Florida Statute 90.402 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.402

90.402 Admissibility of relevant evidence.—All relevant evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.402 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.402 on CourtListener

Amendments to 90.402

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.402

Total Results: 270

Hunter v. State

660 So. 2d 244, 1995 WL 324080

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1995 | Docket: 1639619

Cited 134 times | Published

404(2)(a) as similar fact evidence but under section 90.402 because it is relevant. Gorham v. State, 454

McDuffie v. State

970 So. 2d 312, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 763

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2007 | Docket: 1151064

Cited 100 times | Published

assessment of the evidence presented in this case. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2005), a provision within

Walker v. State

707 So. 2d 300, 1997 WL 539438

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1997 | Docket: 1260222

Cited 88 times | Published

admissible unless the law provides otherwise. Id. § 90.402. We agree with the State that the evidence Walker

Zack v. State

753 So. 2d 9, 2000 WL 14472

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2000 | Docket: 466839

Cited 87 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Court also said relevant

Griffin v. State

639 So. 2d 966, 1994 WL 318674

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1994 | Docket: 1310337

Cited 85 times | Published

for the admissibility of evidence is relevance. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1991). Relevant evidence is defined

Cole v. State

701 So. 2d 845, 1997 WL 574741

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1997 | Docket: 1736770

Cited 84 times | Published

explain the entirety of the criminal episode. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1993). We summarily address and reject

McLean v. State

934 So. 2d 1248, 2006 WL 1837909

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2006 | Docket: 1460812

Cited 80 times | Published

relevancy remains the threshold question. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2005) ("All relevant evidence is

Gore v. State

719 So. 2d 1197, 1998 WL 670380

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1998 | Docket: 2518352

Cited 80 times | Published

be admissible, evidence must be relevant. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). Relevant evidence is defined

Bradley v. State

787 So. 2d 732, 2001 WL 197024

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2001 | Docket: 1495764

Cited 77 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Court also said relevant

Taylor v. State

855 So. 2d 1, 2003 WL 21283161

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2003 | Docket: 1752466

Cited 66 times | Published

entered the application into evidence. Under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1999), "[a]ll relevant evidence

Coolen v. State

696 So. 2d 738, 1997 WL 268909

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1997 | Docket: 1696110

Cited 61 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because "it is a relevant and inseparable part

Echols v. State

484 So. 2d 568, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 526

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1985 | Docket: 1343632

Cited 58 times | Published

the tape objected to should have been excised. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1981); Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d

State v. Savino

567 So. 2d 892, 1990 WL 149736

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 1381388

Cited 55 times | Published

because there is a lessened chance of prejudice. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1987), provides that all

Smith v. State

424 So. 2d 726

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1982 | Docket: 2489148

Cited 55 times | Published

unless excluded by some specific rule of law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1979). Contrary to the claim of appellant

State v. McClain

525 So. 2d 420, 1988 WL 50191

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1988 | Docket: 1304680

Cited 48 times | Published

admissible unless the law otherwise provides. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1985). Relevant evidence is defined

Consalvo v. State

697 So. 2d 805, 1996 WL 559883

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1997 | Docket: 1776654

Cited 45 times | Published

from the crime charged" is admissible under section 90.402). The Walker burglary was closely connected

Smith v. State

699 So. 2d 629, 1997 WL 365536

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1997 | Docket: 1321162

Cited 45 times | Published

episode at issue and not unduly prejudicial. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1989); Griffin v. State, 639 So.2d

Aguirre-Jarquin v. State

9 So. 3d 593, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 467, 2009 WL 775388

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2009 | Docket: 401036

Cited 44 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008). Samantha’s testimony was relevant

Moore v. State

701 So. 2d 545, 1997 WL 603489

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1997 | Docket: 1736799

Cited 44 times | Published

admitted. See § 90.803(18)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995); § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). Here, the evidence was not

McCray v. State

71 So. 3d 848, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 383, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 2637377

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2011 | Docket: 2353993

Cited 43 times | Published

the general rule of relevancy set forth in section 90.402 governs dissimilar fact evidence. (Citations

Gregory v. State

118 So. 3d 770, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 471, 2013 WL 3214455, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1308

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2013 | Docket: 60233430

Cited 42 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2011). Relevant evidence “is inadmissible

LaMarca v. State

785 So. 2d 1209, 2001 WL 223404

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2001 | Docket: 450199

Cited 41 times | Published

404(2)(a) as similar fact evidence but under section 90.402 because it is relevant. Id. at 251 (citations

Hartley v. State

686 So. 2d 1316, 1996 WL 528456

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1996 | Docket: 1260371

Cited 41 times | Published

with the crime charged," is admissible under section 90.402 (admissibility of relevant evidence) because

Butler v. State

842 So. 2d 817, 2003 WL 1786712

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2003 | Docket: 1440370

Cited 40 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1997); Zack v. State, 753 So.2d 9

Butler v. State

842 So. 2d 817, 2003 WL 1786712

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2003 | Docket: 1440370

Cited 40 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1997); Zack v. State, 753 So.2d 9

Larkins v. State

655 So. 2d 95, 1995 WL 273937

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1995 | Docket: 1327098

Cited 40 times | Published

Thompson v. State, 565 So.2d 1311, 1314 (Fla. 1990); § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1993). We have upheld the admission

Brown v. State

426 So. 2d 76

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1983 | Docket: 510869

Cited 40 times | Published

we are required to read in pari materia.[18] Section 90.402 provides that "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible

Peede v. State

955 So. 2d 480, 2007 WL 63640

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2007 | Docket: 1659258

Cited 39 times | Published

at issue and not unduly prejudicial") (citing § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1989); Griffin v. State, 639 So.2d

White v. State

817 So. 2d 799, 2002 WL 500174

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2002 | Docket: 1728324

Cited 38 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Court also said relevant

Twilegar v. State

42 So. 3d 177, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 4, 2010 WL 26512

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2010 | Docket: 2398178

Cited 36 times | Published

to prove or disprove a material fact." And section 90.402 provides that "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible

Miller v. State

42 So. 3d 204, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 323, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 854, 2010 WL 2195709

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2010 | Docket: 2398193

Cited 35 times | Published

needless presentation of cumulative evidence. See § 90.402-.403, Fla. Stat. (2006). Here, the only references

Victorino v. State

23 So. 3d 87, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 645, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1954, 2009 WL 4061285

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2009 | Docket: 1657703

Cited 35 times | Published

Graham's testimony as relevant pursuant to section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2004), to show the circumstances

Smith v. State

866 So. 2d 51, 2004 WL 178582

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 1680037

Cited 34 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because "it is a relevant and inseparable part

Sexton v. State

697 So. 2d 833, 1997 WL 417435

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1997 | Docket: 1777251

Cited 33 times | Published

rather as "dissimilar fact" evidence under section 90.402, which simply states that all relevant evidence

Brackin v. Boles

452 So. 2d 540

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1984 | Docket: 474535

Cited 33 times | Published

evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1981). Evidence is relevant if it

Brackin v. Boles

452 So. 2d 540

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1984 | Docket: 474535

Cited 33 times | Published

evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1981). Evidence is relevant if it

Shere v. State

579 So. 2d 86, 1991 WL 45123

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1991 | Docket: 2041247

Cited 32 times | Published

constitutional and statutory rights and privileges. Cf. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1987) ("All relevant evidence is

State v. Meador

674 So. 2d 826, 1996 WL 252233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1996 | Docket: 1195272

Cited 31 times | Published

their exclusion in those prosecutions under F.S. 90.402 and 90.403?[1] We exercise our discretionary

Erickson v. State

565 So. 2d 328, 1990 WL 78965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1990 | Docket: 379799

Cited 30 times | Published

under a different section of the Evidence Code, section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1987). Therefore, the state

Dorsett v. State

944 So. 2d 1207, 2006 WL 3734363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 3281

Cited 29 times | Published

properly admitted as relevant evidence pursuant to section 90.402 because they were committed in a single criminal

Jorgenson v. State

714 So. 2d 423, 1998 WL 306593

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1998 | Docket: 390867

Cited 28 times | Published

404(2)(a) does not apply and the general rule in section 90.402 controls. A trial court has broad discretion

Perry v. State

801 So. 2d 78, 2001 WL 1241060

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2001 | Docket: 1495138

Cited 27 times | Published

admissible unless the law provides otherwise. Id. § 90.402. In this case, it is undisputed that one of the

Ferrell v. State

686 So. 2d 1324, 1996 WL 528457

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1996 | Docket: 1675958

Cited 26 times | Published

with the crime charged," is admissible under section 90.402 (admissibility of relevant evidence) because

Ramirez v. State

810 So. 2d 836, 2001 WL 1628609

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2001 | Docket: 1223954

Cited 24 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2000). Relevant evidence is excluded

Floyd v. State

18 So. 3d 432, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 359, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 860, 2009 WL 1544273

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2009 | Docket: 2531313

Cited 23 times | Published

the threat to Trelane was admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1997), because "it [was]

Washington v. State

737 So. 2d 1208, 1999 WL 534733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1999 | Docket: 1709666

Cited 21 times | Published

law, "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1997). Whether Washington was the

Huhn v. State

511 So. 2d 583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1987 | Docket: 1700760

Cited 21 times | Published

tends to prove or disprove a material fact. Section 90.402 states all relevant evidence is admissible

Tumulty v. State

489 So. 2d 150, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1986 | Docket: 1528806

Cited 21 times | Published

distribution of the drugs was admissible under section 90.402 simply as relevant evidence. It was relevant

Trees by & Through Trees v. K-MART

467 So. 2d 401, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 1274354

Cited 21 times | Published

___, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984). Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that "[a]ll

Vannier v. State

714 So. 2d 470, 1998 WL 219717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1998 | Docket: 461491

Cited 20 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). While the defense is bound

Bystrom v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC., ETC.

416 So. 2d 1133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 1224667

Cited 20 times | Published

admissible unless *1140 otherwise prohibited by law. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1977). We do not find that

Damren v. State

696 So. 2d 709, 1997 WL 228418

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1997 | Docket: 1696223

Cited 19 times | Published

"similar fact" evidence, none is required under section 90.402 for "relevant" evidence. See Layman v. State

Moreno v. State

418 So. 2d 1223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1982 | Docket: 1289286

Cited 18 times | Published

against the defendant in a criminal trial. It is Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1979) which applies to this

Abdool v. State

53 So. 3d 208, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1637, 2010 WL 3909803

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2010 | Docket: 2407270

Cited 16 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009). Section 90.401, Florida Statutes

Abdool v. State

53 So. 3d 208, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1637, 2010 WL 3909803

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2010 | Docket: 2407270

Cited 16 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009). Section 90.401, Florida Statutes

Cotton v. State

763 So. 2d 437, 2000 WL 763548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2000 | Docket: 1681758

Cited 16 times | Published

otherwise made inadmissible by the evidence code. See § 90.402 Fla. Stat. (1999). Because of the presumption

Jackson v. State

89 So. 3d 1011, 2012 WL 1934426, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8742

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2012 | Docket: 60308482

Cited 15 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007). “Relevant evidence is [defined

Hawthorne v. State

470 So. 2d 770, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1985 | Docket: 1676407

Cited 15 times | Published

to prove. McCormick, supra, § 185, 541-542. Section 90.402 next provides that "[a]ll relevant evidence

McGirth v. State

48 So. 3d 777, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1935, 2010 WL 4483506

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2396375

Cited 14 times | Published

Sheila's testimony as relevant pursuant to section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2006), to establish the

Randall v. State

760 So. 2d 892, 2000 WL 422865

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2000 | Docket: 1695293

Cited 13 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Court also said relevant

Gosciminski v. State

132 So. 3d 678, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2013 WL 5313183, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1988

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2013 | Docket: 60238539

Cited 12 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. Id. (citing § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2004)). 1. Evidence of “Bad Conduct”

Sliney v. State

944 So. 2d 270, 2006 WL 3228813

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1649422

Cited 12 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because "it is a relevant and inseparable part

Strasser v. Yalamanchi

783 So. 2d 1087, 2001 WL 195056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1259353

Cited 12 times | Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1997). In this case, the disputed

Cohen v. Dauphinee

739 So. 2d 68, 1999 WL 236248

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1999 | Docket: 1293999

Cited 11 times | Published

is, in its very essence, a search for truth. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1997), consistent with that

Thomas v. State

599 So. 2d 158, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1992 | Docket: 1483403

Cited 11 times | Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact." Section 90.402 states, "All relevant evidence is admissible

Brown v. Sims

538 So. 2d 901, 1989 WL 6174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1989 | Docket: 472525

Cited 11 times | Published

making that assessment the starting point is section 90.402, Florida Statutes *908 (1987), which provides

