Florida Statute 56.29 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 56.29

56.29 Proceedings supplementary.—

(1) When any judgment creditor holds an unsatisfied judgment or judgment lien obtained under chapter 55, the judgment creditor may file a motion and an affidavit so stating, identifying, if applicable, the issuing court, the case number, and the unsatisfied amount of the judgment or judgment lien, including accrued costs and interest, and stating that the execution is valid and outstanding, and thereupon the judgment creditor is entitled to these proceedings supplementary to execution.

(2) The judgment creditor shall, in the motion described in subsection (1) or in a supplemental affidavit, describe any property of the judgment debtor not exempt from execution in the hands of any person or any property, debt, or other obligation due to the judgment debtor which may be applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment. Upon filing of the motion and affidavits that property of the judgment debtor, or any debt, or other obligation due to the judgment debtor in the custody or control of any other person may be applied to satisfy the judgment, then the court shall issue a Notice to Appear. The Notice to Appear shall direct such person to file an affidavit, as provided in s. 56.16, with the court by a date certain, which date shall not be less than 7 business days from the date of service of the Notice to Appear, stating why the property, debt, or other obligation should not be applied to satisfy the judgment. For good cause shown, the court may shorten the time for serving an affidavit. The Notice to Appear must describe with reasonable particularity the property, debt, or other obligation that may be available to satisfy the judgment, must provide such person with the opportunity to present defenses, and must indicate that discovery as provided under the rules of civil procedure is available and that there is a right to a jury trial as provided in s. 56.18. The Notice to Appear must be served as provided for in chapter 48. A responding affidavit must raise any fact or defense opposing application of the property described in the Notice to Appear to satisfy the judgment, including legal defenses, such as lack of personal jurisdiction. Legal defenses need not be filed under oath but must be served contemporaneously with the affidavit.

(3)(a) When, within 1 year before the service of process on the judgment debtor in the original proceeding or action, the judgment debtor has had title to, or paid the purchase price of, any personal property to which the judgment debtor’s spouse, any relative, or any person on confidential terms with the judgment debtor claims title and right of possession, the judgment debtor has the burden of proof to establish that such transfer or gift was not made to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors.

(b) When any gift, transfer, assignment or other conveyance of personal property has been made or contrived by the judgment debtor to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors, the court shall order the gift, transfer, assignment or other conveyance to be void and direct the sheriff to take the property to satisfy the execution. This does not authorize seizure of property exempted from levy and sale under execution or property which has passed to a bona fide purchaser for value and without notice. Any person aggrieved by the levy or Notice to Appear may proceed under ss. 56.16-56.20.

(4) At any time the court may refer the proceeding to a general or special magistrate who may be directed to report findings of law or fact, or both. The general or special magistrate has all the powers thereof, including the power to issue subpoena, and shall be paid the fees provided by the court.

(5) A party or a witness examined under these provisions is not excused from answering a question on the ground that the answer will tend to show him or her guilty of the commission of a fraud, or prove that he or she has been a party or privy to, or knowing of a conveyance, assignment, transfer, or other disposition of property for any purpose, or that the party or witness or another person claims to have title as against the judgment debtor or to hold property derived from or through the judgment debtor, or to be discharged from the payment of a debt which was due to the judgment debtor or to a person on behalf of the judgment debtor. An answer cannot be used as evidence against the person so answering in any criminal proceeding.

(6)(a) The court may order any property of the judgment debtor not exempt from execution or any property, debt, or other obligation due to the judgment debtor, in the hands of or under the control of any person subject to the Notice to Appear, to be levied upon and applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment debt. The court may enter any orders, judgments, or writs required to carry out the purpose of this section, including those orders necessary or proper to subject property or property rights of any judgment debtor to execution, and including entry of money judgments as provided in ss. 56.16-56.19 against any person to whom a Notice to Appear has been directed and over whom the court obtained personal jurisdiction irrespective of whether such person has retained the property, subject to applicable principles of equity, and in accordance with chapters 76 and 77 and all applicable rules of civil procedure. Sections 56.16-56.20 apply to any order issued under this subsection.

(b) If the personal property of the judgment debtor includes a motor vehicle or vessel that is nonexempt to any extent from execution and for which a Florida certificate of title has been issued, upon presentation of a copy of a valid judgment lien certificate acquired under s. 55.202, the court must order the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to note the liens of the judgment creditor on the certificate of title and in the records of the department.

(7) Any person failing to obey any order issued under this section by a judge or general or special magistrate or failing to attend in response to a subpoena served on him or her may be held in contempt.

(8) Costs for proceedings supplementary shall be taxed against the judgment debtor as well as all other incidental costs determined to be reasonable and just by the court including, but not limited to, docketing the execution, sheriff’s service fees, and court reporter’s fees. Reasonable attorney fees may be taxed against the judgment debtor.

(9) The court may entertain claims concerning the judgment debtor’s assets brought under chapter 726 and enter any order or judgment, including a money judgment against any initial or subsequent transferee, in connection therewith, irrespective of whether the transferee has retained the property. Claims under chapter 726 brought under this section shall be initiated by a supplemental complaint and served as provided by the rules of civil procedure, and the claims under the supplemental complaint are subject to chapter 726 and the rules of civil procedure. The clerk of the court shall docket a supplemental proceeding under the same case number assigned to the original complaint filed by the judgment creditor or the case number assigned to a judgment domesticated pursuant to ¹s. 55.01, shall assign a separate supplemental proceeding number, and shall assign such supplemental proceeding to the same division and judge assigned to the main case or domesticated judgment.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ch. 7842, 1919; CGL 4540-4549; s. 1, ch. 63-144; s. 11, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 72-12; s. 13, ch. 73-334; s. 12, ch. 87-145; s. 309, ch. 95-147; s. 20, ch. 2000-258; s. 53, ch. 2004-11; s. 12, ch. 2005-241; s. 17, ch. 2014-182; s. 18, ch. 2016-33; s. 6, ch. 2023-300.

¹Note.—Section 55.01 relates to general requirements for judgment forms; ss. 55.501-55.509 comprise the Florida Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act.

Note.—Former ss. 55.52-55.611.

F.S. 56.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.29 on CourtListener

Amendments to 56.29

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 56.29

Total Results: 206

In Re Saunders

101 B.R. 303, 21 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 277, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1006, 1989 WL 67495

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 15, 1989 | Docket: 369474

Cited 47 times | Published

instituted proceedings supplementary pursuant to § 56.29 Fla. Stat. against four other entities or individuals

AMJAD MUNIM, MD, PA v. Azar

648 So. 2d 145, 1994 WL 457141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 2465709

Cited 30 times | Published

Associates in proceedings supplementary, pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1993), after learning through

Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC.

