The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 201
EXCISE TAX ON DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 201.01

201.01 Documents taxable, generally.—There shall be levied, collected, and paid the taxes specified in this chapter, for and in respect to the several documents, bonds, debentures or certificates of stock and indebtedness, and other documents, instruments, matters, writings, and things described in the following sections, or for or in respect of the vellum, parchment, paper, or any other medium whether tangible, electronic, or otherwise, upon which such document, instrument, matter, writing, or thing, or any of them, is written, printed, or created electronically or otherwise, by any person who makes, signs, executes, issues, sells, removes, consigns, assigns, records, or ships the same, or for whose benefit or use the same are made, signed, executed, issued, sold, removed, consigned, assigned, recorded, or shipped in the state. Unless exempt under s. 201.24 or under any state or federal law, if the United States, the state, or any political subdivision of the state is a party to a document taxable under this chapter, any tax specified in this chapter shall be paid by a nonexempt party to the document. The documentary stamp taxes shall be paid on all recordable instruments requiring documentary stamp tax according to law, prior to recordation. With respect to mortgages or trust deeds which do not incorporate the certificate of indebtedness, a notation shall be made on the note or certificate that the tax has been paid on the mortgage or trust deed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 15787, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 1279(111); s. 1, ch. 61-278; s. 1, ch. 77-414; s. 6, ch. 87-102; s. 5, ch. 96-395; s. 2, ch. 2007-233.

F.S. 201.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 201.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 201.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 201.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 201.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FELDMAN, v. E. BOWSER,, 315 F. Supp. 3d 299 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Code §§ 1-201.01 et seq. ); id. ¶¶ 41-42 (alleging that the Budget Autonomy Act violates the procedures . . .

DACOSTA, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 296 F. Supp. 3d 569 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . . ¶ 201.01, at 2-7 to 2-9 (1995). . . .

D. C. ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED PUBLIC SCHOOLS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 277 F. Supp. 3d 67 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Code § 1-201.01 et seq.). The D.C. . . .

N. B. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 244 F. Supp. 3d 176 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Code § 4-201.01, et seq., and they seek declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. . . .

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF STRITTMATTER METRO, LLC, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,, 208 F. Supp. 3d 178 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Code § 2-201.01(a)(2) et seq., CHJV secured a payment bond, thereby securing payment to subcontractors . . .

COMPANION PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. APEX SERVICE, INC., 76 F. Supp. 3d 212 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . As a condition of the subcontract, and under D.C.Code § 2-201.01, on August 1, 2011, Niyyah obtained . . .

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE AUTHORITY,, 73 F. Supp. 3d 65 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 1-201.01 et seq.), empowers the D.C. . . .

PARSONS Jr. v. L. RYAN, 754 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 31-201.01; see also id. at § 41-1604 (providing that “the director shall be responsible for the overall . . .

KOTZEV, v. L. RYAN,, 577 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 31-201.01(F) (“Any and all causes of action which may arise out of tort caused by the director, prison . . .

COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v. C. GRAY, S., 42 F. Supp. 3d 134 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . Off.Code § 1-201.01 et seq.), now known as the “Home Rule Act.” Pl.’s MSJ at 4. . . .

HELLER, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 45 F. Supp. 3d 35 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . Council’s regulatory authority, the court found that the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, D.C.Code § 1-201.01 . . .

CASTRO, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,, 39 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 3141 et seq., and the DCLMA, D.C.Code § 2-201.01 et seq., the project’s prime contractor, Whiting-Turner . . .

NB, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 34 F. Supp. 3d 146 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 1396 et seq., and District of Columbia law, D.C.Code § 4-201.01, et seq., and they seek declaratory . . .

CASTRO, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,, 59 F. Supp. 3d 9 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 3141, et seq., and the Little Miller Act, D.C.Code § 2-201.01, et seq., the project’s prime contractor . . .

WANE, v. LOAN CORPORATION, N. A. FSB,, 552 F. App'x 908 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . Loury, 18 So.3d 693, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (noting that § 201.01(1) “contains no prohibition against . . .

In DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF HYDE PARK, INC. A. v. f k a LLC,, 507 B.R. 558 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . General Standard 201.01 states: 0.1 Rule 201 — General standards: A member shall comply with the following . . .

WELCH, v. L. RYAN,, 509 F. App'x 656 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1983 action alleging that Arizona Revised Statutes § 31-201.01(L) violates his due process rights . . .

SPENCER, v. A. SHARP, M. D., 487 F. App'x 424 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 31-201.01(F) (“Any and all causes of action which may arise out of tort caused by the director, prison . . .

P. CANNON, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 873 F. Supp. 2d 272 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, codified as amended at D.C.Code §§ 1-201.01 . . .

HELLER, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. Cir. 2011)

. . . No. 93-198, 87 Stat. 774 (codified as amended at D.C.Code § 1-201.01 et seq.), which remains in effect . . .

ORTMANN, L. v. BELL, 100 So. 3d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 201.01, .02, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . .

NB, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 800 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 1396-1396w-2, and District of Columbia law, D.C.Code § 4-201.01, et seq. . . .

BAVARO, v. J. ASTRUE,, 413 F. App'x 382 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . P, app. 2, § 201.01 et seq.). As discussed, Dr. . . .

CREAMER, v. L. RYAN, ADOC, 411 F. App'x 985 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . .”) § 31-201.01(L) does not bar the initiation of a special action by a prisoner, because it only applies . . .

GLENN WRIGHT HOMES DELRAY LLC B. Jr. v. A. LOWY,, 18 So. 3d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . court inquired as to whether the documentary stamps had been paid on the note pursuant to sections 201.01 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC., 128 S. Ct. 2326 (U.S. 2008)

. . . . §§ 201.01, 201.02(1) (2006). . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC., 554 U.S. 33 (U.S. 2008)

. . . . §§ 201.01, 201.02(1) (2006). . . .

B. FERNEBOK, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 534 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act (Home Rule Act), D.C.Code §§ 1-201.01 . . .

C. EGGLETON, v. PLASSER THEURER EXPORT VON BAHNBAUMASCHINEN GESELLSCHAFT, MBH MBH,, 495 F.3d 582 (8th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 25-201.01(2). . . .

PRICE, v. GODDARD,, 225 F. App'x 493 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . As ARS § 31-201.01(L) exempts suits authorized by a federal statute, and Price’s fundamental rights can . . . Nor does § 31-201.01(L) fail to comply with federal law under Westfall v. . . .

PARKER, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M., 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007)

. . . delegated certain authority to the District’s local government in the Home Rule Act of 1973, D.C.Code §§ 1-201.01 . . .

DECATUR LIQUORS, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 384 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . CODE § 1-201.01 et seq., when it passed the Omnibus Act because the inclusion of the moratorium on the . . .

N. RANGE, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 95 F. App'x 755 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . limited or less education, with unskilled or no transferable skills, would be found disabled under Rules 201.01 . . .

M. BANNER, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 303 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004)

. . . . § 1-201.01 et seq.) (“the Act”). . . .

STRONG, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 88 F. App'x 841 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . Though Claimant maintains that Grid Rules 201.01, et seq., should have been applied and would have resulted . . .

ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION v. M. BIE, M., 330 F.3d 904 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 196.195(5)(a) and (7)(a), 201.01(2), and 201.03(1) (“the securities regulation provisions”): These . . . 196.795(3) (the takeover provision), § 196.795(6m)(b) (the asset cap), and §§ 196.195(5)(a) and (7)(a), 201.01 . . .

DESTEK GROUP, INC. d b a v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION L. PUC PUC S. PUC d b a d b a, 318 F.3d 32 (1st Cir. 2003)

. . . PUC 201.01-205.10 (2002). . . .

MARIJUANA POLICY PROJECT, v. UNITED STATES, 304 F.3d 82 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

. . . .§ 1-201.01 et seq.), granting residents the right to elect a mayor and a D.C. Council. . . .

MARIJUANA POLICY PROJECT, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS,, 191 F. Supp. 2d 196 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . No. 93-198, 87 Stat. 774 (1973), codified at D.C.Code § 1-201.01 et seq. (as amended). . . . See Home Rule Act, codified at D.C.Code § 1-201.01 et seq. (as amended). . . .

SOUCH, v. HOWARD, Jr., 27 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . Arizona Revised Statute § 31-201.01 provided that “every inmate shall be charged a reasonable medical . . . and health services fee for each medical visit an inmate makes .... ” Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 31-201.01(G). . . . He alleged that because he committed his crimes before the effective date of § 31-201.01, he should not . . . Therefore, Arizona Revised Statute § 31-201.01 did not apply retroactively to him. . . . . § 31-201.01 is also REVERSED. . . . .

E. LUCAS, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 268 F.3d 1089 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

. . . Reorganization Act of 1973 (“Home Rule Act”), Pub.L. 93-198, 87 Stat. 774 (codified at D.C.Code §§ 1-201.01 . . .

GONZALEZ, v. S. APFEL,, 113 F. Supp. 2d 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Pursuant to subsections 201.00(d)-(f) and 201.01, which pertain to individuals limited to sedentary work . . .

RICHMOND, XXX- XX- XXXX v. J. CALLAHAN,, 998 F. Supp. 1007 (W.D. Ark. 1997)

. . . hereinafter “ALJ”): improperly found that the plaintiff did not meet the Medical Listing found at Rule 201.01 . . .

A. NUSSBAUM, P. v. MORTGAGE SERVICE AMERICA COMPANY,, 913 F. Supp. 1548 (S.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . documentary stamp tax must be affixed to a document before that document can be recorded, according to § 201.01 . . .

F. PIGNATO E. v. GREAT WESTERN BANK,, 664 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 201.01, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

WACHTER, v. E. SHALALA,, 856 F. Supp. 140 (W.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . . § 404.1569 and Rule 201.01, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1. A.R. 33-34. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. ORANGE COUNTY,, 620 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1993)

. . . subsequently filed notices to assess taxes, interest, and penalties against the sellers pursuant to section 201.01 . . .

CASEY, v. A. LEWIS,, 837 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Ariz. 1993)

. . . . § 41-201.01 to ensure the safe, secure and orderly operation of the prison shall remain in effect and . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. A. DUDA SONS, INC., 608 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The Department argues the trial court erred (1) in ruling that section 201.01, Florida Statutes (1987 . . . The trial court concluded that section 201.01 as applied was unconstitutional. . . . Section 201.01, Florida Statutes (1991) provides that specified taxes must be levied and collected on . . . First, the language of section 201.01 is clear. . . . As previously noted, section 201.01 expresses the legislature’s intent to the contrary. . . .

ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA, Co. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 605 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . meanwhile contends that the tax is proper because it is imposed upon BFC and BPL pursuant to section 201.01 . . . We recognize that section 201.01 as amended in 1987 provides for payment of the documentary stamp tax . . . the deeds under the circumstances of this case constitutes an unconstitutional application of section 201.01 . . .

L. ARNOLD, H. B. v. LEWIS,, 803 F. Supp. 246 (D. Ariz. 1992)

. . . . § 31-201.01.D. . . .

E. MORIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 835 F. Supp. 1414 (D.N.H. 1992)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.01; Table No. 2, Rule 202.01. Cf. Dow v. . . .

BROOKS, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 766 F. Supp. 584 (N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.01, Brooks — being of advanced age with limited education, and . . .

W. ABBOTT, v. M. SULLIVAN, M. D., 905 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1990)

. . . The grid is composed of rules, numbered 201.01 through 203.31, each of which specifies whether a claimant . . .

B. TERRY, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 903 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Rule 201.01 (Table No. 1). . . .

FEDISON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 748 F. Supp. 449 (W.D. La. 1990)

. . . Rules 201.01 and 201.02 indicate a finding of disabled for claimants whose RFC is limited to sedentary . . .

BURTON, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 893 F.2d 821 (6th Cir. 1990)

. . . Burton’s prior work was unskilled, and therefore, she is disabled under Grid Rule 201.01. . . .

THOMPSON, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 721 F. Supp. 34 (W.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . P, App. 2 at Table No. 1, Rule 201.01, and Table No. 2, Rule 202.01. . . .

BONNER, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 714 F. Supp. 420 (D. Ariz. 1989)

. . . Department of Corrections Post Order No. 500.3, Rule No. 5.3, promulgated under the authority of A.R.S. 31-201.01 . . .

In WALLER CREEK, LTD. H. B. ZACHRY CO. v. WALLER CREEK, LTD. N. A. N. A. In WALLER PARKING GARAGE, LTD. H. B. ZACHRY CO. v. WALLER PARKING GARAGE, LTD. N. A. N. A., 867 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . Bendix, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 201.01[3 — 1] (2d ed. 1988). . . .

In WALLER CREEK, LTD. H. B. ZACHRY CO. v. WALLER CREEK, LTD. N. A. N. A. In WALLER PARKING GARAGE, LTD. H. B. ZACHRY CO. v. WALLER PARKING GARAGE, LTD. N. A. N. A., 867 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . Bendix, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 201.01[3-1] (2d ed. 1988). . . .

JANEWAY, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 702 F. Supp. 795 (C.D. Cal. 1988)

. . . obliged to find her disabled by applying the Medical/Vocational Guidelines or “Grids” set forth at Rule 201.01 . . .

CONWAY, v. R. BOWEN,, 680 F. Supp. 394 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . light work capacity, plaintiff must be considered disabled. 20 CFR Sub-part P, App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.01 . . .

COHEN- AGER, INC. a a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 504 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Further, section 201.01, Florida Statutes (1979), imposes the liability for the payment of the documentary . . . Section 201.01, Florida Statutes (1979) in pertinent part provides: 201.01 Documents taxable, generally . . .

RIVERA, v. R. BOWEN,, 664 F. Supp. 708 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.01. . . .

D. MULLEN, v. BOWEN, G. SHEPHERD, v. BOWEN,, 800 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1986)

. . . his history of unskilled work, the AU held that a finding of total disability was dictated by Rule 201.01 . . .

D. BUTTERWORTH, v. R. BOWEN,, 796 F.2d 1379 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . Citing Rule 201.01 of the medical-vocational guidelines, the ALJ concluded that when all relevant factors . . .

GARCIA, v. M. HECKLER,, 625 F. Supp. 491 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . P, app. 2, tables 1-2 at 201.01 & 202.01. See also, e.g., Parker v. . . .

W. TOM, v. HECKLER,, 779 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . OF SEVERE MEDICALLY DETERMINABLE IMPAIRMENT(S) Previous Work Rule Age Education Experience Decision 201.01 . . .

THORNTON, v. M. HECKLER,, 609 F. Supp. 1185 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . of Severe Medically Determinable Impairment(s)_ Rule_Age_Education_Previous Work Experience_Decision 201.01 . . .

D. MULLEN, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 762 F.2d 509 (6th Cir. 1985)

. . . The administrative law judge cited Rule 201.01 as the applicable provision of the grids. . . .

VALENCIA, v. HECKLER,, 751 F.2d 1082 (9th Cir. 1985)

. . . P, app. 2, Table No. 1, rule 201.01 and Table No.. 2, rule 202.01 (1984). . . .

HAVEN FEDERAL LOAN ASSOCIATION v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 1 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1984)

. . . That Section 201.08, F.S., provides that the Section 201.01 tax is: On mortgages, trust deeds, security . . .

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 746 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 201.01 (1983). The tax is owed on written obligations to pay money and security agreements. . . .

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 746 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 201.01 (1983). The tax is owed on written obligations to pay money and security agreements. . . .

HOLMES, v. M. HECKLER,, 594 F. Supp. 536 (D. Me. 1984)

. . . Part 404, Sub-part P, Appendix 2, rules 201.01 & 202.01, plaintiff would be found disabled. . . .

In AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 597 F. Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . Korn, et al., New York Civil Practice, para. 201.01 (1983). . . .

CITY OF NEW YORK, N. Y. S. F. N. Y. S. I II, I, II, III IV, v. M. HECKLER, A. U. S., 742 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . Compare 20 C.F.R. subpart P, app. 2, §§ 201.01, 201.09, 202.01, 202.09, 203.01, 203.10 (1983) (unskilled . . .

PFALZ, v. HECKLER,, 589 F. Supp. 653 (S.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . See e.g., Rules 201.01-201.02 and 202.01-202.02, App. 2, Subpart P, S.S.Reg. No. 4. . . . See Rules 201.01 — .03, 202.01 —.03, App. 2, Subpart P, Reg. No. 4. . . . Rules 201.01 — .02, 202.01-.02, App. 2, Subpart P, S.S.Reg. No. 4. . . .

McKENZIE, v. HECKLER,, 589 F. Supp. 1152 (N.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . P, app. 2 (1982) would have directed a conclusion of disability based on “grid” Rules 201.01, 202.01 . . .

M. NUNN, v. HECKLER,, 732 F.2d 645 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rules 201.01-02. . . .

HOWARD, v. HECKLER,, 581 F. Supp. 1231 (S.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . . § 404 Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.01. . . .

BROWN, v. M. HECKLER,, 576 F. Supp. 289 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . Appendix 2, Rule 201.01. . . .

In LJP, INC. d b a S. ROEMELMEYER, v. ROYAL CROWN BOTTLING CO. OF FLORIDA,, 34 B.R. 39 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 201.01, which imposes an excise tax on documents, provides in part that: “The documentary stamp taxes . . .

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 33 B.R. 394 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Section 201.01, Florida Statutes (1981) requires the payment of excise taxes and the affixing of documentary . . . Without any Florida authority to guide the Bankruptcy Court’s determination, it interpreted §§ 201.01 . . .

E. NALLEY, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 575 F. Supp. 840 (W.D. Ky. 1983)

. . . The Administrative Law Judge also finds plaintiff not disabled under Rule 201.01 of 20 C.F.R. . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CARIB AVIATION, INC., 566 F. Supp. 1489 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Bendix, Moore’s Federal Practice § 201.01 et seq. (1982); 9 C. Wright & A. . . .

In DOLPHIN KNITTING MILLS, INC. a DOLPHIN KNITTING MILLS, INC. v. ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. DOLPHIN KNITTING MILLS, INC., 32 B.R. 100 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Florida Statutes, § 201.01, provides generally for an excise tax on various documents. . . . Section 201.01 provides that the tax is to be paid “by any person who makes, signs, executes, issues, . . .

In AAA MACHINE COMPANY, INC. EQUILEASE CORPORATION, a v. AAA MACHINE COMPANY, INC. B., 30 B.R. 323 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Florida Statute 201.01 requires that “The documentary stamp taxes required under this chapter shall be . . . recordable instruments requiring payment of documentary stamp (excise) taxation pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 201.01 . . .

JONES, v. M. HECKLER,, 562 F. Supp. 870 (W.D.N.C. 1983)

. . . See Appendix 2 to Subpart P of 20 C.F.R., Rule 201.01. . . .

In ILE, INC. d b a LIGHTING SHOWCASE, INC. a H. III A. v. ILE, INC. d b a S., 32 B.R. 71 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 201.01 and § 201.-08. . . .

JONES v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 551 F. Supp. 205 (D. Md. 1982)

. . . would be found disabled under the applicable grid rules. 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Rules 201.01 . . .

In SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION, ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 26 B.R. 223 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . Sec. 201.01. . . .

A. VAZQUEZ, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 683 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1982)

. . . Rules 201.01, 201.02, 202.01, 202.-02. . . .

F. WOOD, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 537 F. Supp. 660 (C.C.S.D. Cal. 1982)

. . . the residual functional capacity for sedentary or light work as defined in the regulations, Rules of 201.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARGO EXPORT CORPORATION,, 675 F.2d 511 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 201.01(i), (1), (r), (s) (1981), provided that the supplier (Cargo) would make appropriate refund . . .

J. HAMILTON, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 532 F. Supp. 868 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . Subpart P, App. 2, Rules 201.01, 201.02, 202.01 & 202.02 (1979). . . .

L. BLAKE, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 528 F. Supp. 881 (E.D. Mich. 1981)

. . . OF SEVERE MEDICALLY DETERMINABLE IMPAIRMENTS) Previous Work Rule Age Education Experience Decision 201.01 . . .

RYLES, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 526 F. Supp. 1141 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . upon plaintiff’s present age of 55 and thus erroneously applied the “advanced age” standard of Rules 201.01 . . .

HICKS, v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 600 F.2d 1048 (4th Cir. 1979)

. . . If claimant’s work was either unskilled or not transferable, then rules 201.01 and 201.-02 of Table 1 . . .