Cases from cite.case.law:

AMARO, v. STATE, 272 So. 3d 853 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. . . .

SALOMON, v. STATE, 267 So. 3d 25 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . ." § 90.702, Fla. Stat (2017). . . .

TOOLE, v. STATE, 270 So. 3d 371 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . establishing his or her competency and reliability to opine as to the property's value, as required by section 90.702 . . . Stat. § 90.702 (2014) ("[A] witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, . . .

CRUZ, v. STATE, 262 So. 3d 244 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Although the legislature amended sections 90.702 and 90.704, Florida Statutes (2013), to replace the . . .

D. R. HORTON, INC. JACKSONVILLE, v. HERON S LANDING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., 266 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . that the testimony does not pass the threshold for admissibility required by Florida Statute Section 90.702 . . . After hearing the parties' arguments, the trial court, in analyzing the issue pursuant to section 90.702 . . . The trial court assessed this evidentiary issue below pursuant to section 90.702, Florida Statutes. . . . court and the Fourth District analyzed the admission of expert testimony in the case under section 90.702 . . .

HAYES ROBERTSON GROUP, INC. v. CHERRY,, 260 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . 3D17-2704) The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in, among other things, applying section 90.702 . . . The plaintiffs are correct that the constitutionality of section 90.702, an issue in contention at the . . . the appropriate test in Florida courts," 258 So.3d at 1229, concluding that the amendment to section 90.702 . . . not abuse its discretion in excluding Bell's proffered testimony, whether under Daubert and section 90.702 . . .

WHITE v. RING POWER CORP., 261 So. 3d 689 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . witnesses were deposed, Ring Power filed a motion to strike the experts' testimony pursuant to section 90.702 . . . or education " in order to testify about "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge." § 90.702 . . . October 15, 2018), holding that section 90.702, as amended in 2013, is procedural and not substantive . . .

CROWN DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES CORP. v. PRENDIVILLE,, 263 So. 3d 103 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . E/C placed a general objection on the record challenging the doctor's expertise "under ... section 90.702 . . .

MEDINA, v. STATE, 260 So. 3d 419 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and section 90.702, Florida . . . October 15, 2018), holding that section 90.702, as amended in 2013, is procedural and not substantive . . .

LITTLE CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, a a a v. MARTIN COUNTY, a LLC RG LLC,, 259 So. 3d 864 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2016). Cf. Gyongyosi v. . . .

DELISLE, v. CRANE CO., 258 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. 2018)

. . . , 206 So.3d 94 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) -which applies the Daubert standard codified in revised section 90.702 . . . of law" as the question addressed in DeLisle , which was controlled by and applied amended section 90.702 . . . The constitutionality of amended section 90.702 is unquestionably an important issue that is worthy of . . . DeLisle had made an argument to the district court challenging the constitutionality of amended section 90.702 . . . Appellees challenged each expert's opinions under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, which adopted the . . . Following our repeated affirmations of the Frye rule, in 2013 the Legislature amended section 90.702 . . . The amendment revised the statute to read as follows: 90.702 Testimony by experts. . . . . § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (as amended by ch. 2013-107, § 1, Laws of Fla.). . . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes, as amended in 2013, is not substantive. . . . reinstatement of the final judgment and its conclusion that the 2013 legislative amendments to section 90.702 . . . guided by the rules of evidence, which require that the expert testimony "assist the trier of fact." § 90.702 . . .

ALVAREZ, v. ALL STAR BOXING, INC., 258 So. 3d 508 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

L. MORRIS, v. S. MUNIZ, M. D., 252 So. 3d 1143 (Fla. 2018)

. . . All other areas are governed by section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2018), entitled "Testimony by experts . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 617 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Officer Michener was a lay witness not qualified to give specialized opinion testimony under section 90.702 . . .

SDI QUARRY a k a v. GATEWAY ESTATES PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,, 249 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), which was adopted when section 90.702 . . .

HAWTHORNE, v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . by the prosecuting attorney, as this expert testimony was not pure opinion testimony under section 90.702 . . . testimony is based only on clinical experience and training; in contrast, the cornerstone of section 90.702 . . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes, requires that to admit expert testimony involving "scientific, technical . . .

