Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 125.0104 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 125.0104 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 125.0104 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 125.0104

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 125
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
View Entire Chapter
125.0104 Tourist development tax; procedure for levying; authorized uses; referendum; enforcement.
(1) SHORT TITLE.This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Local Option Tourist Development Act.”
(2) APPLICATION; DEFINITIONS.
(a) Application.The provisions contained in chapter 212 apply to the administration of any tax levied pursuant to this section.
(b) Definitions.For purposes of this section:
1. “Promotion” means marketing or advertising designed to increase tourist-related business activities.
2. “Tourist” means a person who participates in trade or recreation activities outside the county of his or her permanent residence or who rents or leases transient accommodations as described in paragraph (3)(a).
3. “Retained spring training franchise” means a spring training franchise that had a location in this state on or before December 31, 1998, and that has continuously remained at that location for at least the 10 years preceding that date.
(3) TAXABLE PRIVILEGES; EXEMPTIONS; LEVY; RATE.
(a)1. It is declared to be the intent of the Legislature that every person who rents, leases, or lets for consideration any living quarters or accommodations in any hotel, apartment hotel, motel, resort motel, apartment, apartment motel, roominghouse, mobile home park, recreational vehicle park, condominium, or timeshare resort for a term of 6 months or less is exercising a privilege which is subject to taxation under this section, unless such person rents, leases, or lets for consideration any living quarters or accommodations which are exempt according to the provisions of chapter 212.
2.a. Tax shall be due on the consideration paid for occupancy in the county pursuant to a regulated short-term product, as defined in s. 721.05, or occupancy in the county pursuant to a product that would be deemed a regulated short-term product if the agreement to purchase the short-term right were executed in this state. Such tax shall be collected on the last day of occupancy within the county unless such consideration is applied to the purchase of a timeshare estate. The occupancy of an accommodation of a timeshare resort pursuant to a timeshare plan, a multisite timeshare plan, or an exchange transaction in an exchange program, as defined in s. 721.05, by the owner of a timeshare interest or such owner’s guest, which guest is not paying monetary consideration to the owner or to a third party for the benefit of the owner, is not a privilege subject to taxation under this section. A membership or transaction fee paid by a timeshare owner that does not provide the timeshare owner with the right to occupy any specific timeshare unit but merely provides the timeshare owner with the opportunity to exchange a timeshare interest through an exchange program is a service charge and not subject to taxation under this section.
b. Consideration paid for the purchase of a timeshare license in a timeshare plan, as defined in s. 721.05, is rent subject to taxation under this section.
(b) Subject to the provisions of this section, any county in this state may levy and impose a tourist development tax on the exercise within its boundaries of the taxable privilege described in paragraph (a), except that there shall be no additional levy under this section in any cities or towns presently imposing a municipal resort tax as authorized under chapter 67-930, Laws of Florida, and this section shall not in any way affect the powers and existence of any tourist development authority created pursuant to chapter 67-930, Laws of Florida. No county authorized to levy a convention development tax pursuant to s. 212.0305, or to s. 8 of chapter 84-324, Laws of Florida, shall be allowed to levy more than the 2-percent tax authorized by this section. A county may elect to levy and impose the tourist development tax in a subcounty special district of the county. However, if a county so elects to levy and impose the tax on a subcounty special district basis, the district shall embrace all or a significant contiguous portion of the county, and the county shall assist the Department of Revenue in identifying the rental units subject to tax in the district.
(c) The tourist development tax shall be levied, imposed, and set by the governing board of the county at a rate of 1 percent or 2 percent of each dollar and major fraction of each dollar of the total consideration charged for such lease or rental. When receipt of consideration is by way of property other than money, the tax shall be levied and imposed on the fair market value of such nonmonetary consideration.
(d) In addition to any 1-percent or 2-percent tax imposed under paragraph (c), the governing board of the county may levy, impose, and set an additional 1 percent of each dollar above the tax rate set under paragraph (c) for the purposes set forth in subsection (5) by referendum of the registered electors within the county or subcounty special district pursuant to subsection (6). A county may not levy, impose, and set the tax authorized under this paragraph unless the county has imposed the 1-percent or 2-percent tax authorized under paragraph (c) for a minimum of 3 years before the effective date of the levy and imposition of the tax authorized by this paragraph. Revenues raised by the additional tax authorized under this paragraph may not be used for debt service on or refinancing of existing facilities as specified in subparagraph (5)(a)1. unless approved by referendum pursuant to subsection (6). If the 1-percent or 2-percent tax authorized in paragraph (c) is levied within a subcounty special taxing district, the additional tax authorized in this paragraph shall only be levied therein. The provisions of paragraphs (4)(a)-(d) shall not apply to the adoption of the additional tax authorized in this paragraph. The effective date of the levy and imposition of the tax authorized under this paragraph is the first day of the second month following approval of the ordinance by referendum or the first day of any subsequent month specified in the ordinance. A certified copy of such ordinance shall be furnished by the county to the Department of Revenue within 10 days after approval of such ordinance.
(e) The tourist development tax shall be in addition to any other tax imposed pursuant to chapter 212 and in addition to all other taxes and fees and the consideration for the rental or lease.
(f) The tourist development tax shall be charged by the person receiving the consideration for the lease or rental, and it shall be collected from the lessee, tenant, or customer at the time of payment of the consideration for such lease or rental.
(g) The person receiving the consideration for such rental or lease shall receive, account for, and remit the tax to the Department of Revenue at the time and in the manner provided for persons who collect and remit taxes under s. 212.03. The same duties and privileges imposed by chapter 212 upon dealers in tangible property, respecting the collection and remission of tax; the making of returns; the keeping of books, records, and accounts; and compliance with the rules of the Department of Revenue in the administration of that chapter shall apply to and be binding upon all persons who are subject to the provisions of this section. However, the Department of Revenue may authorize a quarterly return and payment when the tax remitted by the dealer for the preceding quarter did not exceed $25.
(h) The Department of Revenue shall keep records showing the amount of taxes collected, which records shall also include records disclosing the amount of taxes collected for and from each county in which the tax authorized by this section is applicable. These records shall be open for inspection during the regular office hours of the Department of Revenue, subject to the provisions of s. 213.053.
(i) Collections received by the Department of Revenue from the tax, less costs of administration of this section, shall be paid and returned monthly to the county which imposed the tax, for use by the county in accordance with the provisions of this section. They shall be placed in the county tourist development trust fund of the respective county, which shall be established by each county as a condition precedent to receipt of such funds.
(j) The Department of Revenue is authorized to employ persons and incur other expenses for which funds are appropriated by the Legislature.
(k) The Department of Revenue shall promulgate such rules and shall prescribe and publish such forms as may be necessary to effectuate the purposes of this section.
(l) In addition to any other tax which is imposed pursuant to this section, a county may impose up to an additional 1-percent tax on the exercise of the privilege described in paragraph (a) by ordinance approved by referendum pursuant to subsection (6) to:
1. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility, or the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a retained spring training franchise facility, either publicly owned and operated, or publicly owned and operated by the owner of a professional sports franchise or other lessee with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facility, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds.
2. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a convention center, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds.
3. Pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for a period of up to 10 years. Only counties that have elected to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. may use the tax for the purposes enumerated in this subparagraph. Any county that elects to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. after July 1, 2000, may use the proceeds of the tax to pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for the life of the bonds.
4. Promote and advertise tourism in the State of Florida and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event shall have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists.

The provision of paragraph (b) which prohibits any county authorized to levy a convention development tax pursuant to s. 212.0305 from levying more than the 2-percent tax authorized by this section, and the provisions of paragraphs (4)(a)-(d), shall not apply to the additional tax authorized in this paragraph. The effective date of the levy and imposition of the tax authorized under this paragraph is the first day of the second month following approval of the ordinance by referendum or the first day of any subsequent month specified in the ordinance. A certified copy of such ordinance shall be furnished by the county to the Department of Revenue within 10 days after approval of such ordinance.

