Cases from cite.case.law:

R. BUTLER, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 651 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Harrell , 709 So.2d at 1371 ; see also § 837.02(1), Fla. . . .

STATE v. KWITOWSKI, Jr., 250 So. 3d 210 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . order granting Chester Kwitowski's motion to dismiss three counts of perjury in violation of section 837.02 . . . See § 837.02(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . Any other perjury during an official proceeding is a third-degree felony. § 837.02(1). . . . Neither affords a legitimate basis for its construction of section 837.02(2). . . . Nothing in section 837.02(2) shows that the term has a different meaning there. . . .

B. MAYS, v. STATE, 198 So. 3d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See §§ 777.011, 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . See §§ 777.011, 837.02(1). The elements of tampering are: 1. . . .

KINGLAND ESTATES, LTD. v. DAVIS,, 170 So. 3d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . (2) of the Florida Statutes; c.. suborning perjury and obstructing justice in violation of sections 837.02 . . . See § 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1999).”). . . . .

ARTHUR, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,, 569 F. App'x 669 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 837.02 (defining felony perjury); Fla. Stat. § 837.012 (defining misdemeanor perjury). . . . Stat. § 837.02(1). . . .

In BRICAN AMERICA LLC EQUIPMENT LEASE LITIGATION, 977 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Plaintiffs also cite to Florida Statute § 837.02, entitled “Perjury in official proceedings,” which states . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, 113 So. 3d 781 (Fla. 2013)

. . . STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 837.02 . . . statements made in this affidavit are being made under penalty of perjury, punishable as provided in Section 837.02 . . .

WARE, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . record before us, it appears that the alleged victim was never charged with a violation of section 837.02 . . . investigator testified that he believed she lied at the VOP hearing which would have been a violation of 837.02 . . .

ANTHONY, v. STATE, 108 So. 3d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (2008), provides: Perjury in official proceedings.— (1) Except as provided . . .

SIMPSON, v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (2010) ("Perjury in official proceedings"). . . .

SUAREZ, v. BENIHANA NATIONAL OF FLORIDA CORP., 88 So. 3d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Appellants’ contradictory statements “rise[ ] to the level of perjury in official proceedings (Section 837.02 . . .

SANCHEZ, v. STATE, 89 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . 1989) (holding that a racketeering charge was properly dismissed when felony perjury under section 837.02 . . .

E. TARDIF, Jr. v. PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, a, 829 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 837.02, 837.012 and 837.05. (Doc. #135, pp. 8-10.) PETA relies on Kaminer v. . . . Florida Statutes § 837.02 makes it illegal to make a false statement, under oath, in any official proceeding . . . Stat. § 837.02 would not apply in any case. See Schramm v. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 24 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 2009)

. . . To permit or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by section 837.02, Florida . . .

COHEN, v. STATE, 985 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The perjury charge alleged that Cohen, in violation of section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1999), falsely . . . See § 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). See also Hirsch v. State, 279 So.2d 866, 869 (Fla.1973). . . . Section 837.02(2), Florida Statutes (1999) provides: "Whoever makes a false statement, which he or she . . .

CANALS, v. CENTRO MATER, INC., 200 F. App'x 881 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 837.012, 837.02. . . .

IACONO, v. STATE, 930 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (describing the third-degree felony of perjury in an official proceeding). . . .

A. BUTLER, v. STATE, 946 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

FLORIDA EVERGREEN FOLIAGE v. E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a, 336 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . perjury in official proceedings and by contradictory statements in violation of Florida Statues §§ 837.02 . . . (Corrigenda at Exh. 5 ¶¶ 23, 25, 28, alleging violations of Fla Stats. §§ 817.034(4)(a) and (b), 837.02 . . .

AMENDMENT TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 875 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 2004)

. . . To permit or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by section 837.02, Florida . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS- SEXUAL VIOLENCE FORMS, 871 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2004)

. . . statements made in this affidavit are being made under penalty of perjury, punishable as provided in Section 837.02 . . .

STATE v. MARK MARKS, P. A., 833 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The defendants were charged with violating section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes (1989). . . .

VARGAS, v. STATE, 795 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 837.02(1) (1999); see also Hirsch v. . . .

STATE v. DIAZ,, 785 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . .” § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE AND FAMILY LAW FORMS, 810 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2000)

. . . STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 837.02 . . .

HANONO v. MURPHY v., 723 So. 2d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . I can’t bend to the left side or the right side”, in violation of s. 837.02, Fla. Stat. . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, 723 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1998)

. . . STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 837.02 . . .

STATE v. A. ELLIS,, 723 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Section 837.02 defines the crime of perjury in an official proceeding and limits the statute’s sweep . . . official proceeding in regard to any material matter shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree.... § 837.02 . . . . § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (1993) (emphasis supplied). . . .

