The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 163.3194

163.3194 Legal status of comprehensive plan.—

(1)(a) After a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been adopted in conformity with this act, all development undertaken by, and all actions taken in regard to development orders by, governmental agencies in regard to land covered by such plan or element shall be consistent with such plan or element as adopted.

(b) All land development regulations enacted or amended shall be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, and any land development regulations existing at the time of adoption which are not consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, shall be amended so as to be consistent. If a local government allows an existing land development regulation which is inconsistent with the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, to remain in effect, the local government shall adopt a schedule for bringing the land development regulation into conformity with the provisions of the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof. During the interim period when the provisions of the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, and the land development regulations are inconsistent, the provisions of the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, shall govern any action taken in regard to an application for a development order.

(2) After a comprehensive plan for the area, or element or portion thereof, is adopted by the governing body, no land development regulation, land development code, or amendment thereto shall be adopted by the governing body until such regulation, code, or amendment has been referred either to the local planning agency or to a separate land development regulation commission created pursuant to local ordinance, or to both, for review and recommendation as to the relationship of such proposal to the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof. Said recommendation shall be made within a reasonable time, but no later than within 2 months after the time of reference. If a recommendation is not made within the time provided, then the governing body may act on the adoption.

(3)(a) A development order or land development regulation shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, and other aspects of development permitted by such order or regulation are compatible with and further the objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government.

(b) A development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, capacity or size, timing, and other aspects of the development are compatible with and further the objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government.

(4)(a) A court, in reviewing local governmental action or development regulations under this act, may consider, among other things, the reasonableness of the comprehensive plan, or element or elements thereof, relating to the issue justiciably raised or the appropriateness and completeness of the comprehensive plan, or element or elements thereof, in relation to the governmental action or development regulation under consideration. The court may consider the relationship of the comprehensive plan, or element or elements thereof, to the governmental action taken or the development regulation involved in litigation, but private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation.

(b) It is the intent of this act that the comprehensive plan set general guidelines and principles concerning its purposes and contents and that this act shall be construed broadly to accomplish its stated purposes and objectives.

(5) The tax-exempt status of lands classified as agricultural under s. 193.461 shall not be affected by any comprehensive plan adopted under this act as long as the land meets the criteria set forth in s. 193.461.

(6) If a proposed solid waste management facility is permitted by the Department of Environmental Protection to receive materials from the construction or demolition of a road or other transportation facility, a local government may not deny an application for a development approval for a requested land use that would accommodate such a facility, provided the local government previously approved a land use classification change to a local comprehensive plan or approved a rezoning to a category allowing such land use on the parcel, and the requested land use was disclosed during the previous comprehensive plan or rezoning hearing as being an express purpose of the land use changes.

History.—s. 12, ch. 75-257; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 2, ch. 77-223; s. 12, ch. 80-358; s. 69, ch. 81-259; s. 11, ch. 85-55; s. 33, ch. 2002-296.

F.S. 163.3194 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.3194 on Casetext

Amendments to 163.3194

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 163.3194

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 163.3194.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, a a a v. MARTIN COUNTY, a LLC RG LLC,, 259 So. 3d 864 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . . and densities and intensities in the comprehensive plan," not the implementing ordinances (quoting § 163.3194 . . .

HEINE v. LEE COUNTY, a LLC, a, 221 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 163.3194(l)(a) ("After a comprehensive plan ... has been adopted in conformity with this act, all . . . claim that the trial court should have construed the Consistency Statute in pari materia with section 163.3194 . . .

TOWN OF PONCE INLET, a v. PACETTA, LLC, a a a, 226 So. 3d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Id. at 421 (quoting § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005)). . . .

RAINBOW RIVER CONSERVATION, INC. v. RAINBOW RIVER RANCH, LLC,, 189 So. 3d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Id. at 421 (quoting § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005)). . . . See § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. . . .

J. DIBBS, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 625 F. App'x 515 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a). . . . See id. § 163.3194(l)(b). . Dibbs's complaint also raised a procedural Due Process claim. . . .

J. HOWELL, v. PASCO COUNTY, 165 So. 3d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 163.3194(l)(a). . . . In the context of land development, section 163.3194(3), defines consistency as: (a) A development order . . .

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, v. HENDRY COUNTY, a Co. LLC, a, 114 So. 3d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 163.3194(l)(a) provides that once a comprehensive plan has been adopted, all development undertaken . . .

GRAVES, v. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, CITY COMMISSION, a PPI, INC., 74 So. 3d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . .” § 163.3194(4)(b). . . .

FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. PALM BEACH COUNTY, 69 So. 3d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

ARBOR PROPERTIES, INC. PUD, LLC, PUD II, LLC. v. LAKE JACKSON PROTECTION ALLIANCE, INC. S. E. C. C., 51 So. 3d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. . . . (quoting § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005)). . . . .” § 163.3194(4)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

D. KEENE, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,, 22 So. 3d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .”§ 163.3194(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (emphasis added). . . .

BAY COUNTY LLC, v. HARRISON, 13 So. 3d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . further the objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan.... § 163.3194 . . . Bd. of County Comm’rs of Leon County, 765 So.2d 124, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (quoting § 163.3194(3)(a . . .

CITRUS COUNTY, v. HALLS RIVER DEVELOPMENT, INC., 8 So. 3d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 163.3194, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . governmental agencies in regard to land covered by such plan” must be consistent with that plan. § 163.3194 . . . in 1997, the County was without discretion to undertake development actions inconsistent with it. § 163.3194 . . .

SAVE HOMOSASSA RIVER ALLIANCE, INC. v. CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 2 So. 3d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also § 163.3164(7), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

SCHWARZ, v. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND,, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3194, Florida Statutes, which is implemented . . .

LAKE ROSA v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,, 911 So. 2d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Finally, section 163.3194(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), requires that once a comprehensive plan has . . .

ST. JOHNS ST. AUGUSTINE, COMMITTEE, v. CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE,, 909 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See §§ 163.3194(1) & (2); 163.3164(6) & (23), Fla. Stat. . . .

BAY POINT CLUB, INC. v. BAY COUNTY, a K. B. III W. N. F., 890 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Here, the relevant statutes we must read in pari materia are sections 380.06(19)(f)6, 163.3194(l)(a), . . . Section 163.3194(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), provides: “After a comprehensive plan, or element or . . . See § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

CITY OF COCOA BEACH, v. VACATION BEACH, INC., 876 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The lower court invalidated the amendments on the ground that they violated section 163.3194(2), Florida . . . This court held that the charter amendments were not invalid under section 163.3194(2), but remanded . . .

RED- EYED JACK, INC. a v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, a a s, v. a, 322 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . further the “objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan.” § 163.3194 . . .

CITY OF COCOA BEACH, v. VACATION BEACH, INC., 852 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . charter amendments comply with the provisions of Florida’s Growth Management Act, specifically section 163.3194 . . . (2), Florida Statutes (2001), which provides in pertinent part as follows: 163.3194. . . . Our inquiry does not end here, however, because section 163.3194(2) also applies to amendments to land . . . We hold that the charter amendments are not invalid under section 163.3194(2). . . . For example, we have not addressed the validity of the charter amendments under section 163.3194(l)(b . . .

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, a v. CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, a LLC,, 840 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . ; that the development order is required to be consistent with the comprehensive plan under section 163.3194 . . .

GALAXY FIREWORKS, INC. v. CITY OF ORLANDO,, 842 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 163.3194(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

EDGEWATER BEACH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. WALTON COUNTY, KPM, A. v. KPM, LTD., 833 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The Association and the Attorney General cite section 163.3194(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), for the . . . Section 163.3194(l)(a) states: “After a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been adopted . . . Therefore, section 163.3194(l)(a) does not apply in this situation. . . .

MANN, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,, 830 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 163.3194(l)(a), Florida Statutes, part of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land . . .

PINECREST LAKES, INC. v. SHIDEL,, 795 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 163.3194 requires that all development conform to the approved Comprehensive Plan, and that development . . . development orders is necessary to insure that the local governments comply with the duty imposed by section 163.3194 . . . further the objective, policies, land uses, densities and intensities in the Comprehensive Plan. § 163.3194 . . . See § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. . . .

DIXON, Jr. III, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a a, 774 So. 2d 763 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

BAKER, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a k a a Of BMS, 774 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . a commercial use (the facility’s parking) on residentially planned property in violation of section 163.3194 . . . In Machado, Dade County and the property owners therein unsuccessfully argued that section 163.3194(4 . . . Section 163.3194(4)(a) may be found in Machado, at footnote 6. . . . As to section 163.3194(4)(a), this court stated, at 635: “We read the provision, in context, as a recognition . . . development orders, not just special exceptions and unusual uses, "shall be consistent with such plan ....” § 163.3194 . . .

BUCK LAKE ALLIANCE, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LEON COUNTY,, 765 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 163.3194(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), which is also a part of the Local Government Comprehensive . . .

VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE, v. TESAURUS HOLDINGS, INC., 761 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . .” § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . approval of a development order as defined by section 163.3164(8); development orders must, under section 163.3194 . . .

WINDWARD MARINA, L. L. C. v. CITY OF DESTIN, 743 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

FRANKLIN COUNTY, a v. S. G. I. LIMITED, A, 728 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 163.3194(l)(a), Florida Statutes, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development . . .

LOVE PGI PARTNERS, LP, v. SCHULTZ,, 706 So. 2d 887 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Further, section 163.3194(5) expressly states: The tax exempt status of lands classified as agricultural . . .

LEE COUNTY, a v. LIPPI J M a d b a S, 693 So. 2d 686 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . reviewed prior to enactment by the “local planning agency” as required by subsections 163.3174(4)(c) and 163.3194 . . . considered a “land development regulation” subject to review as provided in subsections 163.3174(4)(c) and 163.3194 . . . patently a regulatory ordinance, not subject to the review requirements of subsections 163.3174(4)(c) and 163.3194 . . .

CITY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LANDFILL, INC. OF FLORIDA, a a v. HOLMES COUNTY, a, 677 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 163.3194.” . . .

DAVIS, v. ST. JOE PAPER COMPANY,, 652 So. 2d 907 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla.Stat. . . . Under Section 163.3194(1) Fla.Stat., after adoption of such a plan, zoning changes, should be made only . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a v. M. WYNN, D. W., 650 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . under this act, may consider, among other things, the reasonableness of the . comprehensive plan_” § 163.3194 . . . counter the apparent exclusivity provision of section 163.3184(13), appellees direct us to section 163.3194 . . . Our reading of section 163.3194 convinces us that this section was not intended to broadly justify a . . . Under Section 163.3194(1), Fla.Stat., after adoption of such a plan, zoning changes should be made only . . . This action does not purport to seek review of a development order, see sections 163.3194(3)(a), 163.3215 . . .

SANTA ROSA COUNTY, v. ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, W., 642 So. 2d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 163.3194 contains a provision on the legal status of a comprehensive plan. . . . .” § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . . comprehensive plan, and the County must follow a statutorily prescribed procedure to evaluate consistency. § 163.3194 . . .

REAHARD P. v. LEE COUNTY,, 30 F.3d 1412 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . Specifically, the Reahards invoked sections 163.3194(4)(b) and 380.08 of the Florida Statutes, Article . . .

ALEXANDER, v. TOWN OF JUPITER, a, 640 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Although section 163.3194, Florida Statutes (1979), required that after the adoption of a comprehensive . . . Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

RESTIGOUCHE, INC. a v. TOWN OF JUPITER, a, 845 F. Supp. 1540 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . hearing officer decided that the IOZ Ordinances were not land development regulations subject to § 163.3194 . . .

INTERNATIONAL EATERIES OF AMERICA, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, DMH, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BORDO, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY, INC. a d b a v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 838 F. Supp. 580 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . .-66(6), 163.3164(22), and 163.3194(2) of the Florida Statutes. . . . Sections 125.66(6) and 163.3194(2) specify procedures that a county board of commissioners must observe . . . The Court reaches the same conclusion with respect to sections 163.3164(22) and 163.3194(2). . . . Section 163.3194(2) requires that, after a comprehensive land development plan for an area has been adopted . . . As the applicability of sections 125.-66(6), 163.3164(22), and , 163.3194(2) to Ord. 93-18 is unsettled . . .

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BREVARD COUNTY, v. R. SNYDER,, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Id., § 163.3194(l)(a). . . . Section 163.3194(3), Florida Statutes (1991), explains consistency as follows: (а) A development order . . .

BATTAGLIA PROPERTIES, LTD. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 629 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . §§ 163.3184, 163.3194, Fla.Stat. (1991); Gardens Country Club Inc. v. . . .

R. SNYDER, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BREVARD COUNTY,, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . sought by the landowners was consistent with the county Comprehensive Zoning Plan as required by section 163.3194 . . . constitute a compensable taking and recognized the constitutional “takings” clause by providing in section 163.3194 . . .

GARDENS COUNTRY CLUB, INCORPORATED, a v. PALM BEACH COUNTY, a, 590 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Finally, section 163.3194(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), provides, in pertinent part, as follows: During . . .

GILMORE, v. HERNANDO COUNTY,, 584 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 163.3194(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987). . Palm Beach County v. . . .

SEAVEY v. DADE COUNTY,, 46 Fla. Supp. 2d 1 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . Although Section 163.3194 (Fla. . . .

O. EIDE, v. SARASOTA COUNTY, a, 908 F.2d 716 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 163.3194 (Supp.1989). . . .

B. B. McCORMICK SONS, INC. a J. T. M. Jr. F. R. J. T. St. v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,, 559 So. 2d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 163.3194(l)(a) provides: After a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been . . . Section 163.3194(3)(b) provides: A development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be . . . The court based this determination heavily upon Sections 163.3194(4)(a) — (b), which provide: (a) A court . . . landfill in freshwater wetlands, particularly in light of the reasonableness standard expressed in Section 163.3194 . . .

O. EIDE, v. SARASOTA COUNTY, a, 895 F.2d 1326 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 163.3194 (Supp.1989). . . .

ST. JOHNS COUNTY, v. W. OWINGS,, 554 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . §§§ 163.3161; 163.3194; 163.3202, Fla.Stat. (1987), effective October 1, 1985. . . . .

F. GREGORY v. CITY OF ALACHUA, A. Jr. H., 553 So. 2d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . 163.3215, Florida Statutes (1985), and alleged that the development orders were invalid under Section 163.3194 . . . section 163.3215 and alleged that the development orders were contrary to the provisions of section 163.3194 . . . Section 163.3194(l)(a) provides: After a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY, a v. ALLEN MORRIS COMPANY,, 547 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . The trial court noted that it had considered the factors set forth in section 163.3194(4), Florida Statutes . . . In Southwest Ranches we pointed out: Sections 163.3194(4)(a)-(b) of the Act permit the court to consider . . . requirements set forth in Southwest Ranches and that it considered the factors set forth in section 163.3194 . . .

DeSISTO COLLEGE, INC. E. v. TOWN OF HOWEY- IN- THE- HILLS, P., 706 F. Supp. 1479 (M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 163.3194. . . .

BATTAGLIA FRUIT CO. v. CITY OF MAITLAND,, 530 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 163.3194(l)(a); 1 Florida Real Property Practice Service, § 3.03 at 37-38; Yokley, 1 Zoning Law and . . . their comprehensive planning and land development regulation powers, duties, and responsibilities. . § 163.3194 . . . A.L.R.3d 372 Requirement That Variations or Exceptions Be Made In Accordance With Comprehensive Plan § 163.3194 . . .

