Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 171.062 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 171.062 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 171.062 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 171.062

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 171
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
171.062 Effects of annexations or contractions.
(1) An area annexed to a municipality shall be subject to all laws, ordinances, and regulations in force in that municipality and shall be entitled to the same privileges and benefits as other parts of that municipality upon the effective date of the annexation.
(2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these regulations remain in full force and effect until the municipality adopts a comprehensive plan amendment that includes the annexed area.
(3) An area excluded from a municipality shall no longer be subject to any laws, ordinances, or regulations in force in the municipality from which it was excluded and shall no longer be entitled to the privileges and benefits accruing to the area within the municipal boundaries upon the effective date of the exclusion. It shall be subject to all laws, ordinances, and regulations in force in that county.
(4)(a) A party that has an exclusive franchise which was in effect for at least 6 months prior to the initiation of an annexation to provide solid waste collection services in an unincorporated area may continue to provide such services to an annexed area for 5 years or the remainder of the franchise term, whichever is shorter, if:
1. The franchisee provides, if the annexing municipality requires, a level of quality and frequency of service which is equivalent to that required by the municipality in other areas of the municipality not served by the franchisee, and
2. The franchisee provides such service to the annexed area at a reasonable cost. The cost must include the following as related to providing services to the annexed area:
a. Capital costs for land, structures, vehicles, equipment, and other items used for solid waste management;
b. Operating and maintenance costs for solid waste management;
c. Costs to comply with applicable statutes, rules, permit conditions, and insurance requirements;
d. Disposal costs; and
e. A reasonable profit.

If the municipality and the franchisee cannot enter into an agreement as to such cost, they shall submit the matter of cost to arbitration.

(b) A municipality, at its option, may allow the franchisee to continue providing services pursuant to the existing franchise agreement.
(c) A municipality may terminate any franchise if the franchisee does not agree to comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) within 90 days after the effective date of the proposed annexation.
(5) A party that has a contract that was in effect for at least 6 months prior to the initiation of an annexation to provide solid waste collection services in an unincorporated area may continue to provide such services to an annexed area for 5 years or the remainder of the contract term, whichever is shorter. Within a reasonable time following a written request to do so, the party shall provide the annexing municipality with a copy of the pertinent portion of the contract or other written evidence showing the duration of the contract, excluding any automatic renewals or so-called “evergreen” provisions. This subsection does not apply to contracts to provide solid waste collection services to single-family residential properties in those enclaves described in s. 171.046.
History.s. 1, ch. 74-190; s. 22, ch. 85-55; s. 1, ch. 88-92; s. 17, ch. 93-206; s. 2, ch. 93-243; s. 2, ch. 2000-304.

F.S. 171.062 on Google Scholar

F.S. 171.062 on CourtListener

Amendments to 171.062


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 171.062

Total Results: 8  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Alachua Cnty. v. Florida Rock Indus., Inc., 834 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 2003 WL 104575

...Schwartz, Assistant County Attorney, Gainesville, for Appellant. John A. DeVault, III, and Courtney K. Grimm of Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Coxe, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee. ERVIN, J. Appellant, Alachua County, appeals from a final summary judgment wherein the trial court held that under section 171.062, Florida Statutes (1999), appellant no longer has the authority to enforce its developer's agreement with appellee, Florida Rock Industries, because the City of Newberry annexed the Florida Rock property. Alachua County contends the trial court erred by concluding that the statute applies to the developer's agreement, because the agreement is a contract rather than a law, ordinance, or regulation under section 171.062....
...ve relief. The trial court entered summary judgment against the county, finding that under its home rule charter, Alachua County's land-use responsibilities extend only to its unincorporated area; that the Alachua County Code expressly provides that section 171.062 applies to annexations within the county; and that under subsections 171.062(1) and (2), Alachua County's control over the development of the Florida Rock property passed to the City of Newberry, the county's "successor in interest." [3] Section 171.062 provides, in pertinent part: (1) An area annexed to a municipality shall be subject to all laws, ordinances, and regulations in force in that municipality and shall be entitled to the same privileges and benefits as other parts of that municipality upon the effective date of the annexation....
...t, the site plan approval and the [Developer's] Agreement, are no longer in force and effect." Although a developer's agreement is contractual in nature, [4] and is not itself a law, ordinance, regulation, or land-use plan, which are the subjects of section 171.062, the statutes relevant to the issue at bar demonstrate that the county can no longer exercise control through its developer's agreement with Florida Rock, because it is no longer the local government that has jurisdiction over Florida Rock's property....
...(1999) (Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act). Section 163.3223 provides that a local government may enact procedures regulating the creation of such agreements pertaining to "real property located within its jurisdiction " (emphasis added). As stated above, sections 171.062(1) and (2) provide that any area a municipality annexes is subject to the city's laws, ordinances, regulations, land-use plan, and zoning regulations....
Copy

MARTIN CTY. v. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs, 771 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1726948

...re was a moratorium on development. In 1997, the City of Stuart began receiving petitions for voluntary annexation of parcels of real property. Ultimately, some 1,200 acres were annexed into the City. [1] Despite the annexation, however, pursuant to section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes (1997), the parcels remained subject to Martin County's land use plan and/or zoning and subdivision regulations until such time as the City adopted comprehensive plan amendments that included the annexed parcels....
Copy

Seminole Cnty. v. City of Winter Springs, 935 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1459775

...Therefore, at the time of adoption, the charter amendment did provide for preemption of the City's future land use regulation as to this parcel already included within the City's jurisdiction. Even including the Rook property, however, the "Rural Area" only encompassed land governed by the County's Comprehensive Plan. Section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, provides that if an annexed area "was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these regulations remain in full force and effect until the municipality adopts a comprehensiv...
Copy

Vill. of North Palm Beach v. S & H Foster's, Inc., 80 So. 3d 433 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 555486, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2664

bar the type of relief granted to the Pub. Section 171.062, Florida Statutes (2010), provides in relevant
Copy

St. Johns Comm. v. St. Augustine, 909 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13875

...deira Development), which was recently annexed into the City and which is being developed by the owner, Ponce Associates, LLC. In my view, the circuit court, in denying certiorari, failed to apply the correct law by ruling it was proper, pursuant to section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, for the City to modify the PUD before amending its Comprehensive Plan to include the annexed property....
...perty, it could not modify the County PUD. Thus the PUD modifications were illegal. The circuit court denied the petition, finding that the City's adoption of the special master's recommendations which amended the PUD was proper, because pursuant to section 171.062, Florida Statutes, the City had the power to modify the County PUD so long as the changes were consistent with the County's comprehensive plan. It interpreted the statute as follows: The Court does not agree with the Petitioner's reading of § 171.062....
...The local governing body must hold at least two advertised public hearings on the proposed plan amendment. See § 163.3184(15), Fla. Stat. Section 171.0413, Florida Statutes, sets forth the specific procedures for municipalities to annex areas of unincorporated territory. Section 171.062, Florida Statutes, sets out the specific effects of annexations....
...(2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these regulations remain in full force and effect until the municipality adopts a comprehensive plan amendment that includes the annexed area. (emphasis added). § 171.062, Fla. Stat. The interpretation of section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, as applied to these facts, appears to be a case of first impression in the State of Florida. [2] In my view, a plain reading of the statute does not support the interpretation of the circuit court below. The history of section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, supports this view....
...All zoning changes must be consistent with the zoning entity's own comprehensive plan, not the plan in effect for the entity from whom the property is annexed. Effective October 1, 1974, the Florida legislature in section 7, Ch. 74-190, Laws of Florida, created section 171.062, Florida Statutes, including subsection 2 which reads as follows: (2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or sub-division regulations, said regulations shall remain in full force and *579 effect...
...ations for a period of two years from the effective date of the annexation unless approval of such increase is granted by the governing body of the county. Effective October 1, 1985, the legislature in section 22, Ch. 85-55, Laws of Florida, amended section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, as follows: (2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, said regulations shall remain in full force and effect until the area is rezoned by the municipality to comply with its comprehensive plan otherwise provided by law....
...regulations for a period of 2 years from the effective date of the annexation unless approval of such increase is granted by the governing body of the county. Effective 15 May 1993, the Legislature in section 2, Ch. 93-243, Laws of Florida, amended section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, as follows: (2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, said regulations shall remain in full force and effect until the municipality adopts a comprehensive plan amendment to include the annexed area the area is rezoned by the municipality to comply with its comprehensive plan. Finally, effective 1 July 1993, the Legislature in section 17, Ch. 93-206, Laws of Florida, amended section 171.062(2), Florida Statutes, to its final form: (2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these said regulations shall remain in full force and effect until the municipality a...
...NOTES [1] On September 19, 2002, the City's Director of Planning and Building sent a letter to Ponce Associates' attorney, stating that Ponce Associates could eliminate the existing 18-hole golf course without additional approval from the City Commission. [2] Only three (3) Florida cases were found which cite to section 171.062, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Pinellas Cnty. v. City of Gulfport, 458 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2427, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16529

Statutes.” Pinellas County has alleged that under section 171.062, Florida Statutes (1981), the county had the
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

(1990 Supp.). 16 Section 171.061(2), F.S. 17 Section 171.062(3), F.S.
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1985).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

upon the effective date of the annexation. Section 171.062(1), F.S. Pursuant to s 171.062(2), F.S.,

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.