Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 390.0111 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 390.0111 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 390.0111 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 390.0111

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 390
TERMINATION OF PREGNANCIES
View Entire Chapter
390.0111 Termination of pregnancies.
(1) TERMINATION AFTER GESTATIONAL AGE OF 6 WEEKS; WHEN ALLOWED.A physician may not knowingly perform or induce a termination of pregnancy if the physician determines the gestational age of the fetus is more than 6 weeks unless one of the following conditions is met:
(a) Two physicians certify in writing that, in reasonable medical judgment, the termination of the pregnancy is necessary to save the pregnant woman’s life or avert a serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman other than a psychological condition.
(b) The physician certifies in writing that, in reasonable medical judgment, there is a medical necessity for legitimate emergency medical procedures for termination of the pregnancy to save the pregnant woman’s life or avert a serious risk of imminent substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman other than a psychological condition, and another physician is not available for consultation.
(c) The pregnancy has not progressed to the third trimester and two physicians certify in writing that, in reasonable medical judgment, the fetus has a fatal fetal abnormality.
(d) The pregnancy is the result of rape, incest, or human trafficking and the gestational age of the fetus is not more than 15 weeks as determined by the physician. At the time the woman schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain the abortion, she must provide a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation providing evidence that she is obtaining the termination of pregnancy because she is a victim of rape, incest, or human trafficking. If the woman is 18 years of age or older, the physician must report any known or suspected human trafficking to a local law enforcement agency. If the woman is a minor, the physician must report the incident of rape, incest, or human trafficking to the central abuse hotline as required by s. 39.201.
(2) IN-PERSON PERFORMANCE BY PHYSICIAN REQUIRED.Only a physician may perform or induce a termination of pregnancy. A physician may not use telehealth as defined in s. 456.47 to perform an abortion, including, but not limited to, medical abortions. Any medications intended for use in a medical abortion must be dispensed in person by a physician and may not be dispensed through the United States Postal Service or by any other courier or shipping service.
(3) CONSENTS REQUIRED.A termination of pregnancy may not be performed or induced except with the voluntary and informed written consent of the pregnant woman or, in the case of a mental incompetent, the voluntary and informed written consent of her court-appointed guardian.
(a) Except in the case of a medical emergency, consent to a termination of pregnancy is voluntary and informed only if:
1. The physician who is to perform the procedure, or the referring physician, has, at a minimum, orally, while physically present in the same room, and at least 24 hours before the procedure, informed the woman of:
a. The nature and risks of undergoing or not undergoing the proposed procedure that a reasonable patient would consider material to making a knowing and willful decision of whether to terminate a pregnancy.
b. The probable gestational age of the fetus, verified by an ultrasound, at the time the termination of pregnancy is to be performed.
(I) The ultrasound must be performed by the physician who is to perform the abortion or by a person having documented evidence that he or she has completed a course in the operation of ultrasound equipment as prescribed by rule and who is working in conjunction with the physician.
(II) The person performing the ultrasound must offer the woman the opportunity to view the live ultrasound images and hear an explanation of them. If the woman accepts the opportunity to view the images and hear the explanation, a physician or a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or physician assistant working in conjunction with the physician must contemporaneously review and explain the images to the woman before the woman gives informed consent to having an abortion procedure performed.
(III) The woman has a right to decline to view and hear the explanation of the live ultrasound images after she is informed of her right and offered an opportunity to view the images and hear the explanation. If the woman declines, the woman shall complete a form acknowledging that she was offered an opportunity to view and hear the explanation of the images but that she declined that opportunity. The form must also indicate that the woman’s decision was not based on any undue influence from any person to discourage her from viewing the images or hearing the explanation and that she declined of her own free will.
(IV) Unless requested by the woman, the person performing the ultrasound may not offer the opportunity to view the images and hear the explanation and the explanation may not be given if, at the time the woman schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain an abortion, a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation is presented which provides evidence that the woman is obtaining the abortion because the woman is a victim of rape, incest, domestic violence, or human trafficking or that the woman has been diagnosed as having a condition that, on the basis of a physician’s good faith clinical judgment, would create a serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function if the woman delayed terminating her pregnancy.
c. The medical risks to the woman and fetus of carrying the pregnancy to term.

The physician may provide the information required in this subparagraph within 24 hours before the procedure if requested by the woman at the time she schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain an abortion and if she presents to the physician a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation evidencing that she is obtaining the abortion because she is a victim of rape, incest, domestic violence, or human trafficking.

2. Printed materials prepared and provided by the department have been provided to the pregnant woman, if she chooses to view these materials, including:
a. A description of the fetus, including a description of the various stages of development.
b. A list of entities that offer alternatives to terminating the pregnancy.
c. Detailed information on the availability of medical assistance benefits for prenatal care, childbirth, and neonatal care.
3. The woman acknowledges in writing, before the termination of pregnancy, that the information required to be provided under this subsection has been provided.

Nothing in this paragraph is intended to prohibit a physician from providing any additional information which the physician deems material to the woman’s informed decision to terminate her pregnancy.

