413.08 Rights and responsibilities of an individual with a disability; use of a service animal; prohibited discrimination in public employment, public accommodations, and housing accommodations; penalties.—
(1) As used in this section and s. 413.081, the term:
(a) “Housing accommodation” means any real property or portion thereof which is used or occupied, or intended, arranged, or designed to be used or occupied, as the home, residence, or sleeping place of one or more persons, but does not include any single-family residence, the occupants of which rent, lease, or furnish for compensation not more than one room therein.
(b) “Individual with a disability” means a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of the individual. As used in this paragraph, the term:
1. “Major life activity” means a function such as caring for one’s self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working.
2. “Physical or mental impairment” means:
a. A physiological disorder or condition, disfigurement, or anatomical loss that affects one or more bodily functions; or
b. A mental or psychological disorder that meets one of the diagnostic categories specified in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association, such as an intellectual or developmental disability, organic brain syndrome, traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, or an emotional or mental illness.
(c) “Public accommodation” means a common carrier, airplane, motor vehicle, railroad train, motor bus, streetcar, boat, or other public conveyance or mode of transportation; hotel; a timeshare that is a transient public lodging establishment as defined in s. 509.013; lodging place; place of public accommodation, amusement, or resort; and other places to which the general public is invited, subject only to the conditions and limitations established by law and applicable alike to all persons. The term does not include air carriers covered by the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986, 49 U.S.C. s. 41705, and by regulations adopted by the United States Department of Transportation to implement such act.
(d) “Service animal” means an animal that is trained to do work or perform tasks for an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability. The work done or tasks performed must be directly related to the individual’s disability and may include, but are not limited to, guiding an individual who is visually impaired or blind, alerting an individual who is deaf or hard of hearing, pulling a wheelchair, assisting with mobility or balance, alerting and protecting an individual who is having a seizure, retrieving objects, alerting an individual to the presence of allergens, providing physical support and assistance with balance and stability to an individual with a mobility disability, helping an individual with a psychiatric or neurological disability by preventing or interrupting impulsive or destructive behaviors, reminding an individual with mental illness to take prescribed medications, calming an individual with posttraumatic stress disorder during an anxiety attack, or doing other specific work or performing other special tasks. A service animal is not a pet. For purposes of subsections (2), (3), and (4), the term “service animal” is limited to a dog or miniature horse. The crime-deterrent effect of an animal’s presence and the provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship do not constitute work or tasks for purposes of this definition.
(2) An individual with a disability is entitled to full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges in all public accommodations. A public accommodation must modify its policies, practices, and procedures to permit use of a service animal by an individual with a disability. This section does not require any person, firm, business, or corporation, or any agent thereof, to modify or provide any vehicle, premises, facility, or service to a higher degree of accommodation than is required for a person not so disabled.
(3) An individual with a disability has the right to be accompanied by a service animal in all areas of a public accommodation that the public or customers are normally permitted to occupy.
(a) The service animal must be under the control of its handler and must have a harness, leash, or other tether, unless either the handler is unable because of a disability to use a harness, leash, or other tether, or the use of a harness, leash, or other tether would interfere with the service animal’s safe, effective performance of work or tasks, in which case the service animal must be otherwise under the handler’s control by means of voice control, signals, or other effective means.
(b) Documentation that the service animal is trained is not a precondition for providing service to an individual accompanied by a service animal. A public accommodation may not ask about the nature or extent of an individual’s disability. To determine the difference between a service animal and a pet, a public accommodation may ask if an animal is a service animal required because of a disability and what work or tasks the animal has been trained to perform.
(c) A public accommodation may not impose a deposit or surcharge on an individual with a disability as a precondition to permitting a service animal to accompany the individual with a disability, even if a deposit is routinely required for pets.
(d) An individual with a disability is liable for damage caused by a service animal if it is the regular policy and practice of the public accommodation to charge nondisabled persons for damages caused by their pets.
(e) The care or supervision of a service animal is the responsibility of the individual owner. A public accommodation is not required to provide care or food or a special location for the service animal or assistance with removing animal excrement.
(f) A public accommodation may exclude or remove any animal from the premises, including a service animal, if the animal is out of control and the animal’s handler does not take effective action to control it, the animal is not housebroken, or the animal’s behavior poses a direct threat to the health and safety of others. Allergies and fear of animals are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to an individual with a service animal. If a service animal is excluded or removed for being a direct threat to others, the public accommodation must provide the individual with a disability the option of continuing access to the public accommodation without having the service animal on the premises.
