Cases from cite.case.law:

HOWARD, LLC, v. MURRAY, K H A A, 184 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 380.06(19), Fla. . . . See § 380.06(19)(a); (f)2, Fla, Stat. . . .

RIPPS, v. CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, a II, S. T. O. F., 124 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . By its express terms, the ordinance was adopted pursuant to section 380.06. . . . It did not mention any of the statutory thresholds in section 380.06(19)(b)l.-14. . . . Neither referred to section 380.06(19)(b). . . . Stat. (2010) ("Hotel and motel development”), and § 380.06( 19)(b) 1, Fla. . . . Stat. (2010), with § 380.06(19)(b)9„ Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

CHILDERS, v. UNITED STATES, v., 112 Fed. Cl. 617 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . . § 380.06(1) (2011). . . .

CHILDERS, v. UNITED STATES, v., 116 Fed. Cl. 486 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . . § 380.06(1) (2011). . . .

TURCOTTE v. CITY OF COCONUT CREEK II,, 88 So. 3d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . In our order of denial, we stated: The circuit court correctly applied section 380.06(19)(b), Florida . . .

D. WEISS, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, a, 462 F. App'x 898 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 380.06(1). . . . Id. § 380.06(10)(b). An applicant was required to respond to up to two sufficiency requests. Id. . . . Id. §§ 380.06(11)-(15). . . .

PAYNE a a v. CITY OF MIAMI, a LLC, a, 53 So. 3d 258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . 163.3180(5), or regional activity centers and urban central business districts approved pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

PAYNE a a v. CITY OF MIAMI, a LLC,, 52 So. 3d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . 163.3180(5), or regional activity centers and urban central business districts approved pursuant to s. 380.06 . . . 163.3180(5), or regional activity centers and urban central business districts approved pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

BAY POINT CLUB, INC. v. BAY COUNTY, a K. B. III W. N. F., 890 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 380.06(1), and § 380.06(19), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . See § 380.06(19)(a)-(c), (e), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . See § 380.06(19)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . Here, the relevant statutes we must read in pari materia are sections 380.06(19)(f)6, 163.3194(l)(a), . . . See § 380.06(19)(f)6., Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . . § 380.06(19)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . of whether a proposed change triggers the substantial deviation provisions of section 380.06. . . . The Department of Community Affairs, which under section 380.06(19)(f)4. is directed to file with local . . . Section 380.06 outlines the procedures for review and approval of a development of regional impact. . . . unless an amendment to the project involves a substantial deviation. § 380.06(19), Fla. . . .

MONROE COUNTY, a a v. AMBROSE,, 866 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 380.06(20), Fla. Stat. (1997). The Landowners do not fall under this exception. . . . Section 380.06(20)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that: For the purposes of determining the vesting . . .

EDGEWATER BEACH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. WALTON COUNTY, KPM, A. v. KPM, LTD., 833 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 380.06(15), Fla. . . . Section 380.06 outlines the procedures for review and approval of a development of regional impact. . . . unless an amendment to the project involves a substantial deviation. § 380.06(19), Fla. . . . Section 380.06(19) provides for the local government to determine whether a proposed amendment to a DRI . . . See §§ 380.06(19)(f)6 and 380.07, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . The County’s authority to act on DRI permits derives from section 380.06, Florida Statutes, also known . . .

LORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. COLLIER COUNTY, A. Jr., 819 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 380.06, Fla. Stat. (1999). . § 163.3184, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT,, 816 So. 2d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . (e) Activities which are under review, approved, or vested pursuant to s. 380.06, or other activities . . . (b) activities which are under review, approved, or vested pursuant to section 380.06, or other activities . . .

AVATAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. STATE, 723 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 1998)

. . . .” § 380.06(22)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

SOUTHLAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, INC. v. HAVILL,, 707 So. 2d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the proposed project was such that it constituted a “Development of Regional Impact” under section 380.06 . . .

A. GOOD, Jr. v. UNITED STATES,, 39 Fed. Cl. 81 (Fed. Cl. 1997)

. . . . § 380.06(20) (West 1988) (codifying vested rights procedure). . . .

BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE, a v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, a, 678 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 380.06, Fla.Stat. . . .

LEON COUNTY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 666 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . On May 26, 1993, Leon County petitioned the DCA under section 380.06(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), . . . As such, under section 380.06(2)(d)l.a., Florida Statutes (1991), it was not required to undergo DRI . . . Since the facility is below 80 percent of the numerical threshold, under section 380.06(2)(d)l.a. the . . . in concluding that the “statewide guidelines and standards” referred to in section 380.06(2) directly . . . The “guidelines and standards” incorporated by reference in section 380.06(2) are contained in section . . . Subsection (1) of section 380.06 sets out the definition of developments of regional impact; subsection . . . The purpose of Florida Statutes sections 380.06(2) and 380.0651(3) is to facilitate regulation of the . . . So that there is no mistake, only subsection (1) of section 380.06 is entitled “Definition.” . . . Florida Statutes section 380.06 states, in part, as follows: (1) DEFINITION. — The term "development . . . Florida Statutes section 380.06(4)(c). . . . .

CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a Co. CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a J. S. Jr. R. O. N. A. P. CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a J. S. Jr. R. O. N. A. P. CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a W. a ABC a CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a FTZ a CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a L. P. a A. K. Co. a f k a A. K. Co. a H. CITY OF DANIA, a v. BROWARD COUNTY, a S. F. I. R. D. a N. A., 658 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 380.06(19)(e)(3). . . . assert a valid ground for intervention based upon the County’s alleged failure to comply with section 380.06 . . .

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION,, 638 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . been sought. (3) The impact of projects which are under review, approved, or vested pursuant to s. 380.06 . . . been sought” and “the impact of projects which are under review, approved, or vested pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

BATTAGLIA PROPERTIES, LTD. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 629 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 380.06(6), Fla.Stat. (1991). This application must request DRI and local zoning approval. . . .

D. YOUNG, Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 625 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1993)

. . . the initial burden of showing that the proposed DRI would have an adverse impact in light of section 380.06 . . . government was required to give notice and hold a hearing on the application for development approval. § 380.06 . . . recommendations on the regional impact of the development, including any resulting adverse impact. § 380.06 . . . to which the development unreasonably interfered with the applicable state land development plan. § 380.06 . . . with the land development regulations therefor under s.. 380.05 and the provisions of this section.” § 380.06 . . .

KILLEARN PROPERTIES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SOUTHERN HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, STOUTAMIRE, H. H. Jr. v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, LEON COUNTY, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 623 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . contains a buildout date, such date must arise from the terms of the DO itself, because nothing in section 380.06 . . . Section 380.06(1), Florida Statutes (1973), provides: "Development of regional impact," as used in this . . . Section 380.06(6), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: |T]he developer shall file an application . . . Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, was amended by chapter 80-313, Laws of Florida, to require that DOs . . . alternatively held that Chapter 85-55, Laws of Florida (effective October 1, 1985), which amended section 380.06 . . .

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR LEE COUNTY, E. St. v. ROYAL PELICAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. Co., 614 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The resolution of this matter is controlled by section 380.06, Florida Statutes, part of the Florida . . . and for determining whether particular developments “shall be presumed to be of regional impact.” § 380.06 . . . , then it must undergo a review and approval process, ideally before commencement of the project. § 380.06 . . . regional, and local agencies, as well as the developer,” and thus constitute final agency action. § 380.06 . . . of State Planning an application for a “binding letter of vested rights” in accordance with section 380.06 . . .

LAKE LUCERNE CIVIC ASS N, INC. v. DOLPHIN STADIUM CORP. a, 801 F. Supp. 684 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 380.06(12), the Planning Council only makes recommendations to Dade County concerning DRI’s. . . .

DADE COUNTY, a v. MATHESON, Jr., 605 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . that the projected stadium was subject to Development of Regional Impact reviews pursuant to section 380.06 . . .

In GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 144 B.R. 552 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . GDC has not done this, nor has it abandoned the Myakka Estates DRI pursuant to Florida Statutes § 380.06 . . . See, e.g., Fla.Stat. §§ 380.06(1), (15)(d) & (e) and (26). . . . Stat. § 380.06(26). . . . disallowed subject to GDC’s commencing abandonment, as soon as statutorily possible, pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 380.06 . . . The Court does not know why GDC has yet to abandon the Myakka Estates DRI pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 380.06 . . .

RIDGEWOOD PROPERTIES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 595 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . the DCA’s secretary, establishes that prior to July 1, 1973 appellant had vested rights under section 380.06 . . . position and contrary to the opinion of its secretary concerning the matter of vested rights under section 380.06 . . . , 1973 the City of Maitland gave the required “authorization to commence development” under section 380.06 . . .

COSCAN FLORIDA, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 586 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 380.06(14), Florida Statutes (1987), requires the reviewing authority, FLWAC, to consider whether . . . report and recommendations of the regional planning agency submitted pursuant to subsection (12). § 380.06 . . . unreasonably interferes with the objectives of the state land development plan, the criteria in section 380.06 . . .

CONSERVANCY, INC. v. A. VERNON ALLEN BUILDER, INC., 580 So. 2d 772 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . have been sought. (3)The impact of projects which are under review, approved, or vested pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

AMERICAN SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA, v. PEMBROKE LAKES REGIONAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. C. F., 908 F.2d 885 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 380.06(10) (development of regional impact application must be approved by regional planning agency . . . See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 380.06(6), (11) (development of regional impact application must be approved by the . . . Manager and City Planner testified that the conceptual site plan was approved under Fla.Stat.Ann. § 380.06 . . .

WHITE, Dr. O Dr. Dr. A. Dr. B. J. O Dr. J. J. Dr. O Jr. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 563 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 380.06, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . See §§ 880.0661(3)(b)(l)(b), 380.06(2)(d)(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . Section 380.06(8), Florida Statutes, permits a developer to obtain a written preliminary development . . . Section 380.06(4), Florida Statutes, and section 380.06(8), Florida Statutes, define binding letters . . . Section 380.06(4)(a), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part: If any developer is in doubt whether . . . . § 380.032(1); § 380.06(5)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . coordinate an extensive review assessing the regional impact of the project on the natural environment. § 380.06 . . . proposed project is undergoing or will be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. § 380.06 . . . county zoning authority, must file an application with the regional planning agency and with the FDCA. § 380.06 . . .

BROWN, v. APALACHEE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL,, 560 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 1990)

. . . No fees or costs are required of an applicant for the initial pre-application conference required by 380.06 . . . additional rules ... to promote efficient review of developments-of-regional-impact applications.” § 380.06 . . . Section 380.06, Florida Statutes (1983), defines development of regional impact: (1)The term “development . . . fee deposit shall be combined with other funds available to perform the function outlined by Section 380.06 . . . Section 380.06(23)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: (d) Regional planning agencies which perform . . .

RIDGEWOOD PROPERTIES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 562 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1990)

. . . the Department’s policy was that rezoning was not sufficient to vest development rights under section 380.06 . . . In more detail, the argument runs as follows: Section 380.06(12), Florida Statutes (1973), creates an . . . Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, which governs developments of regional impact, took effect in 1973. . . .

BABCOCK CO. v. STATE LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 558 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . In October 1984, pursuant to Section 380.06(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), Bab-cock filed with the City . . . See Section 380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes (a local government shall not approve a development of regional . . .

APALACHEE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, v. BROWN, d b a a, 546 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 380.06(1). . . . Though the legislature has spoken extensively on DRI guidelines, standards, and procedures in sections 380.06 . . . See generally section 380.06. . . . See section 380.06(2)(b). . . .

CITY OF ORMOND BEACH, v. COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, a, 535 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Chapters 334, 335, 336; § 380.06(15), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

BOOKER CREEK PRESERVATION, INC. v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,, 534 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . developmental approval was filed under the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process pursuant to section 380.06 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS v. LUJAN,, 26 Fla. Supp. 2d 190 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . Pertinent to this appeal, Section 380.06(13), Florida Statutes, provides that where, as here, the proposed . . .

FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION, 25 Fla. Supp. 2d 192 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . (a) If the local government did not provide a full and fair hearing pursuant to s. 380.06(11), the Florida . . . order, and remand the case to the local government to conduct a hearing on such issues pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION, 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 156 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . (a) If the local government did not provide a full and fair hearing pursuant to §380.06(11), the Florida . . . order, and remand the case to the local government to conduct a hearing on such issues pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

In AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS, INC. P. BEGIER, Jr. v. KRAIN OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., 68 B.R. 326 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986)

. . . (2) of the dates of service, which, prorated on the basis of a $190.03 daily rate, were valued at $380.06 . . . Krain therefore successfully defended this action on the basis of § 547(c)(2) as to $380.06 of the transfers . . . The Debtor is entitled to judgment against Krain in the amount of $18,700.00 less $380.06, per § 547( . . . $190.03 which we computed at page 12, supra, the result is that § 547(c)(2) provides a defense for only $380.06 . . . Added to the $380.06 arising from its § 547(c)(2) defenses entitles it to a total offset of $6,841.08 . . .

In BEKER INDUSTRIES CORP. BEKER INDUSTRIES CORP. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 57 B.R. 611 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . . § 380.06(1), the 1983 ADA was submitted before the TBRPC and Manatee County for review. . . . Fla.Stat. § 380.06. . . . local governmental unit where a development is to be located from examining, pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 380.06 . . . Fla.Stat. § 380.06(1). . . . .

HARRIS, v. DADE COUNTY,, 13 Fla. Supp. 2d 69 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . exhaust those administrative remedies available under the Code of Metropolitan Dade County and Section 380.06 . . .

FRIENDS OF EVERGLADES, INC. a a v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FRIENDS OF EVERGLADES, INC. a STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, 456 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 380.06(1). . . . Section 380.06(17)(a), Florida Statutes, provides, in part, "if the proposed changes are found to be . . . proceeding with a plan for development until "further review” of the development is completed under Section 380.06 . . .

TRANSGULF PIPELINE COMPANY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GADSDEN COUNTY, a, 438 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . substantive standards to be used in making determinations under Chapter 380 are contained in sections 380.06 . . . (8) and 380.06(11), Florida Statutes, Transgulf argues that the circuit court implicitly found those . . . The circuit court order in the instant case makes no mention of section 380.06 or any of the substantive . . . grant Transgulf relief based on its counterclaim which asserted the unconstitutionality of sections 380.06 . . . (8) and 380.06(11), Florida Statutes. . . .

CALOOSA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,, 429 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 380.06(6), Fla. Stat. . . . .” § 380.06(9)-(11), Fla.Stat. . . . Section 380.06(1), Florida Statutes, defines a DRI as “any development which, because of its character . . . See generally § 380.06(4), Fla.Stat.; Fla.Admin.Code Rule 27F-1.16; Chapter 27F-2. . . . . . §§ 380.031(13), 380.06(1 l)(a) 1.-6., Florida Statutes. . . . .

FOX, v. TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 442 So. 2d 221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . We recognize the discretion given the Commission under Sections 380.06 and .07, Florida Statutes, to . . .

CITY OF PARKLAND v. SEPTIMUS,, 428 So. 2d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . that: A unit of local government in Broward County that has issued a development order pursuant to s. 380.06 . . .

CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE, v. STATE DIVISION OF LOCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 424 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See § 380.06(18), Fla.Stat. We disagree and affirm. . . . various actions on its part constitute “authorization to commence development” under the terms of section 380.06 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, v. FALLS CHASE SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT,, 424 So. 2d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Division of State Planning’s “binding letter of interpretation” which states the application of section 380.06 . . .

SMITH, v. C. WILLIS,, 415 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . executive department agency contrary to Article V, Section 1, Florida Constitution,” and that “Sections 380.06 . . .

MANATEE COUNTY, a v. ESTECH GENERAL CHEMICALS CORPORATION,, 402 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . County’s denial of Estech’s application for approval of a development of regional impact under sections 380.06 . . .

