The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . ; see also Rules 201.17-201.22. . . .
. . . In addition to the two Grid rules cited by the ALJ, she relies on Grid rules 201.22 and 201.29. . . . Rule 201.22 states that a person of the same age who has the same education and work experience but also . . .
. . . Such forms must be in accord with the requirements of Florida law, including s. 201.22. . . .
. . . exist in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform, the ALJ used Medical-Vocational Rules 201.21, 201.22 . . .
. . . (Tr. at 21, citing Rules 201.27-29, 201.21 and 201.22). . . .
. . . sedentary work, a finding of ‘not disabled’ would be directed by Medical-Vocational Rules 201.21 and 201.22 . . .
. . . . § 201.22). . . . See 17 U.S.C. § 411(c)(1); 37 C.F.R. § 201.22(c). . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rules 201.18 to 201.22. . . .
. . . Applying Rule 201.22 of the guidelines, the administrative law judge found that plaintiff would not be . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2 (Rule 5201.17-201.22); (9) considering Justice’s age, education, work . . .
. . . The ALJ stated her decision was appropriate under the framework of Medical-Vocational Rule 201.22. . . .
. . . and other evidence, that while Plaintiff cannot perform her past relevant work (“PRW”), under Rule 201.22 . . .
. . . * A finding of “disabled” may therefore be reached within the framework of medical-vocational rule 201.22 . . .
. . . In making the fifth step finding, the ALJ relied on Medical-Vocational Rules 201.21 and 201.22. . . .
. . . Accordingly, the ALJ applied Medical-Vocational Guidelines [“Grids”] Rules 202.21 — 201.22, which directed . . .
. . . See 20 C.F.R. part 404, subpart P, appendix 2, Rule 201.22. V. . . .
. . . Even if the claimant were limited to no more than the full range of sedentary work, Rules 201.21 and 201.22 . . .
. . . . § 201.22 to the label of Gensia’s propofol with Sulfite would violate the statutory “same labeling” . . . Section 201.22(b) of the FDA’s regulations requires that prescription drugs containing sulfites shall . . . Sulfite sensitivity is seen more frequently in asthmatic than in nonasthmatic people.” 21 C.F.R. § 201.22 . . . may cause allergic-type reactions in certain susceptible persons, especially asthmatics.” 21 C.F.R. § 201.22 . . . Id. § 201.22(b). . . . .
. . . residual functional capacity for sedentary work, Rules 201.28 and/or 201.29 and Rules 201.21 and/or 201.22 . . .
. . . P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.21, 201.22. . . . The ALJ referred to Rule 201.21 and 201.22 of the regulations which provide that individuals between . . . Pt. 404, Subpart P, App. 2, §§ 201.21, 201.22 (1993). . . .
. . . Section 200.00(a), Appendix 2 of Regulations No. 4 and Social Security Ruling 83-11) Rules 201.21, 201.22 . . . Since the claimant’s medical-vocational profile matches the above factors, Rules 201.21, 201.22, 201.28 . . . Reference to Rule(s) 201.21, 201.22, 201.28 and 201.29, Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . .
. . . $1,114 0 $3,183.09 EXCESS WITHHOLDING: $2,069.09 (not barred by statute of limitations) 1983 $2,092 $201.22 . . .
. . . sedentary work, and the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, section 404.1569 and Rules 201.29, 201.22 . . .
. . . The administrative law judge found that Rule 201.22 of the grids, which assesses jobs in the national . . .
. . . . § 201.22. . . . . See 37 C.F.R. § 201.22(a)(2). . . . . The procedure under 17 U.S.C. § 411(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 201.22 (concerning "advance notice of potential . . .
. . . . § 201.22(k). Until the Commission has “entered” an “order”, there is nothing to review. . . .
. . . . § 201.22(k). . . . I suggest that a fairer interpretation of 17 C.F.R. § 201.22(k) would make the caption date the entry . . . . § 201.22(k) (1985), states: In computing any period of time involving the date of the entry of an order . . .
