Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 921.24 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 921.0024 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 921.0024 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 921.0024

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 921
SENTENCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 921.0024
921.0024 Criminal Punishment Code; worksheet computations; scoresheets.—
(1)(a) The Criminal Punishment Code worksheet is used to compute the subtotal and total sentence points as follows:

FLORIDA CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT CODE
WORKSHEET

OFFENSE SCORE

Primary Offense
LevelSentence Points Total
10116=  
992=  
874=  
756=  
636=  
528=  
422=  
316=  
210=  
14=  
    
Total   
Additional Offenses
LevelSentence Points Counts Total
1058x = 
946x = 
837x = 
728x = 
618x = 
55.4x = 
43.6x = 
32.4x = 
21.2x = 
10.7x = 
M0.2x = 
      
Total   
Victim Injury
LevelSentence Points Number Total
2nd degree
murder-
death		240x = 
Death120x = 
Severe40x = 
Moderate18x = 
Slight4x = 
Sexual
 penetration		80x = 
Sexual
 contact		40x = 
      
Total   

Primary Offense + Additional Offenses + Victim Injury =

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE

PRIOR RECORD SCORE

Prior Record
LevelSentence Points Number Total
1029x = 
923x = 
819x = 
714x = 
69x = 
53.6x = 
42.4x = 
31.6x = 
20.8x = 
10.5x = 
M0.2x = 
      
Total   

  TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 

  TOTAL PRIOR RECORD SCORE 

  LEGAL STATUS 

  COMMUNITY SANCTION VIOLATION 

  PRIOR SERIOUS FELONY 

  PRIOR CAPITAL FELONY 

  FIREARM OR SEMIAUTOMATIC WEAPON 

     SUBTOTAL  

  PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER (no)(yes) 

  VIOLENT CAREER CRIMINAL (no)(yes) 

  HABITUAL VIOLENT OFFENDER (no)(yes) 

  HABITUAL OFFENDER (no)(yes) 

  AGGRAVATED ANIMAL CRUELTY (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

  DRUG TRAFFICKER (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

  LAW ENF. PROTECT. (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

  MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

  CRIMINAL GANG OFFENSE (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE PRESENCE OF RELATED CHILD (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

  ADULT-ON-MINOR SEX OFFENSE (no)(yes) (x multiplier) 

 

     TOTAL SENTENCE POINTS  

(b) WORKSHEET KEY:

Legal status points are assessed when any form of legal status existed at the time the offender committed an offense before the court for sentencing. Four (4) sentence points are assessed for an offender’s legal status.

Community sanction violation points are assessed when a community sanction violation is before the court for sentencing. Six (6) sentence points are assessed for each community sanction violation and each successive community sanction violation, unless any of the following apply:

1. If the community sanction violation includes a new felony conviction before the sentencing court, twelve (12) community sanction violation points are assessed for the violation, and for each successive community sanction violation involving a new felony conviction.

2. If the community sanction violation is committed by a violent felony offender of special concern as defined in s. 948.06:

a. Twelve (12) community sanction violation points are assessed for the violation and for each successive violation of felony probation or community control where:

I. The violation does not include a new felony conviction; and

II. The community sanction violation is not based solely on the probationer or offender’s failure to pay costs or fines or make restitution payments.

b. Twenty-four (24) community sanction violation points are assessed for the violation and for each successive violation of felony probation or community control where the violation includes a new felony conviction.

Multiple counts of community sanction violations before the sentencing court shall not be a basis for multiplying the assessment of community sanction violation points.

Prior serious felony points: If the offender has a primary offense or any additional offense ranked in level 8, level 9, or level 10, and one or more prior serious felonies, a single assessment of thirty (30) points shall be added. For purposes of this section, a prior serious felony is an offense in the offender’s prior record that is ranked in level 8, level 9, or level 10 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023 and for which the offender is serving a sentence of confinement, supervision, or other sanction or for which the offender’s date of release from confinement, supervision, or other sanction, whichever is later, is within 3 years before the date the primary offense or any additional offense was committed.

Prior capital felony points: If the offender has one or more prior capital felonies in the offender’s criminal record, points shall be added to the subtotal sentence points of the offender equal to twice the number of points the offender receives for the primary offense and any additional offense. A prior capital felony in the offender’s criminal record is a previous capital felony offense for which the offender has entered a plea of nolo contendere or guilty or has been found guilty; or a felony in another jurisdiction which is a capital felony in that jurisdiction, or would be a capital felony if the offense were committed in this state.

Possession of a firearm, semiautomatic firearm, or machine gun: If the offender is convicted of committing or attempting to commit any felony other than those enumerated in s. 775.087(2) while having in his or her possession: a firearm as defined in s. 790.001, an additional eighteen (18) sentence points are assessed; or if the offender is convicted of committing or attempting to commit any felony other than those enumerated in s. 775.087(3) while having in his or her possession a semiautomatic firearm as defined in s. 775.087(3) or a machine gun as defined in s. 790.001, an additional twenty-five (25) sentence points are assessed.

Sentencing multipliers:

Aggravated Animal Cruelty: If the primary offense is aggravated animal cruelty under s. 828.12(2), which included the knowing and intentional torture or torment of an animal that injured, mutilated, or killed the animal, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.25. As used in this paragraph, the term “animal” does not include an animal used for agricultural purposes or permitted as captive wildlife as authorized under s. 379.303.

Drug trafficking: If the primary offense is drug trafficking under s. 893.135, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied, at the discretion of the court, for a level 7 or level 8 offense, by 1.5. The state attorney may move the sentencing court to reduce or suspend the sentence of a person convicted of a level 7 or level 8 offense, if the offender provides substantial assistance as described in s. 893.135(4).

Violent offenses committed against specified justice system personnel: If the primary offense is a violation of s. 775.0823(2), (3), or (4), the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 2.5. If the primary offense is a violation of s. 775.0823(5), (6), (7), (8), or (9), the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 2.0. If the primary offense is a violation of s. 784.07(3) or s. 775.0875(1), or s. 775.0823(10) or (11), the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.5.

Grand theft of a motor vehicle: If the primary offense is grand theft of the third degree involving a motor vehicle and in the offender’s prior record, there are three or more grand thefts of the third degree involving a motor vehicle, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.5.

Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer: If the primary offense is fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer or aggravated fleeing or eluding in violation of s. 316.1935, and in the offender’s prior record, there is one or more violation of s. 316.1935, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.5.

Offense related to a criminal gang: If the offender is convicted of the primary offense and committed that offense for the purpose of benefiting, promoting, or furthering the interests of a criminal gang as defined in s. 874.03, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.5. If applying the multiplier results in the lowest permissible sentence exceeding the statutory maximum sentence for the primary offense under chapter 775, the court may not apply the multiplier and must sentence the defendant to the statutory maximum sentence.

Domestic violence in the presence of a child: If the offender is convicted of the primary offense and the primary offense is a crime of domestic violence, as defined in s. 741.28, which was committed in the presence of a child under 16 years of age who is a family or household member as defined in s. 741.28(3) with the victim or perpetrator, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.5.

Adult-on-minor sex offense: If the offender was 18 years of age or older and the victim was younger than 18 years of age at the time the offender committed the primary offense, and if the primary offense was an offense committed on or after October 1, 2014, and is a violation of s. 787.01(2) or s. 787.02(2), if the violation involved a victim who was a minor and, in the course of committing that violation, the defendant committed a sexual battery under chapter 794 or a lewd act under s. 800.04 or s. 847.0135(5) against the minor; s. 787.01(3)(a)2. or 3.; s. 787.02(3)(a)2. or 3.; s. 794.011, excluding s. 794.011(10); s. 800.04; or s. 847.0135(5), the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 2.0. If applying the multiplier results in the lowest permissible sentence exceeding the statutory maximum sentence for the primary offense under chapter 775, the court may not apply the multiplier and must sentence the defendant to the statutory maximum sentence.

(2) The lowest permissible sentence is the minimum sentence that may be imposed by the trial court, absent a valid reason for departure. The lowest permissible sentence is any nonstate prison sanction in which the total sentence points equals or is less than 44 points, unless the court determines within its discretion that a prison sentence, which may be up to the statutory maximums for the offenses committed, is appropriate. When the total sentence points exceeds 44 points, the lowest permissible sentence in prison months shall be calculated by subtracting 28 points from the total sentence points and decreasing the remaining total by 25 percent. The total sentence points shall be calculated only as a means of determining the lowest permissible sentence. The permissible range for sentencing shall be the lowest permissible sentence up to and including the statutory maximum, as defined in s. 775.082, for the primary offense and any additional offenses before the court for sentencing. The sentencing court may impose such sentences concurrently or consecutively. However, any sentence to state prison must exceed 1 year. If the lowest permissible sentence under the code exceeds the statutory maximum sentence as provided in s. 775.082, the sentence required by the code must be imposed. If the total sentence points are greater than or equal to 363, the court may sentence the offender to life imprisonment. An offender sentenced to life imprisonment under this section is not eligible for any form of discretionary early release, except executive clemency or conditional medical release under s. 947.149.
(3) A single digitized scoresheet shall be prepared for each defendant to determine the permissible range for the sentence that the court may impose, except that if the defendant is before the court for sentencing for more than one felony and the felonies were committed under more than one version or revision of the guidelines or the code, separate digitized scoresheets must be prepared. The scoresheet or scoresheets must cover all the defendant’s offenses pending before the court for sentencing. The state attorney shall prepare the digitized scoresheet or scoresheets, which must be presented to the defense counsel for review for accuracy in all cases unless the judge directs otherwise. The defendant’s scoresheet or scoresheets must be approved and signed by the sentencing judge.
(4) The Department of Corrections, in consultation with the Office of the State Courts Administrator, state attorneys, and public defenders, must develop and submit the revised digitized Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet to the Supreme Court for approval by June 15 of each year, as necessary. The digitized scoresheet shall have individual, structured data cells for each data field on the scoresheet. Upon the Supreme Court’s approval of the revised digitized scoresheet, the Department of Corrections shall produce and provide the revised digitized scoresheets by September 30 of each year, as necessary. Digitized scoresheets must include individual data cells to indicate whether any prison sentence imposed includes a mandatory minimum sentence or the sentence imposed was a downward departure from the lowest permissible sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code.
(5) The Department of Corrections shall make available the digitized Criminal Punishment Code scoresheets to those persons charged with the responsibility for preparing scoresheets.
(6) The clerk of the circuit court shall transmit a complete and accurate digitized copy of the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet used in each sentencing proceeding to the Department of Corrections. Scoresheets must be electronically transmitted no less frequently than monthly, by the first of each month, and may be sent collectively.
(7) A digitized sentencing scoresheet must be prepared for every defendant who is sentenced for a felony offense. The individual offender’s digitized Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet and any attachments thereto prepared pursuant to Rule 3.701, Rule 3.702, or Rule 3.703, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, or any other rule pertaining to the preparation and submission of felony sentencing scoresheets, must be included with the uniform judgment and sentence form provided to the Department of Corrections.
History.—s. 7, ch. 97-194; s. 6, ch. 98-204; s. 111, ch. 99-3; s. 57, ch. 99-7; s. 3, ch. 99-12; s. 10, ch. 99-188; s. 56, ch. 99-193; s. 25, ch. 2000-320; s. 2, ch. 2001-126; s. 4, ch. 2001-183; s. 1, ch. 2002-212; s. 163, ch. 2004-5; s. 18, ch. 2005-128; s. 5, ch. 2007-2; s. 2, ch. 2007-212; s. 26, ch. 2008-238; s. 6, ch. 2013-80; s. 9, ch. 2014-4; s. 5, ch. 2016-7; s. 5, ch. 2018-127; s. 31, ch. 2023-18; s. 2, ch. 2023-190; s. 3, ch. 2025-75; s. 3, ch. 2025-102.

