Cases from cite.case.law:

PEARSON, v. PEARSON,, 268 So. 3d 863 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . (first citing § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999) ; and then citing Katos v. . . .

R. MCGEE, v. E. MCGEE,, 264 So. 3d 1087 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See also § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 260 So. 3d 469 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986) rather than the harmless error standard of section 59.041, Florida . . . ... of evidence ... unless ... the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice." § 59.041 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . . DiGuilio test in favor of the "miscarriage of justice" test codified by the Legislature in section 59.041 . . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . .

CANTORE, v. WEST BOCA MEDICAL CENTER, INC., 242 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

CANTORE, v. WEST BOCA MEDICAL CENTER, INC., 254 So. 3d 256 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

IRIMI, v. R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY,, 234 So. 3d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

J. VICKERS, v. D. THOMAS,, 237 So. 3d 412 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2011) ; Bakery Assocs., Ltd. v. . . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2011) ; see also Herbello v. . . .

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. R. J. v. DUIGNAN,, 243 So. 3d 426 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . ."); see also § 59.041, Fla. . . .

PORTAL v. WRI JT TAMIAMI TRAIL, LP,, 222 So. 3d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . ABG5, L.L.C., 977 So.2d 749, 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2016). . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 215 So. 3d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . .

HENDERSON, v. STATE, 212 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

CRANNEY, v. CRANNEY,, 206 So.3d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Esaw, 965 So.2d 1261, 1265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (quoting § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2004)). . . .

MILLS, v. STATE, 177 So. 3d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

GAWKER MEDIA, LLC A. J. v. BOLLEA, HULK HOGAN,, 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . judgment may be reversed unless a court finds error resulting in a miscarriage of justice); see also § 59.041 . . .

KENT, v. STATE, 162 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2013); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). . . .

Z. WHITE, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,, 159 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Excavators, Inc., 697 So.2d 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); § 59.041, Florida Statutes (2014). . . .

SPECIAL, v. WEST BOCA MEDICAL CENTER,, 160 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. 2014)

. . . authority, and explained why section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1981), applied as opposed to section 59.041 . . . Section 59.041 provides: No judgment shall be set aside or reversed, of new trial granted by any court . . . This section shall be liberally construed. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003) (emphasis supplied). . . . Here, the Legislature has established through section 59.041 the public policy that appellate courts . . . In so doing, Justice Pariente has essentially concluded that section 59.041 is irrelevant and should . . . determining harmless error in civil appeals, we are mindful of the harmless error rule contained in section 59.041 . . . This section shall be liberally construed. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . We observe that this test is consistent with the harmless error rule codified in section 59.041, and . . . trier-of-fact, the appellate court will evaluate harmless error in a manner that is consistent with section 59.041 . . . The harmless error rule contained in section 59.041 was codified in 1911 and has not substantively changed . . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2003), provides that a court may not set aside a judgment or grant . . .

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, v. HIOTT,, 129 So. 3d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The legislature has directed in section 59.041, Florida Statutes: No judgment shall be set aside or reversed . . .

SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a v. JOHNSTON, a, 112 So. 3d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

N. M. M. M. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 103 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1967); Johnston v. . . .

MORTIMER, v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2010) provides: No judgment shall be set aside or reversed, or new . . .

DEL VALLE, v. STATE, 80 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2011)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . .

SPECIAL, v. BAUX, M. D. M. D. P. A. P. L., 79 So. 3d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . DiGuilio We first review the history of the harmless error rule contained in section 59.041, Florida . . . This section shall be liberally construed. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2010) (formerly § 54.23, Fla. . . . Because section 59.041 applies to both criminal and civil cases, the same type of “effect on the fact . . . In addition to section 59.041, section 90.104, Florida Statutes (2009) provides that a court may reverse . . . Peralta, 724 So.2d 1188, 1189-90 (Fla.1999) ("When examining an evi-dentiary ruling under section 59.041 . . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2010) (formerly § 54.28, Fla. Stat.). . . .

WALKER, v. STATE, 55 So. 3d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

S. HAYES, v. STATE, 55 So. 3d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Pascale, 656 So.2d at 1354 (quoting § 59.041, Fla. Stat.). . . .

ROSSEN a k a v. SOLOMON SMITH BARNEY, INC., 48 So. 3d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2009). GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur. . . .

BELL, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a S., 30 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .”); § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2007). Affirmed. GROSS, C.J., FARMER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. . . .

HARRIS, Jr. v. T. McKINNEY,, 20 So. 3d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The court noted that section 59.041, Florida Statutes, provides “that ‘[n]o judgment shall be set aside . . . Furthermore, if section 59.041 applies to awards of attorney’s fees, how does an appellant show the existence . . . imposed requirements or how the appellant demonstrated a "miscarriage of justice” as required by section 59.041 . . .

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, v. DAVIS,, 18 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

DANIELS, v. STATE, 4 So. 3d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See §§ 59.041, 924.33, Fla. Stat. (2005 and 2006); see also Heuss v. . . .

BERUBE, a k a v. STATE, 5 So. 3d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2008). The harmless error test, as set forth in Chapman [v. . . .

PLAUT, v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE, LIMITED, d b a, 2 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2007); Herbello v. Perez, 754 So.2d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). . . .

SALEEBY, v. ROCKY ELSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

WORTHEN, v. WORTHEN,, 991 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 59.041.... . . .

HOLLENBECK, v. HOOKS,, 993 So. 2d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

RACOMA, Jr. M. D. M. D. s, P. A. v. L. HANNANS,, 978 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . .

SOUTHSTAR EQUITY, LLC, v. LAI CHAU,, 998 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Lundberg, 379 So.2d 964, 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); see also § 59.041, Fla. . . .

In DOE a, 973 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Applying a harmless error analysis as mandated by section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2007), the panel . . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2007), provides that "[n]o judgment shall be set aside or reversed . . .

BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE, a v. BRODY Co-, 969 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . in Gold, there was no attempt by the court to do a harmless error analysis as is required by section 59.041 . . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2006) states: Harmless error; effect. — No judgment shall be set aside . . .

H H ELECTRIC, INC. R. J. v. J. LOPEZ,, 967 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

ESAW, v. ESAW,, 965 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . It takes seriously the provision of section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2004), that “[n]o judgment shall . . . Under section 59.041, “[i]n a civil case, an error is reversible — that is, harmful error — [only] where . . . is unable to demonstrate “that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” § 59.041 . . .

FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR NEUROLOGIC REHABILITATION, INC. v. MARSHALL, 943 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

BRADLEY Jr. a v. SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC. a, 943 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

LANGDON, v. STATE, 947 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . §§ 59.041, 924.051(7), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. M. SHELTON L., 932 So. 2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Martin County, 706 So.2d 20, 26 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); see also § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

C. DORSEY, v. REDDY, M. D., 931 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

CROWE, v. LOWE, 942 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2004); Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. . . .

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. McDERMOTT, 929 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . civil case is whether, “but for such error,” a different result may have been reached); see also § 59.041 . . .

SAMUELS, v. LUXURY IMPORTS OF PALM BEACH, INC. d b a, 930 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. Affirmed. . . .

J. DeMELLO, v. A. BUCKMAN,, 916 So. 2d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 59.041. . . . .

ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY, v. SOSA,, 907 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

SAMPSON, v. STATE, 903 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See, e.g., § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2004); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). . . .

LORA v. ESCAFFI,, 913 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003) ; Maksad v. . . . Section 59.041 provides: No judgment shall be set aside or reversed, or new trial granted by any court . . .

RYDER TRS, INC. v. HIRSCH,, 900 So. 2d 608 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, v. D. PORRITT,, 891 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003). Reversed and remanded. FULMER and WALLACE, JJ., Concur. . . .

LEINHART v. JURKOVICH,, 882 So. 2d 456 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . We also harken back to section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1994), which states that “[n]o judgment shall . . .

TEAT, v. CITY OF APALACHICOLA,, 880 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . This holding, however, should not be read to preclude the application of section 59.041, Florida Statutes . . . ), we recognized that appellate courts are mandated to perform a harmless error analysis by section 59.041 . . .

DONES, M. D. v. MOSS, M. D., 884 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Jarkesy, 343 So.2d 886, 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); see § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a v. PETTIGREW L., 884 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

McPHERSON v. PHILLIPS, M. D., 877 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . .

LARA, v. STATE, 868 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003); Bradley v. State, 787 So.2d 732, 743-44 (Fla.2001); Murphy v. . . .

SHORT, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION,, 868 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003); Smith v. . . .

E. OWEN B. v. MOORE,, 852 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Pursuant to § 59.041, Fla. . . .

S. GRENITZ, M. D. v. TOMLIAN, v., 858 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 2003)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. . . .

G. STACK, v. HOMESIDE LENDING, INC., 846 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2000). See Parsons v. . . .

McKEEHAN, v. STATE, 838 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1975). 386 So.2d at 540 (footnote omitted). . . .

S. MURRAY G. v. K. HALEY, M. D. P. A. a, 833 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . unnecessary, however, to resolve this question because, assuming that appellants are required by section 59.041 . . . 754 So.2d 840, 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (noting that the test for harmful error pursuant to section 59.041 . . .