(b) If a medical emergency exists and a physician cannot comply with the requirements for informed consent, a physician may terminate a pregnancy if he or she has obtained at least one corroborative medical opinion attesting to the medical necessity for emergency medical procedures and to the fact that to a reasonable degree of medical certainty the continuation of the pregnancy would threaten the life of the pregnant woman. If a second physician is not available for a corroborating opinion, the physician may proceed but shall document reasons for the medical necessity in the patient’s medical records.
(c) Violation of this subsection by a physician constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under s. 458.331 or s. 459.015. Substantial compliance or reasonable belief that complying with the requirements of informed consent would threaten the life or health of the patient is a defense to any action brought under this paragraph.
1(4) STANDARD OF MEDICAL CARE TO BE USED IN THIRD TRIMESTER.If a termination of pregnancy is performed in the third trimester, the physician performing the termination of pregnancy must exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the fetus which the physician would be required to exercise in order to preserve the life and health of a fetus intended to be born and not aborted. However, if preserving the life and health of the fetus conflicts with preserving the life and health of the pregnant woman, the physician must consider preserving the woman’s life and health the overriding and superior concern.
(5) PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION PROHIBITED; EXCEPTION.
(a) No physician shall knowingly perform a partial-birth abortion.
(b) A woman upon whom a partial-birth abortion is performed may not be prosecuted under this section for a conspiracy to violate the provisions of this section.
(c) This subsection shall not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury, provided that no other medical procedure would suffice for that purpose.
(6) EXPERIMENTATION ON FETUS PROHIBITED; EXCEPTION.No person shall use any live fetus or live, premature infant for any type of scientific, research, laboratory, or other kind of experimentation either prior to or subsequent to any termination of pregnancy procedure except as necessary to protect or preserve the life and health of such fetus or premature infant.
(7) FETAL REMAINS.Fetal remains shall be disposed of in a sanitary manner pursuant to s. 381.0098 and rules adopted thereunder. Failure to dispose of fetal remains in accordance with this subsection is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(8) REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN TERMINATION PROCEDURE.Nothing in this section shall require any hospital or any person to participate in the termination of a pregnancy, nor shall any hospital or any person be liable for such refusal. No person who is a member of, or associated with, the staff of a hospital, nor any employee of a hospital or physician in which or by whom the termination of a pregnancy has been authorized or performed, who shall state an objection to such procedure on moral or religious grounds shall be required to participate in the procedure which will result in the termination of pregnancy. The refusal of any such person or employee to participate shall not form the basis for any disciplinary or other recriminatory action against such person.
(9) EXCEPTION.The provisions of this section shall not apply to the performance of a procedure which terminates a pregnancy in order to deliver a live child.
(10) PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION.Except as provided in subsections (3), (7), and (12):
(a) Any person who willfully performs, or actively participates in, a termination of pregnancy in violation of the requirements of this section commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) Any person who performs, or actively participates in, a termination of pregnancy in violation of this section which results in the death of the woman commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(11) CIVIL ACTION PURSUANT TO PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION; RELIEF.
(a) The father, if married to the mother at the time she receives a partial-birth abortion, and, if the mother has not attained the age of 18 years at the time she receives a partial-birth abortion, the maternal grandparents of the fetus may, in a civil action, obtain appropriate relief, unless the pregnancy resulted from the plaintiff’s criminal conduct or the plaintiff consented to the abortion.
(b) In a civil action under this section, appropriate relief includes:
1. Monetary damages for all injuries, psychological and physical, occasioned by the violation of subsection (5).
2. Damages equal to three times the cost of the partial-birth abortion.
(12) INFANTS BORN ALIVE.
(a) An infant born alive during or immediately after an attempted abortion is entitled to the same rights, powers, and privileges as are granted by the laws of this state to any other child born alive in the course of natural birth.
(b) If an infant is born alive during or immediately after an attempted abortion, any health care practitioner present at the time shall humanely exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the infant as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to an infant born alive at the same gestational age in the course of natural birth.
(c) An infant born alive during or immediately after an attempted abortion must be immediately transported and admitted to a hospital pursuant to s. 390.012(3)(c) or rules adopted thereunder.
(d) A health care practitioner or any employee of a hospital, a physician’s office, or an abortion clinic who has knowledge of a violation of this subsection must report the violation to the department.
(e) A person who violates this subsection commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. This subsection shall not be construed as a specific provision of law relating to a particular subject matter that would preclude prosecution of a more general offense, regardless of the penalty.
(f) This subsection does not affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species Homo sapiens at any point prior to being born alive as defined in s. 390.011.
(13) FAILURE TO COMPLY.Failure to comply with the requirements of this section constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under each respective practice act and under s. 456.072.
(14) RULES.The applicable boards, or the department if there is no board, shall adopt rules necessary to implement the provisions of this section.
(15) USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS RESTRICTED.A state agency, a local governmental entity, or a managed care plan providing services under part IV of chapter 409 may not expend funds for the benefit of, pay funds to, or initiate or renew a contract with an organization that owns, operates, or is affiliated with one or more clinics that are licensed under this chapter and perform abortions unless one or more of the following applies:
(a) All abortions performed by such clinics are:
1. On fetuses that are conceived through rape or incest; or
2. Are medically necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant woman or to avert a serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman, other than a psychological condition.
(b) The funds must be expended to fulfill the terms of a contract entered into before July 1, 2016.
(c) The funds must be expended as reimbursement for Medicaid services provided on a fee-for-service basis.
History.s. 1, ch. 79-302; s. 1, ch. 80-208; s. 6, ch. 88-97; s. 6, ch. 91-223; s. 64, ch. 91-224; s. 694, ch. 95-148; s. 2, ch. 97-151; s. 1, ch. 98-1; s. 201, ch. 99-13; s. 1, ch. 2011-224; s. 2, ch. 2013-121; s. 2, ch. 2014-137; s. 1, ch. 2015-118; s. 2, ch. 2016-150; s. 20, ch. 2018-106; s. 1, ch. 2020-147; s. 4, ch. 2022-69; s. 4, ch. 2023-21.
1Note.

A. Section 5, ch. 2014-137, provides:

“Severability and reversion.

“(1) If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this act which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable.

“(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), if s. 390.01112, Florida Statutes, is held unconstitutional and severed by a court having jurisdiction, the amendments made by this act to s. 390.011, Florida Statutes, and subsections (4), (10), and (13) of s. 390.0111, Florida Statutes, will be repealed and will revert to the law as it existed on January 1, 2014.”

B. Section 9, ch. 2023-21, provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise expressly provided in this act and except for this section, which shall take effect upon this act becoming a law, this act shall take effect 30 days after any of the following occurs: a decision by the Florida Supreme Court holding that the right to privacy enshrined in s. 23, Article I of the State Constitution does not include a right to abortion; a decision by the Florida Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. State, SC2022-1050, that allows the prohibition on abortions after 15 weeks in s. 390.0111(1), Florida Statutes, to remain in effect, including a decision approving, in whole or in part, the First District Court of Appeal’s decision under review or a decision discharging jurisdiction; an amendment to the State Constitution clarifying that s. 23, Article I of the State Constitution does not include a right to abortion; or a decision from the Florida Supreme Court after March 7, 2023, receding, in whole or in part, from In re T.W., 551 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 1989), North Fla. Women’s Health v. State, 866 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2003), or Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State, 210 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. 2017).”

C. The contingency in s. 9, ch. 2023-21, which occurred pursuant to the decision in Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida vs. State of Florida, Florida Supreme Court, SC2002-1050 (Fla. 2024), repeals s. 390.01112, effective 30 days after April 1, 2024, the date of the decision. The decision was not final until the 15-day period for filing a motion for rehearing passed per Rule 9.330, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Division of Law Revision confirmed with the office of the Florida Supreme Court on April 17, 2024, that no motion for rehearing had been filed. The Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida vs. State of Florida, became effective May 1, 2024. Subsection (4) was not affected by s. 9, ch. 2023-21; it is repealed by s. 5, ch. 2014-137, contingent upon s. 390.01112 being held unconstitutional, but not technically upon that section being repealed.