(4) Any person, firm, or corporation, or the agent of any person, firm, or corporation, who denies or interferes with admittance to, or enjoyment of, a public accommodation or, with regard to a public accommodation, otherwise interferes with the rights of an individual with a disability or the trainer of a service animal while engaged in the training of such an animal pursuant to subsection (8), commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083 and must perform 30 hours of community service for an organization that serves individuals with disabilities, or for another entity or organization at the discretion of the court, to be completed in not more than 6 months.
(5) It is the policy of this state that an individual with a disability be employed in the service of the state or political subdivisions of the state, in the public schools, and in all other employment supported in whole or in part by public funds, and an employer may not refuse employment to such a person on the basis of the disability alone, unless it is shown that the particular disability prevents the satisfactory performance of the work involved.
(6) An individual with a disability is entitled to rent, lease, or purchase, as other members of the general public, any housing accommodations offered for rent, lease, or other compensation in this state, subject to the conditions and limitations established by law and applicable alike to all persons.
(a) This section does not require any person renting, leasing, or otherwise providing real property for compensation to modify her or his property in any way or provide a higher degree of care for an individual with a disability than for a person who is not disabled.
(b) An individual with a disability who has a service animal or who obtains a service animal is entitled to full and equal access to all housing accommodations provided for in this section, and such individual may not be required to pay extra compensation for such animal. However, such individual is liable for any damage done to the premises or to another individual on the premises by the animal. A housing accommodation may request proof of compliance with vaccination requirements. This paragraph does not apply to an emotional support animal as defined in s. 760.27.
(c) This subsection does not limit the rights or remedies of a housing accommodation or an individual with a disability that are granted by federal law or another law of this state with regard to other assistance animals.
(7) An employer covered under subsection (5) who discriminates against an individual with a disability in employment, unless it is shown that the particular disability prevents the satisfactory performance of the work involved, or any person, firm, or corporation, or the agent of any person, firm, or corporation, providing housing accommodations as provided in subsection (6) who discriminates against an individual with a disability, commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(8) Any trainer of a service animal, while engaged in the training of such an animal, has the same rights and privileges with respect to access to public facilities and the same liability for damage as is provided for those persons described in subsection (3) accompanied by service animals.
(9) A person who knowingly and willfully misrepresents herself or himself, through conduct or verbal or written notice, as using a service animal and being qualified to use a service animal or as a trainer of a service animal commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083 and must perform 30 hours of community service for an organization that serves individuals with disabilities, or for another entity or organization at the discretion of the court, to be completed in not more than 6 months.
Cited 178 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 WL 765614
...evy County (“the County”), Judge Frederick Smith, and Sheriff Ted Glass, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 , et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ; the Florida Civil Rights Act; and Florida Statutes § 413.08....
Cited 94 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 WL 3087215
...ety, compliance
with the applicable procedures for entry into the MRI room and the preclusion of
3
The next day, Sheely filed a complaint with the police about the incident, alleging that
MRN was in violation of Florida Statute § 413.08(3), which provides that “[a]n individual with a
disability has the right to be accompanied by a service animal in all areas of a public
accommodation that the public or customers are normally permitted to occupy.” Although the
police re...
...n Act, 29
U.S.C. § 794 (“RA”). Finally, count three sought the same relief, plus punitive
damages and interest, under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq.
(“FCRA”), and Florida’s service animal statute, Fla. Stat. § 413.08.
On April 20, 2006, almost nine months into the lawsuit and after eight
months of discovery and nearly five months of mediation that ended in stalemate,
MRN moved for summary judgment, announcing that, two days earlier, it had
im...
...ent to MRN on Sheely’s state
law claim under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. §760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”).
That statute provides for a private right of action for violation of any Florida
discrimination statute, and Florida Statutes §§ 413.08 and 413.081, in turn, provide
that disabled individuals have the right to be accompanied by service animals in
places of public accommodation. The district court held that the FCRA’s narrow
definition of “public accommodation” does not apply to MRN, and that Sheely
may not “import” § 413.08’s broader definition of “public accommodation” into
the FCRA....
...Instead, she notes that MRN is a place
of public accommodation under Florida’s separate service animal statute, and
argues that this provides her with a private right of action against MRN under the
FCRA. We are not persuaded. Florida Statute § 413.08 provides that “[a]n
individual with a disability has the right to be accompanied by a service animal in
all areas of a public accommodation that the public or customers are normally
permitted to occupy,” id. § 413.08(3), and defines “public accommodation”
broadly to include “places to which the general public is invited,” id. §
413.08(1)(c)....
...tion in places of public accommodation
58
unlawful, § 760.02 of the FCRA expressly states that its narrow definition of
“public accommodation” applies to § 760.07. Sheely therefore may not import §
413.08’s broader definition of “public accommodation” into the FCRA. As the
district court noted, this conclusion does not gut § 760.07. If MRN were a lodging,
food, or entertainment establishment, § 760.07 would provide a private right of
action for a violation of § 413.08.