J. LAMB, v. STATE, 246 So. 3d 400 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Who constitutes an expert witness may be derived from section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2016): If scientific . . . familiarity with Facebook to have been sufficiently specialized to fall within the scope of section 90.702 . . .

SANCHEZ, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 245 So. 3d 933 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Howard's testimony on various grounds, including the asserted non-compliance with section 90.702, Florida . . .

A. GUTIERREZ, v. VARGAS, M. D., 239 So. 3d 615 (Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CC CHIROPRACTIC, LLC a a o, 245 So. 3d 755 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The court found State Farm did not establish that Simon's testimony satisfied section 90.702, Florida . . .

SANCHEZ LLC, a v. CINQUE, 238 So. 3d 817 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The Daubert test, as codified in section 90.702, requires that "[t]he testimony is based upon sufficient . . .

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. R. J. v. A. GORE, Sr. H., 238 So. 3d 828 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Proctor's ammonia testimony violated Daubert or section 90.702, Florida Statutes. . . . Indeed, there are no references by the defendants to " Daubert " or " section 90.702" anywhere in the . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 228 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Expert witness, See F.S. 90.702 (1985), and Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So.2d 641 (Fla. 1964). . . .

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, v. F. BRITT,, 226 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . competing standards embroiled in the legislative amendments to the Florida Evidence Code (amending sections 90.702 . . . Applying the more rigorous standard, Daubert and its codification in sections 90.702 and 90.704, the . . .

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, v. F. BRITT,, 241 So. 3d 208 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . competing standards embroiled in the legislative amendments to the Florida Evidence Code (amending sections 90.702 . . . Applying the more rigorous standard, Daubert and its codification in sections 90.702 and 90.704, the . . .

LAS OLAS HOLDING COMPANY, d b a a v. DEMELLA, a p r, 228 So. 3d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . We need not address whether the expert was qualified for purposes of section 90.702, Florida Statutes . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 226 So. 3d 758 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2012), provides that a witness may be qualified as an expert based . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. JUNOD,, 217 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . that the EMA improperly relied on the Kales articles and failed to satisfy the requirements of section 90.702 . . . product of reliable principles and methods”; and be applied “reliably to the facts of the case.” § 90.702 . . .

CHURCHILL, Jr. v. STATE, 219 So. 3d 14 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and section 90.702 . . .

MCMILLIAN, v. STATE, 214 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Under section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2010), expert testimony is defined as “scientific, technical, . . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. . . .

RHOADES, III, v. RODRIGUEZ,, 212 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . filing his petition, the Florida Supreme Court has declined to adopt the “Daubert amendment” to section 90.702 . . . Effective July 1, 2013, the Florida Legislature amended section 90.702, Florida Statutes, replacing the . . . Section 90.702 provides that: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the . . . methods; and (3) The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. § 90.702 . . .

L. ANDERSON, v. STATE L. v. L., 220 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 2017)

. . . .” § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE, 210 So. 3d 1231 (Fla. 2017)

. . . procedural, chapter 2013-107, sections 1 and 2, Laws of Florida (Daubert Amendment), which amended sections 90.702 . . . Committee’s recommendation and decline to adopt, to the extent they are procedural, the changes to sections 90.702 . . . DISCUSSION Daubert Amendment The Daubert Amendment amended sections 90.702 and 90.704, Florida Statutes . . . First, the Legislature amended section 90.702 to mirror Federal Rule of Evidence 702 as follows: If scientific . . .

M. BARICKO, v. BARNETT TRANSPORTATION, INC., 220 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in applying the Daubert test codified in section 90.702 . . . (amending § 90.702, Fla. Stat,); § 90.101, Fla. Stat. . . . as the ‘Florida Evidence Code.’ ”), The JCC was bound by Giaimo — -and the plain language of section 90.702 . . . Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, supra, the Court declines to adopt the Daubert test in section 90.702 . . . ] also argues that this court lacks the authority to apply Daubert, as incorporated through section 90.702 . . .

