Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 916.302 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 916.302 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 916.302 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 916.302

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 916
MENTALLY ILL AND INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED DEFENDANTS
View Entire Chapter
916.302 Involuntary commitment of defendant determined to be incompetent to proceed.
(1) CRITERIA.Every defendant who is charged with a felony and who is adjudicated incompetent to proceed due to intellectual disability or autism may be involuntarily committed for training upon a finding by the court of clear and convincing evidence that:
(a) The defendant has an intellectual disability or autism;
(b) There is a substantial likelihood that in the near future the defendant will inflict serious bodily harm on himself or herself or another person, as evidenced by recent behavior causing, attempting, or threatening such harm;
(c) All available, less restrictive alternatives, including services provided in community residential facilities or other community settings, which would offer an opportunity for improvement of the condition have been judged to be inappropriate; and
(d) There is a substantial probability that the intellectual disability or autism causing the defendant’s incompetence will respond to training and the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future.
(2) ADMISSION TO A FACILITY.
(a) A defendant who has been charged with a felony and who is found to be incompetent to proceed due to intellectual disability or autism, and who meets the criteria for involuntary commitment to the agency under this chapter, shall be committed to the agency, and the agency shall retain and provide appropriate training for the defendant. Within 6 months after the date of admission or at the end of any period of extended commitment or at any time the administrator or designee determines that the defendant has regained competency to proceed or no longer meets the criteria for continued commitment, the administrator or designee shall file a report with the court pursuant to this chapter and the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(b) A defendant determined to be incompetent to proceed due to intellectual disability or autism may be ordered by a circuit court into a forensic facility designated by the agency for defendants who have an intellectual disability or autism.
(c) The agency may transfer a defendant from a designated forensic facility to another designated forensic facility and must notify the court of the transfer within 30 days after the transfer is completed.
(d) The agency may not transfer a defendant from a designated forensic facility to a civil facility without first notifying the court, and all parties, 30 days before the proposed transfer. If the court objects to the proposed transfer, it must send its written objection to the agency. The agency may transfer the defendant unless it receives the written objection from the court within 30 days after the court’s receipt of the notice of the proposed transfer.
(3) PLACEMENT OF DUALLY DIAGNOSED DEFENDANTS.
(a) If a defendant has both an intellectual disability or autism and a mental illness, evaluations must address which condition is primarily affecting the defendant’s competency to proceed. Referral of the defendant should be made to a civil or forensic facility most appropriate to address the symptoms that are the cause of the defendant’s incompetence.
(b) Transfer from one civil or forensic facility to another civil or forensic facility may occur when, in the department’s and agency’s judgment, it is in the defendant’s best treatment or training interests. The department and agency shall submit an evaluation and justification for the transfer to the court. The court may consult with an outside expert if necessary. Transfer will require an amended order from the committing court.
History.s. 25, ch. 98-92; s. 19, ch. 2006-195; s. 33, ch. 2013-162.

F.S. 916.302 on Google Scholar

F.S. 916.302 on CourtListener

Amendments to 916.302


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 916.302

Total Results: 11  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Gonzalez v. State, 15 So. 3d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5513, 2009 WL 1393071

...We grant Gonzalez's petition for a writ of certiorari and quash the order. In fall 2006, Gonzalez was arrested and charged with the felony offense of lewd molestation. On June 19, 2007, Gonzalez was adjudicated incompetent to stand trial due to his mental retardation, and he was involuntarily committed pursuant to section 916.302, Florida Statutes (2007)....
..."It is a defendant's `restorability' that allows commitment for competency training. The inability to restore the defendant requires dismissal of the charges against him or civil commitment." Roddenberry v. State, 898 So.2d 1070, 1073 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (reversing mentally retarded defendant's pretrial commitment under § 916.302(1) when court failed to make critical finding that competency could be restored); Mosher, 876 So.2d 1230 (requiring State to institute civil commitment proceedings or release mentally ill defendant when evidence showed no substantial probability that mentally ill defendant will regain competency)....
...*41 In this context, we see no appreciable distinction between commitment and conditional release, because the underlying purpose is the same. The statute governing dismissal of criminal charges is not limited to defendants who are committed under section 916.302, and it does not exclude defendants who are "only" on conditional release under section 916.304....
Copy

Graham v. Jenne, 837 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 289263

...In Part II, section 916.13 authorizes a court to involuntarily commit an accused who is adjudicated mentally ill and incompetent to proceed. In Part III, the court's authority to order the involuntary commitment of someone who is retarded and adjudicated incompetent to proceed is governed by section 916.302....
...nition of "retardation" found in section 916.106(12). Even if Graham met the definition of "retarded," the trial court would not have been able to commit him because his previous non-violent burglaries did not rise to the level of danger required by section 916.302(1)(b). Before a retarded, incompetent defendant can be involuntarily committed, section 916.302(1)(b) requires clear and convincing evidence that "[t]here is a substantial likelihood that in the near future the defendant will inflict serious bodily harm on himself or herself or another person, as evidenced by recent behavior causing, attempting or threatening such harm." § 916.302(1)(b), Fla....
Copy

Roddenberry v. State, 898 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 623340

...idential facilities or other community settings, which might offer an opportunity for improvement of the defendant's condition are judged to be inappropriate. *1073 This order is deficient because it contains no finding pursuant to subsection (d) of section 916.302(1)that: There is a substantial probability that the retardation or autism causing the defendant's incompetence will respond to training and the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future....
Copy

Agency for Persons With Disabilities v. Dallas, 38 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 2010 WL 2472272

...light of the intelligence testing he and Dr. Abeles had performed. Based on the experts' evaluation reports and oral testimony, the court adjudicated Mr. Dallas incompetent to proceed due to mental retardation and found that he meets the criteria in section 916.302(1) for involuntary commitment. Accordingly, the court committed Mr. Dallas to the Agency and ordered that "the Agency shall retain and serve the defendant pursuant to FLA. STAT. § 916.302(2)." III....
...ed to be inappropriate; and (d) There is a substantial probability that the retardation or autism causing the defendant's incompetence will respond to training and the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future. § 916.302(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). If these criteria are met, the defendant " shall be committed to the [Agency], and the [Agency] shall retain and provide appropriate training for the defendant." § 916.302(2)(a), Fla....
...(2009) (emphasis added). Moreover, "[a] defendant determined to be incompetent to proceed due to retardation or autism may be ordered by a circuit court into a forensic facility designated by the [Agency] for defendants who have mental retardation or autism." [6] § 916.302(2)(b), Fla....
Copy

State v. Miranda, 137 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1304724, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823

...endant must suffer from a mental illness, retardation (now referred to as intellectual disability), or autism. See § 916.13(l)(a) (providing for involuntary commitment based on clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has a mental illness); § 916.302(l)(a) (providing for involuntary commitment based on clear and convincing evidence that the defendant suffers from retardation (an in *1138 tellectual disability), or autism)....
...d the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future. § 916.13(1)(a)(2), (b)-(c) (setting forth the criteria for involuntary commitment of a defendant determined to be incompetent to proceed due to mental illness); § 916.302(l)(b)-(d) (setting forth the criteria for involuntary commitment of a defendant determined to be incompetent to proceed due to retardation (an intellectual disability) or autism)....
...living. For the purposes of this chapter, the term does not apply to defendants with only mental retardation or autism and does not include intoxication or conditions manifested only by antisocial behavior or substance abuse impairment. . comes from section 916.302 and shows the only differences between the relevant portions of sections 916.13 and 916.302. Section 916.13 discusses "mental illness” and "treatment,” while section 916.302 utilizes the terms "retardation or autism” and "training.” Section 916.13 also allows the trial court to commit a mentally ill defendant, even if he is not an immediate danger to himself or others, if: The defendant is manifestly...
Copy

Dep't of Child. & Families v. Henry C. Tanner & State, 257 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

he may still qualify for commitment under section 916.302, Florida Statutes (2018), which authorizes
Copy

Columbus Williams v. State of Florida, 256 So. 3d 954 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...competency training if, inter alia, there exists “a substantial probability that the intellectual disability or autism causing the defendant’s incompetence will respond to training and the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future.” § 916.302(1)(d), Fla....
...competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding of a substantial probability that Williams’ intellectual disability would soon improve and enable him to attain competency. * Because Williams does not meet the criteria to be involuntarily committed pursuant to section 916.302, “the State must either institute civil commitment proceedings or release” him....
Copy

Dep't of Child. & Families v. Davis, 114 So. 3d 983 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 1886007, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8429

...Bernstein did not conclude that Davis was incompetent due to mental illness. See § 916.106(13), Fla. Stat. (2011) (defining “mental illness” and specifically excluding defendants with only mental retardation and conditions manifested only by antisocial behavior); see also § 916.302, Fla....
Copy

D.S. v. State, 164 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8570, 2015 WL 3510309

...al illness, and its legal ruling that Petitioner suffered from some unspecified mental illness under section 916.106(14), rather than an intellectual disability under section 916.106(13). 4 Additionally, had the parties and the court proceeded under section 916.302 instead of section 916.13, the course of this case might have been dramatically different....
Copy

Agency for Persons with Disabilities v. Forestal, 115 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9804, 2013 WL 3099769

...November 27, 2012. 1 We accordingly vacate the order and remand for correction and further findings. Order VACATED and REMANDED. SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur. . The Agency also contends that Forestal cannot meet the criteria for commitment under section 916.302, but it is premature to reach that conclusion until the trial court has completed its work.
Copy

Dep't of Child. & Families v. Harrison, 848 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9979, 2003 WL 21507090

...t, was mentally retarded or autistic and, if so, whether he was competent to proceed to trial. Although the court found the respondent incompetent to stand trial, it found he did not meet the statutory criteria for involuntary commitment pursuant to section 916.302(1)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.