Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 212.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 212.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 212.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 212
TAX ON SALES, USE, AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 212.01
212.01 Short title.This chapter shall be known as the “Florida Revenue Act of 1949” and the taxes imposed herein shall be in addition to all other taxes imposed by law.
History.s. 1, ch. 26319, 1949.

F.S. 212.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 212.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 212.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 212.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 212.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PUENTE ARIZONA, v. M. ARPAIO,, 76 F. Supp. 3d 833 (D. Ariz. 2015)

. . . . § 23-212.01). . . .

UNIVERSAL CONTRACTING, LLC, a v. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 69 F. Supp. 3d 1225 (D. Utah 2014)

. . . . §§ 23-211, 212, 212.01, and 23-214(A)) (other citations omitted). . . .

MELENDRES, v. M. ARPAIO, AZ, 989 F. Supp. 2d 822 (D. Ariz. 2013)

. . . . §§ 23-212, 23-212.01. . . .

ALACHUA COUNTY, G. St. v. EXPEDIA, INC., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . as the “Transient Rentals Tax” authorized in the “Florida Revenue Act of 1949” codified at section 212.01 . . .

ORTEGA- MELENDRES, v. M. ARPAIO,, 836 F. Supp. 2d 959 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . . §§ 23-211, 212, 212.01 (2007). It has been held to be constitutional by the Supreme Court. . . . See A.R.S §§ 23-211, 212, 212.01. . . . .

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WHITING, 563 U.S. 582 (U.S. 2011)

. . . . §§23-211,23-212, 23-212.01 (West Supp. 2010) (citing 8 U. S. C. § 1324a). . . . The court must also suspend all the employer’s licenses for a minimum of 10 days. § 23-212.01(F)(l)(c . . . A second intentional violation requires the permanent revocation of all business licenses. § 23-212.01 . . . Ann. §§23-212(A) and (F); §§23-212.01(A) and (F). . . . State law also prohibits “intentionally” employing an unauthorized alien, §23-212.01(A), a more severe . . . . §§23-212(J), 23-212.01(J). . . . Ann. §§ 28-212(D), 23-212.01(D). . . . . §§23-212(F), 23-212.01(F). . . . . §§23-212(A), 23-212.01(A). . . . . §§23-212(I)~(J), 23-212.01(I)-(J). But thereafter the state and federal laws part company. . . . Ann. §23-212.01(F)(2); News Release, Governor Signs Employer Sanctions Bill (2007), App. 399. . . .

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MICHAEL B. WHITING, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1031 (U.S. 2011)

. . . . §§23-211, 23-212, 23-212.01 (West Supp. 2010) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1324a). . . . The court must also suspend all the employer’s licenses for a minimum of 10 days. § 23-212.01(F)(1)(c . . . A second intentional violation requires the permanent revocation of all business licenses. § 23-212.01 . . . the employer is already on probation for a violation at that location. §§ 23-212(F)(3)(a)-(b); §§ 23-212.01 . . . State law also prohibits “intentionally” employing an unauthorized alien, § 23-212.01(A), a more severe . . . . §§ 23-212(D), 23-212.01(D). . . . . §§ 23-212(F), 23-212.01(F). . . . . § 23-212.01(F)(2); News Release, Governor Signs Employer Sanctions Bill (2007), App. 399. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARIZONA K., 703 F. Supp. 2d 980 (D. Ariz. 2010)

. . . . § 23-212.01: amending the crime of intentional employment of unauthorized aliens Section 9 of S.B. . . . See A.R.S. §§ 23-212, 23-212.01, 23-214. . . .

CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC. Up v. NAPOLITANO La Up v. Up La v. Ed D. P. J. P. V. R. Jr. Up La v. Ed D. P. J. P. V. R. Jr. La Up v. Ed D. P. J. P. V. R. Jr., 558 F.3d 856 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 23-212(F)~ 212.01(F). . . . Id. §§ 23-212(F)(2), (3), 23-212.01(F)(2), (3). . . .

CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC. Up v. NAPOLITANO La Up v. Up La v. Ed D. P. J. P. V. R. Jr. Up La v. Ed D. P. J. P. V. R. Jr. La Up v. Ed D. P. J. P. V. R. Jr., 544 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 23-212(F)-212.01(F). . . . Id. §§ 23-212(F)(2), (3), 23-212.01(F)(2), (3). . . .

In J. THOMAS,, 222 B.R. 742 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . the IRS filed a second amended proof of claim which further reduced the amount of its claim to $270,-212.01 . . .

HIGH POINT CONDOMINIUM RESORTS, LTD. v. DAY,, 494 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . §§ 212.01, 212.07(1), Fla.Stat. . . .

AIR JAMAICA, LTD. S. A. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 374 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . The assessment is pursuant to Section 212.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1977). . . .

BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP. v. HARTLEB, 47 Fla. Supp. 123 (Broward Cty. Ct. 1978)

. . . By Chapter 26319, Acts of Special Session 1949, the legislature under Florida Statute 212.01 et seq., . . .

R. KIRK, Jr. v. WESTERN CONTRACTING CORPORATION,, 216 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 212.01 et seq.] is not a property tax, but is a privilege or occupation tax; that the tax is levied . . .

RICHARD BERTRAM CO. v. E. GREEN, J., 132 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . Section 212.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . . .

C. E. GRISWALD, v. STATE BARROW,, 119 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . . § 212.01 et seq. . See. 212.04, F.S., F.S.A. . Sec. 212.22, F.S., F.S.A. . . . .

E. GREEN, v. PANAMA CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, a D. F. a, 115 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 1959)

. . . . § 212.01 et seq.] is not a property tax, but is a privilege or occupation tax; that the tax is levied . . .

THOMPSON, v. INTERCOUNTY TEL. TEL. CO., 62 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1952)

. . . . § 212.01 et seq. . . .

PARAMOUNT- GULF THEATRES, v. CITY OF PENSACOLA, 62 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1951)

. . . . § 212.01 et seq., which latter act is the Sales Tax Act. . . .