CRANE CO. R. J. Co. Co. v. DeLISLE, 206 So.3d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Appellees challenged each expert’s opinions under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, which adopted the . . . Section 90.702 codifies the standard: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist . . . methods; and (3) The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. § 90.702 . . . Under section 90.702 and Dau-bert, 509 U.S. at 597, 113 S.Ct. 2786, the trial courts must “act as gatekeepers . . . DeLisle also argues that this court lacks the authority to apply Daubert, as incorporated through section 90.702 . . .

McNABB, v. TAYLOR ELEVATOR CORP. D. G., 203 So. 3d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (201S). . . .

BOYLES, v. DILLARD S INC., 199 So. 3d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . inadmissible as being, scientifically unreliable, irrelevant, and overly prejudicial under sections 90.702 . . . According to section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2014): If scientific, technical, or other specialized . . .

BUNIN, v. MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC. a f k a a ZICAM, LLC, a f k a LLC, a, 197 So. 3d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . moved to exclude the opinion of the plaintiffs causation expert, based on the recent change to section 90.702 . . . that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the causation testimony under section 90.702 . . . In 2013, the Florida Legislature amended section 90.702 with the intent to adopt the federal Daubert . . . On appeal, the plaintiffs primaiy argument is that the 2013 amendments to section 90.702 are substantive . . . Accordingly, as the Third District has explained, “section 90.702 of the Florida Evidence Code indisputably . . .

R. C. v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . the recently adopted Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony as stated in section 90.702 . . . DAUBERT AND SECTION 90.702 In 2013, the legislature amended section 90.702 with the intention of adopting . . . (Preamble to § 90.702). The legislature also expressed its intention that the standard in Frye v. . . . By amending section 90.702, the legislature further intended to prohibit the use in the Florida courts . . . The effective date of the amendment to section 90.702 is July 1, 2013. Ch. 2013-107, § 3. . . .

FLORIDA LAUNDRY SERVICES, INC. v. SAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 193 So. 3d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Under section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2015), a witness may be “qualified as an expert by knowledge, . . .

MAINES v. FOX,, 190 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The Daubert standard for admissibility was adopted by the Legislature in section 90.702, Florida Statutes . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. LONG,, 189 So. 3d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 90.702, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.390. . . .

L. L. a v. STATE, 189 So. 3d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 90.702: Expert Opinion Testimony The parties focused primarily on Section 90.702, which sets . . . In 2013,. the Florida Legislature amended Section 90.702 to pattern it after Rule 702 of the Federal . . . As amended, Section 90.702, Florida Statutes, reads as follows: 90.702 Testimony by experts If scientific . . . One of the Legislature’s stated purposes in amending Section 90.702 was “to adopt the standards for expert . . . (“Except as otherwise provided in s. 90.702, a witness may not testify to á matter unless evidence is . . .

CASS, v. STATE, 190 So. 3d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

STATE v. LUCAS,, 183 So. 3d 1027 (Fla. 2016)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. . . .

OVERTON, v. L. JONES,, 155 F. Supp. 3d 1253 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . Ch.2013-107, at 1461-63, Laws of Fla, consistent with Daubert, section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2013 . . .

E. BAAN, v. COLUMBIA COUNTY,, 180 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . discussion, nor its suggestion in a footnote that a constitutional challenge to the Daubert standard in § 90.702 . . . And even if they had, our court’s decisions have correctly required the 2013 modifications to § 90.702 . . . As amended, section 90.702 provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist . . . ; and • (3) The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. § 90.702 . . . By amending section 90.702, the Legislature signaled its intent “to tighten the rules for admissibility . . . Under section 90.702, as amended, while the expert’s qualifications may well remain germane, an expert . . . Appellant does not argue that chapter 13-107, section 1, Laws of Florida, in amending section 90.702, . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 197 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . whether the eyewitness identification was correct'in this case, his testimony did not comply with section 90.702 . . . Under our evidence code, § 90.702, Fla. . . .

L. ANDREWS, v. STATE, 181 So. 3d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . However, beginning July 1, 2013, the Florida Legislature amended sections 90.702 and 90.704 of the Florida . . .

L. BELL, Jr. v. STATE, 179 So. 3d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The court noted that the prior version of section 90.702, Florida Statutes; “requires the court to make . . . tests and how to read and explain their results would qualify to testify to the results under section 90.702 . . . To the extent that this would even be a close question under section 90.702, it should not be a question . . . Although section 90.702, Florida Statutes was significantly amended in 2013 to adopt the federal standard . . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

O. SIERRA, v. METROPOLITAN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, 188 So. 3d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Miller’s opinion testimony on causation, including an objection based on section 90.702, Florida Statutes . . .

A. HERNANDEZ, JR. v. STATE A. Jr. v. L., 180 So. 3d 978 (Fla. 2015)

. . . . 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), based on the Legislature’s 2013 amendment to section 90.702 . . . Section 90.702 was amended in 2013 to provide that testimony by an expert who is qualified by knowledge . . . See § 90.702(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PEMBROKE PINES MRI, INC. a a o, 171 So. 3d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . county court’s rejection of the actuary’s affidavit for not meeting the standard required by section 90.702 . . .

PERRY, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG St., 171 So. 3d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . the JCC erred in determining he was not required to address Claimant’s challenge, based on section 90.702 . . . Effective July 1, 2013, the Legislature amended section 90.702 of the evidence code and adopted the admissibility . . . Florida Autosport, Inc., 154 So.3d 385, 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), that the 2013 modifications to section 90.702 . . .

CHURCHILL, Jr. v. STATE, 169 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2014); Perez v. . . .

BOOKER, v. SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE NORTH AMERICAN RISK SERVICES,, 166 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . five issues raised by Appellant were challenges to the judge’s evidentiary rulings grounded in section 90.702 . . . and outlined Florida’s adoption of that standard: In 2013, the Florida Legislature modified section 90.702 . . . See Ch. 13-107, § 1, Laws of Fla. (2013) (Preamble to § 90.702). . . . As amended, section 90.702 now provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will . . . (“In adopting the amendment to section 90.702, the legislature specifically stated its intent that the . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, 154 So. 3d 301 (Fla. 2014)

. . . The social investigator must be qualified as an expert under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, to testify . . .

GIAIMO, v. FLORIDA AUTOSPORT, INC. d b a, 154 So. 3d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . facts and data and lacking a basis in reliable medical principles and methods as required by section 90.702 . . . In 2013, the Florida Legislature modified section 90.702 “to adopt the standards for expert testimony . . . See Ch. 13-107, § 1, Laws of Fla. (2013) (Preamble to § 90.702). . . . As amended, sfection 90.702 now provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will . . . (“In adopting the amendment to section 90.702, the legislature specifically stated its intent that the . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 142 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 2014)

. . . With respect to when the introduction of expert testimony is proper, section 90.702, Florida Statutes . . .

PEREZ, v. BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., 138 So. 3d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Analysis The admissibility of expert testimony in this state is governed by section 90.702 of the Florida . . . Ch. 2013-107, § 1, Laws of Fla. (2013) (Preamble to § 90.702). . . . Moreover, section 90.702 of the Florida Evidence Code indisputably applies retrospectively. . . . Although the revisions to section 90.702 came into force after the filing of this appeal, we apply them . . . Section 90.702, as amended, reads as follows: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge . . .

ALVAREZ, v. STATE, 147 So. 3d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

CONLEY, v. STATE, 129 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Specifically, consistent with Daubert, section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2013), was amended to provide . . . has determined the admissibility of the PPG evidence under the Daubert standard codified by section 90.702 . . .

KIPP, v. STATE, 128 So. 3d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . the “opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training”); § 90.702 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, 123 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. 2013)

. . . .); ch. 2013-107 (amending § 90.702, Fla. Stat.); ch.2013-112, §§ 3, 4, Laws of Fla. . . .

GOSCIMINSKI, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)

. . . will assist the jury in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue under section 90.702 . . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2009), governs the testimony of experts and provides: If scientific . . .

L. BRILHART, v. BRILHART, S. L. B. a, 116 So. 3d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The admission of expert testimony is governed by section 90.702, which states, [i]f scientific, technical . . .

JENNINGS, v. STATE v. D., 123 So. 3d 1101 (Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CONTRACT AND BUSINESS CASES, 116 So. 3d 284 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See F.S. 90.702 (1985), and Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So.2d 641 (Fla.1964). . . .

STATE v. M. R. a, 100 So. 3d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See also § 90.702, Fla. . . .