Moreover, Sheely has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies under
the FCRA....
Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 842
...To dissolve that presumption in the public sector, the Florida legislature forbids public employers to refuse an applicant employment because of his blindness alone, "unless it is shown" that blindness prevents satisfactory performance of the work. Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes (1977)....
...lay County tendered him, then for his blindness denied him, employment as a physical education instructor at Middleburg Elementary School. The court found the federal law inapplicable but held that, in the circumstances of this case, Florida Statute 413.08(3) requires Clay County so to employ Zorick, that he might have the opportunity to demonstrate whether or not he can satisfactorily perform the work of a physical education teacher at Middleburg Elementary School....
...ts training for the United States Olympic Team and supporting himself with Social Security benefits. The plaintiff did not file a complaint until two years later on August 6, 1976. 5. That the Federal Statutes are not applicable in this case in that Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes, ......
...We affirm the circuit court. I We first consider Zorick's claim that the circuit court erred in declining to recognize his asserted Florida-enforceable rights under federal constitutional and statutory law. In the face of the circuit court's finding that Florida Statute 413.08(3) affords Zorick both a right and a remedy, the implication of Zorick's insistence on asserted federal rights is that they may be greater in substance than that afforded by Section 413.08(3), or at least richer in content given by federal judicial and administrative decisions, and that attorney's fees may flow more readily from federal statutes than from Florida's....
...local employment responsibilities Zorick's Florida claim is directly traceable to the Constitution, which provides in Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights: No person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion or physical handicap. Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes (1977), supra n....
...hools, and no school employer shall refuse employment to the blind "on the basis of the disability alone" unless it is shown that blindness "prevents the satisfactory performance of the work involved." We think it clear, as did the trial court, that Section 413.08(3) creates a private right of action for its enforcement. Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010, 117 So. 786 (1928); Florida Constitution, Article I, Section 21. "Unless it is shown" is the heart of Section 413.08(3)....
...rform satisfactorily tasks previously reserved for the fully ablebodied. Incapacity due to a physical handicap must be "shown". "Unless it is shown" does not refer alone to the quality of proof to be offered by an employer defending litigation under section 413.08(3), following a decision not to employ....
...eguards, fully explored all relevant facts, opposing views, and possible alternatives, and as a result of that exploration makes an ultimate decision which reflects that exploration, then the decision is made and made well; and the court considering section 413.08(3) will declare the decision rational, and be not concerned with whether it is also correct and wise. See Hill v. State, 358 So.2d 190, 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); State ex rel. The Tallahassee Democrat, Inc. v. Cooksey, 371 So.2d 207, p. 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). III By the standard of section 413.08(3), it was not "shown" in the circumstances of the school officials' decision to refuse Zorick the tendered employment, that Zorick was and is incapable, by reason of his blindness, to perform satisfactorily....
...The decision to withdraw the employment offer was based, not on any identifiable experience of school administrators in Clay County or elsewhere, not on a test or interview of Zorick or any trial of his abilities, but on ordinary preconceptions of sighted administrators which section 413.08(3) now makes inoperable....
...nt decided to dart away from the playground. Aside from the fact that Zorick was never employed by the school system of Duval County in the manner provided by law, Section 230.33(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1977), I find nothing among the provisions of Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes (1977), that would authorize or even permit the type of judicial experiment that is now mandated....
...The majority now sets the stage for an unsighted person to require an "on-the-job" opportunity to demonstrate his ability, or lack thereof, to serve as a fireman (presumably another to point the fire hose) or as a vehicular traffic control officer. More need not be said. NOTES [1] Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes (1977): It is the policy of this state that the deaf, blind, visually handicapped, and otherwise physically disabled shall be employed in the service of the state or political subdivisions of the state, in the publ...
...re or supervision of a service animal is the responsibility of the individual owner. A public accommodation is not required to provide care or food or a special location for the service animal or assistance with removing animal excrement. Fla. Stat. § 413.08 (3)(d) (emphasis added)....
Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1786, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12139
...NOTES [1] An explanatory note concerning procedure and applicable statutory and rule provisions may be of some benefit here. Neither the parties nor the Commission sought to implement or rely upon, either in the proceedings below or on appeal, the provisions of Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes (1981), which one writer has recently characterized thusly: "The constitutional [Art. I, § 2, Florida Constitution] protection afforded physically handicapped workers in Florida is implemented, for public sector employees, by F.S. § 413.08(3) (1981)." Gibson, Florida's Antidiscrimination Statutes: Time for Reassessment, Vol. 58 Fla.Bar J. 101 (February, 1984). Section 413.08(3) refers to "deaf, blind, visually handicapped, and otherwise physically disabled " persons. (e.s.) That section appears in Part I ("Blind Services Program") of Chapter 413 ("Vocational Rehabilitation") of the Florida Statutes (1981). Section 413.08(3) is obviously not limited to the blind, but the phrase "otherwise physically disabled" as used in that section is not defined....
