Cases from cite.case.law:

J. COOKS, v. STATE, 249 So. 3d 774 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . (Crim.) 20.19; Pizzo , 945 So.2d at 1207. . . .

RAMOS, Ed v. TELGIAN CORPORATION, 176 F. Supp. 3d 181 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . workweeks in a year),” such that his “overtime compensation rate [would] be based off an hourly rate of $20.19 . . . Plaintiffs contend that this hourly rate — $20.19 when he started and $24.03 immediately before his departure . . .

In B. Y. G. M. A, 176 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 20.19, Fla. Stat. (2013) (“There is created a Department of Children and Families ... . . .

GRAHAM, v. STATE, 169 So. 3d 123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See §§ 20.19(l)(a), 39.001(l)(b)(l), 39.4085, and 39.521(l)(b)3., Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . .

BLANCA TELEPHONE COMPANY, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 743 F.3d 860 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 20.19(d)(2) (2006). By the time the deadline arrived, however, few providers had complied. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013)

. . . of Material Involving Child Sexual Conduct); 19.3-19.6 (Unlawful Compensation to/by Public Servant); 20.19 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, 123 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. 2013)

. . . (amending § 20.19, Fla. Stat.); eh.2013-21, § 3, Laws of Fla. (creating § 39.522(3), Fla. . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD., 946 F. Supp. 2d 582 (N.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . the turbines would “disconnect if the grid voltage at the turbine dropped below 5%” because Parameter 20.19 . . . Yet Parameter 20.19 is based on a measurement of voltage on the generator side of-the padmount transformer . . . If not, Parameter 20.19 would be thousands of volts higher. . . . certification test applying a severe fault on the high side of the padmount transformer, Parameter 20.19 . . . GE argues that Larsen did not disclose these prior uses because the software, “Parameter 20.19”, was . . .

FHR TB, LLC, v. TB ISLE RESORT, LP., 865 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . practical respects the hotel manager because all notices under the HMA are to go to FHRUSI (Section 20.19 . . .

ING BANK, v. TZE- HUEY WAH,, 769 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (W.D. Wash. 2011)

. . . Prac., Real Estate § 20.19 (2d ed.2010), the Court enters a decree of foreclosure ordering that (a) the . . .

K. HICKS, v. CONCORDE CAREER COLLEGE,, 695 F. Supp. 2d 779 (W.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . As a senior representative, Harrison’s starting salary was $20.19/hour or $42,000/year. . . . Based upon her verifiable experience, Nelson’s starting salary was set at $20.19/hour or $42,000/year . . . Similarly, Nelson was hired as a senior representative at $20.19/hour or $42,000/ year. . . . According to the record, Harrison was paid a starting salary of $42,000 or $20.19/hour when he was first . . .

CONNECTICUT, v. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC. v., 582 F.3d 309 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . Gans, The American Law of Torts § 20.19 (Thomson West 2003) (“We deem it necessary to explain that a . . .

FIRST TENNESSEE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. JOHANNS, U. S. a k a, 618 F. Supp. 2d 778 (M.D. Tenn. 2008)

. . . $1,933,028, liabilities in the amount of $1,464,373, and tangible balance sheet equity of $528,655 (20.19% . . .

CORAL IMAGING SERVICES, a o a v. GEICO INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 955 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 11.062(2)(a); § 11.066(4); § 11.70(3)(d); § 14.29(3)(b), (12); § 20.04(7)(a); § 20.19(6)(f); § 20.23 . . .

L. WASHINGTON, Sr. E. L. L. Jr. D. L. E. L. L. Jr. D. v. BAUER,, 149 F. App'x 867 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 20.19, which changes the nature of its available § 1983 defenses as explained herein. . . .

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS O. v. EARLE,, 388 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 2004)

. . . P. art. 20.19-22. . . .

CRANDELL v. CAIN,, 421 F. Supp. 2d 928 (W.D. La. 2004)

. . . It then stayed around 20% in 1980 (18.87%) and 1990 (20.19%). Exhibits 1 and 2; Doc. 42, pg. 3. . . .

L. BRUMLEY, v. UNITED STATES, 55 Fed. Cl. 431 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . . § 20.19. . . .

ANDERSON, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES C. A., 248 F. Supp. 2d 584 (S.D. Miss. 2003)

. . . Resident Defendant, Elizabeth Nichols, represented to the Plaintiff that if she paid a monthly premium of $20.19 . . .

B. D. E. F. E. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES T. M., 829 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Health and Rehabilitative Services (predecessor of the Department of Children and Family Services, see § 20.19 . . .

SMITH, v. COBB COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS v. Of v. A. L., 314 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (N.D. Ga. 2002)

. . . Four has a deviation of -6.11%, Post Five has a deviation of -18.13%, Post Six has a deviation of -20.19% . . .

v. U. S., 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1226 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)

. . . Plaintiffs’ Comments at 20.19 U.S.C. § 2331, which sets forth the eligibility requirements for NAFTA . . .

In CROWN BOOKS CORPORATION,, 269 B.R. 12 (Bankr. D. Del. 2001)

. . . The PADC lease provides at Article 20.19 that: In the event either party hereto brings or commences legal . . .

In FELIPE, 229 B.R. 489 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . The contract rates were 20.19% and 21.00% respectively. . . . charged by these secured creditors over the past three to four months and used the contract rates of 20.19% . . .

In FACTOR VIII OR IX CONCENTRATE BLOOD PRODUCTS LITIGATION, 25 F. Supp. 2d 837 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . See Rotunda & Nowak 4 Ronald Rotunda & John Nowak, Treatise on Constitutional Law § 20.19 (noting that . . .

In OGLESBY, Jr. SSN XXX- XX- XXXX SSN XXX- XX- XXXX JONES, SSN XXX- XX- XXXX f k a SSN XXX- XX- XXXX, 221 B.R. 515 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1998)

. . . interest for similar loans in the region, which, according to the testimony at the hearing, would be 20.19% . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, v. BRUNNER,, 707 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .; see also § 20.19(4)(b)4., Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

DOE, Mr. DOE Sr. No. s A A v. CHILES, A., 136 F.3d 709 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 20.19, 20.43 (West Supp. 1998). . . . .

PROCACCI COMMERCIAL REALTY, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, BDC, 690 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . As recently amended, section 20.19, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), redesignates the Department of Health . . .

Co. L. P. LTV Co. U. S. A USX WCI v. B. V N. V. W. U. S. A., 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1126 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . Commerce used this percentage to establish an overall dumping margin of 20.19 percent. . . .

NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION, L. P. LTV U. S. A USX WCI v. UNITED STATES, B. V. N. V. W. U. S. A., 870 F. Supp. 1130 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . Commerce used this percentage to establish an overall dumping margin of 20.19 percent. . . .

S. JOHNSON v. DILLARD DEPT. STORES, INC., 836 F. Supp. 390 (N.D. Tex. 1993)

. . . ANSWER: The Medicine Shoppe $ 329.00 Eekerd Drug $ 20.19 Harris Methodist Hospital $ 464.74 Mr. . . .

STATE Of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, v. BROOKE In In In W. C. J. a k a W. C. J. a J. S. B. a P. H. a A. G. a R. H. a J. R. a O. W. a J. R. a O. W. a, 573 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See sections 216.292(2) and 20.19(9)(b), Fla. Stat. . . . See section 20.19(9)(a) and (b). . . . Section 20.19(9) is a corollary to sections 216.023 and 216.031 which place responsibility for making . . . official in the executive branch of the government who serves at the pleasure of the Governor, see section 20.19 . . .

ZINERMON v. BURCH, 494 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1990)

. . . See § 20.19(6)(b)2 (creating statewide Human Rights Advocacy Committee of eight citizens, charged with . . .

SOUTH FLORIDA BLOOD SERVICE, INC. v. RASMUSSEN,, 467 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See, e.g., § 20.19(l)(g), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . See, e.g., § 20.19(l)(g), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . .

M. TURRO, M. D. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NEW PORT RICHEY, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 458 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 20.19(4)(a), Florida Statutes. . . .

In HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY COMMITTEE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES FOR DISTRICT VIII, v. LEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 457 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Appellant, the district VIII human rights advocacy committee, is an entity created under section 20.19 . . . Although this is a case of first impression, we believe that the statutory language of section 20.19( . . . field of operation described in section 20.-19(7)(g)l bolstered by the language set forth in section 20.19 . . . Section 20.19(7)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982), mandates the creation of at least one district human . . . Id., § 20.19(4)(a). . § 20.19(7)(g)2, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1982). . . . .

