Cases from cite.case.law:

CHAMPAGNE a k a DOC v. STATE, 269 So. 3d 629 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . basis that it departs from the [CPC] only if the sentence is below the [LPS] or as enumerated in s. 924.06 . . . (emphasis added) ), § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("A defendant may appeal from ... . . .

LEWIS, v. STATE, 262 So. 3d 859 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla. . . .

V. GRIMES, v. STATE, 208 So. 3d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 924.06 (3), Fla. . . .

CHARLES, v. STATE, 204 So.3d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 924.06(l)(d), (e), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

M. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 194 So. 3d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat (2015). . . .

ALFONSO- ROCHE, v. STATE, 199 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . imposed, showing compliance with statutory sentencing principles, will effectively end-run section 924.06 . . . the consecutive statutory máxi-mums for offenses at conviction, unless otherwise provided by law. § 924.06 . . . Punishment Code only if the sentence is below the lowest permissible sentence or as enumerated in s. 924.06 . . .

FOGARTY, v. STATE Of, 158 So. 3d 669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . In Jorquera, this court held that section 924.06(1), Florida Statutes, allowing appeals from illegal . . .

LITTLE, v. STATE, 152 So. 3d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . State, 868 So.2d 1250, 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citing § 924.06(1), Fla. . . .

BAGGETT, v. J. ASHE, Jr., 41 F. Supp. 3d 113 (D. Mass. 2014)

. . . . § 924.06(3)(f) authorized strip searches upon an inmate’s transfer into segregation. . . .

BARNHILL, v. STATE, 140 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . There, we held that section 924.06(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), did not give us power to review . . . sentences were not illegal and did not contain any other error we were empowered to correct under section 924.06 . . . Ch. 96-248, § 5, at 955; § 924.06(d), (e), Fla. Stat. . . .

HALL, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . not an appealable order under rule 9.140(b)(1)(D), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or section 924.06 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 81 So. 3d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). APPEAL DISMISSED. . . .

PAMPHILE, v. STATE, 65 So. 3d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .”); § 924.06(3), Fla. . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 56 So. 3d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

TASKER, v. STATE, 48 So. 3d 798 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Section 924.06, Florida Statutes (2007), sets forth the circumstances when a defendant may appeal from . . . Section 924.06(2) states that “[a]n appeal of an order revoking probation may review only proceedings . . . The limitation in section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes, therefore has no application here. . . . Section 924.06(3) states that a “defendant who pleads guilty with no express reservation of the right . . . Importantly, section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that “an appeal of an order revoking . . . State, 698 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and on section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes (2007). . . . Thus, we begin with careful consideration of the text of section 924.06(2), which states: (2) An appeal . . . However, the First District’s reading of section 924.06(2) neither accords with the actual text of the . . . of probation to those “proceedings after the order of probation.” § 924.06(2), Fla. . . . I agree with the First District Court of Appeal that section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes, procedurally . . . Section 924.06(2) limits those issues that may be considered on appeal from an order revoking probation . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 33 So. 3d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 924.06(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

PATRIZI, v. STATE, 31 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . the legal, guidelines sentence, this sentence is not subject to appeal by the defendant under section 924.06 . . . sentence which exceeds the statutory maximum for the offense, and as “otherwise provided by law.” § 924.06 . . .

L. BARRETO, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Fla. . . .

WHITMORE, v. STATE, 27 So. 3d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Punishment Code only if the sentence is below the lowest permissible sentence or as enumerated in s. 924.06 . . . Section 924.06(1) provides: A defendant may appeal from ... a sentence, on the ground that it is illegal . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 22 So. 3d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .; § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2009). MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 33 So. 3d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .; § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2009). MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur. . . .

TASKER, v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Importantly, section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that “an appeal of an order revoking . . .

STANCLIFF, v. STATE, 996 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Punishment Code only if the sentence is below the lowest permissible sentence or as enumerated in s. 924.06 . . . Under sections 924.06(l)(d) and (e), Florida Statutes (2005), a defendant is authorized to appeal an . . .

MARSHALL, v. STATE, 978 So. 2d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 924.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). Dismissed. STONE, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur. . . .

MALONE, v. STATE, 973 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Punishment Code only if the sentence is below the lowest permissible sentence or as enumerated in s. 924.06 . . .

STUBBS, v. STATE, 951 So. 2d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes (2005), provides that “[a]n appeal of an order revoking probation . . . Without any discussion of section 924.06(2) — which first became effective on May 25, 1959 — our cases . . .

HOLLINGSWORTH, v. STATE, 942 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . preserved for appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellant Procedure 9.140 (b) (2) (A) (i) and section 924.06 . . .

DAWKINS, a k a v. STATE, 936 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . An order revoking probation (including community control) is expressly appealable under section 924.06 . . .

MICHANOWICZ, v. STATE, 935 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .”); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2003) (same). See also Williams v. . . .

GILANIAN, v. CITY OF BOSTON, J., 431 F. Supp. 2d 172 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . Regs.Code tit. 103, § 924.06(2)(b) (West 2005); see also Massachusetts Department of Correction, No. . . . Id. § 924.06(2); see also Massachusetts Department of Correction, No. 103 DOC 506.04.2.A. . . .

D. SINGLETARY, v. STATE, 925 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2002); see also Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). Affirmed. . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE N. v., 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006)

. . . He also claims the district court declared invalid section 924.06, Florida Statutes (2004), which describes . . .

BOUCHIER, v. STATE, 915 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

LEMON, v. STATE, 913 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 924.06(3),' Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). See also Eisaman v. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- CONFORM RULES TO LEGISLATION, 900 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 2005)

. . . and 5, Constitution of Florida, concerning the right of appeal from a judgment of conviction; section 924.06 . . .

HEDGLIN, v. STATE, 892 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1979); §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2004); Fla. R.App. . . .

WEST, v. STATE, 888 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2). Accordingly, we affirm. . . .

B. PRINCE, v. STATE, 885 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . P. 9.140(b)(2); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

RITTER, v. STATE, 885 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . State, 678 So.2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), in which we held, pursuant to the version of section 924.06 . . . the issue presented in Melton, the issue in the present case was cognizable on appeal under section 924.06 . . .

CABRERA, v. STATE, 884 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . dismiss, which contains no argument, simply states that the order is not appeal-able under either section 924.06 . . .

JORQUERA, v. STATE, 868 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 924.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2003); Patterson v. State, 796 So.2d 572, 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). . . .

KEARSE, v. STATE, 858 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See also § 924.06(3), Fla. . . .

CRUMITY, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (2002). SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur. . . .

HAWK, v. STATE, 848 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . NECESSITY OF RESERVATION OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (2002) and Florida Rule . . . Section 924.06(3) provides, "A defendant who pleads guilty with no express reservation of the right to . . .

CHAMBERS, v. STATE, 840 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Pursuant to section 924.06(1), Florida Statutes (1999), a defendant may only appeal an illegal sentence . . .

LENNEAR, v. STATE, 833 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . P. 9.140(b); § 924.06(3) Fla. Stat. (2000). See also Jones v. . . .

A. MOULTRIE, a k a v. STATE, 813 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000). See also Robinson v. . . .

WINTHER, v. STATE, 812 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . P. 9.140(b)(1)(E), (F); § 924.06(l)(d), (e), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

HOWARD, v. STATE, 820 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . As authority, the state cites sections 924.06(l)(d) and (e), Florida Statutes (2000) (a defendant may . . .

E. JONES, v. STATE, 806 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . State, 752 So.2d 79, 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Fla. R.App. . . . State, 711 So.2d 64, 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), rev. denied, 722 So.2d 195 (Fla.1998); see also §§ 924.06 . . .

HERRERA, v. STATE, 804 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . State, 650 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

C. Q. a v. STATE, 801 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Amendment to Fla. . . .

STATE v. T. G. a, 800 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2001)

. . . In Robinson, this Court upheld the constitutionality of section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1977), which . . . Section 924.06(3), at issue in Robinson, currently provides that a defendant who pleads guilty or nolo . . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . The court recognized that both section 924.06(3) and rule 9.140 limit appeals in criminal cases from . . . Indeed, Robinson distinguishes these errors, noting that section 924.06(3) did not apply to errors which . . .

PATTERSON, v. STATE, 796 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 924.06(l)(a-e), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998); Hochhauser v. . . . We conclude, however, that section 924.06(1) restricts this court’s scope of review. . . .

HOCHHAUSER, v. STATE, 785 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . State, 736 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); see also § 924.06(1)(a)-(e), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . The 1997 version of section 924.06(1) was in effect at the time of the commission of Hochhauser’s crimes . . .

WILLINGHAM II, v. STATE, 781 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . §§ 921.002(l)(g), (h); 924.06, Fla. Stat. . . .

M. PETERSON, v. STATE, 775 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Punishment Code only if the sentence is below the lowest permissible sentence or as enumerated in s. 924.06 . . .

HALL, v. STATE, 773 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 924.06, Fla. Stat. (1998). . . . See § 924.06(l)(d), (e), Fla. Stat. (1998). . . .

BLOUNT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 766 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See sections 924.06(2) and 949.07, Florida Statutes (1999). . . .

PAULK, v. STATE, 765 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . after a guilty plea on the grounds that it was frivolous and contrary to the provisions of section 924.06 . . .

LEONARD, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Such a defendant shall obtain review by means of collateral attack.” 373 So.2d at 901 (quoting section 924.06 . . . before filing the initial brief or original petition, that the party has a right to appeal under s. 924.06 . . .

FOSTER, v. STATE, 757 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat.; Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979). . . .

BLANCO, v. STATE, 752 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Brown v. . . .

BLAKLEY, v. STATE, 746 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 924.06(1)(d) & (e), Fla. . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND b, 760 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1999)

. . . and 5, Constitution of Florida, concerning the right of appeal from a judgment of conviction; section 924.06 . . .

WHITE, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 749 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1999)

. . . The State asserts that sections 924.06(3) and 924.051(4), Florida Statutes (1996), of the Criminal Appeal . . .

MORSE, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 749 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 1999)

. . . The State asserts that sections 924.06(3) and 924.051(4), Florida Statutes (1996), of the Criminal Appeal . . .

E. GONZALEZ, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 749 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1999)

. . . The State asserts that sections 924.06(3) and 924.051(4), Florida Statutes (1996), of the Criminal Appeal . . .

GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 739 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Teague v. State, 728 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). . . .

U. MATTHEWS, v. STATE, 736 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . original probation order,, rather than attacking the imposition of a condition after its breach”); § 924.06 . . . This court declined to reach the merits relying on section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes (1973), which . . . Based on the statute, this court concluded: Thus, [section 924.06(2) ] clearly limits this appeal to . . . Section 924.06(2), F.S. 1973; Hardrick v. State, 293 So.2d 135 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1974). Id. at 310. . . .

L. GUZZI, v. STATE, 736 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Under section 924.06, Florida Statutes (1997), a defendant may appeal from a sentence outside the guidelines . . .

STATE v. THOMPSON,, 735 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1999)

. . . See also § 924.06(3), Fla. . . .

KALAPP, v. STATE, 729 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Eisaman, this court explained: Under both Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b) and section 924.06 . . .

ZAMBUTO, v. STATE, 731 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (emphasis added); see also §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

COVINGTON, v. STATE, 728 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). . . .

R. ROWE, v. H. SCHREIBER, L., 725 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See §§ 924.051, 924.055, 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

T. G. a v. STATE, 741 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . L.L. applied section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1) . . . Section 924.051(4) and section 924.06(8) are virtually identical, as is Florida Appellate Rule 9.140( . . . Section 924.06(3) states: A defendant who pleads guilty with no express reservation of the right to appeal . . .

NELSON, v. STATE, 719 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . defendant’s appellate rights may have been added in order to comport with the enactment of section 924.06 . . . opinion in Robinson was to construe rule 9.140, despite the restrictive language in both it and section 924.06 . . .

L. A. F. a v. STATE, 708 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1995). COBB, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . . .

BOYD, v. STATE, 707 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . State, 699 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 707 So.2d 1124 (Fla.1998) (Table, No. 91,711); § 924.06 . . .

HARRIEL, v. STATE, 710 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

COLLINS, v. STATE, 710 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 924.06, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1996). AFFIRMED. STONE, C.J., and GUNTHER, J., concur. . . .

TROWELL, v. STATE, 706 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1991), provides that a defendant who pleads guilty has no right . . . Section 924.06(3) now provides the following: "A defendant who pleads guilty with no express reservation . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 716 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . dismiss, which contains no argument, simply states that the order is not appealable under either section 924.06 . . .

GARDNER, v. STATE, 699 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . State, 593 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

J. AUSTIN, v. STATE, 696 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1995); Norman v. State, 634 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). . . .

W. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 691 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . stand for such a proposition, we recede and adopt the procedure set forth in Rule 9.140(b) and section 924.06 . . . not expressly reserved the right to direct appeal, he may obtain review only by collateral attack. § 924.06 . . .

ABNEY, v. STATE, 685 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 924.06(3) of the Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a defendant who enters a plea of nolo . . .

BALL, v. STATE, 686 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat.; Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979); Ford v. . . .

GAINES, v. STATE, 686 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat.; Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979); Ford v. . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 685 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1996)

. . . State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), this Court addressed the validity of section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 696 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1996)

. . . State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), this Court addressed the validity of section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes . . .

I. RASIK, v. STATE, 683 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . We have jurisdiction of this appeal under section 924.06(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1995). See Fla. . . .

WHITE, v. STATE, 682 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1); Nettles v. . . .

WAITE, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,, 681 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . circuit judge dismissed the appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b) and section 924.06 . . . Section 924.06(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a criminal defendant may appeal from a “ . . . This reading of section 924.06(l)(a) draws support from Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)( . . . Nor did Martin cite to section 924.06(l)(a), the statutory section concerning a criminal defendant’s . . . on probation and then immediately suspended it, the order would have been appealable under section 924.06 . . .

HAMPTON, v. STATE, 680 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1). . . .

RAPPAPORT, v. STATE, 678 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1993); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Ford v. . . .

MILLS, v. STATE, 677 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1995); McGinty v. State, 463 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). . . .

MELTON, v. STATE, 678 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 924.06, Fla. Stat. This appeal is therefore dismissed. MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 677 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 924.06(8), Fla. Stat.; Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979); Babb v. . . .