Cases from cite.case.law:

MULLEN, v. BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE,, 241 So. 3d 949 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Second, the trial court held that Plaintiffs could not prevail because Petition 82 violated section 163.3167 . . . provided: "An initiative or referendum process in regard to any development order is prohibited." § 163.3167 . . . The legislative prohibition in section 163.3167(8)(a) tackles the issue of whether an individual's property . . . Petition 82 conflicts with section 163.3167(8)(a). . . . The Village asserted that Petition 82 violates section 163.3167(8)(a) of the Florida Statutes. . . .

TOWN OF PONCE INLET, a v. PACETTA, LLC, a a a, 226 So. 3d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Halls River Dev., Inc., 8 So.3d 413, 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (citing § 163.3167(1), Fla Stat. (2005); . . . ordinance affected, only its singular sixteen-acre parcel, of property and, thus, violated section 163.3167 . . . Town of Palm Beach, 50 So.3d 1176, 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“Section 163.3167(12) rightfully protects . . . affected five or fewer parcels, the trial court correctly determined that the referendum violated section 163.3167 . . .

ARCHSTONE PALMETTO PARK, LLC, a v. KENNEDY, M. S. R. R. A., 132 So. 3d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . the declaratory judgment in favor of the appel-lees, which interpreted a 2012 amendment to section 163.3167 . . . At the time the appellees initiated their petition, section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes (2011) (“the . . . As became effective on April 6, 2012, however, the Legislature amended section 163.3167(8) (the “2012 . . . To support its ruling, the trial court traced section 163.3167(8)’s legislative history, recognizing . . . See § 163.3167(8), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, a v. RIVIERA BEACH CITIZENS TASK FORCE, a, 87 So. 3d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . affirmatively to do; and that the ballot question was unconstitutional because it was in violation of section 163.3167 . . . Finally, the appellants argue that the proposed charter amendment is invalid because it violates section 163.3167 . . . Because the proposed amendment does not involve or require a comprehensive plan amendment, section 163.3167 . . .

D. WEISS, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, a, 462 F. App'x 898 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 163.3167. . . .

TOWN OF PONCE INLET, v. PACETTA, LLC,, 63 So. 3d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . This issue was significant because section 163.3167(12), Florida Statutes (2008), prohibits local initiatives . . . Section 163.3167(12) rightfully protects the small landowner from having to submit her development plans . . . affected five or fewer parcels, the trial court correctly determined that the referendum violated section 163.3167 . . . sense to hold the ordinance invalid as well — as this would be the only way to give effect to section 163.3167 . . . — and the referendum and ordinance were properly held invalid — based on the application of section 163.3167 . . .

PRESERVE PALM BEACH POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH,, 50 So. 3d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . constitutionality of the proposed amendment based on whether the amendment conflicted with section 163.3167 . . . Section 163.3167(12), Floi-ida Statutes, provides in part: An initiative or x-efei-endum process in regard . . . The legislative history of section 163.3167(12) does not provide any guidance as to the purpose of the . . . In other words, this amendment seeks to do the very thing prohibited by section 163.3167(12). . . . Section 163.3167(12) rightfully protects the small landowner from having to submit her development plans . . .

PAYNE a a v. CITY OF MIAMI, a LLC,, 52 So. 3d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 163.3167(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve existing and projected water use demands. § 163.3167 . . .

NASSAU COUNTY, v. G. WILLIS T. H. Jr. D. Co- G. T. u d o G. LLC, a LLC, a v., 41 So. 3d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 163.3167(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

M H PROFIT, INC. a v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY, a, 28 So. 3d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See Halls River, 8 So.3d at 420-21 (citing § 163.3167(1), Fla. Stat. (2005), and Machado v. . . .

CITRUS COUNTY, v. HALLS RIVER DEVELOPMENT, INC., 8 So. 3d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 163.3167(1), Fla. Stat. (2005); Machado v. Musgrove, 519 So.2d 629, 631-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). . . .

SAVE HOMOSASSA RIVER ALLIANCE, INC. v. CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 2 So. 3d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See also § 163.3167, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

CITY OF LAKE WORTH, a LLC, a v. SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, INC. a, 995 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The availability of the Charter’s referendum process turned on interpretation of section 163.3167(12) . . . Section 163.3167(12) provides: “An initiative or referendum process in regard to any development order . . . Section 163.3167(12) prohibits the referendum process in situations where amendments affect five or fewer . . . parcel of property only and therefore an initiated or referendum process is prohibited under section 163.3167 . . .

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GROWTH, a v. CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH, a, 940 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . otherwise prohibited by Florida Statutes including but not limited to Florida Statutes [sic] Section 163.3167 . . . , which Plan or Plan Amendment affects five or fewer parcels as defined in Florida Statutes Section 163.3167 . . . The City relies on section 163.3167(12), which provides: An initiative or referendum process in regard . . . See § 163.3167(12), Fla. . . . Section 163.3167(2) authorizes the Administration Commission to impose sanctions on a local government . . .

ADVISORY OPINION TO ATTORNEY GENERAL REFERENDA REQUIRED FOR ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS, 938 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 2006)

. . . See § 163.3167(12), Fla. . . . Although the initiative would override section 163.3167(12) with respect to plan amendments that affect . . . Section 163.3167(12) was not amended during the 2005 legislative session. . . . Section 163.3167(1) of the Act provides that local governments “shall have the power and responsibility . . .

