The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . court ruled that Defendant was incompetent to proceed due to her mental illness as defined in section 916.106 . . .
. . . He also contends that, contrary to section 916.107(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), and section 916.106 . . .
. . . illness, the court found Petitioner incompetent to proceed due to mental illness as defined in section 916.106 . . . illness, and its legal ruling that Petitioner suffered from some unspecified mental illness under section 916.106 . . . (14), rather than an intellectual disability under section 916.106(13). . . . Notably, subsection (13) of section 916.106 defines "intellectual disability”; subsection (14) defines . . .
. . . Carmona incompetent to proceed to trial due to a mental illness as defined in section 916.106(11), Florida . . . Section 916.106(11) clearly defines when a person is incompetent to proceed in a criminal proceeding. . . . mental competence of the defendant is necessary for a just resolution of the issues being considered.” § 916.106 . . .
. . . Section 916.106(7), Florida Statutes (2013), provides that DCF “is responsible for the treatment of forensic . . . A “forensic client” includes one who has been committed to DCF custody under section 916.13(1). § 916.106 . . .
. . . Section 916.106(13) defines “intellectual disability” as having “the same meaning as in s. 393.063.” . . . definition of “mental illness” “does not apply to defendants who have only an intellectual disability.” § 916.106 . . .
. . . .” § 916.106(15), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . Section 916.106(13), Florida Statutes (2011), provides: "Mental illness” means an impairment of the emotional . . .
. . . See § 916.106(13), Fla. . . .
. . . Section 916.106(13) defines “mental illness” as an impairment of the emotional processes that exercise . . .
. . . Section 916.106 provides further that “[t]he [Agency] is responsible for training forensic clients who . . . developmentally disabled due to mental retardation or autism and have been determined incompetent to proceed.” § 916.106 . . . See § 916.106(15), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 916.106(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . Section 916.106(11), Florida Statutes (2008), determines competency for the purpose of trial and provides . . . The state argues that the procedures for determining incompetency under sections 744.331 and 916.106 . . .
. . . Section 916.106(9) defines a “forensic client” as one who has been “committed” to the Department pursuant . . .
. . . . § 916.106(6) Fla. Stat. (2007); cf. Dep’t of Children & Family Services v. . . .
. . . secure facility was pursuant to chapter 916, and, therefore, he was a forensic client under section 916.106 . . . Stat. (2004) (defining “residential facility”); 916.106(8), Fla. . . .
. . . Respondent was found incompetent to proceed, as defined in section 916.106(1) or (12), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Respondent was found competent to proceed, as defined in section 916.106(1) or (12), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . In 2006, the legislature amended section 916.106(7) of the Florida Statutes. . . . incompetent to proceed due to mental illness or who have been acquitted of a felony by reason of insanity. § 916.106 . . . See § 916.106(7), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . DCF next suggests that section 916.107(l)(a) should supercede the responsibility imposed by section 916.106 . . . Fa-cyson suggested the very relief that the legislature has now authorized by its amendment of section 916.106 . . .
. . . See § 916.106(9), Fla. . . . The order of incompetency found that he meets the definition of "retardation” in section 916.106(12). . . .
. . . results and “refuse[d] to consider” Arbelaez’s ability to adapt to his surroundings, even though section 916.106 . . .
. . . Everette is clearly a “forensic client,” within the meaning of section 916.106(7), Florida Statutes ( . . . Be dangerous to himself or herself or others; .... ” § 916.106(7), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). . . . "Forensic client” is defined under section 916.106(7), Florida Statutes, as "any defendant. ...” . . .
. . . determined to be incompetent to proceed, either because of mental retardation, pursuant to sections 916.106 . . . (12) and 916.302, Florida Statutes (2001), or mental illness pursuant to sections 916.106(11) and 916.12 . . .
. . . to trial due to a mental illness and was unlikely to be restored to competency as defined in section 916.106 . . .
. . . The court also determined that Graham met the statutory definition of “retardation” under section 916.106 . . . See § 916.106(9), (11)-(12), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . There is no doubt that Graham is “incompetent to proceed” as that term is defined in section 916.106( . . . analogized prelinguistic deafness and low intelligence with mental retardation, as defined in section 916.106 . . . Section 916.106(12), Florida Statutes (2002), provides: ''Retardation” means significantly subaver-age . . .
. . . to inmates within the DOC and CMHI is specifically recognized as a forensic facility under section 916.106 . . .
. . . Section 916.106(5), Florida Statutes (1997) provides that a forensic facility, such as SFETC, is a “separate . . . Section 916.106(4), Florida Statutes (1997) defines a forensic client as a “mentally ill person ... . . .
. . . committed Myers to HRS custody as a “forensic client” or mentally ill detainee as defined by section 916.106 . . . Myers was never committed to a “forensic facility” as defined by section 916.106(5), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Section 916.106, Florida Statutes (1995), contains the following pertinent definitions: (2) “Court” means . . . Because the word “court” is defined to mean “circuit court” in section 916.106(2), it necessarily follows . . .
. . . hospital under the supervision of HRS pursuant to chapter 394, Florida Statutes (1991) and to section 916.106 . . . Section 916.106(4), which defines a forensic client, provides in subsection (c) that HRS determines whether . . .
. . . inconsistency between the provisions governing commitment under current chapter 916, Florida Statutes, section 916.106 . . .