Cases from cite.case.law:

RIVERA, v. STATE, 274 So. 3d 537 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .

GOMILLION, DOC v. STATE, 267 So. 3d 502 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 90.608(4), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; Edwards v. . . .

LOWE, v. STATE, 259 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2018)

. . . "To impeach a witness by use of a prior inconsistent statement pursuant to section 90.608, Florida Statutes . . . that the statements in the affidavit "were not 'statements of the witness' as contemplated by section 90.608 . . . Court in a postconviction case theorized that the defendant there could have introduced, under section 90.608 . . .

MACOMBER, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes, provides that Appellant can "attack the credibility of a witness" by . . . a witness by pointing out lack of competency is not collateral and may be used for impeachment); § 90.608 . . . Under section 90.608, a party may attack the credibility of a witness by "[s]howing a defect of capacity . . .

GEORGE, v. STATE, 251 So. 3d 262 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2016), provides that "[a]ny party, including the party calling the . . .

KLAUS, v. STATE, 236 So. 3d 483 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2010), states that any party "may attack the credibility of a witness . . .

PITTS, v. STATE, 227 So. 3d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . testimony was admissible because it directly contradicted the former girlfriend’s testimony. ’See § 90.608 . . .

SEXTON, v. STATE, 221 So. 3d 547 (Fla. 2017)

. . . State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 (Fla. 1990); see §§ 90.608-610, Fla. Stat. (2012). In Cruse v. . . . did] not fall under any of the express ways allowed to attack a witness’s credibility” under section 90.608 . . .

BYRD, v. STATE, 221 So. 3d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . Our reading of section 90.608 leads us to conclude that the impeachment evidence in this case does not . . . Clause, the introduction of the statement to impeach the aunt was nonetheless improper under section 90.608 . . .

WORLEY, v. CENTRAL FLORIDA YOUNG MEN S CHRISTIAN ASS N, INC., 228 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2017)

. . . And section 90.608, Florida Statutes, provides that “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness . . . See majority op. at 23 (citing § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat., and Steinger, 103 So.3d at 203). . . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

J. G. a v. STATE, 213 So. 3d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . ’s prior inconsistent statement be reduced to writing in order to impeach the witness under section 90.608 . . .

FAJARDO, v. STATE, 193 So. 3d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . State, 59 So.3d 1092, 1099 (Fla.2011)); see also § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .

MUSSON, v. STATE, 184 So. 3d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .

BANEGAS- MEMBRAN, v. STATE, 182 So. 3d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . “Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes, permits cross-examination to ‘attack the credibility of a witness . . .

VAZQUEZ, v. MARTINEZ,, 175 So. 3d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 90.608(2),, Fla. . . .

A. HERNANDEZ, JR. v. STATE A. Jr. v. L., 180 So. 3d 978 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Further, such matters are not' the proper subject for impeachment ■ under section 90.608, Florida Statutes . . . Section 90.608(3) allows impeachment of the character of the witness by evidence of character relating . . .

FARRELL, v. STATE, 186 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Under section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2013), parties can impeach a witness by: “1) introducing statements . . .

BEARDEN, v. STATE, 161 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. 2015)

. . . impeached in Florida by “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness,” pursuant to section 90.608 . . . Under section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes, “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness, may . . .

PHELPS, v. STATE, 154 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . witness” pursuant to section 90.615(1), Florida Statutes, in light of the 1990 amendment to section 90.608 . . . Appellant argues that the court witness rule is no longer necessary or appropriate based upon section 90.608 . . .

S. KOO, v. STATE, 149 So. 3d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 90.608(1), Fla. . . .

BROWN, v. MITTELMAN,, 152 So. 3d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

WILCOX, v. STATE, 143 So. 3d 359 (Fla. 2014)

. . . To impeach a witness by use of a prior inconsistent statement pursuant to section 90.608, Florida Statutes . . . Detective Hardy’s arrest affidavit were not “statements of the witness” as contemplated by section 90.608 . . .

PIERCE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 137 So. 3d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2001); Marshall v. . . . See § 90.608(1); see also Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 608.4 (2013 ed.) . . .

J. CARLISLE, v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Carlisle further contends the evidence was admissible under sections 90.404(2) and 90.608(2), Florida . . . Section 90.608(2) (Impeachment by Showing the Witness is Biased) Pantoja addressed the admissibility . . . of the false accusations under 90.608(2), which allows impeachment by “ ‘[sjhowing that the witness is . . . biased.’ ” Id. at 1097 (quoting § 90.608(2), Fla. . . . Applying the Court’s discussion of section 90.608(2) to the instant case, we must conclude the trial . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that a witness’s credibility may be attacked by . . .

CHILDERS, v. L. FLOYD,, 736 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . The court then observed that the Florida Rules of Evidence, specifically Rule 90.608, gave Childers the . . . Florida Evidence Rule 90.608 provides that: "[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness, may . . . Stat. § 90.608. . . . .

L. IVY, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 543 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 90.608, a trial court should allow a defendant to impeach the credibility of a state -witness. . . .

WARE, v. STATE, 124 So. 3d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2012), states that any party may attack the credibility of a witness . . .

D. MARDIS, v. STATE, 122 So. 3d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2009), allows a party to attack the credibility of a witness by . . .

GOSCIMINSKI, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)

. . . While bias is a permissible basis for attacking a witness’s credibility under section 90.608(2), Florida . . .

PACK, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 119 So. 3d 1284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Under Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2009), any party may impeach a witness’s credibility by showing . . . Letter of Protection Any party may attack the credibility of a witness by exposing a potential bias. § 90.608 . . .

MARTINEZ, v. STATE, 125 So. 3d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

MASSEY, v. STATE, 109 So. 3d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . .” § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

W. BLEICH, v. STATE, 108 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that a party may impeach a witness by introducing . . .

HARRELL, v. STATE, 108 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . this limited record that the testimony would be non-hearsay and admissible to show bias under section 90.608 . . .

HENRY, v. STATE, 123 So. 3d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . surrounding the plea bargain in the victim’s pending case were admissible to show bias under section 90.608 . . .

E. BECKER, v. STATE, 110 So. 3d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . .” § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

CARNIVAL CORPORATION, a v. JIMENEZ,, 112 So. 3d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2011); Steinger, Iscoe & Greene, P.A. v. GEICO Gen. Ins. . . .

ALEXANDER, Jr. v. STATE, 103 So. 3d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . State, 25 So.3d 656, 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (emphasis original) (quoting § 90.608(5), Fla. . . .

STEINGER, ISCOE GREENE, P. A. v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 103 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

LOUIS, Jr. v. STATE, 104 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes (2008), allows for the admission of prior inconsistent statements . . .

STATE v. JOUZDANI, v., 98 So. 3d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes, (2008), lists the grounds for impeaching a witness. . . .

ELMER, v. STATE, 114 So. 3d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . State, 688 So.2d 383, 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); see also § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . prior inconsistent statement to be reduced to writing in order to impeach the witness under section 90.608 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2009), allows a party to attack the credibility of a witness by . . .

FAUST, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, permits the impeachment of a witness through the introduction of . . .

M. WOODS, v. STATE, 92 So. 3d 890 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

MAHARAJ, v. STATE, 78 So. 3d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2009), provides that “[a]ny party ... may attack the credibility . . .

AGATHEAS, v. STATE, 77 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 2011)

. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2006), specifies the permissible methods of impeachment, including . . .

SPECIAL, v. BAUX, M. D. M. D. P. A. P. L., 79 So. 3d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Under subsection 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2009), any party “may attack the credibility of a witness . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 72 So. 3d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added). . . .

HARRIS v. E. D. GRUNOW, Jr. O. R., 71 So. 3d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 90.608 allowed counsel for the Harrises to impeach without a showing that the witness was adverse . . .