ST. JOHNS ST. AUGUSTINE, COMMITTEE, v. CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE,, 909 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See §§ 163.3174(1); 163.3167(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE REFERENDA REQUIRED FOR ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS, 902 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2005)

. . . . : See § 163.3167(12), Fla. . . . Although the initiative would override section 163.3167(12) with respect to plan amendments that affect . . .

BAY POINT CLUB, INC. v. BAY COUNTY, a K. B. III W. N. F., 890 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 163.3167(8), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . In this case, the precise issue is whether the vested rights created by section 163.3167(8) inure to . . . The county allowed these changes based upon the developers’ vested rights under section 163.3167(8). . . . We determined that section 163.3167(8) “is clear and unambiguous and should be given its plain meaning . . . We observed that section 163.3167(8) provides to developers vested rights to complete “any development . . . See § 163.3167(8), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . the relevant statutes we must read in pari materia are sections 380.06(19)(f)6, 163.3194(l)(a), and 163.3167 . . . Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes (2001) provides: “Nothing in this act shall limit or modify the . . . See § 163.3167(8), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

EDGEWATER BEACH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. WALTON COUNTY, KPM, A. v. KPM, LTD., 833 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 163.3167(8). . . . The majority attempts to justify its rationale based on the absence of a comma in section 163.3167(8) . . . This case aptly illustrates the dangers inherent in misapplying section 163.3167(8). . . . Section 163.3167(8) provides as follows: (8) Nothing in this act shall limit or modify the rights of . . . First, section 163.3167(8) does not enumerate a series. . . . Grand Dunes and KPM responded that their rights to complete development vested under section 163.3167 . . . We review the trial court’s interpretation of section 163.3167(8) de novo. See Execu-Tech Bus. . . . Applying that standard here, the language of section 163.3167(8) is clear and unambiguous and should . . . If the specific reference to DRI development orders in section 163.3167(8) is to be given effect, it . . . Furthermore, the legislative history of section 163.3167 supports our interpretation. . . .

PINECREST LAKES, INC. v. SHIDEL,, 795 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 163.3167(2), Fla. . . .

MARTIN COUNTY, v. SECTION PARTNERSHIP, LTD., 772 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 163.3167(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

LOVE PGI PARTNERS, LP, v. SCHULTZ,, 706 So. 2d 887 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . §§ 163.3167(2), Fla. Stat. (1995); 163.3202, Fla. Stat. (1995). . §§ 163.3164(23); 163.3201, Fla. . . .

VILLAS OF LAKE JACKSON, LTD. v. LEON COUNTY,, 884 F. Supp. 1544 (N.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . In 1990 Leon County adopted the Leon County Comprehensive Land Use Plan pursuant to § 163.3167, Fla.Stat . . .

EQUITY RESOURCES, INC. L. v. COUNTY OF LEON,, 643 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . The plan and ordinance were adopted in 1990 pursuant to section 163.3167, Florida Statutes. . . .

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, a a v. MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a, 633 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . prevails in its appeal of the city’s decision to deny the extension, are vested pursuant to section 163.3167 . . .

LEE COUNTY, a v. SUNBELT EQUITIES, II, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a, 619 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 163.3167(1), 163.3177(1), and 163.3177(6)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991), all of which are distinctly . . .

R. SNYDER, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BREVARD COUNTY,, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 163.3167, Fla.Stat. . . . .

GARDENS COUNTRY CLUB, INCORPORATED, a v. PALM BEACH COUNTY, a, 590 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 163.3167(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); Southwest Ranches Homeowners Ass’n v. . . .

FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. v. ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION TOWN OF PEMBROKE PARK, v. STATE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION, VILLAGE OF VIRGINIA GARDENS, v. STATE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION, TOWN OF PEMBROKE PARK, v. STATE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION,, 586 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Florida Statutes, Sec. 163.3167(2) and 163.3184(ll)(a) unlawfully delegate the uniquely legislative power . . . III) Sections 163.3167(2) and 163.-3184(ll)(a), Florida Statutes, are unlawful delegations of legislative . . . Section 163.3167(2) provides that the local government submit a “complete proposed comprehensive plan . . . The pertinent portion of section 163.3167(2)(b) provides: Any county or municipality that fails to meet . . . In their final point addressed to the rule challenge, appellants argue that sections 163.3167(2) and . . .

BATTAGLIA FRUIT CO. v. CITY OF MAITLAND,, 530 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 163.3167, Fla.Stat. (1985); Ord. 37-82 I-II; Borough of Cresskitl v. . . .

L. MACHADO, v. MUSGROVE,, 519 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 163.3167(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); Southwest Ranches Homeowners Ass’n v. . . .

SOUTHWEST RANCHES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. COUNTY OF BROWARD, a, 502 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 163.3167(1). . . .

Dr. LOPEZ- TORRES, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 488 So. 2d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . new location, we find: (1) The DOT depends heavily on its choice to relocate on the fact that section 163.3167 . . .

ORANGE COUNTY, a v. R. G. GARDNER, 477 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 163.3167(2), Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .