Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 - SENTENCING GUIDELINES | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701

RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(a) Use with Forms. This rule is to be used in conjunction
with forms 3.988(a)–(i).

(b) Statement of Purpose. The purpose of sentencing
guidelines is to establish a uniform set of standards to guide the
sentencing judge in the sentence decision-making process. The
guidelines represent a synthesis of current sentencing theory and
historic sentencing practices throughout the state. Sentencing
guidelines are intended to eliminate unwarranted variation in the
sentencing process by reducing the subjectivity in interpreting
specific offense-related and offender-related criteria and in defining
their relative importance in the sentencing decision. The sentencing
guidelines embody the following principles:

(1) Sentencing should be neutral with respect to race,
gender, and social and economic status.

(2) The primary purpose of sentencing is to punish the
offender. Rehabilitation and other traditional considerations
continue to be desired goals of the criminal justice system but must
assume a subordinate role.
(3) The penalty imposed should be commensurate with
the severity of the convicted offense and the circumstances
surrounding the offense.

(4) The severity of the sanction should increase with
the length and nature of the offender’s criminal history.

(5) The sentence imposed by the sentencing judge
should reflect the length of time to be served, shortened only by the
application of gain time.

(6) While the sentencing guidelines are designed to aid
the judge in the sentencing decision and are not intended to usurp
judicial discretion, departures from the presumptive sentences
established in the guidelines shall be articulated in writing and
made when circumstances or factors reasonably justify the
aggravation or mitigation of the sentence. The level of proof
necessary to establish facts supporting a departure from a sentence
under the guidelines is a preponderance of the evidence.

(7) Because the capacities of state and local
correctional facilities are finite, use of incarcerative sanctions
should be limited to those persons convicted of more serious
offenses or those who have longer criminal histories. To ensure
such usage of finite resources, sanctions used in sentencing
convicted felons should be the least restrictive necessary to achieve
the purposes of the sentence.

(c) Offense Categories. Offenses have been grouped into 9
offense categories encompassing the following statutes:

Category 1: Murder, manslaughter: Chapter 782 (except
subsection 782.04(1)(a)), subsection 316.193(3)(c)3, and subsection
327.351(2).

Category 2: Sexual offenses: Section 775.22, chapters 794 and
800, section 826.04, and section 491.0112.

Category 3: Robbery: Section 812.13, and sections 812.133
and 812.135.
Category 4: Violent personal crimes: Section 231.06, chapters
784 and 836, section 843.01, and subsection 381.411(4).

Category 5: Burglary: Chapter 810, section 817.025, and
subsection 806.13(3).

Category 6: Thefts, forgery, fraud: Sections 192.037 and
206.56, chapters 322 and 409, section 370.142, section 415.111,
chapter 443, section 493.3175, sections 494.0018, 496.413, and
496.417, chapter 509, subsection 517.301(1)(a), subsections
585.145(3) and 585.85(2), section 687.146, and chapters 812
(except section 812.13), 815, 817, 831, and 832.

Category 7: Drugs: Section 499.005 and chapter 893.

Category 8: Weapons: Chapter 790 and section 944.40.

Category 9: All other felony offenses.

(d) General Rules and Definitions.

(1) One guideline scoresheet shall be utilized for each
defendant covering all offenses pending before the court for
sentencing. The state attorney’s office will prepare the scoresheets
and present them to defense counsel for review as to accuracy in all
cases unless the judge directs otherwise. The sentencing judge shall
approve all scoresheets.

(2) “Conviction” means a determination of guilt
resulting from plea or trial, regardless of whether adjudication was
withheld or whether imposition of sentence was suspended.

(3) “Primary offense” is defined as the offense at
conviction that, when scored on the guidelines scoresheet,
recommends the most severe sanction. In the case of multiple
offenses, the primary offense is determined in the following manner:

(A) A separate guidelines scoresheet shall be
prepared scoring each offense at conviction as the “primary offense
at conviction” with the other offenses at conviction scored as
“additional offenses at conviction.”

(B) The guidelines scoresheet that recommends
the most severe sentence range shall be the scoresheet to be
utilized by the sentencing judge pursuant to these guidelines.

(4) All other offenses for which the offender is convicted
and that are pending before the court for sentencing at the same
time shall be scored as additional offenses based on their degree
and the number of counts of each.

(5) “Prior record” refers to any past criminal conduct on
the part of the offender, resulting in conviction, prior to the
commission of the primary offense. Prior record includes all prior
Florida, federal, out-of-state, military, and foreign convictions, as
well as convictions for violation of municipal or county ordinances
that bring within the municipal or county code the violation of a
state statute or statutes. Provided, however, that:

(A) Entries in criminal histories that show no
disposition, disposition unknown, arrest only, or other
nonconviction disposition shall not be scored.

(B) When scoring federal, foreign, military, or out-
of-state convictions, assign the score for the analogous or parallel
Florida statute.

(C) When unable to determine whether an offense
at conviction is a felony or a misdemeanor, the offense should be
scored as a misdemeanor. When the degree of the felony is
ambiguous or impossible to determine, score the offense as a third-
degree felony.

(D) Prior record shall include criminal traffic
offenses, which shall be scored as misdemeanors.

(E) Convictions that do not constitute violations of
a parallel or analogous state criminal statute shall not be scored.
(F) An offender’s prior record shall not be scored if
the offender has maintained a conviction-free record for a period of
10 consecutive years from the most recent date of release from
confinement, supervision, or sanction, whichever is later, to the
date of the primary offense.

(G) All prior juvenile dispositions that are the
equivalent of convictions as defined in subdivision (d)(2), occurring
within 3 years of the commission of the primary offense and that
would have been criminal if committed by an adult, shall be
included in prior record.

(6) “Legal status at time of offense” is defined as
follows: Offenders on parole, probation, or community control;
offenders in custody serving a sentence; escapees; fugitives who
have fled to avoid prosecution or who have failed to appear for a
criminal judicial proceeding or who have violated conditions of a
supersedeas bond; and offenders in pretrial intervention or
diversion programs. Legal status points are to be assessed where
these forms of legal constraint existed at the time of the commission
of offenses scored as primary or additional offenses at conviction.
Legal status points are to be assessed only once whether there are
one or more offenses at conviction.

(7) Victim injury shall be scored for each victim
physically injured during a criminal episode or transaction, and for
each count resulting in such injury whether there are one or more
victims.

(8) The recommended sentences provided in the
guideline grids are assumed to be appropriate for the composite
score of the offender. A range is provided to permit some discretion.
The permitted ranges allow the sentencing judge additional
discretion when the particular circumstances of a crime or
defendant make it appropriate to increase or decrease the
recommended sentence without the requirement of finding
reasonable justification to do so and without the requirement of a
written explanation.
(9) For those offenses having a mandatory penalty, a
scoresheet should be completed and the guideline sentence
calculated. If the recommended sentence is less than the mandatory
penalty, the mandatory sentence takes precedence. If the guideline
sentence exceeds the mandatory sentence, the guideline sentence
should be imposed.

(10) If the composite score for a defendant charged with
a single offense indicates a guideline sentence that exceeds the
maximum sentence provided by statute for that offense, the
statutory maximum sentence should be imposed.

(11) Departures from the recommended or permitted
guideline sentence should be avoided unless there are
circumstances or factors that reasonably justify aggravating or
mitigating the sentence. Any sentence outside the permitted
guideline range must be accompanied by a written statement
delineating the reasons for the departure. Reasons for deviating
from the guidelines shall not include factors relating to prior arrests
without conviction or the instant offenses for which convictions
have not been obtained.

(12) A sentence must be imposed for each offense.
However, the total sentence cannot exceed the total guideline
sentence unless a written reason is given. Where the offender is
being sentenced for a capital felony and other noncapital felonies
that arose out of the same criminal episode or transaction, the
sentencing court may impose any sentence authorized by law for
the noncapital felonies.

(13) Community control is a form of intensive supervised
custody in the community involving restriction of the freedom of the
offender. When community control is imposed, it shall not exceed
the term provided by general law.

(14) Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or
community control must be in accordance with the guidelines. The
sentence imposed after revocation of probation or community
control may be included within the original cell (guidelines range) or
may be increased to the next higher cell (guidelines range) without
requiring a reason for departure.

(15) Categories 3, 5, and 6 contain an additional factor
to be scored under the heading of Prior Record: Prior convictions for
similar offenses. Prior convictions scored under this factor should
be calculated in addition to the general prior record score. Scoring
is limited to prior felony convictions included within the category.

Sentencing Guidelines Commission Notes

1988 Amendments.

(a) The operation of this rule is not intended to change the
law or requirements of proof as regards sentencing.

(b) These principles are binding on the sentencing court.

(c) Only 1 category is proper in any particular case. Category
9, “All Other Felony Offenses,” should be used only when the
primary offense at conviction is not included in another, more
specific category. The guidelines do not apply to capital felonies.

Inchoate offenses are included within the category of the
offense attempted, solicited, or conspired to, as modified by chapter
777.

The form appearing at Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.988(a) has been revised to incorporate a point value for inclusion
in the prior record factor utilized in the determination of
recommended sentence by scoring each prior conviction under
section 316.193, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or section
316.1931, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or section 327.351,
Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), at a value of 32 points. This point
value will be applied only if the offender is convicted for a violation
of section 316.193(3)(c)3, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986), or section
327.351, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), if the operation of a motor
vehicle or vessel by the offender while intoxicated as defined in
section 316.193(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986), or section
327.351(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), results in the death of
any human being and the scoresheet utilized in sentencing is the
form appearing at Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.988(a). For
purposes of determining a prior conviction for a violation of the
above enumerated statute, a prior conviction for violation of section
316.1931 or section 316.193 or former section 860.01 or former
section 316.028, or a previous conviction for any substantially
similar alcohol-related or drug-related traffic offense outside this
state shall also be considered a prior conviction.

(d)(1) Ultimate responsibility for ensuring that scoresheets are
accurately prepared rests with the sentencing court. Due to ethical
considerations, defense counsel may not be compelled to submit a
scoresheet. Probation and parole officers may be directed to compile
guidelines scoresheets only when a presentence investigation has
been ordered. The forms for calculating the guidelines are forms
3.988(a)–(i).

(d)(2) This definition applies to both instant offense and prior
record scoring.

(d)(3) The proper offense category is identified on determination
of the primary offense. When the defendant is convicted of
violations of more than 1 unique statute, the offenses are to be
sorted by statutory degree.

(d)(4) No points shall be scored for lesser and included
offenses. In the event of multiple counts of the same distinct offense
and degree of felony being scored as primary offense, it shall be
scored as additional counts of the primary offense. All other
offenses for which the defendant is convicted that are pending
before the court for sentencing shall be scored as additional
offenses.

(d)(5) Each separate prior felony and misdemeanor conviction
in an offender’s prior record that amounts to a violation of Florida
law shall be scored, unless discharged by the passage of time. Any
uncertainty in the scoring of the defendant’s prior record shall be
resolved in favor of the defendant, and disagreement as to the
propriety of scoring specific entries in the prior record should be
resolved by the trial judge.
Prior record includes all offenses for which the defendant has
been found guilty, regardless of whether adjudication was withheld
or the record has been expunged.

Juvenile dispositions, with the exclusion of status offenses,
are included and considered along with adult convictions by
operation of this provision. However, each separate adjudication is
discharged from consideration if 3 years have passed between the
date of disposition and the commission of the instant offense.

For any offense where sentence was previously suspended
pursuant to the imposition of probation and such offense is now
before the court for sentencing, upon a revocation of that probation
based upon a subsequent criminal offense (which subsequent
offense is also before the court for sentencing at the same time), the
earlier offense shall be scored as “prior record” and not as
“additional offense.”

(d)(7) This provision implements the intention of the
commission that points for victim injury be added for each victim
injured during a criminal transaction or episode. The injury need
not be an element of the crime for which the defendant is convicted,
but is limited to physical trauma. However, if the victim injury is
the result of a crime for which the defendant has been acquitted, it
shall not be scored.

(d)(8) The first guideline cell in each category (any nonstate
prison sanction) allows the court the flexibility to impose any lawful
term of probation with or without a period of incarceration as a
condition of probation, a county jail term alone, or any
nonincarcerative disposition. Any sentence may include the
requirement that a fine be paid. The sentences are found in forms
3.988(a)–(i).

(d)(10) If an offender is convicted under an enhancement
statute, the reclassified degree should be used as the basis for
scoring the primary offense in the appropriate category. If the
offender is sentenced under section 775.084 (habitual offender), the
maximum allowable sentence is increased as provided by the
operation of that statute. If the sentence imposed departs from the
recommended sentence, the provisions of (d)(11) shall apply.

(d)(11) A sentencing judge may depart from the
recommended sentence and impose a sentence within the permitted
range without giving reasons therefor. If a sentencing judge departs
from the permitted range, reasons for departure shall be articulated
at the time sentence is imposed. The written statement shall be
made a part of the record, with sufficient specificity to inform all
parties, as well as the public, of the reasons for departure. The
court is prohibited from considering offenses for which the
defendant has not been convicted. Other factors, consistent and not
in conflict with the statement of purpose, may be considered and
utilized by the sentencing judge.

(d)(12) The sentencing court shall impose or suspend
sentence for each separate count, as convicted. The total sentence
shall not exceed the guideline sentence, unless the provisions of
subdivision (d)(11) are complied with.

If a split sentence is imposed (i.e., a combination of state
prison and probation supervision), the incarcerative portion
imposed shall not be less than the minimum of the guideline range
nor exceed the maximum of the range. The total sanction
(incarceration and probation) shall not exceed the term provided by
general law.

(d)(13) Community control is a viable alternative for any
state prison sentence less than 24 months without requiring a
reason for departure. It is appropriate to impose a sentence of
community control to be followed by a term of probation. The total
sanction (community control and probation) shall not exceed the
term provided by general law.

Community control is not an alternative sanction from the
recommended range of any nonstate prison sanction unless the
provisions of rule 3.701(d)(11) are applied.

1991 Amendment. The purpose of the 1991 revision to rule
3.701(d)(6) is to clarify the original intent that legal constraint is a
status consideration and is not to be considered a function of the
number of offenses at conviction.

1991 Amendment. The purpose of the 1991 revision to rule
3.701(d)(7) is to provide consistency in the scoring of victim injury
by scoring each offense at conviction for which victim injury can
appropriately be scored, whether committed against a single or
multiple victims.

1993 Amendments. Inchoate offenses are included within the
category of the offense attempted, solicited, or conspired to, as
modified by chapter 777. An attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to
commit first-degree murder as defined in subsection 782.04(1)(a)
shall be scored in category 1. An attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy
to commit capital sexual battery as defined in subsection
794.011(2) shall be scored in category 2.

Cases Citing Rule 3.701

Total Results: 1315

Albritton v. State

476 So. 2d 158, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 426

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1681594

Cited 254 times | Published

elected to depart from the sentencing guidelines of rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and gave

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hendrix v. State

475 So. 2d 1218, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 425

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1710007

Cited 202 times | Published

this Court adopted the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. These guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543

Cited 171 times | Published

921.001(4), Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). To accomplish these goals, the statute

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fitzpatrick v. State

900 So. 2d 495, 2005 WL 168510

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2005 | Docket: 463018

Cited 154 times | Published

sentencing judge shall approve all scoresheets. Thus, "rule 3.701(d)(1) mandates that a sentence be imposed based

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Mischler

488 So. 2d 523, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 139

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 389465

Cited 146 times | Published

warrant aggravating or mitigating a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Thus far, trial courts have cited

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

661 So. 2d 1193, 1995 WL 424172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 1526412

Cited 128 times | Published

statement." § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1983); rule 3.701(d)(11). Two weeks later, relying on our decision

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pope v. State

561 So. 2d 554, 1990 WL 55691

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1990 | Docket: 1740281

Cited 121 times | Published

Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The district court remanded, giving

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitehead v. State

498 So. 2d 863, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 553

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1986 | Docket: 1699742

Cited 114 times | Published

nature of the offender's criminal history." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). Furthermore, the guidelines were to be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Michael R. Branan v. William E. Booth, and Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General of the State of Florida

861 F.2d 1507, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17129, 1988 WL 127628

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 1988 | Docket: 370719

Cited 93 times | Published

from the Florida sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701) and increasing Branan’s sentence from the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burdick v. State

594 So. 2d 267, 1992 WL 18563

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1992 | Docket: 1485882

Cited 91 times | Published

unwarranted variation in the sentencing process." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). The guidelines accomplish this objective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Torres-Arboledo v. State

524 So. 2d 403, 1988 WL 26245

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 2514587

Cited 91 times | Published

adequate written reasons for departure. Under Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, "[v]ictim

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ashley v. State

614 So. 2d 486

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1993 | Docket: 449216

Cited 83 times | Published

punishment. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. A court may depart from these ranges only

Category: Criminal Procedure

Quarterman v. State

527 So. 2d 1380, 1988 WL 73557

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 529938

Cited 82 times | Published

the defendant has not been convicted, see Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), we held that it was not. Id. We

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tripp v. State

622 So. 2d 941, 1993 WL 83094

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1993 | Docket: 547051

Cited 81 times | Published

eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Anderson

905 So. 2d 111, 2005 WL 1404428

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2005 | Docket: 1307996

Cited 78 times | Published

"one-cell" recommended range of years. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d) (1984). A sentence calculation error

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lambert v. State

545 So. 2d 838, 1989 WL 65496

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 105338

Cited 77 times | Published

for violation of community control. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The court gave the following reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Karchesky v. State

591 So. 2d 930, 1992 WL 4876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1992 | Docket: 1528116

Cited 76 times | Published

physical contact and penetration. The version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Collins

985 So. 2d 985, 2008 WL 2277513

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 1252964

Cited 74 times | Published

775.084(3)(a)6., Fla. Stat. (2001); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). Even if the statutes had not been

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Collins

985 So. 2d 985, 2008 WL 2277513

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 1252964

Cited 74 times | Published

775.084(3)(a)6., Fla. Stat. (2001); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). Even if the statutes had not been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ree v. State

565 So. 2d 1329, 1990 WL 103136

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1990 | Docket: 565195

Cited 74 times | Published

acquitted. Lambert, 545 So.2d at 841 (citing Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) & accompanying committee note). Second

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

500 So. 2d 501, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1295199

Cited 73 times | Published

the defendant has not been convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The court then reasoned that because

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Whitfield

487 So. 2d 1045, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 182

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 1797606

Cited 73 times | Published

*1046 an element of aggravated assault. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Neither defense counsel nor the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Whitfield

487 So. 2d 1045, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 182

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 1797606

Cited 73 times | Published

*1046 an element of aggravated assault. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Neither defense counsel nor the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scurry v. State

489 So. 2d 25, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 254

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1986 | Docket: 1528814

Cited 71 times | Published

to premeditation. It is therefore violative of rule 3.701(d)(11)'s proscription against factors relating

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holton v. State

573 So. 2d 284, 1990 WL 141445

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1991 | Docket: 1518689

Cited 58 times | Published

because a guidelines scoresheet was not prepared. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lerma v. State

497 So. 2d 736, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 473

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1986 | Docket: 1242855

Cited 58 times | Published

reasons to support a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). As an appellate court, our function

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

504 So. 2d 392, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 132

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1987 | Docket: 1511201

Cited 57 times | Published

for punishment greater than that provided by Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. On appeal, the district court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alonzo McCullough v. Harry K. Singletary, Robert Butterworth

967 F.2d 530, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17556, 1992 WL 164792

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 1992 | Docket: 155544

Cited 53 times | Published

and he was tried as an adult. Pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c) of the Florida Sentencing Guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

537 So. 2d 982, 1989 WL 3704

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1989 | Docket: 426772

Cited 53 times | Published

which have been received, and we hereby adopt, as rule 3.701 and form 3.988, the rule and forms appended to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

492 So. 2d 1308, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 289

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 478173

Cited 53 times | Published

OR REASONS THAT ARE IMPERMISSIBLE UNDER FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.701 IN MAKING ITS DECISION TO DEPART FROM THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Rules of Crim. Proc.(sent. Guidelines)

439 So. 2d 848

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1983 | Docket: 1265314

Cited 51 times | Published

which have been received, and we hereby adopt, as rule 3.701 and form 3.988, the rule and forms appended to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Booker v. State

514 So. 2d 1079, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 491

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1987 | Docket: 1749121

Cited 49 times | Published

v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526, 528 (Fla. 1987) (rule 3.701(d)(14) does not limit trial judge's discretion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Casteel v. State

498 So. 2d 1249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 631

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 1699946

Cited 49 times | Published

and convincing reason for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3) ("The penalty imposed should be commensurate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weems v. State

469 So. 2d 128, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 268

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1985 | Docket: 1272276

Cited 42 times | Published

consideration by another statute, I conclude that rule 3.701 d.5.(c) must be given a limited construction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

545 So. 2d 851, 1989 WL 65505

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 1344813

Cited 40 times | Published

increase, with credit for time served. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. In the present case, petitioner had

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

452 So. 2d 953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1984 | Docket: 1517721

Cited 40 times | Published

sentence under the new sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We think the trial court erroneously added

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

454 So. 2d 90

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 1508396

Cited 39 times | Published

used is a factor relating to the instant offense rule 3.701(d)(11) prohibits the court from using it as a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

454 So. 2d 691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 1508389

Cited 38 times | Published

to the new sentencing guidelines set forth in Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hankey v. State

485 So. 2d 827, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 137

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 1276105

Cited 36 times | Published

warrant aggravating or mitigating a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We will not determine if the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

644 So. 2d 81, 1994 WL 556906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1994 | Docket: 1248886

Cited 33 times | Published

The court rejected Roberts' argument that under rule 3.701(d)(14) the trial judge could not revise the scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barbera v. State

505 So. 2d 413, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1987 | Docket: 1455109

Cited 33 times | Published

as required by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11. The following colloquy occurred at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burch v. State

462 So. 2d 548, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1985 | Docket: 1509982

Cited 33 times | Published

not clear and convincing as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We agree that three of the four reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mischler v. State

458 So. 2d 37

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1984 | Docket: 1453194

Cited 32 times | Published

Sentencing Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984), Rule 3.701(b)(1). [3] It is true that here the defendant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

454 So. 2d 714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 444553

Cited 32 times | Published

attempted murder charges which were dismissed. Rule 3.701(d)(11) provided, in part, at the time of appellants'

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carney v. State

458 So. 2d 13

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 1452991

Cited 31 times | Published

collateral offenses may not be used for departure. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.[2]Cf

Category: Criminal Procedure

Erickson v. State

565 So. 2d 328, 1990 WL 78965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1990 | Docket: 379799

Cited 30 times | Published

that scoresheets are accurately prepared. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1), Committee Notes. In order to reach

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Pentaude

500 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 29

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1987 | Docket: 425660

Cited 30 times | Published

Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hubler v. State

458 So. 2d 350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 1453369

Cited 30 times | Published

imposed pursuant to the new sentencing guidelines, rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. [2] Both

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swain v. State

455 So. 2d 533

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1984 | Docket: 1692638

Cited 30 times | Published

of this factor violate the prohibition of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) concerning factors relating to arrests

Category: Criminal Procedure

Addison v. State

452 So. 2d 955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1984 | Docket: 474373

Cited 28 times | Published

did relate to the instant offense, nothing in rule 3.701 says that matters excluded for purposes of guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harvey v. State

450 So. 2d 926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 1728952

Cited 28 times | Published

warrants aggravating the sentence for purposes of Rule 3.701(d)(11). The state concedes that none of the items

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

882 So. 2d 977, 2004 WL 1899952

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2004 | Docket: 1686287

Cited 27 times | Published

eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dautel v. State

658 So. 2d 88, 1995 WL 424183

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 1525053

Cited 27 times | Published

Statutes (1991). As explained in the notes following rule 3.701, "[a]ny uncertainty in the scoring of the defendant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

458 So. 2d 10

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1984 | Docket: 1733120

Cited 27 times | Published

have not been obtained" and, thus, violative of Rule 3.701(d)(11).[1] Appellant argues that the reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Matthews

891 So. 2d 479, 2004 WL 2973856

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2004 | Docket: 1704545

Cited 26 times | Published

eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dailey v. State

488 So. 2d 532, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 228

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1986 | Docket: 1287114

Cited 26 times | Published

court at the time of sentencing as required by Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Dailey

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hendrix v. State

455 So. 2d 449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1984 | Docket: 1692607

Cited 26 times | Published

arrests or other nonconviction dispositions, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(1) & (d)(11), and none shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saavedra v. State

576 So. 2d 953, 1990 WL 175055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1991 | Docket: 1669811

Cited 25 times | Published

So.2d 220, 221 (Fla. 1985). On June 29, 1987, Rule 3.701(d)(7) and was amended as follows: "Victim injury

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sellers v. State

578 So. 2d 339, 1991 WL 46861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 440909

Cited 25 times | Published

scoresheet was incorrectly calculated because rule 3.701 does not specify that the indicated score for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wemett v. State

567 So. 2d 882, 1990 WL 127335

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1990 | Docket: 1443343

Cited 25 times | Published

"reasonably justify aggravating ... the sentence." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See, e.g., State v. McCall, 524 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vandeneynden v. State

478 So. 2d 429, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1985 | Docket: 1484582

Cited 25 times | Published

discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The trial court had before it the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boynton v. State

473 So. 2d 703, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 451523

Cited 25 times | Published

that recommended by the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Manning v. State

452 So. 2d 136

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1984 | Docket: 2554098

Cited 25 times | Published

trial court erred in departing from the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peters v. State

128 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6083405, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237174

Cited 24 times | Published

567 So.2d 882, 886 (Fla.1990) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll)), a trial judge is empowered to

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ames

467 So. 2d 994, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 229

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1985 | Docket: 106102

Cited 24 times | Published

Court to develop sentencing guidelines); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701. In summary, there was insufficient separation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mincey v. State

460 So. 2d 396

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1984 | Docket: 1766879

Cited 24 times | Published

Crim.P. 3.720(b). 397 So.2d at 332. Likewise, Rule 3.701 provides notice to defendants that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

455 So. 2d 535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1984 | Docket: 1317191

Cited 24 times | Published

after the offense in the present case occurred. Rule 3.701 d.5.a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weems v. State

451 So. 2d 1027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1984 | Docket: 1741179

Cited 24 times | Published

given for departing from the guidelines. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The fact that appellant's juvenile

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parker v. State

546 So. 2d 727, 1989 WL 84105

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1989 | Docket: 1442334

Cited 23 times | Published

Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984). [5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hunt v. State

468 So. 2d 1100, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1985 | Docket: 1725655

Cited 23 times | Published

conviction for that reason. However, nothing in rule 3.701 prohibited the court from taking that conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Myrick v. State

461 So. 2d 1359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514600

Cited 23 times | Published

not follow the guidelines procedures. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. The court sentenced defendant without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brady v. State

457 So. 2d 544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1984 | Docket: 1199180

Cited 23 times | Published

sentencing guidelines. The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(11) in existence when Brady was sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

455 So. 2d 551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 1316573

Cited 23 times | Published

other jurisdictions is clearly prohibited by Rule 3.701.d.11, Fla.R.Cr.P. There is no logical correlation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clark v. State

572 So. 2d 1387, 1991 WL 1368

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1991 | Docket: 2517804

Cited 22 times | Published

pending case that meets this definition. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d). As a corollary, a presumption then arises

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

525 So. 2d 477, 1988 WL 50139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1988 | Docket: 67818

Cited 22 times | Published

on this ground cannot be justified. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

455 So. 2d 586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1984 | Docket: 1316955

Cited 22 times | Published

sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11. These reasons shall be articulated in writing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 b. 6

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bell v. State

453 So. 2d 478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1984 | Docket: 1651340

Cited 22 times | Published

five-year maximum allowed by the plea bargain. While Rule 3.701(d)11 allows departure from the presumptive sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Montgomery v. State

897 So. 2d 1282, 2005 WL 610049

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2005 | Docket: 1416398

Cited 21 times | Published

921.0021(2), Fla. Stat. (2002); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2)("`Conviction' means a determination

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

526 So. 2d 159, 1988 WL 54214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1988 | Docket: 1679911

Cited 21 times | Published

[9] § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1985). [10] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), Committee Note (1983). [11] The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lomont v. State

506 So. 2d 1141, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1205

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1987 | Docket: 1336134

Cited 21 times | Published

injury is not an element of that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Similarly, Chaplin involved a technical

Category: Criminal Procedure

Steiner v. State

469 So. 2d 179, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 1272579

Cited 21 times | Published

cognizably "clear and convincing" ones under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(11). We disagree. II We will

Category: Criminal Procedure

Von Carter v. State

468 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 1401736

Cited 21 times | Published

reasons for departure at the sentencing hearing. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

35 So. 3d 864, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 219, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 645, 2010 WL 1609876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 456324

Cited 20 times | Published

pending before the court at sentencing, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1); accord Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Raulerson v. State

763 So. 2d 285, 2000 WL 963827

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2000 | Docket: 308353

Cited 20 times | Published

Raulerson, 699 So.2d at 340. After considering Gazda, rule 3.701(d)(2), and several other authorities, the Fifth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cook v. State

645 So. 2d 436, 1994 WL 656609

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1168936

Cited 20 times | Published

used, as is required, a single scoresheet. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Cook's total sentence at the 1990

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

605 So. 2d 511, 1992 WL 213150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1992 | Docket: 1702355

Cited 20 times | Published

2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Committee Note, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The problem can be traced to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kurtz v. State

564 So. 2d 519, 1990 WL 80800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1990 | Docket: 1689007

Cited 20 times | Published

thereby impermissibly punishing the defendant. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. Accordingly, we hold that trial courts

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parker v. State

478 So. 2d 823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1741712

Cited 20 times | Published

included 14 points for victim injury. The version of rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burke v. State

456 So. 2d 1245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1984 | Docket: 1731997

Cited 20 times | Published

years incarceration. Subsection d.11. of criminal rule 3.701 requires that the trial court accompany any sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Higgs v. State

455 So. 2d 451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1984 | Docket: 1316700

Cited 20 times | Published

state prison, and she appeals. As required by Rule 3.701(b)(6), the court made the following written statement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

611 So. 2d 540, 1992 WL 367218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1992 | Docket: 1674204

Cited 19 times | Published

victim injury as provided for on the score sheet. Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Watts

558 So. 2d 994, 1990 WL 29523

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1990 | Docket: 1726285

Cited 19 times | Published

545 So.2d 838, 841-42 (Fla. 1989). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The circuit court's imposition of

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McCall

524 So. 2d 663, 1988 WL 47676

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1341773

Cited 19 times | Published

a conviction has not been obtained. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). If the act was committed after the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines

522 So. 2d 374, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 283, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 678, 1988 WL 35623

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1988 | Docket: 1660934

Cited 19 times | Published

Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines (Rule 3.701; 3.988), 509 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 1987). The existing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mathis v. State

515 So. 2d 214, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 580

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1987 | Docket: 1749182

Cited 19 times | Published

for which the defendant was convicted, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7)(1985), and injury is not an element

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

71 So. 3d 173, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15106, 2011 WL 4424302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 2360508

Cited 18 times | Published

generally § 921.0016, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701, 3.988. . This common understanding is

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Keirn

720 So. 2d 1085, 1998 WL 219729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1998 | Docket: 308401

Cited 18 times | Published

intended to adopt the definition contained in Rule 3.701(d)(2) for section 322.34 or that the supreme

Category: Criminal Procedure

Puffinberger v. State

581 So. 2d 897, 1991 WL 94292

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1991 | Docket: 1683940

Cited 18 times | Published

three years prior to the instant offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c). This placed Puffinberger within

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Chaplin

490 So. 2d 52, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 293

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 1743272

Cited 18 times | Published

court departed from the sentencing guidelines in rule 3.701 without making the mandatorily written, clear

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jean v. State

455 So. 2d 1083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1984 | Docket: 1316519

Cited 18 times | Published

incarceration upon the appellant. As required under rule 3.701(d)(11), the judge provided a written statement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boldes v. State

475 So. 2d 1356, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1985 | Docket: 1710026

Cited 17 times | Published

reasons must be given for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). An interpretation of the guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bowdoin v. State

464 So. 2d 596, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1985 | Docket: 1661176

Cited 17 times | Published

a circumstance surrounding the offense. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3). Finally, as appellant puts it, "it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

462 So. 2d 36

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1984 | Docket: 449467

Cited 17 times | Published

that both of the reasons given are precluded by Rule 3.701(d)(11) which, at the time of the defendant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kiser v. State

455 So. 2d 1071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1984 | Docket: 1316662

Cited 17 times | Published

court pursuant to the sentencing guidelines, rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See In

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Paulk

813 So. 2d 152, 2002 WL 385005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2002 | Docket: 922388

Cited 16 times | Published

valid reason for a departure sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). In this case, the trial judge made

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hodgdon v. State

789 So. 2d 958, 2001 WL 746650

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2001 | Docket: 1696207

Cited 16 times | Published

pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). A sentence must be imposed for each

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gardner v. State

661 So. 2d 1274, 1995 WL 627460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 1526402

Cited 16 times | Published

for the same crime. We disagree. The meaning of rule 3.701(d)(12) is clear. The rule refers to "any felony"

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ogden v. State

605 So. 2d 155, 1992 WL 217079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1992 | Docket: 1702371

Cited 16 times | Published

sanctions are imposed and enforced." See also Rule 3.701(d)(13), Fla.R.Crim.P. (community control is a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cuthbert v. State

459 So. 2d 1098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1984 | Docket: 1683353

Cited 16 times | Published

court relied upon the following Committee Note to Rule 3.701 d.10: If an offender is convicted under an enhancement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lindsey v. State

453 So. 2d 485

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 1651394

Cited 16 times | Published

guidelines and the use of the scoresheet. Under rule 3.701(d)(11), a trial judge is allowed to depart from

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McFadden

772 So. 2d 1209, 2000 WL 1675950

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2000 | Docket: 1435119

Cited 15 times | Published

imposition of sentence was suspended." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2); see § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1997)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Andrews v. Florida Parole Com'n

768 So. 2d 1257, 2000 WL 1530915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1525510

Cited 15 times | Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivera v. Singletary

707 So. 2d 326, 1998 WL 65396

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1998 | Docket: 1259659

Cited 15 times | Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lincoln v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

643 So. 2d 668, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1994 WL 549483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1994 | Docket: 1493202

Cited 15 times | Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bunney v. State

603 So. 2d 1270, 1992 WL 148239

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1992 | Docket: 1475775

Cited 15 times | Published

guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Significantly, capital felonies are not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ward v. State

568 So. 2d 452, 1990 WL 129745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1990 | Docket: 533540

Cited 15 times | Published

been adjudicated guilty. The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(5) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

517 So. 2d 670, 1987 WL 29012

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1987 | Docket: 1528064

Cited 15 times | Published

reason therefore violates the proscription in Rule 3.701(d)(11) against considering factors relating to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

484 So. 2d 71, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1344522

Cited 15 times | Published

for punishment greater than that provided by Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. We, of course, recognize that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sabb v. State

479 So. 2d 845, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1985 | Docket: 1514333

Cited 15 times | Published

the offenses, is expressly prohibited by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11): Reasons for deviating from the guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dailey v. State

471 So. 2d 1349, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 1396815

Cited 15 times | Published

court at the time of sentencing as required by Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Dailey

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sloan v. State

472 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1985 | Docket: 1793462

Cited 15 times | Published

from the presumptive sentence contemplated in Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Banzo v. State

464 So. 2d 620, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1985 | Docket: 2529256

Cited 15 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) In the instant case Appellant was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Banzo v. State

464 So. 2d 620, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1985 | Docket: 2529256

Cited 15 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) In the instant case Appellant was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dickey v. State

458 So. 2d 1156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1984 | Docket: 1733242

Cited 15 times | Published

from the sentencing guidelines as established in Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Key v. State

452 So. 2d 1147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 801405

Cited 15 times | Published

for departure from those guidelines. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). Notwithstanding that this sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez v. State

692 So. 2d 199, 1997 WL 30812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 436342

Cited 14 times | Published

whether there are one or more victims." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1992).[3] The 1988 committee notes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoefert v. State

509 So. 2d 1090, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1987 | Docket: 1362324

Cited 14 times | Published

court specifically states: The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(10) is revised to clarify the relation of

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Tyner

506 So. 2d 405, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 220

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 1336806

Cited 14 times | Published

We concur with the district court's reasoning. Rule 3.701(d)(11) limits a judge's authority to aggravate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

502 So. 2d 1375, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1987 | Docket: 1657568

Cited 14 times | Published

State, 336 So.2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). Therefore we reverse and vacate the withheld

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

469 So. 2d 947, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1985 | Docket: 1679595

Cited 14 times | Published

Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984). [2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). [3] Section 800.04, Florida Statutes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

469 So. 2d 865, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1985 | Docket: 1679634

Cited 14 times | Published

Scott was being sentenced at the same hearing. Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Cr.P. This rule was not in effect

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trainor v. State

468 So. 2d 484, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1985 | Docket: 1402617

Cited 14 times | Published

offense for which there has been no conviction. Rule 3.701(d)(11) provides in part, Reasons for deviating

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooks v. State

456 So. 2d 1305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 1447033

Cited 14 times | Published

in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Finding

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Barnes

753 So. 2d 605, 2000 WL 192150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2000 | Docket: 1433388

Cited 13 times | Published

valid reason for a departure sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d). In this case, the record is unclear

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Williams

667 So. 2d 191, 1996 WL 26547

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1996 | Docket: 156577

Cited 13 times | Published

statutory maximum for community control. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13) ("When community control is imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellison v. State

547 So. 2d 1003, 1989 WL 90481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1989 | Docket: 1475089

Cited 13 times | Published

scoresheet for "legal status at the time of offense." Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hannah v. State

480 So. 2d 718, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1986 | Docket: 1667355

Cited 13 times | Published

the offense" constitutes "legal constraint." Rule 3.701(d)(6) defines legal status at the time of offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santiago v. State

478 So. 2d 47, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 578

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1985 | Docket: 1484451

Cited 13 times | Published

the "clear and convincing" test set forth in Rule 3.701(d)(11). The First District Court of Appeal affirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gallagher v. State

476 So. 2d 754, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 1681478

Cited 13 times | Published

dates... . Id. at 794. [3] Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(1): Ultimate responsibility for assuring

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitfield v. State

471 So. 2d 633, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1396927

Cited 13 times | Published

victim injury was error. We agree. The version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R. Crim.P., which was in effect at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sarvis v. State

465 So. 2d 573, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 1695006

Cited 13 times | Published

clear and convincing reasons, as required by rule 3.701 d.11, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

462 So. 2d 49, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 18

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1984 | Docket: 449547

Cited 13 times | Published

guideline sentence established pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. For this limited reason we therefore vacate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Doby v. State

461 So. 2d 1360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514653

Cited 13 times | Published

forth in the sentencing guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. The court sentenced the defendant to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roux v. State

455 So. 2d 495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 2530788

Cited 13 times | Published

concurrently. The state concedes error in that under rule 3.701(d)(12), In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flowers v. State

567 So. 2d 1055, 1990 WL 150220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 1381015

Cited 12 times | Published

sentenced. In our view, Walker's construction of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure promotes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Singleton v. State

554 So. 2d 1162, 1990 WL 888

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1990 | Docket: 1319321

Cited 12 times | Published

alone or any nonincarcerative disposition. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, committee note (d)(8) (emphasis added).

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Simpson

554 So. 2d 506, 1989 WL 156438

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1989 | Docket: 1693298

Cited 12 times | Published

500 So.2d 501, 503 (Fla. 1986) (citing Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) (1986)) ("Williams II"), receded from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lamb v. State

532 So. 2d 1051, 1988 WL 93705

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 1510266

Cited 12 times | Published

sentencing judge shall approve all scoresheets. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13). As the sentencing guidelines committee

Category: Criminal Procedure

Winters v. State

500 So. 2d 303, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1689583

Cited 12 times | Published

offense, the statutory maximum would be imposed. Rule 3.701(d)(10) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We

Category: Criminal Procedure

Atwaters v. State

495 So. 2d 1219, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 1729085

Cited 12 times | Published

has been convicted and thus is not violative of rule 3.701(d)(11). We conclude that when quantity of contraband

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beauvais v. State

475 So. 2d 1342, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1985 | Docket: 1301648

Cited 12 times | Published

the clear and convincing standard set forth in Rule 3.701 d. 11. We must now determine whether the reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scurry v. State

472 So. 2d 779, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 1794126

Cited 12 times | Published

three was properly considered in accordance with rule 3.701(b)(3), as "circumstances surrounding the offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murphy v. State

459 So. 2d 337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 1683385

Cited 12 times | Published

usurp judicial discretion in sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). Departure from the guidelines does

Category: Criminal Procedure

Duggar v. State

446 So. 2d 222

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1984 | Docket: 1780615

Cited 12 times | Published

sentenced under Florida's new sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, after the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Stafford

593 So. 2d 496, 1992 WL 10611

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1992 | Docket: 446626

Cited 11 times | Published

1986 AMENDMENT TO THE COMMITTEE NOTE TO FLA. R.CRIM.P. 3.701(d)(5), MUST THE TRIAL COURTS SCORE AN OFFENSE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Guardado v. State

562 So. 2d 696, 1990 WL 45511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1990 | Docket: 1256409

Cited 11 times | Published

State, 470 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)6. See generally Ree v. State, 14 *698

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stephens v. State

559 So. 2d 687, 1990 WL 39904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1990 | Docket: 1751498

Cited 11 times | Published

these cases were not "pending" for purposes of rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Although

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rumph v. State

544 So. 2d 1150, 1989 WL 63350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 1709572

Cited 11 times | Published

1985 Amendments to Committee Notes interpreting rule 3.701(d)(7) contained language supporting the court-evolved

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byrd v. State

531 So. 2d 1004, 1988 WL 96448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 544044

Cited 11 times | Published

reason for departure sentence). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(2) ("The primary purpose of sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watkins v. State

516 So. 2d 1043, 1987 WL 2666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1678035

Cited 11 times | Published

vehicle, a felony of the third degree. See Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701 d.5.a(2). We also affirm the points scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Munroe v. State

514 So. 2d 397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1987 | Docket: 1466853

Cited 11 times | Published

presumptive sentence of 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 years. Rule 3.701(d)(9) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

485 So. 2d 1292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1986 | Docket: 1276083

Cited 11 times | Published

reasons" for departure from the guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 b.6. Three reasons were stated by the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitfield v. State

479 So. 2d 208, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 1514319

Cited 11 times | Published

did not see eye to eye on the meaning of the rule 3.701(d)(11) requirement that a deviation from the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Albritton v. State

458 So. 2d 320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 1452444

Cited 11 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] See § 921.001, Fla. Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. [2] See Key v. State, 452 So.2d 1147 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Toney v. State

456 So. 2d 559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1984 | Docket: 1447666

Cited 11 times | Published

1984, the supreme court approved an amendment to rule 3.701(d)(7) which provides: "Victim injury shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bogan v. State

454 So. 2d 686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 1508384

Cited 11 times | Published

primarily on a sentencing guidelines scoresheet. See Rule 3.701(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. The primary offense at conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knarich v. State

866 So. 2d 165, 2004 WL 314515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2004 | Docket: 1273790

Cited 10 times | Published

`parallel' or `analogous' statute referred to by rule 3.701.d.5(a)(2). But even if the current statute, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Witherspoon

810 So. 2d 871, 2002 WL 122167

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2002 | Docket: 1654675

Cited 10 times | Published

So.2d 984, 985 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). [3] Attempted armed robbery is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deason v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

705 So. 2d 1374, 1998 WL 10312

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1998 | Docket: 1578650

Cited 10 times | Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States v. Thompson

756 F. Supp. 1492, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2256, 1991 WL 23651

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1991 | Docket: 2136100

Cited 10 times | Published

whether imposition of sentence was suspended." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(2); see also McCrae v. State, 395 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mohammed v. State

561 So. 2d 384, 1990 WL 57806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1990 | Docket: 1740207

Cited 10 times | Published

537 So.2d 103 (Fla. 1989), and that pursuant to rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(5), no points should have been scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Calvin Walker v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Chester Lambdin, Superintendent

860 F.2d 1010, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15624, 1988 WL 115005

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 22, 1988 | Docket: 278187

Cited 10 times | Published

Florida’s revised sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 (West Supp. 1988). He listed the 1985 conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ewing v. State

526 So. 2d 1029, 1988 WL 62122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1988 | Docket: 1273383

Cited 10 times | Published

not an illegal sentence. The committee note to Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P., states that "community control

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

519 So. 2d 719, 1988 WL 6426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 1698799

Cited 10 times | Published

Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stewart v. State

489 So. 2d 176, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1528906

Cited 10 times | Published

and the resulting suffering of the victim. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3) provides in part that the "penalty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stewart v. State

489 So. 2d 176, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1528906

Cited 10 times | Published

and the resulting suffering of the victim. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3) provides in part that the "penalty

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'BRIEN v. State

478 So. 2d 497, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1985 | Docket: 371789

Cited 10 times | Published

JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12) now provides, in pertinent part: If a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Riggins v. State

477 So. 2d 663, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1985 | Docket: 1320565

Cited 10 times | Published

intended to depart beyond the one cell allowance of Rule 3.701(d)(14), and it gave additional reasons: This

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rita v. State

470 So. 2d 80, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 1260773

Cited 10 times | Published

sentenced him to a term exceeding the guidelines of Rule 3.701. It clearly stated a clear and convincing reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitehead v. State

467 So. 2d 779, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1985 | Docket: 1680315

Cited 10 times | Published

apply when a defendant is sentenced pursuant to Rule 3.701, whether or not the trial court deviates from

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Twelves

463 So. 2d 493, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 1509710

Cited 10 times | Published

from the sentencing guidelines prescribed in Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Twelves

463 So. 2d 493, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 1509710

Cited 10 times | Published

from the sentencing guidelines prescribed in Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gardener v. State

462 So. 2d 874, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1985 | Docket: 449542

Cited 10 times | Published

guidelines, the trial judge, in accordance with rule 3.701(d)(11), delineated in a written statement his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gage v. State

461 So. 2d 202

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 1514580

Cited 10 times | Published

imposed the sentences, despite the admonition of Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gage v. State

461 So. 2d 202

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 1514580

Cited 10 times | Published

imposed the sentences, despite the admonition of Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Randolph v. State

458 So. 2d 64

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1984 | Docket: 1733124

Cited 10 times | Published

We also find that the court erred in applying Rule 3.701 d.14 because it was not in effect at the time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hankey v. State

458 So. 2d 1143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 549886

Cited 10 times | Published

departed from the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. There was no error in departing from the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fleming v. State

456 So. 2d 1300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1984 | Docket: 1446813

Cited 10 times | Published

commission of the robbery offense. See Smith and rule 3.701(b)(3). Second, defendant argues that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

454 So. 2d 751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1984 | Docket: 444380

Cited 10 times | Published

reasons" for departing from the guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). This rule also provides that reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gibson v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

885 So. 2d 376, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 626, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1829, 2004 WL 2360131

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2004 | Docket: 1685267

Cited 9 times | Published

importance or are likely to recur."). [2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1) ("One guideline scoresheet shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Darrisaw

660 So. 2d 269, 1995 WL 541628

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1995 | Docket: 1639606

Cited 9 times | Published

importance in the sentencing decision." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). In the instant case, Darrisaw's offenses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snead v. State

616 So. 2d 964, 1993 WL 102061

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1993 | Docket: 1366899

Cited 9 times | Published

a habitual offender sentence. Consistent with Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,[6]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harrelson v. State

616 So. 2d 128, 1993 WL 86512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1993 | Docket: 1726848

Cited 9 times | Published

disputes the scoring of "victim injury." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The scoresheet reflects the inclusion

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

situations wheren such judge is unavailable. RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES (a.) Use with Forms. This

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sterling v. State

584 So. 2d 626, 1991 WL 150424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1991 | Docket: 1515253

Cited 9 times | Published

and must be reduced. See Committee Note, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12); Spivey v. State, 526 So.2d 762 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

574 So. 2d 247, 1991 WL 9373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1991 | Docket: 1437314

Cited 9 times | Published

status. In the absence of express language in rule 3.701 requiring such a questionable approach to sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Denson v. State

556 So. 2d 823, 1990 WL 14887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1990 | Docket: 543011

Cited 9 times | Published

applying Ray, we note that the amendment to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13), and the explanatory comment thereto

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lacey

553 So. 2d 778, 1989 WL 153673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1989 | Docket: 1675467

Cited 9 times | Published

sentencing within the court's jurisdiction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). No sentence should be delayed to await

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

507 So. 2d 788, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1987 | Docket: 459940

Cited 9 times | Published

the injury is an element of the offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Victim injury is not an element of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Poore v. State

503 So. 2d 1282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 1453615

Cited 9 times | Published

consistent with the guidelines. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. [2] See, e.g., § 775.14, Fla. Stat. [3]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crosby v. State

487 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1986 | Docket: 1796934

Cited 9 times | Published

effect at the time of his sentencing. See Fla.R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14) and 3.988(e); State v. Jackson, 478

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fleming v. State

480 So. 2d 715, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1986 | Docket: 1667362

Cited 9 times | Published

convincing reason for departure within the meaning of Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pentaude v. State

478 So. 2d 1147, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1985 | Docket: 1484664

Cited 9 times | Published

justice, not to usurp his judicial discretion. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); Manning v. State, 452 So.2d 136 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vance v. State

475 So. 2d 1362, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1985 | Docket: 1302130

Cited 9 times | Published

established by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Based on recent Florida Supreme Court

Category: Criminal Procedure

JM v. State

677 So. 2d 890, 1996 WL 346929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 1723714

Cited 8 times | Published

guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; ch. 83-87, § Laws of Fla. The sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

633 So. 2d 1122, 1994 WL 63291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1994 | Docket: 1296711

Cited 8 times | Published

pending before the court for sentencing. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)1. Because remand is necessary to correct

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'CONNOR v. State

590 So. 2d 1018, 1991 WL 259967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1991 | Docket: 211317

Cited 8 times | Published

be the "primary" offense at resentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.3. Additionally, it appears that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

530 So. 2d 61, 1988 WL 31711

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1988 | Docket: 1267403

Cited 8 times | Published

supported by clear and convincing reasons. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The third issue concerns the imposition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

528 So. 2d 521, 1988 WL 74773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1988 | Docket: 1419350

Cited 8 times | Published

1281 (Fla. 1985). See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Davis argues that the trial judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Domberg v. State

518 So. 2d 1360, 1988 WL 2625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1988 | Docket: 1778595

Cited 8 times | Published

elected to be sentenced pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. The court imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paschall v. State

501 So. 2d 1370, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1987 | Docket: 1527603

Cited 8 times | Published

into appellant's presumptive sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) (definition of "legal status at time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Massard v. State

501 So. 2d 1289, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1986 | Docket: 1527605

Cited 8 times | Published

forty-two points for victim injury was error. Rule 3.701 d. 7., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

487 So. 2d 1176, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1986 | Docket: 1796878

Cited 8 times | Published

injury to Officers Brown and Bryan. According to Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R.Crim.P., victim injury "shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

486 So. 2d 709, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1986 | Docket: 1406879

Cited 8 times | Published

Appellant is correct *710 in this argument. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Moore v. State, 469 So.2d 947 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

483 So. 2d 530, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1986 | Docket: 1511925

Cited 8 times | Published

judges, not to usurp judicial discretion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). Following the standard announced in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Monti v. State

480 So. 2d 223, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 61

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 758513

Cited 8 times | Published

increase under the sentencing guidelines (see Rule 3.701(d)(14)), it will not substantiate a greater increase

Category: Criminal Procedure

Monti v. State

480 So. 2d 223, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 61

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 758513

Cited 8 times | Published

increase under the sentencing guidelines (see Rule 3.701(d)(14)), it will not substantiate a greater increase

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilkerson v. State

480 So. 2d 213, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 45

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1985 | Docket: 1220678

Cited 8 times | Published

five and one-half years. The original version of rule 3.701(d)(5)(c) provided that certain juvenile dispositions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ross v. State

478 So. 2d 480, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1985 | Docket: 1484722

Cited 8 times | Published

his departure from the sentencing guidelines of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, this issue

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

478 So. 2d 462, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1985 | Docket: 1484573

Cited 8 times | Published

individual on the basis of social or economic status. Rule 3.701(b)(1), Fla. R.Crim.P.; Mischler v. State, 458

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

474 So. 2d 346, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1870

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1985 | Docket: 1749825

Cited 8 times | Published

recommended armed robbery sentence pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines the court erred by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norman v. State

468 So. 2d 1063, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1985 | Docket: 1725456

Cited 8 times | Published

to persons sentenced under the guidelines. See Rule 3.701(b)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Section

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joyce v. State

466 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1985 | Docket: 438775

Cited 8 times | Published

the state points out that the Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) has been amended to read as follows: The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joyce v. State

466 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1985 | Docket: 438775

Cited 8 times | Published

the state points out that the Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) has been amended to read as follows: The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williard v. State

462 So. 2d 102, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1985 | Docket: 1509952

Cited 8 times | Published

imprisonment. At the time Williard was sentenced, rule 3.701(d)(11) stated: Departures from the guideline

Category: Criminal Procedure

Motyka v. State

457 So. 2d 1114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1984 | Docket: 426245

Cited 8 times | Published

offense. The last sentence of the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) provides: "Victim injury is to be scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

455 So. 2d 457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1984 | Docket: 1316815

Cited 8 times | Published

1983, the effective date of the guidelines. See Rule 3.701, F.R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand for resentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

455 So. 2d 457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1984 | Docket: 1316815

Cited 8 times | Published

1983, the effective date of the guidelines. See Rule 3.701, F.R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand for resentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jupiter v. State

833 So. 2d 169, 2002 WL 31528583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1259185

Cited 7 times | Published

1999) (citing cases). However, in 1991, the rule (rule 3.701(d)(7)) was amended to require that victim injury

Category: Criminal Procedure

Raulerson v. State

699 So. 2d 339, 1997 WL 593917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1997 | Docket: 1321011

Cited 7 times | Published

1971). The above definition is consistent with rule 3.701(d)(2) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waite v. City of Fort Lauderdale

681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208

Cited 7 times | Published

"imposition of sentence was suspended." See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). Rule 3.650 defines a "judgment" as

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lámar

659 So. 2d 262, 1995 WL 500387

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1995 | Docket: 1747960

Cited 7 times | Published

primary offense. *265 593 So.2d at 497 (quoting rule 3.701).[4] In other words, under this sentencing scheme

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

623 So. 2d 547, 1993 WL 292066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1993 | Docket: 2542940

Cited 7 times | Published

Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla. 1992); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Affirmed in part; reversed in part;

Category: Criminal Procedure

Huffman v. State

611 So. 2d 2, 1992 WL 362144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 1699578

Cited 7 times | Published

prior conviction is completely unscoreable. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(5)(a) suggests the crime could be considered

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Tripp

591 So. 2d 1055, 1991 WL 275540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 2244537

Cited 7 times | Published

DCA 1989); § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1987); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)12. By contrast, the sentencing method

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 WL 268080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1991 | Docket: 1428961

Cited 7 times | Published

Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1990); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. Accordingly, this case is reversed

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Baxter

581 So. 2d 937, 1991 WL 98027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1991 | Docket: 2584030

Cited 7 times | Published

takes precedence over a guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.9. Therefore, a trial judge cannot downward

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thorp v. State

555 So. 2d 362, 1990 WL 3851

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 144159

Cited 7 times | Published

to the commission of the primary offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). In Frank v. State, 490 So.2d 190

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thorp v. State

555 So. 2d 362, 1990 WL 3851

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 144159

Cited 7 times | Published

to the commission of the primary offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). In Frank v. State, 490 So.2d 190

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Interest of BA

546 So. 2d 125, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1688, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3960, 1989 WL 77484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1989 | Docket: 1442322

Cited 7 times | Published

sentencing guidelines considerations under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, community control is not akin to probation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanchez v. State

538 So. 2d 923, 1989 WL 6419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1989 | Docket: 472322

Cited 7 times | Published

So.2d 736 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13) committee note. The defendant also

Category: Criminal Procedure

Slaughter v. State

538 So. 2d 509, 1989 WL 6463

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1989 | Docket: 356223

Cited 7 times | Published

explained the above addition: The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) is revised to include language to clarify

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

531 So. 2d 212, 1988 WL 93295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 1528538

Cited 7 times | Published

statement delineating the reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Although the rule does not require

Category: Criminal Procedure

Frazier v. State

530 So. 2d 986, 1988 WL 86338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1988 | Docket: 1267654

Cited 7 times | Published

downward departure from the guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). AFFIRMED. SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ

Category: Criminal Procedure

Abt v. State

528 So. 2d 112, 1988 WL 71535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 1367229

Cited 7 times | Published

constraint at the time of the offense. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). The second reason, escalating pattern

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

525 So. 2d 458, 1988 WL 45874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 1304681

Cited 7 times | Published

allowable sentence to follow incarceration. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). We now address Williams' allegations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jacobs v. State

522 So. 2d 540, 1988 WL 26280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1988 | Docket: 1660854

Cited 7 times | Published

State, 498 So.2d 899, 901 (Fla. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). Because Cullen's guideline sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Royal v. State

508 So. 2d 1313, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1987 | Docket: 1438730

Cited 7 times | Published

yet been obtained for that offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) and Hudson v. State, 504 So.2d 2 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Senior v. State

502 So. 2d 1360, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1987 | Docket: 1181229

Cited 7 times | Published

court departed from the sentencing guidelines in Rule 3.701 without making the mandatorily written, clear

Category: Criminal Procedure

Austin v. State

507 So. 2d 132, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1987 | Docket: 459941

Cited 7 times | Published

occurred after commission of the primary offense. Rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P. Accordingly, it was not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baxter v. State

488 So. 2d 647, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 1287149

Cited 7 times | Published

conformity with the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701). CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

483 So. 2d 740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1986 | Docket: 455667

Cited 7 times | Published

State, 476 So.2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). While a separate sentence must be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burrell v. State

483 So. 2d 479, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 2509251

Cited 7 times | Published

legislative intent, as expressed by the adoption of Rule 3.701(d)(12), see Section 921.001(4)(b), Florida Statutes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

480 So. 2d 225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 50

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 2585252

Cited 7 times | Published

offenses did not result in convictions. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). In its final reason, the court acknowledges

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burke v. State

483 So. 2d 404, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 624

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 1511957

Cited 7 times | Published

computation of the recommended sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c). We have previously addressed this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shelton v. State

478 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1985 | Docket: 1741693

Cited 7 times | Published

convincing, or were not supported by the record. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The court gave as its reasons for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

473 So. 2d 694, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 2469905

Cited 7 times | Published

mandatory sentence automatically takes precedence. Rule 3.701(d)(9), Fla.R. Crim.P. Because the habitual offender

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kirkman v. Wainwright

465 So. 2d 1262, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1985 | Docket: 1323971

Cited 7 times | Published

This was within the Sentencing Guidelines, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701, presumptive sentence range, according to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prince v. State

461 So. 2d 1015, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 86

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514630

Cited 7 times | Published

basis for departure is clearly proscribed by Rule 3.701(11), which provides in pertinent part that "Reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vileta v. State

454 So. 2d 792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1984 | Docket: 444315

Cited 7 times | Published

defendant's "primary offense" was armed burglary, rule 3.701(d)(3), the scoresheet for carrying a concealed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boyett v. State

452 So. 2d 958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1984 | Docket: 474508

Cited 7 times | Published

921.001 or 921.005, Florida Statutes (1983), or Rule 3.701 make specific reference to that circumstance

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moses v. State

13 So. 3d 490, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6042, 2009 WL 1456732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 1188418

Cited 6 times | Published

statute to that contained in the committee notes of rule 3.701 because rule 3.703 specifically superseded case

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wardlaw v. State

832 So. 2d 258, 2002 WL 31756924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2002 | Docket: 1700101

Cited 6 times | Published

including the bump-up provisions. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14); Jenigen v. State, 801 So.2d 156

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rowan v. State

791 So. 2d 40, 2001 WL 584433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2001 | Docket: 1655803

Cited 6 times | Published

community control was not revoked. He points out that rule 3.701(d)(14) allows for a one-cell bump only "after

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Henderson

766 So. 2d 389, 2000 WL 1112309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 475682

Cited 6 times | Published

2d 605, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)). When a trial court imposes a sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Atwood v. State

765 So. 2d 242, 2000 WL 1089149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2000 | Docket: 1522903

Cited 6 times | Published

years before his most recent release, contrary to Rule 3.701(d)(5)(F), appears to be the kind of matter that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayes v. State

748 So. 2d 1042, 1999 WL 743519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1999 | Docket: 1750384

Cited 6 times | Published

for emotional trauma was improper. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (1993). Defendant challenges the scoring

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spioch v. State

742 So. 2d 817, 1999 WL 606442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1303284

Cited 6 times | Published

withheld should be included in the scoresheet. Rule 3.701 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure defines a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Priester v. State

711 So. 2d 177, 1998 WL 236261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 1337175

Cited 6 times | Published

defendant's violation of probation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rubin v. State

697 So. 2d 161, 1997 WL 294552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1997 | Docket: 1776891

Cited 6 times | Published

or convicted with criminal mischief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); Welch v. State, 639 So.2d 1068,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goutier v. State

692 So. 2d 978, 1997 WL 208046

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1997 | Docket: 1524619

Cited 6 times | Published

probation cannot exceed the statutory maximum. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12); Stephens v. State, 677 So.2d 1325

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

685 So. 2d 1282, 1996 WL 726869

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 1415748

Cited 6 times | Published

resulted, this Court interpreted the intent of rule 3.701(d)(5)(c) in Puffinberger to limit departure to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

678 So. 2d 1374, 1996 WL 496635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1996 | Docket: 1470525

Cited 6 times | Published

importance in the sentencing decision." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). 660 So.2d at 271 (emphasis added). Under

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Peterson

667 So. 2d 199, 1996 WL 37647

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1996 | Docket: 308566

Cited 6 times | Published

nature of the offender's criminal history. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(4). In habitual offender cases, before

Category: Criminal Procedure

King v. State

648 So. 2d 183, 1994 WL 697953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1994 | Docket: 1342877

Cited 6 times | Published

mete out. §§ 921.001 et seq., Fla. Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, 3.702, and 3.986. Unlike prisoners sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bacon v. State

620 So. 2d 1084, 1993 WL 225631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1993 | Docket: 1388183

Cited 6 times | Published

sanctions are imposed and enforced. See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13), which defines community control as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

611 So. 2d 58, 1992 WL 387657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1992 | Docket: 1676061

Cited 6 times | Published

pending before the court at sentencing, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); accord Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

610 So. 2d 105, 1992 WL 379816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 1413582

Cited 6 times | Published

encompassing the following statutes ... ." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c) (emphasis added). The full definition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

615 So. 2d 705, 1992 WL 362184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 1184427

Cited 6 times | Published

anyway under the "permitted range." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8). Permitted ranges were incorporated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collins v. State

596 So. 2d 1209, 1992 WL 69040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1992 | Docket: 1707409

Cited 6 times | Published

pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)1; Roberson v. State, 555 So.2d 976 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jennings v. State

595 So. 2d 251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1992 | Docket: 1709044

Cited 6 times | Published

appear for a criminal judicial proceeding. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.6; Thomas v. State, 534 So.2d 1237, 1238

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferguson v. State

594 So. 2d 864, 1992 WL 41469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1992 | Docket: 1485513

Cited 6 times | Published

State, 584 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, Committee Note d.12. Although Ferguson did

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

584 So. 2d 154, 1991 WL 150425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1991 | Docket: 1515225

Cited 6 times | Published

Holmes, 360 So.2d 380, 383 (Fla. 1978). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, comm. note (d)(12)(1987)[1]. Thus, the probationary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burns v. State

584 So. 2d 1073, 1991 WL 147530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 466676

Cited 6 times | Published

during a criminal episode or transaction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7. There is nothing in the text of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

565 So. 2d 838, 1990 WL 115530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1990 | Docket: 1403333

Cited 6 times | Published

double scoring under victim injury was error. Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weiner v. State

562 So. 2d 392, 1990 WL 71772

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1990 | Docket: 1255983

Cited 6 times | Published

sentence unless a written reason is given. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). The reference to "sentence" in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weidner v. State

559 So. 2d 705, 1990 WL 41573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1990 | Docket: 2561686

Cited 6 times | Published

State, 545 So.2d 961 (Fla.2d DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d) (1984 Committee Note). Here, although

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weekley v. State

553 So. 2d 239, 1989 WL 139498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1989 | Docket: 1258570

Cited 6 times | Published

more victims. The committee note relevant to Rule 3.701(d)(7) in the 1987 version of that rule, see Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dewberry v. State

546 So. 2d 409, 1989 WL 83141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1989 | Docket: 1442847

Cited 6 times | Published

guidelines is the only allowable increase. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, we quash the decision

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tyner v. State

545 So. 2d 961, 1989 WL 72100

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1989 | Docket: 1702994

Cited 6 times | Published

848, 852 (Fla. 1983) (Committee Note). However, rule 3.701(d)(12) was amended in 1984 and now states that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vance v. State

545 So. 2d 398, 1989 WL 61529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1989 | Docket: 1345611

Cited 6 times | Published

with appellant's argument on this issue as well. Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that entries

Category: Criminal Procedure

Putt v. State

527 So. 2d 914, 1988 WL 65189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1988 | Docket: 1526007

Cited 6 times | Published

by judicial construction." 522 So.2d at 831. Rule 3.701(d)(12) and the committee note applicable to it

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGriff v. State

528 So. 2d 396, 1988 WL 36912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1988 | Docket: 2529463

Cited 6 times | Published

State, 503 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The trial court gave two reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Thomas

516 So. 2d 1058, 1987 WL 2691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1266992

Cited 6 times | Published

theft count, which was imposed concurrently, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d) (highest guidelines computation as to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Doner v. State

515 So. 2d 1368, 1987 WL 2117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 1749184

Cited 6 times | Published

should be scored as a third-degree felony. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(3). Finally, Doner argues that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Frazier v. State

515 So. 2d 1061, 1987 WL 1913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1987 | Docket: 1749351

Cited 6 times | Published

sentence imposed upon any prisoner. The language of rule 3.701(d)(5) indicates that the sentencing guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williamson v. State

510 So. 2d 1052, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1987 | Docket: 1595914

Cited 6 times | Published

score for sentencing guideline purposes, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(1) (prior record does not include

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Weston

510 So. 2d 1001, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1987 | Docket: 1754318

Cited 6 times | Published

were deemed to supplant the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11 committee note (1983). As of July 1

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Weston

510 So. 2d 1001, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1987 | Docket: 1754318

Cited 6 times | Published

were deemed to supplant the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11 committee note (1983). As of July 1

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fryson v. State

506 So. 2d 1117, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 1700160

Cited 6 times | Published

and convincing reason for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3). However, we agree with appellant that

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'BRIGHT v. State

508 So. 2d 385, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1987 | Docket: 1153473

Cited 6 times | Published

points), and death or serious injury (85 points). Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meadows v. State

498 So. 2d 1018, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1986 | Docket: 1335483

Cited 6 times | Published

imposed after a revocation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The one cell discretionary increase

Category: Criminal Procedure

Falzone v. State

496 So. 2d 894, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1986 | Docket: 1522836

Cited 6 times | Published

subject crime. The state argues that the text of rule 3.701(d)(5)(a) applicable to appellant was: "Prior

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

492 So. 2d 410, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1986 | Docket: 478569

Cited 6 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Since the reasons for departure given

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooks v. State

490 So. 2d 173, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1986 | Docket: 1743221

Cited 6 times | Published

computing the sentencing guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(5). It is impermissible to base a departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Montgomery v. State

489 So. 2d 1225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 545808

Cited 6 times | Published

obtained, a prohibited basis for departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Similarly, reason number 1 addresses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Noland v. State

489 So. 2d 873, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1986 | Docket: 546286

Cited 6 times | Published

ordering community service hours. We reverse. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a)(2), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides: When scoring

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Malone

489 So. 2d 213, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1986 | Docket: 545825

Cited 6 times | Published

delineating the reasons for departure." Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.11; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ballard v. State

501 So. 2d 1285, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1986 | Docket: 1527638

Cited 6 times | Published

presumptive sentence by one cell pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(15), Fla.R.Crim.P. On the other hand, if "poor

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez-Diaz v. State

484 So. 2d 633, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1702494

Cited 6 times | Published

equate with "clear and convincing." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Based on the foregoing, the sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

482 So. 2d 469, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 1769006

Cited 6 times | Published

6) The statement of purpose for the Guidelines Rule 3.701 b provides in part `2. The primary purpose of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spivey v. State

481 So. 2d 100, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 548375

Cited 6 times | Published

the sentencing guidelines established by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 when it imposed sentences totaling fifteen

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodrigue v. State

481 So. 2d 24, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 1529350

Cited 6 times | Published

on the basis of the probation violation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). In Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ehrenshaft v. State

478 So. 2d 842, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1985 | Docket: 1484403

Cited 6 times | Published

by law. Appellant contends that amended Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.14., effective July 1, 1984, permits the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Edwins v. State

475 So. 2d 1031, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1985 | Docket: 1709982

Cited 6 times | Published

Therefore, we must remand. Appellant also contends Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cochran v. State

476 So. 2d 207, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 1277737

Cited 6 times | Published

parole. § 921.001(8), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 b.5. Cochran would have us rule that prisoners

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barr v. State

474 So. 2d 417, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1985 | Docket: 1472577

Cited 6 times | Published

sentence, it should have prepared a scoresheet. Rule 3.701(d)(1) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chaplin v. State

473 So. 2d 842, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1985 | Docket: 1510507

Cited 6 times | Published

only to certain requirements contained within Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Discretionary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

472 So. 2d 1294, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1985 | Docket: 1794319

Cited 6 times | Published

sentence based on the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(2) provides: When scoring federal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

471 So. 2d 630, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1724678

Cited 6 times | Published

OR REASONS THAT ARE IMPERMISSIBLE UNDER FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.701 IN MAKING ITS DECISION TO DEPART FROM THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Finklea v. State

471 So. 2d 596, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 1396555

Cited 6 times | Published

to appellant is dispositive, we note that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.1. mandates the preparation of a sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hart v. State

464 So. 2d 592, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1985 | Docket: 1193488

Cited 6 times | Published

that the sentencing guidelines contained within Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure were

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yohn v. State

461 So. 2d 263, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 91

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1984 | Docket: 1514588

Cited 6 times | Published

imposed pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. In December 1981 the trial court placed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Callaghan v. State

462 So. 2d 832, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 8

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1984 | Docket: 1510012

Cited 6 times | Published

occupied by his ten month old child. However, Rule 3.701(d)(11) provides in pertinent part that the court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coates v. State

458 So. 2d 1219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1984 | Docket: 107374

Cited 6 times | Published

Moreover, we note that there is no requirement in Rule 3.701 that a trial judge sign his or her name to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Troncoso v. State

825 So. 2d 494, 2002 WL 2008110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2002 | Docket: 2533086

Cited 5 times | Published

defendant was placed on probation. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14)(1986); Rodriguez v. State, 645 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Arvinger

751 So. 2d 74, 1999 WL 1136429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1999 | Docket: 475686

Cited 5 times | Published

State, 547 So.2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b)(1). On remand, this case should not be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dillard v. State

728 So. 2d 725, 1999 WL 68513

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1673883

Cited 5 times | Published

sentencing judge pursuant to these guidelines. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1993). [4] The 1994 revision provided:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Annunziata v. State

697 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 446924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1997 | Docket: 1776641

Cited 5 times | Published

pretrial intervention or diversion programs. Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla. R.Crim. P. (1996). The issue in this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taccariello v. State

664 So. 2d 1118, 1995 WL 733378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1995 | Docket: 1229550

Cited 5 times | Published

"reasonably justify aggravating ... the sentence." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See, e.g., State v. McCall, 524 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baggett v. State

637 So. 2d 303, 1994 WL 190004

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1994 | Docket: 1521516

Cited 5 times | Published

within that range. See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) (if a split sentence is imposed, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kio v. State

624 So. 2d 744, 1993 WL 347789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1993 | Docket: 475188

Cited 5 times | Published

during a criminal episode or transaction." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7. This provision was construed as evincing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Najar v. State

614 So. 2d 644, 1993 WL 48241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1993 | Docket: 449286

Cited 5 times | Published

[1] We have not overlooked the amendment to rule 3.701(d)(7), adopted by the supreme court and approved

Category: Criminal Procedure

Desue v. State

605 So. 2d 933, 1992 WL 235288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1992 | Docket: 1343191

Cited 5 times | Published

appellant's original ten offenses. *935 Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) ("Legal status points are to be assessed

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Bowland

604 So. 2d 556, 1992 WL 206418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1992 | Docket: 1686520

Cited 5 times | Published

for the departure." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11. The committee note to rule 3.701(d)(13) states that community

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lamont v. State

597 So. 2d 823, 1992 WL 26462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1992 | Docket: 1704778

Cited 5 times | Published

921.001(4)(a); 921.005, Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701, 3.988. Section 775.084(4)(a), (b), Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Massey v. State

589 So. 2d 336, 1991 WL 226462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1991 | Docket: 1441289

Cited 5 times | Published

[3] See § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ford v. State

572 So. 2d 946, 1990 WL 183831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 1518899

Cited 5 times | Published

State, 489 So.2d 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). A violation of probation after serving

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clark v. State

572 So. 2d 929, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1990 | Docket: 132361

Cited 5 times | Published

812.014(2)(c)3, Fla. Stat. (1987). [3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11. [4] See also State v. Dolen, 390 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Young

561 So. 2d 583, 1990 WL 68109

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1990 | Docket: 1480931

Cited 5 times | Published

juvenile was on "furlough status" and because rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, did

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tillman v. State

555 So. 2d 940, 1990 WL 2407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1990 | Docket: 1396892

Cited 5 times | Published

community control the judge violated the mandate of Rule 3.701(d)(11) by aggravating his guideline sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kirby v. State

553 So. 2d 1290, 1989 WL 148428

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1989 | Docket: 1259383

Cited 5 times | Published

worthless bank check. The sentences exceed the Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines recommendation of community control

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamilton v. State

548 So. 2d 234, 1989 WL 101547

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 2508219

Cited 5 times | Published

guidelines is the only allowable increase. See Fla.R. Crim.P.3.701(d)(4). We quash the district court's decision

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Joseph

543 So. 2d 405, 1989 WL 50258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1989 | Docket: 1437380

Cited 5 times | Published

reversible error. § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Hernandez, 525 So.2d 493

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Rodgers

540 So. 2d 872, 1988 WL 131613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1989 | Docket: 1294564

Cited 5 times | Published

scored in the "prior record" category. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4) and (5). The two sexual assault charges

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Bledsoe

538 So. 2d 94, 1989 WL 8344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1989 | Docket: 2582213

Cited 5 times | Published

1988); § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1987); Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(b)(6) and 3.701(d)(11). Upon remand, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Diers

532 So. 2d 1271, 1988 WL 113885

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1988 | Docket: 450694

Cited 5 times | Published

were deemed to supplant the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11 committee note (1983). As of July 1

Category: Criminal Procedure

Downing v. State

536 So. 2d 189, 1988 WL 135739

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 1759637

Cited 5 times | Published

fifteen-year minimum mandatory sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). We approve the opinion of the district

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

525 So. 2d 964, 1988 WL 47247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1710641

Cited 5 times | Published

"impossible to determine" in the language of Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(3). The prior offense should therefore

Category: Criminal Procedure

Forehand v. State

524 So. 2d 1054, 1988 WL 31728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1988 | Docket: 1341771

Cited 5 times | Published

the analogous or parallel Florida statute under Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(2), a court must look to the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mayo v. State

518 So. 2d 458, 1988 WL 2617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1988 | Docket: 1777908

Cited 5 times | Published

which appellant was not convicted, contrary to rule 3.701(d)(11) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Render v. State

516 So. 2d 1085, 1987 WL 2903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1987 | Docket: 105302

Cited 5 times | Published

the court for sentencing at the same time and rule 3.701(d)(1) is not implicated. To the contrary, we

Category: Criminal Procedure

MacKey v. State

516 So. 2d 330, 1987 WL 2629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1678057

Cited 5 times | Published

Id. at 534. Appellant refers us to the Note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) Florida Rules Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tuthill v. State

518 So. 2d 1300, 1987 WL 658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1778580

Cited 5 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Recent cases have reiterated that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tuthill v. State

518 So. 2d 1300, 1987 WL 658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1778580

Cited 5 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Recent cases have reiterated that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

510 So. 2d 1089, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1754229

Cited 5 times | Published

sentence imposed after probation revocation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The trial court sentenced appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. Wainwright

508 So. 2d 768, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1987 | Docket: 1648791

Cited 5 times | Published

battery count, the sentences to run consecutively. Rule 3.701(d)(10) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Merckle v. State

512 So. 2d 948, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1987 | Docket: 40702

Cited 5 times | Published

convincing written reasons for deviating. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). In departing from the presumptive

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parker v. State

506 So. 2d 86, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1987 | Docket: 1700229

Cited 5 times | Published

which no convictions had been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. The court, accordingly, erred by not granting

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Peters

500 So. 2d 704, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1987 | Docket: 2584578

Cited 5 times | Published

was imposed below that recommended by the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the court's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smelley v. State

500 So. 2d 318, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 1295289

Cited 5 times | Published

element of any offenses at conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The applicable committee note clarifies

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kokx v. State

498 So. 2d 534, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1986 | Docket: 1699900

Cited 5 times | Published

significant that the Court did not say that nearly all Rule 3.701(c) Category 2 cases (sexual offenses) inflict

Category: Criminal Procedure

Denson v. State

493 So. 2d 60, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1986 | Docket: 1671660

Cited 5 times | Published

clearly excluded as grounds for departure by Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDowell v. State

491 So. 2d 594, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1986 | Docket: 1722055

Cited 5 times | Published

years probation. The 1983 committee notes to rule 3.701(d)(12) provide that if a split sentence *596

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitfield v. State

490 So. 2d 1358, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1986 | Docket: 425671

Cited 5 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. The fact that a firearm was used in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vaillant v. State

490 So. 2d 1326, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1986 | Docket: 2584471

Cited 5 times | Published

included physical contact as an element. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7.; State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jefferson v. State

489 So. 2d 860, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1276

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1986 | Docket: 1528826

Cited 5 times | Published

necessarily scored as an element of the offense, rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla. R.Crim.P., and "reasons for deviating

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cummings v. State

489 So. 2d 121, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1986 | Docket: 1249842

Cited 5 times | Published

departure. Weems v. State, 469 So.2d 128 (Fla. 1985); rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R. Crim.P. We hold that the remaining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Safford v. State

488 So. 2d 141, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 1287108

Cited 5 times | Published

NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3). [2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4). [3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bouthner v. State

489 So. 2d 784, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 2562694

Cited 5 times | Published

transcribed in the record do not fulfill the purpose of Rule 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly the conviction is affirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bouthner v. State

489 So. 2d 784, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 2562694

Cited 5 times | Published

transcribed in the record do not fulfill the purpose of Rule 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly the conviction is affirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Laster v. State

486 So. 2d 88, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1986 | Docket: 1226525

Cited 5 times | Published

assault and thus is not a prior offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). It does not matter that appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mortimer v. State

490 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 2524873

Cited 5 times | Published

v. State, 473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gale v. State

483 So. 2d 53, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 276

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1986 | Docket: 455685

Cited 5 times | Published

and awaiting sentencing, is rendered invalid by Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parker v. State

481 So. 2d 560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 1529272

Cited 5 times | Published

[3] § 790.221, Fla. Stat. (1983). [4] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). [5] See, e.g., Weems v. State, 469

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Holcomb

481 So. 2d 1263, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1986 | Docket: 1570590

Cited 5 times | Published

the sentencing guidelines established by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, because the guidelines scoresheet prepared

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beal v. State

478 So. 2d 401, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1985 | Docket: 1741691

Cited 5 times | Published

practice deeming it to be sufficient compliance with Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

McNealy v. State

479 So. 2d 138, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1985 | Docket: 1514363

Cited 5 times | Published

CONSTITUTED A RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF AMENDED RULE 3.701(d)(14)? The attorney general, on behalf of appellee

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cannada v. State

472 So. 2d 1296, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1698

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1985 | Docket: 1793750

Cited 5 times | Published

which no convictions were obtained is invalid. Rule 3.701(d)(11). *1299 Two other reasons given for departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McGraw

474 So. 2d 289, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1676

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1985 | Docket: 1749807

Cited 5 times | Published

probation within the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, esp. Committee Note (d)(8), (12). In fact

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bordeaux v. State

471 So. 2d 1353, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1985 | Docket: 1397481

Cited 5 times | Published

Commission disapproved the Manual Comment following Rule 3.701(d)(5), p. 3, Guidelines Manual, which limited

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brudie v. State

467 So. 2d 1113, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1985 | Docket: 285090

Cited 5 times | Published

presumptive range under the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Defendant's guidelines scoresheet called

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pugh v. State

463 So. 2d 582, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1985 | Docket: 449031

Cited 5 times | Published

this issue is contained in the Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P., which states: Any uncertainty

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Davis

464 So. 2d 195, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1985 | Docket: 1661363

Cited 5 times | Published

not a sufficient basis within the meaning of rule 3.701 d.11 to deviate from the sentencing guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Napoles v. State

463 So. 2d 478, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1985 | Docket: 2522664

Cited 5 times | Published

reasons for its departure as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.11. We reverse. The Court imposed an 18

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deer v. State

462 So. 2d 96, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1985 | Docket: 1509955

Cited 5 times | Published

based on clear and convincing reasons as Criminal Rule 3.701 d.11. requires? Second, where the maximum legal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dominguez v. State

461 So. 2d 277, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1985 | Docket: 1514602

Cited 5 times | Published

intention in departing from the Guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). [5] Compare section 775.087, Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saunders v. State

459 So. 2d 1119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1984 | Docket: 1683229

Cited 5 times | Published

find that the *1120 court erred by applying Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) (1984) prior to the provision's effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

458 So. 2d 396

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1984 | Docket: 1733255

Cited 5 times | Published

sentence imposed under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fletcher v. State

457 So. 2d 570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 426531

Cited 5 times | Published

for which convictions have not been obtained" (Rule 3.701 d.11. as "revamped" *572 May 8, 1984),[5] a reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fletcher v. State

457 So. 2d 570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 426531

Cited 5 times | Published

for which convictions have not been obtained" (Rule 3.701 d.11. as "revamped" *572 May 8, 1984),[5] a reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

454 So. 2d 790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1984 | Docket: 2565818

Cited 5 times | Published

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.988, as well as in Rule 3.701(d)(7) which provides that victim injury shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dorman v. State

457 So. 2d 503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 426075

Cited 5 times | Published

offender is determined to be such a candidate, rule 3.701 is not applicable. See Sweat v. State, 454 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dorman v. State

457 So. 2d 503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 426075

Cited 5 times | Published

offender is determined to be such a candidate, rule 3.701 is not applicable. See Sweat v. State, 454 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sweat v. State

454 So. 2d 749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1984 | Docket: 444641

Cited 5 times | Published

disoriented sex offenders. The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(11), in existence at the time of sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

29 So. 3d 1152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 903, 2010 WL 366616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2010 | Docket: 1643010

Cited 4 times | Published

departure sentence without written reasons. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11) (providing any sentence outside permitted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sims v. State

869 So. 2d 45, 2004 WL 399217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1653982

Cited 4 times | Published

guidance on how to assess victim injury points. Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Childers v. DEPT. OF ENVIRON. PROTECTION

696 So. 2d 962, 1997 WL 402381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1997 | Docket: 1326018

Cited 4 times | Published

governing sentencing guidelines. E.g., Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). See also McCrae v. State, 395 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Doolin v. State

650 So. 2d 44, 1995 WL 25338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1995 | Docket: 1346566

Cited 4 times | Published

findings. Section 921.0016, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.701, Fla. R.Crim.P. Thus, the court, in its wisdom

Category: Criminal Procedure

Westlund v. Florida Parole Commission

637 So. 2d 52, 1994 WL 182256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1994 | Docket: 1521467

Cited 4 times | Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Manuel v. State

629 So. 2d 1052, 1993 WL 540187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 1677409

Cited 4 times | Published

adjudications scored as "prior record." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(G). Counsel, however, allegedly failed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grady v. State

618 So. 2d 341, 1993 WL 154234

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1993 | Docket: 1376117

Cited 4 times | Published

scoresheet that provides the most severe sanction. Rule 3.701(d)(3), which sets forth the method for determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Madrey v. State

594 So. 2d 841, 1992 WL 35366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1992 | Docket: 1742035

Cited 4 times | Published

sentence and remand this cause for resentencing. Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Harrison

589 So. 2d 317, 1991 WL 188313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1991 | Docket: 1730829

Cited 4 times | Published

new sentence requires guideline consideration. Rule 3.701, subd. d, par. 14, Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tarawneh v. State

588 So. 2d 1006, 1991 WL 186981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1991 | Docket: 368954

Cited 4 times | Published

degree murder. He looks to the committee notes to rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which state

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cabrera v. State

576 So. 2d 1358, 1991 WL 45217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1991 | Docket: 1669765

Cited 4 times | Published

defendant is under legal constraint. Id.; see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). In preparing the scoresheet the court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Casmay v. State

569 So. 2d 1351, 1990 WL 175753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 1190782

Cited 4 times | Published

the sentencing guidelines as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We reject this contention and affirm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberson v. State

555 So. 2d 976, 1990 WL 5852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1990 | Docket: 1724716

Cited 4 times | Published

contends further that the analysis does not stop at rule 3.701(d)(14), because appellant committed his last

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swain v. State

553 So. 2d 1331, 1989 WL 152149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1989 | Docket: 1675528

Cited 4 times | Published

court reasoned: [h]ad the amendment introducing rule 3.701(d)(14) into the guidelines not been adopted,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Branton v. State

548 So. 2d 882, 1989 WL 104488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1989 | Docket: 891121

Cited 4 times | Published

recommendation, after the one cell increase permitted by Rule 3.701(d)(14), was two and one-half to three and one-half

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pope v. State

542 So. 2d 423, 1989 WL 36882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1989 | Docket: 468809

Cited 4 times | Published

whether the departure is upward or downward. Rule 3.701(d)11 requires written reasons when the departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trotman v. State

545 So. 2d 890, 1989 WL 4383

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1989 | Docket: 2380571

Cited 4 times | Published

1986); § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 b.6. and d.11. There being none, resentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gopaul v. State

536 So. 2d 296, 1988 WL 131677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1988 | Docket: 1759907

Cited 4 times | Published

reasons supporting an enhanced sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Where a court determines that a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

534 So. 2d 1226, 1988 WL 131117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1988 | Docket: 1707681

Cited 4 times | Published

reasons for departure. The recent amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(8), Fla.R.Crim.P., allowing the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ponder v. State

530 So. 2d 1057, 1988 WL 92976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1988 | Docket: 1678385

Cited 4 times | Published

armed robberies were committed by defendant. Rule 3.701(b) of the sentencing guidelines states: "3. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patten v. State

531 So. 2d 203, 1988 WL 92687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1988 | Docket: 1528604

Cited 4 times | Published

bump permitted under the guidelines. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Myrick v. State, 497 So.2d 728 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

529 So. 2d 1251, 1988 WL 84357

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1988 | Docket: 928437

Cited 4 times | Published

the guidelines range as to that offense. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.9. As to the remaining felony convictions

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Thomas

528 So. 2d 1274, 1988 WL 75966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1988 | Docket: 203317

Cited 4 times | Published

pertaining to sentencing guidelines, the meaning of Rule 3.701(d)(10) is that where the recommended guideline

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

526 So. 2d 1060, 1988 WL 62171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1988 | Docket: 1679712

Cited 4 times | Published

upon his *1063 mother, came within the ambit of Rule 3.701(b)3, which directs that the penalty imposed should

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lettman v. State

526 So. 2d 207, 1988 WL 56515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1988 | Docket: 1273153

Cited 4 times | Published

"punishment" as in this case does not support departure. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hosmer v. State

523 So. 2d 184, 1988 WL 31723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1988 | Docket: 1517252

Cited 4 times | Published

A new scoresheet was prepared which, with the Rule 3.701(d)(14)[1] one cell increase for violation of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Merriex v. State

521 So. 2d 249, 1988 WL 14580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1988 | Docket: 1348112

Cited 4 times | Published

County conviction rather than used it to depart. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clark v. State

519 So. 2d 1095, 1988 WL 8412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1988 | Docket: 1698867

Cited 4 times | Published

justify the aggravation of the sentence. [3] Rule 3.701(d)(1) provides: "One guideline scoresheet shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

Banks v. State

520 So. 2d 43, 1987 WL 3185

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 1709195

Cited 4 times | Published

resulted in neither arrest nor conviction. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Reason # 2 refers to appellant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Slappy v. State

516 So. 2d 342, 1987 WL 2669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1677995

Cited 4 times | Published

change, as reflected in a Committee Note, of Rule 3.701(d)(5) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mooney v. State

516 So. 2d 333, 1987 WL 2654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1267227

Cited 4 times | Published

points so as to arrive at an accurate total. Rule 3.701(d)3, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tapia v. State

509 So. 2d 354, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1987 | Docket: 1361781

Cited 4 times | Published

appellant's presumptive sentence by one cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The failure of previous attempts

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cain v. State

506 So. 2d 1125, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 1700356

Cited 4 times | Published

under both scoresheets. The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(5) clarifies the correct procedure: For any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Welker v. State

504 So. 2d 802, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 1511213

Cited 4 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The trial court's reliance on Mullen

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

503 So. 2d 1370, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 1453139

Cited 4 times | Published

Burke v. State, 483 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). It follows that evidence of a crime

Category: Criminal Procedure

Connell v. State

502 So. 2d 1272, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1987 | Docket: 1657607

Cited 4 times | Published

convincing and cannot support departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Reason three is a repetition of reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grant v. State

510 So. 2d 313, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1987 | Docket: 1588108

Cited 4 times | Published

appellant's violation of probation. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The trial court departed from the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jennings v. State

498 So. 2d 1373, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1334979

Cited 4 times | Published

Supreme Court has adopted committee note (d)(10) to Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. which explains that if an offender

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jennings v. State

498 So. 2d 1373, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1334979

Cited 4 times | Published

Supreme Court has adopted committee note (d)(10) to Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. which explains that if an offender

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson v. State

498 So. 2d 553, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 1699772

Cited 4 times | Published

consecutive to, his sentence in the earlier case. Rule 3.701(d)(1) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lawson v. State

497 So. 2d 288, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 1262955

Cited 4 times | Published

as one of great public importance: DOES FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.701(d)(1) REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SENTENCING

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mize v. State

495 So. 2d 845, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 2588403

Cited 4 times | Published

Sentencing Guidelines Commission, Guidelines Manual, Rule 3.701(d)6 comment (1983). Accordingly, the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Olivera v. State

494 So. 2d 298, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1986 | Docket: 1510775

Cited 4 times | Published

one and nine do not support departure because Rule 3.701(b)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, expressly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

493 So. 2d 48, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1804

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1986 | Docket: 1246953

Cited 4 times | Published

occurred until after the primary offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). See Frank v. State, 490 So.2d 190

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brunson v. State

489 So. 2d 1159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1986 | Docket: 545719

Cited 4 times | Published

the guidelines scoresheet in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) which requires one guideline scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elkins v. State

489 So. 2d 1222, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 545720

Cited 4 times | Published

which a conviction has not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Pursell v. State, 483 So.2d 94 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fabelo v. State

488 So. 2d 915, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1986 | Docket: 1685342

Cited 4 times | Published

of respect for law and order in society." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); see also Tillman v. State, 482 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

489 So. 2d 115, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 545986

Cited 4 times | Published

writing his reasons for departure. Pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, separate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pendergrass v. State

487 So. 2d 35

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1986 | Docket: 1796616

Cited 4 times | Published

guidelines for violation of probation, but under rule 3.701 d. 14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, such

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holden v. State

487 So. 2d 1199, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1797468

Cited 4 times | Published

State, 457 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).[1] The instant offense was second

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neal v. State

487 So. 2d 367, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1986 | Docket: 1796714

Cited 4 times | Published

offenses, they should have been scored. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b). However, the scoring of these DUI

Category: Criminal Procedure

Van Horn v. State

485 So. 2d 1380, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1986 | Docket: 1275898

Cited 4 times | Published

his sentence provided by the version of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3) then in effect, the recommended guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holley v. State

483 So. 2d 854, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1986 | Docket: 455870

Cited 4 times | Published

intentionally violated it, under the guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14)), his sentence could have been enhanced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

483 So. 2d 839, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1986 | Docket: 1511958

Cited 4 times | Published

1985). Section 921.001(6), Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rease v. State

485 So. 2d 5, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 1680907

Cited 4 times | Published

appellant attempted to escape, was improper. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla. R.Crim.P. Because we are not persuaded

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brinson v. State

483 So. 2d 13

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1986 | Docket: 455652

Cited 4 times | Published

affirmative statement to meet the requirements of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Jordan

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gissinger v. State

481 So. 2d 1269, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 548654

Cited 4 times | Published

sentences imposed under the guidelines, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701, for the crimes of aggravated child abuse[1]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boston v. State

481 So. 2d 550, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1986 | Docket: 1529368

Cited 4 times | Published

instant case that the word "court" as used in rule 3.701(d)(1) should mean the division of the circuit

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

481 So. 2d 97, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 549027

Cited 4 times | Published

violate the sentencing guidelines under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We cannot agree. The sentencing guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

480 So. 2d 679, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 3

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 1220597

Cited 4 times | Published

indicating "any nonstate prison sanction." Under rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dawkins v. State

479 So. 2d 818, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1985 | Docket: 1514406

Cited 4 times | Published

trial court. The supreme court recently construed Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Head v. State

473 So. 2d 18, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1985 | Docket: 318263

Cited 4 times | Published

departure from the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Defendant was convicted of aggravated battery

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

471 So. 2d 201, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1985 | Docket: 1724578

Cited 4 times | Published

convincing reasons for doing so are present. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. We find that a clear and convincing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Higgs v. State

470 So. 2d 75, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1985 | Docket: 1260971

Cited 4 times | Published

sentenced him under the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, to two concurrent five year sentences of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parker v. State

465 So. 2d 1361, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1985 | Docket: 1324060

Cited 4 times | Published

presumptive range established pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ryder v. State

464 So. 2d 1324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1985 | Docket: 1661337

Cited 4 times | Published

decision. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 and the sentencing guidelines adopted by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Emory v. State

463 So. 2d 1242, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1985 | Docket: 1509673

Cited 4 times | Published

v. State, 451 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla.R. Crim.P. permits the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Manning v. State

461 So. 2d 1025, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1985 | Docket: 52938

Cited 4 times | Published

guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. On appeal he challenges for the first time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lightfoot v. State

459 So. 2d 1157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1282324

Cited 4 times | Published

trial court was acting within the provisions of rule 3.701 when he imposed consecutive sentences of three

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitlock v. State

458 So. 2d 888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1984 | Docket: 1452340

Cited 4 times | Published

reasons for the trial court's departure, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), and that the trial court's departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hackney v. State

456 So. 2d 1209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1984 | Docket: 1446924

Cited 4 times | Published

NOTES [1] See Ch. 921, Fla. Stat., and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 and Form 3.988. [2] See Robinson v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harms v. State

454 So. 2d 689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 444582

Cited 4 times | Published

violation of the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701[1] in the imposition of the 15-year sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States v. Bobby Jenkins

822 F.3d 1213, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8652, 2016 WL 2754018

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 11, 2016 | Docket: 3063381

Cited 3 times | Published

adjudication was withheld. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). The significant factor concerning

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Johnson

990 So. 2d 1115, 2008 WL 2435672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2008 | Docket: 1291952

Cited 3 times | Published

valid reason for a departure sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); see also Paulk, 813 So.2d at 154

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Naylor

976 So. 2d 1193, 2008 WL 782882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 1680099

Cited 3 times | Published

by competent, substantial evidence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); § 921.0026(1)-(2), Fla. Stat. (1997-2000);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stubbs v. State

951 So. 2d 910, 2007 WL 428926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2007 | Docket: 2562094

Cited 3 times | Published

sentencing after revocation of probation, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14), the reduction in points would result

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sahadeo

890 So. 2d 464, 2004 WL 3008804

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2004 | Docket: 1285985

Cited 3 times | Published

must impose a guidelines sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d). However, when a court imposes a sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brazley v. State

871 So. 2d 986, 2004 WL 784868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 1709456

Cited 3 times | Published

for multiple convictions are improper. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). The trial court merely adjusted downward

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bogan v. State

725 So. 2d 1216, 1999 WL 12745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 1294044

Cited 3 times | Published

defendant's physical contact with the victim. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7). Bogan did not object to the imposition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perry v. State

714 So. 2d 563, 1998 WL 337261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1998 | Docket: 1513770

Cited 3 times | Published

present criminal rules, the former language in Rule 3.701(d)(11) has been moved to (d)(18), and at least

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoffman v. State

700 So. 2d 765, 1997 WL 631141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 1719640

Cited 3 times | Published

explained in writing by the trial court judge." Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williamson v. State

683 So. 2d 193, 1996 WL 673003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1996 | Docket: 2518052

Cited 3 times | Published

consolidated scoresheet should never have been prepared. Rule 3.701(d)(1) requires the use of a single scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lawrence v. State

682 So. 2d 582, 1996 WL 595188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1996 | Docket: 1681047

Cited 3 times | Published

exceeds the guidelines. See Comments to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12); Morris v. State, 532 So.2d 1116

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Green

667 So. 2d 959, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1996 | Docket: 454595

Cited 3 times | Published

section 921.0015, Florida Statutes (1993), and rule 3.701 provide for increased punishment on a violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

662 So. 2d 748, 1995 WL 675284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1683462

Cited 3 times | Published

aggravating or mitigating the sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) (1995); see Galletti v. State, 646

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. State

664 So. 2d 4, 1995 WL 421872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1995 | Docket: 1229978

Cited 3 times | Published

pending before the trial court for sentencing, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d); a single such scoresheet, however, was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rahmings v. State

660 So. 2d 1390, 1995 WL 582277

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1995 | Docket: 1755927

Cited 3 times | Published

of criminal conduct without a conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). We addressed a related issue two

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

652 So. 2d 488, 1995 WL 124687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1995 | Docket: 2585103

Cited 3 times | Published

discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7), 3.702(d). In this case, the state

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

645 So. 2d 98, 1994 WL 617207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1222999

Cited 3 times | Published

for departing from the guideline sentence. *100 Rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hause v. State

643 So. 2d 679, 1994 WL 551480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1493151

Cited 3 times | Published

providing written reasons for the departure. See rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P. Under the presumptive guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fenelon v. State

629 So. 2d 955, 1993 WL 517230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1993 | Docket: 1677402

Cited 3 times | Published

So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). [4] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1986) ("Victim injury shall be scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pinacle v. State

625 So. 2d 1273, 1993 WL 406601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1993 | Docket: 1517540

Cited 3 times | Published

enhanced based on his juvenile convictions. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 and 3.988; see State v. Young, 561 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

619 So. 2d 508, 1993 WL 205451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1993 | Docket: 1721759

Cited 3 times | Published

State, 526 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Also, in imposing sentence, the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Regueiro v. State

619 So. 2d 463, 1993 WL 191991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1993 | Docket: 1382330

Cited 3 times | Published

and the incarcerative term combined. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12); see also Smith v. State, 584 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jeter v. State

604 So. 2d 1250, 1992 WL 212023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1992 | Docket: 1686431

Cited 3 times | Published

severe sanction." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.3. The Committee Note to rule 3.701 d.3 states: "When the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. State

604 So. 2d 23, 1992 WL 192999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1992 | Docket: 375712

Cited 3 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).[2] Here, although defendant was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reynolds v. State

598 So. 2d 188, 1992 WL 88928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1992 | Docket: 1472138

Cited 3 times | Published

explanation by the trial court. We disagree. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) & (d)(10). The state acknowledges that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cecil v. State

596 So. 2d 461, 1992 WL 56709

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1992 | Docket: 1358973

Cited 3 times | Published

the term provided by general law. Comment to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla. R.Crim.P. The comment also provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Durden v. State

582 So. 2d 1256, 1991 WL 146647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1991 | Docket: 379471

Cited 3 times | Published

or go beyond the terms of the negotiated plea. Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla. R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wyche v. State

576 So. 2d 884, 1991 WL 39354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1991 | Docket: 1242999

Cited 3 times | Published

however, may not exceed the guidelines range. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)12. In reversing the two fifteen-year sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walsingham v. State

576 So. 2d 365, 1991 WL 29490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1991 | Docket: 1242411

Cited 3 times | Published

have been five and one-half-twelve years. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. Dugger

575 So. 2d 750, 1991 WL 24876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1991 | Docket: 1443261

Cited 3 times | Published

relief on this ground. See Committee Note, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Affirmed in part, reversed in part

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lipscomb v. State

573 So. 2d 429, 1991 WL 10697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1991 | Docket: 1518859

Cited 3 times | Published

experience and time. In Volume 34 F.S.A. under Rule 3.701, reasons for departure are collected from notes

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Regan

564 So. 2d 1208, 1990 WL 105511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1990 | Docket: 1689173

Cited 3 times | Published

purpose of uniform guidelines sentences. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). The new minimum mandatory sentence may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Calleja v. State

562 So. 2d 395, 1990 WL 71784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1990 | Docket: 1154771

Cited 3 times | Published

substantiated by valid written reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

557 So. 2d 203, 1990 WL 15385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1990 | Docket: 457021

Cited 3 times | Published

conviction had occurred because of the provisions of Rule 3.701(d)11, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Petrillo v. State

554 So. 2d 1227, 1990 WL 784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1990 | Docket: 1693364

Cited 3 times | Published

213 (Fla.3d DCA 1986). While we recognize that Rule 3.701(d)(12) does not apply directly here because this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spann v. State

550 So. 2d 164, 1989 WL 122996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 1718693

Cited 3 times | Published

used. His assertion, however, is contrary to rule 3.701(d)(3), which provides that the guideline scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellison v. State

545 So. 2d 480, 1989 WL 66158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1989 | Docket: 1345458

Cited 3 times | Published

State, 456 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11. However, that has long been held to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Butler v. State

543 So. 2d 432, 1989 WL 52147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1989 | Docket: 1729790

Cited 3 times | Published

Butler's sentencing guidelines scoresheet. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6); 3.988(c)(IV). Deletion of the contested

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blue v. State

541 So. 2d 736, 1989 WL 34580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1989 | Docket: 1516614

Cited 3 times | Published

stated: Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 3.701(d)(6), the court hereby states that the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

McIntyre v. State

539 So. 2d 603, 1989 WL 21455

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1989 | Docket: 1510988

Cited 3 times | Published

State, 464 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Reason two, that the timing of McIntyre's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

538 So. 2d 497, 1989 WL 6199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 472412

Cited 3 times | Published

thus, an improper reason for departure under Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla.R.Crim.P. We disagree. Wright was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferguson v. State

537 So. 2d 144, 1988 WL 73572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1989 | Docket: 1522635

Cited 3 times | Published

departure without written reasons as provided by Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The written reasons given by the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Viera v. State

532 So. 2d 743, 1988 WL 100902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1988 | Docket: 450636

Cited 3 times | Published

the lack of a written order as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Moreover, examination of the entire

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mincey v. State

525 So. 2d 465, 1988 WL 47252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1465427

Cited 3 times | Published

sentences within the recommended sentencing range. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anthony v. State

524 So. 2d 655, 1988 WL 43383

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1988 | Docket: 1340681

Cited 3 times | Published

warrant aggravating or mitigating a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). In order for a reason for departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

522 So. 2d 1022, 1988 WL 26128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1988 | Docket: 1364809

Cited 3 times | Published

departure upwards (12-30 months incarceration). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.14.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hawkins v. State

522 So. 2d 488, 1988 WL 22990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1988 | Docket: 1191907

Cited 3 times | Published

have not been obtained, in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.11. A victim's particular vulnerability

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clifford v. State

518 So. 2d 983, 1988 WL 3305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1988 | Docket: 1778577

Cited 3 times | Published

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur. NOTES [1] Rule 3.701(d)(7) presently provides that, "[v]ictim injury

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clifford v. State

518 So. 2d 983, 1988 WL 3305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1988 | Docket: 1778577

Cited 3 times | Published

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur. NOTES [1] Rule 3.701(d)(7) presently provides that, "[v]ictim injury

Category: Criminal Procedure

Torres v. State

517 So. 2d 796, 1988 WL 1062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1988 | Docket: 541028

Cited 3 times | Published

sentence with the one cell increase allowed under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

518 So. 2d 1336, 1987 WL 3170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 1778311

Cited 3 times | Published

to the commission of the primary offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). The Second District in a series

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peters v. State

516 So. 2d 60, 1987 WL 2120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 2582074

Cited 3 times | Published

appellant's offenses were committed. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Thus, it is contended that the "bump

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mora v. State

515 So. 2d 291, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1987 | Docket: 1749259

Cited 3 times | Published

appellant was never charged or convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schneider v. State

512 So. 2d 308, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1987 | Docket: 473603

Cited 3 times | Published

scoresheet was prepared as required by the rule. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). The problem is compounded by the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shull v. State

512 So. 2d 1021, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1987 | Docket: 473742

Cited 3 times | Published

provide its reasons in writing, in compliance with rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lumpkin v. State

510 So. 2d 1164, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1987 | Docket: 1599299

Cited 3 times | Published

State, 493 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); cf. Weems v. State, 469 So.2d 128

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

510 So. 2d 1088, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1587269

Cited 3 times | Published

one cell without giving written reasons. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Additional departure, however, must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jaggers v. State

509 So. 2d 1165, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1987 | Docket: 1361807

Cited 3 times | Published

non-conviction disposition shall not be scored. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(1). Nor can such entries be considered

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flournoy v. State

507 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1987 | Docket: 460192

Cited 3 times | Published

unwarranted variation in the sentencing process. Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P., positively provides that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stanley v. State

507 So. 2d 1131, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 964

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1987 | Docket: 460016

Cited 3 times | Published

[5] Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v). [6] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11; Atwaters v. State, 495 So.2d 1219 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

504 So. 2d 494, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1987 | Docket: 453599

Cited 3 times | Published

motion denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), and thus is not based upon clear

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amrein v. State

504 So. 2d 783, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 453584

Cited 3 times | Published

written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We affirm. Appellant on November 22, 1985

Category: Criminal Procedure

Houston v. State

502 So. 2d 977, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1987 | Docket: 1657670

Cited 3 times | Published

behalf of appellant in which he pointed out that rule 3.701(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

501 So. 2d 665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1987 | Docket: 1471281

Cited 3 times | Published

these reasons are invalid. We agree and reverse. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watkins v. State

498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1986 | Docket: 1335254

Cited 3 times | Published

motion denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The second reason does not support

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bradley v. State

497 So. 2d 281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1986 | Docket: 1689775

Cited 3 times | Published

See also Williams v. State, supra. [2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Everage v. State

504 So. 2d 1255, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 453486

Cited 3 times | Published

"instant offenses" is not defined anywhere in Rule 3.701 nor is it the subject of a Committee Note. Presumably

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thorne v. State

496 So. 2d 891, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1986 | Docket: 1522791

Cited 3 times | Published

minimum mandatory sentence takes precedence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9); Prentice v. State, 469 So.2d 798 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Wagner

495 So. 2d 283, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1986 | Docket: 2574444

Cited 3 times | Published

supporting a departure were ever entered by the court. Rule 3.701(d)(1) and (11), Florida Rules of *284 Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

492 So. 2d 1388, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1986 | Docket: 478420

Cited 3 times | Published

recommended sentence of 5 1/2 to 7 years. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The *1390 trial court's statement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

492 So. 2d 1171, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1986 | Docket: 478459

Cited 3 times | Published

§ 784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983). [2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11. [3] Hankey v. State, 485 So.2d 827

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ritts v. State

491 So. 2d 1252, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1986 | Docket: 305531

Cited 3 times | Published

injury points on appellant's scoresheet. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). This error was not harmless since

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dawson v. State

491 So. 2d 310, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 1383921

Cited 3 times | Published

scoresheet. § 921.001(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d. 1.; Myrick v. State, 461 So.2d 1359 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Riddle v. State

488 So. 2d 903, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1986 | Docket: 2588128

Cited 3 times | Published

the original cell or the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11. See Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cawthon v. State

486 So. 2d 90, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1986 | Docket: 1406745

Cited 3 times | Published

021(1)(a) & 777.04(1), Fla. Stat. (1983). [5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). [6] Holt v. State, 472 So.2d 551

Category: Criminal Procedure

Irving v. State

484 So. 2d 78, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1702495

Cited 3 times | Published

not a proper basis for the departure here. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). See also Wigfals v. State, 480 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mora v. State

484 So. 2d 621, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1986 | Docket: 1702713

Cited 3 times | Published

departing from the guidelines was invalid under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) which provides that reasons for deviating

Category: Criminal Procedure

Torrey v. State

482 So. 2d 552, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 1769219

Cited 3 times | Published

statement of reasons for departure as is required by Rule 3.701(d)(11) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holloman v. State

482 So. 2d 431, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 52

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 1769504

Cited 3 times | Published

primary or an additional scored offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) and its committee note; Benedict v

Category: Criminal Procedure

Inscore v. State

480 So. 2d 218, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 73

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1985 | Docket: 2557033

Cited 3 times | Published

of the guidelines pertaining to victim injury, rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bell v. State

479 So. 2d 309, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1985 | Docket: 2587371

Cited 3 times | Published

guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, as *310 an illegal "split" sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). In this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thrasher v. State

477 So. 2d 1083, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1985 | Docket: 1320385

Cited 3 times | Published

convictions were obtained in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), which at the time of these offenses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stokes v. State

476 So. 2d 313, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 2534289

Cited 3 times | Published

the guidelines, with one cell enhancement under rule 3.701(d)(14), would be twelve to thirty months. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richardson v. State

472 So. 2d 1278, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1985 | Docket: 1793736

Cited 3 times | Published

10, 1984, respectively. Prior to sentencing, Rule 3.701(d)(3) of the guidelines was amended, effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayward v. State

467 So. 2d 462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1985 | Docket: 1275204

Cited 3 times | Published

court's subsequent departure permitted under Rule 3.701(d)(11), are matters to be considered and evaluated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prentice v. State

469 So. 2d 798, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1985 | Docket: 1271722

Cited 3 times | Published

trial court was acting within the provisions of rule 3.701 when he imposed consecutive sentences of three

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Rice

464 So. 2d 684, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661355

Cited 3 times | Published

from guideline sentences are contemplated by Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burke v. State

460 So. 2d 1022, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1984 | Docket: 1765874

Cited 3 times | Published

court pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. In June 1983 defendant was charged with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnes v. State

461 So. 2d 216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1984 | Docket: 2540620

Cited 3 times | Published

when a defendant's probation is revoked. See Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R. Crim.P. This rule was not effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

459 So. 2d 1151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 1683328

Cited 3 times | Published

her election to be sentenced pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 is vitiated by the court's failure to ascertain

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gordon v. State

454 So. 2d 657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 2575932

Cited 3 times | Published

to exceed the presumptive sentence, provided rule 3.701(d)(11) is followed. We think the court gave "clear

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cigelski v. State

453 So. 2d 840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1984 | Docket: 1651171

Cited 3 times | Published

pursuant to the new sentencing guidelines, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701. Under the guidelines, the recommended sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tucker v. State

78 So. 3d 36, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 55, 2012 WL 29068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2012 | Docket: 2354470

Cited 2 times | Published

written reasons for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11) and Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. AC

44 So. 3d 1240, 2010 WL 3808975

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 1928656

Cited 2 times | Published

"end-run" around the written reason requirements of rule 3.701(d)(11). Contemporaneous written reasons must

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. A.C.

44 So. 3d 1240, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 60295554

Cited 2 times | Published

“end-run” around the written reason requirements of rule 3.701(d)(ll). Contemporaneous written reasons must

Category: Criminal Procedure

FREEMAN-JEW v. State

18 So. 3d 1254, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15524, 2009 WL 3270851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Docket: 1178488

Cited 2 times | Published

sentencing guidelines then in effect. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; 3.988. A scoresheet was prepared listing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peterson v. State

962 So. 2d 367, 2007 WL 2119045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2007 | Docket: 1519395

Cited 2 times | Published

without requiring a reason for departure. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). [W]here there are multiple violations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

870 So. 2d 250, 2004 WL 591027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1697904

Cited 2 times | Published

from the guidelines narrowly permitted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b), (d)(11). The notion that a negotiated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

859 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 22799303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284567

Cited 2 times | Published

2d 143, 144 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snipes v. State

793 So. 2d 1107, 2001 WL 988029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2001 | Docket: 1266266

Cited 2 times | Published

2d 103, 104 (Fla.1989)); see generally Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5)(B). Neither the trial court nor this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bull v. State

782 So. 2d 921, 2001 WL 280258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 456394

Cited 2 times | Published

753 So.2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)). Furthermore, the State benefitted by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bull v. State

782 So. 2d 921, 2001 WL 280258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 456394

Cited 2 times | Published

753 So.2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)). Furthermore, the State benefitted by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trombley v. State

754 So. 2d 121, 2000 WL 282339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2000 | Docket: 1523566

Cited 2 times | Published

require adjudication by the court." See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). In this case, Trombley entered his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Isom v. State

750 So. 2d 734, 2000 WL 121275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2000 | Docket: 1736584

Cited 2 times | Published

the definition of legal constraint. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(6) (1988). This defendant is correct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

750 So. 2d 709, 2000 WL 27543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2000 | Docket: 1430863

Cited 2 times | Published

lawful sentence within the guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701, 3.988(b) (1993). But for the trial judge's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lowe v. State

742 So. 2d 350, 1999 WL 606475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1302924

Cited 2 times | Published

physically injured "during a criminal episode." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (amended effective April 21, 1988)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barr v. State

674 So. 2d 628, 1996 WL 266141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1996 | Docket: 2574069

Cited 2 times | Published

1177 (Ervin, J., dissenting). Barr argues that rule 3.701(d)(11), as interpreted by such cases as Varner

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sinks v. State

661 So. 2d 303, 1995 WL 598594

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1995 | Docket: 2573208

Cited 2 times | Published

from the original guideline range cell. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wick v. State

651 So. 2d 765, 1995 WL 91851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1995 | Docket: 476426

Cited 2 times | Published

articulated at the time sentence is imposed." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, Sentencing Guidelines Commission Notes,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peterson v. State

651 So. 2d 781, 1995 WL 92224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1995 | Docket: 476336

Cited 2 times | Published

nature of the offender's criminal history." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(4). Thus, the requirement of finality

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

650 So. 2d 639, 1995 WL 37339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1995 | Docket: 1345757

Cited 2 times | Published

"ambiguous or impossible to determine," under rule 3.701(d)(5)(C). It was the equivalent of the present

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

645 So. 2d 1042, 1994 WL 616896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1223253

Cited 2 times | Published

fifteen years. § 775.082, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wray v. State

639 So. 2d 621, 1994 WL 178061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1994 | Docket: 1310260

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence is the preponderance of the evidence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6).[1] We conclude that the record supports

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

635 So. 2d 1073, 1994 WL 160099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1994 | Docket: 1353184

Cited 2 times | Published

noted in Karchesky, effective July 1, 1987, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7. provided that "victim injury shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Glover

634 So. 2d 247, 1994 WL 94308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1994 | Docket: 1737683

Cited 2 times | Published

written, acceptable reason for departure. *249 Rule 3.701(b)(6), Rules of Criminal Procedures, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

631 So. 2d 390, 1994 WL 43519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1994 | Docket: 1465022

Cited 2 times | Published

years. However, the 3-cell bump-up authorized by rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Browning v. State

625 So. 2d 960, 1993 WL 424188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1993 | Docket: 474293

Cited 2 times | Published

convictions are invalid reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Brown v. State, 481 So.2d 1271, 1272

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rice v. State

622 So. 2d 1129, 1993 WL 306727

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1993 | Docket: 1528954

Cited 2 times | Published

Rice in the 4 1/2 to 5 1/2 year range. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) (providing that the sentence imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boomer v. State

616 So. 2d 991, 1993 WL 113520

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1993 | Docket: 1726725

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence unless a written reason is given." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). We note that capital felonies are

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McKendry

614 So. 2d 1158, 1993 WL 36289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1993 | Docket: 1509872

Cited 2 times | Published

thereby removing the sentencing court's discretion. Rule 3.701(d)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1989)

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Robertson

614 So. 2d 1155, 1993 WL 36288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1993 | Docket: 449301

Cited 2 times | Published

adoption of the sentencing guidelines. We cited rule 3.701(d)(9), which provides in part that "If the recommended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

606 So. 2d 470, 1992 WL 280386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1992 | Docket: 136359

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 543 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) and (d)(14) (1989). Four of Appellant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Dreyer

594 So. 2d 327, 1992 WL 29039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1992 | Docket: 1485801

Cited 2 times | Published

range without providing written reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)8; ch. 88-131, § 1, Laws of Fla. Because

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

591 So. 2d 1103, 1992 WL 252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 2562540

Cited 2 times | Published

and PETERSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. [2] See § 775.084(4)(e), Fla. Stat

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilcoxson v. State

577 So. 2d 1388, 1991 WL 4992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1991 | Docket: 1162558

Cited 2 times | Published

672 n. 1 (Fla. 1987), the court stated that Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Short v. State

572 So. 2d 1007, 1991 WL 117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1991 | Docket: 2557550

Cited 2 times | Published

is less than the mandatory penalty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). *1008 There is nothing in Section

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McCall

573 So. 2d 362, 1990 WL 211363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1990 | Docket: 807257

Cited 2 times | Published

delineating the reasons for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Because no written reasons were provided

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

571 So. 2d 429, 1990 WL 191718

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 1653288

Cited 2 times | Published

required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.701(d)(11). Instead, it orally gave two reasons for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

569 So. 2d 888, 1990 WL 178656

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 945982

Cited 2 times | Published

discretion to move into the permitted range. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)8. Of course, a mistake as to the applicable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wichael v. State

567 So. 2d 549, 1990 WL 143338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 1380348

Cited 2 times | Published

for which a defendant is being sentenced. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.5. The guidelines also forbid using criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

True v. State

564 So. 2d 1104, 1990 WL 54993

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1990 | Docket: 1689016

Cited 2 times | Published

range. § 921.0015, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8) and 3.988(c).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fullwood v. State

558 So. 2d 168, 1990 WL 26947

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1990 | Docket: 1364644

Cited 2 times | Published

written reason is given. The Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) provides as follows: The sentencing court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fox v. District Court of Appeal, Fourth Dist.