MANATEE COUNTY, a v. ESTECH GENERAL CHEMICALS CORPORATION, SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. ESTECH GENERAL CHEMICALS CORPORATION,, 402 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . , variance, or other action having the effect of permitting development as defined in this chapter. 380.06 . . . developer first files an application for a development permit with the local zoning authorities. § 380.06 . . .

GRAHAM, v. ESTUARY PROPERTIES, INC., 399 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 1981)

. . . commissioners of Lee County for approval of a development of regional impact (DRI) pursuant to section 380.06 . . . the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC), which prepared a report pursuant to section 380.06 . . . legislative intent is clear from the stated purpose of the act and the factors enumerated in section 380.06 . . . district court found that the adjudicatory commission had not balanced the considerations in section 380.06 . . . The legislature did not place specific values on each consideration listed in section 380.06(8). . . .

E. PETERSON, R. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 386 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . (IPRC) pursuant to Section 380.06(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), determining that a 90-acre tract of . . . The issue which is dispositive of this appeal is whether Peterson, et al. had standing under Section 380.06 . . . Peterson, et al. are not entitled to party status under Section 380.06(4)(a). . . . Only DRIs are subject to the requirements of Section 380.06, and developers need a means of determining . . .

SUWANNEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,, 384 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . We quote with approval from the Department’s letter: Binding letters are issued pursuant to Section 380.06 . . . The Legislature in enacting Section 380.06(4)(a), did not specify or intend that third persons, such . . . whether a developer is subject to the additional review and approval procedures specified by Section 380.06 . . . than the mere determination whether such construction must first be authorized pursuant to Section 380.06 . . . In its order, the Department went one step further in stating that in enacting Section 380.06(4)(a), . . .

COMPASS LAKE HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. STATE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING,, 379 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Chapter 380.06(4)(a), Florida Statutes. . . . (Section 380.06). . . . Section 380.06(7Xe). . . . Section 380.06(4)(b) and (c). . . . Section 380.032; 380.06(5)(c); 380.06(2)(a); 380.-06(7)(d); 380.06(13)(c), and 380.06{14)(a). . . .

ESTUARY PROPERTIES, INC. v. O D. ASKEW, A. L. A. D., 381 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Concerning the requirements of F.S. 380.06(8) and (11), the hearing officer found that the effect the . . . The history and interpretations of F.S. 380.06, show that the creators of the development of regional . . . (F.S. 380.06(8)) Such a balancing is required by the very fact that as reasonable people we know that . . . (F.S. 380.06(ll)(c)) Sub judice, the Planning Council’s report is replete with nebulous assessments in . . . (F.S. 380.06(8)) The hearing officer found that Petitioner’s proposal was satisfactory in four areas: . . .

DADE COUNTY, v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC. a, 374 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . any determination hereunder for purposes of determining vested or legal rights, pursuant to Section 380.06 . . .

SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, v. STATE LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION, 372 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Pursuant to Section 380.06(8), Florida Statutes, the SFRPC, in July 1975, issued and referred its report . . . On January 9, 1976, the Attorney General advised the Dade County Attorney that since Section 380.06(4 . . . Section 380.06(4)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that such letters of interpretation ‘shall bind all . . . (12), it may apply to the Division for a binding letter of interpretation. § 380.06(4)(a), Fla. . . . This Section provides as follows: “380.06 Developments of regional impact— (4)(a) If any developer is . . .

SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, v. FLORIDA DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING, 370 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . entered by the Division of State Planning in connection with the discharge of its duties under Section 380.06 . . . As permitted under subparagraph (4)(a) of Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, Blitstein filed an application . . . Under Section 380.06(1), “development of regional impact” means “any development which, because of its . . . First, the developer may file an application under Section 380.06(4)(a), which states, in pertinent part . . . The second method whereby DRI status may be determined is pursuant to Section 380.06(6). . . .

BEKER PHOSPHATE CORPORATION, a a v. A. MUIRHEAD, M. Jr., 581 F.2d 1187 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 380.06, which was granted by the Manatee County Board of County Commissioners. . . .

STATE SARASOTA COUNTY, v. A. BOYER, 360 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 1978)

. . . See § 380.06(1), Fla.Stat. . § 120.57, Fla.Stat. . § 120.68(1), Fla.Stat. . English v. . . .

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION,, 353 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Sections 380.06(6) through (11), .07. . . . Section 380.06(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Section 380.06(2). . . . the definition section above quoted, in Section 380.06(2), text at n. 3, supra, and in Section 380.06 . . . Sec. 380.06(2), Fla.Stat. (1975). . . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, v. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION,, 350 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Administration (DOA) holding the “guidelines and standards” administratively adopted pursuant to Section 380.06 . . . application of the general definition of a development of regional impact (DRI) contained in Section 380.06 . . . Section 380.06(1), Florida Statutes (1975), defines a DRI to be, “[A]ny development which, because of . . . See Sections 380.06(3) and (4)(a). . . . Section 380.06(1) quoted above is a legislative directive designed to implement these intentions. . . . December 27, 1976, stating that the definition of a development of regional impact (DRI) in Section 380.06 . . . Section 380.06 sets forth a comprehensive administrative scheme designed to insure that those entities . . . (1) and (2), the developer must comply with the procedures delineated in Section 380.06(5)-(ll)- This . . . Section 380.06(7)(f). . . . Following said application the local government must give notice and hold a hearing. § 380.06(7). . . . has chosen to pursue is at best an abrogation of the scheme established by the legislature in Section 380.06 . . .

CROSS KEY WATERWAYS v. O D. ASKEW CITY OF KEY WEST v. O D. ASKEW CITY OF KEY WEST v. O D. ASKEW, 351 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . critical state concern, Section 380.05, and by similar control of developments of regional impact, Section 380.06 . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC CREDIT CORPORATION OF GEORGIA, a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 346 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 380.06(11), Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Affirmed. .§ 380.06, Fla.Stat. (1975), defines “developments of regional impact” as follows: “(1) ‘Development . . . location, would have a substantial effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of more than one county.” § 380.06 . . . dwelling units: ****** (f) In counties with a population in excess of 500,000 — 3,000 dwelling units.” . § 380.06 . . . project clearly displays that full consideration was given to the criteria for evaluation set forth in § 380.06 . . .

PINELLAS COUNTY, a v. LAKE PADGETT PINES, a a, 333 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 380.06. . . . Cypress Creek Well Field Project as a development of regional impact which is statutorily defined in § 380.06 . . . field and flood detention area, they argue it must receive the environmental review contemplated by § 380.06 . . . event, Lake Padgett argues that such guidelines cannot amend the statutory definition of a DR1 in § 380.06 . . . Stat. § 380.06(4) (a) that the Cypress Creek Well Field is not a DRI. . . .

W- G DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. H. STARNES,, 330 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . of the respondent, to wit, the issuance of a binding letter of interpretation under Florida Statute 380.06 . . .

INTERCONTINENTAL GROUP, v. DADE COUNTY,, 44 Fla. Supp. 6 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1976)

. . . The Development of Regional Impact or “DRI” process, created in §380.06, is one of the two major legislative . . . planning agency upon the regional impacts of a proposed development prior to making its decision. §380.06 . . . The statute requires consideration by the council of the following criteria set forth in §§380.06 (8) . . . local government is required, by statute, to consider the report and recommendations of the council. §380.06 . . . To require less would render meaningless the requirement of §380.06 (11) (c) that the local government . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a, 325 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 380.06 (1973). GDC had obtained from the City an order approving the development. . . . County complained of improprieties in the procedures followed in obtaining the City’s approval under § 380.06 . . . clearly the “local government” having zoning jurisdiction over the land in question under Fla.Stat. § 380.06 . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. BEKER PHOSPHATE CORPORATION, a a, 322 So. 2d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . the citizens of the surrounding area are protected by the explicit requirements of Florida Statute 380.06 . . . Florida Statute 380.06(6). . Florida Statute 380.06(7). . Id. . . . . Florida Statutes 380.06(8) (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) direct that the report shall address itself to . . . Florida Statutes 380.06(8), 380.08, and 380.07 (2). . . .