450 So. 2d 867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1984 | Docket: 1432922

Cited 25 times | Published

entered in supplementary proceedings under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1981), which found that he

Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.

805 So. 2d 835, 2001 WL 883234

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2001 | Docket: 2449499

Cited 24 times | Published

United States, or of any foreign country. [4] Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2000), is the current version

Mejia v. Ruiz

985 So. 2d 1109, 2008 WL 2037775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2008 | Docket: 1673202

Cited 21 times | Published

commenced proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2003). At depositions in

Cathy Jackson-Platts v. General Electric Capital Corporation

727 F.3d 1127, 2013 WL 4463006, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17580

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 22, 2013 | Docket: 919372

Cited 20 times | Published

supplementary proceeding under Florida Statutes section 56.29(6) — is an independent “civil action” removable

General Trading Inc. v. Yale Materials Handling Corp.

119 F.3d 1485, 47 Fed. R. Serv. 670, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22374, 1997 WL 447351

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 22, 1997 | Docket: 64037342

Cited 19 times | Published

proceedings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 69, and Florida Statute 56.29, in aid of execution of the amended judgment

NATIONSBANK, NA v. Coastal Utilities, Inc.

814 So. 2d 1227, 2002 WL 816836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2002 | Docket: 348208

Cited 15 times | Published

bank utilized supplementary proceedings under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1999), a procedural mechanism

Estate of Jackson v. Schron (In Re Fundamental Long Term Care, Inc.)

873 F.3d 1325, 2017 WL 4682691, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20468

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 19, 2017 | Docket: 6172507

Cited 14 times | Published

proceedings supplementary under Florida Statutes § 56.29; 4 “real party in interest” claims under

Ally v. Naim

581 So. 2d 961, 1991 WL 104528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1991 | Docket: 1284001

Cited 13 times | Published

supplementary against defendant pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1989). Plaintiff asserted

Acadia Partners, LP v. Tompkins

759 So. 2d 732, 2000 WL 678808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2000 | Docket: 1421534

Cited 12 times | Published

instant case. Had Case 320 been an action under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1997), for proceedings supplementary

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. O'Brien Marketing, Inc.

913 F. Supp. 1536, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20026, 1995 WL 791251

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1995 | Docket: 1611449

Cited 11 times | Published

instituted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a) and Fla.Stat. § 56.29. Having received documentary and testimonial evidence

Hurlbert v. Shackleton

560 So. 2d 1276, 1990 WL 48650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1990 | Docket: 1477921

Cited 11 times | Published

any relief, and this appeal followed. Under section 56.29(5), Fla. Stat. (1985), a "judge may order any

Zureikat v. Shaibani

944 So. 2d 1019, 2006 WL 565907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2006 | Docket: 1649909

Cited 10 times | Published

Stat. (2004). Zureikat's argument lacks merit. Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2004), described the procedure

Regent Bank v. Woodcox

636 So. 2d 885, 1994 WL 189589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1994 | Docket: 1715170

Cited 10 times | Published

third party in proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes. The order is appealable as

In Re Warner

83 B.R. 807, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 233, 1988 WL 14147

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1988 | Docket: 1453479

Cited 10 times | Published

unpersuaded by Debtor's argument that Florida Statutes § 56.29 provides creditors the same protection as that

Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh

363 So. 2d 613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1978 | Docket: 1513598

Cited 10 times | Published

creditors against the judgment debtor under Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1975). We reverse. *614

Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh

363 So. 2d 613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1978 | Docket: 1513598

Cited 10 times | Published

creditors against the judgment debtor under Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1975). We reverse. *614

Estate of Jackson v. Ventas Realty, Ltd. Partnership

812 F. Supp. 2d 1306, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108208, 2011 WL 4363919

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2011 | Docket: 151671

Cited 8 times | Published

circuit court a supplemental proceeding under Section 56.29, Florida Statutes, to aid in the satisfaction

Oliver v. Stone

940 So. 2d 526, 2006 WL 3019832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 432808

Cited 8 times | Published

initiates supplementary proceedings pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2005). Such proceedings are

Speer v. Mason

769 So. 2d 1102, 2000 WL 1468308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2000 | Docket: 1476622

Cited 8 times | Published

supplementary proceedings undertaken in accordance with section 56.29, Florida Statutes. Florida law does not allow

Morton v. Cord Realty, Inc.

677 So. 2d 1322, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7991, 1996 WL 426187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 2515239

Cited 8 times | Published

trial court's final judgment states: 15. Under Section 56.29(6)(a), Florida Statutes, TRADEWINDS has the

Babbit Electronics, Inc. v. Dynascan Corp.

915 F. Supp. 335, 1995 WL 789298

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 1184633

Cited 8 times | Published

against the counterdefendants pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 56.29(11), which shall be taxed on appropriate motion

Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams

579 So. 2d 850, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4557, 1991 WL 77671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1991 | Docket: 1432157

Cited 8 times | Published

creditor or appoint a Master to do this for it. Section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes. If the examination of

Allied Industries International, Inc. v. Agfa-Gevaert, Inc.

688 F. Supp. 1516, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6661, 1988 WL 65682

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 13, 1988 | Docket: 1960101

Cited 8 times | Published

law. In this case, Fla.Stat. § 56.29 will control. By enacting section 56.29, the Florida legislature intended

Mogul v. Fodiman

406 So. 2d 1225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1981 | Docket: 449787

Cited 8 times | Published

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., concur. NOTES [1] § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1979). [2] Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(4):

Puzzo v. Ray

386 So. 2d 49

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1980 | Docket: 340196

Cited 8 times | Published

scope of supplementary proceedings pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1979). At issue is whether

Hinton v. Hinton (In Re Hinton)

378 B.R. 371, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 40, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3537, 2007 WL 3051264

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2007 | Docket: 1846050

Cited 7 times | Published

Bankruptcy Code[1] or to administration pursuant to Section 56.29 of the Florida Statutes. The plaintiffs, the

Goodman v. ALDRICH & RAMSEY ENTERPRISES

804 So. 2d 544, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 238, 2002 WL 51949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1334705

Cited 7 times | Published

and the property made subject to execution, see § 56.29(6), Fla. Stat. (1999), or § 726.105, Fla. Stat

381651 Alberta, Ltd. v. 279298 ALBERTA

675 So. 2d 1385, 1996 WL 382273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1996 | Docket: 1323119

Cited 7 times | Published

general adjudication of title to the property. Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1993), provides the statutory

Bakalarz v. Luskin

560 So. 2d 283, 1990 WL 45266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1990 | Docket: 1739581

Cited 7 times | Published

of execution, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 56.29 is an appropriate method of levying on the property

National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC

192 So. 3d 498, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4820, 2016 WL 1238265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2016 | Docket: 3049198

Cited 6 times | Published

National Auto Properties and Mr. Levin pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2013), on the theory that

Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings, LLC v. Estate of Jackson ex rel. Jackson-Platts

110 So. 3d 6, 2012 WL 5935678, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2012 | Docket: 60230446

Cited 6 times | Published

appeal, in proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2010). The trial court entered

Moffatt & Nichol, Inc. v. B.E.A. International Corp.

