Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 194.036 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 194.036 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 194.036 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 194.036

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 194
ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PROPERTY TAXES
View Entire Chapter
194.036 Appeals.Appeals of the decisions of the board shall be as follows:
(1) If the property appraiser disagrees with the decision of the board, he or she may appeal the decision to the circuit court if one or more of the following criteria are met:
(a) The property appraiser determines and affirmatively asserts in any legal proceeding that there is a specific constitutional or statutory violation, or a specific violation of administrative rules, in the decision of the board, except that nothing herein shall authorize the property appraiser to institute any suit to challenge the validity of any portion of the constitution or of any duly enacted legislative act of this state.
(b) There is a variance from the property appraiser’s assessed value in excess of the following: 20 percent variance from any assessment of $250,000 or less; 15 percent variance from any assessment in excess of $250,000 but not in excess of $1 million; 10 percent variance from any assessment in excess of $1 million but not in excess of $2.5 million; or 5 percent variance from any assessment in excess of $2.5 million.
(c) There is an assertion by the property appraiser to the Department of Revenue that there exists a consistent and continuous violation of the intent of the law or administrative rules by the value adjustment board in its decisions. The property appraiser shall notify the department of those portions of the tax roll for which the assertion is made. The department shall thereupon notify the clerk of the board who shall, within 15 days of the notification by the department, send the written decisions of the board to the department. Within 30 days of the receipt of the decisions by the department, the department shall notify the property appraiser of its decision relative to further judicial proceedings. If the department finds upon investigation that a consistent and continuous violation of the intent of the law or administrative rules by the board has occurred, it shall so inform the property appraiser, who may thereupon bring suit in circuit court against the value adjustment board for injunctive relief to prohibit continuation of the violation of the law or administrative rules and for a mandatory injunction to restore the tax roll to its just value in such amount as determined by judicial proceeding. However, when a final judicial decision is rendered as a result of an appeal filed pursuant to this paragraph which alters or changes an assessment of a parcel of property of any taxpayer not a party to such procedure, such taxpayer shall have 60 days from the date of the final judicial decision to file an action to contest such altered or changed assessment pursuant to s. 194.171(1), and the provisions of s. 194.171(2) shall not bar such action.
(2) Any taxpayer may bring an action to contest a tax assessment pursuant to s. 194.171.
(3) The circuit court proceeding shall be de novo, and the burden of proof shall be upon the party initiating the action.
History.s. 23, ch. 83-204; s. 149, ch. 91-112; s. 982, ch. 95-147; s. 5, ch. 2023-157.

F.S. 194.036 on Google Scholar

F.S. 194.036 on CourtListener

Amendments to 194.036


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 194.036

Total Results: 35  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 2005).

Cited 70 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2005 WL 1577040

...However, as we recognized in Department of Education v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla.1982), "[s]tate officers and agencies must presume legislation affecting their duties to be valid, and do not have standing to initiate litigation for the purpose of determining otherwise." Section 194.036(1)(a) provides no exception to this rule....
Copy

Crossings at Fleming Island Cmty. Dev. Dist. v. Echeverri, 991 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 445, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1222, 2008 WL 2609005

...uestion of great public importance, each of which was denied. ANALYSIS In Fuchs, this Court held that a property appraiser seeking review of an adverse decision of the county value adjustment board did not have standing to file an action pursuant to section 194.036(1), Florida Statutes (1997), to argue that an applicable taxing statute was unconstitutional. After explaining that section 194.036(1) preserved the historical rule that a public official acting in his or her official capacity does not have standing to initiate an action challenging the validity of a statute and holding that the property appraiser in Fuchs thus la...
...[7] The 1976 act likewise revised section 194.181(1) to include an appraiser *802 appealing from a decision of the board pursuant to section 194.032 as a potential plaintiff in a tax suit. Ch. 76-234, § 4, Laws of Fla. As discussed above, in Fuchs the Court considered the scope of a property appraiser's standing pursuant to section 194.036(1)(a)....
...ning expressed in Justice Bell's concurring opinion in Sunset Harbour Condominium Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So.2d 925, 933-38 (Fla.2005) (Bell, J., specially concurring), and the Second District's decision in Sun `N Lake. Crossings, 960 So.2d at 29. [2] Section 194.036(1), Florida Statutes (1997), defines the limited circumstances in which a property appraiser may file an action contesting the decision of the value adjustment board relating to a tax assessment. Particularly, section 194.036(1)(a) states that "nothing herein shall authorize the property appraiser to institute any suit to challenge the validity of any portion of the constitution or of any duly enacted legislative act of this state." § 194.036(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added). Section 194.036(2) provides that a taxpayer could bring an action to contest a tax assessment pursuant to section 194.171 without placing conditions on this statutory right....
...allenging the constitutionality of a statute, the question at issue in Fuchs, it does not place any restrictions on a property appraiser's answer to a suit filed by a taxpayer or expressly sanction defenses previously prohibited by common law. Thus, section 194.036 was not cited to support the defensive posture exception discussed in Fuchs and does not resolve the question currently before the Court....
...Notably, the statute enabled taxpayers, not property appraisers, to seek arbitration of the board's decision. [6] While this process is referred to as an "appeal" of the board's decision, actions brought in the circuit court pursuant to section 194.032, now section 194.036, are original actions, not appeals. Williams v. Law, 368 So.2d 1285, 1286 (Fla. 1979). [7] The provisions governing appeals of the board's decisions were moved to their own statute, section 194.036, Florida Statutes, in 1983....
Copy

State, Dept. of Revenue v. Stafford, 646 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 685951

...ent found to be due by a final order of a value adjustment board where the taxpayer timely filed a petition with such value adjustment board and such value adjustment board finding is not subject to an assertion by the property appraiser pursuant to section 194.036....
Copy

Fuchs v. Robbins, 818 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2002 WL 500138

...In Turner v. Hillsborough County Aviation Authority, 739 So.2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), the Second District Court of Appeal determined that, in an action to contest an adverse decision of the Value Adjustment Board (VAB) filed by the tax appraiser pursuant to section 194.036(1)(a)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), [1] *462 the appraiser does not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of an applicable property valuation statute....
...erty which served as a sports facility with permanent seating. It challenged the tax appraiser's assessment before the VAB, which agreed with the taxpayer, finding that the exemption applied. The property appraiser then filed a complaint pursuant to section 194.036, Florida Statutes (1997), challenging the adverse decision of the VAB....
...In Fuchs, the property appraiser assessed the incomplete hotel at its fair market value. The taxpayer challenged the assessment before the VAB, which agreed with the taxpayer that a "zero" valuation applied, because the improvements were not "substantially complete." The property appraiser then filed a complaint pursuant to section 194.036, challenging the VAB's decision....
...PROPERTY APPRAISER'S STANDING The initial question presented is whether, in an action filed by a property appraiser seeking review of an adverse decision of the VAB which has overturned the appraiser's ad valorem tax assessment on a subject property, the appraiser may, within an appeal pursuant to section 194.036, Florida Statutes (1997), challenge the validity of a statute on the basis that such statute is contrary to limitations imposed by the United States Constitution or the Florida Constitution....
...However, as we recognized in Department of Education v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla.1982), "[s]tate officers and agencies must presume legislation affecting their duties to be valid, and do not have standing to initiate litigation for the purpose of determining otherwise." Section 194.036(1)(a) provides no exception to this rule....
...Watts, 70 So.2d 347, 351 (Fla. 1953)). Accordingly, we approve the decision in Turner, and reverse the decision in Fuchs. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] That statute provides: 194.036....
Copy

Vero Beach Shores, Inc. v. Nolte, 467 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 810

...In this case, appellee did not disentitle itself to the presumption of correctness; it did comply with the statute. The Board's valuation is not entitled to special weight, because the variance was large enough to allow appellee to bring suit under section 194.036(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1983)....
Copy

Turner v. Hillsborough Aviation Auth., 739 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 682598

...ssessment accordingly, and the tax rolls were recertified reflecting the adjusted assessment on March 11, 1998. Turner filed suit in circuit court against the Aviation Authority and Melvin B. Smith, the Hillsborough County Tax Collector, pursuant to section 194.036(1)(a), (b), Florida Statutes (1997), which sets forth the procedure to appeal a VAB decision....
...llars amounts to a loss of public funds. Without deciding whether this exception is broad enough to apply in the context of tax assessments, as explained more fully below, we conclude *178 that its application is precluded by the express language of section 194.036(1)(a)....
...We acknowledge that our conclusion on this issue appears to be in conflict with Fuchs v. Robbins, Nos. 98-275, 98-274, 738 So.2d 338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(en banc), appeal filed, No. 96,182 (Fla. Aug. 4, 1999), wherein the Third District characterized a property appraiser's complaint filed pursuant to section 194.036 as a defensive action....
...e VAB declared a violation of the constitution. Turner's challenge to the constitutionality of this tax exemption is not only prohibited by common law, it is also prohibited by the express language of the statute under which Turner's suit was filed. Section 194.036(1) provides that a property appraiser who disagrees with a decision of the VAB may appeal the decision upon establishing that the appropriate "criteria" have been met. The statutory criteria for bringing suit include the circumstance where a property appraiser determines and asserts in a legal proceeding a "specific constitutional violation" in the decision of the VAB. See § 194.036(1)(a), Fla....
...However, this subsection also provides that: "nothing herein shall authorize the property appraiser to institute any suit to challenge the validity ... of any duly enacted legislative act of this state." Id. Therefore, even if a property appraiser is convinced that an enactment is unconstitutional, we interpret section 194.036(1)(a) to prohibit that official from instituting legal proceedings to challenge its validity....
...And, as we stated earlier, this express prohibition leads us to conclude that the "public funds" exception does not apply to appeals of a VAB decision initiated by a property appraiser. Conclusion Turner's suit is a challenge to the constitutional validity of section 196.012(6), and therefore, is expressly prohibited by section 194.036(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1997)....
Copy

Garcia v. Andonie, 101 So. 3d 339 (Fla. 2012).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 613, 2012 WL 4666458, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1923

...anted the Taxpayers’ ad valorem tax exemption and, in so doing, overturned the Property Appraiser’s administrative denial of the exemption. The Property Appraiser then appealed the decision of the Value Adjustment Board to the circuit court. See § 194.036(1), Fla. Stat. (2006) (stating that appeals of the decisions of the Value Adjustment Board are made to the circuit court); see also § 194.036(3), Fla....
...Further, the circuit court proceeding that gave rise to this appeal was initiated by the Property Appraiser when it challenged a decision of the Value Adjustment Board that granted the constitutional tax exemption to the Taxpayers. Under the plain language of section 194.036(3), the Property Appraiser — not the Taxpayers — bore the burden of proof in the circuit court proceedings below. See § 194.036(3), Fla....
Copy

Mason v. Porsche Cars of North Am., 621 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5842, 1993 WL 177731

...g by the aggrieved party. Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, provides for administrative and judicial review of property tax assessments. The value adjustment board is authorized under the statute to conduct administrative hearings on assessment issues. Section 194.036(3), Florida Statutes (1991) states that an appeal from a value adjustment board decision shall be in the circuit court; the circuit court proceeding shall be de novo, and the burden of proof shall be upon the party initiating the action....
Copy

Zingale v. Crossings at Fleming Island Cmty. Dev. Dist., 960 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1319256

...The Florida Supreme Court stated: The initial question presented is whether, in an action filed by a property appraiser seeking review of an adverse decision of the VAB which has overturned the appraiser's ad valorem tax assessment on a subject property, the appraiser may, within an appeal pursuant to section 194.036, Florida Statutes (1997), challenge the validity of a statute on the basis that such statute is contrary to limitations imposed by the United States Constitution or the Florida Constitution....
Copy

In Re Polygraphex Sys., Inc., 275 B.R. 408 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 48 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 96, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 123, 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 241, 39 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 68

...f the locally elected officials from the county. Fla.Stat. § 194.015. If either the property appraiser or the taxpayer disagrees with the decision of the value adjustment board, he or she may then seek redress in the state circuit courts. Fla.Stat. § 194.036, 194.171. The next logical inquiry is the extent of state control over this value adjustment board. Section 194.036(c) of the Florida Statutes provides that the property appraiser may notify the DOR of a "consistent and continuous violation of the intent of the law or administrative rules by the value adjustment board in its decisions." The DOR may investigate and within a set statutory timeframe report its findings or recommendations to the property appraiser. Fla.Stat. § 194.036....
Copy

Fuchs v. Robbins, 738 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 821744

...92. Accordingly, we find that the Property Appraiser had standing to challenge the validity of section 192.042, Florida Statutes pursuant to Department of Educ. v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455 (Fla.1982). We further find that this holding is consistent with section 194.036, Florida Statutes....
...This litigation began when the taxpayer challenged the Appraiser's assessment at the Dade County Value Adjustment Board (VAB). There, the taxpayer argued that the property at issue was not "substantially complete" under the statute. The taxpayer prevailed. Pursuant to the provisions of sections 194.036 and 194.181(1)(b) and (2), Florida Statutes (1991), the Appraiser appealed by filing the Complaint at issue in the Circuit Court....
...Article VII, § 1(a), Florida Constitution. [24] With the obvious exception of the language establishing January 1 of each year as the taxing date. [25] Section 194.181 provides as follows: "(1) The plaintiff in any tax suit shall be: ... (b) The property appraiser pursuant to s. 194.036.(2) In any case brought by the taxpayer... the county property appraiser shall be party defendant. In any case brought by the property appraiser pursuant to s. 194.036(1)(a) or (b), the taxpayer shall be party defendant." [26] Referring to the above quoted language from Barr, the First District Court of Appeal said: "It might be said with some justification that the expression of our Supreme Court ......
Copy

Trinity Episcopal Sch. v. Robbins, 605 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7820, 1992 WL 167613

...[2] The appraiser denied the School's application. The Property Appraisal Adjustment Board [PAAB] reversed the appraiser's decision and granted the School an educational exemption. The Property Appraiser filed an action in the circuit court pursuant to section 194.036(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989)....
Copy

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Day, 742 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11868, 1999 WL 682609

...Upon such certification, the property appraiser shall recertify the tax rolls with all changes to the tax collector and shall provide public notice of the date and fact of recertification pursuant to subsection (2). (4) An appeal of a value adjustment board decision pursuant to § 194.036(1)(a) or (b) by the property appraiser shall be filed prior to extension of the tax roll under subsection (2) or, if the roll was extended pursuant to § 197.323, within 30 days of recertification under subsection (3). The roll may be certified by the property appraiser prior to an appeal being filed pursuant to § 194.036(1)(c), but such appeal shall be filed within 30 days after receipt of the decision of the department relative to further judicial proceedings....
Copy

Sowell v. State, 136 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7050, 2014 WL 1882209

...s. The property owners may file a petition with the county value adjustment board (“VAB”) to contest the assessed value. The VAB makes a determination of whether the assessment of the individual property exceeds just value. See § 194.301(2)(a). Section 194.036(l)(c) provides that a property appraiser may file with the Florida Department of Revenue (“DOR”) an “assertion” that the VAB has committed a “consistent and continuous” violation of the law in certain of its decisions. Section 194.036(l)(c) states that if DOR finds upon investigation that a consistent and continuous violation by the VAB has occurred, DOR “shall so inform the property appraiser, who may thereupon bring suit in circuit court against the value adjustment board ....” In accordance with section 194.036(l)(c), the Bay County Property Appraiser filed such an assertion with DOR challenging the Bay County VAB’s decisions involving 19 taxpayer petitions....
...DOR issued a probable cause review stating that there was no *1287 probable cause to find that a consistent and continuous violation by the Bay County VAB had occurred. DOR’s probable cause review concluded, “Accordingly, the Bay County Property Appraiser is not authorized to file suit” under section 194.036(l)(c)....
...seeks a writ of mandamus to require DOR to file the probable cause review with the agency clerk arguing that he is a “party who is adversely affected by final agency action” entitled to judicial review as allowed by section 120.68(1). We agree. Section 194.036(l)(c) provides, in pertinent part, that if a property appraiser disagrees with the decisions of the VAB, he or she may appeal the decision to the circuit court if: There is an assertion by the property appraiser to the Department of R...
...e value adjustment board for injunctive relief to prohibit continuation of the violation of the law or administrative rules and for a mandatory injunction to restore the tax roll to its just value in such amount as determined by judicial proceeding. Section 194.036(l)(c) allows a property appraiser, in the event of a probable cause finding by DOR, to file suit directly against the VAB for injunctive relief. See § 194.181(2) (providing that in any other case brought by a property appraiser pursuant to section 194.036(l)(a) or (b), the taxpayer is the party defendant). Section 194.036(l)(c) is silent as to what action a property appraiser may take against the VAB if DOR makes a finding of no probable cause. Unlike other statutes 1 governing the Department of Revenue and its supervisory authority over the actions of property appraisers which specifically state that Chapter 120 shall not apply, section 194.036(1) does not contain language which would exempt the probable cause determination of an assertion from Chapter 120....
Copy

Ridgewood Phosphate Corp. v. Perkins, 487 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 658

...g, distribution, and support and monitoring facilities. The Property Appraisal Adjustment Board affirmed the appraiser's decision. As a result, Ridgewood filed a complaint with the trial court. The court conducted a de novo proceeding as required by section 194.036(3), Florida Statutes (1983)....
Copy

McLendon v. Nikolits, 211 So. 3d 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 362555, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 765

...The VAB *94 appointed a special magistrate 1 and reversed the Property Appraiser’s 2013 tax year declassification of the McLendons’ av-iculture-related property. The Property Appraiser appealed the VAB’s decision to the circuit court by filing a Complaint to Reinstate Property Assessment, pursuant to section 194.036(1), Florida Statutes (2014)....
...testimony and making recommendations to the board, which recommendations the board may act upon without further hearing.” . “The circuit court proceeding shall be de novo, and the burden of proof shall be upon the party initiating the action.” § 194.036(3), Fla....
Copy

Primeco Pers. Commc'ns, L.P. v. Mastroianni, 837 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2003 WL 367068

...prior to extension of the roll under s. 197.323. The circuit court, however, accepted Mastroianni’s argument that the time for filing was controlled by section 193.122(4), which provides: An appeal of a value adjustment board decision pursuant to s. 194.036(l)(a) or (b) by the property appraiser shall be filed prior to extension of the tax roll under subsection (2) or, if the roll was extended pursuant to s. 197.323, within 30 days of recertification under subsection (3). The roll may be certified by the property appraiser prior to an appeal being filed pursuant to s. 194.036(l)(c), but such appeal shall be *1159 filed within 20 days after receipt of the decision of the department relative to further judicial proceedings....
...expression of the Florida Legislature, having been last substantively amended in 1983. We find these arguments unpersuasive. Section 193.122(4) sets out the time limits within which the property appraiser may appeal a decision of the VAB pursuant to 194.036(1). By contrast, section 194.036(2) states that “[a]ny taxpayer may bring an action to contest a tax assessment pursuant to s....
Copy

Crane Rental of Orlando v. Hausman, 518 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 125, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816, 1987 WL 29156

...The Board ruled that the carriers upon which the cranes were affixed are motor vehicles and, as such, were not subject to ad valorem taxes. However, the cranes were found to be subject to ad valorem taxes because they were equipment "not part of the motor vehicle." The Appraiser then brought an action in circuit court under section 194.036, Florida Statutes....
Copy

In Re Psychiatric Hospitals of Florida Inc., 217 B.R. 645 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 195, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2171, 1997 WL 828292

...ayer. Fla. Stat. § 194.011(2). In the event the taxpayer is dissatisfied with the determination, the taxpayer is authorized to file a petition with the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board established by Florida Statutes § 194.015. Florida Statutes § 194.036 provides for a procedure to appeal the determination by the Board....
Copy

Wayne C. Johansson v. Miami-dade Cnty. Value Adjustment Bd. (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...prejudice asserting the VAB is a quasi-judicial entity immune from suit. 1 Value adjustment boards are quasi-judicial state entities created by Florida statute to allow taxpayers to administratively challenge their tax assessments. §§194.011 through 194.036, Fla....
...assessment, or procedural or constitutional violations by the VAB. The record shows that the Appellant originally challenged certain property appraisals or assessments before the VAB. The VAB rendered a quasi- judicial ruling pursuant to sections 194.036(2) and 194.171, Florida Statutes....
...review proceeding. Crapo v. Acad. for Five Element Acupuncture, Inc., 278 So. 3d 113, 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). “While this process is referred to as an ‘appeal’ of the board's decision, actions brought in the circuit court pursuant to section 194.032, now section 194.036, are original actions, not appeals.” Id....
...(2022) (“In any case brought by a taxpayer or a condominium or cooperative association, as defined in ss. 718.103 and 719.103, respectively, on behalf of some or all unit or parcel owners, contesting the assessment of any property, the county property appraiser is a party defendant.”). At that point, pursuant to section 194.036, it is the county property appraiser who will evaluate allegations of procedural and constitutional violations by the VAB. 3 3 Section 194.036....
Copy

Edward A. Crapo, as Alachua Cnty. etc. & John Power, as Alachua Cnty. Tax Collector v. Gainesville Area Chamber of Com., Inc. etc., 274 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...ose. The Chamber presented extensive record evidence of its functions, option to contest an assessment before the VAB or directly in circuit court. § 194.171, Fla. Stat. A party that is unsuccessful before the VAB may file suit in circuit court. §§ 194.036(2), 194.171, Fla. Stat. Proceedings in circuit court are de novo, not appeals or reviews of VAB decisions. § 194.036(3), Fla....
Copy

Cent. Carillon Beach Condo. Assoc., Inc. v. Garcia, 245 So. 3d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...specific rights of collective representation given to them in the condominium law, section 718.111(3), and in Rule 1.221, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We disagree. 5 It is undisputed that the Appraiser had a right to appeal the VAB decision pursuant to section 194.036(1), Florida Statutes (2016). 5 Section 718.111(3) provides, in pertinent part: The association may contract, sue, or be sued with respect to the exercise or nonexercise of its powers....
Copy

Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. v. Turner, 753 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2912, 2000 WL 283100

...Lake Port Properties, Inc., 729 So.2d 467 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). See also Bystrom, 416 So.2d at 1141 (holding that the failure to consider the necessary factors renders the valuation invalid). The Property Appraiser, as plaintiff below, had the burden of proof. See § 194.036(3)....
Copy

Edward A. Crapo, in his capacity as Alachua Cnty. Prop. Appraiser v. Academy for Five Element Acupuncture, Inc., a Florida Non-Profit Corp. (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...educational institution under section 196.012(5), and recommended that the VAB grant the exemption. The VAB did so, summarily granting the Academy’s property tax exemption. Property Appraiser Crapo did not seek the de-novo hearing in circuit court authorized under section 194.036(3), Florida Statutes. The Academy received the educational exemption on its Alachua County property from 2008 through 2013....
...ional institution. The Academy responded by again petitioning the VAB. The VAB upheld the tax exemption, the same result as in 2008. This time, however, Property Appraiser Crapo filed suit in circuit court for de-novo determination of the issue. See § 194.036(3), Fla. 1 The “tipsy coachman” doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that “reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons” so long as “there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record.” Dade Cty....
...It is not necessary to confer informally before seeking a VAB hearing or filing suit, and it is not necessary to go to a VAB hearing before filing suit. Property appraisers also have the statutory right to file suit in circuit court after a VAB rules against them. § 194.036(1), Fla. Stat....
...Const. 8 consistently and continuously violating the law or rules, thus triggering review by the Department of Revenue and potential action against the VAB). 5 Property Appraiser Crapo sued in circuit court under section 194.036(1)(a), asserting an erroneous construction and application of the educational tax exemption statute. (2) VABs Each Florida county has its own VAB, the members of which are two members of the county’s governing body, one m...
...oes not have to be a lawyer, except in cases involving exemptions, in which 5 The Tax Section’s amicus brief, filed February 2, 2019, sets forth a useful history of the development of what are now called VABs, and provides context for why section 194.036(1)(c) allows property appraisers to reject VAB decisions through de novo lawsuits in circuit court....
...(“Chapter 120 does not apply to hearings of the value adjustment board.”). Whereas appellate courts have jurisdiction to review the merits of orders entered in chapter-120 proceedings, circuit courts review de novo the issues presented to VABs, giving no precedential effect to VAB decisions. § 194.036(3), Fla....
...A VAB merely serves to informally resolve tax disputes or attempt to do so, and because of the de novo standard that applies in circuit court and the circuit court’s original, exclusive jurisdiction, VAB decisions have no weight whatsoever in circuit court litigation. See § 194.036(3), Fla....
...AB altogether. § 194.171, Fla. Stat. Regardless of the prior history of a dispute, review in circuit court is de novo: “The circuit court proceeding shall be de novo, and the burden of proof shall be upon the party initiating the action.” § 194.036(3), Fla....
...le” in the formal sense of an appeal as a review proceeding. Crossings, 991 So. 2d at 801 n.6 (“While this process is referred to as an ‘appeal’ of the board’s decision, actions brought in the circuit court pursuant to section 194.032, now section 194.036, are original actions, not appeals.” (quoting Williams v....
...VABs, but to no practical avail, as the law enables us to resolve the issue before us without such an academic exercise. 12 value and is owed no deference; the property appraiser’s decision is reviewed de novo. § 194.036(3), Fla....
...are the status of Florida’s property appraisers as elected, independent constitutional officers; the exclusive original jurisdiction of circuit court in tax assessment matters under the constitution and sections 26.012(2)(e) and 194.171(1); the de-novo standard of review required by section 194.036(3); and the one- year-at-a-time concept embedded in rules, regulations, and longstanding tax law practice and procedure....
...who consults with the board’s legal counsel and who must reflect her ruling in the record. 22 Appeals. By statute, the property appraiser may appeal under specified circumstances such as a legal error by the board or a specific violation of an administrative rule. § 194.036(1)(a), Fla. Stat....
...194.171, Florida Statutes, which provides for circuit courts to have original jurisdiction in tax cases. In either case, the “circuit court proceeding shall be de novo, and the burden of proof shall be upon the party initiating the action.” Id. § 194.036(3)....
...board decisions, but they are either not well taken or based on policy rather than legal grounds. 1. Crapo and amici urge that because de novo review of value adjustment board decisions is available on appeal in circuit courts, section 194.036(1)(a), Florida Statutes, final judgments of value adjustment boards are entitled to no preclusive effect....
...at 1305. (emphasis added) (citing Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28, Comment a and Illustration 1). The highlighted language makes clear that preclusion principles are not affected by the availability of a de novo appeal such as that provided in section 194.036(1)(a), Florida Statutes....
Copy

RH Resorts, Ltd. v. Donegan, 881 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10985, 2004 WL 1636931

...5th DCA 1998), app'd, Schultz v. Love PGI Partners, LP, 731 So.2d 1270 (Fla.1999). See also Greenwood v. Oates, 251 So.2d 665 (Fla.1971). As the party challenging the decision of the Value Adjustment Board, the Appraiser had the burden of proof in the trial court. See § 194.036(3), Fla....
...rposes. [2] Having concluded that there was substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's finding that the property was not being used for bona fide agricultural purposes, we affirm. AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 194.036(3) of the Florida Statutes provides, in relevant part: 194.036. Appeals Appeals of the decisions of the board shall be as follows: * * * (3) The circuit court proceeding shall be de novo, and the burden of proof shall be upon the party initiating the action. § 194.036(3), Fla....
Copy

Sowell v. State Dep't of Revenue, 168 So. 3d 355 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10954, 2015 WL 4464693

...Appellant, Dan Sowell, the Bay County Property Appraiser, appeals the “Probable Cause Review by the Department of Revenue” and argues that Appellee, the Department of Revenue (“Department”), erroneously concluded that Appellant’s “Assertion” filed pursuant to section 194.036(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2012), did not establish probable cause that the Bay County Value Adjustment Board (“Board”) committed a consistent and continuous violation of the intent of the law or administrative rules in adopting as...
...oceed to circuit court if he so chooses. 2 REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions. ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur. . Section 193.011, Florida Statutes (2012), lists the eight factors “to consider in deriving just valuation.” . See § 194.036(l)(c), Fla....
Copy

Suber v. Kelley, 592 So. 2d 805 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 895, 1992 WL 18553

...ived from any common law source. Section 193.122(4), Florida Statutes (1989) discusses appeals of value adjustment board decisions and states in part: ... The roll may be certified by the property appraiser prior to an appeal being filed pursuant to s. 194.036(l)(c), but such appeal shall be filed within 20 days after receipt of the decision of the department relative to further judicial proceedings. Section 194.036, Florida Statutes (1989) further provides in pertinent part: Appeals of the decisions of the board shall be as follows: (1) If the property appraiser disagrees with the decision of the board, he may appeal the decision to the circuit...
Copy

TEDC/Shell City, Inc. v. Robbins, 690 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1574, 1997 WL 78340

...The VAB referred the matter to a special master who recommended that a total charitable exemption be granted. The VAB granted the exemption, adopting the master’s recommendation. The Property Appraiser filed an action in Dade County Circuit Court challenging the VAB’s decision. § 194.036, Fla....
Copy

Value Adjustment Bd. of Bay Cnty. v. Spitzer, 27 So. 3d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20522

...estify and present evidence. The VAB subsequently granted many of the petitioners’ requests. The property appraiser then filed an assertion with the Department of Revenue (Department) of a consistent and continuous violation of law by the VAB. See § 194.036(l)(c) (providing that the property appraiser may appeal the decision of the VAB if the property appraiser asserts to the Department of Revenue that there exists a consistent and continuous violation of the intent of the law or administrative rule by the VAB and the Department agrees)....
Copy

Value Adjustment Bd. of Bay Cty. v. Spitzer, 27 So. 3d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...At the hearings held on April 24, 2008, the VAB permitted the petitioners to testify and present evidence. The VAB subsequently granted many of the petitioners' requests. The property appraiser then filed an assertion with the Department of Revenue (Department) of a consistent and continuous violation of law by the VAB. See § 194.036(1)(c) (providing that the property appraiser may appeal the decision of the VAB if the property appraiser asserts to the Department of Revenue that there exists a consistent and continuous violation of the intent of the law or administrative rule by the VAB and the Department agrees)....
Copy

Tampa Port Auth. v. Bob Henriquez, as Prop. Appraiser (Fla. 2d DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...In March 2015, the magistrate recommended denying Gulf Marine's petition. The following month, however, the VAB disagreed with the recommendation and granted the petition. The property appraiser then challenged the VAB decision by filing a de novo circuit court action under section 194.036, naming Gulf Marine as a defendant but not the Port Authority.5 The circuit court later permitted the property appraiser to amend his complaint to add the Port Authority as a defendant....
...er of the property described in the petition or the authorized agent of the owner for purposes of filing this petition." 5 The statute characterizes the process of challenging a value adjustment board decision in circuit court as an "appeal." § 194.036(1). But the Florida Supreme Court has clarified that it is an original action, not an appeal....
...We reject both arguments. II. The Property Appraiser's Standing The Port Authority's standing argument rests on a provision in the VAB appeal statute that permits the property appraiser to challenge a VAB decision in court if one or more of three conditions are met. See § 194.036(1)(a)–(c)....
...back to the timely original complaint. This argument implicates four different statutes in Florida's sinuous property taxation scheme. First, as mentioned, the property appraiser challenged the VAB's decision by filing suit in circuit court pursuant to section 194.036(1)(a)....
... appraiser's initial complaint. However, that complaint named Gulf Marine, but not the Port Authority, as a defendant, whereas a third statute involved here, section 194.181(2), requires that "[i]n any case brought by the property appraiser pursuant to s. 194.036(1)(a) or (b), the taxpayer shall be party defendant [sic]."6 A fourth statute, section 192.001(13), Florida Statutes (2014), applicable "in the imposition of ad valorem taxes," defines "taxpayer" as "the person or other legal entity in who...
...2d 60, 67 6 When the suit was filed, the full text of section 194.181(2), read: In any case brought by the taxpayer or association contesting the assessment of any property, the county property appraiser shall be party defendant. In any case brought by the property appraiser pursuant to s. 194.036(1)(a) or (b), the taxpayer shall be party defendant. In any case brought by the property appraiser pursuant to s. 194.036(1)(c), the value adjustment board shall be party defendant. (Emphasis added.) In 2021, the legislature rearranged and amended section 194.181. Subparagraph (2)(b) now provides that, other than in certain cases involving condominiums, "in any case brought by the property appraiser under s. 194.036(1)(a) or (b), the taxpayer is a party defendant." Ch....
...3d 1096. But Wilkinson and Merrick Park concerned a different statute altogether, section 194.171(2), which imposes a sixty-day deadline for suing to contest a tax assessment. Wilkinson, 540 So. 2d at 142–43; Merrick Park, 299 So. 3d at 1103. Notably, that statute is referred to in a different provision of section 194.036(2) that applies when a "taxpayer . . . bring[s] an action to contest a tax assessment pursuant to s. 194.171." § 194.036(2) (emphasis added)....
Copy

De La Mora v. Andonie, 51 So. 3d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19096, 2010 WL 5093142

...NOTES [1] This type of homestead is sometimes called "common homestead" to distinguish it from the less well-known, but important benefits found in article X, section 4 of the Florida Constitution. [2] This proceeding was a de novo proceeding. See § 194.036(3), Fla....
Copy

Wayne Johansson v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Value Adjustment Bd. (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...5 role in adjudicating taxpayer disputes. Indeed, the exclusive venue for legal adjudication of taxpayer challenges to tax assessments is an original, de novo proceeding in circuit court. § 194.171(1), Fla. Stat. (2023); § 194.036(3), Fla....
...“review” or “supervise” VAB proceedings, neither the VAB nor its Special Magistrate constitutes a “lower tribunal” of the appellate division. Thus, rule 9.030(c)(2) does not provide a basis for the appellate division to exercise 4 We are aware that the heading of section 194.036 (which reads, “Appeals”) and the section’s prefatory language (“Appeals of the decisions of the board shall be as follows:”) are misleading in this regard. But section 194.036(3) plainly states that the circuit court proceeding in which the taxpayer contests a tax assessment is “de novo.” And, as we noted in Johansson-I, “[a] VAB decision is not ‘appealable’ in the formal sense of an appeal as a review proceeding. . . . ‘While this process is referred to as an ‘appeal’ of the board’s decision, actions brought in the circuit court pursuant to section 194.032, now section 194.036, are original actions, not appeals.’ Crapo, 278 So....
Copy

Islamorada, Vill. of Islands v. Higgs, 882 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22715633

...After an evidentiary hearing before a special master, the special master determined that the Marina represented a proper public function, and was not a proprietary venture. The VAB adopted these findings. The Property Appraiser then appealed the VAB's determination by filing suit in the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 194.036, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Schultz v. Rainey, 467 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1067, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13679

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge. This appeal concerns an action commenced under the authority of section 194.-036(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1983): 194.036 Appeals....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.