F.S. 921.0024 on Google Scholar

F.S. 921.0024 on CourtListener

Amendments to 921.0024


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 921.0024

Total Results: 205

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543

Cited 171 times | Published

committed their crimes after October 1, 1998, section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that

Hall v. State

823 So. 2d 757, 2002 WL 1430598

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2002 | Docket: 458638

Cited 82 times | Published

defendant at the lowest permissible sentence. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).[6] Hall asserts that

State v. Anderson

905 So. 2d 111, 2005 WL 1404428

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2005 | Docket: 1307996

Cited 78 times | Published

up to and including the statutory maximum. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). Thus, any change reducing

Hughes v. State

901 So. 2d 837, 2005 WL 977019

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1216663

Cited 42 times | Published

Code. See § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). Therefore, when Apprendi

State v. Ayers

901 So. 2d 942, 2005 WL 991571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2005 | Docket: 1666328

Cited 37 times | Published

offense for which they are being sentenced. See § 921.0024(2) ("If the lowest permissible sentence under

Butler v. State

838 So. 2d 554, 2003 WL 193488

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2003 | Docket: 461371

Cited 28 times | Published

committed their crimes after October 1, 1998, section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that

Moore v. State

882 So. 2d 977, 2004 WL 1899952

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2004 | Docket: 1686287

Cited 27 times | Published

points] up to and including the statutory maximum." § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). Conceptually, the CPC

Reeves v. State

957 So. 2d 625, 2007 WL 1437467

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2007 | Docket: 1679047

Cited 26 times | Published

that this result was mandated by the CPC, section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2000), which stated

Sanders v. State

35 So. 3d 864, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 219, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 645, 2010 WL 1609876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 456324

Cited 20 times | Published

violation of probation. Further, pursuant to section 921.0024(3), Florida Statutes (1999), because the offenses

Howard v. State

820 So. 2d 337, 2002 WL 429180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1715494

Cited 19 times | Published

to and including the statutory maximum...." Section 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). The state contends

Reynolds v. Cochran

138 So. 2d 500

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1962 | Docket: 1404104

Cited 18 times | Published

re-sentencing of habitual offenders. See also, F.S. § 921.24 and § 921.25, F.S.A. and 168 A.L.R. 706. As this

Neeld v. State

977 So. 2d 740, 2008 WL 782885

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 2559892

Cited 16 times | Published

departure" sentence effectively disappeared. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). A Quarterman agreement

Mathew v. State

837 So. 2d 1167, 2003 WL 468260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2003 | Docket: 537529

Cited 13 times | Published

of the victim's and Appellant's toddler. See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (1999). The jury was instructed that

Brown v. State

633 So. 2d 112, 1994 WL 72142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1994 | Docket: 1296519

Cited 13 times | Published

sentence was generally either legal or illegal. See § 921.24, Fla. Stat. (1965); ch. 61-39, Laws of Fla. At

Nettles v. State

850 So. 2d 487, 2003 WL 21467521

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2003 | Docket: 1783362

Cited 11 times | Published

sentence required by the code must be imposed." § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). The First District's decision

Giorgetti v. State

821 So. 2d 417, 2002 WL 1559114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 1236201

Cited 11 times | Published

imprisonment not exceeding 5 years ."); see also § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("If the lowest permissible

State v. Valera

75 So. 3d 330, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17366, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2011 | Docket: 60303690

Cited 10 times | Published

Further, the trial court also contravened section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes, which generally requires

Cillo v. State

913 So. 2d 1233, 2005 WL 2990688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2005 | Docket: 1698268

Cited 10 times | Published

exceed the statutory maximum of fifteen years. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(25);

Jackson v. State

64 So. 3d 90, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 81, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 415, 2011 WL 536429

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2011 | Docket: 60301598

Cited 9 times | Published

to impose a downward departure sentence. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). For noncapital offenses

Cameron v. State

804 So. 2d 338, 2001 WL 803716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2001 | Docket: 1334788

Cited 9 times | Published

as much as 25%— is no longer applicable. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("The permissible range

Cherington v. State

24 So. 3d 658, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19300, 2009 WL 4723312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2009 | Docket: 1151897

Cited 8 times | Published

the violation includes a new felony conviction. § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). A

Almendares v. State

916 So. 2d 29, 2005 WL 3116097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 1659402

Cited 8 times | Published

more of the sentences be served consecutively"); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2003) ("The sentencing court

McCloud v. State

741 So. 2d 512, 1999 WL 4911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1999 | Docket: 453063

Cited 8 times | Published

the scoring of victim injury points under Section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (1997) is a "sentencing

Craig v. State

179 So. 2d 202

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1965 | Docket: 377346

Cited 8 times | Published

from death to life." Allegedly, he moved under Section 921.24, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which authorizes

Arrowood v. State

843 So. 2d 940, 2003 WL 1738409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2003 | Docket: 1670612

Cited 7 times | Published

subject to the imposition *942 of a life sentence. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("If the total sentence

State v. Chapman

805 So. 2d 906, 2001 WL 1245921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2001 | Docket: 1669464

Cited 7 times | Published

guidelines. See Sachs, 526 So.2d at 50; see also § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (1999) (showing victim injury as

McCloud v. State

55 So. 3d 643, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1563, 2011 WL 470254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 1458755

Cited 6 times | Published

it was the only issue argued below. [2] See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (2009).

Rogers v. State

963 So. 2d 328, 2007 WL 2330927

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2007 | Docket: 1697317

Cited 6 times | Published

Criminal Punishment Code worksheet set forth in section 921.0024(1)(a) provides 80 sentence points for sexual

Gartrell v. State

609 So. 2d 112, 1992 WL 341953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1992 | Docket: 1473480

Cited 6 times | Published

first place, rule 3.800(a) comes directly from section 921.24, Florida Statutes (1969), which read: "A court

Drayton v. State

177 So. 2d 250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1965 | Docket: 1736740

Cited 6 times | Published

(5) years in the State Penitentiary. Pursuant to § 921.24, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., a court may correct an illegal

Tasker v. State

48 So. 3d 798, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 658, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1936, 2010 WL 4483514

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 60296624

Cited 5 times | Published

Canady, C.J., concurring op., 48 So.3d at 807. Section 921.0024(3), Florida Statutes, provides: A single scoresheet

Chambers v. State

975 So. 2d 444, 2007 WL 1097953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2007 | Docket: 1424540

Cited 5 times | Published

guidelines *456 exceeds the 30-year statutory maximum, § 921.0024(2). ___ was not in actual possession of a firearm

Moss v. State

925 So. 2d 1131, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5609, 2006 WL 1098260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2006 | Docket: 64843713

Cited 5 times | Published

imposed were calculated on a Code scoresheet. See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (1999, 2000). In this appeal, Moss

Winther v. State

812 So. 2d 527, 2002 WL 460319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2002 | Docket: 1716257

Cited 5 times | Published

establishes a "lowest permissible sentence." § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). The code provides that

Cunningham v. State

22 So. 3d 127, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16370, 2009 WL 3617920

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2009 | Docket: 60267014

Cited 4 times | Published

§ 775.082(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2002). Section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2002), provides for

Horne v. State

6 So. 3d 99, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2905, 2009 WL 839034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2009 | Docket: 1665961

Cited 4 times | Published

court made the following findings: Pursuant to § 921.0024(2) [Florida Statutes (2005) ], where the lowest

Stancliff v. State

996 So. 2d 259, 2008 WL 5220636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2008 | Docket: 2577641

Cited 4 times | Published

illegal sentence or a sentence imposed under section 921.0024 which exceeds the statutory maximum penalty

Rodriguez v. State

883 So. 2d 908, 2004 WL 2236568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2004 | Docket: 1370070

Cited 4 times | Published

offenses committed in a single criminal episode. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2001); ch. 97-194, Laws of Fla

Sims v. State

869 So. 2d 45, 2004 WL 399217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1653982

Cited 4 times | Published

definition factored into the offense level. See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (2001). In contrast, insurance fraud

Wheeler v. State

864 So. 2d 492, 2004 WL 19492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2004 | Docket: 1727552

Cited 4 times | Published

maximum. Rule 3.704(d)(25), Fla. R.Crim. P.; § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (1999). The lowest permissible sentence

Brown v. State

806 So. 2d 576, 2002 WL 111966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2002 | Docket: 1341957

Cited 4 times | Published

pursuant to the Criminal Punishment *578 Code, section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999). Brown asserts

Hall v. State

773 So. 2d 99, 2000 WL 1724976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2000 | Docket: 1291955

Cited 4 times | Published

establishment of the lowest permissible sentence. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1998). It further provides that

Murray v. State

36 So. 3d 792, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6670, 2010 WL 1930131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2010 | Docket: 2410612

Cited 3 times | Published

jail or another non-state prison sanction. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). When the trial court asked

Acosta v. State

884 So. 2d 112, 2004 WL 1454406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2004 | Docket: 1683004

Cited 3 times | Published

approximately ten years in prison for the offense. See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (2001). Likewise, criminal law was

Keith v. State

844 So. 2d 715, 2003 WL 21032006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2003 | Docket: 1662227

Cited 3 times | Published

Laws of Florida 1975." Chapter 75-23 created section 921.24, Florida Statutes (1975) (currently section

Darst v. State

816 So. 2d 680, 2002 WL 463441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2002 | Docket: 1753597

Cited 3 times | Published

appeals the use of a 1.5 multiplier pursuant to section 921.0024(1)(6), Florida Statutes (1999) on his scoresheet

Hindenach v. State

807 So. 2d 739, 2002 WL 215018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2002 | Docket: 1505623

Cited 3 times | Published

correctly scored victim injury points under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (1997), as a "sentencing

Butler v. State

774 So. 2d 925, 2001 WL 9856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 1331100

Cited 3 times | Published

committed their crimes after October 1, 1998, section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that

Vanderblomen v. State

709 So. 2d 144, 1998 WL 128884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1998 | Docket: 1279034

Cited 3 times | Published

illegal sentence imposed by it in a criminal case." § 921.24, Fla. Stat. (1961)(subsequently repealed); In

Woods v. State

214 So. 3d 803, 2017 WL 1438510, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2017 | Docket: 60264262

Cited 2 times | Published

nonforcible felony scores few points by itself). See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (addressing the sentencing scoresheet)

Martinez v. State

216 So. 3d 734, 2017 WL 1364001, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2017 | Docket: 60265476

Cited 2 times | Published

prison on each of the DUI manslaughter counts. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). In compliance with the

State v. Lindsay

163 So. 3d 721, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6430, 2015 WL 1942890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2015 | Docket: 60247739

Cited 2 times | Published

to impose a downward departure sentence. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). For noncapital offenses

Amanda Lee Hobgood v. State of Florida

166 So. 3d 840, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5862, 2015 WL 1849497

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2679389

Cited 2 times | Published

court, absent a valid reason for departure.” § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2013) (emphasis added). The Code

Rigueiro v. State

132 So. 3d 853, 2013 WL 6636137, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2013 | Docket: 60238548

Cited 2 times | Published

followed by five years of sex offender probation. Section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2001), provides in part:

Cotto v. State

89 So. 3d 1025, 2012 WL 1934438, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2012 | Docket: 60308484

Cited 2 times | Published

082. The criminal punishment code, found in section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (2005), states, in relevant

Thompson v. State

79 So. 3d 208, 2012 WL 414005, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2012 | Docket: 430618

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence required by the Code must be imposed. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2001). "The sentence required

State v. Hall

47 So. 3d 361, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16737, 2010 WL 4365571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2010 | Docket: 2535846

Cited 2 times | Published

every defendant sentenced for a felony offense. § 921.0024(3), (7), Fla. Stat. (2008). "The lowest permissible

Halfacre v. State

24 So. 3d 795, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20566, 2009 WL 5150262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1152159

Cited 2 times | Published

calculated on Halfacre's scoresheet for this case. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). It is clear from the face

In Re Amendments to Fl. Rule of Cirm. Proce. 3.992

972 So. 2d 862, 2008 WL 90048

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2008 | Docket: 2565920

Cited 2 times | Published

2007-2, section 5, Laws of Florida (amending § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat.). See In re Amendments to Florida

Cooper v. State

960 So. 2d 849, 2007 WL 1945704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2007 | Docket: 1404023

Cited 2 times | Published

statutory maximum on each offense") (emphasis added); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). Although the State acknowledges

Harris v. State

911 So. 2d 221, 2005 WL 2321699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1207243

Cited 2 times | Published

124 (Fla.1967). This language was copied from section 921.24, Florida Statutes (1965), which likewise did

Moore v. State

859 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 22799303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284567

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence required by the code must be imposed. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). Unlike the sentencing

Nettles v. State

819 So. 2d 243, 2002 WL 1307481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2002 | Docket: 1750083

Cited 2 times | Published

calculating the "lowest permissible sentence." § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). "The lowest permissible

Champagne v. State

269 So. 3d 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 64712522

Cited 1 times | Published

chapter 921, Florida Statutes (2005) (CPC). Section 921.0024(2) states that when "the lowest permissible

EDDIE ISAAC BEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

264 So. 3d 947

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2019 | Docket: 8485203

Cited 1 times | Published

sentencing at the time of the primary offense.”); see § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (allowing for the addition of victim

TIMOTHY TURNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

261 So. 3d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2018 | Docket: 8431873

Cited 1 times | Published

control. The 1998 version of section 921.0024(1)(b) directs that the assessment of "[c]ommunity

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207

Cited 1 times | Published

chapter 2014-4, Laws of Florida, which amended section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, to provide that sentence

State v. Baron C. Rogers

250 So. 3d 821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2018 | Docket: 7371121

Cited 1 times | Published

2d 906, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing to section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, which provides that victim

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2016-08

211 So. 3d 995

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2017 | Docket: 4609133

Cited 1 times | Published

the adidt-on-minor sex offense multiplier in § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat., instruct as follows. Alleyne

Romano v. State

205 So. 3d 828, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 4540927

Cited 1 times | Published

exceed the statutory maximum. Cf. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2004) (“If the lowest permissible

Laisha L. Landrum v. State of Florida

192 So. 3d 459, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 274, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1194, 2016 WL 3191099

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2016 | Docket: 3072271

Cited 1 times | Published

second-degree murder as a "Level 10” offense); § 921.0024, Fla. Stat, (2004) (providing that "Level 10”

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-INSTRUCTIONS 7.8, 7.8(A), and 11.1-11.6(A)

190 So. 3d 1055, 2016 WL 1460708

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2016 | Docket: 3053710

Cited 1 times | Published

legislature added a sentencing multiplier to § 921.0024(l)(b), Fla. Stat., for sexual battery crimes

Morgan v. State

198 So. 3d 812, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3521, 2016 WL 886530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3044950

Cited 1 times | Published

prison sanction for the burglary. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). The trial court sentenced

Robinson v. State

160 So. 3d 521, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4365, 2015 WL 1360794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2015 | Docket: 60246882

Cited 1 times | Published

statutory maximum, such a sentence is proper. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2011) (“If the lowest permissible

State v. Hodges

151 So. 3d 531, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18400, 2014 WL 5836122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2014 | Docket: 2595526

Cited 1 times | Published

the Criminal Punishment Code). Pursuant to section 921.0024(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012), a score-sheet is

Reginald L. Bryant v. State of Florida

148 So. 3d 1251, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2970, 2014 WL 5026405

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2014 | Docket: 1437947

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 882 So.2d 977, 985 (Fla.2004) (quoting § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999)). We verified the constitutionality

Bautista v. State

128 So. 3d 117, 2013 WL 5628724, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2013 | Docket: 60236961

Cited 1 times | Published

the lowest Criminal Punishment Code sentence. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). The defendant’s first

State v. Martinez

103 So. 3d 1013, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21989, 2012 WL 6682018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2012 | Docket: 60226838

Cited 1 times | Published

after the effective date of the revision.”); § 921.0024(l)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (2009) (section entitled

State v. Adkison

56 So. 3d 880, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3500, 2011 WL 892127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2011 | Docket: 60298686

Cited 1 times | Published

permissible sentence, as calculated pursuant to section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (2007), is prohibited absent

Linder v. State

54 So. 3d 1031, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 555, 2011 WL 222285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2011 | Docket: 2407314

Cited 1 times | Published

that 80 points were erroneously included, section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, provides that 80 points

Ricks v. State

36 So. 3d 810, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428, 2010 WL 2079667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1364785

Cited 1 times | Published

be imposed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(25); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2006); Butler v. State, 838 So

Hubard v. State

17 So. 3d 1274, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14256, 2009 WL 3049002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2009 | Docket: 1140567

Cited 1 times | Published

counts are each assigned a point value of 0.2. § 921.0024(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). Deriving support from

In Re Amendments to Fl. Rules of Crim. Procedure

998 So. 2d 1128, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 915, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2207, 2008 WL 4950074

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2008 | Docket: 2541859

Cited 1 times | Published

"criminal gang") and section 26 (amending section 921.0024(1)(a), Florida Statutes, to change the term

In Re Amendments to Fl. Rule of Crim. Proc. 3.992 (A)

992 So. 2d 239, 2008 WL 4346466

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2008 | Docket: 1723221

Cited 1 times | Published

Laws of Florida, the Legislature amended section 921.0024(1)(a), Florida Statutes, which revises the

State v. Perez

979 So. 2d 986, 2008 WL 373242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 1407099

Cited 1 times | Published

the state prison as the guidelines contemplate. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). For two related reasons

Cliatt v. State

970 So. 2d 902, 2007 WL 4458176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2007 | Docket: 1395916

Cited 1 times | Published

prison sentence of 53.25 years. Pursuant to section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court

Brown v. State

965 So. 2d 1234, 2007 WL 2804807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2007 | Docket: 1508960

Cited 1 times | Published

scrivener's error as the order indicates. [5] § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2005).

In Re Amendments to Cr. Pro.-Rule 3.704 and 3.992

957 So. 2d 1160, 2007 WL 1147076

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2007 | Docket: 1678930

Cited 1 times | Published

effective March 12, 2007, the Legislature amended section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes, to mandate the assessment

Lewis v. State

952 So. 2d 1271, 2007 WL 1093488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2007 | Docket: 1347658

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence points for the use of a firearm under section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2003). Mr. Lewis

Smallridge v. State

904 So. 2d 601, 2005 WL 1420858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2005 | Docket: 1365336

Cited 1 times | Published

points pursuant to the range permitted in section 921.0024(1)(a), Florida Statutes, by a preponderance

Rolle v. State

835 So. 2d 1258, 2003 WL 186971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2003 | Docket: 1502420

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence. The multiplier was imposed under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (1999), which provides for

Romero v. State

805 So. 2d 92, 2002 WL 80263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2002 | Docket: 172934

Cited 1 times | Published

affect only the lowest permissible sentence. See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (2000). Whether and when a defendant

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897

Cited 1 times | Published

committed their crimes after October 1, 1998, section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that

In re Adoption of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.704 & 3.992 to Implement the Florida Criminal Punishment Code

721 So. 2d 265, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 497, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1829, 1998 WL 650579

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1998 | Docket: 64784506

Cited 1 times | Published

according to the total sentence points pursuant to section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, is prohibited unless there

Brantley v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2025 | Docket: 69864085

Published

(“LPS”) for each of the three convictions. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (providing that the LPS “is the

Gazoombi v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2025 | Docket: 69760560

Published

statutory maximum for any offense . . . .”); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (“The lowest permissible sentence

Fogarty v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2024 | Docket: 69477344

Published

conviction was nine years’ imprisonment. Cf. § 921.0024, Fla. Stat.; see also § 921.0022(3)(i), Fla.

Debose v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455315

Published

calculate the lowest permissible sentence. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (defining “lowest permissible

State of Florida v. James Earl Gibson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68461433

Published

court should impose—at a minimum—the LPS. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. “A downward departure from the

Ronald Stuyvesant Boyd v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2024 | Docket: 68829284

Published

Boyd’s “Total offense score” by 20 points. See § 921.0024(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (listing 36 points for a Level

Cristian Pozos v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2024 | Docket: 68249803

Published

810; and (2) his total sentence points under section 921.0024 were four, thus fewer than twenty-two points

Alejandro Borges v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2024 | Docket: 68149068

Published

2016). Defendant first argues that under section 921.0024(1)(b)2.b., Florida Statutes (2022), a “new

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.030 and 3.704

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2023 | Docket: 68069463

Published

according to the total sentence points under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, is prohibited unless there

EDUARDO LUIS GALIANA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2023 | Docket: 67419161

Published

JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999) (“If the lowest permissible

ANDRES DUQUESNE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 65879215

Published

sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). However, the lowest permissible

JEREMY E. LYNN vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2022 | Docket: 64984009

Published

2 his sentences should exceed five years. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2020). Second, the written

Tony Barber v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2022 | Docket: 65365625

Published

September 21, 2022 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 921.0024 (2), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“If the lowest permissible

JOHN MATTHEWS BAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346516

Published

imposing a sentence that was illegal under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2020). Based on the

ANTHONY SAMPSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2022 | Docket: 64435978

Published

percent . . . at the discretion of the court.”); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1997) (allowing trial court

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.992

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2022 | Docket: 63389130

Published

1252 (Fla. 2021) (concluding that “under section 921.0024(2), the LPS [lowest permissible sentence]

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.992

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2022 | Docket: 63183508

Published

1252 (Fla. 2021) (concluding that “under section 921.0024(2), the LPS [lowest permissible sentence]

KELLY PETERSON MILLIEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2022 | Docket: 63127636

Published

adult-on-minor multiplier provision contained in section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2015) (“the adult-on-minor

DAVID JAMES SWIFT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2022 | Docket: 63008469

Published

text of the statute, we conclude that under section 921.0024(2), [Florida Statutes], the [lowest permissible

Robert W. Kramer v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2021 | Docket: 60414525

Published

sentence constitutes a legal punishment. See § 921.0024(2) (“The permissible range for sentencing shall

State of Florida v. Ridge Gabriel

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2021 | Docket: 59804367

Published

SENTENCE AS DEFINED BY AND APPLIED IN SECTION 921.0024(2), FLORIDA STATUTES, AN INDIVIDUAL MINIMUM

JEROMEE SAFFOLD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2021 | Docket: 29084937

Published

then eighteen firearm points are authorized. § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2019). Saffold was convicted

ODELL ERIC BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2020 | Docket: 18557492

Published

for the sentence that the court may impose[.]” § 921.0024(3), Fla. Stat. (2020); see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3

JASON REAVES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2020 | Docket: 17330538

Published

Thus, for a de novo resentencing, we read section 921.0024(3), Florida Statutes (2018), as including

CORY J. MORGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2020 | Docket: 17218384

Published

(2019). A point value is assigned to each level. § 921.0024(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2019). A level 3 primary offense

ROBERT SANDERS MC CRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2019 | Docket: 16280848

Published

to Mr. McCray's VFOSC designation.1 See § 921.0024(1)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (2014) (providing for the

Edward Abruscato v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2019 | Docket: 16049256

Published

838 So. 2d 554, 556 (Fla. 2003) (“[W]hen section 921.024(2) [Fla. Stat.] applies so that the statutory

NATHAN S. THORNTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2019 | Docket: 15960206

Published

scoresheet exceeds the statutory maximum. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1998) (stating that when "the

MICHAEL REED v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2019 | Docket: 15897431

Published

language of the statute. See § 921.0024(1)(b)2.a., Fla. Stat. (2017) (“Six (6) sentence

Albert James Hayes, II v. State of Florida

272 So. 3d 815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2019 | Docket: 15420925

Published

multiplier for adult-on-minor sex offenses. See § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). Without the multiplier

Terry D. Ellison, Jr. v. State of Florida

268 So. 3d 1007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2019 | Docket: 15013079

Published

“adult-on-minor sex offense” multiplier in section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes, applies only to certain

RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988954

Published

chapter 921, Florida Statutes (2005) (CPC). Section 921.0024(2) states that when "the lowest permissible

Champagne v. State

269 So. 3d 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 64712523

Published

chapter 921, Florida Statutes (2005) (CPC). Section 921.0024(2) states that when "the lowest permissible

LOUBERT JULES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865399

Published

se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2007); Moore v. State, 882 So

Franklin Vereen v. State of Florida

267 So. 3d 548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2019 | Docket: 14819620

Published

victim-injury points for sexual penetration. § 921.0024(1)(a), Fla. Stat. Those points had the necessary

Timothy Barber v. State of Florida

263 So. 3d 1133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2019 | Docket: 8488324

Published

points) were attributed to that offense. See § 921.0024(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing for 0.2 points

Wilson Brandon Scott v. State of Florida

258 So. 3d 548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2018 | Docket: 8140337

Published

adult-on-minor sentence points multiplier under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes, in absence of a jury

PHILIP WALLACE STAUDERMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

261 So. 3d 649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2018 | Docket: 8020198

Published

Stauderman's Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2010).

JOSEREN DESHUNE DELANCY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

256 So. 3d 940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2018 | Docket: 7905943

Published

4th DCA 2016) (Gross, J., concurring); see also § 921.0024 (2), Fla. Stat. (2016) (“The permissible range

REGINALD LEE TAYLOR, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

253 So. 3d 631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2018 | Docket: 7664428

Published

such sentences concurrently or consecutively.” § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2014). Here, the Defendant

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972

Published

chapter 2014-4, Laws of Florida, which amended section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, to provide that sentence

JORGE CASTILLO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

244 So. 3d 1098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2018 | Docket: 6366317

Published

was 237.45 months, or 19.78 years, and under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes, (2013), “[i]f the lowest

KENNETH WHITTAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

223 So. 3d 270, 2017 WL 2858904, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2017 | Docket: 6085988

Published

violation of probation as a VFOSC. See § 921.0024(b)2.a., Fla. Stat. (2015). Thus, there is no

Bynes v. State

212 So. 3d 1134, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 60262734

Published

became the sentence required by the code. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). Subsequent to these proceedings

Hector Colon v. State of Florida

199 So. 3d 960, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8334, 2016 WL 3065685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3071364

Published

30, 2016), I argued in dissent that neither section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2002), nor the supreme

Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of Florida

199 So. 3d 941, 2016 WL 3065576, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3071354

Published

endanger the public.” Id. Under the Code, section 921.0024 provides for the preparation of a scoresheet

Christopher Busbee v. State of Florida

187 So. 3d 1266, 2016 WL 1337359, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2016 | Docket: 3051978

Published

see also § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). However, “when section 921.0024(2) applies so that

William Greene v. State of Florida

186 So. 3d 1099, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3133, 2016 WL 803647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2016 | Docket: 3040730

Published

921.0021(7)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (2014). Under section 921.0024, sexual contact is scored at forty points

William Lee Rudd v. State of Florida

177 So. 3d 1015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2015 | Docket: 3006984

Published

*1017 imposed.[ 1 ]” § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). Accordingly, 171 months

Miller v. State

177 So. 3d 95, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15347, 2015 WL 6087195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2015 | Docket: 2986200

Published

under the code must be imposed. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1998); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(25);

Ramroop v. State

174 So. 3d 584, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13194, 2015 WL 5165545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2015 | Docket: 60250439

Published

Legislature did not alter subsection (2). . Section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, currently provides for

Jonathan Somps v. State of Florida

183 So. 3d 1090, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8029, 2015 WL 3396661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2015 | Docket: 2679309

Published

the sentence a court may impose. See § 921.0024(3), Fla. Stat. (2010). It “must cover all the

Amanda Lee Hobgood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2015 | Docket: 2642462

Published

court, absent a valid reason for departure.” § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2013) (emphasis added). The Code

Obie Dewayne Holliman v. State of Florida

152 So. 3d 783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2014 | Docket: 2614592

Published

the criminal punishment code. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2009); Perkins v. State

State v. Hodges

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2014 | Docket: 2606371

Published

Criminal Punishment Code). Pursuant to section 921.0024(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012), a scoresheet is

State of Florida v. Rodney Larry Robinson

149 So. 3d 1199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2014 | Docket: 2593278

Published

court, absent a valid reason for departure.” § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2011); see also § 921.00265(1)

In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.992—Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheets

147 So. 3d 515

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2014 | Docket: 60294005

Published

section 9, Laws of Florida, which amends section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes (effective October

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.992 – Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheets

147 So. 3d 515, 2014 WL 4360978

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2014 | Docket: 1167681

Published

section 9, Laws of Florida, which amends section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes (effective October

Cedric Dennard v. State

157 So. 3d 1055, 2014 WL 4082938, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2014 | Docket: 1120041

Published

I write to agree with Judge Warner that section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), is unclear on

Justin R. Jarvis v. State

141 So. 3d 1262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2014 | Docket: 453309

Published

See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(d)(16); § 921.0024(b), Fla. Stat. (2010) (stating that community

Sawyer v. State

139 So. 3d 443, 2014 WL 2206854, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2014 | Docket: 60241120

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2009); Almendares v. State, 916 So.2d 29 (Fla.

State v. McKinley

109 So. 3d 301, 2013 WL 811600, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229553

Published

one version of the sentencing guidelines. See § 921.0024(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); see also Fla. R. Crim

Curry v. State

106 So. 3d 504, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1659, 2013 WL 331553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2013 | Docket: 60228228

Published

that his scoresheet was miscalculated because section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2005), provides “When

Alexander v. State

88 So. 3d 417, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7841, 2012 WL 1698089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 60308285

Published

designating the total sentence points allowed under section 921.0024. Because the trial court sentenced appellant

Link v. Tucker

870 F. Supp. 2d 1309, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61816, 2012 WL 1559702

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2012 | Docket: 65982463

Published

possible sentence, pursuant to Florida Statutes § 921.0024(2) (doc. 12 at 23). Further, Florida’s criminal

State v. Garcia-Costa

86 So. 3d 562, 2012 WL 1368180, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2012 | Docket: 60307716

Published

the criminal punishment code scoresheet. See § 921.0024, Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(25)

Morrison v. State

59 So. 3d 308, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5565, 2011 WL 1485611

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2011 | Docket: 60299677

Published

980 So.2d 613, 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3

Zeman v. State

46 So. 3d 162, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16263, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2010 | Docket: 2567309

Published

not err in sentencing him to fifteen years. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2005) (authorizing the trial

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

48 So. 3d 17, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 516, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1610, 2010 WL 3701323

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2010 | Docket: 60296528

Published

revised part of the worksheet key contained in section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes, pertaining to the

State v. Isom

36 So. 3d 936, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9122, 2010 WL 2508859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 2566130

Published

as a potential mitigator. And the fact that section 921.0024 requires scoring of all prior convictions

McGarrah v. State

38 So. 3d 217, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8240, 2010 WL 2330407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2010 | Docket: 1658816

Published

her Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). McGarrah pleaded no contest

LaVALLEY v. State

30 So. 3d 513, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3910, 2009 WL 4874760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2010 | Docket: 1639536

Published

& (c)2„ Fla. Stat. (2006). .Pursuant to section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes, if a defendant's scoresheet

Daneker v. State

27 So. 3d 228, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 2010 WL 476693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2010 | Docket: 60288097

Published

and the statutory maximum of five years. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). Accordingly, we reverse

Corley v. State

44 So. 3d 109, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9615, 2009 WL 2031177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2009 | Docket: 60295546

Published

guidelines sentence without explanation. See § 921.0024(2) (Fla. 2008); Ch. 97-194, § 7, Laws of Fla

KERSAINT v. State

15 So. 3d 41, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, 2009 WL 1393388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1660673

Published

jail, or another non-state prison sanction. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). The trial judge was told

Garcia v. State

8 So. 3d 1219, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3823, 2009 WL 1139337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2009 | Docket: 60305441

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2003).

Mays v. State

3 So. 3d 423, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1283, 2009 WL 383579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2009 | Docket: 2581144

Published

Criminal Punishment Code, which was 8.375 years. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat.

Bradley v. State

998 So. 2d 1213, 2009 WL 187789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2009 | Docket: 1701392

Published

the CPC score exceeded the statutory maximum. § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). *1214 In his rule 3.800(a)

Lockhart v. State

980 So. 2d 613, 2008 WL 1958638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2008 | Docket: 1735533

Published

defendant was under any form of legal status. § 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(15);

Witchel v. State

969 So. 2d 1143, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18139, 2007 WL 3355600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 64853313

Published

enhanced. See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2000); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat

Huewitt v. State

963 So. 2d 314, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730, 2007 WL 2317108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2007 | Docket: 64851902

Published

reasons or a departure. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704; § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Moore v. State

Ariano v. State

961 So. 2d 366, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11404, 2007 WL 2119133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2007 | Docket: 64851530

Published

found by a preponderance of the evidence. . § 921,0024(l)(b)2.b, Fla. Stat. (2004), states that, "If

Monzon v. State

948 So. 2d 812, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 2007 WL 28260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2007 | Docket: 64849106

Published

for offenses on his scoresheet. Pursuant to section 921.0024(l)(a), Mr. Monzon’s scoresheet also included

McCain v. State

944 So. 2d 507, 2006 WL 3733322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 266225

Published

082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2002). Pursuant to section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2002), however, depending

Desmoke v. State

944 So. 2d 1184, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20859, 2006 WL 3689145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2006 | Docket: 64848326

Published

permissible sentence and the statutory maximum. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). Aggravated stalking is

Pacheco v. State

937 So. 2d 739, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14638, 2006 WL 2519540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2006 | Docket: 64846715

Published

appellant’s probation in case number 01-11925. See § 921.0024(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(16)

Leveille v. State

927 So. 2d 1008, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5635, 2006 WL 1007249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2006 | Docket: 64844469

Published

physical injury. *1010(Emphasis supplied). Section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, provides that forty points

Thomas v. State

909 So. 2d 601, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13861, 2005 WL 2105371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2005 | Docket: 64840191

Published

scoresheet exceeds the statutory maximum. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000 & 2002); Fla. R.Crim. P

Valdes v. State

892 So. 2d 565, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346, 2005 WL 292991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 64835769

Published

impose any sentence up to the legal maximum. Id. § 921.0024(2). Since the sentences here are within the legal

Berka v. State

884 So. 2d 1022, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15555, 2004 WL 2480432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2004 | Docket: 64833657

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(a)(25). SHARP

Willingham v. State

874 So. 2d 685, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7344, 2004 WL 1161642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2004 | Docket: 64830933

Published

enumerated in section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes.” § 921.0024(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001) (Worksheet Key). The

State v. Forbes

856 So. 2d 1146, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15707, 2003 WL 22399712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 64825827

Published

without stating a reason for departure under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (2001). Appellee argues

Thanonglit v. State

838 So. 2d 1261, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3371, 2003 WL 1092829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2003 | Docket: 64821058

Published

enforcement protection multiplier pursuant to section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), which provides:

Daniels v. State

838 So. 2d 617, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2003, 2003 WL 366753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 64820958

Published

Punishment Code scoresheet was 82.3 months, so section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), authorized the

Kemner v. Hemphill

199 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9787, 2002 WL 971734

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2002 | Docket: 2286957

Published

degree murder) which results in death. FLA.STAT. § 921.0024(1)(a), victim injury table. There can be no quarrel

Shervis v. State

808 So. 2d 285, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2206, 2002 WL 313218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2002 | Docket: 64812827

Published

sentences because they are legal sentences under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998). See Brown

Pruitt v. State

801 So. 2d 143, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16387, 2001 WL 1471794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2001 | Docket: 64810567

Published

the imposition of consecutive sentences. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999) (“The permissible range

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.704 & 3.992

810 So. 2d 826, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 626, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1929, 2001 WL 1130811

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2001 | Docket: 64813224

Published

Laws of Florida, the Legislature amended section 921.0024(3), Florida Statutes (2000), to relieve the

Fudge v. State

791 So. 2d 1186, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10389, 2001 WL 844407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2001 | Docket: 64807581

Published

that each misdemeanor scores 0.2 points. See § 921.0024(l)(a), Fla. Stat. Here, the primary offense at

Watkins v. State

787 So. 2d 141, 2001 WL 427580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2001 | Docket: 1744974

Published

required by the Criminal Punishment Code found in section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes (1999), and *142 Florida

Rodarm v. State

756 So. 2d 154, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2717, 2000 WL 275848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2000 | Docket: 64796886

Published

“the scoring of victim injury points under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (1997) is a ‘sentencing

Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.704(d)(23)

763 So. 2d 997, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 570, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2166, 1999 WL 1132900

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1999 | Docket: 64799174

Published

according to the total sentence points pursuant to section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, is prohibited unless there

Riggs v. State

745 So. 2d 1111, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16477, 1999 WL 1112783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 64792704

Published

imposed sentences. In Brown, this court reviewed section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statues, and Florida Rule of

Vitanzo v. State

750 So. 2d 662, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15601, 1999 WL 1049349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1999 | Docket: 64794716

Published

shall not be a basis for multiplying points. § 921.0024(1)0»), F.S. (1997); see also Brown v. State,

Hyman v. State

744 So. 2d 566, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14833, 1999 WL 1014939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 64792088

Published

sentence. The statute and rule do not permit this. § 921.0024(l)(b), F.S. (1997); *567see also Brown v. State

Campbell v. State

745 So. 2d 399, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, 1999 WL 934338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1999 | Docket: 64792390

Published

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(17) and section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes, limits to 12 points

Blount v. State

743 So. 2d 147, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11564, 1999 WL 821315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1999 | Docket: 64791666

Published

contends that the trial court erroneously applied section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), and Florida

Frazier v. State

743 So. 2d 1149, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11155, 1999 WL 632099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1999 | Docket: 64791904

Published

contends that the trial court erroneously applied section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), and Florida

Brown v. State

741 So. 2d 1242, 1999 WL 781780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1999 | Docket: 453083

Published

application of the sentencing guidelines in section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997) and subparagraph

Stallworth v. State

237 So. 2d 328, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1970 | Docket: 64515313

Published

directions. RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur. . F.S. § 921.24, F.S.A.

Dodson v. State

203 So. 2d 204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1967 | Docket: 64502627

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Section 921.24, Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A. LILES, C. J