Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 671.201 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 671.201 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 671.201 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 671.201

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 671
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
671.201 General definitions.Unless the context otherwise requires, words or phrases defined in this section, or in the additional definitions contained in other chapters of this code which apply to particular chapters or parts thereof, have the meanings stated. Subject to definitions contained in other chapters of this code which apply to particular chapters or parts thereof, the term:
(1) “Action,” in the sense of a judicial proceeding, includes recoupment, counterclaim, setoff, suit in equity, and any other proceedings in which rights are determined.
(2) “Aggrieved party” means a party entitled to pursue a remedy.
(3) “Agreement,” as distinguished from “contract,” means the bargain of the parties in fact, as found in their language or inferred from other circumstances, including course of dealing, usage of trade, or course of performance as provided in ss. 671.205 and 672.208.
(4) “Bank” means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, a savings and loan association, a credit union, and a trust company.
(5) “Bearer” means a person in control of a negotiable electronic document of title or a person in possession of a negotiable instrument, a negotiable tangible document of title, or a certificated security that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.
(6) “Bill of lading” means a document of title evidencing the receipt of goods for shipment issued by a person engaged in the business of directly or indirectly transporting or forwarding goods. The term does not include a warehouse receipt.
(7) “Branch” includes a separately incorporated foreign branch of a bank.
(8) “Burden of establishing” a fact means the burden of persuading the triers of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its nonexistence.
(9) “Buyer in ordinary course of business” means a person who, in ordinary course, buys goods in good faith, without knowledge that the sale violates the rights of another person in the goods, from a person, other than a pawnbroker, in the business of selling goods of that kind. A person buys goods in ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the seller’s own usual or customary practices. A person who sells oil, gas, or other minerals at the wellhead or minehead is a person in the business of selling goods of that kind. A buyer in ordinary course of business may buy for cash, by exchange of other property, or on secured or unsecured credit and may acquire goods or documents of title under a preexisting contract for sale. Only a buyer who takes possession of the goods or has a right to recover the goods from the seller under chapter 672 may be a buyer in ordinary course of business. “Buyer in ordinary course of business” does not include a person who acquires goods in a transfer in bulk or as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt.
(10) “Central bank digital currency” means a digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve System, a federal agency, a foreign government, a foreign central bank, or a foreign reserve system, that is made directly available to a consumer by such entities. The term includes a digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve System, a federal agency, a foreign government, a foreign central bank, or a foreign reserve system, that is processed or validated directly by such entities.
(11) “Conspicuous,” with reference to a term, means so written, displayed, or presented that, based on the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it. Whether a term is “conspicuous” is a decision for the court.
(12) “Consumer” means an individual who enters into a transaction primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(13) “Contract,” as distinguished from “agreement,” means the total legal obligation that results from the parties’ agreement as determined by this code and as supplemented by any other applicable laws.
(14) “Creditor” includes a general creditor, a secured creditor, a lien creditor, and any representative of creditors, including an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver in equity, and an executor or administrator of an insolvent debtor’s or assignor’s estate.
(15) “Defendant” includes a person in the position of defendant in a counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim.
(16) “Delivery,” with respect to an electronic document of title, means voluntary transfer of control and, with respect to instruments, tangible document of title, or an authoritative tangible copy of a record evidencing chattel paper, means voluntary transfer of possession.
(17) “Document of title” means a record:
(a) That in the regular course of business or financing is treated as adequately evidencing that the person in possession or control of the record is entitled to receive, control, hold, and dispose of the record and the goods the record covers; and
(b) That purports to be issued by or addressed to a bailee and to cover goods in the bailee’s possession which are either identified or are fungible portions of an identified mass. The term includes a bill of lading, transport document, dock warrant, dock receipt, warehouse receipt, and order for delivery of goods. An electronic document of title means a document of title evidenced by a record consisting of information stored in an electronic medium. A tangible document of title means a document of title evidenced by a record consisting of information that is inscribed on a tangible medium.
(18) “Electronic” means relating to technology having electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic, or similar capabilities.
(19) “Fault” means a default, breach, or wrongful act or omission.
(20) “Fungible goods” means:
(a) Goods of which any unit, by nature or usage of trade, is the equivalent of any other like unit; or
(b) Goods that, by agreement, are treated as equivalents.
(21) “Genuine” means free of forgery or counterfeiting.
(22) “Good faith,” except as otherwise provided in this code, means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.
(23) “Holder” means:
(a) The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession;
(b) The person in possession of a negotiable tangible document of title if the goods are deliverable either to bearer or to the order of the person in possession; or
(c) The person in control, other than pursuant to s. 677.106(7), of a negotiable electronic document of title.
(24) “Insolvency proceeding” includes an assignment for the benefit of creditors or other proceeding intended to liquidate or rehabilitate the estate of the person involved.
(25) “Insolvent” means:
(a) Having ceased to pay debts in the ordinary course of business other than as a result of a bona fide dispute;
(b) Being unable to pay debts as they become due; or
(c) Being insolvent within the meaning of the Federal Bankruptcy Law.
(26) “Money” means a medium of exchange that is currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. The term includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more countries. The term does not include a central bank digital currency.
(27) Subject to subsection (29), a person has “notice” of a fact if the person:
(a) Has actual knowledge of it;
(b) Has received a notice or notification of it; or
(c) From all the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question, has reason to know that it exists. A person “knows” or has “knowledge” of a fact when the person has actual knowledge of it. “Discover” or “learn” or a word or phrase of similar import refers to knowledge rather than to reason to know. The time and circumstances under which a notice or notification may cease to be effective are not determined by this section.
(28) A person “notifies” or “gives” a notice or notification to another person by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other person in ordinary course, whether or not the other person actually comes to know of it. Subject to subsection (29), a person “receives” a notice or notification when:
(a) It comes to that person’s attention; or
(b) It is duly delivered in a form reasonable under the circumstances at the place of business through which the contract was made or at another location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.
(29) Notice, knowledge, or a notice or notification received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time when it is brought to the attention of the individual conducting that transaction, and, in any event, from the time when it would have been brought to the individual’s attention if the organization had exercised due diligence. An organization exercises due diligence if it maintains reasonable routines for communicating significant information to the person conducting the transaction and there is reasonable compliance with the routines. Due diligence does not require an individual acting for the organization to communicate information unless such communication is part of the individual’s regular duties or the individual has reason to know of the transaction and that the transaction would be materially affected by the information.
(30) “Organization” means a person other than an individual.
(31) “Party,” as distinguished from “third party,” means a person who has engaged in a transaction or made an agreement subject to this code.
(32) “Person” means an individual; corporation; business trust; estate; trust; partnership; limited liability company; association; joint venture; government; governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality; or any other legal or commercial entity. The term includes a protected series, however denominated, of an entity if the protected series is established under law other than the Uniform Commercial Code which limits, or conditionally limits if conditions specified under the law are satisfied, the ability of a creditor of the entity or of any other protected series of the entity to satisfy a claim from assets of the protected series.
(33) “Present value” means the amount as of a date certain of one or more sums payable in the future, discounted to the date certain by use of either an interest rate specified by the parties if that rate is not manifestly unreasonable at the time the transaction is entered into or, if an interest rate is not so specified, a commercially reasonable rate that takes into account the facts and circumstances at the time the transaction is entered into.
(34) “Purchase” means taking by sale, lease, discount, negotiation, mortgage, pledge, lien, security interest, issue or reissue, gift, or any other voluntary transaction creating an interest in property.
(35) “Purchaser” means a person who takes by purchase.
(36) “Record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
(37) “Remedy” means any remedial right to which an aggrieved party is entitled with or without resort to a tribunal.
(38) “Representative” means a person empowered to act for another, including an agent, an officer of a corporation or association, and a trustee, executor, or administrator of an estate.
(39) “Right” includes “remedy.”
(40) “Security interest” means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation. “Security interest” includes any interest of a consignor and a buyer of accounts, chattel paper, a payment intangible, or a promissory note in a transaction that is subject to chapter 679. “Security interest” does not include the special property interest of a buyer of goods on identification of those goods to a contract for sale under s. 672.401, but a buyer may also acquire a security interest by complying with chapter 679. Except as otherwise provided in s. 672.505, the right of a seller or lessor of goods under chapter 672 or chapter 680 to retain or acquire possession of the goods is not a security interest, but a seller or lessor may also acquire a security interest by complying with chapter 679. The retention or reservation of title by a seller of goods, notwithstanding shipment or delivery to the buyer under s. 672.401, is limited in effect to a reservation of a security interest. Whether a transaction in the form of a lease creates a security interest is determined by the facts of each case; however:
(a) A transaction in the form of a lease creates a security interest if the consideration that the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is an obligation for the term of the lease not subject to termination by the lessee and:
1. The original term of the lease is equal to or greater than the remaining economic life of the goods;
2. The lessee is bound to renew the lease for the remaining economic life of the goods or is bound to become the owner of the goods;
3. The lessee has an option to renew the lease for the remaining economic life of the goods for no additional consideration or nominal additional consideration upon compliance with the lease agreement; or
4. The lessee has an option to become the owner of the goods for no additional consideration or nominal additional consideration upon compliance with the lease agreement.
(b) A transaction does not create a security interest merely because:
1. The present value of the consideration the lessee is obligated to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is substantially equal to or is greater than the fair market value of the goods at the time the lease is entered into;
2. The lessee assumes the risk of loss of the goods;
3. The lessee agrees to pay, with respect to the goods, taxes; insurance; filing, recording, or registration fees; or service or maintenance costs;
4. The lessee has an option to renew the lease or to become the owner of the goods;
5. The lessee has an option to renew the lease for a fixed rent that is equal to or greater than the reasonably predictable fair market rent for the use of the goods for the term of the renewal at the time the option is to be performed; or
6. The lessee has an option to become the owner of the goods for a fixed price that is equal to or greater than the reasonably predictable fair market value of the goods at the time the option is to be performed.
(c) Additional consideration is nominal if it is less than the lessee’s reasonably predictable cost of performing under the lease agreement if the option is not exercised. Additional consideration is not nominal if:
1. When the option to renew the lease is granted to the lessee, the rent is stated to be the fair market rent for the use of the goods for the term of the renewal determined at the time the option is to be performed; or
2. When the option to become the owner of the goods is granted to the lessee, the price is stated to be the fair market value of the goods determined at the time the option is to be performed.
(d) The “remaining economic life of the goods” and “reasonably predictable” fair market rent, fair market value, or cost of performing under the lease agreement must be determined with reference to the facts and circumstances at the time the transaction is entered into.
(41) “Send,” in connection with a record or notification, means:
(a) To deposit in the mail, deliver for transmission, or transmit by any other usual means of communication, with postage or cost of transmission provided for, addressed to any address reasonable under the circumstances; or
(b) To cause the record or notification to be received within the time it would have been received if properly sent under paragraph (a).
(42) “Sign,” “signing,” “signed,” or “signature” means, with present intent to authenticate or adopt a record, to:
(a) Execute or adopt a tangible symbol; or
(b) Attach to or logically associate with the record an electronic symbol, sound, or process.
(43) “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
(44) “Surety” includes a guarantor or other secondary obligor.
(45) “Term” means a portion of an agreement which relates to a particular matter.
(46) “Unauthorized signature” means a signature made without actual, implied, or apparent authority. The term includes a forgery.
(47) “Warehouse receipt” means a document of title issued by a person engaged in the business of storing goods for hire.
(48) “Writing” includes printing, typewriting, or any other intentional reduction to tangible form. “Written” has a corresponding meaning.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 1, ch. 78-222; s. 2, ch. 79-398; s. 2, ch. 87-275; s. 4, ch. 90-278; s. 3, ch. 92-82; s. 552, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 2000-112; s. 10, ch. 2001-198; s. 8, ch. 2007-134; s. 3, ch. 2010-131; s. 1, ch. 2023-80; s. 36, ch. 2025-92.
Note.s. 1-201, U.C.C.; supersedes ss. 614.02, 673.01, 674.01, 674.07, 674.28, 674.29, 674.30, 678.54.

F.S. 671.201 on Google Scholar

F.S. 671.201 on CourtListener

Amendments to 671.201


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 671.201

Total Results: 175  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard, 269 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Cited 59 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...William Penny (part-time accountant and secretary for Pickard) at Mr. Slama's request from his handwritten notes. It was typed as if on a letterhead of Southern Fiberglass and contained a signature line with the typed words, "Harold L. Slama, President." § 671.201(39), Fla....
...In addition, the Pickard group acted as consultants to the Ashland companies; to that end Pickard furnished them with plans, specifications, and a "plug" mold for the manufacture, by defendants, of still larger trawler hulls. Ashland determined the location of Pickard's Miami boat yard. [7] See: § 671.201(39) and State v....
Copy

Millennium Partners, L.P. v. Colmar Storage, LLC, 494 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 41 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 74 Fed. R. Serv. 140, 63 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 550, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18687, 2007 WL 2245780

...ssed to a bailee and purport to cover goods in the bailee's possession which are either identified or are fungible portions of an identified mass. 12 F LA. S TAT. A NN. § 671.201(15) (West 2007)....
Copy

Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So. 3d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15126, 2013 WL 5338048

...As with the assignment, however, Wells Fargo did not submit the original note until several months after it had filed the complaint. To establish standing as the holder of a note endorsed in blank, a party must be in possession of the original note. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Citizens Nat. Bank of Orlando v. Bornstein, 374 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1979).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 242

...Although it was later assigned by Milford as security for a bond, the certificate as purchased from the Bank simply evidenced the right to payment and was clearly not an agreement creating or providing for a "security interest" as that term is defined in section 671.201(37)....
Copy

Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc., 526 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 50148

...PSI Cosmetics, 125 Misc.2d 68, 478 N.Y.S.2d 505, 510 (N.Y.City Civ.Ct. 1984); see Hill v. Bentco Leasing, Inc., 288 Ark. 623, 708 S.W.2d 608 (1986) (absence of option to purchase not conclusive in determining whether a transaction is a sale or a lease for purposes of law against usury). Section 671.201(37), in defining security interest, expressly discounts the notion that the absence of an option to purchase in the lease necessarily would preclude a finding that the transaction is intended to be a security transaction....
Copy

Fox v. McCaw Cellular Commc'ns, 745 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 870859

...y to subject the insured to a personal judgment for the excess. On the other hand, an example of the duty of good faith as between parties dealing at arms length is found in the UCC provision defining good faith as being synonymous with honesty. See § 671.201(19), Fla.Stat....
Copy

Isaly Klondike Co. v. Sunstate Dairy & Food Prods. Co. (In Re Sunstate Dairy & Food Prods. Co.), 145 B.R. 341 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 18 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 113, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 224, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1496, 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 777

...[4] Section 672.702(3) of the Florida Statutes provides: The seller's right to reclaim under subsection (2) is subject to the rights of a buyer in ordinary course or other good faith purchaser under this chapter . . . [5] A purchaser is "a person who takes by purchase," (Fla.Stat. § 671.201(33) (1991)), and purchase includes "taking by sale, discount, negotiation, mortgage, pledge, lien, issue or reissue, gift or any other voluntary transaction creating an interest in property" (Fla.Stat. § 671.201(32) (1991)). Good faith is "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." Fla.Stat. § 671.201(19) (1991)....
Copy

Monsanto Agr. Prods. Co. v. Edenfield, 426 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 781

...'s limitation of warranty and liability was not unconscionable. There was no special interrogatory in the jury verdict on the question of whether the limitation of warranty was conspicuous, and the trial judge did not rule on the issue. In addition, § 671.201(10), Fla....
Copy

In Re Grubbs Constr. Co., 319 B.R. 698 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 17 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 501, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 75, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 19, 2005 WL 56972

...Consequently, courts and commentators have been required to formulate modes of analyses to uncover the precise nature of the agreement." The new definition of a security agreement contained in U.C.C. 1-201(37) as adopted in Ohio as Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 1301.01(KK)(2004)(see also section 671.201(37)(2001), Fla....
...end of the term would be to exercise the option. Having made such a finding the Court concludes that the consideration given for the purchase options was nominal and as such the agreements must be leases intended for security pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37)." The Economic Realities Test has also been variously referred to as the "sensible person test." See Triplex, 258 B.R....
Copy

Equilease Corp. v. AAA Mach. Co. (In Re AAA Mach. Co.), 30 B.R. 323 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 14 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 287, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6126

...e documents evidencing the agreements were not properly perfected since no excise tax was paid in connection with their recording. Whether agreements are true leases or security agreements is to be determined by the facts of each case. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37), In Re Mountain Carpet, Inc., 11 B.R....
...Most courts look to a combination of factors to make such a determination. One of the most often applied factors and one specifically addressed by the applicable section of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) is whether an option to purchase is included with the agreement. Florida has adopted the U.C.C. and Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) states as follows: Whether a lease is intended as security is to be determined by the facts of each case; however, (a) the inclusion of an option to purchase does not of itself make the lease one intended for security, and (b) an agree...
...e end of the term would be to exercise the option. Having made such a finding the Court concludes that the consideration given for the purchase options was nominal and as such the agreements must be leases intended for security pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)....
Copy

Bondurant v. Beard Equip. Co., 345 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 340

...ed in the name of the debtor in this state or who is known by the secured party to have a security interest in the collateral... ." (Emphasis added.) Bondurant argues from the above statute and from the definition of the word "send", as set forth at Section 671.201(38), that written notice must be sent by the secured party before Beard was permitted to dispose of the collateral. Send is defined in Section 671.201(38) as follows: "`Send' in connection with any writing or notice means to deposit in the mail or deliver for transmission by any other usual means of communication with postage or cost of transmission provided for and properly address...
...The receipt of any writing or notice within the time at which it would have arrived if properly sent has the effect of a proper sending." Send in the above definition applies only to written notice. Notice under Section 679.504(3), however, need only be "reasonable". Compare 671.201(38), which seems to require notice in writing, with the following definitions of notice from 671.201(25), (26), and (27): "(25) A person has `notice' of a fact when (a) He has actual knowledge of it; or (b) He has received a notice or notification of it; or (c) From all the facts and circumstances known to him at the time in question he has reason to know that it exists....
Copy

State v. De Anza Corp., 416 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Section 83.753 provides that "every rental agreement or duty within this part imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement." This provision is identical to language in the Uniform Commercial Code. § 671.203, Fla. Stat. (1981). The term "good faith" is defined in section 671.201(19), Florida Statutes (1981), identically as in section 83.43(8), as "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." In the context of the Uniform Commercial Code, this provision adds an additional term into the contract th...
Copy

Int'l Harvest. Cr. v. Am. Nat. Bk., 296 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 85 A.L.R. 3d 1015

...Fla. Stat. § 679.202, F.S.A. specifically provides: "Each provision of this chapter with regard to rights, obligations and remedies applies whether title to collateral is in the secured party or in the debtor." (Emphasis supplied.) Also, Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37), F.S.A....
...." (Emphasis supplied.) Second, there is no difference between the relationship of a buyer and seller under a sales contract giving rise to a security interest and the relationship of any other debtor and creditor under any type of security agreement. As evidenced by Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201(37) and 679.102(2), F.S.A., the Code recognizes only a single form of contractual lien on personal property — a "security interest." Third, the majority opinion fails to recognize the fact that the owner of a purchase money security interest may be someone other than the seller....
Copy

Branford State Bank v. Hackney Tractor Co., 455 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1134, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1834, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14884

...nowledge of appellant's interest in the security at the time it obtained the equipment in March, 1977. NOTES [1] The borrower traded in the equipment to the appellee toward the purchase of new equipment. The appellee qualified as a "purchaser" under section 671.201(33). Appellee was not a buyer in the ordinary course of business since it did not buy from a person in the business of selling goods of that kind. Section 671.201(9)....
...buyer not in ordinary course of business, ... to the extent that he gives value and receives delivery of the collateral without knowledge of the security interest and before it is perfected; ... . (emphasis added) A person "has `knowledge' of a fact when he has actual knowledge of it." Section 671.201(25)(c)....
Copy

Seinfeld v. Com. Bank & Trust Co., 405 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1137

...This portion of the affidavit was obviously an attempt to track the statutory requisites of a holder in due course [2] that he take the instrument "in good faith," Section 673.302(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) — which is in turn defined as "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned," Section 671.201(19) — and "without notice ......
...In addition, since as the bank correctly contends, the issue of both "good faith," see Baraban v. Manatee National Bank of Bradenton, 212 So.2d 341 (Fla.2d DCA 1968); Frantz v. First National Bank of Anchorage, 584 P.2d 1125 (Alaska 1978), and lack of notice, Section 671.201(25) Florida Statutes (1979) are based upon the bank's subjective knowledge and state of mind, the failure to submit the testimony of those employees who actually dealt with Wolfson concerning these facts made it impossible, on the face of the matter, for the movant to sustain its position on these questions....
Copy

Venn v. Howell's Auto Repair Ctr., Inc. (In Re Howell), 161 B.R. 285 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 11 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 301, 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 38, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1804, 1993 WL 499377

...Thus, the only issue to be decided by the Court is whether the lease evidences a financing or a true lease transaction. The parties agree that the characterization of the lease is governed by the definitional provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as codified by Florida. Florida Statute § 671.201(37) defines the term "security interest" to mean "an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation", and continues in relevant part: Whether a lease transaction creates a lease or security...
...sonable at the time the transaction is entered into; otherwise, the discount is determined by a commercially reasonable rate that takes into account the facts and circumstances of each case at the time the transaction was entered into. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201 (West Supp.1993) (effective January 1, 1991). The Defendant urges the Court to adopt an interpretation of this statutory language that essentially eliminates any consideration of the factors listed under § 671.201(37)(b) when determining the nature of a lease....
...[1] The compelling language in subsection (a) is therefore inapplicable in this case. However the cause is not lost since a court is free to determine whether a lease constitutes a security interest upon the review of any fact or circumstance relevant to the transaction. Fla.Ann. Stat. § 671.201 (West Supp.1993)....
...se, however the clause merely permits the lessor to accelerate any amounts due under the lease upon a default. Thus, the clause is directed at a contractual right belonging to the lessor rather than the lessee. Termination clauses contemplated under § 671.201(37) address whether the lessee has a right to terminate a lease without further obligation and it is these rights which are not expressly addressed in the lease....
Copy

Jackson Vitrified v. People's Am., 388 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 281

...ory. Such an intent could not have been intended. The alternative argument of Ervin and Cooper, supra, regarding the term "representative," is more inviting. "`Representative' includes an agent, . . or any other person empowered to act for another." § 671.201(35), Fla....
Copy

First New England Fin. Corp. v. Woffard, 421 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 650

...and claims accruing between the assignee and obligor before the obligor receives notice of the sub-assignment. Defenses and claims arising from the terms of the contract creating the right are available to the obligor regardless of when they accrue. Section 671.201(26), Florida Statutes, defines the giving and receipt of notice: A person "notifies" or "gives" a notice or notification to another by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not such other actually comes to know of it....
Copy

Troupe v. Redner, 652 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 51111

...Gainey Builders, Inc., 184 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). The "holder" is the *396 "person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment security drawn, issued or endorsed to him or to his order or to the bearer or in blank." § 671.201(20), Fla....
Copy

Paul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 68 So. 3d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13896, 2011 WL 3862091

...its terms." Riggs v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 36 So.3d 932, 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Azize, 965 So.2d 151, 153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Troupe v. Redner, 652 So.2d 394, 395-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (citing § 671.201(20), Fla....
Copy

Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 74 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17849, 2011 WL 5374772

...ey, USMoney in turn endorsed the note without recourse to Bayview. Before the summary judgment hearing, Bayview filed the original note and the allonge. Thus Bayview established its status as holder of the note and its right to enforce the note. See § 671.201(20), Fla....
Copy

Harvey v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 69 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10194, 2011 WL 1485310

...The person entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument, such as a promissory note, is the "holder of the instrument." § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2009). A "holder" is "[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession...." § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). "Bearer" means "a person in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank." § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith, 610 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 365476

...ions under the contract." § 672.106(2), Fla. Stat. (1987) (UCC § 2-106). The code defines the term "contract" as "the total legal obligation which results from the parties' agreement as affected by this code and any other applicable rules of law." § 671.201(11), Fla....
Copy

Any Kind Checks Cashed, Inc. v. Talcott, 830 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 800

...l establishment has steered a crooked course through this debate. Id.; see Patricia L. Heatherman, Comment, Good Faith in Revised Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Any Change? Should There Be?, 29 WILLAMETTE L.REV. 567 (1993). Prior to 1992, section 671.201(19), Florida Statutes (1991), defined "good faith" as "honesty in fact in the conduct of the transaction concerned." Florida courts interpreted this definition as creating a subjective test....
Copy

Rudy's Glass Const. Co. v. EF Johnson Co., 404 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1373, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21337

...*1088 Morales, Rudolph & Hevia and Nestor Morales, Miami, for appellants. Heitner & Rosenfeld and Allan Stein and Mindy Rodney, North Miami Beach, for appellee. Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ. NESBITT, Judge. The issue presented by this appeal is whether a disclaimer of warranty was conspicuous as defined by Section 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1979) and therefore effective under Section 672.316, Florida Statutes (1979) to exclude or modify an implied warranty of fitness....
...ies are excluded by expressions like "as is," "with all faults" or other language which in common understanding calls the buyer's attention to the exclusion of warranties and makes plain that there is no implied warranty; "Conspicuous" is defined in Section 671.201(10), supra, as follows: (10) A term or clause is "conspicuous" when it is so written that a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to have noticed it....
...Rehurek v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, 262 So.2d 452 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 267 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1972). The only question is whether the manner of communicating this disclaimer makes it conspicuous as required by Section 672.316, supra, and defined by Section 671.201(10), supra....
...tions of the contract contained on the reverse side of the document. This provided the purchaser/lessee with adequate notice that he was agreeing to other provisions which were on the back of the contract. As indicated by the definition contained in 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1979), language *1090 in the body of a form is conspicuous if it is in larger or contrasting type or color....
...n letters of which "fine print" is a highly understated description. It is true both that the exclusion is in all capital letters, as opposed to the even-tinier lower case printing which surrounds it, and that the definition of "conspicuous" in Sec. 671.201(10) includes the statement that "[l]anguage in the body of a form is `conspicuous' if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color." But the provision states in its entirety: (10) A term or clause is "conspicuous" when it is so written that a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to have noticed it....
Copy

Gathercrest Ltd. v. First Am. Bank & Trust, 649 F. Supp. 106 (M.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18147

...erformance as provided in this Act (Sections 1-205 and 2-208). Whether an agreement has legal consequences is determined by the provisions of this Act, if applicable; otherwise by the law of contracts (Section 1-103). (Compare "Contract"). Fla.Stat. 671.201(3)....
...Therefore, the only remaining issue is whether or not the documents were to be delivered against honor of the draft. The instructions specified that the documents accompanying the drafts were to be delivered against acceptance. However, under the UCC, to honor is defined as "to pay or to accept and pay". Fla.Stat. § 671.201(21); see Wiley v....
...to its terms, rather than hold that honor requires both acceptance "and" payment. R. Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code, § 1-201:71. In view of the language of the UCC sections on collection of documentary drafts, the Court agrees that § 1-201(21) [§ 671.201(21)] should be construed to mean that a draft is honored when it is delivered for acceptance and is accepted, and that payment is not necessarily required in order for a draft to be honored....
Copy

Garner v. Pearson, 545 F. Supp. 549 (M.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida

...person is the owner of, or has an interest in, the security. Fla.Stat. § 678.8-301; Dean Witter & Co. v. Educational Computer Corp., 369 F.Supp. 757, 764 (E.D.Pa.1974). One has "notice" of a fact when he has actual knowledge of the fact. Fla.Stat. § 671.201(25)(a)....
...ed the claim. Exchange's constructive notice argument thus fails as a matter of law. One has "constructive notice" of a fact when from all the facts and circumstances known to him at the relevant time he has reason to know that it exists. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(25)....
Copy

Royal Food Markets Inc. v. U.S. Berkel Food MacHines, Inc. (In Re Royal Food Markets, Inc.), 121 B.R. 913 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 9 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 13 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 876, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2548, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 182

...The creditor contends that the equipment is held by the debtor pursuant to a "true lease" and wishes to enforce the terms of the lease agreement to regain possession of the equipment. Whether an agreement is a true lease or a security agreement is to be determined by the facts of each case. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37); In re Mountain Carpet, Inc., 11 B.R....
...y agreement. Whether an option to purchase is included in the agreement is one of the most often applied factors and is one which is specifically addressed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Florida has adopted the Uniform Commercial Code and Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) states as follows: Whether a lease is intended as security is to be determined by the facts of each case; however, (a) the inclusion of an option to purchase does not of itself make the lease one intended for security, and (b) an agree...
...Thus, this Court concludes that because the consideration to be given for the purchase option is nominal, and because the lease agreement recognizes an equity interest in the debtor, the agreement is a lease intended for security pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)....
Copy

All Am. Mfg. Corp. v. Quality Textile Screen Prints, Inc. (In Re All Am. Mfg. Corp.), 172 B.R. 394 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 48, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 200, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1443

...DISCUSSION State law determines whether the Second Agreement should be treated as a lease or financing agreement. In re Howell, 161 B.R. 285, 287 (Bankr.N.D.Fla.1993). Whether a purported lease transaction creates a security interest here is governed by subparagraph (a) of § 671.201(37) Florida Statutes, which provides as follows: A transaction creates a security interest if the consideration the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is an obligation for the term of the lease not...
...upon compliance with the lease agreement; or (4) The lessee has an option to become the owner of the goods for no additional consideration or nominal additional consideration upon compliance with the lease agreement. (emphasis added). By its terms, § 671.201(37) mandates that if a "lease" contains both a non-termination clause, whereby the "lessee" may not terminate the "lease" without further obligation, and also contains one of the other provisions listed in subsections (a)(1)-(4), then the...
...The Initial Agreement here contains an express provision preventing cancellation. The Second Agreement likewise is non-cancelable, since All American could not terminate the Second Agreement without further obligation to Quality Textile. [1] Thus, the first prong of § 671.201(37)(a) is satisfied. The second prong of § 671.201(37)(a) also is satisfied since, as stipulated to by Quality Textile in the Pretrial Order, Quality Textile was obligated to purchase the Equipment and to transfer title to All American at the end of the Second Agreement. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a)(2) (a transaction creates a security interest if "[t]he lessee is bound to ......
...Even if Quality Textile was not bound to purchase the Equipment, the $1.00 purchase price under the Purchase Option represents nominal consideration, since the Equipment certainly had a fair market value far greater than $1.00 at the date the Purchase Option was to be exercised. See Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37)(c)(1)....
...Co., 634 F.2d 1050 (10th Cir.1980) ($1.00 purchase price indicative of financing arrangement under Oklahoma law). In sum, since the Second Agreement was non-cancelable and included by incorporation a nominal $1.00 purchase option, this Court finds that under the mandatory provisions of Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a) the Second Agreement constituted a financing arrangement rather than a true lease. The Court would reach the same conclusion by applying the discretionary standards set forth in Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(b). Section 671.201(37)(b) provides a non-exclusive list of factors that are indicative of a financing arrangement rather than a true lease....
...The presence of these several indicia of a financing agreement prove that the Second Agreement was not a true lease, but instead was a financing arrangement creating a security interest. In sum, under either under the applicable mandatory provisions of Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a) or the discretionary factors listed in § 671.201(37)(b), the Second Agreement was not a true lease, but was instead a financing arrangement, intended to create a security interest....
...ong as All American made the monthly payments. Instead, the Second Agreement specifically requires All American to "make payments in the sum of $1,900.00 a month and monthly thereafter in a like amount until said machine is fully paid." [2] Although § 671.201(37)(b) by its terms states that a transaction does not create a security interest merely because it provides for any one of the listed factors, all of the factors may be considered in determining whether a lease constitutes a security interest....
Copy

O'NEILL v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville, NA, 360 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 779

...and whether Barnett's prior security interest was superior to O'Neill's subsequent ownership interest where it had properly registered its security interest with the Federal Aviation Administration. We resolve both issues in favor of Barnett. Under Section 671.201(9), Florida Statutes (1975), a buyer in the ordinary course of business is a person who in good faith and without knowledge that the sale to him is in violation of the security interest of a third party in the goods buys in ordinary course from a person in the business of selling goods of that kind....
...corded instruments affecting the aircraft identified in this certificate to make a personal search of the records or avail themselves of the services of an agent or attorney." O'Neill was not a buyer in the ordinary course of business as required by Section 671.201(9), therefore, Section 679.307(1) is not applicable to this case....
Copy

Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. v. Landers, 421 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1474, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21259

...A printed heading in capitals (as: NON-NEGOTIABLE BILL OF LADING) is conspicuous. Language in the body of a form is "conspicuous" if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color. But in a telegram any stated term is "conspicuous." Whether a term or clause is "conspicuous" or not is for decision by the court. § 671.201(10), Fla....
Copy

Swift v. JI Case Co., 266 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

..."The judgment below is affirmed." CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C.J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] F.S. § 679.302, F.S.A. [2] F.S. § 679.306(2), F.S.A. [3] The exchange of equipment which took place between Swift and Gator constitutes a sale and Swift would be considered a purchaser. F.S. § 671.201(9), F.S.A. [4] F.S. § 679.307(1), F.S.A. [5] F.S. § 671.201(9), F.S.A. [6] Cf. F.S. § 671.201(19), F.S.A....
Copy

Thomas Franklin v. Bank of Am., N.A., Successor in etc., 202 So. 3d 923 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582

...lder in possession with rights of a holder. § 673.3011(1) & (2), Fla. Stat. (2009). A holder is a “person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21), Fla....
Copy

Bert Smith Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Franklin, 400 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1273, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19930

...Stat. (1979). Thus, even if the retail order contained disclaimers, they had to be conspicuous to be effective. Bert Smith contends that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to determine whether the alleged disclaimers were conspicuous. We agree. Section 671.201(10) states that, "Whether a term or clause is conspicuous or not is for decision by the court." Nevertheless, Bert Smith did not object when the trial court instructed the jury on the question....
Copy

Bank of New York v. Olympia & York Florida Equity Corp. (In Re Holywell Corp.), 51 B.R. 56 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 7 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 13 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 446, 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 997, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5879, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 446

...Similarly, O & Y's claim against the lessor would be a claim as an insider, which would be behind all the claims of other creditors. O & Y's claim would be rendered virtually worthless. The predicate for the bank's contention is UCC § 1-201(37), Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37): "(37) `Security interest' means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation ....
Copy

Xerographic Supplies Corp. v. Hertz Com., 386 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1261, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17239

...LIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OTHER THAN USUAL FACTORY WARRANTIES MADE BY THE MANUFACTURER. Xerographic contends that this disclaimer was in compliance with requirements of Section 672.316(2) and 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1975), and therefore should have been given effect....
...Kenworthy, not a party to this appeal, was the user of the copier and plaintiff in the main claim below. [2] Section 672.316(2) sets forth the language that must be included in any valid disclaimer as well as the requirement that the disclaimer be conspicuous. Section 671.201(10) defines the term "conspicuous."
Copy

Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLC, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 87 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 182, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98235, 2015 WL 4554921

...Viewing this language in a vacuum, it would appear that notice to the “customer,” as the term is used in § 670.505, would require notice to the accountholder. However, the U.C.C. also sets forth when an individual “receives a notice or notification.” Under § 671.201, a person gives notice to another “by taking such steps as maybe reasonably required to inform the other person in ordinary course, whether or not the other person actually comes to know of it.” Fla....
...der the circumstances at the place of business through which the contract was made or at another location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.” Id. (emphasis added); see also Fla. Stat. § 671.209 (5) (mirroring § 671.201(26))....
...states that “a person ‘receives’ a notice or notification when ... [i]t is duly delivered in a form reasonable under the circumstances at ... [a] location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (26); Fla....
...e their account statements, statements containing the contested debits. Because there is no dispute over whether the Contract Plaintiffs received account statements at the address they designated, those Plaintiffs received notice as per Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201 (26) and 671.209(5)....
...As stated previously: The U.C.C.-.- states that “a person ‘receives’ a notice or notification when ... [i]t is duly delivered -in a form reasonable under the circumstances at ... [a] location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (26); Fla....
...e their account statements, statements containing the contested debits. Because there is no dispute over whether the Contract Plaintiffs received account statements at the address they designated, those Plaintiffs received notice as per Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201 (26) and 671.209(5)....
...§ 4A-505 bears little to no relation to the facts of this case. See id. at 119-20. Further, Plaintiffs' citation to Grabowski for the proposition that "customer” as used in the U.C.C. may not extend to Plaintiffs' purported agent is belied by the definitional provisions of Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201 (26) and 671.209(5)....
Copy

Benoay v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc., 699 F. Supp. 1523 (S.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14946, 1988 WL 123507

...See, e.g., Breyer v. First National Monetary Corp., 548 F.Supp. 955, 598, n. 5 (D.N.J.1982). Furthermore, pursuant to Florida law, the customer agreement was "signed" by Prudential-Bache, since the agreement had its name printed on it. [4] See, e.g., Fla.Stat. § 671.201(39)(1985) and comments thereto; See, generally, 11 Fla....
Copy

Isaac v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 74 So. 3d 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 74 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 220, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2011 WL 1261142

..."If an instrument is payable to bearer, it may be negotiated by transfer of possession alone." § 673.2011(2), Fla. Stat. A "holder" is defined as "[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession." § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

ITT Indus. Credit Co. v. Regan, 487 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 1986).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 188, 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 274, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1978

...Pursuant to the Code, when the buyer takes possession of property under a credit sales contract, he acquires the property, not merely an equity interest in the property. See § 672.401(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). The seller retains only a security interest in the property. See id.; § 671.201(37), Fla....
Copy

East Bay Ltd. P'ship v. Am. Gen. Life & Accident Ins., 744 F. Supp. 1118 (M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15474, 1990 WL 129282

...eached its duty of good faith as required by Section 671.203, Florida Statutes. Section 671.203 provides that "[e]very contract or duty within this code imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement." Good faith is defined in Section 671.201(19) to mean "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." Defendant had no contractual duty to allow Plaintiff to prepay the loan, and in fact had no duty whatsoever to allow prepayment....
Copy

Cook Sales, Inc. v. Shores (In Re Shores), 332 B.R. 31 (M.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28426, 2005 WL 2663484

...Conversely, Appellees argue such a determination is a mix of law and fact. Neither party provided any support for their assertions. After researching applicable case law, the Court finds the review of the Bankruptcy Court's determination that the Agreement was not subject to the safe harbor provisions in Florida Statute § 671.201(37) is a question of law and is reviewed de novo....
...598, 605 (D.Kan.2002), affirmed, 52 Fed.Appx. 119 (2002). III. Discussion A. Bankruptcy Court In an effort to determine whether the Agreement at issue is a financing arrangement [3] or a true lease, the Bankruptcy Court began by examining Florida Statute § 671.201(37). In pertinent part, Florida Statute § 671.201(37), provides: Whether a transaction creates a lease or security interest is determined by the facts of each case; however: (a) A transaction creates a security interest if the consideration the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to...
...ance with the lease agreement. The Bankruptcy Court found that because the Agreement between the parties was subject to termination by the lessee at any time without further obligation, the Appellees could not rely upon the safe harbor provisions of section 671.201(37)....
...36) months. Based upon these two factors, the Bankruptcy Court determined the Agreement to be a financing arrangement (Dkt. 2 at 5). B. Appellant's Arguments Appellant contends on appeal that the Bankruptcy Court correctly noted that Florida Statute § 671.201(37) controls the determination in this case. However, Appellant argues the Bankruptcy Court erred in its application of section 671.201(37) as the Agreement contains a clause allowing the lessee to terminate the lease without further obligation. Appellant asserts section 671.201(37)(a) creates a security interest "if the consideration the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is an obligation for the term of the lease not subject to termination by the lessee," and if one or more of the other factors listed in the subsection of section 671.201(37)(a) is also present....
...Appellant also asserts the case cited by the Bankruptcy Court, In re Canaveral Seafoods, Inc., 79 B.R. at 58, is inapplicable to the case at bar for several reasons. Appellant initially argues that the court in Canaveral Seafoods did not apply Florida Statute § 671.201(37) and instead held that if the lease contained an option to purchase for a nominal sum at the end of the lease term, then the transaction constituted a financing arrangement and not a true lease....
...Appellees' objection to Appellant's claim is erroneous and should be reversed. C. Appellees' Arguments Appellees filed a response arguing that Appellant was attempting to twist the safe harbor provisions for a fmancing arrangement in Florida Statute § 671.201(37) into safe harbor provisions for a lease....
...it have found that where a debtor has the right to terminate the obligation to pay by surrendering personal property without further financial obligation, the transaction is a true lease (Dkt. 5 at 13). [5] U.C.C. § 1-201(37)(2) and Florida Statute § 671.201(37)(a) mirror each other. [6] Appellant further asserts the Bankruptcy Court ignored the impact of Florida Statute § 671.201(37)(3), which provides a transaction does not create a security interest because of the existence of certain characteristics, such as an option to purchase....
...s, and then only if they meet certain requirements (Dkt. 10 at 7)(citing Florida Statute §§ 559.9231-559.9241). [9] The Court does find the Bankruptcy Court's determination as to the inapplicability of the safe harbor provisions in Florida Statute § 671.201(37) to be proper....
Copy

Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. Walter E. Heller & Co. Se., 440 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 735, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24347

...Plaintiff contends that the removal of such goods by the Defendant was in derogation of the Plaintiff's superior rights to possession as a secured creditor and as such constituted conversion. Plaintiff argues that either the transaction constituted a consignment intended as security within the meaning of Section 671.201(37), Florida Statutes, or was a sale or return transaction governed by the provisions of Section 672.326, Florida Statutes, which in pertinent part provides that: "(3) Where goods are delivered to a person for sale and such person mai...
Copy

Florida Dept. of Corr. v. BLOUNT, ETC., 411 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 912, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19512

...63, 100-101 (1975). In other words, Section 319.22(1) provides that a purchaser shall not acquire a "marketable" title until the certificate of title is issued to him; however, it does not prevent valid title from being passed. Correria, at 24. Under Section 671.201(9), a "buyer in ordinary course of business" is "a person who in good faith and without knowledge that the sale to him is in violation of the ownership rights or security interest of a third party in the goods buys in ordinary course...
Copy

Ernie Passeos, Inc. v. O'HALLORAN, 855 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21536736

...nce." § 679.307(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). A person who buys goods in a "transfer in bulk" or with knowledge that the sale is "in violation of the ... security interest of a third party in the goods" is not a "`[b]uyer in ordinary course of business.'" § 671.201(9), Fla....
Copy

In Re Est. of Barsanti, 773 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1781380

...ck was not "clearly erroneous." It is undisputed that the Conakry stock bearer certificates are in the possession of Mrs. Patrone's husband in Venezuela. Thus Mrs. Patrone's husband, as possessor, is presumed to be the owner and rightful holder. See § 671.201(20), Fla....
Copy

Westship, Inc. v. Trident Shipworks, Inc., 247 B.R. 856 (M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8680, 2000 WL 507105

...nt. See S.Rep. No. 95-989 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, 5849-50. At the same time, the Uniform Commercial Code as codified by Florida provides guidance to courts in distinguishing between a lease and a security interest. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) (1999)....
...t difference between the two as applied to the facts of this case. Both Congress and Florida law instruct courts to look to "the circumstances of the case and consider the economic substance of the transaction." S.Rep. No. 95-989; see also Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) (whether a transaction creates a lease calls for case-by-case analysis)....
...[8] Moreover, *864 the Lease term ends before the mortgage payments are complete. See S.Rep. No. 95-989 (stating that if rental payments are essentially payment of the mortgage, then there is no lease). Further, there is no express provision preventing cancellation by Trident. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a); All American Mfg., 172 B.R. at 398. Finally, there is no option to purchase the leased property at the end of the lease term. See S.Rep. No. 95-989; Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)....
Copy

Sheppard v. Revlon, Inc., 267 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 487

...." According to the Official Comment to Code § 2-304, which is § 672.304, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., the "price of goods is payable in something other than money." Mrs. Sheppard obtained the merchandise as a result of performing an act required, to-wit: purchasing $5.00, or more, of Revlon cosmetics at one itme. See also: § 671.201(11) and (44)(d), Fla....
Copy

Liebowitz v. Wright Props., Inc., 427 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 862, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19190

...therefore, he asserts, no fund was created from which Wright could collect. That may be so but it does not necessarily leave appellee without a remedy. As the designated escrow agent, Wright was a "holder" as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code, section 671.201(20), Florida Statutes (1981), which states: "Holder" means a person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment security drawn, issued or indorsed to him or to his order or to bearer or in blank....
Copy

Lonray, Inc. v. Azucar, Inc., 568 F. Supp. 189 (M.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15945

...e the damages exceed $10,000.00. Reserve Insurance Co., 386 So.2d at 551. 6. The bailor's burden of establishing negligence requires that it persuade the trier of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its nonexistence. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(8)....
Copy

Associated Air Servs., Inc. v. W.J.C., Inc. (In Re Associated Air Servs., Inc.), 42 B.R. 768 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1001, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5506

...ty. (Emphasis Supplied) The facts of the case at bar fit precisely within subsection (b). Since ASSOCIATED AIR is to pay One and 00/100 ($1.00) Dollar and receive an assignment of the lease at the end of the term of the agreement, it would seem that § 671.201(37) mandates a finding (or conclusion of law) that it is a lease intended for security and therefore W.J.C....
Copy

SCADIF, S.A. v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 208 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 232, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12962, 2002 WL 1473458

...The Florida Uniform Commercial Code further expressly provides that such agreements encompass "the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade ...." § 671.201(3), Fla....
Copy

Hartzog v. Dixon, 366 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...A security interest is broadly defined as "an interest in personal property ... which secures payment or performance of an obligation... . The term also includes any interest of a buyer of accounts, chattel paper, or contract rights which is subject to Chapter 679." Section 671.201(37), Fla....
...them regarding an entitlement to the stock... ." "`Agreement' means the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade or course of performance... ." Section 671.201(3)....
Copy

Ardmore Farms v. Smith, 423 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...r this position is mentioned. Florida law is to the contrary. A facsimile signature can be sufficient, even on a document as important as an arrest warrant. See, State v. Hickman, 189 So.2d 254 (Fla.App. 1966). See, further, Uniform Commercial Code, § 671.201(39), Florida Statutes, defining "signed" for Code purposes, as "includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticate a writing." [3] The E/C's argument that the claim form must be signed by the claimant...
Copy

Regan v. ITT Indus. Credit Co., 469 So. 2d 1387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 64

...ASE MONEY CREDITORS UNDER THE "DEBTOR'S EQUITY" CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER SURVIVE THE ENACTMENT OF CHAPTER 78-222, LAWS OF FLORIDA? MILLS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The preamble to Chapter 78-222, Laws of Florida (1978), reenacting Section 671.201, Florida Statutes, and amending subsections (3) and (4) of Section 679.312, Florida Statutes, states: WHEREAS, in a situation where there are conflicting security interests in the same collateral and a purchase money security interest...
Copy

Midland-Guardian Co. v. Hagin, 370 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...ditional sale, trust receipt, other lien or title retention contract and lease or consignment intended as security * *. A perusal of the retail installment contract here involved shows that it was intended to create a security interest as defined in § 671.201(37)....
Copy

Kenney v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 175 So. 3d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14073, 2015 WL 5665217

...who is entitled to enforce. § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

BVA Credit Corp. v. Fisher, 369 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 795

...679.504 provides that a secured party may, after default, sell, lease or otherwise dispose of any or all of the collateral and apply the proceeds toward the satisfaction of indebtedness secured by the security interest under which the disposition is made. F.S. 671.201(37) defines "security interest" and provides "* * * Unless a lease or consignment is intended as security, reservation of title thereunder is not a `security interest' * * *....
Copy

Adler v. Key Fin. Servs., Inc., 553 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 142688

...Under the Uniform Commercial Code, "[a] person `notifies' or `gives' a notice or notification to another by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not such other actually comes to know of it." § 671.201(26), Fla....
Copy

Milnes v. Gen. Elec. Credit Corp., 377 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1428

...ut knowledge that the sale to him is in violation of the ownership rights or security interest of a third party in the goods, buys in the ordinary course from a person in the business of selling goods of that kind, but does not include a pawnbroker. § 671.201(9), Fla....
Copy

Richwagen v. Lilienthal, 386 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 964

...§ 672.2-105(1). We find no distinction between boats and ships in determining what is meant by "goods." [1] Our problem lies in the absence of any warehouse receipt in this case having been issued by the marina to appellant. A warehouse receipt is defined in Section 671.201(45), Florida Statutes (1975) as: ......
Copy

Uc Leasing, Inc. v. Barnett Bk., W. Fla., 443 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1323

...Final judgment was entered for Barnett. The trial court ruled that the lease agreement between U.C.L. and F.W.M.C. was not a true lease but was an agreement intended for security which constituted a secured transaction governed by the provisions of Ch. 679, Florida Statutes (1981). See § 671.201(37), Florida Statutes (1981)....
Copy

Citibank, N.A. v. Dalessio, 756 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (M.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2010 WL 5137601

...The `holder' is the `person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment security drawn, issued or endorsed to him or to his order or to the bearer or in blank.'" Troupe v. Redner, 652 So.2d 394, 395-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (citations omitted); see Fla. Stat. § 671.201(21) (2010); Mortg....
Copy

Am. Nat. Bank v. Int'l Harv. Cr. Corp., 269 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 682

...Installment Contracts in question were drawn pursuant to F.S. § 520.34, F.S.A., and without any verbiage therein indicating any severability of items of equipment from the total contract sales. Also, we must assume that the Uniform Commercial Code Section 671.201(11) is applicable wherein the definition of "contract" is set out as: "means the total legal obligation which results from the parties' agreement as affected by this code ..." This must assume that the "agreement" as defined in the Code at Section 671.201(3) does not limit the security to the total contract, nor by the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade or course of performance as provided in this Code....
Copy

In Re Est. of Silvian, 347 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...t and her brother, William Arkin. It was not redeposited to Account No. 26359 because this account had been closed out by appellant in the interim. The court below ruled that the $3800 belonged to the Estate of Westley Silvian, to which we disagree. Section 671.201(20), Florida Statutes, defines a "holder" as a "person who is in possession of ......
Copy

Gibson v. Resolution Trust Corp., 51 F.3d 1016 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 WL 238647

...§ 1821 (e)(ll), the RTC may not avoid “any legally enforceable or perfected security interest.” Under Florida law a security interest is an “interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation.” See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201(37) (West 1995)....
Copy

Crews v. First Union Nat'l Bank of Florida, N.A. (In Re Michelle's Hallmark Cards & Gifts, Inc.), 219 B.R. 316 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 237, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 225, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 389, 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 504, 1998 WL 154658

...alid and perfected security interest in the debtor's furniture, fixtures, equipment, and inventory. A security interest is defined as "an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation". Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201(37) (West 1998)....
Copy

PennyMac Corp. v. Frost, 214 So. 3d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 92 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 169, 2017 WL 1013192, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3441

...instrument who is entitled to enforce. § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2015). A “holder” is “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

S. Contract Carpe, Inc. v. Cty. Nat. Bk. of S. Fla., 528 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 62004

...We do not agree with this position and accordingly affirm the judgment below. Our holding that the single-signature-when-two-are-required is an "unauthorized" one for 674.406(4) purposes is based largely on our interpretation of the most obviously pertinent source, the specific definition of the term in the UCC itself. Section 671.201(43), Florida Statutes (1985) states: (43) `Unauthorized' signature or indorsement means one made without actual, implied or apparent authority and includes a forgery....
Copy

Suburbia Fed. S. & L. Ass'n v. Bel-Air Conditioning, 385 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1411

...tor's lien, equipment trust, conditional sale, trust receipt, other lien or title retention contract and lease or consignment intended as security. This chapter does not apply to statutory liens except as provided in s. 679.310. (Emphasis supplied.) Section 671.201(37), Florida Statutes (1979), in turn, defines a "security interest" as: ......
Copy

Schmidt v. Deutsche Bank, 170 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11576, 2015 WL 4577287

...4th DCA 2014). Here, Bank asserted it had standing as the holder of the note. To be a “holder” entitled to enforce under the facts of this case, Bank was required to show physical possession of the original note and the allonge endorsed in blank. See § 671.201(21), Fla....
Copy

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Rafaeli, 225 So. 3d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 93 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 149, 2017 WL 3085331, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10444

...t, is enforceable by the holder. § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). The term “holder” means “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Coplan Pipe & Supply Co. v. Ben-Frieda Corp., 256 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 408

...Appellee argues that appellant lacks the status of a holder in due course without notice provided by § 673.302, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. A payee, according to Official Comment 2 to 673.302 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., may become a holder in due course, in his own right, to the same extent as any other holder. See: § 671.201(20), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Appellant Coplan Pipe negotiated and arranged the transaction, and was the entity to whom the funds were ultimately paid. "Notice" includes "actual notice." § 671.201(25) Fla....
Copy

Graphic Prods. Corp. v. WWF Paper Corp. (In Re Graphic Prods. Corp.), 176 B.R. 65 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 262, 32 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 879, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2011, 26 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 545

...[7] The sole remaining issue is whether WWF made a written demand on GPC within 10 days after the goods were delivered to GPC. Section 546(c) does not contain specific requirements for what must be in a written demand other than the requirement that the demand be in writing. Section 671.201(26), Florida Statutes, provides that A person "notifies" or "gives" notice or notification to another by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not such other actually comes to know of it....
Copy

Matter of Forest Enter., Inc., 64 B.R. 310 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 14 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1142, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 764, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5455

...modifying the right. See Fla. Stat. § 679.501(3)(b) (1986). Section 679.504(3) requires that the secured party, Rozier, "send" written notification prior to the sale of the collateral, herein the Caterpillar. The word "send" is defined in Fla.Stat. § 671.201(38) as follows: "Send" in connection with any writing or notice means to deposit in the mail or deliver for transmission by any other usual means of communication with postage or cost of transmission provided for and properly addressed and...
Copy

Graf v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 636 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3501, 1994 WL 135209

...r's "receipt." I would affirm. NOTES [1] Note that any language attempting to exclude or modify implied warranties of merchantability or implied warranties of fitness under section 672.315(2) must be conspicuous when contained in a writing. See also section 671.201(10), Florida Statutes, which defines "conspicuous" under Florida's version of the U.C.C.
Copy

Brittany's Place Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 205 So. 3d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788

...ossessor of the instrument. We reach the same conclusion applying the UCC definition of holder: "[t]he person in possession of the [note] that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession." § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Peter E. Shapiro, P.A. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 352 F. Supp. 3d 1226 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

...Due diligence does not require an individual acting for the organization to communicate information unless such communication is part of the individual's regular duties or the individual has reason to know of the transaction and that the transaction would be materially affected by the information. Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (27) ; see also § 671.201(25)....
...Plaintiff next argues that Wells Fargo would have had knowledge if it exercised due diligence, and due diligence required Wells Fargo to put in place systems to catch name mismatches like this one. 3 This argument fails for several reasons. First, the due diligence requirement from section 671.201(27) applies only to "the "individual conducting the transaction." See Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (27)....
Copy

Madura v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, 593 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...Knight, 90 So.3d 824, 826 (Fla.4th Dist.Ct.App.2012). “A ‘holder’ is someone who is ‘in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession....’” Id. (quoting Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (5))....
Copy

Keane v. Pan Am. Bank, 309 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1054

...We are advised that an accounting action is now pending for this purpose. Our decision in this case should not be construed as passing upon the merits of that controversy. Affirmed. McNULTY, C.J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur. NOTES [1] Fla. Stat. § 673.403 (1971). [2] See Fla. Stat. § 671.201(43) (1971)....
Copy

Hadley v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc., 707 F. Supp. 509 (M.D. Fla. 1989).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2540, 1989 WL 22253

...Notice of a fact may be when a person has *511 actual knowledge of the fact, or he has received a notice or notification of it, or when "from all the facts and circumstances known to him at the time in question he had reason to know that it exists." Section 671.201(25)(c), Florida Statutes; Section 47-1-201(25)(c), Tennessee Code Annotated....
Copy

Quaker Oats Co. v. Affiliated of Florida, Inc. (In Re Affiliated of Florida, Inc.), 237 B.R. 495 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 955, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 338, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 997, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1877, 1998 WL 1107972

...Florida's Uniform Commercial Code contains an equally broad definition of "purchase" in providing that the term "includes taking by sale, discount, negotiation, mortgage, pledge, lien, issue or reissue, gift or any other voluntary transaction creating an interest in property." Fla.Stat. § 671.201(32)....
Copy

Hamilton Cnty. Bank v. Tuten, 250 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 511

...Mercantile National Bank, 161 So.2d 701 (Fla.App. 1964). Our holding in the Barnett case, supra, is consonant with the following provision in Section 679.307, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. a part of the Uniform Commercial Code: "(1) A buyer in ordinary course of business (§ 671.201(9)) other than a person buying farm products from a person engaged in farming operations takes free of a security interest created by his seller even though the security interest is perfected and even though the buyer knows of its existenc...
Copy

Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, Etc. v. Christopher Harris a/k/a Christopher E. Harris, 264 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...Here, the Bank filed its complaint, alleging its status as the holder of the note. A “holder” is defined as: “The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
...possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable . . . to an identified [entity] that is the [entity] in possession,” such that the trial court should have denied the motion for involuntary dismissal at the close of the plaintiff’s case. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

United States v. Vico, 360 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2019).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

...k here. A lien is a security interest, that is, a "legal right or interest that a creditor has in another's property, lasting [usually] until a debt or duty that it secures is satisfied." Black's Law Dictionary (9th Ed.) at 1006; see also Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (" 'Security interest' means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation.")....
Copy

Leader Global Solutions, LLC v. Tradeco Infraestructura, S.A. DE C.V., 155 F. Supp. 3d 1310 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4851, 2016 WL 146612

...in a breach of contract action. . "Contract” in Florida's Uniform Commercial Code means "the total legal obligation that results from the parties' agreement as determined by this code and as supplemented by any other applicable laws.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 ....
Copy

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Becker, 211 So. 3d 142 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 514340, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1546

...HSBC Bank USA, 157 So.3d 355, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (quoting § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013)). A “holder” is “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Finizio v. Shubow, 557 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 17496

...revented by that section). However, for purposes of determining what is a security interest under the probate code, section 731.201, Florida Statutes (1987), refers to the definition of a security interest contained in the Uniform Commercial Code at section 671.201, Florida Statutes (1987), where it is defined as: "Security interest" means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation....
Copy

Lindsey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 139 So. 3d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3145, 2013 WL 692825

...eclosure action does not name the plaintiff, the note must bear an endorsement in favor of the plaintiff or a blank endorsement or the plaintiff must submit evidence of an assignment of the note from the payee or an affidavit of ownership); see also § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Thomas Caraccia v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, 185 So. 3d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2708, 2016 WL 731773

...with the rights of a holder, or a person not in possession but entitled to enforce it. § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). A holder is “the person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Brown v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc., 352 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1213

...bulk transfer creditor. Cf. Oklahoma Hotel Building Co. v. Houghton, 202 Okla. 591, 216 P.2d 288 (1949). AFFIRMED. SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] This statute is Alabama's counterpart to Florida's Section 607.247, Florida Statutes (1975). [2] § 671.201(12), Fla....
Copy

Dep't of Transp. v. United Capital Funding Corp., 219 So. 3d 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 92 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 668, 2017 WL 1536070, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5902

...” § 679.1021(1)(c). The general definitions section of the UCC, in turn, defines “person” to- include a “government” or “governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality” unless the context in which it is used indicates otherwise. § 671.201(30), Fla....
Copy

Bank of New York Mellon v. Heath, 219 So. 3d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1492988, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790

...A plaintiff has standing to foreclose if the plaintiff is the holder of the promissory *106 note. See § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in. possession of .a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Knight, 90 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 335, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570, 2012 WL 1192143

...the “holder of the instrument.” § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). A “holder” is someone who is “in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession ....” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). The “bearer” is a person “in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.” § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Automatic Truck & Trail. W. Ctrs., Inc. v. Eastamp, Inc., 320 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1282

...ansfer provisions of the Code are broad enough to cover both secured and unsecured creditors. [2] To begin with, throughout the Code "creditors" are almost totally referred to by just such term and without qualification; and a creditor is defined in § 671.201, F.S....
Copy

Rayfield Inv. Co. v. Kreps, 35 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 110, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149, 2010 WL 1779891

...The Florida Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs sales and secured transactions. The UCC specifies that the term "security interest" means "an interest in personal property ... which secures payment or performance of an obligation" and "includes any interest of a consignor...." § 671.201(35), Fla....
Copy

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Applewhite, 213 So. 3d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1076936, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3775

...Attached to the complaint was a copy of the note with a blank indorsement, making it payable to the bearer. A “holder” is defined as: “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21), Fla....
Copy

Kumar v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 225 So. 3d 888 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 2017 WL 2885555

...3d 187, 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (en banc). The Trustee asserted in its complaint and at the bench trial that it was the owner and holder of the note. To be a holder, the instrument must be payable to the person in possession or indorsed in blank. See § 671.201(5), (21), Fla....
Copy

St. Clair v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 173 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10840, 2015 WL 4379738

...person not in possession but who has the right to enforce a lost, destroyed, or stolen instrument or an instrument paid by mistake. A holder is a person in possession of the negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to the holder. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Bldg. Materials v. Presidential Fin., 972 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 199883

...payment is to be made to the assignee. After receipt of the notification, the account debtor may discharge its obligation by paying the assignee and may not discharge the obligation by paying the assignor. With respect to notice to an organization, section 671.201(27), Florida Statutes (2002), provides as follows: Notice, knowledge or a notice or notification received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time when it is brought to the attention of the individual...
...formation unless such communication is part of his or her regular duties or unless the individual has reason to know of the transaction and that the transaction would be materially affected by the information. An organization includes a corporation. § 671.201(28)....
Copy

Donna Murray & Marc Murray v. HSBC Bank USA, 157 So. 3d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 725, 2015 WL 248651

....3091 or s[ection] 673.4181(4).” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Thus, to be a holder, the instrument 3 must be payable to the person in possession or indorsed in blank. See § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Elsman v. Hsbc Bank USA, 182 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19500, 2015 WL 9491875

...nder section 673.3091, Florida Statutes. . Gorel, 165 So.3d at 46 . “Holder” is defined as.“[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer-or to an identified person that is th.e person in possession.” § 671.201(21), Fla....
Copy

Espirito Santo Bank of Florida v. Agronomics Fin. Corp., 591 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1054, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888, 1991 WL 276886

...mages, if any, suffered by the party as a proximate consequence.” Section 674.104, Fla.Stat. (1989) (emphasis added). Although section 674.104 does not define “bad faith,” the meaning of the term can be gleaned from other sections of the Code. Section 671.201(19), under “General Definitions and Principles of Interpretation,” de *1080 fines “good faith” as “honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned.” Bad faith, therefore, is the lack of good faith; “the lack of g...
Copy

Frederick Sabido & Jonelle Sabido v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Etc., 241 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 or s. 673.4181(4). § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2016). Here, the original lender was Washington Mutual Bank. Because the note was not indorsed, later transferees were not entitled to enforce it as holders. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Jaffe v. Bank of Am., N.A., 674 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 618, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119984, 2009 WL 4906676

...BoA further notes that the term "action" is defined broadly by the UCC: "Action, in the sense of a judicial proceeding, includes recoupment, counterclaim, setoff, suit in equity, and any other proceedings in which rights are determined." Fla. Stat. 671.201(1)....
Copy

Wells Fargo Bank v. Diz, 253 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...who nevertheless is entitled to enforce the note. A “holder” is defined as, inter alia, “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). A “bearer” is defined as, inter alia, “a person in possession of a negotiable instrument [. . .] that 3 is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.” § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Luiz v. Lynx Asset Servs., LLC, 198 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 90 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12795, 2016 WL 4445941

...in possession with the rights of a holder. To be a holder, Lynx would have had to shdw that Liquidation was “in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Sykes Corp. v. E. Metal Supply, Inc., 659 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 504, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8870, 1995 WL 497263

...Pursuant to the Florida Commercial Code, a negotiable instrument is converted when it is paid on a forged endorsement. § 673.419(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991). Although the code does not explicitly define forgery, it does provide that an unauthorized endorsement includes a forgery. § 671.201(43), Fla.Stat....
Copy

In Re Aquamarine USA, Inc., 330 B.R. 280 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 58 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 647, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1730, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 99

...[15] The Debtor is a commercial merchant dealing in consignment sales of used boats and equipment. [16] The Debtor had the power to sell the Boat to a buyer in the ordinary course. SunTrust had notice of the consignment sale based on the communications between the Seller, Debtor and SunTrust. Sections 671.201(25), (26)....
...Subsection (25) sets forth that a person has "notice" of a fact when: (a) He or she has actual knowledge of it: or (b) He or she has received a notice or notification of it: or (c) From all the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question he or she has reason to know that it exists. FLA. STAT. ANN. § 671.201(25) (West 2004)....
...Acquiescence in a consignment relationship by the lien holder constitutes entrustment pursuant to § 672.403 of the Florida Uniform Commercial Code. Carlsen v. Rivera, 382 So.2d 825, 826 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 4th 1980). SunTrust had notice of the consignment of the Boat pursuant to § 671.201(25)(c) and by providing information to the Debtor and taking no affirmative action to protect its collateral....
...in the business of selling goods of that kind. A person buys goods in the ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the seller's own usual or customary practices. FLA. STAT. ANN. § 671.201(9) (West 2004)....
...sold the Boat to Koetter through the Debtor's usual and customary consignment sale practices. Koetter purchased the Boat in good faith, for value, from the Debtor without knowledge of SunTrust's lien interest in the Boat. Koetter qualifies as a buyer in the ordinary course of the Debtor's business as defined by § 671.201(9) of the Florida Uniform Commercial Code....
Copy

George L. Kenney a/k/a George Kenney v. HSBC USA, Nat'l Ass'n, Susie N. Kenney a/k/a Susie Kenney, Sea Oaks Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc., Sea Oaks of Juno Beach Condo. Two Ass'n, Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce. § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Grant v. Southtrust Bank of Nw. Florida, 605 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9995, 1992 WL 227869

...Statutes (1991) (U.C.C. § 9-105), provides that “chapter 671 [pertaining to general provisions of the Florida U.C.C.] contains general definitions and principles of construction ... applicable throughout this chapter.” Pertinent to this case is Section 671.201(26), Florida Statutes (1991) (U.C.C....
...f of mailing exists. 2 James J. White & Robert S. Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 27-12, at 602 (3d ed. 1988) (footnote omitted; emphasis added). Cases from other jurisdictions involving U.C.C. provisions identical to sections 679.504(3) and 671.201(38), require proof only that notice was sent....
Copy

Santana Equestrian Private Fin., LLC v. Tiffany Richtmyer (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...A person buys goods in ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which 2 the seller is engaged or with the seller’s own usual or customary practices. § 671.201(9), Fla....
Copy

First Bank of Immokalee v. Fwcc, 745 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...e address that was not yet operational. The trial court did not err in so doing. Section 674.302(1) states that a bank is accountable for the amount of a check if it "does not ... return the item or send notice of dishonor" by the midnight deadline. Section 671.201, Florida Statutes (1993), contains the general definitions of the Uniform Commercial Code of which section 674.302 is a part. Section 671.201(38) states that: "`Send' in connection with any writing or notice means to deposit in the mail ......
Copy

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., as Tr. v. William F. Noll, I I I, 261 So. 3d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to an identified person who is in possession. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). Lack
Copy

Jennifer Roller, Andrea Soule, & Kathleen Doud, as Beneficiaries of the James G. Collins Trust u/a/d August 30, 1990 Vs Judith R. Collins & Cypress Trust Co., as Successor Tr. of the James G. Collins Trust u/a/d August 30, 1990 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...instrument is entitled to reimbursement from the accommodated party and is entitled to enforce the instrument against the accommodated party.” Neither chapter 673 nor section 673.4191 defines the term “person” or “a party” as a trust. However, section 671.201, Florida Statutes (2021), contains general definitions that apply to chapter 673. See § 671.101(2). Section 671.201(29) defines a “party” as “a person who has engaged in a transaction or made an agreement subject to this code.” § 671.201(29), Fla. Stat. (2021) (emphasis added). Under section 671.201(30), a “person” is defined as “an individual; corporation; business trust; estate; trust; partnership; limited liability company; association; joint venture; government; governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality; public corporation; or any other legal or commercial entity.” § 671.201(30), Fla....
Copy

Hsbc Bank USA, Nat'l Assoc., Etc. v. James Hess a/k/a James H. Hess, 228 So. 3d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 4679601

...Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 185 So. 3d 1277, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Atl. Bank of West Orlando, 364 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1451, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16474

sold to a good faith purchaser. We disagree. Section 671.201(9) defines a buyer in the ordinary course of
Copy

Powers v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 202 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15241

...enforce a lost, destroyed, or stolen instrument or an instrument paid by mistake. A holder is a person in possession of the negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to the holder. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Mario A. Rodriguez & Lendy Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a Am.'s Servicing Co., 178 So. 3d 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15239, 2015 WL 5948169

...instrument.” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2010) (emphasis added). The Florida UCC defines a “holder” to be “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
...note is not in bearer form or is payable to someone or some entity other than the plaintiff filing suit. In such case, documentation or evidence regarding ownership, assignment, or transfer of the note must prove the plaintiff has the rights of a holder. §§ 671.201(21); 671.2011(1); 673.2031(1), (2), and (3); 673.3011(2); and 673.3081(2), Fla....
Copy

Empire of Am. Fed. Sav. Bank v. Brady, 776 F. Supp. 1571 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1191, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15963, 1991 WL 230487

...trict court. Maseda, 861 F.2d at 1252 . . § 673.403(3) provides: Except as otherwise established the name of an organization preceded or followed by the name and office of an authorized individual is a signature made in a representative capacity. . Section 671.201(25) states that a person has notice of a fact when they have actual knowledge, received notice of it, or has reason to know from all the facts and circumstances known at the time.
Copy

The Allegro at Boynton Beach, LLC v. C. Bruce Pearson & Olson Land Partners, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...to a particular person or place.” Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) (emphasis added). Statutory definitions bear out the voluntariness element. For instance, under the Uniform Commercial Code, “delivery” is the “voluntary transfer of possession.” § 671.201(15), Fla....
Copy

Claudine M. Stacknik v. U. S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...proof of regular business practices, an affidavit swearing that the letter was mailed, or a 1Concomitant with her negative amortization argument, Ms. Stacknik contends that U.S. Bank is not entitled to enforce the note as a holder, as that term is defined in section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes (2013)....
Copy

Bank of New York v. Burgiel, 248 So. 3d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...673.4181(4), Florida Statutes. § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2014). A holder is defined as, inter alia, “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” Id. § 671.201(21)(a). In this case, Bank’s complaint alleged that it acquired the loan and possessed both legal and beneficial interest in the note and mortgage prior to filing the complaint....
Copy

In re Elowitz, 550 B.R. 603 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 75 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 205, 89 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 823, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2206

...In the context of the law of negotiable instruments, the “holder” of an instrument is “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer 11 or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (21)....
...mplaint.” Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So.3d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (internal citation omitted). . "Bearer” means “a person in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank,” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (5)....
Copy

Musselman v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas (In re Balderrama), 473 B.R. 823 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 380, 2012 WL 1893634, 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 2350

...red in time to move for a new trial.” . Doc. No. 71 . A promissory note is a negotiable instrument governed by Chapter 673 of the Florida Statutes. Taylor v. Deutsche Bank National Trust, 44 So.3d 618, 622 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 5th 2010). . Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (21). . “Bearer means a person ... in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (5)....
Copy

Alwyn York McConnell v. JPMorgan Chase, 190 So. 3d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 2745295, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195

...e original lender in this case, prior to the filing of the complaint. A “holder” is “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession[.]” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Hanna v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC, 270 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

....3011(1), Florida Statutes (2016). See Murray v. HSBC Bank USA , 157 So.3d 355 , 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (recognizing that pursuant to section 673.3011, Florida Statutes, the "holder of the instrument" may enforce an instrument, and that pursuant to section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes, a "holder" is a "person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession")....
Copy

Hanna v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC, 270 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

....3011(1), Florida Statutes (2016). See Murray v. HSBC Bank USA , 157 So.3d 355 , 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (recognizing that pursuant to section 673.3011, Florida Statutes, the "holder of the instrument" may enforce an instrument, and that pursuant to section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes, a "holder" is a "person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession")....
Copy

Nermine Hanna v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC & Patricia T. Connor (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...instrument pursuant to section 673.3011(1), Florida Statutes (2016). See Murray v. HSBC Bank USA, 157 So. 3d 355, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (recognizing that pursuant to section 673.3011, Florida Statutes, the “holder of the instrument” may enforce an instrument, and that pursuant to section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes, a “holder” is a “person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession”). The promissory note in this case pr...
Copy

Taoufiq Seffar v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc., 160 So. 3d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4270, 2015 WL 1334288

...673.4181(4).” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Thus, to be a holder, the instrument must be payable to the person in possession or indorsed in blank. See § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Ottoniel Cruz & Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...M & I Bank, 67 So. 3d 1129, 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). “A person may be a 1 A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Catherine P. Cox v. U.S. Bank, Trust N.a., as Tr. for Lsf9 Master Participation Trust (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...who is entitled to enforce. § 673.3011(1)–(3), Fla. Stat. (2015). A “holder” is “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Nationstar Mortg., LLC, as Successor in Interest to Wells Fargo Bank, N. a. v. Stephen Johnson (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...pretrial request, released the original note to Nationstar, and Nationstar introduced the note into evidence. Nationstar, therefore, physically possessed the note at trial and had standing to foreclose at that time as the holder of the note. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Johnson, 250 So. 3d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...r's pretrial request, released the original note to Nationstar, and Nationstar introduced the note into evidence. Nationstar, therefore, physically possessed the note at trial and had standing to foreclose at that time as the holder of the note. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Robert T. Frost a/k/a Robert Frost v. Christiana Trust, a Div. of Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB, etc., 193 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9596, 2016 WL 3419300

...Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 174 So. 3d 489, 490–91 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). “Thus, to be a holder, the instrument must be payable to the person in possession or indorsed in blank.” Murray v. HSBC Bank USA, 157 So. 3d 355, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Richter v. United States, 663 F. Supp. 68 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 722, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13731

...and without knowledge that the sale is in violation of the ownership rights or security interest of *70 a third party in the goods buys the goods in the ordinary course from a person in the business of selling goods of that kind....” Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201(9) (West Supp....
Copy

Vicoria S. Magaldi v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 199 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258, 2016 WL 3268351

...s[ection] 673.4181(4).” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Thus, to be a holder, the instrument must be payable to the person in possession or indorsed in blank. See § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Ottoniel Cruz & Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, etc., 199 So. 3d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9272, 2016 WL 3342651

...the time it filed the complaint. JPMorgan acknowledged that the note was 1 A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

State v. Haas, 433 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20846

Black’s Law Dictionary 345 (5th ed. 1979). See also § 671.201(24), Fla.Stat. (1981).
Copy

Gary S. Snyder & Jane Snyder v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 169 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11413, 2015 WL 4549529

...the rights of a holder.” Mazine v. M & I Bank, 67 So. 3d 1129, 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). A “holder” is “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession[.]” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Bruno v. Fleet Credit Corp., 564 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 807, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5434, 1990 WL 105516

...The master lease states: “Any such filing or recording shall not be deemed evidence of any intent to create a security interest un *600 der the Uniform Commercial Code.” As to the leased equipment,-it is clear that Fleet was the owner under a true lease and not a secured creditor. See § 671.201(37), Fla....
...Elephant Industries signed a security agreement which described the accounts receivable and other collateral and stated that it was signed to secure obligations under the master lease. For purposes of the UCC, “value” is broadly defined to include “any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract.” § 671.201(44)(d), Fla.Stat....
Copy

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Hagstrom, 203 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11054

...ial Code (UCC). §§ 673.1011, .1021, .1041, Fla. Stat. (2011). And Deutsche Bank is entitled to enforce the note not because it is an assignee of the right to bill and collect but because it meets the statutory definition of the holder of the note. Section 671.201, Florida Statutes (2011), defines “holder” as “[t]he person in possession of a [note] that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a)....
Copy

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Ehud Rafaeli, Lizabeth Rafaeli (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...t, is enforceable by the holder. § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). The term “holder” means “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Henderson v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, 92 So. 3d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 2913159, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11669

...4th DCA 2011), we explained that the person entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument such as a note is the “ ‘holder of the instrument.’ ” (quoting § 673.3011, Fla. Stat.). A “holder” is the person in possession of the instrument that is payable to bearer or to an identified person in possession. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. “Bearer” means “a person in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.” § 671.201(5), Fla....
Copy

Bank of New York, Etc. v. Andrew Calloway (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

possession.’” Caraccia, 185 So. 3d at 1279 (quoting § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013)). Here, Bank of
Copy

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurly, Banick & Strickfoot, P.A. v. Ricciardelli (In re G.O. Harris Fin. Corp.), 51 B.R. 100 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1810, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5748

...Assuming without determining that Rose holds a valid and perfected security interest, to be enforceable it must secure an enforceable obligation. The Uniform Commercial Code defines a security interest as, “an interest in personal property which se *104 cures payment or performance of an obligation”. § 671.201(37), Fla.Stats....
Copy

Olivera v. Bank of Am., N.A., 141 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 3377081, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10610

...The note contains an indorsement in blank by Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., which potentially could establish BAC's, and hence BOA's, status as holder when -6- BAC took possession of the note.2 See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Gafoor Jaffer & Nina Jaffer v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 155 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 2015 WL 71828

...(emphasis added). The last sentence of section 673.3011 makes it clear that possession of the instrument is more important than ownership of the instrument in terms of having the right to enforce payment on the instrument.4 Also relevant to the analysis is section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes (2013), which defines who is considered a holder of a negotiable instrument: (21) “Holder” means: (a) The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is 4 Although not discussed in cas...
...The allegation that “Plaintiff is . . . entitled to enforce the Mortgage Note and Mortgage” is ambiguous, fatally vague, and conclusory. Ambiguous attached would be completely consistent with the allegation that the plaintiff was the holder of the note as defined in section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes. 9 because it does not identify whether Chase is “the holder” of the note or “a nonholder in possession of the note who has the rights of a holder.” Fatally vague...
...The brief opinion in Beaulieu does not describe facts or issues on appeal suggesting there was a contention that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. In Beaulieu, we said “[b]ecause 7 Because “holder” by definition requires possession of the instrument, possession is assumed when one is a holder. § 671.201(21), Fla....
...itlement to enforce the claim and obtain a judgment, appears to me, quite frankly, unjust. Section 673.3011 makes it clear that entitlement to enforce a mortgage note depends on possession of the note, not an ownership interest in the note, and section 671.201(21) makes it clear that one cannot be a holder of the mortgage note unless the note is payable to the entity seeking to enforce or to the bearer.10 As the Jaffers pointed out in their brief, the portion of the mortgage note that gave...
Copy

Diego Cartwright v. LJL Mortg. Pool, LLC, Rachel Y. Young a/k/a Rachel Young a/k/a Rachael Young, Roderick Young, Jeniffer Young-Campbell & Amber Lake Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc., 185 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1438, 2016 WL 404074

...JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So. 3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Elliott, 953 F.2d 1560 (11th Cir. 1992).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 588, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2691, 1992 WL 22976

...hich his transferor had or had actual authority to convey. Fla.Stat. § 678.301(1). The statute defines purchaser as anyone who “takes by sale, negotiation, pledge, gift, or any other voluntary action creating an interest in property.” Fla.Stat. § 671.201(31) and (32)....
Copy

Phan v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 198 So. 3d 744 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1306, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2841, 2016 WL 746400

...Florida Uniform Commercial Code. See § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2008) ("The term 'person entitled to enforce' an instrument means: the holder of the instrument[.]"). To hold a note under the Uniform Commercial Code ordinarily connotes possession of the document itself. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

State Environ. Reg. v. Ctl Distrib., 715 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 75058

...The handwritten notation on the bill of lading is also admissible as part of that business record and, therefore, falls under that exception to the rule against hearsay. A bill of lading accompanies the delivery of a product, in this case DOP, to the buyer and serves to acknowledge the buyer's receipt of the product. See section 671.201(6), Florida Statutes (1995)....
Copy

Wane v. Loan Corp., 926 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2013 WL 672574, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25245

holder of the note pursuant to Florida Statute § 671.201(21); and (17) unclean hands. (Doc. # 70). Bank
Copy

Rincon v. HSBC Bank (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Statutes (2012), a party must be: the holder of the note; a non-holder in possession of the note who has the rights of a holder; or a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2012). Section 671.201(21), Florida Statues (2012), defines "holder" as "[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession." If an indorsement...
Copy

The Bank of New York Mellon, Etc. v. Remonde Lopez & Samuel Lopez (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). “Thus, to be
Copy

Houk v. PennyMac Corp., 210 So. 3d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 535437, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1659

...CitiMortgage, it would be a physical impossibility for PennyMac to be a holder of the note. " 'Holder' means: (a) The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession. . . ." § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Morris v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 182 So. 3d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18409, 2015 WL 8316579

...not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce. § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2011). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

In Re Allied Printing, Inc., 344 B.R. 153 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 175, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2853, 2005 WL 3947958

...Erwin estimated that the total cost to de-install, ship, and refurbish the Lotem and the Trendsetter will be approximately $58,000. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Whether a transaction creates a lease or a security interest is determined by the facts of each case in accordance with § 671.201(37) of the Florida Statutes which provides as follows: (37) "Security interest" means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation ....
...ansaction is entered into. Pursuant to the statute, a transaction creates a security interest if the lessee's obligation to make the rental payments is not terminable by the lessee during the term of the lease and any one of the factors set forth in § 671.201(37)(a)(1)-(4) applies....
...time the Lease was entered into. Second, Debtor is not contractually bound to renew the lease for the remaining economic life of the Equipment or to purchase the Equipment. [2] Third, Debtor may only renew the lease if it pays fair rental value. As 671.201(37)(c) specifically provides that "additional consideration is not nominal if, when the option to renew the lease is granted to the lessee, the rent is stated to be the fair market rent for the use of the goods for the term of the renewal determined at the time the option is to be performed", Debtor does not have the option to renew the lease for no additional or nominal additional consideration. Finally, Debtor may only purchase the equipment if it pays fair market value. As 671.201(37)(c) also specifically provides that "additional consideration is not nominal if, when the option to become the owner of the goods is granted to the lessee, the price is stated to be the fair market value of the goods determined at the time...
...e option is to be performed", Debtor does not have the option to purchase the equipment for no additional or nominal additional consideration. A determination that a transaction does not create a security interest based upon the factors set forth in 671.201(37)(a)(1-4) is not dispositive of whether a security interest was created. A court is required to examine all of the facts and circumstances relevant to the transaction. In re Howell, 161 B.R. 285 (Bankr.N.D.Fla.1993). Although a court is free to consider the factors set' forth in 671.201(37)(b) to guide its determination, no single factor is determinative. A leading treatise has suggested that only the first factor in 671.201(37)(b) is relevant to the determination....
Copy

Gonzalez v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 180 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18133, 2015 WL 7781746

...This argument would place GreenTree under subsection (1) of section 673.3011 because the statutes define a “holder” as: “The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession -” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Key Capital Corp. v. Keen, 535 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2739, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5563, 1988 WL 133930

...ed for security. On July 14, 1987, the court granted Keen’s motion for summary judgment denying Key Corporation’s action for a deficiency judgment. “Whether a lease is intended as a security is to be determined by the facts of each case....” Section 671.201(37), Fla....
Copy

Green v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, 230 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Generally, "a party's standing is determined at the time the lawsuit was filed." McLean, 79 So. 3d at 173. Here, BAC's original complaint did not establish its holder status because it included only an unindorsed note payable to the original lender, CHL, Inc. Cf. § 671.201(21), Fla....
Copy

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rivero Diagnostic Ctr., Inc., a/a/o Carlos Bacallao (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...surrounding text of the same or lesser size; and (b) Language in the body of a record or display in larger type than the surrounding text or set off from surrounding text of the same size by symbols or other marks that call attention to the language. § 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (2008) (emphasis added). The Uniform Commercial Code comment relevant to the definition of “conspicuous,” provides: [The definition of the term “conspicuous”] is intended to indicate some of the methods of making a term attention-calling....
...irtually identical format. The question is whether the above language was “conspicuous”—that is, whether it is “so written, displayed, or presented that a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it.” § 671.201(10)....
...We hold that the language is conspicuous, and that the trial court erred in determining otherwise. We reject the argument that the language cannot be deemed “conspicuous” because it does not satisfy any of the examples described in the definitional section 671.201(10)....
...[The accord and satisfaction statute] requires a “conspicuous” statement that the instrument was tendered in full satisfaction of 7 the claim. “Conspicuous” is defined in Section [671.201](10)....
...check, satisfied the “conspicuous statement” requirement of Florida’s Accord and Satisfaction statute in that it was “so written, displayed, or presented that a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it.” § 671.201(10), Fla....
Copy

Gregory Mirmelli v. Harvey Silverman, Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...observing that “[p]romissory notes are, by definition, negotiable instruments which, by law, may be enforced by a holder, a nonholder in possession who has the rights of the holder, or a person not in possession who nevertheless is entitled to enforce the note”); § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

PMT NPL Fin. v. Centurion Sys., 257 So. 3d 516 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...4th DCA 2017) (“Here, Bank established standing because the original note and blank-endorsed allonge was properly authenticated and introduced into evidence at trial, which was identical to the copy of the note and blank-endorsed allonge attached to the complaint.”). See generally § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Certified Priority Restoration a/a/o Cheryl Coakley v. Universal Ins. Co. of North Am. (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...(2017) (emphasis added). The issue here is whether the insurer’s $3,000 check contained a conspicuous statement that it was tendered as full satisfaction of CPR’s claim. To be conspicuous, the term must be displayed so “a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it.” § 671.201(10), Fla....
...surrounding text of the same or lesser size; and (b) Language in the body of a record or display in larger type than the surrounding text or set off from surrounding text of the same size by symbols or other marks that call attention to the language. § 671.201(10)(a)-(b). Here, the insurer agrees that the check did not include terms used as examples of conspicuous terms in section 671.201(10)(a)-(b)....
Copy

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust, Etc. v. Fleming Harris (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...conclusions are subject to de novo review. Gonzalez v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, 276 So. 3d 332, 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). A holder is “in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
...t and also relied on the Ortiz presumption, under which Deutsche Bank filed a copy of the note with blank indorsements and produced an identical, original copy of the note. Deutsche Bank was in fact the holder of an instrument payable to bearer. See § 671.201(21)(a). Moreover, an instrument with an anomalous indorsement does not alter the negotiation of the instrument....
...of the instrument who has the rights of a holder, or a person entitled to enforce a lost note. § 673.3011(1)–(3), Fla. Stat. (2019). A holder has “possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a). “A party may establish standing by showing that it was entitled to enforce the note at the time it filed suit.” U.S....
...3d 1026, 1031–32 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). Deutsche Bank had standing to bring the foreclosure action. See § 673.3011(1)–(3). Although the Note did not identify Deutsche Bank as the bearer, Deutsche Bank was a holder in possession of a note payable to bearer. See § 671.201(21)(a); Kenney, 175 So....
Copy

Assil v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 171 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11965, 2015 WL 4747196

...o enforce the instrument .... ” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2008). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is. the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Sarit J. Assil n/k/a Sarit Levy v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, Soheil Assil, etc., Victoria Grove Homeowners Associaton, Inc., John Doe & Jane Doe, etc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...who is entitled to enforce the instrument . . . .” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2008). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. McFadyen, 194 So. 3d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 89 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 652, 2016 WL 1658773, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6351

...Because the note was indorsed in blank,5 Fannie Mae only had to have possession of it to be a “holder” to have standing to enforce it: 5 A promissory note indorsed in blank is a bearer instrument enforceable by “a person in possession” of that instrument. See § 671.201(5), Fla....
...Stat. (2008) (“The term ‘person entitled to enforce’ an instrument means: the holder of the instrument[.])” To hold a note under the Uniform Commercial Code ordinarily connotes possession of the document itself. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Alaqua Prop., 190 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, 2016 WL 1600421

...includes the holder of the instrument). The definition of the term “holder” of an instrument includes the “person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession . . .” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
Copy

Carlos M. Rivera & Yanira J. Pena Santiago v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys. Inc. as Nominee for FDIC as Receiver for Amtrust Bank, Shaughnessy Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., & Olympia Master Ass'n, Inc., 189 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1579076, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5999

...ferred. 3. The authoritative copy is communicated to and maintained by the person asserting control or its designated custodian. .... (d) Except as otherwise agreed, a person having control of a transferable record is the holder, as defined in s. 671.201(21), of the transferable record and has the same rights and defenses as a holder of an equivalent record or writing under the Uniform Commercial Code, including, if the applicable statutory requirements under s....
...om MERS showing that the bank had electronic possession of the e-note. Because the bank proved that Fannie Mae had control of the e-note, and that the bank was Fannie Mae’s designated custodian, the bank is the e-note’s holder, as defined in section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes (2010), and has the same rights as a holder of an equivalent record or writing under the Uniform Commercial Code....
Copy

Feltman v. BankAtlantic (In re Allied Respiratory Care Servs., Inc.), 182 B.R. 589 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1995).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 901, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 18, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 747

...IDENTIFIABLE CASH PROCEEDS IN THE FORM OF MONEY: 679.306(4)(b) Section 679.306(4)(b) is inapplicable as well because the Neswitz Settlement Funds were paid by “check” and not by “money”. Section 679.306(4)(b) only deals with proceeds in the form of money, which is defined at section 671.201(24) of the Florida Statutes, 3 as “a medium of exchange authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government_” Tralins received a (cashier’s) check for the Neswitz Settlement Funds....
...out prejudice to the Trustee's right to do so. . Section 679.306(4) of the Florida Statutes is Florida’s codification of section 9-306(4) of the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC”) unaltered and in its entirety. . The general definitions provided in section 671.201 of the Florida Statutes (Article 1, Part II of the UCC) are applicable throughout the UCC as adopted in Florida....
Copy

Rincon v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 196 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1465695, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5760

...A party seeking *419 foreclosure must prove by competent, substantial evidence that it had standing to foreclose at the time it filed its complaint. Schmidt v. Deutsche Bank, 170 So.3d 938, 940 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2012), the holder of a note has standing to foreclose. Section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes (2012), defines “holder” as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” However, “[i]f the note...
...ed HSBC with the note when it filed the foreclosure complaint. HSBC argued at trial that Wells Fargo held the note and transferred it with a blank indorsement to HSBC, successfully granting HSBC holder status at the time of filing the complaint. See § 671.201(21); Gorel, 165 So.3d at 46 ....
Copy

Stevens v. Beck (In re Dickey), 19 B.R. 489 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4310

logical construction. Pursuant to Florida Statutes § 671.-201(32) and (33), “Purchase” is defined to include

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.