Cases from cite.case.law:

CARLTON, f k a v. ZANAZZI,, 266 So. 3d 243 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See §§ 61.021, 61.052, Fla. Stat. (2016) ; Marshall v. . . . if the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over a marriage, pursuant to sections 61.021 and 61.052 . . .

MCNEIL, v. JENKINS- MCNEIL,, 252 So. 3d 354 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (2015), requires that proof of residence under section 61.021 be . . . Former Husband's residency in Florida with any of the necessary corroborative evidence under section 61.052 . . .

MINDA, v. MINDA,, 190 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . former wife’s Florida driver’s license, which can be used to corroborate residency pursuant to section 61.052 . . .

ZELMAN, v. ZELMAN,, 175 So. 3d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . In the effort to navigate the legal implications of prenuptial agreements and, perhaps, section 61.052 . . . Section 61.052(l)(b) provides that "no dissolution shall be allowed unless the party alleged to be incapacitated . . .

OLIVER, v. STUFFLEBEAM,, 155 So. 3d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 61.052(1)(a), Fla. . . .

ROMANO, D. v. OLSHEN, v. P. L. v. D., 153 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 61.052(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . trial court ordered the dissolution proceeding abated for a period of three years, pursuant to section 61.052 . . . The purpose of the mandatory abatement of the dissolution proceeding under section 61.052(l)(b), which . . . Where spouses are prevented from divorcing by section 61.052’s abatement provision, for a spouse to deny . . .

Dr. DRELICH, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF DRELICH,, 201 So. 3d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . filed a verified motion to stay or abate the dissolution proceeding for three years pursuant to section 61.052 . . . Section 61.052(l)(b) provides that the mental incapacity of a spouse is an alternative basis for dissolution . . .

M. HALL, v. R. MAAL,, 32 So. 3d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 61.052(7), Fla. Stat.; see, e.g., Cobo v. . . .

NORRIS, v. NORRIS,, 28 So. 3d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See §§ 61.031; 61.052, Fla. Stat. (2008). See generally Marjorie A. . . .

LANDE, v. A. LANDE,, 2 So. 3d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . if the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over a marriage, pursuant to sections 61.021 and 61.052 . . .

M. GREY, v. GREY,, 995 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 61.052(2) requires that proof of compliance with this residency requirement be corroborated, . . .

MARSHALL, III, v. MARSHALL,, 988 So. 2d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . if the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over a marriage, pursuant to sections 61.021 and 61.052 . . .

SNYDER, v. McLEOD,, 971 So. 2d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Additionally, section 61.052(2) provides that proof of a valid Florida driver’s license and voter registration . . .

PARKER, v. J. PARKER,, 950 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 61.052, Fla. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE OUT OF CYCLE, 940 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 2006)

. . . For further information, see section 61.021, Florida Statutes or section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes. . . .

JENKINS, v. JENKINS,, 915 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 61.052(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

E. GUIDA, v. GUIDA,, 870 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 61.052(6), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that “[a]ny injunction for protection against domestic . . .

D. ROWLAND, v. ROWLAND,, 868 So. 2d 608 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 61.052(2) allows corroboration of residency through production of a Florida voter’s registration . . .

F. DENT, v. T. DENT,, 851 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See, e.g., § 61.052(3), Fla. Stat. (2002); see also Kalmanson v. . . . However, section 61.052(3) permits the circuit court to make appropriate orders to provide for support . . .

SPINDLER, v. MAYOL,, 849 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See §§ 61.021, 61.052, Fla. Stat. (2002); Davis v. . . .

M. BOZE, v. E. BOZE,, 824 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Boze failed to establish residency pursuant to sections 61.021 and 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (2001) . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, 783 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 2000)

. . . In proposing this amendment, the rules committee seeks in part to comport with section 61.052(2), Florida . . . Section 61.052(2) regarding dissolution of marriage provides in full: Based on the evidence at the hearing . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE AND FAMILY LAW FORMS, 810 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2000)

. . . For further information, see section 61.021, Florida Statutes or section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes. . . . For further information, see sections 61.052 and 61.13, Florida Statutes. Special notes ... . . . SECURITY NUMBER I, {full legal name}_, certify that my social security number is-, as required in section 61.052 . . .

C. COONS, Jr. v. COONS,, 765 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Another statute addresses the permissible methods of corroborating Florida residence: 61.052 Dissolution . . . marriage when the petition is based on the allegation that the marriage is irretrievably broken.... § 61.052 . . .

N. HUNTER, v. HUNTER,, 736 So. 2d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Pursuant to section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (1997), an allegation that a party satisfies the residency . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW FORMS, 759 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1999)

. . . For further information, see sections 61.052 and 61.13, Florida Statutes. Special notes ... . . . NUMBER I, {full legal name} _, certify that my social security number is _ , as required in section 61.052 . . .

MOGUL, v. MOGUL,, 730 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . On April 9, 1997, after the three-year statutory minimum time period had run, pursuant to section 61.052 . . .

F. GAINES, v. SAYNE, H., 727 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . filed a motion for relief from the judgment of dissolution alleging that the requirements of section 61.052 . . .

H. COOPER, v. F. COOPER,, 725 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Goldberg, 643 So.2d 656, cause me to believe that the legislature should reexamine the contents of section 61.052 . . . Section 61.052(1) authorizes a judgment of dissolution of marriage either when the marriage is irretrievably . . . Although Judge Warner’s decision in Goldberg is persuasive, I do not agree that section 61.052(l)(b), . . . See § 61.052(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

ANDRADE, v. ANDRADE,, 720 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 61.052(1)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that a dissolution of marriage is not allowed where . . . We recognize that section 61.052(1)(b), Florida Statutes, does not establish a procedure applicable in . . .

C. HORNE, v. L. HORNE,, 711 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . a factor when passing upon the question of whether a marriage is irretrievably broken, see section 61.052 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES, 713 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1998)

. . . For further information, see section 61.021, Florida Statutes or section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes. . . . For further information, see sections 61.052 and 61.13, Florida Statutes. Special notes... . . .

SALZVERG, v. SALZVERG,, 696 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . application is denied because the order plainly did not depart from the essential requirements of the law, § 61.052 . . .

COPAS, v. COPAS,, 687 So. 2d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Finally, section 61.052(2) provides that corroborating evidence of residence includes a valid Florida . . .

LEWIS, v. LEWIS,, 665 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . circumstances, the trial court had the discretion to affect an unequal distribution pursuant to section 61.052 . . .

In FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, 663 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1995)

. . . spouse has been adjudicated mentally incapacitated for a period of at least three years (see section 61.052 . . . See section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes. . . . because of serious permanent differences) or one of you must be mentally incapacitated (see section 61.052 . . .

ORBE, v. ORBE,, 651 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Under section 61.052(2), a Florida driver’s license or Florida voter registration is corroborative evidence . . .

FERNANDEZ, Jr. v. E. FERNANDEZ, A. E. E. Jr. E., 648 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1995)

. . . The motion alleged that the requirements of section 61.052, Florida Statutes (1991), were not satisfied . . . Further, evidence establishing a party’s residence must be corroborated. § 61.052(2), Fla.Stat. (1991 . . . Fernandez’ father satisfied the requirements of section 61.052. . . . We do note that pursuant to section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (1991), corroborating evidence can be . . .

VAUGHAN, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF VAUGHAN,, 648 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . The appellant Norma Vaughan contends that section 61.052 and section 744.3215, when read together, are . . . divorce and the statutory provisions regarding grounds for divorce were rewritten and consolidated: 61.052 . . . It is from section 61.052 that the guardian’s authority to initiate the dissolution is derived, not section . . . See § 61.052(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

GOLDBERG, v. GOLDBERG J., 643 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Based on section 61.052(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), the trial court abated the proceedings for three . . . We hold that it did not, because section 61.052(l)(b) precludes the institution or maintenance of an . . . Section 61.052(1) provides: (1) No judgment of dissolution of marriage shall be granted unless one of . . . Its language was similar to section 61.052(l)(b). . . . Section 61.052 replaced the former fault-based grounds for divorce. . . .

E. FERNANDEZ, A. E. E. Jr. E. v. FERNANDEZ, Jr., 632 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . In his verified motion, the appellee alleged that since the requirements of section 61.052, Florida Statutes . . . Section 61.052(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . Sections 61.021, 61.052(2). See also Speigner; Phillips. . . .

VAUGHAN, v. VAUGHAN,, 630 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See §§ 744.3215(4), 744.3725 and 61.052(l)(b). . . . Section 61.052(l)(b) indicates mental incapacity of a spouse is a ground for the competent spouse to . . .

KINDLE, v. KINDLE,, 629 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 61.052, Florida Statutes (1991), allows dissolution of marriage for only two reasons: (1) where . . .

SPEIGNER, v. SPEIGNER,, 621 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 61.052(2) requires that proof of compliance with the section 61.021 residence requirement “be . . .

BIRNBAUM, v. BIRNBAUM,, 615 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 61.052, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

M. WRONA, v. W. WRONA,, 592 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 61.052(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . .” § 61.052(3), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

SHAMMAY, v. SHAMMAY,, 491 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . This dismissal does not bear upon a dissolution of marriage proceeding, pursuant to section 61.052, Florida . . . without prejudice to Terry filing a petition strictly for dissolution of marriage pursuant to section 61.052 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE, 450 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1983)

. . . recommendations concern the need for a requirement of corroborative evidence of residence to comply with section 61.052 . . . testimony that the marriage of the parties to the action is irretrievably broken, as required under section 61.052 . . . We also find that, in conformance with section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (1981), corroboration of residence . . .

GILLMAN, v. GILLMAN,, 413 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 61.052(2), Fla.Stat. (1971). Appellee did not testify to her Florida residence. . . . Because this evidence of residence was not corroborated as required by Section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes . . . We hold that Section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (1971), requires that the individual invoking the jurisdiction . . .

HAIR, v. HAIR,, 402 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See § 61.052, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

GLAZER, v. M. GLAZER,, 394 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . marriage alleging that since neither party contested that marriage’s being irretrievably broken, Section 61.052 . . .

C. FRIEDMAN, v. W. FRIEDMAN,, 383 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . A cause of action for marriage dissolution [§ 61.052, Fla.Stat. (1979)] accrues in the Florida county . . .

PYLE, v. PYLE,, 378 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Riley, 271 So.2d 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); and Sections 61.001 and 61.052, Florida Statutes (1971). . . .

R. WILLIAMSON, v. C. WILLIAMSON,, 353 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Florida Statutes, that court stated: “Looking at these statutes, we would agree that the criteria of § 61.052 . . .

N. GALBUT, v. GARFINKL,, 340 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 1976)

. . . dis-solutions, the court would properly make inquiry to determine this fact, for the statute itself in § 61.052 . . . Section 61.052, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: “If, at any time, the court finds that . . . “Second, Fla.Stat. § 61.052(2), F.S.A. clearly states that ‘if, at anytime, the court finds that the . . .

CANNON, v. CANNON,, 323 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Section 61.052, which deals with dissolution of marriage and is commonly known as the no-fault statute . . .

A. CARROLL, v. CARROLL,, 322 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Sec. 61.052(2) (b)1. . . .

J. v. W. McCLELLAND,, 318 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Secs. 61.011, 61.052(2)(a), F.S.1973. . . .

MASZEWSKI, v. PISKADLO,, 318 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 61.052 (l)(a). . . .

WISE, v. WISE,, 310 So. 2d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Section 61.052, Florida Statutes. . . .

KLARISH, v. C. KLARISH,, 296 So. 2d 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 61.052(2), F.S.A. clearly states that “if, at anytime, the court finds that the marriage is irretrievably . . .

J. YOHEM, v. L. YOHEM,, 295 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . See Sections 61.052(3), 61.071, 61.08 and 61.-13(2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

W. OLIVER, v. OLIVER,, 285 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . potential harm to the spouses and their children caused by the process of legal dissolution of marriage.” “61.052 . . . Looking at these statutes, we would agree that the criteria of § 61.052, F.S. 1971, F.S.A., that a marriage . . .

E. CARRIGAN, Sr. v. E. CARRIGAN,, 283 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Riley, Fla.App.1972, 271 So.2d 181; F.S. section 61.052(2)(a), F.S.A. . . .

TAYLOR, v. TAYLOR,, 279 So. 2d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Section 61.052(4), F.S.1971, F.S.A., provides that no judgment of dissolution of marriage renders the . . .

B. SHIFFMAN, v. O ASKEW, L. MAKRES, v. O ASKEW,, 359 F. Supp. 1225 (M.D. Fla. 1973)

. . . Florida Statute § 61.052 (1971), F.S.A. . . . . Florida Statute § 61.052(2) (1971), F.S.A., provides in part: “Based on the evidence at the hearing, . . .

NOOE, v. NOOE,, 277 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Section 61.052(2) (b), 5 F.S.A. . . .

R. RYAN, v. E. RYAN,, 277 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1973)

. . . VAGUE and INDEFINITE CHALLENGE The next question of law concerns that part of F.S., Section 61.052, F.S.A . . . dissolutions, the court would properly make inquiry to determine this fact, for the statute itself in § 61.052 . . .

RILEY, v. RILEY,, 271 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 61.052. . . . reconciliation, or to order either or both parties to consult professional counselors, is authorized by F.S.A. § 61.052 . . . F.S.A. § 61.052(2). . McKim v. McKim, 6 Cal.3d 673,100 Cal.Rptr. 140, 493 P.2d 866 (1972). . . .

L. NEEL, v. J. NEEL,, 255 So. 2d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . (Section 7, adding new Section 61.052). . . .