(m)1. In addition to any other tax which is imposed pursuant to this section, a high tourism impact county may impose an additional 1-percent tax on the exercise of the privilege described in paragraph (a) by ordinance approved by referendum pursuant to subsection (6). The tax revenues received pursuant to this paragraph shall be used for one or more of the authorized uses pursuant to subsection (5).
2. A county is considered to be a high tourism impact county after the Department of Revenue has certified to such county that the sales subject to the tax levied pursuant to this section exceeded $600 million during the previous calendar year, or were at least 18 percent of the county’s total taxable sales under chapter 212 where the sales subject to the tax levied pursuant to this section were a minimum of $200 million, except that no county authorized to levy a convention development tax pursuant to s. 212.0305 shall be considered a high tourism impact county. Once a county qualifies as a high tourism impact county, it shall retain this designation for the period the tax is levied pursuant to this paragraph.
3. The provisions of paragraphs (4)(a)-(d) shall not apply to the adoption of the additional tax authorized in this paragraph. The effective date of the levy and imposition of the tax authorized under this paragraph is the first day of the second month following approval of the ordinance by referendum or the first day of any subsequent month specified in the ordinance. A certified copy of such ordinance shall be furnished by the county to the Department of Revenue within 10 days after approval of such ordinance.
(n) In addition to any other tax that is imposed under this section, a county that has imposed the tax under paragraph (l) may impose an additional tax that is no greater than 1 percent on the exercise of the privilege described in paragraph (a) by ordinance approved by referendum pursuant to subsection (6) to:
1. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance:
a. The construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a facility either publicly owned and operated, or publicly owned and operated by the owner of a professional sports franchise or other lessee with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facility, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds for a new professional sports franchise as defined in s. 288.1162.
b. The acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a facility either publicly owned and operated, or publicly owned and operated by the owner of a professional sports franchise or other lessee with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facility, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds for a retained spring training franchise.
2. Promote and advertise tourism in the State of Florida and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event shall have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists.

A county that imposes the tax authorized in this paragraph may not expend any ad valorem tax revenues for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a facility for which tax revenues are used pursuant to subparagraph 1. The provision of paragraph (b) which prohibits any county authorized to levy a convention development tax pursuant to s. 212.0305 from levying more than the 2-percent tax authorized by this section shall not apply to the additional tax authorized by this paragraph in counties which levy convention development taxes pursuant to s. 212.0305(4)(a). Subsection (4) does not apply to the adoption of the additional tax authorized in this paragraph. The effective date of the levy and imposition of the tax authorized under this paragraph is the first day of the second month following approval of the ordinance by referendum or the first day of any subsequent month specified in the ordinance. A certified copy of such ordinance shall be furnished by the county to the Department of Revenue within 10 days after approval of the ordinance.

(4) ORDINANCE LEVY TAX; PROCEDURE.
(a) The tourist development tax shall be levied and imposed pursuant to an ordinance containing the county tourist development plan prescribed under paragraph (c), enacted by the governing board of the county. The ordinance levying and imposing the tourist development tax shall not be effective unless the electors of the county or the electors in the subcounty special district in which the tax is to be levied approve the ordinance authorizing the levy and imposition of the tax, in accordance with subsection (6). The effective date of the levy and imposition of the tax is the first day of the second month following approval of the ordinance by referendum or the first day of any subsequent month specified in the ordinance. A certified copy of the ordinance shall be furnished by the county to the Department of Revenue within 10 days after approval of such ordinance. The governing authority of any county levying such tax shall notify the department, within 10 days after approval of the ordinance by referendum, of the time period during which the tax will be levied.
(b) At least 60 days before the enactment or renewal of the ordinance levying the tax, the governing board of the county shall adopt a resolution establishing and appointing the members of the county tourist development council, as prescribed in paragraph (e), and indicating the intention of the county to consider the enactment or renewal of an ordinance levying and imposing the tourist development tax.
(c) Before a referendum to enact or renew the ordinance levying and imposing the tax, the county tourist development council shall prepare and submit to the governing board of the county for its approval a plan for tourist development. The plan shall set forth the anticipated net tourist development tax revenue to be derived by the county for the 24 months following the levy of the tax; the tax district in which the enactment or renewal of the ordinance levying and imposing the tourist development tax is proposed; and a list, in the order of priority, of the proposed uses of the tax revenue by specific project or special use as the same are authorized under subsection (5). The plan shall include the approximate cost or expense allocation for each specific project or special use.
(d) The governing board of the county shall adopt the county plan for tourist development as part of the ordinance levying the tax. After enactment or renewal of the ordinance levying and imposing the tax, the plan for tourist development may not be substantially amended except by ordinance enacted by an affirmative vote of a majority plus one additional member of the governing board.
(e) The governing board of each county which levies and imposes a tourist development tax under this section shall appoint an advisory council to be known as the “  (name of county)   Tourist Development Council.” The council shall be established by ordinance and composed of nine members who shall be appointed by the governing board. The chair of the governing board of the county or any other member of the governing board as designated by the chair shall serve on the council. Two members of the council shall be elected municipal officials, at least one of whom shall be from the most populous municipality in the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied. Six members of the council shall be persons who are involved in the tourist industry and who have demonstrated an interest in tourist development, of which members, not less than three nor more than four shall be owners or operators of motels, hotels, recreational vehicle parks, or other tourist accommodations in the county and subject to the tax. All members of the council shall be electors of the county. The governing board of the county shall have the option of designating the chair of the council or allowing the council to elect a chair. The chair shall be appointed or elected annually and may be reelected or reappointed. The members of the council shall serve for staggered terms of 4 years. The terms of office of the original members shall be prescribed in the resolution required under paragraph (b). The council shall meet at least once each quarter and, from time to time, shall make recommendations to the county governing board for the effective operation of the special projects or for uses of the tourist development tax revenue and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by county ordinance or resolution. The council shall continuously review expenditures of revenues from the tourist development trust fund and shall receive, at least quarterly, expenditure reports from the county governing board or its designee. Expenditures which the council believes to be unauthorized shall be reported to the county governing board and the Department of Revenue. The governing board and the department shall review the findings of the council and take appropriate administrative or judicial action to ensure compliance with this section.
(5) AUTHORIZED USES OF REVENUE.
(a) All tax revenues received pursuant to this section by a county imposing the tourist development tax shall be used by that county for the following purposes only:
1. To acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or promote one or more:
a. Publicly owned and operated convention centers, sports stadiums, sports arenas, coliseums, or auditoriums within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied;
b. Auditoriums that are publicly owned but are operated by organizations that are exempt from federal taxation pursuant to 26 U.S.C. s. 501(c)(3) and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied; or
c. Aquariums or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied;
2. To promote zoological parks that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public;
3. To promote and advertise tourism in this state and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event must have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists;
4. To fund convention bureaus, tourist bureaus, tourist information centers, and news bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the chambers of commerce or similar associations in the county, which may include any indirect administrative costs for services performed by the county on behalf of the promotion agency;
5. To finance beach park facilities, or beach, channel, estuary, or lagoon improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including construction of beach groins and shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup, or restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as those uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline, channel, estuary, lagoon, or inland lake or river. However, any funds identified by a county as the local matching source for beach renourishment, restoration, or erosion control projects included in the long-range budget plan of the state’s Beach Management Plan, pursuant to s. 161.091, or funds contractually obligated by a county in the financial plan for a federally authorized shore protection project may not be used or loaned for any other purpose. In counties of fewer than 100,000 population, up to 10 percent of the revenues from the tourist development tax may be used for beach park facilities;
6. To acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or finance public facilities within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied, if the public facilities are needed to increase tourist-related business activities in the county or subcounty special district and are recommended by the county tourist development council created pursuant to paragraph (4)(e). Tax revenues may be used for any related land acquisition, land improvement, design and engineering costs, and all other professional and related costs required to bring the public facilities into service. As used in this subparagraph, the term “public facilities” means major capital improvements that have a life expectancy of 5 or more years, including, but not limited to, transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and pedestrian facilities. Tax revenues may be used for these purposes only if the following conditions are satisfied:
a. In the county fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the tax revenues were initially used for such purposes, at least $10 million in tourist development tax revenue was received or the county is a fiscally constrained county, as described in s. 218.67(1), located adjacent to the Gulf of America or the Atlantic Ocean;
b. The county governing board approves the use for the proposed public facilities by a vote of at least two-thirds of its membership;
c. No more than 70 percent of the cost of the proposed public facilities will be paid for with tourist development tax revenues, and sources of funding for the remaining cost are identified and confirmed by the county governing board;
d. At least 40 percent of all tourist development tax revenues collected in the county are spent to promote and advertise tourism as provided by this subsection; and
e. An independent professional analysis, performed at the expense of the county tourist development council, demonstrates the positive impact of the infrastructure project on tourist-related businesses in the county; or
7. To employ, train, equip, insure, or otherwise fund the provision of lifeguards certified by the American Red Cross, the Y.M.C.A., or an equivalent nationally recognized aquatic training program, for beaches on the Gulf of America or the Atlantic Ocean.

Subparagraphs 1. and 2. may be implemented through service contracts and leases with lessees that have sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facilities.

(b) Tax revenues received pursuant to this section by a county of less than 950,000 population imposing a tourist development tax may only be used by that county for the following purposes in addition to those purposes allowed pursuant to paragraph (a): to acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or promote one or more zoological parks, fishing piers or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public. All population figures relating to this subsection shall be based on the most recent population estimates prepared pursuant to the provisions of s. 186.901. These population estimates shall be those in effect on July 1 of each year.
(c) A county located adjacent to the Gulf of America or the Atlantic Ocean, except a county that receives revenue from taxes levied pursuant to s. 125.0108, which meets the following criteria may use up to 10 percent of the tax revenue received pursuant to this section to reimburse expenses incurred in providing public safety services, including emergency medical services as defined in s. 401.107(3), and law enforcement services, which are needed to address impacts related to increased tourism and visitors to an area. However, if taxes collected pursuant to this section are used to reimburse emergency medical services or public safety services for tourism or special events, the governing board of a county or municipality may not use such taxes to supplant the normal operating expenses of an emergency medical services department, a fire department, a sheriff’s office, or a police department. To receive reimbursement, the county must:
1.a. Generate a minimum of $10 million in annual proceeds from any tax, or any combination of taxes, authorized to be levied pursuant to this section;
b. Have at least three municipalities; and
c. Have an estimated population of less than 275,000, according to the most recent population estimate prepared pursuant to s. 186.901, excluding the inmate population; or
2. Be a fiscally constrained county as described in s. 218.67(1).

The board of county commissioners must by majority vote approve reimbursement made pursuant to this paragraph upon receipt of a recommendation from the tourist development council.

(d) The revenues to be derived from the tourist development tax may be pledged to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county for the purposes set forth in subparagraphs (a)1., 2., and 5. or for the purpose of refunding bonds previously issued for such purposes, or both; however, no more than 50 percent of the revenues from the tourist development tax may be pledged to secure and liquidate revenue bonds or revenue refunding bonds issued for the purposes set forth in subparagraph (a)5. Such revenue bonds and revenue refunding bonds may be authorized and issued in such principal amounts, with such interest rates and maturity dates, and subject to such other terms, conditions, and covenants as the governing board of the county shall provide. The Legislature intends that this paragraph be full and complete authority for accomplishing such purposes, but such authority is supplemental and additional to, and not in derogation of, any powers now existing or later conferred under law.
(e) Any use of the local option tourist development tax revenues collected pursuant to this section for a purpose not expressly authorized by paragraph (3)(l) or paragraph (3)(n) or paragraphs (a)-(d) of this subsection is expressly prohibited.
(6) REFERENDUM.
(a) An ordinance enacted or renewed by a county levying the tax authorized by this section may not take effect until the ordinance levying and imposing the tax has been approved in a referendum held at a general election, as defined in s. 97.021, by a majority of the electors voting in such election in the county or by a majority of the electors voting in the subcounty special tax district affected by the tax.
(b) The governing board of the county levying the tax shall arrange to place a question on the ballot at a general election, as defined in s. 97.021, to be held within the county, which question shall be in substantially the following form:

 FOR the Tourist Development Tax

 AGAINST the Tourist Development Tax

(c) If a majority of the electors voting on the question approve the levy, the ordinance shall be deemed to be in effect.
(d) In any case where an ordinance levying and imposing the tax has been approved by referendum pursuant to this section and 15 percent of the electors in the county or 15 percent of the electors in the subcounty special district in which the tax is levied file a petition with the board of county commissioners for a referendum to repeal the tax, the board of county commissioners shall cause an election to be held for the repeal of the tax which election shall be subject only to the outstanding bonds for which the tax has been pledged. However, the repeal of the tax shall not be effective with respect to any portion of taxes initially levied in November 1989, which has been pledged or is being used to support bonds under paragraph (3)(d) or paragraph (3)(l) until the retirement of those bonds.
(e) A referendum to reenact an expiring tourist development tax must be held at a general election occurring within the 48-month period immediately preceding the effective date of the reenacted tax, and the referendum may appear on the ballot only once within the 48-month period.
(7) AUTOMATIC EXPIRATION ON RETIREMENT OF BONDS.Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if the plan for tourist development approved by the governing board of the county, as amended pursuant to paragraph (4)(d), includes the acquisition, construction, extension, enlargement, remodeling, repair, or improvement of a publicly owned and operated convention center, sports stadium, sports arena, coliseum, or auditorium, or museum or aquarium that is publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by a not-for-profit organization, the county ordinance levying and imposing the tax automatically expires upon the later of:
(a) The retirement of all bonds issued by the county for financing the acquisition, construction, extension, enlargement, remodeling, repair, or improvement of a publicly owned and operated convention center, sports stadium, sports arena, coliseum, or auditorium, or museum or aquarium that is publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by a not-for-profit organization; or
(b) The expiration of any agreement by the county for the operation or maintenance, or both, of a publicly owned and operated convention center, sports stadium, sports arena, coliseum, auditorium, aquarium, or museum. However, this does not preclude that county from amending the ordinance extending the tax to the extent that the board of the county determines to be necessary to provide funds to operate, maintain, repair, or renew and replace a publicly owned and operated convention center, sports stadium, sports arena, coliseum, auditorium, aquarium, or museum or from enacting an ordinance that takes effect without referendum approval, unless the original referendum required ordinance expiration, pursuant to the provisions of this section reimposing a tourist development tax, upon or following the expiration of the previous ordinance.
(8) PROHIBITED ACTS; ENFORCEMENT; PENALTIES.
(a) Any person who is taxable hereunder who fails or refuses to charge and collect from the person paying any rental or lease the taxes herein provided, either by himself or herself or through agents or employees, is, in addition to being personally liable for the payment of the tax, guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) No person shall advertise or hold out to the public in any manner, directly or indirectly, that he or she will absorb all or any part of the tax, that he or she will relieve the person paying the rental of the payment of all or any part of the tax, or that the tax will not be added to the rental or lease consideration or, when added, that it or any part thereof will be refunded or refused, either directly or indirectly, by any method whatsoever. Any person who willfully violates any provision of this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(c) The tax authorized to be levied by this section shall constitute a lien on the property of the lessee, customer, or tenant in the same manner as, and shall be collectible as are, liens authorized and imposed in ss. 713.67, 713.68, and 713.69.
(9) COUNTY TOURISM PROMOTION AGENCIES.In addition to any other powers and duties provided for agencies created for the purpose of tourism promotion by a county levying the tourist development tax, such agencies are authorized and empowered to:
(a) Provide, arrange, and make expenditures for transportation, lodging, meals, and other reasonable and necessary items and services for such persons, as determined by the head of the agency, in connection with the performance of promotional and other duties of the agency. However, entertainment expenses shall be authorized only when meeting with travel writers, tour brokers, or other persons connected with the tourist industry. All travel and entertainment-related expenditures in excess of $10 made pursuant to this subsection shall be substantiated by paid bills therefor. Complete and detailed justification for all travel and entertainment-related expenditures made pursuant to this subsection shall be shown on the travel expense voucher or attached thereto. Transportation and other incidental expenses, other than those provided in s. 112.061, shall only be authorized for officers and employees of the agency, other authorized persons, travel writers, tour brokers, or other persons connected with the tourist industry when traveling pursuant to paragraph (c). All other transportation and incidental expenses pursuant to this subsection shall be as provided in s. 112.061. Operational or promotional advancements, as defined in s. 288.35(4), obtained pursuant to this subsection, shall not be commingled with any other funds.
(b) Pay by advancement or reimbursement, or a combination thereof, the costs of per diem and incidental expenses of officers and employees of the agency and other authorized persons, for foreign travel at the current rates as specified in the federal publication “Standardized Regulations (Government Civilians, Foreign Areas).” The provisions of this paragraph shall apply for any officer or employee of the agency traveling in foreign countries for the purposes of promoting tourism and travel to the county, if such travel expenses are approved and certified by the agency head from whose funds the traveler is paid. As used in this paragraph, the term “authorized person” shall have the same meaning as provided in s. 112.061(2)(c). With the exception of provisions concerning rates of payment for per diem, the provisions of s. 112.061 are applicable to the travel described in this paragraph. As used in this paragraph, “foreign travel” means all travel outside the United States. Persons traveling in foreign countries pursuant to this subsection shall not be entitled to reimbursements or advancements pursuant to s. 112.061(6)(a)2.
(c) Pay by advancement or reimbursement, or by a combination thereof, the actual reasonable and necessary costs of travel, meals, lodging, and incidental expenses of officers and employees of the agency and other authorized persons when meeting with travel writers, tour brokers, or other persons connected with the tourist industry, and while attending or traveling in connection with travel or trade shows. With the exception of provisions concerning rates of payment, the provisions of s. 112.061 are applicable to the travel described in this paragraph.
(d) Undertake marketing research and advertising research studies and provide reservations services and convention and meetings booking services consistent with the authorized uses of revenue as set forth in subsection (5).
1. Information given to a county tourism promotion agency which, if released, would reveal the identity of persons or entities who provide data or other information as a response to a sales promotion effort, an advertisement, or a research project or whose names, addresses, meeting or convention plan information or accommodations or other visitation needs become booking or reservation list data, is exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution.
2. The following information, when held by a county tourism promotion agency, is exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution:
a. Booking business records, as defined in s. 255.047.
b. Trade secrets and commercial or financial information gathered from a person and privileged or confidential, as defined and interpreted under 5 U.S.C. s. 552(b)(4), or any amendments thereto.
(e) Represent themselves to the public as convention and visitors bureaus, visitors bureaus, tourist development councils, vacation bureaus, or county tourism promotion agencies operating under any other name or names specifically designated by ordinance.
(10) LOCAL ADMINISTRATION OF TAX.
(a) A county levying a tax under this section or s. 125.0108 may be exempted from the requirements of the respective section that:
1. The tax collected be remitted to the Department of Revenue before being returned to the county; and
2. The tax be administered according to chapter 212,

if the county adopts an ordinance providing for the local collection and administration of the tax.

(b) The ordinance shall include provision for, but need not be limited to:
1. Initial collection of the tax to be made in the same manner as the tax imposed under chapter 212.
2. Designation of the local official to whom the tax shall be remitted, and that official’s powers and duties with respect thereto. Tax revenues may be used only in accordance with the provisions of this section.
3. Requirements respecting the keeping of appropriate books, records, and accounts by those responsible for collecting and administering the tax.
4. Provision for payment of a dealer’s credit as required under chapter 212.
5. A portion of the tax collected may be retained by the county for costs of administration, but such portion shall not exceed 3 percent of collections.
(c) A county adopting an ordinance providing for the collection and administration of the tax on a local basis shall also adopt an ordinance electing either to assume all responsibility for auditing the records and accounts of dealers, and assessing, collecting, and enforcing payments of delinquent taxes, or to delegate such authority to the Department of Revenue. If the county elects to assume such responsibility, it shall be bound by all rules promulgated by the Department of Revenue pursuant to paragraph (3)(k), as well as those rules pertaining to the sales and use tax on transient rentals imposed by s. 212.03. The county may use any power granted in this section to the department to determine the amount of tax, penalties, and interest to be paid by each dealer and to enforce payment of such tax, penalties, and interest. The county may use a certified public accountant licensed in this state in the administration of its statutory duties and responsibilities. Such certified public accountants are bound by the same confidentiality requirements and subject to the same penalties as the county under s. 213.053. If the county delegates such authority to the department, the department shall distribute any collections so received, less costs of administration, to the county. The amount deducted for costs of administration by the department shall be used only for those costs which are solely and directly attributable to auditing, assessing, collecting, processing, and enforcing payments of delinquent taxes authorized in this section. If a county elects to delegate such authority to the department, the department shall audit only those businesses in the county that it audits pursuant to chapter 212.
(11) INTEREST PAID ON DISTRIBUTIONS.
(a) Interest shall be paid on undistributed taxes collected and remitted to the Department of Revenue under this section. Such interest shall be included along with the tax proceeds distributed to the counties and shall be paid from moneys transferred from the General Revenue Fund. The department shall calculate the interest for net tax distributions using the average daily rate that was earned by the State Treasury for the preceding calendar quarter and paid to the General Revenue Fund. This rate shall be certified by the Chief Financial Officer to the department by the 20th day following the close of each quarter.
(b) The interest applicable to taxes collected under this section shall be calculated by multiplying the tax amounts to be distributed times the daily rate times the number of days after the third working day following the date the tax is due and payable pursuant to s. 212.11 until the date the department issues a voucher to request the Chief Financial Officer to issue the payment warrant. The warrant shall be issued within 7 days after the request.
(c) If an overdistribution of taxes is made by the department, interest shall be paid on the overpaid amount beginning on the date the warrant including the overpayment was issued until the third working day following the due date of the payment period from which the overpayment is being deducted. The interest on an overpayment shall be calculated using the average daily rate from the applicable calendar quarter and shall be deducted from moneys distributed to the county under this section.
History.ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ch. 77-209; s. 3, ch. 79-359; s. 72, ch. 79-400; s. 4, ch. 80-209; s. 2, ch. 80-222; s. 5, ch. 83-297; s. 1, ch. 83-321; s. 40, ch. 85-55; s. 1, ch. 86-4; s. 76, ch. 86-163; s. 61, ch. 87-6; s. 1, ch. 87-99; s. 35, ch. 87-101; s. 1, ch. 87-175; s. 5, ch. 87-280; s. 4, ch. 88-226; s. 6, ch. 88-243; s. 2, ch. 89-217; ss. 31, 66, ch. 89-356; s. 2, ch. 89-362; s. 1, ch. 90-107; s. 1, ch. 90-349; s. 81, ch. 91-45; s. 230, ch. 91-224; s. 3, ch. 92-175; s. 1, ch. 92-204; s. 32, ch. 92-320; s. 4, ch. 93-233; s. 1, ch. 94-275; s. 3, ch. 94-314; s. 37, ch. 94-338; s. 3, ch. 94-353; s. 1, ch. 95-133; s. 1434, ch. 95-147; s. 3, ch. 95-304; s. 1, ch. 95-360; s. 1, ch. 95-416; ss. 44, 46, ch. 96-397; s. 43, ch. 96-406; s. 15, ch. 97-99; s. 1, ch. 98-106; s. 58, ch. 99-2; s. 1, ch. 99-287; ss. 6, 11, 14, ch. 2000-312; s. 11, ch. 2000-351; s. 14, ch. 2001-252; s. 10, ch. 2002-265; s. 1, ch. 2003-34; s. 1, ch. 2003-37; s. 2, ch. 2003-78; s. 145, ch. 2003-261; s. 1, ch. 2005-96; s. 1, ch. 2009-133; s. 1, ch. 2012-180; s. 1, ch. 2013-168; s. 2, ch. 2016-6; s. 1, ch. 2016-220; s. 1, ch. 2017-36; s. 5, ch. 2018-118; s. 1, ch. 2020-10; s. 3, ch. 2022-5; s. 1, ch. 2022-214; s. 45, ch. 2023-8; s. 2, ch. 2023-157; s. 9, ch. 2024-2; s. 23, ch. 2025-8; s. 1, ch. 2025-208.

