Florida Statute 517.301 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 517
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 517.301

517.301 Fraudulent transactions; falsification or concealment of facts.—

(1) It is unlawful and a violation of this chapter for a person:

(a) In connection with the rendering of any investment advice or in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of any investment or security, including any security exempted under s. 517.051 and including any security sold in a transaction exempted under s. 517.061, s. 517.0611, or s. 517.0612, directly or indirectly:

1. To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

2. To obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

3. To engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person.

(b) By use of any means, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, communication, or broadcast that, although not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received directly or indirectly from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, or from an agent or employee of an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount of the consideration.

(c) In any matter within the jurisdiction of the office, to knowingly and willfully falsify, conceal, or cover up, by any trick, scheme, or device, a material fact, make any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or make or use any false writing or document, knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.

(2) For purposes of this section, the term “investment” means any commitment of money or property principally induced by a representation that an economic benefit may be derived from such commitment, except that the term does not include a commitment of money or property for:

(a) The purchase of a business opportunity, business enterprise, or real property through a person licensed under chapter 475 or registered under former chapter 498; or

(b) The purchase of tangible personal property through a person not engaged in telephone solicitation, electronic mail, text messages, social media, or other electronic means where there are no specific representations or guarantees made by the offeror or seller as to the economic benefit to be derived from the purchase.

(3) It is unlawful for a person in issuing or selling a security within this state, including a security exempted under s. 517.051 and including a transaction exempted under s. 517.061, s. 517.0611, or s. 517.0612, to misrepresent that such security or business entity has been guaranteed, sponsored, recommended, or approved by the state or an agency or officer of the state or by the United States or an agency or officer of the United States.

(4) It is unlawful for a person registered or required to be registered, or subject to the notice requirements, under this chapter, including such persons and issuers who are subject to s. 517.051, s. 517.061, s. 517.0611, s. 517.0612, or s. 517.081, to misrepresent that such person has been sponsored, recommended, or approved, or that such person’s abilities or qualifications have in any respect been approved, by the state or an agency or officer of the state or by the United States or an agency or officer of the United States.

(5) It is unlawful and a violation of this chapter for a person in connection with the offer or sale of an investment to obtain money or property by means of:

(a) A misrepresentation that the investment offered or sold is guaranteed, sponsored, recommended, or approved by the state or an agency or officer of the state or by the United States or an agency or officer of the United States; or

(b) A misrepresentation that such person is sponsored, recommended, or approved, or that such person’s abilities or qualifications have in any respect been approved, by the state or an agency or officer of the state or by the United States or an agency or officer of the United States.

(6)(a) Subsection (3) or subsection (4) may not be construed to prohibit a statement that a person or security is registered or has made a notice filing under this chapter if such statement is required by this chapter or rules promulgated thereunder and is true in fact and if the effect of such statement is not a misrepresentation.

(b) A statement that a person is registered made in connection with the offer or sale of a security under this chapter must include the following disclaimer: “Registration does not imply that such person has been sponsored, recommended, or approved by the state or an agency or officer of the state or by the United States or an agency or officer of the United States.”

1. If the statement of registration is made in writing, the disclaimer must immediately follow such statement and must be in the same size and style of print as the statement of registration.

2. If the statement of registration is made orally, the disclaimer must be made or broadcast with the same force and effect as the statement of registration.

(7) It is unlawful and a violation of this chapter for a person to directly or indirectly manage, supervise, control, or own, either alone or in association with others, a boiler room in this state which sells or offers for sale a security or investment in violation of subsection (1), subsection (3), subsection (4), subsection (5), or subsection (6).

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-428; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 6, ch. 78-435; ss. 4, 5, ch. 80-254; s. 396, ch. 81-259; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 13, ch. 84-159; s. 12, ch. 86-85; ss. 14, 15, ch. 90-362; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 8, ch. 92-45; s. 608, ch. 2003-261; s. 40, ch. 2008-240; s. 18, ch. 2024-168.

F.S. 517.301 on Google Scholar

F.S. 517.301 on CourtListener

Amendments to 517.301

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 517.301

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S517.301 - FRAUD - SALE OF SECURITY/INVESTMENT ADVICE - F: T

Cases Citing Statute 517.301

Total Results: 156

James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed Leavenworth

835 F.2d 1378, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 599, 1988 WL 145

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 22, 1988 | Docket: 126125

Cited 128 times | Published

violations of SEC Rule 10b-5 and Fla. Stat.Ann. § 517.301 (West 1972 & Supp.1987). . McNally and Dean

In Re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, (Esm-1). Appeal of News and Sun-Sentinel Co. And John Edwards

820 F.2d 352, 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1370, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 251, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7993

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1987 | Docket: 790792

Cited 82 times | Published

(4) the Florida Securities Act, Fla. StatAnn. § 517.301 (West Supp.1986); and (5) the Florida Racketeer

Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis

710 F.2d 678

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 25, 1983 | Docket: 225444

Cited 72 times | Published

of the Securities Exchange Commission, and Section 517.301(1)(b) of the Florida Securities Act (Fla.Stat

Gordon Jones and Laura Jones v. John H. Childers and Talent Services, Inc.

18 F.3d 899, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 843, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6530, 1994 WL 91268

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 7, 1994 | Docket: 2167478

Cited 67 times | Published

5 . See Fla.Stat. § 517.301. 6 .See Case History, supra

In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities Litigation

773 F. Supp. 342, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10920, 1991 WL 152814

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1991 | Docket: 1229145

Cited 63 times | Published

gross negligence, (8) violations of § 517.211 and § 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities Litigation

773 F. Supp. 342, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10920, 1991 WL 152814

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1991 | Docket: 1229145

Cited 63 times | Published

gross negligence, (8) violations of § 517.211 and § 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Gochnauer v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.

810 F.2d 1042

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 20, 1987 | Docket: 799684

Cited 47 times | Published

Exchange Commission,6 and Florida Statute Section 517.301,7 the state's "blue sky" securities law. The

Barnebey v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

715 F. Supp. 1512, 109 A.L.R. Fed. 377, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6906, 1989 WL 68010

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1989 | Docket: 1357590

Cited 42 times | Published

and Investor Protection Act, specifically Section 517.301, Florida Statutes. Plaintiffs seek rescission

EF Hutton & Co., Inc. v. Rousseff

537 So. 2d 978, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 3, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 29

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1989 | Docket: 1028436

Cited 37 times | Published

301 and 517.211, Florida Statutes (1981). Section 517.301(1) is similar in language to rule 10b-5. It

First Union Brokerage v. Milos

717 F. Supp. 1519, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8235, 1989 WL 79786

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 12, 1989 | Docket: 496895

Cited 35 times | Published

for Failure to State a Claim under Fla.Stat. Section 517.301 DENIED; 4. Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim

Becker Ex Rel. Anne S. Becker Charitable Remainder Unitrust v. Davis

491 F.3d 1292, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16381, 2007 WL 1988551

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 11, 2007 | Docket: 398958

Cited 32 times | Published

scheme to defraud in violation of Florida Statute § 517.301(1). At first blush, it appears that Becker

Ward v. Atlantic SEC. Bank

777 So. 2d 1144, 2001 WL 121083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2001 | Docket: 306624

Cited 30 times | Published

alleging common law fraud, securities fraud under section 517.301 and breach of fiduciary duty. After Stockholder

Knight v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.

750 F. Supp. 1109, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15044, 1990 WL 176026

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 1041824

Cited 30 times | Published

1934 (the Exchange Act) and Florida Statutes, § 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Bear, Stearns & Co. v. Powell (In Re Powell)

95 B.R. 236, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 38, 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1340

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 17, 1989 | Docket: 1094341

Cited 28 times | Published

breach of contract, violations of Florida Statute § 517.301 regarding misrepresentations and omissions made

Stowell v. Ted S. Finkel Investment Services, Inc.

489 F. Supp. 1209, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9301

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1980 | Docket: 1882948

Cited 27 times | Published

and 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 517.301 of Florida Statutes. Counts II and V allege

Ralph J. Golub v. J.W. Gant & Associates, an Illinois Limited Partnership, J.W. Gant & Associates, Inc., an Illinois Corporation

863 F.2d 1516, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 56, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 551, 1989 WL 285

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 23, 1989 | Docket: 1944766

Cited 26 times | Published

Gant had violated Fla.Stat. *1520 § 517.301 (1985) 2 and entitled Golub to reasonable

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc.

761 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12141, 1999 WL 770736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 1709353

Cited 22 times | Published

Securities and Investor Protection Act (FSIPA). See § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (1993). The crux of this lengthy complaint

W. Floyd Messer, Sr., Individually v. E.F. Hutton & Co., a Delaware Corporation, Raphael M. Kelly, Individually, Henry Herschaft, Individually

847 F.2d 673, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8164, 1988 WL 53303

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 16, 1988 | Docket: 815156

Cited 22 times | Published

securities antifraud provision, Fla. Stat.Ann. § 517.301(l)(a), (b) (West Supp. 1988), follows almost verbatim

Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

710 F.2d 678, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25569

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 25, 1983 | Docket: 66193570

Cited 22 times | Published

Commission, and Section 517.-301(l)(b) of the Florida Securities Act (Fla. Stat.Ann. § 517.301). The jury

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,945, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,134, 9 Ucc rep.serv.2d 158 Robert M. Schneberger v. W. Randolph Wheeler, United States Trust Company of New York, a New York Corporation, United States Trust Company of New York, a New York Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Warren J. Plotner, Defendant- Counterclaim-Plaintiff v. Randolph Wheeler, Andrew A. Levy, and Buckeye Petroleum Co., Counterclaim-Defendants

859 F.2d 1477

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 10, 1988 | Docket: 984573

Cited 20 times | Published

violated Fla.Stat. section 517.07 and Fla.Stat. section 517.301. Fla.Stat. section 517.211 extends liability

Messer v. Hutton & Co.

833 F.2d 909

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 7, 1987 | Docket: 978063

Cited 20 times | Published

FLORIDA SECURITIES ACT 36 Section 517.301(1)(a) of the Florida Securities Act, patterned

Bank of Wessington v. Winters Gov't SEC. Corp.

361 So. 2d 757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1978 | Docket: 668465

Cited 20 times | Published

Steele, 230 So.2d 42 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1970); Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1975). In view of the foregoing

Sierra Equity Group, Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLC

650 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26553, 2009 WL 901500

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2009 | Docket: 158077

Cited 17 times | Published

against White Oak (Count IV); Violation of Section 517.301, Florida Statutes, against all Defendants (Count

Warter v. Boston Securities, S.A.

380 F. Supp. 2d 1299, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26259, 2004 WL 2988555

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2004 | Docket: 2518713

Cited 17 times | Published

BSEC, FLEET and Pusso for violation of Fl. Stat. § 517.301 (fraudulent transactions); BSEC, FLEET and Pusso

McCutcheon v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.

938 F. Supp. 820, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13300, 1996 WL 520475

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1996 | Docket: 291233

Cited 17 times | Published

Securities and Investor Protection Act, Fla.Stat. § 517.301. Asserting that defendant repeatedly represented

Azar v. Richardson Greenshields Sec., Inc.

528 So. 2d 1266, 1988 WL 74806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1988 | Docket: 1367411

Cited 17 times | Published

of the Florida Securities Act, specifically section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985) alleging that misrepresentations

Bryne v. GULFSTREAM FIRST BANK & TRUST CO., ETC.

528 F. Supp. 692, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16439

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1981 | Docket: 2534070

Cited 17 times | Published

applicable *694 to suits founded under Fla.Stat. § 517.301,[2] the State counterpart to federal section 10(b)

Leisure Founders, Inc. v. CUC International, Inc.

833 F. Supp. 1562, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12733, 1993 WL 356774

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1993 | Docket: 974118

Cited 16 times | Published

Act, and Count IV, for violation of Fla.Stat. § 517.301(1)(a), must be DENIED. II. Motion to Dismiss

Zelman v. Cook

616 F. Supp. 1121, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23914

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1985 | Docket: 1388832

Cited 16 times | Published

Plaintiff's state law securities claim under Section 517.301, Florida Statutes, is governed by Florida law

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Byrne

320 So. 2d 436, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1975 | Docket: 1733738

Cited 16 times | Published

state a material fact in violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.301. 2. The Court finds that the defenses of estoppel

Palmer v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.

622 So. 2d 1085, 1993 WL 288738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1993 | Docket: 355682

Cited 15 times | Published

such termination. *1090 (Emphasis added.) Section 517.301 provides in pertinent part: It is unlawful

Alna Capital Associates v. William Wagner

758 F.2d 562, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29147

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 19, 1985 | Docket: 128968

Cited 15 times | Published

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rule 10b-5, section 517.301 of the Florida Statutes, and Florida common

Schein v. Chasen

313 So. 2d 739

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1975 | Docket: 1751177

Cited 15 times | Published

01 et seq., Florida Statutes, particularly Section 517.301, F.S., and Section 517.23, F.S., Blau v. Lehman

Alan Grippo v. John E. Perazzo

357 F.3d 1218, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 946, 2004 WL 98593

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 22, 2004 | Docket: 397886

Cited 14 times | Published

to Allege the Purchase of a Security Section 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Black v. State

819 So. 2d 208, 2002 WL 1085251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 1456941

Cited 13 times | Published

Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, section 517.301(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). We affirm.

Medalie v. FSC Securities Corp.

87 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5455, 2000 WL 255918

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2000 | Docket: 2154367

Cited 13 times | Published

complaint against the defendant alleging violation of § 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Cassedy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

751 So. 2d 143, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 687, 2000 WL 62963

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2000 | Docket: 525842

Cited 13 times | Published

arbitrators found that appellant violated section 517.301, Florida Statutes, and awarded appellees damages

Pierce v. JW CHARLES-BUSH SECURITIES

603 So. 2d 625, 1992 WL 183985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1992 | Docket: 1475532

Cited 13 times | Published

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, violations of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1989), common law fraud

Ralph v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

692 F. Supp. 1322, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15518, 1988 WL 88760

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1988 | Docket: 2258711

Cited 13 times | Published

breach of fiduciary duties; Count III Fla.Stat. § 517.301; Count IV fraud and deceit; Count VII*- negligence;

Raymond James & Associates v. Zumstorchen

488 So. 2d 843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1986 | Docket: 1685521

Cited 12 times | Published

As to the violation of the securities act, section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1983), provides: It is

Rubin v. Gabay

979 So. 2d 988, 2008 WL 373230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 2536454

Cited 11 times | Published

the stock and treble damages. Rubin appeals. Section 517.301, Florida Statutes, makes it unlawful to employ

Hilliard v. Black

125 F. Supp. 2d 1071, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20328, 2000 WL 1780327

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2000 | Docket: 2297016

Cited 11 times | Published

See Def. Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) at 7. Section 517.301, Florida Statutes, provides that any action

Jankovich v. Bowen

844 F. Supp. 743, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2532, 1994 WL 68662

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1994 | Docket: 1063950

Cited 11 times | Published

and Arizona's anti-fraud statutes. Fla.Stat. § 517.301; Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 44-1991. Florida's anti-fraud

Schneberger v. Wheeler

859 F.2d 1477, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 158, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14969, 1988 WL 111209

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 10, 1988 | Docket: 66238549

Cited 11 times | Published

violated Fla.Stat. section 517.07 and Fla.Stat. section 517.301. Fla.Stat. section 517.211 extends liability

Aronson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

675 F. Supp. 1324, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12121, 1987 WL 30656

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 2463152

Cited 11 times | Published

supervision and violations of Florida Statute § 517.301 (1985). Jurisdiction is predicated on the existence

Josef's of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Southern Investment Co.

