WL 110843

95’s applicability in general is covered by section 95.011: Applicability. — A civil action or proceeding
Copy

Bronson v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 394 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18854

claim was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1973), or by section 197
Copy

Israel Reyes, Etc. v. Baptist Health South Florida Found., Inc., Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

statute of limitations began to run pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). In addressing
Copy

O'Neil v. Lorain Nat'l Bank, 369 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14401

that the statute of limitations bars the action. § 95.11(6) Fla.Stat. (1973). Appellee also alleges that
Copy

Evanston Ins. v. Premium Assignment Corp., 935 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2013 WL 1233190, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42330

five-year statute of limitations ran pursuant to § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. Evanston’s Endorsement No. 4
Copy

Cadle Co. v. Rhoades, 978 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4335, 2008 WL 782813

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).2 In its reply
Copy

Harris v. Miles, 330 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14957

we have for consideration the applicability of § 95.11(6), F.S.1972, the new statute of limitations governing
Copy

Balfour Beatty v. Boca Raton, 170 F.3d 1048 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Florida. Hence, it must be concluded that [§]95.11(2)(a) will operate as an exception
Copy

DeSouza v. DeSouza, 708 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2932, 1998 WL 130077

beyond the four year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1995). He argues for
Copy

Maiden v. Cogdill, 428 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19314

appellant alleged that the action was barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). Appellee’s reply
Copy

John Doe 1 v. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

therefore be brought “at any time” pursuant to § 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2022). I. INTRODUCTION
Copy

Joseph v. Est. of Joseph, 83 So. 3d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 933020, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358

not subject to the statute of limitations, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2010). McFall v. Trubey,
Copy

Buccellati Holding Italia Spa v. Laura Buccellati, LLC, 5 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 WL 1202965

statute of limitations period, provided by Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f). The statute of limitations period does
Copy

Pines v. George Hunt, Inc. (In re George Hunt, Inc.), 60 B.R. 128 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6486

statute of limitations pursuant to Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3) (West 1982). The Plaintiffs have not raised
Copy

Wendler v. City of St. Augustine, 108 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1007290, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4206

the analysis in Russo. Consequently, under section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2010), the Wendlers
Copy

Chhs Hosp. Co. LLC, d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hosp. v. John Harmon (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

years." See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2021). Harmon argued that under section 95.11(3)(k), CHHS had
Copy

Aguilar v. Cmty. Gen. Hosp., 396 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1981).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2595

running of the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1977). Summons was served on JMH
Copy

Daniel Fetzer Vs State of Florida, Florida Dep't of Child. & Families, Et Al. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida’s statute of limitations codified at section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2009), because it sought
Copy

Rudner v. Lyons, 395 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1979); § 95.281(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Carpenter v. Florida
Copy

Reinhardt v. Schwab, 343 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 1977).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3848

legislative intent to provide retroactive effect to Section 95.-11(6), Florida Statutes, is not express, clear
Copy

Rosemary Arway v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

limitations for actions on written contracts under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, running from the date
Copy

Guarantee Trust Life Ins. v. Fundora, 343 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15417

five year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975), is governing in
Copy

McLeod v. Bankier, 63 So. 3d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8398, 2011 WL 2200705

limitations governing legal malpractice actions is section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). See Peat, Marwick
Copy

Horta v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 911 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8507, 2005 WL 1338260

of Limitations. [She] cite[s] Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(f) (2003) which limits an action founded on
Copy

Kagan v. Pollock, 638 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1994 WL 246515

extended. DELL, C.J., and STEVENSON, J„ concur. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), provides in
Copy

U.S. Bank v. Morelli, 249 So. 3d 717 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014). Because under
Copy

Riverwood Nursing Ctr., LLC. etc. v. John F. Gilroy, ind., & John F. etc., 219 So. 3d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2438333, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8127

that the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, barred the claims as
Copy

Ins. Co. of the South v. Kennedy & Ely Ins., 143 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3014

as argued by^ appellee under Florida Statutes § 95.11(3), F.S.A., or does the three-year statute of limitations
Copy

Wayne Charles Oken v. The Monsanto Co., 371 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2004).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 58 ERC (BNA) 1683, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11013, 2004 WL 1237063

statute of limitations is provided by Fla. Stat. § 95.11, which states that "[a]n action founded on negligence
Copy

Stern v. Bank of Am. Corp., 112 F. Supp. 3d 1297 (M.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84804, 2015 WL 3991058

a five-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c). Stern argues that the limitations period
Copy

Mercado v. Fitell, 875 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417

four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s
Copy

France v. Ross, 165 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433

year statute relating to wages was applicable (§ 95.11(7) (b), and in the alternative relied on the three
Copy

