Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 726.105 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 726.105 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 726.105

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLI
STATUTE OF FRAUDS, FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS, AND GENERAL ASSIGNMENTS
Chapter 726
FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 726.105
726.105 Transfers fraudulent as to present and future creditors.
(1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor, whether the creditor’s claim arose before or after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation:
(a) With actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor; or
(b) Without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation, and the debtor:
1. Was engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction; or
2. Intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he or she would incur, debts beyond his or her ability to pay as they became due.
(2) In determining actual intent under paragraph (1)(a), consideration may be given, among other factors, to whether:
(a) The transfer or obligation was to an insider.
(b) The debtor retained possession or control of the property transferred after the transfer.
(c) The transfer or obligation was disclosed or concealed.
(d) Before the transfer was made or obligation was incurred, the debtor had been sued or threatened with suit.
(e) The transfer was of substantially all the debtor’s assets.
(f) The debtor absconded.
(g) The debtor removed or concealed assets.
(h) The value of the consideration received by the debtor was reasonably equivalent to the value of the asset transferred or the amount of the obligation incurred.
(i) The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent shortly after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.
(j) The transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was incurred.
(k) The debtor transferred the essential assets of the business to a lienor who transferred the assets to an insider of the debtor.
History.s. 5, ch. 87-79; s. 937, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 726.105 on Google Scholar

F.S. 726.105 on Casetext

Amendments to 726.105


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 726.105
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 726.105.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE P. MCCUAN, E. Jr. v. MDG LLC, E. Jr. v., 603 B.R. 829 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Stat., and not 'fraudulent transfers' pursuant to § 726.105, Fla. Stat ." . . . Plaintiffs seek judgment against Defendants under §§ 56.29 and 726.105(1)(a) of the Florida Statutes, . . . The claims under § 56.29 and § 726.105(1) entail the same analysis, so the Court considers them together . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). Kearney , 2017 WL 942118, at *10. Kearney , 712 F. . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(b). Doc. No. 322, June 5 Tr., p. 154. Doc. No. 325, Sept. 12 Tr., pp. 130-31. . . .

LB JUDGMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, v. R. BOSCHETTI,, 271 So. 3d 115 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . assets in order to avoid collection of LB Judgment's judgment, subject to avoidance under sections 726.105 . . .

LAPTOPPLAZA, INC. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,, 264 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . transferee) with the intent to defraud its creditors (including Wells Fargo) in violation of sections 726.105 . . .

IN RE TAYLOR, BEAN WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP. REO LLC, F. v. ADP,, 593 B.R. 862 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(a), (b) and § 726.106(1). . . .

VILLAMIZAR, v. LUNA CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,, 260 So. 3d 355 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The First District held that the complaint alleged fraudulent transfers under sections 726.105(1) and . . .

IN RE TELTRONICS, INC. T. O v. RPX, 904 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . Assignment, and (2) recover, pursuant to Sections 544 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and Florida Statutes 726.105 . . . The trustee alleges constructive fraudulent transfer under Florida Statutes 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106 . . . Under Section 726.105(1)(b), a transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor if the debtor . . .

IN RE ROLLAGUARD SECURITY, LLC, LLC, C. LLC, v. TD N. A. C. LLC, v. PNC N. A. C. LLC, v. N. A. d b a, 591 B.R. 895 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . under the actual and constructive fraud provisions of section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes §§ 726.105 . . . there was a fraudulent transfer under section 548 or under section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . under section 544(b)(1) because they are voidable under Florida law, specifically Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . .

IN RE MONGELLUZZI, v., 591 B.R. 480 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . the Complaint to which the Motions are addressed: Avoidance of the Transfers as actual fraud under § 726.105 . . . Plaintiff's Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Claims under § 726.105(1)(b), § 726.106(1 ), and 11 U.S.C . . . Under § 726.105(1)(b), a transfer is fraudulent as to present or future creditors if the debtor made . . . Plaintiff's Actual Fraud Claims and § 726.105(1)(a), and § 548(a)(1)(A) (First Motion, Counts IV, XII . . . Under § 726.105(1)(a), a transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to either a present or future creditor . . .

IN RE MONGELLUZZI A. B. T. S. HO II, LLC HO, LLC YJNK II, YJNK XI CA, LLC ABTS LLC B. LLC HQ, LLC LLC U, LLC USL H LLC LLP YJNK III, YJNK VIII, LLC, v., 587 B.R. 392 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . Section 726.109(1) specifically applies to fraudulent transfers voidable under § 726.105(1)(a), which . . .

M. AL- RAYES, v. M. WILLINGHAM, M., 295 F. Supp. 3d 1313 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 726.105(1)(a), the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA) (Count VIII); and a claim for . . .

IN RE GPC MIAMI INC. T. GPC v. N. A. S. A. C. A. d b a C. A. N. A. v. S. A. C. A. d b a C. A. PC CM., 582 B.R. 534 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1), and 726.108(l)(a). . . .

GORRIN, Jr. v. POKER RUN ACQUISITIONS, INC., 237 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . unrebutted presumption was created that the transfer was fraudulent by operation of sections 56.29(6)(a) and 726.105 . . . Poker Run's second theory is based on a presumption of fraud under section 726.105(1)(a) of the Fraudulent . . . Therefore, 'because of the difficulty of proving actual intent to defraud creditors, section 726.105( . . . The language of section 726.105(2) provides as follows: In determining actual intent under paragraph . . . (j) The transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was incurred. § 726.105( . . .

AGRITRADE, LP, v. QUERCIA,, 253 So. 3d 28 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . Count III : Violation of Florida's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ( section 726.105(1), Florida Statutes . . .

IN RE FUNDAMENTAL LONG TERM CARE, INC. v., 873 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b). . . .

IN RE FUNDAMENTAL LONG TERM CARE, INC. v., 873 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 726.105(1)A), In this case, Ae debtor, FLTCI, was the immediate transferor but was allegedly controlled . . .

KEARNEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, LLC. LLC, FTBB, LLC,, 712 F. App'x 907 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 56.29, 726.105. . . . actions are made or contrived to “delay, hinder, or defraud” can be determined with reference to section 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2), who may consist of “[a] relative of the debtor or ... . . .

IN RE ROLLAGUARD SECURITY, LLC, LLC, C. LLC, v. TD N. A. C. LLC, v. PNC N. A. C. LLC, v. N. A. d b a, 576 B.R. 260 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . under the actual and constructive fraud provisions of section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . .

IN RE ROLLAGUARD SECURITY, LLC, LLC, C. LLC, v. TD N. A. C. LLC, v. PNC N. A. C. LLC, v. N. A. d b a, 570 B.R. 859 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . under the actual and constructive fraud provisions of section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . there was a fraudulent transfer under section 548 or under section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . under section 544(b)(1) because they are voidable under Florida law, specifically Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a)-(b). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . .

IN RE SIGMA- TECH SALES, INC. N. v. O- a a AHLO, a, 570 B.R. 408 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . Actual Fraudulent Transfers Under Section 726.105(l)(a) of the Florida Statutes (Count I) Pursuant to . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a); Aqua Clear, 361 B.R. at 583. . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . .

IN RE MONGELLUZZI, L. v., 568 B.R. 702 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . §§ 544, 548, and 550 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.105(a) and (b), 726.106(1), and 726.108. . . . .

IN RE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, F. LLC, v. Co. J. B. LLC TD, 563 B.R. 393 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2017)

. . . .] § 726.105(l)(a) without the need to consider the badges of fraud.” Id. . . .

IN RE D. I. T. INC. R. v. USA, a, 561 B.R. 793 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a)) and New York (N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law § 276) as incorporated by 11 U.S.C. § 544. . . .

IN RE GOMEZ, v. M., 560 B.R. 866 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 726.105(1). . . .

IN RE ANDERSON, v. W., 561 B.R. 230 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, 726.108, 222.30, and Chapter 85, Florida Statutes. R. . . . underlying lawsuit rather than the four-year look back period afforded by § 726.110; and (ii) unlike § 726.105 . . . Fla. 2015) (quoting § 726.105(l)(a), Florida Statutes). . See Fla. Stat. § 726.102(14). . Doc. . . .

IN RE KIPNIS, E. v. N. A. E. v., 555 B.R. 877 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . the Court assumes that the, Bank Account Transfer and the Condominium Transfer are avoidable under § 726.105 . . .

IN RE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC. LLC, R. v. LLC IX, L. P., 560 B.R. 594 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . In Counts III and Y of the Complaint, the Trustee- alleges- a fraudulent transfer claim under § 726.105 . . . Equity IX for receiving a fraudulent transfer under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, and under §§ 726.105 . . . In Counts IV and VI- of the Complaint, the Trustee alleges a-fraudulent transfer claim under § 726.105 . . . employment contract and not in the ordinary course of business. .Count III of the Complaint is based on § 726.105 . . .

THACKER v. E. VENN, Jr., 579 B.R. 621 (N.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . Specifically, the Florida state court found eight different badges of fraud under Section 726.105. . . . Stat. § 726.105. Fourth, the Thackers argue the state court erred in returning property to Mr. . . .

NATIONAL AUTO SERVICE CENTERS, INC. a a D. LLC LLC, v. F R LLC, a F R LLC, a, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ 726.105(l)(a),' .108(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . See generally §§ 726.105-.108. . . . such transfers:’ (1) transfers made “[w]ith actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” creditors, § 726.105 . . . the debtor does not receive “reasonably equivalent value” in exchange for the . asset transferred, §§ 726.105 . . . the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant; (2) Under s. 726.105 . . .

IN RE BOS, Jr., 561 B.R. 868 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . preference period while permitting the parties to litigate in state court under Florida’s UFTA (See § 726.105 . . .

McCALLA v. E. C. KENYON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. a, 183 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The complaint in the present case thus alleged fraudulent transfers within the meaning of sections 726.105 . . .

RREF SNV- FL SSL, LLC, v. SHAMROCK STORAGE, LLC, R. M., 178 So. 3d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See, e.g., Mejia, 985 So.2d at 1112-13 (applying § 726.105 in evaluating a fraudulent transfer claim) . . .

In PSN USA, INC. PSN v. LLC,, 615 F. App'x 925 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b) (providing for avoidance where the debtor does not “receiv[e] a reasonably equivalent . . .

In PSN USA, INC. PSN v. LLC,, 615 F. App'x 925 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b) (providing for avoidance where the debtor does not “reeeiv[e] a reasonably equivalent . . .

IN RE CHESROWN, v., 543 B.R. 685 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 544 and Florida Statutes § 726.105(l)(b); ' (III) avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfer pursuant . . .

S. YARALLI, v. AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY, LLC, a, 165 So. 3d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . To proceed under section 726.105, one need be only a creditor, and a creditor can be someone who is not . . . Section 726.105(2), Fla. . . . consideration received by the debtor was reasonably equivalent to the value of the asset transferred.” § 726.105 . . . Section 726.105(1), Florida Statutes (2012), provides: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by . . .

APR ENERGY, LLC, a v. FIRST INVESTMENT GROUP CORPORATION, a a k a a, 88 F. Supp. 3d 1300 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 726.105-108. . . . .

WELCH, v. HIGHLANDS UNION BANK,, 526 B.R. 152 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2015)

. . . 674.2101(l)(a), thus excluding the deposits from the definition of a “transfer” under Florida Statute § 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b)). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 86 F. Supp. 3d 1316 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a) (“FUFTA”), the Receiver seeks to avoid (and recover amounts representing) (1) movement . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). Lee, 753 F.3d at 1199-1200 (citing Johnson v. . . . that a transfer was made in furtherance of a Ponzi scheme establishes actual intent to defraud under § 726.105 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. BARBER LLC,, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Id. §§ 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1). Defendants attack Counts 3 and 4 on two grounds. . . .

IN RE VICKERY, K. IVDS L. P. a v., 526 B.R. 872 (D. Colo. 2015)

. . . transfers were fraudulent under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA): (1) under FUFTA § 726.105 . . . the transfers were made with the actual intent to -hinder, delay, or defraud IIAP; (2) under FUFTA § 726.105 . . . unreasonably small in relation to what was required to satisfy its obligations; and (3) under FUFTA § 726.105 . . .

NATIONAL MARITIME SERVICES, INC. v. F. STRAUB, LLC,, 776 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). Straub, 979 F.Supp.2d at 1327-29. . . . alternatively was fraudulent because Burrell Shipping “inten[ded] to hinder, delay, or defraud,” id. § 726.105 . . .

IN RE CARPETS, INC. M. v. Sr., 522 B.R. 718 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 548 or Florida Statutes, §§ 726.105 and 726.106. . . . unsecured creditor under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)(1)) may avoid a transfer that is fraudulent under either § 726.105 . . .

BIEL REO, LLC, v. BAREFOOT COTTAGES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC, a H. H., 156 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . § 56.29(6) makes use of substantive provisions of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), see § 726.105 . . . actions are made or contrived to ‘delay, hinder, or defraud’ must be determined with reference to section 726.105 . . .

GUERRERO, v. GLOBALMAX ENTERPRISES, INC., 152 So. 3d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . law, the trial court asked the magistrate to clarify whether she had considered and applied sections 726.105 . . .

IN RE L. BERKMAN, v. K. In K. v., 517 B.R. 288 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.106(1)0»), and 726.106(1) (the “Berkman Adversary”). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1), the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proof . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a), stating A transfer or obligation is not voidable under s. 726.105(l)(a) against . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . Fla. Stat. § 726.105(l)(b). . Fla. Stat. § 726.106(1). . . . .

APR ENERGY, LLC, a v. FIRST INVESTMENT GROUP CORPORATION, a a k a a, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1227 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105-108. . . . .

IN RE J. PEARLMAN, R. v., 515 B.R. 887 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Transfers are both actually and constructively fraudulent under § 548 of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . SunTrust, and any of the hundreds of investor-creditors in this case could have brought a claim under § 726.105 . . . are avoidable as constructive fraudulent transfers under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.108 Count III: Constructive Fraud - Avoidance and Recovery of Fraudulent . . . determines that transfers are avoidable under Bankruptcy Code section 548 or under Florida Statutes section 726.105 . . .

In BIFANI, M. v., 580 F. App'x 740 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat.' § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k); see also Wiand v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194, 1200 (11th Cir.2014). . . .

In BIFANI, M. v., 580 F. App'x 740 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k); see also Wiand v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194, 1200 (11th Cir.2014). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC, IRA LLC, LTD, IRA LTD, L. P. v. DANCING LLC,, 578 F. App'x 938 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.105(1)(a), and constructive fraud, Fla. . . . . §§ 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106(1); and (2) unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Id. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . .

WELCH, v. SYNOVUS BANK,, 517 B.R. 269 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Section 726.105(1), Florida Statutes, provides as follows: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b)[,] 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a), Count XI for constructive fraud pursuant to Fla. . . . . § 726.105(l)(b), and Count XII for constructive fraud pursuant to Fla. Stat. 726.106(1). . . .

PULEO, v. GOLAN,, 201 So. 3d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Scorpion to Yali Golan or both Golans) are based on Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, section 726.105 . . . Under section 726.105(l)(b), Yali Golan transferred his ten million Scorpion Performance shares to joint . . . actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud Puleo regarding' the collection of h'is judgment (section 726.105 . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC IRA LLC IRA L. P. v. M. LEE, M., 753 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a), and its constructive fraud provision, see Fla. Stat. § 726.105(1)(b). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . . that a transfer was made in furtherance of a Ponzi scheme establishes actual intent to defraud under § 726.105 . . .

FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. a d b a f k a v. ASTRO AIR CONDITIONING AND HEATING, INCORPORATED, a Jo a, 137 So. 3d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The complaint tracked the language of sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2012). . . .

BERMAN, v. J. SMITH, In, 510 B.R. 387 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 726.105. . . . Notwithstanding the four-year limitation period, a cause of action under § 726.105(l)(a) may still be . . . Stat. § 726.105. . . . Section 726.105, meanwhile, explicitly applies to both present and future creditors, so the IRS is not . . . of the transfer, causes of action under § 726.105(l)(a) brought four years after the transfer may still . . .

In CUSTOM CONTRACTORS, LLC, C. v., 745 F.3d 1342 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . .

In CUSTOM CONTRACTORS, LLC, C. v., 745 F.3d 1342 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . .

IN RE FUNDAMENTAL LONG TERM CARE, INC. v., 507 B.R. 359 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Hamilton Bank (In re Model Imperial, Inc.), 250 B.R. 776, 791 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2000); see also § 726.105 . . .

SMITH, v. EFFECTIVE TELESERVICES, INC. a n k a LLC, a LLC, a F., 133 So. 3d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Alleging legal theories turning on the claim of a fraudulent transfer of assets under sections 726.105 . . . (l)(a), 726.105(l)(b)2, and 726.106(1), Florida Statutes (2010), the im-pleader complaint sought various . . . Stat. (2010) (using the word “voidable” to describe the application of § 726.105(l)(a)). . . . Sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2010), define the circumstances where a transfer by a . . . Section 726.105 provides, in pertinent part: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is . . .

IN RE PALM BEACH FINANCE PARTNERS, L. P. II, L. P. v. BMO N. A. M I, 501 B.R. 792 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 541 and Florida Statute § 726.105; (2) avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfers pursuant to . . . ) avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfers pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544 and Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . .

NATIONAL MARITIME SERVICES, INC. v. F. STRAUB LLC, F., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Count III is titled, “Action to Avoid and Recover Fraudulent Transfer Pursuant to § 726.105(l)(b), Florida . . . Count II: Florida Statute Section 726.105(l)(a) Count II alleges the transfer violates Florida Statute . . . Section 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a), the UFTA looks to indicia of intent commonly known as “badges of fraud,” Amjad . . . See Fla Stat. §§ 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . .

JACKSON- PLATTS, f. k. a. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION,, 727 F.3d 1127 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 726.105(2). . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CHULY INTERNATIONAL, LLC,, 118 So. 3d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Those “badges of fraud” are set forth in section 726.105, Florida Statutes (2013). . . . substantial debt was incurred (loans were made prior to, and forgiven during, the de Cespedes’ lawsuit). § 726.105 . . . Section 726.105, Florida Statutes (2013), provides, in part: (2) In determining actual intent under paragraph . . .

IN RE BIFANI, v. M., 493 B.R. 866 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . To prevail on her fraudulent transfer claim under section 726.105(l)(a), the Trustee need only prove . . . transferred, the Trustee is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on her claims under section 726.105 . . . the Court’s entry of a final judgment in this proceeding for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(2). . § 726.105 . . . (citing In re Levine, 134 F.3d 1046, 1053 (11th Cir.1998)). . § 726.105(2), Fla. Stat. . Maurer v. . . .

IN RE LYDIA CLADEK, INC. J. v. D., 494 B.R. 555 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108. (Doc. 1). . . . from the Defendant as actually fraudulent transfers under § 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . Statutes, and as constructively fraudulent transfers under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . Section 726.109(1) of the Florida Statutes provides that a fraudulent transfer under § 726.105(l)(a) . . .

TEMPAY, INC. v. BILTRES STAFFING OF TAMPA BAY, LLC, a I. PFG a, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Under section 726.105(l)(a), Florida Statutes, a transfer by a debtor “is fraudulent as to a creditor . . .

In L. DESMARAIS, L. v. LLC,, 518 F. App'x 671 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . .

In L. DESMARAIS, L. v. LLC,, 518 F. App'x 671 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 938 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . .

In PALM BEACH FINANCE PARTNERS, L. P. II, L. P. v. BMO N. A. M I, 488 B.R. 758 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108. . . .

In ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AASI A. v. USA,, 490 B.R. 418 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(B) and 726.108 (Count LVI) because the claims, as pled, are not facially plausible. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.108: (Count LVI — All Defendants). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. MORGAN, III,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)); Veigle v. . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(a)); Bay View Estates Corp. v. . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a): “A transfer or obligation is not voidable under s. 726.105(l)(a) against a person . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. W. CLOUD,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)); Veigle v. . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(a)); Bay View Estates Corp. v. . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. DANCING LLC,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)); Veigle v. . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(a)); Bay View Estates Corp. v. . . . Slat. § 726.105(1)(a). For the reasons given, it is hereby RECOMMENDED: 1. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. MENOTTE,, 484 B.R. 835 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b), and Fla. Stat. § 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105 and § 726.106 contemporaneously with 11 USC § 548); see also Freeman v. . . . Bankr.M.D.Fla.2001) (holding that a trustee had not met her burden under § 548 of the Bankruptcy Code or § 726.105 . . .

In FLORIDA MANUFACTURING DISTRIBUTION, v., 484 B.R. 847 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a)-(b), 726.106(1), paid by Florida Manufacturing and Distribution (“Debtor”) to the . . .

In ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P. A. v., 483 B.R. 15 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 548(a)(1)(A) and (B), 544, and 550, as well as, Florida Statute §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), . . . The Foundation assumes that the Trustee can satisfy his burdens under § 548(a) and Florida Statute §§ 726.105 . . .

BEDWELL, A. H. S. F. O J. J. B. I. v. E. RUCKS, R. Co- E. D. Co- E. L. L. P., 127 So. 3d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . §§ 726.105-.108, Fla. Stat. (2010); Freeman v. . . .

In LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION. v. LAK v. LAK v. LAK v. LAK v. LAK v. LAK v. LAK Co. v. LAK, 903 F. Supp. 2d 152 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105. . Cal. Corp.Code § 25400(d). . See Kamen v. . . .

DESAK, v. VANLANDINGHAM, a, 98 So. 3d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished unless action is brought: (1) Under s. 726.105 . . . obligation: (a) With actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debt- or. ..." § 726.105 . . .

S. NEWMAN, L. P. II, L. P. L. P. v. WILLIAM L. GUNLICKS IRREVOCABLE TRUST f b o L. f b o L. f b o L. f b o L. f b o V. V. L. f b o V., 897 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105(1)(a) and (b). Fla. . . . . § 726.105(1)(a) concerns actual fraud while Fla Stat. § 726.105(1)(b) concerns constructive fraud. . . . Stat. § 726.105 provides: (1) A transfer is made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as . . . Stat. § 726.105 states that “[a] transfer is made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as . . . Stat. § 726.105 (emphasis added). . . .

In KANE KANE, A R. A v. J. N., 479 B.R. 617 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.108(1); (b) in Count II (Constructive Fraud) avoidance and recovery of certain . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b), 726.106(1) and 726.108; and (d) in Count IV, recovery of the avoided transfers . . .

In KANE KANE, a R. a v., 475 B.R. 251 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a), alleging that the Debtor made the Transfers with the actual intent to hinder, delay . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(b), alleging that the transfers were constructively fraudulent because the Debtor did . . .

OGINSKI, v. PARAGON PROPERTIES OF COSTA RICA, LLC,, 282 F.R.D. 672 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105 against the Fraudulent Transfer Defendants. (Id.) . . .

In J. PEARLMAN, s R. s v. s R. s v. Or s R. s v., 472 B.R. 115 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a) and § 726.108. Bankruptcy Code § 548 and Fla. . . . . §§ 726.105 and 726.108 are substantially the same, with the exception of Florida’s more favorable four-year . . . investments in the TCTS Stock Program were constructively fraudulent transfers under § 548 of the Code and §§ 726.105 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108 ("FUFTA”). . . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . World Vision, 275 B.R. at 656; see also Wiand v. . . .

CALARESE, v. WEISSFISCH,, 87 So. 3d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . of two parcels of real property on the ground they were fraudulently made in violation of sections 726.105 . . . (1) and 726.105(2), Florida Statutes (2009). . . . barred by section 726.110, Florida Statutes (2009), which extinguishes a cause of action under section 726.105 . . .

EURO RSCG DIRECT RESPONSE, LLC, d b a RSCG EDGE RSCG DRTV, a v. GREEN BULLION FINANCIAL SERVICES f k a LLC d b a a, 872 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a) brought against all Defendants, on the grounds that Plaintiffs “allegation that the . . . Stat. § 726.105, provides that “[a] transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as . . . Stat. § 726.105(1). . . .

E. PERLMAN, LLC, v. DELISFORT- THEODULE, LLC. a, 451 F. App'x 846 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 726.105. It entered judgment against her in that amount. This is her appeal. II. . . .

In CUSTOM CONTRACTORS, LLC, C. v., 462 B.R. 901 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(a) & (b), 726.106(1), 726.108(1). . . .

S. SALLAH, MRT LLC MRT LLC, v. WORLDWIDE CLEARING LLC,, 860 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . The Amended Complaint contains four counts: (I) Fraudulent Transfer under Florida Statute Section 726.105 . . . (l)(a); (II) Fraudulent Transfer under Florida Statute Section 726.105(l)(b); (III) Fraudulent Transfer . . .

In ERNIE HAIRE FORD, INC. M. v., 459 B.R. 824 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 544(b) and Florida Statutes section 726.105(l)(a), Plaintiff sues “the EHF Defendants, the Wholesaler . . .

In PHARMACY DISTRIBUTOR SERVICES, INC. C. v., 455 B.R. 817 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . The three counts in the Complaint rely on Florida Statutes sections 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), and . . . Florida Statutes section 726.110(1) provides that a cause of action under section 726.105(l)(a) is extinguished . . . For actions brought under sections 726.105(l)(b) or 726.106(1), the cause of action is extinguished if . . .

In J. PEARLMAN, R. J. v. TD N. A. d b a, 460 B.R. 306 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108 ("FUFTA”). . . . . or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished unless such action is brought: (1) Under s. 726.105 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . Cuthill v. . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). .World Vision, 275 B.R. at 656; see also Wiand v. . . .

In NEW CENTURY TRS HOLDINGS, INC, S. N. v. TRS, 450 B.R. 504 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . . § 726.105). . . . .

OGINSKY, v. PARAGON PROPERTIES OF COSTA RICA LLC, a, 784 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 726.105. (DE # 64 ¶¶ 859-65). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. 726.105(l)(b) (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 726.105. . . . .

ZAKI KULAIBEE ESTABLISHMENT, v. H. McFLICKER,, 788 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 726.105(1)(a) for making transfers of ZKE property and of proceeds from the sale of ZKE’s property . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). ZKE alleges that Defendants are liable under Fla. . . . Stat. 726.105(l)(b) because Defendants made certain transfers of ZKE property and proceeds from the sale . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a) remains as to all defendants. Summary judgment is DENIED. b. . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b) remains as to all defendants. Summary judgment is DENIED. c. . . .

LAURITSEN, v. WALLACE,, 67 So. 3d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 739.402, Fla. . . .

In SEMINOLE WALLS CEILINGS CORP. v. L. J. E. PITA v. J. L. PITA, 446 B.R. 572 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . Africh is an avoidable fraudulent transfer under § 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Florida Statute § 726.105 . . . Ex. 230. .Count VII of the Second Amended Complaint in 6:04-ap-79 uses "§ 726.105(l)(b),” the section . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . Mejia v. . . . Because the Court finds actual fraudulent intent under § 726.105(l)(a), the Court need not address the . . . Chapter 7 trustee's argument for finding a constructively fraudulent transfer under § 726.105(l)(b) . . .

In ATM FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, R. v., 446 B.R. 564 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a),(b) or § 726.106(1). . . .

L. FELDKAMP L. v. LONG BAY PARTNERS, LLC a, 773 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(a), (b). . . .