JACOBS, v. STATE, 715 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Anderson was convicted of both perjury in an official proceeding (section 837.02) and providing false . . .

HARRELL, v. STATE, 709 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1998)

. . . In Florida, section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1995), states that the offense of perjury in an official . . .

L. ROBINSON, v. STATE, 707 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1998)

. . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b) and 837.02,- Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b), 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . .

GIBBS, v. STATE, 698 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Whether the double jeopardy clause permits a defendant to be convicted and sentenced under both section 837.02 . . .

STATE v. D. ANDERSON,, 695 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Whether the double jeopardy clause permits a defendant to be convicted and sentenced under both section 837.02 . . . As noted above, section 837.02 punishes one who knowingly makes a false statement under oath in an official . . . Under section 837.02, the violation is of a formal oath, while under section 903.035, it is not. . . . Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1991), provides in relevant part: (1) Whoever makes a false statement . . . Alternatively, the defendant could be prosecuted under section 837.02 for committing perjury in an official . . .

STATE v. A. ELLIS,, 722 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . materiality is not an element of the perjury prosecution in the present case, which was pursued under section 837.02 . . . State, 279 So.2d 866 (Fla.1973), and section 837.02(1) expressly provides that: Whoever makes a false . . . In the instant case, Lauri Ellis was charged with perjury under section 837.02, Florida Statutes. . . . For example, in 1971, section 837.02 provided: Whoever being lawfully required to depose the truth in . . . The 1974 legislature rewrote the perjury statute, codifying section 837.02 in its current form effective . . . Section 837.02 now clearly defines the elements of perjury consistent with previous case law and does . . . Although it is true that the words “material matter” appear in the body of section 837.02, it is also . . .

ROBERTS, v. STATE, 678 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 1996)

. . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b), 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1995). . . .

SOLLER, Jr. v. STATE, 666 So. 2d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . .” § 837.02(1), Fla. . . .

MONCER, v. STATE, 666 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). Reversed and remanded. . . .

BAITON, v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., 661 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Since perjury is a crime, see §§ 837.012, 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993), Baiton asserts that his allegations . . .

ANDERSON a k a v. STATE, 669 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . WHETHER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE PERMITS A DEFENDANT TO BE CONVICTED AND SENTENCED UNDER BOTH SECTION 837.02 . . . Applying section 775.021 to the instant facts, Anderson’s convictions for violating both section 837.02 . . . the crime of providing false information in an application for bail, the perjury charge under section 837.02 . . . connection with an application for bail, is merely a lesser degree of the offense enumerated in section 837.02 . . . Here, sections 903.035 and 837.02 have different “core offenses.” . . . Subsections 837.02(1) and (2), relating to perjury in official proceedings, provide: (1) Whoever makes . . . Hollie, to the emergency room of the Central Florida Regional Hospital in Sanford, contrary to Sections 837.02 . . . GOSHORN, J., dissents, with opinion. . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 903.035, Fla.Stat. (1991). .Although . . . batteiy” describes conduct that is neither a crime nor an offense. . § 837.012, Fla.Stat. (1993). . § 837.02 . . .

D. SHAW, v. STATE, 650 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. . . .

A No. P. DAVEY, 645 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1994)

. . . Cf § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993) (“Whoever makes a false statement, which he does not believe to be true . . .

LIGHTBOURNE, v. STATE, 644 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 1994)

. . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b) and 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

BANKS, v. STATE, 610 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The perjury statute in pertinent part reads as follows: 837.02 Peijury in official proceedings.— (1) . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 605 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1992)

. . . or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by -Florida Statute § section 837.02 . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CRIMINAL CASES NO., 603 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 1992)

. . . PERJURY (Amended) (NOT IN AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING — F.S. 837.012) (IN AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING — F.S. 837.02 . . . Give if applicable F.S. 837.012(2) & 837.02(2) Knowledge of the materiality of the statement is not an . . .

LEHMAN, v. STATE, 602 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . On May 16, 1990, the appellant was charged in count I with perjury in violation of section 837.02, Florida . . .

STATE v. FEAGLE,, 600 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Ralph Kermit Ellis by recanting his sworn testimony and committing Perjury in violation of Section 837.02 . . .

DEES, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a, 747 F. Supp. 679 (S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 837.02, was directly caused by a City policy, custom or usage that required or allowed police officers . . . arrested John Dees charging him with five counts of perjury in an official proceeding (Fla.Stat. § 837.02 . . .

STATE v. J. BARBUTO,, 571 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Florida Statutes (1987), and two counts of perjury in an official proceeding in violation of section 837.02 . . .

BUTTERWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA, v. SMITH, 494 U.S. 624 (U.S. 1990)

. . . . §§837.02, 914.22 (1989), and its courts have subpoena and contempt powers available to bring recalcitrant . . .

DOE, v. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, 734 F. Supp. 981 (S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . §§ 837.02 and 817.49; see also Doe v. Gonzalez, supra at 694. . . . Section 837.02 provides: (1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he does not believe to be true, under . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR PERJURED TESTIMONY, 557 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1990)

. . . To permit or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by Florida Statute § 837.02 . . .

STATE v. P. ADKINS, Jr. B., 553 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . The perjury count charges both appellants with violation of section 837.02, Fla. . . . Section 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1987), reads in pertinent part: “Whoever makes a false Statement, which he . . . indicates a legislative intent that false swearing before a notary public may violate either section 837.02 . . . perjury charge, the predicate acts which led to the State’s charge of felony perjury under section 837.02 . . . However, because the perjury charge delineated in the RICO count only alleges violation of section 837.02 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 543 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1989)

. . . proceeding — 837.012 None None CHARGED OFFENSES CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 Perjury if official proceeding — 837.02 . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 534 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 837.02(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.A6. . . .

STATE v. MARLOW,, 501 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . information in which the defendant, David Marlow, was charged with perjury in violation of section 837.02 . . . See also, § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . the arraignment on the misdemeanor charges was not a material matter within the meaning of section 837.02 . . .

KIRKLAND, v. STATE, 495 So. 2d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . For example, the legislature has distinguished between penury in an official proceeding (Section 837.02 . . .

SEVIN, v. STATE, 478 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . court in Schramm, in regard to a charge of perjury in an official proceeding in violation of section 837.02 . . . Schramm’s statements were not made during an official proceeding, his conviction for violation of Section 837.02 . . .

STATE v. T. MOORMAN,, 475 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . The indictment asserted the allegedly perjurious testimony to be violative of section 837.02, Florida . . .

NESSMITH, v. STATE, 472 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . James William Ness-mith was convicted of perjury in an official proceeding in violation of section 837.02 . . . indicates a legislative intent that false swearing before a notary public may violate either section 837.02 . . . 3d DCA 1984), the appellate court reversed the dismissal of a count charging perjury under section 837.02 . . . that if Nessmith committed any offense, it was in violation of section 837.012 rather than section 837.02 . . . Section 837.02 states: (1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he does not believe to be true, under . . . The conviction was under Section 837.02, Florida Statutes, perjury in official proceedings, a third degree . . .

v., 84 T.C. 600 (T.C. 1985)

. . . 951.88 Lube, oil, and grease. 487.54 Tires, batteries, and accessories. 472.02 Facilities and equipment. 837.02 . . .

STATE v. ROSENFELD,, 467 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . in violation of section 839.25(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), and perjury, in violation of section 837.02 . . .

L. JONES, v. STATE, 466 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . a State Attorney investigation is an official proceeding for the purpose of the perjury statute, § 837.02 . . . COMMIT PERJURY Appellant was charged with solicitation to commit perjury under Sections 777.-04(2) and 837.02 . . . Section 837.02 provides: Perjury in official proceedings.— (1) Whoever makes a false statement, which . . . 368 So.2d 1369 (Fla.1979) (in prosecution for perjury in a State Attorney investigation under Section 837.02 . . . Cf. § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . . Rouen to commit perjury in an Official Proceeding, an offense prohibited by Section 837.02, Florida Statutes . . .

STATE v. L. FOWLER,, 466 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1985)

. . . PERJURY BY LATER CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 837.021; AND (b) FOR PERJURY UNDER SECTION 837.02 . . . addressed in that opinion the second part of the certified question, relating to prosecution under section 837.02 . . .

STATE v. A. WITTE,, 451 So. 2d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . 837.011, Florida Statutes (1981), so as to subject the defendant to a charge of perjury under Section 837.02 . . . One of the information charged Witte with perjury in an official proceeding in violation of Section 837.02 . . . Making a knowing false statement under oath in an official proceeding is a felony under Section 837.02 . . . placed under oath is official as a predicate to prosecuting the witness for a felony under Section 837.02 . . . Section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent part: "Whoever makes a false, statement . . .

CLAUSELL, v. STATE, 455 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Clausell is being prosecuted for perjury in violation of Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

V. KLINE, v. STATE, 444 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Appellant pled nolo contendere to the offense of perjury, Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1979), reserving . . .

FOWLER, v. STATE, 447 So. 2d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . supreme court pointed out in Doe that the state is not precluded from prosecuting her under section 837.02 . . . extremely difficult for the state to prosecute Fowler for perjury in official proceedings under section 837.02 . . . PERJURY BY LATER CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 837.021; AND (b) FOR PERJURY UNDER SECTION 837.02 . . .

TRIBUNE COMPANY v. L. GREEN, Jr. E., 440 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . was charged in the indictment summarized as follows: Count 1 charged that Judge Leon violated section 837.02 . . . Count 2 charged that Judge Leon violated section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes, when he stated under oath . . .

