Cases from cite.case.law:

ALL SEASONS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. a k a De La v. PATRICIAN HOTEL, LLC, LLC,, 274 So. 3d 438 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Florida's statute of frauds is outlined in section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2010), and provides in pertinent . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 267 So. 3d 980 (Fla. 2019)

. . . Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from §725.01 Fla. Stat. . . .

LEE, v. LEE,, 263 So. 3d 826 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . summarily determined that the disclaimer did not meet the requirements of the statute of frauds, section 725.01 . . . party to be charged therewith or by some other person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01 . . .

OJ COMMERCE, LLC, v. ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., 359 F. Supp. 3d 1163 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 725.01 The Supreme Court of Florida further clarified: [A]ll actions based on agreements for longer . . .

JESTER v. PAWLEY,, 245 So. 3d 859 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . properly dismissed those claims against Pawley as they are barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. M. RICHARDS, 226 So. 3d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

ARMAO, v. MCKENNEY, R., 218 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Additionally, nothing in the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, requires that such . . .

IN RE A. CASCIO, L. R. v. A. L., 568 B.R. 851 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 725.01. . . .

ABUNDANT LIVING CITI CHURCH, INC. v. ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES, INC., 213 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . . court on appeal has been on whether the partial performance exception to the statute of frauds, section 725.01 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- INSTRUCTION, 200 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01 Fla. Stat. . . .

H. LOBREE, v. ARDENX LLC,, 199 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . based upon misjoinder of claims; - seek dismissal of any counts based on the statute of frauds (section 725.01 . . .

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, v. DELVAR a k a, 180 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . stated below, we hold the trial court’s finding that the mortgage was orally modified violates section 725.01 . . . Section 725.01 states, in pertinent part: No action shall be brought ...., upon any agreement that is . . . party to be charged therewith or by some other person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01 . . . First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co., 105 So.3d 602, 608 n. 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), and section 725.01. . . . However, appellant argued below only that the oral modification was invalid under section 725.01. . . .

M. HELDT- POPE, v. G. THIBAULT,, 198 So. 3d 650 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 176 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01 Fla. Stat. . . .

RULLAN v. GODEN,, 134 F. Supp. 3d 926 (D. Md. 2015)

. . . . § 725.01 (“[A]ny agreement that is not to be performed within the space of 1 year from the making thereof . . .

LOPER, v. WEATHER SHIELD MANUFACTURING, INC., 203 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Second, the trial court ruled that the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, barred the . . . agreement or promise ... shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith.... ” § 725.01 . . .

BROWNING, v. POIRIER,, 165 So. 3d 663 (Fla. 2015)

. . . breach of an oral contract, the Fifth District looked to the statute of frauds as stated in section 725.01 . . . Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, commonly referred to as the statute of frauds, provides the following . . .

C. BUTTERWORTH, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS,, 581 F. App'x 813 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 725.01. . . . Stat. § 725.01; Rubenstein, 755 So.2d at 748. . . .

In A. TRAVERSE, G. A. v. A., 753 F.3d 19 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . .”); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 725.01 (“It is not the proper function of the trustee to liquidate property . . . for United States Trustees, Handbook for Chapter 7 Trustees at 8-20 (2002); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 725.01 . . .

In A. TRAVERSE, G. A. v. A., 753 F.3d 19 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . .”); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 725.01 (“It is not the proper function of the trustee to liquidate property . . . for United States Trustees, Handbook for Chapter 7 Trustees at 8-20 (2002); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 725.01 . . .

COHEN, v. B. CORBITT,, 135 So. 3d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The parties correctly conceded, prior to the conclusion of the trial proceedings, that section 725.01 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01 Fla. Stat. . . . Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

TOLL, v. TANNENBAUM,, 982 F. Supp. 2d 541 (E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . . § 725.01 (2013). . . .

BROWNING, v. POIRIER,, 128 So. 3d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . party to be charged therewith or by some other person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01 . . . Section 725.01 provides in relevant part that: No action shall be brought ... upon any agreement that . . . party to be charged therewith or by some other person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01 . . .

ALPHA DATA CORPORATION, a v. L. L. C. a, 139 So. 3d 907 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

FI- EVERGREEN WOODS, LLC, N K A LLC, LLC v. L. ROBINSON,, 135 So. 3d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Unlike documents that fall within the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2011), the . . .

F. KAMINSKI, v. BP EXPLORATION PRODUCTION INC. BP Co., 975 F. Supp. 2d 1220 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 725.01; H.P.B.C., Inc. v. . . .

In SCIMECA FOUNDATION, INC., 497 B.R. 753 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . Machine & Tool Co., 816 F.2d 238, 245-46 (6th Cir.1987); 6 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 725.01 at 725-2 ( . . . See 11 U.S.C. § 725; see generally 6 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 725.01 at 725-2 (16th ed. 2012) (“Section . . .

HEDGE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED, a v. SUSTAINABLE GROWTH GROUP HOLDINGS LLC, a USA, INC. a UK In v. a, 952 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 725.01. . . .

DK ARENA, INC. v. EB ACQUISITIONS I, LLC,, 112 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2012). Nearly fifty years ago, in Tanenbaum v. . . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . the sale of land, the agreement between the parties in this case falls within the purview of section 725.01 . . . party to be charged therewith or by some other person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01 . . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

BROWNING, v. POIRIER,, 113 So. 3d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The statute of frauds is found in section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2007), and provides in pertinent . . . The courts have construed the statutory language found in section 725.01 “not to be performed within . . . agreement was ‘not to be performed within the space of 1 year from the making thereof.’ ” (quoting section 725.01 . . . (citing Yates and § 725.01, Fla. Stat.)); Collier v. . . . judgment is precluded by this factual dispute, the resolution of which will determine whether section 725.01 . . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

SAEME, v. LEVINE, LLC,, 502 F. App'x 849 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 725.01. . . .

TERZIS, v. POMPANO PAINT AND BODY REPAIR, INC., 127 So. 3d 592 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

GENERAL MECHANICAL CORPORATION, v. R. WILLIAMS, Sr. M., 103 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See 725.01, Fla. . . .

LaRUE, v. KALEX CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, INC., 97 So. 3d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2010) (“the statute of frauds”), provides in pertinent part: No action . . . Stat. § 725.01, bars en- forcement of an oral contract that was intended by the parties to last longer . . .

M. TYDIR, v. R. WILLIAMS, Sr. a, 89 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, Florida’s “Statute of Frauds,” states in relevant part as follows: . . .

ROACH, v. TOTALBANK, a, 85 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

MARSHALL- BEASLEY, v. W. BEASLEY, Jr., 77 So. 3d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

R. SIEGEL A. v. ROWE,, 71 So. 3d 205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . They also claimed that the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2004), barred Ms. . . .

B C INVESTORS, INC. H. v. VOJAK a, 79 So. 3d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . application of the statute of frauds is apparent from the face of the complaint here because section 725.01 . . .

D. STEWART, v. HOOTERS OF AMERICA, INC. D. v., 432 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 725.01. . . .

GE LIN, v. ECCLESTONE SIGNATURE HOMES OF PALM BEACH, LLC, a, 59 So. 3d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . contract was the sale of real estate, not goods, we apply the statute of frauds contained in section 725.01 . . . Similar to section 672.201(1), section 725.01 requires that a contract for sale of real estate be in . . . This contract met the requirements of section 725.01, and was entitled to be enforced by a judgment of . . .

DK ARENA, INC. a v. EB ACQUISITIONS I, LLC, a, 31 So. 3d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. . . . was an “agreement that is not to be performed within the space of 1 year from the making thereof.” § 725.01 . . .

PVC WINDOORS, INC. v. BABBITBAY BEACH CONSTRUCTION, N. V. a B. V. a St. LLC, a, 598 F.3d 802 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 725.01. . . . .

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, MAL UNLA, 367 F. App'x 971 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 725.01 (2003). . . .

SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION OF TAMPA BAY, INC. a v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC., 356 F. App'x 221 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 725.01. . . . St. § 725.01. . . .

SKYLAKE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. NMB PLAZA, LLC,, 23 So. 3d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The tenant maintains that the lease satisfies the statute of frauds, see § 725.01, Fla. . . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . defective under section 689.01, if the document otherwise complied with the requirements of section 725.01 . . .

CITY OF ORLANDO, v. WEST ORANGE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., 9 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Analysis Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2007), sets forth Florida’s Statute of Frauds as follows: . . . 725.01. . . . has no application here, where enforcement of the contract is barred by the plain language of section 725.01 . . .

WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. a a v. MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. a LLC, a, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 725.01, which is the Florida's general Statute of Frauds governing oral contracts for the sale of . . . Therefore, § 725.01 does not apply. . See Fla. Stat. §§ 672.201; 680.201. . . .

ALA, v. CHESSER,, 5 So. 3d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). But Mr. . . .

B. BRACE M. v. B. COMFORT a k a D. V. a f k a a ACA, a, 2 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . In so doing, the court tracked the language of Florida’s statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes . . . Based on the plain language of section 725.01, such a claim is not subject to the statute of frauds as . . .

MONUMENT ROAD, INC. v. DELTA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., 993 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

J. HEWITT, v. MOBILE RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC. f. k. a., 285 F. App'x 694 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 725.01. . . .

ASPSOFT, INC. a v. WEBCLAY,, 983 So. 2d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes (2007) sets forth Florida’s Statute of Frauds as follows: 725.01 . . .

FERRELL LAW, P. A. v. CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, a, 313 F. App'x 182 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 725.01 — that no enforceable termination agreements exists. . . .

GARCIA, Jr. v. SANTA MARIA RESORT, INC. d b a, 528 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 725.01. Each of these claims must also be dismissed with prejudice. . . .

LYNKUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. WEBMD CORPORATION,, 965 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . to agreements that are “not to be performed within the space of 1 year from the making thereof.” § 725.01 . . .

KEY, v. TRATTMANN,, 959 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2003), provides: No action shall be brought ... upon any contract for . . .

FINANCIAL HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES, INC. v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 488 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . [is] in writing-” § 725.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

RICE, v. L. RICE,, 499 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . §§ 689.01, 725.01; see also Guest v. . . .

DE VAUX, v. WESTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH,, 953 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . The statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2005), provides, in pertinent part: No action . . .

TOPP, INC. a v. UNIDEN AMERICA CORPORATION, a, 483 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 725.01, the general statute, and § 672.201, which governs oral contracts for sale of goods, § 725.01 . . . Florida state court cases considering this issue have also applied § 725.01 to like factual scenarios . . . Stat. § 725.01, the Florida general Statute of Frauds, should apply. Topp contends that Fla. . . . The undersigned finds that § 725.01, and not § 672.201, should control. . . . Stat. § 672.201, and not § 725.01, controls its indefinite oral exclusive distributorship claim. . . .

HAZEN, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 952 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . In the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2002), the legislature has addressed the . . . defendant upon [a] special promise to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage of another person,” § 725.01 . . .

H. P. B. C. INCORPORATED, a v. NOR- TECH POWERBOATS, INC. a, 946 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Analysis Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2005), provides: No action shall be brought ... upon any agreement . . . See §§ 672.201(1), 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . one year, both the general and the Uniform Commercial Code statutes of frauds apply. §§ 672.201(1), 725.01 . . .

K. WHITE v. SYFRETT,, 955 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. . . .

BALLARD- CANNON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a A. L. v. SANDMAN PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Jr., 933 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . estate as partners or as joint adventurers, sharing profits and losses thereof, is not within [Section 725.01 . . .

SANCHEZ, v. MONDY, 936 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The trial court cited to section 725.01 Florida Statutes, which is a part of the Florida Statute of Frauds . . .

R. MARCUS, v. GARLAND, SAMUEL LOEB, P. C. T. M., 441 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . Jacobson); and (3) the claims at issue are barred by Florida Statute Section 725.01 [statute of frauds . . . Stat. § 725.01. . . . Florida statute 725.01 expressly requires that all actions to enforce agreements not to be performed . . . more than one year, the Court finds that the agreement at issue is barred by Florida Statute Section 725.01 . . . Jacobson’s case, is barred by Florida Statute Section 725.01 [statute of frauds]. . . .

D. GUEST, v. D. CLAYCOMB M., 932 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Florida’s statute of frauds is set forth in section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes (2005): 725.01. . . .

HI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a a v. WINGHOUSE OF FLORIDA, INC. a LLC, a KER, a a IX, a XI, LLC, a XII, LLC, a, 451 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 725.01, provides in relevant part: ''[n]o action shall be brought ... upon any agreement that is . . .

W. HARRIS d b a C. W. C. d b a L. C. d b a d b a d b a M. C. d b a J. R. v. SCHOOL BOARD OF DUVAL COUNTY,, 921 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Appellants' argument flies in the teeth of the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2001 . . .

In A. ERKINS M., 343 B.R. 298 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . Stat. 725.01 et seq. . . .

MARTINEZ v. LIEBERMAN,, 920 So. 2d 128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2004), any agreement that is not to be performed within one year . . .

In RANCH HOUSE MOTOR INN INTERNATIONAL, INC. L. FMS v. L., 335 B.R. 894 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . Defendants argue that FMS’s claim of parking is barred by the statute of frauds as contained in sections 725.01 . . .

In BAYSHORE YACHT TENNIS CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 336 B.R. 866 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . . § 725.01 (2006)(stating that "any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of one year . . .

GRAY, a v. PRIME MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., 912 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1997); Tanenbaum v. . . .

STRACK Sr. v. FRED RAWN CONSTRUCTION, INC. A, 908 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

STEINBERG, v. P. KEARNS, D. J., 907 So. 2d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1997), provides in pertinent part: No action . . .

CONSORTIUM INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. a v. CREDIT DATA SERVICES, INC. a a v. a, 149 F. App'x 575 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Chap. 725.01, F.S.2002. . . . Ann. § 725.01. . . .

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. a v. MOTORCYCLE INFORMATION NETWORK, INC. a S., 390 F. Supp. 2d 1170 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: No action shall be brought ... upon any . . .

HOLLOWAY v. KING,, 361 F. Supp. 2d 351 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 725.01 (West 2005). . Horne Mem. 12. . . . .

CIBRAN ENTERPRISES, INC. v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. f k a, 365 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 725.01, or for personal property in excess of $5,000, id. § 671.206, unless there is a writing signed . . .

INDIA AMERICA TRADING CO. INC. a v. WHITE,, 896 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See also § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2004); Alvarez v. . . . America, the oral contract would have been unenforceable pursuant to Florida’s statute of frauds, section 725.01 . . .

SAMRA, v. SHAHEEN BUSINESS AND INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. d b a SBIG USA, M. A. a k a, 355 F. Supp. 2d 483 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . . § 725.01 (2004). . . . Ann. § 725.01 (2004). . . . .

FRESH CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. a v. BRIDGEPORT CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. a, 891 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Fresh Capital’s second amended complaint on the ground that it violated the statute of frauds, section 725.01 . . .

SCHROEDER a k a J. v. R. MANCERI, L., 893 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . extension in this case was not required to have been in writing under either section 95.04 or section 725.01 . . .

RICHEY, v. MODULAR DESIGNS, INC., 879 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . (c), Florida Statutes (2000); that the cause of action was barred by the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01 . . .

BRODIE, v. ALL CORPORATION OF USA NPB, d b a a, 876 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Kim then moved for summary judgment on counts VI-VII, based on Florida Statutes section 725.01, the Statute . . . The trial court granted summary judgment on these counts based on sections 725.01 and 678.319. . . . As such, sections 725.01 and 678.319 did not bar Counts VI-VII or Brodie’s complaint. . . .

AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ST. GEORGE CRYSTAL, LTD., 870 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Because the trial court erred as a matter of law in determining that section 725.01, Florida Statutes . . . In response, American Zurich asserted that section 725.01 was inapplicable. . . . The circuit court ruled that section 725.01 barred the enforcement of American Zurich’s claims “to the . . . Therefore, section 672.201, not section 725.01, is controlling on the statute of frauds issue. . . . Because section 725.01 was inapplicable to the agreement between American Zurich’s insured and St. . . .

MAY, v. ALLAPATTAH PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, a, 867 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Appel-lee Allapattah Properties Partnership moved for summary judgment pursuant to section 725.01, Florida . . .

B. RIZOTI H. v. PLEMMONS,, 91 F. App'x 793 (4th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 725.01 (West 2000), “[n]o action shall be brought ... upon any agreement that is not to be performed . . .

LUNDSTROM REALTY ADVISORS, INC. v. SCHICKEDANZ BROS. RIVIERA LTD. a, 856 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 725.01, Fla. Stat. . . . See Yates, 181 So. at 344; see also § 725.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

DOLTZ, v. HARRIS ASSOCIATES,, 280 F. Supp. 2d 377 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . . § 725.01 (2002), one of Florida’s statutes of frauds, provides, in pertinent part, “any agreement that . . . ANN. § 725.01 (2002). . . .

C. LINDROS, v. F. BACKUS, 848 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . the basis that “the plaintiffs proofs failed to satisfy the requirements of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01 . . . attorney was executed authorizing her to sell the condominium, satisfy the requirements of section 725.01 . . .

SHORE HOLDINGS, INC. a v. SEAGATE BEACH QUARTERS, INC. a, 842 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1994). . . .

EVANS, v. HICKS, 837 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . before the trial court reflects that the contract proposal failed to comport with Florida Statutes § 725.01 . . .

BERGMAN, P. A. v. DeIULIO, 826 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Roses, 565 So.2d 372, 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

CONNER, I, INC. v. WALT DISNEY COMPANY,, 827 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . it is clear that it was intended to last more than one year, and is therefore barred under section 725.01 . . . That argument fails because with the exception of section 725.01, the requirement of a written agreement . . . Only section 725.01 bars enforcement of an unwritten agreement if it cannot be performed within one year . . .

HARRIS CORPORATION, v. GIESTING ASSOCIATES, INC., 297 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 725.01. . . .

O. WILKERSON, v. INTELLIKEY CORPORATION,, 808 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (2000); Fox v. Sails at Laguna Club Dev. . . .