Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 159.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 159.14 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 159.14

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 159
BOND FINANCING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 159.14
159.14 Alternative method.This part shall be deemed to provide an additional and alternative method for the doing of the things authorized hereby and shall be regarded as supplemental and additional to powers conferred by other laws, and shall not be regarded as in derogation of any powers now existing. This part, being necessary for the welfare of the inhabitants of the counties and municipalities of the state, shall be liberally construed to effect the purposes thereof.
History.s. 14, ch. 28045, 1953.

F.S. 159.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 159.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 159.14


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 159.14
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 159.14.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ROWE, v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY,, 668 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1996)

. . . See §§ 125.0104(5)(c), 159.14, Fla.Stat. (1995). . . .

In WATER GAP VILLAGE, a, 99 B.R. 226 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1989)

. . . 18.49 —Borough of Delaware Watergap 1,269.46 —Direct Carpet 477.00 —Farber Sherman 300.00 —Hammond 159.14 . . .

W. TAYLOR, v. LEE COUNTY,, 498 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1986)

. . . Additionally, section 159.14 states that sections 159.01 through 159.19 “shall be regarded as supplemental . . .

STATE v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH,, 360 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Section 159.14 expressly provides that Part I of Chapter 159 is an additional and alternative method . . .

In YORK INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, INC. YORK INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, INC. Dr. v. M. CHANEY, YORK INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, INC. Dr. v. M. CHANEY,, 527 F.2d 1061 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . difference between this award and that awarded to him by the district court, i. e., the sum of $105,-159.14 . . .

In FELSON, 139 F. 275 (N.D.N.Y. 1905)

. . . Akin, ’and .paid his bills, $159.14. . . .