Fuller v. Hahn, 313 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14811

the injuries and damages resulting therefrom. F.S. 95.11(6) Florida Statutes 1971, specifically provides
Copy

Scruggs v. Wilson, 640 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6315, 1994 WL 284113

determined that the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), bars her from
Copy

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Labs., Inc., 822 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 2002 WL 1390728

four year statute of repose as set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, which requires that
Copy

Halveland v. Florida Dep't of Corr., 219 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9305

limitations for prisoners bringing suit under , section 95.11(5)(g) applied, as opposed to section 768.28(14))
Copy

Med. Cost Control & Mgmt., Inc. v. Dougherty, 791 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8822, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1587

period for a suit to recover “wages” is two years. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997).1 Each of the appellants’
Copy

Bradbury v. Fuller, 385 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16650

its face that plaintiff’s action is barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1977). Plaintiff contends
Copy

City of Parker v. Wilson (Fla. 1st DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

before 2017, five years before she filed suit. See § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat. (2022) (codifying laches bar); Corona
Copy

Efron v. Milton, 892 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8739, 2004 WL 1393535

four-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(3)(0), Florida Statutes. The claims for civil
Copy

Stuyvesant Ins. v. Square D. Co., 399 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20330

the applicable statute of limitations was section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1973), which established
Copy

Merkle v. Hogan, 545 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1521, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3564

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1987), is the applicable
Copy

Olean Med. Condo. Ass'n v. Azima, 144 So. 3d 561 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 2783190, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9384

from the accrual of his action had passed. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010) (setting forth the five-year
Copy

Hill v. Virgin, 359 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16111

the time of the filing of this lawsuit was Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973), as amended by Laws
Copy

Lugo v. Ford Motor Co., 611 F. Supp. 789 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18790

the State of Florida is four years. FLA.STAT. § 95.-11(3) (1983). In contrast to the statute of limitations
Copy

Disc. Sleep of Ocala, LLC v. City of Ocala, 200 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2016 WL 3364655

the four-year limitations period set forth in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2014). We agree and
Copy

Townes v. Nat'l Deaf Academy, LLC, 197 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9383, 2016 WL 3381809

601 So.2d 1184, 1186 (Fla.1992) (quoting § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1992)). “In ordinary, common
Copy

Barrier v. JFK Med. Ctr. Ltd. P'ship, 169 So. 3d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9264, 2015 WL 3759641

discovered with the exercise of due diligence .... ” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). In Tanner v. Hartog,
Copy

Pamela Barrier, etc. v. JFK Med. Ctr. Ltd. P'ship, etc., Palm Beach Emergency Med. Assocs., P.L., etc., Jason Sevald, M.D., Armor Corr. Health Servs., Inc., etc., Tanya Beaumont, L.P.N., Shara Davis, L.P.N., Patricia Salmon, L.P.N., Garry J. Beauzile, M.D., & Pierre Dorsainvil, M.D. (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

discovered with the exercise of due diligence . . . .” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). In Tanner v. Hartog
Copy

Ressler v. McNeil, 993 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2403651

habeas corpus petition as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2005). Appellee correctly
Copy

Williams v. Covell, 236 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6319

applicable Statute of Limitation for such claim — F.S. § 95.11(5) (c), F.S.A. Therefore the motion does not allege
Copy

Enlow v. E.C. Scott Wright, P.A., 274 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). The statute of limitations
Copy

Desylvester v. The Bank of New York Mellon, 219 So. 3d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2562370, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8729

applicable to actions on a written instrument. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). In Mr. Desylvester’s
Copy

In Re: The Name Change of Maria Fernanda Benitez, 250 So. 3d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

elapsed from W.M.B.’s attainment of her majority. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla Stat. (2018); see also, Rose v. Sonson
Copy

Downs v. United States, 833 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64020, 2011 WL 2416049

of an improvement to real property, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(c), bars Downs’ cause of action and, alternatively
Copy

Schachter v. Krzynowek, 958 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9197, 2007 WL 1687774

return of deposit or specific performance. Section 95.11(5), Florida Statutes (2003), allowed the buyer
Copy

Shawn M. Daugherty v. Robert Neil McDavid (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

easement and thus the action was untimely under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court rejected
Copy

Lugo v. Florida Patient's Comp. Fund, 452 So. 2d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13578

two year statute of limitations provided by Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), so that the
Copy

Jax Utils. Mgmt., Inc. v. Hancock Bank, A Foreign Corp., 164 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

(1) the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), barred Jax’s
Copy

Angel Barreiro v. Florida Comm'n on Offender Review, 164 So. 3d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

as it relates to that decision, see § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat.; Moger v. Fla. Parole Comm’n
Copy

Freel v. Fleming, 489 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233

barred by the statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. The trial court granted
Copy

Gulam Jaffer v. 153 Rehc LLC, Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

LC, 6 So. 3d 681, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009))); § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (providing that the statute of
Copy

Woods v. Sapolsky, 821 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9581, 2002 WL 1457939

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). This Court has previously
Copy

Keys Country Resort, LLC v. 1733 Overseas High., LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

(“[A] legal action ‘on a contract’ to which [section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes,] applies connotes an
Copy

Knighten v. Palisades Collections, LLC, 721 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67168, 2010 WL 2696768

year statute of limitations applies. Fla. Stat. § 95.11. He claims that his alleged debt was last paid
Copy

Brexendorf v. Bank of Am., N.A., 319 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (M.D. Fla. 2018).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida

from when the cause of action accrued. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Fraud actions accrue when the plaintiff
Copy

Stubbs v. Plantation Gen. Hosp. Ltd. P'ship, 988 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11585, 2008 WL 2907995

applicable to professional negligence actions. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (2005). The motion further alleged
Copy

2765 South Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc., 212 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5390

Both answers raised the statute of limitations, § 95.11, Fla.Stat., *913F.S.A., as an affirmative defense
Copy

Biscayne Developments Ltd. v. Venetian Isle Condo., Inc., 738 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10067, 1999 WL 542848

trial judge that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), bars the Appellants’
Copy

J.B. & J.W.B., Individually & on Behalf of Their Minor Child, S.B. & E.B. & M.B. Individually v. Sacred Heart Hosp. of Pensacola, 27 F.3d 506 (11th Cir. 1994).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19618

TRANSPORTER FOR THE PATIENT FALL WITHIN FLA. STAT. § '95.11(4)(b), THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR
Copy

State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. ex rel. Sippert v. Tindall, 622 So. 2d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7889, 1993 WL 280506

the date the child reaches the age of majority. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). Actions for past due child
Copy

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Robinson, 529 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1781, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3407, 1988 WL 76416

AFFIRMED, DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. . Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1975): 95.11 Limitations
Copy

Pitts v. Pitchford, 201 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4631

limitations of 20 years would apply under F.S.A. § 95.11(1), and if not under seal, then the 5-year statute
Copy

Dhanasar v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013). The
Copy

Penagos v. Capital Bank, 766 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 751, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9419, 2000 WL 1034525

obligation founded on a written instrument, see § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987), had expired because suit
Copy

Meyer v. Roth, 189 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4783

159 Cal.App.2d 566, 323 P.2d 1043 (1958). Section 95.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. permits actions on oral contracts
Copy

Dixon v. Dixon Bellamy, 252 So. 3d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

2 of limitations under section 95.11, Florida Statutes required Bellamy to have
Copy

Nails v. Walmart, 252 So. 3d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(o ), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing four-year limitations period
Copy

Jason Weeks v. Town of Palm Beach (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

limitations for a defamation suit is two years. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012); Wagner, Nugent, Johnson
Copy

Cortes v. Williams, 850 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2003 WL 21705239

alleged malpractice occurred September 30, 1999. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, requires, in relevant
Copy

Daisha Ervin v. Sergio A. Alvarez, M.D. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016) (“An action for medical
Copy

Multi-Line Claims Serv., Inc. v. Cumis Ins. Soc'y, 739 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9638, 1999 WL 510624

four-year statute of limitations as set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1997) began to run
Copy

Kolnick v. Fountainview Ass'n, Inc., 737 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700, 1999 WL 510666

on the basis of the statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). The trial court
Copy

Creative Prop. Mgmt., Inc. v. Gaines, 416 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20556

subject to the five year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1981). However, appellee was
Copy

City of Miami Gardens, Etc. v. City of North Miami Beach, Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3), Florida Statute; and 4) dismissed Counts
Copy

Mobley & Sanders v. Homestead Hosp., Inc., 202 So. 3d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11076

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). See also Tanner
Copy

In re Anthony, 534 B.R. 834 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 319, 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 2526, 2015 WL 4522971

denied without prejudice. ORDERED. . Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c). . Fla. Stat. § 95.281(1)(a). . (Debtor’s
Copy

Nieve & Marisol Linares v. Universal Prop. & Cas., 141 So. 3d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 2965882, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10168

of the cause of action accruing. See § 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). “A cause of action
Copy

Wilson v. Scruggs, 685 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 1996).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

court dismissed Scruggs’ claim, finding that section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), the statute
Copy

Fast v. Florida Patients Comp. Fund, 490 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1986).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2398

2d 349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), in which it held section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1981) bars recovery
Copy

Judkins v. Walton Cnty., 128 So. 3d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 3491163, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11184

four year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. Judkins argues that
Copy

Int'l Graphics, Inc. v. MTA-Travel Ways, Inc., 71 F.R.D. 598 (S.D. Fla. 1976).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14097