L. MACHADO, v. MUSGROVE,, 519 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . In 1985 the legislature added a definition of consistency at section 163.3194(3)(a), Florida Statutes . . . Under Section 163.3194(1), Fla.Stat., after adoption of such a plan, zoning changes should be made only . . . Section 163.3194(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), relied upon by the petitioners in support of the argument . . . Even where there is some basis for consideration by the court pursuant to section 163.3194, its actions . . . Section 163.3194(4)(a) provides: A court, in reviewing local governmental action ... under this act, . . .

NORWOOD- NORLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSN. INC. v. DADE COUNTY, d b a, 511 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The statutory definition of “consistency” is contained in section 163.3194(3), Florida Statutes, as recently . . . Sections 163.3194(4)(a)-(b) of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation . . .

THE CITY OF MAITLAND v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, COOPER, v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 23 Fla. Supp. 2d 128 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1987)

. . . See Section 163.3194(1)(b), Florida Statutes. 20. . . . Section 163.3194(3)(a), Florida Statutes, defines the term “consistent” by noting “a development order . . .

SOUTHWEST RANCHES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. COUNTY OF BROWARD, a, 502 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 163.3194(1). . . . Sections 163.3194(4)(a)-(b) of the Act permit the court to consider a broad range of factors in determining . . .

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, a v. W. PUTNEY, T., 495 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . .; see § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

RINKER MATERIALS CORPORATION, a v. TOWN OF LAKE PARK, a, 494 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 1986)

. . . Section 163.3194 provides that all development undertaken by a local government must conform with its . . .

E. W. HOLLAND W. L. v. E. WALKER,, 492 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . consistent with the goals and purposes of the Comprehensive Land Use Act, which provides in section 163.3194 . . .

HASAM REALTY CORPORATION, v. DADE COUNTY, 486 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . unnecessary to decide the substantial questions of whether such a violation in fact existed, see § 163.3194 . . .

ORANGE COUNTY, a v. R. G. GARDNER, 477 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: After a comprehensive plan or element or portion . . . Section 163.3194(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: A court, in reviewing local governmental action . . .

ALACHUA COUNTY, v. EAGLE S NEST FARMS, INC., 473 So. 2d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See Sections 163.3161(5), 163.3194(1) and 163.3201; City of Cape Canaveral v. . . .

PORPOISE POINT PARTNERSHIP, v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY,, 470 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See § 163.3194(1), Fla.Stat. . . .

CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, v. MOSHER,, 467 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes, defines the legal status of a comprehensive zoning plan to be . . . Under Section 163.3194(1) Fla.Stat., after adoption of such a plan, zoning changes, should be made only . . . comprehensive land use (zoning) plan was inconsistent with its plan and contrary to the dictates of Section 163.3194 . . .

PINELLAS COUNTY, a v. W. ASHLEY,, 464 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 163.3194, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH, v. C. GRUBBS,, 461 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 163.3194(1) provides in pertinent part: After a comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof . . .

BRISKER, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, 8 Fla. Supp. 2d 155 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1984)

. . . Sec. 163.3194, Fla. Stat. . . .

PINELLAS COUNTY, a v. CITY OF GULFPORT, 458 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . orders which are not consistent with the lawfully and properly adopted comprehensive plan by Section 163.3194 . . .

CITIZENS GROWTH MANAGEMENT COALITION OF WEST PALM BEACH, INC. v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, INC., 450 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1984)

. . . to grant standing to the fullest extent possible by using the phrase “justiciably raised” in section 163.3194 . . .

COUNCIL OF LOWER KEYS, v. CHARLEY TOPPINO SONS, INC., 429 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . conclusions of the Department of Environmental Regulation that it is not required or authorized by Sec. 163.3194 . . . This provision states that 163.3194 — Legal status of comprehensive plan. (1) After a comprehensive plan . . .

FISHER S ISLAND, v. DADE COUNTY,, 47 Fla. Supp. 129 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1977)

. . . Pursuant to Section 163.3194(2) (a) of the Act, all land use decisions, including the adoption and implemention . . . Pursuant to Section 163.3194-(3) (a) of the Act, the courts of this state are legislatively empowered . . .