Kopsho v. State

84 So. 3d 204, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149, 2012 WL 652790, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 454

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2012 | Docket: 60306683

Cited 10 times | Published

Dissimilar fact evidence may be admissible under section 90.402, but like similar fact evidence its admissibility

Thigpen v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

990 So. 2d 639, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13824, 2008 WL 4146663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2008 | Docket: 1687449

Cited 10 times | Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact."). Section 90.402 provides that "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible

Fitzsimmons v. State

935 So. 2d 125, 2006 WL 2347731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2006 | Docket: 1671134

Cited 10 times | Published

(Fla.1994). Such evidence is admissible under section 90.402 because it is a relevant and inseparable part

Livingston v. State

678 So. 2d 895, 1996 WL 471155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1996 | Docket: 1737015

Cited 10 times | Published

prior contacts with Martin was admissible under section 90.402 as being relevant to and inseparable from the

Toledo v. State

452 So. 2d 661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1984 | Docket: 1517662

Cited 10 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1983). The State suggests that the

McGee v. State

435 So. 2d 854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1983 | Docket: 1328478

Cited 10 times | Published

therefore, as falling within the ambit of Section 90.402-.403, Florida Evidence Code, rather than as

Delhall v. State

95 So. 3d 134, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 468, 2012 WL 2848691, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1352

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2012 | Docket: 60311152

Cited 9 times | Published

cumulative evidence.” Miller, 42 So.3d at 224; see also § 90.402-.403, Fla. Stat. (2008). “An appellate court will

Denmark v. State

927 So. 2d 1079, 2006 WL 1328832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2006 | Docket: 1765360

Cited 9 times | Published

offenses. Accordingly, the relevancy rule of section 90.402 governed the admissibility of the evidence

Eliakim v. State

884 So. 2d 57, 2004 WL 432488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2004 | Docket: 1282197

Cited 9 times | Published

reliable and trustworthy knowledge. See, e.g., § 90.402 ("All relevant evidence is admissible, except

O'CONNOR v. State

835 So. 2d 1226, 2003 WL 186965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2003 | Docket: 1643629

Cited 9 times | Published

must be relevant in order to be admissible. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2001). Relevant evidence is defined

Home Ins. Co. v. Owens

573 So. 2d 343, 1990 WL 175784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 479030

Cited 9 times | Published

error to admit evidence of an unrelated notice. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1987). The admission of up to three

Anderson v. State

549 So. 2d 807, 1989 WL 118976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1989 | Docket: 1373904

Cited 9 times | Published

is admissible except as otherwise provided. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. To this rule there is a rather broad

Austin v. State

500 So. 2d 262, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1986 | Docket: 1689595

Cited 9 times | Published

"inseparable crime evidence" admissible under Section 90.402, Florida Statutes, simply as relevant evidence

Victorino v. State

127 So. 3d 478, 2013 WL 5567079

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2013 | Docket: 60236730

Cited 8 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2006). A limitation on this rule

Bartlett v. State

993 So. 2d 157, 2008 WL 4722492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2008 | Docket: 1516286

Cited 8 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2006). Generally, any relevant evidence

State v. Clyatt

976 So. 2d 1182, 2008 WL 731545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2008 | Docket: 1275642

Cited 8 times | Published

admissibility of evidence is its relevance. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007) ("All relevant evidence is

State v. Coleman

911 So. 2d 259, 2005 WL 2396579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2005 | Docket: 1751840

Cited 8 times | Published

admissible, unless otherwise prohibited by law. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2005) (unless prohibited by law,

Billie v. State

863 So. 2d 323, 2003 WL 21749078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 1432231

Cited 8 times | Published

was not relevant to prove a material issue. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat.; § 90.404(2)(a), Fla. Stat.; Robertson

Diaz v. State

747 So. 2d 1021, 1999 WL 1144797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 1475247

Cited 8 times | Published

forums for the search of truth."). To this end, section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that "all

Layman v. State

652 So. 2d 373, 1995 WL 121612

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1995 | Docket: 1518047

Cited 8 times | Published

"similar fact evidence,"[3] none is required under section 90.402 for "relevant" evidence.[4] The evidence here

State v. Andres

552 So. 2d 1151, 1989 WL 133269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1989 | Docket: 1200773

Cited 8 times | Published

other rule of law, they are admissible evidence. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1987). The order is reversed and

Moore v. State

530 So. 2d 61, 1988 WL 31711

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1988 | Docket: 1267403

Cited 8 times | Published

admissibility of all evidence is relevancy. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1985). Furthermore, the relevancy

Carter v. Rukab

437 So. 2d 761

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1983 | Docket: 1674897

Cited 8 times | Published

State, 110 So.2d 654, 658 (Fla. 1959). See also Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1979) which provides that

Bell v. State

179 So. 3d 349, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14993, 2015 WL 5883607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2015 | Docket: 60251742

Cited 7 times | Published

meets the foundational test for admissibility, see § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2014) (“All relevant evidence is

MONESTIME v. State

41 So. 3d 1110, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12188, 2010 WL 3239158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2010 | Docket: 1238189

Cited 7 times | Published

with the crime charged is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2009), because it is a relevant

MONESTIME v. State

41 So. 3d 1110, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12188, 2010 WL 3239158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2010 | Docket: 1238189

Cited 7 times | Published

with the crime charged is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2009), because it is a relevant

McGee v. State

19 So. 3d 1074, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14918, 2009 WL 3189171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 1651797

Cited 7 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because "it is a relevant and inseparable part

Berube v. State

5 So. 3d 734, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1502, 2009 WL 454602

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2009 | Docket: 1663241

Cited 7 times | Published

Defendant. Even if the lower general standard in § 90.402[,] Fla. Stat.[,] were applied, the prior crime

Elysee v. State

920 So. 2d 1205, 2006 WL 348862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2006 | Docket: 1730657

Cited 7 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2003). Our standard of review of

Thomas v. State

885 So. 2d 968, 2004 WL 2452473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2004 | Docket: 1685289

Cited 7 times | Published

crimes because the evidence was admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2003), as relevant evidence

State v. Richman

861 So. 2d 1195, 2003 WL 22899976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2003 | Docket: 1514112

Cited 7 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402. Once it is determined that similar fact evidence

Smith v. Hooligan's Pub & Oyster Bar, Ltd.

753 So. 2d 596, 2000 WL 159019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 1433537

Cited 7 times | Published

inadmissible as "similar fact evidence" pursuant to section 90.402(2)(a). Hooligan's responds that the evidence

Bush v. State

690 So. 2d 670, 1997 WL 131574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1997 | Docket: 437025

Cited 7 times | Published

constitute inseparable crimes, admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes, without need for compliance

Domino's Pizza v. Gibson

668 So. 2d 593, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 150, 1996 WL 73780

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1996 | Docket: 2272886

Cited 7 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1991). Clearly, an employee's blood

Fincke v. Peeples

476 So. 2d 1319, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1985 | Docket: 116351

Cited 7 times | Published

precluded by some specific rule of exclusion"); § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1983). In Piper Aircraft Corporation

Smith v. State

126 So. 3d 1038, 2013 WL 5312085

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2013 | Docket: 60236167

Cited 6 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2006). Evidence of a defendant’s

Johnson v. State

47 So. 3d 941, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17673, 2010 WL 4628532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2010 | Docket: 2400408

Cited 6 times | Published

evidence is admissible unless excluded by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008). Section 90.803(22), Florida

Salas v. State

972 So. 2d 941, 2007 WL 4352749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2007 | Docket: 1650696

Cited 6 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. Relevant evidence is evidence tending

Jean-Marie v. State

947 So. 2d 484, 2006 WL 3302644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2006 | Docket: 1720429

Cited 6 times | Published

entire context out of which these crimes arose. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2005); Griffin v. State, 639 So.2d

Gray v. State

873 So. 2d 374, 2004 WL 625632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 1732930

Cited 6 times | Published

with the crime charged is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2002), because it is a relevant

MBL Life Assur. Corp. v. Suarez

768 So. 2d 1129, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2000 | Docket: 2452135

Cited 6 times | Published

forums for the search of truth."). To this end, section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that "all

Smith v. State

683 So. 2d 577, 1996 WL 648296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1996 | Docket: 276474

Cited 6 times | Published

concerning the other guns were admissible under section 90.402, because the evidence was relevant to prove

Willis v. State

669 So. 2d 1090, 1996 WL 106444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1996 | Docket: 530606

Cited 6 times | Published

"Williams Rule"[4] evidence of other crimes under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1993) and was impermissible

Denmark v. State

646 So. 2d 754, 1994 WL 551527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1405323

Cited 6 times | Published

evidence may be admissible for this purpose under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1991), which provides that

Johnson v. State

595 So. 2d 132, 1992 WL 25819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1992 | Docket: 1709138

Cited 6 times | Published

Williams, 417 So.2d 755 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); section 90.402, Florida Statutes ("All relevant evidence is

State v. Lewis

543 So. 2d 760, 1989 WL 11945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1989 | Docket: 1437747

Cited 6 times | Published

procedural prejudice resulted from the delay. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1985). Consequently, there was no

Kalisz v. State

124 So. 3d 185, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 745, 2013 WL 5642073, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2288

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2013 | Docket: 60235421

Cited 5 times | Published

of autopsy photos when they are relevant. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008); Larkins v. State, 655 So.2d

Harden v. State

87 So. 3d 1243, 2012 WL 1859267, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2012 | Docket: 60307907

Cited 5 times | Published

992 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); see also § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008). However, even if evidence

Thompson v. State

76 So. 3d 1050, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20267, 2011 WL 6342342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2011 | Docket: 401238

Cited 5 times | Published

with the crime charged may be admissible under section 90.402, because such evidence is relevant and constitutes

Thompson v. State

76 So. 3d 1050, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20267, 2011 WL 6342342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2011 | Docket: 401238

Cited 5 times | Published

with the crime charged may be admissible under section 90.402, because such evidence is relevant and constitutes

Special v. Baux

79 So. 3d 755, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090, 2011 WL 5554531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 2412998

Cited 5 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009). “Relevant evidence is [defined

Jomolla v. State

990 So. 2d 1234, 2008 WL 4329928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2008 | Docket: 1688263

Cited 5 times | Published

evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2002); Gore v. State, 719 So.2d 1197

Amend. to Rules of App. Proc., Civ. Proc.

887 So. 2d 1090, 2004 WL 2201732

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2004 | Docket: 1515169

Cited 5 times | Published

fact evidence to be presented at trial under section 90.402(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses

Flores v. State

853 So. 2d 566, 2003 WL 22047694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 1189513

Cited 5 times | Published

with the crime charged "is admissible under section 90.402 because `it is a relevant and inseparable part

Quentin Marcus Truehill v. State of Florida

211 So. 3d 930, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 223, 2017 WL 727167, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 374

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2017 | Docket: 4609129

Cited 4 times | Published

evidence and evidence that was relevant under, section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2010). However, the trial

Petruschke v. State

125 So. 3d 274, 2013 WL 811616, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60235816

Cited 4 times | Published

992 So.2d 380, 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); see also § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2010). However, even if evidence

Geiser v. State

83 So. 3d 834, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19546, 2011 WL 6057949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2011 | Docket: 60306504

Cited 4 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Downs v. State

65 So. 3d 594, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11003, 2011 WL 2694558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2011 | Docket: 2362204

Cited 4 times | Published

must be relevant in order to be admissible. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. [(2009)]. Relevant evidence is defined

Carter v. State

23 So. 3d 1238, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17694, 2009 WL 4060861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2009 | Docket: 1657336

Cited 4 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007). "Relevant evidence is [defined

Shaw v. Jain

914 So. 2d 458, 2005 WL 2662548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2005 | Docket: 1767843

Cited 4 times | Published

401.1, at 120 (2005 ed.) (footnote omitted). Section 90.402 states that "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible

Bulkmatic Transport Co. v. Taylor

860 So. 2d 436, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12741, 2003 WL 22002564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2003 | Docket: 454798

Cited 4 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2000). Section 90.404(1), Florida

Curry v. State

839 So. 2d 887, 2003 WL 1036726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2003 | Docket: 1296257

Cited 4 times | Published

with the crime charged is admissible under Section 90.402, Florida Statutes, because it is a relevant

Padilla v. State

618 So. 2d 165, 1993 WL 83072

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1993 | Docket: 1376292

Cited 4 times | Published

that the evidence was properly admitted under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1989). Penalty Phase Padilla

Story v. State

589 So. 2d 939, 1991 WL 203102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1991 | Docket: 2520629

Cited 4 times | Published

relevant evidence which should have been admitted. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1985), states all relevant

Kelly v. State

552 So. 2d 1140, 1989 WL 122628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1989 | Docket: 1663560

Cited 4 times | Published

properly admitted as "res gestae" evidence under section 90.402, Florida Statutes. We agree with the defendant

Jackson v. State

538 So. 2d 533, 1989 WL 11604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1989 | Docket: 472360

Cited 4 times | Published

effect that all relevant evidence is admissible (§ 90.402, Fla. Stat.); second, relevant evidence that is

Kalb v. International Resorts, Inc.

396 So. 2d 199, 25 A.L.R. 4th 977, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1981 | Docket: 1447271

Cited 4 times | Published

and the trial court improperly excluded them. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1979). Given the sparsity of evidence

Beckman v. State

230 So. 3d 77

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2017 | Docket: 6148142

Cited 3 times | Published

it was “inextricably intertwined” evidence. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2013) (“All relevant evidence is

Metayer v. State

89 So. 3d 1003, 2012 WL 1859142, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2012 | Docket: 60308476

Cited 3 times | Published

992 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); see also § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009). However, even if evidence

Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Ashe

50 So. 3d 645, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17891, 2010 WL 4628915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2010 | Docket: 60297329

Cited 3 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (emphasis added); Gibson v. Metropolitan

Downs v. State

40 So. 3d 49, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9749, 2010 WL 2628646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2010 | Docket: 1219404

Cited 3 times | Published

1959),] rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because `it is a relevant and inseparable part

Parker v. State

20 So. 3d 966, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15557, 2009 WL 3273213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Docket: 1640178

Cited 3 times | Published

unless the law precludes its introduction. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008). Relevant evidence is defined

Estrich v. State

995 So. 2d 613, 2008 WL 4998757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2008 | Docket: 1684332

Cited 3 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007). Evidence is "relevant" if

Kane v. State

975 So. 2d 1277, 2008 WL 723922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2008 | Docket: 1727166

Cited 3 times | Published

Williams rule evidence; it is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes, because "it is a relevant

Coverdale v. State

940 So. 2d 558, 2006 WL 3040291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2006 | Docket: 1157901

Cited 3 times | Published

acts. Thus, the general rule of relevance in section 90.402 controls. See Jorgenson v. State, 714 So.2d

Minus v. State

901 So. 2d 344, 2005 WL 1030127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 1666218

Cited 3 times | Published

is admissible, except *349 as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2001). "Relevant evidence is evidence

Menna v. State

846 So. 2d 502, 2003 WL 1923337

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2003 | Docket: 1301609

Cited 3 times | Published

to prove or disprove a material fact," while section 90.402 states that "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible

Robertson v. State

780 So. 2d 106, 2001 WL 293156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 1708605

Cited 3 times | Published

precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. See § 90.402(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); Heiney v. State, 447

Osborne v. State

743 So. 2d 602, 1999 WL 817832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1999 | Docket: 2583741

Cited 3 times | Published

with the crime charged, is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes, because "it is a relevant

DM v. State

714 So. 2d 1117, 1998 WL 390513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 1513783

Cited 3 times | Published

966, 968 (Fla. 1994). "It is admissible under section 90.402 because `it is a relevant and inseparable part

Chaudoin v. State

707 So. 2d 813, 1998 WL 66569

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1998 | Docket: 1259427

Cited 3 times | Published

absent a showing of abuse of discretion. See § 90.402; Heath v. State, 648 So.2d 660, 664 (Fla.1994)

Pozo v. State

682 So. 2d 1124, 1996 WL 536493

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1996 | Docket: 1276078

Cited 3 times | Published

probative value of this relevant evidence. See § 90.402 & 90.403, Fla.Stat. (1993). On Issue II, in which

Florida Drum Co. v. Thompson

668 So. 2d 192, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 68, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 104, 1996 WL 63080

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1996 | Docket: 1290481

Cited 3 times | Published

such contract provision in the instant case. [2] § 90.402 provides: "All relevant evidence is admissible

Griner v. State

662 So. 2d 758, 1995 WL 675374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1282873

Cited 3 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because "it is a relevant and inseparable part

Payne v. State

541 So. 2d 699, 1989 WL 27641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 140202

Cited 3 times | Published

of a civil suit was irrelevant pursuant to section 90.402, Florida Statutes. The court held that there

Ritter v. Shamas

452 So. 2d 1057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1984 | Docket: 2530111

Cited 3 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402. Second, the evidence the appellant sought to

DESMOND D. SANDERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

254 So. 3d 1038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2018 | Docket: 7905946

Cited 2 times | Published

162 So. 3d 52, 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (citing § 90.402, Fla. Stat.). Evidence is relevant if it tends

KERVEN CHARLES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

223 So. 3d 318, 2017 WL 2983282, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2017 | Docket: 6088825

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla. 1994). Such evidence is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Scott v. State

218 So. 3d 476, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2017 | Docket: 6057953

Cited 2 times | Published

outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2014), provides that “[a]ll

Hilton v. State

117 So. 3d 742, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 486, 2013 WL 1149715

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2013 | Docket: 60232773

Cited 2 times | Published

the general rule of relevancy set forth in section 90.402 governs dissimilar fact evidence. Id.; see

Ritz v. State

101 So. 3d 939, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20888, 2012 WL 6028093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2012 | Docket: 60226492

Cited 2 times | Published

with the crime charged ... is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Ellerbee v. State

87 So. 3d 730, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 142, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 455, 2012 WL 652793

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2012 | Docket: 60308039

Cited 2 times | Published

there has been abuse of discretion); see also § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009) (“All relevant evidence is

State v. Wright

74 So. 3d 503, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15714, 2011 WL 4578536

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2011 | Docket: 2360328

Cited 2 times | Published

apply and the general rule [of relevancy] in section 90.402[[3]] controls." Id. at 837. In Dennis v. State

Bruce v. State

44 So. 3d 1225, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14551, 2010 WL 3808435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 2401861

Cited 2 times | Published

supreme court recognized that relevancy under section 90.402 was not abrogated by the adoption of section

Stephenson v. State

31 So. 3d 847, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2524, 2010 WL 711790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2010 | Docket: 1647718

Cited 2 times | Published

evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2002); Gore v. State, 719 So.2d 1197

Joyner v. State

4 So. 3d 76, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1492, 2009 WL 439298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2009 | Docket: 1218769

Cited 2 times | Published

admissible, unless excluded by a specific rule. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007). Relevant evidence is "evidence

State v. Sercey

825 So. 2d 959, 2002 WL 1307480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2002 | Docket: 1312222

Cited 2 times | Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact." Section 90.402 provides: "All relevant evidence is admissible

Harris v. State

801 So. 2d 321, 2001 WL 1613864

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 1495273

Cited 2 times | Published

with admissible evidence may be allowed under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1993). See Coolen v. State

Ward v. State

765 So. 2d 299, 2000 WL 1205714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2000 | Docket: 428834

Cited 2 times | Published

that weapon. We find no abuse of discretion. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. [9] The Florida Supreme Court recently

Bennett v. State

593 So. 2d 1069, 1992 WL 3679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1992 | Docket: 446441

Cited 2 times | Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact.' Section 90.402 states, `All relevant evidence is admissible

Buchanan v. State

575 So. 2d 704, 1991 WL 15559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1991 | Docket: 1443756

Cited 2 times | Published

trial court erred in excluding the letter. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1987), provides that all

Hall Ex Rel. Hall v. Daee

570 So. 2d 296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1990 | Docket: 1704334

Cited 2 times | Published

is presumptively admissible, Fla.Evidence Code § 90.402, and I see no foundation for the claim that there

Mendez v. State

271 So. 3d 1093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2019 | Docket: 14549571

Cited 1 times | Published

into the category of relevant evidence under section 90.402; therefore, no pretrial notice under section

Mendez v. State

271 So. 3d 1093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2019 | Docket: 14549571

Cited 1 times | Published

into the category of relevant evidence under section 90.402; therefore, no pretrial notice under section

Pickett v. State

254 So. 3d 1162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 64688693

Cited 1 times | Published

Collateral crimes evidence is admissible under section 90.402 of the Florida Statutes if it is a "relevant

Felice John Veach v. State of Florida

254 So. 3d 624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2018 | Docket: 7775010

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2016). “Relevant evidence is inadmissible

Robert Roy Macomber v. State of Florida

254 So. 3d 1098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2018 | Docket: 7774961

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2015). The statutory definition of

Melvin Douglas Hawthorne v. State of Florida

248 So. 3d 1261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7143522

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2016). “Relevant evidence is inadmissible

JOSEPH BALDINO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

225 So. 3d 257, 2017 WL 3085326, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2017 | Docket: 6122338

Cited 1 times | Published

with the crime charged, is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes, because ‘it is a relevant

Hudson v. State

213 So. 3d 941, 2017 WL 1018524, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 60263954

Cited 1 times | Published

with the crime charged” is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2015), because “it is a

Okeechobee Aerie 4137, Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc. v. Wilde

199 So. 3d 333, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11736, 2016 WL 4132105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2016 | Docket: 60256584

Cited 1 times | Published

of the RVA was not relevant to this case. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (allowing only relevant evidence to

Okeechobee Aerie 4137, Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc. v. Wilde

199 So. 3d 333, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11736, 2016 WL 4132105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2016 | Docket: 60256584

Cited 1 times | Published

of the RVA was not relevant to this case. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (allowing only relevant evidence to

Young v. State

122 So. 3d 891, 2013 WL 3811816, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 60234799

Cited 1 times | Published

outweighed by its unfairly prejudicial effect. Under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2007), all relevant evidence

Holmes v. State

91 So. 3d 859, 2012 WL 447284, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2012 | Docket: 60309991

Cited 1 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Leon v. State

68 So. 3d 351, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13236, 2011 WL 3667887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2011 | Docket: 2357232

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008). "Relevant evidence is evidence

Walden v. State

57 So. 3d 248, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3516, 2011 WL 890813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2011 | Docket: 60298977

Cited 1 times | Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Tripoli v. State

50 So. 3d 776, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19854, 2010 WL 5346445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2010 | Docket: 60297351

Cited 1 times | Published

charged under the general rule of relevance. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008); Dorsett, 944 So.2d at 1213;

Hernandez v. Paris Industrial Maintenance

39 So. 3d 466, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9890, 2010 WL 2671799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2010 | Docket: 2398695

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402 Fla. Stat. (2007). Relevant evidence is evidence

Cromartie v. State

1 So. 3d 340, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 486, 2009 WL 160310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2009 | Docket: 60224849

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2005). “Relevant evidence is evidence

Cardona v. State

997 So. 2d 524, 2009 WL 18679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2009 | Docket: 2578434

Cited 1 times | Published

provides that "all relevant evidence is admissible." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007). Section 776.012 authorizes

Kittles v. State

897 So. 2d 517, 2005 WL 475341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2005 | Docket: 1735355

Cited 1 times | Published

analyzed not under section 90.404(2)(a), but under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2002), which states that

Gonzalez-Valdes v. State

834 So. 2d 933, 2003 WL 141591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2003 | Docket: 1329356

Cited 1 times | Published

moved for mistrial which was, again, denied. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes, provides that evidence must

Miller v. State

791 So. 2d 1165, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2001 | Docket: 64807577

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 110 So.2d 654, 662 (Fla.1959); see also § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1999). Section 90.404(2), Florida

TS v. State

682 So. 2d 1202, 1996 WL 656407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1996 | Docket: 1680856

Cited 1 times | Published

missing. This evidence was admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1995), because it was inextricably

Spoerri v. State

561 So. 2d 604, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 959

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 1740326

Cited 1 times | Published

latitude in cross-examining K.G.'s mother. Under Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1989), all relevant evidence

McCray v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2025 | Docket: 71098305

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. “[I]t is reversible error to exclude

Zachary Nathaniel Music v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2024 | Docket: 69435431

Published

charged offenses, the evidence is admitted under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2023), which simply provides

Ted'Qwon McGowan v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2024 | Docket: 69151368

Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact.” Section 90.402, Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ll relevant

Sache Almaguer v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2024 | Docket: 68274292

Published

with the crime charged] is admissible under section 90.402 because ‘it is a relevant and inseparable

L.X.A., a Juvenile v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2024 | Docket: 68886717

Published

the crime charged, is . . . admissible under section 90.402 [of the Florida Statutes] because ‘it is a

Doug Cantrel Heath v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2024 | Docket: 68867372

Published

the general rule of relevancy set forth in section 90.402.” Victorino v. State, 23 So. 3d 87, 98–99 (Fla

Eleazar Neri Aviles v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2024 | Docket: 68290249

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2023). Relevant evidence is defined

BRENDAN SIGISMONDI v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2024 | Docket: 63591352

Published

is admissible, except as provided by law." § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2018). And the "[e]xclusion

Taurean Marquis Washington v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2023 | Docket: 68069486

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. “We review evidentiary rulings by

JOSEPH BLOW vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2023 | Docket: 68034173

Published

admissible unless such evidence is excluded by law, see § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2022), such as when the probative

THE STATE OF FLORIDA v. MICHAEL CLAYTON WOODRUFF

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63654630

Published

rather is admissible as relevant evidence under section 90.402, Florida. Statutes. See Dorsett v. State,

HEALTHCARE UNDERWRITERS GROUP, INC., AMARNATH VEDERE, M.D. and CARDIOLOGY PARTNERS, P.L. v. DEBORAH SANFORD, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF GERALD L. SANFORD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2022 | Docket: 63198516

Published

must be relevant in order to be admissible. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2020); § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2020)

MICHAEL D. JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2021 | Docket: 59936582

Published

unless precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2019). Even if evidence is relevant

MICHAEL D. JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2021 | Docket: 59936582

Published

unless precluded by a specific rule of exclusion. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2019). Even if evidence is relevant

MARLON TERRANCE MURPHY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2021 | Docket: 59882185

Published

794.022(2), Fla. Stat.; § 90.404, Fla. Stat.; § 90.402, Fla. Stat.; § 90.610, Fla. Stat. The lower

JOSE REYNA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2020 | Docket: 17479791

Published

strikingly similar to that of the previously enacted section 90.402(2)(b)1., which applies in “child molestation”

JACKSON PRIDEMORE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2020 | Docket: 17415844

Published

the Supreme Court narrowed the broad sweep of section 90.402(2)(b)1. by reading the statute in conjunction

GUSTAVO ENAMORADO DUBON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2020 | Docket: 17089289

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017). In a criminal case, “[i]f

LENSKY JEANBART v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2020 | Docket: 17033714

Published

McClain, 525 So. 2d 420, 421 (Fla. 1988); see also § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2019). “Relevant evidence is evidence

Joseph Edward Jordan v. State of Florida & Joseph Edward Jordan v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2019 | Docket: 68539974

Published

general rules that relevant evidence is admissible, § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2019), and that evidence is relevant

TREMAINE BEARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2019 | Docket: 16211759

Published

be relevant in order to be admissible. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. [(2017)]. Relevant evidence is

Williams v. State

272 So. 3d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 64714693

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing: "All relevant evidence is admissible

Williams v. State

272 So. 3d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 64714694

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing: "All relevant evidence is admissible

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

258 So. 3d 1254

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2018 | Docket: 8347876

Published

fact evidence to be presented at trial under section 90.402(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses

John William Campbell v. State of Florida & SC18-260 John William Campbell v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

271 So. 3d 914

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2018 | Docket: 8342339

Published

66 So.3d 912 , 917 (Fla. 2011). Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2018), provides: "All relevant

MICHAEL PERRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

256 So. 3d 888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2018 | Docket: 7935063

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017). Perry’s failure to bring

Felice John Veach v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 7386601

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2016). “Relevant evidence is inadmissible

MARCUS STRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

254 So. 3d 428

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2018 | Docket: 7225323

Published

testimony may be irrelevant and thus inadmissible. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat.

JOSEPH PIERRE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

246 So. 3d 545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2018 | Docket: 6716312

Published

admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2007). “Relevant evidence is

VINCENT CLARENCE NEWTON, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

237 So. 3d 386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2018 | Docket: 6280930

Published

except as provided by law.’” Id. at 753 (quoting § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2006)). In any criminal prosecution

Vahtiece Alfonzo Kirkman v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2018 | Docket: 6259324

Published

- 22 - general rule of relevancy in section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2015). Id. This Court has

Sewell v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.

245 So. 3d 822

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2017 | Docket: 6248129

Published

tending to prove or disprove a material fact.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017). Therefore, while Sewell

Barry Trynell Davis, Jr. v. State of Florida

217 So. 3d 1006, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 558, 2017 WL 1954979, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1055

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2017 | Docket: 6060826

Published

objection, which the court overruled. See id. § 90.402. Mr. Elmore continued questioning Steward:

Portillo v. State

211 So. 3d 1135, 2017 WL 697729, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608343

Published

Portillo’s objection was not to relevance under section 90.402, but instead based on the prohibition under

Boyle v. JA Cummings, Inc.

212 So. 3d 1060, 2017 WL 629420, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2017 | Docket: 60262729

Published

Law that cases be decided on their merits. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (“All relevant evidence is admissible

Bowles v. State

198 So. 3d 1055, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12458, 2016 WL 4381840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2016 | Docket: 60256390

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2014). “Relevant evidence is inadmissible

Raul Eduardo Banegas-Membran v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 865, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 235, 2016 WL 72547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026026

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2014). “Relevant evidence is inadmissible

John Lee Taylor v. Seketa Culver

178 So. 3d 550, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17925, 2015 WL 7731432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2015 | Docket: 3017316

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2014). While relevant evidence may

Cotton v. State

176 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12718, 2015 WL 5023063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2015 | Docket: 2687686

Published

relevant to a material issue as required by section 90.402, and is also subject to the balancing test

Carlos Roman v. State of Florida

165 So. 3d 723, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623, 2015 WL 2393275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2015 | Docket: 2679336

Published

admissible, unless provided by law.” Id. § 90.402. “[Wlhere evidence tends in any way, even indirectly

Stewart v. State

147 So. 3d 119, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089, 2014 WL 4114339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2014 | Docket: 60243117

Published

and collateral offenses had been abrogated by section 90.402(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). The evidence

Oscar E. Castanon v. State

162 So. 3d 52, 2014 WL 3730458, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2014 | Docket: 3210

Published

for the admissibility of evidence is relevance. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2012). Relevant evidence is defined

Spipniewski v. State

134 So. 3d 563, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3974, 2014 WL 1047119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60239287

Published

crimes evidence was properly admitted under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2012), because it was relevant

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

123 So. 3d 1128, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 697, 2013 WL 5476883, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2139

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2013 | Docket: 60234859

Published

fact evidence to be presented at trial under section 90.402(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses

Grace v. State

122 So. 3d 417, 2013 WL 4727479, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60234682

Published

admitted this evidence as relevant evidence under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (2012), to show consciousness

Rolle v. State

93 So. 3d 1230, 2012 WL 3237729, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13345

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2012 | Docket: 60310500

Published

with the crime charged ... is admissible under section 90.402 because ‘it is a relevant and inseparable part

Smith v. State

88 So. 3d 412, 2012 WL 1697034, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 60308282

Published

from the crime charged is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Strohm v. State

84 So. 3d 1181, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5173, 2012 WL 1108406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2012 | Docket: 60306618

Published

with the crime charged ... is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Nshaka v. State

92 So. 3d 843, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4470, 2012 WL 932684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 60310354

Published

order to be admissible, evidence must be relevant. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2011). Relevant evidence is generally

T.J. v. State

57 So. 3d 975, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5369, 2011 WL 1135549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 60299224

Published

fact evidence to be presented at trial under section 90.402(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses

THERMIDOR v. State

55 So. 3d 741, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2011 WL 890854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2011 | Docket: 2407273

Published

intent to offer Williams[1] rule evidence under section 90.402, Florida Statutes. A hearing was held and the

Aguiluz v. State

43 So. 3d 800, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12187, 2010 WL 3239143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2010 | Docket: 60295482

Published

evidence introduced in this case is section 90.402. Section 90.402 provides that “[a]ll relevant evidence

Special v. Baux

52 So. 3d 682, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9114, 2010 WL 2523942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 60297836

Published

Along with his related corporate entities. . § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009) ("All relevant evidence is

Wolfe v. State

34 So. 3d 227, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6559, 2010 WL 1881095

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2010 | Docket: 1642086

Published

governed by the general rule of relevancy in section 90.402, Florida Statutes, which states that generally

Oyibo v. State

980 So. 2d 601, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6942, 2008 WL 1930042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2008 | Docket: 64854702

Published

contextual aspect of the act that is at issue. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2003); Hunter v. State, 660 So.2d

Da Silva v. State

966 So. 2d 1013, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16332, 2007 WL 3005979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2007 | Docket: 64852729

Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because ‘it is a relevant and inseparable part

Grzelka v. State

881 So. 2d 633, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11659, 2004 WL 1749498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2004 | Docket: 64832436

Published

evidence is admissible unless excluded by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2003). Relevant evidence is that

Mills v. State

816 So. 2d 170, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5703, 2002 WL 800922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2002 | Docket: 64815044

Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 [Florida Statutes] because ‘it is a relevant

Canion v. State

793 So. 2d 80, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11095, 2001 WL 883279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2001 | Docket: 64807947

Published

Williams rule evidence. It is admissible under section 90.402 because “it is a relevant and inseparable part

Amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Procedure

783 So. 2d 138, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 924, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2041, 2000 WL 1587805

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2000 | Docket: 64804956

Published

fact evidence to be presented at trial under section 90.402(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses

State v. Mosley

760 So. 2d 1129, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8498, 2000 WL 902274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 64798170

Published

the testimony is not inadmissible pursuant to section 90.402 or section 90.403. Mosley’s former testimony

Mitchell v. State

743 So. 2d 1171, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13960, 1999 WL 960858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1999 | Docket: 64791912

Published

crime charged and thus is admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1997). Griffin v. State

Washington v. State

737 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1999 | Docket: 64789652

Published

law, “[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible.” § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (1997). Whether Washington was the

D.M. v. State

714 So. 2d 1117, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781960

Published

966, 968 (Fla.1994). “It is admissible under section 90.402 because ‘it is a relevant and inseparable part

T.S. v. State

682 So. 2d 1202, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1996 | Docket: 64769018

Published

missing. This evidence was admissible under section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1995), because it was inextricably

Mauro v. Deer Park Spring Water, Inc.

667 So. 2d 416, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 64761987

Published

issue is relevant to the cause of the accident. § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1995); see Brackin v. Boles, 452 So

Wilson v. State

666 So. 2d 979, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 141, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1996 | Docket: 64761708

Published

interest in testifying against Wilson at trial. § 90.402, Fla.Stat.; Johnson v. State, 608 So.2d 4, 10

Robert LARKINS v. STATE

655 So. 2d 95, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 228, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 730

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1995 | Docket: 64756440

Published

Thompson v. State, 565 So.2d 1311, 1314 (Fla.1990); § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1993). We have upheld the admission

Simmons v. State

635 So. 2d 161, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3929, 1994 WL 157128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 64747711

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1991); State v. Wadsworth, 210 So.2d 4 (Fla. 1968); State

Bogren v. State

611 So. 2d 547, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12629, 1992 WL 371558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1992 | Docket: 64693231

Published

exclusion of this testimony. Bogren relies upon section 90.-402, Florida Statutes (1989), which provides that

Cass v. Cass

560 So. 2d 1326, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3034, 1990 WL 54988

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1990 | Docket: 64650359

Published

evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1987). Evidence which has “a tendency

Hall ex rel. Hall v. Daee

570 So. 2d 296, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605, 1990 WL 45526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1990 | Docket: 64654649

Published

is presumptively admissible, Fla.Evidence Code § 90.402, and I see no foundation for the claim that there

Kelly v. State

552 So. 2d 1140, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1989 | Docket: 64646591

Published

properly admitted as “res gestae” evidence under section 90.402, Florida Statutes. We agree with the defendant

Hester v. State

546 So. 2d 1164, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4304, 1989 WL 85247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1989 | Docket: 64643945

Published

Baisden v. State, 203 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1987). Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and

Zuppardo v. O'Hare

487 So. 2d 39, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 660, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1986 | Docket: 64618760

Published

exclusion. McCrae v. State, 395 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1981); § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1983). No applicable rule of exclusion

Fann v. State

453 So. 2d 230, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 64606065

Published

alleged to contain contraband were relevant under Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1983), and admissible. Asmer

Scatigno v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

425 So. 2d 217, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1983 | Docket: 64594678

Published

have changed the result provided by the jury. See § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1981). The final judgment below is

State v. Joseph

419 So. 2d 391, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1982 | Docket: 64592076

Published

v. State, 418 So.2d 1223, (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1981). The bag, which contained cocaine

Bystrom v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

416 So. 2d 1133, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 64591251

Published

admissible un*1140less otherwise prohibited by law. Section 90.402, Florida Statutes (1977). We do not find that