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a v. J. McGEE, a J. J. a a, 837 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2001). The jury was not swept away by the emotions of the attorneys. . . .

TARGET STORES, a v. DETJE,, 833 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .” § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 827 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Subdivision (d) is the appellate procedure counterpart of the harmless error statute, section 59.041, . . .

In GREEN, v. STATE, 826 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2001), provides that no judgment shall be reversed because of the improper . . .

G. LEVIN, v. ETHAN ALLEN, INC., 823 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (2002), our harmless error statute, provides that no judgment shall . . .

G. LEWIS, v. J. LEWIS,, 807 So. 2d 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . transcript or statement precluded us from applying the harmless error analysis required by section 59.041 . . .

BRIOIS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 807 So. 2d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Salzverg, 696 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2001)(harmless error). . . .

NEWKIRK, II, v. STATE, 791 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 59.041; 924.33, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). . . .

STATE v. W. CUTLER,, 785 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . §§ 924.051(1)(a), 924.33, 59.041. REVERSED. . . .

S. KLETTE, v. R. KLETTE,, 785 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 59.041, Florida Statutes, the harmless error statute directs: No judgment shall be set aside . . . Because of this, we cannot conduct “an examination of the entire case” as we are directed by section 59.041 . . . The Casella court did not mention its obligation under section 59.041. . . .

C. DUNN, S. v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 781 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

D. HOPPER v. R. RENO, 778 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

NATIONAL HEALTHCORP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. CLOSE, F., 787 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 780 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Subdivision (d) is the appellate procedure counterpart of the harmless error statute, section 59.041, . . .

BUSH, A. v. D. HOLMES E. H. NAACP a k a PTA AFT AFL- CIO, a Jr. F. Of v. D. E. H. NAACP a k a PTA AFT AFL- CIO, a Jr. F., 767 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. . . .

KAMMER, M. D. s a v. HURLEY S., 765 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Fuller, 453 So.2d 547, 548 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); § 59.041, Fla. . . .

MURPHY v. INTERNATIONAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, INC., 766 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2000)

. . . See, e.g., § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Weise v. . . .

NITA CORPORATION, v. KAGAN,, 766 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Decks, Inc. v. Nunez, 299 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Affirmed. . . .

TEXIDOR, v. BENNETT M. LIFTER, INC. a, 756 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Florida Power & Light Co. v. McCollum, 140 So.2d 569 (Fla.1962). . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, v. D. BLACKMON,, 754 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Faáss’ statement from the EMT records, we must determine whether the error was harmless under section 59.041 . . . Section 59.041 provides, in pertinent part, that [n]o judgment shall be set aside or reversed, or new . . . Thus, “[w]hen examining an evidentiary ruling under section 59.041, we are required to look at the entire . . .

HERBELLO, v. PEREZ,, 754 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Ratos v. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. VEGA a, 751 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 59.041 Florida Statutes (1999)provides: Harmless error; effect. — No judgment shall be set aside . . .

GONZALEZ v. B. ROSE, II,, 752 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

STEPHENSON, v. COBB, Jr., 763 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

GOODWIN, v. STATE v., 751 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1999)

. . . certified question reflected the district court’s acknowledgment of both section 924.33 and section 59.041 . . . although the Legislature has the authority to enact harmless error statutes like sections 924.33 and 59.041 . . . that our holding is consistent with the legislative directive of the harmless error statutes, sections 59.041 . . . Note the similarity between this constitutional provision and section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1997) . . . Section 59.041 specifies that “improper admission or rejection of evidence” should lead to reversal only . . .

QUITO, v. COMPANIA DE VAPORES OCEAN BREEZE S. A., 743 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stecher v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla.1971); Chrysler v. . . .

GUMBERG, v. GUMBERG,, 755 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Finally, section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that a judgment will not be reversed unless . . .

M. JEAN, v. THEODORSEN,, 736 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 728 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1997). . . . .

SANCHEZ, v. UNION AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 728 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1997); Goldschmidt v. Holman, 571 So.2d 422 (Fla.1990); Security Mut. . . .

K. FRAVEL, D. M. D. v. HAUGHEY,, 727 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See also § 59.041, Cleveland Clinic Florida v. Wilson, 685 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Weise v. . . .

A. MEDINA, Sr. v. PERALTA,, 724 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1999)

. . . An evidentiary ruling such as the one in Furtado could be deemed harmless error under section 59.041, . . . When examining an evidentiary ruling under section 59.041, we are required to look at the entire record . . . distinction as to whether the trial court's error applied to the action against the tortfeasor. .Section 59.041 . . .