Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 316.0745 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 316.0745 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 316.0745 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 316.0745

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316
STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
316.0745 Uniform signals and devices.
(1) The Department of Transportation shall adopt a uniform system of traffic control devices for use on the streets and highways of the state. The uniform system shall, insofar as is practicable, conform to the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway Officials and shall be revised from time to time to include changes necessary to conform to a uniform national system or to meet local and state needs. The Department of Transportation may call upon representatives of local authorities to assist in the preparation or revision of the uniform system of traffic control devices.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall compile and publish a manual of uniform traffic control devices which defines the uniform system adopted pursuant to subsection (1), and shall compile and publish minimum specifications for traffic control signals and devices certified by it as conforming with the uniform system.
(a) The department shall make copies of such manual and specifications available to all counties, municipalities, and other public bodies having jurisdiction of streets or highways open to the public in this state.
(b) The manual shall provide for the use of regulatory speed signs in work zone areas. The installation of such signs is exempt from the provisions of s. 335.10.
(3) All official traffic control signals or official traffic control devices purchased and installed in this state by any public body or official shall conform with the manual and specifications published by the Department of Transportation pursuant to subsection (2).
(4) It shall be unlawful for any public body or official to purchase, or for anyone to sell, any traffic control signal or device unless it conforms with the manual and specifications published by the Department of Transportation and is certified to be of such conformance prior to sale. Any manufacturer or vendor who sells any traffic control signal, guide, or directional sign or device without such certification shall be ineligible to bid or furnish traffic control devices to any public body or official for such period of time as may be established by the Department of Transportation; however, such period of time shall be for not less than 1 year from the date of notification of such ineligibility.
(5) It is unlawful for any public body to manufacture for installation or placement any traffic control signal, guide, or directional sign or device unless it conforms to the uniform system of traffic control devices published by the Department of Transportation. It is unlawful for any public body to sell any traffic control signal, guide, or directional sign or device it manufactures to any nongovernmental entity or person.
(6) Any system of traffic control devices controlled and operated from a remote location by electronic computers or similar devices must meet all requirements established for the uniform system, and, if such a system affects the movement of traffic on state roads, the design of the system shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Transportation.
(7) The Department of Transportation may, upon receipt and investigation of reported noncompliance and after hearing pursuant to 14 days’ notice, direct the removal of any purported traffic control device that fails to meet the requirements of this section, wherever the device is located and without regard to assigned responsibility under s. 316.1895. The public agency erecting or installing the same shall immediately bring it into compliance with the requirements of this section or remove said device or signal upon the direction of the Department of Transportation and may not, for a period of 5 years, install any replacement or new traffic control devices paid for in part or in full with revenues raised by the state unless written prior approval is received from the Department of Transportation. Any additional violation by a public body or official shall be cause for the withholding of state funds deposited in the State Transportation Trust Fund until such public body or official demonstrates to the Department of Transportation that it is complying with this section.
(8) The Department of Transportation is authorized to permit traffic control devices not in conformity with the uniform system upon showing of good cause.
History.s. 1, ch. 71-135; s. 1, ch. 72-189; s. 1, ch. 73-310; s. 1, ch. 76-31; s. 1, ch. 77-146; s. 1, ch. 80-178; s. 4, ch. 88-91; s. 3, ch. 88-93; s. 95, ch. 99-248; s. 6, ch. 2010-80; s. 6, ch. 2016-239; s. 8, ch. 2025-155.
Note.Former s. 316.131.

F.S. 316.0745 on Google Scholar

F.S. 316.0745 on CourtListener

Amendments to 316.0745


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 316.0745

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Spruce Creek Dev. of Ocala v. Drew, 746 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 754708

...markings, and other traffic control devices for the regulation, control, guidance, and protection of traffic on the State Highway System. Such system shall conform to the department's uniform system of traffic control devices as adopted pursuant to s. 316.0745. Section 316.0745, Florida Statutes (1989), entitled "Uniform Signals and Devices," provided in pertinent part: (1) The Department of Transportation shall adopt a uniform system of traffic control devices for use on the streets and highways of the state....
Copy

City of Sarasota v. Windom, 736 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 413922

...er 316. The City sought to dismiss the action, alleging the plaintiffs lacked standing. The trial court concluded otherwise, denied the motion, and ultimately entered a summary final judgment on both counts for the plaintiffs. This appeal ensued. In section 316.0745(1), Florida Statutes (1995), the legislature granted the Department of Transportation authority to adopt a uniform system of traffic control devices for use on Florida's streets and highways. Section 316.0745(3) requires that all traffic control signals or devices installed by a public body, such as the City, conform with the DOT's regulations. The authority to direct the removal of any traffic control device that fails to meet the requirement of section 316.0745 rests with the DOT. See § 316.0745(7)....
...Legislative intent is the luminous polestar by which this court must be guided. See In re: Order on Prosecution of Criminal Appeals by Tenth Judicial Circuit Public Defender, 561 So.2d 1130, 1137 (Fla.1990). Therefore, we must ascertain whether the legislature intended to create a private cause of action by enacting section 316.0745....
...here. The legislative intent of chapter 316 is to provide for the public safety of both vehicle operators and pedestrians by standardizing equipment and by ensuring that each device is appropriate for its function. Further, the enforcement power for section 316.0745 is vested in the Department of Transportation....
...Therefore, the plaintiffs possess no private cause of action and, accordingly, lack standing to institute such a claim. We next consider whether standing derives from any other basis. First, because the plaintiffs claim entitlement to the protections *743 afforded by section 316.0745, Florida Statutes, they contend that they can seek redress in the courts as guaranteed by Article I, Section 21, of the Florida Constitution. As to this contention, we have held that section 316.0745 does not create a privately enforceable duty; therefore, the argument that redress is available in the courts for the claimed injury also fails....
Copy

Liboy Ex Rel. Liboy v. Rogero Ex Rel. Rogero, 363 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (M.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2828, 2005 WL 756837

...e care for the safety of motorists whenever its track crosses a highway and shall be responsible for erecting and maintaining crossbuck grade-crossing warning signs in accordance with the uniform system of traffic control devices adopted pursuant to s. 316.0745....
...fic control devices by the governmental entity having jurisdiction over or maintenance responsibility for the highway or street .... [3] FLA. STAT. § 351.03(1)-(2). The reference to "the uniform system of traffic control devices adopted pursuant to s. 316.0745" is a reference to the Federal Highway Administration ("FHA") Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003 Edition, ("MUTCD"). See FLA. STAT. § 316.0745(2); FLA....
...ng any track intersecting a public road at grade and upon which railroad trains are operated shall erect traffic control devices that are necessary to conform with the requirements of the uniform system of traffic control devices adopted pursuant to s. 316.0745....
...pplies only at new installations and at locations where replacements of existing devices are being made. Fla. Stat. § 316.171. As with Section 351.03, Section 316.171's reference to "the uniform system of traffic control devices adopted pursuant to s. 316.0745" is a reference to the MUTCD....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 316 in the context of traffic and automobile accident law and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.