733.702 Limitations on presentation of claims.—(1) If not barred by s. 733.710, no claim or demand against the decedent’s estate that arose before the death of the decedent, including claims of the state and any of its political subdivisions, even if the claims are unmatured, contingent, or unliquidated; no claim for funeral or burial expenses; no claim for personal property in the possession of the personal representative; and no claim for damages, including, but not limited to, an action founded on fraud or another wrongful act or omission of the decedent, is binding on the estate, on the personal representative, or on any beneficiary unless filed in the probate proceeding on or before the later of the date that is 3 months after the time of the first publication of the notice to creditors or, as to any creditor required to be served with a copy of the notice to creditors, 30 days after the date of service on the creditor, even though the personal representative has recognized the claim or demand by paying a part of it or interest on it or otherwise. The personal representative may settle in full any claim without the necessity of the claim being filed when the settlement has been approved by the interested persons. (2) No cause of action, including, but not limited to, an action founded upon fraud or other wrongful act or omission, shall survive the death of the person against whom the claim may be made, whether or not an action is pending at the death of the person, unless a claim is filed within the time periods set forth in this part.
(3) Any claim not timely filed as provided in this section is barred even though no objection to the claim is filed unless the court extends the time in which the claim may be filed. An extension may be granted only upon grounds of fraud, estoppel, or insufficient notice of the claims period. No independent action or declaratory action may be brought upon a claim which was not timely filed unless an extension has been granted by the court. If the personal representative or any other interested person serves on the creditor a notice to file a petition for an extension, the creditor shall be limited to a period of 30 days from the date of service of the notice in which to file a petition for extension.
(4) Nothing in this section affects or prevents:(a) A proceeding to enforce any mortgage, security interest, or other lien on property of the decedent.
(b) To the limits of casualty insurance protection only, any proceeding to establish liability that is protected by the casualty insurance.
(c) The filing of a cross-claim or counterclaim against the estate in an action instituted by the estate; however, no recovery on a cross-claim or counterclaim shall exceed the estate’s recovery in that action.
(5) Nothing in this section shall extend the limitations period set forth in s. 733.710. History.—s. 1, ch. 74-106; s. 84, ch. 75-220; s. 2, ch. 80-127; s. 4, ch. 81-27; s. 160, ch. 83-216; s. 5, ch. 84-106; s. 4, ch. 85-79; s. 6, ch. 88-340; s. 5, ch. 89-340; s. 4, ch. 90-23; s. 1016, ch. 97-102; s. 146, ch. 2001-226; s. 6, ch. 2002-82; s. 26, ch. 2006-312; s. 21, ch. 2010-4. Note.—Created from former s. 733.16.
Notes of Decisions
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
· cites it 95× “710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
Morgenthau v. Est. of Andzel, 26 So. 3d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
· cites it 28× “Because appellant failed to file a request for extension pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statutes (2007), we affirm.”
Spohr v. Berryman, 589 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1991).
· cites it 22× “Under section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1985), this meant that claims against the estate had to be filed by no later than April 9, 1987.”
Est. of Arroyo v. Infinity Indem. Ins. Co., 211 So. 3d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
· cites it 28× “First, Infinity moved for entry of summary judgment in the circuit court’s bad-faith lawsuit, arguing that, because Reyes failed to file a statement of claim in the probate court regarding the negligence lawsuit, she could no longer do so because the negligence lawsuit was…”
AHCA v. Est. of Johnson, 743 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
· cites it 19× “The Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") appeals an order of the probate court setting aside an order granting enforcement of its lien against the estate of Kevin Johnson a/k/a Robert Watson ("estate") pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statute (1991). Although…”
Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
· cites it 13× “Section 733.702 operates as a statute of limitations for claims made against an estate.”
Thames v. Jackson, 598 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
· cites it 18× “705 revealed a legislative intent to reclassify section 733.702, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), as a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim; therefore, Barnett was found to be no longer controlling.”
Golden v. Jones, 126 So. 3d 390 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
· cites it 14× “Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (2006), 1 provides in relevant part: (1) If not barred by s.”
Velzy v. Est. of Miller, 502 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
· cites it 15× “In our companion opinion, we affirmed the trial court order that struck as untimely appellant's claim against the decedent's estate (section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1983)).”
— 733.702(1) — 58 cases
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
“710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
Morgenthau v. Est. of Andzel, 26 So. 3d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
“Because appellant failed to file a request for extension pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statutes (2007), we affirm.”
— 733.702(1)(a) — 13 cases
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
“710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
Thames v. Jackson, 598 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
“705 revealed a legislative intent to reclassify section 733.702, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), as a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim; therefore, Barnett was found to be no longer controlling.”
— 733.702(1)(b) — 4 cases
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
“710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
— 733.702(2) — 12 cases
Spohr v. Berryman, 589 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1991).
“Under section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1985), this meant that claims against the estate had to be filed by no later than April 9, 1987.”
Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
“Section 733.702 operates as a statute of limitations for claims made against an estate.”
— 733.702(3) — 39 cases
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
“710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
Morgenthau v. Est. of Andzel, 26 So. 3d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
“Because appellant failed to file a request for extension pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statutes (2007), we affirm.”
— 733.702(3)(a) — 1 case
— 733.702(3)(b) — 2 cases
— 733.702(3)(d) — 1 case
— 733.702(4) — 4 cases
— 733.702(4)(a) — 2 cases
— 733.702(4)(b) — 7 cases
Est. of Arroyo v. Infinity Indem. Ins. Co., 211 So. 3d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
“First, Infinity moved for entry of summary judgment in the circuit court’s bad-faith lawsuit, arguing that, because Reyes failed to file a statement of claim in the probate court regarding the negligence lawsuit, she could no longer do so because the negligence lawsuit was…”
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
“710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
“Section 733.702 operates as a statute of limitations for claims made against an estate.”
— 733.702(4)(c) — 1 case
— 733.702(4)(d) — 1 case
— 733.702(5) — 6 cases
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000).
“710, Florida Statutes (1991), is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim that is not subject to waiver or extension in a probate proceeding.”
Est. of Arroyo v. Infinity Indem. Ins. Co., 211 So. 3d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
“First, Infinity moved for entry of summary judgment in the circuit court’s bad-faith lawsuit, arguing that, because Reyes failed to file a statement of claim in the probate court regarding the negligence lawsuit, she could no longer do so because the negligence lawsuit was…”
AHCA v. Est. of Johnson, 743 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
“The Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") appeals an order of the probate court setting aside an order granting enforcement of its lien against the estate of Kevin Johnson a/k/a Robert Watson ("estate") pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statute (1991). Although…”
— 733.702(6) — 1 case
— 733.702(l) — 1 case
Morgenthau v. Est. of Andzel, 26 So. 3d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
“Because appellant failed to file a request for extension pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statutes (2007), we affirm.”
— 733.702(l)(a) — 9 cases
— 733.702(l)(b) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.