Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 775.0845
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§775.0845(1a)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESREMOVEDM · 1st
§775.0845(1b)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.0845(2a)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESREMOVEDF · 2nd
§775.0845(2b)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESREMOVEDF · 1st
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
52
cases, 1984–2020 · leading case:
Cabal v. State, 678 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1996).
Cabal v. State, 678 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1996).
· cites it 19× “" § 775.0845, Fla.Stat. (1995) (emphasis added).”
Fletcher v. State, 472 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
· cites it 11× “He also challenges the trial court's application of section 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1983), which enhances the penalty for an offense where the offender, while committing the offense, wears a device that conceals his identity.”
Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 2002).
· cites it 2× “See § 775.084, Fla. Stat. (2001). However, there are other statutes which allow the courts to reclassify the offense and thus exceed the statutory maximum sentence: section 775.”
Wright v. State, 810 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2002).
· cites it 14× “Wright contends that since he remained unmasked in his vehicle, his offenses cannot be reclassified under the provisions of section 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1997) ("Wearing mask while committing offense; reclassification").”
Spicer v. State, 615 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
· cites it 6× “Spicer argues that although section 775.0845 is an enhanced penalty statute, it does not reclassify the degree of felony.”
Cooper v. State, 800 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
· cites it 6× “Cooper next alleges that his sentences are illegal because the trial court enhanced the convictions from second-degree felonies to first-degree felonies under section 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1995), and then again enhanced them to life felonies under the habitual offender…”
Pethtel v. State, 177 So. 3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).
· cites it 5× “(2014) (expressly authorizing reclassification of an assault or battery to a higher degree based on the victim's status as a law enforcement officer, firefighter, emergency medical care provider, public transit employee or agent, or other specified officer), and § 775.0845, Fla.…”
Wright v. State, 767 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
· cites it 10× “But Wright contends that since he remained unmasked in his vehicle as he sent his minions out to commit masked offenses, his offenses cannot be reclassified under the provisions of section 775.0845, Florida Statutes ("Wearing mask while committing offense; reclassification").”
Newman v. State, 738 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
· cites it 7× “" § 775.0845, Fla. Stat. (1995) (emphasis supplied).”
Jennings v. State, 498 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
· cites it 5× “However on its face, § 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1985), the mask statute, reveals language that distinguishes it from the habitual offender statute.”
Sanders v. State, 621 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
· cites it 2× “§ 775.0845, Fla. Stat.(1985). That statute provides: The penalty for any criminal offense .”
Cuthbert v. State, 459 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
· cites it 2× “(1981), use of a weapon or firearm in commission of a felony, and § 775.0845, Fla. Stat. (1981), wearing a mask while committing an offense).”
775.0845(3): 1 case
Jennings v. State, 498 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“However on its face, § 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1985), the mask statute, reveals language that distinguishes it from the habitual offender statute.”
775.0845(4): 7 cases
Spicer v. State, 615 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
“Spicer argues that although section 775.0845 is an enhanced penalty statute, it does not reclassify the degree of felony.”
Cabal v. State, 678 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1996).
“" § 775.0845, Fla.Stat. (1995) (emphasis added).”
Jennings v. State, 498 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“However on its face, § 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1985), the mask statute, reveals language that distinguishes it from the habitual offender statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.