48 So. 3d 896, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15828, 2010 WL 4103149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2010 | Docket: 51979

Cited 6 times | Published

prerequisites for proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2008); Mejia v. Ruiz, 985 So.2d 1109

Lobato-Bleidt v. Lobato

688 So. 2d 431, 1997 WL 82115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1997 | Docket: 1508315

Cited 6 times | Published

cannot be deemed fraudulent transfers under section 56.29 (proceedings supplementary) or section 726.101

Rosenfeld v. TPI INTERN. AIRWAYS

630 So. 2d 1167, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12677, 1993 WL 538220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 418569

Cited 6 times | Published

proceedings should be conducted in accordance with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987), providing for supplementary

Rosenfeld v. TPI INTERN. AIRWAYS

630 So. 2d 1167, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12677, 1993 WL 538220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 418569

Cited 6 times | Published

proceedings should be conducted in accordance with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987), providing for supplementary

300 Pine Island Associates, Ltd. v. Steven L. Cohen & Associates, Pa

547 So. 2d 255, 1989 WL 81762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1989 | Docket: 2091068

Cited 6 times | Published

in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.570 and section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987). Appellee filed a motion

Ferre v. City Nat. Bank of Miami

548 So. 2d 701, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1771, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4233, 1989 WL 81734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1989 | Docket: 1699178

Cited 6 times | Published

under Supplemental Proceedings, Florida Statute Section 56.29, the court hereby enters a final judgment against

Warren v. SOUTHEASTERN LEISURE SYSTEMS

522 So. 2d 979, 1988 WL 27812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1988 | Docket: 1660803

Cited 6 times | Published

complaint in proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1985). Appellants contend

Estey v. Sharp Electronics Corp.

409 So. 2d 217, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1982 | Docket: 1525469

Cited 6 times | Published

Fla. 536, 10 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1942). However, Section 56.29(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1981) alters this conclusion

Compton v. Societe Eurosuisse, S.A.

494 F. Supp. 836, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14697

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1980 | Docket: 2019305

Cited 6 times | Published

Oklahoma arsenal of execution procedures. Fla.Stat. § 56.29 sets forth the procedure for deposing a judgment

Schwartz v. CAPITAL CITY FIRST NAT. BANK

365 So. 2d 181, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1978 | Docket: 1314431

Cited 6 times | Published

that venue in supplementary proceedings under § 56.29 may be (and in this instance is) in a county other

FREDERICK LONGO v. ASSOCIATED LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC. and LIMOUSINE MANAGEMENT, INC.

236 So. 3d 1115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2018 | Docket: 6280932

Cited 5 times | Published

not satisfy the description requirement of section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes (2016). However, our affirmance

Paul v. Avrahami

216 So. 3d 647, 2017 WL 1363963, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2017 | Docket: 60265459

Cited 5 times | Published

supplementary. At the time of the proceedings below, section 56.29, Florida Statutes, which governs proceedings

OCALA BREEDERS'SALES v. Hialeah, Inc.

735 So. 2d 542, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6769, 1999 WL 330175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 1430620

Cited 5 times | Published

Breeders' brought proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1997), seeking to hold Hialeah

Tabet v. Tabet

644 So. 2d 557, 1994 WL 552461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1248231

Cited 5 times | Published

Proceedings Supplementary to execution, pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes, in order to determine the

Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams

597 So. 2d 275, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 259, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 827, 1992 WL 85080

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1992 | Docket: 1350978

Cited 5 times | Published

master in accordance with the provisions of section 56.29(11), Florida Statutes (1989). The motion was

MacHado v. Foreign Trade, Inc.

544 So. 2d 1061, 1989 WL 59559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1989 | Docket: 1301378

Cited 5 times | Published

appellants in proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987), is a nonfinal, nonappealable

Jim Appley's Tru-Arc, Inc. v. LIQUID EXT. SYS. LTD. P'SHIP

526 So. 2d 177, 1988 WL 54545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1988 | Docket: 1272679

Cited 5 times | Published

discovery into the debtor's finances, pursuant to section 56.29(4), Fla. Stat. (1985), and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280

Whigham v. Muehl

511 So. 2d 717, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1987 | Docket: 217786

Cited 5 times | Published

instituted supplementary proceedings under Section 56.29, Florida *718 Statutes.[2] He sought an order

Mickler v. Aaron

490 So. 2d 1343, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 1489258

Cited 5 times | Published

petition for proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1983), for collection of

Mickler v. Aaron

490 So. 2d 1343, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 1489258

Cited 5 times | Published

petition for proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1983), for collection of

Sun Bank, N. A. v. Snell (In Re Cone)

11 B.R. 925, 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1744, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3511

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1981 | Docket: 1855751

Cited 5 times | Published

D. 432 (M.D.Fla.1976), the court held that Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1969), providing for supplementary

Deluca v. King

197 So. 3d 74, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6559, 2016 WL 1718865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2016 | Docket: 60256351

Cited 4 times | Published

to initiate proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2014), and to implead the

Sargeant v. Al-Saleh

137 So. 3d 432, 2014 WL 836755, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2014 | Docket: 60240307

Cited 4 times | Published

proceedings supplementary to execution pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2012). The motion sought

Pollizzi v. Paulshock

52 So. 3d 786, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20134, 2010 WL 5391523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2010 | Docket: 2408242

Cited 4 times | Published

commence a proceeding supplementary pursuant to section 56.29 of the Florida Statutes (2009), and implead

17315 Collins Avenue, LLC v. Fortune Development Sales Corp.

34 So. 3d 166, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6140, 2010 WL 1779903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2010 | Docket: 19755

Cited 4 times | Published

Fortune initiated proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2007). At a hearing, the trial court

Arellano v. Bisson

847 So. 2d 998, 2003 WL 1720139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2003 | Docket: 1686653

Cited 4 times | Published

forms the basis of the present appeal. *1000 Section 56.29(5), Florida Statutes (2000), governs proceedings

Oliver v. Kolody (In Re Oliver)

142 B.R. 486, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 169, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1186, 1992 WL 166062

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 1090473

Cited 4 times | Published

supplementary proceeding pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 56.29. Kolody immediately initiated post-judgment discovery

Patterson v. Venne

594 So. 2d 331, 1992 WL 34671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1992 | Docket: 1485949

Cited 4 times | Published

impleading her in proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1989). To the extent that

Novo v. Scott

438 So. 2d 477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1983 | Docket: 1731634

Cited 4 times | Published

federal judge declared unconstitutional Florida Statute 56.29(8), because it merely used the language

Neff v. Adler

416 So. 2d 1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 1654848

Cited 4 times | Published

Neff and his partners," presumably pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1979).[3] Regarding that

Continental Cigar Corp. v. Edelman & Co., Inc.

