Cases from cite.case.law:

M. W. a v. STATE, 263 So. 3d 214 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

E. T. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 261 So. 3d 593 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 90.612(1)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2018). . . .

ANDRES, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 283 (Fla. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

STEVENSON, v. STATE, 234 So. 3d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . courtroom which also includes the protection of witnesses under examination”) (emphasis added); see also § 90.612 . . .

I. ABAUNZA, v. STATE, 180 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . ruling on a claim of cumulative evidence is subject to an abuse of discretion standard); see also § ■90.612 . . .

WOODSON, v. GO, M. D. M. D., 166 So. 3d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . We would observe that section 90.612(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), expressly requires a trial judge . . .

Z. BROOKS, v. STATE Z. v. L., 175 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 2015)

. . . First, the plain'language of section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes, expressly provides trial courts with . . . discretion to expand cross-examination beyond the subject matters discussed during direct examination. § 90.612 . . . Thus, pursuant to section 90.612(2), the .trial court could have permitted the defense to cross-examine . . .

GOSCIMINSKI, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)

. . . .” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . moving back with Goseiminski and thus it fell within the scope of cross-examination permitted by section 90.612 . . .

K. P. a v. STATE, 90 So. 3d 890 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 90.612(3), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

SNELGROVE, v. STATE, 107 So. 3d 242 (Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); see Boyd v. State, 910 So.2d 167, 185 (Fla.2005). . . .

PEDRO v. BABER,, 83 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

W. POLAND v. S. ZACCHEO,, 82 So. 3d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Boyd v. . . .

LINIC, v. STATE, 80 So. 3d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 90.612(2), Fla. . . .

McCRAY, II, v. STATE, 71 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 2011)

. . . .” § 90.612(l)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

FISCHER, v. FISCHER,, 55 So. 3d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.612, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

STATE v. STONE,, 42 So. 3d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

PULCINI, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 90.612(1), Florida Statutes, provides that the judge shall exercise reasonable control over the . . .

POLITE, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 935 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .; see also, § 90.612(2), Fla. . . .

LINDSEY, v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 211 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (2006), provides: Cross-examination of a witness is limited to the . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 7 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2009)

. . . .” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

GARCIA, v. STATE, 974 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2006); Brown v. . . .

LOVE, v. STATE, 971 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . trial judge has the discretion to control the mode, order, and scope of cross examination under section 90.612 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 90.612(l)(b), Fla. . . .

J. R. a v. STATE, 923 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See also § 90.612(l)(a), Fla. . . .

CHANDLER, v. V. CROSBY, Jr., 454 F. Supp. 2d 1137 (M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . attempted cross-examination of police detective which was “clearly outside the scope of direct”); § 90.612 . . .

BOYD, v. STATE, 910 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 2005)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (2001), states, “Cross-examination of a witness is limited to the . . .

LION PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC. v. SUAREZ, 844 So. 2d 768 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Ehrhardt, § 403.1, at 159-60 (2002); see also § 90.612(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

HARDWICK, Jr. v. CROSBY,, 320 F.3d 1127 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . Stat. 90.612(2). . . . .

STOTLER, v. STATE, 834 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (2001) provides that “[c]ross-examination of a witness is limited . . .

BORROTO, v. STATE, 829 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE, 825 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Chapter 2000-316, section 2, amends subsection (3) of section 90.612, Florida Statutes (Mode and order . . .

RIMMER, v. STATE FLORIDA,, 825 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 2002)

. . . control the mode and order of the interrogation of witnesses and the presentation of evidence, see § 90.612 . . .

TOBIN v. W. LELAND, L. USAA, 804 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . "Section 90.612(l)(b) recognizes the trial judge’s responsibility to reasonably control the interrogation . . . Evidence which has minimal probative value can be excluded under section 90.612(l)(b) when it is a waste . . .

JENKINS, v. D. WESSEL,, 780 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

A. WOLOWITZ, v. THOROUGHBRED MOTORS, INC., 765 So. 2d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See also § 90.612(l)(b), Fla. . . .

GRANT, v. STATE, 764 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Sections 90.612 and 90.615 of the Florida Evidence Code give the judge the reasonable control over the . . .

SLOCUM, v. STATE, 757 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

WASHINGTON, v. STATE, 758 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 90.612, Fla. Stat. (1999). On the remaining issue, we find no error. AFFIRMED. . . .

YATES, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., 746 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (1997) provides: Cross-examination of a witness is limited to the . . . This was an “additional” matter, under section 90.612(2), which the court had the discretion to allow . . .

WASHINGTON, v. STATE, 737 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); Sanders v. State, 707 So.2d 664, 667 (Fla.1998). . . .

SULLIVAN, v. SULLIVAN,, 736 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . The trial court has authority under section 90.612, Florida Statutes (1997), to efficiently manage trial . . .

REGISTER, v. STATE, 718 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .” § 90.612(l)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Britton v. . . .

DAVILA, v. STATE, 716 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (1996); see also Coco v. State, 62 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla.1953). . . .

C. KETTERSON MRI v. In ESTATE OF BRUNS,, 711 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .” § 90.612(1)(a) & (b), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

L. ROBINSON, v. STATE, 707 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Alternatively, as Professor Ehrhardt has observed, section 90.612(l)(b) also “recognizes the trial judge . . .

SANDERS, v. STATE, 707 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (1995), provides: Cross-examination of a witness is limited to the . . .

CHANDLER, v. STATE, 702 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1997)

. . . attempted cross-examination of police detective which was “clearly outside the scope of direct”); § 90.612 . . . Chandler as it attempted to cast doubt on his defense and undermine his credibility as a witness. § 90.612 . . .

GREEN, Jr. v. STATE, 688 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1996)

. . . See § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

GERALDS, v. STATE, 674 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1996)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (1993), states that “[c]ross-examination of a witness is limited . . . the facts and circumstances connected to the matters testified to during direct examination, section 90.612 . . .

HUNTER, v. STATE, 660 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1995)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes (1993), states that “[c]ross-examination of a witness is limited . . .

JOSEPH F. MAIMONE SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIONS, INC. v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC., 598 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See § 90.612(1), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

MORGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 60 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . At this point the trial court sent the jury out and announced that under section 90.612, F.S., the court . . .

SHERE, Jr. v. STATE, 579 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1991)

. . . . §§ 90.608, 90.612, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . Section 90.612 of the Florida Statutes (1987) provides: 90.612 Mode and order of Interrogation and presentation . . .

SMITH, a a v. GARDY, M. D. Ob, 569 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See § 90.612(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). As to the plaintiffs’ deposition of Dr. . . .

FARINAS, v. STATE, 569 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 90.612(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

MORRIS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 173 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . In addition, under § 90.612 Fla. . . .

KINGERY, v. STATE, 523 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . to give due weight to the broad discretion accorded a trial court in the conduct of a trial, see § 90.612 . . .

KOON, v. STATE, 513 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1987)

. . . seeking to impeach the credibility of a defense witness on cross-examination as permitted by section 90.612 . . .

G. MURRELL, v. R. EDWARDS,, 504 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 90.612(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1985) provides that a witness may not be asked a leading question . . .

RIVERA, v. STATE, 462 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of the interrogation of witnesses,” Section 90.612 . . .

DUNCAN, v. STATE, 450 So. 2d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes, provides that cross-examination of a witness is limited to the subject . . .

ERP, v. CARROLL,, 438 So. 2d 31 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 90.612(3), Florida Statutes (1981), now provides generally for leading questions only on cross-examination . . . hostile witnesses, as an exception provided by rule of court as is explicitly permitted by section 90.612 . . . Fla.Stat. § 90.612(3)(a), (1981). . . .

D. LANDERS, v. H. LANDERS,, 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . The court cited as authority for this practice sections 90.612(l)(b) and 90.403, Florida Statutes (1978 . . . order, restrict the number of witnesses to avoid merely repetitious or cumulative testimony. §§ 90.403, 90.612 . . .

MENDOZA, v. STATE, 427 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 90.612, Fla.Stat. (1981); Ellis v. State, 25 Fla. 702, 6 So. 768 (1889). Clinton v. . . .

E. SMITH, v. STATE, 404 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 90.612; Hernandez, supra. . . .