Cases Citing Rule 3.701
Total Results: 1315
476 So. 2d 158, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 426
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1681594
Cited 254 times | Published
elected to depart from the sentencing guidelines of rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and gave
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 1218, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 425
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1710007
Cited 202 times | Published
this Court adopted the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. These guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 89
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543
Cited 171 times | Published
921.001(4), Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). To accomplish these goals, the statute
Category: Criminal Procedure
900 So. 2d 495, 2005 WL 168510
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2005 | Docket: 463018
Cited 154 times | Published
sentencing judge shall approve all scoresheets.
Thus, "rule 3.701(d)(1) mandates that a sentence be imposed based
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 523, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 139
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 389465
Cited 146 times | Published
warrant aggravating or mitigating a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Thus far, trial courts have cited
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 1193, 1995 WL 424172
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 1526412
Cited 128 times | Published
statement." § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1983); rule 3.701(d)(11). Two weeks later, relying on our decision
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 554, 1990 WL 55691
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1990 | Docket: 1740281
Cited 121 times | Published
Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The district court remanded, giving
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 863, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 553
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1986 | Docket: 1699742
Cited 114 times | Published
nature of the offender's criminal history." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). Furthermore, the guidelines were to be
Category: Criminal Procedure
861 F.2d 1507, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17129, 1988 WL 127628
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 1988 | Docket: 370719
Cited 93 times | Published
from the Florida sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701) and increasing Branan’s sentence from the
Category: Criminal Procedure
594 So. 2d 267, 1992 WL 18563
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1992 | Docket: 1485882
Cited 91 times | Published
unwarranted variation in the sentencing process." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). The guidelines accomplish this objective
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 403, 1988 WL 26245
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 2514587
Cited 91 times | Published
adequate written reasons for departure.
Under Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, "[v]ictim
Category: Criminal Procedure
614 So. 2d 486
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1993 | Docket: 449216
Cited 83 times | Published
punishment. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. A court may depart from these ranges only
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 1380, 1988 WL 73557
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 529938
Cited 82 times | Published
the defendant has not been convicted, see Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), we held that it was not. Id. We
Category: Criminal Procedure
622 So. 2d 941, 1993 WL 83094
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1993 | Docket: 547051
Cited 81 times | Published
eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized
Category: Criminal Procedure
905 So. 2d 111, 2005 WL 1404428
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2005 | Docket: 1307996
Cited 78 times | Published
"one-cell" recommended range of years. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d) (1984). A sentence calculation error
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 838, 1989 WL 65496
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 105338
Cited 77 times | Published
for violation of community control. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The court gave the following reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 930, 1992 WL 4876
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1992 | Docket: 1528116
Cited 76 times | Published
physical contact and penetration. The version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in
Category: Criminal Procedure
985 So. 2d 985, 2008 WL 2277513
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 1252964
Cited 74 times | Published
775.084(3)(a)6., Fla. Stat. (2001); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11).
Even if the statutes had not been
Category: Criminal Procedure
985 So. 2d 985, 2008 WL 2277513
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 1252964
Cited 74 times | Published
775.084(3)(a)6., Fla. Stat. (2001); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11).
Even if the statutes had not been
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 1329, 1990 WL 103136
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1990 | Docket: 565195
Cited 74 times | Published
acquitted. Lambert, 545 So.2d at 841 (citing Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) & accompanying committee note). Second
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 501, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1295199
Cited 73 times | Published
the defendant has not been convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The court then reasoned that because
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1045, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 182
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 1797606
Cited 73 times | Published
*1046 an element of aggravated assault. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Neither defense counsel nor the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1045, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 182
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 1797606
Cited 73 times | Published
*1046 an element of aggravated assault. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Neither defense counsel nor the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 25, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 254
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1986 | Docket: 1528814
Cited 71 times | Published
to premeditation. It is therefore violative of rule 3.701(d)(11)'s proscription against factors relating
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 284, 1990 WL 141445
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1991 | Docket: 1518689
Cited 58 times | Published
because a guidelines scoresheet was not prepared. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 736, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 473
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1986 | Docket: 1242855
Cited 58 times | Published
reasons to support a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
As an appellate court, our function
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 392, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 132
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1987 | Docket: 1511201
Cited 57 times | Published
for punishment greater than that provided by Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P.
On appeal, the district court
Category: Criminal Procedure
967 F.2d 530, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17556, 1992 WL 164792
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 1992 | Docket: 155544
Cited 53 times | Published
and he was tried as an adult. Pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c) of the Florida Sentencing Guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 982, 1989 WL 3704
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1989 | Docket: 426772
Cited 53 times | Published
which have been received, and we hereby adopt, as rule 3.701 and form 3.988, the rule and forms appended to
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 1308, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 289
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 478173
Cited 53 times | Published
OR REASONS THAT ARE IMPERMISSIBLE UNDER FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.701 IN MAKING ITS DECISION TO DEPART FROM THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 848
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1983 | Docket: 1265314
Cited 51 times | Published
which have been received, and we hereby adopt, as rule 3.701 and form 3.988, the rule and forms appended to
Category: Criminal Procedure
514 So. 2d 1079, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 491
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1987 | Docket: 1749121
Cited 49 times | Published
v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526, 528 (Fla. 1987) (rule 3.701(d)(14) does not limit trial judge's discretion
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 631
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 1699946
Cited 49 times | Published
and convincing reason for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3) ("The penalty imposed should be commensurate
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 128, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 268
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1985 | Docket: 1272276
Cited 42 times | Published
consideration by another statute, I conclude that rule 3.701 d.5.(c) must be given a limited construction
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 851, 1989 WL 65505
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 1344813
Cited 40 times | Published
increase, with credit for time served. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14.
In the present case, petitioner had
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1984 | Docket: 1517721
Cited 40 times | Published
sentence under the new sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We think the trial court erroneously added
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 90
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 1508396
Cited 39 times | Published
used is a factor relating to the instant offense rule 3.701(d)(11) prohibits the court from using it as a
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 691
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 1508389
Cited 38 times | Published
to the new sentencing guidelines set forth in Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 827, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 137
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 1276105
Cited 36 times | Published
warrant aggravating or mitigating a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We will not determine if the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
644 So. 2d 81, 1994 WL 556906
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1994 | Docket: 1248886
Cited 33 times | Published
The court rejected Roberts' argument that under rule 3.701(d)(14) the trial judge could not revise the scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
505 So. 2d 413, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1987 | Docket: 1455109
Cited 33 times | Published
as required by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11. The following colloquy occurred at
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 548, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1985 | Docket: 1509982
Cited 33 times | Published
not clear and convincing as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We agree that three of the four reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 37
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1984 | Docket: 1453194
Cited 32 times | Published
Sentencing Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984), Rule 3.701(b)(1).
[3] It is true that here the defendant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 714
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 444553
Cited 32 times | Published
attempted murder charges which were dismissed. Rule 3.701(d)(11) provided, in part, at the time of appellants'
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 13
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 1452991
Cited 31 times | Published
collateral offenses may not be used for departure. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.[2]Cf
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 328, 1990 WL 78965
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1990 | Docket: 379799
Cited 30 times | Published
that scoresheets are accurately prepared. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1), Committee Notes. In order to reach
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 29
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1987 | Docket: 425660
Cited 30 times | Published
Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 1453369
Cited 30 times | Published
imposed pursuant to the new sentencing guidelines, rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
[2] Both
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 533
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1984 | Docket: 1692638
Cited 30 times | Published
of this factor violate the prohibition of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) concerning factors relating to arrests
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 955
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1984 | Docket: 474373
Cited 28 times | Published
did relate to the instant offense, nothing in rule 3.701 says that matters excluded for purposes of guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
450 So. 2d 926
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 1728952
Cited 28 times | Published
warrants aggravating the sentence for purposes of Rule 3.701(d)(11). The state concedes that none of the items
Category: Criminal Procedure
882 So. 2d 977, 2004 WL 1899952
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2004 | Docket: 1686287
Cited 27 times | Published
eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized
Category: Criminal Procedure
658 So. 2d 88, 1995 WL 424183
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 1525053
Cited 27 times | Published
Statutes (1991).
As explained in the notes following rule 3.701, "[a]ny uncertainty in the scoring of the defendant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 10
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1984 | Docket: 1733120
Cited 27 times | Published
have not been obtained" and, thus, violative of Rule 3.701(d)(11).[1] Appellant argues that the reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
891 So. 2d 479, 2004 WL 2973856
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2004 | Docket: 1704545
Cited 26 times | Published
eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 532, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 228
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1986 | Docket: 1287114
Cited 26 times | Published
court at the time of sentencing as required by Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Dailey
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 449
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1984 | Docket: 1692607
Cited 26 times | Published
arrests or other nonconviction dispositions, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(1) & (d)(11), and none shall be
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 953, 1990 WL 175055
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1991 | Docket: 1669811
Cited 25 times | Published
So.2d 220, 221 (Fla. 1985).
On June 29, 1987, Rule 3.701(d)(7) and was amended as follows:
"Victim injury
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 339, 1991 WL 46861
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 440909
Cited 25 times | Published
scoresheet was incorrectly calculated because rule 3.701 does not specify that the indicated score for
Category: Criminal Procedure
567 So. 2d 882, 1990 WL 127335
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1990 | Docket: 1443343
Cited 25 times | Published
"reasonably justify aggravating ... the sentence." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See, e.g., State v. McCall, 524 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 429, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1985 | Docket: 1484582
Cited 25 times | Published
discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The trial court had before it the
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 703, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 795
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 451523
Cited 25 times | Published
that recommended by the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and by
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 136
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1984 | Docket: 2554098
Cited 25 times | Published
trial court erred in departing from the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6083405, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237174
Cited 24 times | Published
567 So.2d 882, 886 (Fla.1990) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll)), a trial judge is empowered to
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 994, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 229
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1985 | Docket: 106102
Cited 24 times | Published
Court to develop sentencing guidelines); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701.
In summary, there was insufficient separation
Category: Criminal Procedure
460 So. 2d 396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1984 | Docket: 1766879
Cited 24 times | Published
Crim.P. 3.720(b).
397 So.2d at 332.
Likewise, Rule 3.701 provides notice to defendants that the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1984 | Docket: 1317191
Cited 24 times | Published
after the offense in the present case occurred. Rule 3.701 d.5.a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
451 So. 2d 1027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1984 | Docket: 1741179
Cited 24 times | Published
given for departing from the guidelines. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The fact that appellant's juvenile
Category: Criminal Procedure
546 So. 2d 727, 1989 WL 84105
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1989 | Docket: 1442334
Cited 23 times | Published
Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984).
[5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 1100, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1223
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1985 | Docket: 1725655
Cited 23 times | Published
conviction for that reason. However, nothing in rule 3.701 prohibited the court from taking that conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 1359
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514600
Cited 23 times | Published
not follow the guidelines procedures. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. The court sentenced defendant without
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1984 | Docket: 1199180
Cited 23 times | Published
sentencing guidelines. The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(11) in existence when Brady was sentenced
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 551
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 1316573
Cited 23 times | Published
other jurisdictions is clearly prohibited by Rule 3.701.d.11, Fla.R.Cr.P.
There is no logical correlation
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 1387, 1991 WL 1368
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1991 | Docket: 2517804
Cited 22 times | Published
pending case that meets this definition. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d). As a corollary, a presumption then arises
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 477, 1988 WL 50139
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1988 | Docket: 67818
Cited 22 times | Published
on this ground cannot be justified. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 586
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1984 | Docket: 1316955
Cited 22 times | Published
sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11. These reasons shall be articulated in writing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 b. 6
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 478
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1984 | Docket: 1651340
Cited 22 times | Published
five-year maximum allowed by the plea bargain.
While Rule 3.701(d)11 allows departure from the presumptive sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
897 So. 2d 1282, 2005 WL 610049
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2005 | Docket: 1416398
Cited 21 times | Published
921.0021(2), Fla. Stat. (2002); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2)("`Conviction' means a determination
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 159, 1988 WL 54214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1988 | Docket: 1679911
Cited 21 times | Published
[9] § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1985).
[10] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), Committee Note (1983).
[11] The
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 1141, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1205
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1987 | Docket: 1336134
Cited 21 times | Published
injury is not an element of that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Similarly, Chaplin involved a technical
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 179, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1261
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 1272579
Cited 21 times | Published
cognizably "clear and convincing" ones under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(11). We disagree.
II
We will
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 664
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 1401736
Cited 21 times | Published
reasons for departure at the sentencing hearing. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
35 So. 3d 864, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 219, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 645, 2010 WL 1609876
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 456324
Cited 20 times | Published
pending before the court at sentencing, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1); accord Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
763 So. 2d 285, 2000 WL 963827
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2000 | Docket: 308353
Cited 20 times | Published
Raulerson, 699 So.2d at 340. After considering Gazda, rule 3.701(d)(2), and several other authorities, the Fifth
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 436, 1994 WL 656609
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1168936
Cited 20 times | Published
used, as is required, a single scoresheet. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Cook's total sentence at the 1990
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 511, 1992 WL 213150
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1992 | Docket: 1702355
Cited 20 times | Published
2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Committee Note, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).
The problem can be traced to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 519, 1990 WL 80800
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1990 | Docket: 1689007
Cited 20 times | Published
thereby impermissibly punishing the defendant. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. Accordingly, we hold that trial courts
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 823
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1741712
Cited 20 times | Published
included 14 points for victim injury. The version of rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1984 | Docket: 1731997
Cited 20 times | Published
years incarceration.
Subsection d.11. of criminal rule 3.701 requires that the trial court accompany any sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 451
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1984 | Docket: 1316700
Cited 20 times | Published
state prison, and she appeals.
As required by Rule 3.701(b)(6), the court made the following written statement
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 540, 1992 WL 367218
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1992 | Docket: 1674204
Cited 19 times | Published
victim injury as provided for on the score sheet. Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states
Category: Criminal Procedure
558 So. 2d 994, 1990 WL 29523
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1990 | Docket: 1726285
Cited 19 times | Published
545 So.2d 838, 841-42 (Fla. 1989). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The circuit court's imposition of
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 663, 1988 WL 47676
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1341773
Cited 19 times | Published
a conviction has not been obtained. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). If the act was committed after the
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 374, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 283, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 678, 1988 WL 35623
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1988 | Docket: 1660934
Cited 19 times | Published
Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines (Rule 3.701; 3.988), 509 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 1987). The existing
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 214, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 580
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1987 | Docket: 1749182
Cited 19 times | Published
for which the defendant was convicted, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7)(1985), and injury is not an element
Category: Criminal Procedure
71 So. 3d 173, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15106, 2011 WL 4424302
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 2360508
Cited 18 times | Published
generally § 921.0016, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701, 3.988.
. This common understanding is
Category: Criminal Procedure
720 So. 2d 1085, 1998 WL 219729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1998 | Docket: 308401
Cited 18 times | Published
intended to adopt the definition contained in Rule 3.701(d)(2) for section 322.34 or that the supreme
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 897, 1991 WL 94292
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1991 | Docket: 1683940
Cited 18 times | Published
three years prior to the instant offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c). This placed Puffinberger within
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 52, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 293
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 1743272
Cited 18 times | Published
court departed from the sentencing guidelines in rule 3.701 without making the mandatorily written, clear
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 1083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1984 | Docket: 1316519
Cited 18 times | Published
incarceration upon the appellant. As required under rule 3.701(d)(11), the judge provided a written statement
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 1356, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2271
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1985 | Docket: 1710026
Cited 17 times | Published
reasons must be given for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). An interpretation of the guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 596, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1985 | Docket: 1661176
Cited 17 times | Published
a circumstance surrounding the offense. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3). Finally, as appellant puts it, "it
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 36
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1984 | Docket: 449467
Cited 17 times | Published
that both of the reasons given are precluded by Rule 3.701(d)(11) which, at the time of the defendant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 1071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1984 | Docket: 1316662
Cited 17 times | Published
court pursuant to the sentencing guidelines, rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See In
Category: Criminal Procedure
813 So. 2d 152, 2002 WL 385005
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2002 | Docket: 922388
Cited 16 times | Published
valid reason for a departure sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). In this case, the trial judge made
Category: Criminal Procedure
789 So. 2d 958, 2001 WL 746650
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2001 | Docket: 1696207
Cited 16 times | Published
pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). A sentence must be imposed for each
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 1274, 1995 WL 627460
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 1526402
Cited 16 times | Published
for the same crime. We disagree. The meaning of rule 3.701(d)(12) is clear. The rule refers to "any felony"
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 155, 1992 WL 217079
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1992 | Docket: 1702371
Cited 16 times | Published
sanctions are imposed and enforced."
See also Rule 3.701(d)(13), Fla.R.Crim.P. (community control is a
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 1098
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1984 | Docket: 1683353
Cited 16 times | Published
court relied upon the following Committee Note to Rule 3.701 d.10:
If an offender is convicted under an enhancement
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 485
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 1651394
Cited 16 times | Published
guidelines and the use of the scoresheet.
Under rule 3.701(d)(11), a trial judge is allowed to depart from
Category: Criminal Procedure
772 So. 2d 1209, 2000 WL 1675950
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2000 | Docket: 1435119
Cited 15 times | Published
imposition of sentence was suspended." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2); see § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1997)
Category: Criminal Procedure
768 So. 2d 1257, 2000 WL 1530915
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1525510
Cited 15 times | Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
707 So. 2d 326, 1998 WL 65396
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1998 | Docket: 1259659
Cited 15 times | Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
643 So. 2d 668, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1994 WL 549483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1994 | Docket: 1493202
Cited 15 times | Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
603 So. 2d 1270, 1992 WL 148239
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1992 | Docket: 1475775
Cited 15 times | Published
guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Significantly, capital felonies are not
Category: Criminal Procedure
568 So. 2d 452, 1990 WL 129745
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1990 | Docket: 533540
Cited 15 times | Published
been adjudicated guilty.
The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(5) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 670, 1987 WL 29012
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1987 | Docket: 1528064
Cited 15 times | Published
reason therefore violates the proscription in Rule 3.701(d)(11) against considering factors relating to
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 71, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 581
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1344522
Cited 15 times | Published
for punishment greater than that provided by Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P.
We, of course, recognize that
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 845, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1985 | Docket: 1514333
Cited 15 times | Published
the offenses, is expressly prohibited by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11):
Reasons for deviating from the guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1349, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1583
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 1396815
Cited 15 times | Published
court at the time of sentencing as required by Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Dailey
Category: Criminal Procedure
472 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1402
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1985 | Docket: 1793462
Cited 15 times | Published
from the presumptive sentence contemplated in Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 620, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1985 | Docket: 2529256
Cited 15 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11)
In the instant case Appellant was
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 620, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1985 | Docket: 2529256
Cited 15 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11)
In the instant case Appellant was
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 1156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1984 | Docket: 1733242
Cited 15 times | Published
from the sentencing guidelines as established in Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 1147
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 801405
Cited 15 times | Published
for departure from those guidelines. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6).
Notwithstanding that this sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
692 So. 2d 199, 1997 WL 30812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 436342
Cited 14 times | Published
whether there are one or more victims." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1992).[3] The 1988 committee notes
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 1090, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1250
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1987 | Docket: 1362324
Cited 14 times | Published
court specifically states:
The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(10) is revised to clarify the relation of
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 405, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 220
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 1336806
Cited 14 times | Published
We concur with the district court's reasoning. Rule 3.701(d)(11) limits a judge's authority to aggravate
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 1375, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 701
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1987 | Docket: 1657568
Cited 14 times | Published
State, 336 So.2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). Therefore we reverse and vacate the withheld
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 947, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1985 | Docket: 1679595
Cited 14 times | Published
Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984).
[2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
[3] Section 800.04, Florida Statutes
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 865, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1189
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1985 | Docket: 1679634
Cited 14 times | Published
Scott was being sentenced at the same hearing. Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Cr.P. This rule was not in effect
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 484, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1985 | Docket: 1402617
Cited 14 times | Published
offense for which there has been no conviction.
Rule 3.701(d)(11) provides in part,
Reasons for deviating
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 1305
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 1447033
Cited 14 times | Published
in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Finding
Category: Criminal Procedure
753 So. 2d 605, 2000 WL 192150
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2000 | Docket: 1433388
Cited 13 times | Published
valid reason for a departure sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d). In this case, the record is unclear
Category: Criminal Procedure
667 So. 2d 191, 1996 WL 26547
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1996 | Docket: 156577
Cited 13 times | Published
statutory maximum for community control. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13) ("When community control is imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 1003, 1989 WL 90481
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1989 | Docket: 1475089
Cited 13 times | Published
scoresheet for "legal status at the time of offense." Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 718, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 151
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1986 | Docket: 1667355
Cited 13 times | Published
the offense" constitutes "legal constraint." Rule 3.701(d)(6) defines legal status at the time of offense
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 47, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 578
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1985 | Docket: 1484451
Cited 13 times | Published
the "clear and convincing" test set forth in Rule 3.701(d)(11). The First District Court of Appeal affirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
476 So. 2d 754, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2322
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 1681478
Cited 13 times | Published
dates... .
Id. at 794.
[3] Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(1):
Ultimate responsibility for assuring
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 633, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1564
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1396927
Cited 13 times | Published
victim injury was error. We agree.
The version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R. Crim.P., which was in effect at
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 573, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 667
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 1695006
Cited 13 times | Published
clear and convincing reasons, as required by rule 3.701 d.11, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 49, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 18
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1984 | Docket: 449547
Cited 13 times | Published
guideline sentence established pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. For this limited reason we therefore vacate
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 1360
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514653
Cited 13 times | Published
forth in the sentencing guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. The court sentenced the defendant to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 2530788
Cited 13 times | Published
concurrently.
The state concedes error in that under rule 3.701(d)(12), In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
567 So. 2d 1055, 1990 WL 150220
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 1381015
Cited 12 times | Published
sentenced. In our view, Walker's construction of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure promotes
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 1162, 1990 WL 888
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1990 | Docket: 1319321
Cited 12 times | Published
alone or any nonincarcerative disposition.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, committee note (d)(8) (emphasis added).
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 506, 1989 WL 156438
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1989 | Docket: 1693298
Cited 12 times | Published
500 So.2d 501, 503 (Fla. 1986) (citing Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) (1986)) ("Williams II"), receded from
Category: Criminal Procedure
532 So. 2d 1051, 1988 WL 93705
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 1510266
Cited 12 times | Published
sentencing judge shall approve all scoresheets.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13). As the sentencing guidelines committee
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 303, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 104
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1689583
Cited 12 times | Published
offense, the statutory maximum would be imposed. Rule 3.701(d)(10) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 1219, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2187
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 1729085
Cited 12 times | Published
has been convicted and thus is not violative of rule 3.701(d)(11).
We conclude that when quantity of contraband
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 1342, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2279
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1985 | Docket: 1301648
Cited 12 times | Published
the clear and convincing standard set forth in Rule 3.701 d. 11. We must now determine whether the reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
472 So. 2d 779, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1614
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 1794126
Cited 12 times | Published
three was properly considered in accordance with rule 3.701(b)(3), as "circumstances surrounding the offense
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 337
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 1683385
Cited 12 times | Published
usurp judicial discretion in sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). Departure from the guidelines does
Category: Criminal Procedure
446 So. 2d 222
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1984 | Docket: 1780615
Cited 12 times | Published
sentenced under Florida's new sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, after the
Category: Criminal Procedure
593 So. 2d 496, 1992 WL 10611
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1992 | Docket: 446626
Cited 11 times | Published
1986 AMENDMENT TO THE COMMITTEE NOTE TO FLA. R.CRIM.P. 3.701(d)(5), MUST THE TRIAL COURTS SCORE AN OFFENSE
Category: Criminal Procedure
562 So. 2d 696, 1990 WL 45511
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1990 | Docket: 1256409
Cited 11 times | Published
State, 470 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)6. See generally Ree v. State, 14 *698
Category: Criminal Procedure
559 So. 2d 687, 1990 WL 39904
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1990 | Docket: 1751498
Cited 11 times | Published
these cases were not "pending" for purposes of rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Although
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 1150, 1989 WL 63350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 1709572
Cited 11 times | Published
1985 Amendments to Committee Notes interpreting rule 3.701(d)(7) contained language supporting the court-evolved
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 1004, 1988 WL 96448
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 544044
Cited 11 times | Published
reason for departure sentence). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(2) ("The primary purpose of sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 1043, 1987 WL 2666
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1678035
Cited 11 times | Published
vehicle, a felony of the third degree. See Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701 d.5.a(2).
We also affirm the points scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
514 So. 2d 397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1987 | Docket: 1466853
Cited 11 times | Published
presumptive sentence of 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 years. Rule 3.701(d)(9) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 1292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1986 | Docket: 1276083
Cited 11 times | Published
reasons" for departure from the guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 b.6. Three reasons were stated by the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 208, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2651
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 1514319
Cited 11 times | Published
did not see eye to eye on the meaning of the rule 3.701(d)(11) requirement that a deviation from the
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 320
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 1452444
Cited 11 times | Published
concur.
NOTES
[1] See § 921.001, Fla. Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
[2] See Key v. State, 452 So.2d 1147 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 559
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1984 | Docket: 1447666
Cited 11 times | Published
1984, the supreme court approved an amendment to rule 3.701(d)(7) which provides: "Victim injury shall be
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 686
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 1508384
Cited 11 times | Published
primarily on a sentencing guidelines scoresheet. See Rule 3.701(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. The primary offense at conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 165, 2004 WL 314515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2004 | Docket: 1273790
Cited 10 times | Published
`parallel' or `analogous' statute referred to by rule 3.701.d.5(a)(2). But even if the current statute, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
810 So. 2d 871, 2002 WL 122167
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2002 | Docket: 1654675
Cited 10 times | Published
So.2d 984, 985 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14).
[3] Attempted armed robbery is
Category: Criminal Procedure
705 So. 2d 1374, 1998 WL 10312
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1998 | Docket: 1578650
Cited 10 times | Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
756 F. Supp. 1492, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2256, 1991 WL 23651
District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1991 | Docket: 2136100
Cited 10 times | Published
whether imposition of sentence was suspended." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(2); see also McCrae v. State, 395 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 384, 1990 WL 57806
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1990 | Docket: 1740207
Cited 10 times | Published
537 So.2d 103 (Fla. 1989), and that pursuant to rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(5), no points should have been scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
860 F.2d 1010, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15624, 1988 WL 115005
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 22, 1988 | Docket: 278187
Cited 10 times | Published
Florida’s revised sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 (West Supp. 1988). He listed the 1985 conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 1029, 1988 WL 62122
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1988 | Docket: 1273383
Cited 10 times | Published
not an illegal sentence. The committee note to Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P., states that "community control
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 719, 1988 WL 6426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 1698799
Cited 10 times | Published
Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 176, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1528906
Cited 10 times | Published
and the resulting suffering of the victim.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3) provides in part that the "penalty
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 176, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1528906
Cited 10 times | Published
and the resulting suffering of the victim.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3) provides in part that the "penalty
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 497, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1985 | Docket: 371789
Cited 10 times | Published
JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] The committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12) now provides, in pertinent part:
If a
Category: Criminal Procedure
477 So. 2d 663, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2441
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1985 | Docket: 1320565
Cited 10 times | Published
intended to depart beyond the one cell allowance of Rule 3.701(d)(14), and it gave additional reasons: This
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 80, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 1260773
Cited 10 times | Published
sentenced him to a term exceeding the guidelines of Rule 3.701. It clearly stated a clear and convincing reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 779, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 973
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1985 | Docket: 1680315
Cited 10 times | Published
apply when a defendant is sentenced pursuant to Rule 3.701, whether or not the trial court deviates from
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 493, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 373
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 1509710
Cited 10 times | Published
from the sentencing guidelines prescribed in Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 493, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 373
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 1509710
Cited 10 times | Published
from the sentencing guidelines prescribed in Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 874, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1985 | Docket: 449542
Cited 10 times | Published
guidelines, the trial judge, in accordance with rule 3.701(d)(11), delineated in a written statement his
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 1514580
Cited 10 times | Published
imposed the sentences, despite the admonition of Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 1514580
Cited 10 times | Published
imposed the sentences, despite the admonition of Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 64
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1984 | Docket: 1733124
Cited 10 times | Published
We also find that the court erred in applying Rule 3.701 d.14 because it was not in effect at the time
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 1143
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 549886
Cited 10 times | Published
departed from the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
There was no error in departing from the
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 1300
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1984 | Docket: 1446813
Cited 10 times | Published
commission of the robbery offense. See Smith and rule 3.701(b)(3).
Second, defendant argues that the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 751
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1984 | Docket: 444380
Cited 10 times | Published
reasons" for departing from the guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). This rule also provides that reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
885 So. 2d 376, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 626, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1829, 2004 WL 2360131
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2004 | Docket: 1685267
Cited 9 times | Published
importance or are likely to recur.").
[2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1) ("One guideline scoresheet shall be
Category: Criminal Procedure
660 So. 2d 269, 1995 WL 541628
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1995 | Docket: 1639606
Cited 9 times | Published
importance in the sentencing decision." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b).
In the instant case, Darrisaw's offenses
Category: Criminal Procedure
616 So. 2d 964, 1993 WL 102061
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1993 | Docket: 1366899
Cited 9 times | Published
a habitual offender sentence.
Consistent with Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,[6]
Category: Criminal Procedure
616 So. 2d 128, 1993 WL 86512
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1993 | Docket: 1726848
Cited 9 times | Published
disputes the scoring of "victim injury." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The scoresheet reflects the inclusion
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
situations wheren such judge is unavailable.
RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
(a.) Use with Forms. This
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 626, 1991 WL 150424
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1991 | Docket: 1515253
Cited 9 times | Published
and must be reduced. See Committee Note, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12); Spivey v. State, 526 So.2d 762 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
574 So. 2d 247, 1991 WL 9373
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1991 | Docket: 1437314
Cited 9 times | Published
status. In the absence of express language in rule 3.701 requiring such a questionable approach to sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 823, 1990 WL 14887
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1990 | Docket: 543011
Cited 9 times | Published
applying Ray, we note that the amendment to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13), and the explanatory comment thereto
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 778, 1989 WL 153673
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1989 | Docket: 1675467
Cited 9 times | Published
sentencing within the court's jurisdiction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). No sentence should be delayed to await
Category: Criminal Procedure
507 So. 2d 788, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1330
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1987 | Docket: 459940
Cited 9 times | Published
the injury is an element of the offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Victim injury is not an element of
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 1282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 450
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 1453615
Cited 9 times | Published
consistent with the guidelines.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
[2] See, e.g., § 775.14, Fla. Stat.
[3]
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1038
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1986 | Docket: 1796934
Cited 9 times | Published
effect at the time of his sentencing. See Fla.R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14) and 3.988(e); State v. Jackson, 478
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 715, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1986 | Docket: 1667362
Cited 9 times | Published
convincing reason for departure within the meaning of Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 1147, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2625
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1985 | Docket: 1484664
Cited 9 times | Published
justice, not to usurp his judicial discretion. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); Manning v. State, 452 So.2d 136 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 1362, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2268
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1985 | Docket: 1302130
Cited 9 times | Published
established by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Based on recent Florida Supreme Court
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 890, 1996 WL 346929
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 1723714
Cited 8 times | Published
guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; ch. 83-87, § Laws of Fla. The sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
633 So. 2d 1122, 1994 WL 63291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1994 | Docket: 1296711
Cited 8 times | Published
pending before the court for sentencing. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)1. Because remand is necessary to correct
Category: Criminal Procedure
590 So. 2d 1018, 1991 WL 259967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1991 | Docket: 211317
Cited 8 times | Published
be the "primary" offense at resentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.3. Additionally, it appears that the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 So. 2d 61, 1988 WL 31711
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1988 | Docket: 1267403
Cited 8 times | Published
supported by clear and convincing reasons. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The third issue concerns the imposition
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 521, 1988 WL 74773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1988 | Docket: 1419350
Cited 8 times | Published
1281 (Fla. 1985). See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
Davis argues that the trial judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 1360, 1988 WL 2625
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1988 | Docket: 1778595
Cited 8 times | Published
elected to be sentenced pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. The court imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 1370, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1987 | Docket: 1527603
Cited 8 times | Published
into appellant's presumptive sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) (definition of "legal status at time
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 1289, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1561
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1986 | Docket: 1527605
Cited 8 times | Published
forty-two points for victim injury was error. Rule 3.701 d. 7., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1176, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 985
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1986 | Docket: 1796878
Cited 8 times | Published
injury to Officers Brown and Bryan. According to Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R.Crim.P., victim injury "shall be
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 709, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 909
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1986 | Docket: 1406879
Cited 8 times | Published
Appellant is correct *710 in this argument. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Moore v. State, 469 So.2d 947 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 530, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1986 | Docket: 1511925
Cited 8 times | Published
judges, not to usurp judicial discretion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). Following the standard announced in
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 223, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 61
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 758513
Cited 8 times | Published
increase under the sentencing guidelines (see Rule 3.701(d)(14)), it will not substantiate a greater increase
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 223, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 61
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 758513
Cited 8 times | Published
increase under the sentencing guidelines (see Rule 3.701(d)(14)), it will not substantiate a greater increase
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 213, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 45
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1985 | Docket: 1220678
Cited 8 times | Published
five and one-half years.
The original version of rule 3.701(d)(5)(c) provided that certain juvenile dispositions
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 480, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2540
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1985 | Docket: 1484722
Cited 8 times | Published
his departure from the sentencing guidelines of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, this issue
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 462, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1985 | Docket: 1484573
Cited 8 times | Published
individual on the basis of social or economic status. Rule 3.701(b)(1), Fla. R.Crim.P.; Mischler v. State, 458
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 346, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1870
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1985 | Docket: 1749825
Cited 8 times | Published
recommended armed robbery sentence pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines the court erred by
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 1063, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1190
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1985 | Docket: 1725456
Cited 8 times | Published
to persons sentenced under the guidelines. See Rule 3.701(b)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Section
Category: Criminal Procedure
466 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1985 | Docket: 438775
Cited 8 times | Published
the state points out that the Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) has been amended to read as follows:
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
466 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1985 | Docket: 438775
Cited 8 times | Published
the state points out that the Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) has been amended to read as follows:
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 102, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 213
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1985 | Docket: 1509952
Cited 8 times | Published
imprisonment.
At the time Williard was sentenced, rule 3.701(d)(11) stated:
Departures from the guideline
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 1114
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1984 | Docket: 426245
Cited 8 times | Published
offense.
The last sentence of the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) provides: "Victim injury is to be scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 457
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1984 | Docket: 1316815
Cited 8 times | Published
1983, the effective date of the guidelines. See Rule 3.701, F.R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand for resentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 457
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1984 | Docket: 1316815
Cited 8 times | Published
1983, the effective date of the guidelines. See Rule 3.701, F.R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand for resentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
833 So. 2d 169, 2002 WL 31528583
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1259185
Cited 7 times | Published
1999) (citing cases). However, in 1991, the rule (rule 3.701(d)(7)) was amended to require that victim injury
Category: Criminal Procedure
699 So. 2d 339, 1997 WL 593917
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1997 | Docket: 1321011
Cited 7 times | Published
1971).
The above definition is consistent with rule 3.701(d)(2) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208
Cited 7 times | Published
"imposition of sentence was suspended." See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). Rule 3.650 defines a "judgment" as
Category: Criminal Procedure
659 So. 2d 262, 1995 WL 500387
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1995 | Docket: 1747960
Cited 7 times | Published
primary offense.
*265 593 So.2d at 497 (quoting rule 3.701).[4] In other words, under this sentencing scheme
Category: Criminal Procedure
623 So. 2d 547, 1993 WL 292066
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1993 | Docket: 2542940
Cited 7 times | Published
Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla. 1992); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part;
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 2, 1992 WL 362144
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 1699578
Cited 7 times | Published
prior conviction is completely unscoreable. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(5)(a) suggests the crime could be considered
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 1055, 1991 WL 275540
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 2244537
Cited 7 times | Published
DCA 1989); § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1987); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)12. By contrast, the sentencing method
Category: Criminal Procedure
592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 WL 268080
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1991 | Docket: 1428961
Cited 7 times | Published
Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1990); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11.
Accordingly, this case is reversed
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 937, 1991 WL 98027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1991 | Docket: 2584030
Cited 7 times | Published
takes precedence over a guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.9. Therefore, a trial judge cannot downward
Category: Criminal Procedure
555 So. 2d 362, 1990 WL 3851
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 144159
Cited 7 times | Published
to the commission of the primary offense.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). In Frank v. State, 490 So.2d 190
Category: Criminal Procedure
555 So. 2d 362, 1990 WL 3851
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 144159
Cited 7 times | Published
to the commission of the primary offense.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). In Frank v. State, 490 So.2d 190
Category: Criminal Procedure
546 So. 2d 125, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1688, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3960, 1989 WL 77484
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1989 | Docket: 1442322
Cited 7 times | Published
sentencing guidelines considerations under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, community control is not akin to probation
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 923, 1989 WL 6419
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1989 | Docket: 472322
Cited 7 times | Published
So.2d 736 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13) committee note.
The defendant also
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 509, 1989 WL 6463
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1989 | Docket: 356223
Cited 7 times | Published
explained the above addition:
The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) is revised to include language to clarify
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 212, 1988 WL 93295
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 1528538
Cited 7 times | Published
statement delineating the reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Although the rule does not require
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 So. 2d 986, 1988 WL 86338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1988 | Docket: 1267654
Cited 7 times | Published
downward departure from the guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10).
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 112, 1988 WL 71535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 1367229
Cited 7 times | Published
constraint at the time of the offense. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6).
The second reason, escalating pattern
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 458, 1988 WL 45874
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 1304681
Cited 7 times | Published
allowable sentence to follow incarceration. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
We now address Williams' allegations
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 540, 1988 WL 26280
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1988 | Docket: 1660854
Cited 7 times | Published
State, 498 So.2d 899, 901 (Fla. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). Because Cullen's guideline sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 1313, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1987 | Docket: 1438730
Cited 7 times | Published
yet been obtained for that offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) and Hudson v. State, 504 So.2d 2 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 1360, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1987 | Docket: 1181229
Cited 7 times | Published
court departed from the sentencing guidelines in Rule 3.701 without making the mandatorily written, clear
Category: Criminal Procedure
507 So. 2d 132, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 572
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1987 | Docket: 459941
Cited 7 times | Published
occurred after commission of the primary offense. Rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P. Accordingly, it was not
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 647, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 1287149
Cited 7 times | Published
conformity with the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701).
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 740
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1986 | Docket: 455667
Cited 7 times | Published
State, 476 So.2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). While a separate sentence must be
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 479, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 442
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 2509251
Cited 7 times | Published
legislative intent, as expressed by the adoption of Rule 3.701(d)(12), see Section 921.001(4)(b), Florida Statutes
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 50
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 2585252
Cited 7 times | Published
offenses did not result in convictions. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). In its final reason, the court acknowledges
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 404, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 624
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 1511957
Cited 7 times | Published
computation of the recommended sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c).
We have previously addressed this
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2496
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1985 | Docket: 1741693
Cited 7 times | Published
convincing, or were not supported by the record. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The court gave as its reasons for
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 694, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 2469905
Cited 7 times | Published
mandatory sentence automatically takes precedence. Rule 3.701(d)(9), Fla.R. Crim.P. Because the habitual offender
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 1262, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 477
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1985 | Docket: 1323971
Cited 7 times | Published
This was within the Sentencing Guidelines, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701, presumptive sentence range, according to
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 1015, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 86
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514630
Cited 7 times | Published
basis for departure is clearly proscribed by Rule 3.701(11), which provides in pertinent part that "Reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 792
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1984 | Docket: 444315
Cited 7 times | Published
defendant's "primary offense" was armed burglary, rule 3.701(d)(3), the scoresheet for carrying a concealed
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 958
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1984 | Docket: 474508
Cited 7 times | Published
921.001 or 921.005, Florida Statutes (1983), or Rule 3.701 make specific reference to that circumstance
Category: Criminal Procedure
13 So. 3d 490, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6042, 2009 WL 1456732
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 1188418
Cited 6 times | Published
statute to that contained in the committee notes of rule 3.701 because rule 3.703 specifically superseded case
Category: Criminal Procedure
832 So. 2d 258, 2002 WL 31756924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2002 | Docket: 1700101
Cited 6 times | Published
including the bump-up provisions. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14); Jenigen v. State, 801 So.2d 156
Category: Criminal Procedure
791 So. 2d 40, 2001 WL 584433
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2001 | Docket: 1655803
Cited 6 times | Published
community control was not revoked. He points out that rule 3.701(d)(14) allows for a one-cell bump only "after
Category: Criminal Procedure
766 So. 2d 389, 2000 WL 1112309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 475682
Cited 6 times | Published
2d 605, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)). When a trial court imposes a sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
765 So. 2d 242, 2000 WL 1089149
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2000 | Docket: 1522903
Cited 6 times | Published
years before his most recent release, contrary to Rule 3.701(d)(5)(F), appears to be the kind of matter that
Category: Criminal Procedure
748 So. 2d 1042, 1999 WL 743519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1999 | Docket: 1750384
Cited 6 times | Published
for emotional trauma was improper. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (1993).
Defendant challenges the scoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
742 So. 2d 817, 1999 WL 606442
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1303284
Cited 6 times | Published
withheld should be included in the scoresheet. Rule 3.701 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure defines a
Category: Criminal Procedure
711 So. 2d 177, 1998 WL 236261
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 1337175
Cited 6 times | Published
defendant's violation of probation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273
Category: Criminal Procedure
697 So. 2d 161, 1997 WL 294552
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1997 | Docket: 1776891
Cited 6 times | Published
or convicted with criminal mischief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); Welch v. State, 639 So.2d 1068,
Category: Criminal Procedure
692 So. 2d 978, 1997 WL 208046
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1997 | Docket: 1524619
Cited 6 times | Published
probation cannot exceed the statutory maximum. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12); Stephens v. State, 677 So.2d 1325
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1282, 1996 WL 726869
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 1415748
Cited 6 times | Published
resulted, this Court interpreted the intent of rule 3.701(d)(5)(c) in Puffinberger to limit departure to
Category: Criminal Procedure
678 So. 2d 1374, 1996 WL 496635
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1996 | Docket: 1470525
Cited 6 times | Published
importance in the sentencing decision." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b).
660 So.2d at 271 (emphasis added).
Under
Category: Criminal Procedure
667 So. 2d 199, 1996 WL 37647
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1996 | Docket: 308566
Cited 6 times | Published
nature of the offender's criminal history. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(4). In habitual offender cases, before
Category: Criminal Procedure
648 So. 2d 183, 1994 WL 697953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1994 | Docket: 1342877
Cited 6 times | Published
mete out. §§ 921.001 et seq., Fla. Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, 3.702, and 3.986.
Unlike prisoners sentenced
Category: Criminal Procedure
620 So. 2d 1084, 1993 WL 225631
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1993 | Docket: 1388183
Cited 6 times | Published
sanctions are imposed and enforced.
See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13), which defines community control as
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 58, 1992 WL 387657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1992 | Docket: 1676061
Cited 6 times | Published
pending before the court at sentencing, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); accord Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
610 So. 2d 105, 1992 WL 379816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 1413582
Cited 6 times | Published
encompassing the following statutes ... ." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c) (emphasis added). The full definition
Category: Criminal Procedure
615 So. 2d 705, 1992 WL 362184
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 1184427
Cited 6 times | Published
anyway under the "permitted range." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8). Permitted ranges were incorporated
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 1209, 1992 WL 69040
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1992 | Docket: 1707409
Cited 6 times | Published
pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)1; Roberson v. State, 555 So.2d 976 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
595 So. 2d 251
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1992 | Docket: 1709044
Cited 6 times | Published
appear for a criminal judicial proceeding. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.6; Thomas v. State, 534 So.2d 1237, 1238
Category: Criminal Procedure
594 So. 2d 864, 1992 WL 41469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1992 | Docket: 1485513
Cited 6 times | Published
State, 584 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, Committee Note d.12. Although Ferguson did
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 154, 1991 WL 150425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1991 | Docket: 1515225
Cited 6 times | Published
Holmes, 360 So.2d 380, 383 (Fla. 1978). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, comm. note (d)(12)(1987)[1]. Thus, the probationary
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 1073, 1991 WL 147530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 466676
Cited 6 times | Published
during a criminal episode or transaction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7. There is nothing in the text of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 838, 1990 WL 115530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1990 | Docket: 1403333
Cited 6 times | Published
double scoring under victim injury was error. Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
562 So. 2d 392, 1990 WL 71772
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1990 | Docket: 1255983
Cited 6 times | Published
sentence unless a written reason is given. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
The reference to "sentence" in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
559 So. 2d 705, 1990 WL 41573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1990 | Docket: 2561686
Cited 6 times | Published
State, 545 So.2d 961 (Fla.2d DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d) (1984 Committee Note). Here, although
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 239, 1989 WL 139498
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1989 | Docket: 1258570
Cited 6 times | Published
more victims.
The committee note relevant to Rule 3.701(d)(7) in the 1987 version of that rule, see Florida
Category: Criminal Procedure
546 So. 2d 409, 1989 WL 83141
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1989 | Docket: 1442847
Cited 6 times | Published
guidelines is the only allowable increase. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Accordingly, we quash the decision
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 961, 1989 WL 72100
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1989 | Docket: 1702994
Cited 6 times | Published
848, 852 (Fla. 1983) (Committee Note). However, rule 3.701(d)(12) was amended in 1984 and now states that
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 398, 1989 WL 61529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1989 | Docket: 1345611
Cited 6 times | Published
with appellant's argument on this issue as well. Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that entries
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 914, 1988 WL 65189
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1988 | Docket: 1526007
Cited 6 times | Published
by judicial construction." 522 So.2d at 831. Rule 3.701(d)(12) and the committee note applicable to it
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 396, 1988 WL 36912
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1988 | Docket: 2529463
Cited 6 times | Published
State, 503 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The trial court gave two reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 1058, 1987 WL 2691
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1266992
Cited 6 times | Published
theft count, which was imposed concurrently, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d) (highest guidelines computation as to
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 1368, 1987 WL 2117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 1749184
Cited 6 times | Published
should be scored as a third-degree felony. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(3).
Finally, Doner argues that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 1061, 1987 WL 1913
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1987 | Docket: 1749351
Cited 6 times | Published
sentence imposed upon any prisoner.
The language of rule 3.701(d)(5) indicates that the sentencing guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1052, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1819
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1987 | Docket: 1595914
Cited 6 times | Published
score for sentencing guideline purposes, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(1) (prior record does not include
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1001, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1707
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1987 | Docket: 1754318
Cited 6 times | Published
were deemed to supplant the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11 committee note (1983). As of July 1
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1001, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1707
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1987 | Docket: 1754318
Cited 6 times | Published
were deemed to supplant the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11 committee note (1983). As of July 1
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 1117, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 1700160
Cited 6 times | Published
and convincing reason for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3).
However, we agree with appellant that
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 385, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 807
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1987 | Docket: 1153473
Cited 6 times | Published
points), and death or serious injury (85 points). Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1018, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2639
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1986 | Docket: 1335483
Cited 6 times | Published
imposed after a revocation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The one cell discretionary increase
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 894, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2217
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1986 | Docket: 1522836
Cited 6 times | Published
subject crime. The state argues that the text of rule 3.701(d)(5)(a) applicable to appellant was:
"Prior
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 410, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1489
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1986 | Docket: 478569
Cited 6 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Since the reasons for departure given
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 173, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1384
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1986 | Docket: 1743221
Cited 6 times | Published
computing the sentencing guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(5). It is impermissible to base a departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1322
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 545808
Cited 6 times | Published
obtained, a prohibited basis for departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Similarly, reason number 1 addresses
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 873, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1302
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1986 | Docket: 546286
Cited 6 times | Published
ordering community service hours. We reverse.
Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a)(2), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides:
When scoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 213, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1986 | Docket: 545825
Cited 6 times | Published
delineating the reasons for departure." Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.11; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 1285, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1179
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1986 | Docket: 1527638
Cited 6 times | Published
presumptive sentence by one cell pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(15), Fla.R.Crim.P. On the other hand, if "poor
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 633, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 588
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1702494
Cited 6 times | Published
equate with "clear and convincing." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Based on the foregoing, the sentences
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 469, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 215
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 1769006
Cited 6 times | Published
6) The statement of purpose for the Guidelines Rule 3.701 b provides in part `2. The primary purpose of
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 100, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 548375
Cited 6 times | Published
the sentencing guidelines established by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 when it imposed sentences totaling fifteen
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 24, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2672
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 1529350
Cited 6 times | Published
on the basis of the probation violation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). In Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 842, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1985 | Docket: 1484403
Cited 6 times | Published
by law.
Appellant contends that amended Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.14., effective July 1, 1984, permits the
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 1031, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2236
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1985 | Docket: 1709982
Cited 6 times | Published
Therefore, we must remand.
Appellant also contends Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
476 So. 2d 207, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 1277737
Cited 6 times | Published
parole. § 921.001(8), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 b.5. Cochran would have us rule that prisoners
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 417, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1985 | Docket: 1472577
Cited 6 times | Published
sentence, it should have prepared a scoresheet. Rule 3.701(d)(1) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 842, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1936
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1985 | Docket: 1510507
Cited 6 times | Published
only to certain requirements contained within Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Discretionary
Category: Criminal Procedure
472 So. 2d 1294, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1688
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1985 | Docket: 1794319
Cited 6 times | Published
sentence based on the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(2) provides:
When scoring federal
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 630, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1563
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1724678
Cited 6 times | Published
OR REASONS THAT ARE IMPERMISSIBLE UNDER FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.701 IN MAKING ITS DECISION TO DEPART FROM THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 596, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1480
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 1396555
Cited 6 times | Published
to appellant is dispositive, we note that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.1. mandates the preparation of a sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 592, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1985 | Docket: 1193488
Cited 6 times | Published
that the sentencing guidelines contained within Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure were
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 263, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 91
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514588
Cited 6 times | Published
imposed pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
In December 1981 the trial court placed
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 832, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 8
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1984 | Docket: 1510012
Cited 6 times | Published
occupied by his ten month old child. However, Rule 3.701(d)(11) provides in pertinent part that the court
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 1219
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1984 | Docket: 107374
Cited 6 times | Published
Moreover, we note that there is no requirement in Rule 3.701 that a trial judge sign his or her name to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
825 So. 2d 494, 2002 WL 2008110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2002 | Docket: 2533086
Cited 5 times | Published
defendant was placed on probation. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14)(1986); Rodriguez v. State, 645 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
751 So. 2d 74, 1999 WL 1136429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1999 | Docket: 475686
Cited 5 times | Published
State, 547 So.2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b)(1). On remand, this case should not be
Category: Criminal Procedure
728 So. 2d 725, 1999 WL 68513
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1673883
Cited 5 times | Published
sentencing judge pursuant to these guidelines.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1993).