MARSHALL, v. STATE, 68 So. 3d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . State, 472 So.2d 1350, 1352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (citing § 90.608(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983)). . . .

CITY OF ORLANDO, v. PINEIRO,, 66 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The City asserted that, pursuant to section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2009), evidence of these prior . . . Section 90.608 provides in pertinent part: Any party, including the party calling the witness, may attack . . . specifically provides that nothing in section 90.610 affects the admissibility of evidence under section 90.608 . . .

FERERE, v. SHURE, M. D. A. D. O. A. M. D. P. A. d b a, 65 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“Any party ... may attack the credibility of a witness by ... . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 65 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . not know who shot him; that statement was admissible as a prior inconsistent statement under section 90.608 . . . The Supreme Court described the operation of a section 90.608(1) prior inconsistent statement in Pearce . . . his trial testimony that Rodriguez shot him, so it was “inconsistent” within the meaning of section 90.608 . . .

B. M. a v. STATE, 66 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Diaz v. State, 597 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). . . . State, 680 So.2d 567, 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); see also § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .

CHILDERS, v. L. FLOYD,, 642 F.3d 953 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . He also argued that barring this cross-examination violated Florida Evidence Rule 90.608(2), which allows . . .

BEARDEN, v. STATE, 62 So. 3d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .; see also § 90.608, Fla. . . . But even though section 90.608 permits a party to impeach its own witness, “it is still improper under . . .

PANTOJA, v. STATE, 59 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 2011)

. . . admissible. (3) Nothing in this section affects the admissibility of evidence under s. 90.404 or s. 90.608 . . . In so holding, we have explained, “Allowing this testimony would violate sections 90.608, 90.609, and . . . Pantoja further argues that the victim’s prior false accusation is admissible under section 90.608(2) . . . Evidence that is relevant to a witness’ bias is admissible under section 90.608(2). . . . ways of showing the witness’ bias, and, thus, are also proper grounds for impeachment under section 90.608 . . . In a particular case, however, the evidence might be admissible under section 90.608(2) to show the witness . . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that “the credibility of a witness” may be attacked . . .

STATE v. E. SMITH,, 52 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

J. TRIPOLI, v. STATE, 50 So. 3d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . properly argued this ground before the trial court, Gooch’s testimony would be inadmissible under section 90.608 . . . “Section 90.608(5) provides that any party may attack the credibility of a witness by contradictory testimony . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 52 So. 3d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Nor was the officer’s statement admissible to impeach the witness under sections 90.608 and 90.614(2) . . .

HOLLEY, v. STATE, 48 So. 3d 916 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 90.608(2),. Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

ROOSEVELT, v. STATE, 42 So. 3d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . See § 90.608, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . Tanzi, on the other hand, was decided under section 90.608, Florida Statutes, which was the section involved . . . See §§ 90.608, 609, 610, Fla. Stat. (2007). See also Fernandez v. . . .

PULCINI, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . In addition, section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny party, including the party calling . . .

SPECIAL, v. BAUX, M. D. M. D. P. A. P. L., 52 So. 3d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See also § 90.608(5), Fla. . . . . § 90.608(5), Fla. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. STATE, 37 So. 3d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

CHILDERS, v. L. FLOYD,, 608 F.3d 776 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 90.608, and Florida case law. . . . Stat. § 90.608 ("Any party ... may attack the credibility of a witness by ... . . . State, 661 So.2d 288, 291 (Fla.1995); and that " 'Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes, as well as the . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 31 So. 3d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness . . .

C. TUMBLIN, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. 2010)

. . . relevant evidence that prior drug use affects the witness’s ability to observe, remember, and recount); § 90.608 . . .

RUFF, v. STATE, 31 So. 3d 833 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness . . .

JEANCHARLES, v. STATE, 25 So. 3d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added). . . .

PETERSON, v. STATE, 24 So. 3d 686 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 25 So. 3d 518 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Under section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2007), any party may attack the credibility of a witness by . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GERMAN,, 12 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

B. GAEDTKE, v. A. McNEIL,, 612 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Evid.Code § 90.608(1). . . .

SALEEBY, v. ROCKY ELSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2006), expressly authorizes the introduction of evidence to attack . . . Here, section 768.041(3) should not be applied in derogation of section 90.608(2). . . . the situation in which a choice was required between applying section 768.041(3) and applying section 90.608 . . .

OCASIO, v. STATE, 994 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes, permits “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness,” to . . . introducing statements of the witness which are ineonsis-tent with the witness’s present testimony.” § 90.608 . . . appellant claims that the attorney’s testimony would have been evidence of bias, admissible under section 90.608 . . .

HUNTER, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 256 (Fla. 2008)

. . . See § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

PANTOJA, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 626 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . (holding that a trial court properly refused to allow impeachment by a means not listed in section 90.608 . . . Section 90.608 provides a complete list of the proper ways to attack a witness’ credibility: (1) Introducing . . . Evidence that is relevant to a witness’ bias is admissible under section 90.608(2). . . . ways of showing the witness’ bias, and, thus, are also proper grounds for impeachment under section 90.608 . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BRUSCARINO, a k a, 982 So. 2d 753 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . In doing so, we noted that section 90.608, Florida Statutes, permits the credibility of a witness' to . . . In light of Doremus and considering the limitations on impeachment as contained in section 90.608, Florida . . .

MUNROE, v. STATE, 983 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Id. at 770-71; see also §§ 90.403, 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

D. M. L. v. STATE, 976 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 90.608(5), Fla. . . .

MORDENTI, v. STATE, 982 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 90.608. . . .

LOVE, v. STATE, 971 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . introducing evidence about Peters’s racial bias, since such testimony was admissible under section 90.608 . . . Section 90.608(2)(e) provides that any party may attack the credibility of a witness by “[sjhowing that . . . well as a generalized prejudice against black persons, are proper subjects to explore under section 90.608 . . .

PINTADO, v. STATE, 970 So. 2d 857 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

STATE v. PATTERSON,, 966 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . (citing § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (1995), and State v. Smith, 573 So.2d 306, 313 (Fla. 1990))). . . . . our analysis, we need not decide whether this would have constituted proper impeachment under section 90.608 . . .

MARTINO, v. STATE, 964 So. 2d 906 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes, permits cross-examination to “attack the credibility of a witness . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

B. BELL, v. STATE B. v. R., 965 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

WILLIAMSON, v. STATE, 961 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2007)

. . . In theory, the Sanchez-Velasco affidavit could be introduced under section 90.608, Florida Statutes ( . . . Because Sanchez-Velasco died without perpetuating his testimony, impeachment pursuant to section 90.608 . . .

ROEBUCK, v. STATE, 953 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . justify the use of the false reporting evidence (1) to establish bias or motive pursuant to section 90.608 . . .

FELTON, v. STATE, 949 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 90.608(4), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

SANCHEZ v. NERYS,, 954 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2005); § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

WELCH, v. STATE, 940 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . — Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in ss. 90.608-90.610. . . . Section 90.608 deals with “[w]ho may impeach” a witness and section 90.609 defines the “[c]haracter of . . .

L. ROWLEY, v. STATE, 939 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Slocum did indeed read section 90.608 to exclude cross examination of a police officer about his interrogation . . . Slocum is also contrary to Gibson which interpreted section 90.608 to liberally permit cross examination . . .

TARNER, v. STATE, 938 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . As the state correctly notes, section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes, provides that a party may attack the . . .

GRAVES, v. STATE, 937 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . However, rule 90.608(2) of the Florida Evidence Code provides that a party may attack the credibility . . . of a witness by showing that the witness is biased. § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .

O. PIETRI, v. STATE, 935 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .