Cases from cite.case.law:

NATIONAL AUTO SERVICE CENTERS, INC. a a D. LLC LLC, v. F R LLC, a F R LLC, a, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . provides as follows: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

PRONMAN, a v. STYLES, Mr. S., 645 F. App'x 870 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . Stat. 726.101, 11 U.S.C. § 1125(c); Count X, Preliminary and Permanent Injunction. . . .

McCALLA v. E. C. KENYON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. a, 183 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Florida Statutes, provides: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

REISECK, v. UNIVERSAL COMMUNICATIONS OF MIAMI, INC., 141 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . incorporating the legal standards of Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Florida Statute sections 726.101 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. BARBER LLC,, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 726.101-.201, provides creditors 'with various forms of relief to avoid a debtor’s fraudulent transfer . . .

NATIONAL MARITIME SERVICES, INC. v. F. STRAUB, LLC,, 776 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 726.101-.112. Morton v. Cord Realty, Inc., 677 So.2d 1322, 1324 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1996). . . .

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a FDIC v. ARK DEVELOPMENT OCEANVIEW, LLC, a SKD a d b a LLC, a I LLC, a LLC, a a, 150 So. 3d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (2000).” Id. . . .

IN RE L. BERKMAN, v. K. In K. v., 517 B.R. 288 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 726.101, et seq. . Adv. Pro. No. 8:13-ap-336-CED, Doc. No. 1. . Adv. Pro. . . .

In BIFANI, M. v., 580 F. App'x 740 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. After a thorough review, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I. . . .

In BIFANI, M. v., 580 F. App'x 740 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. After a thorough review, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I. . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC, IRA LLC, LTD, IRA LTD, L. P. v. DANCING LLC,, 578 F. App'x 938 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.101-726.210. . . . Stat. §§ 726.101-726.201, is Florida’s version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the "UFTA”). . . .

WELCH, v. SYNOVUS BANK,, 517 B.R. 269 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . which states in relevant part: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under §§ 726.101 . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC IRA LLC IRA L. P. v. M. LEE, M., 753 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . . Stat. § 726.101(2) (defining “asset” to mean “property of a debtor”). . . . Stat. § 726.101(4). . . . .

EDWARDS a k a a k a D. v. AIRLINE SUPPORT GROUP, INC., 138 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . .Section 726.108 provides: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

BERMAN, v. J. SMITH, In, 510 B.R. 387 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. . . .

E. PERLMAN, LLC, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., 561 F. App'x 810 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. (“FUFTA”), for the following reasons. . . . . § 726.101 et seq., by acting as the initial transferee of millions of dollars fraudulently transferred . . .

JACKSON- PLATTS, f. k. a. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION,, 727 F.3d 1127 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.101-.201, commonly known as UFTA, to give meaning to and interpret the “delay, hinder or defraud . . .

SOUTH MIAMI HOLDINGS, LLC, a v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 533 F. App'x 898 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq., against First-Citizens, which acquired Sun American’s deposit liabilities and . . .

C. CARLUCCI III, v. S. HAN,, 292 F.R.D. 309 (E.D. Va. 2013)

. . . Han and Envión Under Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, § 726.101 et seq. . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. MORGAN, III,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . defendant was not “property” of Nadel under Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA), Section 726.101 . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.101, et seq.), like other UFTA schemes, a receiver may proceed under two theories, actual . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. W. CLOUD,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.101, et seq.), like other UFTA schemes, a receiver may proceed under two theories, actual . . .

W. WIAND, L. P. LLC LLC L. P. v. DANCING LLC,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . the Receiver to bring the action under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (FUFTA), Section 726.101 . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.101, et seq.), like other UFTA schemes, a receiver may proceed under two theories, actual . . .

DESAK, v. VANLANDINGHAM, a, 98 So. 3d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The statute provides: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . . See § 726.101, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

In GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS INCORPORATED GMBH SDN BHD v., 694 F.3d 705 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .

In GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS INCORPORATED GMBH SDN BHD v., 694 F.3d 705 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .

In KANE KANE, A R. A v. J. N., 479 B.R. 617 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . or defraud creditors or that has been transferred in a manner making the transfer voidable under ss. 726.101 . . .

S. SALLAH, MRT LLC MRT LLC, v. WORLDWIDE CLEARING LLC,, 860 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . Receiver to pursue actions under Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (Florida Statute Sections 726.101 . . .

In PHARMACY DISTRIBUTOR SERVICES, INC. C. v., 455 B.R. 817 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . which relies on section 544 and Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Florida Statutes sections 726.101 . . .

B I CONTRACTORS, INC. v. MEL RE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, f k a Re LLC,, 66 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

In J. PEARLMAN, R. J. v. TD N. A. d b a, 460 B.R. 306 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . § 726.110 states: "A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

JANKOWSKI, v. M. DEY, a k a f k a P. P. P. A. CPA,, 64 So. 3d 183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . fraudulent transfer voidable by other creditors under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, sections 726.101 . . .

In NEW CENTURY TRS HOLDINGS, INC, S. N. v. TRS, 450 B.R. 504 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq,). . . .

OGINSKY, v. PARAGON PROPERTIES OF COSTA RICA LLC, a, 784 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq; Wiand v. . . .

In GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS, INC. In v. U. S. A., 431 B.R. 739 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . Stat. 726.101, et seq. To prevail under Fla. . . . ) provides, in relevant part: "Notwithstanding voidability of a transfer or an obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

E. v., 134 T.C. 266 (T.C. 2010)

. . . Ann. secs. 726.101 to 726.112 (West 2000); and (2) whether respondent is equitably estopped from asserting . . .

SILVERMAN PARTNERS, L. P. v. FIRST BANK, N. A. L. LLC,, 687 F. Supp. 2d 269 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .

In DAVIS,, 403 B.R. 914 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. Dowling v. Davis, No. 8:06-cv-562-T-27TGW (M.D.Fla. . . .

W. WIAND, L. L. C. HKW LLC, HKW I LLC, v. J. WAXENBERG,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (Counts I, III, and V) and for unjust enrichment (Counts II, IV, and VI). . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. . . .

In RIDLEY OWENS, INC., 391 B.R. 867 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . trustee’s claim was brought under Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), Florida Statutes § 726.101 . . .

LIQUIDATION COMMISSION OF BANCO INTERCONTINENTAL, S. A. v. RENTA, S. A., 530 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . When Bankinvest was sold to Baez-Figueroa, it assumed Interduty’s debts. . . .

In ENERGY SMART, INC. St. v. P. P. v., 381 B.R. 359 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. See Cumulative Annual Pocket Part Vol. 20A at p. 99 (West 2006). . . . .

M. TERRY, Jr. v. M. JUNE, F. Sr., 432 F. Supp. 2d 635 (W.D. Va. 2006)

. . . . §§ 726.101-.201 (2005). . . .

JEAN, v. DOR LIEN, LLC, a, 431 F.3d 776 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . No. 102-256 (1992), and the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“FUFTA”), Florida Statutes § 726.101 . . .

In HILL, P. v. MTLC a, 332 B.R. 835 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Florida Statute § 726.111, specifically provides that, unless displaced by the provisions of § 726.101 . . .

In TRANSIT GROUP, INC. v. L. H. F. L. W. J. W. C. L. B., 332 B.R. 45 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . In this case, the debtor only became entitled to assert its claims under Florida Statute Sections 726.101 . . . plaintiff refers is Florida's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, embodied in Florida Statute Sections 726.101 . . . For example, Florida Statute Sections 726.101, et. seq. . . .

CHEPSTOW LIMITED, v. B. HUNT,, 381 F.3d 1077 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq., against parties who are neither debtors nor transferees. . . .

B. FREEMAN, l v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL, a f. k. a. N. A., 362 F.3d 697 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (2002), and remand for proceedings consistent with the Florida Supreme Court decision . . .

B. FREEMAN, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK,, 865 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2004)

. . . .— (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112, a creditor . . .

L. STEFFEN, v. GRAY, HARRIS ROBINSON, P. A. d b a T., 283 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 726.101, et seq. . . .

In PRO GREENS, INC. a v. T. LR IRL a a a, 297 B.R. 850 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .

In EVERGREEN SECURITY, LTD. R. W. Jr. v. a, 319 B.R. 245 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 726.101 et. seq. 2. . . .

B. FREEMAN, l v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL, a f. k. a. N. A., 329 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (2002), provisions defining fraudulent transfers are similar to 11 U.S.C. § 548 . . . Stat. § 726.111 reads: Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112, the principles of law . . .

B. FREEMAN, l v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL, a f. k. a. N. A., 329 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (2002), provisions defining fraudulent transfers are similar to 11 U.S.C. § 548 . . . Stat. § 726.111 reads: Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112, the principles of law . . .

In CLARK, Jr. v., 289 B.R. 474 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq., as made applicable by Section 544(b) of the Code, the transfers from the Family . . . Stat. § 726.101 et seq., as made applicable by Section 544(b) of the Code, transfers from the Family . . .

In Re FINANCIAL FEDERATED TITLE TRUST, INC. v. W., 309 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. (UFTA). . . .

In Re FINANCIAL FEDERATED TITLE TRUST, INC. v. W., 309 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. (UFTA). . . .

UNITED STATES v. EXECUTIVE AUTO HAUS, INC. C. Sr., 234 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Stat. ch. 726.101-726.201 (West.2001). . . .

In J. STEWART, Jr. v. J. Jr. K. v. J. Jr. J. Jr. a, 280 B.R. 268 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished . . .

BEAL BANK, SSB, v. ALMAND AND ASSOCIATES,, 780 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2001)

. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

VARVERIS, v. ALBERTO M. CARBONELL, P. A., 773 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See §§ 726.101-.112, Fla.Stat. (1999). Carbonell, however, was not able to serve Marie. . . .

In TOY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. FSB,, 256 B.R. 1 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . provides, in pertinent part, that: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

YUSEM, C. v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a C., 770 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . (l)In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112, a creditor, subject . . .

In Re DELSON, A. v. d b a s, M S By a a a, 247 B.R. 873 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. The B.R.E. Holding court expressly recognized the case of Sneed v. . . .

INVO FLORIDA, INC. v. SOMERSET VENTURER, INC., 751 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . the UFTA’s application: 726.111 Supplementary provisions Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101 . . .

MANSOLILLO, v. PARTIES BY LYNN, INC., 753 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . We note that the statute provides, “Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112 [the Fraudulent . . .

SASHA SASHA, INC. v. STARDUST MARINE, S. A. U. S. A. a U. S. A. a, 741 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . (1) and the transfer is not so perfected before the commencement of an action for relief under ss. 726.101 . . .

SANWA BANK, LTD. v. KATO,, 734 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . defendants, including Kitazawa, for violation of Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, see §§ 726.101 . . .

In AMERICAN WAY SERVICE CORPORATION, S. M. A. v. GMC a a S. M. A. v., 229 B.R. 496 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . . § 726.101 etseq. . Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 566.11 etseq. . See § 544(b). . . .

In W. HARLOFF d b a W. d b a v. F. III, A. N. A. P. III, N. u a d, 236 B.R. 438 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . Temporary Injunction and the Enforcement Order, it is sought'to be set aside based on Florida Statute § 726.101 . . .

In GOLDBERG, L. v., 229 B.R. 877 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . . §§ 544, 548 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.101, 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1), and alternatively . . .

HUNTSMAN PACKAGING CORP. v. KERRY PACKAGING CORP. N. A., 992 F. Supp. 1439 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . as proscribed by Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the Act) which is codified , at chapters 726.101 . . .

IDYLWOODS ASSOCIATES v. MADER CAPITAL, INC., 177 F.R.D. 136 (W.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . . § 726.101, et seq. . . .

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 131 F.3d 1037 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. or by obtaining outside insurance. 30 U.S.C. § 933(a) (1994); 20 C.F.R. § 725.494 . . . negotiable securities in an amount sufficient to discharge its liability under the Act. 20 C.F.R. § 726.101 . . . To fulfill its obligations under section 726.101, Kaiser obtained two indemnity bonds from INA, one in . . .

LOBATO- BLEIDT a v. LOBATO,, 688 So. 2d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . transactions cannot be deemed fraudulent transfers under section 56.29 (proceedings supplementary) or section 726.101 . . .

ROSEN, v. H. ZOBERG, H. P. A. a k a Co- Co-, 680 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . §§ 726.101 — .201, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

ALBERTA, LTD. v. ALBERTA, LTD., 675 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

UNITED STATES v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 83 F.3d 1507 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 726.101. . . .

In CELOTEX CORPORATION, ASBESTOS HEALTH CLAIMANTS COMMITTEE v. JASPER CORPORATION, JWC F. B., 196 B.R. 596 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . Ch. 726.101-.201 (Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act), and an alleged conspiracy to commit fraudulent transfers . . .

In EMERALD INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, INC. d b a EMERALD INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, INC. d b a v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, N. A., 190 B.R. 701 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 548 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.101-201, and could be avoided pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544. . . .

AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 71 F.3d 475 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 726.4, 726.101 (1994). . Pub.L. . . .

In KAUFMAN ROBERTS, INC. TABAS, v. GIGI ADVERTISING PARTNERSHIP, a, 188 B.R. 309 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . First, Defendant maintained that application of § 726.101, Fla.Stat. (1993) to transfers occurring in . . . RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE STATUTE In paragraph 20 of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff cites to § 726.101 . . . Defendant argues that to apply § 726.101 FlcuStat (1993) to transfers occurring in 1988 and 1989 represents . . . provides the following: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under §§ 726.101 . . .

In H. BEAHM S. R. KAPILA, v. H. BEAHM S., 179 B.R. 329 (S.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Florida Statute § 726.108(1) provides: In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

In DAVIDSON AMERITRUST NATIONAL BANK n k a C. v. DAVIDSON, 178 B.R. 544 (S.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Florida Statute § 726.108(1) provides: In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

P. VEIGLE, D. D. v. UNITED STATES v. F. MEAD, D. D. D. HYSELL D. v. UNITED STATES P., 873 F. Supp. 623 (M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .

UNITED STATES v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 881 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1994)

. . . . § 726.101. . . .

A. STOECKLIN, v. UNITED STATES v. R. STOECKLIN K., 858 F. Supp. 167 (M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . Wayne Stoecklin in violation of §§ 726.101 et seq., Florida Statutes, Florida’s codification of the Uniform . . .

SNELLGROVE, d b a v. N. F. FOGAZZI, a k a, 616 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Statutes (1991) provides: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .

In A. MARKS, L. BAKST, v. A. MARKS,, 131 B.R. 220 (S.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq., as well as its predecessor statute Fla.Stat. §§ 726.01 et seq. . . . purchase the two annuity contracts constituted a “transfer” for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 544 or Fla.Stat. § 726.101 . . .

In MIAMI GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC. L. P. GOVEART, v. CAPITAL BANK, CAPITAL BANK, a v. AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,, 124 B.R. 383 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . The new Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act adopted by Florida under § 726.101, et seq. does not affect this . . .

ADVEST, INC. v. S. RADER,, 743 F. Supp. 851 (S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq., the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, as the Florida legislature substantially incorporated . . . under the act which replaced section 726.01 in 1988, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Fla.Stat. § 726.101 . . .

TAZCO, INCORPORATED v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 895 F.2d 949 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 726.101. . . . .

In TAYLOR S OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC. d b a TAYLOR S OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC. d b a v. J. GUGINO, 110 B.R. 593 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . adopted by this state by Fla.Stat. 676.6-101, et seq., and a fraudulent transfer claim based on Fla.Stat. 726.101 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROMANO a a VNA T., 757 F. Supp. 1331 (M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . §§ 726.101-.201 (1987). . . .

In SARASOTA PLAZA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SARASOTA PLAZA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a v. TRUPIN,, 105 B.R. 109 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 726.101 et seq. of certain promissory notes to the Defendants. . . .

In DAMO CORPORATION, L. BAKST, v. MAR- FLITE LIMITED,, 101 B.R. 810 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 726.101. The defendant transferee has answered. The matter was tried on June 6. . . .

In L. WARNER,, 83 B.R. 807 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Section 726.101 et seq., Florida Statutes (1987). . . .