553 So. 2d 161, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 582, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1172, 1989 WL 145523

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1989 | Docket: 1675672

Cited 2 times | Published

whenever the court enters a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) states: "Any sentence outside the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Arnold

550 So. 2d 154, 1989 WL 122631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1989 | Docket: 1370090

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence.[1] However, there is no authority under Rule 3.701 for a trial judge to substitute electronic monitoring

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Arnold

550 So. 2d 154, 1989 WL 122631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1989 | Docket: 1370090

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence.[1] However, there is no authority under Rule 3.701 for a trial judge to substitute electronic monitoring

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

543 So. 2d 1289, 1989 WL 53342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1989 | Docket: 1436918

Cited 2 times | Published

appellant's sentencing militates against his position. Rule 3.701 d.1., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provided:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

543 So. 2d 1289, 1989 WL 53342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1989 | Docket: 1436918

Cited 2 times | Published

appellant's sentencing militates against his position. Rule 3.701 d.1., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provided:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Onesky v. State

544 So. 2d 1048, 1989 WL 52158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1989 | Docket: 1301133

Cited 2 times | Published

victim injury for sentencing purposes. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCaskell v. State

542 So. 2d 461, 1989 WL 43794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1989 | Docket: 468837

Cited 2 times | Published

departure. We agree and, therefore, reverse. Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

545 So. 2d 302, 1989 WL 33983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1989 | Docket: 1345164

Cited 2 times | Published

trial court with directions to comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). "[B]ecause all of the recited reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boom v. State

538 So. 2d 476, 1989 WL 3267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 472533

Cited 2 times | Published

conform Boom's sentence to the prescription of rule 3.701(d)(9) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamilton v. State

533 So. 2d 926, 1988 WL 121303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1988 | Docket: 1233083

Cited 2 times | Published

sentencing scoresheet was properly "notched up" under Rule 3.701 d.14. Because of differences in the burden of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eldridge v. State

531 So. 2d 741, 1988 WL 100559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 2551340

Cited 2 times | Published

without requiring a reason for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14. That rule now answers the question

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Whitten

524 So. 2d 1114, 1988 WL 44399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 1057063

Cited 2 times | Published

the recommended guidelines sentence. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), Committee Note (d)(12) (1983). Since

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tollefson v. State

525 So. 2d 957, 1988 WL 47238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 1710677

Cited 2 times | Published

pretrial intervention or diversion programs." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.6. Appellant had received a one-year suspended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nodal v. State

524 So. 2d 476, 1988 WL 39134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1988 | Docket: 1701543

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 490 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The trial court's third reason for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rowe v. State

523 So. 2d 620, 1988 WL 13722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1988 | Docket: 1517210

Cited 2 times | Published

The trial court did fail to comply with Fla.R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11), regarding written reasons for departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coleman v. State

521 So. 2d 265, 1988 WL 16997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1988 | Docket: 1348002

Cited 2 times | Published

offenses for which he has not been convicted. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDonald v. State

520 So. 2d 668, 1988 WL 14568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1988 | Docket: 174850

Cited 2 times | Published

discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The trial court had before it the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Duncan v. State

532 So. 2d 674, 1988 WL 14563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1988 | Docket: 1510211

Cited 2 times | Published

may not be used as a reason for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Scurry v. State, supra. Third, although

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hembree v. State

519 So. 2d 1138, 1988 WL 9014

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 1698599

Cited 2 times | Published

sentenced for a category six offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). His scoresheet, therefore, was required

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hembree v. State

519 So. 2d 1138, 1988 WL 9014

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 1698599

Cited 2 times | Published

sentenced for a category six offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). His scoresheet, therefore, was required

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hopkins

520 So. 2d 301, 1988 WL 6047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1988 | Docket: 1300660

Cited 2 times | Published

State v. Mestas, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla. 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 committee note d(13) (Dec. 19, 1985 amendment);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayes v. State

516 So. 2d 318, 1987 WL 2580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 1266551

Cited 2 times | Published

Commission's recommendation for amendment of Rule 3.701(d)(7). The amendment took effect July 1, 1987

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alexander v. State

513 So. 2d 1117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1987 | Docket: 1689549

Cited 2 times | Published

depart one cell without giving a reason. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Any further departure must be supported

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spivey v. State

512 So. 2d 322, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2248

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1517295

Cited 2 times | Published

of deviating from the guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d. 11.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

511 So. 2d 430, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1987 | Docket: 1338460

Cited 2 times | Published

"unwarranted variation in the sentencing process." Rule 3.701(d)(11), Fla.R.Crim.P. Exemplifying judicial obedience

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ventosa v. State

510 So. 2d 1093, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1864

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 1593208

Cited 2 times | Published

factor for which appellant was not convicted. See Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. (Reasons for deviating from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grandison v. State

506 So. 2d 74, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1987 | Docket: 428019

Cited 2 times | Published

831.01, 831.02, Fla. Stat. (1985). [2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). [3] See also Byrd v. State, 503 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Niemcow

505 So. 2d 670, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1987 | Docket: 1455011

Cited 2 times | Published

is less than the mandatory penalty and under Rule 3.701(d)(9), the mandatory sentence takes precedence

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Northern

503 So. 2d 1001, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 1452716

Cited 2 times | Published

has been convicted and is thus not violative of Rule 3.701(d)(11). [Footnote omitted.] See also Atwaters

Category: Criminal Procedure

Millard v. State

503 So. 2d 939, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1987 | Docket: 1733224

Cited 2 times | Published

So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984). The Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(12) now reads as follows: The sentencing court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

501 So. 2d 139, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1987 | Docket: 2589609

Cited 2 times | Published

points for victim injury in that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7; Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCullum v. State

498 So. 2d 1374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 65

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1335843

Cited 2 times | Published

guidelines scoresheet or considered under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14)); Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sellers v. State

499 So. 2d 43, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1986 | Docket: 1131321

Cited 2 times | Published

appellant had been "arrested 29 times since 1973." Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

496 So. 2d 911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1986 | Docket: 427961

Cited 2 times | Published

accompanying written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). If the sentence is to be increased

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pendleton v. State

493 So. 2d 1111, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1964

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1986 | Docket: 1247225

Cited 2 times | Published

battery, is improper according the proscription of Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gause v. State

491 So. 2d 320, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1986 | Docket: 778243

Cited 2 times | Published

v. State, 472 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Rule 3.701(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weir v. State

490 So. 2d 234, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 2582570

Cited 2 times | Published

the defendant has not been convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). It is clear that reasons two and

Category: Criminal Procedure

DeGroat v. State

489 So. 2d 1163, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 545643

Cited 2 times | Published

§ 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1983). [3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.5(c). [1] See also Tillman v. State, 482

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

487 So. 2d 1158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 1796400

Cited 2 times | Published

departure on a "clear and convincing" basis. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Reason (2), as pointed out by the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Self v. State

487 So. 2d 391, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 959

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1986 | Docket: 1796987

Cited 2 times | Published

case was improper under the plain meaning of rule 3.701(d)(7). The trial judge erred in failing to correct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patterson v. State

486 So. 2d 74, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1986 | Docket: 1714191

Cited 2 times | Published

guidelines by clear and convincing reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Ordinarily, having found a sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peters v. State

485 So. 2d 30, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1986 | Docket: 1680777

Cited 2 times | Published

new sentencing guidelines established by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 with a recommended sentencing range of four

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mestas v. State

484 So. 2d 612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1986 | Docket: 1344225

Cited 2 times | Published

provide written reasons for this departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomason v. State

480 So. 2d 713, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1986 | Docket: 1220982

Cited 2 times | Published

that was used is incorrect according to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d) and the guidelines scoresheets themselves

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

479 So. 2d 861, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 23

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1985 | Docket: 463534

Cited 2 times | Published

the defense, this increase was improper under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. State

479 So. 2d 257, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1985 | Docket: 294027

Cited 2 times | Published

the guidelines presumptive sentencing range. Rule 3.701(d)(9), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. Therefore

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spain v. State

475 So. 2d 944, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1985 | Docket: 1301915

Cited 2 times | Published

imprisonment imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. We affirm. The appellant was tried

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shively v. State

474 So. 2d 352, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1985 | Docket: 1478800

Cited 2 times | Published

COBB, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur. NOTES [1] Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides: Sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGouirk v. State

470 So. 2d 31

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 1676621

Cited 2 times | Published

available for persons sentenced thereunder. See Rule 3.701(b)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Therefore

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tanner v. State

468 So. 2d 505, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1985 | Docket: 1725488

Cited 2 times | Published

so only for clear and convincing reasons. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). Accordingly, we affirm appellant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Farrow v. State

464 So. 2d 689, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661142

Cited 2 times | Published

rather than separate ones for each offense. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). This appears to us to be harmless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Farrow v. State

464 So. 2d 689, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661142

Cited 2 times | Published

rather than separate ones for each offense. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). This appears to us to be harmless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

464 So. 2d 638, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1985 | Docket: 2576123

Cited 2 times | Published

imposed outside the sentencing guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. He contends that no departures from the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hopper v. State

465 So. 2d 1269, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 1694934

Cited 2 times | Published

accordingly, the court, apparently relying upon amended rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, considered

Category: Criminal Procedure

Frazier v. State

463 So. 2d 458, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 368

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1985 | Docket: 106583

Cited 2 times | Published

relying on amended rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Under amended rule 3.701, a sentence imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

MacFarland v. State

462 So. 2d 496, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 43

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1984 | Docket: 1509923

Cited 2 times | Published

1984. At that time, Committee Note (d)(12) to Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provided[1]:

Category: Criminal Procedure

MacFarland v. State

462 So. 2d 496, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 43

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1984 | Docket: 1509923

Cited 2 times | Published

1984. At that time, Committee Note (d)(12) to Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provided[1]:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

453 So. 2d 411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1984 | Docket: 1163546

Cited 2 times | Published

sentences, and to permit his election of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701[1] sentencing guidelines to apply to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Champagne v. State

269 So. 3d 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 64712522

Cited 1 times | Published

includes the plural and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joseph Peter Clarke v. United States

184 So. 3d 1107, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 41, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 277, 2016 WL 533898

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2016 | Docket: 3035598

Cited 1 times | Published

adjudication was withheld. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). The significant factor concerning

Category: Criminal Procedure

Speights v. State

102 So. 3d 671, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18037, 2012 WL 4900827

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2012 | Docket: 60226743

Cited 1 times | Published

element of any offenses at conviction.” See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (1984 Rev.) (emphasis added); see

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

1 So. 3d 1272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1144, 2009 WL 350606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2009 | Docket: 323702

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence for third-degree felonies. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12); Smith v. State, 584 So.2d 154 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Companioni v. State

971 So. 2d 883, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18733, 2007 WL 4179501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 1731907

Cited 1 times | Published

years, for the revocation of probation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). According to Florida Rule of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Thomas

954 So. 2d 1253, 2007 WL 1201757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 316327

Cited 1 times | Published

delineating the reasons for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Sherman, 909 So.2d 963

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

932 So. 2d 1287, 2006 WL 1999444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2006 | Docket: 1684809

Cited 1 times | Published

increase his sentence by a one-cell bump, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14), which placed him in the recommended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perkowski v. State

920 So. 2d 836, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2234, 2006 WL 399247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2006 | Docket: 64842384

Cited 1 times | Published

enacted section 921.0015, Florida Statutes (1987). Rule 3.701(d)(5) defines “prior record” as “any past criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Issel

919 So. 2d 719, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1541, 2006 WL 287356

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 64842088

Cited 1 times | Published

2d 605, 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)); see also Banks v. State, 732 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sherman

909 So. 2d 963, 2005 WL 2088050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2005 | Docket: 2569058

Cited 1 times | Published

delineating the reasons for said departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly, we reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellis v. State

881 So. 2d 685, 2004 WL 1906105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 861932

Cited 1 times | Published

exceed the statutory maximum penalty. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(10). Accordingly, the trial court could

Category: Criminal Procedure

DPB v. State

877 So. 2d 770, 2004 WL 1393381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 1285384

Cited 1 times | Published

and § 921.0015, Fla. Stat. (1993), and Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701, all providing for increased punishment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peters v. State

830 So. 2d 191, 2002 WL 31422861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2002 | Docket: 1516785

Cited 1 times | Published

Sentencing Guidelines Commission Notes, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(4). We now hold that multiple counts

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hill v. State

805 So. 2d 61, 2002 WL 54509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1669469

Cited 1 times | Published

included even if the sentence was suspended. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). Defendant also claims that there

Category: Criminal Procedure

Willis v. State

785 So. 2d 698, 2001 WL 530547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2001 | Docket: 2545580

Cited 1 times | Published

not Count I as argued by Appellee. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(3); see also Jeter v. State, 604 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seccia v. State

786 So. 2d 12, 2001 WL 328562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1681964

Cited 1 times | Published

element of any offenses at conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897

Cited 1 times | Published

921.001(4), Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b). To accomplish these goals, the statute

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

752 So. 2d 85, 2000 WL 220437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2000 | Docket: 1279839

Cited 1 times | Published

Rahmings, 660 So.2d at 1392. See also, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). The state does not dispute Ms. Taylor's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferguson v. State

746 So. 2d 1171, 1999 WL 1076809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1999 | Docket: 783011

Cited 1 times | Published

denial of his motion on that allegation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(c)(1989). However, we reject the state's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gainer v. State

671 So. 2d 240, 1996 WL 160795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1996 | Docket: 1671999

Cited 1 times | Published

must be in accordance with the guidelines." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The scoresheet prepared on May 6

Category: Criminal Procedure

Palmer v. State

667 So. 2d 1018, 1996 WL 64796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1996 | Docket: 454533

Cited 1 times | Published

a score of one hundred seventeen. Pursuant to rule 3.701(d)(12) (effective January 1, 1994), twenty-five

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'NEILL v. State

661 So. 2d 1265, 1995 WL 627454

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 531958

Cited 1 times | Published

cited by O'Neill rely on the Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(5), which directs that any uncertainties in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Logan v. State

619 So. 2d 350, 1993 WL 168328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1993 | Docket: 1721802

Cited 1 times | Published

"bumped" the recommended sentence by one cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). This argument is unavailing. Logan's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Warrender v. State

617 So. 2d 829, 1993 WL 136607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1993 | Docket: 1391508

Cited 1 times | Published

cell without written reasons for departure. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. When multiple violations of probation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haye v. State

615 So. 2d 762, 1993 WL 55931

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1993 | Docket: 1658848

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). [9] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(A) (prior record is "any past criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Traster

610 So. 2d 572, 1992 WL 361317

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 1413591

Cited 1 times | Published

aggravating or mitigating the sentence." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6) and (d)(11); In re Sentencing Guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

605 So. 2d 1002, 1992 WL 277275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1992 | Docket: 1343244

Cited 1 times | Published

*1003 after violations of community control by Rule 3.701 d.14., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayles v. State

608 So. 2d 13, 1992 WL 251397

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1992 | Docket: 1449356

Cited 1 times | Published

and alcohol-related manslaughter charges. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). A category 9 scoresheet is used for any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayles v. State

608 So. 2d 13, 1992 WL 251397

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1992 | Docket: 1449356

Cited 1 times | Published

and alcohol-related manslaughter charges. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). A category 9 scoresheet is used for any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roth v. State

601 So. 2d 613, 1992 WL 138995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 1710970

Cited 1 times | Published

Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.988(a). The Committee Notes to Rule 3.701 state that "[i]nchoate offenses are included

Category: Criminal Procedure

Obojes v. State

590 So. 2d 461, 1991 WL 248686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1991 | Docket: 1512689

Cited 1 times | Published

made the following comment in a footnote: Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) provides: "Any sentence outside of

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Buchanan

580 So. 2d 201, 1991 WL 61803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1365372

Cited 1 times | Published

*203 around the written reason requirements of rule 3.701.d.11. Contemporaneous written reasons must be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Foster v. State

576 So. 2d 937, 1991 WL 41021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1991 | Docket: 1242420

Cited 1 times | Published

discouraging multiple crimes is suspect. NOTES [1] Rule 3.701(d)(1), Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maxwell v. State

576 So. 2d 367, 1991 WL 30430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1991 | Docket: 1242336

Cited 1 times | Published

the one-cell guidelines increase authorized by rule 3.701(d)14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, when

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gordon v. State

575 So. 2d 736, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1477, 1991 WL 22525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1991 | Docket: 64656865

Cited 1 times | Published

Weekley court so held because the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, no

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McKenzie

574 So. 2d 1176, 1991 WL 15557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1991 | Docket: 1729800

Cited 1 times | Published

trial court was mistaken in this conclusion. Rule 3.701.d.9 simply says that when a guidelines score

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henderson v. State

572 So. 2d 972, 1990 WL 205869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1990 | Docket: 479323

Cited 1 times | Published

the maximum of the permitted range pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure (1990)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

563 So. 2d 822, 1990 WL 91865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1990 | Docket: 2560967

Cited 1 times | Published

Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). See also Pope v. State, 561 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Leatherwood

561 So. 2d 459, 1990 WL 66212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1990 | Docket: 2582400

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence of any nonstate prison sanction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).[2] We reverse the sentence of probation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cooper v. State

553 So. 2d 1371, 1989 WL 154950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1989 | Docket: 1258973

Cited 1 times | Published

suspended sentence or the one cell increase of rule 3.701(d)(14), whichever is less. This is consistent

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

549 So. 2d 1385, 1989 WL 120851

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1989 | Docket: 274072

Cited 1 times | Published

permitted by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, we quash the opinion

Category: Criminal Procedure

McNair v. State

540 So. 2d 896, 1989 WL 27651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 2563490

Cited 1 times | Published

year sentences were imposed pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. Each offense involved

Category: Criminal Procedure

Felts v. State

537 So. 2d 995, 1988 WL 2616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 427285

Cited 1 times | Published

of the impact on the victim is prohibited by rule 3.701(b)(1).[3] Appellant seeks remand for resentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

531 So. 2d 1018, 1988 WL 99741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1988 | Docket: 1528560

Cited 1 times | Published

v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See also State v. Pentaude, 500 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thrasher v. State

528 So. 2d 474, 1988 WL 70561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1988 | Docket: 1367676

Cited 1 times | Published

3.701(d)(12) and the committee note thereto. Rule 3.701(d)(12) states: Sentencing for separate offenses:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parrish v. State

527 So. 2d 926, 1988 WL 67258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1988 | Docket: 1526034

Cited 1 times | Published

scoresheets for sentencing in # 2 and # 3. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) (1986). In summary, we affirm the appellant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

McKee v. State

528 So. 2d 417, 1988 WL 57433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1988 | Docket: 1367785

Cited 1 times | Published

927 (Fla. 1987); see also Committee Note, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).[1] In the instant case, the incarcerative

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Jaggers

526 So. 2d 682, 1988 WL 43378

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1988 | Docket: 1272444

Cited 1 times | Published

relating to prior arrests without conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). A finding of guilt has always been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bell v. State

522 So. 2d 989, 1988 WL 27809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1988 | Docket: 1660972

Cited 1 times | Published

an element of the offense at conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7 (1985).[2] Appellant asserts that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

520 So. 2d 105, 1988 WL 11350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1988 | Docket: 1300437

Cited 1 times | Published

record if they are "convictions" as described in Rule 3.701(d)(2) but only if they occurred "within three

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

517 So. 2d 792, 1988 WL 975

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1988 | Docket: 541034

Cited 1 times | Published

v. State, 489 So.2d 25, 29 (Fla. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), i.e., aspects of a higher degree

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lemon

517 So. 2d 117, 1987 WL 3390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 541044

Cited 1 times | Published

§ 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); (d)(11). See State v. Jackson, 478

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kersey v. State

515 So. 2d 261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1987 | Docket: 1467328

Cited 1 times | Published

the language in the revised committee note to rule 3.701.d.10., quoted in Hoefert lends support to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

511 So. 2d 703, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1987 | Docket: 394037

Cited 1 times | Published

sentencing criminal offense; in absence of conviction Rule 3.701(d)(11) prohibits departure on this ground); Johnson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gemme v. State

508 So. 2d 533, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1987 | Docket: 2589070

Cited 1 times | Published

in New York. We disagree with his contention. Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

506 So. 2d 101, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 1336550

Cited 1 times | Published

for the departure. This is clear error. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054

Category: Criminal Procedure

Worthington v. State

501 So. 2d 75, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 276

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1987 | Docket: 120660

Cited 1 times | Published

Fla. Stat. (1985). [3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11. [4] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.c., Committee Note, 1983

Category: Criminal Procedure

Broomhead v. State

497 So. 2d 734, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1986 | Docket: 2391371

Cited 1 times | Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); see Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Myrick v. State

497 So. 2d 728, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1986 | Docket: 1689702

Cited 1 times | Published

which no conviction had been obtained, see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Trainor v. State, 468 So.2d 484

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

488 So. 2d 641, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 1685533

Cited 1 times | Published

additional clear and convincing reasons. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Likewise, this is proper for a violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

486 So. 2d 53, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1986 | Docket: 1713936

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence unsupported by the elements required by Rule 3.701(d)(11) — clear and convincing reasons set forth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Petras v. State

486 So. 2d 44, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 1407017

Cited 1 times | Published

conflict will soon be resolved by the amendments to Rule 3.701(d)(13) and its committee note, which take effect

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ludmin v. State

480 So. 2d 1389, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 1221050

Cited 1 times | Published

indicated beyond the one bracket provided in Rule 3.701(d)(14), the increase must be supported by clear

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stewart v. State

480 So. 2d 1387, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1986 | Docket: 1220124

Cited 1 times | Published

*1389 Prior to adoption of subsection (d)(14) to Rule 3.701, case law was clear that violation of probation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kolbe v. State

480 So. 2d 694, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 96

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 430961

Cited 1 times | Published

court at the time of sentencing, a violation of rule 3.701 d.1., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hallback v. State

479 So. 2d 865, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 13

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 277509

Cited 1 times | Published

UPCHURCH and SHARP, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Rule 3.701(d)(4) reads as follows: Additional offenses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Proctor v. State

480 So. 2d 160, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1985 | Docket: 1221048

Cited 1 times | Published

for grand theft. In view of our construction of rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

471 So. 2d 671, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1985 | Docket: 2543174

Cited 1 times | Published

not follow the guidelines' procedure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). An examination of the transcript of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lawrence v. State

470 So. 2d 102, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1985 | Docket: 2586842

Cited 1 times | Published

forth in the sentencing guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). In sentencing appellant to the maximum

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Viamari

462 So. 2d 1154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 1509879

Cited 1 times | Published

prepared in reliance on a portion of the comment to rule 3.701(d)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

461 So. 2d 274, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1985 | Docket: 464521

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Russell v. State

458 So. 2d 422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1984 | Docket: 1453000

Cited 1 times | Published

convictions have not been obtained. There is nothing in rule 3.701 to suggest that matters excluded for purposes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maged v. State

455 So. 2d 1153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1984 | Docket: 2572713

Cited 1 times | Published

3.701 and Form 3.988(f), and, as required by Rule 3.701 b. 6. and d. 11., articulated in writing his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell Robert Landis v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455586

Published

sentenced. § 921.002(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2022); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(b)(3). The trial court is also permitted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Debose v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455315

Published

Court highlighted that the notes accompanying rule 3.701 suggested that “[a]ny uncertainty in the scoring

Category: Criminal Procedure

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CAMERON MICHAEL CRANDALL

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2023 | Docket: 68092093

Published

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14); State v. Marshall, 869 So. 2d 754

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANDRES DUQUESNE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 65879215

Published

State, 871 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12). Accordingly, on remand, if

Category: Criminal Procedure

TAVARIS JAMAL EVANS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2020 | Docket: 17391433

Published

category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANDRIE J. BONNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2019 | Docket: 16338036

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); Bonney v. State, 252 So. 3d 1203

Category: Criminal Procedure

DAVID FOX v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2019 | Docket: 16280858

Published

commission of the primary offense.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5). We determine the holding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Champagne v. State

269 So. 3d 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 64712523

Published

includes the plural and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed for

Category: Criminal Procedure

RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988954

Published

includes the plural and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988954

Published

includes the plural and vice versa."); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12) ("A sentence must be imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

DAVID WEEKS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

240 So. 3d 101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2018 | Docket: 6314405

Published

sentence Mr. Weeks to the next higher cell under rule 3.701(d)(14) without requiring a reason for departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pinder v. State

217 So. 3d 130, 2017 WL 1018497, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 4617675

Published

a “threat” that was never charged. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). But for Pinder’s misreading

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stuckey v. Jones

226 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 2016 WL 7444955, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178844

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2016 | Docket: 64312008

Published

from the Florida sentencing guidelines (Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701) and increasing [petitioner’s] sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dennewitz v. State

192 So. 3d 662, 2016 WL 3065079, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3068946

Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5) (1992 & 1993) (defining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez-Aguilar v. State

198 So. 3d 792, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3601, 2016 WL 886225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3044949

Published

5 . See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll) (explaining that for offenses prior

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Jimenez

173 So. 3d 1020, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10366, 2015 WL 4095272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2015 | Docket: 2671920

Published

cover multiple counts is an illegal sentence; Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla. R.Crim. P., provides “[a] sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rochelle Hawkins v. State of Florida

162 So. 3d 1099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2015 | Docket: 2650241

Published

the commission of the primary offense.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5). We determine the holding in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sprott v. State

124 So. 3d 400, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16899, 2013 WL 5744692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2013 | Docket: 60235476

Published

addition to "a county jail term alone." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(8). Later, appellant filed a pro se motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ross v. State

88 So. 3d 297, 2012 WL 1392662, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2012 | Docket: 60308224

Published

guidelines promulgated by the Florida Supreme Court in rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which indicated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Treacy v. Lamberti

80 So. 3d 1053, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2012 | Docket: 60305627

Published

the guidelines could be demonstrated. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12), 3.702(d)(18), 3.703(d)(30). Nevertheless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gilmore v. State

64 So. 3d 200, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10643, 2011 WL 2652341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2011 | Docket: 60301397

Published

which the defendant was convicted, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.701(d)(7) (1985), and injury is not an element

Category: Criminal Procedure

Corley v. State

44 So. 3d 109, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9615, 2009 WL 2031177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2009 | Docket: 60295546

Published

1089 (Fla.1987), which, in subsection (d)(7) of Rule 3.701, declared that “Victim injury points shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miller v. State

9 So. 3d 700, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3178, 2009 WL 996389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2009 | Docket: 60309072

Published

fourteen points for victim injury. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(c); 3.701(d)(15); 3.988(c). The State does

Category: Criminal Procedure

Companion v. State

971 So. 2d 883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 64853544

Published

years, for the revocation of probation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). According to Florida Rule of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ledesma v. State

958 So. 2d 477, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7488, 2007 WL 1427472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 64851015

Published

convictions included within the category.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(15). Here, a category 9 scoresheet was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simpson v. State

940 So. 2d 604, 2006 WL 3077619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2006 | Docket: 1503389

Published

departure without written reasons. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11). Therefore, we reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

939 So. 2d 136, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14949, 2006 WL 2570850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2006 | Docket: 64847143

Published

PER CURIAM. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(3)(B) (“The guidelines scoresheet that recommends the most

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weeks v. State

936 So. 2d 670, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12081, 2006 WL 2032523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2006 | Docket: 64846310

Published

prison was within the range permitted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). AFFIRMED. SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knarich v. State

932 So. 2d 257, 2005 WL 2172240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2005 | Docket: 1285649

Published

with the addition of the following language to rule 3.701(d)(12): "Where the offender is being sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dennewitz v. State

899 So. 2d 476, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2005 WL 840187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2005 | Docket: 64837648

Published

distinct offense as an additional offense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(3), (4); Thomason v. State, 480 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martin v. State

876 So. 2d 1256, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9928, 2004 WL 1496649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 64831656

Published

guidelines. Id. at 193. The relevant portion of rule 3.701(d) specifically states: (3) “Primary offense”

Category: Criminal Procedure

D.P.B. v. State

877 So. 2d 770, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 64831834

Published

and § 921.0015, Fla. Stat. (1993), and Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701, all providing for increased punishment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dillard v. State

869 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4095, 2004 WL 626082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 64829189

Published

sentence is the preponderance of the evidence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(b)(6)”). We reverse appellant’s sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Russell v. State

855 So. 2d 722, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15069, 2003 WL 22298995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2003 | Docket: 64825572

Published

PER CURIAM. We affirm based on the authority of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Montgomery

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

852 So. 2d 441, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12554, 2003 WL 21990587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 64824402

Published

921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1995). See also Fla. R. Crim P. 3.701(d)(11), (12). Thus, the sentence imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Horton v. Crosby

848 So. 2d 504, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10828, 2003 WL 21658308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 64823811

Published

So.2d 1167, 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1983)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Horton v. Crosby

848 So. 2d 504, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10828, 2003 WL 21658308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 64823811

Published

So.2d 1167, 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1983)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gibson v. Florida Department of Corrections

828 So. 2d 422, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14577, 2002 WL 31250739

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64818260

Published

eliminate unwarranted variation in sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b). One guidelines scoresheet must be utilized

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jongewaard v. State

824 So. 2d 1009, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12524, 2002 WL 1997979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2002 | Docket: 64817157

Published

category 1, category 2, category 3 or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mosley v. State

820 So. 2d 395, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7619, 2002 WL 1071921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 64816220

Published

Both counts are category 2 offenses pursuant to Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. He was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gove v. Florida Parole Com'n

816 So. 2d 1150, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5466, 2002 WL 730732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2002 | Docket: 1753481

Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marker v. State

795 So. 2d 1037, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12865, 2001 WL 1040382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2001 | Docket: 64809022

Published

violation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.988(b) (1992); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14) (1992). Because Marker received a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Terry v. State

789 So. 2d 1177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 2001 WL 776223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2001 | Docket: 64806918

Published

counts. An 1985 amendment to the committee note to rule 3.701(d)(5) added: For any offense where the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yankovski v. State

785 So. 2d 1283, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7892, 2001 WL 627584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2001 | Docket: 64805655

Published

810.02(3), Florida Statutes (1991). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(10) (when guideline sentence exceeds

Category: Criminal Procedure

Russell v. State

786 So. 2d 54, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6677, 2001 WL 514365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 64805667

Published

primary or additional offenses at conviction.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). Defendant asserts that his prior

Category: Criminal Procedure

Titel v. State

788 So. 2d 286, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14791, 2000 WL 1700929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 64806370

Published

convictions were analogous to Florida crimes. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(B) (in scoring out-of-state conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fitzgerald v. State

765 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11460, 2000 WL 1268786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2000 | Docket: 64799737

Published

now substituted. PER CURIAM AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1). THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and W. SHARP

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stephenson v. State

737 So. 2d 1154, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8534, 1999 WL 420369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 64789639

Published

. § 800.04(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)14.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rogers v. State

730 So. 2d 716, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 1999 WL 30673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 64787629

Published

reason is given for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12). Rogers’ guideline sentencing range

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. King

723 So. 2d 932, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 334, 1999 WL 18032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1999 | Docket: 64785310

Published

Because a trial court does not have authority under rule 3.701 to substitute probation for a prison sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. West

718 So. 2d 266, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11316, 1998 WL 558987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783174

Published

downward are required. § 921.0016(l)(c); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). We think the trial court’s belated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jessie v. State

714 So. 2d 1220, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10137, 1998 WL 472563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1998 | Docket: 64782000

Published

exceeded the maximum permitted by statute. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(10) (1991). Accordingly, appellant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGlothlin v. State

714 So. 2d 640, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9526, 1998 WL 422307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 64781876

Published

from the recommended guidelines range. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). In other words, although a plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

707 So. 2d 1204, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3825, 1998 WL 171416

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 64779814

Published

sentencing points for “severe” victim injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); see Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Albritton v. State

709 So. 2d 101, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 162, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 448, 1998 WL 122246

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1998 | Docket: 64780118

Published

habitual offender sentence. 681 So.2d at 1141. Under Rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

LaFountain v. State

700 So. 2d 774, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11534, 1997 WL 633899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 64776320

Published

deviating from the sentencing guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). Because the trial judge failed to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Childers v. Department of Environmental Protection

696 So. 2d 962, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8173, 1997 WL 402381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1997 | Docket: 64774873

Published

governing sentencing guidelines. E.g., Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(2). See also McCrae v. State, 395 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waddell v. State

694 So. 2d 146, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6183, 1997 WL 291492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 64773890

Published

the effective date of the 1988 amendments to rule 3.701(d). Snyder v. State, 615 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1st

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cook v. State

691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3151, 1997 WL 154773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1997 | Docket: 64772269

Published

guidelines cell or a one-cell bump-up. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, we remand the cause

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

692 So. 2d 155, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 175, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 328, 1997 WL 151790

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1997 | Docket: 64772599

Published

covered under the definition for “prior record” in rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deason v. State

688 So. 2d 988, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1773, 1997 WL 82131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1997 | Docket: 64771503

Published

category 1, category 2, category 3, or category 4 of Rule 3.701 and Rule 3.988, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Simmons

687 So. 2d 827, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 19, 1997 WL 57204

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771046

Published

Sentencing Guidelines Commission note (d)(8)8 to rule 3.701, which is applicable to the pre-1994 guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Poe v. State

689 So. 2d 333, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1231, 1997 WL 47276

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Docket: 64771620

Published

scoresheets are properly prepared. See generally, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701 Commission Notes (d)(1) (1988). This case

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lea v. State

687 So. 2d 1354, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 402, 1997 WL 43452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1997 | Docket: 64771161

Published

“prior record” or an “additional offense.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.988. The trial court’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

685 So. 2d 1277, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 5, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2155, 1996 WL 726856

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 64770230

Published

the pre-1994 sentencing guidelines contained in rule 3.701, which provided: The sentencing court shall impose

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snouffer v. State

684 So. 2d 247, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12731, 1996 WL 691397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1996 | Docket: 64769535

Published

prior record must be scored in accordance with rule 3.701(d)(5)(F). Affirmed in part, reversed in part

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Jordan

678 So. 2d 526, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9124, 1996 WL 492167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1996 | Docket: 64766765

Published

Williams, 652 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). Moreover, the oral reasons expressed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

679 So. 2d 42, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 1996 WL 476337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1996 | Docket: 64767094

Published

injury where there are one or more victims.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(15) (1994).1 JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cooper v. State

678 So. 2d 865, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8390, 1996 WL 454788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1996 | Docket: 64766897

Published

scoresheet. See § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1987), Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). Once operating outside the guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

J.M. v. State

677 So. 2d 890, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 64766469

Published

guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701; ch. 83-87, § Laws of Fla. The sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Brown

675 So. 2d 991, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054, 1996 WL 309987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1996 | Docket: 64765515

Published

plain mandate of both section 921.001(6) and rule 3.701(d)(ll), that any departure from the recommended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reid v. State

673 So. 2d 972, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5482, 1996 WL 278823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1996 | Docket: 64764748

Published

require written reasons for a departure. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The appellant’s first claim of error

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

674 So. 2d 110, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 209, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 778, 1996 WL 254376

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1996 | Docket: 64764916

Published

conviction as a third-degree felony. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(C). Harris asserted that since the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bover v. State

671 So. 2d 828, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3547, 1996 WL 164627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1996 | Docket: 64763867

Published

supervision. § 775.082(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Rule 3.701(d)(10) Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also, e.g., Eubanks

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

685 So. 2d 1330, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3045, 1996 WL 135508

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1996 | Docket: 64770253

Published

were legal at the time of Williams’ offense. Rule 3.701(d)(7), (1992)1 states: “[V]ictim injury shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

677 So. 2d 309, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 1996 WL 100837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1996 | Docket: 64766302

Published

minimum guidelines range. Comm. Note (d)(12) Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. The trial judge may, of course, depart

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

667 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 873, 1996 WL 46887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 64762203

Published

unwarranted variation in the sentencing process.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b); see Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259

Category: Criminal Procedure

Long v. State

666 So. 2d 1059, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 637, 1996 WL 39618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1996 | Docket: 64761756

Published

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)12. . “Credit for time served” was Long’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. Singletary

666 So. 2d 986, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 241, 1996 WL 14051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 64761711

Published

1993). At the time of the offense at issue here, rule 3.701(d)(7) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eubanks v. State

662 So. 2d 1360, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12290, 1995 WL 689518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 64760211

Published

reversed and remanded for resentencing. E.g., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10); State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380, 383

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Weaver

662 So. 2d 1019, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103, 1995 WL 680449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1995 | Docket: 64760133

Published

reasons for the downward departure as required by rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hills v. State

661 So. 2d 1314, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583, 1995 WL 642673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1995 | Docket: 64759624

Published

for violation of community control, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14), places Hills in the “2½ — 5⅜” range

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hubbs v. State

661 So. 2d 1282, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11424, 1995 WL 637504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1995 | Docket: 64759605

Published

Florida sentencing guidelines seoresheet. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(B) & (E).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

659 So. 2d 1360, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9424, 1995 WL 527192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1995 | Docket: 64758587

Published

and a Category 3 scoresheet offense. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4) and (5). .Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(vi)

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lamar

659 So. 2d 262, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 431, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1389

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1995 | Docket: 64758290

Published

primary offense. *265593 So.2d at 497 (quoting rule 3.701).4 In other words, under this sentencing scheme

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tucker v. State

657 So. 2d 1219, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7115, 1995 WL 385380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 64757847

Published

considered in imposing a departure sentence. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.ll. Nor does it appear Tucker’s criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bransfield v. State

657 So. 2d 1191, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 1995 WL 316361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 64757842

Published

offense. The latter scoresheet was correct. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d. In resentencing a defendant after violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bransfield v. State

657 So. 2d 1191, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 1995 WL 316361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 64757842

Published

offense. The latter scoresheet was correct. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d. In resentencing a defendant after violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harden v. State

655 So. 2d 187, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5407, 1995 WL 302340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1995 | Docket: 64756458

Published

that was “criminal” and “judicial.” See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) (defining legal status at the time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barr v. State

655 So. 2d 1175, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5069, 1995 WL 276076

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1995 | Docket: 64756665

Published

Williams and Tyner, both of which held that rule 3.701(d)(ll) prohibits departure sentences based on

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rias v. State

653 So. 2d 495, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4179, 1995 WL 232561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1995 | Docket: 64755496

Published

State, 625 So.2d 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). This reason is an invalid reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

653 So. 2d 484, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3685, 1995 WL 214675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 64755487

Published

departure sentence rendered in this case. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The one cell bump up allowed the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bankston v. State

651 So. 2d 719, 1995 WL 69030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1995 | Docket: 1518286

Published

Weekly D77 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 28, 1994); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). On motion for rehearing, the state

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pearson v. State

650 So. 2d 210, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 1995 WL 59542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1995 | Docket: 64754188

Published

109 S.Ct. 250, 102 L.Ed.2d 239 (1988)); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The trial court, by noting on the

Category: Criminal Procedure

King v. State

648 So. 2d 183, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 13196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1994 | Docket: 64753229

Published

must be in accordance with the guidelines.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); see Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coleman v. State

647 So. 2d 299, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12171, 1994 WL 697477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1994 | Docket: 64752942

Published

both the recommended and permitted ranges. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8); Williams v. State, 611 So.2d 1334

Category: Criminal Procedure

Doyle v. State

644 So. 2d 1041, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 64752016

Published

sentencing defendant in these cases. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Clark v. State, 572 So.2d 1387 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dautel v. State

647 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11104, 1994 WL 637296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752915

Published

of guilt resulting from plea or trial.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(2) (1993) (emphasis supplied). Here the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castaline v. State

645 So. 2d 561, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11022, 1994 WL 637730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752246

Published

rather than, as urged, a slight injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). See Williams v. State, 614 So.2d 640

Category: Criminal Procedure

Colbert v. State

646 So. 2d 234, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 1994 WL 576167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64752502

Published

See § 921.001(5)-(8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). In this case, the trial judge did

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vela v. State

645 So. 2d 30, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10120, 1994 WL 576106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64752146

Published

could not possibly increase to 15 years. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Because we do not have Vela’s scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harvard v. State

643 So. 2d 712, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 1994 WL 568457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1994 | Docket: 64751440

Published

retroactive application of the new rule. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

642 So. 2d 838, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9294, 1994 WL 524293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1994 | Docket: 64750895

Published

prior to commission of the primary offense. See rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P. Accordingly, we reverse

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

641 So. 2d 976, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8853, 1994 WL 498414

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1994 | Docket: 64750552

Published

scoresheet error affected the guidelines range. Rule 3.701(d)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prince v. State

641 So. 2d 496, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367, 1994 WL 454877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750412

Published

his “prior record.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5) (1993) 1; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(G) (1993).2 In our

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnett v. State

642 So. 2d 575, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7992, 1994 WL 419084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1994 | Docket: 64750817

Published

scoresheet, recommends the most severe *576sanction. Rule 3.701(d)(3), Fla.R.Crim.P. The state attorney is to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cave v. State

642 So. 2d 10, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9783, 1994 WL 382934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1994 | Docket: 64750607

Published

670, 672 n. 1 (Fla.1987), the court stated that Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grant v. State

639 So. 2d 1100, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7219, 1994 WL 380928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1994 | Docket: 64749714

Published

conduct resulting in a conviction. . Under rule 3.701(d)(20), a conviction is a consequence of a determination

Category: Criminal Procedure

Welch v. State

639 So. 2d 1068, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6893, 1994 WL 330321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1994 | Docket: 64749708

Published

for which a defendant is not convicted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Pennant v. State, 600 So.2d 526 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Aciego v. State

641 So. 2d 122, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5877, 1994 WL 259667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1994 | Docket: 64750295

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Booker v. State, 397 So.2d 910, 914 (Fla.), cert. denied

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jory v. State

647 So. 2d 152, 1994 WL 236385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1994 | Docket: 1524752

Published

because no convictions have been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

637 So. 2d 368, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5271, 1994 WL 234354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1994 | Docket: 64748542

Published

which we conclude to have merit. Contrary to rule 3.701(d)(5)(G), the trial court erroneously scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Verble v. State

636 So. 2d 890, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, 1994 WL 190009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1994 | Docket: 64748324

Published

must impose a sentence for each offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). The trial judge herein pronounced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kopko v. State

638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3913, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 64749188

Published

resentenc-ing pursuant to the guidelines. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stoudmire v. State

636 So. 2d 118, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3549, 1994 WL 133535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1994 | Docket: 64748139

Published

pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d); Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tuck v. State

632 So. 2d 663, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1228, 1994 WL 46917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1994 | Docket: 64746570

Published

one-cell bump-up. § 948.06, Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. Cf. Ogden v. State, 605 So.2d 155

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pankhurst v. State

632 So. 2d 142, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 845, 1994 WL 36872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1994 | Docket: 64746457

Published

for resen-tencing within the guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14), and for the award of credit for time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whichard v. State

630 So. 2d 231, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 330, 1994 WL 20930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1994 | Docket: 64745773

Published

(1991); § 921.001(5)(6), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d). REVERSED AND REMANDED. PETERSON and DIAMANTIS

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burnett v. State

627 So. 2d 1355, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189, 1993 WL 540165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744735

Published

also has the option of a one cell bump-up. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tindle v. State

627 So. 2d 1354, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13186, 1993 WL 540161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744732

Published

section 948.06(1), Florida Statutes (1989) and Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. King

629 So. 2d 278, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347, 1993 WL 523966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1993 | Docket: 64745019

Published

1281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), this court interpreted rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Disbrow

626 So. 2d 1123, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11973, 1993 WL 495983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1993 | Docket: 64744127

Published

(or as here, community control). As such, under Rule 3.701(d)(ll), it is a downward departure sentence,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

626 So. 2d 1119, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11933, 1993 WL 492547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 64744119

Published

So.2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). We reverse and remand for resentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines

628 So. 2d 1084, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 490876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744908

Published

[Additions underlined; deletions struck-through] RULE 3.701 SENTENCING GUIDELINES (c) Offense Categories

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sequoia v. State

624 So. 2d 381, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9464, 1993 WL 369352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1993 | Docket: 64742990

Published

have imposed plus a one-cell bump up. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bowman v. State

620 So. 2d 1036, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5969, 1993 WL 182517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1993 | Docket: 64697439

Published

reasons for entering a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.ll. Since the trial court failed to enter

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Jones

625 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739, 1993 WL 174882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1993 | Docket: 64743783

Published

001(5), (6), (7) and (8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We are concerned that to apply that

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Jones

625 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739, 1993 WL 174882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1993 | Docket: 64743783

Published

001(5), (6), (7) and (8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We are concerned that to apply that

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Stone

617 So. 2d 355, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4143, 1993 WL 113315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 64695777

Published

Whether the trial court’s failure to comply with Rule. 3.701(d)(ll) can be the basis of a claim of ineffective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Felty v. State

616 So. 2d 88, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3005, 1993 WL 75789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1993 | Docket: 64695249

Published

term permitted by law. See Comm.Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). We are inclined to follow the Collins

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schmitt v. State

614 So. 2d 637, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2150, 1993 WL 46131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1993 | Docket: 64694625

Published

a sentencing guidelines scoresheet. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(13); and Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

613 So. 2d 1307, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 113, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 172, 1993 WL 32299

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1993 | Docket: 64694361

Published

guidelines to those changes, categories 4, 6, and 7 of rule 3.701(c) are amended to read as follows: Category 4:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Turner v. State

611 So. 2d 1363, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 200, 1993 WL 9785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1993 | Docket: 64693408

Published

sentence by one cell for a probation violation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The recommended range of a second

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

613 So. 2d 924, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 148, 1993 WL 8863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1993 | Docket: 64694091

Published

State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c). The trial court failed to set forth reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

611 So. 2d 1334, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 87, 1993 WL 5312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1993 | Docket: 64693395

Published

committed Williams to seven years in prison. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Howell

611 So. 2d 5, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12503, 1992 WL 362208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1992 | Docket: 64693113

Published

must not exceed the statutory maximum. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)10. On remand, we alert the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vitiello v. State

609 So. 2d 111, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11781, 1992 WL 341952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1992 | Docket: 64692262

Published

herein. GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL, J., concur. . Rule 3.701(d)(3)(b) Fla.R.Crim.P. . We do not find in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Douglas v. State

606 So. 2d 1281, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11360, 1992 WL 322991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1992 | Docket: 64670939

Published

141(4), 947.146(11), Fla.Stat. Douglas cites Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

605 So. 2d 1021, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10680, 1992 WL 281874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1992 | Docket: 64670146

Published

an additional offense at conviction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5) committee note (stating that on earlier

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sheffield v. State

605 So. 2d 1323, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10888, 1992 WL 280776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1992 | Docket: 64670506

Published

the requirement of a written explanation.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8). Therefore, the original twenty year

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sheffield v. State

605 So. 2d 1323, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10888, 1992 WL 280776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1992 | Docket: 64670506

Published

the requirement of a written explanation.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(8). Therefore, the original twenty year

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

606 So. 2d 675, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 1992 WL 235358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1992 | Docket: 64670847

Published

reason for departure. The Lettman court reasoned: Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walsh v. State

606 So. 2d 636, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9335, 1992 WL 213080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1992 | Docket: 64670845

Published

by degrees and the question is whether under Rule 3.701 d.5.a)3) the degree of the offense was “impossible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamilton v. State

603 So. 2d 606, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8070, 1992 WL 175550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1992 | Docket: 64669285

Published

purposes are those specifically enumerated within Rule 3.701(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

602 So. 2d 604, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6763, 1992 WL 143618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1992 | Docket: 64668979

Published

scoresheet prior to the imposition of a sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dominguez v. State

601 So. 2d 300, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7266, 1992 WL 138820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 64668617

Published

Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alvarez v. State

600 So. 2d 559, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6900, 1992 WL 134839

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 64668030

Published

1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). The Committee Note to rule 3.701 d.1.,1 which makes the sentencing court responsible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Witherspoon v. State

601 So. 2d 607, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6521, 1992 WL 134878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 64668665

Published

“prior record” is for an out-of-state offense, rule 3.701.d.5(a) of the guidelines provides: (2) When scoring

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blizzard v. State

600 So. 2d 542, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6555, 1992 WL 131893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1992 | Docket: 64668018

Published

would be without merit. The committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pennant v. State

600 So. 2d 526, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6248, 1992 WL 126556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1992 | Docket: 64668008

Published

instant offense which was not prosecuted. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Banzo v. State, 464 So.2d 620 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

599 So. 2d 279, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425, 1992 WL 115772

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1992 | Docket: 64667579

Published

555 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Accordingly, while the judgment of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marshall v. State

600 So. 2d 474, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5383, 1992 WL 104642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1992 | Docket: 64667993

Published

which the defendant has been acquitted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); State v. Jaggers, 526 So.2d 682,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dolan v. State

598 So. 2d 291, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5369, 1992 WL 101260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 64667153

Published

Amendment (applicable to this case) provides: Rule 3.701.d.7 Victim injury shall be scored for each victim

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

599 So. 2d 1017, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4876, 1992 WL 83874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1992 | Docket: 64667809

Published

appellant’s sentence only to the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, the sentence imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Varner v. State

597 So. 2d 426, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4619, 1992 WL 80993

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1992 | Docket: 64666783

Published

for which Varner has not been convicted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Allen v. State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brozik v. State

595 So. 2d 1111, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3879, 1992 WL 64459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1992 | Docket: 64666142

Published

adjusted for the probation violation. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) and (d)(14). However, the declaration

Category: Criminal Procedure

Orr v. State

597 So. 2d 833, 1992 WL 63447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1992 | Docket: 1704894

Published

guidelines do not apply to capital felonies. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c) (Committee Note). Since first degree murder

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ludeman v. State

595 So. 2d 978, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1992 WL 35367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1992 | Docket: 64666092

Published

offenses at conviction” under Rule 3.701 d.4. or as “prior record” under Rule 3.701 d.5.a). Several years ago

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez v. State

593 So. 2d 331, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 1992 WL 32813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1992 | Docket: 64665164

Published

to sentence the defendant in this case. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). See also Clark v. State, 572 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Salves v. State

592 So. 2d 378, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 633, 1992 WL 16010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1992 | Docket: 64664567

Published

statement delineating the reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); see also State v. Jackson, 478 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alvarez v. State

592 So. 2d 1213, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 540, 1992 WL 12078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1992 | Docket: 64664852

Published

sentence must be imposed for each offense.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). We therefore vacate the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Steiner v. State

591 So. 2d 1070, 1991 WL 279434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 64664430

Published

accordance with the guidelines.” (Emphasis added.) Rule 3.701(d)(14) appears controlling because community

Category: Criminal Procedure

Steiner v. State

591 So. 2d 1070, 1991 WL 279434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 64664430

Published

accordance with the guidelines.” (Emphasis added.) Rule 3.701(d)(14) appears controlling because community

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gordon v. State

589 So. 2d 1024, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11919, 1991 WL 253342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1991 | Docket: 64663291

Published

third-degree felony to which he pled. Further, under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stinson v. State

590 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11883, 1991 WL 248623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1991 | Docket: 64663496

Published

701 & 3.988), 522 So.2d 374, 379 (Fla.1988). Rule 3.701.d.8 provides that non-state prison sanctions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fletcher v. State

593 So. 2d 514, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11867, 1991 WL 248608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1991 | Docket: 64665244

Published

more serious offense scored as “prior record” (Rule 3.701.d.5.) OR (2) should a single scoresheet be used

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

589 So. 2d 439, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11447, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2920

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1991 | Docket: 64663128

Published

record reveals that the score sheet is correct. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

588 So. 2d 1047, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11125, 1991 WL 229785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1991 | Docket: 64662901

Published

even when the one cell bump-up permitted by rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure-sentencing Guidelines (rules 3.701 & 3.988)

589 So. 2d 271, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 725, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1914, 1991 WL 236191

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1991 | Docket: 64663082

Published

[Additions underlined; deletions struck through] RULE 3.701 SENTENCING GUIDELINES [[Image here]] c. Offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodwell v. State

588 So. 2d 19, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10286, 1991 WL 206840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1991 | Docket: 64662541

Published

(filed) “contemporaneously” as required. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d 11. (Committee Note); Ree v. State, 565

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

586 So. 2d 504, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15190, 1991 WL 196308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1991 | Docket: 64661799

Published

criminal episode against one victim, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Stermer v. State, 567 So.2d 13 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Giron v. State

584 So. 2d 238, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9010, 1991 WL 168378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660900

Published

entry of an appropriate sentence as provided in Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Giron v. State

584 So. 2d 238, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9010, 1991 WL 168378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660900

Published

entry of an appropriate sentence as provided in Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Charles v. State

584 So. 2d 227, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8186, 1991 WL 159139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1991 | Docket: 64660886

Published

that the 1987 amendment to the committee note to rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, omitted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harrison v. State

585 So. 2d 393, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8190, 1991 WL 159158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1991 | Docket: 64661340

Published

So.2d 304 (1947). The state further relies on rule 3.701(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to classify

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oglesby v. State

584 So. 2d 93, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1991 WL 138135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1991 | Docket: 64660818

Published

Ewing majority relied on a committee note to rule 3.701 which approves community control as a “viable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

582 So. 2d 817, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7489, 1991 WL 136863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1991 | Docket: 64660171

Published

he was neither charged nor convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Hallman v. State, 560 So.2d 223 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Waldo

582 So. 2d 820, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7099, 1991 WL 136884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1991 | Docket: 64660176

Published

minimum guidelines range. Comm.Note (d)(12) Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. The trial judge may, of course, depart

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lovely v. State

582 So. 2d 801, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992, 1991 WL 131916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1991 | Docket: 64660161

Published

1986); and (3) unconstitutional application of rule 3.701; Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wise v. State

582 So. 2d 776, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7058, 1991 WL 133436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1991 | Docket: 64660155

Published

incorrectly calculated scoresheet. In accordance with rule 3.701(b)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

McPherson v. State

581 So. 2d 1006, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6504, 1991 WL 118239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1991 | Docket: 64659881

Published

ONE-CELL BUMP FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION UNDER RULE 3.701(d)(14), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thrift v. State

581 So. 2d 655, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6501, 1991 WL 118238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1991 | Docket: 64659605

Published

ONE-CELL BUMP FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION UNDER RULE 3.701(d)(14), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hruska v. State

582 So. 2d 129, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6136, 1991 WL 117020

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660007

Published

the points assessed for legal constraint, see Rule 3.701(d)(6), and a hiatus in the purported split sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pollis v. State

581 So. 2d 991, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6091, 1991 WL 115589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1991 | Docket: 64659873

Published

State, 496 So.2d 894 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). The deletion from the scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

581 So. 2d 970, 1991 WL 105615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1991 | Docket: 1283894

Published

bump-up for the violation of probation. [2] Rule 3.701 d.1.; Foster v. State, 576 So.2d 937 (Fla. 5th

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nesmith v. State

580 So. 2d 898, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6430, 1991 WL 109695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 64659311

Published

guidelines range one-cell increase authorized by Rule 3.701(d)(14). JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swinson v. State

579 So. 2d 927, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5142, 1991 WL 93526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1991 | Docket: 64658872

Published

Commission to clarify the committee notes appended to Rule 3.701 d.6., wherein the commission states it was never

Category: Criminal Procedure

Furlow v. State

579 So. 2d 910, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4975, 1991 WL 87961

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1991 | Docket: 64658842

Published

permitted for the violation of probation (Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701.d.l4.); (2) the permitted range on the new

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

579 So. 2d 377, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4575, 1991 WL 80034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1991 | Docket: 64658666

Published

SCHOONOVER, C.J. and DANAHY, J., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Butler v. State

579 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4250, 1991 WL 72093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1991 | Docket: 64658635

Published

convictions as “additional offenses at conviction.” Rule 3.701(d)(3)b states that the guidelines scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Booker v. State

578 So. 2d 818, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 1991 WL 60853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658334

Published

scoresheet. We agree. In 1987, the legislature amended Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Booker v. State

578 So. 2d 818, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 1991 WL 60853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658334

Published

scoresheet. We agree. In 1987, the legislature amended Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pennington v. State

578 So. 2d 815, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3823, 1991 WL 61219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1991 | Docket: 64658332

Published

limited to the one-cell increase permitted by rule 3.701(d)14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

577 So. 2d 1006, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3545, 1991 WL 56386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1991 | Docket: 64657993

Published

properly bumped the sentence by one cell pursuant to rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Irizarry v. State

578 So. 2d 711, 1990 WL 58259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1991 | Docket: 440528

Published

years. With the one-cell increase authorized by Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waddell v. State

577 So. 2d 678, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2919, 1991 WL 44989

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 64657912

Published

probation, should not exceed that maximum. See Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clifton v. State

576 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2515, 1991 WL 38138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1991 | Docket: 64657461

Published

sentence should be used in sentencing. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3). However, the transcript of the sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stroud v. State

576 So. 2d 880, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2465, 1991 WL 35987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1991 | Docket: 64657453

Published

488 (Fla.1990). The Lla-bona opinion notes that rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Johnson

591 So. 2d 204, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2323, 1991 WL 35415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1991 | Docket: 64664191

Published

written reasons for departure. We agree based on Rule 3.701(d)(ll) and Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re: Sentencing Guidelines

576 So. 2d 1307, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 198, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 411, 1991 WL 28402

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1991 | Docket: 64657567

Published

[Additions underlined; deletions struck through] RULE 3.701 SENTENCING GUIDELINES [[Image here]] c. Offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Natvik v. State

574 So. 2d 1230, 1991 WL 22982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1991 | Docket: 2578797

Published

status. Any one of the circumstances cataloged in Rule 3.701 d.6. is sufficient to create the status of being

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pire v. State

575 So. 2d 299, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1435, 1991 WL 22523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1991 | Docket: 64656612

Published

the next higher cell (guidelines range). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14. The “bumped-up” cell (guidelines range)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stafford v. State

573 So. 2d 884, 1990 WL 192318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1991 | Docket: 479230

Published

scoresheet. This was error. Committee note (d)(5) to Rule 3.701 Florida rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McCulloch

573 So. 2d 395, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 245, 1991 WL 3177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1991 | Docket: 64655937

Published

departure without providing written reasons. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gordon v. State

572 So. 2d 33, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15, 1991 WL 142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1991 | Docket: 64655419

Published

sentence may ultimately be the same because of Rule 3.701 d.14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stevens v. State

571 So. 2d 558, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 1990 WL 212130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1990 | Docket: 64655087

Published

and remand for resentencing in accordance with rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peeples v. State

571 So. 2d 86, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9367, 1990 WL 199163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1990 | Docket: 64654969

Published

community control or 12-30 months incarceration. See Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

570 So. 2d 1070, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8990, 1990 WL 183825

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 64654792

Published

. § 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1989). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goss v. State

569 So. 2d 1390, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8992, 1990 WL 183832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1990 | Docket: 64654605

Published

criminal procedure governing the proper procedure. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure says

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miranda v. State

569 So. 2d 890, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8569, 1990 WL 175819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 64654326

Published

give written reasons for its departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) (1987). The state argues, however

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beasley v. State

569 So. 2d 525, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8616, 1990 WL 175763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 64654269

Published

not exceed the one-cell increase provided by Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henderson v. State

571 So. 2d 511, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8370, 1990 WL 166806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1990 | Docket: 64655072

Published

the necessity of a separate departure order, by rule 3.701(d)(12). See Petrillo v. State, 554 So.2d 1227

