The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Stat. § 222.30. . . . Stat. § 222.30(3). Mr. . . . Section 222.30 requires a "conversion by a debtor." . . . Section 222.30 does not apply. . . . Stat. § 222.30. Mr. . . .
. . . 56.29 Proceeding "as they relate to those transactions that are properly considered conversions under § 222.30 . . .
. . . Similarly, section 222.30, Florida Statutes (2015), removes property from the statutory exemption if . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, 726.108, 222.30, and Chapter 85, Florida Statutes. R. . . . Stat. §§ 726.205, 222.29, and 222.30 to Florida’s constitutional homestead exemption: .,. a homestead . . .
. . . determination that the $80,000 payment to Citibank was a fraudulent asset conversion pursuant to section 222.30 . . . Even Defendant acknowledges that Havo-co is silent on the specific question of whether section 222.30 . . . Stat. § 222.30(3)(c)(2) — i.e., in interpreting the phrase "any other relief the circumstances may require . . .
. . . Florida has opted out through provisions of the Florida Constitution and Florida Statute Sections 222.201-222.30 . . .
. . . 1), respectively; Count V is a claim for fraudulent asset conversion pursuant to Florida Statutes § 222.30 . . .
. . . . § 222.30) and fraudulent transfers (F.S. § 726) did not create a cause of action against a party who . . .
. . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30? . . .
. . . Gosman as tenants by the entireties violated the Florida Fraudulent Asset Conversion Statute, Section 222.30 . . .
. . . However, Cadle did properly assert claims under Sections 222.29 and 222.30, both of which generally prohibit . . .
. . . However, Cadle did properly assert claims under Sections 222.29 and 222.30, both of which generally prohibit . . .
. . . 548, Chapter 726 of Florida Statutes, and Florida Statute Section 56.29, and Florida Statute Section 222.30 . . . 548, and Chapter 726 of the Florida Statutes, Florida Statute Section 56.29, Florida Statute Section 222.30 . . . and Chapter 726 of the Florida Statutes, Florida Statute Section 56.29, and Florida Statute Section 222.30 . . .
. . . Bradshaw, 349 B.R. at 516 (debtor who filed revised schedules I and J reflecting disposable income of $222.30 . . .
. . . . §§ 222.30(5) (Fraudulent asset conversions), and 95.11(Limitations other than for the recovery of real . . .
. . . (ii) the Highway Avenue Property and Picketville Property are not exempt pursuant to §§ 222.29 and 222.30 . . . $231,952.23 check was not exempt because the conversion was fraudulent pursuant to Florida Statutes, § 222.30 . . . entireties property, as the evidence presented by the Trustee does not warrant a violation of F.S. § 222.30 . . . Florida Statutes, § 222.30(2) states: Any conversion by a debtor of an asset that results in the proceeds . . . Ann. § 222.30(2) (West 2005). . . .
. . . income as $1,924.98 and her total monthly expenses as $1,702.68, resulting in monthly excess income of $222.30 . . . individual’s expenses, the debtor’s sworn-to schedules establish that she has excess monthly income of $222.30 . . .
. . . the specific intent of hindering, delaying and defrauding creditors in violation of section 222.29, 222.30 . . .
. . . . §§ 222.30, 726.10, the court held that the purchase of the annuity on the eve of bankruptcy, debtor . . .
. . . Pursuant to Florida Statute § 222.30 assets are not exempt if a debtor executes a fraudulent conversion . . . Section 222.30 adopts the definitional section from Florida Statutes § 726, “unless the application of . . . Section 222.30 provides the following: (1) As used in this section, "conversion” means every mode, direct . . . Stat. 222.30 (1993). . . .
. . . Section 222.30 of the Florida Statutes provides that “[a]ny conversion by a debtor of an asset that results . . . Section 222.30 adopts the definitional section from Florida Statutes § 726, “unless the application of . . . However, as Maxfield points out § 222.30 does not contain a size limitation on avoiding a fraudulent . . .
. . . delaying, or defrauding his creditors within the meaning of Florida Statute Sections 726.105, 222.29 and 222.30 . . .
. . . . § 222.30 and is based on the allegation that Ms. . . . Stat. § 222.30, which is the statute that provides relief to a party who claims that a debtor fraudulently . . .
. . . La-vecchia, Jonathan Alper, and Mark Koteen is affirmed based on our conclusion that neither section 222.30 . . .
. . . . § 222.30. Fla. . . . . § 222.30 provides in pertinent part: Fraudulent asset conversions (1) As used in this section, “conversion . . .
. . . transfers or the conversion of non-exempt funds into exempt assets in contravention of §§ 222.29 and 222.30 . . . Stat. § 222.30 provides in pertinent part: Fraudulent asset conversions (1) As used in this section, . . . Stat. § 222.30. Debtors argue that policy 1 is a long standing policy. . . . Section 222.30 was not an available remedy in Barker because the annuities that were the subject of the . . . objection were purchased prior to the effective date of § 222.30. . . .
. . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30? Id. at 1144. . . .
. . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30? Id. at 1144. . . .
. . . . § § 222.29 and 222.30? Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hill, 197 F,3d 1135, 1144 (11th Cir.1999). . . . APPLICABILITY OF SECTIONS 726.105, 222.29, AND 222.30 TO THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION Section 726.105, Florida . . . Accordingly, we reach the same conclusion as to sections 222.29 and 222.30. . . . Section 222.30, Florida Statutes (2000), provides in pertinent part: 222.30 Fraudulent asset conversions . . . Several federal courts have concluded that sections 222.29 and 222.30 cannot expand or limit the scope . . .
. . . Judith Yusem alleging that Henry Yusem engaged in a fraudulent asset conversion in violation of section 222.30 . . .
. . . Courts are split regarding the impact of Florida Statutes §§ 222.29 and 222.30. . . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30 (West 1999). . . . See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 222.30(2) (West 1999). . . . only applies to exemptions within § 222), with Thomas, 172 B.R. at 674 (holding that §§ 222.29 and 222.30 . . .
. . . . § 222.30 (West 2000). . . .
. . . hinder, delay, and defraud creditors in violation of Florida Statutes §§ 726.105, 726.108, 222.29, and 222.30 . . . hinder, delay, and defraud creditors in violation of Florida Statutes §§ 726.105, 726.108, 222.29, and 222.30 . . .
. . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30. . . . Stat. § 222.30(2). . . . Stat. §§ 222.29 and 222.30 were not in effect at the time of this case, we have previously concluded . . . STAT. §§ 222.29 and 222.30? . . . Stat. chs. 726.105, 222.29, and 222.30. . . . .
. . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30. . . . Stat. § 222.30(2). . . . Stat. §§ 222.29 and 222.30 were not in effect at the time of this case, we have previously concluded . . . STAT. §§ 222.29 and 222.30? . . . Stat. chs. 726.105, 222.29, and 222.30. . . . .
. . . . § 222.30, occurs when a debtor’s conversion of an asset results in its proceeds becoming exempt. . . .
. . . Seife $425.00 222.30 $ 94,477.50 J. Askey $110.00 123.50 $ 13,585.00 A. . . .
. . . that the Florida legislature intended to change this rule by enacting Florida Statutes § 222.29 and § 222.30 . . . Fla.Stat. § 222.30 simply provides that the protection of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act applies . . .
. . . the account on the ground that Appellant engaged in a fraudulent transfer of his trust funds under § 222.30 . . .
. . . As FBC concedes, Section 222.30, Fla.Stat., is not implicated. . . .
. . . 1993, while this case law was developing, the Florida legislature stepped into the fray, enacting § 222.30 . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 222.30 (West 1998). . . .
. . . This Statute is part of the Chapter which now includes § 222.30. . . . Section 222.30 provides that any conversion of non-exempt assets to exempt assets is a fraudulent asset . . .
. . . hinder, delay, or defraud creditors); In re Thomas, 172 B.R. 673, 674 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1994) (applying § 222.30 . . .
. . . hinder, delay, or defraud creditors); In re Thomas, 172 B.R. 673, 674 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1994) (applying § 222.30 . . .
. . . . § 222.30(2). . . . We conclude, as did the district court in Davidson, that prior to the adoption of § 222.30, § 726.105 . . . Moreover, § 222.30 expressly adopts the definitional section from § 726 “unless the application of a . . . Stat. § 222.30(1). . . . Stat. § 222.30 does not necessarily suggest that no remedy for transfer of assets from non-exempt to . . .
. . . . § 222.30(2). . . . We conclude, as did the district court in Davidson, that prior to the adoption of § 222.30, § 726.105 . . . Moreover, § 222.30 expressly adopts the definitional section from § 726 “unless the application of a . . . Stat. § 222.30(1). . . . Stat. § 222.30 does not necessarily suggest that no remedy for transfer of assets from non-exempt to . . .
. . . . § 222.30, and thus, the insurance policy may not be claimed as exempt. . . . Stat. § 222.30 applies only to transactions occurring on or after October 1, 1993. 1993 Fla. . . .
. . . . §§ 222.29 and 222.30. (Id.). 13. . . . The Receiver and Trustee relied on Fla.Stat. § 222.30(1)-(2) to support their contention that the Court . . . held that a homestead exemption will not be disallowed even upon a finding of fraud under Fla.Stat. 222.30 . . . The Court does note, however, that it did not rely on Fla.Stat. 222.30 in Brown or Frederick, and is . . . Section 222.30 of the Florida Statutes provides, in relevant part, that: (1) As used in this section, . . .
. . . . § 222.29 and § 222.30. . . .
. . . . § 222.30. This is a recent amendment which became effective October 1,1993. . . . consideration, i.e. the purchase of the annuities, it has been stated that the enactment of Fla.Stat. § 222.30 . . .
. . . . § 222.30. § 222.30 provides that any conversion of non-exempt assets to exempt assets is a fraudulent . . . Although § 222.30 is not directly applicable to the present case, it has been stated that “the enactment . . . of [Fla.Stat.] § 222.30 did little to alter the law. . . . While it can be and has been argued that Fla.Stat. § 222.30 would not have been necessary if the law . . . of fraud” operates as a permanent brake upon misuse of the exemption, then the view that Fla.Stat. § 222.30 . . .
. . . (3) Section 222.25(2), exempting health aids for debtors and dependents; and (4) Section 222.29 and 222.30 . . .
. . . As was noted in Davidson, effective October 1,1993, Florida Statute Section 222.30 provides that any . . . Trustee, however, argues that Florida Statute 222.30 (enacted after the establishment of the Annuity) . . . Bankruptcy Court in that case, as well as the case at bar, focused on the fact that Florida Statute § 222.30 . . . Florida Statute § 222.30(2) provides that: Any conversion by a debtor of an asset that results in the . . . Because Section 222.30 only applies to a transfer or conversion occurring on or after October 1, 1993 . . .
. . . consequence for fraudulent conduct, [in a footnote, the Bankruptcy Court refers to Florida Statute 222.30 . . . Debtors’ claimed Annuity exemption, the Bankruptcy Court focused on the fact that Florida Statute § 222.30 . . . Florida Statute § 222.30(2) provides that: Any conversion by a debtor of an asset that results in the . . . Because Section 222.30 only applies to a transfer or conversion occurring on or after October 1, 199S . . .
. . . . § 222.30(2) Fraudulent asset conversions.— Any conversion by a debtor of an asset that results in the . . .
. . . . § 222.30 (West 1993). . . .
. . . Effective October 1, 1993, Florida Statute Section 222.30 provides that any conversion of nonexempt assets . . .
. . . . § 222.30(b)(2) expressly authorized the Secretary “to make the type of comparison that takes place . . . NO. 2287, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 11 (1950). . 20 U.S.C. § 238(d)(3) (1982). . 34 C.F.R. § 222.30 (1985) . . . The second preceding fiscal year is the year used for comparison. 34 C.F.R. § 222.30(b) (1985). . . . .
. . . . § 222.30(b)(2) expressly authorized the Secretary “to make the type of comparison that takes place . . . NO. 2287, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 11 (1950). . 20 U.S.C. § 238(d)(3) (1982). . 34 C.F.R. § 222.30 (1985) . . . The second preceding fiscal year is the year used for comparison. 34 C.F.R. § 222.30(b) (1985). . . . .
. . . . §§ 222.30-.32 (1984). . . .
. . . fibrous vegetable materials, suitable for use in making blinds, shutters, curtains, screens or shades: 222.30 . . . The goods are not properly classified in items 222.30, 222.32 or 222.34 which relate to exemplars of . . .
. . . fibrous vegetable materials, suitable for use in making blinds, shutters, curtains, screens or shades: 222.30 . . . The goods are not properly classified in items 222.30, 222.32 or 222.34 which relate to exemplars of . . .
. . . of labor and material to said vessel at the instance of the Freeman Enterprises Company, claiming ' $222.30 . . .
. . . during the 90 days preceding the appointment of a receiver, there is due for salary $600, for expenses $222.30 . . .