Note.Former s. 390.001.

F.S. 390.0111 on Google Scholar

F.S. 390.0111 on CourtListener

Amendments to 390.0111


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 390.0111
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S390.0111 5 - ABORTION - PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION-MOTHER DIES - F: S
S390.0111 5 - ABORTION - PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION-MOTHER SURVIVES - F: T
S390.0111 7 - HEALTH-SAFETY - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7917 - M: S
S390.0111 7 - HEALTH-SAFETY - FAIL TO PROPERLY DISPOSE OF FETAL REMAINS - M: F
S390.0111 12 - ABORTION - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9108 - M: F
S390.0111 12 - ABORTION - UNLAWFUL TERMINATION OF INFANT BORN ALIVE - F: T
S390.0111 10a - ABORTION - UNLAWFUL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY - F: T
S390.0111 10b - ABORTION - UNLAWFUL TERM OF PREG RESULT IN WOMAN'S DEATH - F: S

Cases Citing Statute 390.0111

Total Results: 25  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State of Florida, 210 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. 2017).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 183, 2017 WL 633772, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 340

...The issue in this case is whether the trial court properly applied strict scrutiny when reviewing the Mandatory Delay Law, which imposes an additional twenty-four hour waiting period on women seeking to terminate their pregnancies. See ch. 2015-118 § 1, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 390.0111(3), Fla....
...The Woman’s Right to Know Act requires the physician to inform the patient of “[t]he nature and risks of undergoing or not undergoing” the termination of pregnancy procedure, “[t]he probable gestational age of the fetus,” and some other, additional information. See § 390.0111(3)(a), Fla....
...In 2015, the Florida Legislature amended the Woman’s Right to Know Act to require that a woman be given the statutorily re *1248 quired information at least twenty-four hours prior to the termination of pregnancy procedure. Ch. 2015-118 § 1, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 390.0111(3))....
...additional information which the physician deems material to the woman’s informed decision to terminate her pregnancy. Ch. 2015-118, § 1, Laws of Fla. (deletions indicated by strike-through type and additions indicated by underline) (codified at § 390.0111(3)(a), Fla....
...As Justice Pariente’s concurrence, which was joined by Justice Quince and Justice Anstead, made clear, it was because of this Court’s interpretation of the law as a neutral informed consent law, which the State conceded was appropriate, that the law avoided any constitutional infirmity: The majority has construed section 390.0111(3)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2005), to be a neutral informed consent statute that is comparable to other informed consent statutes and the common law from which they are derived....
...trips to the clinic by the new law because they can receive the information from their referring physician, the law, in fact, requires women to make a second trip to their health care provider at least twenty-four hours after their first visit. See § 390.0111, Fla....
Copy

State v. Presidential Women's Ctr., 937 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 210, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 555, 2006 WL 870497

...of Florida, and American Civil Liberties Union Reproductive Freedom Project, for Amici Curiae. LEWIS, J. We have on appeal State v. Presidential Women's Center, 884 So.2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal declared section 390.0111 of the Florida Statutes invalid. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the district court's decision and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND In 1997, the Florida Legislature enacted subsection 390.0111, Florida Statutes, titled the "Woman's Right to Know Act" (hereinafter "the Act")....
...The Act essentially prohibits termination of pregnancy procedures from being performed or induced unless either the referring physician or the physician performing the procedure first obtains informed and voluntary written consent from the patient. See § 390.0111(3), Fla....
...Presidential contends that requiring physicians to inform patients of "[t]he nature and risks of undergoing or not undergoing the proposed procedure that a reasonable patient would consider material to making a knowing and willful decision of whether to terminate a pregnancy," § 390.0111(3)(a)(1)(a), Fla....
...of "[t]he medical risks to the woman and fetus of carrying the pregnancy to term" (emphasis supplied), subsection (3)(a)(1)(a) requires physicians to inform patients of "[t]he nature and risks of undergoing or not undergoing the proposed procedure." § 390.0111(3)(a)(1)(a),(c), Fla....
...s award of summary judgment. [7] Because we have concluded that the Fourth District erred in holding that the Act is unconstitutional, we vacate the Fourth District's award of attorneys' fees to Presidential at this time. CONCLUSION We conclude that section 390.0111(3)(a)(1) of the Florida Statutes is not unconstitutional....
...It is so ordered. PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, C.J., specially concurs with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, C.J., specially concurring. The majority has construed section 390.0111(3)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2005), to be a neutral informed consent statute that is comparable to other informed consent statutes and the common law from which they are derived....
...nowing and willful decision of whether to terminate a pregnancy. b. The probable gestational age of the fetus at the time the termination of pregnancy is to be performed. c. The medical risks to the woman and fetus of carrying the pregnancy to term. § 390.0111(3)(a)(1), Fla....
Copy

A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (S.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1998 WL 1070946

...The State also contends that the Act is not unconstitutionally vague because the only way that a physician can be held criminally liable is if he knowingly performs the partial birth abortion. B. Summary of the Act The Act prohibits physicians from "knowingly perform[ing] a partial-birth abortion." FLA.STAT. § 390.0111(5)(a)....
...livery." FLA.STAT. § 390.011(5). Violation of the Act carries both criminal and civil penalties. Under the Act "any person who willfully performs, or actively participates in" a partial-birth abortion commits a felony in the third degree. FLA.STAT. § 390.0111(10)(a)....
...The Act excepts from its criminal prohibition only those "partial-birth abortions" that are "necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury, provided that no other medical procedure would suffice for that purpose." FLA.STAT. § 390.0111(5)(c). Further, the Act creates a civil cause of action for the father of the fetus and for the maternal grandparents of the fetus if the mother is a minor. FLA. STAT. § 390.0111(11)(a). The relief that can be obtained in such a civil action includes monetary damages for "all injuries, psychological and physical" and "damages equal to three times the cost of the partial-birth abortion." FLA.STAT. § 390.0111(11)(b). Finally, FLA.STAT. § 390.0111(5)(b) of the Act provides that "a woman upon whom a partial-birth abortion is performed" cannot be prosecuted for a conspiracy to violate the partial-birth abortion ban but the Act does not exempt the woman from civil liability. FLA. STAT. § 390.0111(11)....
...becomes viable. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Permanent Injunction is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendants are prohibited from enforcing FLA.STAT. §§ 390.0111(5), 390.0111(11), and 390.011(5) (as renumbered by the Act)....
...[T]his point may differ with each pregnancy ..." Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 388-89, 99 S.Ct. 675, 682, 58 L.Ed.2d 596 (1979). [2] Specifically, the Act amends Florida's Statutes governing abortion by renumbering and amending Florida Statutes § 390.001 (as § 390.0111), renumbering Florida Statutes § 390.002 (as § 390.0112), and amending Florida Statutes § 390.011 as renumbered by the Act, §§ 390.0111(5), 390.0111(11), and 390.011(5) of the Florida Statutes deal with the prohibition of the performance of "partial-birth" abortions....
Copy

In Re Doe, 973 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 53616

...The appellant, a minor, challenges the final order dismissing her petition for judicial waiver of the statutory requirement that her physician notify her parent or guardian prior to terminating her pregnancy. We affirm because the minor has failed to carry her burden of proving the grounds for a waiver under section 390.01114, Florida Statutes (2007), alleged in her petition. Section 390.01114(2)(a) requires a physician to notify a minor's parent or legal guardian at least forty-eight hours before performing an abortion on that minor. A minor may petition a circuit court to waive the notification requirement. § 390.01114(4)(a)....
...parental notification requirement. We agree. In arguing for reversal, the minor asserts that she is sufficiently mature to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy. The statute requires that she establish maturity by clear and convincing evidence. § 390.01114(4)(c)....
...lopment, maturity, intellect, and understanding of the minor, and all other relevant evidence" and at a minimum, provides a sound starting point in attempting to determine whether a minor is sufficiently mature to decide whether to have an abortion. § 390.01114(4)(e)....
...e circuit court [was] not likely to yield findings sufficient to deny the waiver petition." Id. at 283. Here, a reversal and remand for additional findings, even if it could be accomplished in a manner consistent with the time constraints imposed by section 390.01114(4)(b) and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(n), could not possibly yield findings sufficient to grant the minor's waiver petition....
...My reasoning is more fully explained below. I. Background The appellant, Jane Doe, a minor who will turn eighteen in a few months time, sought to terminate her pregnancy without the requirement of Florida law that her parents be notified of the impending procedure. § 390.01114, Fla....
...anc consideration was necessary because the case is one of exceptional importance because it may "affect large numbers of persons" or "implicates `fundamental legal or constitutional rights.'" [3] I agree with Ms. Doe that the procedures outlined in section 390.01114 may affect large numbers of persons and that a woman's decision to terminate a pregnancy implicates a fundamental legal and constitutional right....
...be remembered that facts must first be placed in evidence before the trial judge can make appropriate findings. V. Concluding Observations Presently, there appears to be no bar preventing Ms. Doe from filing a new petition seeking judicial by-pass. Section 390.01114 contains no language that limits a petitioner to but one petition....
...Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 932-33 (Fla.2005). Ms. Doe's circumstances do not fit the requirements of res judicata because, first of all, there has not been a final judgment on the merits. In accordance with the mandate of the statute, see sections 390.01114(4)(c) and (d), the trial judge dismissed her petition when he found that she had not made the required evidentiary showing....
...2926, 111 L.Ed.2d 344 (1990); Planned Parenthood of Cent. Mo. v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52, 75, 96 S.Ct. 2831, 49 L.Ed.2d 788 (1976); In re T.W., 551 So.2d 1186, 1194-95 (Fla.1989). Florida's legislature has imposed a condition on the exercise of this right in section 390.01114(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), which requires a physician to notify a minor's parent or legal guardian at least 48 hours before performing an abortion on the minor. § 390.01114(3)(a). The statute excuses the notice requirement under five circumstances, one of them being that the minor has successfully petitioned a circuit court to waive it. § 390.01114(3)(b)(5)....
...evidence of child abuse or sexual abuse of the petitioner by one or both of her parents or her legal guardian"; or (3) by a preponderance of the evidence, that "the notification of a parent or guardian is not in the best interest of the petitioner." § 390.01114(4)(c), (d)....
...he petition. Id. The statute further provides that, unless the minor requests an extension, the petition will be deemed granted if the court does not rule on it and issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law within 48 hours of its filing. § 390.01114(4)(b). Importantly, the statute mandates that a court conducting a judicial bypass proceeding must provide for a written transcript and that its order must contain "specific factual findings and legal conclusions supporting its decision." § 390.01114(4)(e)....
...Even if the judge had otherwise kept his thoughts to himself, these remarks by themselves warranted a reversal. The judge's decision must also be reversed for his failure to abide by the statutory requirement that the court's written order contain "specific factual findings and legal conclusions supporting its decision." § 390.01114(4)(e)....
...The judge employed a form order prescribed by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.991. The form language of the order stated: "The minor has not proven by sufficient evidence any of the criteria that would permit a judicial waiver of the parental notification requirement of Section 390.01114(3), Florida Statutes, for the following reasons:....
...filed, except that the 48-hour limitation may be extended at the request of the minor. If the court fails to rule within the 48-hour period and an extension has not been requested, *568 the petition is granted, and the notice requirement is waived. § 390.01114(b) (emphases supplied)....
...1st DCA 2006) (reversing dismissal of bypass petition because trial court erroneously disqualified the petitioner's counsel, and holding that the case could not be remanded for a new hearing because a remand would violate the time limits specified in section 390.01114)....
...debate on these issues. I would emphasize that I merely vote to reconsider this case en banc, and have not decided how I would actually rule on the merits of the case. The trial court did not make the factual findings mandated by the legislature in section 390.01114(4)(e)....
...he record did not contain competent, substantial evidence from which a trial judge could decide, under the clear and convincing standard, that this seventeen-year-old petitioner was "sufficiently mature to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy." § 390.01114(4)(c)....
...ly related concepts, a petitioner may prove maturity without necessarily revealing all private aspects of her decision to seek an abortion. I see nothing in the record to indicate that the trial judge applied the correct legal standard enunciated in section 390.01114(4)(c) or that he understood that the petitioner's maturity was the critical issue that he needed to decide....
...is little dispute that Ms. Doe failed to carry her burden of proof under subsection 4(d). Therefore, my discussion will be limited to her showing under subsection (4)(c), the "sufficiently mature" basis entitling the minor to a judicial by-pass. [5] Section 390.01114(4)(e) provides, "the trial court shall hear evidence relating to the emotional development, maturity, intellect, and understanding of the minor, and all other relevant evidence." These are examples of the important factors the legis...
...[9] Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2007), provides that "[n]o judgment shall be set aside or reversed . . . for error as to any matter of . . . procedure," unless it is apparent "that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice." [10] Section 390.01114(4) requires the trial court to rule and issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law within forty-eight hours after the petition is filed....
...The trial judge, using a form approved by the supreme court, placed his initials in the appropriate place on the form to indicate his finding that the minor had failed to prove by sufficient evidence any of the criteria that permit a judicial waiver of the notification requirements of section 390.01114(3)....
...d of the medical risks associated with terminating their pregnancies. That function is served by another statute that requires this information to be given to every woman, young or old, as part of her informed consent to a termination procedure. See § 390.0111(3), Fla....
Copy