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

568 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8242, 1990 WL 162391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1990 | Docket: 64653903

Published

a sentence within the next highest cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Reversed. SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY

Category: Criminal Procedure

Karchesky v. State

568 So. 2d 80, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7496, 1990 WL 143339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 64653749

Published

physical contact and penetration. The version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pigue v. State

567 So. 2d 530, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7309, 1990 WL 139629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 64653387

Published

corrections. We reverse and remand for resentencing. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

566 So. 2d 590, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1990 WL 132026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1990 | Docket: 64652896

Published

sentences must, therefore, be vacated. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). As to the dealing in stolen property

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.701 & 3.988

566 So. 2d 770, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 458, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1847, 1990 WL 130217

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1990 | Docket: 64652923

Published

barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. APPENDIX Rule 3.701(c) — OFFENSE CATEGORIES (c) Offenses have been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

566 So. 2d 823, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210, 1990 WL 117266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 64652927

Published

used to support a departure sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Rozar v. State, 500 So.2d 659 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reid v. State

565 So. 2d 415, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6107, 1990 WL 116367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1990 | Docket: 64652127

Published

State, 532 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11, 12). See also Tyner v. State, 545

Category: Criminal Procedure

William v. State

564 So. 2d 1262, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6129, 1990 WL 116324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1990 | Docket: 64652038

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b); see Snowden v. State, 449 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beach v. State

564 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5762, 1990 WL 110296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1990 | Docket: 64651893

Published

based on sentencing guidelines calculations under Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that included

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pringal v. State

564 So. 2d 285, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5401, 1990 WL 103144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1990 | Docket: 64651689

Published

one-cell bump for community control violation. Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R. Crim.P. The written reasons for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cartwright v. State

565 So. 2d 784, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5193, 1990 WL 98759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1990 | Docket: 64652393

Published

statutory maximum sentence should be imposed.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10); Stamper v. State, 528 So.2d 1323

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richardson v. State

564 So. 2d 564, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5114, 1990 WL 98485

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1990 | Docket: 64651858

Published

court for sentencing at the same time, and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1) thus requires a current guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

562 So. 2d 844, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4354, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1990 | Docket: 64651056

Published

Statutes (1969), is “impossible to determine” within Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Denegal v. State

562 So. 2d 828, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4074, 1990 WL 74060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1990 | Docket: 64651047

Published

permitted after a violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Denegal then violated his community

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vargas v. State

561 So. 2d 476, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3796, 1990 WL 70609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1990 | Docket: 64650702

Published

defendants have not yet been convicted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Moreover, the guidelines require

Category: Criminal Procedure

Calhoun v. State

561 So. 2d 462, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3547, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1990 | Docket: 64650679

Published

State, 511 So.2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(4). It is further conceded by the State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodwell v. State

561 So. 2d 438, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 1990 WL 64113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1990 | Docket: 64650666

Published

aggravated assault as prior record. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5) (committee notes, December, 1985 Amendment)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

561 So. 2d 447, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 1990 WL 64121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1990 | Docket: 64650671

Published

and current offenses. The first general rule of Rule 3.701(d) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rosa-Sanchez v. State

561 So. 2d 25, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 1990 WL 62863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 64650419

Published

statutory maximum sentence should be imposed.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10); Sears v. State, 539 So.2d 1174 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wareham v. State

560 So. 2d 408, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3009, 1990 WL 55990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1990 | Docket: 64650172

Published

this is an improper reason for departure because Rule 3.701 d. 11., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

560 So. 2d 335, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2924, 1990 WL 52793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 64650141

Published

its calculation of the second scoresheet. See rule 3.701(d)(ll), Fla.R.Crim.P. This improper methodology

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

559 So. 2d 456, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2501, 1990 WL 43147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1990 | Docket: 64649562

Published

clear and convincing reasons for departure. Under Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., the court should have

Category: Criminal Procedure

Christian v. State

559 So. 2d 448, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2531, 1990 WL 43129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1990 | Docket: 64649559

Published

legal status under rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.701(d)(6) provides that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

566 So. 2d 515, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2377, 1990 WL 64071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 64652875

Published

Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 *516(Fla.1989). Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kirkman v. State

559 So. 2d 695, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2362, 1990 WL 40334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 64649636

Published

pending before the court for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). When the defendant was sentenced in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robertson v. State

559 So. 2d 352, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2313, 1990 WL 39890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1990 | Docket: 64649510

Published

scoresheet. We disagree, and affirm the sentence. Rule 3.701(c), Fla.R.Crim.P., lists nine offense categories

Category: Criminal Procedure

Puffinberger v. State

558 So. 2d 189, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 1990 WL 29579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1990 | Docket: 64648798

Published

consideration of a juvenile record except as provided by Rule 3.701(d)(5)(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

558 So. 2d 180, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1698, 1990 WL 28175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1990 | Docket: 64648790

Published

resentencing with a guidelines scoresheet. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)1.; Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jenkins v. State

556 So. 2d 1239, 1990 WL 15389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1990 | Docket: 1528442

Published

"impossible to determine" in the language of Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(3). The prior offense should therefore

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez v. State

557 So. 2d 160, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 1990 WL 15228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1990 | Docket: 64648445

Published

guideline sentence of 20 to 27 years. Complying with rule 3.701(d)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanborn v. State

557 So. 2d 132, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 804, 1990 WL 11806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1990 | Docket: 64648430

Published

State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), we affirm appellant’s sentence. Affirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

556 So. 2d 795, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 766, 1990 WL 10897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1990 | Docket: 64648069

Published

not increase the statutory máxi-mums allowable. Rule 3.701(d)(10), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jenkins v. State

556 So. 2d 769, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 1990 WL 10224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1990 | Docket: 64648057

Published

one cell for the revocation of probation under Rule 3.701(d)(14). Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987)

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Silomon

557 So. 2d 105, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1990 WL 8644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64648411

Published

departure from the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). The trial court did note on the bottom

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ray v. State

556 So. 2d 495, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 709, 1990 WL 7637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64647990

Published

to Williams, the Florida Supreme Court amended Rule 3.701(d)(13) and the committee note to the rule2 to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

557 So. 2d 109, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 664, 1990 WL 8669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64648415

Published

required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.701(d)(11). Instead, it orally gave two reasons for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Quarles v. State

556 So. 2d 476, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 547, 1990 WL 6438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1990 | Docket: 64647978

Published

currently calculated score sheet as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1).2 REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING. COWART

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Gavins

555 So. 2d 933, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 158, 1990 WL 2087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 64647592

Published

for entry of the required written order. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054, 1055

Category: Criminal Procedure

Padgett v. State

554 So. 2d 674, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 142, 1990 WL 2073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 64647294

Published

State, 554 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim P. 3.701(d)(14), if departure is appropriate. Sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Llabona v. State

557 So. 2d 66, 1990 WL 2074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 456937

Published

agree. The Florida Supreme Court has construed Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snelling v. State

554 So. 2d 673, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 89, 1990 WL 1082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 64647291

Published

bump up one cell. Franklin v. State, supra; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14. SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED. DAUKSCH

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

554 So. 2d 672, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1990 WL 952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1990 | Docket: 64647289

Published

State, 545 So.2d 851, 852-53 (Fla.1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morales v. State

554 So. 2d 662, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 63, 1990 WL 594

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1990 | Docket: 64647278

Published

thirty points for “legal constraint.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). We therefore reverse the trial court’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

554 So. 2d 572, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7140, 1989 WL 153709

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1989 | Docket: 64647226

Published

defendant only within a one-cell increase, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); reasons relating to the violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

554 So. 2d 14, 1989 WL 149629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1989 | Docket: 290696

Published

directions to resentence the defendant pursuant to Rule 3.701 d 14.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daigle v. State

552 So. 2d 347, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6455, 1989 WL 139519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1989 | Docket: 64646372

Published

procedure we affirm the sentence in this case. Rule 3.701 d.13. defines community control as “a form of

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Foburg

552 So. 2d 314, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6407, 1989 WL 137726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1989 | Docket: 64646354

Published

of imprisonment was at least an option. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The trial court did acknowledge a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byrd v. State

552 So. 2d 287, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2670, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6411, 1989 WL 137718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 64646343

Published

a convicted felon and was carrying a firearm. Rule 3.701(d)(11) states that reasons for deviating from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bogan v. State

552 So. 2d 1171, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2659, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6352, 1989 WL 136161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1989 | Docket: 64646611

Published

the highest sentence must be applied, see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.3, argues most persuasively against a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lane v. State

550 So. 2d 1195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2614, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6263, 1989 WL 133754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1989 | Docket: 64645840

Published

resentenc-ing. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burg v. State

550 So. 2d 1192, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6109, 1989 WL 129803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1989 | Docket: 64645836

Published

resentenc-ing. COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

550 So. 2d 563, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2529, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6080, 1989 WL 129134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 64645584

Published

for appellant’s upward departure sentence. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Both parties agree there was a plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamilton v. State

550 So. 2d 164, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5871, 1989 WL 122995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 64645510

Published

475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)6; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll. Accordingly, while we

Category: Criminal Procedure

Guide v. State

549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 64645390

Published

to the trial court for proper sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

549 So. 2d 819, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2356, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5729, 1989 WL 117146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1989 | Docket: 64645315

Published

program does not constitute legal constraint under Rule 3.701(d)(6). We reverse on authority of Ellison v.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Washington v. State

549 So. 2d 799, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5454, 1989 WL 114260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1989 | Docket: 64645306

Published

035(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). .Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). . Rule 3.701(d)(ll) provides that reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

549 So. 2d 743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1989 WL 112128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1989 | Docket: 64645270

Published

scored only if an element of the offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1985 amendments). Victim injury is

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Williams

549 So. 2d 230, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2262, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5225, 1989 WL 110935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1989 | Docket: 64645182

Published

requires such a written order to comply with Rule 3.701(d)(ll). State v. Bledsoe, 538 So.2d 94 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferguson v. State

548 So. 2d 1183, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5136, 1989 WL 107522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1989 | Docket: 64644918

Published

written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Accordingly, the sentence is vacated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

548 So. 2d 908, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5153, 1989 WL 109527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1989 | Docket: 64644867

Published

of any reasons for departure, in violation of Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

555 So. 2d 1221, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1961, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4759, 1989 WL 97698

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1989 | Docket: 64647689

Published

were not prosecuted and one was still pending. Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules Criminal Procedure, prohibits

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamilton v. State

547 So. 2d 305, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1873, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4491, 1989 WL 88940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1989 | Docket: 64644202

Published

and, therefore, con-cededly illegal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14; see generally Poore v. State, 531 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gortman v. State

547 So. 2d 285, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1865, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4384, 1989 WL 86803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1989 | Docket: 64644185

Published

amended, provides for scoring victim injury, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1985), and factors taken into account

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roache v. State

547 So. 2d 706, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1847, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425, 1989 WL 87546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1989 | Docket: 64644382

Published

2d 380 (Fla.1978). See also Committee Note to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P. Since the maximum statutory

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hadley v. State

546 So. 2d 769, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1706, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4008, 1989 WL 78310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1989 | Docket: 64643836

Published

provided for under the sentencing guidelines, rule 3.701(d)(5)(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grant v. State

547 So. 2d 952, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1629, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3725, 1989 WL 73148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1989 | Docket: 64644441

Published

of the offense involves a “legal constraint." Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weakley v. State

547 So. 2d 951, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1557, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 1989 WL 69807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1989 | Docket: 64644440

Published

those reasons to writing as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We vacate the sentence and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

544 So. 2d 346, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1451, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3387, 1989 WL 63358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 64642918

Published

without giving written reasons therefor. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The sentence is quashed and this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines

544 So. 2d 198, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1295, 1989 WL 65666

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 64642859

Published

violent personal crimes. We agree, and amend rule 3.701(c) and the heading to rule 3.988(d) accordingly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tate v. State

544 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3349, 1989 WL 62392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1989 | Docket: 64643154

Published

which time the trial court may also consider rule 3.701 d.14., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. REVERSED

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

544 So. 2d 1125, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1437, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421, 1989 WL 64705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1989 | Docket: 64643153

Published

State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701. While attempting to rob Juan Rodriguez

Category: Criminal Procedure

Torres v. State

544 So. 2d 1100, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3229, 1989 WL 62584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1989 | Docket: 64643143

Published

cannot be included as prior offenses under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). However, the subsequent offenses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dillard v. State

544 So. 2d 329, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1385, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3191, 1989 WL 59489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1989 | Docket: 64642897

Published

use separate scoresheets for sentencing. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701.d. REVERSED; SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Chenault

543 So. 2d 1314, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1341, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3062, 1989 WL 56313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1989 | Docket: 64642797

Published

the crime while in custody serving a sentence. Rule 3.701(d)(6) in conjunction with Rule 3.988(i) says

Category: Criminal Procedure

Humphrey v. State

543 So. 2d 420, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1232, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2769, 1989 WL 51214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1989 | Docket: 64642612

Published

for a criminal judicial proceeding.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)6. Because the elimination of these points

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mosley v. State

543 So. 2d 340, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1989 WL 49628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1989 | Docket: 64642566

Published

In imposing this sentence pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines, the court assessed

Category: Criminal Procedure

DiCicco v. State

545 So. 2d 904, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 817, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1623, 1989 WL 29045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1989 | Docket: 64643419

Published

the mistaken belief that it was authorized by rule 3.701(d)(12), DiCicco must be resentenced. Dreyer.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Riggs v. State

540 So. 2d 897, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 773, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1527, 1989 WL 27652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 64641368

Published

review of sentences imposed pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. These sentences were

Category: Criminal Procedure

Washington v. State

539 So. 2d 1191, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1496, 1989 WL 25371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1989 | Docket: 64641071

Published

which he faced sentencing at that time. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1). It is also alleged that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Landa v. State

539 So. 2d 593, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1222, 1989 WL 20100

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1989 | Docket: 64640879

Published

resentence appellant on the remaining counts. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whiddon v. State

539 So. 2d 586, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 643, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1263, 1989 WL 19555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1989 | Docket: 64640878

Published

discretion in scoring victim injury as severe. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); McDonald v. State, 520 So.2d 668 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sutton v. State

539 So. 2d 566, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 608, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1139, 1989 WL 20704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1989 | Docket: 64640869

Published

departure beyond the next cell. The court said: Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Bohannon

538 So. 2d 1384, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 579, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1019, 1989 WL 16656

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1989 | Docket: 64640727

Published

Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 1988, adopted rule 3.701 and rule 3.988, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

539 So. 2d 1160, 1989 WL 16621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1989 | Docket: 1410452

Published

January 21, 1988, for said offense. R. 295. [2] Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., permits a one-cell departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Duval v. State

539 So. 2d 15, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1989 | Docket: 64640743

Published

without requiring a reason for departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Thus, a guidelines sentence in this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

538 So. 2d 541, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 461, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 854, 1989 WL 12385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1989 | Docket: 64640395

Published

Florida Statutes for third-degree felonies. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), Committee Note. Upon review of appellant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Toles v. State

537 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 364, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 465, 1989 WL 7516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1989 | Docket: 64640090

Published

the offense. In addition, we would have to find Rule 3.701(d)(11) inapplicable to this issue. There is no

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Paul

537 So. 2d 702, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1989 WL 6247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1989 | Docket: 64640079

Published

approved guidelines scoresheet is warranted. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Richards v. State, 502 So.2d 1000

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Mitchell

538 So. 2d 71, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 327, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 418, 1989 WL 6218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 64640331

Published

exception for a decrease to the next lower cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Third, and finally, the fact that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haggerty v. State

537 So. 2d 688, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 276, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 294, 1989 WL 4301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1989 | Docket: 64640064

Published

court may exceed the one cell bump-up provided in rule 3.701.d.l4, and use those facts as a reason for “departing”

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

537 So. 2d 195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 250, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1989 WL 3272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 64639946

Published

awarding twenty-one points for victim injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). When considered in conjunction with

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

537 So. 2d 196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1989 WL 3274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1989 | Docket: 64639948

Published

to have committed the offenses now before us. Rule 3.701(d)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, specifically

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dewberry v. State

537 So. 2d 669, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 1989 WL 2073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1989 | Docket: 64640048

Published

The supreme court additionally commented that rule 3.701(d)(14), relating to a trial court’s right to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bulger v. State

537 So. 2d 672, 1989 WL 2075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1989 | Docket: 427271

Published

reason for departure clear and convincing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6) (1988); See generally, State v. Mischler

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Raskiewicz

541 So. 2d 1217, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 193, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 107, 1989 WL 1348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1989 | Docket: 64641962

Published

cell due to the violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); 3.988(i). Instead the court restored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Banks v. State

536 So. 2d 1175, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 102, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 28, 1989 WL 90

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1989 | Docket: 64639638

Published

appropriate sentence within the statutory limit.” ... Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pisano v. State

539 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 109, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, 1988 WL 139088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 64640849

Published

version of the rule, the supreme court amended rule 3.701(d)(7) to add the following sentence to the committee

Category: Criminal Procedure

Foister v. State

536 So. 2d 1130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 40, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5751, 1988 WL 138513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1988 | Docket: 64639625

Published

guidelines went into effect, the Committee Note to rule 3.701(d)(12) stated as follows: The sentencing court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Aleman v. State

535 So. 2d 342, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2747, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531, 1988 WL 133889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1988 | Docket: 64639186

Published

as a second degree felony on the scoresheet. Rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R.Crim.P. The trial court, however

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

534 So. 2d 1237, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2729, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5497, 1988 WL 132366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1988 | Docket: 64639076

Published

assessed for category IV “legal status.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.6. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

534 So. 2d 1239, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2732, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5498, 1988 WL 132369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1988 | Docket: 64639077

Published

committed, (February 19, 1987), sentencing guideline rule 3.701.d.7. provided: “Victim injury shall be scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oliver v. State

534 So. 2d 1224, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2660, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5400, 1988 WL 130482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1988 | Docket: 64639070

Published

offenses which must be scored as misdemeanors. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(5)(a)(4). The trial court’s explanation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collier v. State

535 So. 2d 316, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1988 WL 130067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1988 | Docket: 64639173

Published

time of offense, not the time of sentencing. Rule 3.701(d)(6) Fla.R. Crim.P. Therefore, we find the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

534 So. 2d 1220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2668, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 1988 WL 130483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1988 | Docket: 64639068

Published

offenses represented a violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). This is so even though the primary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

534 So. 2d 1220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2668, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 1988 WL 130483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1988 | Docket: 64639068

Published

offenses represented a violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). This is so even though the primary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lipscomb v. State

534 So. 2d 1202, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2542, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5075, 1988 WL 122439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1988 | Docket: 64639061

Published

Peters v. State, 531 So.2d 121 (Fla.1988) and Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P. Accordingly, we reverse

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McLeod

533 So. 2d 916, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5055, 1988 WL 122446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1988 | Docket: 64638568

Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

533 So. 2d 888, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896, 1988 WL 117591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 64638545

Published

battery conviction. . The current version of Fla.R.Crim P. 3.701(d)7 provides that victim injury shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Barber

533 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 64638547

Published

State, 512 So.2d 1085 (Fla 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The defendant should be given an

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson v. State

532 So. 2d 1324, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2414, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4747, 1988 WL 113837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1988 | Docket: 64638110

Published

Nelson, the committee note to the version of Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R.Crim.P., applicable to Nelson states

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lawler

531 So. 2d 752, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2316, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4472, 1988 WL 103935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1988 | Docket: 64637324

Published

legal rea*753sons therefor. This was error. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). State v. Nichols, (Fla. 4th DCA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dreyer v. State

532 So. 2d 733, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2243, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4317, 1988 WL 99744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1988 | Docket: 64637902

Published

existed at the time of sentencing. The original rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bennett v. State

531 So. 2d 250, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4190, 1988 WL 96460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 64636997

Published

However, the committee note (1985 amendment) to Rule 3.701 d.5., states that in this circumstance, the earlier

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bennett v. State

531 So. 2d 250, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4190, 1988 WL 96460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1988 | Docket: 64636997

Published

However, the committee note (1985 amendment) to Rule 3.701 d.5., states that in this circumstance, the earlier

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rubier v. State

530 So. 2d 523, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4078, 1988 WL 93732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 64636758

Published

107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 3S1 (1987). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (as amended effective July 1, 1985)

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Robinson

530 So. 2d 1082, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2153, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4057, 1988 WL 93735

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 64636937

Published

definition of "conviction” within the purview of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(2).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

530 So. 2d 402, 1988 WL 86351

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1988 | Docket: 1267397

Published

conviction and a sentence which departed from the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines recommendation. Among other assertions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thorn v. State

529 So. 2d 363, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1921, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3675, 1988 WL 82682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1988 | Docket: 64636322

Published

victim injury is not an element of burglary. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).1 This argument would be true if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stamper v. State

528 So. 2d 1323, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1839, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, 1988 WL 79821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1988 | Docket: 64636239

Published

part, 509 So.2d 927 (Fla.1987); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). Accordingly, we vacate the sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eugene G. Adams v. Richard L. Dugger, Superintendent, Florida Dept. Of Corrections

850 F.2d 1495, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10292, 1988 WL 72805

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1988 | Docket: 815636

Published

on each, for appropriate cause. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.12. Finally, a sentence can be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stokes v. State

529 So. 2d 323, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3464, 1988 WL 77955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1988 | Docket: 64636311

Published

sentence to the next *324higher cell, arguing that rule 3.701(d)(14) permits a one cell “bump-up” only for

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Cano

529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1988 | Docket: 64636379

Published

delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Torres

528 So. 2d 133, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1988 | Docket: 64635909

Published

State, 512 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Pursuant to State v. Thomas, 516

Category: Criminal Procedure

Abt v. State

528 So. 2d 112, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1618, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3004

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 64635897

Published

constraint at the time of the offense. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6). The second reason, escalating pattern

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martire v. State

528 So. 2d 496, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3023, 1988 WL 72231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 64636026

Published

is clearly illegal; neither the provisions of rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, nor the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burns v. State

528 So. 2d 78, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1599, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2902, 1988 WL 69370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1988 | Docket: 64635880

Published

the state concedes, that under the version of Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Denson v. State

527 So. 2d 939, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1549, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774, 1988 WL 67260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1988 | Docket: 64635755

Published

period in excess of the recommended range. See rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stockton v. State

529 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2882, 1988 WL 68089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1988 | Docket: 64636371

Published

the recommended sentence pursuant to the Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines upon impermissible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

527 So. 2d 911, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1528, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2684, 1988 WL 65175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1988 | Docket: 64635745

Published

sentence provided by statute for that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). The final judgment of conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

526 So. 2d 1047, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1459, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2611

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1988 | Docket: 64635494

Published

collectively, support the upward departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Appellant Brown raises several issues

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saunders v. State

526 So. 2d 1041, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1446, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2596, 1988 WL 62674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1988 | Docket: 64635489

Published

child are affirmed. See the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12); The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saunders v. State

526 So. 2d 1041, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1446, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2596, 1988 WL 62674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1988 | Docket: 64635489

Published

child are affirmed. See the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12); The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gulker v. State

528 So. 2d 434, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1420, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2563, 1988 WL 61875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1988 | Docket: 64636016

Published

relying on the guidelines committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12) which specifies that if a split sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

527 So. 2d 277, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1439, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1988 WL 60468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1988 | Docket: 64635635

Published

guidelines sentence. See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Burrell v. State, 483 So.2d 479 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bush v. State

526 So. 2d 992, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2467, 1988 WL 56513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1988 | Docket: 64635467

Published

the defendant was a danger to the community. Rule 3.701 d.ll., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Amico

525 So. 2d 515, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1310, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2213, 1988 WL 53032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1988 | Docket: 64634916

Published

have available a new scoresheet. This was error. Rule 3.701 d.14., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vazquez v. State

525 So. 2d 1005, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1988 WL 56102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1988 | Docket: 64635019

Published

CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12); The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fennell v. State

528 So. 2d 1212, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1193, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2008, 1988 WL 47535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1988 | Docket: 64636195

Published

if it was an element of the offense.1 See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); Massard v. State, 501 So.2d 1289

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

524 So. 2d 1153, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 1988 WL 47482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1988 | Docket: 64634751

Published

the reasons for departure” requirement, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). See, e.g., State v. Lemon, 517 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grassmyer v. State

523 So. 2d 1282, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1055, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1719, 1988 WL 40530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1988 | Docket: 64634330

Published

the date of his release from confinement. See rule 3.701(d)(5)(b), Fla.R.Crim.P. The state argues that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

525 So. 2d 449, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1052, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1739, 1988 WL 39143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1988 | Docket: 64634883

Published

one cell for the violation of probation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). On April 29 the court convened a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

523 So. 2d 199, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1413, 1988 WL 32052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1988 | Docket: 64634020

Published

sentencing him under the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We agree and remand for resentencing. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cochran v. State

534 So. 2d 1165, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1567, 1988 WL 32908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1988 | Docket: 64639052

Published

in 1980). This, of course, we cannot do. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Dawkins v. State, 487 So.2d 63 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cridland v. State

522 So. 2d 538, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 801, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1254, 1988 WL 26274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1988 | Docket: 64633695

Published

489 So.2d 1130 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(4); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). Second, the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peterson v. State

523 So. 2d 168, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 744, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1268, 1988 WL 28339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1988 | Docket: 64634011

Published

the sentences were imposed pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We find that the crimes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pettit v. State

522 So. 2d 494, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 709, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1089, 1988 WL 22994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1988 | Docket: 64633674

Published

conviction. Appellant states that while Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 permits scoring of pri- or offenses which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sumler v. State

521 So. 2d 386, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 686, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1018, 1988 WL 20608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1988 | Docket: 64633214

Published

recommended sentencing range established by the Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines the trial court had

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

522 So. 2d 924, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 677, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 961, 1988 WL 20049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1988 | Docket: 64633840

Published

guideline sentence, four and one-half years. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The defendant was not under legal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Montgomery v. State

521 So. 2d 298, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 616, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 859, 1988 WL 18578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1988 | Docket: 64633157

Published

authorized for a probation violation by Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Affirmed in part, reversed in part

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnes v. State

519 So. 2d 1112, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 421, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 496, 1988 WL 8382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 64632643

Published

“bump-up” for violation of probation pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., the maximum recommended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnes v. State

519 So. 2d 1112, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 421, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 496, 1988 WL 8382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 64632643

Published

“bump-up” for violation of probation pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., the maximum recommended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stokes v. State

527 So. 2d 216, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 451, 1988 WL 8110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1988 | Docket: 64635619

Published

State has candidly conceded, is erroneous. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Tyner v. State, 491 So.2d 1228 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Inscho v. State

521 So. 2d 164, 1988 WL 8338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 1703749

Published

Florida Statutes, as to guideline sentences under Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cummins v. State

519 So. 2d 718, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 328, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 348, 1988 WL 6425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 64632529

Published

was error. The automatic one-cell departure of Rule 3.701(d)(14) only applies to the sentence imposed for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

518 So. 2d 977, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 249, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 151, 1988 WL 2613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1988 | Docket: 64632099

Published

statement delineating reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mayo v. State

518 So. 2d 458, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 201, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1988 | Docket: 64632007

Published

which appellant was not convicted, contrary to rule 3.701(d)(ll) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grasselli v. State

517 So. 2d 764, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 117, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11828, 1987 WL 29155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1987 | Docket: 64631782

Published

pending before the court for sentencing, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1), and was of a greater degree than the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Machansky v. State

517 So. 2d 101, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 95, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11728, 1987 WL 3177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1987 | Docket: 64631649

Published

providing written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). A court is permitted to depart beyond

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGriff v. State

517 So. 2d 94, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 55, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11682, 1987 WL 3017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 64631640

Published

State, 503 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The recidivistic nature of a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oliver v. State

517 So. 2d 735, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 58, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11733, 1987 WL 3184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 64631774

Published

was under “legal constraint” in accordance with Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P., and that the thirty points

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

525 So. 2d 424, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2882, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11696, 1987 WL 3208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1987 | Docket: 64634874

Published

more than ten years old in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vidal v. State

516 So. 2d 1051, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2884, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11596, 1987 WL 2680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 64631509

Published

1985); § 921.001(6), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d) (11). Furthermore, the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lowe v. State

516 So. 2d 114, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2769, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 1987 WL 2330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1987 | Docket: 64631246

Published

status at time of offense” is defined in Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6) as: Offenders on parole, probation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ivey v. State

516 So. 2d 335, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2820, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11589, 1987 WL 2655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1987 | Docket: 64631367

Published

supreme court has recently approved an amendment to rule 3.701 d.7., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, expressly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Farnam v. State

516 So. 2d 329, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2821, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11496, 1987 WL 2627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631366

Published

of fourteen points for victim injury. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. Consequently, we must remand the cause

Category: Criminal Procedure

Farnam v. State

516 So. 2d 329, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2821, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11496, 1987 WL 2627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631366

Published

of fourteen points for victim injury. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. Consequently, we must remand the cause

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gerow v. State

516 So. 2d 326, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2830, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11480, 1987 WL 2588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631362

Published

State, 404 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), committee note (1985 amendment)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gerow v. State

516 So. 2d 326, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2830, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11480, 1987 WL 2588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64631362

Published

State, 404 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), committee note (1985 amendment)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fine v. State

519 So. 2d 639, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2782, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 1987 WL 2164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 64632489

Published

opportunity under either a “bump up” pursuant to rule 3.701(d)(14) or written reasons for departure. We reverse

Category: Criminal Procedure

Littles v. State

515 So. 2d 401, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2618, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1987 | Docket: 64630869

Published

THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . The Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) states in part: If a split sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vanover v. State

514 So. 2d 1140, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2530, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1987 | Docket: 64630667

Published

which convictions have not been obtained. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). While worded as a valid reason,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Finklea v. State

514 So. 2d 1126, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10770, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1987 | Docket: 64630657

Published

guidelines, and is the subject of this appeal. Rule 3.701(d)(1) Fla.R.Crim.P. provides that one guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Wadley

514 So. 2d 80, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2495, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10727

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1987 | Docket: 64630307

Published

reasons for a departure from the guidelines. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). See also State v. Jackson, 478 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCoy v. State

513 So. 2d 778, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2395, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1987 | Docket: 64629987

Published

forms set out at Rule 3.988, Fla.R.Crim.P. (see Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.) the defendant had added

Category: Criminal Procedure

Winkler v. State

515 So. 2d 1017, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2398, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10569, 1987 WL 3993

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1987 | Docket: 64631026

Published

which convictions had not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Upon review of the record, however

Category: Criminal Procedure

McHaney v. State

513 So. 2d 252, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2356, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1987 | Docket: 64629791

Published

charge. See § 921.001(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985) and Rule 3.701(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. (1987). It was, therefore,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tanner v. State

512 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2327, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1987 | Docket: 64629660

Published

gender, and social and economic status. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(1). Accordingly, finding neither reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goff v. State

512 So. 2d 1095, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2282, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1987 | Docket: 64629618

Published

sentence without written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saldana v. State

510 So. 2d 1238, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2035, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1987 | Docket: 64628816

Published

accordance with the guidelines as supplemented by Rule 3.701(d)(14). Upon remand, the trial court shall also

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yarberry v. State

510 So. 2d 1117, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1904, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1987 | Docket: 64628765

Published

the next higher guidelines cell, as provided in rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yarberry v. State

510 So. 2d 1117, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1904, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1987 | Docket: 64628765

Published

the next higher guidelines cell, as provided in rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shaw v. State

510 So. 2d 1112, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1892, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1987 | Docket: 64628763

Published

during a criminal episode. We therefore amend rule 3.701.d.7 to read: “Victim injury shall be scored for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. State

510 So. 2d 654, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1852, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1987 | Docket: 64628667

Published

separate sentence imposed for that offense, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), could not exceed the guideline sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Woods v. State

509 So. 2d 1370, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1791, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1987 | Docket: 64628464

Published

been obtained (trafficking in cocaine). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll. For whatever reason, the jury acquitted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fazio v. State

509 So. 2d 979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1987 | Docket: 64628354

Published

remanded for resentencing in that regard. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). The trial court, as a condition of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Poppell v. State

509 So. 2d 390, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1632, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1987 | Docket: 64628221

Published

over the lesser guidelines sentence under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). Thus, so the argument goes, the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines (Rules 3.701 & 3.988)

509 So. 2d 1088, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 320, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2142

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1987 | Docket: 64628388

Published

during a criminal episode. We therefore amend rule 3.701.-d.7 to read: “Victim injury shall be scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Camerron v. State

508 So. 2d 570, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1537, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1987 | Docket: 64627878

Published

490 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. See also Byrd v. State, 503 So.2d 434

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sparkman v. State

507 So. 2d 1188, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1372, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1987 | Docket: 64627479

Published

reasons for departure were given, as required by Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore, we reverse the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hardy v. State

507 So. 2d 682, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1987 | Docket: 64627330

Published

be considered as a basis for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rojas v. State

506 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1219, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1987 | Docket: 64627025

Published

as a prior conviction. The committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(5), which defines “prior record,” indicates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chudeusz v. State

508 So. 2d 418, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8109, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 64627788

Published

State, 491 So.2d 594 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701, Committee Note (d)(12). The convictions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spates v. State

506 So. 2d 1116, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1171, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 64627006

Published

appellant for this felony offense utilized the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines, and the sentence imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

508 So. 2d 407, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7933, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1987 | Docket: 64627786

Published

Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). . The cases cited by the majority

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

506 So. 2d 1086, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1987 | Docket: 64626991

Published

guidelines scoresheet for victim injury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). This court has held that, since “victim

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davidson v. State

506 So. 2d 43, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1099, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1987 | Docket: 64626698

Published

guidelines scoresheet before imposing sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Here, however, since appellant’s sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davidson v. State

506 So. 2d 43, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1099, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1987 | Docket: 64626698

Published

guidelines scoresheet before imposing sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Here, however, since appellant’s sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Medlock v. State

505 So. 2d 688, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1090, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1987 | Docket: 64626475

Published

HEREWITH. COBB and COWART, JJ., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). . See Medlock v. State, 489 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cowan v. State

505 So. 2d 640, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1987 | Docket: 64626455

Published

drug abuse.” The reason was invalidated under Rule 3.701(d)(ll) because no convictions had been obtained

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ricardo v. State

504 So. 2d 539, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 893, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 64626029

Published

from the sentence recommended under the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. However, we conclude

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

503 So. 2d 1360, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 769, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1987 | Docket: 64625859

Published

v. State, 491 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986): Rule 3.701(d)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that only one

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deegan v. State

503 So. 2d 970, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 745, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1987 | Docket: 64625725

Published

Criminal Procedure, 482 So.2d 311 (Fla.1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11), (14), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Carter v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Bruner

503 So. 2d 457, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1987 | Docket: 64625472

Published

Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Accordingly, we reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Todd v. State

503 So. 2d 451, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11988, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1987 | Docket: 64625468

Published

which defendant had not been convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Because none of the cited reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byrd v. State

503 So. 2d 434, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 684, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1987 | Docket: 64625459

Published

sentencing category than he should have been. *435See Rule 3.701(d)(7), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Vega v. State, 498 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Martin

502 So. 2d 1371, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7011, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1987 | Docket: 64625287

Published

years statutory maximum should be imposed. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(10). Committee Note (d)(12) provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jolly v. State

502 So. 2d 1324, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 635, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1987 | Docket: 64625268

Published

before the court at the time of the sentencing. Rule 3.701(d)(4), Fla.R.Crim.P. See also State v. Salsberry

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCall v. State

503 So. 2d 1306, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 578, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1987 | Docket: 64625852

Published

justifies imposition of an aggravated sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(3). See Vanover v. State, 498 So.2d 899

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vogtsberger v. State

502 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 535, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1987 | Docket: 64625163

Published

period of time of abuse, is invalid under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll), which prohibits the use of factors

Category: Criminal Procedure

Copeland v. State

503 So. 2d 1301, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 539, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1987 | Docket: 64625851

Published

crimes shall be included in the prior record. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c). As a converse to this rule, juvenile

Category: Criminal Procedure

Matthews v. State

502 So. 2d 63, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 469, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1987 | Docket: 64624882

Published

the court predicated a departure from the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines upon impermissible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

501 So. 2d 752, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 441, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624694

Published

State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); 5) appellant lied to police is clearly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

501 So. 2d 752, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 441, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624694

Published

State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); 5) appellant lied to police is clearly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vicknair v. State

501 So. 2d 755, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 441, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624696

Published

P. 9.120 Committee Notes, 1977 Rev. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. . See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

501 So. 2d 163, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 373, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1987 | Docket: 64624417

Published

State, 479 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)9; see also Pedraza v. State, 493 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Colvin v. State

501 So. 2d 118, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 334, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1987 | Docket: 64624407

Published

for which no conviction had been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); see also, Denson v. State, 493 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Colvin v. State

501 So. 2d 118, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 334, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1987 | Docket: 64624407

Published

for which no conviction had been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); see also, Denson v. State, 493 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

502 So. 2d 24, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 176, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1986 | Docket: 64624855

Published

statement delineating reasons for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Washington v. State

500 So. 2d 316, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 164, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64624124

Published

which a conviction has not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Finally, the protection of society

Category: Criminal Procedure

Strickland v. State

502 So. 2d 18, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 140, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 64624851

Published

State, 457 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The sentence is vacated and this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Uptagrafft v. State

499 So. 2d 33

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1986 | Docket: 1444363

Published

scoresheet for Uptagrafft's charge of lewd assault, Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mazza v. State

499 So. 2d 30, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 120, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11070

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1986 | Docket: 64623778

Published

sentence was not a departure from that allowed by rule 3.701. Prentice v. State, 469 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

498 So. 2d 688, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1986 | Docket: 64623533

Published

legal status at the time of the offense. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(6). Second, the court properly calculated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pentaude v. State

498 So. 2d 1030, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2620, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1986 | Docket: 64623669

Published

Pentaude now argues on appeal that since Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) provides that probation violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Joiner

498 So. 2d 1017, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2599, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11311

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 64623665

Published

robbery as the primary offense at conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(3). Neither is the judge’s personal view

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

498 So. 2d 1015, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2598, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 64623664

Published

. § 893.13(1)(f), Fla.Stat. (1983). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.11.; Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d 47 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saskowitz v. State

498 So. 2d 598, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2561, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1986 | Docket: 64623490

Published

Saskowitz elects to be sentenced pursuant to Rule 3.701, the trial court may depart for valid reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Foreman v. State

498 So. 2d 601, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2568, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1986 | Docket: 64623492

Published

sentence — the “clear and convincing” test in Rule 3.701(d)(ll) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weiner v. State

497 So. 2d 1347, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 64623261

Published

RESENTENCING. DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Randall v. State

497 So. 2d 1326, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2494, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 64623250

Published

We remand for resentenc-ing in accordance with Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lundin v. State

497 So. 2d 997, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2426, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1986 | Docket: 64623091

Published

011(3), 775.082(1), Fla.Stat. (1985). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.8. . Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mixon v. State

497 So. 2d 720, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2389, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1986 | Docket: 64623009

Published

on remand, a scoresheet must be prepared. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Gause v. State, 491 So.2d 320 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Aleman v. State

498 So. 2d 967, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2306, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10368

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 64623645

Published

which a conviction has not been obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). Tyner v. State, 491 So.2d 1228 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pertee v. State

496 So. 2d 964, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10418, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 64622644

Published

prohibited by the guidelines themselves. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henderson v. State

496 So. 2d 965, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2290, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10398

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 64622645

Published

beyond the one cell departure provided for in Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bailey v. State

496 So. 2d 225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2249, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1986 | Docket: 64622369

Published

that conforms to the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701). SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED. UPCHURCH

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

508 So. 2d 358, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1986 | Docket: 64627771

Published

for thirty days, commending to its attention rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

496 So. 2d 889, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2216, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1986 | Docket: 64622626

Published

on remand, a scoresheet must be prepared. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Gause v. State, 491 So.2d 320 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bram v. State

496 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 64622622

Published

possession.” Both of these grounds violate Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) because they punish defendant for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Floyd v. State

495 So. 2d 872, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2143, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1986 | Docket: 64622223

Published

COWART, J., dissents without opinion. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.ll. . See Smith v. State, 480 So.2d 663

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dowling v. State

495 So. 2d 874, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1986 | Docket: 1748652

Published

DCA 1986). The fourth reason is also invalid as Rule 3.701(d)(11), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Powell v. State

495 So. 2d 828, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2104, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1986 | Docket: 64622204

Published

, the sexual battery charge, in violation of rule 3.701 d.ll., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

495 So. 2d 284, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2112, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1986 | Docket: 64622049

Published

without requiring reasons for departure. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). The recommendation for the next

Category: Criminal Procedure

Isgette v. State

494 So. 2d 534, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2079, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1986 | Docket: 64621831

Published

465 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Amended rule 3.701 d.14, which took effect July 1, 1984, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pedraza v. State

493 So. 2d 1122, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1980, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1986 | Docket: 64621529

Published

precedence as the presumptive sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9); cf. Tanner v. State, 468 So.2d 505

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCarthy v. State

492 So. 2d 462, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1735, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1986 | Docket: 64620966

Published

conformity with the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701). CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED;

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coleman v. State

491 So. 2d 1292, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1669, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1986 | Docket: 64620844

Published

sentences below the minimum mandatory penalty. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). In sentencing defendants to twenty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parsons v. State

491 So. 2d 1247, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1633, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1986 | Docket: 64620825

Published

requiring a written reason for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). In the instant case, although appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

493 So. 2d 19, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9013, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1986 | Docket: 64621236

Published

competency of counsel at sentencing.8 . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. . In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hubert v. State

491 So. 2d 615, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1627, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1986 | Docket: 64620682

Published

464 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

490 So. 2d 1384, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1578, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620458

Published

crimes for which no conviction was obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The fifth reason, that appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

490 So. 2d 1384, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1578, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620458

Published

crimes for which no conviction was obtained. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The fifth reason, that appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Foster v. State

491 So. 2d 328, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8772

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 64620581

Published

State, 483 So.2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). In the present case, no written reason

Category: Criminal Procedure

Antunovich v. State

491 So. 2d 328, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1546, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 64620582

Published

the trial court relied upon two scoresheets. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that only one

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clark v. State

490 So. 2d 1349, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1499, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 64620436

Published

charge, which was subsequently nolle pressed. Rule 3.701(c)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Teague v. State

491 So. 2d 296, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1481, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1986 | Docket: 64620574

Published

014(1)(a), (b) & (2)(b)1., Fla.Stat. (1983). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6) & (d)(11).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Muff v. State

490 So. 2d 1065, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1483, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1986 | Docket: 64620367

Published

that conforms to the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701). SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED. ORFINGER

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

490 So. 2d 1336, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1470, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1986 | Docket: 64620431

Published

Category 9 for the bond jumping, pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(3), Fla.R.Crim.P., as amended by the Supreme

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

490 So. 2d 1046, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1456, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1986 | Docket: 64620359

Published

calling for a sentence of 7 to 9 years. Pursuant to Rule 3.701 d 14, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vickers v. State

490 So. 2d 231, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1430, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1986 | Docket: 64620204

Published

cell without stating reasons for departure, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 d.14, but for an increase beyond that, other

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

492 So. 2d 449, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1433, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1986 | Docket: 64620960

Published

recommended sentence established pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines. We affirm the orders

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spivey v. State

489 So. 2d 1245, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1986 | Docket: 64620105

Published

State, 451 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12) note (1983).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burgess v. State

491 So. 2d 1167, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1402, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620800

Published

defendant’s sentences to the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). However, the third reason does not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Diggs v. State

489 So. 2d 1228, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1324, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 64620089

Published

clearly an improper reason because it violates Rule 3.701(d)(ll), which disallows using past conduct for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fisher v. State

489 So. 2d 857, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1279, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1986 | Docket: 64619917

Published

recommended sentence established pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines. We therefore vacate appellant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Medlock v. State

489 So. 2d 848, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1276, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1986 | Docket: 64619912

Published

that conforms to the sentencing guidelines (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701). *850SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED. UPCHURCH

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bruton v. State

489 So. 2d 1195, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1263, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1986 | Docket: 64620074

Published

total guidelines sentence, in violation of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Since no written reasons were given

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mack v. State

489 So. 2d 205, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1244, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1986 | Docket: 64619717

Published

of two felonies runs afoul of the provision in rule 3.701(d)(ll) that “reasons for deviating from the guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rutledge v. State

489 So. 2d 179, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1232, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 64619712

Published

824 (Fla.1984), regarding the comment following Rule 3.701(d)(5), and Bordeaux v. State, 471 So.2d 1353

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chiodo v. State

489 So. 2d 159, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1244, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1986 | Docket: 64619709

Published

resultant enhancement but without deference to Rule 3.701(d)(11). Thus, use of the probation violations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

488 So. 2d 911, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1192, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1986 | Docket: 64619513

Published

sentence without giving a reason therefor. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Any further departure must be supported

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boylan v. State

489 So. 2d 110, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1138, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64619703

Published

unambiguous language of the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(12), which provides: The sentencing court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

488 So. 2d 114, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 987, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1986 | Docket: 64619128

Published

appellant argues the departure is prohibited by Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Fla.R. Crim.P., which states that “reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chenard v. State

486 So. 2d 689, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1986 | Docket: 64618521

Published

sentencing guidelines is required under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(ll). State v. Jackson, 478 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martire v. State

486 So. 2d 681, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 875, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1986 | Docket: 64618513

Published

to provide written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), (12); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stabler v. State

486 So. 2d 51, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 795, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1986 | Docket: 64618415

Published

to justify departure from the guidelines, and Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carlisle v. State

485 So. 2d 26, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 672, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1986 | Docket: 64618064

Published

for departure from the guidelines. We agree. Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., which became effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

483 So. 2d 855, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 528, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1986 | Docket: 64617552

Published

a juvenile record over three years old (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(c)). The only two possible reasons

Category: Criminal Procedure

Olofson v. State

483 So. 2d 468, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 371, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1986 | Docket: 64617463

Published

convincing” reason to justify departure. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also Santiago v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sutton v. State

485 So. 2d 836, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 337, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1986 | Docket: 64618270

Published

departure. As this court has recently recognized, rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nunez v. State

482 So. 2d 565, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 377, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617148

Published

convictions have been obtained is improper. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Furthermore, in branding the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dohn v. State

482 So. 2d 564, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 373, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617147

Published

of more than the one cell authorized by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14) for a probation revocation. See,

Category: Criminal Procedure

McClatchie v. State

482 So. 2d 550, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6180, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617141

Published

probation, without providing written reasons. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). We would respectfully remind the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

481 So. 2d 1312, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 313, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1986 | Docket: 64616877

Published

providing written reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). If the court decides to depart from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Utsey v. State

483 So. 2d 60, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 299, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1986 | Docket: 64617374

Published

case then before the court in Clay County. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ingram v. State

481 So. 2d 1006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1986 | Docket: 64616810

Published

departure from the presumptive sentence. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.; State v. Jackson, 478

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

483 So. 2d 749, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1986 | Docket: 64617517

Published

probation or community control has been revoked. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14; see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

483 So. 2d 749, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1986 | Docket: 64617517

Published

probation or community control has been revoked. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.14; see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356

Category: Criminal Procedure

Graziano v. State

481 So. 2d 1293, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 258, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1986 | Docket: 64616867

Published

cell without a given reason for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). It is immaterial that if the 220

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

480 So. 2d 712, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5833, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1986 | Docket: 64616403

Published

COBB, C.J., and UPCHURCH, J., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stowers v. State

480 So. 2d 249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 64616274

Published

burglary had not resulted in convictions. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) provides: Reasons for deviating from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stowers v. State

480 So. 2d 249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 64616274

Published

burglary had not resulted in convictions. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll) provides: Reasons for deviating from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

479 So. 2d 878, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 60, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1985 | Docket: 64616096

Published

Jackson, which was subsequently decided. . Rule 3.701 was modified, and subsection (d)(14) was added

Category: Criminal Procedure

Petronis v. State

479 So. 2d 872, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 43, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1985 | Docket: 64616090

Published

consecutive five-year terms of probation violates rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Statutes (1983). We disagree

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal Procedure

482 So. 2d 311, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 15, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 1427

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 64617097

Published

MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur. RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES *313a. This rule is to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Borden v. State

479 So. 2d 823, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2718, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1985 | Docket: 64616055

Published

the fact and should not have been scored. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); see Hendry v. State, 460 So.2d 589

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilkins v. State

479 So. 2d 297, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2736, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1985 | Docket: 64615905

Published

the guidelines’ recommended sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The defendant contends that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dirk v. State

479 So. 2d 265, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2671, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 64615892

Published

Fla.Stat. (1983), case no. 85-256. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.d.1. Although no score-sheet is in the record

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hutchinson v. State

479 So. 2d 267, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2691, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1985 | Docket: 64615893

Published

reasons for the departure, as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), is essential in these circumstances

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanchious v. State

478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2636, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1985 | Docket: 64615751

Published

§ 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1983). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). . Knowlton v. State, 466 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lowe v. State

478 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2643, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 64615616

Published

statute did not track the Florida statute. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)a.3. requires that an offense be scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fernquist v. State

480 So. 2d 123, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16984, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 64616235

Published

guidelines. § 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. Appellant’s recommended guidelines sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

478 So. 2d 1154, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2624, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1985 | Docket: 64615735

Published

to all other statutory provisions,” or of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12), providing “Sentences for separate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rease v. State

478 So. 2d 1150, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2621, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1985 | Docket: 64615732

Published

ZEHMER, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bouyer v. State

478 So. 2d 882, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 64615612

Published

and convincing reasons for a departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We agree. The trial judge intended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

480 So. 2d 659, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2574, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16989

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 64616380

Published

properly, and a legal sentence imposed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1); Gallagher v. State, 476 So.2d 754

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

478 So. 2d 519, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2580, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 64615548

Published

(Fla.1985) that a trial judge does not satisfy rule 3.701(d)(ll)’s requirement of a written statement delineating

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Walden

476 So. 2d 771, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1985 | Docket: 64614709

Published

Addison v. State, 452 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1984)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pete v. State

478 So. 2d 375, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1985 | Docket: 64615467

Published

trial court based its sentence on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(12), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

476 So. 2d 303, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2311, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1985 | Docket: 64614525

Published

and was properly considered, in accordance with Rule 3.701(b)(3), as ‘circumstances surrounding the offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pommier v. State

476 So. 2d 284, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2305, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1985 | Docket: 64614516

Published

recommended by the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We reverse and remand for resen-tencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weaver v. State

475 So. 2d 1365, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2284, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1985 | Docket: 64614475

Published

basis for departing from the guidelines. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Young v. State, 455 So.2d 551 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

474 So. 2d 1266, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2072, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613927

Published

penalty exceeds the guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). The correctness of this portion of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

474 So. 2d 1266, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2072, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613927

Published

penalty exceeds the guideline sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(9). The correctness of this portion of

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDonald v. State

474 So. 2d 1261, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64613923

Published

scoresheets in arriving at appellant’s sentence. Rule 3.701 d.l., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, explicitly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

479 So. 2d 751, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2077, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1985 | Docket: 64616036

Published

guidelines were clear and convincing, as required by Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hyder v. State

474 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2038, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1985 | Docket: 64613803

Published

in accord with the sentencing guidelines. See Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. The presence of the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dougherty v. State

474 So. 2d 11, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1934, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1985 | Docket: 64613609

Published

imposed pursuant to the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ennis v. State

475 So. 2d 713, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1846, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1985 | Docket: 64614227

Published

Sentencing Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla.1984). . Rule 3.701(d)(3), as amended, reads as follows: (3) “Primary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elbert v. State

473 So. 2d 30, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1808, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1985 | Docket: 64613311

Published

trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elbert v. State

473 So. 2d 30, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1808, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1985 | Docket: 64613311

Published

trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lloyd v. State

473 So. 2d 765, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1776, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1985 | Docket: 64613501

Published

effective date of the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. She contends that the trial court erred

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hurst v. State

474 So. 2d 280, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1611, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 64613674

Published

presumptive sentence range under the Guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Both parties concede that at least

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

471 So. 2d 659, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 64612764

Published

in determining the recommended sentence under Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. We affirm. Franklin Jones, a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trasti v. State

470 So. 2d 849, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 64612575

Published

guidelines (§ 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701) anytime prior to, or during, sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morrell v. State

470 So. 2d 843, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14541, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 64612572

Published

REMANDED. ORFINGER and COWART, JJ„ concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. . § 847.014(2)(b)(2), Fla.Stat. (1981)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reichman v. State

473 So. 2d 1324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1954, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15351

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 64613593

Published

written reason is given. Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P. Second, Rule 3.701(d)(1) states, in pertinent

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stubbs v. State

470 So. 2d 768, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1372, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612559

Published

contends that the trial court erred in relying on Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holder v. State

470 So. 2d 88, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1371, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612427

Published

The Rule’s Committee Note, adopted as part of Rule 3.701, supports our conclusion by stating that “any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ames v. State

470 So. 2d 94, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14363, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612431

Published

guidelines. See § 921.001(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983); Rule 3.701, In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

469 So. 2d 951, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1357, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1985 | Docket: 64612282

Published

be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

E.W. v. State

469 So. 2d 914, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1289, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1985 | Docket: 64612258

Published

the time of sentencing, the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(ll) provided that sentences under the provisions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Edwards v. State

469 So. 2d 200, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1985 | Docket: 64612144

Published

implementation of the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richardson v. State

471 So. 2d 1292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1269, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 64612858

Published

Guidelines), 439 So.2d 848, 849 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(c) and committee note thereto.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Steiner v. State

469 So. 2d 179, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1261, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14020

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 64612141

Published

cognizably “clear and convincing” ones under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(ll). We disagree. II We will not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

468 So. 2d 499, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1172, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1985 | Docket: 64611809

Published

the “clear and convincing reasons” required by Rule 3.701(d)ll, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Arnett v. State

471 So. 2d 547, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1985 | Docket: 64612739

Published

1984). The change was effected by addition of rule 3.701(d)(14). Appellant contends the enhanced sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oldfield v. State

468 So. 2d 446, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1123, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1985 | Docket: 64611775

Published

trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sisson v. State

467 So. 2d 793, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1013, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1985 | Docket: 64611488

Published

range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. She contends

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bowker v. State

466 So. 2d 1246, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 931, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 64611196

Published

not purport to be a departure sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). His sentencing scoresheet totaled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988—Sentencing Guidelines)

468 So. 2d 220, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 226, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3912

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 64611706

Published

the existing law relating to manslaughter. b) Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a) is revised by the elimination of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988—Sentencing Guidelines)

468 So. 2d 220, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 226, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3912

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1985 | Docket: 64611706

Published

the existing law relating to manslaughter. b) Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a) is revised by the elimination of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

465 So. 2d 1372, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 825, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 64610863

Published

clear and convincing reasons for departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Smith v. State, 454 So.2d 90 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bibby v. State

465 So. 2d 670, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 797, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 64610728

Published

reason for this action because it believed that Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R.Crim.P., which would have justified

Category: Criminal Procedure

Browning v. State

465 So. 2d 1357, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 778, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 64610860

Published

would be a futile act because the amendment to' rule 3.701 allowing for a one cell upward departure based

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

465 So. 2d 613, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 732, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1985 | Docket: 64610695

Published

“additional offense at conviction,” see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.4, and the concomitant 27 *614points which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnes v. State

464 So. 2d 1333, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 707, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1985 | Docket: 64610478

Published

sentencing him under the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We agree. The underlying offense in this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whiteman v. State

465 So. 2d 591, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 694, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1985 | Docket: 64610692

Published

time he was sentenced, the committee note *592to rule 3.701(d)(12) stated that “If a split sentence is imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Arquilla v. State

464 So. 2d 716, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 656, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 64610358

Published

classified as misdemeanors in North Carolina. Rule 3.701(d)(5)(a), provides in part: a) “Prior record”

Category: Criminal Procedure

De Castro v. State

464 So. 2d 1305, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12894

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1985 | Docket: 64610460

Published

Procedure, 451 So.2d 824, 828 (Fla.1984); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) and committee note thereto.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Irving v. State

464 So. 2d 672, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1327835

Published

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lyons v. State

462 So. 2d 883, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 64609560

Published

departure from the sentencing guidelines. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). In fact, the trial court said he

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'Malley v. State

462 So. 2d 868, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 267, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1985 | Docket: 64609553

Published

demonstrate clear and convincing reasons therefor. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 (d)(ll). Accordingly, we reverse the appellant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

462 So. 2d 860, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1985 | Docket: 64609548

Published

guideline sentence established pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. For this limited reason we therefore vacate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cassidy v. State

464 So. 2d 580, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1985 | Docket: 64610317

Published

serve only six years. Appellant contends that rule 3.701(d)(12) was violated since his sentences totaled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dreggors v. State

464 So. 2d 581, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11923, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1985 | Docket: 64610318

Published

serve only six years. Appellant contends that rule 3.701(d)(12) was violated since his sentences totaled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

462 So. 2d 51, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 92, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1984 | Docket: 64609241

Published

defendant’s sentence under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. *52The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Havis v. State

461 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2600, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 64609157

Published

departure from the guidelines pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The trial court disagreed and imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hodges v. State

460 So. 2d 555, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2607, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 64608645

Published

sentence unless a written reason is given.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). Moreover, when appellant was sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

460 So. 2d 478, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2535, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 64608626

Published

shall not be scored. (Emphasis supplied). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). The guidelines’ all encompassing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santiago v. State

459 So. 2d 468, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2479, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 64608294

Published

urban area, not rural. Appellant asserts that Rule 3.701 delineates the presumptively correct bounds of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Draves v. State

459 So. 2d 455, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2459, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1984 | Docket: 64608288

Published

section. The use of the term “total sentence” in Rule 3.701(d)(12) does not refer to the mathematical total

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tackett v. State

458 So. 2d 368, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2304, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1984 | Docket: 64607817

Published

writing or in the transcript of the hearing. Rule 3.701 Fla.R.Crim.P. was amended to provide that no

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mack v. State

458 So. 2d 347, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2211, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 64607813

Published

effective. See § 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983), and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701. As permitted by the guidelines, by formal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooks v. State

456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 64607239

Published

in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find

Category: Criminal Procedure

Atkinson v. State

456 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 64607028

Published

judge on the score sheet were improper. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). We disagree and affirm. A “Category

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rutlin v. State

455 So. 2d 1347, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 64606868

Published

writing his reasons for deviating as required by Rule 3.701 b6. and dll. We have recently held that, in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Query v. State

455 So. 2d 554, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1840, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 64606698

Published

be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Fla. R.Crim.P. We agree that appellant was entitled

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGrath v. State

454 So. 2d 694, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1707, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 64606454

Published

accordance with the new sentencing guidelines. Rule 3.701, F.R. Crim.P. We affirm. On December 7, 1983

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bodine v. State

452 So. 2d 957, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 64605875

Published

the instant offense.” (Emphasis added). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). This subsequently committed crime

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure

451 So. 2d 824, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2928

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1984 | Docket: 64605432

Published

and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents. RULE 3.701. SENTENCING GUIDELINES a. This rule is to be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 20, 1984 | Docket: 3255301

Published

While it is true that the Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) does provide for the exceptions you

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Rules of Criminal Procedure

439 So. 2d 848, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3193

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1983 | Docket: 64600267

Published

which have been received, and we hereby adopt, as rule 3.701 and form 3.988, the rule and forms appended to

Category: Criminal Procedure