397 So. 2d 957, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1981 | Docket: 1706579

Cited 4 times | Published

proceedings supplementary to execution pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1977). Edelman and Company

Walter J. Kassuba Realty Corp. v. Hemmerle (In Re Kassuba)

10 B.R. 309, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 4716

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1981 | Docket: 1478253

Cited 4 times | Published

state in which the district court is held." Section 56.29, Florida Statutes, governs that procedure in

ART ADVERTISING CO. INC. v. Associated Press

340 So. 2d 1291, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 14974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1977 | Docket: 1299447

Cited 4 times | Published

neither of them has ever been joined as parties. Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1975), specifically authorizes

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.570 and Form 1.914

244 So. 3d 1009

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2018 | Docket: 6981030

Cited 3 times | Published

is adopted in response to 2016 amendments to section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes, which require a court

Spector v. Spector

226 So. 3d 256, 2017 WL 2264636, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2017 | Docket: 60274311

Cited 3 times | Published

alternative basis for the award of attorney’s fees, section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2016). As noted in the Former

Forster v. Nations Funding Source, Inc.

648 F. App'x 850

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 19, 2016 | Docket: 65962354

Cited 3 times | Published

Sookrani Narain. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 69; Fla. Stat. § 56.29. Forster, Lacy, and Hirschfeld obtained a default

National Maritime Services, Inc. v. Glenn F. Straub

776 F.3d 783, 2015 A.M.C. 1321, 2015 WL 151703, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 511

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 2015 | Docket: 2624046

Cited 3 times | Published

supplementary proceeding, Fed.R.Civ.P. 69; Fla. Stat. § 56.29(6), to void the transfer, and the district court

BIEL REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Development etc.

156 So. 3d 506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2014 | Docket: 2614605

Cited 3 times | Published

involves proceedings supplementary to execution, section 56.29, Florida Statutes, which for almost 100 years

Bodywell Nutrition, LLC v. Fortress Systems, LLC

846 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2012 WL 565993, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20929

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2012 | Docket: 65979449

Cited 3 times | Published

Second, Bodywell asserts that Florida Statute § 56.29 and the Federal Rules require that James River

In Re Lezdey

332 B.R. 217, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 459, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2057, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 165, 2005 WL 2739111

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2005 | Docket: 1571321

Cited 3 times | Published

supplementary in Pinellas County, Florida, pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes, to collect on the Arizona

Jones v. MTLC Investment, Ltd. (In Re Hill)

332 B.R. 835, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 436, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2129, 2005 WL 2483338

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2005 | Docket: 1574319

Cited 3 times | Published

discovered by Doughty. Application of Florida Statute § 56.29 The Court now considers Trustee's alternative argument

Gaedeke Holdings v. Mortgage Consultants

877 So. 2d 824, 2004 WL 1505999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 1285123

Cited 3 times | Published

to recover attorneys' fees and costs under section 56.29(11), Florida Statutes, from Nier and Olinick

Hyman v. Harrold (In Re Scott Wetzel Services, Inc.)

293 B.R. 791, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 131, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 533, 2003 WL 21289976

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2003 | Docket: 1860061

Cited 3 times | Published

proceedings supplementary, as set forth in Fla. Stat. § 56.29, to collect upon the money judgment against Ms

Novak v. Snieda

659 So. 2d 1138, 1995 WL 467297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1995 | Docket: 1748160

Cited 3 times | Published

to examine Novak numerous times pursuant to section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes (1991). The record demonstrates

Real Estate Corp. of Fla. v. Dawn Devel.

644 So. 2d 145, 1994 WL 576103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 1248659

Cited 3 times | Published

parties in proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1993). Real Estate Corporation

Amjad Munim, M.D., P.A. v. Azar

648 So. 2d 145, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64753225

Cited 3 times | Published

Associates in proceedings supplementary, pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1993), after learning through

STANDARD PROP. INV. TRUST, INC. v. Luskin

585 So. 2d 1099, 1991 WL 174662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1991 | Docket: 1293869

Cited 3 times | Published

failure to comply with the requirements of section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987), specifically by failing

Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchants Sav. Bank

582 So. 2d 738, 1991 WL 120783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1991 | Docket: 1363585

Cited 3 times | Published

however, orders impleading third parties under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1989), determine no substantive

Bonizo Properties NV v. Schroeder

528 So. 2d 1304, 1988 WL 79368

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1988 | Docket: 1717334

Cited 3 times | Published

requested attorney's fees on appeal, pursuant to section 56.29(11), Florida Statutes (1987). Under that section

Salina Mfg. Co. v. Diner's Club, Inc.

382 So. 2d 1309, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16458

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1980 | Docket: 1674445

Cited 3 times | Published

instituted supplementary proceedings, pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1977), so as to subject the

Conrad v. McMechen

338 So. 2d 1306

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1976 | Docket: 162682

Cited 3 times | Published

an order (dated August 3, 1976) pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1975), requiring appellant

in British Am. Ins. Co. v. Fullerton (In re British Am. Ins. Co.)

600 B.R. 890

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 17, 2019 | Docket: 65791381

Cited 2 times | Published

506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding that Fla. Stat. § 56.29 borrows substantively from fraudulent transfer

JAMES J. GIBSON & DR. LORI G. GIBSON v. WACHOVIA BANK

255 So. 3d 944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2018 | Docket: 7428852

Cited 2 times | Published

Fargo sought proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2014), and moved to implead

Susan S. Kennedy v. RES-GA Lake Shadow, LLC, Lake Shadow etc.