[4] The 1994 revision provided:
Category: Criminal Procedure
697 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 446924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1997 | Docket: 1776641
Cited 5 times | Published
pretrial intervention or diversion programs.
Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla. R.Crim. P. (1996).
The issue in this
Category: Criminal Procedure
664 So. 2d 1118, 1995 WL 733378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1995 | Docket: 1229550
Cited 5 times | Published
"reasonably justify aggravating ... the sentence." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See, e.g., State v. McCall, 524 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
637 So. 2d 303, 1994 WL 190004
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1994 | Docket: 1521516
Cited 5 times | Published
within that range. See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) (if a split sentence is imposed, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
624 So. 2d 744, 1993 WL 347789
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1993 | Docket: 475188
Cited 5 times | Published
during a criminal episode or transaction." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7. This provision was construed as evincing
Category: Criminal Procedure
614 So. 2d 644, 1993 WL 48241
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1993 | Docket: 449286
Cited 5 times | Published
[1] We have not overlooked the amendment to rule 3.701(d)(7), adopted by the supreme court and approved
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 933, 1992 WL 235288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1992 | Docket: 1343191
Cited 5 times | Published
appellant's original ten offenses. *935 Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) ("Legal status points are to be assessed
Category: Criminal Procedure
604 So. 2d 556, 1992 WL 206418
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1992 | Docket: 1686520
Cited 5 times | Published
for the departure." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11. The committee note to rule 3.701(d)(13) states that community
Category: Criminal Procedure
597 So. 2d 823, 1992 WL 26462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1992 | Docket: 1704778
Cited 5 times | Published
921.001(4)(a); 921.005, Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701, 3.988. Section 775.084(4)(a), (b), Florida
Category: Criminal Procedure
589 So. 2d 336, 1991 WL 226462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1991 | Docket: 1441289
Cited 5 times | Published
[3] See § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 946, 1990 WL 183831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 1518899
Cited 5 times | Published
State, 489 So.2d 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). A violation of probation after serving
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 929, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2794
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1990 | Docket: 132361
Cited 5 times | Published
812.014(2)(c)3, Fla. Stat. (1987).
[3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.
[4] See also State v. Dolen, 390 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 583, 1990 WL 68109
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1990 | Docket: 1480931
Cited 5 times | Published
juvenile was on "furlough status" and because rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, did
Category: Criminal Procedure
555 So. 2d 940, 1990 WL 2407
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1990 | Docket: 1396892
Cited 5 times | Published
community control the judge violated the mandate of Rule 3.701(d)(11) by aggravating his guideline sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 1290, 1989 WL 148428
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1989 | Docket: 1259383
Cited 5 times | Published
worthless bank check. The sentences exceed the Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines recommendation of community control
Category: Criminal Procedure
548 So. 2d 234, 1989 WL 101547
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 2508219
Cited 5 times | Published
guidelines is the only allowable increase. See Fla.R. Crim.P.3.701(d)(4). We quash the district court's decision
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 405, 1989 WL 50258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1989 | Docket: 1437380
Cited 5 times | Published
reversible error. § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Hernandez, 525 So.2d 493
Category: Criminal Procedure
540 So. 2d 872, 1988 WL 131613
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1989 | Docket: 1294564
Cited 5 times | Published
scored in the "prior record" category. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4) and (5). The two sexual assault charges
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 94, 1989 WL 8344
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1989 | Docket: 2582213
Cited 5 times | Published
1988); § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1987); Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(b)(6) and 3.701(d)(11). Upon remand, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
532 So. 2d 1271, 1988 WL 113885
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1988 | Docket: 450694
Cited 5 times | Published
were deemed to supplant the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11 committee note (1983). As of July 1
Category: Criminal Procedure
536 So. 2d 189, 1988 WL 135739
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 1759637
Cited 5 times | Published
fifteen-year minimum mandatory sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).
We approve the opinion of the district
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 964, 1988 WL 47247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1710641
Cited 5 times | Published
"impossible to determine" in the language of Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(3). The prior offense should therefore
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 1054, 1988 WL 31728
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1988 | Docket: 1341771
Cited 5 times | Published
the analogous or parallel Florida statute under Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(2), a court must look to the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 458, 1988 WL 2617
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1988 | Docket: 1777908
Cited 5 times | Published
which appellant was not convicted, contrary to rule 3.701(d)(11) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 1085, 1987 WL 2903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1987 | Docket: 105302
Cited 5 times | Published
the court for sentencing at the same time and rule 3.701(d)(1) is not implicated.
To the contrary, we
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 330, 1987 WL 2629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1678057
Cited 5 times | Published
Id. at 534.
Appellant refers us to the Note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) Florida Rules Criminal Procedure, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 1300, 1987 WL 658
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1778580
Cited 5 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Recent cases have reiterated that
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 1300, 1987 WL 658
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1778580
Cited 5 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Recent cases have reiterated that
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1089, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1754229
Cited 5 times | Published
sentence imposed after probation revocation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
The trial court sentenced appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 768, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1987 | Docket: 1648791
Cited 5 times | Published
battery count, the sentences to run consecutively.
Rule 3.701(d)(10) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 948, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1987 | Docket: 40702
Cited 5 times | Published
convincing written reasons for deviating. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). In departing from the presumptive
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 86, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1142
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1987 | Docket: 1700229
Cited 5 times | Published
which no convictions had been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. The court, accordingly, erred by not granting
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 704, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 229
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1987 | Docket: 2584578
Cited 5 times | Published
was imposed below that recommended by the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the court's
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 318, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 114
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 1295289
Cited 5 times | Published
element of any offenses at conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The applicable committee note clarifies
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 534, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2442
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1986 | Docket: 1699900
Cited 5 times | Published
significant that the Court did not say that nearly all Rule 3.701(c) Category 2 cases (sexual offenses) inflict
Category: Criminal Procedure
493 So. 2d 60, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1859
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1986 | Docket: 1671660
Cited 5 times | Published
clearly excluded as grounds for departure by Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 594, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1572
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1986 | Docket: 1722055
Cited 5 times | Published
years probation.
The 1983 committee notes to rule 3.701(d)(12) provide that if a split sentence *596
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1358, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1986 | Docket: 425671
Cited 5 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. The fact that a firearm was used in
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1326, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1451
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1986 | Docket: 2584471
Cited 5 times | Published
included physical contact as an element. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7.; State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 860, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1276
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1986 | Docket: 1528826
Cited 5 times | Published
necessarily scored as an element of the offense, rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla. R.Crim.P., and "reasons for deviating
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 121, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1986 | Docket: 1249842
Cited 5 times | Published
departure. Weems v. State, 469 So.2d 128 (Fla. 1985); rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R. Crim.P.
We hold that the remaining
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 141, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1068
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 1287108
Cited 5 times | Published
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3).
[2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4).
[3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 784, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1069
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 2562694
Cited 5 times | Published
transcribed in the record do not fulfill the purpose of Rule 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly the conviction is affirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 784, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1069
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 2562694
Cited 5 times | Published
transcribed in the record do not fulfill the purpose of Rule 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly the conviction is affirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 88, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1986 | Docket: 1226525
Cited 5 times | Published
assault and thus is not a prior offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). It does not matter that appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 2524873
Cited 5 times | Published
v. State, 473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 53, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 276
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1986 | Docket: 455685
Cited 5 times | Published
and awaiting sentencing, is rendered invalid by Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 1529272
Cited 5 times | Published
[3] § 790.221, Fla. Stat. (1983).
[4] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
[5] See, e.g., Weems v. State, 469
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 1263, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 210
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1986 | Docket: 1570590
Cited 5 times | Published
the sentencing guidelines established by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, because the guidelines scoresheet prepared
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 401, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2466
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1985 | Docket: 1741691
Cited 5 times | Published
practice deeming it to be sufficient compliance with Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 138, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2377
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1985 | Docket: 1514363
Cited 5 times | Published
CONSTITUTED A RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF AMENDED RULE 3.701(d)(14)?
The attorney general, on behalf of appellee
Category: Criminal Procedure
472 So. 2d 1296, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1698
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1985 | Docket: 1793750
Cited 5 times | Published
which no convictions were obtained is invalid. Rule 3.701(d)(11).
*1299 Two other reasons given for departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 289, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1676
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1985 | Docket: 1749807
Cited 5 times | Published
probation within the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, esp. Committee Note (d)(8), (12). In fact
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1353, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1640
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1985 | Docket: 1397481
Cited 5 times | Published
Commission disapproved the Manual Comment following Rule 3.701(d)(5), p. 3, Guidelines Manual, which limited
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 1113, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1114
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1985 | Docket: 285090
Cited 5 times | Published
presumptive range under the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Defendant's guidelines scoresheet called
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 582, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 442
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1985 | Docket: 449031
Cited 5 times | Published
this issue is contained in the Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P., which states:
Any uncertainty
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 195, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 433
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1985 | Docket: 1661363
Cited 5 times | Published
not a sufficient basis within the meaning of rule 3.701 d.11 to deviate from the sentencing guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 478, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 337
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1985 | Docket: 2522664
Cited 5 times | Published
reasons for its departure as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.11. We reverse.
The Court imposed an 18
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 96, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 147
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1985 | Docket: 1509955
Cited 5 times | Published
based on clear and convincing reasons as Criminal Rule 3.701 d.11. requires? Second, where the maximum legal
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 277, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1985 | Docket: 1514602
Cited 5 times | Published
intention in departing from the Guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
[5] Compare section 775.087, Florida
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 1119
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1984 | Docket: 1683229
Cited 5 times | Published
find that the *1120 court erred by applying Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) (1984) prior to the provision's effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1984 | Docket: 1733255
Cited 5 times | Published
sentence imposed under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and from
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 426531
Cited 5 times | Published
for which convictions have not been obtained" (Rule 3.701 d.11. as "revamped" *572 May 8, 1984),[5] a reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 426531
Cited 5 times | Published
for which convictions have not been obtained" (Rule 3.701 d.11. as "revamped" *572 May 8, 1984),[5] a reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 790
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1984 | Docket: 2565818
Cited 5 times | Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.988, as well as in Rule 3.701(d)(7) which provides that victim injury shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 503
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 426075
Cited 5 times | Published
offender is determined to be such a candidate, rule 3.701 is not applicable. See Sweat v. State, 454 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 503
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 426075
Cited 5 times | Published
offender is determined to be such a candidate, rule 3.701 is not applicable. See Sweat v. State, 454 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 749
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1984 | Docket: 444641
Cited 5 times | Published
disoriented sex offenders.
The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(11), in existence at the time of sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
29 So. 3d 1152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 903, 2010 WL 366616
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2010 | Docket: 1643010
Cited 4 times | Published
departure sentence without written reasons. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11) (providing any sentence outside permitted
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 45, 2004 WL 399217
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1653982
Cited 4 times | Published
guidance on how to assess victim injury points. Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 962, 1997 WL 402381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1997 | Docket: 1326018
Cited 4 times | Published
governing sentencing guidelines. E.g., Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). See also McCrae v. State, 395 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
650 So. 2d 44, 1995 WL 25338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1995 | Docket: 1346566
Cited 4 times | Published
findings. Section 921.0016, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.701, Fla. R.Crim.P. Thus, the court, in its wisdom
Category: Criminal Procedure
637 So. 2d 52, 1994 WL 182256
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1994 | Docket: 1521467
Cited 4 times | Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
629 So. 2d 1052, 1993 WL 540187
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 1677409
Cited 4 times | Published
adjudications scored as "prior record." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(G). Counsel, however, allegedly failed
Category: Criminal Procedure
618 So. 2d 341, 1993 WL 154234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1993 | Docket: 1376117
Cited 4 times | Published
scoresheet that provides the most severe sanction. Rule 3.701(d)(3), which sets forth the method for determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
594 So. 2d 841, 1992 WL 35366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1992 | Docket: 1742035
Cited 4 times | Published
sentence and remand this cause for resentencing.
Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states
Category: Criminal Procedure
589 So. 2d 317, 1991 WL 188313
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1991 | Docket: 1730829
Cited 4 times | Published
new sentence requires guideline consideration.
Rule 3.701, subd. d, par. 14, Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
588 So. 2d 1006, 1991 WL 186981
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1991 | Docket: 368954
Cited 4 times | Published
degree murder. He looks to the committee notes to rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which state
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 1358, 1991 WL 45217
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1991 | Docket: 1669765
Cited 4 times | Published
defendant is under legal constraint. Id.; see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6).
In preparing the scoresheet the court
Category: Criminal Procedure
569 So. 2d 1351, 1990 WL 175753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 1190782
Cited 4 times | Published
the sentencing guidelines as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We reject this contention and affirm
Category: Criminal Procedure
555 So. 2d 976, 1990 WL 5852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1990 | Docket: 1724716
Cited 4 times | Published
contends further that the analysis does not stop at rule 3.701(d)(14), because appellant committed his last
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 1331, 1989 WL 152149
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1989 | Docket: 1675528
Cited 4 times | Published
court reasoned:
[h]ad the amendment introducing rule 3.701(d)(14) into the guidelines not been adopted,
Category: Criminal Procedure
548 So. 2d 882, 1989 WL 104488
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1989 | Docket: 891121
Cited 4 times | Published
recommendation, after the one cell increase permitted by Rule 3.701(d)(14), was two and one-half to three and one-half
Category: Criminal Procedure
542 So. 2d 423, 1989 WL 36882
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1989 | Docket: 468809
Cited 4 times | Published
whether the departure is upward or downward. Rule 3.701(d)11 requires written reasons when the departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 890, 1989 WL 4383
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1989 | Docket: 2380571
Cited 4 times | Published
1986); § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 b.6. and d.11. There being none, resentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
536 So. 2d 296, 1988 WL 131677
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1988 | Docket: 1759907
Cited 4 times | Published
reasons supporting an enhanced sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Where a court determines that a defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1226, 1988 WL 131117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1988 | Docket: 1707681
Cited 4 times | Published
reasons for departure. The recent amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(8), Fla.R.Crim.P., allowing the trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 So. 2d 1057, 1988 WL 92976
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1988 | Docket: 1678385
Cited 4 times | Published
armed robberies were committed by defendant. Rule 3.701(b) of the sentencing guidelines states: "3. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 203, 1988 WL 92687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1988 | Docket: 1528604
Cited 4 times | Published
bump permitted under the guidelines. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Myrick v. State, 497 So.2d 728 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
529 So. 2d 1251, 1988 WL 84357
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1988 | Docket: 928437
Cited 4 times | Published
the guidelines range as to that offense. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.9.
As to the remaining felony convictions
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 1274, 1988 WL 75966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1988 | Docket: 203317
Cited 4 times | Published
pertaining to sentencing guidelines, the meaning of Rule 3.701(d)(10) is that where the recommended guideline
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 1060, 1988 WL 62171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1988 | Docket: 1679712
Cited 4 times | Published
upon his *1063 mother, came within the ambit of Rule 3.701(b)3, which directs that the penalty imposed should
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 207, 1988 WL 56515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1988 | Docket: 1273153
Cited 4 times | Published
"punishment" as in this case does not support departure. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
523 So. 2d 184, 1988 WL 31723
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1988 | Docket: 1517252
Cited 4 times | Published
A new scoresheet was prepared which, with the Rule 3.701(d)(14)[1] one cell increase for violation of
Category: Criminal Procedure
521 So. 2d 249, 1988 WL 14580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1988 | Docket: 1348112
Cited 4 times | Published
County conviction rather than used it to depart. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 1095, 1988 WL 8412
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1988 | Docket: 1698867
Cited 4 times | Published
justify the aggravation of the sentence.
[3] Rule 3.701(d)(1) provides: "One guideline scoresheet shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
520 So. 2d 43, 1987 WL 3185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 1709195
Cited 4 times | Published
resulted in neither arrest nor conviction. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Reason # 2 refers to appellant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 342, 1987 WL 2669
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1677995
Cited 4 times | Published
change, as reflected in a Committee Note, of Rule 3.701(d)(5) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 333, 1987 WL 2654
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1267227
Cited 4 times | Published
points so as to arrive at an accurate total. Rule 3.701(d)3, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 354, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1418
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1987 | Docket: 1361781
Cited 4 times | Published
appellant's presumptive sentence by one cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
The failure of previous attempts
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 1125, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 1700356
Cited 4 times | Published
under both scoresheets. The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(5) clarifies the correct procedure:
For any
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 802, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 918
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 1511213
Cited 4 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The trial court's reliance on Mullen
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 1370, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 813
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 1453139
Cited 4 times | Published
Burke v. State, 483 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). It follows that evidence of a crime
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 1272, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1987 | Docket: 1657607
Cited 4 times | Published
convincing and cannot support departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Reason three is a repetition of reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 313, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 236
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1987 | Docket: 1588108
Cited 4 times | Published
appellant's violation of probation. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The trial court departed from the
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1373, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1334979
Cited 4 times | Published
Supreme Court has adopted committee note (d)(10) to Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. which explains that if an offender
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1373, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1334979
Cited 4 times | Published
Supreme Court has adopted committee note (d)(10) to Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. which explains that if an offender
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 553, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2486
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 1699772
Cited 4 times | Published
consecutive to, his sentence in the earlier case.
Rule 3.701(d)(1) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 288, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2188
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 1262955
Cited 4 times | Published
as one of great public importance:
DOES FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.701(d)(1) REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SENTENCING
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 845, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 2588403
Cited 4 times | Published
Sentencing Guidelines Commission, Guidelines Manual, Rule 3.701(d)6 comment (1983). Accordingly, the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
494 So. 2d 298, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2026
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1986 | Docket: 1510775
Cited 4 times | Published
one and nine do not support departure because Rule 3.701(b)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, expressly
Category: Criminal Procedure
493 So. 2d 48, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1804
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1986 | Docket: 1246953
Cited 4 times | Published
occurred until after the primary offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). See Frank v. State, 490 So.2d 190
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1986 | Docket: 545719
Cited 4 times | Published
the guidelines scoresheet in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) which requires one guideline scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1222, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 545720
Cited 4 times | Published
which a conviction has not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Pursell v. State, 483 So.2d 94 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 915, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1193
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1986 | Docket: 1685342
Cited 4 times | Published
of respect for law and order in society." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); see also Tillman v. State, 482 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 115, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1143
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 545986
Cited 4 times | Published
writing his reasons for departure.
Pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, separate
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 35
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1986 | Docket: 1796616
Cited 4 times | Published
guidelines for violation of probation, but under rule 3.701 d. 14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, such
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1199, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1034
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1797468
Cited 4 times | Published
State, 457 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).[1] The instant offense was second
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 367, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 914
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1986 | Docket: 1796714
Cited 4 times | Published
offenses, they should have been scored. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b). However, the scoring of these DUI
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 1380, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1986 | Docket: 1275898
Cited 4 times | Published
his sentence provided by the version of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3) then in effect, the recommended guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 854, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1986 | Docket: 455870
Cited 4 times | Published
intentionally violated it, under the guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14)), his sentence could have been enhanced
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 839, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 543
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1986 | Docket: 1511958
Cited 4 times | Published
1985). Section 921.001(6), Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 5, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 642
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 1680907
Cited 4 times | Published
appellant attempted to escape, was improper. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla. R.Crim.P. Because we are not persuaded
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 13
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1986 | Docket: 455652
Cited 4 times | Published
affirmative statement to meet the requirements of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Jordan
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 1269, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 212
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 548654
Cited 4 times | Published
sentences imposed under the guidelines, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701, for the crimes of aggravated child abuse[1]
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 550, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1986 | Docket: 1529368
Cited 4 times | Published
instant case that the word "court" as used in rule 3.701(d)(1) should mean the division of the circuit
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 97, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 165
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 549027
Cited 4 times | Published
violate the sentencing guidelines under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We cannot agree. The sentencing guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 679, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 3
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 1220597
Cited 4 times | Published
indicating "any nonstate prison sanction." Under rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 818, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2767
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1985 | Docket: 1514406
Cited 4 times | Published
trial court. The supreme court recently construed Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 18, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1783
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1985 | Docket: 318263
Cited 4 times | Published
departure from the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Defendant was convicted of aggravated battery
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 201, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1543
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1985 | Docket: 1724578
Cited 4 times | Published
convincing reasons for doing so are present. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. We find that a clear and convincing
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 75, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1985 | Docket: 1260971
Cited 4 times | Published
sentenced him under the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, to two concurrent five year sentences of
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 1361, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 785
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1985 | Docket: 1324060
Cited 4 times | Published
presumptive range established pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the court
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 1324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 648
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1985 | Docket: 1661337
Cited 4 times | Published
decision. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 and the sentencing guidelines adopted by
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 1242, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 480
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1985 | Docket: 1509673
Cited 4 times | Published
v. State, 451 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla.R. Crim.P. permits the trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 1025, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1985 | Docket: 52938
Cited 4 times | Published
guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. On appeal he challenges for the first time
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 1157
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1282324
Cited 4 times | Published
trial court was acting within the provisions of rule 3.701 when he imposed consecutive sentences of three
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 888
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1984 | Docket: 1452340
Cited 4 times | Published
reasons for the trial court's departure, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), and that the trial court's departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 1209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1984 | Docket: 1446924
Cited 4 times | Published
NOTES
[1] See Ch. 921, Fla. Stat., and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 and Form 3.988.
[2] See Robinson v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 689
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 444582
Cited 4 times | Published
violation of the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701[1] in the imposition of the 15-year sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
822 F.3d 1213, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8652, 2016 WL 2754018
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 11, 2016 | Docket: 3063381
Cited 3 times | Published
adjudication was withheld.
See
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). The significant factor concerning
Category: Criminal Procedure
990 So. 2d 1115, 2008 WL 2435672
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2008 | Docket: 1291952
Cited 3 times | Published
valid reason for a departure sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); see also Paulk, 813 So.2d at 154
Category: Criminal Procedure
976 So. 2d 1193, 2008 WL 782882
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 1680099
Cited 3 times | Published
by competent, substantial evidence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); § 921.0026(1)-(2), Fla. Stat. (1997-2000);
Category: Criminal Procedure
951 So. 2d 910, 2007 WL 428926
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2007 | Docket: 2562094
Cited 3 times | Published
sentencing after revocation of probation, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14), the reduction in points would result
Category: Criminal Procedure
890 So. 2d 464, 2004 WL 3008804
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2004 | Docket: 1285985
Cited 3 times | Published
must impose a guidelines sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d). However, when a court imposes a sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
871 So. 2d 986, 2004 WL 784868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 1709456
Cited 3 times | Published
for multiple convictions are improper. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). The trial court merely adjusted downward
Category: Criminal Procedure
725 So. 2d 1216, 1999 WL 12745
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 1294044
Cited 3 times | Published
defendant's physical contact with the victim. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7). Bogan did not object to the imposition
Category: Criminal Procedure
714 So. 2d 563, 1998 WL 337261
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1998 | Docket: 1513770
Cited 3 times | Published
present criminal rules, the former language in Rule 3.701(d)(11) has been moved to (d)(18), and at least
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 765, 1997 WL 631141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 1719640
Cited 3 times | Published
explained in writing by the trial court judge." Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
683 So. 2d 193, 1996 WL 673003
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1996 | Docket: 2518052
Cited 3 times | Published
consolidated scoresheet should never have been prepared. Rule 3.701(d)(1) requires the use of a single scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
682 So. 2d 582, 1996 WL 595188
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1996 | Docket: 1681047
Cited 3 times | Published
exceeds the guidelines. See Comments to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12); Morris v. State, 532 So.2d 1116
Category: Criminal Procedure
667 So. 2d 959, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1996 | Docket: 454595
Cited 3 times | Published
section 921.0015, Florida Statutes (1993), and rule 3.701 provide for increased punishment on a violation
Category: Criminal Procedure
662 So. 2d 748, 1995 WL 675284
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1683462
Cited 3 times | Published
aggravating or mitigating the sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) (1995); see Galletti v. State, 646
Category: Criminal Procedure
664 So. 2d 4, 1995 WL 421872
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1995 | Docket: 1229978
Cited 3 times | Published
pending before the trial court for sentencing, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d); a single such scoresheet, however, was
Category: Criminal Procedure
660 So. 2d 1390, 1995 WL 582277
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1995 | Docket: 1755927
Cited 3 times | Published
of criminal conduct without a conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
We addressed a related issue two
Category: Criminal Procedure
652 So. 2d 488, 1995 WL 124687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1995 | Docket: 2585103
Cited 3 times | Published
discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7), 3.702(d). In this case, the state
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 98, 1994 WL 617207
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1222999
Cited 3 times | Published
for departing from the guideline sentence.
*100 Rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
643 So. 2d 679, 1994 WL 551480
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1493151
Cited 3 times | Published
providing written reasons for the departure. See rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P. Under the presumptive guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
629 So. 2d 955, 1993 WL 517230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1993 | Docket: 1677402
Cited 3 times | Published
So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
[4] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1986) ("Victim injury shall be scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
625 So. 2d 1273, 1993 WL 406601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1993 | Docket: 1517540
Cited 3 times | Published
enhanced based on his juvenile convictions. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 and 3.988; see State v. Young, 561 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
619 So. 2d 508, 1993 WL 205451
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1993 | Docket: 1721759
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 526 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Also, in imposing sentence, the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
619 So. 2d 463, 1993 WL 191991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1993 | Docket: 1382330
Cited 3 times | Published
and the incarcerative term combined. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12); see also Smith v. State, 584 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
604 So. 2d 1250, 1992 WL 212023
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1992 | Docket: 1686431
Cited 3 times | Published
severe sanction." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.3. The Committee Note to rule 3.701 d.3 states: "When the
Category: Criminal Procedure
604 So. 2d 23, 1992 WL 192999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1992 | Docket: 375712
Cited 3 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).[2] Here, although defendant was
Category: Criminal Procedure
598 So. 2d 188, 1992 WL 88928
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1992 | Docket: 1472138
Cited 3 times | Published
explanation by the trial court. We disagree. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) & (d)(10).
The state acknowledges that
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 461, 1992 WL 56709
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1992 | Docket: 1358973
Cited 3 times | Published
the term provided by general law. Comment to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla. R.Crim.P. The comment also provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
582 So. 2d 1256, 1991 WL 146647
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1991 | Docket: 379471
Cited 3 times | Published
or go beyond the terms of the negotiated plea. Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla. R.Crim.P.
We reverse and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 884, 1991 WL 39354
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1991 | Docket: 1242999
Cited 3 times | Published
however, may not exceed the guidelines range. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)12.
In reversing the two fifteen-year sentences
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 365, 1991 WL 29490
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1991 | Docket: 1242411
Cited 3 times | Published
have been five and one-half-twelve years. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
Category: Criminal Procedure
575 So. 2d 750, 1991 WL 24876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1991 | Docket: 1443261
Cited 3 times | Published
relief on this ground. See Committee Note, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 429, 1991 WL 10697
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1991 | Docket: 1518859
Cited 3 times | Published
experience and time. In Volume 34 F.S.A. under Rule 3.701, reasons for departure are collected from notes
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 1208, 1990 WL 105511
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1990 | Docket: 1689173
Cited 3 times | Published
purpose of uniform guidelines sentences. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). The new minimum mandatory sentence may
Category: Criminal Procedure
562 So. 2d 395, 1990 WL 71784
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1990 | Docket: 1154771
Cited 3 times | Published
substantiated by valid written reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 203, 1990 WL 15385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1990 | Docket: 457021
Cited 3 times | Published
conviction had occurred because of the provisions of Rule 3.701(d)11, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 1227, 1990 WL 784
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1990 | Docket: 1693364
Cited 3 times | Published
213 (Fla.3d DCA 1986). While we recognize that Rule 3.701(d)(12) does not apply directly here because this
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 164, 1989 WL 122996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 1718693
Cited 3 times | Published
used. His assertion, however, is contrary to rule 3.701(d)(3), which provides that the guideline scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 480, 1989 WL 66158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1989 | Docket: 1345458
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 456 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11. However, that has long been held to
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 432, 1989 WL 52147
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1989 | Docket: 1729790
Cited 3 times | Published
Butler's sentencing guidelines scoresheet. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6); 3.988(c)(IV). Deletion of the contested
Category: Criminal Procedure
541 So. 2d 736, 1989 WL 34580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1989 | Docket: 1516614
Cited 3 times | Published
stated:
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 3.701(d)(6), the court hereby states that the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 603, 1989 WL 21455
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1989 | Docket: 1510988
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 464 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Reason two, that the timing of McIntyre's
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 497, 1989 WL 6199
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 472412
Cited 3 times | Published
thus, an improper reason for departure under Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla.R.Crim.P. We disagree. Wright was
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 144, 1988 WL 73572
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1989 | Docket: 1522635
Cited 3 times | Published
departure without written reasons as provided by Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
The written reasons given by the
Category: Criminal Procedure
532 So. 2d 743, 1988 WL 100902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1988 | Docket: 450636
Cited 3 times | Published
the lack of a written order as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Moreover, examination of the entire
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 465, 1988 WL 47252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1465427
Cited 3 times | Published
sentences within the recommended sentencing range.
Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 655, 1988 WL 43383
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1988 | Docket: 1340681
Cited 3 times | Published
warrant aggravating or mitigating a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). In order for a reason for departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 1022, 1988 WL 26128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1988 | Docket: 1364809
Cited 3 times | Published
departure upwards (12-30 months incarceration). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.14.
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 488, 1988 WL 22990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1988 | Docket: 1191907
Cited 3 times | Published
have not been obtained, in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.11. A victim's particular vulnerability
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 983, 1988 WL 3305
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1988 | Docket: 1778577
Cited 3 times | Published
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 3.701(d)(7) presently provides that, "[v]ictim injury
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 983, 1988 WL 3305
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1988 | Docket: 1778577
Cited 3 times | Published
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 3.701(d)(7) presently provides that, "[v]ictim injury
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 796, 1988 WL 1062
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1988 | Docket: 541028
Cited 3 times | Published
sentence with the one cell increase allowed under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 1336, 1987 WL 3170
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 1778311
Cited 3 times | Published
to the commission of the primary offense.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a).
The Second District in a series
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 60, 1987 WL 2120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 2582074
Cited 3 times | Published
appellant's offenses were committed. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Thus, it is contended that the "bump
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 291, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1987 | Docket: 1749259
Cited 3 times | Published
appellant was never charged or convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 308, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2223
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1987 | Docket: 473603
Cited 3 times | Published
scoresheet was prepared as required by the rule. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). The problem is compounded by the
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 1021, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2097
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1987 | Docket: 473742
Cited 3 times | Published
provide its reasons in writing, in compliance with rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1164, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1955
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1987 | Docket: 1599299
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 493 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); cf. Weems v. State, 469 So.2d 128
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1088, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1854
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1587269
Cited 3 times | Published
one cell without giving written reasons. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Additional departure, however, must
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 1165, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1987 | Docket: 1361807
Cited 3 times | Published
non-conviction disposition shall not be scored. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(1). Nor can such entries be considered
Category: Criminal Procedure
507 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1216
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1987 | Docket: 460192
Cited 3 times | Published
unwarranted variation in the sentencing process. Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P., positively provides that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
507 So. 2d 1131, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 964
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1987 | Docket: 460016
Cited 3 times | Published
[5] Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v).
[6] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11; Atwaters v. State, 495 So.2d 1219 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 494, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 848
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1987 | Docket: 453599
Cited 3 times | Published
motion denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), and thus is not based upon clear
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 783, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 453584
Cited 3 times | Published
written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We affirm.
Appellant on November 22, 1985
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 977, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 494
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1987 | Docket: 1657670
Cited 3 times | Published
behalf of appellant in which he pointed out that rule 3.701(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 665
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1987 | Docket: 1471281
Cited 3 times | Published
these reasons are invalid. We agree and reverse.
Rule 3.701(d)(5)(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2511
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1986 | Docket: 1335254
Cited 3 times | Published
motion denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The second reason does not support
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1986 | Docket: 1689775
Cited 3 times | Published
See also Williams v. State, supra.
[2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 1255, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 453486
Cited 3 times | Published
"instant offenses" is not defined anywhere in Rule 3.701 nor is it the subject of a Committee Note. Presumably
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 891, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2219
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1986 | Docket: 1522791
Cited 3 times | Published
minimum mandatory sentence takes precedence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9); Prentice v. State, 469 So.2d 798 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 283, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2109
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1986 | Docket: 2574444
Cited 3 times | Published
supporting a departure were ever entered by the court. Rule 3.701(d)(1) and (11), Florida Rules of *284 Criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 1388, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1986 | Docket: 478420
Cited 3 times | Published
recommended sentence of 5 1/2 to 7 years. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The *1390 trial court's statement
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 1171, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1790
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1986 | Docket: 478459
Cited 3 times | Published
§ 784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983).
[2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.
[3] Hankey v. State, 485 So.2d 827
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 1252, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1633
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1986 | Docket: 305531
Cited 3 times | Published
injury points on appellant's scoresheet. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). This error was not harmless since
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 310, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1521
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 1383921
Cited 3 times | Published
scoresheet. § 921.001(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d. 1.; Myrick v. State, 461 So.2d 1359 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 903, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1986 | Docket: 2588128
Cited 3 times | Published
the original cell or the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. See Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 90, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 861
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1986 | Docket: 1406745
Cited 3 times | Published
021(1)(a) & 777.04(1), Fla. Stat. (1983).
[5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
[6] Holt v. State, 472 So.2d 551
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 78, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1702495
Cited 3 times | Published
not a proper basis for the departure here. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). See also Wigfals v. State, 480 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 621, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 436
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1986 | Docket: 1702713
Cited 3 times | Published
departing from the guidelines was invalid under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) which provides that reasons for deviating
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 552, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 1769219
Cited 3 times | Published
statement of reasons for departure as is required by Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 431, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 52
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 1769504
Cited 3 times | Published
primary or an additional scored offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) and its committee note; Benedict v
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 218, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 73
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 2557033
Cited 3 times | Published
of the guidelines pertaining to victim injury, rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 309, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2721
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1985 | Docket: 2587371
Cited 3 times | Published
guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, as *310 an illegal "split" sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). In this
Category: Criminal Procedure
477 So. 2d 1083, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2470
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1985 | Docket: 1320385
Cited 3 times | Published
convictions were obtained in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), which at the time of these offenses
Category: Criminal Procedure
476 So. 2d 313, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2329
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 2534289
Cited 3 times | Published
the guidelines, with one cell enhancement under rule 3.701(d)(14), would be twelve to thirty months. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
472 So. 2d 1278, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1712
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1985 | Docket: 1793736
Cited 3 times | Published
10, 1984, respectively. Prior to sentencing, Rule 3.701(d)(3) of the guidelines was amended, effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1985 | Docket: 1275204
Cited 3 times | Published
court's subsequent departure permitted under Rule 3.701(d)(11), are matters to be considered and evaluated
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 798, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 944
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1985 | Docket: 1271722
Cited 3 times | Published
trial court was acting within the provisions of rule 3.701 when he imposed consecutive sentences of three
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 684, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661355
Cited 3 times | Published
from guideline sentences are contemplated by Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
460 So. 2d 1022, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 105
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1984 | Docket: 1765874
Cited 3 times | Published
court pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
In June 1983 defendant was charged with
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 216
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1984 | Docket: 2540620
Cited 3 times | Published
when a defendant's probation is revoked. See Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R. Crim.P. This rule was not effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 1151
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1683328
Cited 3 times | Published
her election to be sentenced pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 is vitiated by the court's failure to ascertain
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 2575932
Cited 3 times | Published
to exceed the presumptive sentence, provided rule 3.701(d)(11) is followed. We think the court gave "clear
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 840
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1984 | Docket: 1651171
Cited 3 times | Published
pursuant to the new sentencing guidelines, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701. Under the guidelines, the recommended sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
78 So. 3d 36, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 55, 2012 WL 29068
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2012 | Docket: 2354470
Cited 2 times | Published
written reasons for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11) and Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554
Category: Criminal Procedure
44 So. 3d 1240, 2010 WL 3808975
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 1928656
Cited 2 times | Published
"end-run" around the written reason requirements of rule 3.701(d)(11). Contemporaneous written reasons must
Category: Criminal Procedure
44 So. 3d 1240, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14541
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 60295554
Cited 2 times | Published
“end-run” around the written reason requirements of rule 3.701(d)(ll). Contemporaneous written reasons must
Category: Criminal Procedure
18 So. 3d 1254, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15524, 2009 WL 3270851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Docket: 1178488
Cited 2 times | Published
sentencing guidelines then in effect. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; 3.988. A scoresheet was prepared listing
Category: Criminal Procedure
962 So. 2d 367, 2007 WL 2119045
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2007 | Docket: 1519395
Cited 2 times | Published
without requiring a reason for departure.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14).
[W]here there are multiple violations
Category: Criminal Procedure
870 So. 2d 250, 2004 WL 591027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1697904
Cited 2 times | Published
from the guidelines narrowly permitted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b), (d)(11). The notion that a negotiated
Category: Criminal Procedure
859 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 22799303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284567
Cited 2 times | Published
2d 143, 144 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed for
Category: Criminal Procedure
793 So. 2d 1107, 2001 WL 988029
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2001 | Docket: 1266266
Cited 2 times | Published
2d 103, 104 (Fla.1989)); see generally Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5)(B). Neither the trial court nor this
Category: Criminal Procedure
782 So. 2d 921, 2001 WL 280258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 456394
Cited 2 times | Published
753 So.2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)). Furthermore, the State benefitted by
Category: Criminal Procedure
782 So. 2d 921, 2001 WL 280258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 456394
Cited 2 times | Published
753 So.2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)). Furthermore, the State benefitted by
Category: Criminal Procedure
754 So. 2d 121, 2000 WL 282339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2000 | Docket: 1523566
Cited 2 times | Published
require adjudication by the court." See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). In this case, Trombley entered his
Category: Criminal Procedure
750 So. 2d 734, 2000 WL 121275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2000 | Docket: 1736584
Cited 2 times | Published
the definition of legal constraint. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(6) (1988). This defendant is correct
Category: Criminal Procedure
750 So. 2d 709, 2000 WL 27543
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2000 | Docket: 1430863
Cited 2 times | Published
lawful sentence within the guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701, 3.988(b) (1993). But for the trial judge's
Category: Criminal Procedure
742 So. 2d 350, 1999 WL 606475
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1302924
Cited 2 times | Published
physically injured "during a criminal episode." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (amended effective April 21, 1988)
Category: Criminal Procedure
674 So. 2d 628, 1996 WL 266141
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1996 | Docket: 2574069
Cited 2 times | Published
1177 (Ervin, J., dissenting).
Barr argues that rule 3.701(d)(11), as interpreted by such cases as Varner
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 303, 1995 WL 598594
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1995 | Docket: 2573208
Cited 2 times | Published
from the original guideline range cell. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
651 So. 2d 765, 1995 WL 91851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1995 | Docket: 476426
Cited 2 times | Published
articulated at the time sentence is imposed." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, Sentencing Guidelines Commission Notes,
Category: Criminal Procedure
651 So. 2d 781, 1995 WL 92224
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1995 | Docket: 476336
Cited 2 times | Published
nature of the offender's criminal history." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(4). Thus, the requirement of finality
Category: Criminal Procedure
650 So. 2d 639, 1995 WL 37339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1995 | Docket: 1345757
Cited 2 times | Published
"ambiguous or impossible to determine," under rule 3.701(d)(5)(C). It was the equivalent of the present
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 1042, 1994 WL 616896
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1223253
Cited 2 times | Published
fifteen years. § 775.082, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10).
Category: Criminal Procedure
639 So. 2d 621, 1994 WL 178061
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1994 | Docket: 1310260
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence is the preponderance of the evidence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6).[1] We conclude that the record supports
Category: Criminal Procedure
635 So. 2d 1073, 1994 WL 160099
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1994 | Docket: 1353184
Cited 2 times | Published
noted in Karchesky, effective July 1, 1987, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7. provided that "victim injury shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
634 So. 2d 247, 1994 WL 94308
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1994 | Docket: 1737683
Cited 2 times | Published
written, acceptable reason for departure.
*249 Rule 3.701(b)(6), Rules of Criminal Procedures, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
631 So. 2d 390, 1994 WL 43519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1994 | Docket: 1465022
Cited 2 times | Published
years. However, the 3-cell bump-up authorized by rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
625 So. 2d 960, 1993 WL 424188
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1993 | Docket: 474293
Cited 2 times | Published
convictions are invalid reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Brown v. State, 481 So.2d 1271, 1272
Category: Criminal Procedure
622 So. 2d 1129, 1993 WL 306727
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1993 | Docket: 1528954
Cited 2 times | Published
Rice in the 4 1/2 to 5 1/2 year range. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) (providing that the sentence imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
616 So. 2d 991, 1993 WL 113520
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1993 | Docket: 1726725
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence unless a written reason is given." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
We note that capital felonies are
Category: Criminal Procedure
614 So. 2d 1158, 1993 WL 36289
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1993 | Docket: 1509872
Cited 2 times | Published
thereby removing the sentencing court's discretion.
Rule 3.701(d)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1989)
Category: Criminal Procedure
614 So. 2d 1155, 1993 WL 36288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1993 | Docket: 449301
Cited 2 times | Published
adoption of the sentencing guidelines. We cited rule 3.701(d)(9), which provides in part that "If the recommended
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 470, 1992 WL 280386
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1992 | Docket: 136359
Cited 2 times | Published
State, 543 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) and (d)(14) (1989).
Four of Appellant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
594 So. 2d 327, 1992 WL 29039
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1992 | Docket: 1485801
Cited 2 times | Published
range without providing written reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)8; ch. 88-131, § 1, Laws of Fla. Because
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 1103, 1992 WL 252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 2562540
Cited 2 times | Published
and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14.
[2] See § 775.084(4)(e), Fla. Stat
Category: Criminal Procedure
577 So. 2d 1388, 1991 WL 4992
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1991 | Docket: 1162558
Cited 2 times | Published
672 n. 1 (Fla. 1987), the court stated that Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 1007, 1991 WL 117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1991 | Docket: 2557550
Cited 2 times | Published
is less than the mandatory penalty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). *1008 There is nothing in Section
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 362, 1990 WL 211363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1990 | Docket: 807257
Cited 2 times | Published
delineating the reasons for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Because no written reasons were provided
Category: Criminal Procedure
571 So. 2d 429, 1990 WL 191718
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 1653288
Cited 2 times | Published
required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.701(d)(11). Instead, it orally gave two reasons for
Category: Criminal Procedure
569 So. 2d 888, 1990 WL 178656
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 945982
Cited 2 times | Published
discretion to move into the permitted range. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)8. Of course, a mistake as to the applicable
Category: Criminal Procedure
567 So. 2d 549, 1990 WL 143338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 1380348
Cited 2 times | Published
for which a defendant is being sentenced. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.5. The guidelines also forbid using criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 1104, 1990 WL 54993
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1990 | Docket: 1689016
Cited 2 times | Published
range. § 921.0015, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8) and 3.988(c).
Category: Criminal Procedure
558 So. 2d 168, 1990 WL 26947
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1990 | Docket: 1364644
Cited 2 times | Published
written reason is given.
The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) provides as follows:
The sentencing court
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 161, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 582, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1172, 1989 WL 145523
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1989 | Docket: 1675672
Cited 2 times | Published
whenever the court enters a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) states: "Any sentence outside the
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 154, 1989 WL 122631
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1989 | Docket: 1370090
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence.[1] However, there is no authority under Rule 3.701 for a trial judge to substitute electronic monitoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 154, 1989 WL 122631
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1989 | Docket: 1370090
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence.[1] However, there is no authority under Rule 3.701 for a trial judge to substitute electronic monitoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 1289, 1989 WL 53342
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1989 | Docket: 1436918
Cited 2 times | Published
appellant's sentencing militates against his position. Rule 3.701 d.1., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provided:
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 1289, 1989 WL 53342
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1989 | Docket: 1436918
Cited 2 times | Published
appellant's sentencing militates against his position. Rule 3.701 d.1., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provided:
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 1048, 1989 WL 52158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1989 | Docket: 1301133
Cited 2 times | Published
victim injury for sentencing purposes. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
542 So. 2d 461, 1989 WL 43794
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1989 | Docket: 468837
Cited 2 times | Published
departure. We agree and, therefore, reverse.
Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 302, 1989 WL 33983
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1989 | Docket: 1345164
Cited 2 times | Published
trial court with directions to comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). "[B]ecause all of the recited reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 476, 1989 WL 3267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 472533
Cited 2 times | Published
conform Boom's sentence to the prescription of rule 3.701(d)(9) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
533 So. 2d 926, 1988 WL 121303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1988 | Docket: 1233083
Cited 2 times | Published
sentencing scoresheet was properly "notched up" under Rule 3.701 d.14. Because of differences in the burden of
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 741, 1988 WL 100559
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 2551340
Cited 2 times | Published
without requiring a reason for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14. That rule now answers the question
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 1114, 1988 WL 44399
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 1057063
Cited 2 times | Published
the recommended guidelines sentence. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), Committee Note (d)(12) (1983). Since
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 957, 1988 WL 47238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 1710677
Cited 2 times | Published
pretrial intervention or diversion programs." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.6. Appellant had received a one-year suspended
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 476, 1988 WL 39134
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1988 | Docket: 1701543
Cited 2 times | Published
State, 490 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The trial court's third reason for
Category: Criminal Procedure
523 So. 2d 620, 1988 WL 13722
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1988 | Docket: 1517210
Cited 2 times | Published
The trial court did fail to comply with Fla.R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11), regarding written reasons for departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
521 So. 2d 265, 1988 WL 16997
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1988 | Docket: 1348002
Cited 2 times | Published
offenses for which he has not been convicted. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405
Category: Criminal Procedure
520 So. 2d 668, 1988 WL 14568
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1988 | Docket: 174850
Cited 2 times | Published
discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The trial court had before it the
Category: Criminal Procedure
532 So. 2d 674, 1988 WL 14563
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1988 | Docket: 1510211
Cited 2 times | Published
may not be used as a reason for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Scurry v. State, supra. Third, although
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 1138, 1988 WL 9014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 1698599
Cited 2 times | Published
sentenced for a category six offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). His scoresheet, therefore, was required
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 1138, 1988 WL 9014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 1698599
Cited 2 times | Published
sentenced for a category six offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). His scoresheet, therefore, was required
Category: Criminal Procedure
520 So. 2d 301, 1988 WL 6047
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1988 | Docket: 1300660
Cited 2 times | Published
State v. Mestas, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla. 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 committee note d(13) (Dec. 19, 1985 amendment);
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 318, 1987 WL 2580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1266551
Cited 2 times | Published
Commission's recommendation for amendment of Rule 3.701(d)(7). The amendment took effect July 1, 1987
Category: Criminal Procedure
513 So. 2d 1117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1987 | Docket: 1689549
Cited 2 times | Published
depart one cell without giving a reason. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Any further departure must be supported
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 322, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2248
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1517295
Cited 2 times | Published
of deviating from the guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11.
Category: Criminal Procedure
511 So. 2d 430, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2011
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1987 | Docket: 1338460
Cited 2 times | Published
"unwarranted variation in the sentencing process." Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla.R.Crim.P. Exemplifying judicial obedience
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1093, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1864
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1593208
Cited 2 times | Published
factor for which appellant was not convicted. See Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. (Reasons for deviating from
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 74, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1987 | Docket: 428019
Cited 2 times | Published
831.01, 831.02, Fla. Stat. (1985).
[2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).
[3] See also Byrd v. State, 503 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
505 So. 2d 670, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1069
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1987 | Docket: 1455011
Cited 2 times | Published
is less than the mandatory penalty and under Rule 3.701(d)(9), the mandatory sentence takes precedence
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 1001, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 1452716
Cited 2 times | Published
has been convicted and is thus not violative of Rule 3.701(d)(11). [Footnote omitted.]
See also Atwaters
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 939, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 606
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1987 | Docket: 1733224
Cited 2 times | Published
So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984).
The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(12) now reads as follows:
The sentencing court
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 139, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1987 | Docket: 2589609
Cited 2 times | Published
points for victim injury in that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7; Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 65
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1335843
Cited 2 times | Published
guidelines scoresheet or considered under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14)); Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688
Category: Criminal Procedure
499 So. 2d 43, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1986 | Docket: 1131321
Cited 2 times | Published
appellant had been "arrested 29 times since 1973." Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 911
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1986 | Docket: 427961
Cited 2 times | Published
accompanying written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). If the sentence is to be increased
Category: Criminal Procedure
493 So. 2d 1111, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1964
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1986 | Docket: 1247225
Cited 2 times | Published
battery, is improper according the proscription of Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 320, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1542
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1986 | Docket: 778243
Cited 2 times | Published
v. State, 472 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Rule 3.701(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 234, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1421
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 2582570
Cited 2 times | Published
the defendant has not been convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). It is clear that reasons two and
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1163, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1127
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 545643
Cited 2 times | Published
§ 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1983).
[3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.5(c).
[1] See also Tillman v. State, 482
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 1796400
Cited 2 times | Published
departure on a "clear and convincing" basis. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Reason (2), as pointed out by the
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 391, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 959
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1986 | Docket: 1796987
Cited 2 times | Published
case was improper under the plain meaning of rule 3.701(d)(7). The trial judge erred in failing to correct
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 74, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 819
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1986 | Docket: 1714191
Cited 2 times | Published
guidelines by clear and convincing reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Ordinarily, having found a sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 30, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 683
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1986 | Docket: 1680777
Cited 2 times | Published
new sentencing guidelines established by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 with a recommended sentencing range of four
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1986 | Docket: 1344225
Cited 2 times | Published
provide written reasons for this departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 713, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1986 | Docket: 1220982
Cited 2 times | Published
that was used is incorrect according to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d) and the guidelines scoresheets themselves
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 861, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 23
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1985 | Docket: 463534
Cited 2 times | Published
the defense, this increase was improper under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure which
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 257, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2696
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1985 | Docket: 294027
Cited 2 times | Published
the guidelines presumptive sentencing range. Rule 3.701(d)(9), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. Therefore
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 944, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2067
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1985 | Docket: 1301915
Cited 2 times | Published
imprisonment imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. We affirm.
The appellant was tried
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 352, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1901
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1985 | Docket: 1478800
Cited 2 times | Published
COBB, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides:
Sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 31
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 1676621
Cited 2 times | Published
available for persons sentenced thereunder. See Rule 3.701(b)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Therefore
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 505, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1180
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1985 | Docket: 1725488
Cited 2 times | Published
so only for clear and convincing reasons. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6).
Accordingly, we affirm appellant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 689, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661142
Cited 2 times | Published
rather than separate ones for each offense. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). This appears to us to be harmless
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 689, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661142
Cited 2 times | Published
rather than separate ones for each offense. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). This appears to us to be harmless
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 638, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1985 | Docket: 2576123
Cited 2 times | Published
imposed outside the sentencing guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. He contends that no departures from the
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 1269, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 1694934
Cited 2 times | Published
accordingly, the court, apparently relying upon amended rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, considered
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 458, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 368
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1985 | Docket: 106583
Cited 2 times | Published
relying on amended rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Under amended rule 3.701, a sentence imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 496, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 43
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1984 | Docket: 1509923
Cited 2 times | Published
1984. At that time, Committee Note (d)(12) to Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provided[1]:
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 496, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 43
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1984 | Docket: 1509923
Cited 2 times | Published
1984. At that time, Committee Note (d)(12) to Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provided[1]:
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 411
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1984 | Docket: 1163546
Cited 2 times | Published
sentences, and to permit his election of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701[1] sentencing guidelines to apply to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
269 So. 3d 629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 64712522
Cited 1 times | Published
includes the plural and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed for
Category: Criminal Procedure
184 So. 3d 1107, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 41, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 277, 2016 WL 533898
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2016 | Docket: 3035598
Cited 1 times | Published
adjudication was withheld.
See
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). The significant factor concerning
Category: Criminal Procedure
102 So. 3d 671, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18037, 2012 WL 4900827
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2012 | Docket: 60226743
Cited 1 times | Published
element of any offenses at conviction.” See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (1984 Rev.) (emphasis added); see
Category: Criminal Procedure
1 So. 3d 1272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1144, 2009 WL 350606
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2009 | Docket: 323702
Cited 1 times | Published
sentence for third-degree felonies. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12); Smith v. State, 584 So.2d 154 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
971 So. 2d 883, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18733, 2007 WL 4179501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 1731907
Cited 1 times | Published
years, for the revocation of probation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). According to Florida Rule of Criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
954 So. 2d 1253, 2007 WL 1201757
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 316327
Cited 1 times | Published
delineating the reasons for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Sherman, 909 So.2d 963
Category: Criminal Procedure
932 So. 2d 1287, 2006 WL 1999444
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2006 | Docket: 1684809
Cited 1 times | Published
increase his sentence by a one-cell bump, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14), which placed him in the recommended
Category: Criminal Procedure
920 So. 2d 836, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2234, 2006 WL 399247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2006 | Docket: 64842384
Cited 1 times | Published
enacted section 921.0015, Florida Statutes (1987). Rule 3.701(d)(5) defines “prior record” as “any past criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 719, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1541, 2006 WL 287356
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 64842088
Cited 1 times | Published
2d 605, 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)); see also Banks v. State, 732 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 963, 2005 WL 2088050
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2005 | Docket: 2569058
Cited 1 times | Published
delineating the reasons for said departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly, we reverse and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
881 So. 2d 685, 2004 WL 1906105
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 861932
Cited 1 times | Published
exceed the statutory maximum penalty. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(10). Accordingly, the trial court could
Category: Criminal Procedure
877 So. 2d 770, 2004 WL 1393381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 1285384
Cited 1 times | Published
and § 921.0015, Fla. Stat. (1993), and Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701, all providing for increased punishment
Category: Criminal Procedure
830 So. 2d 191, 2002 WL 31422861
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2002 | Docket: 1516785
Cited 1 times | Published
Sentencing Guidelines Commission Notes, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(4).
We now hold that multiple counts
Category: Criminal Procedure
805 So. 2d 61, 2002 WL 54509
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1669469
Cited 1 times | Published
included even if the sentence was suspended. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2).
Defendant also claims that there
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 698, 2001 WL 530547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2001 | Docket: 2545580
Cited 1 times | Published
not Count I as argued by Appellee. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(3); see also Jeter v. State, 604 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
786 So. 2d 12, 2001 WL 328562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1681964
Cited 1 times | Published
element of any offenses at conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897
Cited 1 times | Published
921.001(4), Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). To accomplish these goals, the statute
Category: Criminal Procedure
752 So. 2d 85, 2000 WL 220437
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2000 | Docket: 1279839
Cited 1 times | Published
Rahmings, 660 So.2d at 1392. See also, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). The state does not dispute Ms. Taylor's
Category: Criminal Procedure
746 So. 2d 1171, 1999 WL 1076809
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1999 | Docket: 783011
Cited 1 times | Published
denial of his motion on that allegation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(c)(1989).
However, we reject the state's
Category: Criminal Procedure
671 So. 2d 240, 1996 WL 160795
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1996 | Docket: 1671999
Cited 1 times | Published
must be in accordance with the guidelines." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
The scoresheet prepared on May 6
Category: Criminal Procedure
667 So. 2d 1018, 1996 WL 64796
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1996 | Docket: 454533
Cited 1 times | Published
a score of one hundred seventeen.
Pursuant to rule 3.701(d)(12) (effective January 1, 1994), twenty-five
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 1265, 1995 WL 627454
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 531958
Cited 1 times | Published
cited by O'Neill rely on the Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(5), which directs that any uncertainties in
Category: Criminal Procedure
619 So. 2d 350, 1993 WL 168328
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1993 | Docket: 1721802
Cited 1 times | Published
"bumped" the recommended sentence by one cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). This argument is unavailing. Logan's
Category: Criminal Procedure
617 So. 2d 829, 1993 WL 136607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1993 | Docket: 1391508
Cited 1 times | Published
cell without written reasons for departure. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. When multiple violations of probation
Category: Criminal Procedure
615 So. 2d 762, 1993 WL 55931
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1993 | Docket: 1658848
Cited 1 times | Published
So.2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
[9] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(A) (prior record is "any past criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
610 So. 2d 572, 1992 WL 361317
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 1413591
Cited 1 times | Published
aggravating or mitigating the sentence." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6) and (d)(11); In re Sentencing Guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 1002, 1992 WL 277275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1992 | Docket: 1343244
Cited 1 times | Published
*1003 after violations of community control by Rule 3.701 d.14., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
608 So. 2d 13, 1992 WL 251397
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1992 | Docket: 1449356
Cited 1 times | Published
and alcohol-related manslaughter charges. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). A category 9 scoresheet is used for any
Category: Criminal Procedure
608 So. 2d 13, 1992 WL 251397
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1992 | Docket: 1449356
Cited 1 times | Published
and alcohol-related manslaughter charges. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). A category 9 scoresheet is used for any
Category: Criminal Procedure
601 So. 2d 613, 1992 WL 138995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 1710970
Cited 1 times | Published
Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.988(a). The Committee Notes to Rule 3.701 state that "[i]nchoate offenses are included
Category: Criminal Procedure
590 So. 2d 461, 1991 WL 248686
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1991 | Docket: 1512689
Cited 1 times | Published
made the following comment in a footnote:
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) provides:
"Any sentence outside of
Category: Criminal Procedure
580 So. 2d 201, 1991 WL 61803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1365372
Cited 1 times | Published
*203 around the written reason requirements of rule 3.701.d.11. Contemporaneous written reasons must be
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 937, 1991 WL 41021
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1991 | Docket: 1242420
Cited 1 times | Published
discouraging multiple crimes is suspect.
NOTES
[1] Rule 3.701(d)(1), Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 367, 1991 WL 30430
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1991 | Docket: 1242336
Cited 1 times | Published
the one-cell guidelines increase authorized by rule 3.701(d)14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, when
Category: Criminal Procedure
575 So. 2d 736, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1477, 1991 WL 22525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1991 | Docket: 64656865
Cited 1 times | Published
Weekley court so held because the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, no
Category: Criminal Procedure
574 So. 2d 1176, 1991 WL 15557
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1991 | Docket: 1729800
Cited 1 times | Published
trial court was mistaken in this conclusion. Rule 3.701.d.9 simply says that when a guidelines score
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 972, 1990 WL 205869
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1990 | Docket: 479323
Cited 1 times | Published
the maximum of the permitted range pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure (1990)
Category: Criminal Procedure
563 So. 2d 822, 1990 WL 91865
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1990 | Docket: 2560967
Cited 1 times | Published
Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). See also Pope v. State, 561 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 459, 1990 WL 66212
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1990 | Docket: 2582400
Cited 1 times | Published
sentence of any nonstate prison sanction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).[2]
We reverse the sentence of probation
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 1371, 1989 WL 154950
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1989 | Docket: 1258973
Cited 1 times | Published
suspended sentence or the one cell increase of rule 3.701(d)(14), whichever is less. This is consistent
Category: Criminal Procedure
549 So. 2d 1385, 1989 WL 120851
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1989 | Docket: 274072
Cited 1 times | Published
permitted by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Accordingly, we quash the opinion
Category: Criminal Procedure
540 So. 2d 896, 1989 WL 27651
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 2563490
Cited 1 times | Published
year sentences were imposed pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. Each offense involved
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 995, 1988 WL 2616
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 427285
Cited 1 times | Published
of the impact on the victim is prohibited by rule 3.701(b)(1).[3] Appellant seeks remand for resentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 1018, 1988 WL 99741
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1988 | Docket: 1528560
Cited 1 times | Published
v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See also State v. Pentaude, 500 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 474, 1988 WL 70561
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1988 | Docket: 1367676
Cited 1 times | Published
3.701(d)(12) and the committee note thereto. Rule 3.701(d)(12) states:
Sentencing for separate offenses:
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 926, 1988 WL 67258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1988 | Docket: 1526034
Cited 1 times | Published
scoresheets for sentencing in # 2 and # 3. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) (1986).
In summary, we affirm the appellant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 417, 1988 WL 57433
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1988 | Docket: 1367785
Cited 1 times | Published
927 (Fla. 1987); see also Committee Note, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).[1] In the instant case, the incarcerative
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 682, 1988 WL 43378
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1988 | Docket: 1272444
Cited 1 times | Published
relating to prior arrests without conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). A finding of guilt has always been
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 989, 1988 WL 27809
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1988 | Docket: 1660972
Cited 1 times | Published
an element of the offense at conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7 (1985).[2] Appellant asserts that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
520 So. 2d 105, 1988 WL 11350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1988 | Docket: 1300437
Cited 1 times | Published
record if they are "convictions" as described in Rule 3.701(d)(2) but only if they occurred "within three
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 792, 1988 WL 975
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1988 | Docket: 541034
Cited 1 times | Published
v. State, 489 So.2d 25, 29 (Fla. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), i.e., aspects of a higher degree
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 117, 1987 WL 3390
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 541044
Cited 1 times | Published
§ 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); (d)(11). See State v. Jackson, 478
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 261
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1987 | Docket: 1467328
Cited 1 times | Published
the language in the revised committee note to rule 3.701.d.10., quoted in Hoefert lends support to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
511 So. 2d 703, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2040
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1987 | Docket: 394037
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing criminal offense; in absence of conviction Rule 3.701(d)(11) prohibits departure on this ground); Johnson
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 533, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1476
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1987 | Docket: 2589070
Cited 1 times | Published
in New York. We disagree with his contention. Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 101, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1193
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 1336550
Cited 1 times | Published
for the departure. This is clear error. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 75, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 276
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1987 | Docket: 120660
Cited 1 times | Published
Fla. Stat. (1985).
[3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.
[4] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.c., Committee Note, 1983
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 734, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2386
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1986 | Docket: 2391371
Cited 1 times | Published
which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); see Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 728, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2386
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1986 | Docket: 1689702
Cited 1 times | Published
which no conviction had been obtained, see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Trainor v. State, 468 So.2d 484
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 641, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 1685533
Cited 1 times | Published
additional clear and convincing reasons. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Likewise, this is proper for a violation
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 53, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 806
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1986 | Docket: 1713936
Cited 1 times | Published
sentence unsupported by the elements required by Rule 3.701(d)(11) clear and convincing reasons set forth
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 44, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 789
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 1407017
Cited 1 times | Published
conflict will soon be resolved by the amendments to Rule 3.701(d)(13) and its committee note, which take effect
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 1389, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 153
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 1221050
Cited 1 times | Published
indicated beyond the one bracket provided in Rule 3.701(d)(14), the increase must be supported by clear
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 1387, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 153
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 1220124
Cited 1 times | Published
*1389 Prior to adoption of subsection (d)(14) to Rule 3.701, case law was clear that violation of probation
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 694, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 96
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 430961
Cited 1 times | Published
court at the time of sentencing, a violation of rule 3.701 d.1., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Review
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 865, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 13
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 277509
Cited 1 times | Published
UPCHURCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 3.701(d)(4) reads as follows:
Additional offenses
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 160, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2775
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1985 | Docket: 1221048
Cited 1 times | Published
for grand theft. In view of our construction of rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 671, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1615
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1985 | Docket: 2543174
Cited 1 times | Published
not follow the guidelines' procedure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). An examination of the transcript of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 102, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1985 | Docket: 2586842
Cited 1 times | Published
forth in the sentencing guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). In sentencing appellant to the maximum
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 1154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 1509879
Cited 1 times | Published
prepared in reliance on a portion of the comment to rule 3.701(d)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 274, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1985 | Docket: 464521
Cited 1 times | Published
So.2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 422
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1984 | Docket: 1453000
Cited 1 times | Published
convictions have not been obtained.
There is nothing in rule 3.701 to suggest that matters excluded for purposes
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 1153
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1984 | Docket: 2572713
Cited 1 times | Published
3.701 and Form 3.988(f), and, as required by Rule 3.701 b. 6. and d. 11., articulated in writing his
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455586
Published
sentenced. § 921.002(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2022); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(b)(3).
The trial court is also permitted
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455315
Published
Court highlighted that the notes accompanying
rule 3.701 suggested that “[a]ny uncertainty in the scoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2023 | Docket: 68092093
Published
REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing. See Fla. R.
Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14); State v. Marshall, 869 So. 2d 754
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 65879215
Published
State, 871 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12).
Accordingly, on remand, if
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2020 | Docket: 17391433
Published
category 2,
category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida
Rules of Criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2019 | Docket: 16338036
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); Bonney v. State, 252 So. 3d
1203
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2019 | Docket: 16280858
Published
commission of the primary
offense.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5).
We determine the holding
Category: Criminal Procedure
269 So. 3d 629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 64712523
Published
includes the plural and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed for
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988954
Published
includes the plural
and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988954
Published
includes the plural
and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
240 So. 3d 101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2018 | Docket: 6314405
Published
sentence Mr. Weeks to the next higher cell under rule
3.701(d)(14) without requiring a reason for departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
217 So. 3d 130, 2017 WL 1018497, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 4617675
Published
a “threat” that was never charged. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll).
But for Pinder’s misreading
Category: Criminal Procedure
226 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 2016 WL 7444955, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178844
District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2016 | Docket: 64312008
Published
from the Florida sentencing guidelines (Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701) and increasing [petitioner’s] sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
192 So. 3d 662, 2016 WL 3065079, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8250
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3068946
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5) (1992
&
1993) (defining
Category: Criminal Procedure
198 So. 3d 792, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3601, 2016 WL 886225
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3044949
Published
5
.
See also
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll) (explaining that for offenses prior
Category: Criminal Procedure
173 So. 3d 1020, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10366, 2015 WL 4095272
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2015 | Docket: 2671920
Published
cover multiple counts is an illegal sentence; Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla. R.Crim. P., provides “[a] sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
162 So. 3d 1099
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2015 | Docket: 2650241
Published
the commission of the primary offense.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5).
We determine the holding in
Category: Criminal Procedure
124 So. 3d 400, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16899, 2013 WL 5744692
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2013 | Docket: 60235476
Published
addition to "a county jail term alone." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(8).
Later, appellant filed a pro se motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
88 So. 3d 297, 2012 WL 1392662, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2012 | Docket: 60308224
Published
guidelines promulgated by the Florida Supreme Court in rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which indicated
Category: Criminal Procedure
80 So. 3d 1053, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 228
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2012 | Docket: 60305627
Published
the guidelines could be demonstrated. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12), 3.702(d)(18), 3.703(d)(30). Nevertheless
Category: Criminal Procedure
64 So. 3d 200, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10643, 2011 WL 2652341
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2011 | Docket: 60301397
Published
which the defendant was convicted, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (1985), and injury is not an element
Category: Criminal Procedure
44 So. 3d 109, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9615, 2009 WL 2031177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2009 | Docket: 60295546
Published
1089 (Fla.1987), which, in subsection (d)(7) of Rule 3.701, declared that “Victim injury points shall be
Category: Criminal Procedure
9 So. 3d 700, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3178, 2009 WL 996389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2009 | Docket: 60309072
Published
fourteen points for victim injury. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(c); 3.701(d)(15); 3.988(c). The State does
Category: Criminal Procedure
971 So. 2d 883
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 64853544
Published
years, for the revocation of probation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). According to Florida Rule of Criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
958 So. 2d 477, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7488, 2007 WL 1427472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 64851015
Published
convictions included within the category.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(15).
Here, a category 9 scoresheet was
Category: Criminal Procedure
940 So. 2d 604, 2006 WL 3077619
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2006 | Docket: 1503389
Published
departure without written reasons. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). Therefore, we reverse and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
939 So. 2d 136, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14949, 2006 WL 2570850
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2006 | Docket: 64847143
Published
PER CURIAM.
See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(3)(B) (“The guidelines scoresheet that recommends the most
Category: Criminal Procedure
936 So. 2d 670, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12081, 2006 WL 2032523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2006 | Docket: 64846310
Published
prison was within the range permitted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14).
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY
Category: Criminal Procedure
932 So. 2d 257, 2005 WL 2172240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2005 | Docket: 1285649
Published
with the addition of the following language to rule 3.701(d)(12): "Where the offender is being sentenced
Category: Criminal Procedure
899 So. 2d 476, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2005 WL 840187
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2005 | Docket: 64837648
Published
distinct offense as an additional offense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(3), (4); Thomason v. State, 480 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
876 So. 2d 1256, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9928, 2004 WL 1496649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 64831656
Published
guidelines. Id. at 193.
The relevant portion of rule 3.701(d) specifically states:
(3) “Primary offense”
Category: Criminal Procedure
877 So. 2d 770, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8741
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 64831834
Published
and § 921.0015, Fla. Stat. (1993), and Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701, all providing for increased punishment
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4095, 2004 WL 626082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 64829189
Published
sentence is the preponderance of the evidence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b)(6)”).
We reverse appellant’s sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
855 So. 2d 722, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15069, 2003 WL 22298995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2003 | Docket: 64825572
Published
PER CURIAM.
We affirm based on the authority of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Montgomery
Category: Criminal Procedure
852 So. 2d 441, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12554, 2003 WL 21990587
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 64824402
Published
921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1995). See also Fla. R. Crim P. 3.701(d)(11), (12). Thus, the sentence imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
848 So. 2d 504, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10828, 2003 WL 21658308
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 64823811
Published
So.2d 1167, 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1983)
Category: Criminal Procedure
848 So. 2d 504, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10828, 2003 WL 21658308
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 64823811
Published
So.2d 1167, 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1983)
Category: Criminal Procedure
828 So. 2d 422, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14577, 2002 WL 31250739
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64818260
Published
eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized
Category: Criminal Procedure
824 So. 2d 1009, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12524, 2002 WL 1997979
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2002 | Docket: 64817157
Published
category 1, category 2, category 3 or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
820 So. 2d 395, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7619, 2002 WL 1071921
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 64816220
Published
Both counts are category 2 offenses pursuant to Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. He was
Category: Criminal Procedure
816 So. 2d 1150, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5466, 2002 WL 730732
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2002 | Docket: 1753481
Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
795 So. 2d 1037, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12865, 2001 WL 1040382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2001 | Docket: 64809022
Published
violation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.988(b) (1992); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14) (1992). Because Marker received a
Category: Criminal Procedure
789 So. 2d 1177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 2001 WL 776223
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2001 | Docket: 64806918
Published
counts.
An 1985 amendment to the committee note to rule 3.701(d)(5) added:
For any offense where the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 1283, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7892, 2001 WL 627584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2001 | Docket: 64805655
Published
810.02(3), Florida Statutes (1991). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(10) (when guideline sentence exceeds
Category: Criminal Procedure
786 So. 2d 54, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6677, 2001 WL 514365
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 64805667
Published
primary or additional offenses at conviction.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6).
Defendant asserts that his prior
Category: Criminal Procedure
788 So. 2d 286, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14791, 2000 WL 1700929
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 64806370
Published
convictions were analogous to Florida crimes. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(B) (in scoring out-of-state conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
765 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11460, 2000 WL 1268786
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2000 | Docket: 64799737
Published
now substituted.
PER CURIAM AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1).
THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and W. SHARP
Category: Criminal Procedure
737 So. 2d 1154, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8534, 1999 WL 420369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 64789639
Published
. § 800.04(1), Fla. Stat. (1993).
. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)14.
Category: Criminal Procedure
730 So. 2d 716, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 1999 WL 30673
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 64787629
Published
reason is given for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12). Rogers’ guideline sentencing range
Category: Criminal Procedure
723 So. 2d 932, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 334, 1999 WL 18032
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1999 | Docket: 64785310
Published
Because a trial court does not have authority under rule 3.701 to substitute probation for a prison sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 266, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11316, 1998 WL 558987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783174
Published
downward are required. § 921.0016(l)(c); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). We think the trial court’s belated
Category: Criminal Procedure
714 So. 2d 1220, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10137, 1998 WL 472563
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1998 | Docket: 64782000
Published
exceeded the maximum permitted by statute. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(10) (1991). Accordingly, appellant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
714 So. 2d 640, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9526, 1998 WL 422307
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 64781876
Published
from the recommended guidelines range. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). In other words, although a plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
707 So. 2d 1204, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3825, 1998 WL 171416
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 64779814
Published
sentencing points for “severe” victim injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); see Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
709 So. 2d 101, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 162, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 448, 1998 WL 122246
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1998 | Docket: 64780118
Published
habitual offender sentence. 681 So.2d at 1141. Under Rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 774, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11534, 1997 WL 633899
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 64776320
Published
deviating from the sentencing guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). Because the trial judge failed to
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 962, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8173, 1997 WL 402381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1997 | Docket: 64774873
Published
governing sentencing guidelines. E.g., Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). See also McCrae v. State, 395 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
694 So. 2d 146, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6183, 1997 WL 291492
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 64773890
Published
the effective date of the 1988 amendments to rule 3.701(d). Snyder v. State, 615 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1st
Category: Criminal Procedure
691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3151, 1997 WL 154773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1997 | Docket: 64772269
Published
guidelines cell or a one-cell bump-up. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, we remand the cause
Category: Criminal Procedure
692 So. 2d 155, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 175, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 328, 1997 WL 151790
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1997 | Docket: 64772599
Published
covered under the definition for “prior record” in rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
688 So. 2d 988, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1773, 1997 WL 82131
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1997 | Docket: 64771503
Published
category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 827, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 19, 1997 WL 57204
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771046
Published
Sentencing Guidelines Commission note (d)(8)8 to rule 3.701, which is applicable to the pre-1994 guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
689 So. 2d 333, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1231, 1997 WL 47276
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Docket: 64771620
Published
scoresheets are properly prepared. See generally, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701 Commission Notes (d)(1) (1988).
This case
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 1354, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 402, 1997 WL 43452
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1997 | Docket: 64771161
Published
“prior record” or an “additional offense.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.988. The trial court’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1277, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 5, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2155, 1996 WL 726856
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 64770230
Published
the pre-1994 sentencing guidelines contained in rule 3.701, which provided:
The sentencing court shall impose
Category: Criminal Procedure
684 So. 2d 247, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12731, 1996 WL 691397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1996 | Docket: 64769535
Published
prior record must be scored in accordance with rule 3.701(d)(5)(F).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Category: Criminal Procedure
678 So. 2d 526, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9124, 1996 WL 492167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1996 | Docket: 64766765
Published
Williams, 652 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). Moreover, the oral reasons expressed
Category: Criminal Procedure
679 So. 2d 42, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 1996 WL 476337
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1996 | Docket: 64767094
Published
injury where there are one or more victims.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(15) (1994).1
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE
Category: Criminal Procedure
678 So. 2d 865, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8390, 1996 WL 454788
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1996 | Docket: 64766897
Published
scoresheet. See § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1987), Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). Once operating outside the guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 890, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6691
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 64766469
Published
guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; ch. 83-87, § Laws of Fla. The sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
675 So. 2d 991, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054, 1996 WL 309987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1996 | Docket: 64765515
Published
plain mandate of both section 921.001(6) and rule 3.701(d)(ll), that any departure from the recommended
Category: Criminal Procedure
673 So. 2d 972, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5482, 1996 WL 278823
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1996 | Docket: 64764748
Published
require written reasons for a departure. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The appellant’s first claim of error
Category: Criminal Procedure
674 So. 2d 110, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 209, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 778, 1996 WL 254376
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1996 | Docket: 64764916
Published
conviction as a third-degree felony. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(C). Harris asserted that since the
Category: Criminal Procedure
671 So. 2d 828, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3547, 1996 WL 164627
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1996 | Docket: 64763867
Published
supervision. § 775.082(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Rule 3.701(d)(10) Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also, e.g., Eubanks
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1330, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3045, 1996 WL 135508
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1996 | Docket: 64770253
Published
were legal at the time of Williams’ offense. Rule 3.701(d)(7), (1992)1 states: “[V]ictim injury shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 309, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 1996 WL 100837
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1996 | Docket: 64766302
Published
minimum guidelines range. Comm. Note (d)(12) Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. The trial judge may, of course, depart
Category: Criminal Procedure
667 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 873, 1996 WL 46887
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 64762203
Published
unwarranted variation in the sentencing process.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b); see Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259
Category: Criminal Procedure
666 So. 2d 1059, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 637, 1996 WL 39618
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1996 | Docket: 64761756
Published
GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)12.
. “Credit for time served” was Long’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
666 So. 2d 986, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 241, 1996 WL 14051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 64761711
Published
1993).
At the time of the offense at issue here, rule 3.701(d)(7) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
662 So. 2d 1360, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12290, 1995 WL 689518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 64760211
Published
reversed and remanded for resentencing. E.g., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10); State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380, 383
Category: Criminal Procedure
662 So. 2d 1019, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103, 1995 WL 680449
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1995 | Docket: 64760133
Published
reasons for the downward departure as required by rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 1314, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583, 1995 WL 642673
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1995 | Docket: 64759624
Published
for violation of community control, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14), places Hills in the “2½ — 5⅜” range
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 1282, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11424, 1995 WL 637504
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1995 | Docket: 64759605
Published
Florida sentencing guidelines seoresheet. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(B) & (E).
Category: Criminal Procedure
659 So. 2d 1360, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9424, 1995 WL 527192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1995 | Docket: 64758587
Published
and a Category 3 scoresheet offense.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4) and (5).
.Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(vi)
Category: Criminal Procedure
659 So. 2d 262, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 431, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1389
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1995 | Docket: 64758290
Published
primary offense.
*265593 So.2d at 497 (quoting rule 3.701).4 In other words, under this sentencing scheme
Category: Criminal Procedure
657 So. 2d 1219, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7115, 1995 WL 385380
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 64757847
Published
considered in imposing a departure sentence. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.ll.
Nor does it appear Tucker’s criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
657 So. 2d 1191, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 1995 WL 316361
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 64757842
Published
offense. The latter scoresheet was correct. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d. In resentencing a defendant after violation
Category: Criminal Procedure
657 So. 2d 1191, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 1995 WL 316361
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 64757842
Published
offense. The latter scoresheet was correct. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d. In resentencing a defendant after violation
Category: Criminal Procedure
655 So. 2d 187, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5407, 1995 WL 302340
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1995 | Docket: 64756458
Published
that was “criminal” and “judicial.” See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) (defining legal status at the time
Category: Criminal Procedure
655 So. 2d 1175, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5069, 1995 WL 276076
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1995 | Docket: 64756665
Published
Williams and Tyner, both of which held that rule 3.701(d)(ll) prohibits departure sentences based on
Category: Criminal Procedure
653 So. 2d 495, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4179, 1995 WL 232561
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1995 | Docket: 64755496
Published
State, 625 So.2d 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). This reason is an invalid reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
653 So. 2d 484, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3685, 1995 WL 214675
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 64755487
Published
departure sentence rendered in this case. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The one cell bump up allowed the
Category: Criminal Procedure
651 So. 2d 719, 1995 WL 69030
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1995 | Docket: 1518286
Published
Weekly D77 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 28, 1994); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). On motion for rehearing, the state
Category: Criminal Procedure
650 So. 2d 210, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 1995 WL 59542
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1995 | Docket: 64754188
Published
109 S.Ct. 250, 102 L.Ed.2d 239 (1988)); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The trial court, by noting on the
Category: Criminal Procedure
648 So. 2d 183, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 13196
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1994 | Docket: 64753229
Published
must be in accordance with the guidelines.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); see Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
647 So. 2d 299, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12171, 1994 WL 697477
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1994 | Docket: 64752942
Published
both the recommended and permitted ranges. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8); Williams v. State, 611 So.2d 1334
Category: Criminal Procedure
644 So. 2d 1041, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11315
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 64752016
Published
sentencing defendant in these cases. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Clark v. State, 572 So.2d 1387 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
647 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11104, 1994 WL 637296
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752915
Published
of guilt resulting from plea or trial.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(2) (1993) (emphasis supplied). Here the
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 561, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11022, 1994 WL 637730
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752246
Published
rather than, as urged, a slight injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). See Williams v. State, 614 So.2d 640
Category: Criminal Procedure
646 So. 2d 234, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 1994 WL 576167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64752502
Published
See § 921.001(5)-(8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). In this case, the trial judge did
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 30, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10120, 1994 WL 576106
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64752146
Published
could not possibly increase to 15 years. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Because we do not have Vela’s scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
643 So. 2d 712, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 1994 WL 568457
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1994 | Docket: 64751440
Published
retroactive application of the new rule.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Category: Criminal Procedure
642 So. 2d 838, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9294, 1994 WL 524293
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1994 | Docket: 64750895
Published
prior to commission of the primary offense. See rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P.
Accordingly, we reverse
Category: Criminal Procedure
641 So. 2d 976, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8853, 1994 WL 498414
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1994 | Docket: 64750552
Published
scoresheet error affected the guidelines range.
Rule 3.701(d)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines
Category: Criminal Procedure
641 So. 2d 496, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367, 1994 WL 454877
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750412
Published
his “prior record.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5) (1993) 1; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(G) (1993).2
In our
Category: Criminal Procedure
642 So. 2d 575, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7992, 1994 WL 419084
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1994 | Docket: 64750817
Published
scoresheet, recommends the most severe *576sanction. Rule 3.701(d)(3), Fla.R.Crim.P. The state attorney is to
Category: Criminal Procedure
642 So. 2d 10, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9783, 1994 WL 382934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1994 | Docket: 64750607
Published
670, 672 n. 1 (Fla.1987), the court stated that Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
639 So. 2d 1100, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7219, 1994 WL 380928
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1994 | Docket: 64749714
Published
conduct resulting in a conviction.
. Under rule 3.701(d)(20), a conviction is a consequence of a determination
Category: Criminal Procedure
639 So. 2d 1068, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6893, 1994 WL 330321
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1994 | Docket: 64749708
Published
for which a defendant is not convicted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Pennant v. State, 600 So.2d 526 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
641 So. 2d 122, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5877, 1994 WL 259667
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1994 | Docket: 64750295
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Booker v. State, 397 So.2d 910, 914 (Fla.), cert. denied
Category: Criminal Procedure
647 So. 2d 152, 1994 WL 236385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1994 | Docket: 1524752
Published
because no convictions have been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Category: Criminal Procedure
637 So. 2d 368, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5271, 1994 WL 234354
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1994 | Docket: 64748542
Published
which we conclude to have merit. Contrary to rule 3.701(d)(5)(G), the trial court erroneously scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
636 So. 2d 890, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, 1994 WL 190009
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1994 | Docket: 64748324
Published
must impose a sentence for each offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). The trial judge herein pronounced
Category: Criminal Procedure
638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3913, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 64749188
Published
resentenc-ing pursuant to the guidelines. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
636 So. 2d 118, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3549, 1994 WL 133535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1994 | Docket: 64748139
Published
pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d); Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993)
Category: Criminal Procedure
632 So. 2d 663, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1228, 1994 WL 46917
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1994 | Docket: 64746570
Published
one-cell bump-up. § 948.06, Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. Cf. Ogden v. State, 605 So.2d 155
Category: Criminal Procedure
632 So. 2d 142, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 845, 1994 WL 36872
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1994 | Docket: 64746457
Published
for resen-tencing within the guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14), and for the award of credit for time
Category: Criminal Procedure
630 So. 2d 231, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 330, 1994 WL 20930
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1994 | Docket: 64745773
Published
(1991); § 921.001(5)(6), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
PETERSON and DIAMANTIS
Category: Criminal Procedure
627 So. 2d 1355, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189, 1993 WL 540165
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744735
Published
also has the option of a one cell bump-up. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273
Category: Criminal Procedure
627 So. 2d 1354, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13186, 1993 WL 540161
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744732
Published
section 948.06(1), Florida Statutes (1989) and Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
629 So. 2d 278, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347, 1993 WL 523966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1993 | Docket: 64745019
Published
1281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), this court interpreted rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
626 So. 2d 1123, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11973, 1993 WL 495983
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1993 | Docket: 64744127
Published
(or as here, community control). As such, under Rule 3.701(d)(ll), it is a downward departure sentence,
Category: Criminal Procedure
626 So. 2d 1119, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11933, 1993 WL 492547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 64744119
Published
So.2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). We reverse and remand for resentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
628 So. 2d 1084, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 490876
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744908
Published
[Additions underlined; deletions struck-through]
RULE 3.701 SENTENCING GUIDELINES
(c) Offense Categories
Category: Criminal Procedure
624 So. 2d 381, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9464, 1993 WL 369352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1993 | Docket: 64742990
Published
have imposed plus a one-cell bump up. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273
Category: Criminal Procedure
620 So. 2d 1036, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5969, 1993 WL 182517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1993 | Docket: 64697439
Published
reasons for entering a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.ll. Since the trial court failed to enter
Category: Criminal Procedure
625 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739, 1993 WL 174882
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1993 | Docket: 64743783
Published
001(5), (6), (7) and (8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
We are concerned that to apply that
Category: Criminal Procedure
625 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739, 1993 WL 174882
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1993 | Docket: 64743783
Published
001(5), (6), (7) and (8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
We are concerned that to apply that
Category: Criminal Procedure
617 So. 2d 355, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4143, 1993 WL 113315
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 64695777
Published
Whether the trial court’s failure to comply with Rule. 3.701(d)(ll) can be the basis of a claim of ineffective
Category: Criminal Procedure
616 So. 2d 88, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3005, 1993 WL 75789
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1993 | Docket: 64695249
Published
term permitted by law. See Comm.Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
We are inclined to follow the Collins
Category: Criminal Procedure
614 So. 2d 637, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2150, 1993 WL 46131
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1993 | Docket: 64694625
Published
a sentencing guidelines scoresheet. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13); and Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051
Category: Criminal Procedure
613 So. 2d 1307, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 113, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 172, 1993 WL 32299
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1993 | Docket: 64694361
Published
guidelines to those changes, categories 4, 6, and 7 of rule 3.701(c) are amended to read as follows:
Category 4:
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 1363, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 200, 1993 WL 9785
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1993 | Docket: 64693408
Published
sentence by one cell for a probation violation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The recommended range of a second
Category: Criminal Procedure
613 So. 2d 924, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 148, 1993 WL 8863
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1993 | Docket: 64694091
Published
State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c).
The trial court failed to set forth reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 1334, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 87, 1993 WL 5312
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1993 | Docket: 64693395
Published
committed Williams to seven years in prison. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 5, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12503, 1992 WL 362208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1992 | Docket: 64693113
Published
must not exceed the statutory maximum. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)10. On remand, we alert the trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
609 So. 2d 111, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11781, 1992 WL 341952
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1992 | Docket: 64692262
Published
herein.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.
. Rule 3.701(d)(3)(b) Fla.R.Crim.P.
. We do not find in
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 1281, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11360, 1992 WL 322991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1992 | Docket: 64670939
Published
141(4), 947.146(11), Fla.Stat.
Douglas cites Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 1021, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10680, 1992 WL 281874
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1992 | Docket: 64670146
Published
an additional offense at conviction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5) committee note (stating that on earlier
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 1323, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10888, 1992 WL 280776
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1992 | Docket: 64670506
Published
the requirement of a written explanation.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8). Therefore, the original twenty year
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 1323, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10888, 1992 WL 280776
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1992 | Docket: 64670506
Published
the requirement of a written explanation.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8). Therefore, the original twenty year
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 675, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 1992 WL 235358
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1992 | Docket: 64670847
Published
reason for departure. The Lettman court reasoned:
Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 636, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9335, 1992 WL 213080
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1992 | Docket: 64670845
Published
by degrees and the question is whether under Rule 3.701 d.5.a)3) the degree of the offense was “impossible
Category: Criminal Procedure
603 So. 2d 606, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8070, 1992 WL 175550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1992 | Docket: 64669285
Published
purposes are those specifically enumerated within Rule 3.701(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
602 So. 2d 604, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6763, 1992 WL 143618
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1992 | Docket: 64668979
Published
scoresheet prior to the imposition of a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
601 So. 2d 300, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7266, 1992 WL 138820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 64668617
Published
Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).
Category: Criminal Procedure
600 So. 2d 559, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6900, 1992 WL 134839
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 64668030
Published
1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). The Committee Note to rule 3.701 d.1.,1 which makes the sentencing court responsible
Category: Criminal Procedure
601 So. 2d 607, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6521, 1992 WL 134878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 64668665
Published
“prior record” is for an out-of-state offense, rule 3.701.d.5(a) of the guidelines provides:
(2) When scoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
600 So. 2d 542, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6555, 1992 WL 131893
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1992 | Docket: 64668018
Published
would be without merit. The committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
600 So. 2d 526, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6248, 1992 WL 126556
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1992 | Docket: 64668008
Published
instant offense which was not prosecuted. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Banzo v. State, 464 So.2d 620 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
599 So. 2d 279, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425, 1992 WL 115772
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1992 | Docket: 64667579
Published
555 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).
Accordingly, while the judgment of
Category: Criminal Procedure
600 So. 2d 474, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5383, 1992 WL 104642
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1992 | Docket: 64667993
Published
which the defendant has been acquitted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); State v. Jaggers, 526 So.2d 682,
Category: Criminal Procedure
598 So. 2d 291, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5369, 1992 WL 101260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 64667153
Published
Amendment (applicable to this case) provides:
Rule 3.701.d.7
Victim injury shall be scored for each victim
Category: Criminal Procedure
599 So. 2d 1017, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4876, 1992 WL 83874
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1992 | Docket: 64667809
Published
appellant’s sentence only to the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, the sentence imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
597 So. 2d 426, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4619, 1992 WL 80993
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1992 | Docket: 64666783
Published
for which Varner has not been convicted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Allen v. State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
595 So. 2d 1111, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3879, 1992 WL 64459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1992 | Docket: 64666142
Published
adjusted for the probation violation. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) and (d)(14). However, the declaration
Category: Criminal Procedure
597 So. 2d 833, 1992 WL 63447
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1992 | Docket: 1704894
Published
guidelines do not apply to capital felonies. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c) (Committee Note). Since first degree murder
Category: Criminal Procedure
595 So. 2d 978, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1992 WL 35367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1992 | Docket: 64666092
Published
offenses at conviction” under Rule 3.701 d.4. or as “prior record” under Rule 3.701 d.5.a).
Several years ago
Category: Criminal Procedure
593 So. 2d 331, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 1992 WL 32813
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1992 | Docket: 64665164
Published
to sentence the defendant in this case. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). See also Clark v. State, 572 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
592 So. 2d 378, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 633, 1992 WL 16010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1992 | Docket: 64664567
Published
statement delineating the reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); see also State v. Jackson, 478 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
592 So. 2d 1213, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 540, 1992 WL 12078
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1992 | Docket: 64664852
Published
sentence must be imposed for each offense.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). We therefore vacate the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 1070, 1991 WL 279434
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 64664430
Published
accordance with the guidelines.” (Emphasis added.) Rule 3.701(d)(14) appears controlling because community
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 1070, 1991 WL 279434
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 64664430
Published
accordance with the guidelines.” (Emphasis added.) Rule 3.701(d)(14) appears controlling because community
Category: Criminal Procedure
589 So. 2d 1024, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11919, 1991 WL 253342
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1991 | Docket: 64663291
Published
third-degree felony to which he pled. Further, under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
590 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11883, 1991 WL 248623
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1991 | Docket: 64663496
Published
701 & 3.988), 522 So.2d 374, 379 (Fla.1988). Rule 3.701.d.8 provides that non-state prison sanctions
Category: Criminal Procedure
593 So. 2d 514, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11867, 1991 WL 248608
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1991 | Docket: 64665244
Published
more serious offense scored as “prior record” (Rule 3.701.d.5.) OR
(2) should a single scoresheet be used
Category: Criminal Procedure
589 So. 2d 439, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11447, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2920
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1991 | Docket: 64663128
Published
record reveals that the score sheet is correct.
Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
588 So. 2d 1047, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11125, 1991 WL 229785
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1991 | Docket: 64662901
Published
even when the one cell bump-up permitted by rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
589 So. 2d 271, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 725, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1914, 1991 WL 236191
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1991 | Docket: 64663082
Published
[Additions underlined; deletions struck through]
RULE 3.701 SENTENCING GUIDELINES
[[Image here]]
c. Offense
Category: Criminal Procedure
588 So. 2d 19, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10286, 1991 WL 206840
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1991 | Docket: 64662541
Published
(filed) “contemporaneously” as required. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d 11. (Committee Note); Ree v. State, 565
Category: Criminal Procedure
586 So. 2d 504, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15190, 1991 WL 196308
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1991 | Docket: 64661799
Published
criminal episode against one victim, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Stermer v. State, 567 So.2d 13 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 238, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9010, 1991 WL 168378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660900
Published
entry of an appropriate sentence as provided in Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 238, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9010, 1991 WL 168378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660900
Published
entry of an appropriate sentence as provided in Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 227, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8186, 1991 WL 159139
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1991 | Docket: 64660886
Published
that the 1987 amendment to the committee note to rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, omitted
Category: Criminal Procedure
585 So. 2d 393, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8190, 1991 WL 159158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1991 | Docket: 64661340
Published
So.2d 304 (1947). The state further relies on rule 3.701(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to classify
Category: Criminal Procedure
584 So. 2d 93, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1991 WL 138135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1991 | Docket: 64660818
Published
Ewing majority relied on a committee note to rule 3.701 which approves community control as a “viable
Category: Criminal Procedure
582 So. 2d 817, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7489, 1991 WL 136863
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1991 | Docket: 64660171
Published
he was neither charged nor convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Hallman v. State, 560 So.2d 223 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
582 So. 2d 820, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7099, 1991 WL 136884
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1991 | Docket: 64660176
Published
minimum guidelines range. Comm.Note (d)(12) Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. The trial judge may, of course, depart
Category: Criminal Procedure
582 So. 2d 801, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992, 1991 WL 131916
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1991 | Docket: 64660161
Published
1986); and (3) unconstitutional application of rule 3.701; Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989).
Category: Criminal Procedure
582 So. 2d 776, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7058, 1991 WL 133436
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1991 | Docket: 64660155
Published
incorrectly calculated scoresheet.
In accordance with rule 3.701(b)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 1006, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6504, 1991 WL 118239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1991 | Docket: 64659881
Published
ONE-CELL BUMP FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION UNDER RULE 3.701(d)(14), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 655, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6501, 1991 WL 118238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1991 | Docket: 64659605
Published
ONE-CELL BUMP FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION UNDER RULE 3.701(d)(14), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?
Category: Criminal Procedure
582 So. 2d 129, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6136, 1991 WL 117020
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660007
Published
the points assessed for legal constraint, see Rule 3.701(d)(6), and a hiatus in the purported split sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 991, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6091, 1991 WL 115589
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1991 | Docket: 64659873
Published
State, 496 So.2d 894 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). The deletion from the scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 970, 1991 WL 105615
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1991 | Docket: 1283894
Published
bump-up for the violation of probation.
[2] Rule 3.701 d.1.; Foster v. State, 576 So.2d 937 (Fla. 5th
Category: Criminal Procedure
580 So. 2d 898, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6430, 1991 WL 109695
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 64659311
Published
guidelines range one-cell increase authorized by Rule 3.701(d)(14).
JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Category: Criminal Procedure
579 So. 2d 927, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5142, 1991 WL 93526
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1991 | Docket: 64658872
Published
Commission to clarify the committee notes appended to Rule 3.701 d.6., wherein the commission states it was never
Category: Criminal Procedure
579 So. 2d 910, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4975, 1991 WL 87961
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1991 | Docket: 64658842
Published
permitted for the violation of probation (Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701.d.l4.); (2) the permitted range on the new
Category: Criminal Procedure
579 So. 2d 377, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4575, 1991 WL 80034
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1991 | Docket: 64658666
Published
SCHOONOVER, C.J. and DANAHY, J., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Category: Criminal Procedure
579 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4250, 1991 WL 72093
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1991 | Docket: 64658635
Published
convictions as “additional offenses at conviction.” Rule 3.701(d)(3)b states that the guidelines scoresheet
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 818, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 1991 WL 60853
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658334
Published
scoresheet. We agree. In 1987, the legislature amended Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 818, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 1991 WL 60853
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658334
Published
scoresheet. We agree. In 1987, the legislature amended Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 815, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3823, 1991 WL 61219
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1991 | Docket: 64658332
Published
limited to the one-cell increase permitted by rule 3.701(d)14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
577 So. 2d 1006, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3545, 1991 WL 56386
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1991 | Docket: 64657993
Published
properly bumped the sentence by one cell pursuant to rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 711, 1990 WL 58259
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1991 | Docket: 440528
Published
years. With the one-cell increase authorized by Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
577 So. 2d 678, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2919, 1991 WL 44989
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 64657912
Published
probation, should not exceed that maximum. See Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2515, 1991 WL 38138
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1991 | Docket: 64657461
Published
sentence should be used in sentencing. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3). However, the transcript of the sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 880, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2465, 1991 WL 35987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1991 | Docket: 64657453
Published
488 (Fla.1990). The Lla-bona opinion notes that rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 204, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2323, 1991 WL 35415
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1991 | Docket: 64664191
Published
written reasons for departure. We agree based on Rule 3.701(d)(ll) and Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
576 So. 2d 1307, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 198, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 411, 1991 WL 28402
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1991 | Docket: 64657567
Published
[Additions underlined; deletions struck through]
RULE 3.701 SENTENCING GUIDELINES
[[Image here]]
c. Offense
Category: Criminal Procedure
574 So. 2d 1230, 1991 WL 22982
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1991 | Docket: 2578797
Published
status. Any one of the circumstances cataloged in Rule 3.701 d.6. is sufficient to create the status of being
Category: Criminal Procedure
575 So. 2d 299, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1435, 1991 WL 22523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1991 | Docket: 64656612
Published
the next higher cell (guidelines range). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14. The “bumped-up” cell (guidelines range)
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 884, 1990 WL 192318
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1991 | Docket: 479230
Published
scoresheet. This was error.
Committee note (d)(5) to Rule 3.701 Florida rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 395, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 245, 1991 WL 3177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1991 | Docket: 64655937
Published
departure without providing written reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 33, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15, 1991 WL 142
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1991 | Docket: 64655419
Published
sentence may ultimately be the same because of Rule 3.701 d.14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, or
Category: Criminal Procedure
571 So. 2d 558, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 1990 WL 212130
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1990 | Docket: 64655087
Published
and remand for resentencing in accordance with rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
571 So. 2d 86, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9367, 1990 WL 199163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1990 | Docket: 64654969
Published
community control or 12-30 months incarceration. See Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
570 So. 2d 1070, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8990, 1990 WL 183825
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 64654792
Published
. § 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1989).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
Category: Criminal Procedure
569 So. 2d 1390, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8992, 1990 WL 183832
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 64654605
Published
criminal procedure governing the proper procedure. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure says
Category: Criminal Procedure
569 So. 2d 890, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8569, 1990 WL 175819
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 64654326
Published
give written reasons for its departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) (1987).
The state argues, however
Category: Criminal Procedure
569 So. 2d 525, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8616, 1990 WL 175763
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 64654269
Published
not exceed the one-cell increase provided by Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
571 So. 2d 511, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8370, 1990 WL 166806
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1990 | Docket: 64655072
Published
the necessity of a separate departure order, by rule 3.701(d)(12). See Petrillo v. State, 554 So.2d 1227
Category: Criminal Procedure
568 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8242, 1990 WL 162391
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1990 | Docket: 64653903
Published
a sentence within the next highest cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Reversed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY
Category: Criminal Procedure
568 So. 2d 80, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7496, 1990 WL 143339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 64653749
Published
physical contact and penetration. The version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in
Category: Criminal Procedure
567 So. 2d 530, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7309, 1990 WL 139629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 64653387
Published
corrections. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
566 So. 2d 590, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1990 WL 132026
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1990 | Docket: 64652896
Published
sentences must, therefore, be vacated. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10).
As to the dealing in stolen property
Category: Criminal Procedure
566 So. 2d 770, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 458, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1847, 1990 WL 130217
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1990 | Docket: 64652923
Published
barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
APPENDIX
Rule 3.701(c) — OFFENSE CATEGORIES
(c) Offenses have been
Category: Criminal Procedure
566 So. 2d 823, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210, 1990 WL 117266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 64652927
Published
used to support a departure sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Rozar v. State, 500 So.2d 659 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 415, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6107, 1990 WL 116367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1990 | Docket: 64652127
Published
State, 532 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11, 12). See also Tyner v. State, 545
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 1262, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6129, 1990 WL 116324
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1990 | Docket: 64652038
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b); see Snowden v. State, 449 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5762, 1990 WL 110296
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1990 | Docket: 64651893
Published
based on sentencing guidelines calculations under Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that included
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 285, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5401, 1990 WL 103144
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1990 | Docket: 64651689
Published
one-cell bump for community control violation. Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R. Crim.P. The written reasons for
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 784, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5193, 1990 WL 98759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1990 | Docket: 64652393
Published
statutory maximum sentence should be imposed.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10); Stamper v. State, 528 So.2d 1323
Category: Criminal Procedure
564 So. 2d 564, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5114, 1990 WL 98485
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1990 | Docket: 64651858
Published
court for sentencing at the same time, and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) thus requires a current guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
562 So. 2d 844, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4354, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1990 | Docket: 64651056
Published
Statutes (1969), is “impossible to determine” within Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
562 So. 2d 828, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4074, 1990 WL 74060
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1990 | Docket: 64651047
Published
permitted after a violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Denegal then violated his community
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 476, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3796, 1990 WL 70609
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1990 | Docket: 64650702
Published
defendants have not yet been convicted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Moreover, the guidelines require
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 462, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3547, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1411
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1990 | Docket: 64650679
Published
State, 511 So.2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4). It is further conceded by the State
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 438, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 1990 WL 64113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1990 | Docket: 64650666
Published
aggravated assault as prior record. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5) (committee notes, December, 1985 Amendment)
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 447, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 1990 WL 64121
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1990 | Docket: 64650671
Published
and current offenses.
The first general rule of Rule 3.701(d) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 25, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 1990 WL 62863
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 64650419
Published
statutory maximum sentence should be imposed.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10); Sears v. State, 539 So.2d 1174 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
560 So. 2d 408, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3009, 1990 WL 55990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1990 | Docket: 64650172
Published
this is an improper reason for departure because Rule 3.701 d. 11., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
560 So. 2d 335, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2924, 1990 WL 52793
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 64650141
Published
its calculation of the second scoresheet. See rule 3.701(d)(ll), Fla.R.Crim.P. This improper methodology
Category: Criminal Procedure
559 So. 2d 456, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2501, 1990 WL 43147
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1990 | Docket: 64649562
Published
clear and convincing reasons for departure. Under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., the court should have
Category: Criminal Procedure
559 So. 2d 448, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2531, 1990 WL 43129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1990 | Docket: 64649559
Published
legal status under rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Rule 3.701(d)(6) provides that
Category: Criminal Procedure
566 So. 2d 515, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2377, 1990 WL 64071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 64652875
Published
Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 *516(Fla.1989). Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
559 So. 2d 695, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2362, 1990 WL 40334
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 64649636
Published
pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). When the defendant was sentenced in
Category: Criminal Procedure
559 So. 2d 352, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2313, 1990 WL 39890
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1990 | Docket: 64649510
Published
scoresheet. We disagree, and affirm the sentence.
Rule 3.701(c), Fla.R.Crim.P., lists nine offense categories
Category: Criminal Procedure
558 So. 2d 189, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 1990 WL 29579
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1990 | Docket: 64648798
Published
consideration of a juvenile record except as provided by Rule 3.701(d)(5)(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
558 So. 2d 180, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1698, 1990 WL 28175
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1990 | Docket: 64648790
Published
resentencing with a guidelines scoresheet. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)1.; Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 1239, 1990 WL 15389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1990 | Docket: 1528442
Published
"impossible to determine" in the language of Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(3). The prior offense should therefore
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 160, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 1990 WL 15228
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1990 | Docket: 64648445
Published
guideline sentence of 20 to 27 years. Complying with rule 3.701(d)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 132, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 804, 1990 WL 11806
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1990 | Docket: 64648430
Published
State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), we affirm appellant’s sentence.
Affirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 795, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 766, 1990 WL 10897
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1990 | Docket: 64648069
Published
not increase the statutory máxi-mums allowable. Rule 3.701(d)(10), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 769, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 1990 WL 10224
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1990 | Docket: 64648057
Published
one cell for the revocation of probation under Rule 3.701(d)(14). Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987)
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 105, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1990 WL 8644
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64648411
Published
departure from the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). The trial court did note on the bottom
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 495, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 709, 1990 WL 7637
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64647990
Published
to Williams, the Florida Supreme Court amended Rule 3.701(d)(13) and the committee note to the rule2 to
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 109, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 664, 1990 WL 8669
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64648415
Published
required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.701(d)(11). Instead, it orally gave two reasons for
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 476, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 547, 1990 WL 6438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1990 | Docket: 64647978
Published
currently calculated score sheet as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1).2
REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
COWART
Category: Criminal Procedure
555 So. 2d 933, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 158, 1990 WL 2087
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 64647592
Published
for entry of the required written order. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054, 1055
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 674, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 142, 1990 WL 2073
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 64647294
Published
State, 554 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim P. 3.701(d)(14), if departure is appropriate.
Sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 66, 1990 WL 2074
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 456937
Published
agree.
The Florida Supreme Court has construed Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 673, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 89, 1990 WL 1082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 64647291
Published
bump up one cell. Franklin v. State, supra; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14.
SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
DAUKSCH
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 672, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1990 WL 952
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1990 | Docket: 64647289
Published
State, 545 So.2d 851, 852-53 (Fla.1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 662, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 63, 1990 WL 594
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1990 | Docket: 64647278
Published
thirty points for “legal constraint.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). We therefore reverse the trial court’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 572, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7140, 1989 WL 153709
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1989 | Docket: 64647226
Published
defendant only within a one-cell increase, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); reasons relating to the violation
Category: Criminal Procedure
554 So. 2d 14, 1989 WL 149629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1989 | Docket: 290696
Published
directions to resentence the defendant pursuant to Rule 3.701 d 14.
Category: Criminal Procedure
552 So. 2d 347, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6455, 1989 WL 139519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1989 | Docket: 64646372
Published
procedure we affirm the sentence in this case. Rule 3.701 d.13. defines community control as “a form of
Category: Criminal Procedure
552 So. 2d 314, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6407, 1989 WL 137726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1989 | Docket: 64646354
Published
of imprisonment was at least an option. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The trial court did acknowledge a
Category: Criminal Procedure
552 So. 2d 287, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2670, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6411, 1989 WL 137718
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 64646343
Published
a convicted felon and was carrying a firearm. Rule 3.701(d)(11) states that reasons for deviating from
Category: Criminal Procedure
552 So. 2d 1171, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2659, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6352, 1989 WL 136161
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1989 | Docket: 64646611
Published
the highest sentence must be applied, see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.3, argues most persuasively against a
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 1195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2614, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6263, 1989 WL 133754
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1989 | Docket: 64645840
Published
resentenc-ing.
SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 1192, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6109, 1989 WL 129803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1989 | Docket: 64645836
Published
resentenc-ing.
COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 563, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2529, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6080, 1989 WL 129134
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 64645584
Published
for appellant’s upward departure sentence. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Both parties agree there was a plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 164, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5871, 1989 WL 122995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 64645510
Published
475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)6; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll.
Accordingly, while we
Category: Criminal Procedure
549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 64645390
Published
to the trial court for proper sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
549 So. 2d 819, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2356, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5729, 1989 WL 117146
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1989 | Docket: 64645315
Published
program does not constitute legal constraint under Rule 3.701(d)(6). We reverse on authority of Ellison v.
Category: Criminal Procedure
549 So. 2d 799, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5454, 1989 WL 114260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1989 | Docket: 64645306
Published
035(2), Fla.Stat. (1985).
.Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
. Rule 3.701(d)(ll) provides that reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
549 So. 2d 743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1989 WL 112128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1989 | Docket: 64645270
Published
scored only if an element of the offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1985 amendments). Victim injury is
Category: Criminal Procedure
549 So. 2d 230, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2262, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5225, 1989 WL 110935
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1989 | Docket: 64645182
Published
requires such a written order to comply with Rule 3.701(d)(ll). State v. Bledsoe, 538 So.2d 94 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
548 So. 2d 1183, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5136, 1989 WL 107522
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1989 | Docket: 64644918
Published
written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Accordingly, the sentence is vacated
Category: Criminal Procedure
548 So. 2d 908, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5153, 1989 WL 109527
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1989 | Docket: 64644867
Published
of any reasons for departure, in violation of Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
555 So. 2d 1221, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1961, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4759, 1989 WL 97698
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1989 | Docket: 64647689
Published
were not prosecuted and one was still pending. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules Criminal Procedure, prohibits
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 305, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1873, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4491, 1989 WL 88940
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1989 | Docket: 64644202
Published
and, therefore, con-cededly illegal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14; see generally Poore v. State, 531 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 285, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1865, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4384, 1989 WL 86803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1989 | Docket: 64644185
Published
amended, provides for scoring victim injury, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1985), and factors taken into account
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 706, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1847, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425, 1989 WL 87546
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1989 | Docket: 64644382
Published
2d 380 (Fla.1978). See also Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P. Since the maximum statutory
Category: Criminal Procedure
546 So. 2d 769, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1706, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4008, 1989 WL 78310
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1989 | Docket: 64643836
Published
provided for under the sentencing guidelines, rule 3.701(d)(5)(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 952, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1629, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3725, 1989 WL 73148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1989 | Docket: 64644441
Published
of the offense involves a “legal constraint." Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 951, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1557, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 1989 WL 69807
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1989 | Docket: 64644440
Published
those reasons to writing as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We vacate the sentence and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 346, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1451, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3387, 1989 WL 63358
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 64642918
Published
without giving written reasons therefor. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
The sentence is quashed and this
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 198, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1295, 1989 WL 65666
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 64642859
Published
violent personal crimes. We agree, and amend rule 3.701(c) and the heading to rule 3.988(d) accordingly
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3349, 1989 WL 62392
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1989 | Docket: 64643154
Published
which time the trial court may also consider rule 3.701 d.14., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
REVERSED
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 1125, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1437, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421, 1989 WL 64705
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1989 | Docket: 64643153
Published
State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.
While attempting to rob Juan Rodriguez
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 1100, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3229, 1989 WL 62584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1989 | Docket: 64643143
Published
cannot be included as prior offenses under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). However, the subsequent offenses
Category: Criminal Procedure
544 So. 2d 329, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1385, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3191, 1989 WL 59489
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1989 | Docket: 64642897
Published
use separate scoresheets for sentencing. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.
REVERSED; SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 1314, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1341, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3062, 1989 WL 56313
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1989 | Docket: 64642797
Published
the crime while in custody serving a sentence. Rule 3.701(d)(6) in conjunction with Rule 3.988(i) says
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 420, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1232, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2769, 1989 WL 51214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1989 | Docket: 64642612
Published
for a criminal judicial proceeding.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)6. Because the elimination of these points
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 340, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1989 WL 49628
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1989 | Docket: 64642566
Published
In imposing this sentence pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines, the court assessed
Category: Criminal Procedure
545 So. 2d 904, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 817, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1623, 1989 WL 29045
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1989 | Docket: 64643419
Published
the mistaken belief that it was authorized by rule 3.701(d)(12), DiCicco must be resentenced. Dreyer.
Category: Criminal Procedure
540 So. 2d 897, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 773, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1527, 1989 WL 27652
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 64641368
Published
review of sentences imposed pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. These sentences were
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 1191, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1496, 1989 WL 25371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1989 | Docket: 64641071
Published
which he faced sentencing at that time. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1). It is also alleged that the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 593, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1222, 1989 WL 20100
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1989 | Docket: 64640879
Published
resentence appellant on the remaining counts. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).
CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 586, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 643, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1263, 1989 WL 19555
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1989 | Docket: 64640878
Published
discretion in scoring victim injury as severe. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); McDonald v. State, 520 So.2d 668 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 566, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 608, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1139, 1989 WL 20704
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1989 | Docket: 64640869
Published
departure beyond the next cell. The court said:
Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 1384, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 579, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1019, 1989 WL 16656
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1989 | Docket: 64640727
Published
Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 1988, adopted rule 3.701 and rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 1160, 1989 WL 16621
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1989 | Docket: 1410452
Published
January 21, 1988, for said offense.
R. 295.
[2] Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., permits a one-cell departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 15, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1057
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1989 | Docket: 64640743
Published
without requiring a reason for departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Thus, a guidelines sentence in this
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 541, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 461, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 854, 1989 WL 12385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1989 | Docket: 64640395
Published
Florida Statutes for third-degree felonies. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), Committee Note. Upon review of appellant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 364, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 465, 1989 WL 7516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1989 | Docket: 64640090
Published
the offense. In addition, we would have to find Rule 3.701(d)(11) inapplicable to this issue. There is no
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 702, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1989 WL 6247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1989 | Docket: 64640079
Published
approved guidelines scoresheet is warranted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Richards v. State, 502 So.2d 1000
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 71, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 327, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 418, 1989 WL 6218
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 64640331
Published
exception for a decrease to the next lower cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Third, and finally, the fact that
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 688, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 276, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 294, 1989 WL 4301
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1989 | Docket: 64640064
Published
court may exceed the one cell bump-up provided in rule 3.701.d.l4, and use those facts as a reason for “departing”
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 250, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1989 WL 3272
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 64639946
Published
awarding twenty-one points for victim injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). When considered in conjunction with
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1989 WL 3274
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 64639948
Published
to have committed the offenses now before us. Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, specifically
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 669, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 1989 WL 2073
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1989 | Docket: 64640048
Published
The supreme court additionally commented that rule 3.701(d)(14), relating to a trial court’s right to
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 672, 1989 WL 2075
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1989 | Docket: 427271
Published
reason for departure clear and convincing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6) (1988); See generally, State v. Mischler
Category: Criminal Procedure
541 So. 2d 1217, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 193, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 107, 1989 WL 1348
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1989 | Docket: 64641962
Published
cell due to the violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); 3.988(i). Instead the court restored
Category: Criminal Procedure
536 So. 2d 1175, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 102, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 28, 1989 WL 90
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1989 | Docket: 64639638
Published
appropriate sentence within the statutory limit.” ...
Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following
Category: Criminal Procedure
539 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 109, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, 1988 WL 139088
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 64640849
Published
version of the rule, the supreme court amended rule 3.701(d)(7) to add the following sentence to the committee
Category: Criminal Procedure
536 So. 2d 1130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 40, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5751, 1988 WL 138513
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1988 | Docket: 64639625
Published
guidelines went into effect, the Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) stated as follows:
The sentencing court
Category: Criminal Procedure
535 So. 2d 342, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2747, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531, 1988 WL 133889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1988 | Docket: 64639186
Published
as a second degree felony on the scoresheet. Rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P. The trial court, however
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1237, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2729, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5497, 1988 WL 132366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1988 | Docket: 64639076
Published
assessed for category IV “legal status.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.6. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1239, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2732, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5498, 1988 WL 132369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1988 | Docket: 64639077
Published
committed, (February 19, 1987), sentencing guideline rule 3.701.d.7. provided: “Victim injury shall be scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1224, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2660, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5400, 1988 WL 130482
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1988 | Docket: 64639070
Published
offenses which must be scored as misdemeanors. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(4). The trial court’s explanation
Category: Criminal Procedure
535 So. 2d 316, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1988 WL 130067
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1988 | Docket: 64639173
Published
time of offense, not the time of sentencing. Rule 3.701(d)(6) Fla.R. Crim.P. Therefore, we find the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2668, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 1988 WL 130483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1988 | Docket: 64639068
Published
offenses represented a violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). This is so even though the primary
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2668, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 1988 WL 130483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1988 | Docket: 64639068
Published
offenses represented a violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). This is so even though the primary
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1202, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2542, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5075, 1988 WL 122439
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1988 | Docket: 64639061
Published
Peters v. State, 531 So.2d 121 (Fla.1988) and Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P.
Accordingly, we reverse
Category: Criminal Procedure
533 So. 2d 916, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5055, 1988 WL 122446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1988 | Docket: 64638568
Published
which convictions have not been obtained.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
Category: Criminal Procedure
533 So. 2d 888, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896, 1988 WL 117591
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 64638545
Published
battery conviction.
. The current version of Fla.R.Crim P. 3.701(d)7 provides that victim injury shall be
Category: Criminal Procedure
533 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 64638547
Published
State, 512 So.2d 1085 (Fla 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The defendant should be given an
Category: Criminal Procedure
532 So. 2d 1324, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2414, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4747, 1988 WL 113837
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1988 | Docket: 64638110
Published
Nelson, the committee note to the version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R.Crim.P., applicable to Nelson states
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 752, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2316, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4472, 1988 WL 103935
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1988 | Docket: 64637324
Published
legal rea*753sons therefor. This was error. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). State v. Nichols, (Fla. 4th DCA
Category: Criminal Procedure
532 So. 2d 733, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2243, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4317, 1988 WL 99744
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1988 | Docket: 64637902
Published
existed at the time of sentencing. The original rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 250, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4190, 1988 WL 96460
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 64636997
Published
However, the committee note (1985 amendment) to Rule 3.701 d.5., states that in this circumstance, the earlier
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 250, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4190, 1988 WL 96460
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 64636997
Published
However, the committee note (1985 amendment) to Rule 3.701 d.5., states that in this circumstance, the earlier
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 So. 2d 523, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4078, 1988 WL 93732
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 64636758
Published
107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 3S1 (1987).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (as amended effective July 1, 1985)
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 So. 2d 1082, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2153, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4057, 1988 WL 93735
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 64636937
Published
definition of "conviction” within the purview of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(2).
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 So. 2d 402, 1988 WL 86351
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1988 | Docket: 1267397
Published
conviction and a sentence which departed from the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines recommendation. Among other assertions
Category: Criminal Procedure
529 So. 2d 363, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1921, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3675, 1988 WL 82682
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1988 | Docket: 64636322
Published
victim injury is not an element of burglary. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).1 This argument would be true if the
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 1323, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1839, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, 1988 WL 79821
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1988 | Docket: 64636239
Published
part, 509 So.2d 927 (Fla.1987); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). Accordingly, we vacate the sentences
Category: Criminal Procedure
850 F.2d 1495, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10292, 1988 WL 72805
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1988 | Docket: 815636
Published
on each, for appropriate cause.
Fla.R.Crim.P.
3.701 d.12.
Finally, a sentence can be
Category: Criminal Procedure
529 So. 2d 323, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3464, 1988 WL 77955
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1988 | Docket: 64636311
Published
sentence to the next *324higher cell, arguing that rule 3.701(d)(14) permits a one cell “bump-up” only for
Category: Criminal Procedure
529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1988 | Docket: 64636379
Published
delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 133, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3059
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1988 | Docket: 64635909
Published
State, 512 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Pursuant to State v. Thomas, 516
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 112, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1618, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3004
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 64635897
Published
constraint at the time of the offense. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6).
The second reason, escalating pattern
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 496, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3023, 1988 WL 72231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 64636026
Published
is clearly illegal; neither the provisions of rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, nor the
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 78, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1599, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2902, 1988 WL 69370
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1988 | Docket: 64635880
Published
the state concedes, that under the version of Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 939, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1549, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774, 1988 WL 67260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1988 | Docket: 64635755
Published
period in excess of the recommended range. See rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
529 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2882, 1988 WL 68089
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1988 | Docket: 64636371
Published
the recommended sentence pursuant to the Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines upon impermissible
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 911, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1528, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2684, 1988 WL 65175
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1988 | Docket: 64635745
Published
sentence provided by statute for that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10).
The final judgment of conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 1047, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1459, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2611
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1988 | Docket: 64635494
Published
collectively, support the upward departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
Appellant Brown raises several issues
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 1041, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1446, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2596, 1988 WL 62674
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1988 | Docket: 64635489
Published
child are affirmed. See the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12); The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 1041, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1446, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2596, 1988 WL 62674
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1988 | Docket: 64635489
Published
child are affirmed. See the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12); The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 434, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1420, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2563, 1988 WL 61875
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1988 | Docket: 64636016
Published
relying on the guidelines committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12) which specifies that if a split sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 277, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1439, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1988 WL 60468
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1988 | Docket: 64635635
Published
guidelines sentence. See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Burrell v. State, 483 So.2d 479 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
526 So. 2d 992, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2467, 1988 WL 56513
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1988 | Docket: 64635467
Published
the defendant was a danger to the community.
Rule 3.701 d.ll., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 515, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1310, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2213, 1988 WL 53032
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1988 | Docket: 64634916
Published
have available a new scoresheet. This was error. Rule 3.701 d.14., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 1005, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1988 WL 56102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1988 | Docket: 64635019
Published
CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12); The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 1212, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1193, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2008, 1988 WL 47535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1988 | Docket: 64636195
Published
if it was an element of the offense.1 See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Massard v. State, 501 So.2d 1289
Category: Criminal Procedure
524 So. 2d 1153, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 1988 WL 47482
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1988 | Docket: 64634751
Published
the reasons for departure” requirement, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). See, e.g., State v. Lemon, 517 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
523 So. 2d 1282, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1055, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1719, 1988 WL 40530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1988 | Docket: 64634330
Published
the date of his release from confinement. See rule 3.701(d)(5)(b), Fla.R.Crim.P.
The state argues that
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 449, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1052, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1739, 1988 WL 39143
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1988 | Docket: 64634883
Published
one cell for the violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). On April 29 the court convened a
Category: Criminal Procedure
523 So. 2d 199, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1413, 1988 WL 32052
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1988 | Docket: 64634020
Published
sentencing him under the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We agree and remand for resentencing.
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
534 So. 2d 1165, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1567, 1988 WL 32908
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1988 | Docket: 64639052
Published
in 1980). This, of course, we cannot do. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Dawkins v. State, 487 So.2d 63 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 538, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 801, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1254, 1988 WL 26274
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1988 | Docket: 64633695
Published
489 So.2d 1130 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(4); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).
Second, the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
523 So. 2d 168, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 744, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1268, 1988 WL 28339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1988 | Docket: 64634011
Published
the sentences were imposed pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the crimes
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 494, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 709, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1089, 1988 WL 22994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1988 | Docket: 64633674
Published
conviction. Appellant states that while Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 permits scoring of pri- or offenses which
Category: Criminal Procedure
521 So. 2d 386, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 686, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1018, 1988 WL 20608
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1988 | Docket: 64633214
Published
recommended sentencing range established by the Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines the trial court had
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 924, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 677, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 961, 1988 WL 20049
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1988 | Docket: 64633840
Published
guideline sentence, four and one-half years. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
The defendant was not under legal
Category: Criminal Procedure
521 So. 2d 298, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 616, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 859, 1988 WL 18578
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1988 | Docket: 64633157
Published
authorized for a probation violation by Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 1112, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 421, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 496, 1988 WL 8382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 64632643
Published
“bump-up” for violation of probation pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., the maximum recommended
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 1112, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 421, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 496, 1988 WL 8382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 64632643
Published
“bump-up” for violation of probation pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., the maximum recommended
Category: Criminal Procedure
527 So. 2d 216, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 451, 1988 WL 8110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1988 | Docket: 64635619
Published
State has candidly conceded, is erroneous. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Tyner v. State, 491 So.2d 1228 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
521 So. 2d 164, 1988 WL 8338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 1703749
Published
Florida Statutes, as to guideline sentences under Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 718, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 328, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 348, 1988 WL 6425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 64632529
Published
was error. The automatic one-cell departure of Rule 3.701(d)(14) only applies to the sentence imposed for
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 977, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 249, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 151, 1988 WL 2613
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1988 | Docket: 64632099
Published
statement delineating reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 458, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 201, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1988 | Docket: 64632007
Published
which appellant was not convicted, contrary to rule 3.701(d)(ll) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 764, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 117, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11828, 1987 WL 29155
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1987 | Docket: 64631782
Published
pending before the court for sentencing, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1), and was of a greater degree than the
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 101, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 95, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11728, 1987 WL 3177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1987 | Docket: 64631649
Published
providing written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). A court is permitted to depart beyond
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 94, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 55, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11682, 1987 WL 3017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 64631640
Published
State, 503 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The recidivistic nature of a defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
517 So. 2d 735, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 58, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11733, 1987 WL 3184
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 64631774
Published
was under “legal constraint” in accordance with Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P., and that the thirty points
Category: Criminal Procedure
525 So. 2d 424, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2882, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11696, 1987 WL 3208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1987 | Docket: 64634874
Published
more than ten years old in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 1051, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2884, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11596, 1987 WL 2680
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 64631509
Published
1985); § 921.001(6), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d) (11). Furthermore, the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 114, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2769, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 1987 WL 2330
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1987 | Docket: 64631246
Published
status at time of offense” is defined in Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) as:
Offenders on parole, probation
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 335, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2820, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11589, 1987 WL 2655
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1987 | Docket: 64631367
Published
supreme court has recently approved an amendment to rule 3.701 d.7., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, expressly
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 329, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2821, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11496, 1987 WL 2627
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631366
Published
of fourteen points for victim injury. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. Consequently, we must remand the cause
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 329, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2821, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11496, 1987 WL 2627
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631366
Published
of fourteen points for victim injury. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. Consequently, we must remand the cause
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 326, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2830, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11480, 1987 WL 2588
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631362
Published
State, 404 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), committee note (1985 amendment)
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 326, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2830, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11480, 1987 WL 2588
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631362
Published
State, 404 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), committee note (1985 amendment)
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 639, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2782, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 1987 WL 2164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 64632489
Published
opportunity under either a “bump up” pursuant to rule 3.701(d)(14) or written reasons for departure.
We reverse
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 401, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2618, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1987 | Docket: 64630869
Published
THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
. The Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) states in part:
If a split sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
514 So. 2d 1140, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2530, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1987 | Docket: 64630667
Published
which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). While worded as a valid reason,
Category: Criminal Procedure
514 So. 2d 1126, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10770, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1987 | Docket: 64630657
Published
guidelines, and is the subject of this appeal.
Rule 3.701(d)(1) Fla.R.Crim.P. provides that one guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
514 So. 2d 80, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2495, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10727
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1987 | Docket: 64630307
Published
reasons for a departure from the guidelines. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). See also State v. Jackson, 478 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
513 So. 2d 778, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2395, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12270
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1987 | Docket: 64629987
Published
forms set out at Rule 3.988, Fla.R.Crim.P. (see Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.) the defendant had added
Category: Criminal Procedure
515 So. 2d 1017, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2398, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10569, 1987 WL 3993
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1987 | Docket: 64631026
Published
which convictions had not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Upon review of the record, however
Category: Criminal Procedure
513 So. 2d 252, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2356, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1987 | Docket: 64629791
Published
charge. See § 921.001(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985) and Rule 3.701(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. (1987). It was, therefore,
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2327, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10405
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1987 | Docket: 64629660
Published
gender, and social and economic status. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(1). Accordingly, finding neither reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 1095, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2282, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10290
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1987 | Docket: 64629618
Published
sentence without written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1238, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2035, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9982
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1987 | Docket: 64628816
Published
accordance with the guidelines as supplemented by Rule 3.701(d)(14). Upon remand, the trial court shall also
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1117, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1904, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1987 | Docket: 64628765
Published
the next higher guidelines cell, as provided in rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1117, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1904, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1987 | Docket: 64628765
Published
the next higher guidelines cell, as provided in rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 1112, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1892, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9652
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1987 | Docket: 64628763
Published
during a criminal episode. We therefore amend rule 3.701.d.7 to read: “Victim injury shall be scored for
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 654, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1852, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 64628667
Published
separate sentence imposed for that offense, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), could not exceed the guideline sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 1370, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1791, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1987 | Docket: 64628464
Published
been obtained (trafficking in cocaine). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll. For whatever reason, the jury acquitted
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 979
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1987 | Docket: 64628354
Published
remanded for resentencing in that regard. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).
The trial court, as a condition of
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 390, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1632, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9182
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1987 | Docket: 64628221
Published
over the lesser guidelines sentence under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). Thus, so the argument goes, the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 1088, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 320, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2142
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1987 | Docket: 64628388
Published
during a criminal episode. We therefore amend rule 3.701.-d.7 to read: “Victim injury shall be scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 570, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1537, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1987 | Docket: 64627878
Published
490 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. See also Byrd v. State, 503 So.2d 434
Category: Criminal Procedure
507 So. 2d 1188, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1372, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8492
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1987 | Docket: 64627479
Published
reasons for departure were given, as required by Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P.
Therefore, we reverse the
Category: Criminal Procedure
507 So. 2d 682, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1987 | Docket: 64627330
Published
be considered as a basis for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1219, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1987 | Docket: 64627025
Published
as a prior conviction. The committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(5), which defines “prior record,” indicates
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 418, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8109, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1189
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 64627788
Published
State, 491 So.2d 594 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, Committee Note (d)(12). The convictions
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 1116, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1171, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 64627006
Published
appellant for this felony offense utilized the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines, and the sentence imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 407, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7933, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1987 | Docket: 64627786
Published
Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
. The cases cited by the majority
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 1086, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7985
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1987 | Docket: 64626991
Published
guidelines scoresheet for victim injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). This court has held that, since “victim
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 43, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1099, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7881
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1987 | Docket: 64626698
Published
guidelines scoresheet before imposing sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Here, however, since appellant’s sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 43, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1099, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7881
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1987 | Docket: 64626698
Published
guidelines scoresheet before imposing sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Here, however, since appellant’s sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
505 So. 2d 688, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1090, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7865
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1987 | Docket: 64626475
Published
HEREWITH.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
. See Medlock v. State, 489 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
505 So. 2d 640, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1987 | Docket: 64626455
Published
drug abuse.” The reason was invalidated under Rule 3.701(d)(ll) because no convictions had been obtained
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 539, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 893, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 64626029
Published
from the sentence recommended under the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. However, we conclude
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 1360, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 769, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12098
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1987 | Docket: 64625859
Published
v. State, 491 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986):
Rule 3.701(d)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that only one
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 970, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 745, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12044
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1987 | Docket: 64625725
Published
Criminal Procedure, 482 So.2d 311 (Fla.1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11), (14), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Carter v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 457, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1987 | Docket: 64625472
Published
Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 451, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11988, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 701
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1987 | Docket: 64625468
Published
which defendant had not been convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
Because none of the cited reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 434, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 684, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1987 | Docket: 64625459
Published
sentencing category than he should have been. *435See Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Vega v. State, 498 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 1371, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7011, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 650
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1987 | Docket: 64625287
Published
years statutory maximum should be imposed. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). Committee Note (d)(12) provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 1324, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 635, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6976
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1987 | Docket: 64625268
Published
before the court at the time of the sentencing. Rule 3.701(d)(4), Fla.R.Crim.P. See also State v. Salsberry
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 1306, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 578, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11960
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1987 | Docket: 64625852
Published
justifies imposition of an aggravated sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3). See Vanover v. State, 498 So.2d 899
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 535, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6730
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1987 | Docket: 64625163
Published
period of time of abuse, is invalid under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll), which prohibits the use of factors
Category: Criminal Procedure
503 So. 2d 1301, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 539, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11961
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1987 | Docket: 64625851
Published
crimes shall be included in the prior record. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c). As a converse to this rule, juvenile
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 63, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 469, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6647
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1987 | Docket: 64624882
Published
the court predicated a departure from the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines upon impermissible
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 752, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 441, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624694
Published
State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); 5) appellant lied to police is clearly
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 752, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 441, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624694
Published
State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); 5) appellant lied to police is clearly
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 755, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 441, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624696
Published
P. 9.120 Committee Notes, 1977 Rev.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 163, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 373, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6468
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1987 | Docket: 64624417
Published
State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)9; see also Pedraza v. State, 493 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 118, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 334, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6413
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1987 | Docket: 64624407
Published
for which no conviction had been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); see also, Denson v. State, 493 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 118, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 334, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6413
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1987 | Docket: 64624407
Published
for which no conviction had been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); see also, Denson v. State, 493 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 24, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 176, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1986 | Docket: 64624855
Published
statement delineating reasons for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 316, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 164, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64624124
Published
which a conviction has not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Finally, the protection of society
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 18, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 140, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11099
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 64624851
Published
State, 457 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The sentence is vacated and this
Category: Criminal Procedure
499 So. 2d 33
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1986 | Docket: 1444363
Published
scoresheet for Uptagrafft's charge of lewd assault, Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
499 So. 2d 30, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 120, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11070
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1986 | Docket: 64623778
Published
sentence was not a departure from that allowed by rule 3.701. Prentice v. State, 469 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 688, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1986 | Docket: 64623533
Published
legal status at the time of the offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). Second, the court properly calculated
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1030, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2620, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11337
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1986 | Docket: 64623669
Published
Pentaude now argues on appeal that since Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) provides that probation violation
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1017, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2599, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11311
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 64623665
Published
robbery as the primary offense at conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3). Neither is the judge’s personal view
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 1015, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2598, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 64623664
Published
. § 893.13(1)(f), Fla.Stat. (1983).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.; Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d 47 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 598, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2561, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1986 | Docket: 64623490
Published
Saskowitz elects to be sentenced pursuant to Rule 3.701, the trial court may depart for valid reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 601, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2568, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1986 | Docket: 64623492
Published
sentence — the “clear and convincing” test in Rule 3.701(d)(ll) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 1347, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 64623261
Published
RESENTENCING.
DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 1326, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2494, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10849
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 64623250
Published
We remand for resentenc-ing in accordance with Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 997, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2426, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10723
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1986 | Docket: 64623091
Published
011(3), 775.082(1), Fla.Stat. (1985).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.8.
. Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 720, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2389, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10575
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1986 | Docket: 64623009
Published
on remand, a scoresheet must be prepared. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Gause v. State, 491 So.2d 320 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
498 So. 2d 967, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2306, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10368
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 64623645
Published
which a conviction has not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Tyner v. State, 491 So.2d 1228 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 964, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10418, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 64622644
Published
prohibited by the guidelines themselves. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 965, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2290, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 64622645
Published
beyond the one cell departure provided for in Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2249, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1986 | Docket: 64622369
Published
that conforms to the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701).
SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
UPCHURCH
Category: Criminal Procedure
508 So. 2d 358, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1986 | Docket: 64627771
Published
for thirty days, commending to its attention rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 889, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2216, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10204
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1986 | Docket: 64622626
Published
on remand, a scoresheet must be prepared. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Gause v. State, 491 So.2d 320 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10213
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 64622622
Published
possession.” Both of these grounds violate Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) because they punish defendant for
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 872, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2143, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10041
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1986 | Docket: 64622223
Published
COWART, J., dissents without opinion.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.ll.
. See Smith v. State, 480 So.2d 663
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 874, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1986 | Docket: 1748652
Published
DCA 1986). The fourth reason is also invalid as Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 828, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2104, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9948
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1986 | Docket: 64622204
Published
, the sexual battery charge, in violation of rule 3.701 d.ll., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 284, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2112, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1986 | Docket: 64622049
Published
without requiring reasons for departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The recommendation for the next
Category: Criminal Procedure
494 So. 2d 534, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2079, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9909
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1986 | Docket: 64621831
Published
465 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
Amended rule 3.701 d.14, which took effect July 1, 1984, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
493 So. 2d 1122, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1980, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1986 | Docket: 64621529
Published
precedence as the presumptive sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9); cf. Tanner v. State, 468 So.2d 505
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 462, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1735, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1986 | Docket: 64620966
Published
conformity with the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701).
CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED;
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 1292, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1669, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9116
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1986 | Docket: 64620844
Published
sentences below the minimum mandatory penalty. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).
In sentencing defendants to twenty
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 1247, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1633, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1986 | Docket: 64620825
Published
requiring a written reason for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). In the instant case, although appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
493 So. 2d 19, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9013, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1625
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1986 | Docket: 64621236
Published
competency of counsel at sentencing.8
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
. In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 615, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1627, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1986 | Docket: 64620682
Published
464 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1384, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1578, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620458
Published
crimes for which no conviction was obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
The fifth reason, that appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1384, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1578, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620458
Published
crimes for which no conviction was obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
The fifth reason, that appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 328, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8772
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 64620581
Published
State, 483 So.2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). In the present case, no written reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 328, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1546, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8749
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 64620582
Published
the trial court relied upon two scoresheets.
Rule 3.701(d)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that only one
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1349, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1499, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 64620436
Published
charge, which was subsequently nolle pressed. Rule 3.701(c)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 296, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1481, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1986 | Docket: 64620574
Published
014(1)(a), (b) & (2)(b)1., Fla.Stat. (1983).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6) & (d)(11).
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1065, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1483, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8646
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1986 | Docket: 64620367
Published
that conforms to the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701).
SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
ORFINGER
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1336, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1470, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8677
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1986 | Docket: 64620431
Published
Category 9 for the bond jumping, pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(3), Fla.R.Crim.P., as amended by the Supreme
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 1046, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1456, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8610
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1986 | Docket: 64620359
Published
calling for a sentence of 7 to 9 years. Pursuant to Rule 3.701 d 14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure the
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 231, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1430, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8512
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 64620204
Published
cell without stating reasons for departure, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.14, but for an increase beyond that, other
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 449, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1433, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1986 | Docket: 64620960
Published
recommended sentence established pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We affirm the orders
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1245, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8476
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1986 | Docket: 64620105
Published
State, 451 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) note (1983).
Category: Criminal Procedure
491 So. 2d 1167, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1402, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620800
Published
defendant’s sentences to the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). However, the third reason does not
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1228, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1324, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 64620089
Published
clearly an improper reason because it violates Rule 3.701(d)(ll), which disallows using past conduct for
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 857, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1279, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1986 | Docket: 64619917
Published
recommended sentence established pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines. We therefore vacate appellant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 848, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1276, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1986 | Docket: 64619912
Published
that conforms to the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701).
*850SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
UPCHURCH
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 1195, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1263, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1986 | Docket: 64620074
Published
total guidelines sentence, in violation of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Since no written reasons were given
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 205, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1244, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1986 | Docket: 64619717
Published
of two felonies runs afoul of the provision in rule 3.701(d)(ll) that “reasons for deviating from the guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 179, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1232, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8066
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 64619712
Published
824 (Fla.1984), regarding the comment following Rule 3.701(d)(5), and Bordeaux v. State, 471 So.2d 1353
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 159, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1244, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8058
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1986 | Docket: 64619709
Published
resultant enhancement but without deference to Rule 3.701(d)(11). Thus, use of the probation violations
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 911, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1192, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1986 | Docket: 64619513
Published
sentence without giving a reason therefor. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Any further departure must be supported
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 110, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1138, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7837
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64619703
Published
unambiguous language of the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12), which provides:
The sentencing court
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 114, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 987, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7524
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1986 | Docket: 64619128
Published
appellant argues the departure is prohibited by Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Fla.R. Crim.P., which states that “reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 689, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7320
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1986 | Docket: 64618521
Published
sentencing guidelines is required under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(ll). State v. Jackson, 478 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 681, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 875, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7241
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1986 | Docket: 64618513
Published
to provide written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), (12); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 51, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 795, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1986 | Docket: 64618415
Published
to justify departure from the guidelines, and Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 26, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 672, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6911
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1986 | Docket: 64618064
Published
for departure from the guidelines. We agree. Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., which became effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 855, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 528, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1986 | Docket: 64617552
Published
a juvenile record over three years old (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c)). The only two possible reasons
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 468, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 371, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6236
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1986 | Docket: 64617463
Published
convincing” reason to justify departure. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also Santiago v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
485 So. 2d 836, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 337, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6268
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1986 | Docket: 64618270
Published
departure. As this court has recently recognized, rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure:
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 565, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 377, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6264
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617148
Published
convictions have been obtained is improper. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Furthermore, in branding the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 564, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 373, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617147
Published
of more than the one cell authorized by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) for a probation revocation. See,
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 550, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6180, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617141
Published
probation, without providing written reasons. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). We would respectfully remind the
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 1312, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 313, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1986 | Docket: 64616877
Published
providing written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). If the court decides to depart from
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 60, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 299, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1986 | Docket: 64617374
Published
case then before the court in Clay County. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 1006
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1986 | Docket: 64616810
Published
departure from the presumptive sentence. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.; State v. Jackson, 478
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 749, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1986 | Docket: 64617517
Published
probation or community control has been revoked. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14; see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356
Category: Criminal Procedure
483 So. 2d 749, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1986 | Docket: 64617517
Published
probation or community control has been revoked. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14; see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356
Category: Criminal Procedure
481 So. 2d 1293, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 258, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1986 | Docket: 64616867
Published
cell without a given reason for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). It is immaterial that if the 220
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 712, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5833, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1986 | Docket: 64616403
Published
COBB, C.J., and UPCHURCH, J., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6056
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 64616274
Published
burglary had not resulted in convictions. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) provides:
Reasons for deviating from
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6056
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 64616274
Published
burglary had not resulted in convictions. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) provides:
Reasons for deviating from
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 878, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 60, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1985 | Docket: 64616096
Published
Jackson, which was subsequently decided.
. Rule 3.701 was modified, and subsection (d)(14) was added
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 872, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 43, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17305
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1985 | Docket: 64616090
Published
consecutive five-year terms of probation violates rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Statutes (1983). We disagree
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 311, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 15, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 1427
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 64617097
Published
MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
*313a. This rule is to
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 823, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2718, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17280
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1985 | Docket: 64616055
Published
the fact and should not have been scored. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); see Hendry v. State, 460 So.2d 589
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 297, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2736, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17255
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1985 | Docket: 64615905
Published
the guidelines’ recommended sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The defendant contends that the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 265, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2671, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 64615892
Published
Fla.Stat. (1983), case no. 85-256.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.1. Although no score-sheet is in the record
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 267, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2691, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17151
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 64615893
Published
reasons for the departure, as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), is essential in these circumstances
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2636, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17105
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1985 | Docket: 64615751
Published
§ 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1983).
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
. Knowlton v. State, 466 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2643, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17044
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 64615616
Published
statute did not track the Florida statute. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)a.3. requires that an offense be scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 123, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16984, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2639
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 64616235
Published
guidelines. § 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Appellant’s recommended guidelines sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 1154, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2624, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16998
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1985 | Docket: 64615735
Published
to all other statutory provisions,” or of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), providing “Sentences for separate
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 1150, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2621, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1985 | Docket: 64615732
Published
ZEHMER, Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 882, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 64615612
Published
and convincing reasons for a departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We agree.
The trial judge intended
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 659, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2574, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16989
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 64616380
Published
properly, and a legal sentence imposed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Gallagher v. State, 476 So.2d 754
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 519, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2580, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 64615548
Published
(Fla.1985) that a trial judge does not satisfy rule 3.701(d)(ll)’s requirement of a written statement delineating
Category: Criminal Procedure
476 So. 2d 771, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1985 | Docket: 64614709
Published
Addison v. State, 452 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1984)
Category: Criminal Procedure
478 So. 2d 375, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1985 | Docket: 64615467
Published
trial court based its sentence on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
476 So. 2d 303, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2311, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16269
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1985 | Docket: 64614525
Published
and was properly considered, in accordance with Rule 3.701(b)(3), as ‘circumstances surrounding the offense
Category: Criminal Procedure
476 So. 2d 284, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2305, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16170
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1985 | Docket: 64614516
Published
recommended by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We reverse and remand for resen-tencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 1365, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2284, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1985 | Docket: 64614475
Published
basis for departing from the guidelines. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Young v. State, 455 So.2d 551 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 1266, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2072, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613927
Published
penalty exceeds the guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). The correctness of this portion of
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 1266, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2072, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613927
Published
penalty exceeds the guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). The correctness of this portion of
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 1261, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613923
Published
scoresheets in arriving at appellant’s sentence. Rule 3.701 d.l., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, explicitly
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 751, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2077, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64616036
Published
guidelines were clear and convincing, as required by Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2038, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15598
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1985 | Docket: 64613803
Published
in accord with the sentencing guidelines. See Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. The presence of the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 11, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1934, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1985 | Docket: 64613609
Published
imposed pursuant to the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
Category: Criminal Procedure
475 So. 2d 713, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1846, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17409
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1985 | Docket: 64614227
Published
Sentencing Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla.1984).
. Rule 3.701(d)(3), as amended, reads as follows:
(3) “Primary
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 30, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1808, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14682
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1985 | Docket: 64613311
Published
trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 30, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1808, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14682
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1985 | Docket: 64613311
Published
trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 765, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1776, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1985 | Docket: 64613501
Published
effective date of the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. She contends that the trial court erred
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 280, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1611, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 64613674
Published
presumptive sentence range under the Guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).
Both parties concede that at least
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 659, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1606
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 64612764
Published
in determining the recommended sentence under Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. We affirm.
Franklin Jones, a
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 849, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 64612575
Published
guidelines (§ 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701) anytime prior to, or during, sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 843, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14541, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 64612572
Published
REMANDED.
ORFINGER and COWART, JJ„ concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
. § 847.014(2)(b)(2), Fla.Stat. (1981)
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 1324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1954, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15351
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 64613593
Published
written reason is given.
Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P.
Second, Rule 3.701(d)(1) states, in pertinent
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 768, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1372, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612559
Published
contends that the trial court erred in relying on Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 88, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1371, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612427
Published
The Rule’s Committee Note, adopted as part of Rule 3.701, supports our conclusion by stating that “any
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 94, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14363, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1390
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612431
Published
guidelines. See § 921.001(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983); Rule 3.701, In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 951, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1357, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1985 | Docket: 64612282
Published
be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 914, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1289, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14312
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1985 | Docket: 64612258
Published
the time of sentencing, the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(ll) provided that sentences under the provisions
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 200, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14203
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1985 | Docket: 64612144
Published
implementation of the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1269, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 64612858
Published
Guidelines), 439 So.2d 848, 849 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c) and committee note thereto.
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 179, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1261, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14020
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 64612141
Published
cognizably “clear and convincing” ones under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(ll). We disagree.
II
We will not
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 499, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1172, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13945
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1985 | Docket: 64611809
Published
the “clear and convincing reasons” required by Rule 3.701(d)ll, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure for
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 547, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1985 | Docket: 64612739
Published
1984). The change was effected by addition of rule 3.701(d)(14).
Appellant contends the enhanced sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 446, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1123, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13826
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1985 | Docket: 64611775
Published
trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 793, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1013, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13572
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1985 | Docket: 64611488
Published
range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. She contends
Category: Criminal Procedure
466 So. 2d 1246, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 931, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13301
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 64611196
Published
not purport to be a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). His sentencing scoresheet totaled
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 220, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 226, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3912
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 64611706
Published
the existing law relating to manslaughter.
b) Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a) is revised by the elimination of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 220, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 226, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3912
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 64611706
Published
the existing law relating to manslaughter.
b) Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a) is revised by the elimination of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 1372, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 825, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13201
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 64610863
Published
clear and convincing reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Smith v. State, 454 So.2d 90 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 670, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 797, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13127
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 64610728
Published
reason for this action because it believed that Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., which would have justified
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 1357, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 778, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13949
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 64610860
Published
would be a futile act because the amendment to' rule 3.701 allowing for a one cell upward departure based
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 613, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 732, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13079
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1985 | Docket: 64610695
Published
“additional offense at conviction,” see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.4, and the concomitant 27 *614points which
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 1333, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 707, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12971
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1985 | Docket: 64610478
Published
sentencing him under the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We agree. The underlying offense in this
Category: Criminal Procedure
465 So. 2d 591, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 694, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12969
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1985 | Docket: 64610692
Published
time he was sentenced, the committee note *592to rule 3.701(d)(12) stated that “If a split sentence is imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 716, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 656, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12948
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 64610358
Published
classified as misdemeanors in North Carolina.
Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), provides in part:
a) “Prior record”
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 1305, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12894
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1985 | Docket: 64610460
Published
Procedure, 451 So.2d 824, 828 (Fla.1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) and committee note thereto.
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 672, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 628
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1327835
Published
DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 883, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 64609560
Published
departure from the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). In fact, the trial court said he
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 868, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 267, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12152
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1985 | Docket: 64609553
Published
demonstrate clear and convincing reasons therefor. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 (d)(ll).
Accordingly, we reverse the appellant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 860, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12115
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1985 | Docket: 64609548
Published
guideline sentence established pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. For this limited reason we therefore vacate
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 580, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1985 | Docket: 64610317
Published
serve only six years. Appellant contends that rule 3.701(d)(12) was violated since his sentences totaled
Category: Criminal Procedure
464 So. 2d 581, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11923, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1985 | Docket: 64610318
Published
serve only six years. Appellant contends that rule 3.701(d)(12) was violated since his sentences totaled
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 51, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 92, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1984 | Docket: 64609241
Published
defendant’s sentence under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
*52The
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2600, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 64609157
Published
departure from the guidelines pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The trial court disagreed and imposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
460 So. 2d 555, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2607, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16731
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 64608645
Published
sentence unless a written reason is given.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Moreover, when appellant was sentenced
Category: Criminal Procedure
460 So. 2d 478, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2535, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 64608626
Published
shall not be scored. (Emphasis supplied).
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). The guidelines’ all encompassing
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 468, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2479, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16392
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 64608294
Published
urban area, not rural.
Appellant asserts that Rule 3.701 delineates the presumptively correct bounds of
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 455, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2459, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1984 | Docket: 64608288
Published
section. The use of the term “total sentence” in Rule 3.701(d)(12) does not refer to the mathematical total
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 368, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2304, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15699
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1984 | Docket: 64607817
Published
writing or in the transcript of the hearing. Rule 3.701 Fla.R.Crim.P. was amended to provide that no
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 347, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2211, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15600
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 64607813
Published
effective. See § 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983), and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701. As permitted by the guidelines, by formal
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 64607239
Published
in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find
Category: Criminal Procedure
456 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 64607028
Published
judge on the score sheet were improper. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We disagree and affirm.
A “Category
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 1347, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15233
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 64606868
Published
writing his reasons for deviating as required by Rule 3.701 b6. and dll.
We have recently held that, in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 554, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1840, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14867
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 64606698
Published
be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Fla. R.Crim.P. We agree that appellant was entitled
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 694, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1707, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14476
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 64606454
Published
accordance with the new sentencing guidelines. Rule 3.701, F.R. Crim.P. We affirm.
On December 7, 1983
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 957, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14060
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 64605875
Published
the instant offense.” (Emphasis added). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). This subsequently committed crime
Category: Criminal Procedure
451 So. 2d 824, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2928
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1984 | Docket: 64605432
Published
and SHAW, JJ., concur.
ADKINS, J., dissents.
RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
a. This rule is to be
Category: Criminal Procedure
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 20, 1984 | Docket: 3255301
Published
While it is true that the Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) does provide for the exceptions you
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 848, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3193
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1983 | Docket: 64600267
Published
which have been received, and we hereby adopt, as rule 3.701 and form 3.988, the rule and forms appended to
Category: Criminal Procedure