Cases from cite.case.law:

LB JUDGMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, v. R. BOSCHETTI,, 271 So. 3d 115 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . order to avoid collection of LB Judgment's judgment, subject to avoidance under sections 726.105 and 726.106 . . .

LAPTOPPLAZA, INC. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,, 264 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . with the intent to defraud its creditors (including Wells Fargo) in violation of sections 726.105 and 726.106 . . .

IN RE TAYLOR, BEAN WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP. REO LLC, F. v. ADP,, 593 B.R. 862 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(a), (b) and § 726.106(1). . . .

VILLAMIZAR, v. LUNA CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,, 260 So. 3d 355 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The First District held that the complaint alleged fraudulent transfers under sections 726.105(1) and 726.106 . . .

IN RE TELTRONICS, INC. T. O v. RPX, 904 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . recover, pursuant to Sections 544 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and Florida Statutes 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106 . . . The trustee alleges constructive fraudulent transfer under Florida Statutes 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106 . . . Similarly, under Section 726.106(1), a transfer made by the debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor if . . .

IN RE MONGELLUZZI, v., 591 B.R. 480 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . Count VIII Other Loan Repayment Transfers Avoidance of the Transfers as constructive fraud under § 726.106 . . . Plaintiff's Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Claims under § 726.105(1)(b), § 726.106(1 ), and 11 U.S.C . . . Under § 726.106(1), a transfer is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer was . . .

RREF SNV- FL SSL, LLC, v. SHAMROCK STORAGE, LLC, M., 250 So. 3d 788 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ANALYSIS Under section 726.106, a debtor's transfer is fraudulent as to a creditor if (a) the creditor's . . . debtor made the transfer without receiving reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer. § 726.106 . . . As a result, the ... section 726.106(1) [and other] claims fail as to the less than reasonably equivalent . . . transfer of "economically valueless" title does not meet the reasonably equivalent value standard in § 726.106 . . .

IN RE MONGELLUZZI A. B. T. S. HO II, LLC HO, LLC YJNK II, YJNK XI CA, LLC ABTS LLC B. LLC HQ, LLC LLC U, LLC USL H LLC LLP YJNK III, YJNK VIII, LLC, v., 587 B.R. 392 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . Plaintiff seeks to avoid the Subject Transfers as constructively fraudulent transfers under Sections 726.106 . . . PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AS TO COUNT IV-CONSTRUCTIVELY FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS UNDER § 726.106(1) Under § 726.106 . . . The Court will address each of the elements of § 726.106(1) in turn. A. . . .

IN RE GPC MIAMI INC. T. GPC v. N. A. S. A. C. A. d b a C. A. N. A. v. S. A. C. A. d b a C. A. PC CM., 582 B.R. 534 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1), and 726.108(l)(a). . . .

AGRITRADE, LP, v. QUERCIA,, 253 So. 3d 28 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . Count IV : Violation of Florida's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ( section 726.106, Florida Statutes . . .

J. KARDASH, Sr. v. COMMISSIONER OF IRS,, 866 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Id. at § 726.106(1). . . . . Stat, § 726.106(1). . . .

IN RE SIGMA- TECH SALES, INC. N. v. O- a a AHLO, a, 570 B.R. 408 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Claims Under Sections 726.105(l)(b), and Section 726.106(1) of the . . . Florida Statutes (Counts II and III) Under 11 U.S.C. § 544 and sections 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1) . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . .

A. ZUCKER, L. A. v. U. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 856 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 726.106(2). . . .

A. ZUCKER, L. A. v. U. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 856 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 726.106(2). . . .

IN RE MONGELLUZZI, L. v., 568 B.R. 702 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . §§ 544, 548, and 550 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.105(a) and (b), 726.106(1), and 726.108. . . . .

IN RE ANDERSON, v. W., 561 B.R. 230 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, 726.108, 222.30, and Chapter 85, Florida Statutes. R. . . .

IN RE KIPNIS, E. v. N. A. E. v., 555 B.R. 877 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . assumes that the, Bank Account Transfer and the Condominium Transfer are avoidable under § 726.105 and § 726.106 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. MAJOR, 551 B.R. 531 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . The Transfer of the Sarasota Property is Avoidable as a Fraudulent Transfer Pursuant to Section 726.106 . . . Stat., § 726.106(1) (2016). . . . succeeds in showing that a transfer satisfies the elements for being a fraudulent transfer under Section 726.106 . . . so called “marital consideration” is not sufficient to create a genuine issue of fact under Section 726.106 . . . Sarasota Property to Major and his wife and tenants by the entirety is AVOIDED pursuant to Sections 726.106 . . .

IN RE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC. LLC, R. v. LLC IX, L. P., 560 B.R. 594 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . and Y of the Complaint, the Trustee- alleges- a fraudulent transfer claim under § 726.105(l)(b) and § 726.106 . . . receiving a fraudulent transfer under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, and under §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106 . . . and VI- of the Complaint, the Trustee alleges a-fraudulent transfer claim under § 726.105(l)(b) and § 726.106 . . . Count V of the Complaint is based on § 726.106(1) of the Florida Statutes. . . .

NATIONAL AUTO SERVICE CENTERS, INC. a a D. LLC LLC, v. F R LLC, a F R LLC, a, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . an antecedent debt when the debtor is insolvent and the insider has reasonable cause to know that, § 726.106 . . . obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant; (2) Under s. 726.105(l)(b) or s. 726.106 . . . value], within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or (3) Under s. 726.106 . . .

IN RE BOS, Jr., 561 B.R. 868 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . period while permitting the parties to litigate in state court under Florida’s UFTA (See § 726.105 & § 726.106 . . . were insolvent at the time of the transfers, or rendered insolvent as a result of the transfers. § 726.106 . . .

McCALLA v. E. C. KENYON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. a, 183 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . in the present case thus alleged fraudulent transfers within the meaning of sections 726.105(1) and 726.106 . . .

RREF SNV- FL SSL, LLC, v. SHAMROCK STORAGE, LLC, R. M., 178 So. 3d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Parties By Lynn, Inc., 753 So.2d 637, 639-40 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (applying § 726.106). III. . . .

IN RE CHESROWN, v., 543 B.R. 685 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 544 and Florida Statutes § 726.106(1); (IV) avoidance and recovery of' fraudulent transfer pursuant . . .

WELCH, v. HIGHLANDS UNION BANK,, 526 B.R. 152 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2015)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1). “What constitutes ‘reasonable value’ is not statutorily defined. . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. BARBER LLC,, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1). Defendants attack Counts 3 and 4 on two grounds. . . .

NATIONAL MARITIME SERVICES, INC. v. F. STRAUB, LLC,, 776 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 726.106(2). Straub, 979 F.Supp.2d at 1329-30. . . . Stat. § 726.106(2). . . . Reasonably equivalent value is not an element of proof under section 726.106(2) or any associated defenses . . . Id. § 726.106. . . . Stat. § 726.106(2). . . .

IN RE CARPETS, INC. M. v. Sr., 522 B.R. 718 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 548 or Florida Statutes, §§ 726.105 and 726.106. . . . creditor under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)(1)) may avoid a transfer that is fraudulent under either § 726.105 or § 726.106 . . .

GUERRERO, v. GLOBALMAX ENTERPRISES, INC., 152 So. 3d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . court asked the magistrate to clarify whether she had considered and applied sections 726.105(l)(b), 726.106 . . .

IN RE L. BERKMAN, v. K. In K. v., 517 B.R. 288 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.106(1)0»), and 726.106(1) (the “Berkman Adversary”). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1), the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proof . . . Stat. § 726.106(1). . In re Phoenix Diversified Investment Corp., 2011 WL 2182881, *4 (Bankr.S.D. . . .

IN RE J. PEARLMAN, R. v., 515 B.R. 887 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.106(l)(b), 726.106(1), and 726.108. Count V: Unjust Enrichment .Doc. Nos. 40 and 58. . . . .

In BIFANI, M. v., 580 F. App'x 740 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.106(1). . . .

In BIFANI, M. v., 580 F. App'x 740 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.106(1). . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC, IRA LLC, LTD, IRA LTD, L. P. v. DANCING LLC,, 578 F. App'x 938 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106(1); and (2) unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1); and (4) alternatively, whether Nadel’s guilty plea established . . . insolvent at that time or the debtor became insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation,” id. § 726.106 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1), and are thus irrelevant in light of the District Court’s finding . . .