DOCTORS OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 459 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See Section 20.19(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983). . See, Osteopathic Medical Hospital, Inc. v. . . .

J. B. SMITH, v. HIGHTOWER, B. G. L., 693 F.2d 359 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . Ann. arts. 20.09-, 10, 20.19, 20.21. . . . .

B. SHINHOLSTER, v. GRAHAM,, 527 F. Supp. 1318 (N.D. Fla. 1981)

. . . of the report, notify the appropriate human rights advocacy committee, as established pursuant to s. 20.19 . . . defendants concede that the Statewide and District Human Rights Advocacy Committees established in Section 20.19 . . .

A. ATHANSON, v. J. MESKILL,, 523 F. Supp. 392 (D. Conn. 1981)

. . . The plaintiffs also claim that the assessed value of tax-exempt property in Connecticut is 20.19%, while . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. WHELAN, 456 F. Supp. 744 (D.N.J. 1978)

. . . Sentence Time Served Percent Basis for Release Served 774-71 360 mos. 72.690 mos. 20.19% In custody 6 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, a v. A. CALIFANO, Jr. HEW, 449 F. Supp. 274 (N.D. Fla. 1978)

. . . Chapter 75-48, Laws of Florida 1975, Florida Statutes § 20.19. . . .

CASTANEDA, SHERIFF v. PARTIDA, 430 U.S. 482 (U.S. 1977)

. . . Proc., Art. 20.19 (1966). . . .

In J. N. a S. H. a, 279 So. 2d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . See Sec. 20.19, F.S.1971, F.S.A. . . .

NORWALK CORE, a k a v. NORWALK BOARD OF EDUCATION, a k a, 298 F. Supp. 213 (D. Conn. 1969)

. . . 46.5 24.5 27.95 36.16 3S.78 32.97 Cranbury .6 6.4 7.16 5.80 9.59 17.56 Fitch 12.8 13.1 12.80 18.11 20.19 . . .

C. T. DAY, v. E. WALKER, Jr. J. G. W. a M. a a, 206 F. Supp. 32 (W.D.N.C. 1962)

. . . warehouse was blocked more often and for longer periods than any other warehouse, Day succeeded in selling 20.19% . . .

ASHEVILLE TOBACCO BOARD OF TRADE, INC. a v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 294 F.2d 619 (4th Cir. 1961)

. . . The operator that ranked second (Day) with 20.19% in 1954, now ranks first with 27.78%, and so forth. . . .

ASHEVILLE TOBACCO BOARD OF TRADE, INC. a v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 263 F.2d 502 (4th Cir. 1959)

. . . warehouse was blocked more often and for longer periods than any other warehouse, he succeeded in selling 20.19% . . .

A. PHELAN, v. MIDDLE STATES OIL CORPORATION KRAUSHAAR D. W. D. v. GLASS P. Jr. P., 220 F.2d 593 (2d Cir. 1955)

. . . 15 18.60 Skelly Oil Co..................... 5.28 28 18.86 Superior Oil Corp................ 1.06 5% 20.19 . . .

COMMONWEALTH SOUTHERN CORPORATION v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 134 F.2d 747 (3d Cir. 1943)

. . . cost of the property of the system as reflected on its books and that the preferred stock equalled 20.19% . . .

v. J. W., 133 Fla. 722 (Fla. 1938)

. . . 1926 23.63 No. 2263-A . 1927 26.75 No. 9234-A . 1928 28.30 No. 12319-A 1929 33.15 No. 2157-B . 1930 20.19 . . .

GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. WEEKS, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER,, 297 U.S. 135 (U.S. 1936)

. . . Miles of all track (as of December 31, 1931) — 20.19%. 2. . . .

MASON v. UNITED STATES, 162 F. 23 (4th Cir. 1908)

. . . St. 1901, p. 20.19), with haying negligently and designedly permitted a violation of the law by another . . .

DAVIS v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO., 7 F. Cas. 150 (C.C.E.D. Va. 1879)

. . . rendered a verdict for $1,-015.47, with interest thereon from April 17th, 1865, the principal being for $20.19 . . .