Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 916.301 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 916.301 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 916.301 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 916.301

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 916
MENTALLY ILL AND INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED DEFENDANTS
View Entire Chapter
916.301 Appointment of experts.
(1) All evaluations ordered by the court under this part must be conducted by qualified experts who have expertise in evaluating persons who have an intellectual disability or autism. The agency shall maintain and provide the courts annually with a list of available professionals who are appropriately licensed and qualified to perform evaluations of defendants alleged to be incompetent to proceed due to intellectual disability or autism. The courts may use professionals from this list when appointing experts and ordering evaluations under this part.
(2) If a defendant’s suspected mental condition is intellectual disability or autism, the court shall appoint the following:
(a) At least one, or at the request of any party, two experts to evaluate whether the defendant meets the definition of intellectual disability or autism and, if so, whether the defendant is competent to proceed; and
(b) A psychologist selected by the agency who is licensed or authorized by law to practice in this state, with experience in evaluating persons suspected of having an intellectual disability or autism, and a social service professional, with experience in working with persons who have an intellectual disability or autism.
1. The psychologist shall evaluate whether the defendant meets the definition of intellectual disability or autism and, if so, whether the defendant is incompetent to proceed due to intellectual disability or autism.
2. The social service professional shall provide a social and developmental history of the defendant.
(3) The experts may examine the defendant in jail, in another appropriate local facility, in a facility of the Department of Corrections, or on an outpatient basis.
(4) Experts appointed by the court to evaluate the mental condition of a defendant in a criminal case shall be allowed reasonable fees for services rendered as evaluators and as witnesses, which shall be paid by the court. State employees shall be paid expenses pursuant to s. 112.061. The fees shall be taxed as costs in the case. In order for the experts to be paid for the services rendered, the reports and testimony must explicitly address each of the factors and follow the procedures set out in this chapter and in the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
History.s. 23, ch. 98-92; s. 60, ch. 2005-236; s. 17, ch. 2006-195; s. 17, ch. 2008-244; s. 31, ch. 2013-162.

F.S. 916.301 on Google Scholar

F.S. 916.301 on CourtListener

Amendments to 916.301


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 916.301

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Agency for Persons With Disabilities v. Dallas, 38 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 2010 WL 2472272

...o a forensic facility to receive services to help them regain competency. [2] The court appoints experts to evaluate whether the defendant meets the definition of retardation or autism and, if so, whether the defendant is competent to proceed. See §§ 916.301, 916.3012(2), (3), Fla. Stat. In addition to reporting on the defendant's mental condition and competence or lack thereof, the experts are required to "recommend[ ] training for the defendant to attain competence to proceed." § 916.3012(4), Fla....
...Stat. (2009). II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In November 2008, Mr. Dallas was arrested and charged with domestic battery and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b) [3] and sections 916.301 and 916.3012(2), Florida Statutes, the court appointed two experts to evaluate Mr....
...Section 916.106 provides further that "[t]he [Agency] is responsible for training forensic clients who are developmentally disabled due to mental retardation or autism and have been determined incompetent to proceed." § 916.106(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). Under section 916.301(2), the Agency selects at least one of the experts appointed by the court to evaluate a defendant pursuant to section 916.3012, thereby giving the Agency input into the court's determinations regarding whether a defendant has mental retardation or autism, whether such a defendant is incompetent to proceed, and whether involuntary commitment is necessary....
Copy

Antonio Reyes Reina v. State of Florida (Fla. 6th DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 6th District Court of Appeal

...Florida Statutes (2023); and (2) an order appointing a committee to re-evaluate his competency. We grant the petition and quash both orders. In 2020, Reina was charged with several counts of theft and burglary. He was subsequently declared incompetent to proceed under section 916.3012, Florida Statutes (2021), by virtue of intellectual disability....
...time within which the defendant is expected to become competent to proceed. The charges may be refiled by the state if the defendant is declared competent to proceed in the future. The State, in response, filed a motion under section 916.301, Florida Statutes (2023), seeking the appointment of a committee to re-evaluate Reina’s competency. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing during which it considered both motions....
Copy

Larry Lamar Koonce III v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...each, for respondent. GERBER, J. The defendant petitions for a writ of certiorari, arguing the circuit court’s procedure for appointing an expert to determine the defendant’s competency to proceed departed from the essential requirements of section 916.301(1), Florida Statutes (2024)....
...Agency for Persons with Disabilities’ (“APD”) maintained list of appropriately licensed and qualified professionals to perform evaluations of persons alleged to be incompetent due to intellectual disability. We disagree with the defendant’s argument. Although section 916.301(1) requires that “[a]ll evaluations ordered by the court under this part must be conducted by qualified experts who have expertise in evaluating persons who have an intellectual disability,” § 916.301(1), Fla. Stat. (2024) (emphases added), section 916.301(1) does not require a court to appoint only an expert who is included on the APD-maintained list. Rather, section 916.301(1) pertinently provides that “courts may use professionals from this list when appointing experts and ordering evaluations under this part.” § 916.301(1), Fla....
...Under the whole-text canon, proper interpretation requires consideration of “the entire text, in view of its structure and of the physical and logical relation of its many parts.” Id. Id. at 323–24. Applying the “whole text” canon to section 916.301(1), the circuit court properly appointed a “qualified expert[] who ha[s] expertise in evaluating persons who have an intellectual disability” to determine the defendant’s competency....
...the ability to disclose facts pertinent to the proceedings to his lawyer; (5) the ability to display appropriate courtroom behavior; and (6) the ability to testify relevantly. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(2)(A). Based on the foregoing, the circuit court did not depart from section 916.301(1)’s essential requirements in appointing a “qualified expert[] who ha[s] expertise in evaluating persons who have an intellectual disability” to determine the defendant’s competency....
Copy

Dep't of Child. & Families v. Harrison, 848 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9979, 2003 WL 21507090

...order finding respondent incompetent to stand trial in a criminal case and ordering him to receive treatment at specific facilities. The Department argues that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to comply with section 916.301, Florida Statutes (2002), regarding the appointment of the experts for the respondent's incompetency evaluations and in ordering the Department to provide the treatment from a particular facility. The respondent concedes that the trial court erred in failing to comply with section 916.301 by failing to include the Department in the evaluation....
...While the order does not indicate, it is apparent that the court intended the Department to provide these services. The unilateral manner in which the trial court appointed the psychologists and ordered the type of treatment for the respondent violated section 916.301....
...While the court appointed two psychologists, one was not from the Department's developmental services program as required by statute. This is important because upon finding the respondent incompetent to proceed, the experts were required to recommend "training for the defendant to attain competence to proceed." § 916.3012(4)....
...Specifically, the expert's report must include recommendations on the appropriate training for the respondent, the availability of acceptable training in the community, the likelihood of the respondent attaining competency, and the probable duration of his attaining competency. See § 916.3012(4)(a)-(d)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.