Cases from cite.case.law:

J. P. MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC, v. GEVERAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED, L. P. LLC, GP, LLC, PCA LSG LLC, L. P. v. J. P. LLC, L. P. LLC, GP, LLC, PCA LSG LLC,, 224 So. 3d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . The FSIPA provides for a remedy of rescission for all violations of section 517.301 “if the plaintiff . . . Joint and several liability under section 517.301 extends to any “director, officer, partner, or agent . . . Perazzo, 357 F.3d 1218, 1222 (11th Cir. 2004) (noting the elements of a section 517.301 claim are similar . . . as to justifiable reliance in Rousseff was dicta and’holding reliance is not an element of a section 517.301 . . .

A. BROWN, v. STATE, 189 So. 3d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . )l., Florida Statutes ■ (2007); and (2) a fraudulent security transaction, in violation of sections 517.301 . . . time of appellant’s crime, the statutory elements of a fraudulent security transaction, under section 517.301 . . . See § 517.301(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). This is not required of grand theft. . . .

L. BARNETT, v. ANTONACCI,, 122 So. 3d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 517.301 (l)(a)2. & 517.302(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). . See § 812.014(2)(b)l„ Fla. . . .

SPACE COAST CREDIT UNION, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH INCORPORATED d b a LLC f k a LLC J. P. f k a Co. UBS LLC S. Jr. s d b a s, 295 F.R.D. 540 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 517.301; common-law fraud; negligent misrepresentation; unjust enrichment; and imposition of a constructive . . .

FREECHARM LIMITED, v. ATLAS WEALTH HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a LLC, a, 499 F. App'x 941 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . We have held that the elements of a Section 10(b) claim are virtually identical to a Section 517.301 . . .

A. WOJNOWSKI, Jr. v. STATE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION,, 98 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . violation of section 517.07, Florida Statutes, and committed securities fraud in violation of Section 517.301 . . . Claimants, as follows: (1) as to misrepresentation, Respondents are in violation of Florida Statute § 517.301 . . . association ... to have violated provisions of Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, specifically Section 517.301 . . . violated section 517.07, Florida Statutes, by selling unregistered securities, and violated section 517.301 . . .

S. ANWAR, v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED,, 891 F. Supp. 2d 548 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . The Barbachano complaint alone alleges a violation of state securities fraud under Florida Statute §§ 517.301 . . . (“§ 517.301”) and 517.211(2). . . . See Anwar IV, 826 F.Supp.2d at 585-90 (applying Rule 9(b) to § 517.301 and negligent misrepresentation . . . The elements of § 517.301 securities fraud are almost identical to common law fraud and federal securities . . . "To state a claim under § 517.301, a plaintiff must allege: (1) a misrepresentation or omission of material . . .

ANWAR, v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED,, 283 F.R.D. 193 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 517.301 (“FSIPA”); and 3) additional factual allegations. (See Docket No. 838, 840.) . . .

In NATIONAL CENTURY FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., 846 F. Supp. 2d 828 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . . § 517.301; 815 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 5/12; Mass. Gen. . . .

EAGLETECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a v. BRYN MAWR INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. a k a a f k a a T. R. II, L. L. C. a a L. P. a L. P. LBC a k a LBC a S. A. J. E. a O a a L. P. a G. a a L. P. a a T. J., 79 So. 3d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . violations of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, and in particular violation of section 517.301 . . . Section 517.211(2) creates a civil remedy for a violation of section 517.301: Any person purchasing or . . . selling a security in violation of s. 517.301, and every director, officer, partner, or agent of or . . . In count six, Eagletech alleged that the named defendants had violated section 517.301(1) via a market . . . Section 517.301(1) provides: It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter for a person . . .

GEMINI INVESTORS III, L. P. v. NUNEZ,, 78 So. 3d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The securities act violation claims are based on section 517.301(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), which . . .

Dr. ARNOLD, v. A. McFALL,, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . the following counts against seven individual Defendants: (1) securities fraud pursuant to section 517.301 . . . Count One In count one, Plaintiffs allege Defendants violated section 517.301(l)(a) (“Section 301”) of . . . Stat. § 517.301(l)(a)(l)-(3). . . . Rousseff, 537 So.2d 978, 981 (Fla.1989) (“Proof of loss causation is not mentioned in sections 517.211 or 517.301 . . . proof of loss causation is not required in a civil securities proceeding under sections 517.211 and 517.301 . . .

S. ANWAR, v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED,, 826 F. Supp. 2d 578 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . FRAUD CLAIMS UNDER § 517.301 1. . . . Stat. § 517.301(l)(a). . . . Finally, § 517.301 does not create a private right of action. . . . Sufficiency of § 517.301 Claims under Rule 9(b) SCBI argues that Almiron and Carrillo’s § 517.301 claims . . . Mgmt., Inc., 401 F.Supp.2d 1270, 1280 (S.D.Fla.2003) (§ 517.301)). . . .

BAMERT, So D. LLC, v. PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a E. J., 445 F. App'x 256 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 517.301; (7) fraud and fraud in the inducement; and (8) negligent misrepresentation. . . .

M. DURDEN, M. v. CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB,, 763 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . violations of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act (FSIPA), Florida Statutes section 517.301 . . . Plaintiff brought his FSI-PA claim pursuant to Florida Statutes sections 517.301(l)(a) and 517.211(2) . . . explaining that section 517.211(2) provides the civil liability provision for violations of section 517.301 . . . July 3, 2008) ("Because § 517.301 involves fraud, Plaintiffs must allege the elements of the claim with . . .

E. RUSHING, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. N. A., 752 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . Pursuant to Florida Statute § 517.301: It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter . . . The remedy for a violation of Section 517.301 is contained in Florida Statutes Section 517.211(2) and . . . states: Any person purchasing or selling a security in violation of s. 517.301, and every ... agent . . . a Seller’s Agent Wachovia first argues that it is not liable under FSIPA, Florida Statutes Section 517.301 . . . The County responds that “[ujnlike its federal counterpart, a securities fraud claim under Section 517.301 . . .

In LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION MD LAK In S. Jr. v., 706 F. Supp. 2d 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . § 517.301. . SC ¶¶ 33, 44, 52-53, 55, 67, 78, 88. . Id. ¶¶ 47-54. . Id. ¶¶ 33, 55. . . . .

SEREFEX CORPORATION, v. HICKMAN HOLDINGS, LP, LLC, D, 695 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . 10b-5 (Count II), common law fraud (Count III), and securities fraud pursuant to Florida Statute § 517.301 . . . St. § 517.301 Plaintiff alleges in Count IV that the defendants violated Florida Statute § 517.301 by . . . Florida Statute § 517.301 makes it unlawful for any person: (a) In connection with the rendering of any . . . Stat. § 517.301. . . . Under section 517.301 an agent can be held liable for fraud. Fla. Stat. § 517.211. . . .

A. BACON, F. v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC. a W. D. De S. N. LLP. a, 677 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 517.301, against the Company and Charles W. . . .

SIERRA EQUITY GROUP, INC. E. W. v. WHITE OAK EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC,, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . all Defendants (Count III); Declaratory Judgment against White Oak (Count IV); Violation of Section 517.301 . . . Defendants Count III (fraudulent inducement against all Defendants), Count V (violation of Section 517.301 . . . does not bar Sierra’s statutory claims, such as the fraud claims brought for violations of Section 517.301 . . .

KASHNER DAVIDSON SECURITIES CORP. L. v. MSCISZ, 531 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 517.301]; (3) violations of the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act [Mass. Gen. . . .

RUBIN, v. Dr. GABAY,, 979 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 517.301, Florida Statutes, makes it unlawful to employ certain false representations, schemes . . . ) imposes individual liability on: [a]ny person purchasing or selling a security in violation of s. 517.301 . . . In discussing the meaning of the term agent in the context of section 517.301, this court explained that . . .

I. WEISSMAN, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. a NASDAQ a, 500 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 517.301(l)(b) by promoting WorldCom through its marketing and advertising without disclosing that . . .

S. BECKER, S. v. A. DAVIS, a. k. a. IFG D., 491 F.3d 1292 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . the defendants acts or practices constituted a scheme to defraud in violation of Florida Statute § 517.301 . . .

INSTITUTO DE PREVISION MILITAR, v. LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC., 485 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 517.301; (12) Accounting. . . . . Stat. § 517.301; (12) Accounting. . . .

CARRAN, v. MORGAN, d b a a, 510 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Issuance of Lis Pendens (Count III) against Morgan, individually, and a violation of Florida Statute § 517.301 . . .

UNIVERSAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC. MICHAEL J. ZWEBNER, v. LYCOS, INC. d b a S. A. Jr. a k a a k a Jr. a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a H., 478 F.3d 413 (1st Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 517.301; (2) cyberstalking under 47 U.S.C. § 223; (3) dilution of trade name under Fla. . . .

I. WEISSMAN, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. a NASDAQ a, 468 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 517.301(l)(b) by promoting WorldCom through its marketing and advertising without disclosing that . . . dealers, directly or indireetly[,] for the advertisements and promotions violated Florida Statute Section 517.301 . . .

R. M. STARK CO. INC. L. v. NODDLE, U A, 941 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Noddle was the trustee for the Mal-ing Trust, which sued Appellants for violation of section 517.301, . . .

D. H. BLAIR CO. INC. E. D. H. Co. v. GOTTDIENER, D. H. J., 462 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . .; 5) prejudgment interest; and 6) a finding that each respondent violated Section 517.301, Florida Statutes . . . Stat. ch. 517.301 but failed to award the full statutory damages as directed by Fla. . . .

In Re VEROLA, H. v., 446 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 517.301 (l)(a) (2001). Rl-7, Exh. 3 at 1. He was sentenced to thirty-four months in prison. . . .

In Re VEROLA, H. v., 446 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 517.301(l)(a) (2001). R1-7, Exh. 3 at 1. He was sentenced to thirty-four months in prison. . . .

PINNACLE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. a v. AMERICAN FAMILY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a v., 417 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (D. Minn. 2006)

. . . Securities Fraud (Counterclaim Count VII) A successful claim for securities fraud under Florida Statute 517.301 . . .

WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, f k a v. D. VOGEL F., 918 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The thrust of the Vogels’ complaint was that Wachovia violated section 517.301, which is titled “Fraudulent . . .

PEEBLES, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH INCORPORATED,, 431 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . Peebles presented the following claims: (1) violation of Section 517.301 of Florida Statutes; (2) fraud . . .

In DUPREE, T. Sr. E. v., 336 B.R. 520 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Stat. 517.301, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, negligence and negligent supervision. . . . Stat. 517.301, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, negligence and negligent supervision . . . Section 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investors Protection Act provides, in part, that: (1) It . . .

CITIGROUP, INC. v. D. BOLES, M. D., 914 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The Boleses’ claims unquestionably sound in tort and as violations of section 517.301, Florida Statutes . . .

DILLON, v. AXXSYS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 385 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 517.301 (l)(a), known generally as Florida’s “Little 10b-5.” . . . It imposes liability only on “[a]ny person purchasing or selling a security in violation of § 517.301 . . . Stat. 517.301(l)(a), a director or officer must personally engage in some act or acts that induce a purchaser . . . directed to violations of Section 517.07 and 517.12 and the latter directed to violations of Section 517.301 . . . proportion, to say the least): (1) persons who purchased or sold a security in violation of Section 517.301 . . .

MUSOLINO, v. YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ, a a N. C. a, 137 F. App'x 321 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 517.301. . . . Stat. § 517.301. II. . . . Stat. § 517.301 as well. However, because Musolino prevails under Fla. . . . Stat. § 517.301 is the same — namely, recision — we need not address Machzikei Hadas’s grievance with . . . Stat. § 517.301. Compare Fla. Stat. § 517.211(1) with Fla. Stat. § 517.211(2). . . .

J. MOELLER, v. R. CASSEDY, Jr., 364 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (N.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Petitioners and against Respondent Cassedy on a statutory violation of the Florida Securities Act, § 517.301 . . . arbitration award acknowledges in the case summary that Petitioners raised a statutory claim under § 517.301 . . .

WARTER, S. A. a v. BOSTON SECURITIES, S. A. N. A. N. A., 380 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . § 517.301 (fraudulent transactions); BSEC, FLEET and Pusso for violation of FI. . . .

UBUY HOLDINGS, INC. f k a E- a f k a E- v. GLADSTONE,, 340 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . Rule 144; (2) State Securities Fraud in violation of Florida Statutes ch. 517.301; (3) Common Law Fraud . . .

In S. APPEL, v. S., 315 B.R. 645 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . sought recovery against Debtor on claims for breach of contract, violations of Sections 517.01 and 517.301 . . .

In VEROLA, v. H., 336 B.R. 547 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . § 517.301(l)(a). He was sentenced to thirty-four months in prison. . . .

GRIPPO, v. E. PERAZZO, T. S. C., 357 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . Failure to Allege the Purchase of a Security Section 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection . . . The elements of a cause of action under § 517.301 are identical to those under the Federal Rule 10b-5 . . . based on the allegations in count 10, he is clearly alleging a violation of Florida Statute Chapter 517.301 . . .

COMPANIA DE ELABORADOS DE CAF El C. A. v. CARDINAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., 401 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . Plaintiffs further maintain that Sections 517.12, 560.111, 655.50, and 517.301, Florida Statutes, impose . . . a security in violation of s. 517.301, and every director, officer, partner, or agent of or for the . . . Therefore, as a matter of law Plaintiffs cannot maintain a claim for a violation of Section 517.301, . . . A plaintiff is afforded a private cause of action for violations of section 517.301, Fla. . . . Stat. § 517.301(1)). . . .

KAHAN NOVOA v. SAFRA NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK,, 313 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 517.301), Plaintiffs seek to hold Safra vicariously liable for misrepresentations that BNM representatives . . . Stat. §§ 517.301, 517.07, 517.211; Allen v. . . . Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (sales or offers for sale occurring outside of Florida are not actionable under § 517.301 . . .

In VEROLA, v., 296 B.R. 266 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 517.301(l)(a). . . .

SHIELDS COMPANY, s v. G. BRIGHT, s, 254 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . The complaint in Ward was based on common law fraud, securities fraud under section 517.301, Florida . . . In Ward, the Third District Court of Appeals notes that a securities fraud claim under section 517.301 . . . pursuing claims for: violation of Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act sections 517.12(5) and 517.301 . . . The Palmer court found that Florida Statute subsections 517.301(3) and 517.12(11) and rule 3E-600.08 . . . also said “Nothing in the Rousseff opinion purports to pass on the statutory provisions in subsection 517.301 . . .

In INFOCURE SECURITIES LITIGATION. V. v. a M. D. v. a v. a v. a M. D. v. a v. LLP,, 210 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (N.D. Ga. 2002)

. . . . § 517.301 (West 1997). . . . under Section 517.211(2) which states: Any person in purchasing or selling a security in violation of § 517.301 . . .

BLACK, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . counts alleged two or more violations of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, section 517.301 . . . or to “engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates ... as a fraud.” § 517.301 . . . At least two violations of section 517.301(l)(a) in which money was obtained from Escambia County were . . . Black based on violations of section 517.301(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), which the state alleged . . . (These theories correspond to section 517.301(l)(a)l., 3. and 2., respectively.) . . .

PEREZ- ABREU, ZAMORA De La Fe, P. A. v. E. TARACIDO,, 790 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2001)

. . . and third-party complaint against the Clients, asserting fraud; negligence; violations of sections 517.301 . . .

ROSATI v. BEKHOR,, 167 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Panel finds that Respondents Cohen, Lee, Bekhor, and Island Securities violated Sections 517.211 and 517.301 . . .

In GOLDBRONN, B. v., 263 B.R. 347 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . 1), 517.301(1)(a)(2), and 517.301(1)(a)(3), Florida Statutes. . . . This is not the case with Section 517.301. . . . (1)(a)(2) as 517.301(2). . . . Section 517.301(2) is a definitional section of the statute. . . . of Section 517.301(1)(a)(2). . . . .

SECURITIES, INC. v. ARON, 787 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . further retooled their order and found that NationsBanc had violated both the common law and section 517.301 . . .

WARD, v. ATLANTIC SECURITY BANK,, 777 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Stockholder filed a Complaint against Bank alleging common law fraud, securities fraud under section 517.301 . . . that the trial court erred in entering Summary Judgment on the securities fraud claim under section 517.301 . . . Under section 517.301, it is unlawful to engage in fraud “in connection with the offer, sale or purchase . . . , even if that were true, we find that Stockholder still has a securities fraud claim under section 517.301 . . . Unlike its federal counterpart, a securities fraud claim under section 517.301 may also be brought for . . .

HILLIARD v. H. BLACK,, 125 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . Section 517.301, Florida Statutes, provides that any action for a violation of chapter 517, Florida Statutes . . .

J. BUEHLER, Jr. v. LTI INTERNATIONAL, INC. a n k a, 762 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . (Registration of dealers, associated persons, investment advisers, and branch offices), or section 517.301 . . .

D. MEDALIE, v. FSC SECURITIES CORPORATION,, 87 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . Plaintiffs filed a four count complaint against the defendant alleging violation of § 517.301 of the . . . Count I Securities Fraud — Violation of § 517.301, Florida Statutes Count I of plaintiffs complaint alleges . . . a violation of § 517.301, Florida Statutes. . . . not serve to extend the five-year bar provided by the statute of limitations in § 95.11(4)(e) in a § 517.301 . . .

Dr. E. GARLAND R. v. ADVANCED MEDICAL FUND, L. P. II,, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Ga. 2000)

. . . . §§ 517.211(2) and 517.301; (4) rescission and rescissionary damages for violating §§ 517.211(2) and . . . 517.301; (5) fraud in the inducement; (6) negligent misrepresentation; (7) breach of fiduciary duty; . . . Stat. § 517.301 create or confer rights different from those found at common law. . . . Stat. § 517.301 is virtually identical to that of Rule 10b-5, the court finds that § 517.301 creates . . . Stat. §§ 517.211 and 517.301. . . .

D. ALLEN, D. Jr. J. C. N. E. A. G. A. C. P. L. O M. S. v. OAKBROOK SECURITIES CORPORATION, a D. E. a W. A. S. B. CFS TIC a USLC CFS a a a a WA a H. L. O, 763 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . The security fraud claims are grounded on section 517.301, Florida Statutes, an anti-fraud provision . . .

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. CEDAR RESOURCES, INC., 761 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 517.301, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . venue principle applies to all three of its claims, including its securities fraud claim under section 517.301 . . . It does not appear that such reliance damages are a compensable injuiy under its section 517.301 FSIPA . . . Stat. (1993) (providing remedies for violations of section 517.301). . . . .

BARRON CHASE SECURITIES, INC. v. B. MOSER, B., 745 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . which would not support her entitlement to attorney’s fees, as well as a statutory claim under section 517.301 . . .

JOSEPHTHAL LYON ROSS, INC. v. L. DURHAM,, 734 So. 2d 487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Success on the FSIPA claim, see section 517.301, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), would entitle Durham to . . .

DAVIS v. KAMINSKY P. A. LTD., 734 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . We affirm the trial court’s finding of a violation of section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1985), for the . . .

C. PROFILET, v. CAMBRIDGE FINANCIAL CORP., 231 B.R. 373 (S.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . of the Exchange Act (Count III); Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Count TV); Florida Blue Sky Law Section 517.301 . . . Violation of Florida Blue Sky Law § 517.301 (Count V) Defendants argue the Trustee has failed to meet . . . Thus, to establish a claim under § 517.301, a plaintiff must establish the following: (1) a misrepresentation . . . because the Trustee has failed sufficiently to plead an element necessary to bring a claim under § 517.301 . . .

MEDINE, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, FA,, 185 F.R.D. 366 (S.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . . § 517.301 of the Florida Securities laws by defrauding or otherwise wrongfully inducing Plaintiff and . . .

BOOKHARDT, v. STATE, 710 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .§ 517.301, Fla. Stat. . . .

BUTTERWORTH, v. QUICK REILLY, INC., 998 F. Supp. 1404 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . Plaintiff also alleges a violation of Section 517.301(l)(a)(2) of said act because Defendant conducted . . . Second, that Defendant breached its contract with Plaintiff by violating Sections 517.12 and 517.301 . . .

D. H. BLAIR CO. INC. v. P. JOHNSON, 697 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Civil Theft Statute, section 812.014, and the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, section 517.301 . . . The arbitrators found that appellant violated section 517.301, Florida Statutes, and awarded appellees . . .

BUTTERWORTH, v. QUICK REILLY, INC., 171 F.R.D. 319 (M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person, in violation of §§ 517.301 . . . (l)(a)(l) and 517.301(l)(a)(3) of the Florida Securities Act; 4. . . .

TAMM v. T. BRADLEY,, 696 So. 2d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . appellee sounded in common law fraud and the other claimed damages pursuant to violations of section 517.301 . . .

KASHNER DAVIDSON SECURITIES CORPORATION, a v. N. DESROSIERS, 689 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . court found KDS and Kashner liable only for statutory securities fraud in contravention of section 517.301 . . . under section 517.211, Florida Statutes (1987), which provides the remedies for a violation of section 517.301 . . . The trial court, therefore, erred in finding a violation of section 517.301, and imposing judgment based . . .

In INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 954 F. Supp. 81 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . . § 78r) and Sections 517.241 and 517.301 of the Florida Securities Act, has previously consented to . . .

A. MESHER, v. A. COMBS, H. a k a a a, 685 So. 2d 1391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . (HSSI) violated section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1993), by making material misrepresentations that . . . in the sale of securities as follows: Any person purchasing or selling a security in violation of s. 517.301 . . . Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1993), states in relevant part: (1) It is unlawful and a violation . . .

S. BOIM, v. NATIONAL DATA PRODUCTS, INC., 932 F. Supp. 1402 (M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act Section 517.301(1), Florida Statutes (1995) provides: . . .

McCUTCHEON, v. KIDDER, PEABODY COMPANY, INC., 938 F. Supp. 820 (S.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . . § 517.301. . . .

WATERS v. INTERNATIONAL PRECIOUS METALS CORPORATION,, 172 F.R.D. 479 (S.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . . § 517.301 by selling investments in ETOs while operating a boiler room operation as defined by Fla.St . . . Plaintiffs’ Claims Involve Investments Under § 517.301(2) Fla.Stat. § 517.301(2) reads, in pertinent . . . See Fla.Stat. § 517.301(1). . . . Milos, 997 F.2d 835, 844 (11th Cir.1993), the Eleventh Circuit stated, “To establish a § 517.301 claim . . . A reading of Florida’s Boiler Room statute reveals that in an action for the violation of § 517.301, . . .

ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. W. A. v. R. DAVIS, B. E. C. C. S. C. L. H., 897 F. Supp. 783 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 517.301 (1994), which prohibits the fraudulent procurement of an investment. . . .

TUCKER R. Jr. v. E. MARIANI, Sr., 655 So. 2d 221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1987), provides: (1) It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions . . .

OSBORNE STERN AND COMPANY, INC. W. v. DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND INVESTOR PROTECTION,, 647 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . 517.161, Florida Statutes (1989), based upon appellants’ having violated sections 517.12(1), 517.07, 517.301 . . . (l)(a)2, and 517.301(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1989). . . . evidence of mitigating circumstances as to the alleged violations of sections 517.12(1), 517.07, and 517.301 . . . The Department did not seek to preclude such evidence as to the alleged violations of section 517.301 . . . Section 517.301 (1989), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: 517.301 Fraudulent transactions . . .

G. TWISS R. v. J. KURY, E. P. SANDERS, v. J. KURY, E. R. ADDONIZIO, v. J. KURY, E. B. MILLER, v. J. KURY, E. J. LAMKIN, v. J. KURY, E. O. STEFL A. v. J. KURY, E. M., 25 F.3d 1551 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . The court in Palmer, however, next found that Florida Statute subsections 517.301(3) and 517.12(ll)(b . . . Although the Investors did not specifically cite subsection 517.301(3), their memoranda in opposition . . . The portions of the statutes involved in Roussejf, subsections 517.-211(2)-(5) and 517.301(1), Florida . . . Appellants do not rely on these provisions in sections 517.211 and 517.301(1) as the basis for their . . . Nothing in the Roussejf opinion purports to pass on the statutory provisions in subsection 517.301(1) . . .

In CHECKERS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 858 F. Supp. 1168 (M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . Negligent Misrepresentation against all Defendants; (6) alleges violation under Sections 517.211 and 517.301 . . . SECTIONS 517.211 AND 517.301 OF THE FLORIDA SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT (“FSI-PA”) The Florida . . . Defendant’s Dis-positive Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 13) alleged violations under Sections 517.211 and 517.301 . . . Peat Marwick’s Dispositive Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 16) alleged violations of Sections 517.211 and 517.301 . . .

JONES v. H. CHILDERS, 18 F.3d 899 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 517.301. .See Case History, supra. . . . .

ARTHUR YOUNG COMPANY, n k a a v. MARINER CORPORATION, 630 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Stat. 517.301. . . . under Section 517.211(2) which states: Any person purchasing or selling a security in violation of s. 517.301 . . . When we examine section 517.301, for which section 517.211 provides a remedy, it also fails to support . . . Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Fraudulent transactions; falsification or concealment . . . exclude an entire array of related “persons,” other than the actual seller, who could violate section 517.301 . . .

P. JANKOVICH, Jr. a v. Al BOWEN a k a a k a J. a TJB a E. P. L. C. a, 844 F. Supp. 743 (S.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 517.301; Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 44-1991. . . .

In INTEGRATED RESOURCES REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 850 F. Supp. 1105 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . would apply the state’s two-year statute of limitations applicable to actions under Florida Statutes § 517.301 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, 628 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 1993)

. . . 415.111, chapter 443, section 493.3175, sections 494.0018, 496.413, and 496.417, chapter 509, subsection 517.301 . . .

POLARIS PUBLIC INCOME FUNDS, v. EINHORN,, 625 So. 2d 128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The Florida complaint alleges a failure to disclose in violation of Florida’s Blue Sky Law, section 517.301 . . . fraud and misrepresentation complaint through the state fraudulent securities transactions statute, § 517.301 . . .

P. SCHEURENBRAND L. E. S. Sr. R. A. v. WOOD GUNDY CORP., 8 F.3d 1547 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 78j (1988), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder; and (2) section 517.301 of the Florida Securities . . .

T. McDONOUGH, D. L. J. V. A. H. Jr. R. C. v. AMERICOM INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION n k a E., 151 F.R.D. 140 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . violations of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act at Florida Statutes sections 517.241 and 517.301 . . .

LEISURE FOUNDERS, INC. V. v. CUC INTERNATIONAL, INC. E., 833 F. Supp. 1562 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 517.301(l)(a), must be DENIED. II. . . .

FIRST UNION DISCOUNT BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC. v. P. MILOS, P., 997 F.2d 835 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 517.301 (1989), a state securities anti-fraud statute, by making false representations, (2) committed . . . , and five of their amended counterclaim, the Miloses alleged that First Union violated Fla.Stat. § 517.301 . . . To establish a § 517.301 claim, the Miloses had to prove that, in connection with a securities transaction . . . Section 517.301 declares it unlawful for a person, in connection with a security transaction, directly . . . Fla.Stat. § 517.301 (1992 Supp.). . . . .

C. PALMER, v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC. E. YOUNG, W. v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., 622 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . When read in pari materia, subsections 517.12(ll)(b) and 517.301(3), Florida Statutes (1983), and rule . . . Section 517.301 provides in pertinent part: It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this . . . The portions of the statutes involved in Rousseff, subsections 517.211(2)-(5) and 517.301(1), Florida . . . Appellants do not rely on these provisions in sections 517.211 and 517.301(1) as the basis for their . . . Unlike subsection 517.301(1), subsection 517.301(3) does not address solely sales transactions between . . .

C. ANDREWS, v. E. FITZGERALD, Jr., 823 F. Supp. 356 (M.D.N.C. 1993)

. . . have also filed claims against Defendants for violation and conspiracy to violate Florida Statute § 517.301 . . .

I. MARCUS, v. SHAPIRO, ABRAMSON SCHWIMMER, P. A. H., 620 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . complaint, the psychiatrist alleged that the active participants and the association had violated section 517.301 . . . Their liability for a section 517.301(l)(a)(2) violation, however, turns on whether the omitted fact . . . Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1991), states that it is unlawful for a person (a) in connection with . . . Section 517.301 creates a "criminal or administrative offense which allows the government to pursue wrongdoers . . . section 517.211 which states: (2) Any person purchasing or selling a security in violation of section 517.301 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- SENTENCING GUIDELINES RULES, 613 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Chapter 92-45, section 8, Laws of Florida, amended section 517.301, Florida Statutes, to make the rendering . . . 415.111, chapter 443, section 493.3175, sections 494.0018, 496.413, and 496.417, chapter 509, subsection 517.301 . . . Section 494.0018 — Mortgage Brokers Section 496.413, 496.417 — Solicitation of Contributions Section 517.301 . . .

In INTEGRATED RESOURCES REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 815 F. Supp. 620 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . would apply Florida’s two-year statute of limitations applicable to actions under Florida Statutes § 517.301 . . .

T. HARRISON a v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INCORPORATED, a, 974 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1992)

. . . In Count XII Harrison did cite Fla.Stat. ch. 517.211 and 517.301, but, as in most of the other counts . . .

AIRPORT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. UNITED NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, J. B., 611 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . recision based upon two theories: common law fraudulent misrepresentation and violation of section 517.301 . . .