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS According to Fla.Stat. § 95.11, “a legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation
Copy

Doral Health Ctr., P.a., a/a/o Esperanza Escariz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

within five years of the cause of action accruing. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). The breach occurs upon
Copy

Sandra A. Forero & William L. Forero v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, 223 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2989493, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10145

and because the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, did not bar the action
Copy

Fairways at Eagle Ridge Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Eagle Ridge Prop. Owners' Ass'n, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

by the parties in this appeal, we affirm. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). In doing so, we voice
Copy

Ervans v. The City of Venice, Florida, 169 So. 3d 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10491, 2015 WL 4154176

a four-year limitations period. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2009). While it is possible
Copy

Lowell v. Singer Co., 528 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1539, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2883, 1988 WL 68084

instead sued within the two years provided by section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Once she did so, Pullum
Copy

Miles Plastering & Assocs., Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Co., 573 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 1986

regarding improvements to real property had run. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1989). Miles responded arguing
Copy

Shanks v. Bros., 230 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7022

arising under Section 627.0851, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Section 95.11(5) (a), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., allows three years
Copy

Velden v. Nationstar Mortg. (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

first missed payment. We disagree. Section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes (2014) provides
Copy

Arrowood Indem. Co. v. Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer, P.A., 134 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 51692, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 167

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). Recognizing that the
Copy

Phillips v. City of West Palm Beach, 133 So. 3d 1071 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 51665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 159, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 135

limitations on a negligence claim is four years. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). A negligence claim does
Copy

Yacht Investors, Inc. v. Lazar (In re Lazar), 81 B.R. 148 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1988).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 6

fraud is four years, which period has expired. See § 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1986). However, the four
Copy

Gasparro ex rel. Gasparro v. Horner, 245 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6960

follows: Does the four year Statute of Limitations (F.S. 95.11(4), Laws of 1964) bar the tort claim of an infant
Copy

Nina Solonenko & Valeriy Solonenko v. Georgia Notes 18, LLC, 182 So. 3d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 257, 2016 WL 72580

mortgage has a five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013), Appellants argue that
Copy

Winston R. Wilkins v. State of Florida, 182 So. 3d 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2016 WL 64974

for actions to recover personal property in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes-(2014). Poux v. State
Copy

City of Pembroke Pines v. Villasenor, 894 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6, 2005 WL 17673

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes. This, rather than the
Copy

Mishiyev v. Davis, Beasley Media Grp., LLC (Fla. 2d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

as barred by the statute of limitations, see § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2020), and for failure to comply
Copy

Inlet Marina of Palm Beach, Ltd. v. Anderson Moore Constr., 237 So. 3d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

statute of limitations as a matter of law. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“Actions . . . shall
Copy

Williams v. Ivey, 708 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 337, 1997 WL 35262

mandamus. The trial court apparently relied upon section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), in denying the
Copy

Wolack v. Florida Comm'n on Offender Review, 155 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1280, 2015 WL 404109

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2012). MARSTILLER and RAY, JJ., and TERRELL, TERRY
Copy

Blackburn v. BARTSOCAS, 972 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 238568

reality a claim for past wages and is limited by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), which provides
Copy

Young v. Ball, 835 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 761, 2003 WL 187439

were first asserted against them in 1999.2 See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1993). The circuit court agreed
Copy

Gallizzi v. Williams, 218 So. 2d 499 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6284

the statute of limita*500tions. Florida Statutes § 95.11(6), F.S.A. requires that an action for slander
Copy

King v. Est. of Anderson, 519 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 296, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 297, 1988 WL 4391

barred by the four year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(b) for actions relating to the determination
Copy

City of Miami v. 346 Nw 29th Street, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

applicability of either section 194.171 or section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes, as we find any such
Copy

City of Miami v. 346 NW 29th Street, LLC, 184 So. 3d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1006, 2016 WL 313977

applicability of either section 194.171 or section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes, as we find any such
Copy

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey (Fla. 2018).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the five-year limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes. The judgment
Copy

Young v. Wilder, 77 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1955).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 48 A.L.R. 2d 397

controlled by Section 95.11(6) F.S.A. Speaking of limitation on actions, Section 95.11(6) provides that
Copy

Schultz v. Amica Mut. Ins., 778 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 490, 2001 WL 55788

running of the five year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (2000); Bolin v. Mass. Bay Ins
Copy

Bustetter v. Armor Corr. Health Servs., Inc., 919 F. Supp. 2d 1282 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2013 WL 247106, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9002

period set forth in Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b) has expired. Section 95.11(4)(b) provides the following:
Copy

CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Mgmt., LLC v. Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trs., or other of Norman W. Gendron (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), and by the
Copy

State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Skinner, 649 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1995 WL 15481

motion for partial summary judgment refers to section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1991).1 We agree with
Copy

Smith v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 21 F. Supp. 3d 1286 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72781, 2014 WL 2139248

four-year statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(f); Maggio v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec
Copy

Kansas City Mortg. Co. v. Burgess, 306 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14703

Statute of Limitations for an action for fraud (Section 95.11(5) (d), F.S.) applies, and, ultimately, may
Copy

Trust Mortg. LLC v. Residential Credit Solutions Inc. (In re Gonzalez), 544 B.R. 716 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

by the five year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. 95.11(2)(c). Count II of the Amended Complaint alleges
Copy

Shouman v. Ecker, 53 So. 3d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 124

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla
Copy

Popper v. Popper, 595 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 894

and SAWAYA, T.D., Associate Judge, concur. . Section 95.11(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989). . But see Boyer v
Copy

Trustman v. Gelfman, 724 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 858, 1999 WL 44196

estate, as the action was barred by laches. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: Laches
Copy

Wartena v. deClaire, 446 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11944

four year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1981), and limited
Copy

Valero v. Tri-City Title Co., 445 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039

and section 4663, Compiled General Laws 1927, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1941) (providing that actions
Copy

Lee Mem'l Health Sys. etc. v. State of Florida, Agency For Agency For Health etc., 272 So. 3d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

years of the date the cause of action accrues. § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. A cause of action accrues when
Copy

Hill v. Crews, 109 So. 3d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 692976, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3162

that Appellant’s claim is time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2009), as to the legal documents
Copy

Rogers v. Ruiz, 594 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 262916

that the two-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), had expired
Copy

Hummer v. Adams Homes of Nw. Florida, Inc., 198 So. 3d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 2016 WL 746423

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3). In reaching its decision, it appears the majority
Copy

State Environ. Reg. v. Ctl Distrib., 715 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 75058

proffer this proof, both were held liable. [4] Section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), provides for
Copy

Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Ins. Agency, 520 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 523, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 654

limited to persons in privity with the professional. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). The term "profession"
Copy

State ex rel. Gerstein v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc., 245 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1971).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3917

controlled was not this statute, but rather Fla.Stat. § 95.11(7) (a), F.S.A., which provided for a one year limit
Copy

Otero v. Arcia, 264 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

limitations for litigation-related malpractice under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), begins to run
Copy

Otero v. Arcia, 264 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

limitations for litigation-related malpractice under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), begins to run
Copy

Whitfield v. Dep't of Corr., 107 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 646059, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2962

state’ ”) (quoting Haag, 591 So.2d at 617). Section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[a]ny
Copy

Calhoun v. Nienhuis, 110 So. 3d 24 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 645348, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2949

statute of limitations for prisoner claims, section 95.11(5)(g), because she filed her complaint more
Copy

Cates ex rel. Cates v. Graham, 427 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18710

asserted that Plaintiffs’ action was time barred by F.S. 95.11(4)(b) which provides that in medical malpractice
Copy

Winniefred Ramsay Vs South Lake Hosp., Kerry L. Neall, M.d., & Holly B. Saunders, M.D. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

under the statute of limitations codified at section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2015), because it
Copy

Fisher v. Fisher, 613 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2039, 1993 WL 40415

moved for a directed verdict on the basis that section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1989) required dismissal
Copy

John Patrick v. Richard Hess, 212 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 2017).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2017 WL 632259, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 337

twenty-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (2012), is applicable to
Copy

Aisy Aleu, Pharm. D. v. Nova Se. Univ., Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

this case, the four- year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2015), for “[a]n action
Copy

Miami Beach Cruisers, LLC v. Rolly Marine Serv. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Actions other than for
Copy

Fenner v. Florentine Forge, Inc., 342 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15239

of limitations is five years as set forth in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1973). '■ The trial court
Copy

Fagan v. Jackson Cnty. Hosp. Dist., Jackson Hosp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

accrues. § 768.28(6)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2017); see § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (establishing two-year statute
Copy

Eddie Edwin Gaitor v. the State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

outside the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(h), Fla. Stat. (setting forth four-year limitation
Copy

Paige v. Florida Dep't of Transp., 502 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 517, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681

Judge. This case involves the application of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), a statute of
Copy

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report (Fla. 2021).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

numbers. (1) 7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). (2) 30 Fla. Stat. Ann
Copy

Doris Rich Corya, etc. v. Roy Sanders, 155 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846

affirmative defense of lach-es, pursuant to section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2008), was an issue to
Copy

Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 195 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5316

ruling that the 20-year statute of limitations of § 95.11(1), Fla.Stats., F.S.A., governed. That ruling is
Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Warren, 805 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 952, 2002 WL 125608

736(5)(b), which establishes the 30-day period and section 95.11(2)(b), which affords medical providers five
Copy

Edmund Accardi v. Regions Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

one-year statute of limitations specified in section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes (2018), apply to a motion
Copy

Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Ltd. P'ship (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida’s delayed discovery doctrine12 11 Section 95.11 reads, in relevant part, as follows:
Copy

Rosa v. Roth, 442 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24547

the applicable two-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). We reverse and remand
Copy

Park v. City of West Melbourne, 999 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18369, 2008 WL 5100339

...k's declaratory action. We reverse. "A civil action or proceeding . . . shall be barred unless begun within the time prescribed in this chapter or, if a different time is prescribed elsewhere in these statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere." § 95.011, Fla....
Copy

Broward Cnty. v. 8705 Hampshire Drive Condo., Inc., 127 So. 3d 853 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 6244200, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19190

statute of limitations had expired in July 2008. See § 95.11(2)(b) and (c), Fla. Stat. (2009). Nevertheless
Copy

Pierson D. Constr., Inc. v. Yudell, 863 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757, 2003 WL 23095239

the case with prejudice. Pierson argues that section 95.11 contains the applicable statute of limitations
Copy

Vellanti v. Maercks, 590 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11975, 1991 WL 253819

within the two year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. *496(1985). Accordingly, we reverse
Copy

Tampa Port Auth. v. Bob Henriquez, as Prop. Appraiser (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida's civil statutes of limitation generally. Section 95.11, which prescribes limitations for civil lawsuits
Copy

Miller v. Anheuser Busch, Inc., 591 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (S.D. Fla. 2008).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106241, 2008 WL 5427990

the specific categories provided in Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (entitled "Limitations other than for the recovery
Copy

In re Kessler Mfg. Corp., 109 B.R. 516 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1989).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2312

Statute of Limitations set forth in FLA.STAT. Section 95.11(3)(k), which provides: Actions other than for
Copy

Repub. of Ecuador v. Dassum, 255 So. 3d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. C. Proceedings
Copy

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A., 263 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of
Copy

Parker v. Critton, 611 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12843, 1992 WL 379893

actions complained of occurred over ten years ago. § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1992 Supp.). As to the former husband’s
Copy

Backus v. Howard W. Backus Towing, Inc., 391 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18254

Corporation also argues that under any circumstances Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1977), and the case law interpreting
Copy

Coconut Grove Station Dev., Ltd. v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 76 So. 3d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20455, 2011 WL 6373024

under the applicable statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009) (providing a five year
Copy

N.G. ex rel. M.G. v. Arvida Corp., 630 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12518, 1993 WL 530857

of the accrual date, or by August 9, 1988. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983). Rule 1.210, Florida Rules
Copy

AFFCO New Zealand, Ltd. v. Am. Fine Foods Corp., 913 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 WL 6644997, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180097

years for a breach of contract claim, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), and one year for specific performance against
Copy

Hanano v. Petrou, 683 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 1996 WL 685534

that the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), had run. The
Copy

Estes v. Rockinson, 461 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268

provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). AFFIRMED. SMITH
Copy

Falisha Bell v. Scott Wagner & Assocs. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (“An action for professional
Copy

Young v. Williamson, 169 So. 2d 856 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

embodied in Fla.Stat. 95.11(4), F.S.A., or upon the arguably applicable limitation in Fla.Stat. 95.-11(5) (e)
Copy

Smith v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 103 So. 3d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21520, 2012 WL 6216756

years from the date of death. Id. at 56 (citing § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2001)). But the two-year statute
Copy

Velazquez v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 442 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25174

CURIAM. We reject the plaintiff’s challenge to section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), as an unconstitutional
Copy

Lemelin v. Gensler, 570 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9289, 1990 WL 198316

construction, is barred by the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that the
Copy

Spence v. Tucker, 107 So. 3d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 6097977, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21208

disciplinary proceedings was time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), but asserts the
Copy

Commenos v. Fam. Practice Med. Grp., Inc., 516 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2697, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11183, 1987 WL 1908

discovered with the exercise of due diligence. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985). In the present
Copy

Engelke, I I I v. Logan, Smart Commc'ns Pasco, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

limitation for oral agreements set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2019).
Copy

Mcdowell v. Sch. Bd. of Leon Cnty., 765 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10182, 2000 WL 1088608

"[a]n action founded on a statutory liability," section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1993), the Milano and
Copy

Kay v. Fernandez, 373 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

statute of limitations. See the wording of Section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, as it appears in 1973
Copy

Hendon v. Stanley Home Prods., Inc., 225 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459

limitations had run, relying on the three year statute § 95.11(5) (e). The trial court granted summary judgment
Copy

Joselyn Santiago v. Raytheon Tech. Corp. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

action for trespass on real property. Fla. Stat. § 95.11.
Copy

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. v. Anton, 230 So. 3d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

barred by the five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009). The trial court entered
Copy

Johnson, Blakely v. Fernando R. Alvarez (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the exercise of due diligence.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however
Copy

Johnson, Blakely v. Fernando R. Alvarez (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

exercise of due diligence." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however
Copy

Admiral Sec. & Inv. Co. v. Curtis, 804 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12126, 2001 WL 984793

Florida, as expressed in legal authority such as section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), which seek to
Copy

Vaughter v. E. Air Lines, Inc., 619 F. Supp. 463 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16370

Fla.Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), § 95.-ll(3)(a), § 95.11(3)(f), or § 95.11(3)(p). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) provides
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

exceptions, they come under the scope of s. 95.091. Section 95.011, F. S., states: 95.011 Applicability.
Copy

Anderson Jerome Parker, Sr. v. The Geo Grp., Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the
Copy

Rubenstein v. Saldariagga, 699 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678, 1997 WL 530344

limitations provi*755sions of sections 681.68 and section 95.11(5)(d) were constitutional, The court acknowledged
Copy

Melbourne Ocean Club Condo. v. Elledge, 71 So. 3d 144 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416, 2011 WL 3754655

one year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2007): Actions other
Copy

Olaya Milian v. Adrian Garcia (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

at 192 (“The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or
Copy

Archey v. Gov't Healthcare Servs., 718 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10789, 1998 WL 530888

by the statute of limitations and repose in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the
Copy

Rosenbaum v. South Miami Hosp., Inc., 642 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8377, 1994 WL 454873

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Florida, Inc
Copy

Daytona Dev. Corp. v. McFarland, 454 So. 2d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1841, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14772

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). This section
Copy

Kornaker v. Payor, 565 So. 2d 899 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6417, 1990 WL 120765

the time required by the statute of limitations. § 95.11(6), Fla.Stat.; cf. Pratt v. Durkop, 356 So.2d 1278
Copy

Davis v. Big Bend Hospice, Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

the four- year limitation period set out in section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes, applied, as held by
Copy

Emilio Perez v. Univ. of Miami (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

written instrument’ is five years.” (quoting § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023))); Mendoza v. V.A. Crudele
Copy

Imperial Apt. Hotel, Inc. v. Aronson, 213 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5176

statute of limitation was based upon a finding that § 95.11(5) (e), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.,1 applied to the counterclaim
Copy

It's a New 10, LLC, It's a 10, Inc, & Carolyn Aronson v. Michael Wilson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

expired four years later, by November 22, 2017. See § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“Actions other than for
Copy

Tobin v. Damian, 772 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1060487

limitations under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1991), and that neither section 95.11(7), Florida
Copy

Stuart L. Longman Vs Atl. Coast Bank, Robert J. Mckay, Whitfield Dev. Corp., Dreamfields Equestrian Cmty. Homewoners Ass'n, Inc. & Tdma, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

motion for deficiency was untimely based on section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes. We agree with Longman’s
Copy

Michael R. Maisonneuve & Cynthia a. Maisonneuve v. Situs Investments, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

last payment required under the mortgage. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). Ultimately, the trial
Copy

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. BH-NV Investments 1, LLC, 230 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

five-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes. A review of the record
Copy

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Riede, 565 So. 2d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6350, 1990 WL 120007

under Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, or a four-year limitations period under Section 95.11(3)(p)
Copy

Dubose v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 387 So. 2d 461 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17535

the two-year statute of limitations set forth in § 95.11(4)(d), Fla.Stat. Appellant asserted that the four-year
Copy

Parker v. Geo Grp., Inc., 224 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 3469420, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11631

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the
Copy

James Harrell v. The Ryland Grp., doing Bus. as Ryland Homes, a foreign for-profit Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

erred in ruling that the statute of repose of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), applies. In
Copy

Hardey v. Shell, 144 So. 3d 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 3929140, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12408

Limitations would begin to run pursuant to Florida Statute 95.11, at the latest, as of the filing of that
Copy

Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 145 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 3928495, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12422

limitations on a wrongful death claim is two years. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). 3 . Based
Copy

Nelson v. Winter Park Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n, 350 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16222

date of the two-year statute of limitations (Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973)) governing malpractice
Copy

Guillermo Pozo v. Sunset Real Est. Partners, Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

containing the avoidance.” (emphasis added)); § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that the statute
Copy

Bistricer v. Palmer, 93 So. 3d 1231 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3237813, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13342

limitations applicable to actions alleging fraud. See § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2002). We reverse. Although
Copy

Gonzalez v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Assoc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Supreme Court stated that: 3 See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013).
Copy

Rodriguez v. Favalora, 11 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2861, 2009 WL 928467

connection with intentional torts based on abuse. § 95.11(7), Fla. Stat. (1992). Subsection 7 states: An
Copy

Helton v. Gunderson, 708 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3675, 1998 WL 158846

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). However, as the plaintiff
Copy

Amaran v. Marath, 34 So. 3d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4509, 2010 WL 1329801

instead of the usual two years provided by section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes. See 46 App. U.S.C.A
Copy

Schweihs v. Bianchini, 728 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1999 WL 187224

Bianchini moved to dismiss all claims based on Florida Statute 95.11(3)(b), which provided for a four-year statute
Copy

Kahler v. Kent, 616 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3812, 1993 WL 100649

action was barred by the statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). We distinguish this case
Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. B & A Diagnostic, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 3d 1366 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64336, 2015 WL 2217312

enrichment claim is four (4) years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k). Therefore, Defendants state that as State
Copy

D.H. Ex Rel. R.H. v. Adept Cmty. Servs., Inc., 217 So. 3d 1072 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

limitations applicable to negligence claims under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006). In case 2D15-677
Copy

Condo. Ass'n of Golf Villas II, Inc. v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

would appear that Florida Statute § 95.11(2)(b) and § 95.11(5)(d) are in conflict, but they are
Copy

Armus v. Kuttler, 578 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3906, 1991 WL 65954

entered the final summary judgment under review. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986), provides
Copy

Gindel v. Centex Homes, 272 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? Fernandez and
Copy

Gindel v. Centex Homes, 272 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? Fernandez and
Copy

Robert C. Gindel v. Centex Homes (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? FERNANDEZ and
Copy

Leyte-Vidal v. Murray, 523 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1669, 1988 WL 37849

applicable statute of limitations in this case is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), which provides
Copy

Onofrio v. Johnston & Sasser, P.A., 782 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5732, 2001 WL 427353

four year statute of limitations prescribed in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996) bars any recovery
Copy

Carter v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., 954 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1213670

prejudice based upon the statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2002). Carter's complaint
Copy

Gonzalez v. Stern, 244 So. 3d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

statute of limitations barred her complaint. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (2004) (providing two-year statute
Copy

Dinerstein v. Paul Revere Ins., 173 F.3d 826 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) (1995). The Florida Supreme Court has held that, under § 95.11(2)(b), a breach
Copy

Romero v. Suntrust Mortg., Inc., 15 F. Supp. 3d 1279 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58185, 2014 WL 1623703

year statute of limitations under Florida Statute § 95.11 to bring a foreclosure action on the mortgage or
Copy

Roberts v. Casey, 413 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19865

concur. SHARP, J., dissents with opinion. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), which was in
Copy

Elmore v. Florida Power & Light Co., 760 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4579, 2000 WL 390329

and (5)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). Under section 95.11(2)(b), an action for damages for breach of a
Copy

Wells Fargo Bank v. Rendon, 245 So. 3d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

the applicable five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015). For the reasons that
Copy

Vance v. Florida Reduction Corp., 263 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624

two-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes, requiring an action for
Copy

Blue Water Coast Servs., LLC & Jacqueline Hyatt v. Maize (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

verdict to conform to the jury’s intent 1 See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2011) (establishing a four-year
Copy

George Escalona v. People's Trust Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

the second amended complaint as untimely. See § 95.11(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (“Actions other than for recovery
Copy

Dutra v. Kaplan, 137 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1491639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5557

of limitations *1192for breach of contract, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), began to run
Copy

Reed v. Lincoln, 731 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4903, 1999 WL 218324

barred by the five year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. The facts in this case are not
Copy

Busch v. Lennar Homes, LLC, 219 So. 3d 93 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1372085, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5106

applicable to construction defect claims. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015). Because the complaint
Copy

Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

barred by the statute of limitations found in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, provided the subsequent
Copy

The Lexi Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Moss & Assocs., LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

with the exercise of due diligence” (quoting § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat.)).
Copy

Langley Ltd. P'ship v. Sch. Bd. of Lake Cnty., 113 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1482779

one-year statute of limitations set forth' in section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes, for an action seeking
Copy

Bove v. Naples HMA, LLC, 196 So. 3d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047, 2016 WL 1273260

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2011). 3
Copy

Hess v. Patrick, 164 So. 3d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 WL 1443113

five-year statute of limitations to bring the action. § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Such an action results
Copy

Best v. Lakeland Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 899 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4482, 2005 WL 735000

limitations applicable to negligence claims. See § 95.11(3)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). The trial court
Copy

Barfield v. United States Rubber Co., 234 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1970).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6502

statute of limitations set forth in Florida Statutes § 95.11(5) (e), or by the four year statute of limitations

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 95 in the context of civil statutes of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.