State v. Presidential Women's Ctr., 707 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 64072

...Gartner, New York, New York, for Amicus Curiae-Florida Association of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, Planned Parenthood of Northeast Florida, Inc., and Planned Parenthood of Southwest Florida, Inc. KLEIN, Judge. The Florida Legislature, in 1997, passed legislation known as the "Women's Right to Know Act," section 390.0111, Florida Statutes (1997)....
...an and may not be significantly restricted by the state. Following this point, the state may impose significant restrictions only in the least intrusive manner designed to safeguard the health of the mother. T.W., 551 So.2d at 1193. We first address section 390.0111(3)(a)1 which provides that a woman's consent is not voluntary or informed unless "the physician who is to perform the procedure, or the referring physician, has, at a minimum, orally, in person, informed the woman [of described infor...
...In this case there is evidence in the record that the regulation would make it more difficult for women to get abortions. The other abortion cases on which the State relies are distinguishable for the same reasons. [4] We next address the new informed consent statute, section 390.0111(3)(a)1.a, which provides that consent is not voluntary or informed unless the information provided by the physician includes: "the nature and risks of undergoing or not undergoing the proposed procedure that a reasonable patient woul...
Copy

Beckett v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., 982 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133, 2008 WL 2026154

...mers that ancillary products are optional, we reject that interpretation of the informed consent requirement. If the Legislature had intended to require particular means or procedures for obtaining informed consent, it could have done so. See, e.g., § 390.0111(3)(a), Fla....
Copy

OB/GYN Specialists of the Palm Beaches, P.A. v. Mejia, 134 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 51896, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 148

...om making an informed decision as to whether they should terminate the pregnancy. Prior to trial, defendants sought to preclude plaintiffs from presenting any evidence or argument that the Level II ultrasound caused any damages. The defendants cited section 390.0111, Florida Statutes, which, in pertinent part, provides: (1) TERMINATION IN THIRD TRIMESTER; WHEN ALLOWED.— No termination of pregnancy shall be performed on any human being in the third trimester of pregnancy unless: (a) Two physici...
...ealth of the pregnant woman; or (b) The physician certifies in writing to the medical necessity for legitimate emergency medical procedures for termination of pregnancy in the third trimester, and another physician is not available for consultation. § 390.0111(1), Fla....
...Plaintiffs, however, represented that using the date of conception, the mother was not in her third trimester when the Level II ultrasound was performed. The trial court ruled that any reference or evidence regarding Florida’s prohibition against third trimester abortions under section 390.0111, as applied to the Level II ultrasound, 2 was irrelevant....
...The trial court denied the motion, reasoning that the mother could have obtained a legal abortion in another state. Following the adverse jury verdict and final judgment ultimately rendered against the defendants, this timely appeal was taken. On appeal, defendants assert that the trial court incorrectly ruled section 390.0111 was irrelevant. They maintain that the mother could not have obtained an abortion in Florida as of the date of the Level II ultrasound, arguing that the term “third trimester” as used in section 390.0111, should be calculated using the gestational age....
...2481 , 76 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983) (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (emphasis added). Thus, it appears that the Supreme Court in Roe also measured the weeks of pregnancy and trimesters by the fetus’s gestational age. Id. Consequently, we hold that the term “third trimester” as used section 390.0111 must also be interpreted using gestational age in light of Roe’s trimester viability analysis....
...1st DCA 1988), the First District upheld a ruling by the State Board of Medicine revoking a doctor’s license after he miscalculated the gestational age of the fetus and performed an abortion during the last trimester of the patient’s pregnancy. To adopt plaintiffs’ view that “third trimester” as used in section 390.0111 should be determined using the date of conception would hereafter require clinicians to calculate the “weeks of pregnancy” based on indiscernible facts and make estimates of fetal age in a manner contrary to established medical p...
...Even if we were to agree that the statute should be interpreted to measure pregnancy from the alleged time of conception, thereby allowing the mother nearly two weeks after the June 30 Level II ultrasound to obtain a lawful abortion under Florida law, the existence of section 390.0111 would still be relevant to whether the mother could have logistically obtained an abortion in Florida before the statutory deadline....
...issue of causation, those considerations do not constitute valid reasons for excluding evidence that third trimester abortions are generally illegal in Florida. In light of the trial court’s failure to permit the jury to consider the relevance of section 390.0111 to the plaintiffs’ specific situation, leading to the exclusion of other relevant evidence on that factual issue, a new trial on the issue of liability and causation is required....
Copy

Renee B. v. State, Agency for Health Care, 756 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 423471

...[there are] few more personal or private decisions concerning one's body that one can make in the course of a lifetime." Similarly, in State v. Presidential Women's Center, 707 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the Court upheld a non-final order temporarily enjoining enforcement of the "Women's Right to Know Act," Section 390.0111, Florida Statutes, which required that a physician performing an abortion inform the patient of what a "reasonable patient would consider material." Id....
Copy

In Re Guardianship of JDS, 864 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 42619

...Wixtrom is concerned that J.D.S.'s guardian could have authorized an abortion of the fetus. Florida law provides safeguards to insure that a guardian does not act capriciously or cavalierly when considering the health of the incapacitated mother and fetus. For example, sections 390.0111(1) and (3), Florida Statutes, state that no abortion can be performed on a ward unless two physicians certify in writing that "to a reasonable degree of medical probability, the termination of pregnancy is necessary to save the life or prese...
...nitely outside the womb. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, the woman's life and health shall constitute an overriding and superior consideration to the concern for the life and health of the fetus when such concerns are in conflict. § 390.0111(4), Fla....
...less certain conditions are met. In recognition of its interests in the life of the unborn child, Florida has chosen to prohibit abortions after the 24th week of pregnancy except where medically necessary to protect the life or health of the mother. § 390.0111, Fla....
Copy