E. LYNCH, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 897 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, expert testimony is admissible only where “specialized knowledge . . .

L. JACKSON, Jr. v. STATE, 89 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. . . . See § 90.702 (expert witness is one "qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training . . .

GYONGYOSI, L. f u b o La a v. MILLER, 80 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue.... ” § 90.702 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. E. BOWLING, 81 So. 3d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2009), provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge . . . See § 90.702; Charles Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.1, at 677-78 (2009 ed.) . . . (noting that definition of expert in section 90.702 “applies not only to persons with scientific or technical . . . See § 90.702; see also Dungan v. . . .

L. B. v. NAKED TRUTH III, INC. d b a, 117 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . to “assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence, or in determining a fact issue ...,” § 90.702 . . .

SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION, v. A. MITZEL,, 83 So. 3d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2010), provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge . . .

FIDELITY WARRANTY SERVICES, INC. a a v. FIRSTATE INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. PR,, 74 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

FEACHER, v. TOTAL EMPLOYEE LEASING GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 61 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2010) (allowing experts to offer opinion on matters in dispute); cf. . . .

STOKES, v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. BROADSPIRE,, 60 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. . . .

JOHNSTON, v. STATE v. S., 70 So. 3d 472 (Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 90.702 (an expert’s opinion "is admissible only if it can be applied to the evidence at trial”); . . .

VEGA, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE,, 45 So. 3d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). . . .

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, L. P. v. HODGEMIRE,, 49 So. 3d 767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Thus, generally objecting to the expert under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, is insufficient. . . .

SPECIAL, v. BAUX, M. D. M. D. P. A. P. L., 52 So. 3d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 90.702, Fla. . . .

HARRISON, v. STATE, 33 So. 3d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 90.702, Fla. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. In No. In No. In No. In No. s In No. In No. In No. In No., 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See F.S. 90.702 (1985), and Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So.2d 641 (Fla.1964). . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 28 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2005), provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge . . .

CHAVEZ, v. STATE v. A., 12 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2007), provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge . . .

DORBAD, v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 90.702, Florida Statutes (2006), governs the admissibility of expert testimony and provides in . . . Based on section 90.702, the evidence should have been admitted unless it would not assist the trier . . .

TENGBERGEN, v. STATE, 9 So. 3d 729 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . As the supreme court has explained: Section 90.702 requires that before an expert may testify in the . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 7 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 90.702 governs opinion testimony by expert witnesses and provides that a witness can be qualified . . . as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.702, Fla. . . .

BUNCHE, v. STATE, 5 So. 3d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . §§ 90.702-706, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

DIAMOND REGAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. MATINNAZ CONSTRUCTION, INC., 1 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . . § 90.702. . . .

LYNCH, v. STATE v. A., 2 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, expert testimony is admissible only where “specialized knowledge . . .

ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. v. FLORIDA BIRTH- RELATED NEUROLOGICAL,, 997 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . §§ 90.702, 90.703, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

BARTLETT, v. STATE, 993 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . was beyond the scope of an ordinary juror’s knowledge and understanding, as is required under section 90.702 . . .

SINCLAIR, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . person — in Brooks, a drug dealer possessed of “specialized knowledge” within the meaning of section 90.702 . . .

PEREZ, v. STATE, 980 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . records custodians from Sprinfi-Nextel and Metro PCS, did not constitute expert testimony under section 90.702 . . .

J. ANDREWS N. v. J. BARTON,, 974 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

MARSH, v. VALYOU, Jr., 977 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Section 90.702 of Florida’s code is essentially identical to Federal Rule 702. . . . And, to paraphrase the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert, nothing in section 90.702 or . . . Sections 90.702 and 90.703 deal specifically with expert testimony: 90.702 Testimony by experts. — If . . . Section 90.702 contains three requirements: (1) that the opinion evidence be helpful to the trier of . . . This view is consistent with the first requirement of section 90.702, that the opinion evidence be helpful . . .

COX, v. STATE W. v. R., 966 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 2007)

. . . With regard to the admissibility of expert testimony, this Court has stated: Section 90.702 requires . . .

SANCHEZ v. NERYS,, 954 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Stat. (2005); § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .