The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 672.316(1) ; 810 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. § 5/2-316(1) ; N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-316(1) ; N.M. Stat. . . .
. . . with the Kansas Supreme Court which, upon examining that state’s statute similar to Florida’s Section 672.316 . . .
. . . . § 672.316(2); Ga. Code § 11-2-316(2); Idaho Code § 28-2-316(2); 810 ILCS 5/2-316(2); Ind. . . .
. . . . § 672.316(2). . . . Stat. § 672.316(3)(b). . . .
. . . . § 672.316 (“Remedies for breach of warranty can be limited in accordance with the provisions of this . . . Mincom, Inc., 2007 WL 1222595 (M.D.Fla. 2007) (holding that § 672.316 and § 672.719 stand for the principle . . .
. . . Section 672.316(2), Florida Statutes (1999), instructs that, “to exclude or modify the implied warranty . . .
. . . The supreme court referred to section 672.316(5), Florida Statutes (1981), acknowledging that the Legislature . . .
. . . . § 672.314, in pertinent part as follows: "(1) Unless excluded or modified (s.672.316), a warranty that . . . Stat. § 672.316. . . . .
. . . See §§ 672.313, 672.316(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 672.316(2), Fla. . . .
. . . .”); § 672.316, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Equico Lessors, Inc. v. . . .
. . . Section 672.316(2), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that in order to exclude the warranty of merchantability . . .
. . . The next section provides in relevant part: 672.316 (1997) Exclusion or modification of warranties. ( . . . By its language, subsection 672.316(3)(b) applies only to implied warranties and not to express warranties . . . Express warranties are not excluded by subsection 672.316(3)(b). . . .
. . . See §§ 672.316(1), 672.317, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . . §§ 672.316(4), 672.719(3); see also Action Orthopedics, Inc. v. . . . language excluding implied warranties of merchantability and fitness must be “conspicuous,” Fla.Stat. § 672.316 . . .
. . . Originally, appellants alleged negligence and breach of implied warranty under section 672.316(5), Florida . . . The Florida Supreme Court has held that the law of this state prior to the enactment of section 672.316 . . . Section 672.316(5) was clearly an effort by the legislature to limit implied warranty actions against . . . The only limitation on implied warranty cause of actions specified and plainly pronounced in section 672.316 . . . Bay County, 307 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975): Accordingly, we hold that the application of Section 672.316 . . .
. . . . § 672.316(2). . . .
. . . .” § 672.316(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . Fla.Stat. § 672.316(5). . . . The court further stated that § 672.316(5) “was enacted to limit the Uniform Commercial Code [“U.C.C. . . . Neither the plain meaning of the statutory language of Florida’s “blood-shield” statute, § 672.316(5) . . . The Florida appellate court’s discussion of the statutory purpose of § 672.316(5) in Sicuranza v. . . . The Sicuranza court based its holding on its statutory interpretation that § 672.316(5) “does not, on . . .
. . . from disclaiming responsibility for the warranties of the manufacturer, despite the fact that section 672.316 . . . See § 672.316(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1987) (UCC § 2-316(3)(a)). See also City Dodge, Inc. v. . . .
. . . See § 672.316(5), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . . Section 672.316(5) was enacted to limit the Uniform Commercial Code warranties in the context of the . . . Section 672.316(5), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: The procurement, processing, storage, distribution . . .
. . . Section 672.316(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). . . .
. . . procedures or techniques” for the detection of the human immunodeficiency virus as contemplated by Section 672.316 . . . Section 672.316(5) provides as follows: The procurement, processing, storage, distribution, or use of . . . However, by virtue of section 672.316(5), a cause of action for breach of implied warranty against a . . . of this particular passage, but the opinion, when read in its entirety, properly construes section 672.316 . . . incorrect in its assumption that a plaintiff alleging negligence would have to prove, under section 672.316 . . .
. . . In the enacting provision of what has come to be known as the blood shield statute, § 672.316(5), Fla.Stat . . .
. . . Similarly, Counts III and VI, which allege a claim under Florida Statutes Section 672.316(5), must also . . .
. . . Section 672.316(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1989) provides for the exclusion of the implied warranty: When . . . implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (assuming it did arise), was excluded by section 672.316 . . .
. . . We find the language fails to satisfy the requisite standard of conscpicuousness required by F.S. 672.316 . . .
. . . manufacture, negligent failure to warn, and breach of implied warranty pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 672.316 . . . defect that cannot be detected or removed by a reasonable use of scientific procedures or techniques. 672.316 . . . or remove the AIDS virus from the plasma products, a cause of action under Florida Statutes, Section 672.316 . . .
. . . disclaimer, which ordinarily would preclude a finding of express and implied warranties, see section 672.316 . . .
. . . Hudgens, 455 So.2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (unconscionable contracts), and applying section 672.316, . . .
. . . The trial court disagreed, finding that the disclaimer was conspicuous within the meaning of section 672.316 . . . provided the disclaimer mentions merchantability, and in the case of a writing, that it be conspicuous. § 672.316 . . . disclaim all implied warranties because the language “makes plain that there is no implied warranty.” § 672.316 . . . here to negate the implied warranty of merchantability would effect a literal rewriting of section 672.316 . . .
. . . . §672.316(2). . . . Stat. § 672.316(2). . . . leases only by being printed in somewhat darker type are conspicuous within the requirements of section 672.316 . . .
. . . . §§ 672.316(2), .719, Fla. Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 672.314 states that “[ujnless excluded or modified (s. 672.316), a warranty that the . . .
. . . . § 672.316 Florida Statutes (1985) sets forth the language a disclaimer of warranty must contain in . . . The disclaimers in the Nice House-TCL lease quoted above clearly comply with the requirements of §672.316 . . .
. . . Section 672.314, Florida Statutes (1975), states: "(1) Unless excluded or modified (s. 672.316), a warranty . . . or affirmations of fact made on the container or label if any. “(3) Unless excluded or modified (s. 672.316 . . .
. . . . § 672.316(3)(b). . . .
. . . The courts in both Miller and Rehurek based their decisions on the language of sections 672.315 and 672.316 . . .
. . . . § 672.316, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .
. . . appeared in small print in paragraph six on the back page of the contract and did not comply with § 672.316 . . .
. . . We reject Pennington’s theory based on Sections 672.316 and 672.719, that the “warranty” printed on each . . . with the Kansas Supreme Court which, upon examining that state’s statute similar to Florida’s Section 672.316 . . . Asgrow Seed Company, et al., 246 Cal.App.2d 87, 54 Cal.Rptr. 609 (3d DCA 1966); Section 672.316(3)(d) . . .
. . . Relevant portions of section 672.316, Florida Statutes (1981), provide: 1)Words or conduct relevant to . . . Sec. 672.316, Fla.Stat. . . . Sec. 672.316(3)(a), Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . conspicuous as defined by Section 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1979) and therefore effective under Section 672.316 . . . The pertinent provisions of Section 672.-316, supra, provide: 672.316 Exclusion or modification of warranties . . . is whether the manner of communicating this disclaimer makes it conspicuous as required by Section 672.316 . . . Warranties,” and the contrasting type, clearly causes this disclaimer to fall within the requirements of 672.316 . . . Under Section 672.316, Fla.Stat. (1979), “to exclude or modify any implied warranty of fitness the exclusion . . .
. . . Section 672.316(3Xb), Florida Statutes (1979), provides: When the buyer before entering into the contract . . .
. . . . § 2-316; § 672.316, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . Xerographic contends that this disclaimer was in compliance with requirements of Section 672.316(2) and . . . Having complied with the requirements of Section 672.316(2), Florida Statutes (1975), Xerographic had . . . Section 672.316(2) sets forth the language that must be included in any valid disclaimer as well as the . . .
. . . . § 672.316(2), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . . . § 672.316(2), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .
. . . Section 672.314, Florida Statutes provides: (1) Unless excluded or modified (§ 672.316), a warranty that . . . promises or affirmations of fact made on the container or label if any. (3) Unless excluded or modified (§ 672.316 . . .
. . . transaction giving rise to the claim occurred prior to the enactment of Chapter 69-157, now Section 672.316 . . . Accordingly, we hold that the application of Section 672.316(5), Florida Statutes, provides that a plaintiff . . .
. . . This has also become the law in Florida with the passage of Florida Statutes § 672.316(5), F.S.A. . . .
. . . . § 672.316(2), F.S.A., Exclusion or Modification of Warranties. . . . Dairies, Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 319, said at page 320: “Under § 672.316(2), Fla.Stat, F.S.A., the critical . . . Brooks-Massey urges that the reasoning behind Fla.Stat. § 672.316 was not violated in that purchaser . . . Fla.Stat. § 672.316, F.S.A. does not permit a manufacturer of stock items to disclaim those warranties . . .
. . . Under § 672.316(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the critical requirement for language excluding or modifying implied . . .
. . . Ch. 69-157 (§ 672.316 (5) Fla.Stat, F.S.A.). . . .
. . . Sec. 672.316(2), F.S.1969, F.S.A., “Subject to subsection (3), to exclude or modify the implied warranty . . . F.S.A. 672.314 Implied warranty: merchantability ; usage of trade “(1) Unless excluded or modified (§ 672.316 . . .