...as defined in Section 413.033(2). However, that definitions section is expressly limited to the words and phrases used in Sections 413.032 through 413.037 and therefore has no bearing upon the meaning of "otherwise physically disabled" appearing in Section 413.08(3)....
...We would also note that, unlike the provisions of Section 23.161 et seq., Florida Statutes (1981) (the provisions relied upon by the parties herein), Chapter 413 contains no procedural apparatus for the handling administratively of any complaints or grievances for violations of Section 413.08(3). In any event, we are not called upon to determine whether Section 413.08(3) would have any application to Rateau's circumstances or condition inasmuch as he instituted proceedings strictly under the provisions of Section 23.161 et seq....
...injuries or conditions. [3] The job requirements, therefore, were apparently the "pretext" about which the hearing officer was referring. [4] Compare Zorick v. Tynes, 372 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). There, a blind person sought relief pursuant to Section 413.08(3), Florida Statutes (1977), by reason of the Clay County School Board's refusal to employ him. This Court upheld the circuit court's order requiring "trial employment" to determine whether he was able to perform the job satisfactorily. Essential to the court's affirmance was the particular language of Section 413.08(3): "[N]o employer shall refuse employment to the ... blind ... unless it is shown that the particular disability prevents the satisfactory performance of the work involved." (e.s.) We observed in Zorick: "`Unless it is shown' is the heart of Section 413.08(3)....
...half of Ilana. In Count I of the Complaint Plaintiff alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA") and sought injunctive relief. In Count II, Plaintiff alleged violation of Florida's service animal statute, Fla. Stat. § 413.08(3), and sought both damages and injunctive relief....
...itions while extracting her blood and causing injury and sought damages. Defendants moved to dismiss Counts II, III and IV for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Court dismissed Count II with prejudice because Fla. Stat. § 413.08(3) does not explicitly create a private right of action for the interference with the right of a disabled person to be accompanied by an animal....
Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
...sued Levy County ("the
County"), Judge Frederick Smith, and Sheriff Ted Glass, alleging violations of the
Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.; 42 U.S.C. §
1983; the Florida Civil Rights Act; and Florida Statutes § 413.08....
...ince enforcement of Chapter 760 lies with the Florida Commission on Human Relations. These conclusions were adopted by PERC in its final order, and appellant has failed to challenge any of these findings. Instead he asserts *694 that Chapter 760 and section 413.08, Florida Statutes, prohibit an employer from discriminating against an individual because of a handicap. Section 413.08(3), however, provides that "no employer shall refuse employment to the ......
...erwise disposing of the animal. You
may not request to have exclusive care, possession, or control of an animal owned primarily for a bona fide
agricultural purpose, as defined in section 193.461, Florida Statutes, or a service animal, as defined in section 413.08,
Florida Statutes, if Respondent is the service animal’s handler.) {Indicate all that apply}.
1....
...otherwise disposing of the animal. You may not request to have exclusive care, possession, or control of
an animal owned primarily for a bona fide agricultural purpose, as defined in section 193.461, Florida
Statutes, or a service animal, as defined in section 413.08, Florida Statutes, if Respondent is the service
animal’s handler.) {Indicate all that apply}.
1....
...otection Against
Domestic Violence (10/22)
- 53 -
an animal owned primarily for a bona fide agricultural purpose, as defined in section 193.461, Florida
Statutes, or a service animal, as defined in section 413.08, Florida Statutes, if Respondent is the service
animal’s handler.) {Indicate all that apply}.
1....
...erwise disposing of the animal. You
may not request to have exclusive care, possession, or control of an animal owned primarily for a bona fide
agricultural purpose, as defined in section 193.461, Florida Statutes, or a service animal, as defined in section 413.08,
Florida Statutes, if Respondent is the service animal’s handler.) {Indicate all that apply}.
Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Form 12.980(a), Petition for Injunction for Protection Against
Domestic Violence (08/23)
-13-
1....
...excluding crustacea, shellfish, and fish in aquariums, are
allowed in a food service establishment, in vehicles used
for transporting food, or in any other area or facility used
to conduct food service operations, except as provided
under section 413.08, F.S. 1
The text of the rule broadly prohibits live animals from being in
food service establishments. Section 381.0072(2)(c) provides:
1 Section 413.08, Florida Statutes, applies to service animals.
5
“Food service establishment” means detention
facilities, public or private schools, migrant labor camps,
assisted living facilities...
This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.