224 So. 3d 931, 2017 WL 3864173, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2017 | Docket: 6147716

Cited 2 times | Published

fraudulently transferred to another. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. But the rights of any third party interest-holders

Tardif v. McCuan (In re McCuan)

569 B.R. 511, 2017 WL 1161305, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46146

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2017 | Docket: 65517500

Cited 2 times | Published

Statute § 56.29 in which the Trustee joined as a party plaintiff (id.); and (6) under § 56.29 the Court

MYD Marine Distributor, Inc. v. International Paint Ltd.

201 So. 3d 843, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2016 | Docket: 60257104

Cited 2 times | Published

pending Lauderdale Marine case, pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2015), which permits seizure

Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

205 So. 3d 768, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2016 | Docket: 4111232

Cited 2 times | Published

”); cf. ch. 55, Fla. Stat. (2014); § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2014). “Before a cause of action for

General Electric Capital Corp. v. Shattuck

132 So. 3d 908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2014 | Docket: 60238580

Cited 2 times | Published

conducting proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2013), it is not necessary

Kingston Corp. Group of Florida, Inc. v. Richard Kleiber Walter Kleiber Partnership

127 So. 3d 802, 2013 WL 6212030, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2013 | Docket: 60236858

Cited 2 times | Published

So.2d 1167, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also § 56.29(11), Fla. Stat. (2011). Here, the only judgment

Sanchez v. Renda Broadcasting Corp.

127 So. 3d 627, 2013 WL 6030085, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2013 | Docket: 60236787

Cited 2 times | Published

use of proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2012), is not permitted unless

National Maritime Services, Inc. v. Straub

979 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 2013 WL 5770677, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152869

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2013 | Docket: 65995101

Cited 2 times | Published

Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and Florida Statute Section 56.29, to avoid and recover a fraudulent transfer

National Maritime Services, Inc. v. Straub

979 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 2013 WL 5770677, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152869

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2013 | Docket: 65995101

Cited 2 times | Published

Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and Florida Statute Section 56.29, to avoid and recover a fraudulent transfer

In re C.D. Jones & Co.

482 B.R. 449, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 481, 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5168, 2012 WL 5390327

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2012 | Docket: 65784510

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida’s (then) Fraudulent Transfer statute (F.S. § 56.29). The issue before the Court in Saunders was whether

Donan v. Dolce Vita Sa, Inc.

992 So. 2d 859, 2008 WL 4414299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2008 | Docket: 1390187

Cited 2 times | Published

exception to section 56.29(5), Florida Statutes (2007), which does not exist. Section 56.29(5) provides:

Bloco, Inc. v. Porterfield Oil Co., Inc.

990 So. 2d 578, 2008 WL 2986655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1687474

Cited 2 times | Published

Bloco in "supplementary proceedings pursuant to section 56.29." The final judgment reserved jurisdiction to

Amoco Oil Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.

765 So. 2d 111, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6796, 2000 WL 718181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2000 | Docket: 428797

Cited 2 times | Published

after a final judgment has been entered." See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1997). Id. In the case at bar, the

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Smithbilt

715 So. 2d 963, 1998 WL 299386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1998 | Docket: 1717033

Cited 2 times | Published

usually after a final judgment has been entered. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1997). Oddly, in chapter 74, the quick-take

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Smithbilt

715 So. 2d 963, 1998 WL 299386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1998 | Docket: 1717033

Cited 2 times | Published

usually after a final judgment has been entered. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1997). Oddly, in chapter 74, the quick-take

Bleidt v. Lobato

664 So. 2d 1074, 1995 WL 722903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 1229553

Cited 2 times | Published

In Wieczoreck, this court ruled that under section 56.29, Florida Statutes, a jurisdictional prerequisite

Coral Contractors, Inc. v. Paul

387 So. 2d 554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1980 | Docket: 1328127

Cited 2 times | Published

contending that such requirement was erroneous under section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes[1], petitioners nowhere

Ball v. Papp

317 So. 2d 801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1975 | Docket: 1692373

Cited 2 times | Published

instituted a Supplementary Proceeding under Fla. Stat. § 56.29 (1973) against the appellee, Papp, as defendant

RICHARD B. WEBBER, II v. THOMAS B. D'AGOSTINO

251 So. 3d 188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2018 | Docket: 7361295

Cited 1 times | Published

(2) section 57.115, Florida Statutes; and (3) section 56.29, Florida Statutes. On August 4, 2017, the

P & S & Co v. Sj Mak

254 So. 3d 535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2018 | Docket: 6958934

Cited 1 times | Published

provision followed by Professional is set forth at § 56.29(6)(b) Fla. Stat. which states . . . ‘When any

Gorrin Jr. v. Poker Run Acquisitions, Inc.

237 So. 3d 1149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2018 | Docket: 6288191

Cited 1 times | Published

Inc., 163 So. 3d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). 3 Section 56.29(6)(a) was the version in effect in 2015. That

Destination Boat Clubs, Inc. v. Island Breeze Boat Club & Rental Inc.

226 So. 3d 301, 2017 WL 2491564, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2017 | Docket: 6071537

Cited 1 times | Published

entitled to reasonable costs and fees pursuant to section 56.29(11), Florida Statutes (2015). The court considered

Berman v. Smith (In re Goldschmidt)

510 B.R. 387, 2014 WL 1745361

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 1, 2014 | Docket: 65516791

Cited 1 times | Published

others to collect on the judgment pursuant to § 56.29, Fla. Stat.1 Id. at 4-5. Sylvia Berman’s Complaint

Jarboe Family & Friends Irrevocable Living Trust v. Spielman

136 So. 3d 666, 2014 WL 185215, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2014 | Docket: 60240055

Cited 1 times | Published

action for proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2011). Spielman asserted

Licea v. Curacao Drydock Co.

870 F. Supp. 2d 1360, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87376, 2012 WL 2402042

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2012 | Docket: 65982467

Cited 1 times | Published

of Civil Procedure 69(a)2 and Florida Statute § 56.29(a)3 to implead the governments of the Island Territory

B & I Contractors, Inc. v. Mel Re Construction Management

66 So. 3d 1035, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12141, 2011 WL 3300328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2011 | Docket: 2363624

Cited 1 times | Published

motion for proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2009). The trial court denied

Licea v. CURACAO DRYDOCK CO., INC.

794 F. Supp. 2d 1299, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57955, 2011 WL 2118716

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 27, 2011 | Docket: 2012091

Cited 1 times | Published

of Civil Procedure 69(a)[2] and Florida Statute § 56.29(a)[3] to commence proceedings supplementary to

Wavestone Properties v. Fortune Development

978 So. 2d 830

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 1508462

Cited 1 times | Published

Fortune initiated proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2007). At a hearing, the trial court

Calderon v. Kalb

963 So. 2d 857, 2007 WL 2258613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2007 | Docket: 2583903

Cited 1 times | Published

proceedings supplementary to execution under section 56.29, Florida Statutes, seeks relief from an order

RPS, Inc. v. Travel Max International, Inc.

823 So. 2d 243, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281, 2002 WL 1798575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2002 | Docket: 64816802

Cited 1 times | Published

liberal rights of discovery in aid of execution. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2000), esp. subsections (4) (“Testimony

State, Department of Insurance v. Accelerated Benefits Corp.

817 So. 2d 1086, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8249, 2002 WL 1285161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2002 | Docket: 64815559

Cited 1 times | Published

subsequently initiated proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2000), by impleading the

Varveris v. ALBERTO M. CARBONELL, PA

773 So. 2d 1275, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16892, 2000 WL 1872341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 2239424

Cited 1 times | Published

Marie's husband. In proceedings supplementary, § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1999), Carbonell sought to implead

Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba

64 F. Supp. 2d 1245, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15110, 1999 WL 755947

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1999 | Docket: 2477460

Cited 1 times | Published

prejudgment attachments (28 U.S.C. § 1610(d)) and Section 56.29 of the Florida Statutes. In addition, ETECSA

Dusoe v. SECURIS INTERN., INC.

672 So. 2d 89, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3895, 1996 WL 185657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1996 | Docket: 2585775

Cited 1 times | Published

third-party defendants, is justified under section 56.29(11), Florida Statutes. In fact, we find that

Warshall v. Price

617 So. 2d 751, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4158, 1993 WL 113421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 64695874

Cited 1 times | Published

paid to the debtor and from accounts payable. Section 56.29, Florida Statutes, authorizes orders subjecting

Trustees of North Florida Operating Engineers Health v. Lane Crane Service, Inc.

148 F.R.D. 662, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13587, 1993 WL 156903

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1993 | Docket: 66307861

Cited 1 times | Published

Specifically, see Florida Statutes Annotated § 56.29 (1969 & Supp.1993).

Zeuda Corp. v. Grancolombiana Corp. Financiera, SA

610 So. 2d 509, 1992 WL 335898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1992 | Docket: 1413443

Cited 1 times | Published

court in proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1991), which shows that property

Zeuda Corp. v. Grancolombiana Corp. Financiera, SA

610 So. 2d 509, 1992 WL 335898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1992 | Docket: 1413443

Cited 1 times | Published

court in proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1991), which shows that property

Nobles v. Ring Power Corp.

531 So. 2d 1023, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2255, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4343, 1988 WL 100551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1988 | Docket: 64637373

Cited 1 times | Published

in this cause. Appellant argues that under section 56.29, Florida Statutes, which provides for supplementary

Mission Bay Campland, Inc. v. Sumner Financial Corp.

72 F.R.D. 464, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12522

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1976 | Docket: 66072474

Cited 1 times | Published

master, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 69 and Fla.Stat. § 56.29(7), but not pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 53. The Court

Sam's West, Inc. v. Sydney Silverman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2024 | Docket: 68398370

Published

Argued: Apr 17, 2024

proceedings pursuant to Flor- ida Statute § 56.29. Sam’s West sought to pierce WPP’s corporate

ZAHAV REFI, LLC, ZAHAV FLORIDA, LLC, ZAHAV REFI I I, LLC, SP POOL 7 ZAHAV FL, LLC, BOG TWELVE ZAHAV FL, LLC, AND POOL7 ZAHAV FLORIDA, LLC v. WHITE HAWK ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2023 | Docket: 68117303

Published

receivership cases are more commonly found under section 56.29, Florida Statutes, in proceedings supplementary

Estate of Arlene Townsend v. Steven Berman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 18, 2023 | Docket: 63145394

Published

Argued: Mar 9, 2022

ration (“GECC”) 25—pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 56.29, 26 for the purpose As the Bankruptcy

ADWEISS LLLP, etc. v. JOHN A. DAUM

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2023 | Docket: 66639443

Published

proceedings supplementary brought pursuant to section 56.29 of the Florida Statutes, appellants Adweiss

SARA ROSENBERG, etc. v. U.S. BANK, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2023 | Docket: 60382878

Published

arguments as contrary to the plain text of section 56.29. B. Subsection 56.29(3)’s statute

ROSE RENDA, individually, and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF GUISEPPE RENDA v. JOSEPH PRICE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2022 | Docket: 64435982

Published

commence proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2018), to collect on it.

THE AVAEL LAW FIRM, PLLC v. SARINA SECHRIST

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2022 | Docket: 63588186

Published

Cure, Cristina Serrano and Eva Bryant. 2 See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2019).

Young Bock Shim v. Frederick F. Buechel, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2022 | Docket: 63339285

Published

jurisdiction to act on foreign property pursuant to section 56.29(6), Florida Statutes (2021), and disapprove

ADA TURKISH TRASK 2005 TRUST NUMBER ONE, etc. v. ELLEN TURKISH

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2022 | Docket: 63285680

Published

726.110 apply to proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29(9), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Claims under chapter 726

VERONICA ROSS-WILLIAMS, etc. v. LINDA LEALI, RECEIVER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2022 | Docket: 63266648

Published

proceeding supplementary initiated pursuant to section 56.29. 4 Proceedings supplementary provide a judgment

APOLLO TRUST v. BNP PARIBAS JERSEY TRUST CORPORATION LIMITED

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2022 | Docket: 62646380

Published

issuing notices to appear in compliance with section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes. Apollo and United Trust

JOHN G. MCGREGOR v. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2021 | Docket: 61585939

Published

between the proceedings supplementary statute (section 56.29, Florida Statutes) and the Uniform Fraudulent

ZEEV SEGAL, etc. v. FORASTERO, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2021 | Docket: 59954626

Published

LLC’s performance of the agreement. 1 See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2018).