STATE v. SNIPES, Jr., 433 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Tabor and Virgil Douglas did in fact not burn down the Lake Butler Middle School, contrary to Section 837.02 . . .

In a W. TURNER, 421 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1982)

. . . Perjury is made a criminal violation by and defined in § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979), as: (1) Whoever makes . . .

YARBRO, Jr. v. STATE, 402 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

OWNER S ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. v. H. OTT,, 402 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979); see § 837.012, Fla. Stat. (1979). . . . .

A. ADAMS, v. P. MURPHY L., 394 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1981)

. . . Adams was charged with the crime of perjury in violation of section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1973). . . . Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1973), provides: Whoever being lawfully required to depose the truth . . . reasoning to be directly applicable to the question of whether there can be an attempt to violate section 837.02 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. v. AGAR,, 394 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 1980)

. . . brought criminal charges against Agar in this matter for perjury in violation of sections 777.011 and 837.02 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. DOE, THE FLORIDA BAR, v. ROE,, 384 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1980)

. . . inconsistent statements, it does not follow, however, that if they now commit perjury, in violation of section 837.02 . . .

T. R. CARTER, v. STATE, 384 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1980)

. . . a licensed and practicing chiropractor charged with perjury in an official proceeding under section 837.02 . . .

MAHAN v. PARLIAMENT INSURANCE COMPANY, C. d b a D s, 382 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Perjury in official proceedings is defined in Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1977): (1) Whoever makes . . .

STATE v. J. SEDLMAYER,, 375 So. 2d 887 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . is charged by Information in this cause with two Counts of Perjury in violation of Florida Statute § 837.02 . . . Florida Statute, § 837.02(1) provides that a violation of this Statute is committed only if the statement . . .

SCHRAMM, v. STATE, 374 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Schramm’s statements were not made during an official proceeding, his conviction for violation of Section 837.02 . . . of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in § 775.082, § 775.083, or § 775.084.” . “837.02 . . .

A. ADAMS, v. P. MURPHY, L., 598 F.2d 982 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . Petitioner Adams was indicted in 1974 for the crime of perjury, in violation of section 837.02, Florida . . .

STATE v. LEIGHTON, a k a, 365 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . made certain statements which formed the basis for a subsequent Information charging perjury under § 837.02 . . .

STATE v. T. R. CARTER,, 364 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Appellee was charged with the crime of perjury under Section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes (1977) as the . . .

STATE v. NEWSOME,, 349 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Sections 837.02, .021, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

MOBLEY, v. STATE, 347 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . William Allan Mob-ley from an adjudication of guilty of perjury in an official proceeding under Section 837.02 . . . Affirmed. . “837.02 Perjury in official proceedings “(1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he does . . .

STATE v. STOCKSDALE, 44 Fla. Supp. 191 (Leon Cty. Cir. Ct. 1976)

. . . Stocksdale, was charged in an amended information with one count of perjury in a judicial proceeding, F.S. 837.02 . . . self-incrimination certainly causes prosecutorial scrutiny of previous testimony for violations of §837.02 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In BROOKS, 336 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 1976)

. . . The parties hereto stipulate that Respondent’s testimony although not legally perjurious, (See F.S. 837.02 . . .

DIAMOND, v. STATE, 270 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Section 837.02, F.S.A. . . . Section 837.02, F.S.A. . . .

WOLFE, v. STATE, 256 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We affirm. . . .

E. BRADLEY, v. STATE, 208 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . of having given false testimony before the grand jury, which constitutes an offense as provided in § 837.02 . . .

STATE v. WOLFE,, 203 So. 2d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . . § 837.02, F.S.A. . Nix v. State, (Fla.App.1965) 173 So. 2d 465. . United States v. . . .

MAY BROADCASTING COMPANY, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 299 F.2d 84 (8th Cir. 1962)

. . . An additional payment of excess profits tax in the amount of $837.02 subsequently was made, making its . . .

v., 33 T.C. 1007 (T.C. 1960)

. . . An additional payment of excess profits tax in the amount of $837.02 subsequently was made, making its . . .

BAZARTE, v. STATE, 117 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . record, before the beginning of the trial, that the State would proceed under Florida Statutes Sec. 837.02 . . . , F.S.A., which provides: “837.02 Perjury in judicial proceeding ; punishment. . . . of perjury, says: “The crime of perjury committed in a judicial proceeding is condemned by Section 837.02 . . . since the County Solicitor had stipulated that the case would be tried under Florida Statutes Sec. 837.02 . . .

H. P. GORDON, E. L. v. STATE, 104 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1958)

. . . The crime of perjury committed in a judicial proceeding is condemned by Section 837.02, Florida Statutes . . .