349 F. Supp. 1057, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11483

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1972 | Docket: 991106

Cited 11 times | Published

S.A., is applicable to actions brought under § 517.301 of the Florida Blue Sky Laws, which is substantially

DH Blair & Co., Inc. v. Johnson

697 So. 2d 912, 1997 WL 407811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 1777267

Cited 10 times | Published

Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1993). Appellant denied

Arthur Young & Co. v. Mariner Corp.

630 So. 2d 1199, 1994 WL 10800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1994 | Docket: 418867

Cited 10 times | Published

connection with the sale of Dielco which violated Fla. Stat. 517.301. It alleged AY was liable under Section 517

POLARIS PUBLIC INCOME v. Einhorn

625 So. 2d 128, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10645, 1993 WL 414267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1993 | Docket: 1517489

Cited 10 times | Published

disclose in violation of Florida's Blue Sky Law, section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1991). Prudential Securities

First Union Discount Brokerage Services, Inc. v. Milos

744 F. Supp. 1145, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10956, 1990 WL 120065

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1990 | Docket: 1371191

Cited 10 times | Published

asserting therein claims for: violation of Fla.Stat. § 517.301 (Count I); common law fraud (Count II); breach

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Del Valle

528 F. Supp. 147, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16431

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1981 | Docket: 1358834

Cited 10 times | Published

220.1 et seq., and 12 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, Section 517.301 of the Florida Statutes and he has also made

State v. Covington

392 So. 2d 1321

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1981 | Docket: 1267937

Cited 10 times | Published

counts of the information charged violations of section 517.301(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1977), an antifraud

Beefy Trail, Inc. v. Beefy King International, Inc.

348 F. Supp. 799, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12607, 1972 Trade Cas. (CCH) 74,127

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1972 | Docket: 344700

Cited 10 times | Published

limitations should be controlling. In Florida § 517.301(1) Florida Statutes, F.S.A. is similar to § 10(b)

Schlenkerman v. Goldbronn (In Re Goldbronn)

263 B.R. 347, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 277, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 414, 2001 WL 454534

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 1754222

Cited 9 times | Published

facts establishing the requisite elements of Section 517.301, Florida Statutes.[6] The court may also infer

Al Ainsworth v. Sam Skurnick

909 F.2d 456, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14231, 1990 WL 108016

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 17, 1990 | Docket: 826702

Cited 9 times | Published

*459 Stat. § 517.12, Fla.Stat. § 517.301, and common law breach of fiduciary duties, fraud

Craft v. Florida Federal Savings & Loan Association

786 F.2d 1546, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24578

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 22, 1986 | Docket: 244115

Cited 9 times | Published

1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereon, Section 517.301 of the Florida Blue Sky Laws and Section 563b

Compania De Elaborados De Café v. Cardinal Capital Management, Inc.

401 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29385, 2003 WL 24188675

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2004 | Docket: 2367755

Cited 8 times | Published

Plaintiffs if they can establish a violation of Section 517.301, Fla. Stat.. Section 517.211, Florida Statutes[3]

Profilet v. Cambridge Financial Corp.

231 B.R. 373, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2277, 1999 WL 102184

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1415092

Cited 8 times | Published

Fiduciary Duty (Count IV); Florida Blue Sky Law Section 517.301 (state securities laws) (Count V); Florida

Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. v. Wieneke

591 So. 2d 956, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10870, 1991 WL 224558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1991 | Docket: 541268

Cited 8 times | Published

Raymond James and others, alleging a claim under section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1987), as well as other

Wilder v. Meyer

779 F. Supp. 164, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17796, 1991 WL 259869

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1991 | Docket: 2180895

Cited 8 times | Published

III violation of Florida's Blue Sky Law, section 517.301; d) Count IV violation of the Racketeer Influenced

Beltram v. Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans

725 F. Supp. 499, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13973, 1989 WL 141410

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1989 | Docket: 956703

Cited 8 times | Published

of summary judgment. Count I Violation of Section 517.301, Florida Statutes It is uncontroverted that

Instituto De Prevision Militar v. Lehman Bros., Inc.

485 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38266, 2007 WL 1238795

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 25, 2007 | Docket: 2288138

Cited 7 times | Published

Stat. § 517.12; (11) Violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.301; (12) Accounting. [1] The claims were: (1) Conversion;

Kulla v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.

426 So. 2d 1055, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1983 | Docket: 1269869

Cited 7 times | Published

defendants could be deemed insiders under Section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1981),[2] rendering Kulla

Rushing v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

752 F. Supp. 2d 1254, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118362, 2010 WL 4639308

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2010 | Docket: 2342661

Cited 6 times | Published

FSIPA violations. Pursuant to Florida Statute § 517.301: It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions

Barron Chase Securities, Inc. v. Moser

745 So. 2d 965, 1999 WL 510632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 2528783

Cited 6 times | Published

attorney's fees, as well as a statutory claim under section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1997), which would support

Gemini Investors III, L.P. v. Nunez

78 So. 3d 94, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 972, 2012 WL 204722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2012 | Docket: 2355791

Cited 5 times | Published

securities act violation claims are based on section 517.301(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), which makes

Citigroup, Inc. v. Boles

914 So. 2d 23, 2005 WL 2373885

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2005 | Docket: 1781702

Cited 5 times | Published

unquestionably sound in tort and as violations of section 517.301, Florida Statutes, the Florida Securities Investors

Allen v. Oakbrook Securities Corp.

763 So. 2d 1099, 1999 WL 1191450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 1278294

Cited 5 times | Published

The security fraud claims are grounded on section 517.301, Florida Statutes, an anti-fraud provision

Josephthal Lyon & Ross, Inc. v. Durham

734 So. 2d 487, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6280, 1999 WL 299729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1999 | Docket: 1441742

Cited 5 times | Published

disagree. Success on the FSIPA claim, see section 517.301, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), would entitle

Waters v. International Precious Metals Corp.

172 F.R.D. 479, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21244, 1996 WL 814728

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 66315439

Cited 5 times | Published

Grosfeld, IPMC and Multivest, Inc. violated Fla. St. § 517.301 by selling investments in ETOs while operating

Newsom v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

558 So. 2d 1076, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1741, 1990 WL 28178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1990 | Docket: 1359349

Cited 5 times | Published

was guilty of negligence and had violated Section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes. Regarding the statutory

Gorman v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc.

609 F. Supp. 1054, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21146

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1985 | Docket: 2258152

Cited 5 times | Published

GRANTED. In compelling arbitration of Count II (Section 517.301 of the Florida Securities Act), the Court declines

Eaton v. Coal Par of West Virginia, Inc.

580 F. Supp. 572, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19526

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1984 | Docket: 1009848

Cited 5 times | Published

violations of the anti-fraud provisions of section 517.301, Florida Statutes.[7] Finally, plaintiff charges

Sparks v. State

256 So. 2d 537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1972 | Docket: 427858

Cited 5 times | Published

and (3) fraudulent sale of securities, F.S. Section 517.301, F.S.A. Each count arose out of a single transaction

Space Coast Credit Union v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.

295 F.R.D. 540, 2013 WL 1131628, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36882

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2013 | Docket: 66051492

Cited 4 times | Published

Investor Protection Act (“FSIPA”), Fla. Stat. § 517.301; common-law fraud; negligent misrepresentation;

Arnold v. McFall

839 F. Supp. 2d 1281, 2011 WL 6980847

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2011 | Docket: 65978494

Cited 4 times | Published

Defendants: (1) securities fraud pursuant to section 517.301 of the Florida Statutes; (2) securities fraud

Peebles v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fener & Smith Inc.

431 F.3d 1320, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27069, 2005 WL 3357496

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 12, 2005 | Docket: 213140

Cited 4 times | Published

presented the following claims: (1) violation of Section 517.301 of Florida Statutes; (2) fraud and misrepresentation;

Boim v. National Data Products, Inc.

932 F. Supp. 1402, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10811, 1996 WL 419866

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1996 | Docket: 944491

Cited 4 times | Published

Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act Section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1995) provides: It is

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,963 Christ Rousseff, Kenneth Barneby, Vinita Robinson, William R. Jacobson, Charles Helton v. E.F. Hutton Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Anadarko Land & Exploration Co., Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Christ Rousseff, Kenneth Barneby v. E.F. Hutton Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Anadarko Land & Exploration Co., Inc., a Foreign Corporation

867 F.2d 1281

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 15, 1989 | Docket: 986455

Cited 4 times | Published

301 and 517.211, Florida Statutes (1981). Section 517.301(1) is similar in language to rule 10b-5. It

Bongard v. Winter

516 So. 2d 27, 1987 WL 1582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1987 | Docket: 1678058

Cited 4 times | Published

improperly dismissed count III grounded upon section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985). See § 517.211(2)

Spitz v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

502 So. 2d 479, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1987 | Docket: 1657781

Cited 4 times | Published

two count complaint alleging violation of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985), because of misrepresentations

Weinberg v. Pennington

462 So. 2d 862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1985 | Docket: 449528

Cited 4 times | Published

fraud, fraudulent sale of securities contrary to § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (1981), and the sale of unregistered

Alna Capital Associates v. Wagner

532 F. Supp. 591, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10637

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1982 | Docket: 2014064

Cited 4 times | Published

brought under § 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, § 517.301 of the Florida Statutes, and Florida common law

Durden v. CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB

763 F. Supp. 2d 1299, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11739, 2011 WL 337363

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2011 | Docket: 2335635

Cited 3 times | Published

Investor Protection Act (FSIPA), Florida Statutes section 517.301(1)(a) (count one); breach of fiduciary duty

Weissman v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

500 F.3d 1293, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22224

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 18, 2007 | Docket: 65658509

Cited 3 times | Published

Weissman claimed that NASDAQ violated Fla. Stat. § 517.301(l)(b) by promoting WorldCom through its marketing

Weissman v. NATIONAL ASS'N OF SECURITIES DEALERS

500 F.3d 1293

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 18, 2007 | Docket: 213277

Cited 3 times | Published

Weissman claimed that NASDAQ violated Fla. Stat. § 517.301(1)(b) by promoting WorldCom through its marketing

Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Vogel

918 So. 2d 1004, 2006 WL 141515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2006 | Docket: 1361529

Cited 3 times | Published

Vogels' complaint was that Wachovia violated section 517.301, which is titled "Fraudulent transactions;

NATIONBANC SECURITIES, INC. v. Aron

787 So. 2d 881, 2001 WL 193744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1744909

Cited 3 times | Published

NationsBanc had violated both the common law and section 517.301. Thereafter, the trial court conducted a hearing

Butterworth v. Quick & Reilly, Inc.

998 F. Supp. 1404, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4352, 1998 WL 154413

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1998 | Docket: 1246040

Cited 3 times | Published

required. Plaintiff also alleges a violation of Section 517.301(1)(a)(2) of said act because Defendant conducted

Messer v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

833 F.2d 909, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15963

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 7, 1987 | Docket: 66230701

Cited 3 times | Published

Mes-ser’s CEA claim. C. FLORIDA SECURITIES ACT Section 517.301(l)(a) of the Florida Securities Act, patterned

Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. v. Warner

665 F. Supp. 1549, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6935

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1256464

Cited 3 times | Published

and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, Fla.Stat. § 517.301, common law breach of fiduciary duty, negligence

Gochnauer v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.

810 F.2d 1042, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2360

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 20, 1987 | Docket: 66222485

Cited 3 times | Published

Exchange Commission,6 and Florida Statute Section 517.301,7 the state’s “blue sky” securities law. The

Thiele v. Davidson

440 F. Supp. 585, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12908

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1977 | Docket: 1397302

Cited 3 times | Published

to recission by virtue of the provisions of Section 517.301 of the Florida Statutes. This statute is the

Bacon v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.

677 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 48 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2703, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1186, 2010 WL 54753

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2010 | Docket: 2369736

Cited 2 times | Published

violation of the Florida Securities Act, Fla. Stat. § 517.301, against the Company and Charles. W. Stiefel;

Weissman v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

468 F.3d 1306, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27091, 2006 WL 3077471

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 1, 2006 | Docket: 65657758

Cited 2 times | Published

Weissman alleged that NASDAQ violated Fla. Stat. § 517.301(l)(b) by promoting WorldCom through its marketing

Bruce H. Colton v. Victor Verola

446 F.3d 1206, 55 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1905, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9950, 2006 WL 1029641

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 20, 2006 | Docket: 398550

Cited 2 times | Published

between 1994 and 1998, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.301(l)(a) (2001). R1-7, Exh. 3 at 1. He was sentenced

Barnes v. Dupree (In Re Dupree)

336 B.R. 520, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2427, 2005 WL 3454676

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2005 | Docket: 1775188

Cited 2 times | Published

Securities and Investors Protection Act, Fla. Stat. 517.301, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement

Verola v. Colton (In Re Verola)

296 B.R. 266, 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1597, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 188, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 869, 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 171

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 8, 2003 | Docket: 1861295

Cited 2 times | Published

Fraudulent Transactions pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 517.301(1)(a). Subsequently, on December 6, 2001, the

Scheurenbrand v. Wood Gundy Corp.

8 F.3d 1547, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26733

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 13, 1993 | Docket: 372482

Cited 2 times | Published

Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder; and (2) section 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Scheurenbrand v. Wood Gundy Corp.

8 F.3d 1547, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26733

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 13, 1993 | Docket: 372482

Cited 2 times | Published

Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder; and (2) section 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Marcus v. SHAPIRO, ABRAMSON & SCHWIMMER, PA

620 So. 2d 1284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1993 | Docket: 1387920

Cited 2 times | Published

participants and the association had violated section 517.301(1)(a)(2),[2] Florida Statutes (1991), by failing

Rousseff v. E.F. Hutton Co.

867 F.2d 1281, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3073, 1989 WL 15722

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 15, 1989 | Docket: 66242150

Cited 2 times | Published

301 and 517.211, Florida Statutes (1981). Section 517.301(1) is similar in language to rule 10b-5. It

Craft v. Florida Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

786 F.2d 1546

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 22, 1986 | Docket: 66214999

Cited 2 times | Published

1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereon, Section 517.-301 of the Florida Blue Sky Laws and Section 563b

Finn v. Davis

602 F. Supp. 801, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22494

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1985 | Docket: 1664192

Cited 2 times | Published

fraudulent transactions in violation of Fla.Stat. § 517.301 (Count II, state complaint); 3. Count VII alleging

Ratner v. Scientific Resources Corp.

53 F.R.D. 325, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 952, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11762

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1971 | Docket: 66065295

Cited 2 times | Published

15 U.S.C. §§ 77q and 78j; and for violation of § 517.301, Florida Statutes 1969, F. S.A.; and for common

Wilfred A. Brown v. State of Florida

189 So. 3d 837, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410, 2015 WL 4549461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2015 | Docket: 2679154

Cited 1 times | Published

of a fraudulent security transaction, under section 517.301 (l)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), on which appellant

Eagletech Communications, Inc. v. Bryn Mawr Investment Group, Inc.

79 So. 3d 855, 2012 WL 280242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2012 | Docket: 60305390

Cited 1 times | Published

Protection Act, and in particular violation of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (2000).7 Section 517.211(2)

Carran v. Morgan

510 F. Supp. 2d 1053, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13097, 2007 WL 628129

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2007 | Docket: 1808600

Cited 1 times | Published

individually, and a violation of Florida Statute § 517.301 (Count IV) against Morgan, individually and d/b/a

Dillon v. AXXSYS International, Inc.

385 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24509, 2005 WL 2012273

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2005 | Docket: 2313193

Cited 1 times | Published

defendants, including Thompson, violated Fla.Stat. § 517.301(1)(a), known generally as Florida's "Little 10b-5

Moeller v. Cassedy

364 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5984, 2005 WL 799207

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2005 | Docket: 2214587

Cited 1 times | Published

statutory violation of the Florida Securities Act, § 517.301, Fla. Stat. Despite Respondent Cassedy's argument

Bookhardt v. State

710 So. 2d 700, 1998 WL 211649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1998 | Docket: 1445345

Cited 1 times | Published

07, Fla. Stat. [2] § 517.12, Fla. Stat. [3] § 517.301, Fla. Stat.

Mesher v. Combs

685 So. 2d 1391, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 131, 1997 WL 12940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1997 | Docket: 64770283

Cited 1 times | Published

Historical Shipwreck Salvors, Inc. (HSSI) violated section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1993), by making material

Tucker v. Mariani

655 So. 2d 221, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5777, 1995 WL 323061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1995 | Docket: 64756483

Cited 1 times | Published

address first the claim for securities fraud. Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1987), provides: (1) It

Osborne Stern and Co. v. Dept. of Banking

647 So. 2d 245, 1994 WL 646266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1994 | Docket: 437560

Cited 1 times | Published

such evidence as to the alleged violations of section 517.301(1)(c), Florida Statutes, which imposes liability

Verhaegen v. Montigny

553 So. 2d 756, 1989 WL 151460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1989 | Docket: 1259201

Cited 1 times | Published

on the fraud count of the complaint under section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985); a basis for the judgment

Whigham v. Muehl

500 So. 2d 1374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 289, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 64624368

Cited 1 times | Published

securities transaction subject to the provisions of section 517.301, Florida Statutes; (2) whether the trial court

NGUYEN v. PERSPECTIVE GLOBAL, LLC, HOOKS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2024 | Docket: 68471735

Published

of [an] investment or security" under section 517.301, Florida Statutes (2020), and sale of an unregistered

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68034190

Published

Count III claimed that the Appellants violated section 517.301(1)(a), as they misrepresented and omitted material

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68024814

Published

Count III claimed that the Appellants violated section 517.301(1)(a), as they misrepresented and omitted material

Kevin Harris v. James F. Jayo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 14, 2021 | Docket: 60058125

Published

investment fraud in violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.301, unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation

SHORELINE FOUNDATION, INC. v. VICTOR BRISK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2019 | Docket: 15835852

Published

fraud, misrepresentation in violation of section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (2015), (the “Blue Sky

J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC v. Geveran Investments Ltd.

224 So. 3d 316, 2017 WL 3318715, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 6136502

Published

made, ... *324 not misleading.” § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (2012). The FSIPA provides for a remedy

J.P. Morgan Securities v. Geveran Investments

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2017 | Docket: 6136505

Published

make the statements made, . . . not misleading.” § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (2012). The FSIPA provides for a

Lighting Science v. Geveran Investments

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2017 | Docket: 6076387

Published

make the statements made, . . . not misleading.” § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (2012). The FSIPA provides for a

JP Morgan Securities v. Geveran Investments

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2017 | Docket: 6076389

Published

make the statements made, . . . not misleading.” § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (2012). The FSIPA provides for a

Wojnowski v. State, Office of Financial Regulation

98 So. 3d 189, 2012 WL 4009546, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2012 | Docket: 60312201

Published

committed securities fraud in violation of Section 517.301, Florida Statutes. Appellant argues that OFR

Serefex Corp. v. Hickman Holdings, Lp

695 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15707, 2010 WL 672772

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2010 | Docket: 2230906

Published

securities fraud pursuant to Florida Statute § 517.301 (Count IV) against all four defendants. Finally

Serefex Corp. v. Hickman Holdings, Lp

695 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15707, 2010 WL 672772

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2010 | Docket: 2230906

Published

securities fraud pursuant to Florida Statute § 517.301 (Count IV) against all four defendants. Finally

Weissman v. NATIONAL ASS'N OF SECURITIES DEALERS

500 F.3d 1293, 2007 WL 2701308

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 1, 2006 | Docket: 213215

Published

Weissman alleged that NASDAQ violated Fla. Stat. § 517.301(1)(b) by promoting WorldCom through its marketing

R.M. Stark & Co. v. Noddle

941 So. 2d 401, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15512, 2006 WL 2683210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 64847719

Published

Trust, which sued Appellants for violation of section 517.301, Florida Statutes, and breach of fiduciary

Verola v. Colton (In Re Verola)

336 B.R. 547, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29131, 2004 WL 3655108

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2004 | Docket: 357417

Published

Fraudulent Transactions pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 517.301(1)(a). He was sentenced to thirty-four months

Kahan Novoa v. Safra National Bank of New York

313 F. Supp. 2d 1347, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25203

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2003 | Docket: 41770

Published

negligent misrepresentation pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 517.301), Plaintiffs seek to hold Safra vicariously liable

Shields & Co. v. Bright

254 F. Supp. 2d 1253, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5526, 2003 WL 1733688

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 2378975

Published

on common law fraud, securities fraud under section 517.301, Florida Statutes, and breach of fiduciary

Buehler v. LTI International, Inc.

762 So. 2d 530, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3748, 2000 WL 331910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2000 | Docket: 64798682

Published

investment advisers, and branch offices), or section 517.301 (Fraudulent transactions; falsification or

Davis v. Kaminsky

734 So. 2d 476, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6018, 1999 WL 308817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1999 | Docket: 64788587

Published

the trial court’s finding of a violation of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985), for the last half

Medine v. Washington Mutual, FA

185 F.R.D. 366, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21665, 1998 WL 1033254

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1998 | Docket: 66009515

Published

— 5; c. Whether Defendants violated Fla.Stat. § 517.301 of the Florida Securities laws by defrauding or

Tamm v. Bradley

696 So. 2d 816, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2141, 1997 WL 106189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 64774814

Published

claimed damages pursuant to violations of section 517.301(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse

Kashner Davidson Securities Corp. v. Desrosiers

689 So. 2d 1106, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 933, 1997 WL 47572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Docket: 64771777

Published

statutory securities fraud in contravention of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1987). It entered judgment

Scheurenbrand v. Wood Gundy Corp.

8 F.3d 1547, 1993 WL 488586

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 13, 1993 | Docket: 64015453

Published

Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder; and (2) section 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

613 So. 2d 1307, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 113, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 172, 1993 WL 32299

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1993 | Docket: 64694361

Published

92-45, section 8, Laws of Florida, amended section 517.301, Florida Statutes, to make the rendering of

Airport Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. United National Bank of Miami

611 So. 2d 1256, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1992 | Docket: 64693375

Published

fraudulent misrepresentation and violation of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985) (fraudulent securities

Bissell v. State

605 So. 2d 878, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5816, 1992 WL 111375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1992 | Docket: 64670105

Published

thirty counts of selling unregistered securities; § 517.-301, twenty counts of securities fraud; § 895.-03(1)

Kane v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.

916 F.2d 643, 1990 WL 157290

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 6, 1990 | Docket: 66258807

Published

remedy for violation of the antifraud provision, § 517.301: (2) Any person purchasing or selling a security

Smith v. State ex rel. Lewis

570 So. 2d 1315, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3002, 1990 WL 57434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1990 | Docket: 64654897

Published

may have violated Florida Statutes § 517.301(l)(c) and § 517.301(l)(a)(l). Her actions evidence an intent

Seligman v. Office of Comptroller

557 So. 2d 144, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 963, 1990 WL 13526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1990 | Docket: 64648440

Published

with the State, violating the provisions of section 517.301 or any other provision of Chapter 517, F.S

Poncy v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

548 So. 2d 1196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2252, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5223, 1989 WL 109983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1989 | Docket: 64644931

Published

breach of fiduciary duty and violations of section 517.301, Florida Statutes, an anti-fraud statute. Shearson

Rousseff v. E.F. Hutton Co.

843 F.2d 1326, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5811, 1988 WL 32972

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 1988 | Docket: 66234120

Published

the Florida Investor Protection Act, Fla.Stat. § 517.301. We therefore certify this question of Florida

Rousseff v. E.F. Hutton Co.

843 F.2d 1324, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5723, 1988 WL 32969

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 1988 | Docket: 66234119

Published

Securities and Investor Protection Act, Fla.Stat. § 517.301, must prove that the defendant’s fraud proximately

State v. Block

428 So. 2d 782, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1983 | Docket: 64595897

Published

We disapprove of the court’s ruling that section 517.301(l)(c) is unconstitutional. It is a generally

State v. Cardinal

429 So. 2d 747, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1983 | Docket: 64596348

Published

which only tracked a securities fraud statute, section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1977), was held to be

Butts v. State

418 So. 2d 468, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1982 | Docket: 64591823

Published

eighteen charged five defendants with violating Section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1981). This section prohibits

Markham v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.

373 So. 2d 709, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1979 | Docket: 64571421

Published

constituted securities fraud, pursuant to Section 517.-301, Florida Statutes (1977), and sought rescission

Krutel v. Stolberg

356 So. 2d 1299, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1978 | Docket: 64563725

Published

indebtedness to the company. Such departures violated Section 517.301 Florida Statutes. *1301“5. Upon the execution

State v. Fried

357 So. 2d 211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1978 | Docket: 453874

Published

notes in a fraudulent manner, in violation of Section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Subsequently,

Haygood v. Adams Drugs, Inc.

346 So. 2d 612, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1977 | Docket: 64558888

Published

inference that a violation has occurred. See e. g. § 517.301, Fla.Stat. (1975) (Fraudulent transactions; falsification

Davis v. McGahee

257 So. 2d 62, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1972 | Docket: 64524074

Published

defendant corporations in violation of F.S. Section 517.301, F.S.A. By their complaint petitioners sought