FABRIZIO PUCCI AND FRANCA FELLI v. MAY-WONG CHOU, ESQ.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2021 | Docket: 59840415

Published

Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2020), governs proceedings supplementary. Section 56.29(1) sets

ALVARO GORRIN RAMOS v. MISSISSIPPI REAL ESTATE DISPOSITIONS LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2021 | Docket: 29102119

Published

court to exercise its equitable powers under section 56.29(6)

UOWEIT, LLC v. THOMAS W. FLEMING, ROBIN FLEMING and CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2020 | Docket: 17370644

Published

inapplicable to proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2018). We disagree and affirm

Regions Bank v. MDG Lake Trafford, LLC (In re McCuan)

603 B.R. 829

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2019 | Docket: 65791520

Published

Plaintiffs seek judgment against Defendants under § 56.29 of the Florida Statutes ; in the Fraudulent Transfer

Lb Judgment Holdings v. Boschetti

271 So. 3d 115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2019 | Docket: 14693163

Published

proceedings supplementary is authorized by section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2017). In Longo v. Associated

American Shuttle v. Zilber

257 So. 3d 1173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2018 | Docket: 8110465

Published

the three impleaded party defendants under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2018). Contained in the

Nieto Villamizar v. Luna Capital Partners

260 So. 3d 355

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2018 | Docket: 8074511

Published

applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment.” § 56.29(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). When Mr. Nieto filed his

Nieto Villamizar v. Luna Capital Partners

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2018 | Docket: 8110466

Published

applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment.” § 56.29(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). When Mr. Nieto filed his

RREF SNV-FL SSL, LLC v. Shamrock Storage, LLC

250 So. 3d 788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2018 | Docket: 64684258

Published

avoid a fraudulent transfer brought pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2013). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND

RENEE SPECTOR v. ROBERT L. SPECTOR, ROBERT L. SPECTOR, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2017 | Docket: 6088819

Published

alternative basis for the award of attorney’s fees, section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2016). As noted in the Former

Jensen v. Anderson (In re Anderson)

561 B.R. 230

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2016 | Docket: 65789320

Published

commence proceedings supplementary under Fla. Sta. § 56.29. In November 2014, the Bank filed its First Amended

Wells v. Sacks

180 So. 3d 1223, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18782, 2015 WL 9263988

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2015 | Docket: 60252300

Published

to establish a prima facie case, pursuant to section 56.29(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2010), that Robert

Wells v. Sacks

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2015 | Docket: 3021644

Published

to establish a prima facie case, pursuant to section 56.29(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2010), that Robert

RREF SNV-FL SSL, LLC v. Shamrock Storage, LLC

178 So. 3d 90, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15909, 2015 WL 6446074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2015 | Docket: 60251623

Published

denying its petition for supplemental relief under § 56.29 Florida Statutes (2013). We reverse because under

Reiseck v. Universal Communications of Miami, Inc.

141 F. Supp. 3d 1295, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147090, 2015 WL 6561689

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2015 | Docket: 64305048

Published

supplementary proceedings under Florida Statute section 56.29(6)(b),3 which provides: When any gift, transfer

Winderting Investments, LLC v. Furnell

144 So. 3d 598, 2014 WL 3765448, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2014 | Docket: 795474

Published

initiating proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2012). One thing is clear

Puleo v. Golan

201 So. 3d 37, 2014 WL 2756524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2014 | Docket: 60257016

Published

impleaded—Puleo satisfied the requirements of section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2011), for the commencement

Schron v. Nunziata

136 So. 3d 684, 2014 WL 444019, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60240058

Published

the order because supplementary proceedings, see § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (2012), do not require the full panoply

Estrada v. Sorrento Townhomes, LLC

164 So. 3d 675, 2013 WL 2321189, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2013 | Docket: 60248017

Published

confirms that execution is valid and outstanding. § 56.29(1), Fla. Stat. (2012); see also B & I Contractors

Okaloosa New Opportunity, LLC v. LD Projects, LLC

109 So. 3d 1209, 2013 WL 1234193, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2013 | Docket: 60229466

Published

transferred its assets in violation of Chapter 726 and § 56.29(6)(a) & (b), Florida Statutes, to Defendants, WILLIAM

Perrone v. Frank

80 So. 3d 402, 2012 WL 385539, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2012 | Docket: 60305702

Published

find Perrone individually liable. Pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2003), the Franks requested

Rodriguez v. Nieves

75 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18176, 2011 WL 5554819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 60303695

Published

and the order denying rehearing. Affirmed. . Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2007). . The loan was evidenced

Vp Gables, LLC v. Cobalt Group, Inc.

709 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43637, 2010 WL 1778689

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 4, 2010 | Docket: 2405628

Published

in proceedings supplementary is governed by section 56.29 of the Florida Statutes and not Fed. R.Civ.P

Gamez v. First Union National Bank of Florida

31 So. 3d 220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2943, 2010 WL 785936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 60289553

Published

implead that third party and proceed under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2005), which Cypress Recovery

PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. v. Kahn

26 So. 3d 25, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19078, 2009 WL 4639638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2009 | Docket: 1115475

Published

services as the court deems reasonable...." [2] Section 56.29(11) provides: "Costs for proceedings supplementary

Boats Express, Inc. v. Thackeray

978 So. 2d 206, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 2008 WL 782880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 64854387

Published

00-2120CI-HNO, alleging only the basic requirements of section 56.29(1), Florida Statutes (2004). The motion and

Forman v. Great American Resorts of Florida

929 So. 2d 1089, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2006 | Docket: 64844779

Published

moved for proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2004). Forman did not attach

Forman v. GREAT AMERICAN RESORTS OF FLORIDA

929 So. 2d 1089, 2006 WL 1155163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2006 | Docket: 1421564

Published

moved for proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2004). Forman did not attach

Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf

900 So. 2d 734, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 2005 WL 957606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 64837924

Published

entitled to proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes. Upon a showing of the statutory

Riley v. Crossings Community Church, Inc.

881 So. 2d 685, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12600, 2004 WL 1905786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 64832447

Published

Community Church, Inc. (“Crossings”), under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (2002). She appeals a summary

Rudo v. Levin

855 So. 2d 115, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11060, 2003 WL 21697185

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2003 | Docket: 64825234

Published

the essential requirements of law. We agree. Section 56.29(2) specifically provides that “the court shall

Craft v. Craft

757 So. 2d 571, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4784, 2000 WL 484743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2000 | Docket: 64797156

Published

supplementary are governed by the mandates of section 56.29, Florida Statutes, one provision of which reads

Varela v. American Alliance Trade Finance Service Corp.

729 So. 2d 533, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4647, 1999 WL 212978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1999 | Docket: 64787195

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610(a)(1); Pecora v. Pecora

Cole v. Barlar Enterprises, Inc.

779 So. 2d 289, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14348, 1998 WL 798714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1998 | Docket: 64804085

Published

CURIAM. This appeal is before us pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1995) (proceedings supplementary)

Myers v. Brook

708 So. 2d 607, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1868, 1998 WL 80460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1998 | Docket: 64779930

Published

was instituted as a summary proceeding under section 56.29, Florida Statute (1993). The Fourth District

Kraft Foodservice, Inc. v. Thunder Boat Row & Associates, Inc.

700 So. 2d 181, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11566, 1997 WL 640650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 64776139

Published

explained that in supplementary proceedings under section 56.29, Florida Statutes that: “venue in the case does

O'Steen v. First Union National Bank of Florida

661 So. 2d 913, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10949, 1995 WL 607763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1995 | Docket: 64759516

Published

latter claim of error compels reversal. Under section 56.29(5), Florida Statutes, a “judge may order any

Feliz Industries, Inc. v. Holmes Lumber Co.

621 So. 2d 550, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7368, 1993 WL 265300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1993 | Docket: 64697668

Published

instituted proceedings supplementary, pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1991), and impleaded the

Luskin v. Luskin

616 So. 2d 559, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3842, 1993 WL 98670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1993 | Docket: 64695392

Published

proceedings supplementary to judgment under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1989), are simply a continuation

Boyle v. Schmitt

614 So. 2d 39, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3197, 1993 WL 62092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1993 | Docket: 64694426

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 56.29(9), Fla.Stat. (1991).

Hughes Supply, Inc. v. A.A. Electric Corp.

145 F.R.D. 590, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158, 1993 WL 5204

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1993 | Docket: 66306984

Published

defendant, E.D.W., Inc. (“E.D.W”) pursuant to § 56.-29, Fla.Stat., proceedings supplementary. Plaintiff

Urban v. Venne

595 So. 2d 1108, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3972, 1992 WL 61320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1992 | Docket: 64666134

Published

impleaded in a proceeding supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1989), may be compelled to

Lahav Flooring & Fixtures, Inc. v. Weinstein

590 So. 2d 1055, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12522, 1991 WL 267983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1991 | Docket: 64663960

Published

the above referenced successor corporation. Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1989), requires the filing

Mash v. Express One International, Inc.

585 So. 2d 1154, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9084, 1991 WL 181531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1991 | Docket: 64661611

Published

creditor or appoint a master to do this for it. Section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes. If the examination of

United Farm Agency of Florida, Inc. v. DKLS, Inc.

585 So. 2d 1139, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9553, 1991 WL 181489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1991 | Docket: 64661603

Published

is to institute proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1989). Proceedings supplementary to

TPI International Airways v. Rosenfeld

573 So. 2d 963, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 379, 1991 WL 4320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1991 | Docket: 64656041

Published

discovery should be conducted in accord with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987). See Treated Timber

Sullivan v. Musella

564 So. 2d 150, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4285, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1990 | Docket: 64651610

Published

support his motion with an affidavit under section 56.-29(1), Florida Statutes (1987). We affirm the

Allen v. Hinson

560 So. 2d 411, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3148, 1990 WL 57796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1990 | Docket: 64650174

Published

action against Allen to recover these funds. Section 56.29(5), Florida Statutes, provides that in a proceeding

Pinkerton v. Leisure Properties, Ltd.

559 So. 2d 402, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2521, 1990 WL 41239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 64649540

Published

proceedings supplementary to execution pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes, and a motion to implead appellant

Ruddy v. Ashton

554 So. 2d 557, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2818, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6844, 1989 WL 147390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1989 | Docket: 64647220

Published

creditor or appoint a master to do this for it. Section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes. If the examination of

Nestor v. Dependable Insurance Co.

552 So. 2d 1192, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2756, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6697, 1989 WL 143446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1989 | Docket: 64646621

Published

Dependable then sought to levy execution pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes on the $3000.00 held by appellant’s

Doyle v. Polo Syndications, Inc.

530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4068, 1988 WL 93726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1988 | Docket: 64636940

Published

that the appellant substantially complied with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987) and case law requirements

Marco Technology Corp. v. Reynolds

520 So. 2d 63, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 344, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 343, 1988 WL 6068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1988 | Docket: 64632718

Published

the outstanding writ of execution pursuant to section 56.29(5), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides:

Coloso Boat Corp. v. Souza

492 So. 2d 1100, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1612, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1986 | Docket: 64621090

Published

examined in Broward County was error. Under section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes (1985), the trial court

Treated Timber Products, Inc. v. S & A Associates, Inc.

488 So. 2d 159, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1114, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64619156

Published

denying its petition for supplemental relief under § 56.29 Florida Statutes (1983). We conclude that the trial

Tubero v. Ellis

469 So. 2d 206, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1298, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14037

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1985 | Docket: 64612145

Published

and attempted to depose Tubero pursuant to section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes (1983). Tubero, in turn

Smith v. Daniel Mones, P.A.

459 So. 2d 462, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2528, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1984 | Docket: 64608291

Published

execution. Riley v. Fatt, 47 So.2d 769 (Fla.1950); Section 56.29 Florida Statutes (1983). Therefore, for the

Becker v. Effenberger

458 So. 2d 891, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2438, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1984 | Docket: 64608043

Published

appeal. In proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1983), to collect the judgment

Bally Case & Cooler, Inc. v. H. Kaiser Associates, Inc.

514 F. Supp. 352, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12246

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 1981 | Docket: 66156142

Published

Id. at 435. It is patently clear that Fla.Stat. § 56.29 is the correct procedure to be followed in execution

Sutton v. Sutton

382 So. 2d 776, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1980 | Docket: 64575642

Published

judgment, the wife moved (as provided for in Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1977)) for an order to require

Blouin v. American Liberty Insurance

375 So. 2d 326, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64572036

Published

judgment entered on June 9, 1978. . Pursuant to Section 56.29(9), Florida Statutes (1977).

Day v. Miramar Holding Corp.

362 So. 2d 305, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1978 | Docket: 64565951

Published

none of the assets of the judgment debtor. See Section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1977). Likewise, appellees

Vazquez v. Santisteban

334 So. 2d 97, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14569

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1976 | Docket: 64554224

Published

proceedings supplementary to execution. See Fla.Stat. § 56.29. This appeal is from an order directing levy on

Ferguson v. State Exchange Bank

264 So. 2d 867, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1972 | Docket: 64526978

Published

the appellee judgment creditor pursuant to Section 56.29(6), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Appellant contends

McCollister v. McCollister

248 So. 2d 490, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1971 | Docket: 64520558

Published

05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., nor as an action under § 56.29(6) (a), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Second, there was no

Swartz v. Lipsky

241 So. 2d 448, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1970 | Docket: 64517620

Published

$138.65 costs. In supplementary proceedings under § 56.29 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., an order was entered on June

Lubarr v. Waldman

212 So. 2d 664, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1968 | Docket: 64506161

Published

judgment appealed is affirmed. Affirmed. . Section 56.29(6), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., 1967 Revision.