Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 63.089 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 63.089 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 63.089 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 63.089

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 63
ADOPTION
View Entire Chapter
63.089 Proceeding to terminate parental rights pending adoption; hearing; grounds; dismissal of petition; judgment.
(1) HEARING.The court may terminate parental rights pending adoption only after a hearing.
(2) HEARING PREREQUISITES.The court may hold the hearing only when:
(a) For each person whose consent to adoption is required under s. 63.062:
1. A consent under s. 63.082 has been executed and filed with the court;
2. An affidavit of nonpaternity under s. 63.082 has been executed and filed with the court;
3. Notice has been provided under ss. 63.087 and 63.088; or
4. The certificate from the Office of Vital Statistics has been provided to the court stating that a diligent search has been made of the Florida Putative Father Registry created in s. 63.054 and that no filing has been found pertaining to the father of the child in question or, if a filing is found, stating the name of the putative father and the time and date of the filing.
(b) For each notice and petition that must be served under ss. 63.087 and 63.088:
1. At least 20 days have elapsed since the date of personal service and an affidavit of service has been filed with the court;
2. At least 30 days have elapsed since the first date of publication of constructive service and an affidavit of service has been filed with the court; or
3. An affidavit of nonpaternity, consent for adoption, or other document that affirmatively waives service has been executed and filed with the court.
(c) The minor named in the petition has been born.
(d) The petition contains all information required under s. 63.087 and all affidavits of inquiry, diligent search, and service required under s. 63.088 have been obtained and filed with the court.
(3) GROUNDS FOR TERMINATING PARENTAL RIGHTS PENDING ADOPTION.The court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption if the court determines by clear and convincing evidence, supported by written findings of fact, that each person whose consent to adoption is required under s. 63.062:
(a) Has executed a valid consent under s. 63.082 and the consent was obtained according to the requirements of this chapter;
(b) Has executed an affidavit of nonpaternity and the affidavit was obtained according to the requirements of this chapter;
(c) Has been served with a notice of the intended adoption plan in accordance with the provisions of s. 63.062(3) and has failed to respond within the designated time period;
(d) Has been properly served notice of the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and has failed to file a written answer or personally appear at the evidentiary hearing resulting in the judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption;
(e) Has been properly served notice of the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and has been determined under subsection (4) to have abandoned the minor;
(f) Is a parent of the person to be adopted, which parent has been judicially declared incapacitated with restoration of competency found to be medically improbable;
(g) Is a person who has legal custody of the person to be adopted, other than a parent, who has failed to respond in writing to a request for consent for a period of 60 days or, after examination of his or her written reasons for withholding consent, is found by the court to be withholding his or her consent unreasonably;
(h) Has been properly served notice of the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of this chapter, but has been found by the court, after examining written reasons for the withholding of consent, to be unreasonably withholding his or her consent; or
(i) Is the spouse of the person to be adopted who has failed to consent, and the failure of the spouse to consent to the adoption is excused by reason of prolonged and unexplained absence, unavailability, incapacity, or circumstances that are found by the court to constitute unreasonable withholding of consent.
(4) FINDING OF ABANDONMENT.A finding of abandonment resulting in a termination of parental rights must be based upon clear and convincing evidence that a parent or person having legal custody has abandoned the child in accordance with the definition contained in s. 63.032. A finding of abandonment may also be based upon emotional abuse or a refusal to provide reasonable financial support, when able, to a birth mother during her pregnancy or on whether the person alleged to have abandoned the child, while being able, failed to establish contact with the child or accept responsibility for the child’s welfare.
(a) In making a determination of abandonment at a hearing for termination of parental rights under this chapter, the court shall consider, among other relevant factors not inconsistent with this section:
1. Whether the actions alleged to constitute abandonment demonstrate a willful disregard for the safety or welfare of the child or the unborn child;
2. Whether the person alleged to have abandoned the child, while being able, failed to provide financial support;
3. Whether the person alleged to have abandoned the child, while being able, failed to pay for medical treatment; and
4. Whether the amount of support provided or medical expenses paid was appropriate, taking into consideration the needs of the child and relative means and resources available to the person alleged to have abandoned the child.
(b) The child has been abandoned when the parent of a child is incarcerated on or after October 1, 2001, in a federal, state, or county correctional institution and:
1. The period of time for which the parent has been or is expected to be incarcerated will constitute a significant portion of the child’s minority. In determining whether the period of time is significant, the court shall consider the child’s age and the child’s need for a permanent and stable home. The period of time begins on the date that the parent enters into incarceration;
2. The incarcerated parent has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be a violent career criminal as defined in s. 775.084, a habitual violent felony offender as defined in s. 775.084, convicted of child abuse as defined in s. 827.03, or a sexual predator as defined in s. 775.21; has been convicted of first degree or second degree murder in violation of s. 782.04 or a sexual battery that constitutes a capital, life, or first degree felony violation of s. 794.011; or has been convicted of a substantially similar offense in another jurisdiction. As used in this section, the term “substantially similar offense” means any offense that is substantially similar in elements and penalties to one of those listed in this subparagraph, and that is in violation of a law of any other jurisdiction, whether that of another state, the District of Columbia, the United States or any possession or territory thereof, or any foreign jurisdiction; or
3. The court determines by clear and convincing evidence that continuing the parental relationship with the incarcerated parent would be harmful to the child and, for this reason, termination of the parental rights of the incarcerated parent is in the best interests of the child.
(5) DISMISSAL OF PETITION.If the court does not find by clear and convincing evidence that parental rights of a parent should be terminated pending adoption, the court must dismiss the petition and that parent’s parental rights that were the subject of such petition shall remain in full force under the law. The order must include written findings in support of the dismissal, including findings as to the criteria in subsection (4) if rejecting a claim of abandonment.
(a) Parental rights may not be terminated based upon a consent that the court finds has been timely revoked under s. 63.082 or a consent to adoption or affidavit of nonpaternity that the court finds was obtained by fraud or duress.
(b) The court must enter an order based upon written findings providing for the placement of the minor, but the court may not proceed to determine custody between competing eligible parties. The placement of the child should revert to the parent or guardian who had physical custody of the child at the time of the placement for adoption unless the court determines upon clear and convincing evidence that this placement is not in the best interests of the child or is not an available option for the child. The court may not change the placement of a child who has established a bonded relationship with the current caregiver without providing for a reasonable transition plan consistent with the best interests of the child. The court may direct the parties to participate in a reunification or unification plan with a qualified professional to assist the child in the transition. The court may order scientific testing to determine the paternity of the minor only if the court has determined that the consent of the alleged father would be required, unless all parties agree that such testing is in the best interests of the child. The court may not order scientific testing to determine paternity of an unmarried biological father if the child has a father as described in s. 63.088(4)(a)-(d) whose rights have not been previously terminated. Further proceedings, if any, regarding the minor must be brought in a separate custody action under chapter 61, a dependency action under chapter 39, or a paternity action under chapter 742.
(6) JUDGMENT TERMINATING PARENTAL RIGHTS PENDING ADOPTION.
(a) The judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption must be in writing and contain findings of fact as to the grounds for terminating parental rights.
(b) Within 7 days after filing, the court shall mail a copy of the judgment to the department. The clerk shall execute a certificate of the mailing.
(c) The judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption legally frees the child for subsequent adoption, adjudicates the child’s status, and may not be challenged by a person claiming parental status who did not establish parental rights before the filing of the petition for termination, except as specifically provided in this chapter.
(7) RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT TERMINATING PARENTAL RIGHTS.
(a) A motion for relief from a judgment terminating parental rights must be filed with the court originally entering the judgment. The motion must be filed within a reasonable time, but not later than 1 year after the entry of the judgment. An unmarried biological father does not have standing to seek relief from a judgment terminating parental rights if the mother did not identify him to the adoption entity before the date she signed a consent for adoption or if he was not located because the mother failed or refused to provide sufficient information to locate him.
(b) No later than 30 days after the filing of a motion under this subsection, the court must conduct a preliminary hearing to determine what contact, if any, shall be permitted between a parent and the child pending resolution of the motion. Such contact shall be considered only if it is requested by a parent who has appeared at the hearing and may not be awarded unless the parent previously established a bonded relationship with the child and the parent has pled a legitimate legal basis and established a prima facie case for setting aside the judgment terminating parental rights. If the court orders contact between a parent and child, the order must be issued in writing as expeditiously as possible and must state with specificity any provisions regarding contact with persons other than those with whom the child resides.
(c) At the preliminary hearing, the court, upon the motion of any party or upon its own motion, may order scientific testing to determine the paternity of the minor if the person seeking to set aside the judgment is alleging to be the child’s father and that fact has not previously been determined by legitimacy or scientific testing. The court may order visitation with a person for whom scientific testing for paternity has been ordered and who has previously established a bonded relationship with the child.
(d) Unless otherwise agreed between the parties or for good cause shown, the court shall conduct a final hearing on the motion for relief from judgment within 45 days after the filing and enter its written order as expeditiously as possible thereafter.
(e) If the court grants relief from the judgment terminating parental rights and no new pleading is filed to terminate parental rights, the placement of the child should revert to the parent or guardian who had physical custody of the child at the time of the original placement for adoption unless the court determines upon clear and convincing evidence that this placement is not in the best interests of the child or is not an available option for the child. The court may not change the placement of a child who has established a bonded relationship with the current caregiver without providing for a reasonable transition plan consistent with the best interests of the child. The court may direct the parties to participate in a reunification or unification plan with a qualified professional to assist the child in the transition. The court may not direct the placement of a child with a person other than the adoptive parents without first obtaining a favorable home study of that person and any other persons residing in the proposed home and shall take whatever additional steps are necessary and appropriate for the physical and emotional protection of the child.
(8) RECORDS; CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.All papers and records pertaining to a petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption are related to the subsequent adoption of the minor and are subject to s. 63.162. An unmarried biological father does not have standing to seek the court case number or access the court file if the mother did not identify him to the adoption entity before the date she signed the consent for adoption. The confidentiality provisions of this chapter do not apply to the extent information regarding persons or proceedings is made available as specified under s. 63.088.
History.s. 18, ch. 2001-3; s. 19, ch. 2003-58; s. 13, ch. 2004-371; s. 14, ch. 2008-151; s. 17, ch. 2012-81; s. 17, ch. 2016-24; s. 17, ch. 2017-37; s. 9, ch. 2017-107; s. 8, ch. 2024-71; s. 22, ch. 2025-156.

F.S. 63.089 on Google Scholar

F.S. 63.089 on CourtListener

Amendments to 63.089


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 63.089

Total Results: 41  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Heart of Adoptions, Inc. v. JA, 963 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2007).

Cited 134 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 455, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1236, 2007 WL 2002660

...The petition also stated that although J.A. was able, he refused to provide financial support after he was informed he might be the father of the child. In addition, the petition alleged physical and financial abandonment of the birth mother and child pursuant to sections 63.089, 63.064(1) and 63.032(1), Florida Statutes (2005)....
...petition." The notice of petition and notice of hearing, which were in the form prescribed by section 63.088(3), Florida Statutes (2005), informed J.A. of the date and time of the hearing on the petition to terminate his parental rights and contained the following warning: UNDER SECTION 63.089, FLORIDA STATUTES, FAILURE TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE WITH THE COURT OR TO APPEAR AT THIS HEARING CONSTITUTES GROUNDS UPON WHICH THE COURT SHALL END ANY PARENTAL *194 RIGHTS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THE MINOR CHILD....
...did not comply with this subsection, then J.A.'s parental rights may be terminated. If J.A. demonstrates compliance with all applicable subsections, then the trial court must determine if his consent is required for the adoption. However, the adoption entity may pursue its claim of abandonment under sections 63.089, 63.064(1) and 63.032(1), as pled in the petition for termination of parental rights....
Copy

Js v. Sa, 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 2292311

...The court may terminate the parental rights of the mother if the court determines by clear and convincing evidence that the mother executed a valid consent under section 63.082, Florida Statutes, and that the consent was obtained according to the requirements of Chapter 63. See Fla. Stat. § 63.089(3)(a)(2004)....
...Abandonment by the Father The trial court excused the father's consent to adoption upon finding that he abandoned the child. The court may excuse the father's consent to adoption if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the father has abandoned the minor child. § 63.089(3)(e), Fla....
...e. See E.A.W, 658 So.2d at 967; Matter of Adoption of Doe, 543 So.2d 741 (Fla.1989); see also § 63.032(1). However, the adoption statute defines "abandoned" as a situation where the parent makes no support provisions "while being able." Pursuant to section 63.089(4)(a), the court must consider the needs of the child and the relative means and resources available to the person alleged to have abandoned the child....
Copy

In Re Baby RPS, 942 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2683776

...2d DCA July 21, 2006), the statute that authorizes the trial court to terminate parental rights pending adoption does not apply to cases, such as this, where the father has failed to comply with the registration requirements of section 63.062. See § 63.089(3). [2] Section 63.089(3) provides that "[t]he court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption if the court determines by clear and convincing evidence, supported by written findings of fact, that each person whose consent to adoption is required under s....
...al fathers who have registered with the Putative Father Registry. However, since J.C.J. failed to register with the Putative Father Registry, his consent to R.P.S.'s adoption was not required and the grounds for terminating parental rights listed in section 63.089(3) do not apply to him....
...will be a party to a termination of parental rights action. Although the trial court found that J.C.J.'s consent to the adoption was not required due to his failure to register, the trial court nevertheless terminated J.C.J.'s parental rights pursuant to section 63.089(3). This was error. Since section 63.089(3) specifies the grounds upon which the trial court may terminate the parental rights of a parent whose consent is required, that section cannot apply to J.C.J. since his consent was not required and he was not a parent. Even if J.C.J. was a person whose consent was required, none of the grounds specified in section 63.089(3) apply to J.C.J....
Copy

In Re Adoption of Baby A., 944 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2033896

...ghts, inchoate or otherwise, that the father may have. The legislature's intent to treat an unmarried biological father such as A.S. as a "non-parent" who has no established rights requiring termination is further demonstrated in sections 63.088 and 63.089....
...for, only those persons "whose consent to adoption is required." Notice to an unregistered putative biological father, such as A.S., is not required because he is not a person whose consent is required. There are numerous grounds for termination in section 63.089(3), but these refer only to "each person whose consent to adoption is required." [15] Thus, Gift of Life properly followed the statute when it neither named nor served A.S....
...de the adoption entity with a copy of the verified response filed with the court and the claim of paternity form filed with the Office of Vital Statistics. [15] This statute also permits termination based upon a theory of parental "abandonment." See § 63.089(4)....
Copy

Maf v. Ejs, 917 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 3327780

...rental rights pursuant to this chapter, the court must consider, among other relevant factors not inconsistent with this section: . . . 2. Whether the person alleged to have abandoned the child, while being able, failed to provide financial support; § 63.089(4)(a)(2), Fla....
...Because the ultimate issue is the intent of the parent, as determined by reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the conduct of the parent, it is a question of fact for the trial judge. Id. The judge must consider the factors enumerated in the statute and all "other relevant factors ...." § 63.089(4)(a), Fla....
Copy

In re Adoption of K.A.G., 152 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20849, 2014 WL 7331269

...l-being. *1274 In Father’s rehearing motion, he argued that his consent to adoption was valid, absent findings that it was obtained by fraud or duress, which was not alleged. Father stated that the court misapplied the burden of proof. Pursuant to section 63.089, Florida Statutes (2013), the court should have applied the clear and convincing evidence standard only to determine whether Father had executed a valid consent and whether that consent was obtained according to the requirements of chapter 63....
...The final judgment of adoption shall have the effect of terminating parental rights simultaneously with the granting of the decree of adoption.”). Thus, in this case, the termination of parental rights *1275 and the adoption are dealt with in the same proceeding. Section 63.089(3)(a) allows the trial court to terminate parental rights pending adoption if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence, supported by written findings, that the parent has executed a valid consent under section 63.082 and the consent was obtained according to the requirements of chapter 63....
...Different evidentiary burdens of proof apply to each determination. The former determination on “termination of parental rights” must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, while the latter, “best interests determination,” is to be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Compare § 63.089(3), Fla....
Copy

JCJ v. Heart of Adoptions, Inc., 989 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2596365

...was a party whose consent was needed in order to proceed with the adoption. See J.A., 963 So.2d at 191. Thus, at the final hearing upon remand, the only issue remaining as to J.C.J. was whether his parental rights should be terminated because of his abandonment of the child. See Id. at 202 (citing §§ 63.089, 63.064(1), 63.032(1), Fla....
...to support and communicate with the child are only marginal efforts that do not evince a settled purpose to assume all parental duties, the court may declare the child to be abandoned. In making this decision, the court may consider the conduct of a father toward the child's mother during her pregnancy. § 63.089(4)....
...Because the record supports the trial court's finding of abandonment, we affirm the final judgment terminating J.C.J.'s parental rights. [3] Affirmed. KELLY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur. NOTES [1] HOA included abandonment as a ground for termination of J.C.J.'s parental rights in its original petition. See § 63.089(4), Fla. Stat. (2004). The trial court correctly rejected J.C.J.'s argument that language in our prior opinion, see J.C.J., 942 So.2d at 908, stating "none of the grounds specified in section 63.089(3) apply to J.C.J." became "law of the case" on the issue of abandonment....
Copy

J.S. v. S.A., 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14744

...The court may terminate the parental rights of the mother if the court determines by clear and convincing evidence that the mother executed a valid consent under section 63.082, Florida Statutes, and that the consent was obtained according to the requirements of Chapter 63. See Fla. Stat. § 63.089 (3)(a)(2004)....
...Abandonment by the Father The trial court excused the father’s consent to adoption upon finding that he abandoned the child. The court may excuse the father’s consent to adoption if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the father has abandoned the minor child. § 63.089(3)(e), Fla....
...See E.A.W, 658 So.2d at 967 ; Matter of Adoption of Doe, 543 So.2d 741 (Fla.1989); see also § 63.032(1). However, the adoption statute defines “abandoned” as a situation where the parent makes no support provisions “while being able.” Pursuant to section 63.089(4)(a), the court must consider the needs of the child and the relative means and resources available to the person alleged to have abandoned the child....
Copy

S.C. v. Gift of Life Adoptions, 100 So. 3d 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19447, 2012 WL 5458083

...had complied with the statutory requirements for asserting his rights as an unmarried biological father, such a finding of abandonment independently supports the granting of the petition. Furthermore, this finding was made after S.C. was appointed counsel. See § 63.089(3)(e)....
Copy

J.H. v. K.D.M., 8 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110

parental rights pending adoption are contained in section 63.089(3), Florida Statutes. A trial court’s determination
Copy

SDT v. Bundle of Hope Ministries, Inc., 949 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 597042

...Although there was no explicit finding by the court establishing appellant as the child's statutory parent in its order denying appellant's motions, we consider the court implicitly found, by addressing the motions on their merits and tracking the provisions of section 63.089(4), Florida Statutes (2005), relating to a father's abandonment of his child, that appellant's status in such regard had been established during the later proceeding....
...cured by his appearance and testimony at the later proceeding, which, although designated as one seeking relief from judgment, met all the requisites essential for a hearing conducted on a petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption under section 63.089....
...The biological father has not filed an acknowledgment of paternity with the Office of Vital Statistics of the Department of Health.... Pursuant to § 63.062, Fla. Stat., the consent of the birth father is not required. [2] This provision states in part: (1) Unless supported by one or more of the grounds enumerated under s. 63.089(3), a petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption may be granted only if written consent has been executed as provided in s....
...a parent for purposes of a termination proceeding. The burden of showing that an unmarried biological father meets the definition of a parent in order for his rights to be terminated is, in our judgment, placed on the party seeking termination. See § 63.089(2)(a)3., Fla....
Copy

A.D. v. M.D.M., 920 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2279, 2006 WL 401316

...Thus, the clerk will not accept his pleading for filing without a case number, but he cannot obtain the case number because the file is confidential. The confidentiality of papers and records in termination and adoption proceedings is protected by statute. See § 63.089(8), Fla....
Copy

M.S.B. v. R.B., 93 So. 3d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3136496, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12641

...However, he seeks continued contact with the children, presumably requiring the natural mother bring the children to his institution. M.S.B. misconstrúes the legal impact of the termination of his parental *533 rights and the subsequent adoption by the stepfather. AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, C.J., and TORPY, J., concur. . Section 63.089(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that where a parent is or will be incarcerated for a significant period of a child's minority, the child is deemed to have been abandoned.
Copy

N.A.G. v. J.L.G., 198 So. 3d 1025 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12180, 2016 WL 4261865

...If a parent does not consent to the termination, the court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights if it determines by clear and convincing evidence supported by written findings of fact that the parent has been given notice and has abandoned the child. See § 63.089(3)(e)....
...5th DCA 1985))). In making an abandonment determination under this chapter, the trial court must consider, among other factors) “[w]hether the actions alleged to constitute abandonment demonstrate a willful disregard for the safety or welfare of the child.” § 63.089(4)(a)(l)....
Copy

D.T.S. v. J.M., 33 So. 3d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5527

...We affirm the father’s remaining issues without comment. Section 68.062(1), Florida Statutes (2009), authorizes termination of parental rights pending adoption when the parents have executed written consent that complies with section 63.082, Florida Statutes (2009). Section 63.089, Florida Statutes (2009), permits the circuit court to terminate parental rights pending adoption when it has determined by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has “executed a valid consent under s....
Copy

Floridians Against Increased Rates, Inc. v. Gary F. Clark, etc. (Fla. 2023).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...1982) (applying the federal standing rule only because both statutes recognized a form of associational standing). 18. See, e.g., § 775.21(3)–(5), Fla. Stat. (2023) (expressly requiring a trial court to make written finding that an offender is a sexual predator or a sexually violent offender); § 63.089(3), (5)–(7), Fla....
Copy

J.C.J. v. Heart of Adoptions, Inc., 942 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15505

...2d DCA July 21, 2006), the statute that authorizes the trial court to terminate parental rights pending adoption does not apply to cases, such as this, where the father has failed to comply with the registration requirements of section 63.062. See § 63.089(3). 2 Section 63.089(3) provides that “[t]he court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption if the court determines by clear and convincing evidence, supported by written findings of fact, that each person whose consent to adoption is required under s....
...fathers who have registered with the Putative Father Registry. However, since J.C.J. failed to register with the Putative Father Registry, his consent to R.P.S.’s adoption was not required and the grounds for terminating parental rights listed in section 63.089(3) do not apply to him....
...will be a party to a termination of parental rights action. Although the trial court found that J.C.J.’s consent to the adoption was not required due to his failure to register, the trial court nevertheless terminated J.C.J.’s parental rights pursuant to section 63.089(3). This was error. Since section 63.089(3) specifies the grounds upon which the trial court may terminate the parental rights of a parent whose consent is required, that section cannot apply to J.C.J. since his consent was not required and he was not a parent. Even if J.C.J. was a person whose consent was required, none of the grounds specified in section 63.089(3) apply to J.C.J....
Copy

C.G. & C.G. v. R.C. (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...II. The trial court’s decision to deny Appellants’ petition to terminate Appellee’s parental rights to R. pending their petition for stepparent adoption, was predicated on a complex, interlocking interpretation of the factors in section 63.089, Florida Statutes (2017)....
...for a significant period of R.’s minority, but also that Appellee had, in general, “abandoned” R., as that term is defined in section 63.032, Florida Statutes, and further, that Appellee had abandoned R. according to the elements set forth in section 63.089(4)(a)1.-4., Florida Statutes. A. The order on review presents a pure question of law and statutory interpretation....
...Although the trial court in the present case did not expressly cite to these two rules of construction, the tenor of its analysis suggests that it effectively employed them. It is our view, however, that the court needlessly went beyond the plain meaning of the statute. The language of section 63.089(4) is clear and unambiguous. Unpacked, it provides a cascade of independent factors for the trial court to evaluate in determining the issue of abandonment. To begin with, section 63.089(3), Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part: Grounds for terminating parental rights pending adoption.--The court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights pending adoption if the court determines by...
...63.062: 4 .... (e) Has been properly served notice of the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and has been determined under subsection (4) to have abandoned the minor; . . . (Emphasis added.) Section 63.089(4), Florida Statutes, adds: Finding of abandonment.--A finding of abandonment resulting in a termination of parental rights must be based upon clear and convincing evidence that a parent or person...
...child to be abandoned. In making this decision, the court may consider the conduct of a father towards the child’s mother during her pregnancy. 5 Having referenced abandonment as defined in section 63.032(1), section 63.089(4) continues: (a) In making a determination of abandonment at a hearing for termination of parental rights under this chapter, the court shall consider, among other relevant factors not inconsistent with this section: 1....
...abandoned the child. Subsection (4)(a) requires no parsing. According to its terms, the trial court will make a finding of abandonment as defined in section 63.032(1) and, in doing so, consider the four factors in subparagraphs 1.-4. But, section 63.089(4)(b), Florida Statutes, contemplates a distinctly different scenario, as is evident in its opening sentence: The child has been abandoned when the parent of a child is incarcerated on or after October 1, 2001, in a federal, state, or county correctional institution and: 1....
.... (Emphasis added.) The emphasized language of this paragraph is unassailably definitional. It expresses the essential nature of “abandonment” in the context of an incarcerated parent who will remain so for a “significant portion of the child’s minority.” § 63.089(4)(b)1., Fla....
...the court “shall consider the child’s age and the child’s need for a permanent and stable home.” Id. By its clear terms, subsection (4)(b) is an independent, alternative means of establishing abandonment. In the instant case, however, the trial court applied the factors in section 63.089(4) linearly, beginning with the introductory reference to the definition of abandonment in section 63.032, then proceeding downward to the salient considerations in subsections (4)(a) and (4)(b). The result was a legal analysis that eviscerated the legislative concept of abandonment through incarceration. The significance of this misplaced examination is evidenced by the way in which the court evaluated the facts under section 63.089(4)(b)1.: The Father was incarcerated in January 2010....
...The period of incarceration will be 13 years. The child is currently 13 years old. . . . While few people could argue 13 out of 18 years is not a significant period of time, the child has not also been abandoned by the [F]ather as required by section 63.089(4) and defined in section 63.032, Fla. Stat. Therefore, the ground for termination listed in section 63.089(4)(b), Fla. Stat. has not been met. There is no foundation in section 63.089(4) to support the emphasized language in the above-quoted paragraph. Put another way, there is no suggestion in the statutory language that abandonment in the context of section 63.089(4)(b) is contingent on any other definition of abandonment that precedes it in the statute. Lending credence to this notion that section 63.089(4)(b) offers up separate reasons for finding abandonment is the fact that 7 it proposes three distinct disjunctive scenarios of parental incarceration that would constitute abandonment. See § 63.089(4)(b)1.-3, Fla. Stat. Unquestionably, by its plain terms, section 63.089(4)(b) is to be read separate and apart from section 63.089(4) and (4)(a). Moreover, the trial court’s misapprehension that the definition of “abandoned” in section 63.032(1) overlays all of section 63.089(4) led it to accord undue importance to the Second District’s opinion in In re B.W.G., 198 So....
...2d DCA 2016), and that decision’s emphasis on the parent’s conduct as manifesting a settled purpose to permanently forgo all parental rights—behavior evincing a complete relinquishment of responsibility. But B.W.G. did not involve an incarcerated parent. The analysis in that case proceeded under sections 63.032 and 63.089(4)(a). However, and as noted by the trial court below, the Second District in B.W.G....
...v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 979 So. 2d 1075, 1080 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), J.T. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 819 So. 2d 270, 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), and, lastly, R.R. v. M.M., 143 So. 3d 449, 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). That observation is sound, and section 63.089(4)(b) reflects its wisdom by predicating abandonment under that subsection not on incarceration alone, but on a period of incarceration that will constitute “a significant portion of the child’s minority” and requiring the court...
...ble home.” Moreover, T.H., J.T., and R.R. involved different facts and proceeded under chapter 39. The trial court acknowledged the Fifth District’s observation in M.S.B. v. R.B., 93 So. 3d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (Mem.), that “[s]ection 63.089(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that where a parent is or will be incarcerated for a significant period of a child’s minority, the child is deemed to have been abandoned.” Id....
...8 did not abandon the child according to the definition of section 63.032(1), the legislature should amend the statutes to reflect this.” That conclusion is not consistent with the statute, since the unambiguous language of section 63.089(4)(b) provides that “[t]he child has been abandoned when” the parent will be incarcerated for a significant period of the child’s minority. (Emphasis added.) The Fifth District in M.S.B. got it right. Appellee defends the trial court’s reliance on the introductory language of section 63.089(4) by analogizing it to the statutory analysis employed in Hilton v....
...requirements for windshields in order to find if a violation had in fact occurred. In this case, Appellee seizes on the supreme court’s reliance in Hilton on the “introductory language” of section 316.610, and urges that the “introductory language” of section 63.089(4) be given the same gloss. However, the statutory analysis employed in Hilton is unsuitable for understanding how section 63.089(4) operates for the simple reason that, at issue here, is a comprehensive statutory formula for determining if a child has been abandoned by a parent, not a singular statute setting forth guidelines for vehicular safety that requires the factfinder to search chapter 316 for the discrete vehicular equipment requirements. That process requires reading different statutory sections in pari materia. But the introductory language of section 63.089(4) does not require going outside the statutory criteria apart from the reference to section 63.032. It does not alter the fact 10 that section 63.089(4)(b) provides an alternative ground for a finding of abandonment. To apply Hilton chapter and verse here would be to ignore the clear and unambiguous language of section 63.089(4). Accordingly, the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that the ground for termination listed in section 63.089(4)(b) had not been met because Appellants failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Appellee abandoned R. as that term is defined in section 63.032(1) and section 63.089(4)(a). As a result, the cause must be remanded for the court to reconsider Appellants’ petition under the correct interpretation of the statute. B. Moreover, due to evidentiary errors committed by the trial court, a new hearing is required on remand....
...termination of Appellee’s parental rights. Consequently, we hold that the trial court erred in denying the Appellants’ motion for counsel to obtain the records. III. In conclusion, the trial court’s misinterpretation of the provisions of section 63.089(4) and its erroneous evidentiary rulings warrant reversal and remand for a new hearing. REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. _______________...
Copy

Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms-Stepparent Adoption Forms, 832 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 2002).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 809, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1953, 2002 WL 31190929

...er of venue, you have the right to request that the hearing on the petition to terminate parental rights be transferred to the county in which you reside. You may object by appearing at the-hearing or filing a written objection with the court. UNDER SECTION 63.089, FLORIDA STATUTES, FAILURE TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE WITH THE COURT OR TO APPEAR AT THIS HEARING CONSTITUTES GROUNDS UPON WHICH THE COURT SHALL END ANY PARENTAL RIGHTS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THE MINOR CHILD....
Copy

S.b.-b. v. J.m.b.-s., 260 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...("Mother" and "Prospective Adoptive Parent," respectively) appeal the denial of their petition for stepparent adoption of J.M.B.-S. ("Child"). In the petition, they sought to excuse the necessity of obtaining the consent of M.S. ("Father"), alleging that he abandoned Child pursuant to section 63.089(4), Florida Statutes (2016)....
Copy

S.b.-b. v. J.m.b.-s., 260 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...("Mother" and "Prospective Adoptive Parent," respectively) appeal the denial of their petition for stepparent adoption of J.M.B.-S. ("Child"). In the petition, they sought to excuse the necessity of obtaining the consent of M.S. ("Father"), alleging that he abandoned Child pursuant to section 63.089(4), Florida Statutes (2016)....
Copy

Home at Last Adoption Agency, Inc. v. V.M., 126 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 6031048, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18158

...ire not to place the child in foster care or involve the Department of Children and Families. Appellee filed a motion for rehearing in which he argued that the court’s adjudication of the child as dependent was improper. In support, Appellee cited section 63.089(5), Florida Statutes (2010), 1 which provides: If the court does not find by clear and convincing evidence that parental rights of a parent should be terminated pending adoption, the court must dismiss the petition and that parent’s...
...However, we held that the trial court erred in proceeding to adjudicate the child dependent because that *1240 action was not authorized in a chapter 63 proceeding. We observed that after finding that Appellee had not abandoned the child, the trial court was required to dismiss the petition: Section 63.089(5) is clear and unambiguous....
Copy

D.M. v. M.D., 247 So. 3d 713 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...he children's minority. Alternatively, she contended that continuing the parental relationship with M.D. would be harmful to the children and, for this reason, termination of M.D.'s parental rights would be in the best interests of the children. See § 63.089(4)(b)1. & 3., Fla. Stat. (2015). Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied D.M.'s petition. 1 As D.M. correctly observes, the trial court's order does not include written findings addressing the criteria set forth in section 63.089(4), as required by section 63.089(5)....
...Disston v. Hanson , 116 So.3d 612 , 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. The trial court's order erroneously referred to section 39.806(1), Florida Statutes (2015), to interpret "abandonment" instead of section 63.089(4). However, the error was harmless, as there is no significant difference in the analysis under either statute. Compare § 63.089(4)(b), Fla....
Copy

D.M. v. M.D. (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...of the children’s minority. Alternatively, she contended that continuing the parental relationship with M.D. would be harmful to the children and, for this reason, termination of M.D.’s parental rights would be in the best interests of the children. See § 63.089(4)(b)1. & 3., Fla. Stat. (2015). Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied D.M.’s petition.1 As D.M. correctly observes, the trial court’s order does not include written findings addressing the criteria set forth in section 63.089(4), as required by section 63.089(5)....
...3d 612, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 1 The trial court’s order erroneously referred to section 39.806(1), Florida Statutes (2015), to interpret “abandonment” instead of section 63.089(4). However, the error was harmless, as there is no significant difference in the analysis under either statute. Compare § 63.089(4)(b), Fla....
Copy

Child.'s Home Soc'y of Florida v. V.D., 188 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4700, 2016 WL 1178018

...erminating parental rights if the mother did not identify him to the adoption entity before the date she signed a consent for adoption 'or if he was not located because the mother failed or refused to provide sufficient information to locate him.” § 63.089, Fla....
Copy

Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms—Stepparent Adoption Forms, 821 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 2002).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 285, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 542, 2002 WL 464628

...er of venue, you have the right to request that the hearing on the petition to terminate parental rights be transferred to the county in which you reside. You may object by appearing at the hearing or filing a written objection with the court. UNDER SECTION 63.089, FLORIDA STATUTES, FAILURE TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE WITH THE COURT OR TO APPEAR AT THIS HEARING CONSTITUTES GROUNDS UPON WHICH THE COURT SHALL END ANY PARENTAL RIGHTS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THE MINOR CHILD....
Copy

S.M.K. v. S.L.E., 238 So. 3d 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...e a "full commitment" to being a parent to Child. Section 63.062(1) provides that the consent of certain persons is required before an adoption petition may be granted. See § 63.062(1), Fla. Stat. (2016). Nonetheless, a finding of abandonment under section 63.089(3) waives the consent requirement of any persons under section 63.062(1). See id. § 63.089(3)-(4); see also J.C.J....
...hat do not evince a settled purpose to assume all parental duties, the court may declare the child to be abandoned. In making this decision, the court may consider the conduct of a father towards the child's mother during her pregnancy. In addition, section 63.089(4) provides that a finding of abandonment under section 63.032(1) must be supported by clear and convincing evidence and identifies additional factors for the court's consideration: A finding of abandonment may also be based upon emoti...
...medical treatment; and 4. Whether the amount of support provided or medical expenses paid was appropriate, taking into consideration the needs of the child and relative means and resources available to the person alleged to have abandoned the child. § 63.089(4), Fla. Stat. (2016). Here, the trial court made no specific findings under sections 63.032(1) or 63.089(4)....
Copy

D.M., etc. v. M.D., etc., 272 So. 3d 1229 (Fla. 2019).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

be in the best interests of the children. See § 63.089(4)(b)1. & 3., Fla. Stat. (2015). Following an
Copy

Gift of Life Adoptions, Inc. v. S. R. B., 252 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...Acholonu, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Conflict Counsel, Clearwater, for Respondent. LUCAS, Judge. Gift of Life Adoptions (GLA) is an adoption agency that is endeavoring to facilitate a baby's adoption by a prospective couple. As part of the adoption process, pursuant to section 63.089, Florida Statutes (2017), GLA initiated the underlying action to terminate the parental rights of the baby's biological parents....
Copy

Y.M. v. Home At Last Adoption Agency, 93 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3044277, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12219

...after finding that there was insufficient evidence to support termination of his parental rights. He contends that after making such a finding, the court had no choice but to dismiss the petition. We agree. The pertinent part of chapter 63 provides: 63.089....
...me during which the court has jurisdiction over the minor. Further proceedings, if any, regarding the minor must be brought in a separate custody action under chapter 61, a dependency action under chapter 39, or a paternity action under chapter 742. § 63.089(5), Fla....
...The court specifically found that there was insufficient evidence to establish that Appellant abandoned his child or that Appellant’s parental rights should be terminated on any other asserted ground. Instead of dismissing the petition after finding no basis for termination, as required by section 63.089(5), the trial court proceeded to create and adopt a case plan, order Appellant to complete several tasks, and order child support and visitation. This was error. Section 63.089(5) is clear and unambiguous....
Copy

D.C. & G.C. v. In Re: The Matter of the adoption of N.L.W. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

defined in section 63.032. § 63.089(3)(e), Fla. Stat. And section 63.089(4) identifies additional factors
Copy

J.Q. v. E.B., 23 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14, 2010 WL 22688

...cal father to a little girl. The stepfather brought the petition so he could adopt the child. The biological father is in prison. Although the trial judge made a legal error in focusing on section 39.806(l)(d)l, Florida Statutes (2008), to interpret section 63.089(4), Florida Statutes (2008), we find the error to be harmless....
...The judge found no abandonment by the biological father on a number of grounds. The significance of the two statutes cited above is that they prescribe different time periods for computation of the portion of the child’s minority that a parent will be incarcerated. See § 63.089(4)(b)l, Fla....
Copy

Jh v. Kdm, 8 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 WL 275173

...and the mother allegedly prevented him from providing support. We do not address these issues because they are matters to be resolved by the trial court on remand. [2] The grounds for termination of parental rights pending adoption are contained in section 63.089(3), Florida Statutes. A trial court's determination that there are grounds for termination must be made by clear and convincing evidence, supported by written findings of fact. § 63.089(3), Fla....
Copy

S.M.K. v. S.L.E. (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...failed to demonstrate a “full commitment” to being a parent to Child. Section 63.062(1) provides that the consent of certain persons is required before an adoption petition may be granted. See § 63.062(1), Fla. Stat. (2016). Nonetheless, a finding of abandonment under section 63.089(3) waives the consent requirement of any persons under section 63.062(1). See id. § 63.089(3)–(4); see also J.C.J....
...parental duties, the court may declare the child to be abandoned. In making this decision, the court may consider the conduct of a father towards the child’s mother during her pregnancy. In addition, section 63.089(4) provides that a finding of abandonment under section 63.032(1) must be supported by clear and convincing evidence and identifies additional factors for the court’s consideration: A finding of abandonment may also...
...Whether the amount of support provided or medical expenses paid was appropriate, taking into consideration the needs of the child and relative means and resources available to the person alleged to have abandoned the child. § 63.089(4), Fla. Stat. (2016). Here, the trial court made no specific findings under sections 63.032(1) or 63.089(4)....
Copy

M.A.F. v. E.J.S., 917 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19810

...(a) In making a determination of abandonment at a hearing for termination of parental rights pursuant to this chapter, the court must consider, among other relevant factors not inconsistent with this section: 2. Whether the person alleged to have abandoned the child, while being able, failed to provide financial support; § 63.089(4)(a)(2), Fla....
...Because the ultimate issue is the intent of the parent, as determined by reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the conduct of the parent, it is a question of fact for the trial judge. Id. The judge must consider the factors enumerated in the statute and all “other relevant factors ....”§ 63.089(4)(a), Fla....
Copy

Mangiafico v. Bellefiuer, 915 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18920, 2005 WL 3234912

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 63.089(7)(a), Fla....
Copy

V.C.B. & E.G.B. v. Sultan Shakir, 145 So. 3d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13445, 2014 WL 4209216

...Hoffman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. No brief filed for appellee. CONNER, J. The maternal grandparents appeal the trial court’s order denying their petition to terminate the father’s parental rights and to adopt their grandchild. They argue that the trial court erred in interpreting section 63.089, Florida Statutes (2014) and Florida case law to require a finding that the father exhibited a willful disregard for the child’s safety prior to terminating the father’s parental rights....
...andoned” contained within section 63.032, Florida Statutes (2014).1 The trial court further stated, however: W. That the Court has considered the holding In Beagle v. Beagle, 678 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1996) and Florida Statute Section 63.089(4)(a)....
...ermination. 2 adopt a child in the same petition. § 63.087(3), Fla. Stat. (2014). If a duly executed consent by a parent is not filed with the court, notice of the proceedings must be given to the parent. § 63.089(2)(a)3., Fla....
...A court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights if the court determines by clear and convincing evidence, supported by written findings of fact, that the parent has been properly served with notice of the proceedings, “and has been determined under subsection (4) to have abandoned the child.” § 63.089(3)(e), Fla. Stat. Subsection (4) of Section 63.089 provides: (4) Finding of abandonment.--A finding of abandonment resulting in a termination of parental rights must be based upon clear and convincing evidence that a parent or person having legal custody has abandoned the child in accordance with the definition contained in s. 63.032. § 63.089(4), Fla....
...rt and communicate with the child are only marginal efforts that do not evince a settled purpose to assume all parental duties, the court may declare the child to be abandoned. § 63.032(1), Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). Section 63.089(4) further states: (a) In making a determination of abandonment at a hearing for termination of parental rights under this chapter, the court shall consider, among other relevant factors not inconsistent with this section: 1....
...4. Whether the amount of support provided or medical expenses paid was appropriate, taking into consideration the needs of the child and relative means and resources available to the person alleged to have abandoned the child. § 63.089(4), Fla....
...maintenance or has failed to establish or maintain a substantial and positive relationship with the child, or both. 5 definition of “abandoned” in Chapter 63 does not require such a finding. Section 63.089(4)(a) simply states the court shall consider, among other relevant factors, whether actions alleged to constitute abandonment demonstrate a willful disregard for the safety or welfare of the child. In essence, the trial court construed “abandoned” more narrowly than the statute requires. We reach that conclusion because section 63.089(4) states the sole ground for termination of parental rights, absent consent, and requires a finding by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has “abandoned” the child as defined in section 63.032(1). We construe the provisions of section 63.089(4)(a) to simply list factors the trial court should consider which the legislature deemed to be particularly pertinent. We do not construe the provisions of section 63.089(4)(a) to limit the definition of “abandoned” under section 63.032(1) to only those situations. As we observed in J.S....
Copy

N.A.G. v. J.L.G. (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...If a parent does not consent to the termination, the court may enter a judgment terminating parental rights if it determines by clear and convincing evidence supported by written findings of fact that the parent has been given notice and has abandoned the child. See § 63.089(3)(e)....
...5th DCA 1985))). In making an abandonment determination under this chapter, the trial court must consider, among other factors, "[w]hether the actions alleged to constitute abandonment demonstrate a willful disregard for the safety or welfare of the child." § 63.089(4)(a)(1)....
Copy

Dts v. Jm, 33 So. 3d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 WL 1642789

...We affirm the father's remaining issues without comment. Section 63.062(1), Florida Statutes (2009), authorizes termination of parental rights pending adoption when the parents have executed written consent that complies with section 63.082, Florida Statutes (2009). Section 63.089, Florida Statutes (2009), permits the circuit court to terminate parental rights pending adoption when it has determined by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has "executed a valid consent under s....
Copy

M.G.C. v. M.C., 899 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5213, 2005 WL 856067

...s parental rights is upheld. In granting the petition, the trial court found that the Father, who is incarcerated, failed to appear telephonically at the summary judgment hearing, and the Father’s actions supported a finding of abandonment under section 63.089(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2002)....
Copy

D.M. v. Elizabeth R. Berkowitz, PA, 112 So. 3d 575 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1438253, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5714

...He then moved for access to the court file in the termination proceedings alleging that he needed access to the pleadings so that he can defend his paternity rights. The adoption entity objected to his access to the file, relying on the confidentiality provision of section 63.089(8), Florida Statutes, which provides: All papers and records pertaining to a petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption are related to the subsequent adoption of the minor and are subject to s....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.