WELCH, v. SYNOVUS BANK,, 517 B.R. 269 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 544(b) and Florida Statute §§ 726.106(1) and 726.108 — Overdraft Loan Repayment Transfers; (4) Actual . . . and 726.108 — Deposit Transfers; (5) Constructive Fraud, 11 U.S.C. § 544(b) and Florida Statute §§ 726.106 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b)[,] 726.106(1). . . . Stat. 726.106(1). (See Doc. # 17 at 4). . . . Section 726.106(1), Florida Statutes, provides: A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is . . .

FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. a d b a f k a v. ASTRO AIR CONDITIONING AND HEATING, INCORPORATED, a Jo a, 137 So. 3d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The complaint tracked the language of sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2012). . . .

BERMAN, v. J. SMITH, In, 510 B.R. 387 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . became a creditor “before the transfer was made and the obligation was incurred,” that case discussed § 726.106 . . .

SMITH, v. EFFECTIVE TELESERVICES, INC. a n k a LLC, a LLC, a F., 133 So. 3d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . turning on the claim of a fraudulent transfer of assets under sections 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b)2, and 726.106 . . . Sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2010), define the circumstances where a transfer by a . . . Section 726.106 states: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a . . .

IN RE PALM BEACH FINANCE PARTNERS, L. P. II, L. P. v. BMO N. A. M I, 501 B.R. 792 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 544 and Florida Statutes § 726.106 and § 726.108. . . .

NATIONAL MARITIME SERVICES, INC. v. F. STRAUB LLC, F., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Count V: Florida Statute Section 726.106 Count V of the Supplemental Complaint alleges a violation of . . . Florida Statute Section 726.106. . . . Under Section 726.106(2), “[a] transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose . . . Stat. § 726.106(2) (emphasis added). The statutory conditions are satisfied here. . . . Under Florida Statute section 726.106(2), the transfer was made to an insider, Straub, for an antecedent . . .

IN RE LYDIA CLADEK, INC. J. v. D., 494 B.R. 555 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108. (Doc. 1). . . .

In PALM BEACH FINANCE PARTNERS, L. P. II, L. P. v. BMO N. A. M I, 488 B.R. 758 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108. . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. MORGAN, III,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1), for constructive fraud. See doc. 15, ¶¶ 115-118. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.106(1) because neither Nadel, the fund managers, nor the hedge funds and Traders received . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. W. CLOUD,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106(1), for constructive fraud. See doc. 4, ¶¶ 109-112. . . . obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant ... (2) Under § 726.105(l)(b) or § 726.106 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . . Finally, the Receiver asserts that the transfers were fraudulent under Fla.Stat. § 726.106(1) because . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. DANCING LLC,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106(1), for constructive fraud. See doc. 1, ¶¶ 105-113. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.106(1) because neither Nadel, the fund managers, nor the hedge funds received a reasonably . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. MENOTTE,, 484 B.R. 835 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105 and § 726.106 contemporaneously with 11 USC § 548); see also Freeman v. . . .

In FLORIDA MANUFACTURING DISTRIBUTION, v., 484 B.R. 847 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a)-(b), 726.106(1), paid by Florida Manufacturing and Distribution (“Debtor”) to the . . .

In ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P. A. v., 483 B.R. 15 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . 548(a)(1)(A) and (B), 544, and 550, as well as, Florida Statute §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), and 726.106 . . . assumes that the Trustee can satisfy his burdens under § 548(a) and Florida Statute §§ 726.105(1) and 726.106 . . .

BEDWELL, A. H. S. F. O J. J. B. I. v. E. RUCKS, R. Co- E. D. Co- E. L. L. P., 127 So. 3d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 726.106(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . Fraudulent Transfer Act only requires that a creditor’s claim arise before the alleged transfer. § 726.106 . . .

S. NEWMAN, L. P. II, L. P. L. P. v. WILLIAM L. GUNLICKS IRREVOCABLE TRUST f b o L. f b o L. f b o L. f b o L. f b o V. V. L. f b o V., 897 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.106. Fla. . . . Section 726.106(1) provides: A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a . . . insolvent at that time or the debtor became insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation.” § 726.106 . . .

In GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS INCORPORATED GMBH SDN BHD v., 694 F.3d 705 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 726.106(1). . . .

In GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS INCORPORATED GMBH SDN BHD v., 694 F.3d 705 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 726.106(1). . . .

In KANE KANE, A R. A v. J. N., 479 B.R. 617 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(b), 726.106(1) and 726.108; and (d) in Count IV, recovery of the avoided transfers pursuant . . . Stat. § 726.106(1), brought pursuant to § 544(b), and requesting recovery of any avoided Transfers. . . . Stat. § 726.106(1), brought pursuant to § 544(b), and requesting recovery of any avoided Transfers. . . . Section 726.106(1) of the Florida Statutes provides: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a . . .

In DELTA- T CORPORATION, P. v. LLC, N. V. DCR M I, 475 B.R. 495 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . . § 726.106(2), and, thus, even if the Trustee avoids and retains the alleged Bateman Litwin security . . . Stat. § 726.106(2).” DCR Answer ¶ 186. 3. . . .

In KANE KANE, a R. a v., 475 B.R. 251 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 726.106(1), and Fla. . . .

In J. PEARLMAN, s R. s v. s R. s v. Or s R. s v., 472 B.R. 115 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Stock Program were constructively fraudulent transfers under § 548 of the Code and §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108 ("FUFTA”). . . . .

In CUSTOM CONTRACTORS, LLC, C. v., 462 B.R. 901 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(a) & (b), 726.106(1), 726.108(1). . . .

S. SALLAH, MRT LLC MRT LLC, v. WORLDWIDE CLEARING LLC,, 860 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . under Florida Statute Section 726.105(l)(b); (III) Fraudulent Transfer under Florida Statute Section 726.106 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. M. NIEVES,, 75 So. 3d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Dennis Nieves and Dennis’ company, Trust Management Group, LLC, for fraudulent transfer under section 726.106 . . . On that record, the trial court found all three elements of section 726.106(1) were satisfied. . . .

In PHARMACY DISTRIBUTOR SERVICES, INC. C. v., 455 B.R. 817 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . The three counts in the Complaint rely on Florida Statutes sections 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), and 726.106 . . . For actions brought under sections 726.105(l)(b) or 726.106(1), the cause of action is extinguished if . . .

In J. PEARLMAN, R. J. v. TD N. A. d b a, 460 B.R. 306 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108 ("FUFTA”). . . . . obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant; (2) Under s. 726.105(l)(b) or s. 726.106 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . .

ZAKI KULAIBEE ESTABLISHMENT, v. H. McFLICKER,, 788 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 726.106(1) because Defendants transferred ZKE’s property and the proceeds of ZKE’s property, or incurred . . . Stats. §§ 726.106(l)(b), 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.106(2) for transferring ZKE’s property and the proceeds of ZKE’s property “at a time when . . . Stat. § 726.106(1) remains as to all defendants. Summary judgment is DENIED. d. . . . Stat. § 726.106(2) is dismissed as to all defendants. Summary judgment is GRANTED. . . . .

In ATM FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, R. v., 446 B.R. 564 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a),(b) or § 726.106(1). . . .

In J. PEARLMAN, R. J. v. TD N. A. d b a, 440 B.R. 900 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108. . Doc. No. 4. .Burger King Corp. v. . . .

MOFFATT NICHOL, INC. v. B. E. A. INTERNATIONAL CORP. INC., 48 So. 3d 896 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . thousands of dollars in cash to ADC the day after the Assignment was executed, in contravention of section 726.106 . . .

In GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS, INC. In v. U. S. A., 431 B.R. 739 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . Stat. 726.106(1). . . . Stat. 726.106(1). To prevail under its alternative statutory theory, Fla. . . . Stat. 726.106(1), GTI bears the burden of proving the existence of an actual creditor whose claim arose . . . Stat. 726.106(1). GTI has met this burden. . . . Stat. 726.106(1), made applicable by 11 U.S.C. § 544(b). . . .

E. v., 134 T.C. 266 (T.C. 2010)

. . . issues for decision are: (1) Whether the transfer was constructively fraudulent pursuant to section 726.106 . . . Ann. sec. 726.106, which is identical to section 5 of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). . . . Ann. sec. 726.106(1). . . . Ann. sec. 726.106(1) have been met, however, the transfer is treated as constructively fraudulent; no . . . Ann. sec. 726.106(1), we need not and do not address respondent’s alternative argument. . . .

In ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AASI A. v., 427 B.R. 559 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1) and 726.108 seeking recovery of all payments for services from the beginning . . .

In CHAMPALANNE, C. v., 425 B.R. 707 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . IV are fraudulent transfer claims pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), and 726.106 . . .

In TOUSA, INC. v., 422 B.R. 783 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Specifically, Plaintiff asserts claims under Sections 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108 of the Florida Statutes . . .

In SKYWAY COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CORP. f k a v. LLC, a d b a, 415 B.R. 859 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . transfers under § 726.105 of the Florida Statutes; (2) an action to recover fraudulent transfers under § 726.106 . . .

W. WIAND, L. L. C. HKW LLC, HKW I LLC, v. J. WAXENBERG,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 726.105(1)(a), § 726.105(1)(b), and § 726.106(1), which include different elements of proof. . . . The third basis for the Receiver’s FUF-TA claims, § 726.106(1), provides another constructive fraud theory . . . Stat. § 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(b) and § 726.106(1), he maintains that for the purposes of the actual fraud claims . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(b) and § 726.106(1), and her motion is GRANTED IN PART to this extent. . . .

In TODD, v., 391 B.R. 504 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . §§ 726.105(1) & 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.106(1), the statute relied upon in Count IV of the adversary complaint, are identical to . . . As a result, the section 548(a)(1)(B), Florida Statute section 726.106(1) and Florida Statute section . . .

In SKYWAY COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CORP. f k a v. LLC, a d b a, 389 B.R. 801 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . action to avoid and recover a fraudulent transfer pursuant to § 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.106 . . .

In V. LOWERY, H. II, v. V. H., 250 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . addressing its claim that the life insurance payments constituted constructive fraud as described in Section 726.106 . . . Instead, Cadle exclusively relied on a section 726.106 constructive fraud theory.” . . .

In V. LOWERY, H. II, v. V. H., 250 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . addressing its claim that the life insurance payments constituted constructive fraud as described in Section 726.106 . . . Instead, Cadle exclusively relied on a section 726.106 constructive fraud theory.” . . .

In LENTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. P. A. a v. P. A., 377 B.R. 396 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . transfers/payments pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 548, 550, and Florida Statute Sections 726.105 and 726.106 . . . are liable pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 541, 544, 548, 550, and Florida Statutes 726.105 and 726.106 . . .

MANCHEC, LLC, a a v. MANCHEC a k a, 951 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 726.106(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . exchange for the transfer” and John “was insolvent ... or became insolvent as a result of the transfer.” § 726.106 . . . As to the second aspect of the section 726.106(1) equation, Jeff gave no money or property in exchange . . .

In E. MOODIE, R. v. E. M., 362 B.R. 554 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Crosdale pursuant to § 548(a)(1)(B), § 550 and Florida Statute § 726.105(a), § 726.105(l)(b) and § 726.106 . . . As a result, the § 548(a)(1)(B) and Florida Statute § 726.106(1) claims fail. . . . The Court notes that Florida Statute § 726.106(1) is identical in pertinent part to 11 U.S.C. § 548(a . . . Therefore, the analysis of § 548(a)(1)(B) shall apply equally to Florida Statute § 726.106(1). . . .

In AQUA CLEAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. A. f k a v., 361 B.R. 567 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Stat §§ 726.105(1)(B) and 726.106. . . .

In H. REISNER K. A. H. K. v. C., 357 B.R. 206 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Florida Statute § 726.105(1)(b) and Florida Statute § 726.106(1) are analogous in form and substance . . .

In VILSACK, R. v. O TBM, 356 B.R. 546 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . . seeks to avoid the transfer under Florida’s constructive fraud statutes, sections 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106 . . . Fla Stat. § 726.106(1) titled “Transfers fraudulent as to present creditors” states in pertinent part . . .

In OLD NAPLES SECURITIES, INC. v. H. v., 343 B.R. 310 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . . §§ 726.106(1) and 726.109. . . . Stat. § 726.106(1). . . .

WILLIS, v. RED REEF, INC. a, 921 So. 2d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . violation of section 726.105(l)(b), Florida Statutes; and fraudulent transfers in violation of section 726.106 . . . defendants were not liable on the other three counts: fraudulent transfers in violation of section 726.106 . . .

In INTERNATIONAL PHARMACY DISCOUNT II, INC. v. L., 158 F. App'x 256 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 544(b) and Florida Statutes § 726.106(l)(b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PERSAUD, a k a K. D. N. a k a, 235 F.R.D. 696 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106;” and that “the federal tax liens of the United States upon parcels I, II, III, . . .

In V. LOWERY H., 335 B.R. 199 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . that Debtors’ annual payments to the Jackson policy constitute a fraudulent conversion pursuant to 726.106 . . . Florida Statute § 726.106(1) provides: A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent . . . Stat. 726.106 (1988) (emphasis added). . . .

In NUMED HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. v. K., 326 B.R. 859 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . that purports to release causes of action against the Defendant) is avoidable under §§ 726.105 and 726.106 . . . asserts that the Plaintiff “cannot satisfy any of the basic elements necessary to bring a claim under § 726.106 . . . The proposed Amendment is brought pursuant to § 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and §§ 726.105 and 726.106 . . .

In McCARN S ALLSTATE FINANCE, INC. s P. s v. G. Jr. V., 326 B.R. 843 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 548(a)(1)(A) and treating § 726.106 as state law equivalent of § 548(a)(1)(B)); In re Stewart, 280 . . .

In Re INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. IBT v. A., 408 F.3d 689 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 544(b) and Florida Statutes §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108, which permit avoidance of transfer . . .

In Re INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. IBT v. A., 408 F.3d 689 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 544(b) and Florida Statutes §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108, which permit avoidance of transfer . . .

R. BROWN, v. NOVA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., 903 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . pay Nova’s judgment against it, in violation of Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, section 726.106 . . .

In HANCOCK PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT INC. S. v. a k a, 325 B.R. 662 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . was voidable as a fraudulent transfer, pursuant to Section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Section 726.106 . . .

In GRUBBS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v., 321 B.R. 346 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . existing creditor as of the date of the petition who could have brought an action under sections 726.105, 726.106 . . . the cause of action asserted is one for recovery of a fraudulent transfer under section 726.105 and 726.106 . . .

BYKER, v. J. STANCHINA,, 892 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . $1,000,000 in trust assets and that the disbursements were fraudulent transfers under sections 726.105 and 726.106 . . .

In D. POTTER, L. T. v. D. L., 320 B.R. 753 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . avoidance powers under Bankruptcy Code Sections 544 and 550 and Florida Statute Sections 726.105 and 726.106 . . . against the debtors pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 544 and Florida Statute Sections 726.105 and 726.106 . . . Here, the applicable state laws are Florida Statute Sections 726.105 and 726.106. . . .

B. FREEMAN, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK,, 865 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2004)

. . . the obligation: (a)With actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debt- or;.... 726.106 . . . insolvent at that time or the debtor became insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation.” § 726.106 . . .

BALSAMO v. GRUPPO CERAMICHE RICCHETTI, S. P. A. BMI, 862 So. 2d 812 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . court held that Building could not, as a matter of law, rebut the insolvency presumption of section 726.106 . . . Appellee seeks to impose liability on the ground that the individuals were “insiders” under section 726.106 . . . Appellants, we also consider whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment under sections 726.106 . . . In doing so, it appears that the trial court confused the two factors required under section 726.106( . . . Section 726.106(1) provides that a transfer is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the . . .

PARAGON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. v. CENTRAL PALM BEACH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC. d b a CMHC, d b a CMHC, D. M. D., 859 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 726.106(2) transfers are extinguished by the limitations in section 726.110(3). . . . (1), within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or (3) Under s. 726.106 . . . The statute is clear and unambiguous and extinguishes the cause of action under section 726.106(2) one . . . Therefore, the cause of action under section 726.106(2) is extinguished. Paragon cites to Segal v. . . . Section 726.106(1) transfers were not part of issues raised at summary judgment. . . .

FRIEDMAN, M. D. v. HEART INSTITUTE OF PORT ST. LUCIE, INC., 863 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2003)

. . . .” § 726.106(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .