The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Officer Cipiti issued Plaintiff a ticket pursuant to Port Clinton Ordinance § 351.03(n). . . . Port Clinton Codified Ordinance § 351.03(n), available at http://www. conwaygreene.com/PortClinton/lpext.dll . . . The citation stated Plaintiff violated § 351.03(n) and further provided: Instructions for Paying Parking . . . Port Clinton Codified Ordinances § 351.03(f), (n), available at http://www. conwaygreene.com/PortClinton . . . It stated Plaintiff violated § 351.03(n) by parking at a yellow curb, instructed Plaintiff to pay $20.00 . . .
. . . MCC § 351.03; see also W. Va.Code § 17A-3-15. . . . MCC § 351.03. . . . MCC § 351.03. . . . He testified he stopped the vehicle pursuant to Morgantown City Code Section 351.03. . . . Section 351.03 mirrors West Virginia Code Section 17A-3-15. . . . .
. . . .”); § 351.03(4)(c), Fla. . . .
. . . At the outset, Florida Statute Section 351.03, in relevant part, sets a base line: (1) Every railroad . . . Stat. § 351.03(l)-(2). . . . Stat. § 351.03(1). . . . Stat. §§ 351.03, 316.171, 335.141. . . . Stat. 351.03(3). . . .
. . . . § 2307.76 and the applicable jury instructions, 2 Ohio Jury INSTRUCTIONS §§ 351.03, 351.11 (2000), . . . See 2 Ohio JURY Instructions §§ 351.03, 351.11 (2000). . . .
. . . . § 351.03(4)(a), which was enacted in 1984. . . . Thus, if § 351.03(4)(a) can be enforced, it can only be enforced by the state. . . . Section 351.03(4)(a) empowers counties and municipalities to enact ordinances regarding the sounding . . . enacted a whistle-blowing ordinance pursuant to § 351.03(4)(a). . . . Fla.Stat. § 351.03(4)(a) (1989). . . . .
. . . failing to provide additional crossing protection and warnings other than that mandated by section 351.03 . . . white roadway markings showing “R X R,” in addition to the crossbucks and signs required by section 351.03 . . .
. . . the Court also demonstrates that Seaboard was in compliance with another railroad safety provision, § 351.03 . . . Section 351.03 provides in relevant part: Grade crossing warning signs and signals; exercise of reasonable . . .
. . . not have been admitted over objection; 2) that the court’s instruction that a violation of Section 351.03 . . . in this case, the trial court stated that if the jury found that the Railroad had violated Section 351.03 . . . We hold that Section 351.03, Florida Statutes, was enacted to protect the motoring public from collisions . . . We have already held that the court may instruct that a violation of the statute (Section 351.03) is . . . Had the D.O.T. placed such crossing site warning signs, the crossbucks required by Section 351.03 would . . .
. . . Seaboard contends that the crossbuck complied with its obligations under the law, Section 351.03, Florida . . .
. . . Section 351.03, F. S.A. . . .
. . . “It was proven that the crossbuck signs required by Florida Statutes § 351.03, F.S.A. was visible 400 . . . Section 351.03, F.S.A., or the signboard required by Section 320.46, F.S.1961, F.S.A. . . .
. . . . § 351.03, F.S.A., provides that in all incorporated cities and towns the bell on an engine should be . . .
. . . It was proven that the crossbuck signs required by Florida Statutes § 351.03, F.S.A. was visible 400 . . .
. . . There are no speed restrictions divulged by the record unless Florida Statutes, § 351.03, F.S.A., which . . . show that the railroad was running through a traveled street, to-wit: DeSoto Avenue, and thus section 351.03 . . . Line train ran through DeSoto Avenue and was subject to the speed restrictions of Florida Statutes, § 351.03 . . . of Florida Statutes, in effect when this accident occurred, reads in part as follows: “ '351.03. * * . . . “Sec. 2264, Fla.Rev.St.1892, now sec. 351.03, Fla.St.1949, F.S.A., provides that * * * and their trains . . .
. . . Sec. 2264, Fla.Rev.St.1892, now sec. 351.03, Fla.St.1949, F.S.A., provides that “In all incorporated . . .
. . . Sects. 320.45, 320.46, and 351.03 provide for railway crossing signs. . . . The third cited section, 351.03, .requires the railroad company at .other highway crossings to erect . . . And the same reasoning seems applicable to Sec. 351.03, Florida Statutes Annotated, which provides that . . .
. . . level and, at the time this accident occurred, was protected by the statutory cross arm signal (Section 351.03 . . .