F.S. 125.0104 on Google Scholar

F.S. 125.0104 on CourtListener

Amendments to 125.0104


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 125.0104
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S125.0104 8a - TAX REVENUE - FAIL REFUSE TO CHARGE COLLECT RENTAL LEASE TAX - M: F
S125.0104 8b - TAX REVENUE - ADVERTISE TO ABSORB OR REFUND RENTAL LEASE TAX - M: F

Cases Citing Statute 125.0104

Total Results: 58  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 49 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Ginsburg, County Atty., Vicki Jay, Asst. County Atty., and Stuart Simon, Miami, for appellee. ADKINS, Justice. These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. (1972); Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(1)(A) (ii). On April 4, 1978, the Dade Metropolitan County Commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission), pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), known as the "Local Option Tourist Development Act" (hereinafter referred to as the act), created a Tourist Development Council which in turn developed and submitted to the commission a tourist development tax expenditure plan....
...Appellant reasons that since "a condition precedent to the passage of the ordinance and the referendum is the adoption of a valid tourist development tax plan," the requirements of the act have not been met. *984 The plan in the case sub judice does, however, comply with the requirements of the act. Section 125.0104(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1977), provides as follows: The plan shall set forth the anticipated net tourist development tax revenue to be derived by the county for the 24 months following the levy of the tax; the tax district in which...
...special use. The statute does not require that the plan submitted to the board include evidence that each proposal contained therein is feasible and permissible. The plan adopted by the commission complied with each of the requirements enunciated in section 125.0104(4)(c), Florida Statutes, and the absence of an agreement between the city and the county on the proposed renovation does not effect its validity....
...The ruling in Sarasota, therefore, does not apply here. Further, any questions raised concerning whether the county can give the money to the city to use for renovations rather than insisting upon retaining control itself over the project are laid to rest by the provisions of section 125.0104(5)(a), Florida Statutes....
...ersons who maintain and operate adequate existing facilities." The county need not acquire control over the Orange Bowl in order to renovate the stadium; instead, it can contract that the city will handle all of the work. Utilizing the provisions of section 125.0104(5)(a), Florida Statutes, the county may properly provide the city the money for the renovation, and no powers will have been improperly transferred in violation of article VIII, section 4, of the Florida Constitution....
...llenge. The district court, in its opinion reviewing the order enjoining the referendum, addressed the issues raised concerning the validity of the referendum and reversed the trial court, holding that the ballot question was neither in violation of section 125.0104(6)(b), Florida Statutes, nor grossly misleading....
...e have done so. We now consider the second part of appellant's second issue on appeal; the contention that the referendum was invalid. Its validity is challenged on two grounds: 1) That the ballot language did not comply with the wording required by section 125.0104(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1977); and 2) that the ballot language was misleading. We are in agreement with the district court's holding that the language employed on the ballot complied with the provisions of the Act. Section 125.0104(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), provides: (b) The governing board of the county levying the tax shall arrange to place a question on the ballot at the next regular or special election to be held within the county, substantially as follows: ......
...tainty, from the terms of the law itself, what would be deemed an infringement of the law, it must be held unconstitutional as attempting to grant to the administrative body the power to say what the law shall be. Id. at 211. Appellant contends that section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, fails to provide adequate guidelines or criteria as to who is subject to the tourist tax, even if read in pari materia with chapter 212, Florida Statutes (1977), as appellee contends it should be, and that in admin...
..., the state transient rentals tax, and that when such is done, the former is "complete and whole in every way with all legal policies of significance set and enacted by the legislature... ." The trial court found so for three reasons: First, because section 125.0104(2), Florida Statutes, provides that the provisions of chapter 212 are to apply to the administration of *988 taxes levied under the former. Second, because section 125.0104(3)(f) provides that the receipt, accounting for, and remitting of taxes collected pursuant to the act is to be in the time and manner provided by section 212.03, Florida Statutes....
...llant is, however, incorrect. The tax imposed by Dade County does not distinguish between residents and nonresidents, rather, it is imposed, with certain exceptions, on anyone who rents certain kinds of living space for a term of six months or less. Section 125.0104(3)(a) *989 provides "[i]t is declared to be the intent of the Legislature that every person who rents, leases, or lets ......
Copy

Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Auth., 461 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1984).

Cited 30 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...These are consolidated appeals from a final judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Pinellas County validating revenue bonds to be used to finance a sports stadium. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(2), (7), Fla. Const. In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted what is now section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1983), the "Local Option Tourist Development Act." This statute authorizes Florida's counties, after referendum to levy a tourist development tax, to be used for certain enumerated purposes....
...evelopment Act were not complied with. First, appellants contend that the initial Ordinance 78-20 is invalid because it allegedly does not comply with the requirements of the statute. In permitting Florida counties to levy a Tourist Development Tax, section 125.0104(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), provides in pertinent part: (a) The tourist development tax shall be levied and imposed pursuant to an ordinance containing the county tourist development plan prescribed under paragraph (c), enacted by the governing board of the county....
...y special district in which the tax is to be levied approve the ordinance authorizing the levy and imposition of the tax, in accordance with section (6). The statute further prescribes certain requisites for the ordinance levying the tax in sections 125.0104(4)(b) and (c): (b) At least 60 days prior to the enactment of the ordinance levying the tax, the governing board of the county shall adopt a resolution establishing and appointing the members of the county tourist development council, as pre...
...nty voters as was the initial ordinance. However, there is no requirement in the Tourist Development Act that a referendum be held to ratify an amendment. The statutory requirement for subsequent amendments to a tourist development plan is stated in section 125.0104(4)(d): After enactment of the ordinance levying and imposing the tax, the plan of tourist development may not be substantially amended except by ordinance enacted by an affirmative vote of a majority plus one additional member of the governing board....
...Because section 8(c) of the PSA charter was enacted by subsequent special act, the authority for the pledging of tourist development tax revenues by the county to secure obligations issued by the PSA controls over any limitation imposed upon such a pledge by section 125.0104(5), Florida Statutes (1983)....
Copy

Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Shiver, 365 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...This opinion more fully explains our reasons for taking such action. The controlling facts in this case are undisputed. The Board of County Commissioners of Dade County, Florida enacted an ordinance subject to voter approval imposing a certain tourist development tax pursuant to Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977) throughout Dade County, Florida except within the municipal limits of Miami Beach, Bal Harbour, and Surfside where municipal resort taxes were already in effect....
...which he is to cast his vote. Hill v. Milander, 72 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1954). In the instant case, the trial court rested its decision to enjoin the holding of the election herein on two basic grounds, to wit: (1) the ballot question as framed violated Section 125.0104(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), and (2) the ballot question as framed was grossly misleading to the public. We disagree. Section 125.0104(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), provides for the ballot language on the tourist development tax referendum herein in the following terms: "(b) The governing board of the county levying the tax shall arrange to place a question on the...
Copy

State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 245, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1999 WL 343064

...is valid. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(2), Fla. Const. We affirm the bond validation judgment. MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997)....
...In July 1998, the County adopted a resolution, entitled "Tourist Development Tax Revenue Bond Resolution," for the issuance of Series 1998 Bonds not exceeding $35,000,000 for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, and equipping a county-owned convention center. [2] The Resolution was adopted pursuant to the ordinance and section 125.0104(3)( l )....
...throughout the period of the Agreement (i.e., twenty years). In August of 1998, pursuant to chapter 75, Florida Statutes (1997), the County filed a complaint in circuit court to validate the bonds. The complaint alleged the County was authorized by section 125.0104 of the Florida Statutes to issue revenue bonds to (a) pay for the cost of acquiring and constructing a publicly owned convention center; (b) establish a debt service reserve account, if necessary; and (c) pay costs associated with the issuance of the bonds....
...lidating the bonds. The court found that the County fully complied with all of the requirements of chapter 75, Florida Statutes (1997); that proper notice of the validation proceeding was given as required by law; that the County is authorized under section 125.0104 to issue the bonds for the purposes of financing the acquisition and construction of the convention center, establishing a debt service reserve account, and paying the costs associated with the issuance of the bonds....
...Johns County, 668 So.2d 196 (Fla.1996) (holding that noncharter county has authority under section 125.01 to issue revenue bonds for purpose of acquiring convention facility); Taylor, 498 So.2d at 426. At issue in this case, however, is the County's authority under section 125.0104 to issue bonds for the purpose of acquiring the convention center. The State contests the County's authority under section 125.0104(3)( l ) to levy the additional one percent tax for the purpose of acquiring the convention center....
...ing it from a private entity to be operated by a private entity, the State argues the County is without statutory authority to levy the additional one percent tax for purposes of repaying the bonds. To best understand the provisions contained within section 125.0104, we begin our analysis with a brief overview of the taxing purposes permitted by the statute. Under subsection 125.0104(3)(c), the County may impose a one or two percent tax on every dollar of the total consideration received from leases or rentals in any hotel, motel, condominium, and other living quarters or accommodations, for a period of six months or less. In addition to this "base" tax, the statute permits the levy of additional one percent taxes for certain specified uses. [8] For example, subsection *534 125.0104(3)(d) permits the County to impose an additional one percent tax for the purposes set forth in subsection (5)....
...seums, or auditoriums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied. § 125.0104(5)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (1997). At issue in this case is section 125.0104(3)( l ), which permits an additional one percent tax for the specific purpose of paying the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction of sports facilities or convention centers: ( l ) In addition to any other tax which...
...ay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds. 3. Only counties that have elected to levy the tax initially for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 1. may use the tax for the purposes enumerated in subparagraph 2. § 125.0104(3)( l )1.-3., Fla. Stat. (1997) [9] (emphasis added). Notwithstanding the above, subsection 125.0104(5) specifically limits the uses for which each tax may be imposed to those purposes expressly authorized: "Any use of the local option tourist development tax revenues collected pursuant to this section for a purpose not expressly authorized by paragraph (3)( l ) or paragraph [(3)(n)] or *535 paragraph (a), paragraph (b), or paragraph (c) of this subsection is expressly prohibited." § 125.0104(5)(d). Thus, the legislature has provided that the taxes permitted under this section may only be levied for the particular use authorized. Based on this language, the State contends that subsection 125.0104(3)( l ), which limits the tourist tax to the payment of debt service for the purpose of financing the construction of a convention center, does not include the acquisition of a convention center. They support this argument by pointing to the preceding subsection, 125.0104(3)(d), which permits tax dollars to be used for the purpose of acquiring a convention center....
...In other words, the State argues had the legislature intended to grant counties the authority to levy taxes for the purpose of paying the debt service of bonds issued to finance the acquisition of a convention center, it certainly could have done so by including the word "acquisition" in subsection 125.0104(3)( l ). Contrary to the State's posture, we do not read the language in section 125.0104(3)( l ) so narrowly....
...There is nothing within the confines of this provision which indicates an intent to limit the use of bonds to the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a convention center to the exclusion of all other acts permitted by the statute. [10] See § 125.0104(5)(a)1....
...See Poe, 695 So.2d at 675; Northern Palm Beach County Water Control Dist., 604 So.2d at 441-42; but see State v. Osceola County Indus. Dev. Auth., 424 So.2d 739 (Fla.1982) (no pledge of credit involved but Court determined whether obligation served paramount public purpose). In this case, the County levied taxes under section 125.0104, and therefore this Court must determine whether the convention center serves a paramount public purpose....
...[13] Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order validating the issuance of bonds in this case. It is so ordered. HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., concurs in result only. NOTES [1] A referendum was not required to pass the ordinance. See § 125.0104(3)( l )....
...ure, the resolution attached to the complaint omits material information, and the complaint's allegation that it will comply with rule 15c12-12 of the Securities Exchange Commission in the future is insufficient; (3) the County lacks authority under section 125.0104(3)( l )2....
...dge that same day. Although we affirm the trial court's order in this case, we urge trial courts to treat the material issues raised by the State Attorney in such cases. [8] In addition to the one percent taxes specified in the body of this opinion, section 125.0104(3)(n) also authorizes an additional one percent tax for the purpose of paying the debt service on bonds issued for the purpose of financing the construction of a facility where the county has imposed a tax as specified in subsection (3)( l )....
...However, subsection (n) imposes an additional limitation: namely, if the county imposes the tax authorized in this subsection, it "may not expend any ad valorem tax revenues for the construction, reconstruction or renovation of that facility." See § 125.0104(3)(n)....
...Pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for a period of up to 10 years. Only counties that have elected to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. may use the tax for the purposes enumerated in this subparagraph. § 125.0104(3)( l )3., Fla....
...ction of the convention center. Contrary to the State's assertion, we do not find the changes to subparagraph 3. to be of particular relevance in resolving the issues in this case. [10] To the contrary, the legislative history to the enactment of subsection 125.0104(3)( l ) indicates the legislature's fervid interest in attracting professional sports franchises for the purpose of inducing non-polluting economic development, promoting tourism and recreation, and improving the prosperity and welfare of the state and its citizens....
...ate and local areas. See id. Apparently, in keeping with the overall public purposes served by attracting professional sports franchises, the legislature amended the section in 1995 by adding convention centers to the list of permitted uses under subsection 125.0104(3)( l )....
...levy taxes for the purposes of financing necessary capital projects, than with drawing distinctions between the meaning of the word "construction" on the one hand and the meaning of the word "acquisition" on the other. Stated otherwise, the focus of section 125.0104(3)( l ) is to permit counties to use tax dollars to finance projects necessary to accomplish the legislature's goal of promoting tourism and economic development....
Copy

Rivergate Rest. Corp. v. METRO. DADE CTY., 369 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...motels. We rejected the arguments against submitting the proposal, as written, to the electorate, and concluded that the ballot language of the proposed ordinance gave the voter fair notice of the question to be decided and was not misleading under Section 125.0104(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1977)....
Copy

Alachua Cnty. v. Adams, 702 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1997 WL 746291

...We also decided a case under the 1968 constitution in which we found valid a special *1257 law that expanded the means of funding local government projects. In Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Authority, 461 So.2d 72, 74 (Fla.1984), we confronted the following factual circumstances: In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted what is now section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1983), the "Local Option Tourist Development Act." This statute authorizes Florida's counties, after referendum to levy a tourist development tax, to be used for certain enumerated purposes....
...um the ordinance levying and imposing the tourist development tax, the revenues to be derived from the tourist development tax may be pledged to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county for the purposes set forth in subparagraph (a)1. § 125.0104, Fla....
...Because section 8(c) of the [Pinellas Sports Authority] charter was enacted by subsequent special act, the authority for the pledging of tourist development *1258 tax revenues by the county to secure obligations issued by the [Pinellas Sports Authority] controls over any limitation imposed upon such a pledge by section 125.0104(5), Florida Statutes (1983)....
Copy

Orange Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 985 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2387991