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 858 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375

guardian ad litem if one has been appointed-under section 390.0111-5(4)(a-) — Florida-Statutes. (g) -Time Limits
Copy

State v. Presidential Women's Ctr., 884 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2290364

..., M.D., and North Florida Women's Health and Counseling Services, Inc. (collectively Presidential Women's Center), and finding unconstitutional Florida's abortion informed-consent statute, also known as the "Women's Right to Know Act" (the Act). See § 390.0111, Fla....
...ute, or risk penalties including licensure penalties, the Amended Statute violates due process and is otherwise void for vagueness; 30. The vagueness of the Amended Statute is increased by the ambiguity created by its reference to "medical risks" in Section 390.0111(3)(a)1.c, but then making reference simply to "risks" in Section 390.0111(3)(a)1.a....
.... . . 32. To sever the challenged portions of the Amended Statute would be to sever subsections of the informed consent section. To do so would reduce the section to being nonsensical and incomplete. Accordingly, the constitutional *535 defects of Section 390.0111(3) cannot be cured by severing portions of it....
Copy

Santa Lucia v. LeVine, 198 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3529, 2016 WL 886384

...n underlying neuromuscular disease would not have consented to surgery had he been advised that he was at "increased risk of pulmonary complications." Cf. Presidential Women's Ctr., 937 So. 2d at 119 (discussing the reasonable patient standard of section 390.0111, Florida Statutes (2005), and approving the interpretation that "the doctor need only consider, address, and inform based on that patient's individualized circumstances in determining what information is material and to be provided as the 'informed consent' "); Ritz, 436 So....
Copy

Pendergraft v. Dep't of Health, Bd. of Med., 19 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8694, 2009 WL 1883893

...s. First, she found that Dr. Pendergraft's conduct violated section 797.03(3), Florida Statutes (2005), which prohibits the performance of such a procedure in a location other than a hospital. [1] Second, the ALJ found that the same conduct violated section 390.0111(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), which prohibits third trimester abortions unless "two physicians certify in writing to the fact that, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, the termination of the pregnancy is necessary to save the life or preserve the health of the pregnant woman." Third, the ALJ found that Dr. Pendergraft failed to comply with section 390.0111(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2005), because he did not certify in writing "to the medical necessity for legitimate emergency medical procedures *394 for termination of pregnancy in the third trimester, and another physician is not availa...
...clear and convincing evidence that Dr. Pendergraft committed medical malpractice pursuant to section 458.331(1)(t)1., Florida Statutes (2005), by failing to meet the standard of care for performing third trimester abortions as set forth in sections 390.0111 and 797.03....
...The Board approved and accepted the recommended order, including the recommended penalties. On appeal, Dr. Pendergraft argues that the violation of sections 456.072(1)(k) and 458.331(1)(g) cannot serve as the basis for any disciplinary action by the Board because he has not been convicted of violating sections 390.0111 and 797.03....
...LAWSON, J., and PLEUS, JR., R., Senior Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Criminal sanctions are available for violation of this subsection as any person who violates this provision is guilty of a second degree misdemeanor. § 797.03(4), Fla. Stat. (2005). [2] A violation of sections 390.0111(1)(a) and (1)(b) is punishable as a third degree felony. § 390.0111(10)(a), Fla....
Copy

State v. Gainesville Woman Care LLC, 187 So. 3d 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2868, 2016 WL 745900

PER CURIAM. The State of Florida appeals a tempor rary injunction against- enforcement of a 24-hour waiting period added to Florida’s abortion statute in 2015. § 390.0111(3)(a), Fla....
...that it applied the proper legal analysis, render this tempo *283 rary injunction invalid and thwart meaningful appellate review. Accordingly, we reverse the temporary injunction enjoining the enforcement of Chapter 15-118, Laws of Florida (amending section 390.0111(3), Florida .Statutes)....
Copy

Burton v. State, 49 So. 3d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11754, 2010 WL 3168124

...705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); In re T.W., 551 So.2d 1186, 1193 (Fla.1989). The Legislature has defined "viability" as "that stage of fetal development when the life of the unborn child may *266 with a reasonable degree of medical probability be continued indefinitely outside the womb." § 390.0111(4), Fla....
Copy

In Re: Jane Doe Vs (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...vacate it and remand for a new hearing. I. On August 29, 2023, the minor filed her petition in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. That same day, the court set the petition for a hearing and appointed counsel for her. 1 1 Consistent with section 390.01116, Florida Statutes (2023), and Rule 9.147(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we The court held the hearing on August 31, 2023....
...The Florida Parental Notice of and Consent for Abortion Act generally prohibits the performance or induction of abortions on pregnant minors unless their parents or legal guardians are notified of the abortion and have provided written informed consent to the abortion. See § 390.01114(3), (4)(a), (5)(a), Fla....
...Stat. (2023). These statutory requirements of parental notice and consent may be waived upon a minor’s petition if a court “finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the minor is sufficiently mature to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy.” Id. § 390.01114(6)(c)....
...2 We note that the judicial waiver statute expressly prohibits a judge from considering “financial best interest or financial considerations or the potential financial impact on the minor or the minor’s family if the minor does not terminate the pregnancy.” § 390.01114(6)(d), Fla. Stat. (2023). 3 circuit court since the proceeding is a nonadversarial proceeding.” Id. § 390.01114(6)(b)2. Here, the circuit court correctly acknowledged that it cannot waive the requirements of parental notice and consent where the minor’s planned abortion would take place beyond the allowable gestational age of the fetus....
...here because it rests on a legal error: a failure to appreciate that Florida’s prohibition on abortions beyond six weeks of fetal gestational age has yet to take effect. Section four of Florida’s recent Heartbeat Protection Act, Ch. 2023-21, Laws of Fla., amends section 390.0111, Florida Statutes, to generally prohibit physicians from knowingly performing or inducing abortions where the fetus has reached a gestational age of more than six weeks....
...23, Article I of the State Constitution does not include a right to abortion; a decision by the Florida Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. State, SC2022- 1050, that allows the prohibition on abortions after 15 weeks in s. 390.0111(1), Florida Statutes, to remain in effect, including a decision approving, in whole or in part, the First District Court of Appeal’s decision under review or a decision dischar...
...III. We now must determine the appropriate appellate remedy. This appeal arrives in an unusual posture, as the circuit court expressly declined to hold a full waiver hearing, did not consider the full list of factors enumerated in section 390.01114(6)(c), and did not make or decline to make the factual finding described in that statute....
...on. Given the under-developed record, we vacate the circuit court’s order, remand this case for the court to hold a new and full hearing, and direct the court to rule on the minor’s petition within three business days after the remand. See § 390.01114(6)(b)2., Fla. Stat....
...(2023). Moreover, based on our review of the record, we direct the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court to reassign the petition forthwith to another circuit judge. The new judge’s ruling must be based on a consideration of all the factors enumerated in section 390.01114(6)(c), Florida Statutes (2023), and the ruling must make the factual finding described in that statute (whether or not, “by clear and convincing evidence,” the minor is “sufficiently mature to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy,” § 390.01114(6)(c)). 5 VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS. LAMBERT and PRATT, JJ., concur. PRATT, J., concurs with opinion. HARRIS, J., concurs in part with opinion. 6 Case No....
...best interests—to procure secret abortions that are hidden from the very adults who superintend all their other life decisions. We do not review these judicial waivers. The statute provides for appellate review only of decisions not to grant waiver petitions, see § 390.01114(6)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (2023), and it expressly states that “[a]n order authorizing a termination of pregnancy under this subsection is not subject to appeal,” id. § 390.01114(6)(g)....
...gestational age of the fetus and whether the abortion can occur. As the majority correctly notes, in order to grant the judicial waiver of the statutory notice and consent requirements, the trial court is required to consider the eight factors set forth in section 390.01114(6)(c), Florida Statutes. None of these factors includes the gestational age of the fetus. In fact, this issue is not mentioned one time in the “Procedure for Judicial Waiver” subsection. Section 390.0111, Florida Statutes, specifically deals with fetal gestational age....
Copy

In re Doe, 113 So. 3d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 5898058

...By the opinion attached, the Second District Court of Appeal has reversed the order entered by the Honorable Harvey A. Kornstein, Circuit Judge of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Polk County, Florida, in Case Number 2012-DP-000536-0000-00, dismissing a petition for a judicial waiver of parental notice under section 390.01114(4)(c), (d), Florida Statutes (2012)....
...The minor may consent to the performance or inducement of a termination of pregnancy without notice to a parent or guardian. WALLACE, Judge. Jane Doe, 1 a minor, challenges the final order dismissing her petition for judicial waiver of parental notification under section 390.01114(4)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (2012). We find no error in the circuit court’s determination that Doe failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that it would not be in her best interest to notify a parent under section 390.01114(4)(d). However, we reverse the order of dismissal because the circuit court abused its discretion in concluding that Doe is not sufficiently mature to terminate her pregnancy under section 390.01114(4)(c)....
...After the conclusion of the hearing, the circuit court promptly entered an order dismissing Doe’s petition, finding that she failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence either of the grounds alleged. This appeal followed. II. THE APPLICABLE LAW Under section 390.01114(3)(a), a physician is required to notify a minor’s parent or legal guardian at least forty-eight hours in advance of performing an abortion on that minor....
...The statute excuses the notice requirement under five circumstances, but the pertinent provision applicable to this case provides for judicial waiver of the notice requirement in the event the minor successfully petitions a circuit court to waive that requirement. See § 390.01114(3)(b)(5)....
...s the victim of child abuse or sexual abuse inflicted by one or both of her *885 parents or her guardian”; or (3) “by clear and convincing evidence!,] that the notification of a parent or guardian is not in the best interest of the [minor].” §§ 390.01114(4)(c), (d)....
...*886 The numerous criteria considered by various courts in assessing whether a minor is sufficiently mature to determine whether to terminate her pregnancy, while perhaps a starting point, did not provide for consistent application of the bypass provision of section 390.01114. See, e.g., Doe, 973 So.2d at 552 . It is against this backdrop that the Florida legislature amended section 390.01114 in 2011 to provide a list of factors a trial court must consider when determining whether a minor is sufficiently mature....
...Ability to accept responsibility. f. Ability to assess both the immediate and long-range consequences of the minor’s choices. g. Ability to understand and explain the medical risks of terminating her pregnancy and to apply that understanding to her decision. § 390.01114(4)(c)(l). In addition, the trial court must consider “[wjhether there may be any undue influence by another on the minor’s decision to have an abortion.” § 390.01114(4)(c)(2)....
...ress. Moreover, not only must the trial court consider these factors in its determination of maturity, its final order must include “factual findings and legal conclusions relating to the maturity of the minor” in view of these specific factors. § 390.01114(4)(e)(2)....
...EXAMINATION OF THE STATUTORY FACTORS The circuit court’s order contains findings of fact and conclusions of law. The findings of fact generally summarize Doe’s testimony at the hearing. Although the circuit court’s order contains a recital that it has considered each of the factors outlined in section 390.01114(4)(c), the order actually only addresses some of the statutory factors while ignoring others. In the following discussion, we will use the statutory factors as a framework to address the circuit court’s findings and conclusions in the light of the record. Section 390.01114-(4-)(c)(1)(a): The minor’s age....
...A fair reading of the record supports the conclusion that Doe’s emotional development and stability are appropriate to her age and circumstances. Nothing in the record suggests that she has any emotional problems or instability. The circuit court’s order fails to address this factor. Section 390.0111JfU)(c)(l)(d): The minor’s credibility and demeanor as a witness....
...The circuit court accurately summarized the substantial responsibilities assumed by Doe at home but did not otherwise consider this factor. The circuit court failed to note or otherwise consider Doe’s testimony about the steps she normally took to avoid the consumption of alcohol and participation in sexual relationships. Section 390.0111h.(k)(c)(l)(f): The minor’s ability to assess both the immediate and long-range consequences of the minor’s choices....
...ether to terminate her pregnancy). In assessing Doe’s judgment and decision-making, the circuit court simply failed to consider the substantial evidence of the maturity she displayed in understanding and addressing the consequences of her actions. Section 390.0111k(U)(o)(l)(g): The minor’s ability to understand and explain the medical risks of terminating her pregnancy and to apply that understanding to her decision....
...However, the circuit court did not ask Doe for any details about her understanding of the risks of the available procedures and gave no hint that it considered Doe’s response inadequate. Thus neither Doe nor her counsel had an opportunity to address the issue further. Section 390.01111p(U)(c)(2): Whether there may be any undue influence by another on the minor’s decision to have an abortion....
...The circuit court’s failure to follow this court’s controlling precedent also constitutes an abuse of discretion. V. CONCLUSION For these reasons, we reverse the circuit court’s order, and Doe’s petition for judicial waiver of the parental notification required by section 390.01114 is deemed granted....
Copy

Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Florida v. Philip, 194 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (N.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86251

“de-funding provision” — is Florida Statutes § 390.0111(15). It provides that a state agency, local government
Copy

Wixtrom v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 864 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 161

...Wixtrom is concerned that J.D.S.’s guardian could have authorized an abortion of the fetus. Florida law provides safeguards to insure that a guardian does not act capriciously or cavalierly when considering the health of the incapacitated mother and fetus. For example, sections 390.0111(1) and (3), Florida Statutes, state that no abortion can be performed on a ward unless two physicians certify in writing that “to a reasonable degree of medical probability, the termination of pregnancy is necessary to save the life or pre...
Copy

State of Florida, Florida Dep't of Health, Celeste Philip, M.D., M.P.H., in her Off. capacity as Surgeon Gen. & Sec'y of Health etc v. Gainesville Woman Care, LLC, d/b/a Bread & Roses Women's Health Ctr., & Med. Students for Choice (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

..., have challenged an amendment to Florida’s abortion law requiring 24 hours to pass between the time a patient is informed of the nature and risks of having an abortion and a physician’s completion of the procedure. Ch. 2015–118, Laws of Fla.; § 390.0111(3), Fla....
...2 must be resolved in the State’s favor for purposes of deciding Appellees’ summary judgment motion, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. I. The Woman’s Right to Know Act, § 390.0111(3), Fla....
...Stat., generally prohibits abortions unless the physician obtains informed consent from a patient. In 2015, the Legislature amended the Act to require a 24-hour period between the time a pregnant woman receives the statutorily required informed consent information and completion of the procedure. § 390.0111(3)(a)1, Fla....
...2017) (describing and quoting the 24-hour Law). The 24-hour Law has some exceptions. For example, a physician can forego the 24-hour period if there is a medical emergency, or if the patient is a victim of rape, incest, domestic violence, or human trafficking. § 390.0111(3)(a)1.c....
...restrictive measures to be utilized to advance the interest.” Uniquely treating abortions differently from other medical procedures and failing to present evidence that the statute is the least restrictive means to accomplish the purported goals of section 390.0111(3) renders the law unconstitutional....
...the abortion procedure; “[t]he probable gestational age of the fetus, verified by an ultrasound,” which is relevant to the nature and risks of the procedure; and “[t]he medical risks to the woman and fetus of carrying the pregnancy to term.” § 390.0111(3)(a)(1)a.-c., Fla....
...Stat. The Act amends this pre-existing, abortion-specific informed consent law to require that a patient make a separate, medically necessary visit to her physician to receive exactly the same information described above, and then delay her abortion by at least 24 hours. § 390.0111(3)(a)1., Fla....
...Stat.; see also Gainesville 12 Woman Care, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1261 (Fla. 2017). Florida law subjects no other medical procedure to a mandatory delay. 1 ANALYSIS In Gainesville Woman Care, the court held that section 390.0111(3), Florida Statutes (2015), “implicates the Florida Constitution’s express right of privacy” and, therefore, was subject to strict scrutiny and presumptively unconstitutional....
...The first is for a woman who “presents to the physician a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation evidencing that she is obtaining the abortion because she is a victim of rape, incest, domestic violence, or human trafficking.” § 390.0111(3)(a)(1)c., Fla. Stat. This exception does not apply to a woman who lacks documentation of these assaults. The second exception is for a woman experiencing a “medical emergency.” § 390.0111(3)(a), Fla. Stat. The term “medical emergency” is undefined, but the statute specifies that a woman may obtain care without delay only if “continuation of the pregnancy would threaten [her] life.” § 390.0111(3)(b), Fla....
Copy

State v. Gainesville Woman Care LLC, 213 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1242696, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4535

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. The 2015 amendment to Florida’s informed consent law for termination of pregnancies, section 390.0111(3)(a) of the Florida Statutes, created a 24-hour wait *1142 ing period....
Copy

State of Florida the Florida etc. v. Gainesville Woman Care LLC (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...ive Rights, New York, New York, pro hac vice, for Appellee Medical Students for Choice. ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. The 2015 amendment to Florida’s informed consent law for termination of pregnancies, section 390.0111(3)(a) of the Florida Statutes, created a 24-hour waiting period....
Copy

Hellwege v. Tampa Fam. Health Centers, 103 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47102, 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1613, 2015 WL 1608827

...Hellwege asserts that this refusal violates federal and state law. (Id. at ¶¶32, 46-49). In particular, the Amended Complaint lists the following claims for relief: (I) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 300a-7; (II) Violation of Fla. Stat. § 381.0051 (5); 2 (III) Violation of Fla. Stat. § 390.0111 (8); 3 (IV) Violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C....
...ghts Act to survive a motion to dismiss. Accordingly, TFHC’s Motion is denied as to Counts IV and V. V. Counts II and III In Counts II and III of her Amended Complaint, Hellwege alleges violations of Fla. Stat. § 381.0051 (5) and Fla. Stat. *1314 § 390.0111 (8)....
...physician or other person from refusing to furnish any contraceptive or family planning service, supplies, or information for medical or religious reasons; and the physician or other person shall not be held liable for such refusal.” . Fla. Stat. § 390.0111 (8) states: "Nothing in this section shall require any hospital or any person to participate in the termination of a pregnancy, nor shall any hospital or any person be liable for such refusal....
Copy

Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Florida v. State of Florida & Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Florida v. State of Florida (Fla. 2024).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

2022-69, § 4, Laws of Fla. (codified at section 390.0111(1), Florida Statutes (2022)). The parties
Copy

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney Gen. re: Limiting Gov't Interference with Abortion (Fla. 2024).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...regulations on both pre and postviability abortions. This includes current laws defining viability and drawing the line at a certain number of weeks, §§ 390.011(15), .0111(1), Fla. Stat. (2023); those requiring a sonogram and informed consent, § 390.0111(3), Fla. Stat. (2023); and those prohibiting abortions postviability with limited exceptions. §§ 390.0111(1)(a)-(c), .0112, Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.