. . . . § 201.22 (1983). . . .
. . . . § 201.22 (1983). . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Table No. 1, § 201.22, which determines whether, in light of plaintiff’s . . .
. . . In reaching the conclusion that there was such work, the AU found Rule 201.22 of Table No. 1 of Appendix . . . that the ALJ’s findings refer to Rule 201.21 as applicable and the text of his decision refers to Rule 201.22 . . .
. . . plaintiff had a severe impairment, the AU went on to consider the vocational factors outlined in Rule 201.22 . . . Applying Rule 201.22 to plaintiff’s characteristics, the AU concluded that plaintiff was not disabled . . . See id., Rule 201.22. III. . . .
. . . Without any Florida authority to guide the Bankruptcy Court’s determination, it interpreted §§ 201.01 and 201.22 . . .
. . . . § 201.22, which provides, inter alia, that the clerk or filing officer shall not accept for filing . . .
. . . . § 201.22. . . . Florida Statute § 201.22 states that “The clerk or filing officer shall not accept for filing or filing . . .
. . . .-20, 201.22, 201.26, 201.29. . . .
. . . Sec. 201.22 provides: .. . . . . Sec. 201.22 is mandatory; the clerk “shall not” accept for filing a financing statement without a notation . . .
. . . is true that the ALJ, as Defendant observes, referred to the vocational expert’s testimony and Rule 201.22 . . .
. . . In reaching his conclusion, the ALJ applied Rule 201.22 of the medical-vocational (or “grid”) guidelines . . . However, the Magistrate further held that Rule 201.22 does not fully apply when an individual claims . . .
. . . Section 201.22, Fla.Stats., enacted by the Florida Legislature in 1965 as a part of the same bill that . . . originally enacted the Uniform Commercial Code, reads, in pertinent part, as follows: 201.22 “The excise . . . Faced with Section 201.22 which says that the documentary excise tax is to be applied to transactions . . .
. . . The fact that the ALJ’s purported findings may match the criteria set out in Rule 201.22 or Rule 201.29 . . .
. . . timber sale, the Forest Service issued a special use permit to U.S.P. for construction of the mill on 201.22 . . . Plaintiffs attack the issuance by the Forest Service on April 24, 1970 of a 201.22 acre permit for the . . .
. . . . § 201.22(k) (1970), which provides : In computing any period of time involving the date of the entry . . .
. . . . § 201.22. . . .
. . . Commission directs that “a docket of all proceedings shall be maintained by the Commission” [17 C.F.R. 201.22 . . .
. . . Although there is sharp dispute as to whether Section 201.22 of Regulation I is a price setting rule . . . The section of Regulation 1 relied upon reads, in part (§ 201.22(e) (2)): “A price for a purchase * * . . . ECA Regulation 3, Section 201.22(a) as amended May 3, 3949 provides: “Scope of this section. (1) Section . . . ECA Regulation 1, Section 201.22(e) (2) provides: “Unlisted commodities. . . . Section 201.22(b) (2) provides: “The term ‘comparable sale’ includes all sales which are comparable as . . .
. . . 1 of the Economic Cooperation Administration, amended May 3, 1949, 14 F.R. 2166, § 201.19(d) and § 201.22 . . .
. . . (a) (1) and the comparable sales provisions, (§ 201.22(e) (2)). . . . The comparable sales test is set forth in § 201.22(e) (2) of Regulation 1. . . . A comparable sale is defined in § 201.22(b) 2. . . . The government has no claim with respect to § 201.22(e) (2) (iii). . . . Nor can any claim be based upon § 201.22(e) (2) (ii). . . .
. . . Reg. 2166, Regulation 1, Sec. 201.22(e) (2), and were inserted therein by the Ad- . ministrator by amendment . . .
. . . The Rules and Regulations of the Copyright Office, Section 201.22(c), 17 U.S.C.A. following section 207 . . .