...el, motel, resort motel, apartment, apartment motel, roominghouse, mobile home park, recreational vehicle park, or condominium for a term of 6 months or less," unless the transaction is made specifically exempt under Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. §§ 125.0104(3)(a), 212.21(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). Counties have the option of levying and imposing the tax, known as the "tourist development tax" or "TDT," on such rentals. § 125.0104(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). Any county that chooses to levy and impose a TDT, and to self-administer the tax, is required to follow the duties and privileges regarding the administration and enforcement of the TDT as set forth in Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. § 125.0104(3)(g), (10)(c), Fla. Stat. If a county does not choose to self-administer its TDT, the authority for the administration of such lies with the Florida Department of Revenue ("DOR"). § 125.0104(10)(a), Fla. Stat. Pursuant to section 125.0104(3)(b), Florida Statutes, Orange County has enacted the local option TDT, and its TDT is codified at section 25-136 through 25-138 of the Orange County Code (hereinafter "Code")....
...Accordingly, the provisions of Chapter 212, Florida Statutes, including the legal principles governing the transient tax under section 212.03, Florida Statutes, are applicable and binding upon the County and the Comptroller in the administration and enforcement of the County's TDT. See § 125.0104(3)(g), Fla....
Copy

METRO. DADE CTY. v. Golden Nugget Grp., 448 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...Appellees next claim that the Act impermissibly classifies persons on the basis of the duration and type of residence in the county, thus violating equal protection. A similar argument was rejected in Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 394 So.2d 981 (Fla. 1981). Miami Dolphins involved a challenge to Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1981), a Local Option Tourist Development Act....
...ix months or less. Further, the various classifications and exemptions were found to be rationally connected to a legitimate state interest, and not arbitrary. Taxes on transient rental housing as are found in Chapter 212 (which is incorporated into § 125.0104 by reference), the court observed, have been part of Florida law for many years and have withstood several court tests....
...32(1)(b). We agree with the finding of the trial court that no such trust fund was created or contemplated. Further, no statutory mechanism exists to effect a transfer from the General Revenue Fund to a State Trust Fund to the local authorities. Cf. § 125.0104, Fla....
Copy

Rowe v. St. Johns Cnty., 668 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1996).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 75, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 103, 1996 WL 63086

...In fact, in Orange County, this Court specifically found that section 125.01(1)(c), (r), and (t) [2] authorized Orange County, a noncharter county, to issue capital improvement revenue bonds pursuant to a county ordinance. 281 So.2d at 311. The appellants argue that section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1995) (the "Local Option Tourist Development Act"), sections 125.011 and 125.012, Florida Statutes (1995) (relating to certain authorized charter county projects), and chapter 159, Florida Statutes (1995) (the "Rev...
...As we explained in Speer, when an act "recites that it is an additional and supplemental grant of power, [it] may be used in addition to other laws on the same subject, but may be rejected by a public entity and another applicable law used in its place." 367 So.2d at 213. Section 125.0104 and chapter 159 expressly state that they are supplemental and additional to any other powers conferred upon counties by law. See §§ 125.0104(5)(c), 159.14, Fla.Stat....
Copy

Bennett M. Lifter v. METRO. DADE CTY., 482 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...being used as residences for hotel and motel management. The six-month provision of the Code is also a reasonable line of demarcation between temporary or transient and more permanent occupancy for purposes of creating a rebuttable presumption. See § 125.0104, 212.03, and 212.0305, Fla....
Copy

Orange Cnty. v. EXPEDIA, INC., 440 F. Supp. 2d 1341 (M.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53389, 2006 WL 2135710

...ng beach park facilities, beach improvement, and cleanup and preservation of beaches, and inland lakes and rivers; and (5) securing and liquidating bonds for the purposes of carrying out the functions listed above. (Doc. 9 at 5.) ( citing Fla. Stat. § 125.0104(5))....
Copy

Lozier v. Collier Cnty., 682 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1996).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1996 WL 647510

...nrelated to beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control and is therefore unauthorized. Lozier further asserts that Collier County may not use tourist development tax proceeds to refund its Series 1989 Bond because section 125.0104(5)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), only allows tourist development tax proceeds to be used to refund revenue bonds and the Series 1989 Bonds are not revenue bonds....
...e public body has the authority to issue the bonds; 2) determining if the purpose of the obligation is legal; and 3) ensuring that the bond issuance complies with the requirements of law." Rowe v. St. Johns County, 668 So.2d 196, 198 (Fla.1996). [3] Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1995), governs the levying and use of tourist development taxes. Under section 125.0104(5)(a), the use of tourist development tax proceeds is restricted to certain purposes, including the financing of beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control. Section 125.0104(5)(c), addresses the pledge of tourist tax revenues for a loan to refund previously issued bonds....
...The Legislature intends that this paragraph shall be full and complete authority for accomplishing such purposes, but such authority shall be supplemental and additional to, and not in derogation of, any powers now existing or later conferred under law. § 125.0104(5)(c), Fla....
...Collier County, on the other hand, takes the position that this section does not place a limit on the type of bonds that can be refunded with tourist development tax proceeds and that there is nothing in the section that prohibits them from using the tax proceeds to refund the Series 1989 Bonds. While section 125.0104 is not a model of clarity, the language emphasized above does authorize the revenues from the tourist development tax to be pledged for the purpose of refunding bonds previously issued for beach renourishment and erosion control....
...d bonds issued to finance beach renourishment. In light of the fact that beach renourishment is not typically a revenue-generating activity, it is unlikely that a county would issue revenue bonds to finance beach renourishment projects. In order for section 125.0104(5)(c), to have meaning in the context of the legislative goal of providing counties with a means of refunding bonds previously issued for beach renourishment, this provision is more logically interpreted to allow the refunding of bonds other than revenue bonds....
Copy

Cnty. of Monroe v. Priceline.Com, Inc., 265 F.R.D. 659 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25066, 2010 WL 959933

tourist development tax under authority of F.S.A. § 125.0104; and 2) have not received the tax due on the
Copy

Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 325, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1281, 2015 WL 3618004

...Court of Appeal in Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). In its decision, the district court certified the following question of great public importance: DOES THE “LOCAL OPTION TOURIST DEVELOPMENT ACT,” CODIFIED AT SECTION 125.0104, FLORIDA STATUTES, IMPOSE A TAX ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONSIDERATION RECEIVED BY AN ON-LINE TRAVEL COMPANY FROM TOURISTS WHO RESERVE ACCOMMODATIONS USING THE ON-LINE TRAVEL COMPANY’S WEBSITE, OR ONLY O...
...that the tax at issue applies only to the funds received for the rental of transient accommodations. BACKGROUND The present review concerns statutory interpretation of the Tourist Development Tax (hereinafter “TDT”). § 125.0104, Fla....
...lows: -4- Are the total monetary amounts that OTCs charge their customers to secure reservations for transient accommodation rentals in Florida counties subject to taxation under section 125.0104, Florida Statutes? And, we answer the rephrased certified question in the negative. In answering the rephrased certified question, we examined the TDT’s plain language and its antecedent statute, the Transient Rental Tax (hereinafter “TRT”). See § 212.03, Fla....
...of 6 months or less is exercising a privilege which is subject to taxation under this section, unless such person rents, leases, or lets for consideration any living quarters or accommodations which are exempt according to the provisions of chapter 212. § 125.0104(3)(a), Fla....
...ct” reflects an understanding that the TDT was enacted for the specific purpose of providing tax revenue to Florida counties for the funding of statutorily specified initiatives that promote tourism or otherwise foster the tourism industry. See § 125.0104(5), Fla....
...TDT, in Miami Dolphins we acknowledged that the two statutes will invariably conflict “as needed” so that the TDT may be able to fulfill the Legislature’s intent that revenue streams from that statute have only specific authorized uses. See § 125.0104(5), Fla....
...Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control Dist., 604 So. 452, 455 (Fla. 1992))). This lack of clarity of legislative intent is further evident in considering whether the OTCs are the entities that “rent[], lease[], or let[] for consideration” within the meaning of the TDT statute, § 125.0104(3)(a)1., Fla....
...language of the TDT statute requires the tax to be levied on the full consideration charged by an OTC that uses the merchant model business plan.2 The statute straightforwardly provides that the “[t]ax shall be due on the consideration paid for occupancy . . . .” § 125.0104(3)(a)2.a., Fla....
...nd not the service charge that is retained by the OTC. - 19 - rate of 1 percent or 2 percent of each dollar and major fraction of each dollar of the total consideration charged for such lease or rental.” § 125.0104(3)(c) (emphasis supplied)....
...nt paid to the OTC. Additionally, the statute directs that the tax shall be charged by the party that receives the consideration for the lease or rental and collected from the customer at the time that he or she pays such consideration. See § 125.0104(3)(f)....
Copy

Alachua Cnty. v. Adams, 677 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 412792

...Pinellas Sports Authority, 461 So.2d 72 (Fla.1984), wherein a general law allowed Florida counties to levy a tourist development tax to "be pledged to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county for the purposes" of, inter alia, building stadiums. § 125.0104, Fla....
Copy

Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 709561, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3202

address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1988).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

therein. LOCAL OPTION TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX Section 125.0104, F.S., the "Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2000).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, to pay for these signs. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2000).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

convention center, will the provisions of section 125.0104(7), Florida Statutes, act to terminate the
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1997).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

the tourist development tax authorized by section 125.0104, Florida Statutes,1 or the convention development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1992).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

revenues be used to purchase such vehicles. Section 125.0104, F.S., the "Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-report No. 2014-08, 176 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 2015).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2015 WL 5853925

...onditions only or who later received an upgraded discharge under honorable conditions, notwithstanding any action by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs on individuals discharged or released with other than honorable discharges. § 125.01045(2), Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1990).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

ordinance levying the tourist development tax.7 Section 125.0104(4)(e), F.S., provides that: The governing
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1995).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

State Agriculture Museum would not violate section 125.0104, Florida Statutes. 2. While the acquisition
Copy

Freni v. Collier Cnty., 588 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10871, 1991 WL 224572

ordinance to comply with the requirements of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1987), Local Option Tourist
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1988).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

revenues to make up these matching funds. Section 125.0104, F.S., the "Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1986).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

I concur with the Department's conclusion. Section 125.0104, F.S., as amended by s. 1, Ch. 86-4, Laws
Copy

Green v. Greider, 645 So. 2d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11326, 1994 WL 659358

rentals pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1991). We affirm. Section 125.0104(3)(a) authorizes
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2002).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

impose the tourist development tax provided in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, on boat slips rented at
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2008).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

substantially the following questions: 1. Does section 125.0104(5)(a)1., Florida Statutes, authorize Broward
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2000).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

renourishment revenue as it becomes available. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, known as the "Local Option
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1992).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

county as a desirable place to live or visit. Section 125.0104, F.S., known as the Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2010).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

development tax dollars collected pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, to stock publicly accessible
Copy

Anne Gannon, in Her Capacity as Palm Beach Cnty. Tax Collector, on Behalf of Palm Beach Cnty. v. Airbnb, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

payment on the Owners’ behalf. We disagree. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, allows participating counties
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1983).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

IMPROVEMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE? QUESTION ONE Section 125.0104, F.S., the Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2000).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

phrase "open to the public" as it is used in section 125.0104(5)(a)1., Florida Statutes? In sum: The phrase
Copy

Anne Gannon, in Her Capacity as Palm Beach Cnty. Tax Collector, on Behalf of Palm Beach Cnty. v. Airbnb, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

certify the following question: Does section 125.0104(f)-(g), Florida Statutes, require that the
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2001).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

park for eco-tourists and the general public. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, is the "Local Option Tourist
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2010).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

special district," as that term is used in section 125.0104(3)(b), Florida Statutes, apply to both independent
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1990).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

enhance the condition of these lakes and rivers. Section 125.0104, F.S., known as the Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1997).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

development tax dollars collected pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1996 Supplement), to construct
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1990).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

sanitary facilities on or near the beach. Section 125.0104, F.S., the "Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1996).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

substantially the following question: Does section 125.0104(5)(a)1., Florida Statutes, authorize the use
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1992).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

governing board of the county pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1990 Supplement). Such
Copy

Tamar 7600, Inc. v. Orange Cnty., 686 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 24242

...missing their multicount complaint with prejudice and refusing certain discovery and public record requests. This case involves Orange County's assessment, effective February 1, 1995, of a one percent "tourist tax" ("fifth-cent tax") [1] pursuant to section 125.0104(3),( l ), Florida Statutes (1993), the Local Option Tourist Development Act....
..., of the Florida Constitution, in that pursuant to the agreement Orange County has pledged the use of its taxing power or credit for the benefit or aid of the Baseball Owners, a private, for-profit group. The count further asserts that to the extent section 125.0104(3)( l ) permits the imposition of a tax for the purposes of financing a professional sports facility to be privately operated (and, eventually, privately owned), according to the Revised Summary of Expected Lease Terms, the statute was also passed in contravention of Article VII, section 10. Count II complains that section 125.0104(3)( l ), Florida Statutes (1993) does not permit the imposition of a tourist tax to accrue funds for the purpose of constructing a ballpark. The complaint alleges that the statute permits only the imposition of a tax to pay for bonds already issued to fund construction of such a facility. Count III alleges that section 125.0104(3)( l ) does not authorize the imposition of a fifth-cent tax to fund the Renewal and Replacement Reserve Account called for by the Revised Summary of Expected Lease Terms. Count IV asserts that section 125.0104(3)( l ) does not authorize the imposition of a fifth-cent tourist tax for the purpose of constructing three stand-alone parking garages at an estimated cost of $35 million....
...it is intended that they will be used not only by patrons of the facility, but by patrons of the Citrus Bowl, Orange Blossom Trail Sports District and other facilities and where all revenues are to belong to the Baseball Owners. Count V alleges that section 125.0104(3)( l ) does not authorize the imposition of a fifth-cent tourist tax to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to issuance of the bonds. The count seeks an order invalidating the tax to the extent it is not being used for payment of debt service on any bonds. Count VI alleges that the "fifth-cent" tax imposed pursuant to section 125.0104(3)( l ) cannot be imposed to finance the construction of a ballpark to be operated by private "for-profit" entrepreneurs....
...provisions that do not yet exist. However, it appears the lower court's refusal to allow any amendment and the dismissal of the entire suit was erroneous in light of the issue raised by Tamar concerning the county's power to assess a tax pursuant to section 125.0104(3)( l ) and then accrue those tax dollars to fund a project that is not permitted under the constitution simply because there is another legal use to which the money could be put....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1997).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

the tourist development tax imposed under section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1996 Supplement). 2. While
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1990).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

interrelated, they will be answered together. Section 125.0104, F.S., is the "Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1987).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

purposes set forth in subparagraph (a)4." Section 125.0104(5)(b), F.S. (1986 Supp.). In conclusion
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1994).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

development tax revenues received pursuant to section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, to acquire and construct
Copy

Broward Cnty. v. Fairfield Resorts Inc., 946 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21237, 2006 WL 3733893

is inapplicable,2 but the plain meaning of section 125.0104(3)(a) provides the answer to the riddle. As
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

placed at the center as a community memorial. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, known as the Local Option
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

spring which feeds Crystal River? SUMMARY: 1. Section 125.0104(5)(a)4., F.S. (1990 Supp.), does not authorize
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

See, s. 125.0104(1), F.S. (1988 Supp.). 5 Section 125.0104(3)(a), F.S. (1988 Supp.), provides: It
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1986).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

expenditure of tourist development tax revenues. Section 125.0104, F.S., as amended by Ch. 86-4, Laws of Florida
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2000).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

the purchase of an annual track sponsorship. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, known as the Local Option
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1996).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Commissioners of Bay County authorized by section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, to create a separate tax
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1992).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

interrelated, they will be answered together. Section 125.0104, F.S., the Local Option Tourist Development
Copy

Collier Cnty. v. Freni, 635 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3509, 1994 WL 128047

Option Tourist Development Act (the Act), section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1987). The circuit court

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.